Next Article in Journal
Nrf2 Is Associated with Metastasis-Related Processes in a Chemoresistant Breast Cancer Model: Insights from siRNA Modulation
Previous Article in Journal
Searching for New Pharmacological Treatments of Alcohol Use Disorder (AUD): Focus on GLP–1 Receptor Agonists
Previous Article in Special Issue
Correction: Tongta et al. Neurobiological Mechanisms and Therapeutic Potential of Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists in Binge Eating Disorder: A Narrative Review. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26, 10974
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Efavirenz-Altered Gut-Microbiota, Tph1, and Systemic 5-HT Levels: Could They Affect Depression Mechanisms in Mice?

by
Sandra Angélica Rojas-Osornio
1,†,
Vladimir Paredes-Cervantes
2,†,
María Magdalena Aguirre-García
3,
Minerva Crespo-Ramírez
4,
Claudia C. Márquez-Mota
5,
Raquel Aguilar-Rosales
3,
José Moisés Talamantes-Gómez
5,
Alma Reyna Escalona-Montaño
3,
Águeda García-Pérez
5,
Miguel Pérez de la Mora
4,
Dasiel O. Borroto-Escuela
6,7,
Leticia Manuel-Apolinar
8,
Gilberto Pérez-Sánchez
9,
Salvador Vazquez-Vega
10,
Ricardo Martínez-Lara
11 and
Emiliano Tesoro-Cruz
11,*
1
Academia de Bioquímica Médica II, Departamento de Formación Básica Disciplinaria, Escuela Superior de Medicina, Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Mexico City 11340, Mexico
2
Laboratorio Central, Hospital de Especialidades “Dr. Antonio Fraga Mouret”, Centro Médico Nacional “LaRaza”, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Mexico City 02990, Mexico
3
Unidad de Investigación UNAM-INC, División de Investigación, Facultad de Medicina, Instituto Nacional de Cardiología Ignacio Chávez, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City 14080, Mexico
4
Division de Neurociencias, Instituto de Fisiología Celular, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City 04510, Mexico
5
Departamento de Nutrición Animal y Bioquímica, Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria y Zootécnia, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City 02990, Mexico
6
Receptomics and Signaling Networks in Brain Diseases (Group C22), Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Málaga y Plataforma en Nanomedicina−IBIMA Plataforma BIONAND., 29010 Malaga, Spain
7
Receptomics & Brain Disorders Laboratory, Department of Human Physiology and Physical Education and Sport Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Malaga, 29010 Malaga, Spain
8
Unidad de Investigación Médica en Enfermedades Endocrinas, Hospital de Especialidades, Centro Médico Nacional “Siglo XXI”, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Mexico City 06720, Mexico
9
Laboratorio de Psicoinmunología, Dirección de Investigaciones Biomédicas en Salud Mental, Instituto Nacional de Psiquiatría Ramón de la Fuente Muñiz, Mexico City 14370, Mexico
10
Unidad de Investigación Epidemiológica y en Servicios de Salud, Centro Médico Nacional “Siglo XXI”, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Mexico City 06720, Mexico
11
Unidad de Investigación Biomédica en Inmunología e Infectología, del Hospital de Infectología del Centro Médico Nacional “La Raza” IMSS, Mexico City 02990, Mexico
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2026, 27(10), 4504; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms27104504
Submission received: 12 April 2026 / Revised: 7 May 2026 / Accepted: 12 May 2026 / Published: 18 May 2026
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Research in Gut Microbiota–Gut–Brain Axis)

Abstract

The gut microbiota produces molecules that trigger responses at the local and distant levels. It affects the brain through several metabolic products, including serotonin (5-HT). Tryptophan hydroxylase type 1 (Tph1) is the rate-limiting enzyme during 5-HT biosynthesis in the gut. Efavirenz (EFV), an antiretroviral agent against HIV, is associated with depression disorders and Tryptophan hydroxylase type 2 (Tph2) deregulation in mice. The possible association between the depressive effects of EFV secondary to dysbiosis and the expression of Tph1 in the intestine is yet to be studied. Therefore, we aimed to elucidate the role of the gut microbiota in depression mechanisms. We reviewed the gut microbiota, their metabolites (short-chain fatty acids [SCFA]), Tph1 expression in the gut, and systemic 5-HT and tryptophan levels in CD1 mice after 36 days of oral EFV (10 mg/kg) treatment. The proportions of Bacteroidota and Bacillota_A_368345 decreased and increased, respectively, following EFV treatment. Additionally, the abundance of Lactobacillus spp. and Faecalbaculum decreased, whereas that of Dubosiella spp., Blautia_A_141780, and Anaerostipes increased. These bacteria contribute to SCFA production and may have counteracted the lack of protective effects provided by Lactobacillus. Tph1 expression was dysregulated in the gut, whereas serum 5-HT levels decreased following EFV treatment. Lactobacillus species promote 5-HT production in the gut, and the deregulation of Tph1 affects 5-HT synthesis. This disruption in the gut–brain axis decreased peripheral 5-HT levels. This affects the serotonergic system in the brain, which could contribute to depression.

1. Introduction

The gut microbiota is considered a virtual endocrine organ. It produces molecules that can interact with the host physiology to trigger responses at local and distant levels, owing to its bidirectional role in regulating the function of several organs. Multiple factors affect its composition (diet, lifestyle, and drugs). Alterations in the composition of the intestinal microbiota (dysbiosis) are associated with extra-digestive diseases, such as metabolic, immunological, cardiovascular, and neuropsychiatric disorders [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10].
The presence of certain bacteria is associated with inflammatory molecules that can trigger a cascade of inflammatory pathways involving immune cells, such as macrophages and neutrophils, producing pro-inflammatory factors, including interleukins and other cytokines, which are triggered by bacterial structural elements (such as lipopolysaccharide) [11]. Similarly, byproducts of bacterial metabolic processes, including short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) such as butyrate, propionate, and acetate, can help inhibit inflammatory processes [11,12].
Dysbiosis in the brain facilitates the release of neurotransmitters and cytokines that cause neuroinflammation and are related to the pathogenesis of neuropsychiatric diseases [13] and depressive symptoms. These inflammatory molecules are associated with a decrease in distinct microbial groups, such as the genera Dialister, Bifidobacterium, Coprococcus, and Lactobacillus [14,15].
The biological mechanisms underlying the depressive effects of efavirenz (EFV) secondary to dysbiosis remain largely understudied. However, many of these bacteria are involved in the synthesis of glutamate, butyrate, serotonin (5-HT), and gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA), which are key to the mechanism of depression [16,17].
Gao et al. [18,19] revealed that changes in the gut microbiota composition affect the gut–brain axis by modulating tryptophan metabolism. Products of tryptophan metabolism, such as 5-HT, have profound effects on the interaction between the gut microbiota and the gut–brain axis [20,21].
EFV, a non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor, has been the first-line component of antiretroviral therapy (ART) worldwide for several years. However, 25–40% of treated people living with HIV (PLWH) have reported abnormal dreams, insomnia, mood disturbances, nervousness, anxiety, depression, and dizziness in clinical studies; similar results have been observed in murine models [22,23,24]. Moreover, this drug affects brain energy metabolism dysfunction, especially in the cerebral cortex, striatum, and hippocampus of mice [25,26]. Alterations in monoamine turnover, as well as GABA and glutamate levels, have also been reported in the rat striatum after oral administration of EFV [27].
Acute administration of EFV damages the blood–brain barrier (BBB) through various secondary mechanisms; it induces endoplasmic reticulum stress, along with mitochondrial and autophagy dysfunction [28]. Huang et al. [28] also observed a significant increase in the levels of proinflammatory cytokines (IL-6, IL-1β, and IL-8) and NOS2 in the brain after 24 and 48 h of exposure to EFV. Similarly, we previously reported Tryptophan hydroxylase type 2 (Tph2) dysregulation in the brainstem, amygdala, and hypothalamus of mice after chronic oral administration of EFV, which resulted in increased 5-HT levels in the amygdala [29].
Ray et al. [30] reported the effects of EFV on the intestinal microbiota. High concentrations inhibited the growth of Enterococcus faecalis (100%), Bacteroides (75%), and Prevotella (100%) [30]. Furthermore, ART did not reverse HIV-induced gut microbiome dysbiosis and may have aggravated microbiota alterations, owing due to the antibacterial effect of EFV [30]. Research suggests that EFV damages intestinal crypts, reduces the number of protective goblet cells, and lowers the expression of intestinal tight junction molecules, such as zonula occludens-1. EFV causes gut dysbiosis and significantly increases gut permeability [31].
Tryptophan hydroxylase 1 (Tph1) is a crucial enzyme for 5-HT biosynthesis in the peripheral tissues of the body, such as the intestine and skin. It differs from tryptophan hydroxylase 2 (Tph2), which is mainly found in the brain. This enzyme catalyzes the rate-limiting step in 5-HT synthesis by converting the amino acid tryptophan (Trp) to 5-hydroxytryptophan [32,33,34].
The possible association between the depressive effects conferred by EFV secondary to dysbiosis and the expression of Tph1 in the intestine remains largely understudied. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate alterations in the gut microbiota, their metabolites (short-chain fatty acids, SCFAs), Tph1 expression in the gut, and systemic 5-HT and Trp levels after oral administration of EFV to assess its role in the mechanism of depression in mice.

2. Results

2.1. Characterization of the Gut Microbiota

Taxonomic composition of the microbiota at the phylum and genus level following oral administration of EFV in CD1 mice is shown in Figure 1. At the phylum level, the EFV group had a lower proportion of Bacteroidota and a higher proportion of Bacillota_A_368345 than the control group. At the genus level, a decrease in Lactobacillus spp. and Faecalbaculum, and an increase in Dubosiella spp., were observed in the EFV group compared to those in the control group. Blautia_A_141780 and Anaerostipes were also detected in the EFV group (Figure 1).

2.2. Comparative Analysis of Intestinal Microbial Diversity

Comparative analysis of intestinal microbial diversity between the control and EFV groups showed no significant differences in alpha and beta diversity (Figure 2).

2.3. Exploratory Analysis Using Heat Maps

Correlation analysis of the bacterial genera and experimental variables using heat maps revealed differences in the abundance profiles of some bacterial genera. Dendrograms show the hierarchical grouping of taxa according to abundance profiles. In particular, the most abundant phylum was Bacillota. At the genus level, Lactobacillus and Dubosiella were more abundant in the control and EFV groups, respectively. However, these variations between groups were not statistically significant (Figure 3).

2.4. Short Chain Fatty Acids (SCFA)

Figure 4 shows the SCFA contents of mice treated with EFV and control groups (n = 3 per group). All SCFA concentrations increased in the EFV group, except for that of isovaleric acid, which decreased (Welch’s t-test, F = 15.602,2; p < 0.01).

2.5. Effect of EFV on Tph1 Expression in the Gut, and on Serum 5-HT and Trp Levels

Real-time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) was performed after 36 days of antiretroviral treatment to determine Tph1 mRNA expression (n = 3), whereas ELISA was performed to determine serum 5-HT (n = 3) and Trp (n = 5) levels in CD1 mice. Unpaired t-tests with Welch’s correction analysis revealed significant differences in Tph1 expression after EFV (F2,2 = 2.443; p < 0.01) (Figure 5A) and 5-HT (F2,2 = 229, p < 0.01) treatments (Figure 5B). Trp levels did not differ between groups (F4,4 = 2.822; p > 0.05) (Figure 5B).

3. Discussion

EFV is used to treat HIV. However, it causes depression and other neuropsychiatric effects such as anxiety, insomnia, vivid dreams, and depression [24,27]. Although its main function is to block HIV replication, this drug has a considerable effect on the central nervous system (CNS), demonstrating its ability to cross the BBB [28].
However, the mechanism by which EFV causes depression remains unclear. Several studies have sought to elucidate these mechanisms. For instance, Zareifopoulos et al. [35] reported interactions with 5-HT receptors such as 5-HT2A. The chemical structure of EFV is similar to that of hallucinogenic compounds such as lysergic acid diethylamide, which are closely linked to the regulation of mood and perception [35].
Apostolova et al. [36] reported alterations in the function of mitochondria in neurons, causing toxicity. Moreover, cellular energy production and oxidative stress processes are affected in the brain. Cavalcante et al. [37] reported destabilization of the neurotransmitter systems of 5-HT or norepinephrine, unlike common antidepressants that increase the levels these neurotransmitters, leading to anxiety, insomnia, and depression. Furthermore, other studies have suggested that certain byproducts of EFV (active metabolites) that form in the body are more toxic to brain cells than the drug itself [38]. Similarly, our group reported that EFV triggers the dysregulation of Tph2 in the three serotonergic areas studied, and that 5-HT levels increased in the amygdala. Anxiety and depression-like behaviors have also been observed in mice [29].
Animal and human studies of the microbiome after EFV administration, particularly in the context of ART, have indicated that EFV-based regimens induce considerable gut dysbiosis. This dysbiosis is characterized by reduced bacterial diversity, specific microbial shifts, and compromised integrity of the intestinal barrier [30]. When gut dysbiosis occurs, it generally triggers a pro-inflammatory state characterized by increased intestinal permeability; elevated systemic inflammatory markers, including C-reactive protein, lipopolysaccharides, and LPS-binding protein; and heightened inflammatory cytokines as IL-6, TNF-alpha, IL-1β, and IL-17. Moreover, beneficial bacteria that produce anti-inflammatory compounds decrease whereas harmful bacteria (pathobionts) flourish and release toxins that trigger systemic inflammation [39].
These changes are often more pronounced with newer agents such as dolutegravir (DTG). In a recent study by Huang et al. [31] EFV treatment in mice resulted in the destruction of intestinal crypts, loss of goblet cells, and more severe damage to gut barrier integrity than in the DTG and normal control groups. In contrast, the same research group identified a significant reduction in Lactobacillus abundance in EFV-treated mice. This was consistent with our results in which mice from the EFV group showed a decrease in Lactobacillus spp. (Figure 1B). Moreover, murine studies have revealed a correlation between a reduction in Lactobacillus species and increased neuroinflammation, higher levels of kynurenine, and behavioral despair. Conversely, dietary supplementation with Lactobacillus can reverse these behaviors and reduce neuroinflammation [40,41].
Several studies have identified the mechanisms by which Lactobacillus affects depression and directly acts on the brain: (i) neurotransmitter regulation—some Lactobacillus strains facilitate the synthesis of essential chemicals such as 5-HT and dopamine [42]; (ii) stress management—Lactobacillus help regulate the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal axis, which reduces cortisol levels, consequently improving resilience to stressful situations [43]; (iii) inflammation reduction—which is often linked to systemic inflammation. Lactobacillus helps maintain the integrity of the intestinal barrier, thereby preventing inflammatory substances from entering the bloodstream and affecting the brain [44]; and (iv) GABA receptor modulation—specific Lactobacillus strains minimize neuronal activity and reduce anxiety [45].
The gut microbiota, particularly Lactobacillus, enhances 5-HT synthesis by modulating Trp metabolism. Trp is a biosynthetic precursor of several microbial metabolites [46]. A decrease in Lactobacillus in the EFV group (Figure 1B) impaired this process, leading to lower systemic 5-HT levels (Figure 5B). This is consistent with the findings of Da Fonseca et al. [47], who reported a connection of the Trp–5-HT–Microbiota Axis. These results indicate that the gut microbiota, particularly Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium, enhances 5-HT synthesis by modulating Trp metabolism. In the present study, we evaluated systemic Trp levels in mice but did not observe changes between groups (F4,4 = 2.822, p > 0.05) (Figure 5B). However, we expected an increase in Trp levels because Tph1 was dysregulated, possibly resulting in an excess of Trp (because it had not been used for 5-HT synthesis). Therefore, Trp may have been insufficiently detected during ELISA, although it showed a slight upward trend (Figure 5B). This could be considered a limitation of our study and suggests a need for the measurement of Trp using HPLC in future studies.
In addition to a decrease in the abundance of Lactobacillus spp., we detected a decrease in Faecalbaculum in the EFV group. Faecalbaculum is a genus of Gram-positive, strictly anaerobic, non-motile bacteria belonging to the family Erysipelotrichaceae. Its principal species is Faecalibaculum rodentium, which prevents intestinal tumors by regulating epithelial homeostasis in mice. Zagato et al. [48] reported that F. rodentium is an endogenous member of the murine microbiota. It can prevent the growth of intestinal tumors in both mice and humans, highlighting its potential for translational applications [48].
Lower and higher proportions of Bacteroidota and Bacillota_A_368345, respectively, were observed in the EFV group. The low abundance of Bacteroidota in the gut microbiota is often referred to as dysbiosis and is commonly associated with obesity, inflammatory bowel disease, and reduced dietary fiber breakdown. These bacteria are essential for gut health, and their decline can reduce the ability to metabolize fats and complex sugars, thereby affecting metabolic health. This is consistent with our recent study, wherein EFV-treated mice showed a decrease in body weight. This occurred despite increased food intake resulting from appetite stimulation by specific compounds, hormones, and neural signals acting on the brain’s hunger centers, primarily in the hypothalamus, to promote eating behaviors. Furthermore, an increase in serum triglyceride and cholesterol levels was detected [49].
Bacillota spp. are involved in nutrient fermentation, production of SCFAs such as acetate and butyrate, and regulation of intestinal metabolism. Their participation also affects gut–brain communication and metabolic, immunological, and neurological processes [50]. This concept could be related to our results, in which all SCFA (acetic, propionic, isobutyric, butyric, and valeric acids) measured increased in the EFV group, with the exception of isovaleric acid (Figure 4).
SCFAs are the products of bacterial fermentation in the colon and are directly related to bacterial growth. They have different effects on genes that regulate cell proliferation, the cell cycle, and anti-inflammatory effects [51], which constitute a link in distant organs. The observed increase in acetic acid (Figure 4), a product of the alcoholic fermentation of bacteria (for example, Bacteroides), could be related to oxidative stress—a known effect of EFV on neurons. Acetate can generate oxidative stress and increase the sympathetic response [52]. The increase in propionic acid levels (Figure 4) could be related to the EFV-induced emotional imbalance at the amygdala level. In a study on the effect of acute administration of low doses of propionic acid on social behavior, anxiety-like behavior, and the structure/ultrastructure of the central nucleus of the amygdala in adolescent male Wistar rats, even a single and relatively low dose of propionic acid was sufficient to produce fast and relatively long-lasting (48 h after treatment) decreases in social motivation and structural alterations in the amygdala [53].
The final numbers in ‘Bacillota_A_368345’ (i.e., 368345) often act as a unique identifier of a group of uncultured or poorly characterized bacteria within the class Clostridia or Bacilli in sequencing databases (such as EzBioCloud or NCBI) for a specific strain, operon, or taxon in 16S rRNA analysis. Aires and Souza [54] examined the composition of the microbial community. Specific taxa under the designation “Bacillota A 368345” were identified, suggesting an adaptation to specific organic matter conditions in industrial wastewater. However, no precise information was found to explain the increase in this bacterium. Therefore, further research is required.
Our results also indicated an increase in Dubosiella spp., Blautia_A_141780, and Anaerostipes compared with those in the control group (Figure 1A). Dubosiella spp. participate in nutrient metabolism, thereby contributing to the production of bacterial metabolites, such as butyrate and acetate, which improve the symptoms of depression and anxiety. It is considered a beneficial bacterium within the gut–brain axis [55]. This aligns with our findings regarding the increases in acetate and butyrate levels (Figure 4).
Blautia can ferment fiber and produce acetate, butyrate, and lactate. These metabolites have anti-inflammatory properties that protect the blood–brain barrier. Additionally, this bacterium affects the production of neurotransmitters that are essential for mood and helps reduce systemic inflammation—a factor closely linked to the pathophysiology of depression [56]. Specifically, higher levels of Blautia_A_141780 were often associated with better mental health and fewer depressive symptoms. People diagnosed with major depressive disorder often show a significant decrease in Blautia abundance compared to healthy individuals [56,57].
Anaerostipes, a butyrate-producing bacterium, is a beneficial component of the gut microbiota. It belongs to the Lachnospiraceae family (Firmicutes phylum) and is highly regarded for its metabolic flexibility and ability to ferment carbohydrates, lactate, and acetate to produce butyrate in the colon. Butyrate exhibits potent anti-inflammatory properties and protects the intestinal barrier. Thus, its decline has been directly linked to the presence of depressive symptoms [58]. Moreover, a reduction in the levels of butyrate-producing bacteria is frequently observed in patients with depression [58,59]. This is consistent with our findings that showed an increase in SCFA concentrations (Figure 4).
In summary, the low proportion of Lactobacillus in this study may have been offset by an increase in other bacterial groups, such Dubosiella, Blautia, and Anaerostipes. These bacteria contribute to the production of metabolites such as propionate, butyrate, and acetate, which improve the symptoms of depression and anxiety. These bacterial groups likely counteracted the lack of protective effects of Lactobacillus (neurotransmitter regulation, stress management, inflammation reduction, maintaining the integrity of the intestinal barrier, and preventing brain damage). Although the underlying biological mechanisms remain largely understudied, many of these bacteria are involved in the synthesis of glutamate, butyrate, 5-HT, dopamine (DA), and GABA, which are key neurotransmitters in depression [16]. These neurotransmitters are essential transducers of the gut–brain axis and play critical roles both peripherally and centrally.
DA plays a complex, indirect role in enhancing EFV’s impact on the BBB and HIV entry into the CNS, primarily by increasing BBB permeability and promoting the migration of infected immune cells. Although DA does not readily cross the BBB, elevated extracellular DA levels increase BBB permeability and HIV-infected cell transmigration [60].
Regarding our SCFA results coincided with increases in the abundance of bacterial groups, such Dubosiella, Blautia, and Anaerostipes, which contribute to the production of metabolites such as propionate, butyrate, and acetate. However, the correlation analysis of bacterial genera and experimental variables using heat maps (Figure 3) showed no statistically significant differences.
In the present study, Tph1 deregulation reduced peripheral 5-HT levels in EFV-treated mice (Figure 5B). This indicates the failure of the serotonergic system, likely driven by gut-level Tph1 deregulation and microbial shifts. The signal may reach the CNS via SCFAs and not the produced neurotransmitters. However, these can act on neurons in the digestive tract, consequently regulating mood, anxiety, and depression. Peripheral 5-HT also increases nutrient absorption and storage, regulates the composition of the gut microbiota, and participates in mediating neuronal disorders [61].
In addition, we previously reported the deregulation of Tph2 in the brains of mice after EFV administration [29], including behavioral assays, such as the forced swim test, in which mice revealed a significant increase in immobility time in the EFV-treated group [29], and in the sucrose preference test, mice showed an increased preference for sucrose compared with control mice (day 1: Welch’s t test F4,4 = 1.114; p < 0.01; day 2: Welch’s t test F4,4 = 1.646; p < 0.01) [49]. This information can directly contribute to our understanding of the mechanisms underlying depression in the CNS.
Finally, the gut microbiota affects the brain and may be involved in neuropsychiatric disorders, partly by modulating the availability circulating SCFAs and 5-HT production Tph1 in the gut and Tph2 in the brain. This research was considered a descriptive study, since behavioral experiments were not carried out at the same time as the analytes of this work were measured; however, behavioral experiments with this drug were previously analyzed under the same conditions reported by our group [29,49].
Limitations: The main limitation of this study was the small sample size, which was insufficient to detect significant differences in microbiota analysis. Additionally, we acknowledge the reduced statistical power as a limitation due to the small number of mice per test. Tryptophan (Trp) measurements were performed by ELISA, but this technique was insufficiently sensitive to detect Trp levels compared with HPLC. Therefore, future studies should use more animals to clarify those points and to measure Trp by HPLC.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Mice and Ethical Considerations

Thirty-six mice from a local colony at the Instituto de Fisiología Celular, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (UNAM) were used. Adult CD1 male mice (weighing 40–44 g, 12–14 weeks old) were maintained under controlled conditions (12/12 h dark-light cycle, lights on 8:00–20:00, and at a temperature of 22 °C). The mice were divided into two groups: the control and EFV-treated groups, with 18 mice per group (n = 36). Mice were housed in groups of six in filter-top cages (17.8 × 30.5 × 12.7 cm) and provided food (LabDiet 5001 PMI., Laboratory Rodent Diet, LabDiet, Hayward, CA, USA) and water ad libitum. This study was conducted in accordance with the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals established by Mexican Animal Welfare and Ethical Authorities [62], the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals, 8th Edition [63] and the ARRIVE guidelines [64]. The Ethics Animal Experiments Committee of Instituto de Fisiología Celular, UNAM (MPM206-22).and the National Scientific Research Committee (IMSS) (license number R-2021-785-057).

4.2. Pharmacological Treatment

The treatment group received EFV (SUSTIVA. tablets, 600 mg; Bristol-Myers Squibb Pharma, Montreal, QC, Canada) (10 mg/kg for 36 days) [65] and the control group received distilled water (1.5 μL/kg). EFV and distilled water were rapidly and gently administered into the mouth using a metal cannula (mouse oral gavage of 3.0 mm diameter, 1.2 mm curve, and 55 mm length for the 18G syringe, Ketu Store, Perth, Australia) attached to a syringe. The animals were weighed daily, and the drug volumes were adjusted to the animal weights to avoid toxic effects. EFV was administered orally once a day for 36 days (for chronic administration) at a dose of 10 mg/kg, as previously reported [61]; and based on the doses used for human therapy (dose: 600 mg daily), as reported previously [29,36,49,66].

4.3. Intestinal Preparation Techniques for qPCR Analysis

The procedure used to obtain mouse intestines was performed rapidly to prevent tissue degradation. Each mouse was euthanized using an overdose of ketamine (60 mg/kg) (KETANIL, 10 mL solution; Wildlife Pharmaceuticals, Mexico City, Mexico) and xylazine (6 mg/kg) (PROCIN, 25-mL solution; PiSA Agropecuaria S.A. de C. V., Jalisco, Mexico) via intraperitoneal (IP) injection. The skin of the lower abdomen was lifted with forceps, and a V-shaped or longitudinal incision was made using scissors to expose the peritoneum and abdominal cavity. The stomach and anus were examined to extract the intestines. The junction of the pylori and the ileum terminus was cut, and the small intestine was gently pulled out of the abdominal cavity. Curved forceps were used to grasp and carefully remove the mesentery (the membrane with fat and blood vessels connecting the intestinal loops). A portion of the small intestine was cut below the pyloric sphincter (stomach) and above the cecum to separate the intestine from the colon. After extraction, the intestinal lumen was washed by inserting a needle with a syringe containing cold sterile phosphate-buffered saline at one end of the segment and pressing to remove fecal content and mucus. Each portion of intestine (1.0–1.5 cm) was placed in a 1.5-mL conical microtube with mRNA preservation buffer solution (RNA Stabilization Reagent; Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) (150–250 µL) and stored at −80 °C until use.

4.4. RNA Preparation and Tph1 Expression via qPCR Analysis

For qPCR analysis of Tph1 expression in the gut, frozen gut tissue was powdered and total RNA was extracted using an RNeasy Mini Kit according to the manufacturer’s protocol (Qiagen, Valencia, CA, USA). qPCR analysis was performed using an Applied Biosystems 7300 Real-Time PCR system (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) in a 25 μL reaction mixture containing 100 pg of template RNA. PCR was performed using a One-Step RT- PCR Kit (Applied Biosystems) for Tph1 (Mm01202614_M1) and the beta-actin (Actb) (Mm02619580_G1) TaqMan probes. Actb was used as the reference gene. qPCR was performed in triplicate. Reverse transcription was performed at 45 °C for 10 min, followed by inactivation at 95 °C for 10 min and 40 cycles of amplification at 95 °C for 15 s. Annealing was performed at 60 °C for 45 s. The relative amount of mRNA in each sample was calculated using the comparative ΔCt method.

4.5. Fecal Sampling for Gut Microbiota Analyses

Fecal sampling from eight mice (four control and four EFV-treated) for microbiota studies (16S rRNA, metagenomics) required strict procedures to avoid cross-contamination and ensure the preservation of microorganisms. This analysis was performed at the end of chronic administration of EFV to mice, including those in the control group. All animals were euthanized with an overdose of ketamine (60 mg/kg) (KETANIL, 10-mL solution; Wildlife Pharmaceuticals) and xylazine (6 mg/kg) (PROCIN, 25-mL solution; PiSA Agropecuaria S.A. de C. V.) via IP injection. Aseptic dissection was performed after the animals were euthanized. Briefly, a fecal sample was obtained directly from the junction of the colon and anus, which was cut. The large intestine was gently obtained, and fecal samples from each mouse were placed in two 1.5 mL cryotubes (800–1000 mg per sample). One microtube was used for each laboratory technique (one for SCFA measurement and another for microbiota analysis). The cryotubes were labeled and immediately placed in a Styrofoam box with dry ice. Subsequently, they were stored at −80 °C until use.

4.6. Measurements of Serum Serotonin and Tryptophan Levels by ELISA

Serum serotonin (5-HT) levels were measured using a commercial mouse 5-HT ELISA kit (Cat. No: MBS1601042; My-BioSource, San Diego, CA, USA).
5-HT quantification was performed in triplicate according to the manufacturer’s protocol, and the plate was read spectrophotometrically using an ELISA reader (Thermo Scientific TM, Kennesaw, GA, USA) at 450 nm. The serum 5-HT concentration is expressed in ng/mL.
Serum Trp levels were measured by using a commercial Mouse Trp ELISA kit (Cat. No: MBS008614; My-BioSource, San Diego, CA, USA). Trp quantification was performed in triplicate according to the manufacturer’s instructions, and the plate was read spectrophotometrically at 450 nm using an ELISA reader (Thermo Scientific TM, Kennesaw, GA, USA). The serum Trp concentration is expressed in µg/mL.

4.7. DNA Extraction and 16S rRNA Sequencing

DNA was extracted from fecal samples using the QIAamp PowerFecal Pro DNA kit (QIAGEN). The DNA concentration, purity, and integrity were verified using a spectrophotometer (Nanodrop 1000, ThermoFisher, Waltham, MA, USA) and gel electrophoresis (ChemiDoc Image System; Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA). The extracted DNA was sent to Novogene for library preparation and sequencing on a NovaSeq 6000 PE250 platform (Illumina, San Diego, CA, USA). The V3–175 V4 hypervariable region of the 16S rRNA gene was amplified using the primer pairs 341F176 (CCTAYGGGRBGCASCAG) and 806R (GGACTACNNGGTATCTAAT).

4.8. Measurement of SCFAs in Fecal Samples

Once the sample was thawed, 500 mg of feces were weighed into a 2.0 mL conical tube and 500 µL of 0.1 M HCl was added, followed by shaking in a minivortex (Heathrow Scientific. SGS, Vernon Hills, IL, USA) for 3 min to integrate the solution with the sample. Next, 500 µL of 0.1 M HCl was added and homogenized with a Scientific Industries SiTM model SI-D238 disruptor, Bohemia, NY 11716 U.S.A. (USA) at 60 Hz for 5 min. The samples were subsequently placed in a Scientific Multifunctional Ultrasonic Cleaner model CS-UB100 ultrasonic bath at a frequency of 40 kHz for 7 min and subsequently centrifuged at 3000 rpm for 15 min in a Heathrow Scientific model Sprout TM centrifuge (Vernon Hills, IL, USA). Finally, the supernatant was filtered using a hydrophilic nylon acrodisc (25 mm diameter, 45 µm pore; Nylon Syringe filter’ Membrane Solutions). The filtered liquid was placed in a 2.0 mL HPLC vial and refrigerated for subsequent injection into the gas chromatograph.

4.9. Preparation of the SCFA Curve

A calibration curve was prepared using a WSFA-2 standard (SUPELCO 4-7056; Sigma-Aldrich, Bellefonte, PA, USA). EC Number 23 17912 CAS-No 7732185. for each volatile fatty acid, with a concentration range of 0.2–1.0 µg/µL [67]. The standard contained 0.1% of each volatile fatty acid, equivalent to 1 µg/µL. Six calibration points were prepared (0.1, 0.2, 0.4, 0.6, 0.8, and 1.0 µg/µL). Aliquots of 50, 100, 200, 300, 400, and 500 µL were diluted to 500 µL. Finally, 1 µL from each point was injected.

4.10. SCFA Quantification

One microliter (split mode) of the filtrate was injected into an AutoSystem XL gas chromatograph (PerkinElmer Instruments, New York, NY, USA). The operating conditions were as follows: injector temperature, 190 °C; flame ionization detector temperature, 250 °C; oven at 80 °C, with an initial temperature gradient program of 80 °C for 1 min, increasing at 15 °C/min until reaching 200 °C at 4 min; the total run time was 14 min. The carrier gas (nitrogen), hydrogen, and air flow rates were 1, 45, and 450 mL/min, respectively. Volatile fatty acids were quantified using a 30 m long, 0.53 mm diameter DB-FFAP column (PN-125-3232, Agilent J&W GC Columns; Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) with a film thickness of 1.00 µm.

4.11. Bioinformatics and Statistical Analysis

Data analysis was performed using the QIIME2 platform (version 2024.10), complemented by statistical analyses and visualizations in RStudio (version 4.5.1). FASTQ files derived from 16S rRNA gene sequencing were organized and imported into QIIME2. The DADA2 algorithm was applied for noise reduction, error correction, generation of representative sequences, and for filtering out scarce sequences. Taxonomic assignment was performed using a Naive Bayes classifier trained with the Greengenes2 database (version 2024.09) and Scikit-learn (version 1.4.2). Bar charts were generated to represent taxonomic composition at the phylum and genus levels. Representative sequences were aligned using multiple alignments with fast Fourier transform, non-informative regions were masked, and a phylogenetic tree was constructed using FastTree. Shannon, Faith’s phylogenetic diversity, Chao1, and observed feature indices were calculated for alpha diversity analysis. Differences between the groups were assessed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Beta diversity was analyzed using the Bray–Curtis index and permutational multivariate analysis of variance (999 permutations). The distances between communities were visualized using principal coordinate analysis. Rarefaction was performed at a sampling depth of 157,000 sequences/sample. The output results of QIIME2 were complemented with additional analyses in RStudio: relative abundance graphs (most abundant phyla and genera), statistical comparisons between groups (Wilcoxon), heat maps to explore correlations between bacterial genera and experimental variables (relative abundance and data transformed to base 10 logarithm), and volcano plots generated with DESeq2 to detect differentially abundant genera.
The statistical analyses for gut Tph1, serum 5-HT, serum tryptophan, and SCFA in feces were analyzed using unpaired t tests with Welch’s correction to determine differences between the experimental and control groups. These analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism 6.0 statistical software (La Jolla, CA, USA). The distribution of the values of the studied parameters was tested for normality using the Shapiro–Wilk test. All data are expressed as the mean ± standard error (S.E.M.) of three independent assays. Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.

5. Conclusions

In the present study, chronic administration of EFV to healthy mice altered the gut microbiota, specifically increasing the abundance of Bacillota and Dubosiella while decreasing that of Lactobacillus and Faecalbaculum. These results may be associated with Tph1 dysregulation in the gut and decreased serum 5-HT levels. Dysbiosis and the subsequent products of these bacteria (acetic, propionic, butyric, and valeric acids) increased. This could contribute to neuropsychiatric alterations, such as depression, caused by the chronic administration of EFV. Further studies are required to clarify whether SCFAs reach the brain and contribute to these effects. The development of innovative antidepressant treatments focused on gut microbiota transplantation could be beneficial for PLWH that consume EFV, highlighting the importance of a healthy gut microbiome for mental health and overall well-being.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.A.R.-O., V.P.-C., L.M.-A. and E.T.-C.; methodology, M.M.A.-G., C.C.M.-M., R.A.-R., M.C.-R., A.R.E.-M. and J.M.T.-G.; validation, A.R.E.-M., J.M.T.-G., R.A.-R., M.M.A.-G., Á.G.-P., D.O.B.-E., G.P.-S., S.V.-V., R.M.-L. and M.C.-R.; formal analysis, J.M.T.-G., D.O.B.-E., R.M.-L., M.P.d.l.M., S.A.R.-O., R.A.-R. and E.T.-C.; investigation, S.V.-V., D.O.B.-E., S.A.R.-O., L.M.-A., V.P.-C., G.P.-S. and E.T.-C.; resources, M.P.d.l.M. and E.T.-C.; visualization, S.V.-V., G.P.-S., Á.G.-P. and A.R.E.-M.; data curation, L.M.-A., Á.G.-P., R.M.-L., S.V.-V., A.R.E.-M., R.A.-R. and M.C.-R.; writing—original draft preparation, G.P.-S., M.M.A.-G., S.A.R.-O. and E.T.-C.; writing—review and editing, D.O.B.-E., R.M.-L., M.P.d.l.M., L.M.-A., V.P.-C. and E.T.-C.; supervision, Á.G.-P., J.M.T.-G., M.C.-R., M.M.A.-G., C.C.M.-M. and V.P.-C. project administration, E.T.-C.; funding acquisition, M.P.d.l.M. and E.T.-C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by “Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social” under grant number FIS/IMSS/R-2021-785-057 to ETC. and DGAPA, Dirección General de Asuntos del Personal Académico under grant number IN210024 to MPM. This work was also supported by the Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation through the Agencia Estatal de Investigación, Consolidación Investigadora grant CNS2022-136008, and by the Junta de Andalucía through the EMERGIA-2020 programme under grant/reference 30318, and Karolinska Institutet Forskningsstiftelser/KI Research Grant (2024-02763) to DOBE.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The animal study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board and Ethical Committee of “Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social (Protocol code R-2021-785-057) on 2 June 2021. Also, approved by the Local Ethical Committee for animal Experiments at Instituto de Fisiologia Celular; Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (MPM206-22) on 15 August 2022.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article. Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank MDV Mónica Guevara Canizal and Dra Anayántzin Paulina Heredia Antúnez, both from the Department of Wildlife and Laboratory Animals (DEFSAL), Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Zootechnics, UNAM, and Daniel Andrés Sánchez Almaraz from Unidad de Investigación UNAM-INC, División de Investigación, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Instituto Nacional de Cardiología Ignacio Chávez, for their kind and thorough review of this manuscript. The authors are also grateful to the computing unit from the Instituto de Fisiología Celular, UNAM, and, in particular, Francisco Pérez-Eugenio, for their support during this work.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Huang, L.; Hong, Y.; Fu, X.; Tan, H.; Chen, Y.; Wang, Y.; Chen, D. The role of the microbiota in glaucoma. Mol. Asp. Med. 2023, 94, 101221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Zheng, M.; Ye, H.; Yang, X.; Shen, L.; Dang, X.; Liu, X.; Gong, Y.; Wu, Q.; Wang, L.; Ge, X.; et al. Probiotic Clostridium butyricum ameliorates cognitive impairment in obesity via the microbiota-gut-brain axis. Brain Behav. Immun. 2024, 115, 565–587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Pan, Y.; Jiao, F.Y. Link between childhood obesity and gut microbiota. World J. Gastroenterol. 2024, 30, 3560–3563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Vamanu, E.; Rai, S.N. The Link between Obesity, Microbiota Dysbiosis, and Neurodegenerative Pathogenesis. Diseases 2021, 9, 45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Chang, Y.; Chen, J.; Peng, Y.; Zhang, K.; Zhang, Y.; Zhao, X.; Wang, D.; Li, L.; Zhu, J.; Liu, K.; et al. Gut-derived macrophages link intestinal damage to brain injury after cardiac arrest through TREM1 signaling. Cell. Mol. Immunol. 2025, 22, 437–455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Dinakis, E.; O’Donnell, J.A.; Marques, F.Z. The gut-immune axis during hypertension and cardiovascular diseases. Acta Physiol. 2024, 240, e14193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Ahmadmehrabi, S.; Tang, W.H.W. Gut microbiome and its role in cardiovascular diseases. Curr. Opin. Cardiol. 2017, 32, 761–766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Batagianni, M.; Papazoglou, A.; Galiatsatos, P.; Linos, D. Assessing the relationship of gut microbiota with neurological, psychiatric, and neurodegenerative disorders: A narrative review. World J. Biol. Psychiatry 2025, 26, 409–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Aijaz, M.; Ahmad, M.; Ahmad, S.; Afzal, M.; Kothiyal, P. The gut-brain axis: Role of gut microbiota in neurological disease pathogenesis and pharmacotherapeutics. Naunyn-Schmiedeberg’s Arch. Pharmacol. 2026, 399, 4879–4905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Li, J.; Zhao, F.; Wang, Y.; Chen, J.; Tao, J.; Tian, G.; Wu, S.; Liu, W.; Cui, Q.; Geng, B.; et al. Gut microbiota dysbiosis contributes to the development of hypertension. Microbiome 2017, 5, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Nigam, M.; Devi, K.; Coutinho, H.D.M.; Mishra, A.P. Exploration of gut microbiome and inflammation: A review on key signalling pathways. Cell Signal. 2024, 118, 111140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Al Bander, Z.; Nitert, M.D.; Mousa, A.; Naderpoor, N. The Gut Microbiota and Inflammation: An Overview. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 7618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Bustos-Fernández, L.; Hanna, I. Eje cerebro intestino microbiota. Importancia en la práctica clínica. Rev. Gastroenterol. Perú 2022, 42, 106–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Recker, J. Scientists Find a Possible Link Between Gut Bacteria and Depression. Smithsonian Magazine, 5 February 2019.
  15. Kamble, S.R.; Dandekar, M.P. Implication of microbiota gut-brain axis in the manifestation of obsessive-compulsive disorder: Preclinical and clinical evidence. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2023, 957, 176014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Bosch, J.A.; Nieuwdorp, M.; Zwinderman, A.H.; Deschasaux, M.; Radjabzadeh, D.; Kraaij, R.; Davids, M.; de Rooij, S.R.; Lok, A. The gut microbiota and depressive symptoms across ethnic groups. Nat. Commun. 2022, 13, 7129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Tian, P.; Wang, G.; Zhao, J.; Zhang, H.; Chen, W. Bifidobacterium with the role of 5-hydroxytryptophan synthesis regulation alleviates the symptom of depression and related microbiota dysbiosis. J. Nutr. Biochem. 2019, 66, 43–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Gao, K.; Pi, Y.; Mu, C.L.; Farzi, A.; Liu, Z.; Zhu, W.Y. Increasing carbohydrate availability in the hindgut promotes hypothalamic neurotransmitter synthesis: Aromatic amino acids linking the microbiota-brain axis. J. Neurochem. 2019, 149, 641–659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Gao, K.; Pi, Y.; Mu, C.L.; Peng, Y.; Huang, Z.; Zhu, W.Y. Antibiotics-induced modulation of large intestinal microbiota altered aromatic amino acid profile and expression of neurotransmitters in the hypothalamus of piglets. J. Neurochem. 2018, 146, 219–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Sherwin, E.; Dinan, T.G.; Cryan, J.F. Recent developments in understanding the role of the gut microbiota in brain health and disease. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2018, 1420, 5–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Rothhammer, V.; Mascanfroni, I.D.; Bunse, L.; Takenaka, M.C.; Kenison, J.E.; Mayo, L.; Chao, C.C.; Patel, B.; Yan, R.; Blain, M.; et al. Type I interferons and microbial metabolites of tryptophan modulate astrocyte activity and central nervous system inflammation via the aryl hydrocarbon receptor. Nat. Med. 2016, 22, 586–597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Gutiérrez, F.; García, L.; Padilla, S.; Alvarez, D.; Moreno, S.; Navarro, G.; Gómez-Sirvent, J.; Vidal, F.; Asensi, V.; Masiá, M. Risk of clinically significant depression in HIV infected patients: Effect of antiretroviral drugs. HIV Med. 2014, 15, 213–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Jin, J.; Grimmig, B.; Izzo, J.; Brown, L.A.M.; Hudson, C.; Smith, A.J.; Tan, J.; Bickford, P.C.; Giunta, B. HIV Non-Nucleoside Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitor Efavirenz Reduces Neural Stem Cell Proliferation in Vitro and in Vivo. Cell Transplant. 2016, 25, 1967–1977. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Sumari-de Boer, M.; Schellekens, A.; Duinmaijer, A.; Lalashowi, J.M.; Swai, H.J.; de Mast, Q.; van der Ven, A.; Kinabo, G. Efavirenz is related to neuropsychiatric symptoms among adults, but not among adolescents livin with human immunodeficiency virus in Kilimanjaro, Tanzania. Trop. Med. Int. Health 2018, 23, 164–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Streck, E.L.; Ferreira, G.K.; Scaini, G.; Rezin, G.T.; Gonçalves, C.L.; Jeremias, I.C.; Zugno, A.I.; Ferreira, G.C.; Moreira, J.; Fochesato, C.M.; et al. Non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors efavirenz and nevirapine inhibit cytochrome C oxidase in mouse brain regions. Neurochem. Res. 2011, 36, 962–966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Montenegro-Burke, J.R.; Woldstad, C.J.; Fang, M.; Bade, A.N.; McMillan, J.; Edagwa, B.; Boska, M.D.; Gendelman, H.E.; Siuzdak, G. Nanoformulated Antiretroviral Therapy Attenuates Brain Metabolic Oxidative Stress. Mol. Neurobiol. 2019, 56, 2896–2907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Dalwadi, D.A.; Ozuna, L.; Harvey, B.H.; Viljoen, M.; Schetz, J.A. Adverse Neuropsychiatric Events and Recreational Use of Efavirenz and Other HIV-1 Antiretroviral Drugs. Pharmacol. Rev. 2018, 70, 684–711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Huang, C.; Hoque, T.; Bendayan, R. Antiretroviral drugs efavirenz, dolutegravir and bictegravir dysregulate blood-brain barrier integrity and function. Front. Pharmacol. 2023, 14, 1118580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Rojas-Osornio, S.A.; Crespo-Ramírez, M.; Paredes-Cervantes, V.; Mata-Marín, A.; Martínez-Lara, R.; Pérez de la Mora, M.; Tesoro-Cruz, E. Oral Administration of Efavirenz Dysregulates the Tph2 Gene in Brain Serotonergic Areas and Alters Weight and Mood in Mice. Pharmaceuticals 2024, 801, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Ray, S.; Narayanan, A.; Giske, C.G.; Neogi, U.; Sönnerborg, A.; Nowak, P. Altered Gut Microbiome under Antiretroviral Therapy: Impact of Efavirenz and Zidovudine. ACS Infect. Dis. 2021, 7, 1104–1115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Huang, Y.X.; Tang, Q.; Fu, S.H.; Zhong, H.J.; Liu, Z.; Zhong, Q.Y.; Wang, Y.H.; Luo, Y.D.; Li, X.Y.; Chen, S.; et al. Comparison of Efavirenz and Dolutegravir on Gut Microbiome and Gut Barrier Functions. ACS Omega 2025, 10, 23099–23110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Mordhorst, A.; Dhandapani, P.; Matthes, S.; Mosienko, V.; Rothe, M.; Todiras, M.; Self, J.; Schunck, W.H.; Schütz, A.; Bader, M.; et al. Phenylalanine hydroxylase contributes to serotonin synthesis in mice. FASEB J. 2021, 35, e21648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Carkaci-Salli, N.; Salli, U.; Tekin, I.; Hengst, J.A.; Zhao, M.K.; Gilman, T.L.; Andrews, A.M.; Vrana, K.E. Functional characterization of the S41Y (C2755A) polymorphism of tryptophan hydroxylase 2. J. Neurochem. 2014, 130, 748–758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Carkaci-Salli, N.; Salli, U.; Kuntz-Melcavage, K.L.; Pennock, M.M.; Ozgen, H.; Tekin, I.; Freeman, W.M.; Vrana, K.E. TPH2 in the ventral tegmental area of the male rat brain. Brain Res. Bull. 2011, 84, 376–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Zareifopoulos, N.; Lagadinou, M.; Karela, A.; Pouliasi, F.; Economou, I.; Tsigkou, A.; Velissaris, D. Efavirenz as a psychotropic drug. Eur. Rev. Med. Pharmacol. Sci. 2020, 24, 10729–10735. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  36. Apostolova, N.; Funes, H.A.; Blas-Garcia, A.; Alegre, F.; Polo, M.; Esplugues, J.V. Involvement of nitric oxide in the mitochondrial action of efavirenz: A differential effect on neurons and glial cells. J. Infect. Dis. 2015, 21, 1953–1958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Cavalcante, G.I.; Chaves, A.J.; Linhares, M.I.; de Carvalho, C.N.; Venâncio, E.T.; Rios, E.R.; de Souza, F.C.; Vasconcelos, S.M.; Macêdo, D.; de França, M.M. HIV antiretroviral drug Efavirenz induces anxiety-like and depression-like behavior in rats: Evaluation of neurotransmitter alterations in the striatum. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2017, 799, 7–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Wang, P.F.; Neiner, A.; Kharasch, E.D. Efavirenz Metabolism: Influence of Polymorphic CYP2B6 Variants and Stereochemistry. Drug Metab. Dispos. 2019, 47, 1195–1205, Erratum in Drug Metab. Dispos. 2019, 47, 1231. https://doi.org/10.1124/dmd.119.086348err. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [PubMed Central]
  39. Zhao, M.; Chu, J.; Feng, S.; Guo, C.; Xue, B.; He, J.K.; Li, L. Immunological mechanisms of inflammatory diseases caused by gut microbiota dysbiosis: A review. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2023, 164, 114985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Choi, J.; Kim, Y.K.; Han, P.L. Extracellular Vesicles Derived from Lactobacillus plantarum Increase BDNF Expression in Cultured Hippocampal Neurons and Produce Antidepressant-like Effects in Mice. Exp. Neurobiol. 2019, 28, 158–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Skowrońska, A.; Gawlik-Kotelnicka, O.; Margulska, A.; Strzelecki, D. The Influence of Probiotic Supplementation on the Severity of Anxiety and Depressive Symptoms; Function and Composition of Gut Microbiota; and Metabolic, Inflammation, and Oxidative Stress Markers in Patients with Depression-A Study Protocol. Metabolites 2023, 13, 182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Vijayaram, S.; Mahendran, K.; Razafindralambo, H.; Ringø, E.; Kannan, S.; Sun, Y.Z. Probiotics, gut microbiota, and brain health: Exploring therapeutic pathways. AIMS Microbiol. 2025, 11, 501–541. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  43. Knezevic, E.; Nenic, K.; Milanovic, V.; Knezevic, N.N. The Role of Cortisol in Chronic Stress, Neurodegenerative Diseases, and Psychological Disorders. Cells 2023, 12, 2726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Shen, Y.; Fan, N.; Ma, S.X.; Cheng, X.; Yang, X.; Wang, G. Gut Microbiota Dysbiosis: Pathogenesis, Diseases, Prevention, and Therapy. MedComm 2025, 6, e70168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Arora, I.; Mal, P.; Arora, P.; Paul, A.; Kumar, M. GABAergic implications in anxiety and related disorders. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2024, 724, 150218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Alkhalaf, L.M.; Ryan, K.S. Biosynthetic manipulation of tryptophan in bacteria: Pathways and mechanisms. Chem. Biol. 2015, 22, 317–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. da Fonseca, S.; Alves, C.; Dias, C.; Mendes-da-Silva, C. Probiotics and undernourishment impact on brain 5-Hydroxytryptamine system and neurotrophin BDNF in rats: Risk of depression and anxiety? Nutrition 2025, 132, 112680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Zagato, E.; Pozzi, C.; Bertocchi, A.; Schioppa, T.; Saccheri, F.; Guglietta, S.; Fosso, B.; Melocchi, L.; Nizzoli, G.; Troisi, J.; et al. Endogenous murine microbiota member Faecalibaculum rodentium and its human homologue protect from intestinal tumour growth. Nat. Microbiol. 2020, 5, 511–524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Rojas-Osornio, S.A.; Manuel-Apolinar, L.; Crespo-Ramírez, M.; Paredes-Cervantes, V.; Mata-Marín, A.; Molina-López, J.; Pérez de la Mora, M.; Borroto-Escuela, D.; Martínez-Lara, R.; Tesoro-Cruz, E. Efavirenz Interacts with Hormones Involved in Appetite and Satiety, Affecting Body Weight in Mice. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2026, 27, 735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. O’Riordan, K.J.; Collins, M.K.; Moloney, G.M.; Knox, E.G.; Aburto, M.R.; Fülling, C.; Morley, S.J.; Clarke, G.; Schellekens, H.; Cryan, J.F. Short chain fatty acids: Microbial metabolites for gut-brain axis signalling. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol. 2022, 546, 111572. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Fusco, W.; Lorenzo, M.B.; Cintoni, M.; Porcari, S.; Rinninella, E.; Kaitsas, F.; Lener, E.; Mele, M.C.; Gasbarrini, A.; Collado, M.C.; et al. Short-Chain Fatty-Acid-Producing Bacteria: Key Components of the Human Gut Microbiota. Nutrients 2023, 15, 2211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Chapp, A.D.; Shan, Z.; Chen, Q.H. Ácido acético: Un metabolito subestimado en los cambios inducidos por el etanol en la regulación de la función cardiovascular. Antioxidantes 2024, 13, 139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Lobzhanidze, G.; Lordkipanidze, T.; Zhvania, M.; Japaridze, N.; MacFabe, D.F.; Pochkidze, N.; Gasimov, E.; Rzaev, F. Effect of propionic acid on the morphology of the amygdala in adolescent male rats and their behavior. Micron 2019, 125, 102732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Aires, J.V.; Souza, E. Use of microbial fuel cell systems in wastewater treatment in connection with bioenergy generation. Rev. Desafios 2025, 12, 1–20. [Google Scholar]
  55. Zhu, H.; Yang, D.; Du, P.; Qian, H.; Yang, Z. 6-shogaol improves the cognitive and memory declines of natural aging mice by modulating butyrate-producing microbiota and intestinal barrier. Phytomedicine 2025, 148, 157381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Cao, J.; Ma, J.; Zha, X.; Bian, X.; Wang, W.; Liu, X. Gut Microbiota Dysbiosis in Depression: Pathological Correlations, Molecular Pathways, and Therapeutic Interventions. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2026, 27, 1530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Yeo, L.F.; Palmu, J.; Havulinna, A.S.; Pärnänen, K.; Salomaa, V.; Lahti, L.; Knight, R.; Niiranen, T. Prospective association between the gut microbiome and incident hypertension: A 20-year cohort study. J. Hypertens. 2026, 44, 673–681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Liu, D.; Xie, L.-S.; Lian, S.; Li, K.; Yang, Y.; Wang, W.-Z.; Hu, S.; Liu, S.-J.; Liu, C.; He, Z. Anaerostipes hadrus, a butyrate-producing bacterium capable of metabolizing 5-fluorouracil. mSphere 2024, 9, e0081623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Coetzee, O.; Arnold, D. Anaerostipes caccae CLB101TM, a Novel Probiotic and Key Butyrate Producer, Aids in the Resolution of Long-Term Food Intolerances in a Patient in 12 Weeks: A Case Report. Ann. Case Rep. 2026, 11, 102510. [Google Scholar]
  60. Banks, W.A.; Rhea, E.M.; Reed, M.J.; Erickson, M.A. The penetration of therapeutics across the blood-brain barrier: Classic case studies and clinical implications. Cell Rep. Med. 2024, 5, 101760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Deng, Y.; Zhou, M.; Wang, J.; Yao, J.; Yu, J.; Liu, W.; Wu, L.; Wang, J.; Gao, R. Involvement of the microbiota-gut-brain axis in chronic restraint stress: Disturbances of the kynurenine metabolic pathway in both the gut and brain. Gut Microbes 2021, 13, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. NOM-062-Z00-1999; Norma Oficial Mexicana Para la Producción, Cuidado y Uso de los Animales de Laboratorio; Chapter 9. NOM: Mexico, México, 1999.
  63. NRC National Research Council. Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals, 8th ed.; Fletcher, C., Crossgrove, R., Eds.; The National Academy Press: Washington, DC, USA, 2011. Available online: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK54050/ (accessed on 10 February 2026).
  64. NC3Rs. National Centre for the Replacement, Refinement and Reduction of Animals in Research. ARRIVE Guidelines. 2010. Available online: https://arriveguidelines.org/ (accessed on 10 February 2026).
  65. Romão, P.R.; Lemos, J.C.; Moreira, J.; de Chaves, G.; Moretti, M.; Castro, A.A.; Andrade, V.M.; Boeck, C.R.; Quevedo, J.; Gavioli, E.C. Anti-HIV drugs nevirapine and efavirenz affect anxiety-related behavior and cognitive performance in mice. Neurotox. Res. 2011, 19, 73–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Streck, E.L.; Scaini, G.; Rezin, G.T.; Moreira, J.; Fochesato, C.M.; Romão, P.R.T. Effects of the HIV treatment drugs nevirapine and efavirenz on brain creatine kinase activity. Metab. Brain Dis. 2008, 23, 485–492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Magzal, F.; Even, C.; Haimov, I.; Agmon, M.; Asraf, K.; Shochat, T.; Tami, S. Associations between fecal short-chain fatty acids and sleep continuity in older adults with insomnia symptoms. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 4052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Taxonomic composition of the gut microbiota of CD1 mice. Taxonomic composition of the gut microbiota in an experimental murine model comparing two groups (control and efavirenz (EFV), n = 4 per group). Relative abundance (%) at the phylum (A) and genus (B) levels is presented. Only taxa with relative abundances >1% are shown.
Figure 1. Taxonomic composition of the gut microbiota of CD1 mice. Taxonomic composition of the gut microbiota in an experimental murine model comparing two groups (control and efavirenz (EFV), n = 4 per group). Relative abundance (%) at the phylum (A) and genus (B) levels is presented. Only taxa with relative abundances >1% are shown.
Ijms 27 04504 g001
Figure 2. Comparative analysis of intestinal microbial diversity in the control and EFV groups. (A) Alpha diversity assessed using the Shannon, Faith’s Phylogenetic Diversity (Faith PD), Chao1, and Observed Features indices. (B) Beta diversity estimated with the Bray–Curtis index and represented by a principal coordinate analysis (PCoA), accompanied by the permutational multivariate analysis of variance result (n = 4 per group).
Figure 2. Comparative analysis of intestinal microbial diversity in the control and EFV groups. (A) Alpha diversity assessed using the Shannon, Faith’s Phylogenetic Diversity (Faith PD), Chao1, and Observed Features indices. (B) Beta diversity estimated with the Bray–Curtis index and represented by a principal coordinate analysis (PCoA), accompanied by the permutational multivariate analysis of variance result (n = 4 per group).
Ijms 27 04504 g002
Figure 3. Correlation analysis of bacterial genera and experimental variables using heat maps. (A) A heatmap showing the correlation using the relative abundance of bacterial genera to identify associations with the experimental groups. (B) A heatmap based on abundance transformed with a base-10 logarithm, used to minimize the effect of extreme values and facilitate the detection of patterns in the correlations (n = 4 per group).
Figure 3. Correlation analysis of bacterial genera and experimental variables using heat maps. (A) A heatmap showing the correlation using the relative abundance of bacterial genera to identify associations with the experimental groups. (B) A heatmap based on abundance transformed with a base-10 logarithm, used to minimize the effect of extreme values and facilitate the detection of patterns in the correlations (n = 4 per group).
Ijms 27 04504 g003
Figure 4. Short-chain fatty acids detected in the feces of mice treated with EFV. Acetic (F2,2 = 1.747; **** p < 0.0001), propionic (F2,2 = 77.47; *** p < 0.001), isobutyric (F2,2 = 1922; ** p < 0.01), butyric (F2,2 = 20.96; * p < 0.05), and valeric (F2,2 = 28.44; *** p < 0.001) acid contents increased in mice treated with EFV, whereas isovaleric acids levels decreased (F2,2 = 15.60; ** p < 0.01) (Welch’s t test; n = 3).
Figure 4. Short-chain fatty acids detected in the feces of mice treated with EFV. Acetic (F2,2 = 1.747; **** p < 0.0001), propionic (F2,2 = 77.47; *** p < 0.001), isobutyric (F2,2 = 1922; ** p < 0.01), butyric (F2,2 = 20.96; * p < 0.05), and valeric (F2,2 = 28.44; *** p < 0.001) acid contents increased in mice treated with EFV, whereas isovaleric acids levels decreased (F2,2 = 15.60; ** p < 0.01) (Welch’s t test; n = 3).
Ijms 27 04504 g004
Figure 5. Effect of EFV on tryptophan hydroxylase type 1 (Tph1) expression in the gut (A); serum 5-HT and Trp levels (B) in CD1 mice. Tph1 mRNA expression was diminished following EFV administration compared to that in the control group (A) (F2,2 = 2.443; ** p < 0.01). 5-HT levels were diminished after 36 days of EFV treatment (B). Unpaired t test with Welch’s correction ** p < 0.01. To elucidate the likely functional correlation between Tph1 expression and 5-HT synthesis, the serum levels of this neurotransmitter and the quantity of Trp were measured in mice. An unpaired t test with Welch’s correction revealed a statistically significant decrease in the 5-HT level after EFV treatment (F2,2 = 229, p < 0.01), although serum Trp levels did not change (F4,4 = 2.822, p > 0.05) (B); ns = non-significance.
Figure 5. Effect of EFV on tryptophan hydroxylase type 1 (Tph1) expression in the gut (A); serum 5-HT and Trp levels (B) in CD1 mice. Tph1 mRNA expression was diminished following EFV administration compared to that in the control group (A) (F2,2 = 2.443; ** p < 0.01). 5-HT levels were diminished after 36 days of EFV treatment (B). Unpaired t test with Welch’s correction ** p < 0.01. To elucidate the likely functional correlation between Tph1 expression and 5-HT synthesis, the serum levels of this neurotransmitter and the quantity of Trp were measured in mice. An unpaired t test with Welch’s correction revealed a statistically significant decrease in the 5-HT level after EFV treatment (F2,2 = 229, p < 0.01), although serum Trp levels did not change (F4,4 = 2.822, p > 0.05) (B); ns = non-significance.
Ijms 27 04504 g005
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Rojas-Osornio, S.A.; Paredes-Cervantes, V.; Aguirre-García, M.M.; Crespo-Ramírez, M.; Márquez-Mota, C.C.; Aguilar-Rosales, R.; Talamantes-Gómez, J.M.; Escalona-Montaño, A.R.; García-Pérez, Á.; Pérez de la Mora, M.; et al. Efavirenz-Altered Gut-Microbiota, Tph1, and Systemic 5-HT Levels: Could They Affect Depression Mechanisms in Mice? Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2026, 27, 4504. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms27104504

AMA Style

Rojas-Osornio SA, Paredes-Cervantes V, Aguirre-García MM, Crespo-Ramírez M, Márquez-Mota CC, Aguilar-Rosales R, Talamantes-Gómez JM, Escalona-Montaño AR, García-Pérez Á, Pérez de la Mora M, et al. Efavirenz-Altered Gut-Microbiota, Tph1, and Systemic 5-HT Levels: Could They Affect Depression Mechanisms in Mice? International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2026; 27(10):4504. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms27104504

Chicago/Turabian Style

Rojas-Osornio, Sandra Angélica, Vladimir Paredes-Cervantes, María Magdalena Aguirre-García, Minerva Crespo-Ramírez, Claudia C. Márquez-Mota, Raquel Aguilar-Rosales, José Moisés Talamantes-Gómez, Alma Reyna Escalona-Montaño, Águeda García-Pérez, Miguel Pérez de la Mora, and et al. 2026. "Efavirenz-Altered Gut-Microbiota, Tph1, and Systemic 5-HT Levels: Could They Affect Depression Mechanisms in Mice?" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 27, no. 10: 4504. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms27104504

APA Style

Rojas-Osornio, S. A., Paredes-Cervantes, V., Aguirre-García, M. M., Crespo-Ramírez, M., Márquez-Mota, C. C., Aguilar-Rosales, R., Talamantes-Gómez, J. M., Escalona-Montaño, A. R., García-Pérez, Á., Pérez de la Mora, M., Borroto-Escuela, D. O., Manuel-Apolinar, L., Pérez-Sánchez, G., Vazquez-Vega, S., Martínez-Lara, R., & Tesoro-Cruz, E. (2026). Efavirenz-Altered Gut-Microbiota, Tph1, and Systemic 5-HT Levels: Could They Affect Depression Mechanisms in Mice? International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 27(10), 4504. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms27104504

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop