Circularly Polarized Broadband Printed Antenna for Wireless Applications

A simple, compact sickle-shaped printed antenna with a slotted ground plane is designed and developed for broadband circularly polarized (CP) radiation. The sickle-shaped radiator with a tapered feed line and circular slotted square ground plane are utilized to realize the wideband CP radiation feature. With optimized dimensions of 0.29λ × 0.29λ × 0.012λ at 2.22 GHz frequency for the realized antenna parameters, the measured results display that the antenna has a 10 dB impedance bandwidth of 7.70 GHz (126.85%; 2.22–9.92 GHz) and a 3 dB axial ratio (AR) bandwidth of 2.64 GHz (73.33%; 2.28–4.92 GHz). The measurement agrees well with simulation, which proves an excellent circularly polarized property. For verification, the mechanism of band improvement and circular polarization are presented, and the parametric study is carried out. Since, the proposed antenna is a simple design structure with broad impedance and AR bandwidth, which is a desirable feature as a candidate for various wireless communication systems. Because of the easy printed structure and scaling the dimension with broadband CP characteristics, the realized antenna does incorporate in a number of CP wireless communication applications.


Introduction
Circularly polarized (CP) microstrip antennas have been popularly used in various contemporary wireless communications systems, such as for satellite communication, WLAN (Wireless Local Area Network) and WiMAX (Worldwide Interoperability for Microwave Access), GPS (Global Positioning System), RFID (Radio-frequency identification) tag and RFID readers because of the versatile orientation of the transmitter and receiver [1,2]. Systems utilizing CP antennas in both transmitter and receiver ends have observed they improved upon cross polarization discrimination and present better immunity to multipath propagation. With the latest interest in high-speed transmission for wireless communications, the marketplace demand for CP antennas with a broad impedance and AR (Axial Ratio) bandwidth are in popular.
Several types of antennas with different shapes for the patch, feed line, and different slots in the ground and radiating patches, which can generate considerable wideband CP properties, have been reported in the literature. Among the reported research, dielectric resonator antennas (DRAs) [3][4][5], cross dipole antennas [6][7][8][9] and magneto-electric dipole antennas [10][11][12] was designed for broadband CP characteristics. The DRA designed by [3] to achieve ARBW (Axial Ratio Bandiwdth) of 46% while the magneto-electric dipole antenna proposed by [12] yielded IBW (Impedance Bandwidth) of 65%, 3 dB ARBW of 71.5%. However, the thickness of DRA is comparatively large and complex design of 4.5 and a dielectric loss of 0.02. The physical dimensions of the anticipated antenna are 39 mm × 39 mm × 1.6 mm, which is 0.29λ × 0.29λ × 0.012λ for the lowest −10 dB frequency. The anticipated antenna is comprised of a semicircular slotted patch with a tapered microstrip feed line on the upper side of the substrate and a circular slotted square ground plane on the other side of the substrate. This semicircular patch radiator is fed by a 50 Ω tapered microstrip line to create a sickle-shaped with a width of Wf 1 and a length of Lf 1 for signal transmission. A circle with center O and radius R1 is imprinted out from the rectangular ground plane, which is responsible for the created wideband impedance bandwidth with linear polarization (LP) in the desired operating band. On the other hand, the semicircle patch is created by subtracting the circle (B, R3) from the circle (O, R2), where A and B define the center of the two circles and R is the radius of the circle. These three points (O, A, B) make an angle <AOB, which is defined by α. By tuning the angle α = 96 • , the maximum impedance and AR bandwidth are acquired. The semicircular slotted patch and feed line make the shape appear as a sickle. The comprehensive dimensions of the optimum antenna configuration as exposed in Figure 1a are L = 39 mm, Lf 1 = 4.15 mm, Lf 2 = 5.14 mm, W f = 2.24 mm, R1 = 17 mm, R2 = 11.2 mm, R3 = 7.7 mm, h = 1.6 mm, α = 96 • , and L1 = 25.42 mm.

Antenna Design Evolution Procedure
To validate the development procedure, three layouts is depicted, as shown in Figure 2 where Ant1 has exhibited an LP in the two resonant modes and CP of one resonant mode with circular patch antenna that is fed by a tapered microstrip line. To improve the impedance bandwidth of Ant1, an R1 circular slot is etched out (Ant2). According to the S 11 plot shown in Figure 3a, the etched out R1 slot results in an improvement in the −10 dB impedance bandwidth from 2.2 to 9.4 GHz, except for the middle frequency of 4-5 GHz. The Ant1 is designed at multiple resonating frequencies, which gives some small bandwidth in the specific point. To enhance the impedance bandwidth, a circular slot, R1 in the ground plane has been added which overlaps the fundamental mode of the antenna and creates higher order mode. This higher order mode also helps to overlap the original bandwidth, and that is responsible for gradually increases the overall bandwidth of the antenna from 2.2 to 9.4 GHz. However, it can be seen that both Ant1 and Ant2 have an LP radiation wave (AR values greater than 9 dB) except at 6.2 GHz of Ant1. The additional step to stimulate the electrical field parts with identical amplitudes and phase variations of 90 • to create the CP radiation. To achieve the CP features, a semicircular slot with a radius R3 is etched out from the circular patch radiator, seen as Ant3 in Figure 2. It can be observed from Figures 2 and 3 that R3 in the patch radiator plays an important role to create wide 3 dB AR bandwidth with improved impedance bandwidth. These advancements are because of the growth in the lengths of the current path. The AR is significantly diminished from 20 dB for Ant1 to underneath 3 dB for Ant3. From Figure 3, it could be noticed that without the R3 slot, the antenna achieves a 125% (2.20-4.24 GHz, 5.32-10.2 GHz) impedance bandwidth (−10 dB) and 0% dB AR bandwidth. On the other hand, with the R3 slot, the proposed designed attained a 122.80% (2.2-9.20 GHz) impedance (−10 dB) and 69.71% (2.28-4.72 GHz) 3 dB AR bandwidth.

CP Mechanism Analyze
To justify the CP property mechanism, the computer-generated surface electric current distribution of the anticipated semicircular radiating patch at 2.6 GHz in the Z > 0 direction is displayed in Figure 4, where Jsum characterizes the vector sum of all the significant current distributions. Jsum at t = 0 is orthogonal compared to that in t = T/4 and alternates clockwise as the period increases in the regular interval, thus generating the left-hand circular polarized (LHCP) radiation in the +Z direction.

Various Parameter Optimization
To investigate the consequences of the corresponding structural variables on the impedance and AR bandwidth, parametric research has been completed in this section. Figure 5 portrays the simulated S11 and AR with dissimilar parameter values of R1, R2, R3, L1, and angle α. Initial values were fixed of all the parameters during optimization.
(a) Effect of ground plane circular slot radius R1 Figure 5a depicts the antenna functionality against the bottom circular slot radius R1. As displayed in Figure 5a, R1 includes a nominal influence on the impedance bandwidth of higher frequencies when its radius decreases. On the other hand, increasing its radius from an optimum value of 17 mm improves the S11 in the higher frequency range but upshifts, the lower frequencies.
However, the variations in R1 have a nominal influence upon CP procedure in the higher frequency range. Nevertheless, when R1 is varying with regards to the 17 mm radius, the antenna seems to lose its CP property in the low and middle of the targeted frequency range.

(b) Effect of patch circular radius R2
The proposed antenna functionality is also examined when the patch circle radius R2 is diversified as depicted in Figure 5b. The impedance bandwidth is relatively susceptible to the deviation of R2. From Figure 5b, it can be noticed that reducing R2 with esteem to the ideal 11.2 mm causes the antenna to reduce its −10 dB bandwidth while raising it causes the antenna S11 to reduce in the upper rate of the recurrence range. However, the variants of R2 have a nominal influence on the CP radiation in the larger frequency range. Nevertheless, when R2 is reduced with regard to the most effective worth, the antenna seems to lose its CP procedure in the low operating frequency range.
(c) Effect of patch circular slot radius R3 Figure 5c describes the overall antenna performance against the circle slot patch radius R3. As demonstrated in Figure 5c, R3 includes a less significant influence on the impedance bandwidth when its size decreases. Nevertheless, increasing its size decreases the S11 in the center frequency range. However, all the CP settings are sensitive to the patch slot radius R3. The circular slot radius R3 can influence the relative placement of the sickled slot patch strips. Therefore, the CP behavior is usually influenced because of the coupling capacitance between the sickle from the patch and the copper in the bottom plane. Seen from the graph that reducing R3 with regard to 7.7 mm triggers the antenna to drop its CP property completely within in the entire bandwidth while increasing it triggers the antenna to reduce its CP features in the low-frequency range. Seen from Figure 5c that the broadest 3 dB ARBW is definitely accomplished when R3 is 7.7 mm.

Various Parameter Optimization
To investigate the consequences of the corresponding structural variables on the impedance and AR bandwidth, parametric research has been completed in this section. Figure 5 portrays the simulated S 11 and AR with dissimilar parameter values of R1, R2, R3, L1, and angle α. Initial values were fixed of all the parameters during optimization.
(a) Effect of ground plane circular slot radius R1 Figure 5a depicts the antenna functionality against the bottom circular slot radius R1. As displayed in Figure 5a, R1 includes a nominal influence on the impedance bandwidth of higher frequencies when its radius decreases. On the other hand, increasing its radius from an optimum value of 17 mm improves the S 11 in the higher frequency range but upshifts, the lower frequencies. However, the variations in R1 have a nominal influence upon CP procedure in the higher frequency range. Nevertheless, when R1 is varying with regards to the 17 mm radius, the antenna seems to lose its CP property in the low and middle of the targeted frequency range.

(b) Effect of patch circular radius R2
The proposed antenna functionality is also examined when the patch circle radius R2 is diversified as depicted in Figure 5b. The impedance bandwidth is relatively susceptible to the deviation of R2. From Figure 5b, it can be noticed that reducing R2 with esteem to the ideal 11.2 mm causes the antenna to reduce its −10 dB bandwidth while raising it causes the antenna S 11 to reduce in the upper rate of the recurrence range. However, the variants of R2 have a nominal influence on the CP radiation in the larger frequency range. Nevertheless, when R2 is reduced with regard to the most effective worth, the antenna seems to lose its CP procedure in the low operating frequency range.
(c) Effect of patch circular slot radius R3 Figure 5c describes the overall antenna performance against the circle slot patch radius R3. As demonstrated in Figure 5c, R3 includes a less significant influence on the impedance bandwidth when its size decreases. Nevertheless, increasing its size decreases the S 11 in the center frequency range. However, all the CP settings are sensitive to the patch slot radius R3. The circular slot radius R3 can influence the relative placement of the sickled slot patch strips. Therefore, the CP behavior is usually influenced because of the coupling capacitance between the sickle from the patch and the copper in the bottom plane. Seen from the graph that reducing R3 with regard to 7.7 mm triggers the antenna to drop its CP property completely within in the entire bandwidth while increasing it triggers the antenna to reduce its CP features in the low-frequency range. Seen from Figure 5c that the broadest 3 dB ARBW is definitely accomplished when R3 is 7.7 mm.
(d) Effect of patch circular slot radius L1 Figure 5d displays the overall antenna performance versus the antenna feed placement size L1. The monopole feed line is the primary radiator of the antenna. Thus, the semicircle slotted patch mounted on it plays an essential role in the antenna linear radiation design for CP radiation features. As demonstrated in Figure 5d, L1 has a nominal influence upon impedance bandwidth when L1 decreases from its optimum value. However, increasing the space improved the S 11 in the upper rate of the recurrence but decreases the low-frequency range. However, the variants of L1 have minimal influence on the CP procedure in the desired working band.
(e) Effect of <AOB angle α Figure 5e depicts the antenna performance versus the <AOB angle α. From this figure, the S 11 is sensitive to the variation of the three-circle angle α. The S 11 at the lower frequency bands tends to decrease as α increase, while very small changes are found at the higher frequencies. However, when the angle decreases from the optimum value, the lower frequency does not affect while the higher frequency S 11 decreases. However, variations of α have a minor aftereffect of the AR based on the desired operating band. (d) Effect of patch circular slot radius L1 Figure 5d displays the overall antenna performance versus the antenna feed placement size L1. The monopole feed line is the primary radiator of the antenna. Thus, the semicircle slotted patch mounted on it plays an essential role in the antenna linear radiation design for CP radiation features. As demonstrated in Figure 5d, L1 has a nominal influence upon impedance bandwidth when L1 decreases from its optimum value. However, increasing the space improved the S11 in the upper rate of the recurrence but decreases the low-frequency range. However, the variants of L1 have minimal influence on the CP procedure in the desired working band.
(e) Effect of <AOB angle α Figure 5e depicts the antenna performance versus the <AOB angle α. From this figure, the S11 is sensitive to the variation of the three-circle angle α. The S11 at the lower frequency bands tends to decrease as α increase, while very small changes are found at the higher frequencies. However, when the angle decreases from the optimum value, the lower frequency does not affect while the higher frequency S11 decreases. However, variations of α have a minor aftereffect of the AR based on the desired operating band.

Experimental Result and Discussion
To validate the feasibility of the proclaimed broadband CP antenna, a constructed prototype was measured and fabricated. The experimental results are measured with an Agilent N5227A PNA microwave network analyzer (Keysight, CA, USA) and a UKM Satimo StarLab (Microwave Vision Group, French). The snapshots of the fabricated antenna are verified in Figure 6(a). From the realized results portrayed in Figure 6(a), the measured impedance bandwidth of the reflection coefficient below the −10 dB is approximately 7.70 GHz (2.22-9.92 GHz), which is approximately 126.85% with regard to the center frequency at 6.07 GHz. On the other hand, the measured 3 dB AR bandwidth is around 2.64 GHz (2.28-4.92 GHz), which is approximately 73.33% at 3.60 GHz in Figure 6

Experimental Result and Discussion
To validate the feasibility of the proclaimed broadband CP antenna, a constructed prototype was measured and fabricated. The experimental results are measured with an Agilent N5227A PNA microwave network analyzer (Keysight, CA, USA) and a UKM Satimo StarLab (Microwave Vision Group, French). The snapshots of the fabricated antenna are verified in Figure 6a. From the realized results portrayed in Figure 6a, the measured impedance bandwidth of the reflection coefficient below the −10 dB is approximately 7.70 GHz (2.22-9.92 GHz), which is approximately 126.85% with regard to the center frequency at 6.07 GHz. On the other hand, the measured 3 dB AR bandwidth is around 2.64 GHz (2.28-4.92 GHz), which is approximately 73.33% at 3.60 GHz in Figure 6b. The measured and simulated radiation patterns at 2.40 GHz, 3.50 GHz and 4.30 GHz are plotted in Figure 7. The antenna radiates a bidirectional wave with opposite sense circular polarization. The radiation pattern of the antenna is usually LHCP (Left Hand Circular Polarization) for Z > 0 and RHCP ((Right Hand Circular Polarization) for Z < 0. It can be seen that the primary beam direction hardly shifts away from the zenith at both frequencies. The measured and simulated broad sight gains and antenna efficiency are shown in Figure 8. The average measured peak realized gain is greater than 3.98 dBic in the realized CP operating band and the maximum peak realized gain is around 4.85 dBic at 4.92 GHz. The antenna efficiency of the archived 3 dB AR frequency band range is approximately 80%. Hand Circular Polarization) for Z < 0. It can be seen that the primary beam direction hardly shifts away from the zenith at both frequencies. The measured and simulated broad sight gains and antenna efficiency are shown in Figure 8. The average measured peak realized gain is greater than 3.98 dBic in the realized CP operating band and the maximum peak realized gain is around 4.85 dBic at 4.92 GHz. The antenna efficiency of the archived 3 dB AR frequency band range is approximately 80%.
(a) (b) Figure 6. The numerical and measured results of (a) S11 (Reflection coefficient) and (b) ARBW. Figure 6. The numerical and measured results of (a) S 11 (Reflection coefficient) and (b) ARBW.    Table 1 describes the overall performance of the realized antenna with existing literature reviewed antennas in the literature review section. Here λ0 refers to the wavelength of the lowest frequency band for each reported antenna. It can be clearly noticed that the realized antenna achieves the widest fractional bandwidth in terms of dimension, impedance, and AR bandwidth property. Table 2 reveals the impedance and axial ratio bandwidth performance with applications of the recommended design for the various scaling dimension (L) just., It could be observed from the presented table that the wide impedance (a lot more than 75%) and AR bandwidth (more than 66%) have already been accomplished for the scaling dimension (L) without varying the additional antenna parameters. If the realized parameters, such as R1, R2, R3, L1, and α, could be tuned, the impedance and AR bandwidth may also be improved. Therefore, any researcher could be very easily remodeled from the recommended created for any preferred wide CP working band application through the scaling dimension (L) without varying the form, which may increase the sensor journal reader interest of the offered antenna.  Table 1 describes the overall performance of the realized antenna with existing literature reviewed antennas in the literature review section. Here λ 0 refers to the wavelength of the lowest frequency band for each reported antenna. It can be clearly noticed that the realized antenna achieves the widest fractional bandwidth in terms of dimension, impedance, and AR bandwidth property. Table 2 reveals the impedance and axial ratio bandwidth performance with applications of the recommended design for the various scaling dimension (L) just., It could be observed from the presented table that the wide impedance (a lot more than 75%) and AR bandwidth (more than 66%) have already been accomplished for the scaling dimension (L) without varying the additional antenna parameters. If the realized parameters, such as R1, R2, R3, L1, and α, could be tuned, the impedance and AR bandwidth may also be improved. Therefore, any researcher could be very easily remodeled from the recommended created for any preferred wide CP working band application through the scaling dimension (L) without varying the form, which may increase the sensor journal reader interest of the offered antenna.

Conclusions
In this article, a novel compact broadband CP sickle-shaped structure excited with a simply tapered feedline has been designed, fabricated and experimentally verified. The broad −10 dB impedance and 3 dB AR bandwidth performance is achieved due to the sickle-shaped patch radiator and the circular slotted square ground plane. The entire functionality for distinctly designed parameters has been analyzed and maximized. Through parameter optimization, the measured 3 dB AR bandwidth is 73.33% (2.28-4.92 GHz), and the impedance bandwidth is 126.85% (2.22-9.92 GHz), which agree well with the simulation results. The realized antenna is compact with design simplicity, broadband CP property, and low cost, making it suitable for the practical integration in WLAN/WiMAX and other broadband wireless communication systems. Finally, we have scaling the dimension to check the impedance and CP property of the realized antenna.