Next Article in Journal
Biomarkers of Cardiac Metabolic Flexibility in Health, HFrEF and HFpEF
Next Article in Special Issue
The Multi-Target lncRNA–miRNA–mRNA TRIAD in Pancreatic Cancer Diagnosis and Therapy
Previous Article in Journal
Molecular and Immune Mechanisms Governing Cancer Metastasis, Including Dormancy, Microenvironmental Niches, and Tumor-Specific Programs
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

MicroRNAs in Esophageal Cancer: Implications for Diagnosis, Progression, Prognosis and Chemoresistance

by
Erica Cataldi-Stagetti
1,
Giulia Governatori
1,
Arianna Orsini
1,
Bianca De Nicolo
2,
Rocco Maurizio Zagari
1,3 and
Elena Bonora
1,2,*
1
Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), University of Bologna, 40126 Bologna, Italy
2
SSD Medicina e Biologia Molecolare, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, 40126 Bologna, Italy
3
Gastro-Esophageal Organic Diseases Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2026, 27(2), 878; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms27020878
Submission received: 9 December 2025 / Revised: 8 January 2026 / Accepted: 12 January 2026 / Published: 15 January 2026
(This article belongs to the Collection Latest Review Papers in Molecular Genetics and Genomics)

Abstract

Esophageal cancer (EC), including esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) and esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC), remains a highly lethal disease because of its late diagnosis, significant biological heterogeneity, and frequent resistance to therapy. Growing evidence indicates that microRNAs (miRNAs) are key posttranscriptional regulators involved in tumor initiation, progression, metastasis, and response to treatment. This review provides a comprehensive and updated overview of miRNA dysregulation in both ESCC and EAC, with a specific focus on its emerging clinical relevance in early detection, prognostic assessment, and prediction of therapeutic response. Multiple tissue-based and circulating miRNA signatures, some capable of distinguishing between Barrett’s esophagus (BE), dysplasia, and EAC, demonstrate promising diagnostic performance. In parallel, several miRNAs, including miR-21, miR-23a, miR-455-3p, and miR-196b, have been consistently associated with chemoresistance and radioresistance. Moreover, distinct miRNA expression patterns are correlated with tumor aggressiveness, metastatic potential, and the risk of recurrence, supporting their integration with conventional histopathological and molecular parameters for improved patient stratification. Overall, miRNAs represent a powerful class of biomarkers and potential therapeutic targets in EC, with increasing translational relevance in precision oncology.

1. Introduction

Esophageal cancer (EC) is among the most common malignant tumors worldwide and is characterized by high incidence and mortality rates. According to the 2022 Global Cancer Observatory (GLOBOCAN) report, EC ranks as the 11th most frequently diagnosed cancer and the seventh leading cause of cancer-related death globally, accounting for approximately 510,716 new cases and 445,129 deaths in 2022 [1]. These numbers are projected to rise substantially, potentially reaching nearly one million new cases by 2050 [1].
EC comprises two major histological subtypes, esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) and esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC), which display distinct epidemiological, anatomical, and molecular characteristics [2]. ESCC remains the predominant subtype in East Asia, South Central Asia, and southern Africa, whereas EAC is more prevalent in northern Europe and North America [3]. A small minority of esophageal tumors (1–2%) represent other rare histological types, including sarcomas, small-cell carcinomas, melanomas, leiomyosarcomas, carcinoids, and lymphomas [4].
ESCC develops from dysplastic transformation of the squamous epithelium, most frequently in the middle and upper portions of the esophagus. This progression is driven by the accumulation of genetic and molecular alterations that disrupt epithelial integrity and promote uncontrolled proliferation [5]. Early stages involve the transition from normal squamous mucosa to intraepithelial neoplasia (IEN), a recognized precancerous lesion characterized by increasing degrees of dysplasia and genomic instability [6]. Defects in DNA repair and cell cycle regulation arise at this stage and persist throughout tumor evolution, allowing damaged cells to evade normal growth control and acquire malignant potential [7,8]. The primary environmental risk factors for ESCC are tobacco smoking and alcohol consumption. Ethanol enhances mucosal susceptibility by increasing epithelial permeability and facilitating the uptake of tobacco-derived carcinogens; it also induces oxidative stress, DNA damage, and impaired detoxification capacity, fostering genomic instability. Chronic exposure to these agents promotes the selection and expansion of oncogenic clones and malignant transformation [9,10]. Additional cofactors, including advanced age, nutritional deficiencies, and genetic predispositions, further modulate individual risk [11].
In contrast, EAC most commonly originates in the distal esophagus and at the gastroesophageal junction (GEJ). It is strongly associated with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), which causes chronic exposure of the esophageal mucosa to gastric acid and bile salts. This sustained injury induces metaplastic conversion of the normal stratified squamous epithelium into a columnar epithelium resembling the gastric or intestinal mucosa, known as Barrett’s esophagus (BE) [12,13]. BE represents a well-recognized precancerous condition that progresses through stages of metaplasia and dysplasia to invasive adenocarcinoma [12]. Although the malignant potential is greatest in dysplastic BE, even patients without dysplasia have an estimated annual risk of 0.1–0.4% of developing adenocarcinoma [14].
Within this complex sequence of molecular and environmental events, microRNAs (miRNAs) have emerged as pivotal posttranscriptional regulators of gene expression. These small noncoding RNAs (approximately 20–22 nucleotides in length) bind to complementary sequences on target mRNAs, leading to transcript degradation or translational inhibition [15].
Through these mechanisms, miRNAs control key cellular processes, such as proliferation, differentiation, apoptosis, and the stress response [16,17]. In cancer, they act as either oncogenic miRNAs (oncomiRs), which promote tumor growth by repressing tumor-suppressor genes, or tumor-suppressor miRNAs, which inhibit malignancy by targeting oncogenic pathways [18]. It is estimated that miRNAs regulate up to one-third of all human genes, and more than half of known miRNA loci are located within genomic regions associated with cancer or chromosomal fragile sites [19].
Dysregulation of miRNA expression has been increasingly recognized as a hallmark of esophageal carcinogenesis, influencing tumor initiation, progression, metastasis, and response to therapy [20]. Owing to their stability, detectability in body fluids, and broad regulatory capacity, miRNAs also represent particularly attractive candidates as biomarkers for early diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment monitoring, as well as potential therapeutic targets.
In this state-of-the-art review, we provide a comprehensive overview of miRNA dysregulation in esophageal cancer, with particular attention given to the distinct patterns observed in ESCC and EAC. We examine the diagnostic and prognostic utility of miRNAs, as well as their emerging translational implications along the continuum of disease development, progression, and therapy.

2. Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma (ESCC)

2.1. MicroRNAs as Noninvasive Diagnostic Biomarkers in ESCC

Epigenetic mechanisms, which regulate gene expression without altering the underlying DNA sequence, play a central role in cancer development by influencing tumor initiation, progression, and biologically crucial processes such as proliferation, invasion, metastasis, and drug resistance [21]. Among the various epigenetic regulators, miRNAs have emerged as particularly significant because each miRNA can modulate hundreds of target genes and displays strong tissue-specific expression patterns, thereby making miRNAs powerful tools for early detection, diagnosis, and prognosis across cancer types [22].

2.1.1. Multi-miRNA Signatures for Early Detection

The potential of circulating miRNAs as diagnostic biomarkers for ESCC was first demonstrated in 2010, when Zhang et al. identified a seven-miRNA serum signature (miR-10a, miR-22, miR-100, miR-148b, miR-223, miR-133a, and miR-127-3p) that robustly distinguished patients from healthy controls, including those with early-stage disease [23]. miR-22, miR-133a, and miR-223 act mainly as tumor suppressors by inhibiting cell proliferation, migration and invasion through the modulation of epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT)-associated programs and targets such as SOX4 and ARTN [24,25,26]. Other miRNAs in the panel, including miR-10a, miR-100, miR-127-3p and miR-148b, regulate angiogenesis, proliferation and cell motility in different tumor types through pathways involving VEGF-A, FGF2-FGFR2, HIF-1α, mTOR and Wnt/β-catenin signaling and epigenetic or cytoskeleton-associated targets [27,28,29,30]. This discovery was followed by the work of Huang et al., who established a five-miRNA diagnostic panel consisting of miR-20b-5p, miR-28-3p, miR-192-5p, miR-223-3p, and miR-296-5p, all of which are upregulated in ESCC serum [31]. Each miRNA in the panel has been implicated in tumor biology through different mechanisms. miR-20b-5p promotes the activation of the PI3K/AKT pathway by suppressing PTEN [32,33]. miR-28-3p is consistently elevated in ESCC tissue, although its downstream pathways remain incompletely characterized [34]. In gastric cancer, miR-28-3p directly targets ARF6, a small GTPase that promotes tumor progression via Hedgehog signaling and EMT, suppressing proliferation, migration, and metastasis [35]. miR-192-5p facilitates proliferation by repressing the proapoptotic factor BIM [36]; miR-223-3p enhances tumor growth by directly targeting FBXW7, a tumor suppressor that controls the stability of key cell cycle regulators such as c-MYC and c-Jun [37]. Downregulation of FBXW7 leads to the accumulation of these proteins and the consequent activation of the AKT signaling pathway, promoting tumor cell proliferation, survival, and progression [38]. miR-296-5p, initially associated with angiogenesis [39], has shown context-dependent roles, including the suppression of migration and invasion in ESCC [40] and colorectal cancer [41].
Further refinement of miRNA-based diagnostic tools was achieved by Zhou et al., who identified a six-miRNA signature composed of miR-106a, miR-18a, miR-20b, miR-486-5p, and miR-584 (upregulated), along with miR-223-3p (downregulated). This panel demonstrated strong diagnostic accuracy, including for stage I ESCC [42]. The most extensive effort in this field is the work of Sudo et al., who analyzed a large cohort of 566 ESCC patients and 4965 controls to develop the “EC index,” a composite diagnostic score based on six circulating miRNAs (miR-8073, miR-3196, miR-744-5p, miR-6820-5p, miR-6794-5p, and miR-6799-5p) [43]. These miRNAs target genes involved in cell cycle regulation, apoptosis, angiogenesis, EMT, and metastasis and act through pathways such as the TGF-β signaling, PI3K/AKT, and chromatin remodeling pathways [44,45,46,47]. This model achieved outstanding performance, with sensitivity and specificity values of 0.96 and 0.98, respectively, and demonstrated excellent ability to detect stage 0–I tumors. These findings position the EC index as a very promising noninvasive early detection tool [43].

2.1.2. Circulating OncomiRs

Several circulating miRNAs act as oncogenic drivers in ESCC and serve as effective biomarkers because of their consistent upregulation in patient serum. Among them, miR-21 represents one of the most robust and widely validated oncomiRs. Multiple studies [48,49,50,51,52] have shown that miR-21 levels are markedly elevated in ESCC patients and are strongly correlated with tumor size, invasion depth, and aggressive clinical behavior. The levels of miR-21 decrease following surgical resection or chemotherapy and increase again in cases of recurrence, confirming its role as a dynamic and sensitive indicator of tumor burden. Mechanistically, miR-21 promotes oncogenesis by suppressing PTEN, TPM1, and PDCD4, thereby enhancing proliferation and metastatic potential [53].
Another important oncomiR is miR-18a, a member of the miR-17-92 cluster, whose expression is significantly elevated in both tumor tissue and plasma. Its circulating levels decrease postoperatively and increase again during recurrence [54]. Functionally, miR-18a contributes to ESCC development by inhibiting PTEN and promoting the expression of cyclin D1, thereby accelerating G1/S cell cycle progression [55].
miR-205-5p, which is detectable in exosomes, also has clinical relevance, as it is significantly enriched in ESCC plasma [56]. This miRNA acts as an oncomiR by directly targeting key tumor suppressors such as PTEN and SMAD4 and activating oncogenic pathways, including the PI3K/AKT and TGF-β signaling pathways. Through these mechanisms, miR-205 has been widely implicated in promoting tumor initiation and EMT in multiple cancer types [57,58,59,60].
Other circulating miRNAs upregulated in ESCC include miR-25 [61], which supports tumor progression by repressing several tumor-suppressor genes and activating the TGF-β, VEGFA/VEGFR, EGF/EGFR, and Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathways, which are fundamental for angiogenesis and metastasis [62]. Additional oncogenic biomarkers include miR-1322, which regulates the tumor-suppressor gene ECRG2 in an allele-specific manner [63], and the triad, miR-16-5p, miR-451a, and miR-574-5p, each of which exhibits strong diagnostic performance, with AUC values exceeding 0.80 [64]. Although their biological functions differ, with miR-16-5p promoting tumor growth through RECK and SOX6 suppression [50], miR-451a regulating erythroid maturation [65], and miR-574-5p acting as an oncogene in multiple cancers [66], their collective upregulation provides additional support for their use as circulating biomarkers.

2.1.3. Tumor-Suppressive miRNAs

Several circulating miRNAs function as tumor suppressors and are consistently downregulated in ESCC.
miR-375 was one of the earliest identified miRNAs to be significantly reduced in the plasma of ESCC patients [48]. Its known involvement in proliferation, invasion, metastasis, and therapeutic resistance [67,68] suggests that its dysregulation may mark the onset of malignant transformation.
Similarly, miR-216a and miR-216b are significantly downregulated in patient serum [69] and are known to inhibit oncogenic pathways across multiple tumor types by targeting KRAS, IGF2BP2, eIF4B, and ZEB1 [70,71,72]. The functional role of miR-216a appears context dependent, as it has been shown to act as an oncogene in early hepatocellular carcinoma [73], emphasizing the need for cancer-specific mechanistic studies in ESCC.
A particularly relevant tumor-suppressive miRNA for ESCC is miR-613, which was previously described in thyroid and gastric cancer [74,75]. miR-613 is significantly downregulated in ESCC tissues and patient serum [76]. Mechanistically, miR-613 has been shown to inhibit tumor cell invasion and migration by directly targeting fibronectin 1 (FN1), a key extracellular matrix component involved in cell adhesion, motility, and metastatic dissemination [77]. In ESCC, miR-613 downregulation can be further exacerbated by CircRIMS, a circular RNA markedly overexpressed in this cancer, which suppresses miR-613 expression through a DNMT1-dependent DNA methylation mechanism, thereby promoting tumor cell proliferation both in vitro and in vivo [78].
Another emerging tumor suppressor is miR-1297, which was first investigated in the serum of patients with ESCC by Wang et al. The study revealed significant downregulation of miR-1297 in patient serum compared with healthy controls, with excellent diagnostic accuracy. Importantly, even early-stage patients presented AUC values above 0.81, with sensitivity and specificity surpassing 80% [79]. Mechanistically, miR-1297 directly targets EphA2, a receptor tyrosine kinase associated with metastasis and poor clinical outcomes [80]. Recent evidence has demonstrated that the early overexpression of EphA2 in premalignant breast lesions results from the loss of miR-1297, suggesting that a conserved tumorigenic axis that may also be relevant in ESCC [81].

2.2. MicroRNAs Involved in the Development and Progression of ESCC

miRNAs play crucial regulatory roles in ESCC progression through their ability to fine-tune posttranscriptional gene expression programs that control invasion, metastasis, EMT, proliferation, and cell survival. Their biological importance is particularly evident in ESCC, a malignancy typically diagnosed at advanced stages and characterized by aggressive invasive behavior [82]. Importantly, circulating miRNAs demonstrate exceptional stability in serum and plasma and exhibit consistent, reproducible expression across individuals, underscoring their value as noninvasive biomarkers suitable for early diagnosis and real-time disease monitoring [83,84].
In this section, we examine the contribution of dysregulated miRNAs to ESCC progression, focusing on those that are downregulated and function as tumor suppressors, as well as those that are upregulated and act as oncogenic drivers promoting aggressive tumor behavior and metastatic dissemination.

2.2.1. Tumor-Suppressive miRNAs in ESCC Progression

A substantial subset of miRNAs is downregulated in ESCC, leading to key malignant traits. Among the most relevant miRNAs, miR-29b is markedly reduced in ESCC tumor tissues and cell lines; its reintroduction suppresses in vitro invasiveness and slows xenograft growth in vivo by directly inhibiting MMP-2, a matrix metalloproteinase essential for ECM degradation and metastatic spread [85]. Consistent with observations in osteosarcoma, uterine leiomyoma and ovarian carcinoma, reduced miR-29b expression in ESCC is associated with increased invasive potential, particularly lymph node metastasis [86,87,88].
Another crucial tumor suppressor is miR-30c, which is significantly downregulated in both tumor tissues and the serum of ESCC patients [89,90]. Similar reductions have been described in other malignancies [91,92,93], further supporting its tumor-suppressive function. Restoration of miR-30c in ESCC cells reduces proliferation and migration while increasing E-cadherin and decreasing N-cadherin and vimentin, blocking EMT through the repression of SNAI1. Recent data also support its ability to modulate the PI3K/AKT pathway [89,90].
miR-150 is another regulator of the EMT/MET (mesenchymal–epithelial transition) axis. Its expression is significantly reduced in ESCC, and its re-expression induces a MET-like phenotype, suppressing migration, invasion, and tumorigenicity in vivo. Functionally, miR-150 targets ZEB1, a key EMT driver implicated in stem-like tumor cell features [94]. Several of its known targets, including c-MYB, NOTCH3, and CXCR4, have long been recognized as key regulators of cancer progression, reinforcing the relevance of miR-150 loss in ESCC aggressiveness [95,96,97].
miR-375 plasma levels are significantly lower in patients than in healthy controls [48,52]. Its tumor-suppressive role is well established across several malignancies, including head and neck squamous cell carcinoma [98], hepatocellular carcinoma [99], and gastric cancer [100], where it regulates multiple oncogenic pathways [101]. Functional studies have demonstrated that miR-375 suppresses proliferation, colony formation, and metastasis both in vitro and in vivo [56] by directly inhibiting multiple oncogenic genes, including PRDX1 [102], IGF1R [103], and XPR1 [104]. PRDX1, a redox-modulating protein, promotes tumor cell growth and survival by modulating reactive oxygen species and supporting oncogenic signaling [102]. IGF1R, encoding a key regulator of the PI3K/AKT pathway, is negatively regulated by miR-375, leading to reduced proliferation, survival, and metastasis [103]. XPR1, a phosphate exporter and receptor with viral binding activity, can increase proliferation, migration, and invasion through the activation of oncogenic signaling pathways, including the BRAF-ERK1/2-p53 pathway, and the modulation of phosphate homeostasis [105].
Another robust tumor suppressor, miR-486-5p, is strongly downregulated in ESCC [34,106]. It represses critical regulators of cell cycle progression and survival, including CDK4, which promotes the G1–S transition via E2F activation, and BCAS2, encoding a PRP19-complex component involved in mRNA splicing and p53 regulation whose loss disrupts cell division and promotes apoptosis [107].
Similarly, miR-630 is downregulated in ESCC and acts as a potent inhibitor of proliferation and invasion [108,109]. Functional studies have shown that miR-630 restoration suppresses EMT-associated invasive traits by directly targeting SLUG, a master regulator of EMT, leading to the re-expression of epithelial markers such as E-cadherin and β-catenin and a concomitant reduction in mesenchymal markers, including N-cadherin and vimentin [108]. miR-630 exerts tumor-suppressive functions across multiple solid malignancies, including pancreatic, ovarian, lung, and prostate cancers, by inducing apoptosis and limiting tumor aggressiveness through the inhibition of key oncogenic targets [110,111,112,113]. These include GAK (cyclin G-associated kinase), which is involved in clathrin-mediated membrane trafficking [111]; PRKCI, whose repression impairs proliferation, clonogenicity, and cancer stem–like properties via the suppression of Hedgehog signaling [113]; and components of the JAK2/STAT3 pathway, resulting in reduced vimentin expression and invasive capacity [112].
Circulating miR-718 is also decreased in ESCC: its plasma levels are significantly lower in patients than in healthy controls and increase postesophagectomy [114], suggesting a close association with tumor burden and dissemination. Although its molecular targets in ESCC remain undefined, evidence from ovarian cancer indicates that miR-718 directly targets VEGF, leading to the inhibition of tumor cell proliferation, invasion, and angiogenesis and increased apoptosis [115]. In addition, miR-718 has been reported to suppress tumor growth in hepatocellular carcinoma by targeting HOXB8, which encodes for a transcription factor involved in tumorigenesis and metastasis [114].

2.2.2. Oncogenic miRNAs in ESCC Progression

On the other hand, several miRNAs are upregulated in ESCC and function as strong promoters of malignant progression. Among them, miR-9 is markedly elevated in tumor tissues and patient plasma and is associated with advanced invasive and metastatic phenotypes [116,117]. Functionally, miR-9 induces EMT by suppressing α1-catenin, enhancing β-catenin nuclear translocation, and activating downstream targets such as VEGF, c-MYC and CD44, thereby reducing E-cadherin, increasing the expression of mesenchymal markers, including vimentin and fibronectin, and promoting invasion and metastasis [118,119].
miR-155-5p is another well-established oncomiR that is consistently overexpressed in ESCC [120]. It promotes proliferation and migration while inhibiting apoptosis by targeting TP53INP1, impairing p53 function and enabling uncontrolled cell cycle progression [121,122]. This leads to accelerated G1–S transition in ESCC cells, sustaining continuous proliferation [123].
Similarly, miR-183 enhances tumor aggressiveness. Its overexpression increases the proliferation, migration, invasion, and survival of ESCC cells, whereas its inhibition reverses these effects. Mechanistically, miR-183 directly represses PDCD4, a proapoptotic gene, contributing to tumor progression [124,125]. Furthermore, c-Jun directly binds the miR-183 promoter and upregulates its expression; increased miR-183 then targets SMAD4, promoting EMT through the upregulation of N-cadherin and vimentin and the downregulation of E-cadherin [126].
Circulating miR-367 is increased in advanced ESCC patients and decreases significantly after surgery or chemotherapy [127]. Although its direct role in ESCC remains to be fully clarified, studies in bladder carcinoma have demonstrated that the miR-367-3p/RAB23 regulatory axis drives tumor proliferation, migration, and invasion [128].
A recent comprehensive analysis by Tanaka et al. provided important insights into the miRNA-mediated modulation of ESCC differentiation and aggressiveness. This study highlighted miR-100-5p and miR-203a-3p as key factors involved in the inhibition of ESCC cell migration and invasion [129]. Previous research has shown that miR-100-5p suppresses CXCR7 and inhibits PI3K/AKT signaling [130,131], whereas miR-203a-3p exerts a similar inhibitory effect on the PI3K/AKT pathway [132]. In this signaling context, Tanaka et al. identified FKBP5 as a crucial convergent target of both miR-100-5p and miR-203a-3p. FKBP5 acts as an oncogenic mediator in several malignancies by enhancing tumor progression and chemoresistance through NF-κB activation [133]. In ESCC, it also amplifies PI3K/AKT signaling, further promoting aggressive behavior. These findings point to FKBP5 as a promising therapeutic target and suggest that the combined restoration of miR-100-5p and miR-203a-3p may represent an effective strategy to block ESCC progression [129].

2.3. MicroRNAs as Prognostic Biomarkers in ESCC

Despite advances in diagnostic and therapeutic strategies, ESCC recurrence rates are high, and long-term survival remains limited. In this context, the identification of molecular biomarkers that are able to provide reliable prognostic information is crucial. Several studies have demonstrated that specific alterations in miRNA expression are closely associated with the clinical outcome of patients with ESCC.
One of the most extensively investigated miRNAs in ESCC as a negative prognostic biomarker is miR-21. In several studies, miR-21 was significantly upregulated in tumor tissues compared with adjacent nonneoplastic tissues, particularly in stage II carcinomas. High miR-21 expression is associated with unfavorable clinicopathological features, including poorer tumor differentiation, lymph node metastases, and reduced progression-free and overall survival in patients undergoing surgical resection [134,135]. miR-21 exerts its oncogenic effects by repressing the tumor suppressor gene PDCD4, whose low expression in tumor tissues is in turn associated with worse clinical outcomes [135,136].
In contrast, miR-133a acts as a tumor suppressor and a favorable prognostic marker in ESCC. Its expression is significantly downregulated in ESCC tissues compared with adjacent normal tissues, and low miR-133a levels are associated with more aggressive clinicopathological features, including advanced tumor stage and increased tumor length, as well as significantly reduced overall survival and disease-free survival [26,137]. miR-133a inhibits cell proliferation, migration and invasion by regulating genes involved in EMT, such as SOX4, and receptors promoting tumor growth, including IGF1R [138].
Similarly, miR-133b is considered a strong tumor suppressor in ESCC, with reduced expression associated with a poorer prognosis and a more aggressive tumor phenotype [139]. Low miR-133b levels correlate with increased phosphorylation of STAT3 (p-STAT3) and deregulation of the JAK2/STAT3/Bcl-2 axis, thereby promoting cell survival and tumor progression [140]. In addition, the lncRNA TTN-AS1 acts as a molecular “sponge” for miR-133b, reducing its functional availability and consequently increasing the expression of SNAIL1, a key regulator of EMT, thus further promoting invasion and metastasis [141].
Another miRNA with high prognostic value in ESCC is miR-138, which is significantly downregulated at both the tissue and serum levels in affected patients. Its reduced expression is associated with adverse clinicopathological parameters, lymph node metastasis and increased tumor aggressiveness, thus representing a negative prognostic marker [142,143]. Similar findings have been reported in other solid tumors, including thyroid cancer [144], non-small cell lung cancer [145] and osteosarcoma [146], in which loss of miR-138 was associated with metastasis and poorer survival. It has been proposed that miR-138 loss promotes lipid raft formation and constitutive activation of the NF-κB pathway, resulting in enhanced proliferation, invasion and survival of tumor cells [142].
miR-375 has also been extensively described as a prognostic biomarker in ESCC [103,147,148]. Because it is known for its tumor-suppressive function by inhibiting ESCC cell proliferation, colony formation and metastasis both in vitro and in vivo [56], miR-375 has also been identified as an independent prognostic factor. In particular, a meta-analysis by Luo and Wu demonstrated that low miR-375 expression is associated with reduced overall survival. This effect may be mediated, at least in part, by the downregulation of PDK1, a key kinase in the PI3K/AKT signaling pathway, resulting in the inhibition of PI3K/AKT signaling, reduced aerobic glycolysis and decreased tumor growth [148,149].
miR-1246 has emerged as one of the most clinically informative oncomiRs and one of the strongest independent predictors of poor survival in patients with ESCC. Elevated serum levels of miR-1246 are associated with advanced tumor stage (T3–T4), lymph node and distant metastases, and stage III–IV disease. Since its expression decreases postoperatively, it has been proposed for posttreatment surveillance. MiR-1246 modulates the p53 network, inhibits DYRK1A and modulates stem-like characteristics associated with invasion and adhesion [150].
miR-655, which is implicated in EMT regulation and ESCC prognosis [151], is markedly downregulated in ESCC cells and tissues, and its overexpression increases E-cadherin levels by directly targeting ZEB1 and TGFBR2, thereby significantly inhibiting cell migration and invasion [152]. Moreover, miR-655 is downregulated at the plasma level, particularly in exosomes, and reduced circulating levels are associated with lymph node metastasis, lymphatic invasion and advanced pathological stage. Notably, this association is already present in early-stage disease, suggesting a potential role for miR-655 as an early prognostic predictor and a risk stratification marker [153].
In addition, several other miRNAs have been identified as potential prognostic biomarkers in ESCC. miR-203 represents a favorable prognostic factor: its high expression is associated with improved survival and reduced tumor growth, promoting squamous differentiation and repressing key proliferation regulators such as p63 [154]. In contrast, miR-129 and miR-296 are associated with an unfavorable prognosis. High levels of miR-129 correlate with reduced postoperative survival and may contribute to tumor progression by targeting tumor suppressors such as APC and RAB11 [155]. Similarly, high miR-296 expression is associated with worse outcomes and increased tumor aggressiveness and chemoresistance through the modulation of cyclin D1, p27, and the drug efflux glycoprotein MDR1 (P-gp) [156]. Finally, miR-142-3p has been identified as an independent negative prognostic factor, even in patients with early-stage disease; its high expression correlates with poor cellular differentiation and with the regulation of genes involved in proliferation, adhesion and apoptosis, including APC, KLF4 and BCL2L1 [157].

2.4. MicroRNAs as Biomarkers for Cancer Resistance in ESCC

Drug resistance is a major cause of tumor recurrence. In the case of ESCC, the clinical manifestations in the early stages are modest and nonspecific; therefore, many patients are diagnosed in intermediate or advanced stages of the disease, effectively compromising their suitability for optimal surgical treatment [158]. Radiotherapy and chemotherapy, particularly 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), cisplatin (CDDP), and taxanes, remain standard therapeutic approaches [159]; however, treatment efficacy and overall survival remain limited, highlighting the need to clarify the mechanisms of the therapeutic response and identify reliable predictive biomarkers. In this context, circulating miRNAs represent a particularly promising biomarker class. The use of these minimally invasive methods, combined with increasing evidence that they regulate tumor cell sensitivity to antineoplastic agents, underscores their potential as predictors of therapeutic response.
miR-27a is one of the earliest examples of drug resistance, since its downregulation enhances the sensitivity of ESCC cell lines to both P-gp and non–P-gp substrate drugs, potentiates ADR-induced apoptosis, and reduces P-gp, BCL2, and MDR1 levels while increasing BAX, shifting the BCL2/BAX ratio toward apoptosis [160].
miR-148a plays a chemosensitizing role: its upregulation after transfection increases ESCC sensitivity to 5-FU and cisplatin and attenuates resistance in chemotherapy-resistant cell lines. This effect is mediated through the modulation of multiple pathways conferring chemoresistance, including epigenetic regulation via DNA methyltransferases (DNMT1 and DNMT3B), stress–response signaling through MSK1, and drug metabolism and efflux by targeting PXR, a key regulator of ABC transporters [161].
In contrast, miR-141 promotes cisplatin resistance by targeting the 3′-UTR of YAP1, a key mediator of genotoxic agent-induced apoptosis, thus resulting in downregulation of its expression [162].
High plasma levels of miR-23a represent an independent risk factor for chemoresistance in ESCC. Through a genome-wide analysis of plasma miRNAs from ESCC patients, increased miR-23a expression was found in the pretreatment plasma and ESCC tissues of patients with a limited response to therapy. The overexpression of miR-23a also induced marked resistance to 5-FU and cisplatin in vitro. Although its downstream mechanisms in ESCC are not fully defined, miR-23a has been shown to target multiple tumor suppressor genes, including PTEN, CDH1, IRF1, APAF1, and TOP2B, thereby promoting prosurvival signaling, EMT-related programs, and resistance to cytotoxic treatments [163].
In contrast, miR-218 is downregulated in cisplatin-resistant ESCC cells, and its overexpression restores sensitivity to treatment. miR-218 indeed increases cisplatin sensitivity in esophageal tumor cells by modulating survivin expression [164].
The expression levels of miR-455-3p in tumor tissues significantly correlated with patient overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS). The overexpression of miR-455-3p led to a marked increase in the subpopulations of CD90+ and CD271+ tumor-initiating cells (T-ICs), which were previously identified as T-ICs in ESCC [165,166]. Notably, treatment with a specific antagomir against miR-455-3p not only increased the sensitivity of ESCC cells to chemotherapy but also reduced the number of T-IC subpopulations. Furthermore, aberrant expression of miR-455-3p in ESCC cells has been reported to activate the Wnt/β-catenin and TGF-β/SMAD signaling pathways through the concurrent suppression of multiple negative regulators of these pathways [167].
miR-21 is highly expressed in patients with ESCC and is also closely associated with tumor stage, lymph node metastasis, and the inflammatory response [168]. Several studies have suggested that miR-21 could be used as a biomarker to predict patient resistance to chemotherapy [169]. In particular, Wang et al. reported that ESCC patients with high miR-21 expression (>5.80) have a significantly increased risk of ineffective treatment, suggesting the potential predictive role of miR-21 in the therapeutic response [170].
miR-29c represents another potential predictive biomarker. Its reduced expression in the tumors and serum of ESCC patients is correlated with chemoresistance, while restoration of miR-29c resensitizes chemoresistant ESCC cells (KYSE150FR and KYSE410FR) to 5-FU. miR-29c directly targets FBXO31, thereby modulating stress–response signaling pathways, including the p38 MAPK axis, which are implicated in cell survival and drug resistance [171].
miR-196b promotes broad chemoresistance (to UV, cisplatin, paclitaxel, 5-FU, and epirubicin) through EPHA7 inhibition and EPHA2-driven EMT activation [172].
In the case of miR-192-5p, elevated levels correlate with chemosensitivity. Plasma miR-192-5p levels can predict the response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and the prognosis of patients with esophageal cancer [173]. In particular, Furuke et al. reported that its downregulation in KYSE170 cells reduces cisplatin sensitivity, whereas its overexpression in the human cell line TE-15 enhances sensitivity via the modulation of ERCC3 and ERCC4, key genes involved in DNA repair–mediated resistance [174].
A summary of the dysregulated miRNAs implicated in ESCC diagnosis, progression, prognosis, and therapy resistance is provided in Table 1 and Figure 1.

3. Esophageal Adenocarcinoma (EAC)

3.1. MicroRNAs as Noninvasive Diagnostic Biomarkers in EAC

Despite intensive screening with current techniques, over 80% of EACs are diagnosed in patients without a prior diagnosis of BE or GERD [175,176]. Moreover, more than 80% of BE cases in the general population remain undiagnosed, thereby failing to benefit from surveillance strategies [177]. These limitations highlight the urgent need for molecular biomarkers able to identify individuals at high risk of progression and distinguish true progressors from nonprogressors.
High-throughput profiling studies have shown that miRNA expression patterns can reliably distinguish BE, dysplasia, and EAC, supporting their potential as promising tools for molecular diagnosis.
Among the miRNAs altered in BE, miR-194 shows a particularly consistent pattern: its HNF-1α–mediated upregulation aligns with the acquisition of the intestinal phenotype [178]. Several studies have reported a progressive increase in miR-194 from columnar metaplasia to EAC, making it a sensitive indicator of early BE development [178,179]. Wijnhoven, Cabibi and colleagues demonstrated that the levels of miR-194 and miR-215, together with those of miR-143 and miR-145, increase progressively across the stages that precede BE, i.e., esophagitis and columnar metaplasia, and reach their highest levels in established BE, both in tissue and in serum. These miRNAs are linked to regulatory networks controlling epithelial differentiation, cell cycle regulation (via p53), and responses to genomic stress and represent reliable markers of the initial transition toward BE metaplasia before dysplastic changes arise [180,181].
In contrast, miRNAs typical of squamous differentiation exhibit the opposite behavior. miR-203 and miR-205 are downregulated in BE and further reduced in EAC, defining an inverse gradient that reflects the progressive loss of squamous features. In particular, miR-203 downregulation reactivates TP63 expression, facilitating the metaplastic switch toward a columnar phenotype [180].
Circulating miRNAs also offer diagnostic potential. Bus et al. reported that the levels of miR-194-5p, miR-451a and miR-365a-3p are elevated in the plasma and tissue of BE/EAC patients, supporting their utility as noninvasive biomarkers [182]. Moreover, Slaby et al. identified a two-miRNA tissue signature (miR-375 and miR-93) capable of differentiating nondysplastic BE (BE-ND), dysplastic BE, and EAC with high accuracy (AUC 0.89), providing objective support for routine FFPE histological assessment [183].
A large-scale analysis further expanded this diagnostic landscape, identifying 46 miRNAs significantly upregulated in EAC compared with BE. A subset, miR-663b, miR-421, and miR-502-5p, was detected in more than 80% of EACs but in fewer than 20% of BE biopsies, forming a highly discriminative signature. Several of these miRNAs target well-known tumor suppressors or oncogenes, including SMAD4, PTEN, c-MYC and BCL2, reinforcing their diagnostic relevance [184].
Serum-based profiling by Zhang et al. revealed a dysregulated circulating miRNA pattern in EAC, with miR-25 and miR-151 significantly upregulated and miR-100 and miR-375 markedly reduced. These four miRNAs influence key oncogenic and tumor-suppressive pathways, including the CDH1, p21, Bim, PDK1, IGF1R, MXI1 and JAK2 pathways, which regulate cell cycle progression, apoptosis, proliferation, metabolic adaptation, clonogenicity, invasion, and metastatic potential, making them promising panels for EAC screening [185].
Recently, the EMERALD study developed and validated a six-miRNA plasma signature for the noninvasive detection of BE (with or without dysplasia) and EAC. The expression levels of miR-106b, miR-146a, miR-15a, miR-18a, miR-21 and miR-93 reliably distinguished BE, low-grade dysplasia (LGD), high-grade dysplasia (HGD) and EAC from both healthy controls and GERD patients. Within this panel, the most robust contributors, miR-21-5p, miR-93-5p and miR-15a-5p, participate in the regulation of cell cycle progression and apoptotic sensitivity [186].
These findings indicate that circulating miRNAs could become powerful, minimally invasive tools to aid early detection and risk stratification in patients with BE and EAC.

3.2. MicroRNAs Involved in the Development and Progression of EAC

Several miRNAs exhibit expression patterns and biological functions consistent with roles in the progression from BE to dysplasia and invasive EAC, contributing to EMT, invasion, apoptosis resistance and metastasis.
Among them, miR-196a is one of the earliest and most robust markers of progression. Maru et al. demonstrated a dramatic increase in miR-196a levels in early BE, with a further gradual increase through LGD, HGD and EAC, reaching levels 10–100-fold greater than those in nonneoplastic tissue. This pattern indicates that miR-196a deregulation is both an early and persistent carcinogenic event and that its marked upregulation in HGD may help distinguish LGD from HGD [183,187]. Functionally, miR-196a promotes malignant transformation by repressing genes typically lost in EAC (SPRR2C, S100A9 and KRT5) and enhances proliferation and EMT through the modulation of the NF-κB and c-MYC pathways [187,188].
Leidner and collaborators examined 26 miRNAs across the BE–dysplasia–EAC sequence, identifying two, miR-31 and miR-375, as true progression markers. The expression of miR-31, which was largely unchanged in BE-ND, was sharply downregulated in HGD and EAC. Early loss of miR-31 in BE correlates with an increased risk of neoplastic progression, which is consistent with a tumor-suppressive role involving the E2F2/CDKN2A axis. In contrast, miR-375 is selectively lost only in EAC, not in BE or dysplasia, marking the transition to invasive carcinoma and affecting targets such as PDK1 and IGF1R, which promote metabolic adaptation and proliferation [189].
A subsequent analysis revealed a five-miRNA signature marking the key steps of the progression sequence: miR-215, miR-192, miR-205, let-7c and miR-203. p53-induced miR-192 and miR-215 are progressively upregulated from metaplasia through dysplasia to carcinoma, whereas miR-205, miR-203 and let-7c undergo gradual downregulation. Loss of miR-203 and miR-205 reflects the gradual loss of differentiation of BE; downregulation of let-7c, which normally represses HMGA2, contributes to the increased expression of this oncogenic protein during progression [190].
miR-21, one of the most frequently upregulated oncomiRs in cancer, also functions as a progression marker in BE–EAC [191]. Its expression increases from BE to carcinoma, and functional studies in EAC have shown that miR-21 enhances anoikis resistance, which is crucial for metastatic spread, by directly suppressing PDCD4 and PTEN, thereby activating PI3K/AKT signaling [136].
Finally, an important contribution to early progression comes from the circulating miRNAs identified by Fassan and colleagues. In the serum of HGD patients compared with that of BE-ND patients, seven miRNAs were upregulated (miR-92a-3p, miR-151a-5p, miR-362-3p, miR-345-3p, miR-619-3p, miR-1260b, and miR-1276), and three were downregulated (miR-381-3p, miR-502-3p, and miR-3615). Among these, miR-92a-3p has emerged as the most significant marker of early progression. In both the serum and tissue of neoplastic patients, miR-92a-3p belongs to the oncogenic miR-17-92 cluster and modulates key targets such as PTEN, BIM and components of the TGF-β/SMAD pathway [192].

3.3. MicroRNAs as Prognostic Biomarkers in EAC

EAC is a highly aggressive and biologically heterogeneous malignancy characterized by marked genomic instability and an overall poor prognosis. This heterogeneity hampers the identification of reliable prognostic markers and limits the implementation of truly personalized therapeutic strategies.
Recently, the use of advanced high-throughput sorting techniques combined with massive sequencing has been shown to enable a more accurate characterization of the mutational landscape and tumor heterogeneity than the analysis of bulk tissues [193]. In addition, a diagnostic algorithm based on the glandular architectural features of EAC has been developed, allowing the distinction and subclassification of specific histological subtypes; when combined with pathological stage, this algorithm has high prognostic power, enabling a more accurate discrimination of patients at low or high risk of cancer-specific mortality [194]. In this framework, the potential contribution of miRNAs as complementary prognostic markers was also assessed [195]. In that study, two miRNAs, miR-221 and miR-483-3p, which are known to promote growth and progression in several solid tumors [196,197,198,199,200], were identified as being consistently overexpressed in EAC samples. In particular, miR-221 overexpression was significantly associated with worse cancer-specific survival and an increased risk of recurrence, with a clinically evident impact even in EAC subgroups classified as low risk according to the EACSGE classification [194]. In parallel, the lower expression of miR-483-3p in early-stage disease suggests its potential utility in the initial stratification of EAC. At the molecular level, the deregulation of these miRNAs is associated not only with the modulation of key genes involved in invasiveness, metabolism, and drug response but also with altered expression of the oncogenic lncRNA MALAT1, a well-known regulator of metastasis, cell survival, and apoptosis [195].
A contribution to prognostic stratification in EAC was provided by Matsui et al. In a cohort of stage I patients, four miRNAs, namely, miR-652-5p, miR-7-2-3p, miR-3925-3p, and miR-219-3p, were identified as significantly associated with disease progression. The clinical relevance of this signature was subsequently validated in an independent cohort of stage II/III patients, in which miR-652-5p and miR-7-2-3p emerged as independent prognostic markers. In particular, reduced expression of these two miRNAs was associated with poorer overall survival and progression-free survival, suggesting their potential use in identifying high-risk patients who may benefit from adjuvant therapy [201]. miR-652-5p downregulation promotes tumor aggressiveness via hypermethylation of its promoter and activation of the SDC1/TGFβ2/pERBB4 axis under hypoxic conditions [202]; miR-7-2-3p acts as a tumor suppressor by targeting DCLK1, thereby modulating the PI3K/Akt/NF-κB pathway and limiting proliferation, EMT, and metastatic potential [203].
Several other miRNAs with prognostic significance in EAC have been identified. Gu et al. conducted one of the largest studies on circulating miRNAs in EAC, analyzing a cohort of 72 patients in the discovery phase and 329 patients in the validation phase. In both cohorts, a significant association emerged between high serum levels of miR-331-3p and a markedly reduced risk of recurrence (−55% and −45%, respectively). This study is the first to report the ability of miR-331-3p to stratify recurrence risk accurately in patients with EAC [204]. The expression of miR-331-3p, a known tumor suppressor, is also downregulated in other solid malignancies, including gastric [205], prostate [206], thyroid [207], and breast cancer [208]. Its overexpression is associated with the inhibition of cell proliferation and migration, and with reduced activity of the HER2 receptor, a direct target of this miRNA, leading to the inhibition of the PI3K/AKT pathway. Since HER2 gene is frequently amplified in EAC and contributes to tumor aggressiveness and metastatic dissemination, its downregulation represents a plausible mechanism underlying the protective effect of miR-331-3p against recurrence [204].
In addition to their role in recurrence and disease progression, several circulating miRNAs also appear to be directly associated with mortality risk in patients with EAC. In 2021, Petrick and colleagues identified 79 circulating miRNAs that are differentially expressed between EAC patients and healthy controls. The most relevant finding was the identification of two miRNAs, miR-4253 and miR-1238-5p, that are significantly associated with postdiagnosis mortality in EAC patients. These miRNAs influence key oncogenic and tumor-suppressive pathways involved in cell proliferation, apoptosis, migration and invasion by acting through targets such as LHX2 and other effectors of oxidative stress, growth arrest, and survival signaling [209]. miR-4253 has previously been linked to aggressiveness in HER2-positive breast cancer [210] and to mechanisms related to oxidative stress and apoptosis [211]. miR-1238-5p expression has been associated with proliferation and invasion in osteosarcoma [212] and with chemoresistance in glioblastoma [213].
Odenthal and colleagues analyzed the miRNA profile in the sera of patients with EAC undergoing multimodal treatment followed by surgical resection. This study highlighted a significant prognostic role for miR-222 and miR-302c. Specifically, high expression of miR-302c and low expression of miR-222 are associated with longer overall survival [214]. At the biological level, miR-302 cluster promoters are bound by key pluripotency transcription factors, including OCT4, SOX2, NANOG and TCF3, and these miRNAs are involved in the regulation of the G1–S transition and self-renewal of pluripotent stem cells [215]. In addition, the cluster miR-302/367 promotes BMP pathway activation by directly targeting multiple BMP inhibitors, such as TOB2, DAZAP2, and SLAIN1, thereby contributing to the maintenance of pluripotency and the regulation of differentiation programs [216]. miR-222 regulates MMP1 expression and promotes cellular invasion through both cis- and trans-regulatory mechanisms [217].
Beyond its established role in EAC development, miR-375 has also emerged as a clinically relevant prognostic biomarker. An analysis of paired tumor and adjacent nontumor tissues from 100 EAC patients revealed that reduced levels of miR-375 in tumor tissue were strongly associated with a worse prognosis, independent of tumor stage, lymph node status, cohort type, and the administration of chemoradiotherapy (CRT) [218]. Among the experimentally validated targets of miR-375, MXI1, an antagonist of c-MYC [219], and JAK2 [220] are both involved in the regulation of cellular proliferation.
Multivariate analysis of global miRNA expression in primary tumors revealed different miRNAs, namely, miR-143, miR-145, miR-199a-3p, miR-199a-5p, miR-100, and miR-99a, whose overexpression was associated with reduced overall survival. Notably, miR-143 and miR-145 exhibited higher expression levels in tumors with poorer prognoses and in patients with lymph node metastases, suggesting that re-expression may be associated with a more aggressive phenotype [221]. miR-199a-5p suppresses EMT by targeting SOX4 and inhibits NF-κB signaling, whereas both miR-199a-3p and miR-199a-5p regulate FXR1 and PXN, affecting cell adhesion, proliferation, and motility [222]. Overall, miR-199a has emerged as a robust prognostic marker and has been previously associated with poor outcomes in other solid tumors [221,223].
miR-16-2 and miR-30e were identified as relevant from a prognostic perspective. High expression of miR-16-2 was associated with the presence of lymph node metastases and with reduced overall and disease-free survival [224]. At the molecular level, miR-16-2 is associated with the suppression of RAR-β2, which encodes a receptor involved in cellular differentiation, and with the antiproliferative effects of retinoic acid [225], supporting its role in promoting tumor progression. In parallel, miR-30e has emerged as a strong negative prognostic marker: its high expression correlates with reduced survival and an increased risk of recurrence [224]. More recently, miR-30e was shown to be transcriptionally induced by SOX2 and to act through the inhibition of USP4, resulting in reduced SMAD4 activity and increased expression and activity of CK2. Through this axis, miR-30e promotes proliferation, invasion, migration, and activation of EMT, ultimately contributing to a more aggressive tumor phenotype [226].

3.4. MicroRNAs as Biomarkers for Cancer Resistance in EAC

Research has demonstrated that miRNAs regulate chemoresistance in EAC. Hummel et al. reported that miR-148a upregulation consistently improved the response to cisplatin and 5-FU treatment in most chemotherapy-sensitive and resistant EAC cell lines. MSK1, PXR and de novo DNA methylation have emerged as potential mediators of this mechanism [161].
Similarly, miR-31 plays a role in modulating the cellular response to radiation. Alterations in the expression of miR-31, together with DNA repair genes regulated by this miRNA, were observed in tumors resistant to neoadjuvant CRT, suggesting that the miR-31-mediated regulation of DNA repair may constitute a major mechanism underlying therapeutic resistance [227].
Streppel et al. demonstrated that miR-223 was upregulated during progression from BE-ND to EAC in most patients and that increased miR-223 enhanced cisplatin sensitivity in OE-33 cells by reducing PARP1 expression [228].
Low miR-187 expression is associated with resistance to CRT, increases the sensitivity of EAC to X-ray radiation and cisplatin, and is related to treatment failure in patients with EAC. miR-187 is significantly reduced in pretreatment-treated EAC tumors from patients who respond poorly to neoadjuvant CRT, suggesting that its downregulation may contribute to therapeutic resistance. Functional studies revealed that miR-187 overexpression modified the expression of 303 genes, including those involved in the complement cascade, and that C3 was increased in pretreatment biopsies of nonresponders, indicating that miR-187 is regulated in vivo. Overall, these results highlight the potential value of miR-187 and C3 as predictive markers of neoadjuvant CRT response in EAC patients [229].
In EAC patients who have a poor response to neoadjuvant CRT, the miR-17-5p level is reduced. Loss of miR-17-5p contributes to resistance to radiotherapy and neoadjuvant chemotherapy by derepressing target genes involved in survival and treatment response. In particular, miR-17-5p directly regulates PRKACB and C6orf120, whose increased expression has been associated with radioresistance and impaired treatment efficacy, potentially through the modulation of stress-response and immune-related pathways. In vitro, re-expression of miR-17-5p sensitized radioresistant OE33R cells to treatment [230].
Finally, the overexpression of miR-27b-3p increased the sensitivity of EAC cell lines to 5-FU and cisplatin. This effect has been associated with reduced expression of SP1 and PPARγ, a key pathway in chemoresistance and metastatic progression [231].
Table 2 and Figure 2 summarize the key miRNAs dysregulated in EAC across diagnostic, progression, prognostic, and therapy-resistance contexts.

4. MicroRNA-Based Therapeutic Approaches in Esophageal Cancer

Since miRNA expression is frequently deregulated in cancer, miRNAs represent promising therapeutic targets for novel molecular targeted therapies in tumor treatment [232].
Currently, miRNA-based therapies are based on two approaches: (i) inhibition of oncomiRs and (ii) restoration of downregulated tumor-suppressor miRNAs. This is achieved via two types of inhibitory molecules, anti-miRNA oligonucleotides (AMOs) and miR masks. AMOs act as competitive inhibitors, blocking the interaction between specific miRNAs and their target mRNAs [233]. Instead, miR masks are perfectly complementary to the miRNA binding site in a target gene and prevent the endogenous miRNA from accessing the binding site [234]. The re-expression of downregulated tumor-suppressor miRNAs can be accomplished via miRNA mimetics (short synthetic double-stranded RNA molecules) or miRNAs encoded by viral vectors and transduced into cells/tissues [232,235].
In EC, miRNA modulation has emerged as a clinically relevant strategy with potential applications in treatment prediction, therapeutic sensitization, and disease monitoring. Several miRNAs have been identified as key regulators of chemosensitivity, acting to sensitize cancer cells to chemotherapy. miR-29c sensitizes EC cells to 5-FU by regulating the FBXO31–p38 signaling pathway, and systemic administration of miR-29c oligonucleotides has been proposed as an innovative therapeutic approach to significantly reduce 5-FU chemoresistance [171].
Tumor suppressor miRNAs, such as miR-100, can suppress proliferation, migration, invasion, and tumor growth in vivo by targeting CXCR7, encoding a chemokine receptor implicated in tumor progression, angiogenesis, and metastasis [131].
Conversely, oncomiRs such as miR-455-3p drive chemoresistance and tumor recurrence; their silencing reduces T-IC subpopulations and simultaneously inactivates multiple stemness-associated pathways, including the Wnt/β-catenin and TGF-β/SMAD signaling pathways [167].
miRNAs have also increasingly emerged as targets of experimental anticancer drugs. Owing to their low toxicity to healthy cells and high selectivity for tumor cells, organometallic arene Ru(II) complexes are considered promising alternatives to cisplatin. Among these compounds, Rawq01 exerts antitumor activity in EC by downregulating miR-21, leading to the restoration of PTEN expression and the inhibition of the PI3K/AKT pathway [236].
Overall, these findings indicate that miRNAs involved in chemoresistance act not only as key molecular regulators but also as predictive biomarkers and therapeutic targets capable of simultaneously modulating multiple oncogenic pathways, supporting patient stratification and personalized therapeutic approaches [237].
The clinical translation of miRNA-based therapies is progressing, albeit with challenges. Several miRNA derivative clinical nucleotide drugs (mdCNDs), including MRX34 (miR-34a) [238], Miravirsen (miR-122) [239], and TargomiRs (miR-16) [240], have entered clinical trials, showing promising gene modulation and safety in patients with refractory tumors or viral infections. However, challenges such as enzymatic degradation, low cellular uptake, off-target effects, and immune reactions necessitate advanced delivery systems. Recent developments include lipid, polymeric, and metallic nanoparticles; self-assembling vectors; exosomes; and cell-penetrating peptides, which are often combined with stimulus-responsive release strategies (pH, redox, enzymes, ATP) [241]. Nanotechnologies have significantly improved miRNA delivery, using liposomes, dendrimers, polymeric nanoparticles, nanogels, and hybrid/exosome-mimetic systems to protect miRNAs from degradation and enable both passive and ligand-mediated targeting [242].
Currently, circulating miRNAs associated with chemosensitivity and resistance in EC suggest potential applications as noninvasive prognostic and predictive biomarkers, supporting early patient stratification and therapeutic monitoring [237,243].

5. Conclusions

Current evidence demonstrates that miRNAs are critically involved in the biology of EC. The integration of miRNA expression profiles with conventional clinicopathological parameters may contribute to improved early detection, more accurate risk stratification, and the development of personalized therapeutic strategies for both ESCC and EAC patients.
Several miRNAs, including miR-21, miR-375, miR-203 and miR-205, are consistently deregulated across both histological subtypes of EC, i.e., ESCC and EAC. Their recurrent alteration points to a role in shared, fundamental mechanisms of esophageal carcinogenesis, such as dysregulated proliferation, altered differentiation and enhanced invasive potential. The identification of these common miRNA signatures highlights their value as biomarkers capable of providing prognostic information regardless of histology and complementing existing staging systems while also supporting risk stratification irrespective of tumor histology.
Future large-scale, prospective and multicenter studies, together with the methodological standardization of miRNA detection and quantification, will be crucial to validate their clinical utility and enable their translation from experimental research into routine clinical practice.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, E.C.-S. and E.B.; methodology, E.C.-S.; software, E.C.-S.; validation, E.C.-S., G.G., A.O., B.D.N. and E.B.; data curation, E.C.-S., G.G., A.O. and B.D.N.; writing—review and editing, E.C.-S., G.G., A.O., B.D.N., R.M.Z. and E.B.; visualization, E.C.-S.; supervision, E.B.; project administration, R.M.Z. and E.B.; funding acquisition, E.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by Fondazione Cassa di Risparmio di Bologna-Carisbo (DRAMA-BE) to E.B. and R.M.Z.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analyzed in this study. Data sharing is not applicable to this article.

Acknowledgments

E.C.-S. is a recipient of a research fellowship from the Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), University of Bologna. G.G. is a graduate student in the Cardio-Nephro-Thoracic Sciences PhD program at the University of Bologna. A.O. is supported by “Fondazione Umberto Veronesi” Postdoctoral fellowship. Bianca De Nicolo is a recipient of a research fellowship supported by Macroricfund IRCCS—AOU Policlinico Sant’Orsola.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
5-FU5-Fluorouracil
AMOsAnti-miRNA oligonucleotides
BEBarrett’s Esophagus
BE-NDNondysplastic BE
CRTChemoradiotherapy
ECEsophageal Cancer
EACEsophageal Adenocarcinoma
EMTEpithelial–Mesenchymal Transition
ESCCEsophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma
GERDGastroesophageal reflux disease
HGDHigh-grade dysplasia
LGDLow-grade dysplasia
METMesenchymal–Epithelial Transition
miRNAMicroRNA
oncomiRsOncogenic microRNAs
T-ICsTumor-initiating Cells

References

  1. Bray, F.; Laversanne, M.; Sung, H.; Ferlay, J.; Siegel, R.L.; Soerjomataram, I.; Jemal, A. Global Cancer Statistics 2022: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA A Cancer J. Clin. 2024, 74, 229–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  2. Ajani, J.A.; D’Amico, T.A.; Bentrem, D.J.; Cooke, D.; Corvera, C.; Das, P.; Enzinger, P.C.; Enzler, T.; Farjah, F.; Gerdes, H.; et al. Esophageal and Esophagogastric Junction Cancers, Version 2.2023, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. J. Natl. Compr. Cancer Netw. 2023, 21, 393–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  3. Yang, H.; Wang, F.; Hallemeier, C.L.; Lerut, T.; Fu, J. Oesophageal Cancer. Lancet 2024, 404, 1991–2005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  4. Zhang, Y. Epidemiology of Esophageal Cancer. World J. Gastroenterol. 2013, 19, 5598–5606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  5. Ko, K.-P.; Huang, Y.; Zhang, S.; Zou, G.; Kim, B.; Zhang, J.; Jun, S.; Martin, C.; Dunbar, K.J.; Efe, G.; et al. Key Genetic Determinants Driving Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Initiation and Immune Evasion. Gastroenterology 2023, 165, 613–628.e20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  6. Sachdeva, U.M.; Shimonosono, M.; Flashner, S.; Cruz-Acuña, R.; Gabre, J.T.; Nakagawa, H. Understanding the Cellular Origin and Progression of Esophageal Cancer Using Esophageal Organoids. Cancer Lett. 2021, 509, 39–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  7. Liu, X.; Zhang, M.; Ying, S.; Zhang, C.; Lin, R.; Zheng, J.; Zhang, G.; Tian, D.; Guo, Y.; Du, C.; et al. Genetic Alterations in Esophageal Tissues from Squamous Dysplasia to Carcinoma. Gastroenterology 2017, 153, 166–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  8. Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network; Analysis Working Group: Asan University; BC Cancer Agency; Brigham and Women’s Hospital; Broad Institute; Brown University; Case Western Reserve University; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute; Duke University; Greater Poland Cancer Centre; et al. Integrated Genomic Characterization of Oesophageal Carcinoma. Nature 2017, 541, 169–175. [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  9. Engel, L.S.; Chow, W.; Vaughan, T.L.; Gammon, M.D.; Risch, H.A.; Stanford, J.L.; Schoenberg, J.B.; Mayne, S.T.; Dubrow, R.; Rotterdam, H.; et al. Population Attributable Risks of Esophageal and Gastric Cancers. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 2003, 95, 1404–1413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  10. Castro, C.; Peleteiro, B.; Lunet, N. Modifiable Factors and Esophageal Cancer: A Systematic Review of Published Meta-Analyses. J. Gastroenterol. 2018, 53, 37–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  11. Tarazi, M.; Chidambaram, S.; Markar, S.R. Risk Factors of Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma beyond Alcohol and Smoking. Cancers 2021, 13, 1009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  12. Spechler, S.J. Barrett Esophagus and Risk of Esophageal Cancer: A Clinical Review. JAMA 2013, 310, 627–636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  13. Lander, S.; Lander, E.; Gibson, M.K. Esophageal Cancer: Overview, Risk Factors, and Reasons for the Rise. Curr. Gastroenterol. Rep. 2023, 25, 275–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  14. Kota, L.; Tyberg, A. Risk of Barrett’s Esophagus Progression to Esophageal Adenocarcinoma. Clin. Endosc. 2024, 57, 763–764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  15. O’Brien, J.; Hayder, H.; Zayed, Y.; Peng, C. Overview of MicroRNA Biogenesis, Mechanisms of Actions, and Circulation. Front. Endocrinol. 2018, 9, 402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  16. Pandey, S.; Yadav, P. Exploring the Therapeutic Potential of microRNAs: Targeted Gene Regulation Strategies for Enhanced Cancer Therapy. J. Genet. Eng. Biotechnol. 2025, 23, 100556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  17. He, L.; Hannon, G.J. MicroRNAs: Small RNAs with a Big Role in Gene Regulation. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2004, 5, 522–531, Correction in Nat. Rev. Genet. 2004, 5, 631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  18. Ohtsuka, M.; Ling, H.; Doki, Y.; Mori, M.; Calin, G.A. MicroRNA Processing and Human Cancer. J. Clin. Med. 2015, 4, 1651–1667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  19. Calin, G.A.; Sevignani, C.; Dumitru, C.D.; Hyslop, T.; Noch, E.; Yendamuri, S.; Shimizu, M.; Rattan, S.; Bullrich, F.; Negrini, M.; et al. Human microRNA Genes Are Frequently Located at Fragile Sites and Genomic Regions Involved in Cancers. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2004, 101, 2999–3004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  20. Zarrilli, G.; Galuppini, F.; Angerilli, V.; Munari, G.; Sabbadin, M.; Lazzarin, V.; Nicolè, L.; Biancotti, R.; Fassan, M. miRNAs Involved in Esophageal Carcinogenesis and miRNA-Related Therapeutic Perspectives in Esophageal Carcinoma. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 3640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  21. Yang, J.; Xu, J.; Wang, W.; Zhang, B.; Yu, X.; Shi, S. Epigenetic Regulation in the Tumor Microenvironment: Molecular Mechanisms and Therapeutic Targets. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 2023, 8, 210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  22. Metcalf, G.A.D. MicroRNAs: Circulating Biomarkers for the Early Detection of Imperceptible Cancers via Biosensor and Machine-Learning Advances. Oncogene 2024, 43, 2135–2142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  23. Zhang, C.; Wang, C.; Chen, X.; Yang, C.; Li, K.; Wang, J.; Dai, J.; Hu, Z.; Zhou, X.; Chen, L.; et al. Expression Profile of MicroRNAs in Serum: A Fingerprint for Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Clin. Chem. 2010, 56, 1871–1879. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  24. Li, S.; Li, Z.; Guo, F.; Qin, X.; Liu, B.; Lei, Z.; Song, Z.; Sun, L.; Zhang, H.-T.; You, J.; et al. miR-223 Regulates Migration and Invasion by Targeting Artemin in Human Esophageal Carcinoma. J. Biomed. Sci. 2011, 18, 24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  25. Yang, C.; Ning, S.; Li, Z.; Qin, X.; Xu, W. miR-22 Is down-Regulated in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma and Inhibits Cell Migration and Invasion. Cancer Cell Int. 2014, 14, 138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  26. Li, S.; Qin, X.; Li, Y.; Zhang, X.; Niu, R.; Zhang, H.; Cui, A.; An, W.; Wang, X. MiR-133a Suppresses the Migration and Invasion of Esophageal Cancer Cells by Targeting the EMT Regulator SOX4. Am. J. Transl. Res. 2015, 7, 1390–1403. [Google Scholar]
  27. Zhang, H.; Ye, Q.; Du, Z.; Huang, M.; Zhang, M.; Tan, H. MiR-148b-3p Inhibits Renal Carcinoma Cell Growth and pro-Angiogenic Phenotype of Endothelial Cell Potentially by Modulating FGF2. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2018, 107, 359–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  28. Ji, L.; Zhu, Z.-N.; He, C.-J.; Shen, X. MiR-127-3p Targets KIF3B to Inhibit the Development of Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Eur. Rev. Med. Pharmacol. Sci. 2019, 23, 630–640. [Google Scholar]
  29. Borelli Bovo, T.J.; de Camargo, J.A.; Pimenta, R.; Ribeiro Guimarães, V.; Candido, P.; Leite, K.R.M.; Camargo Passerotti, C.; Nahas, W.C.; Reis, S.T. MiR-10a as a Potential Biomarker and Therapeutic Target in Localized and Metastatic Prostate Cancer. Curr. Issues Mol. Biol. 2025, 47, 913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  30. Han, M.T.T.; Oo, T.Z.M.; Chewaskulyong, B.; Pornprasert, S.; Choocheep, K.; Punturee, K.; Kumsaiyai, W.; Wuttiin, Y.; Chiampanichayakul, S.; Cressey, R. MiR-125b-5p and miR-100-5p as Biomarkers and Therapeutic Targets for the Prevention of Particulate Matter-Induced Non-Smoker Lung Cancer. PLoS ONE 2025, 20, e0337805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  31. Huang, Z.; Zhang, L.; Zhu, D.; Shan, X.; Zhou, X.; Qi, L.; Wu, L.; Zhu, J.; Cheng, W.; Zhang, H.; et al. A Novel Serum microRNA Signature to Screen Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Cancer Med. 2016, 6, 109–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  32. Zhu, J.; Chen, L.; Zou, L.; Yang, P.; Wu, R.; Mao, Y.; Zhou, H.; Li, R.; Wang, K.; Wang, W.; et al. MiR-20b, -21, and -130b Inhibit PTEN Expression Resulting in B7-H1 over-Expression in Advanced Colorectal Cancer. Hum. Immunol. 2014, 75, 348–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  33. Yu, J.; Chen, S.; Niu, Y.; Liu, M.; Zhang, J.; Yang, Z.; Gao, P.; Wang, W.; Han, X.; Sun, G. Functional Significance and Therapeutic Potential of miRNA-20b-5p in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Mol. Ther. Nucleic Acids 2020, 21, 315–331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  34. Liu, S.-G.; Qin, X.-G.; Zhao, B.-S.; Qi, B.; Yao, W.-J.; Wang, T.-Y.; Li, H.-C.; Wu, X.-N. Differential Expression of miRNAs in Esophageal Cancer Tissue. Oncol. Lett. 2013, 5, 1639–1642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  35. Ji, H.; Liu, S.; Yang, L.; Wu, Y.; Zhang, H.; Liu, X.; Li, L.; Li, L. miR-28–3p Suppresses Gastric Cancer Growth and EMT-Driven Metastasis by Targeting the ARF6/Hedgehog Axis. Mol. Cell. Probes 2025, 79, 102010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  36. Li, S.; Li, F.; Niu, R.; Zhang, H.; Cui, A.; An, W.; Wang, X. Mir-192 Suppresses Apoptosis and Promotes Proliferation in Esophageal Aquamous Cell Caicinoma by Targeting Bim. Int. J. Clin. Exp. Pathol. 2015, 8, 8048–8056. [Google Scholar]
  37. Kurashige, J.; Watanabe, M.; Iwatsuki, M.; Kinoshita, K.; Saito, S.; Hiyoshi, Y.; Kamohara, H.; Baba, Y.; Mimori, K.; Baba, H. Overexpression of microRNA-223 Regulates the Ubiquitin Ligase FBXW7 in Oesophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Br. J. Cancer 2012, 106, 182–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  38. Tang, H.; Zhong, Y.; Wang, J.; Meng, S.; Yu, D.; Fan, B.; Dong, X.; Wang, M.; Fu, M.; Qian, Y.; et al. N2 Neutrophils Induce Cell Stemness Reprogramming to Promote Gastric Cancer Progression via Exosomal miRNAs. Cell. Signal 2025, 136, 112085. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  39. Würdinger, T.; Tannous, B.A.; Saydam, O.; Skog, J.; Grau, S.; Soutschek, J.; Weissleder, R.; Breakefield, X.O.; Krichevsky, A.M. miR-296 Regulates Growth Factor Receptor Overexpression in Angiogenic Endothelial Cells. Cancer Cell 2008, 14, 382–393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  40. Wang, Z.-Z.; Luo, Y.-R.; Du, J.; Yu, Y.; Yang, X.-Z.; Cui, Y.-J.; Jin, X.-F. MiR-296-5p Inhibits Cell Invasion and Migration of Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma by Downregulating STAT3 Signaling. Eur. Rev. Med. Pharmacol. Sci. 2019, 23, 5206–5214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  41. He, Z.; Yu, L.; Luo, S.; Li, M.; Li, J.; Li, Q.; Sun, Y.; Wang, C. miR-296 Inhibits the Metastasis and Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition of Colorectal Cancer by Targeting S100A4. BMC Cancer 2017, 17, 140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  42. Zhou, X.; Wen, W.; Zhu, J.; Huang, Z.; Zhang, L.; Zhang, H.; Qi, L.-W.; Shan, X.; Wang, T.; Cheng, W.; et al. A Six-microRNA Signature in Plasma Was Identified as a Potential Biomarker in Diagnosis of Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Oncotarget 2017, 8, 34468–34480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  43. Sudo, K.; Kato, K.; Matsuzaki, J.; Boku, N.; Abe, S.; Saito, Y.; Daiko, H.; Takizawa, S.; Aoki, Y.; Sakamoto, H.; et al. Development and Validation of an Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Detection Model by Large-Scale MicroRNA Profiling. JAMA Netw. Open 2019, 2, e194573, Correction in JAMA Netw. Open 2019, 2, e197401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  44. Kim, H.G.; Cho, Y.; Lee, J.-S.; Oh, E.-T.; Park, H.J. Identification of miR-6794-3p as a Suppressor in Pancreatic Cancer Metastasis. Int. J. Biol. Sci. 2024, 20, 5272–5292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  45. Xie, L.; Li, W.; Li, Y. Mir-744-5p Inhibits Cell Growth and Angiogenesis in Osteosarcoma by Targeting NFIX. J. Orthop. Surg. Res. 2024, 19, 485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  46. Skóra, K.; Strojny, D.; Sobański, D.; Staszkiewicz, R.; Bryś, K.; Gogol, P.; Bereza, K.; Masternak, M.; Grabarek, B.O. Multi-Omics Profiling of TGF-β Isoforms and Regulatory miRNAs in Astrocytic Tumors Reveals TGF-β-3 as a Prognostic Biomarker. Front. Oncol. 2025, 15, 1592685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  47. Mizoguchi, A.; Takayama, A.; Arai, T.; Kawauchi, J.; Sudo, H. MicroRNA-8073: Tumor Suppressor and Potential Therapeutic Treatment. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0209750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  48. Komatsu, S.; Ichikawa, D.; Takeshita, H.; Tsujiura, M.; Morimura, R.; Nagata, H.; Kosuga, T.; Iitaka, D.; Konishi, H.; Shiozaki, A.; et al. Circulating microRNAs in Plasma of Patients with Oesophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Br. J. Cancer 2011, 105, 104–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  49. Kurashige, J.; Kamohara, H.; Watanabe, M.; Tanaka, Y.; Kinoshita, K.; Saito, S.; Hiyoshi, Y.; Iwatsuki, M.; Baba, Y.; Baba, H. Serum microRNA-21 Is a Novel Biomarker in Patients with Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma. J. Surg. Oncol. 2012, 106, 188–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  50. Li, B.-X.; Yu, Q.; Shi, Z.-L.; Li, P.; Fu, S. Circulating microRNAs in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Association with Locoregional Staging and Survival. Int. J. Clin. Exp. Med. 2015, 8, 7241–7250. [Google Scholar]
  51. Luo, D.; Huang, Z.; Lv, H.; Wang, Y.; Sun, W.; Sun, X. Up-Regulation of MicroRNA-21 Indicates Poor Prognosis and Promotes Cell Proliferation in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma via Upregulation of lncRNA SNHG1. Cancer Manag. Res. 2020, 12, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  52. Kahng, D.H.; Kim, G.H.; Park, S.J.; Kim, S.; Lee, M.W.; Lee, B.E.; I, H. MicroRNA Expression in Plasma of Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Patients. J. Korean Med. Sci. 2022, 37, e197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  53. Sun, L.-H.; Tian, D.; Yang, Z.-C.; Li, J.-L. Exosomal miR-21 Promotes Proliferation, Invasion and Therapy Resistance of Colon Adenocarcinoma Cells through Its Target PDCD4. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 8271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  54. Hirajima, S.; Komatsu, S.; Ichikawa, D.; Takeshita, H.; Konishi, H.; Shiozaki, A.; Morimura, R.; Tsujiura, M.; Nagata, H.; Kawaguchi, T.; et al. Clinical Impact of Circulating miR-18a in Plasma of Patients with Oesophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Br. J. Cancer 2013, 108, 1822–1829. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  55. Zhang, W.; Lei, C.; Fan, J.; Wang, J. miR-18a Promotes Cell Proliferation of Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Cells by Increasing Cylin D1 via Regulating PTEN-PI3K-AKT-mTOR Signaling Axis. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2016, 477, 144–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  56. Kim, S.; Kim, G.H.; Park, S.J.; Kwon, C.H.; I, H.; Lee, M.W.; Lee, B.E. Exosomal MicroRNA Analyses in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Cell Lines. J. Clin. Med. 2022, 11, 4426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  57. Gandellini, P.; Folini, M.; Longoni, N.; Pennati, M.; Binda, M.; Colecchia, M.; Salvioni, R.; Supino, R.; Moretti, R.; Limonta, P.; et al. miR-205 Exerts Tumor-Suppressive Functions in Human Prostate through down-Regulation of Protein Kinase Cepsilon. Cancer Res. 2009, 69, 2287–2295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  58. Jiang, M.; Zhang, P.; Hu, G.; Xiao, Z.; Xu, F.; Zhong, T.; Huang, F.; Kuang, H.; Zhang, W. Relative Expressions of miR-205-5p, miR-205-3p, and miR-21 in Tissues and Serum of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients. Mol. Cell. Biochem. 2013, 383, 67–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  59. Li, J.; Hu, K.; Gong, G.; Zhu, D.; Wang, Y.; Liu, H.; Wu, X. Upregulation of MiR-205 Transcriptionally Suppresses SMAD4 and PTEN and Contributes to Human Ovarian Cancer Progression. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 41330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  60. Nagai, H.; Hasegawa, S.; Uchida, F.; Terabe, T.; Ishibashi Kanno, N.; Kato, K.; Yamagata, K.; Sakai, S.; Kawashiri, S.; Sato, H.; et al. MicroRNA-205-5p Suppresses the Invasiveness of Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma by Inhibiting TIMP-2 Expression. Int. J. Oncol. 2018, 52, 841–850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  61. Komatsu, S.; Ichikawa, D.; Hirajima, S.; Kawaguchi, T.; Miyamae, M.; Okajima, W.; Ohashi, T.; Arita, T.; Konishi, H.; Shiozaki, A.; et al. Plasma microRNA Profiles: Identification of miR-25 as a Novel Diagnostic and Monitoring Biomarker in Oesophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Br. J. Cancer 2014, 111, 1614–1624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  62. Karunakara, S.H.; Moorthy, M.; Ramaswamy, G.; Puttamallapa, V.S.; Prakash, M.; Mehtani, R.; Kabekkodu, S.P.; Vishwanath, P.M.; Santhekadur, P.K. Identification of Potential Oncogenic miRNA Clusters with a Special Focus on miR-106b/25 Cluster-Regulated Networks and Their Clinical Utility in Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Discov. Oncol. 2025, 16, 2047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  63. Zhang, T.; Zhao, D.; Wang, Q.; Yu, X.; Cui, Y.; Guo, L.; Lu, S.H. MicroRNA-1322 Regulates ECRG2 Allele Specifically and Acts as a Potential Biomarker in Patients with Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Mol. Carcinog. 2013, 52, 581–590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  64. Zheng, D.; Ding, Y.; Ma, Q.; Zhao, L.; Guo, X.; Shen, Y.; He, Y.; Wei, W.; Liu, F. Identification of Serum MicroRNAs as Novel Biomarkers in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Using Feature Selection Algorithms. Front. Oncol. 2019, 8, 674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  65. Lv, Y.; Ma, X.; Liu, Q.; Long, Z.; Li, S.; Tan, Z.; Wang, D.; Xing, X.; Chen, L.; Chen, W.; et al. C-Jun Targets miR-451a to Regulate HQ-Induced Inhibition of Erythroid Differentiation via the BATF/SETD5/ARHGEF3 Axis. Toxicology 2024, 505, 153843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  66. Huang, W.; Zhao, Y.; Xu, Z.; Wu, X.; Qiao, M.; Zhu, Z.; Zhao, Z. The Regulatory Mechanism of miR-574-5p Expression in Cancer. Biomolecules 2022, 13, 40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  67. Osan, C.; Chira, S.; Nutu, A.M.; Braicu, C.; Baciut, M.; Korban, S.S.; Berindan-Neagoe, I. The Connection between MicroRNAs and Oral Cancer Pathogenesis: Emerging Biomarkers in Oral Cancer Management. Genes 2021, 12, 1989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  68. Barroso, L.; Veiga, P.; Melo, J.B.; Carreira, I.M.; Ribeiro, I.P. Molecular and Genetic Pathogenesis of Oral Cancer: A Basis for Customized Diagnosis and Treatment. Biology 2025, 14, 842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  69. Dong, S.; Yin, H.; Dong, C.; Sun, K.; Lv, P.; Meng, W.; Ming, L.; He, F. Predictive Value of Plasma MicroRNA-216a/b in the Diagnosis of Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Dis. Markers 2016, 2016, 1857067, Erratum in Dis. Markers 2017, 2017, 3437679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  70. Wang, R.-T.; Xu, M.; Xu, C.-X.; Song, Z.-G.; Jin, H. Decreased Expression of miR216a Contributes to Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Progression. Clin. Cancer Res. 2014, 20, 4705–4716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  71. Liu, F.; Zhou, S.; Deng, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Zhang, E.; Wu, Z.; Huang, Z.; Chen, X. MiR-216b Is Involved in Pathogenesis and Progression of Hepatocellular Carcinoma through HBx-miR-216b-IGF2BP2 Signaling Pathway. Cell Death Dis. 2015, 6, e1670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  72. Deng, M.; Tang, H.; Zhou, Y.; Zhou, M.; Xiong, W.; Zheng, Y.; Ye, Q.; Zeng, X.; Liao, Q.; Guo, X.; et al. miR-216b Suppresses Tumor Growth and Invasion by Targeting KRAS in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma. J. Cell Sci. 2011, 124, 2997–3005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  73. Chen, P.-J.; Yeh, S.-H.; Liu, W.-H.; Lin, C.-C.; Huang, H.-C.; Chen, C.-L.; Chen, D.-S.; Chen, P.-J. Androgen Pathway Stimulates microRNA-216a Transcription to Suppress the Tumor Suppressor in Lung Cancer-1 Gene in Early Hepatocarcinogenesis. Hepatology 2012, 56, 632–643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  74. Liu, H.; Chen, K.; Wang, L.; Zeng, X.; Huang, Z.; Li, M.; Dong, P.; Chen, X. miR-613 Inhibits Warburg Effect in Gastric Cancer by Targeting PFKFB2. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2019, 515, 37–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  75. Huang, Y.; Zhang, H.; Wang, L.; Liu, C.; Guo, M.; Tan, H.; Liu, Z. MiR-613 Inhibits the Proliferation, Migration, and Invasion of Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma Cells by Directly Targeting TAGLN2. Cancer Cell Int. 2021, 21, 494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  76. Guan, S.; Wang, C.; Chen, X.; Liu, B.; Tan, B.; Liu, F.; Wang, D.; Han, L.; Wang, L.; Huang, X.; et al. MiR-613: A Novel Diagnostic and Prognostic Biomarker for Patients with Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Tumour Biol. 2016, 37, 4383–4391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  77. Yang, Z.; Yuan, Z.; Fan, Y.; Deng, X.; Zheng, Q. Integrated analyses of microRNA and mRNA expression profiles in aggressive papillary thyroid carcinoma. Mol. Med. Rep. 2013, 8, 1353–1358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  78. Wan, H.; Yuan, B.; Jiang, K.; Wei, J.; Feng, X.; Sun, B.; Wang, F. CircRNA CircRIMS Is Overexpressed in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma and Downregulate miR-613 Through Methylation to Increase Cell Proliferation. Cancer Manag. Res. 2021, 13, 4587–4595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  79. Wang, C.; Li, Q.; Liu, F.; Chen, X.; Nesa, E.U.; Guan, S.; Liu, B.; Han, L.; Tan, B.; Wang, D.; et al. Serum miR-1297: A Promising Diagnostic Biomarker in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Biomarkers 2016, 21, 517–522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  80. Yan, S.; Wang, M. HCG11 Inhibits Salivary Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma by Upregulating EphA2 via Binding to miR-1297. Oral. Surg. Oral. Med. Oral. Pathol. Oral. Radiol. 2023, 135, 257–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  81. Scafetta, G.; Rampioni Vinciguerra, G.L.; Giglio, S.; Faruq, O.; Cirombella, R.; Segatto, I.; Citron, F.; Mattevi, M.C.; Di Renzi, E.; Cascione, L.; et al. miR-1297 Is Frequently Downmodulated in Flat Epithelial Atypia of the Breast and Promotes Mammary Neoplastic Transformation via EphrinA2 Regulation. J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res. 2025, 44, 96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  82. Pubu, S.; Zhang, J.-W.; Yang, J. Early Diagnosis of Esophageal Cancer: How to Put “Early Detection” into Effect? World J. Gastrointest. Oncol. 2024, 16, 3386–3392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  83. Chen, X.; Ba, Y.; Ma, L.; Cai, X.; Yin, Y.; Wang, K.; Guo, J.; Zhang, Y.; Chen, J.; Guo, X.; et al. Characterization of microRNAs in Serum: A Novel Class of Biomarkers for Diagnosis of Cancer and Other Diseases. Cell Res. 2008, 18, 997–1006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  84. Mitchell, P.S.; Parkin, R.K.; Kroh, E.M.; Fritz, B.R.; Wyman, S.K.; Pogosova-Agadjanyan, E.L.; Peterson, A.; Noteboom, J.; O’Briant, K.C.; Allen, A.; et al. Circulating microRNAs as Stable Blood-Based Markers for Cancer Detection. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2008, 105, 10513–10518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  85. Qi, Y.; Li, X.; Zhao, S. miR-29b Inhibits the Progression of Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma by Targeting MMP-2. Neoplasma 2015, 62, 384–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  86. Dai, F.; Zhang, Y.; Chen, Y. Involvement of miR-29b Signaling in the Sensitivity to Chemotherapy in Patients with Ovarian Carcinoma. Hum. Pathol. 2014, 45, 1285–1293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  87. Qiang, W.; Liu, Z.; Serna, V.A.; Druschitz, S.A.; Liu, Y.; Espona-Fiedler, M.; Wei, J.-J.; Kurita, T. Down-Regulation of miR-29b Is Essential for Pathogenesis of Uterine Leiomyoma. Endocrinology 2014, 155, 663–669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  88. Hou, S.-M.; Cheng, C.-Y.; Chen, W.-L.; Chang, E.-M.; Lin, C.-Y. NGF-TrkA Axis Enhances PDGF-C-Mediated Angiogenesis in Osteosarcoma via miR-29b-3p Suppression: A Potential Therapeutic Strategy Using Larotrectinib. Life 2025, 15, 99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  89. Ma, T.; Zhao, Y.; Lu, Q.; Lu, Y.; Liu, Z.; Xue, T.; Shao, Y. MicroRNA-30c Functions as a Tumor Suppressor via Targeting SNAI1 in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2018, 98, 680–686, Erratum in Biomed. Pharmacother. 2024, 179, 117376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  90. Shi, H.; Pan, B.; Liang, J.; Cai, B.; Wu, G.; Bian, Y.; Shan, G.; Ren, S.; Huang, Y.; Guo, W. miR-30c-5p Inhibits Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Progression by Repressing the PI3K/AKT Signaling Pathway. Thorac. Cancer 2024, 15, 2206–2216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  91. Bockhorn, J.; Yee, K.; Chang, Y.-F.; Prat, A.; Huo, D.; Nwachukwu, C.; Dalton, R.; Huang, S.; Swanson, K.E.; Perou, C.M.; et al. MicroRNA-30c Targets Cytoskeleton Genes Involved in Breast Cancer Cell Invasion. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 2013, 137, 373–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  92. Zhong, Z.; Xia, Y.; Wang, P.; Liu, B.; Chen, Y. Low Expression of microRNA-30c Promotes Invasion by Inducing Epithelial Mesenchymal Transition in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer. Mol. Med. Rep. 2014, 10, 2575–2579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  93. Tian, X.-Y.; Mu, Y.-P. Serum miR-30c Serves as Potential Biomarkers for the Diagnosis and Prognosis of Gastric Cancer. J. Toxicol. Environ. Health A 2025, 88, 701–709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  94. Yokobori, T.; Suzuki, S.; Tanaka, N.; Inose, T.; Sohda, M.; Sano, A.; Sakai, M.; Nakajima, M.; Miyazaki, T.; Kato, H.; et al. MiR-150 Is Associated with Poor Prognosis in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma via Targeting the EMT Inducer ZEB1. Cancer Sci. 2013, 104, 48–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  95. Xiao, C.; Calado, D.P.; Galler, G.; Thai, T.-H.; Patterson, H.C.; Wang, J.; Rajewsky, N.; Bender, T.P.; Rajewsky, K. MiR-150 Controls B Cell Differentiation by Targeting the Transcription Factor c-Myb. Cell 2007, 131, 146–159, Erratum in Cell 2016, 165, 1027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  96. Ghisi, M.; Corradin, A.; Basso, K.; Frasson, C.; Serafin, V.; Mukherjee, S.; Mussolin, L.; Ruggero, K.; Bonanno, L.; Guffanti, A.; et al. Modulation of microRNA Expression in Human T-Cell Development: Targeting of NOTCH3 by miR-150. Blood 2011, 117, 7053–7062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  97. Tano, N.; Kim, H.W.; Ashraf, M. microRNA-150 Regulates Mobilization and Migration of Bone Marrow-Derived Mononuclear Cells by Targeting Cxcr4. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e23114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  98. Avissar, M.; Christensen, B.C.; Kelsey, K.T.; Marsit, C.J. MicroRNA Expression Ratio Is Predictive of Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Clin. Cancer Res. 2009, 15, 2850–2855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  99. Li, L.; Xiao, C.; He, K.; Xiang, G. Circ_0072088 Promotes Progression of Hepatocellular Carcinoma by Activating JAK2/STAT3 Signaling Pathway via miR-375. IUBMB Life 2021, 73, 1153–1165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  100. Ding, L.; Xu, Y.; Zhang, W.; Deng, Y.; Si, M.; Du, Y.; Yao, H.; Liu, X.; Ke, Y.; Si, J.; et al. MiR-375 Frequently Downregulated in Gastric Cancer Inhibits Cell Proliferation by Targeting JAK2. Cell Res. 2010, 20, 784–793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  101. Yan, J.-W.; Lin, J.-S.; He, X.-X. The Emerging Role of miR-375 in Cancer. Int. J. Cancer 2014, 135, 1011–1018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  102. Wu, K.; Liu, F.; Zhang, T.; Zhou, Z.; Yu, S.; Quan, Y.; Zhu, S. miR-375 Suppresses the Growth and Metastasis of Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma by Targeting PRDX1. J. Gastrointest. Oncol. 2022, 13, 2154–2168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  103. Kong, K.L.; Kwong, D.L.W.; Chan, T.H.-M.; Law, S.Y.-K.; Chen, L.; Li, Y.; Qin, Y.-R.; Guan, X.-Y. MicroRNA-375 Inhibits Tumour Growth and Metastasis in Oesophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma through Repressing Insulin-like Growth Factor 1 Receptor. Gut 2012, 61, 33–42, Correction in Gut 2016, 65, 531. Erratum in Gut 2016, 65, 1388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  104. Wu, W.; Zhang, Y.; Li, X.; Wang, X.; Yuan, Y. miR-375 Inhibits the Proliferation, Migration and Invasion of Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma by Targeting XPR1. Curr. Gene Ther. 2021, 21, 290–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  105. Su, Y.; Mei, L.; Wu, Y.; Li, C.; Jiang, T.; Zhao, Y.; Feng, X.; Sun, T.; Li, Y.; Wang, Z.; et al. Xenotropic and Polytropic Retrovirus Receptor 1 (XPR1) Promotes Progression of Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma via the BRAF-ERK1/2-P53 Signaling Pathway. J. Endocrinol. Investig. 2025, 48, 633–652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  106. Yi, Y.; Lu, X.; Chen, J.; Jiao, C.; Zhong, J.; Song, Z.; Yu, X.; Lin, B. Downregulated miR-486-5p Acts as a Tumor Suppressor in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Exp. Ther. Med. 2016, 12, 3411–3416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  107. Lang, B.; Zhao, S. miR-486 Functions as a Tumor Suppressor in Esophageal Cancer by Targeting CDK4/BCAS2. Oncol. Rep. 2018, 39, 71–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  108. Jin, L.; Yi, J.; Gao, Y.; Han, S.; He, Z.; Chen, L.; Song, H. MiR-630 Inhibits Invasion and Metastasis in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Acta Biochim. Biophys. Sin. 2016, 48, 810–819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  109. Liu, X.; Wu, W.; Zhang, S.; Tan, W.; Qiu, Y.; Liao, K.; Yang, K. Effect of miR-630 Expression on Esophageal Cancer Cell Invasion and Migration. J. Clin. Lab. Anal. 2021, 35, e23815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  110. Sarkar, S.; Bristow, C.A.; Dey, P.; Rai, K.; Perets, R.; Ramirez-Cardenas, A.; Malasi, S.; Huang-Hobbs, E.; Haemmerle, M.; Wu, S.Y.; et al. PRKCI Promotes Immune Suppression in Ovarian Cancer. Genes. Dev. 2017, 31, 1109–1121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  111. Sakurai, M.A.; Ozaki, Y.; Okuzaki, D.; Naito, Y.; Sasakura, T.; Okamoto, A.; Tabara, H.; Inoue, T.; Hagiyama, M.; Ito, A.; et al. Gefitinib and Luteolin Cause Growth Arrest of Human Prostate Cancer PC-3 Cells via Inhibition of Cyclin G-Associated Kinase and Induction of miR-630. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e100124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  112. Wang, B.; Li, J.; Li, Y.; Liang, T.; Chu, X. MiR-630 Suppresses Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer by Targeting Vimentin. J. Clin. Lab. Anal. 2022, 36, e24536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  113. Zou, J.; Yang, S.; He, C.; Deng, L.; Xu, B.; Chen, S. miR-630 as a Therapeutic Target in Pancreatic Cancer Stem Cells: Modulation of the PRKCI-Hedgehog Signaling Axis. Biol. Direct 2024, 19, 109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  114. Sun, L.; Dong, S.; Dong, C.; Sun, K.; Meng, W.; Lv, P.; Yin, H.; Ming, L.; He, F. Predictive Value of Plasma miRNA-718 for Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Cancer Biomark. 2016, 16, 265–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  115. Leng, R.; Zha, L.; Tang, L. MiR-718 Represses VEGF and Inhibits Ovarian Cancer Cell Progression. FEBS Lett. 2014, 588, 2078–2086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  116. Song, Y.; Li, J.; Zhu, Y.; Dai, Y.; Zeng, T.; Liu, L.; Li, J.; Wang, H.; Qin, Y.; Zeng, M.; et al. MicroRNA-9 Promotes Tumor Metastasis via Repressing E-Cadherin in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Oncotarget 2014, 5, 11669–11680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  117. Cui, Y.; Xue, Y.; Dong, S.; Zhang, P. Plasma microRNA-9 as a Diagnostic and Prognostic Biomarker in Patients with Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma. J. Int. Med. Res. 2017, 45, 1310–1317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  118. Polyak, K.; Weinberg, R.A. Transitions between Epithelial and Mesenchymal States: Acquisition of Malignant and Stem Cell Traits. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2009, 9, 265–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  119. Ma, L.; Young, J.; Prabhala, H.; Pan, E.; Mestdagh, P.; Muth, D.; Teruya-Feldstein, J.; Reinhardt, F.; Onder, T.T.; Valastyan, S.; et al. miR-9, a MYC/MYCN-Activated microRNA, Regulates E-Cadherin and Cancer Metastasis. Nat. Cell Biol. 2010, 12, 247–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  120. Zheng, Y.-J.; Liang, T.-S.; Wang, J.; Zhao, J.-Y.; Zhai, S.-N.; Yang, D.-K.; Wang, L.-D. MicroRNA-155 Acts as a Diagnostic and Prognostic Biomarker for Oesophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Artif. Cells Nanomed. Biotechnol. 2020, 48, 977–982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  121. Xu, W.; Song, C.; Wang, X.; Li, Y.; Bai, X.; Liang, X.; Wu, J.; Liu, J. Downregulation of miR-155-5p Enhances the Anti-Tumor Effect of Cetuximab on Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Cells via Inducing Cell Apoptosis and Pyroptosis. Aging 2021, 13, 228–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  122. Xu, R.; Guo, C.-X.; Qian, J.; Yin, F.-X.; Zhang, M.-L. Exosomal miR-155-5p Modulates Breast Cancer Proliferation and Metastasis Via NF-κB Activation. J. Biochem. Mol. Toxicol. 2025, 39, e70542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  123. Zhang, J.; Cheng, C.; Yuan, X.; He, J.-T.; Pan, Q.-H.; Sun, F.-Y. microRNA-155 Acts as an Oncogene by Targeting the Tumor Protein 53-Induced Nuclear Protein 1 in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Int. J. Clin. Exp. Pathol. 2014, 7, 602–610. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  124. Ren, L.-H.; Chen, W.-X.; Li, S.; He, X.-Y.; Zhang, Z.-M.; Li, M.; Cao, R.-S.; Hao, B.; Zhang, H.-J.; Qiu, H.-Q.; et al. MicroRNA-183 Promotes Proliferation and Invasion in Oesophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma by Targeting Programmed Cell Death 4. Br. J. Cancer 2014, 111, 2003–2013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  125. Yang, M.; Liu, R.; Li, X.; Liao, J.; Pu, Y.; Pan, E.; Yin, L.; Wang, Y. miRNA-183 Suppresses Apoptosis and Promotes Proliferation in Esophageal Cancer by Targeting PDCD4. Mol. Cells 2014, 37, 873–880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  126. Xu, X.; Zheng, L.; Hang, N.; Zhu, G.; Mao, W.; Fan, Y.; Tao, K. The Transcription Factor C-Jun Regulates Smad4 Expression by Upregulating Pre-miR-183 Expression to Promote Invasion and Metastasis of Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinomas. Vitr. Cell. Dev. Biol. Anim. 2020, 56, 550–558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  127. Sun, J.; Song, K.; Feng, X.; Gao, S. MicroRNA-367 Is a Potential Diagnostic Biomarker for Patients with Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2016, 473, 363–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  128. Wei, X.; Jiang, Y.; Yang, G.; Chang, T.; Sun, G.; Chen, S.; Wu, S.; Liu, R. MicroRNA-367-3p Directly Targets RAB23 and Inhibits Proliferation, Migration and Invasion of Bladder Cancer Cells and Increases Cisplatin Sensitivity. J. Cancer Res. Clin. Oncol. 2023, 149, 17807–17821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  129. Tanaka, H.; Maruyama, S.; Shoda, K.; Kawaguchi, Y.; Higuchi, Y.; Ozawa, T.; Nakayama, T.; Saito, R.; Izumo, W.; Takiguchi, K.; et al. miR-100-5p and miR-203a-3p Suppress Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Progression by Targeting FKBP5. Oncol. Rep. 2025, 54, 170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  130. Chen, C.; Yang, C.; Tian, X.; Liang, Y.; Wang, S.; Wang, X.; Shou, Y.; Li, H.; Xiao, Q.; Shu, J.; et al. Downregulation of miR-100-5p in Cancer-associated Fibroblast-derived Exosomes Facilitates Lymphangiogenesis in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Cancer Med. 2023, 12, 14468–14483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  131. Zhou, S.-M.; Zhang, F.; Chen, X.-B.; Jun, C.-M.; Jing, X.; Wei, D.-X.; Xia, Y.; Zhou, Y.-B.; Xiao, X.-Q.; Jia, R.-Q.; et al. miR-100 Suppresses the Proliferation and Tumor Growth of Esophageal Squamous Cancer Cells via Targeting CXCR7. Oncol. Rep. 2016, 35, 3453–3459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  132. Wang, L.; Zhang, Z.; Yu, X.; Li, Q.; Wang, Q.; Chang, A.; Huang, X.; Han, X.; Song, Y.; Hu, J.; et al. SOX9/miR-203a Axis Drives PI3K/AKT Signaling to Promote Esophageal Cancer Progression. Cancer Lett. 2020, 468, 14–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  133. Cugliari, G. FKBP5, a Modulator of Stress Responses Involved in Malignant Mesothelioma: The Link between Stress and Cancer. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 8183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  134. Li, P.; Mao, W.-M.; Zheng, Z.-G.; Dong, Z.-M.; Ling, Z.-Q. Down-Regulation of PTEN Expression Modulated by Dysregulated miR-21 Contributes to the Progression of Esophageal Cancer. Dig. Dis. Sci. 2013, 58, 3483–3493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  135. Zhang, J.; Ma, L.; Shi, D.; Zhang, Z.; Yao, C.; Zhao, X.; Xu, Q.; Wen, P.; He, L. Prognostic Significance of miR-21 and PDCD4 in Patients with Stage II Esophageal Carcinoma after Surgical Resection. J. Cell. Biochem. 2018, 119, 4783–4791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  136. Zhao, M.-Y.; Wang, L.-M.; Liu, J.; Huang, X.; Liu, J.; Zhang, Y.-F. MiR-21 Suppresses Anoikis through Targeting PDCD4 and PTEN in Human Esophageal Adenocarcinoma. Curr. Med. Sci. 2018, 38, 245–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  137. Gao, S.; Liu, J.; Zhang, H.; Zhao, N.; Zhang, J. Low miR-133a Expression Is a Predictor of Outcome in Patients with Esophageal Squamous Cell Cancer. Eur. Rev. Med. Pharmacol. Sci. 2016, 20, 3788–3792. [Google Scholar]
  138. Akanuma, N.; Hoshino, I.; Akutsu, Y.; Murakami, K.; Isozaki, Y.; Maruyama, T.; Yusup, G.; Qin, W.; Toyozumi, T.; Takahashi, M.; et al. MicroRNA-133a Regulates the mRNAs of Two Invadopodia-Related Proteins, FSCN1 and MMP14, in Esophageal Cancer. Br. J. Cancer 2014, 110, 189–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  139. Zhang, H.; Tang, K. Clinical Value of Integrated-signature miRNAs in Esophageal Cancer. Cancer Med. 2017, 6, 1893–1903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  140. Huang, C.-G.; Liu, Q.; Zheng, S.-T.; Liu, T.; Tan, Y.-Y.; Peng, T.-Y.; Chen, J.; Lu, X.-M. miR-133b Promotes Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Metastasis. Clin. Med. Insights Oncol. 2023, 17, 11795549231219502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  141. Lin, C.; Zhang, S.; Wang, Y.; Wang, Y.; Nice, E.; Guo, C.; Zhang, E.; Yu, L.; Li, M.; Liu, C.; et al. Functional Role of a Novel Long Noncoding RNA TTN-AS1 in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Progression and Metastasis. Clin. Cancer Res. 2018, 24, 486–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  142. Gong, H.; Song, L.; Lin, C.; Liu, A.; Lin, X.; Wu, J.; Li, M.; Li, J. Downregulation of miR-138 Sustains NF-κB Activation and Promotes Lipid Raft Formation in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Clin. Cancer Res. 2013, 19, 1083–1093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  143. Zheng, S.; Zhang, X.; Wang, X.; Li, J. Downregulation of miR-138 Predicts Poor Prognosis in Patients with Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Cancer Biomark. 2017, 20, 49–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  144. Huang, B.; Zhang, Y.; Sun, P.; Yuan, Y.; Wang, C. MiR-138-5p Inhibits Thyroid Cancer Cell Growth and Stemness by Targeting TRPC5/Wnt/β-Catenin Pathway. Mol. Biotechnol. 2024, 66, 544–553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  145. Ye, Z.; Fang, B.; Pan, J.; Zhang, N.; Huang, J.; Xie, C.; Lou, T.; Cao, Z. miR-138 Suppresses the Proliferation, Metastasis and Autophagy of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer by Targeting Sirt1. Oncol. Rep. 2017, 37, 3244–3252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  146. Jiang, B.; Mu, W.; Wang, J.; Lu, J.; Jiang, S.; Li, L.; Xu, H.; Tian, H. MicroRNA-138 Functions as a Tumor Suppressor in Osteosarcoma by Targeting Differentiated Embryonic Chondrocyte Gene 2. J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res. 2016, 35, 69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  147. Isozaki, Y.; Hoshino, I.; Akutsu, Y.; Hanari, N.; Mori, M.; Nishimori, T.; Murakami, K.; Akanuma, N.; Takeshita, N.; Maruyama, T.; et al. Usefulness of microRNA-375 as a Prognostic and Therapeutic Tool in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Int. J. Oncol. 2015, 46, 1059–1066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  148. Luo, H.-S.; Wu, D.-H. Identification of miR-375 as a Potential Prognostic Biomarker for Esophageal Squamous Cell Cancer: A Bioinformatics Analysis Based on TCGA and Meta-Analysis. Pathol. Res. Pract. 2019, 215, 512–518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  149. Li, X.; Lin, R.; Li, J. Epigenetic Silencing of MicroRNA-375 Regulates PDK1 Expression in Esophageal Cancer. Dig. Dis. Sci. 2011, 56, 2849–2856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  150. Takeshita, N.; Hoshino, I.; Mori, M.; Akutsu, Y.; Hanari, N.; Yoneyama, Y.; Ikeda, N.; Isozaki, Y.; Maruyama, T.; Akanuma, N.; et al. Serum microRNA Expression Profile: miR-1246 as a Novel Diagnostic and Prognostic Biomarker for Oesophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Br. J. Cancer 2013, 108, 644–652, Correction in Br. J. Cancer 2024, 131, 1106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  151. Chang, P.; Wang, X.; Zhou, Y.; Hou, Y. Analysis of the Correlation between the Expression of miR-655 and Esophageal Cancer Prognosis. Oncol. Lett. 2017, 13, 4691–4694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  152. Harazono, Y.; Muramatsu, T.; Endo, H.; Uzawa, N.; Kawano, T.; Harada, K.; Inazawa, J.; Kozaki, K. miR-655 Is an EMT-Suppressive MicroRNA Targeting ZEB1 and TGFBR2. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e62757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  153. Kiuchi, J.; Komatsu, S.; Imamura, T.; Nishibeppu, K.; Shoda, K.; Arita, T.; Kosuga, T.; Konishi, H.; Shiozaki, A.; Okamoto, K.; et al. Low Levels of Tumour Suppressor miR-655 in Plasma Contribute to Lymphatic Progression and Poor Outcomes in Oesophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Mol. Cancer 2019, 18, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  154. Okumura, T.; Shimada, Y.; Moriyama, M.; Takei, Y.; Omura, T.; Sekine, S.; Nagata, T.; Shimizu, K.; Tsukada, K. MicroRNA-203 inhibits the progression of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma with restored epithelial tissue architecture in vivo. Int. J. Oncol. 2014, 44, 1923–1932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  155. Ogawa, R.; Ishiguro, H.; Kuwabara, Y.; Kimura, M.; Mitsui, A.; Katada, T.; Harata, K.; Tanaka, T.; Fujii, Y. Expression Profiling of Micro-RNAs in Human Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Using RT-PCR. Med. Mol. Morphol. 2009, 42, 102–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  156. Hong, L.; Han, Y.; Zhang, H.; Li, M.; Gong, T.; Sun, L.; Wu, K.; Zhao, Q.; Fan, D. The Prognostic and Chemotherapeutic Value of miR-296 in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Ann. Surg. 2010, 251, 1056–1063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  157. Lin, R.-J.; Xiao, D.-W.; Liao, L.-D.; Chen, T.; Xie, Z.-F.; Huang, W.-Z.; Wang, W.-S.; Jiang, T.-F.; Wu, B.-L.; Li, E.-M.; et al. MiR-142-3p as a Potential Prognostic Biomarker for Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma. J. Surg. Oncol. 2012, 105, 175–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  158. Zhao, Y.-X.; Zhao, H.-P.; Zhao, M.-Y.; Yu, Y.; Qi, X.; Wang, J.-H.; Lv, J. Latest Insights into the Global Epidemiological Features, Screening, Early Diagnosis and Prognosis Prediction of Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma. World J. Gastroenterol. 2024, 30, 2638–2656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  159. Takahashi, K.; Osaka, Y.; Ota, Y.; Watanabe, T.; Iwasaki, K.; Tachibana, S.; Nagakawa, Y.; Katsumata, K.; Tsuchida, A. Phase II Study of Docetaxel, Cisplatin, and 5-Fluorouracil Chemoradiotherapy for Unresectable Esophageal Cancer. Anticancer. Res. 2020, 40, 2827–2832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  160. Zhang, H.; Li, M.; Han, Y.; Hong, L.; Gong, T.; Sun, L.; Zheng, X. Down-Regulation of miR-27a Might Reverse Multidrug Resistance of Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Dig. Dis. Sci. 2010, 55, 2545–2551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  161. Hummel, R.; Watson, D.I.; Smith, C.; Kist, J.; Michael, M.Z.; Haier, J.; Hussey, D.J. Mir-148a Improves Response to Chemotherapy in Sensitive and Resistant Oesophageal Adenocarcinoma and Squamous Cell Carcinoma Cells. J. Gastrointest. Surg. 2011, 15, 429–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  162. Imanaka, Y.; Tsuchiya, S.; Sato, F.; Shimada, Y.; Shimizu, K.; Tsujimoto, G. MicroRNA-141 Confers Resistance to Cisplatin-Induced Apoptosis by Targeting YAP1 in Human Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma. J. Hum. Genet. 2011, 56, 270–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  163. Komatsu, S.; Ichikawa, D.; Kawaguchi, T.; Takeshita, H.; Miyamae, M.; Ohashi, T.; Okajima, W.; Imamura, T.; Kiuchi, J.; Arita, T.; et al. Plasma microRNA Profiles: Identification of miR-23a as a Novel Biomarker for Chemoresistance in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Oncotarget 2016, 7, 62034–62048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  164. Jingjing, L.; Wangyue, W.; Qiaoqiao, X.; Jietong, Y. MiR-218 Increases Sensitivity to Cisplatin in Esophageal Cancer Cells via Targeting Survivin Expression. Open Med. 2016, 11, 31–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  165. Tang, K.H.; Dai, Y.D.; Tong, M.; Chan, Y.P.; Kwan, P.S.; Fu, L.; Qin, Y.R.; Tsao, S.W.; Lung, H.L.; Lung, M.L.; et al. A CD90+ Tumor-Initiating Cell Population with an Aggressive Signature and Metastatic Capacity in Esophageal Cancer. Cancer Res. 2013, 73, 2322–2332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  166. Zhao, J.-S.; Li, W.-J.; Ge, D.; Zhang, P.-J.; Li, J.-J.; Lu, C.-L.; Ji, X.-D.; Guan, D.-X.; Gao, H.; Xu, L.-Y.; et al. Tumor Initiating Cells in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinomas Express High Levels of CD44. PLoS ONE 2011, 6, e21419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  167. Liu, A.; Zhu, J.; Wu, G.; Cao, L.; Tan, Z.; Zhang, S.; Jiang, L.; Wu, J.; Li, M.; Song, L.; et al. Antagonizing miR-455-3p Inhibits Chemoresistance and Aggressiveness in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Mol. Cancer 2017, 16, 106, Correction in Mol. Cancer 2021, 20, 152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  168. Tanaka, Y.; Kamohara, H.; Kinoshita, K.; Kurashige, J.; Ishimoto, T.; Iwatsuki, M.; Watanabe, M.; Baba, H. Clinical Impact of Serum Exosomal microRNA-21 as a Clinical Biomarker in Human Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Cancer 2013, 119, 1159–1167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  169. Komatsu, S.; Ichikawa, D.; Kawaguchi, T.; Miyamae, M.; Okajima, W.; Ohashi, T.; Imamura, T.; Kiuchi, J.; Konishi, H.; Shiozaki, A.; et al. Circulating miR-21 as an Independent Predictive Biomarker for Chemoresistance in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Am. J. Cancer Res. 2016, 6, 1511–1523. [Google Scholar]
  170. Wang, W.-T.; Guo, C.-Q.; Cui, G.-H.; Zhao, S. Correlation of Plasma miR-21 and miR-93 with Radiotherapy and Chemotherapy Efficacy and Prognosis in Patients with Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma. World J. Gastroenterol. 2019, 25, 5604–5618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  171. Li, B.; Hong, P.; Zheng, C.-C.; Dai, W.; Chen, W.-Y.; Yang, Q.-S.; Han, L.; Tsao, S.W.; Chan, K.T.; Lee, N.P.Y.; et al. Identification of miR-29c and Its Target FBXO31 as a Key Regulatory Mechanism in Esophageal Cancer Chemoresistance: Functional Validation and Clinical Significance. Theranostics 2019, 9, 1599–1613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  172. Tan, X.; Ren, S.; Fu, M.Z.; Ren, S.; Yang, C.; Wu, X.; Chen, T.; Latham, P.S.; Meltzer, S.J.; Fu, S.W. microRNA-196b Promotes Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinogenesis and Chemoradioresistance by Inhibiting EPHA7, Thereby Restoring EPHA2 Activity. Am. J. Cancer Res. 2021, 11, 3594–3610. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  173. Odenthal, M.; Bollschweiler, E.; Grimminger, P.P.; Schröder, W.; Brabender, J.; Drebber, U.; Hölscher, A.H.; Metzger, R.; Vallböhmer, D. MicroRNA Profiling in Locally Advanced Esophageal Cancer Indicates a High Potential of miR-192 in Prediction of Multimodality Therapy Response. Int. J. Cancer 2013, 133, 2454–2463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  174. Furuke, H.; Konishi, H.; Arita, T.; Kataoka, S.; Shibamoto, J.; Takabatake, K.; Takaki, W.; Shimizu, H.; Yamamoto, Y.; Komatsu, S.; et al. Plasma microRNA-192-5p Can Predict the Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy and Prognosis in Esophageal Cancer. Cancer Sci. 2023, 114, 1686–1696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  175. Dulai, G.S.; Guha, S.; Kahn, K.L.; Gornbein, J.; Weinstein, W.M. Preoperative Prevalence of Barrett’s Esophagus in Esophageal Adenocarcinoma: A Systematic Review. Gastroenterology 2002, 122, 26–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  176. Shaheen, N.J.; Falk, G.W.; Iyer, P.G.; Gerson, L.B. ACG Clinical Guideline: Diagnosis and Management of Barrett’s Esophagus. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 2016, 111, 30–51, Erratum in Am. J. Gastroenterol. 2016, 111, 1077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  177. Kadri, S.; Lao-Sirieix, P.; Fitzgerald, R.C. Developing a Nonendoscopic Screening Test for Barrett’s Esophagus. Biomark. Med. 2011, 5, 397–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  178. Bao, C.; Li, Y.; Huan, L.; Zhang, Y.; Zhao, F.; Wang, Q.; Liang, L.; Ding, J.; Liu, L.; Chen, T.; et al. NF-κB Signaling Relieves Negative Regulation by miR-194 in Hepatocellular Carcinoma by Suppressing the Transcription Factor HNF-1α. Sci. Signal 2015, 8, ra75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  179. Krützfeldt, J.; Rösch, N.; Hausser, J.; Manoharan, M.; Zavolan, M.; Stoffel, M. MicroRNA-194 Is a Target of Transcription Factor 1 (Tcf1, HNF1α) in Adult Liver and Controls Expression of Frizzled-6. Hepatology 2012, 55, 98–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  180. Wijnhoven, B.P.L.; Hussey, D.J.; Watson, D.I.; Tsykin, A.; Smith, C.M.; Michael, M.Z. MicroRNA Profiling of Barrett’s Oesophagus and Oesophageal Adenocarcinoma. Br. J. Surg. 2010, 97, 853–861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  181. Cabibi, D.; Caruso, S.; Bazan, V.; Castiglia, M.; Bronte, G.; Ingrao, S.; Fanale, D.; Cangemi, A.; Calò, V.; Listì, A.; et al. Analysis of Tissue and Circulating microRNA Expression during Metaplastic Transformation of the Esophagus. Oncotarget 2016, 7, 47821–47830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  182. Bus, P.; Kestens, C.; Ten Kate, F.J.W.; Peters, W.; Drenth, J.P.H.; Roodhart, J.M.L.; Siersema, P.D.; van Baal, J.W.P.M. Profiling of Circulating microRNAs in Patients with Barrett’s Esophagus and Esophageal Adenocarcinoma. J. Gastroenterol. 2016, 51, 560–570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  183. Slaby, O.; Srovnal, J.; Radova, L.; Gregar, J.; Juracek, J.; Luzna, P.; Svoboda, M.; Hajduch, M.; Ehrmann, J. Dynamic Changes in microRNA Expression Profiles Reflect Progression of Barrett’s Esophagus to Esophageal Adenocarcinoma. Carcinogenesis 2015, 36, 521–527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  184. Drahos, J.; Schwameis, K.; Orzolek, L.D.; Hao, H.; Birner, P.; Taylor, P.R.; Pfeiffer, R.M.; Schoppmann, S.F.; Cook, M.B. MicroRNA Profiles of Barrett’s Esophagus and Esophageal Adenocarcinoma: Differences in Glandular Non-Native Epithelium. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev. 2016, 25, 429–437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  185. Zhang, K.; Wu, X.; Wang, J.; Lopez, J.; Zhou, W.; Yang, L.; Wang, S.E.; Raz, D.J.; Kim, J.Y. Circulating miRNA Profile in Esophageal Adenocarcinoma. Am. J. Cancer Res. 2016, 6, 2713–2721. [Google Scholar]
  186. Miyoshi, J.; Mannucci, A.; Scarpa, M.; Gao, F.; Toden, S.; Whitsett, T.; Inge, L.J.; Bremner, R.M.; Takayama, T.; Cheng, Y.; et al. Liquid Biopsy to Identify Barrett’s Oesophagus, Dysplasia and Oesophageal Adenocarcinoma: The EMERALD Multicentre Study. Gut 2025, 74, 169–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  187. Maru, D.M.; Singh, R.R.; Hannah, C.; Albarracin, C.T.; Li, Y.X.; Abraham, R.; Romans, A.M.; Yao, H.; Luthra, M.G.; Anandasabapathy, S.; et al. MicroRNA-196a Is a Potential Marker of Progression during Barrett’s Metaplasia-Dysplasia-Invasive Adenocarcinoma Sequence in Esophagus. Am. J. Pathol. 2009, 174, 1940–1948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  188. García-Castillo, J.; Martínez-Cáceres, C.M.; Bernabé-García, M.; Munitiz, V.; Ruiz de Angulo, D.; Parrilla, P.; Ortiz, Á.; Martínez de Haro, L.F.; Cayuela, M.L. MicroRNA 196a Contributes to the Aggressiveness of Esophageal Adenocarcinoma through the MYC/TERT/NFκB Axis. Mol. Oncol. 2025, 19, 3305–3324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  189. Leidner, R.S.; Ravi, L.; Leahy, P.; Chen, Y.; Bednarchik, B.; Streppel, M.; Canto, M.; Wang, J.S.; Maitra, A.; Willis, J.; et al. The MicroRNAs, MiR-31 and MiR-375, as Candidate Markers in Barrett’s Esophageal Carcinogenesis. Genes. Chromosomes Cancer 2012, 51, 473–479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  190. Fassan, M.; Volinia, S.; Palatini, J.; Pizzi, M.; Baffa, R.; De Bernard, M.; Battaglia, G.; Parente, P.; Croce, C.M.; Zaninotto, G.; et al. MicroRNA Expression Profiling in Human Barrett’s Carcinogenesis. Int. J. Cancer 2011, 129, 1661–1670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  191. Winther, M.; Alsner, J.; Tramm, T.; Baeksgaard, L.; Holtved, E.; Nordsmark, M. Evaluation of miR-21 and miR-375 as Prognostic Biomarkers in Esophageal Cancer. Acta Oncol. 2015, 54, 1582–1591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  192. Fassan, M.; Realdon, S.; Cascione, L.; Hahne, J.C.; Munari, G.; Guzzardo, V.; Arcidiacono, D.; Lampis, A.; Brignola, S.; Dal Santo, L.; et al. Circulating microRNA Expression Profiling Revealed miR-92a-3p as a Novel Biomarker of Barrett’s Carcinogenesis. Pathol. Res. Pract. 2020, 216, 152907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  193. Isidori, F.; Bozzarelli, I.; Mastracci, L.; Malvi, D.; Lugaresi, M.; Molinari, C.; Söderström, H.; Räsänen, J.; D’Errico, A.; Fiocca, R.; et al. Targeted Sequencing of Sorted Esophageal Adenocarcinoma Cells Unveils Known and Novel Mutations in the Separated Subpopulations. Clin. Transl. Gastroenterol. 2020, 11, e00202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  194. Fiocca, R.; Mastracci, L.; Lugaresi, M.; Grillo, F.; D’Errico, A.; Malvi, D.; Spaggiari, P.; Tomezzoli, A.; Albarello, L.; Ristimäki, A.; et al. The Prognostic Impact of Histology in Esophageal and Esophago-Gastric Junction Adenocarcinoma. Cancers 2021, 13, 5211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  195. Bozzarelli, I.; Orsini, A.; Isidori, F.; Mastracci, L.; Malvi, D.; Lugaresi, M.; Fittipaldi, S.; Gozzellino, L.; Astolfi, A.; Räsänen, J.; et al. miRNA-221 and miRNA-483-3p Dysregulation in Esophageal Adenocarcinoma. Cancers 2024, 16, 591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  196. Fornari, F.; Gramantieri, L.; Ferracin, M.; Veronese, A.; Sabbioni, S.; Calin, G.A.; Grazi, G.L.; Giovannini, C.; Croce, C.M.; Bolondi, L.; et al. MiR-221 Controls CDKN1C/P57 and CDKN1B/P27 Expression in Human Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Oncogene 2008, 27, 5651–5661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  197. Zhu, J.; Liu, F.; Wu, Q.; Liu, X. MiR-221 Increases Osteosarcoma Cell Proliferation, Invasion and Migration Partly through the Downregulation of PTEN. Int. J. Mol. Med. 2015, 36, 1377–1383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  198. Yang, Z.-G.; Ma, X.-D.; He, Z.-H.; Guo, Y.-X. miR-483-5p Promotes Prostate Cancer Cell Proliferation and Invasion by Targeting RBM5. Int. Braz. J. Urol. 2017, 43, 1060–1067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  199. Wu, K.; Wang, J.; He, J.; Chen, Q.; Yang, L. miR-483-3p Promotes Proliferation and Migration of Neuroblastoma Cells by Targeting PUMA. Int. J. Clin. Exp. Pathol. 2018, 11, 490–501. [Google Scholar]
  200. Chang, W.; Chang, Q.; Lu, H.; Li, Y.; Chen, C. MiR-221-3p Facilitates Thyroid Cancer Cell Proliferation and Inhibit Apoptosis by Targeting FOXP2 Through Hedgehog Pathway. Mol. Biotechnol. 2022, 64, 919–927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  201. Matsui, D.; Zaidi, A.H.; Martin, S.A.; Omstead, A.N.; Kosovec, J.E.; Huleihel, L.; Saldin, L.T.; DiCarlo, C.; Silverman, J.F.; Hoppo, T.; et al. Primary Tumor microRNA Signature Predicts Recurrence and Survival in Patients with Locally Advanced Esophageal Adenocarcinoma. Oncotarget 2016, 7, 81281–81291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  202. Wang, P.; Gong, S.; Liao, B.; Liu, J.; Zhao, L.; Yao, H.; Wu, N. miR-652-5p Promoter Hypermethylation Enhances Glioblastoma Malignancy through the SDC1/TGFβ2/pERBB4 Complex via HIF2α-Mediated Regulation under Hypoxia. Cancer Cell Int. 2025. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  203. Lai, T.; Qiu, H.; Si, L.; Zhen, Y.; Chu, D.; Guo, R. Long Noncoding RNA BMPR1B-AS1 Facilitates Endometrial Cancer Cell Proliferation and Metastasis by Sponging miR-7-2-3p to Modulate the DCLK1/Akt/NF-κB Pathway. Cell Cycle 2022, 21, 1599–1618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  204. Gu, J.; Zhang, J.; Zheng, L.; Ajani, J.A.; Wu, X.; Ye, Y. Serum miR-331-3p Predicts Tumor Recurrence in Esophageal Adenocarcinoma. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 14006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  205. Guo, X.; Guo, L.; Ji, J.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, J.; Chen, X.; Cai, Q.; Li, J.; Gu, Q.; Liu, B.; et al. miRNA-331-3p Directly Targets E2F1 and Induces Growth Arrest in Human Gastric Cancer. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2010, 398, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  206. Epis, M.R.; Giles, K.M.; Barker, A.; Kendrick, T.S.; Leedman, P.J. miR-331-3p Regulates ERBB-2 Expression and Androgen Receptor Signaling in Prostate Cancer. J. Biol. Chem. 2009, 284, 24696–24704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  207. Orlandella, F.M.; Imperlini, E.; Pane, K.; Luciano, N.; Braile, M.; De Stefano, A.E.; Iervolino, P.L.C.; Ruocco, A.; Orrù, S.; Franzese, M.; et al. miR-331-5p Affects Motility of Thyroid Cancer Cell Lines and Regulates BID Expression. Biomedicines 2024, 12, 658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  208. Jiang, F.; Zhang, L.; Liu, Y.; Zhou, Y.; Wang, H. Overexpression of miR-331 Indicates Poor Prognosis and Promotes Progression of Breast Cancer. Oncol. Res. Treat. 2020, 43, 441–448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  209. Petrick, J.L.; Pfeiffer, R.M.; Liao, L.M.; Abnet, C.C.; Wu, X.; Gammon, M.D.; Vaughan, T.L.; Cook, M.B. Circulating MicroRNAs in Relation to Esophageal Adenocarcinoma Diagnosis and Survival. Dig. Dis. Sci. 2021, 66, 3831–3841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  210. Vos, S.; Vesuna, F.; Raman, V.; van Diest, P.J.; van der Groep, P. miRNA Expression Patterns in Normal Breast Tissue and Invasive Breast Cancers of BRCA1 and BRCA2 Germ-Line Mutation Carriers. Oncotarget 2015, 6, 32115–32137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  211. Luo, Y.; Wen, X.; Wang, L.; Gao, J.; Wang, Z.; Zhang, C.; Zhang, P.; Lu, C.; Duan, L.; Tian, Y. Identification of MicroRNAs Involved in Growth Arrest and Apoptosis in Hydrogen Peroxide-Treated Human Hepatocellular Carcinoma Cell Line HepG2. Oxid. Med. Cell Longev. 2016, 2016, 7530853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  212. Qi, H.; Sun, Y.; Jiang, Y.; Li, X. Upregulation of Circular RNA Circ_0000502 Predicts Unfavorable Prognosis in Osteosarcoma and Facilitates Cell Progression via Sponging miR-1238. J. Cell. Biochem. 2019, 120, 8475–8482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  213. Yin, J.; Zeng, A.; Zhang, Z.; Shi, Z.; Yan, W.; You, Y. Exosomal Transfer of miR-1238 Contributes to Temozolomide-Resistance in Glioblastoma. eBioMedicine 2019, 42, 238–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  214. Odenthal, M.; Hee, J.; Gockel, I.; Sisic, L.; Schmitz, J.; Stoecklein, N.H.; Driemel, C.; Möhlendick, B.; Schmidt, T.; Knoefel, W.T.; et al. Serum microRNA Profiles as Prognostic/Predictive Markers in the Multimodality Therapy of Locally Advanced Adenocarcinomas of the Gastroesophageal Junction. Int. J. Cancer 2015, 137, 230–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  215. Ye, J.; Boileau, R.M.; Parchem, R.J.; Judson-Torres, R.L.; Blelloch, R. The miR-290 and miR-302 Clusters Are Essential for Reprogramming of Fibroblasts to Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells. Stem Cells 2025, 43, sxae080. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  216. Lipchina, I.; Elkabetz, Y.; Hafner, M.; Sheridan, R.; Mihailovic, A.; Tuschl, T.; Sander, C.; Studer, L.; Betel, D. Genome-Wide Identification of microRNA Targets in Human ES Cells Reveals a Role for miR-302 in Modulating BMP Response. Genes. Dev. 2011, 25, 2173–2186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  217. Liu, X.; Yu, J.; Jiang, L.; Wang, A.; Shi, F.; Ye, H.; Zhou, X. MicroRNA-222 Regulates Cell Invasion by Targeting Matrix Metalloproteinase 1 (MMP1) and Manganese Superoxide Dismutase 2 (SOD2) in Tongue Squamous Cell Carcinoma Cell Lines. Cancer Genom. Proteom. 2009, 6, 131–139. [Google Scholar]
  218. Mathé, E.A.; Nguyen, G.H.; Bowman, E.D.; Zhao, Y.; Budhu, A.; Schetter, A.J.; Braun, R.; Reimers, M.; Kumamoto, K.; Hughes, D.; et al. MicroRNA Expression in Squamous Cell Carcinoma and Adenocarcinoma of the Esophagus: Associations with Survival. Clin. Cancer Res. 2009, 15, 6192–6200, Correction in Clin. Cancer Res. 2010, 16, 1692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  219. Boult, J.K.R.; Tanière, P.; Hallissey, M.T.; Campbell, M.J.; Tselepis, C. Oesophageal Adenocarcinoma Is Associated with a Deregulation in the MYC/MAX/MAD Network. Br. J. Cancer 2008, 98, 1985–1992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  220. Ogunwobi, O.O.; Beales, I.L.P. Glycine-Extended Gastrin Stimulates Proliferation via JAK2- and Akt-Dependent NF-kappaB Activation in Barrett’s Oesophageal Adenocarcinoma Cells. Mol. Cell Endocrinol. 2008, 296, 94–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  221. Feber, A.; Xi, L.; Pennathur, A.; Gooding, W.E.; Bandla, S.; Wu, M.; Luketich, J.D.; Godfrey, T.E.; Litle, V.R. MicroRNA Prognostic Signature for Nodal Metastases and Survival in Esophageal Adenocarcinoma. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 2011, 91, 1523–1530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  222. Tanaka, N.; Minemura, C.; Asai, S.; Kikkawa, N.; Kinoshita, T.; Oshima, S.; Koma, A.; Kasamatsu, A.; Hanazawa, T.; Uzawa, K.; et al. Identification of miR-199-5p and miR-199-3p Target Genes: Paxillin Facilities Cancer Cell Aggressiveness in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Genes 2021, 12, 1910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  223. Garzon, R.; Volinia, S.; Liu, C.-G.; Fernandez-Cymering, C.; Palumbo, T.; Pichiorri, F.; Fabbri, M.; Coombes, K.; Alder, H.; Nakamura, T.; et al. MicroRNA Signatures Associated with Cytogenetics and Prognosis in Acute Myeloid Leukemia. Blood 2008, 111, 3183–3189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  224. Hu, B.; El Hajj, N.; Sittler, S.; Lammert, N.; Barnes, R.; Meloni-Ehrig, A. Gastric Cancer: Classification, Histology and Application of Molecular Pathology. J. Gastrointest. Oncol. 2012, 3, 251–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  225. Liang, Z.D.; Lippman, S.M.; Wu, T.-T.; Lotan, R.; Xu, X.-C. RRIG1 Mediates Effects of Retinoic Acid Receptor Β2 on Tumor Cell Growth and Gene Expression through Binding to and Inhibition of RhoA. Cancer Res. 2006, 66, 7111–7118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  226. Yang, Y.; Fan, X.; Ren, Y.; Wu, K.; Tian, X.; Wen, F.; Liu, D.; Fan, Y.; Zhao, S. SOX2-Upregulated microRNA-30e Promotes the Progression of Esophageal Cancer via Regulation of the USP4/SMAD4/CK2 Axis. Mol. Ther. Nucleic Acids 2020, 23, 200–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  227. Lynam-Lennon, N.; Reynolds, J.V.; Marignol, L.; Sheils, O.M.; Pidgeon, G.P.; Maher, S.G. MicroRNA-31 Modulates Tumour Sensitivity to Radiation in Oesophageal Adenocarcinoma. J. Mol. Med. 2012, 90, 1449–1458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  228. Streppel, M.M.; Pai, S.; Campbell, N.R.; Hu, C.; Yabuuchi, S.; Canto, M.I.; Wang, J.S.; Montgomery, E.A.; Maitra, A. microRNA 223 Is Upregulated in the Multistep Progression of Barrett’s Esophagus and Modulates Sensitivity to Chemotherapy by Targeting PARP1. Clin. Cancer Res. 2013, 19, 4067–4078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  229. Lynam-Lennon, N.; Bibby, B.A.S.; Mongan, A.M.; Marignol, L.; Paxton, C.N.; Geiersbach, K.; Bronner, M.P.; O’Sullivan, J.; Reynolds, J.V.; Maher, S.G. Low MiR-187 Expression Promotes Resistance to Chemoradiation Therapy In Vitro and Correlates with Treatment Failure in Patients with Esophageal Adenocarcinoma. Mol. Med. 2016, 22, 388–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  230. Lynam-Lennon, N.; Heavey, S.; Sommerville, G.; Bibby, B.A.S.; Ffrench, B.; Quinn, J.; Gasch, C.; O’Leary, J.J.; Gallagher, M.F.; Reynolds, J.V.; et al. MicroRNA-17 Is Downregulated in Esophageal Adenocarcinoma Cancer Stem-like Cells and Promotes a Radioresistant Phenotype. Oncotarget 2017, 8, 11400–11413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  231. Matuszcak, C.; Lindner, K.; Eichelmann, A.-K.; Hussey, D.J.; Haier, J.; Hummel, R. microRNAs: Key Regulators of Chemotherapy Response and Metastatic Potential via Complex Control of Target Pathways in Esophageal Adenocarcinoma. Surg. Oncol. 2018, 27, 392–401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  232. Huang, J.; Zhang, S.-Y.; Gao, Y.-M.; Liu, Y.-F.; Liu, Y.-B.; Zhao, Z.-G.; Yang, K. MicroRNAs as Oncogenes or Tumour Suppressors in Oesophageal Cancer: Potential Biomarkers and Therapeutic Targets. Cell Prolif. 2014, 47, 277–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  233. Lennox, K.A.; Behlke, M.A. Chemical Modification and Design of Anti-miRNA Oligonucleotides. Gene Ther. 2011, 18, 1111–1120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  234. Nana-Sinkam, S.P.; Croce, C.M. Clinical Applications for microRNAs in Cancer. Clin. Pharmacol. Ther. 2013, 93, 98–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  235. Lu, T.X.; Rothenberg, M.E. MicroRNA. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2018, 141, 1202–1207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  236. Weng, W.; Wu, Q.; Yu, Y.; Mei, W.; Wang, X. A Novel Chemotherapeutic Arene Ruthenium(II) Drug Rawq01 Altered the Effect of microRNA-21 on PTEN/AKT Signaling Pathway in Esophageal Cancer Cells. Anticancer Res. 2013, 33, 5407–5414. [Google Scholar]
  237. Doghish, A.S.; El-Husseiny, A.A.; Abdelmaksoud, N.M.; El-Mahdy, H.A.; Elsakka, E.G.E.; Abdel Mageed, S.S.; Mahmoud, A.M.A.; Raouf, A.A.; Elballal, M.S.; El-Dakroury, W.A.; et al. The Interplay of Signaling Pathways and miRNAs in the Pathogenesis and Targeted Therapy of Esophageal Cancer. Pathol. Res. Pract. 2023, 246, 154529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  238. Hong, D.S.; Kang, Y.-K.; Borad, M.; Sachdev, J.; Ejadi, S.; Lim, H.Y.; Brenner, A.J.; Park, K.; Lee, J.-L.; Kim, T.-Y.; et al. Phase 1 Study of MRX34, a Liposomal miR-34a Mimic, in Patients with Advanced Solid Tumours. Br. J. Cancer 2020, 122, 1630–1637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  239. Janssen, H.L.A.; Reesink, H.W.; Lawitz, E.J.; Zeuzem, S.; Rodriguez-Torres, M.; Patel, K.; van der Meer, A.J.; Patick, A.K.; Chen, A.; Zhou, Y.; et al. Treatment of HCV Infection by Targeting microRNA. N. Engl. J. Med. 2013, 368, 1685–1694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  240. van Zandwijk, N.; Pavlakis, N.; Kao, S.C.; Linton, A.; Boyer, M.J.; Clarke, S.; Huynh, Y.; Chrzanowska, A.; Fulham, M.J.; Bailey, D.L.; et al. Safety and Activity of microRNA-Loaded Minicells in Patients with Recurrent Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma: A First-in-Man, Phase 1, Open-Label, Dose-Escalation Study. Lancet Oncol. 2017, 18, 1386–1396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  241. Asakiya, C.; Zhu, L.; Yuhan, J.; Zhu, L.; Huang, K.; Xu, W. Current Progress of miRNA-Derivative Nucleotide Drugs: Modifications, Delivery Systems, Applications. Expert Opin. Drug Deliv. 2022, 19, 435–450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  242. Kuran, S.A.; Adıyıl, R.; Zıkşahna, K.; Özkan, M.; Ihlamur, M. Nanotechnology-Enabled miRNA Delivery Systems next-Generation Molecular Strategies in Cancer Therapy. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2025, 792, 152923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  243. Mayne, G.C.; Hussey, D.J.; Watson, D.I. microRNAs and Esophageal Cancer–Implications for Pathogenesis and Therapy. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2013, 19, 1211–1226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
Figure 1. Summary of miRNA dysregulation in ESCC. miRNAs that are upregulated are indicated with blue arrowheads, and miRNAs that are downregulated are indicated by pink arrowheads; these miRNAs are associated with early detection and diagnosis, progression, prognosis, and resistance or sensitivity to chemoradiotherapy in ESCC. (Created in BioRender. Cataldi-Stagetti, E. (2026) https://BioRender.com/o090zbo, accessed on 17 December 2025).
Figure 1. Summary of miRNA dysregulation in ESCC. miRNAs that are upregulated are indicated with blue arrowheads, and miRNAs that are downregulated are indicated by pink arrowheads; these miRNAs are associated with early detection and diagnosis, progression, prognosis, and resistance or sensitivity to chemoradiotherapy in ESCC. (Created in BioRender. Cataldi-Stagetti, E. (2026) https://BioRender.com/o090zbo, accessed on 17 December 2025).
Ijms 27 00878 g001
Figure 2. Summary of miRNA dysregulation in EAC. miRNAs whose expression is upregulated are indicated by blue arrowheads. miRNAs whose expression is downregulated are indicated by pink arrowheads; these miRNAs are associated with early detection and diagnosis, progression, prognosis, and resistance or sensitivity to chemoradiotherapy in EAC. (Created in BioRender. Cataldi-Stagetti, E. (2026) https://BioRender.com/o090zbo, accessed on 17 December 2025).
Figure 2. Summary of miRNA dysregulation in EAC. miRNAs whose expression is upregulated are indicated by blue arrowheads. miRNAs whose expression is downregulated are indicated by pink arrowheads; these miRNAs are associated with early detection and diagnosis, progression, prognosis, and resistance or sensitivity to chemoradiotherapy in EAC. (Created in BioRender. Cataldi-Stagetti, E. (2026) https://BioRender.com/o090zbo, accessed on 17 December 2025).
Ijms 27 00878 g002
Table 1. Key microRNAs involved in ESCC diagnosis, progression, prognosis, and therapy resistance.
Table 1. Key microRNAs involved in ESCC diagnosis, progression, prognosis, and therapy resistance.
miRNAExpression in ESCCSampleMain Targets/PathwaysFunctional RoleClinical
Relevance
References
miR-10a, miR-22, miR-100, miR-148b, miR-223, miR-133a, miR-127-3pAll upregulated (miR-223 downregulated)SerumSOX4, ARTN, VEGF-A, FGF2-FGFR2, mTOR, Wnt/β-catenin, CXCR7, PI3K/AKT, FBXW7, IGF1R, HIF-1αAngiogenesis, motility, EMT suppression, migration, proliferationDiagnostic[23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30]
miR-20b-5p, miR-28-3p, miR-192-5p, miR-296-5pAll upregulatedSerumPTEN, FBXW7 (PI3K/AKT pathway), BIM, ARF6 (Hedgehog signaling)Proliferation, migration, invasionDiagnostic[31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41]
miR-106a, miR-18a, miR-20b, miR-486-5p, and miR-584, miR-223-3pAll upregulated (miR-223-3p downregulated)SerumPTEN (PI3K/AKT pathway), CDK4, BCAS2Proliferation, cell-cycle progression, apoptosisDiagnostic[32,42,51,54,55,103,107]
miR-8073, miR-3196, miR-744-5p, miR-6820-5p, miR-6794-5p, miR-6799-5pmiR-8073, miR-3196, miR-744-5p upregulated; miR-6820-5p, miR-6794-5p, miR-6799-5p downregulatedSerumTGF-β signaling, PI3K/AKT, chromatin remodelingCell cycle regulation, angiogenesis, EMT, apoptosis, metastasisDiagnostic[43,44,45,46,47]
miR-21UpregulatedSerum/tissuePTEN, PDCD4, TPM1Proliferation, invasion, resistanceDiagnostic, prognostic, predictive[53,134,135,136,168,169,170]
miR-205-5pUpregulatedPlasmaPTEN, SMAD4,
PI3K/AKT pathway, TGF-β pathway
Proliferation, EMTDiagnostic[56,57,58,59,60]
miR-25UpregulatedSerumTGF-β, VEGF, EGFR, Wnt/β-cateninAngiogenesis, metastasisDiagnostic[61,62]
miR-1322UpregulatedSerumECRG2ProliferationDiagnostic[63,64]
miR-16-5p, miR-451a, miR-574-5pUpregulatedSerumRECK, SOX6ProliferationDiagnostic[50,65,66]
miR-375DownregulatedSerum/tissueIGF1R, PDK1 (PI3K/AKT pathway), XPR1 (BRAF-ERK1/2-p53), PRDX1Proliferation, survival, metastasisDiagnostic, progression, prognostic[48,52,56,67,68,98,99,100,101,102,103,104,105,147,148,149]
miR-216a/bDownregulatedSerumKRAS, eIF4B, ZEB1, IGF2BP2EMT, proliferationDiagnostic[70,71,72,73]
miR-613DownregulatedSerum/tissueFN1Migration, invasionDiagnostic[74,75,76,77,78]
miR-1297DownregulatedSerumEphA2MetastasisDiagnostic[79,80,81]
miR-29bDownregulatedTissueMMP2Invasion, metastasisProgression[85,86,87,88]
miR-30cDownregulatedSerum/tissueSNAI1, PI3K/AKT pathwayEMT suppressionProgression[89,90,91,92,93]
miR-150DownregulatedTissueZEB1, c-MYB, NOTCH3, CXCR4EMT/METProgression[94,95,96,97]
miR-486-5pUpregulatedSerumCDK4, BCAS2Cell-cycle progression, apoptosisProgression[34,106,107]
miR-630DownregulatedTissueSLUG, GAK, PRKCI, JAK2/STAT3 pathwayEMT, invasionProgression[108,109,110,111,112,113]
miR-718DownregulatedPlasmaVEGF, HOXB8Proliferation, invasion, angiogenesis, apoptosisProgression[114,115]
miR-9UpregulatedPlasma/tissueα-catenin, β-cateninEMT, metastasisProgression[118,119]
miR-155-5pUpregulatedTissueTP53INP1ProliferationProgression[120,121,122,123]
miR-183UpregulatedTissuePDCD4, SMAD4EMT, survivalProgression[124,125,126]
miR-367UpregulatedPlasmaRAB23ProliferationProgression[127,128]
miR-100-5p, miR-203a-3pDownregulatedTissueCXCR7, FKBP5, PI3K/AKT pathwayInvasion suppressionProgression[129,130,131,132,133]
miR-133aDownregulatedTissueSOX4, IGF14Proliferation, migration, invasionPrognostic[137,138]
miR-133bDownregulatedTissueJAK2/STAT3 pathway, SNAIL1Survival, progressionPrognostic[139,140,141]
miR-138DownregulatedSerum/tissueNF-κBProliferation, invasionPrognostic[142,143,144,145,146]
miR-1246UpregulatedSerump53 network, DYRK1AStemness, invasionPrognostic[150]
miR-655DownregulatedTissueZEB1, TGFBR2Migration, invasionPrognostic[151,152,153]
miR-203DownregulatedTissueTP63Survival, differentiationPrognostic[154]
miR-129UpregulatedTissueAPC, RAB11ProgressionPrognostic[155]
miR-296UpregulatedTissuecyclin D1, p27, MDR1 (P-gp)ProliferationPrognostic[156]
miR-142-3pUpregulatedTissueAPC, KLF4, BCL2L1ProliferationPrognostic[157]
miR-27aDownregulatedCell linesP-gp, BCL2Drug resistancePredictive[160]
miR-148aUpregulatedCell linesDNMT1, DNMT3B,
PXR
ChemosensitivityPredictive[161]
miR-141UpregulatedCell linesYAP1Cisplatin resistancePredictive[162]
miR-23aUpregulatedPlasma/tissuePTEN, CDH1, IRF1, APAF1, TOP2BChemoresistancePredictive[163]
miR-218DownregulatedCell linesSurvivinChemosensitivityPredictive[164]
miR-455-3pUpregulatedTissueWnt/β-catenin pathway, TGF-β/SMAD pathwayChemoresistancePredictive[165,166,167]
miR-29cDownregulatedSerum/tissueFBXO31ChemoresistancePredictive[171]
miR-196bUpregulatedCell linesEPHA7/EPHA2EMT, resistancePredictive[172]
miR-192-5pUpregulatedPlasmaERCC3, ERCC4Cisplatin resistancePredictive[173,174]
Table 2. Key microRNAs involved in EAC diagnosis, progression, prognosis, and therapy resistance.
Table 2. Key microRNAs involved in EAC diagnosis, progression, prognosis, and therapy resistance.
miRNAExpression in EACSampleMain Targets/PathwaysFunctional RoleClinical
Relevance
References
miR-194, miR-215, miR-143, miR-145All upregulatedSerum/TissueHNF1α, TP53Metaplasia acquisitionDiagnostic[178,179,180,181,221]
miR-203, miR-205DownregulatedTissueTP63EMTDiagnostic/progression[180,190]
miR-375DownregulatedTissue, serumPDK1, IGF1R, MXI1, JAK2ProliferationDiagnostic/progression/prognostic[183,188,218,219,220]
miR-663b, miR-421, miR-502-5pUpregulatedTissueSMAD4, PTEN, c-MYC, BCL2TumorigenesisDiagnostic[184]
miR-25, miR-151, miR-100, miR-375miR-25, miR-151 upregulated; miR-100, miR-375 downregulatedSerumCDH1, p21, Bim, PDK1, IGF1R, MXI1, JAK2Proliferation, invasionDiagnostic[185]
miR-106b, miR-146a, miR-15a, miR-18a, miR-93, miR-21-5pDysregulatedPlasmaCell-cycle regulationProliferationDiagnostic[186]
miR-196aUpregulatedTissueSPRR2C, S100A9, KRT5, NF-κB, c-MYCEMT, proliferationProgression[183,187,188]
miR-31DownregulatedTissueE2F2/CDKN2AProliferationProgression/predictive[189,227]
miR-215, miR-192, miR-205, let-7c, miR-203miR-215, miR-192 upregulated; miR-205, let-7c, miR-203 downregulated.TissueTP53, TP63, HMGA2Progression, EMTProgression[180,190]
miR-21UpregulatedTissuePDCD4, PTEN (PI3K/AKT pathway)ProliferationProgression[136,191]
miR-92a-3pUpregulatedSerum/tissuePTEN, BIM, TGF-β/SMAD pathwayEarly progressionProgression[192]
miR-221, miR-483-3pUpregulatedTissueMALAT1Invasion, recurrencePrognostic[194,195,196,197,198,199,200]
miR-652-5p, miR-7-2-3pDownregulatedTissueSDC1/TGFβ2/pERBB4, DCLK1EMT, proliferationPrognostic[201,202,203]
miR-331-3pDownregulatedSerumHER2, PI3K/AKT pathwayProliferation, migrationPrognostic[204,205,206,207,208]
miR-4253, miR-1238-5pDysregulatedSerumLHX2Proliferation, invasion, apoptosisPrognostic[209,210,211,212,213]
miR-222, miR-302cDysregulatedSerumTOB2, DAZAP2, SLAIN1, MMP1InvasionPrognostic[214,215,216,217]
miR-199a-3p, miR-199a-5pUpregulatedTissueSOX4, FXR1, PXNProliferationPrognostic[221,222,223]
miR-16-2UpregulatedTissueRAR-β2Tumor progressionPrognostic[224,225]
miR-30eUpregulatedTissueUSP4EMT, invasionPrognostic[226]
miR-148aUpregulatedCell linesMSK1, PXRChemosensitivityPredictive[161]
miR-223UpregulatedCell linesPARP1ChemosensitivityPredictive[228]
miR-187DownregulatedTissueComplement cascade (C3)CRT resistancePredictive[229]
miR-17-5pDownregulatedCell linesPRKACB C6orf120CRT resistancePredictive[230]
miR-27b-3pUpregulatedCell linesSP1, PPARγChemosensitivityPredictive[231]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Cataldi-Stagetti, E.; Governatori, G.; Orsini, A.; De Nicolo, B.; Zagari, R.M.; Bonora, E. MicroRNAs in Esophageal Cancer: Implications for Diagnosis, Progression, Prognosis and Chemoresistance. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2026, 27, 878. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms27020878

AMA Style

Cataldi-Stagetti E, Governatori G, Orsini A, De Nicolo B, Zagari RM, Bonora E. MicroRNAs in Esophageal Cancer: Implications for Diagnosis, Progression, Prognosis and Chemoresistance. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2026; 27(2):878. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms27020878

Chicago/Turabian Style

Cataldi-Stagetti, Erica, Giulia Governatori, Arianna Orsini, Bianca De Nicolo, Rocco Maurizio Zagari, and Elena Bonora. 2026. "MicroRNAs in Esophageal Cancer: Implications for Diagnosis, Progression, Prognosis and Chemoresistance" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 27, no. 2: 878. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms27020878

APA Style

Cataldi-Stagetti, E., Governatori, G., Orsini, A., De Nicolo, B., Zagari, R. M., & Bonora, E. (2026). MicroRNAs in Esophageal Cancer: Implications for Diagnosis, Progression, Prognosis and Chemoresistance. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 27(2), 878. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms27020878

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop