Next Article in Journal
3-(4-Hydroxynaphthalen-1-yl)-3-(1-hydroxynaphthalen-2-yl)isobenzofuran-1(3H)-one
Previous Article in Journal
1α-Methoxy-3-oxo-8α-hydroxy-10αH-eremophila-7(11)-en-12,8β-olide from Ligularia fischeri
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Short Note

Methyl (S)-3-((1r*,3R*)-3-((1H-indol-3-yl)methyl)cyclobutane-1-carboxamido)-2-(phenylsulfonamido)propanoate

by
Helen M. Sheldrake
School of Pharmacy, Optometry and Medical Sciences, Faculty of Health and Social Care, University of Bradford, Bradford BD7 1DP, UK
Molbank 2026, 2026(4), M2194; https://doi.org/10.3390/M2194
Submission received: 21 May 2026 / Revised: 19 June 2026 / Accepted: 29 June 2026 / Published: 1 July 2026
(This article belongs to the Section Organic Synthesis and Biosynthesis)

Abstract

The cyclobutane ring has attractive properties as a scaffold in medicinal chemistry but is underused, potentially due to the limited methods available for synthesising highly functionalised cyclobutanes. This short note describes the synthesis of the 1,3-cis disubstituted cyclobutane, methyl (S)-3-((1r*,3R*)-3-((1H-indol-3-yl)methyl)cyclobutane-1-carboxamido)-2-(phenylsulfonamido)propanoate using a one-pot thermal stepwise cycloaddition reaction and its characterisation by NMR spectroscopy and HRMS.

1. Introduction

The cyclobutane ring has attractive properties as a scaffold in medicinal chemistry, such as structural rigidity replacing alkane chains, reduced planarity compared to aromatic rings and improved metabolic stability or solubility [1,2]. However, there are limited methods available for synthesising highly functionalised cyclobutanes.
The integrin family of cell surface adhesion receptors are a popular target for drug discovery [3,4]. The subfamily of integrins which bind to the Arg-Gly-Asp (RGD) tripeptide sequence in extracellular matrix proteins have been extensively investigated with aims to develop anti-thrombotic [5], anti-fibrotic [6,7,8], and anti-angiogenic [9] agents and molecules targeting other processes in cancer progression [10,11,12]. Most molecules targeting RGD-binding integrins have been designed to mimic the RGD tripeptide sequence [3,13]. Elarofiban was developed from the KQAGD sequence in fibrinogen [14]; however, its pharmacophore is essentially identical to a RGD mimetic. Snake venom disintegrins have proven to be a useful source of biologically active peptide sequences targeting integrins [15,16]. Disintegrin CC8 is a heterodimer containing both RGD and WGD tripeptide sequences; the presence of WGD significantly enhances its anti-integrin activity [17]. As part of a larger project developing cyclobutane-based tripeptide mimetics as potential integrin antagonists [18,19], we aimed to synthesise an analogue containing a W-mimetic sidechain (Figure 1).

2. Results

The synthetic route to methyl (S)-3-((1r*,3R*)-3-((1H-indol-3-yl)methyl)cyclobutane-1-carboxamido)-2-(phenylsulfonamido)propanoate 1 is shown in Scheme 1. The WG-mimetic skeleton in compound 1 was obtained by a telescoped 4-step reaction sequence starting with protected aldehyde 2. Reaction with diethylamine forms an enamine which adds to methyl acrylate in a thermal stepwise [2 + 2] cycloaddition to yield an intermediate cyclobutane [20]. The intermediate is quaternised with methyl iodide then base-mediated elimination generates the cyclobutene which is easily isolated by flash column chromatography. Cyclobutene 3 was obtained in moderate (40%) yield accompanied by aldehyde-containing side-products which may have resulted from the conjugated cyclobutene being unstable to reaction with environmental water leading to ring opening. Therefore, it was identified by 1H NMR (characteristic cyclobutene alkene proton at 6.87 ppm) then immediately hydrogenated to give cyclobutane 4. The stereochemistry of 4 was assigned by comparison with other cyclobutanes—the H-1 proton adjacent to the ester appears as a triple triplet at 2.99 ppm with two large couplings of 8.6 and 9.6 Hz (see Supplementary Materials for spectrum) which is characteristic of 1,3-cis substituents. The H-1 proton in 1.3-trans-disubstituted cyclobutanes appears slightly downfield (~3.05 ppm) as a narrower and generally more complex multiplet [18].
To allow coupling with the D-sidechain mimetic 6, the methyl ester of 4 was hydrolysed under basic conditions. The Boc-protecting group was unstable to the hydrolysis conditions and the reaction yielded fully deprotected carboxylic acid 5. Successful coupling was indicated by the presence of characteristic signals in the 1H NMR arising from the functionalised propionic acid sidechain. A broad triplet at 5.88 ppm integrating as one hydrogen and coupling to the two beta hydrogens is consistent with the amide proton in compound 1 and the adjacent broad doublet at 5.78 ppm is consistent with the sulfonamide proton coupling to the one alpha hydrogen. These two signals are consistent with other compounds with 3-amino-2-arylsulfonylamino-propionic acid-based sidechains synthesised in related work [18,19]. Amide and ester carbonyls (175.9 and 170.1 ppm) were also observed in the 13C NMR and the expected molecular ion ([M + H]+, 470) by mass spectrometry. The indole signals in aromatic region of the spectrum of 1 are similar to those of the starting acid 5 suggesting no undesired functionalisation of this ring has occurred. The yield of 1 has not been optimised.

3. Discussion

The synthesis of substituted cyclobutane 1 extends information available on the substrate scope of [2 + 2] stepwise synthesis of cyclobutenes and cyclobutanes. The intermediate cyclobutene 3 appears less stable than molecules with longer arginine mimetic sidechains in the allylic position synthesised previously [18] but is substantially more stable than cyclobutenes with sp2 hybridised carbon attached directly to this position [21]. The full W-mimetic sidechain is introduced at the start of the synthesis allowing a short synthesis of a relatively complex disubstituted cyclobutane. Similar cyclobutanes with a range of heterocyclic substituents may find wider applications in medicinal chemistry.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. General

Chemical reagents and anhydrous solvents were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (Gillingham, Dorset, UK) and used without further purification. All other solvents were supplied by VWR (Lutterworth, Leicestershire, UK). Unless otherwise stated, reactions were carried out in anhydrous solvent and were not air sensitive. Petroleum ether (PE) refers to the fraction boiling between 60 and 80 °C. Flash chromatography was carried out on silica gel (Merck 9385 Kieselgel 60 (230–400 ASTM) (VWR) or Davisil 60A, 40–63 μm (Fisher Scientific (Loughborough, Leicestershire, UK))). Analytical TLC was carried out on 0.25 mm thick aluminium plates precoated with Merck Kieselgel F254 silica gel (VWR) and visualised by UV and aqueous alkaline potassium permanganate solution. Preparative TLC was carried out on Analtech silica plates with UV245 indicator (Sigma-Aldrich, Gillingham, Dorset, UK). NMR spectra were recorded on a Bruker DPX400 spectrometer (Coventry, UK). Low resolution mass spectra were recorded on a Micromass Quattro Ultima spectrometer (Waters, Milford, MA, USA). High resolution mass spectra were recorded on a LTQ Orbitrap XL spectrometer (Thermofisher, Altrincham, Cheshire, UK) at the EPSRC National Mass Spectrometry Service Facility, Swansea University, UK. The synthesis of aldehyde 2 has been described by Roman et al. [22]. (S)-3-Amino-2-benzenesulfonylamino-propionic acid methyl ester 6 was synthesised as previously described [18].

4.2. Synthetic Methods

4.2.1. Tert-butyl 3-((3-(methoxycarbonyl)cyclobut-2-enyl)methyl)-1H-indole-1-carboxylate 3

To a stirred solution of tert-butyl 3-(3-oxopropyl)-1H-indole-1-carboxylate (888 mg, 3.25 mmol) in acetonitrile (18 mL), diethylamine (0.673 mL, 476 mg, 6.51 mmol) and K2CO3 (898 mg, 6.51 mmol) were added and the reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature for 2.15 h. Methyl acrylate (0.741 mL, 560 mg, 6.51 mmol) was added and the reaction mixture was stirred for a further 45 h. The mixture was filtered through Celite and the solvent was removed under reduced pressure. The residue was redissolved in acetonitrile (21 mL), methyl iodide (1.01 mL, 2.31 g, 16.25 mmol) was added and the resulting solution was stirred at room temperature for 2 h. The solution was then concentrated in vacuo, the residue was redissolved in chloroform (21 mL), DBU (0.486 mL, 495 mg, 3.25 mmol) was added and the solution heated to 80 °C for 21 h. The reaction mixture was then concentrated in vacuo and purified by flash column chromatography (EtOAc:PE 1:9 → 2:5) to yield tert-butyl 3-((3-(methoxycarbonyl)cyclobut-2-enyl)methyl)-1H-indole-1-carboxylate (447 mg, 40%) as a yellow oil. Rf 0.71 (EtOAc:PE 3:7). δH (400 MHz, CDCl3) 8.13 (1H, brd, J = 7.6 Hz), 7.51 (1H, d, J = 7.6 Hz), 7.36–7.40 (1H, m), 7.32 (1H, dt, J = 5.1, 8.6 Hz), 7.24 (1H, dt, J = 1.0, 8.1 Hz), 6.87 (1H, d, J = 1.0 Hz, H-2), 3.74 (3H, s, OCH3), 3.12 (1H, dddt, J = 1.0, 1.5, 4.5, 8.1 Hz, H-3), 2.91 (1H, dd, J = 4.2, 13.6 Hz, H-4), 2.88 (2H, brd, J = 8.1 Hz, CH2Indole), 2.42 (1H, dd, J = 1.5, 13.6 Hz, H-4), 1.67 (9H, s, (CH3)3). Due to concerns over stability, the product was used in the next step without further characterisation.

4.2.2. Tert-butyl 3-(((1s*,3r*)-3-(methoxycarbonyl)cyclobutyl)methyl)-1H-indole-1-carboxylate 4

To a stirred solution of tert-butyl 3-((3-(methoxycarbonyl)cyclobut-2-enyl)methyl)-1H-indole-1-carboxylate (229 mg, 0.672 mmol) in EtOAc (20 mL), 10% Pd/C (20 mg) was added and the reaction mixture was degassed × 3 and stirred under 1 atm H2 for 22 h. The reaction mixture was filtered through 1 cm SiO2 and concentrated in vacuo and the residue resubjected to the reaction conditions a further 2 times (72 h total reaction time, 3 batches of catalyst) to yield the title compound (230 mg, 100%) as a yellow oil. Rf 0.71 (EtOAc:PE 3:7). δH (400 MHz, CDCl3) 8.10 (1H, br), 7.50 (1H, d, J = 7.1 Hz), 7.26–2.32 (2H, m), 7.22 (1H, dt, J = 1.0, 8.6 Hz), 3.68 (3H, s, OCH3), 2.99 (1H, tt, J = 8.6, 9.6 Hz, H-1), 2.77 (2H, d, J = 7.6 Hz, CH2Indole), 2.63 (1H, tdd, J = 7.6, 8.1, 9.1 Hz, H-3), 2.36 (2H, dddd, J = 2.5, 8.1, 8.6, 9.1 Hz, H-2,4), 2.03 (2H, dddd, J = 2.5, 8.1, 8.6, 9.1 Hz, H-2,4), 1.66 (9H, s, C(CH3)3); δC (100 MHz, CDCl3) 175.7 (C), 149.8 (C), 135.4 (C), 130.7 (C), 124.2 (CH), 122.4 (CH), 122.3 (CH), 120.4 (C), 119.0 (CH), 115.2 (CH), 83.4 (C), 51.6 (CH3), 34.1 (CH), 32.0 (CH2), 31.7 (CH2), 31.3 (CH), 28.3 (CH3); m/z (ES+) 361 ([M + NH4]+, 100%); HRMS Found 361.2125 [M + NH4]+, C20H29N2O4 req. 361.2122.

4.2.3. (1r*,3s*)-3-((1H-indol-3-yl)methyl)cyclobutanecarboxylic Acid 5

To a stirred solution of tert-butyl 3-(((1s*,3r*)-3-(methoxycarbonyl)cyclobutyl)methyl)-1H-indole-1-carboxylate (46 mg, 0.134 mmol) in THF (5 mL) and methanol (0.5 mL), 1 M aqueous NaOH solution (0.67 mL, 0.670 mmol) was added and the reaction mixture was heated to reflux for 30 h, at which point a further 1 M NaOH solution (0.268 mL) was added and the reaction continued for a further 16 h. The reaction mixture was diluted with 5% aqueous HCl (30 mL), extracted with EtOAc (3 × 7 mL) and the combined organic layers were dried (MgSO4) and concentrated in vacuo to yield the title compound (24 mg, 78%) as a pale brown oil; Rf 0.11 (EtOAc:PE, 3:7); δH (400 MHz, CDCl3) 7.94 (1H, brs), 7.59 (1H, d, J = 8.1 Hz), 7.35 (1H, d, J = 8.1 Hz), 7.19 (1H, dt, J = 1.0, 8.1 Hz), 7.14 (1H, dt, J = 1.0, 8.1 Hz), 6.95 (1H, d, J = 2.5 Hz), 3.02 (1H, qn, J = 8.6 Hz, H-1), 2.86 (2H, d, J = 7.1 Hz, CH2Indole), 2.66 (1H, ttt, J = 7.1, 7.6, 9.6 Hz, H-3), 2.38 (2H, ddt, J = 2.5, 7.6, 8.6 Hz, H-2,4), 2.07 (2H, dtd, J = 2.5, 8.6, 9.6 Hz, H-2,4); δC (100 MHz, CDCl3) 181.2 (C), 136.3 (C), 127.6 (C), 121.9 (CH), 121.3 (CH), 119.2 (CH), 118.9 (CH), 114.4 (C), 111.1 (CH), 34.0 (CH), 32.3 (CH2), 32.1 (CH), 31.6 (CH2); m/z (ES+) 230 ([M + H]+, 100%). Found 228.1034 [M − H], C14H14O2N req. 228.1030.

4.2.4. Methyl (S)-3-((1r*,3R*)-3-((1H-indol-3-yl)methyl)cyclobutane-1-carboxamido)-2-(phenylsulfonamido)propanoate 1

To a stirred solution of (1r*,3s*)-3-((1H-indol-3-yl)methyl)cyclobutanecarboxylic acid (59 mg, 0.258 mmol) in DMF (6. mL), (S)-3-amino-2-benzenesulfonylamino-propionic acid methyl ester 6 (73 mg, 0.283 mmol), EDCI.HCl (148 mg, 0.773 mmol), HOBt (104 mg, 0.773 mmol) and DIPEA (0.224 mL, 167 mg, 1.29 mmol) were added. The reaction mixture was stirred at room temperature for 21 h then poured into water (50 mL) and extracted with EtOAc (4 × 5 mL). The combined organic layers were dried (MgSO4), filtered, concentrated in vacuo and purified by PTLC (DCM:MeOH, 95:5) to yield the title compound (17 mg, 14%); Rf 0.07 (DCM:MeOH, 95:5); δH (400 MHz, CDCl3) 8.05 (1H, brs, indole), 7.83 (2H, d, J = 7.1 Hz, ArH-o), 7.55–7.58 (2H, m, ArH-p + indole), 7.49 (2H, t, J = 7.1 Hz, ArH-m), 7.34 (1H, d, J = 8.1 Hz, indole), 7.18 (1H, dt, J = 1.0, 7.1 Hz, indole), 7.10 (1H, dt, J = 1.0, 7.6 Hz, indole), 6.95 (1H, d, J = 2.5 Hz, indole), 5.88 (1H, brt, J = 6.1 Hz, NHCH2), 5.78 (1H, d, J = 7.6 Hz, NHSO2Ph), 3.98 (1H, dt, J = 4.6, 6.6, 7.6 Hz, CHNHSO2Ph), 3.59 (1H, ddd, J = 4.6, 6.1, 14.1 Hz CHH’NH), 3.55 (3H, s, OCH3), 3.51 (1H, ddd, J = 6.1, 6.6, 14.1 Hz, CHH’NH), 2.83 (2H, d, J = 7.6 Hz, indole-CH2), 2.78 (1H, tt, J = 8.6, 9.6 Hz, H-1), 2.59 (qd, J = 7.6, 9.1 Hz, H-3), 2.23–2.30 (2H, m, H-2,4), 1.93–2.02 (2H, m, H-2,4); δC (100 MHz, CDCl3) 175.9 (C), 170.1 (C), 139.3 (C), 136.3 (C), 133.1 (CH), 129.2 (CH), 127.6 (C), 127.2 (CH), 121.8 (CH), 121.5 (CH), 119.1 (CH), 118.9 (CH), 114.4 (C), 111.1 (CH), 55.8 (CH3), 53.1 (CH), 41.7 (CH2), 35.8 (CH), 31.9 (CH2), 31.8 (CH), 31.5 (CH2), 31.4 (CH2); m/z (ES+) 470 ([M + H]+, 100%) Found 470.1738; C23H28O5N3S req. 470.1744.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded online: 1H NMR spectrum of compound 3, 1H, 13C, DEPT, COSY and mass spectra of compounds 4, 5, and 1.

Funding

This research was supported by the EPSRC (RCUK Academic Fellowship 2007–2012 to H.M.S.). For the purposes of open access, the author has applied a Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license to any Accepted Author Manuscript version arising from this submission.

Data Availability Statement

Spectroscopic data for the molecules described is available in the article and Supplementary Materials.

Acknowledgments

We thank the EPSRC National Mass Spectrometry Facility, Swansea for HRMS measurements.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
BocTert-butyloxycarbonyl
COSYCorrelation spectroscopy
DBU1,8-Diazabicycloundec-7-ene
DCMDichloromethane
DEPTDistortionless enhancement by polarisation transfer
DIPEAN,N-diisopropylethylamine
DMFN,N-dimethylformamide
EDCI1-Ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)carbodiimide
EPSRCEngineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
EtOAcEthyl acetate
HOBtHydroxybenzotriazole
HRMSHigh resolution mass spectroscopy
KQAGDLys-Gln-Ala-Gly-Asp
MeCNAcetonitrile
MeOHMethanol
NMRNuclear magnetic resonance
PEPetroleum ether
PTLCPreparative thin layer chromatography
RGDArg-Gly-Asp
WGDTrp-Gly-Asp

References

  1. Bauer, M.R.; Di Fruscia, P.; Lucas, S.C.C.; Michaelides, I.N.; Nelson, J.E.; Storer, R.I.; Whitehurst, B.C. Put a ring on it: Application of small aliphatic rings in medicinal chemistry. RSC Med. Chem. 2021, 12, 448–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. van der Kolk, M.R.; Janssen, M.A.C.H.; Rutjes, F.P.J.T.; Blanco-Ania, D. Cyclobutanes in Small-Molecule Drug Candidates. ChemMedChem 2022, 17, e202200020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Ley, K.; Rivera-Nieves, J.; Sandborn, W.J.; Shattil, S. Integrin-based therapeutics: Biological basis, clinical use and new drugs. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2016, 15, 173–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Slack, R.J.; Macdonald, S.J.F.; Roper, J.A.; Jenkins, R.G.; Hatley, R.J.D. Emerging therapeutic opportunities for integrin inhibitors. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2021, 21, 60–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Scarborough, R.M.; Gretler, D.D. Platelet Glycoprotein IIb-IIIa Antagonists as Prototypical Integrin Blockers: Novel Parenteral and Potential Oral Antithrombotic Agents. J. Med. Chem. 2000, 43, 3453–3473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Wilkinson, A.L.; John, A.E.; Barrett, J.W.; Gower, E.; Morrison, V.S.; Man, Y.; Pun, K.T.; Roper, J.A.; Luckett, J.C.; Borthwick, L.A.; et al. Pharmacological characterisation of GSK3335103, an oral αvβ6 integrin small molecule RGD-mimetic inhibitor for the treatment of fibrotic disease. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2021, 913, 174618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. John, A.E.; Graves, R.H.; Pun, K.T.; Vitulli, G.; Forty, E.J.; Mercer, P.F.; Morrell, J.L.; Barrett, J.W.; Rogers, R.F.; Hafeji, M.; et al. Translational pharmacology of an inhaled small molecule αvβ6 integrin inhibitor for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 4659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Shihan, M.H.; Novo, S.G.; Wang, Y.; Sheppard, D.; Atakilit, A.; Arnold, T.D.; Rossi, N.M.; Faranda, A.P.; Duncan, M.K. αVβ8 integrin targeting to prevent posterior capsular opacification. JCI Insight 2022, 6, e145715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Mas-Moruno, C.; Rechenmacher, F.; Kessler, H. Cilengitide: The First Anti-Angiogenic Small Molecule Drug Candidate. Design, Synthesis and Clinical Evaluation. Anti-Cancer Agents Med. Chem. 2010, 10, 753–768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Takasaka, N.; Seed, R.I.; Cormier, A.; Bondesson, A.J.; Lou, J.; Elattma, A.; Ito, S.; Yanagisawa, H.; Hashimoto, M.; Ma, R.; et al. Integrin αvβ8-expressing tumor cells evade host immunity by regulating TGF-β activation in immune cells. JCI Insight 2018, 3, e122591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Bakewell, S.J.; Nestor, P.; Prasad, S.; Tomasson, M.H.; Dowland, N.; Mehrotra, M.; Scarborough, R.M.; Kanter, J.; Abe, K.; Phillips, D.; et al. Platelet and Osteoclast β3 Integrins are Critical for Bone Metastasis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2003, 100, 14205–14210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Ross, M.H.; Esser, A.K.; Fox, G.C.; Schmieder, A.H.; Yang, X.; Hu, G.; Pan, D.; Su, X.; Xu, Y.; Novack, D.V.; et al. Bone-induced expression of integrin β3 enables targeted nanotherapy of breast cancer metastases. Cancer Res. 2017, 77, 6299–6312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Miller, L.M.; Pritchard, J.M.; Macdonald, S.J.F.; Jamieson, C.; Watson, A.J.B. The Emergence of Small Molecule Non-RGD-mimetic Inhibitors for RGD Integrins. J. Med. Chem. 2017, 60, 3241–3251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Hoekstra, W.J.; Beavers, M.P.; Andrade-Gordon, P.; Evangelisto, M.F.; Keane, P.M.; Press, J.B.; Tomko, K.A.; Fan, F.; Kloczewiak, M.; Mayo, K.H.; et al. Design and Evaluation of Nonpeptide Fibrinogen g-Chain Based GPIIb-IIa Antagonists. J. Med. Chem. 1995, 38, 1582–1592. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  15. Calvete, J.J. The continuing saga of snake venom disintegrins. Toxicon 2013, 62, 40–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Swenson, S.; Costa, F.; Ernst, W.; Fujii, G.; Markland, F.S. Contortrostatin, a Snake Venom Disintegrin with Anti-Angiogenic and Anti-Tumor Activity. Pathophysiol. Haemost. Thromb. 2005, 34, 169–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Calvete, J.J.; Fox, J.W.; Agelan, A.; Niewiarowski, S.; Marcinkiewicz, C. The Presence of the WGD Motif in CC8 Heterodimeric Disintegrin Increases Its Inhibitory Effect on αIIbβ3, αvβ3, and α5β1 Integrins. Biochemistry 2002, 41, 2014–2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Sutherland, M.; Gordon, A.; Al-Shammari, F.O.; Throup, A.; Cilia La Corte, A.; Philippou, H.; Shnyder, S.D.; Patterson, L.H.; Sheldrake, H.M. Synthesis and Biological Evaluation of Cyclobutane-Based β3 Integrin Antagonists: A Novel Approach to Targeting Integrins for Cancer Therapy. Cancers 2023, 15, 4023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Throup, A.; Zraikat, M.S.; Gordon, A.; Soumehsaraei, S.J.; Haase, K.D.; Patterson, L.H.; Cooper, P.A.; Hanlon, K.; Loadman, P.M.; Sutherland, M.; et al. Sidechain structure-activity relationships of cyclobutane-based small molecule αvβ3 antagonists. RSC Med. Chem. 2024, 15, 3616–3624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Sheldrake, H.M.; Wallace, T.W.; Wilson, C.P. Functionalized Cyclobutenes via Multicomponent Thermal [2 + 2] Cycloaddition Reactions. Org. Lett. 2005, 7, 4233–4236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Binns, F.; Hayes, R.; Ingham, S.; Saengchantara, S.T.; Turner, R.W.; Wallace, T.W. Thermal electrocyclic ring-opening of cyclobutenes: Stereoselective routes to functionalised conjugated (Z,E)- and (E,E)-2,4-dienals. Tetrahedron 1992, 48, 515–530. [Google Scholar]
  22. Romano, C.; Fiorito, D.; Mazet, C. Remote Functionalization of α,β-Unsaturated Carbonyls by Multimetallic Sequential Catalysis. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019, 141, 16983–16990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Structures of the RGD and WGD tripeptide sequences and WGD peptidomimetic 1. Key structural features in 1 are the W sidechain mimetic highlighted in blue; G-mimetic cyclobutane linker in pink and D-mimetic in purple.
Figure 1. Structures of the RGD and WGD tripeptide sequences and WGD peptidomimetic 1. Key structural features in 1 are the W sidechain mimetic highlighted in blue; G-mimetic cyclobutane linker in pink and D-mimetic in purple.
Molbank 2026 m2194 g001
Scheme 1. Synthesis of the title compound. i. Et2NH, K2CO3, MeCN, 2 h. ii. Methyl acrylate, 45 h. iii. MeI, MeCN, 3 h. iv. DBU, CHCl3, 80 °C, 21 h. 40% over 4 steps, v. H2, Pd/C, EtOAc, 3 days. 100%. vi. NaOH, THF/MeOH, 78%. vii. EDCI, HOBt, DIPEA, DMF, 14%.
Scheme 1. Synthesis of the title compound. i. Et2NH, K2CO3, MeCN, 2 h. ii. Methyl acrylate, 45 h. iii. MeI, MeCN, 3 h. iv. DBU, CHCl3, 80 °C, 21 h. 40% over 4 steps, v. H2, Pd/C, EtOAc, 3 days. 100%. vi. NaOH, THF/MeOH, 78%. vii. EDCI, HOBt, DIPEA, DMF, 14%.
Molbank 2026 m2194 sch001
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Sheldrake, H.M. Methyl (S)-3-((1r*,3R*)-3-((1H-indol-3-yl)methyl)cyclobutane-1-carboxamido)-2-(phenylsulfonamido)propanoate. Molbank 2026, 2026, M2194. https://doi.org/10.3390/M2194

AMA Style

Sheldrake HM. Methyl (S)-3-((1r*,3R*)-3-((1H-indol-3-yl)methyl)cyclobutane-1-carboxamido)-2-(phenylsulfonamido)propanoate. Molbank. 2026; 2026(4):M2194. https://doi.org/10.3390/M2194

Chicago/Turabian Style

Sheldrake, Helen M. 2026. "Methyl (S)-3-((1r*,3R*)-3-((1H-indol-3-yl)methyl)cyclobutane-1-carboxamido)-2-(phenylsulfonamido)propanoate" Molbank 2026, no. 4: M2194. https://doi.org/10.3390/M2194

APA Style

Sheldrake, H. M. (2026). Methyl (S)-3-((1r*,3R*)-3-((1H-indol-3-yl)methyl)cyclobutane-1-carboxamido)-2-(phenylsulfonamido)propanoate. Molbank, 2026(4), M2194. https://doi.org/10.3390/M2194

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop