Next Article in Journal
Pathophysiological Role of Vitamin D Deficiency in Down Syndrome: Insights into Metabolic Dysfunction and Sarcopenia
Previous Article in Journal
Bioproduction Optimization, Characterization, and Bioactivity of Extracellular Pigment Produced by Streptomyces parvulus
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Arsenome, Arsenobolome, and Arsenobiolome

by
Fernando J. Pereira
1,*,
Roberto López
2 and
A. Javier Aller
1,*
1
Area of Analytical Chemistry, Department of Applied Chemistry and Physics, Faculty of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of León, Campus de Vegazana, s/n, E-24007 León, Spain
2
Area of Physical Chemistry, Department of Applied Chemistry and Physics, Faculty of Biological and Environmental Sciences, University of León, Campus de Vegazana, s/n, E-24007 León, Spain
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26(21), 10761; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms262110761
Submission received: 7 October 2025 / Revised: 31 October 2025 / Accepted: 3 November 2025 / Published: 5 November 2025
(This article belongs to the Section Biochemistry)

Abstract

A complete characterisation of the potential biological implications of any chemical species requires assessing as much information as possible about the dose of all physicochemical forms involved in its metabolic pathways or any other biological activity (beneficial or harmful). Research investigating the biological significance of arsenic species in living systems needs to involve not only the chemical characterisation of the complete set of arsenic-containing species (arsenome), but also the distinction of all arsenic-bearing metabolites (arsenobolome) and those arsenic-containing species involved directly in specific beneficial or harmful processes (arsenobiolome). This work offers insight into the above considerations regarding arsenic species that are of toxicological significance. We highlight the differences in the metabolic and toxicological behaviour of inorganic (iAs) and organoarsenic (oAs) species, focusing on mechanistic clarification, particularly in signalling transduction, chronic effects, genotoxicity, and oxidative deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) damage. The beneficial applications of arsenic compounds in the treatment of cancer and other diseases have also been noted. Furthermore, we also seek efficient diagnosis of intoxication by iAs and overcoming of adverse effects.

1. Introduction

Arsenic, the 53rd most abundant element in the Earth’s crust [1], ubiquitously exists mainly as several inorganic arsenic (iAs) species in three valence states {−3, +3, +5} and similarly for the organic compounds of arsenic (organoarsenicals, oAs), characterised by a C-As chemical bond (Table 1 and Table 2, Appendix A). The oxidation state +1 is less environmentally significant than the others. Diverse inorganic trivalent (iAs(III), arsenite) and pentavalent (iAs(V), arsenate) species are naturally present in soils and waters [2,3,4,5,6] as solid and soluble forms depending on the Eh–pH conditions [7].
However, under typical Eh–pH environmental and biological systems conditions, the predominant species are arsenite (H3AsO3 and H2AsO3) and arsenate (H2AsO4 and HAsO42−) (Figure 1). The oAs(V) compounds typically contain the functional groups RAsO(OH)2 or R2AsO(OH) (R = alkyl or aryl), although apart from the pentaphenyl derivative As(C6H5)5 (Table 2), compounds of As(V) with only organic ligands are rare [8]. Most important oAs(III) compounds include trimethylarsine (CH3)3As (Gosio gas) [9], dimethylarsine (CH3)2AsH, methylarsine CH3AsH2, dimethylarsine chloride (CH3)2AsCl, and methylarsine dichloride CH3AsCl2 [10]. There are also heterocycles containing As(III), such as arsole, arsabenzene, and the arsenic analogues of pyrrole and pyridine. Further, arsenic-containing nucleosides (sugar derivatives or arsenosugars) exist in seaweeds [11], while some lipids can also contain arsenic [12]. Arsenicin A is the only polyarsenic compound isolated from the natural source of the New Caledonian marine sponge Echinochalina bargibanti [13]. The oAs(I) compounds exist in some drugs, such as Salvarsan and Neosalvarsan (Table 1), but not in natural environments. Organoarsenic compounds featuring As–Cl bonds show high toxicity, thus providing characteristic properties for the development of different chemical weapons, such as “Lewisite” (chlorovinyl-2-arsenic dichloride), “Clark I” (chlorodiphenylarsine), “Clark II” (diphenylcyanoarsine), and phenyldichloroarsine. Thus, dimethylarsine chloride (CH3)2AsCl and other chlorinated organoarsenicals were widely employed as chemical warfare agents, especially in World War I [14]. Its antidote is British anti-Lewisite (HO-CH2-CHSH-CH2SH), which alters the affinity of As(III) for thiolate ligands, thereby decreasing its acute toxicity. Dimethylarsinic acid (CH3)2AsO(OH), also known as Agent Blue (cacodylic acid), was used by the US Army as an herbicide in the Vietnam War.
iAs species are predominantly deposited in soils through natural processes from parent rocks [15] and are primarily associated with non-weathering-resistant mineral deposits, such as sulphide-rich arsenic-bearing minerals [16]. Under aerobic conditions, iAs(V) species prevail in the environment due to mineralisation processes, microbial activity, oxidation reactions, and the weathering of arsenopyrite-rich rocks [15,17]. However, iAs are also released by natural processes, such as volcanic activity, particularly through eruptions (lava and ashes) and fumaroles (sublimates and incrustations) [15].
Rainwater solubilises some arsenic species [18], thereby transferring them to flood and storm waters, where under reducing soil conditions [19,20], As(V) is quickly reduced to As(III) within hours [20,21]. Nonetheless, it is usual to underestimate the geochemical mobilisation of arsenic species in anoxic systems due to the difficulty in measuring their rapid transformation and transport under low-oxygen conditions [22,23]. In aqueous environmental systems at neutral pHs in lakes, and less frequently in rivers and streams, arsenite and arsenate are usually retained on metal oxide particles (iron and aluminium), altering their distribution in environmental systems [24,25]. However, irrigation with wastewater facilitates the mobilisation of iAs(III) (and other potentially toxic metals, such as Cd, Co, Cr, Ni, Zn, Cu, and Pb) from soil particles [26], which is mainly driven by low oxygen levels dissolved in the water [27], where especially at the bottom of lakes microbial reduction is prevalent [28]. Furthermore, microorganisms can also reduce iAs(III) to arsine (AsH3) in soils [29]. Arsine and dimethyl arsine may be volatilised from swamps and marshy soils at pH < 6.0.
Nevertheless, agricultural, industrial, mining, medicinal, and other human activities largely contribute to environmental contamination with arsenic compounds [5,30,31]. Primary industrial uses of arsenic include the preparation of alloys, semiconductors, pigments, pesticides, glasses, and drugs, the latter employed for the treatment of diverse diseases, such as sleeping sickness (African human trypanosomiasis) and chronic myeloid leukaemia (chronic myelogenous leukaemia) [32]. Many pesticides, such as cacodylic acid, substantially enhance arsenic accumulation in soils, from where it can leach to surface and groundwater [6]. Mining techniques, such as hydraulic fracturing, mobilise iAs into groundwater and aquifers by altering redox conditions and injecting fluids containing additional arsenic species. Many aquifers contain high concentrations of iAs (>50 μg/L), which can lead to chronic arsenic poisoning if consumed over months or years [33]. The World Health Organisation (WHO) stipulates a limit value of 0.01 mg/L (10 μg/L) for arsenic in drinking water, since the chronic ingestion of drinking water with higher concentrations of arsenic can lead to arsenicosis [34].
Plants absorb iAs from soil and water systems and then pass it on to animals and humans through the food chain [35,36]. Nonetheless, phytoplankton and zooplankton also play a crucial role in the bioconcentration and bioaccumulation of iAs [37]. Consequently, iAs accumulates in food, soil, water, and air systems, primarily affecting the human population through ingestion of contaminated food and some natural seaweeds [38]. Drinking water can contain iAs, whereas food can contain both oAs and iAs species. However, iAs species primarily abound in fruit juice and rice [39], while oAs, such as arsenobetaine and arsenocholine, are present in marine organisms, including marine algae and certain terrestrial mushrooms. In living systems (humans, animals, and microorganisms), all iAs species are partly methylated, forming different oAs species, mainly monomethylarsonous acid {CH3As(OH)2, MMA(III)}, dimethylarsinous acid {(CH3)2As(OH), DMA(III)}, methylarsonic acid {CH3AsO(OH)2, MMA(V)}, and dimethylarsinic acid {DMA(V)} (Table 1 and Table 2) [40]. Rice grown in iAs-contaminated soils can accumulate arsenic up to levels around ≈23.7 mg As/kg [41], which, depending on the amount that is ingested per day, may exceed the total arsenic, tAs (=iAs(III) + iAs(V)), dose that is ingested by humans relative to the consumption of arsenic-laced drinking water [34]. However, other countries have established limits for arsenic in food of 1 mg As/kg (seaweed and molluscs) and 2 mg As/kg (fish and crustacea), although the limit of tAs is 1 mg As/kg for cereals (including rice) and 0.5 mg As/kg for table salts [42]. The source of arsenic in chicken is related to feed additives, such as roxarsone and nitarsone, which are widely used to control coccidiosis, a parasitic infection, and to increase the weight and skin colour of poultry [43]. However, roxarsone is no longer used in the USA, European Union, and possibly other countries as well [44].
Soluble As(III) and As(V) species are absorbed from the gastrointestinal tract and eliminated as iAs(V) and oAs via the kidneys. The biological half-life of iAs(III) for human adults is about 1–3 days and slightly shorter for iAs(V) [45], established using aqueous iAs concentrations in the range 0.15–0.58 mg/L, while other authors, using similar iAs concentrations, stated that the half-life of iAs(III) in humans is about 10 h [46]. Consequently, additional precise information concerning this topic is still necessary. The strong relationship between urinary excretion and body retention following iAs intake facilitates a straightforward accumulation process, with approximately 50% of the total iAs ingested remaining in the body for a prolonged period [47]. After ingestion of iAs, it is typically bound to thiol or sulfhydryl groups (-SH), primarily incorporated into the nails, hair, and skin and in small amounts into bones [48]. However, iAs is primarily stored in the kidneys, liver, heart, and lungs, but in lesser amounts in muscle and neural tissue. After chronic ingestion of As(III), it can be incorporated into the fingernails and toenails.
Although human exposure to iAs can also occur through inhalation exposure [49,50], exposure to contaminated air and soil is usually minimal, but exposure to elevated concentrations of iAs in drinking water is a significant problem in several regions worldwide [33,51]. The acute iAs poisoning symptoms in humans begin with headaches, diarrhoea, drowsiness, convulsions, confusion, leukonychia striata (fingernail pigmentation, Mees’s, or Aldrich–Mees’s lines appear after a chronic exposure), vomiting blood, hematuria (blood in the urine), muscle cramps or spasms (charley horse), hair loss, and abdominal pain [52].

2. The Biological Significance of Arsenic Species

The biological significance of arsenic species is correlated with and, consequently, better understood through the mechanisms underlying the metabolism of ingested iAs species. The chemical characterisation of any metabolic process involves elucidating and quantifying the starting metabolite, its transformation and distribution within the biological system, and potential interactions with other inorganic compounds and biomolecules, such as enzymes, cofactors, and other compounds. All metal/loid species within a biological system (whole body, organ, tissue, cell, and other constituents) relate to the metallome, which is synonymous with speciation [47]. On the other hand, metallomics (or chemical characterisation) [53,54] encompasses all analytical activities to localise, identify, and characterise qualitatively and quantitatively the chemical forms of a metal or metalloid existing in any biological system. In this way, metallomics represents a speciation analysis, which, as a first step, only reveals aspects at a particular time/point of the metabolism process. Nevertheless, the term metabolomics involves the complete characterisation of all metabolites, usually low-molecular-weight molecules, present in a biological system, which constitutes the metabolome.
We can elaborate on the above comments by simply using the term metallome with a specific name to refer to the arsenic species present in a biological system [55]. Thus, we use arsenome to describe the complete set of arsenic-containing species present in a given biological system, regardless of their metabolic or physiological role. At the same time, arsenobolome represents the subset of the arsenome comprising only arsenic-containing metabolites (primary metabolites) formed within the organism after the ingestion or uptake of arsenic species, including their metabolic pathways and profiles. Similarly, we introduce the term arsenobiolome to cover the subset of arsenome consisting of arsenic-containing species, other than primary metabolites, that participate directly in specific beneficial (e.g., therapeutic activity) or harmful (e.g., toxicity, carcinogenesis) processes. Consequently, arsenomics, arsenobolomics, and arsenobiolomics have evolved as instrumental and methodological approaches to obtain the required information at the corresponding biological level. In the following sections, we outline various aspects of the arsenic term-omes described above.

2.1. Arsenome: Speciation of Arsenic Compounds

Each arsenic species is more abundant in the organs and tissues involved in the different stages of its toxicokinetic behaviour, which depend on its biotransformation pathways during the entry, metabolism, interactions, accumulation, and excretion phases (Figure 2).
Both As(III) and As(V) are absorbed into the cell: As(III) by aquaglyceroporins 7 and 9, transporting water and glycerol [56], and arsenate through a phosphate transporter system [57]. The uptake mechanisms of small molecular weight oAs species (including arsenobetaine, arsenosugars, and arsenolipids) are largely unknown but may involve organic ion transporters (Figure 3).
Excretion of iAs follows through multiple methylation steps [58]. Humans excrete most of the orally ingested arsenic compounds via the urine, metabolising them as mono- and dimethylated acids, and unmetabolised as iAs(V). DMA(V) is typically the most abundant arsenic species in human urine after exposure to iAs, followed by lesser amounts of MMA(III+V) and iAs species (As(III) and As(V)). The relative proportions vary depending on individual metabolism and exposure source [59]. However, DMA(V) is the primary urinary metabolite of iAs and the major metabolite of the arsenosugars naturally occurring in seaweed [60]. Rodents and humans rapidly excrete DMA(V) unchanged, together with minor amounts of trimethylarsine oxide {TMAO(V), (CH3)3AsO}, a metabolite only detectable in urine at trace levels after exposure to high doses of iAs(III) and its dimethylated arsenicals (DMA(III)) [61]. However, most humans exposed to iAs excrete other arsenic species, such as iAs (20 ± 10%), MMA(V+III) (15 ± 5%), and DMA(V+III) (70 ± 5%) [62], although occasionally MMA(III) is absent, even though this oAs(III) is an intermediary in the arsenic methylation pathway. Some particular populations excrete high amounts of MMA(III) [63], particularly after oral administration of the chelating agent DIMAVAL (2,3-dimercapto-1-propane sulfonic acid) [64]. In this respect, the three trivalent arsenicals {iAs(III), MMA(III), and DMA(III)} and the three pentavalent arsenicals {iAs(V), MMA(V), and DMA(V)} are frequently present in human and animal urine [38,65,66,67,68], which together with other less abundant arsenic species constitute the main components of the arsenome.
Compounds containing arsenic–sulphur bonds are also subject to significant metabolic transformation in living systems, involving cleavage and reformation of these bonds during biotransformation [69,70]. Thio-arsenicals have been found in the urine, faeces, and wool of sheep after naturally consuming large doses of DMA(V) [71,72,73] and arsenosugars (arsenic-containing seaweeds) [74], probably due to microbial transformations of the intestinal flora [73]. Dimethylthio-arsenicals are formed in the liver after intravenous injections of tri- and pentavalent mono- and di-methylated arsenicals [69,70], which indicates that in the presence of sulphide ions, thioarsenicals are generated in vivo in the liver and other organs. Methylated thioarsenicals, found in urine, are highly toxic, particularly dimethylmonothioarsinic acid (CH3)2AsSH or DMMTA(V), which is a relevant arsenic compound in the genesis of human bladder cancer [75]. Thus, long-term exposure (of rats) to DMA(V) produces thioarsenicals DMMTA(V) and trimethylarsine sulphide (CH3)3AsS or TMAS in urine [72,76]. Monomethylmonothioarsonic acid (MMMTA(V)), DMMTA(V) and DMDTA(V) have also been detected in urine after exposure to iAs or DMA(V) compounds [77,78,79], which is an indication of the involvement of sulphur compounds in the metabolism of iAs. Nonetheless, oxo-compounds are the most usual metabolites of arsenosugars excreted in the urine because thio-organoarsenates are unstable and rapidly transformed into oxo-organoarsenates [80].
The biotransformation of iAs for excretion occurs through the activation of the nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor-2 (Nrf2), inducing a beneficial antioxidant response but also a cell-damaging effect [81,82] (Figure 4). However, binding of Nrf2 to Kelch-like ECH-associated protein 1 (Keap1) in its inactive form counteracts the detrimental effects raised by iAs [83]. Keap1, through its thiol or sulphydryl (-SH) moieties, binds electrophilic arsenic species, such as MMA(III), and induces the release of Nrf2, migrating through the cytoplasm to the nucleus [81]. MMA(III) does not directly engage with Nrf2 but instead modulates Keap1 through post-translational modifications. MMA(III) and iAs(III) interact with the Keap1 protein by disrupting the Keap1-Cul3 E3 ubiquitin ligase complex, thereby preventing Nrf2 degradation and leading to its accumulation and subsequent activation of the Nrf2-antioxidant response pathway [84]. Many other post-translational modifications that activate the Nrf2 pathway to regulate antioxidant and anti-inflammatory responses are under investigation, although the modification sites differ, being typically at Cys151 in Keap2. The protein Nrf2 activates the antioxidant responsive element (ARE) and electrophile responsive element (EpRE), which contribute to increasing antioxidant proteins [85], where heme oxygenase 1 (HO-1), NAD(P)H-quinone oxidoreductase 1 (NQO-1), and γ-glutamylcysteine synthase (γGCS) work in combination to reduce the oxidative stress (OS). It seems that the presence of γGCS facilitates liberation of arsenite triglutathionine As(SG)3 from the liver into the bile for excretion, thus removing As(III) from the cell [81].
In humans, iAs species accumulate in diverse tissues and body fluids (bone marrow, cardiac, central nervous system, blood, gastrointestinal, gonadal, kidney, liver, pancreatic, and skin) [86,87]. The chemical structure of the iAs(V) ion resembles that of phosphate, thus replacing it in bones. However, in mammal liver, iAs is enzymatically and non-enzymatically methylated, generating DMA(V), which is excreted (greater than 90%) in the urine [87]. Nonetheless, As(III) can bind to proteins in red blood cells (RBCs) [88], which are involved in the regulation of gene expression. This interaction may, over prolonged exposure, lead to the molecular changes associated with certain cancers (including skin, bladder, kidney, liver, lung, and prostate), although the precise mechanisms remain under investigation [87].

2.2. Arsenobolome: Primary Metabolites of Ingested Arsenic-Containing Compounds

The term arsenobolome refers to the arsenic metabolome’s equivalent content (metabolic dynamics, arsenic profiles). A good understanding of the biochemical processes involved in the metabolism of arsenic compounds would enable us to selectively inhibit (or reduce) the chemical mechanisms that give rise to the most toxicological forms of arsenic or, at the very least, induce an appropriate metabolic pathway to generate less toxic arsenic species. Understanding arsenic-based metabolites is crucial for comprehending their metabolic processes, body burden, and associated health effects.
Inside the cell, iAs(III) participates in different redox and substitution reactions, forming oxo-arsenical species and binding to the –SH groups of proteins. The iAs(III) species show high affinity for vicinal –SH groups in proteins, such as the disulphide oxidoreductase family-like glutathione reductase [89] and thioredoxin reductase (TR), thereby inhibiting their activity. In this way, the bacterial strain ULPAs1 (β-Proteobacteria), together with α- and β-Proteobacteria, oxidise iAs(III) to iAs(V) [90], which presumably evolved as a detoxification process and energy generation. On the other hand, iAs(V) can also be reduced by glutathione (GSH) to iAs(III) [91]. Thus, the enzyme purine nucleoside phosphorylase (PNP) (enzyme encoded in humans by the NP gene), bearing a dithiol group, reduces iAs(V) in vitro to iAs(III) [81,92,93], although it is unknown if this reduction also unfolds in vivo [94]. The reduction in iAs(V) to iAs(III) is an energy-generating process for microorganisms, serving as a necessary step before iAs(III) methylation. Consequently, the detoxification of iAs(III) occurs through complex methylation and redox processes [95] (Figure 5). In mammals, iAs(III) methylation primarily occurs in the liver, with smaller quantities being methylated in the kidney and lung [96].
The methylation mechanism of iAs in humans remains unresolved, although methionine is the source of methyl groups, and arsenic methyltransferase (AS3MT, Cyt19) is the enzyme involved [10,97]. In many mammals, including humans, all AS3MTs utilise S-adenosyl-methionine (SAM, AdoMet) as a cofactor [98], with As(III) as the preferred substrate. Consequently, the most probable mechanism of in vivo iAs(V) methylation would involve a previous 2-electron reduction in As(V) to As(III) to fulfil the subsequent methyl transfer reaction [64,99] (Figure 5). This behaviour behind the methylation of As(III) by AS3MT is a spontaneous exergonic ≈38 kJ/mol process under standard conditions [100]. All As(III) species are more toxic than As(V) species, and more readily methylated [63]. The principal methylation pathway depends on the cell type [99], resulting in the formation of MMA(III) and DMA(III) metabolites. As a whole, we can view the enzymatic methylation of iAs to MMA(III), DMA(III) or trimethylarsine (TMA(III)) as a detoxification process if the methylated As(III) intermediate is rapidly excreted via urine [101], but the reduction in As(V) to As(III) might be considered a bioactivation, as As(III) is more toxic than As(V) [62]. Methylation can be viewed as a toxification process [48,102,103] because the mono-methylated compounds are more reactive and toxic than the iAs compounds to human hepatocyte, keratinocyte, and bronchial epithelial cells [104,105]. However, although iAs and methylated As(III) metabolites cross the placenta to the foetus, the maternal methylation capacity for iAs increases during pregnancy, particularly in the first trimester and independent of folate status [106], leading to enhanced urinary excretion of mono- and dimethylated arsenic species. Current evidence indicates that this increased methylation occurs primarily in the mother, which may help reduce foetal exposure [63,107].
The enzymatically catalysed methylation of iAs (Figure 5) by AS3MT can occur via two primary routes (Figure 5A,B) [108,109]. However, a third route, similar to the second one (Figure 5B), but involving the participation of proteins, particularly as a substrate, is also accepted (Figure 5C) [110]. The third route considers that only As(III) metabolites bind to high-molecular-weight proteins, and iAs is methylated, followed by a reduction process if glutathione (GSH) is present. However, it does not follow stepwise oxidative methylation with MMA(V) and DMA(V), which are only present as final metabolites [111].
The first route (Reaction (1)) outlines an enzymatic oxidative methylation process of iAs(III) and MMA(III) in cells of different organisms (humans, rats, fish, and bacteria, among others), which produces MMA(V) and DMA(V) [40], according to the following sequence (Figure 5A and Figure 6),
i A s ( I I I ) + e , + M e + M M A ( V ) 2 e M M A ( I I I ) + e , + M e + D M A ( V ) 2 e D M A ( I I I )
The enzyme AS3MT transfers a methyl group from the co-factor SAM to iAs(III), generating a mono-methylated As(V) compound, MMA(V) [81], and S-adenosyl-L-homocysteine (SAH).
Using a multimodular protein, CmArsM, a 400-residue thermostable enzyme with 44,980 Da, orthologue of AS3MT, the reaction mechanism between iAs(III) and SAM provides the interaction of iAs(III) with the thiol groups of the cysteine (Cys) residues in Cys72, Cys174, and Cys224. In this process, the SAM sulphur atom carries a positive charge, which attracts an electron from the carbon atom to bond to the methyl group, facilitating a bimolecular nucleophilic substitution (SN2) reaction with the lone pair of electrons on the arsenic atom to form an As–C bond, leaving SAH [112].
The MMA(V) formed in Reaction (1) acts as a precursor to DMA(V). However, MMA(V) needs a previous reduction to MMA(III) by methylarsonate reductase, a member of the Glutathione S-Transferase superfamily, omega-1 (GSTO1), or omega-2 (GSTO2) [81], which are essential rate-limiting enzymes of iAs biotransformation [113]. The MMA(III) is methylated again by AS3MT through the co-factor SAM to form DMA(V) [114], SAM + CH3As(OH)2 ↔ SAH + DMA(V), which can be converted to DMA(III) by GTSO1 [81]. However, the cytosolic concentration of SAM varies among tissues; typically, in the sequence, testis > kidney > lung > liver [115,116].
The second route (Reaction (2)) involves thiol-containing iAs(III) complexes, in which methylation occurs by a non-oxidative mechanism. In this route, iAs(III) species acquire two methyl groups first, making a complex with the thiol-containing tripeptide GSH (enzyme encoded in humans by the GSR gene) and probably also lipoic acid (6,8-dithiooctanoic acid),
i A s ( I I I ) + S H A s ( I I I ) S G 3 + 2 e , + M e + M M A s ( I I I ) S G 2 + M e + D M A s ( I I I ) S H
In this second route, the metabolism of iAs(III) to form methylated arsenicals occurs by AS3MT, transferring a methyl group from SAM to the As(III) centre, but only when GSH is present via arsenic triglutatione (ATG(III), As(III)(SG)3), which transforms into monomethylarsino diglutathione (MMADG(III) or MMA(III)(SG)2) [81]. Furthermore, AS3MT can methylate this complex again, establishing equilibrium with the DMA(III)-SG (DMAG(III), dimethylarsino glutathione) [81,117]. Both MMADG(III) and DMAG(III) are unstable at low GSH concentrations (2.4 mmol/L), hydrolysing and oxidising to MMA(V) and DMA(V), respectively. This model requires the scission of an As(III)–S bond between the cysteinyl residue of GSH and As(III). The oAs(V) compounds have an affinity to thiol groups lower than iAs(V) ones [99], but GSH can reduce non-enzymatically oAs(V) [94]. Thus, GSH or glutathione-S-transferase omega class 1-1 (GSTO1-1) (enzyme encoded by the GSTO1 gene) reduces MMA(V) to MMA(III) [118]. In a second reaction, MMA(III) can be oxidatively methylated to DMA(V) [119], while some DMA(V) can also be reduced to DMA(III) (Figure 5B). The GSTO1 gene is identical to the AS3MT gene [120], but the latter uses thioredoxin (Trx) and NADPH as a reducing agent, whereas GSTO1-1 uses GSH. The activity of AS3MT (methylation process) increased with the presence of GSH and, notably, if the reductants Trx/TR/NADPH-coupled system is present. However, the omission of Trx sharply reduces activity with minimal formation of MMA, suggesting some effect of GSH on AS3MT’s catalytic activity. TMAO(V) is present in reactions containing AS3MT, SAM, iAs(III), and TCEP (tris(2-carboxyethyl)phosphine) but not GSH.
On the other hand, the proposed metabolism of DMA(V) includes (i) the first reduction in DMA(V) to DMA(III), a more toxic and genotoxic compound [121], which then transforms into DMMTA(V) and DMMTA(III); (ii) formation of TMAO(V); and (iii) reduction in DMA(V) to (CH3)2AsH, which transforms to peroxyl (O-O-R), hydroperoxyl (H-O-O), hydroxyl (O-H), and superoxide (O2) radicals [113,122].
Some thioarsenicals, DMMTA(V), and smaller amounts of DMMTA(III), appeared as metabolites in sheep’s urine, which naturally consumed arsenosugars from seaweed as a primary food source [69,70]. Further, incubation of MMA(III), DMA(V), and DMA(III) in rats, hamsters, mice, and human RBCs, measuring the uptake rates and the arsenic species present, has confirmed that DMA(III) is taken up more efficiently than DMA(V) [88]. DMA(III) transforms in the presence of sulphide ions to DMMTA(III) and DMMTA(V) by oxidative replacement of the (As-)OH group (Figure 7) with the (As-)SH group [74,123,124]. The As-S bond in MMADG(III) and DMAG(III) is more stable than in ATG(III), suggesting that the stability of the As–S bond is critical in the disposition/excretion of methylated As(III) compounds in mammals [124]. GSH-conjugated forms of trivalent arsenicals, ATG(III) and MMADG(III), but not DMAG(III), have been detected in bile [125,126,127]. DMAG(III) constitutes a key metabolite in the metabolism of iAs, which is seemingly excreted into the bloodstream in a trivalent form, although the underlying mechanism is not yet understood [111,117]. The chemical kinetics and potency of methylated thioarsenicals and oxyarsenicals As(V) differ when acting as cytotoxicants and genotoxicants [128]. So, the formation, fate, and effects of methylated thioarsenicals require bridging the molecular processes underlying methylation and thiolation reactions [128].
The methylation rate of As(III) varies among species and ethnicity [129], with essential differences between individuals, including functional genetic polymorphisms, age, sex, pregnancy, body weight, arsenic species, dose levels, exposure routes, smoking habits, nutritional status, and dietary composition affecting the different susceptibility to iAs-induced health hazards [64,130,131,132]. Thus, women, particularly during pregnancy, have greater methylation capacity than men and exhibit increased tAs levels in urine [133]. Similar enhanced methylation of As(III) occurs in children, but not in adults [134]. Furthermore, smoking and alcohol consumption relate to a low As(III) methylation capacity, while subjects with skin lesions show a low arsenic methylation capacity [135]. A robust genetic association exists between three polymorphic sites in the AS3MT gene and the DMA(V) to MMA(V) ratio in Mexican children (7–11 years old) but not in adults (18–79 years old) [64]. Thus, single-nucleotide polymorphisms in GSTO1, GSTO2, and PNP (purine nucleotide phosphorylase) are associated with As-induced skin lesions, which are the most common signs of iAs toxicity [136]. The strong association between AS3MT and GST polymorphisms, that affect iAs metabolism, has significant implications for the toxicology and pharmacogenetics of As(III) with substantial repercussions for public health and government regulations [137,138].
Many organisms methylate iAs, but some mammals, including the guinea pig, marmoset monkey, chimpanzee, and many South American monkeys, are incapable of methylating iAs because they are deficient in or have slightly different forms (genetic or ethnic polymorphism) of AS3MT [64]. Alternatively, nutritional status also plays a crucial role in arsenic methylation, where folate may facilitate the methylation and excretion of As(III) [134], linking As(III) metabolism with one-carbon/folate metabolism and histidine catabolism. For this reason, it is unclear whether diabetes is related to arsenic metabolism or is a consequence of the metabolism of one-carbon molecules [139]. A protein-altering variant in FTCD (formiminotransferase cyclodeaminase) increases urinary excretion of iAs and MMA(III) but not DMA(III), also inducing skin lesions [140,141]. Other detoxification pathways are activated by methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase and glutathione S-transferase, which are involved in iAs(III) metabolism in humans, and polymorphisms in the genes that encode these enzymes play a role in susceptibility to arsenic-induced cancer [142], which can be influenced by environmental, genetic, and nutritional factors.
Low levels of other oAs, such as arsenobetaine {(CH3)3As+CH2COO, AsBet} and arsenocholine {(CH3)3As+CH2CH2OH, AsCho}, are also present in living systems, although AsCho is oxidised to AsBet in vivo, ubiquitously present in marine and terrestrial habitats [143]. Nonetheless, the biosynthesis of AsBet also occurs from dimethyl arsinoyl ethanol {(CH3)2As(O)CH2CH2OH}. This process involves an oxidation stage, generating the acidic carboxymethyl group {-CH2COOH} of dimethyl arsinoyl acetate {(CH3)2As(O)CH2COO}, catalysed by a methyltransferase enzyme using SAM as a methyl donor [144]. The reversible action of a methyltransferase also catalyses the bioconversion of AsBet to (CH3)2As(O)CH2COO [145].

2.3. Arsenobiolome: Arsenic Species with Specific Beneficial or Harmful Activity

Arsenobiolome refers to the different forms of arsenic and their beneficial and harmful effects.

2.3.1. General Toxicological Effects of Arsenic Species

As(III) is highly toxic and a carcinogen (classified as Group I by the International Agency for Research on Cancer, IARC) [146]. Strongly associated iAs toxicity problems mainly include cardiac, respiratory, gastrointestinal, reproductive system, liver, kidney, nervous, and neurological disorders [10], developing especially skin, lung, and bladder cancers, disabling the immune system, and generating coma and death [147,148]. Additionally, iAs causes dermatological manifestations, such as raindrop pigmentation and hyperkeratosis, also facilitating the excretion of several compounds in the urine: (i) uroporphyrin (2,7,12,17-porphine-tetra propionic acid, any of the four isomeric porphyrins) (uroporphyrinuria), (ii) coproporphyrin (3,8,13,17-tetramethylporphyrin-2,7,12,18-tetrapropanoic acid or any related porphyrin compounds originated from the decomposition of bilirubin and haemoglobin) (coproporphyrinuria), and (iii) protein (tubular proteinuria). Furthermore, total blood arsenic concentrations are associated with diverse metabolic alterations, including those directly related to one-carbon metabolism (OCM) pathways [149]. A relationship exists between human exposure to iAs and diverse diseases, and further studies are needed to confirm this causal association [150].
Even though conditioned by its clearance rate from the body, iAs(III) species are more toxic than iAs(V) [151]. The gas arsine, AsH3, also shows a strong toxicity [152]. Nonetheless, oAs(V) species are less toxic than iAs(V) [9]. This way, methylation is classically the primary mechanism of biotransformation and detoxification for iAs [153]. However, methylated As(III) species are, in general, more toxic than iAs(III) to humans and animals [105,154], although they are excreted more rapidly in urine [91], thereby addressing the potential drawback generated through methylation. The oral LD50 values (for rats) differ broadly for iAs(V) (100 mg/kg), iAs(III) (41 mg/kg), MMA(V) (961 mg/kg), and DMA(V) (644 mg/kg) [155], although the LC50 value found in Chang human hepatocytes using tetrazolium salt is 13.6 μmol/L for MMA(III) versus 164 μmol/L for iAs(III) [104].
The most toxic arsenic compound, AsH3 [152], causes haemolysis of RBCs, leading to haemolytic anaemia, which is responsible for the development of oliguria (diuresis), a primary criterion for diagnosing acute kidney injury (AKI) (or acute renal failure). AsH3 can also interact with the -SH groups of proteins and enzymes, inhibiting the erythrocyte sodium–potassium pump [156].
Several iAs(III) compounds, such as NaAsO2 and As2O3, cause oxidative stress (OS), genotoxicity, cytotoxicity, cell cycle arrest, and apoptosis. However, the use of As2O3 improves production of reactive oxygen species (ROS), significantly decreasing superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity and intracellular GSH levels compared with NaAsO2 [157]. Furthermore, DNA damage, chromosomal breakage, cell cycle arrest, and apoptosis are more severe in the As2O3-treated cells than in the NaAsO2-treated cells at the same tAs content [158]. This paradoxical differential behaviour of NaAsO2 and As2O3 results in distinct mechanisms of carcinogenesis and anticancer function [159], likely due to minimal differences in the chemical structure of the same iAs(III) solutions, as suggested by Raman spectroscopy [7]. These differences in the behaviour of both compounds, even though both compounds provide iAs(III) ions in solution, are still unclear. Their different biological behaviour is probably due to differences in the pH of the solutions prepared with both compounds. It is assumed that the arsenic species As(OH)3 is the most stable structure existing in solution at neutral pH. However, at neutral pH, As(OH)3 and AsO(OH)2 coexist at different concentrations [160,161], which, together with the fact that As2O3 provides twice the number of iAs(III) ions per molecule, means that the arsenic solutions injected into the experimental subjects can be quite different.
iAs(III) and its methylated derivatives, MMA(III) and DMA(III), are more toxic than the corresponding pentavalent arsenicals, iAs(V), MMA(V), and DMA(V) [162,163]. The toxicity of iAs(III) is associated with the generation of ROS within cells [164,165,166] and its effective interactions with the –SH groups of proteins [167,168]. Consequently, iAs(III) species inhibit many enzymes [169], such as succinate dehydrogenase and pyruvate dehydrogenase (PDH) [169], thereby elevating lactate dehydrogenase levels and leading to lactic acidosis [170]. Furthermore, iAs(III) species can inhibit DNA repair processes [171], thereby enhancing cancer susceptibility [172], and causing other multi-system non-cancerous effects [2,173]. In rats, iAs(III) enhances in vitro arterial thrombosis, increases serotonin levels, thromboxane A2 formation, and platelet adhesion proteins in platelets (similar to human platelets) [174]. Human exposure to iAs can induce atherosclerosis by increasing platelet aggregation and reducing fibrinolysis, leading to arrhythmia and increased cellular calcium overload [175]. In addition, iAs upregulates the expression of interleukin-1, tumour necrosis factor-α, vascular cell adhesion molecule, and vascular endothelial growth factor, thereby inducing cardiovascular pathogenesis [176].
Like iAs(III) and unlike MMA(V), MMA(III) binds strongly to the SH-group of proteins. As a result, MMA(III) and DMA(III) are in vitro and in vivo significantly more cytotoxic to human and animal cells than iAs(III), assuming the decreasing toxicity sequence MMA(III) > DMA(III) > iAs(III) > iAs(V) > MMA(V) ≥ DMA(V) [105,119,154,162,164,177,178,179]. MMA(III) species are highly reactive, being a much more potent inhibitor than iAs(III) and MMA(V) for glutathione reductase, glutathione peroxidase [180], PDH [177], and especially TR [181,182]. Conclusively, methylation is not solely involved in a detoxification mechanism of iAs(III) but could also represent a pathway for its activation [183]. We can note the greater toxicity of methylated As(III) with respect to genotoxic effects, particularly in humans, who exhibit higher methylation rates than those excreting less methylated species and, consequently, more iAs [184]. Therefore, MMA(III) must be considered a pivotal intermediary to understand the genesis and evolution of iAs carcinogenicity.
The high toxicity of the trivalent and pentavalent thioarsenicals warrants additional research, as amino acids (Cys) and peptides (GSH) containing –SH groups bind As(III) metabolites more effectively than those of As(V) [183]. Thus, the cytotoxicity of DMMTA(V) (LC50 10.7 μmol/L) is higher than that of iAs(III) (LC50 5.5 μmol/L) and DMA(III) (LC50 2.2 μmol/L) for cultured A431 human epidermoid carcinoma cells [185,186,187,188]. This high toxicity is also relevant to iAs-induced carcinogenicity in the urinary bladder [75], whilst EJ-1 human bladder cancer cells follow the decreasing toxicity sequence DMA(III), DMMTA(V) > iAs(III)iAs(V) > MMMTA(V) > MMA(V), DMA(V), and DMDTA(V). Exposure of EJ-1 human bladder cancer cells to DMMTA(V) reduces the expression of the p21 and p53, accompanied by increased DNA damage and elevated intracellular ROS levels. However, iAs(III) significantly increases the protein expression of p21 and p53, as well as the intracellular GSH contents in human bladder cancer EJ-1 cells, but not the ROS levels at the IC50, although ROS levels increase after prolonged exposure to iAs(III) [75]. Exposure of human bladder cancer EJ-1 cells to DMA(III) or DMMTA(V) reduces the GSH levels, suggesting that DMMTA(V) causes cell death through OS [75].
Arsenic (arsenite) also acts as an antagonist to selenium (Se) as selenite in vivo through the formation of seleno-bis (S-glutathionyl) arsinium ion, [AsSe(GS)2] [189,190], accelerating its excretion from the bile [191] and affecting its metabolism in vivo [192]. Thus, Se deficiency can result from chronic exposure to iAs [161,193]. In particular, high concentrations of iSe(IV) in serum (0.160–0.174 μg/g creatinine) correlate with reduced methyl and dimethyl arsenic levels in urine in human studies [194]. In other words, the concurrent exposure to iSe(IV) and iAs(III) inhibits methylation. It increases retention of iAs(III) [195], which is significantly higher in tissues and, consequently, has more pronounced toxic effects [102], also forming [AsSe(GS)2] in liver tissues, which is then rapidly excreted via bile into the intestinal tract [193]. Se(IV) and N-acetylcysteine (NAC) play a similar role, protecting against As2O3-induced cytotoxicity, DNA damage, and apoptosis in PLHC-1 cells [196]. On the other hand, other interacting compounds involve the vitamin B complex, where the intake of thiamin (B1), niacin (B3), pantothenic acid (B5), and pyridoxine (B6) correlates with an increased tAs excretion in humans [196].
Many microorganisms from As(III)-enriched environments are resistant to iAs toxicity [151,197,198,199,200]. The resistance of Escherichia coli to iAs links to the combined effect of the following five genes [201,202]: (i) ArsR/metal-binding protein with a domain for iAs(III) (and iSb(III) as well); (ii) ArsD/metal-binding protein with three pairs of vicinal Cys residues; (iii) ArsA, a catalytic unit of arsenite-translocating ATPase; (iv) ArsB membrane sector of ArsA gene product; and (v) ArsC, an arsenate reductase. However, similar studies need to be conducted on mammalian cells. The resistance involves reduced uptake of iAs(V) and increased phosphate (PO43−) transport within the bacterial cell, resulting from a possible intracellular competition between iAs(V) (AsO43−) and PO43− ions. Certain microorganisms can develop alternative resistance mechanisms to iAs toxicity by reducing the less toxic iAs(V) form to the more toxic iAs(III), which is then more rapidly excreted [9,203,204]. The OS adaptation factors, such as ABC transporter proteins (ABCC1, ABCC2), GST-π, and SOD, together with efflux As(III), heme oxygenase-1 (HO-1), and Nrf2, usually facilitate As(III) tolerance, playing essential roles in innate resistance to As(III) [205].
From a general perspective, iAs intoxication in mammals can occur at high and low doses and over short and chronic exposure times. Intoxication by high concentrations of iAs(III) results in its accumulation in cells, with effects quite different from those observed with a slow accumulation of low As(III) doses. The latter situation would allow tolerance mechanisms to come into play. Low doses (μg/L concentrations in drinking water) of iAs(III) species show aneugenicity (activity to induce aneuploidy or an abnormal number of chromosomes) [206]. However, at high doses (μg/L concentrations in drinking water) of As(III), it behaves as a clastogenic agent causing disruption or breakages in chromosomes in human keratinocytes [207,208]. The human adults’ minimal lethal dose for acute As(III) poisoning is around 100–300 mg [209] or ≈0.6 mg/kg/day [210], although the toxicity level also depends on the chemical form present. Nonetheless, differences in the acute and chronic effects of As(III) remain poorly understood, particularly in terms of signal transduction. Thus, after acute (24 h) exposure (human keratinocyte and fibroblast cells) to As(III), the generation of ROS activates AP-1 (activator protein 1) and NF-κB (nuclear factor-κB), resulting in c-fos/c-jun activation, over-secretion of pro-inflammatory and growth-promoting cytokines stimulating cell proliferation [211,212,213,214]. In contrast, long-term exposure (10–12 weeks) of human fibroblast cells to iAs(III) induces carcinogenesis [215], via several mechanisms, including genotoxicity, altered cell proliferation, OS, epigenetic changes, signal transduction disorders, cytotoxicity, and regenerative proliferation [216].
Early-life exposure to the following doses of iAs in drinking water, 2 weeks before pregnancy until the birth of the F1 offspring, 1, 10, 245, and 2300 μg/L, induces phenotypic changes in offspring and subsequent generations of foetal primordial germ cells (PGCs), influencing the long-term health of the rat lineage [217]. Changes in body weight in a rat model with chronic exposure to arsenic in drinking water (1 mg As2O3/L) have been shown to decrease sperm quality, likely due to DNA methylation in ovaries and testes, DNA damage in the white blood cells (WBC), and aberrant gonad morphology [218]. Notwithstanding, there are dose-dependent effects of As(III) exposure in utero in humans, including genetic damages in newborns as determined by 8-OHdG, 8-nitroguanine, DNA strand breaks, and micronuclei (MN) frequency, which facilitate the later development of various diseases, including cancer [219]. Furthermore, DNA-N7-methylguanine (DNA-N7-MeG) in urine is an indicator of alkylating agent exposure in humans, and As(III)-induced N7-MeG levels in urine of pregnant women significantly associated with an increased risk of adverse birth outcomes in newborns, emphasising maternal N7-MeG as a sensitive and effective biomarker for newborn health, particularly after early-life As(III) prenatal exposure to low-to-moderate levels of arsenic [220].
In the following subsections, we highlight some particular toxicological effects of arsenic species.
Signal Transduction
As(III) alters different cellular signalling, inducing ROS, neoplastic transformation, carcinogenesis, and apoptosis, also affecting different the cell cycle, growth factors, mitogen-activated protein kinase pathways, NF-ĸβ regulation, cellular proliferation, and matrix-metalloproteinases (MMPs) [221]. Human exposure to iAs affects signal transduction, inducing heat shock proteins (HSP) [211,222] and increasing OS by generating ROS and reactive nitrogen species (RNS) [22], with ROS playing the most crucial role in exerting arsenic’s toxic effects [223]. Moreover, iAs generate OS by depleting the cell’s antioxidants containing –SH groups [48]. Oxidative stress causes cell damage, altering glucose homeostasis and lipid metabolism, which facilitates the development of metabolic syndrome X, obesity, insulin resistance, inflammation, and type 2 diabetes [224,225,226]. Oxidative stress disrupts the signal transduction pathways of the nuclear transcriptional factors PPARs (peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors) [227], which play a crucial physiological role in the ω-hydroxylation of fatty acids. Further, the OS also inhibits pro-inflammatory transcription factors (the nuclear factor kappa beta, NF-κB, and the activator protein-1, AP-1), pro-inflammatory cytokines (interleukins, IL-1, -6, -8, -12, and tumour necrosis factor, TNF-α), pro-inflammatory nitric oxide (NO), inducible nitric oxide synthase (NOS), cell adhesion molecules (ICAM-1 and VCAM-1), and anti-apoptotic factors [87,215,224,226,228,229,230,231,232,233,234]. The OS inhibits antioxidant enzymes, such as SOD and catalase, but particularly GSH-dependent enzymes, like glutathione-S-transferases (GSTs), GSH peroxidase (GSH-Px), GSH reductase [179], and TR [181], via binding to the –SH groups [235,236]. The last enzyme catalyses the NADPH-dependent reduction in the redox protein Trx [237], thereby impairing cellular protective mechanisms against oxidants [235]. However, Trx depletion affects gene expression by modulating the DNA-binding activity of specific transcription factors [238,239,240]. A decrease in cellular GSH content sensitises cultured rat myoblast (L6) cells to iAs(III) and iAs(V) compounds, contributing to cell transformation [241].
iAs can induce mitochondrial biogenesis through the mitochondrial transcription factor A (mtTFA) in keratinocytes, the primary cell type of the epidermis. However, iAs also induces mitochondrial dysfunction and apoptosis in the hearts of ducks by inhibiting Nrf2 activation, downregulating Nrf2, HO-1, and SOD-1 mRNA and protein, and upregulating the expression of Keap1 mRNA and protein [242]. Exposure to iAs also increases mitochondrial oxidative damage (OD) with mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) mutation in keratinocytes and tumour tissues of patients with iAs-induced skin cancers. Thus, carcinogenesis progression is related to mitochondrial OD, making mitochondria a therapeutic target for treating cancers involving iAs(III) [243].
Furthermore, iAs suppresses the longevity gene SIRT1, which modulates fibrous actin in the liver and MIHA cells, thereby impeding the formation of membrane structures, such as tunnelling nanotubes, and the mitochondrial transfer between cells [244]. Specific demethylase fat mass and obesity-associated protein (FTO) can catalyse high levels of N6-methyladenosine, regulating OD induced by iAs via reader protein IGF2BP3 (insulin-like growth factor 2 mRNA binding protein 3). This process represents a new molecular mechanism underlying FTO-mediated OD, implicating enhanced SUMOylation of the FTO protein and thereby reducing its expression, which serves as a potential approach for treating OD [245]. Note that SUMOylation is a post-translational modification involving a family of small proteins (SUMO, Small Ubiquitin-like MOdifier) covalently attached to and detached from other proteins, modifying their function and playing a role in mediating protein quality control in cardiomyocytes by stimulating degradation through the ubiquitin proteasome system [246].
The action of iAs on NAD-linked substrates (support of mitochondrial respiration, decrease in adenosine triphosphate (ATP) synthesis, and increase phosphorylation of other intracellular biochemical species) also generates ROS (i.e., one-electron reduction of O2 to form free radical superoxide, O2), inducing OS, and altering cellular gene regulation [113,247,248,249]. ROS production can occur by activating the enzyme NADPH oxidase (NOX), which transfers electrons from NADPH to oxygen, generating reactive O2, and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2). However, the enzyme NOX generates more ROS in the presence of iAs, and the subunit p22phax, which is responsible for electron transfer, was upregulated by iAs [26]. The iAs(III) ion in cells induces the production of H2O2 as a result of the previous formation of ROS, such as OH and OOH [249], probably via Fenton- and Haber–Weiss-type reactions (Reactions (3)–(7)),
iAs(III) + 2 H2O2iAs(V) + 2 OH + 2 OH-
iAs(V) + 2 H2O2iAs(III) + 2 OOH + 2 H+
iAs(V) + 2 O2iAs(III) + 2 O2
(CH3)2AsH + O2 → (CH3)2As + O2 + H+
(CH3)2As + O2 → (CH3)2AsOO
The enzyme NOX contributes to the As(III)-dependent oxidation of PARP-1 {poli-(ADP-ribose)-polymerase-1}, thus inhibiting PARP-1 activity and enhancing UVR-induced DNA damage in keratinocytes. In human skin, the enzyme NOX2 is expressed at greater levels than the enzyme NOX1 [250,251,252], demonstrating that the NOX2 isoform is the major contributor to the As(III)-induced ROS and DNA damage retention in keratinocytes. NOX2 [253] and also metals such as zinc [254] show a role in mediating the effects of As(III) on UVR-induced DNA damage repair. The As(III) inhibition of UVR-induced PARP activity is not evident in the epidermis of NOX2−/− mice compared to controls, and retention of UVR-induced DNA damage by As(III) decreases in NOX2−/− mice [253].
On the other hand, DMA(III) also forms ROS by reaction with O2, generating the dimethyl arsenic radical {(CH3)2As} and the dimethylarsenic peroxyl radical {(CH3)2AsOO} [255]. Further, both DMA(III) and DMA(V) at 10 mmol/L concentration in vitro can release iron from horse spleen and human liver ferritin, at high rates (29.8 nmol/L Fe2+/min) as compared to the other arsenic species in the presence of ascorbic acid, thus promoting ROS through the Fenton reaction [164]. ROS stresses the endoplasmic reticulum, increasing the amount of unfolded protein response signals, which leads to inflammation, cell proliferation, and ultimately, cell death through cytoskeleton rearrangement and the disruption of contractile proteins [26]. Nonetheless, ROS also exhibits positive effects as a regulatory agent [256]. However, accurate analytical methods are available for determining ROS in cells and in vivo, thereby enhancing our understanding of their biological functions [257].
RNS, which is responsible for damaging DNA, forms after ROS damage to the mitochondria [26]; however, other unstable, reactive species are also typically present. Thus, the endothelial NOS combines with L-arginine to form NO, but MMA(III) at concentrations of 0–15 μmol/L inactivates this enzyme in a concentration-dependent manner [26] by reducing the NO generation and its bioavailability. Similarly, As(III) also acts as a competitive inhibitor, interfering with the binding of L-arginine, a substrate, to the active site of NOS, thereby reducing NO production. NO participates in cell regulation, including cellular metabolism, growth, division, and even death [26]. Furthermore, the superoxide O2 can react with NO radicals [26], releasing the much more cytotoxic peroxynitrite (ONO2), an unstable structural isomer of nitrate.
iAs(III) affects voltage-gated potassium channels [258], which can cause life-threatening heart rhythm problems due to low cellular potassium levels. Consequently, disrupting cellular electrolytic function results in neurological disturbances and several cardiovascular episodes, such as a wider QT interval on electrocardiogram (elapsed time taken by the heart muscle to contract and recover), neutropenia (abnormally low levels of neutrophils), high blood pressure, central nervous system dysfunction, anaemia, and death [259]. iAs compounds block both IKr and IKs channels in vitro with an IC50 for tail current block of 0.14 ± 0.01 µmol/L for IKr and 1.13 ± 0.06 µmol/L for IKs but activate IK-ATP channels and disrupt ATP production in HERG- or KCNQ1+KCNE1-transfected CHO cells [260]. Alternatively, at the citric acid cycle level, the binding between MMA(III) and the thiol group of the lipoic acid co-factor allosterically inhibits the activity of the essential PDH complex [183], which catalyses pyruvate oxidation to acetyl-CoA with the transformation of NAD+ to NADH, uncoupling oxidative phosphorylation by competing with PO43−. Consequently, it inhibits the energy-linked reduction in NAD+, mitochondrial respiration, and ATP production in the electron transport chain, as well as gluconeogenesis intermediates [183]. The cell’s energy system is disrupted in this situation, leading to a cellular apoptosis episode.
iAs is a significant environmental risk factor for neurodegenerative diseases, triggering neuronal cell death through the following signalling pathways: (i) the JNK/ERK activation-mediated mitochondria-dependent apoptosis pathway, where mitochondrial dysfunction, PARP cleavage, and caspase cascade activation are essential for apoptosis, and (ii) the GRP 78 and CHOP activation resulting in neuronal cell apoptosis [261]. As(III)-induced upregulation of AS3MT, which is overexpressed in human lung adenocarcinoma (A549) and human bronchial epithelial (16HBE) cells, inhibits the p53 signalling pathway by the deactivation of p38 MAPK and binding to c-Fos, thereby promoting cell proliferation and inhibiting cellular apoptosis. This way, AS3MT might be a notable proto-oncogene mediating iAs-induced tumorigenesis in lung cancer [262]. Alternatively, the iAs-induced transformation (As-T) cells show upregulation of EGFR (epidermal growth factor receptor) and downregulation of miR-218-5p. MiR-218-5p can act as a tumour suppressor, inhibiting cell proliferation, migration, colony formation, tube formation, tumour growth, and angiogenesis by directly targeting EGFR via its 30-untranslated region (UTR). This way, the 218-5p/EGFR signalling pathway represents a potential therapeutic target for treating lung cancer induced by chronic exposure to iAs [263]. Furthermore, iAs, which is linked to N6-methyladenosine (m6A), a significant and dynamic epigenetic RNA modification, contributes to the development of iAs(III)-induced skin lesions. Arsenite induces METTL3 (methyltransferase-like 3) upregulation, represses suppressors of cytokine signalling 3 (SOCS3) expression in an m6A-YTH m6A RNA binding protein 2 (YTHDF2)-dependent manner, and leads to the aberrant activation of the Janus kinase (JAK)2/signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3) signalling pathway. The activated transcription factor STAT3 binds to the promoters of Krt1 and Krt10, thereby facilitating their transcription, and ultimately leading to As(III)-induced skin lesions [264].
On the other hand, iAs(V) species bind covalently to the thiol groups of GSH and Cys residues, forming thioesters [124]. They also react with glucose and gluconate to form glucose-6-arsenate and 6-arsenogluconate, which act as analogues for glucose-6-phosphate and 6-phosphogluconate, respectively [183]. Unlike the importance of PO43− in glycolysis, iAs(V) attacks the enzyme-bound thioester in the D-glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase reaction, forming anhydride 1-arsenate-3-phospho-D-glycerate, which hydrolyses spontaneously due to the long As-O’s bond length (≈1.77 Å) compared to P-O (≈1.54 Å) [183]. As a result, it prevents the subsequent transfer of PO43− to adenosine diphosphate (ADP) and impedes ATP formation in glycolysis [183], thereby lowering cellular energy. These metabolic interferences can lead to death due to a multi-system organ failure, probably necrotic cell death, but not apoptosis. Submitochondrial particles synthesise adenosine-5′-diphosphate-arsenate from ADP and iAs(V) in the presence of succinate, impairing cell respiration and subsequently diminishing ATP formation [265]. Chronic exposure (18–20 weeks) of CAsE cells to low levels (500 nmol/L) of iAs(III) species also induces the production of proteins, such as metallothionein (MT-I/II) in a rat liver epithelial cell line (TRL 1215) [266,267], which in turn gives protection against proper iAs(III) toxicity, mainly because MT blocks the possible participation of intracellular heme group and porphyrins in the formation of ROS. Thus, levels of GSH, ferritin, porphyrins, and the 32 kDa stress protein (heme oxygenase, HO) increase after treatment of human cells with iAs(III) [208,268,269,270]. Other stress proteins, such as those in the 27, 60, and 90 kDa families, are also induced by iAs(III), indicating broad proteotoxic stress (accumulation of misfolded proteins) [271].
Chronic Effects (Chronic Exposure) of Arsenic Species to Humans
The chronic effects result from a slow but permanent accumulation of low doses of toxicants. Documentation of the chronic effects of iAs in humans is extensive, with the most affected organs usually involved in absorption, accumulation, and excretion (the gastrointestinal tract, circulatory system, heart, liver, kidney, and skin) [272]. Strong epidemiological relationships exist between long-term ingestion of iAs and bladder, lung, kidney, and liver cancers, as well as other health effects [273,274,275]. Thus, prolonged exposure to low-level iAs elicits a pro-inflammatory profile, partly driven by the blood monocyte marker CD14, which can lead to the prolonged persistence of pulmonary and systemic inflammation, promoting oxidative DNA damage in rural women [276]. Chronic exposure to iAs relates to vitamin A deficiency, heart disease (hypertension-related cardiovascular disease) [277], stroke (cerebrovascular diseases) [278], chronic lower respiratory diseases [279], diabetes [280,281], and night blindness (nyctalopia) [282]. The most frequent signs of chronic iAs toxicity include dermal lesions (hyperpigmentation, hyperkeratosis, desquamation or skin peeling, and loss of hair), peripheral neuropathy (damage of the peripheral nerves), Blackfoot disease (BFD, a peripheral vascular disorder), and different cancers [210,283]. However, each cancer type shows a different iAs speciation profile and, in general, a different metallome [284]. All skin cancers, including in situ cell carcinoma (Bowen’s disease), invasive cell carcinoma, and multiple basal cell carcinomas, are associated with chronic iAs exposure [285,286,287]. These signs have been observed chiefly among people working in arsenic ore smelters, pesticides, and drinking water contaminated with iAs [239], representing a public health issue worldwide [173]. Individuals who chronically drank water contaminated with iAs showed increased cytokine expression and cell proliferation in skin biopsies [288]. A correlation exists between chronic iAs exposure through drinking water and Type 2 diabetes mellitus [87], although no scientific evidence exists regarding cause-and-effect relationships. Nonetheless, related findings have shown a direct correlation between elevated serum lipid peroxides (LPO) and blood levels of iAs and its methylated metabolites in individuals exposed to iAs, but an inverse correlation with nonprotein sulfhydryl levels in the general population [289]. Nevertheless, evidence linking arsenic exposure to chronic kidney disease is still scarce and limited to some populations [290].
Notwithstanding these factors, several other factors, such as inadequate nutrition and genetics, can also enhance susceptibility to different iAs-induced diseases [282,291,292]. Thus, Euro-Americans show basal cell carcinoma, but in Asians, Bowen’s disease. On the other hand, individuals from India show a range of health effects, including peripheral vascular disease (BFD), non-cirrhotic portal fibrosis, obstructive lung diseases, and polyneuropathy (peripheral neuropathy), whilst in Taiwan (China), changes in skin pigmentation and hyperkeratosis are widespread [293]. The vascular disease appeared among German vintners, inhabitants of Antofagasta (Chile), and Taiwanese people [294]. Other effects are hematopoietic depression, anhydremia (abnormal reduction in water in the blood), liver damage characterised by jaundice (icterus), portal or nutritional cirrhosis (Laënnec’s cirrhosis) and ascites, sensory disturbance and peripheral neuritis, anorexia and weight loss. Females are more susceptible to developing iAs-induced skin affection, probably due to a more efficient methylation process in females’ iAs metabolism [295,296]. Thus, Thai females are more affected by skin manifestations, including skin cancer, which is likely induced by the combined effects of skin melanin and ultraviolet (UV) radiation [297].
Some epigenetic effects change gene expression without altering the genetic code by altering DNA methylation [298], which can result in opposite methylation patterns (hypo- and hyper-methylation). The identification of signature epigenetic patterns associated with telomere lengthening, mitochondrial functions, and DNA damage repair in arsenic-exposed children revealed altered DNA methylation profiles, including promoter hypermethylation of MLH1 and MSH2, indicating inefficiency in DNA damage repair. Additionally, hypomethylation was observed in the mitochondrial D-loop and the TFAM promoter region, accompanied by an increase in the number of mitochondrial DNA copy number. Further, a significant increase in telomere length and region-specific subtelomeric hypermethylation was found. Analysis of SAM and 8-oxo-2′-deoxyguanosine (8-oxo-2dG) levels revealed significant depletion of SAM and elevated oxidative DNA damage in iAs toxicity [299].
Choline and other methyl-group donors, such as methionine, betaine, and the B group vitamins, influence DNA methylation primarily by affecting the concentrations of SAH and SAM. Thus, hypomethylation may occur due to a lack of SAM, resulting in aberrant gene activation [98,300,301]. In mice, making hepatic methyl donors deficient through a choline-deficient diet, arsenite-induced genotoxicity shifts from the liver and bladder (in normal mice) to the skin (in methyl-deficient mice) [302]. The long-term effects of iAs suggest that genome-wide DNA hypomethylation contributes to genetic instability [303]. Chronic low-dose As(III) exposure can lead to global hypomethylation, which is associated with prolonged exposure periods, accompanied by the concomitant induction of the DNA methyltransferase genes DNMT1 and DNMT3B, and a slight downregulation of DNMT3A. Thus, pronounced time- and concentration-dependent effects of iAs are observed when genes are involved in the DNA damage response and repair, inflammation, the OS response, and metal homeostasis are affected [304]. Hypomethylation also represents a critical process in the transformation induced by iAs(III)-induced transformation of Syrian hamster embryo cells [305].
The interaction of As(III) with methyltransferases, particularly in relation to DNA methylation, typically leads to the inactivation of tumour suppressor genes through hypermethylation [306]. Many proteins encoded by genes with differentially methylated cytosine-guanine (CpG) islands play critical roles in arsenic-associated diseases, including heart disease, diabetes, and cancer. Chronic exposure to iAs(III) leads to a large interactome of hypermethylated genes, including p53 and p16, which are involved in cancer-associated pathways [307,308]. Nonetheless, conclusive results on the effect of iAs(III) on DNA methylation of the p53 gene promoter in human lung A549 carcinoma cells are still elusive. In other words, progressively increased methylation at CpG islands—DNA sequence clusters rich in CpG dinucleotides within the p53 promoter—would be expected to block transcription of the p53 gene [309,310]. However, the protein produced by the tumour-suppressor p53 gene functions as a transcriptional regulator, playing a crucial role in activating the expression of numerous other genes involved in cell death, cell cycle arrest, senescence, apoptosis, DNA repair, and other processes [311,312]. Cells treated with iAs(III) reported altered expression of the p53 promoter and changes in the cell cycle distribution, while cells transfected with a mutant p53 gene showed increased sensitivity to iAs(III) cytotoxicity [206,313]. An arsenic-methylated tumour suppressorome comprised seventeen known or putative tumour suppressors, silenced in arsenic-induced human cancers (bladder, kidney, lung, liver, and prostate), cardiovascular disease, and diabetes mellitus [308,314,315].
Different altered growth factors lead to cell proliferation and carcinogenesis [48]. Thus, cell proliferation induced by mitogenic stimuli or by regeneration after cytotoxicity can enhance carcinogenesis [316]. No definitive model exists for the Brambila chronic iAs poisoning mechanism, although chronic low-dose iAs poisoning may increase tolerance to its acute toxicity [207,283], mediated through the drug pump MRP1-mediated efflux [317]. In GLC4 and GLC4/ADR cells, overexpression of MRP1, a human membrane protein, reduced the efficiency of arsenic-derived anticancer drugs. Furthermore, as the MRP1-catalysed export of GSH from cells increases in response to As(III) and its efflux depends on cell type (resistant or sensitive), it has been postulated that MRP1 can act as a carrier of the As(SG)3 complex [318,319]. However, its significance in the in vivo metabolism and transport of As(III) still needs to be demonstrated [320]. The toxicity and carcinogenicity of iAs might be tissue-specific, whilst co-carcinogenicity occurs in diverse models. iAs(III), and perhaps some of its metabolites, can act as co-carcinogens by activating signal transduction pathways, enhancing cell proliferation, reducing antiproliferative signalling, and overriding checkpoints controlling cell division after a genotoxic insult [113]. The current consensus on the mode of carcinogenesis is that it acts primarily as a tumour promoter. However, Andean populations (most highly exposed to UV radiation) do not develop skin cancer with chronic iAs exposure [167], probably due to differences in the levels of iAs in the drinking water, although concentrations of 1.25 mg/L iAs(III) are able to enhance the tumorigenicity in mouse skin of solar UV irradiation, the most effective carcinogenic partner of arsenic [321]. Some of the factors governing the differences existing in the generation of skin cancer by As can include different UV-induced genotoxic photoproducts in DNA to those usual (cyclobutane dimers and 6–4 photoproducts at dipyrimidine sites), oxidative lesions, differences in the epigenetic influence, differences in the methylation process, DNA repair, DNA methylation, enhanced proliferation, and induction of genomic instability via effects on telomerase and the enzyme poly(ADP-ribosyl) polymerase [322]. Several mitogens (mitotic inducers), including growth factors, mitogenic lipids, inflammatory cytokines, and hormones, are modified by integrin-mediated adhesion (a critical regulator of cell migration) and thereby regulate the proliferation of mammalian cells [323].
As(III) impairs the immune system [108,324], thereby increasing susceptibility to viral and bacterial infections. Some viral infections, like the human papillomavirus (HPV), represent an additional risk factor in developing non-melanoma skin cancer among populations chronically exposed to iAs [325] and with squamous cell carcinoma and keratosis [326]. The unfolded protein response (UPR) increases the activity of several receptors responsible for restoring homeostasis [108]. The two receptors, inositol-requiring enzyme-1 (IRE1) and protein kinase RNA-like endoplasmic reticulum kinase (PERK), regulate the translation rates. On the other hand, chaperones correct the unfolded proteins induced by the activating transcription factor 6 (ATF6). If the number of erroneous proteins increases, another mechanism activates apoptosis, whose activity is enhanced by iAs [108]. Apoptosis may be an essential mechanism for iAs-induced immunosuppression [327]. However, malfunctions in apoptosis can lead to various diseases, including cancer [328]. Substantially low iAs(III) concentrations trigger apoptosis in B cell line TA3, which could mediate immunosuppressive effects [324,329]. iAs causes anaemia [286], whose severity indicates the extent of disruption to standard regulatory mechanisms exerted by macrophages and T-cells [330]. In children, iAs disrupts the ratio of CD4+ helper to CD8+ cytotoxic T cells, which is responsible for immunodepression [265], and increases the number of inflammatory molecules secreted through macrophages. An excessive number of granulocytes and monocytes can lead to chronic inflammation, which may contribute to the development of cancer [265].
Genotoxicity and Oxidative DNA Damage
The replacement of phosphorus (PO43−) with arsenic (AsO43−) in DNA or RNA is not straightforward and requires additional experimentation [331,332,333,334]. iAs is a weak mutagen because low iAs(III) concentrations do not react directly with DNA, even for bacteria [122]. Genome stability is notably altered through DNA replication, particularly when unrepaired or poorly repaired damage occurs. DNA repair enzymes are insensitive to inhibition by iAs(III), and consequently, iAs(III) can likely interfere with the regulation of DNA repair rather than with the specific repair enzymes [322]. Significant consumption of cooked rice with iAs concentrations exceeding 200 µg/kg generates genotoxic effects in humans, as measured by MN in urothelial cells [335]. Indirect genotoxicity in diverse in vitro and in vivo systems involves cytotoxic exposure, which is not the basis for cancer development. Evidence for genotoxicity in humans involves the detection of chromosomal aberrations, sister chromatid exchanges and micronucleus formation in lymphocytes, buccal mucosal cells, and exfoliated urothelial cells in the urine. However, a non-linear dose–response relationship exists for the effects of iAs(III), although with a threshold for biological responses, including cancer, in diverse in vitro and in vivo animal models and human epidemiological studies [336]. Overall, iAs(III) genotoxicity involves gene amplification and chromosomal damage, enhancing the mutagenicity of other carcinogens [337], such as UV light in humans and other mammalian cells [338], probably by inhibiting DNA methylation and DNA repair [339], which is one of the main mechanisms of genotoxicity involving iAs(III). Thus, iAs(III) species interfere with the base and nucleotide excision repair [340], inhibiting the repair of endogenously produced lesions, such as spontaneous mutagenesis caused by increasing endogenous reactive oxidant levels, ROS and NO, in plasma [341,342,343], directly associated with iAs levels in whole blood [344]. The iAs genotoxicity generates ROS [345,346,347], which can cause aberrant gene expression at low concentrations but, at higher concentrations, can damage lipids, proteins, and DNA (adducts, strand breaks, cross-links, and chromosomal aberrations) [348,349,350,351]. ROS also induces DNA base damage through nucleotide excision repair (NER) and base excision repair (BER). NER repairs bulky distortions in the DNA double helix while BER mainly focuses on single-strand breaks. Arsenic species (iAs(III), MMA(III), and DMA(III)) at concentrations up to 500 μmol/L, incubated in vitro for 24 h with human A549 epithelial lung adenocarcinoma cells, induced NER and BER inhibition, much more strongly with mixed arsenic species, although DNA polymerase beta showed an essential role in reducing arsenite-induced DNA damage [352,353,354,355,356,357].
OD occurs by modifying DNA nucleobases, particularly 8-oxoguanine (8-hydroxyguanine, 8-oxo-Gua, OH8Gua, 8-OHdG), which leads to G-C and T-A mutations [358]. iAs can cause malignant transformation in cells that do not methylate it, indicating that arsenic methylation is not necessary for the development of a malignant phenotype. However, methylated arsenic species, such as MMA(III), are directly involved in the generation of DNA OD [205]. Biomethylation of arsenic is essential for generating oxidative DNA damage, thereby increasing carcinogenicity. Ogg1 genetic background and arsenic-induced 8-OH-dG proved relevant for iAs-mediated carcinogenic effects [359]. Nonetheless, MT has high Cys content and can protect against iAs-induced OD, possibly by sequestering ROS or by directly responding to iAs. This effect is minor in cells that produce MT, showing minimal sensitivity to iAs-induced OD [360]. Compounds, such as polydatin (3,5,4′-Trihydroxystilbene-3-O-β-D-glucopyranoside) or piceid (a stilbenoid glucoside precursor of resveratrol), have a dose-dependent protective effect on iAs-induced LPO DNA damage, inflammation, and apoptosis in rats [361], enhancing the activity of the antioxidant defence system.
iAs(III), but not iAs(V), species induce DNA double-strand breaks in both lung fibroblasts and epithelial cells but only induce chromosomal aberrations, occasionally including chromosome breaks too [362], endoreduplication (replication of the nuclear genome without mitosis), aneuploidy (abnormal number of chromosomes), mitotic abnormalities, deletion mutations, MN formation [363,364], and cross-linking of DNA with proteins [113,365,366], particularly in human fibroblasts. Nonetheless, both iAs(III) and iAs(V) can cause sister chromatid exchanges [367]. iAs cause concentration-dependent but not time-dependent chromosome damage in lung fibroblasts, indicating cytotoxicity and genotoxicity in human lung primary cells. However, lung fibroblasts are more sensitive to the cytotoxicity of iAs than epithelial cells [368]. Protein cross-links might be the primary DNA lesions induced by iAs(III) [268,347,351,369,370]. Unlike spindle toxins, which disrupt cell division by altering the protein threads and connecting the centromere regions of chromosomes, iAs(III) species do not inhibit spindle fibre formation; instead, they upset the spindle apparatus (mitotic spindle), possibly by accelerating microtubule polymerisation [371]. Compounds, such as TiO2 nanoparticles (NPs), enhance the genotoxicity of As(III) in human–hamster hybrid mammalian cells via physicochemical interactions mediated by mitochondria-dependent ROS [372].
iAs causes epigenetic effects involving DNA methylation, histone tail modifications, and microRNA activity (noncoding RNA that modulates mRNA translation), which, together with its capacity to induce mutations, could be the leading cause of iAs-induced carcinogenesis [373].
Large doses of DMA(V) (up to 400 mg/L DMA(V) in drinking water) cause DNA damage in male F344/DuCrj rats, acting as a tumour promoter in mouse lungs, previously initiated with 4-nitroquinoline 1-oxide [121]. DMA(V) in rats produce high levels of 8-hydroxy-2′-desoxyguanosine (8-OHdG, a possible biomarker of ROS DNA damage) in the urine [107]. Further, DMA(V) at 5–100 μmol/L concentrations causes DNA single-strand breaks in human epithelial type II cells [351,374], also inducing DNA-protein cross-links and alkali-labile sites (a weakened polymer structure at the site of the attack on DNA) in cultured human alveolar L-132 cells [375,376]. MMA(III) and DMA(III) are directly genotoxic by effectuating scissions in supercoiled ΦX174 DNA [178].

2.4. Beneficial Effects of Inorganic Arsenic

iAs can cause toxicity but also play protective roles in various ways [377]. iAs can generate a potent poison, and some monomethylated arsenicals, such as MMA(V), acted as essential precursors in the preparation of earlier pesticides, insecticides (Paris green), herbicides, and fungicides (Neoasozin), even though they show diverse illnesses in humans [378].
Nonetheless, the use of iAs for over 200 years has also been reported to have direct beneficial effects on humans, particularly in traditional Chinese medicine, prior to the development of penicillin [379,380]. Thus, Fowler’s solution {1% potassium meta-arsenite (KAsO2)} and Donovan’s solution {arsenic triiodide and mercuric iodide (AsI3 and HgI2) mixed with sodium bicarbonate (NaHCO3)} have historically been reported (in the western world) as remedies for stomach ailments, several digestive problems, rheumatism, psoriasis, and syphilis [381].
The first synthetic chemotherapeutic agent applied as an antibiotic derives from the organoarsenic compound arsphenamine (Salvarsan, compound 606, Solarson, 2-amine-4-(3-amine-4-hydroxyphenyl)arsanilidenearsanilphenol clorhydrate) (Table 2), known as the “silver bullet” [382]. Later, sulfa drugs and other antibiotics replaced salvarsan as therapeutic agents. On the other hand, melarsoprol (Mel B; 2-(p-(4,6-diamino-S-triacin-2-ilamino)phenyl)-1,3,2-dithiarsolane-4-methanol) was an available medicinal compound for the treatment of trypanosomiasis (African sleeping sickness) related to the human central nervous system [382,383]. Mel B results from a condensation reaction between melarsen oxide (2-N-(4-arsorosophenyl)-1,3,5-triazine-2,4,6-triamine) and Dimercaprol or British anti-Lewisite (BAL, (R,S)-2,3-Dimercaptopropanol).
On the other hand, iAs(III) inhibits the in vitro proliferation of myeloma cells by inducing cell cycle arrest and triggering cell death [384], suggesting a potential clinically sound treatment for patients with multiple myeloma [385] or leukaemia [386]. iAs(III) induces the mitochondrial pathway of apoptosis in human leukaemia (HL-60) cells. However, this process is modulated by OS, DNA damage, and changes in the mitochondrial membrane potential, resulting in the translocation and upregulation of apoptotic proteins and programmed cell death [387]. iAs(III) is a chemotherapeutic drug for treating acute promyelocytic leukaemia (APL). Some patients with APL are often refractory to retreatment with tretinoin or all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA) and anthracycline chemotherapy [388], which is the first-line treatment; however, they respond successfully to the treatment with iAs(III) [381,389,390]. iAs(III) induces partial cytodifferentiation [389,391] and also triggers apoptosis of leukaemia cells, resulting in high remission rates in patients with relapsed APL [392] and chronic lymphocytic leukaemia [393]. Different diseases, including hyperleukocytosis, APL differentiation syndrome, electrocardiographic abnormalities, and hyperglycemia, were manageable [394], resulting in substantial clinical benefits. No increase in the incidence of secondary malignancies was observed among APL patients who received iAs(III) up to 5 years of follow-up [395]. Furthermore, moderate to high doses of iAs(III) and Mel B can control some leukaemia types (i.e., leukocytosis in patients with chronic myelocytic leukaemia) [383,384] or, in cooperation with lonidamine, induce apoptosis in HL-60 and other human leukaemia cell lines, with low toxicity in non-tumour peripheral blood lymphocytes [396], but sudden deaths among some patients also occur [397,398,399]. iAs(III) can act as a therapeutic agent, but it generates other side effects [400], as mentioned above.
Nonetheless, substantial efforts to expand its clinical utility to solid tumours are challenging [401] because iAs(III) still present many drawbacks in clinical use, mainly including rapid renal clearance and short half-life, severe adverse effects, and high toxicity to normal cells (folate receptor (FR)–positive human nasopharyngeal (KB) and cervix (HeLa) cells). However, nanomedicine can offer potential solutions to these limitations, treating them to achieve biocompatibility, targeting capability, and desirable effectiveness [402]. In this way, iAs(III) and ascorbic acid synergistically inhibit the viability of human colorectal cells, activate caspase-3 to trigger apoptosis, upregulate caspase-1 expression, and promote the formation of inflammasomes to induce pyroptosis. Furthermore, the combined treatment with iAs(III) and ascorbic acid stimulates the overproduction of ROS, a subcellular mechanism underlying apoptosis and pyroptosis [403]. Supplementation to rodent models with vitamins folate (B9) and cobalamine (B12) acts against arsenic-related tissue/DNA damage. Furthermore, they protect RBCs and maintain the expected levels of haemoglobin and other compounds, such as urate, mercaptans, and diverse enzymes (catalase, GSH peroxidase, peroxiredoxins, SOD, lactoperoxidase, and xanthine oxidase) [404]. As2O3-NP encapsulated in folate-targeted liposomes reduce toxicity systematically, providing a platform for targeted delivery of this agent. These arsenic “nanobins” release drugs when the pH decreases to endosomal or lysosomal levels. iAs(III) is also a devitalizing agent in tooth cavities [381,405]. As2O3-NPs promote more outstanding LDH release and induce pyroptosis. However, As2O3-NPs decrease the expression of the proteins, Dnmt3a (DNA(cytosine-S)-methyltransferase-3α), Dnmt3b (DNA(cytosine-S)-methyltransferase-3β), and Dnmt1 (DNA(cytosine-S)-methyltransferase-1), but inhibit tumour growth more strongly than As2O3, probably due to the downregulation of PCNA (proliferating cell nuclear antigen) and DNMT-related proteins and the upregulation of GSDME-N (Gasdermin E-N) [406].
Low doses of iAs can also benefit animals, acting as a growth factor, particularly in chicken nutrition [173]. The primary uses of some derivatives of phenylarsonic acid (C6H5AsO(OH)2), including 4-hydroxy-3-nitrobenzene arsonic acid (roxarsone), 4-ureidophenyl arsonic acid (carbarsone), and p-arsanilic acid, were as feed additives for livestock [43]. Other applications of arsenic derivatives include copper arsenates as a preservative for treating wood and their use externally in mineral hot springs. Arsenic reportedly protects against Se toxicity, enhancing the biliary excretion of Se [406]. Thus, at lethal dose Se and As(III) interact to form an equimolar arsenic−selenium compound in the liver, which is then excreted in the bile of rabbits, identified spectroscopically as [AsSe(SG)2] [161,195]. However, it is worth noting that the beneficial and harmful effects depend on the metabolic pathways involved in the excretion or accumulation of arsenic species and possibly also on potential interactions with other compounds.

3. Diagnosis and Possible Treatment

3.1. Diagnosis

To monitor high environmental or occupational exposures and to confirm poisoning for forensic purposes, the primary diagnosis of intoxication by iAs mainly relies on measuring its levels in body fluids (blood and urine), hair, and fingernails, as well as on the cutaneous manifestations (melanosis, keratosis, and cutaneous cancers). Urinary porphyrin levels and blood MT show promising results as potential biomarkers of iAs exposure [407,408,409]. Thus, increased urinary B2MG (β2-microglobulin) concentrations show a significant relationship with urinary iAs(V) concentrations in Taiwanese adults (aged 20–29 years) [410]. Elevated tAs levels in the urine of Chinese adults were associated with increased annual change rates in the levels of 8-isoPGF2α (8-iso prostaglandin F2α) lipid peroxidation, 8-OHdG (8-hydroxy-2′-deoxyguanosine) DNA OD, and PCO (protein carbonyls) protein OD in dose-dependent manners [411]. It is usual to distinguish between the following three possible biomarker types: (i) exposure, (ii) effect, and (iii) susceptibility. Thus, porphyrins and tAs in the urine, blood, hair, and nails represent typical biomarkers of exposure. The effects’ biomarkers include clastogenicity in peripheral lymphocytes, MN in oral mucosa and bladder cells, and induction of heme oxygenase. Finally, the biomarkers of susceptibility typically account for variability in iAs metabolism [96,412,413].
Genomics [126] and proteomics [127] have also facilitated the identification of potential biomarkers for iAs toxicity. Reconstructed genes from a reference transcriptome of the aquatic oligochaete, Tubifex tubifex (Annelida, Clitellata), relate to cell stress response (Hsc70, Hsp10, Hsp60, and Hsp83), energy metabolism (COX1), OS (Cat, GSR, and MnSOD), and the homeostasis of organisms (CaM, RpS13, and UBE2) can be used for risk assessment in freshwater ecosystems as early biomarkers of arsenic toxicity [414]. Changes in the urinary proteome have been shown to help identify potential iAs-associated pathologies and elucidating the mechanisms involved in chronic exposure to iAs [415,416,417]. Alternatively, monitoring malondialdehyde levels, enhanced by iAs, can serve as a valuable marker for OS, although other toxicants can also contribute in the same direction.
Potential biomarkers for iAs intoxication in populations exposed to iAs in drinking water include the following:
  • The arsenic level in the blood measures the dose ingested but does not provide evidence of chronic intoxication.
  • The arsenic level in urine is a reliable marker of internal dose, and correlates well with chronic effects from iAs in drinking water, although it requires detailed speciation analysis.
  • Arsenic level in hair and nails reflects long-term exposure.
  • The As content in urine correlates with urinary and blood porphyrin levels.
  • Genotoxic effects, including increased DNA damage, sister chromatid exchange, micronuclei, or chromosomal aberrations, support the DNA OD of peripheral blood polymorphonuclear leukocytes and
  • MN assays are the techniques of choice for assessing the adverse health effects of low levels of iAs as essential biomarkers.
However, urinary and toenail analysis are usually the most practical sampling choices, complemented by MN assays [418,419]. The most reliable test for iAs exposure is urine-based, but it must be performed within 24–48 h to detect acute exposure accurately. According to the biomarker 8-OHdG, iAs in urine is associated with an increased prevalence of type 2 diabetes mellitus, a mechanism partly involving DNA OD but lacking a causal relationship [420]. The same holds for the lack of relationships between the blood concentration and the effect of oxidation states on ROS production, DNA fragmentation, and apoptotic cell death.
Tests on hair and fingernails are adequate for measuring exposure to high levels of arsenic during long periods (3–6 months) [421]. However, they cannot predict whether arsenic levels in the body have a health impact. In chronic exposures, iAs remains in the body for very long periods. Arsenic levels in hair serve as a reliable bioindicator of iAs exposure, as they accumulate trace elements from the blood. Incorporated elements in hair are maintained during hair growth, allowing a temporal exposure estimation. Hair sampling facilitates the determination of arsenic levels, and the treatment of APL with arsenic oxide [422]. For this purpose, non-invasive microanalytical techniques offer attractive advantages, including X-ray fluorescence (XRF) using electromagnetic radiation (synchrotron radiation), electron or particle beams as excitation probes, such as particle-induced X-ray emission (PIXE), FT-IR spectroscopy, and Raman spectrometry [7,423,424]. Other methodologies, however, based on different analytical approaches, are being developed to broaden the detection of various arsenic species [424,425,426,427,428,429,430,431,432,433,434], often combined with challenging separation techniques [432,433,434,435]. Thus, the mechanisms underlying iAs(III)-induced clinical effects serve as potential gateways for developing therapies for iAs(III) toxicity. A proteomic approach helps evaluate the mechanisms and structural changes in proteins associated with low-dose iAs exposure, complemented by effective national and international regulations that establish a suitable threshold value for groundwater arsenic at ≤10 μg/L [436].

3.2. Possible Treatment

iAs shows a high affinity for diverse types of ligands, using symmetrical oAs(III) (TMA(III) and triphenyl arsine) as common ligands in coordination chemistry, although non-symmetrical oAs(III) compounds, such as 1,2-bis(dimethylarsino)benzene (diars), also act as valuable chelating ligands. However, the problem presented in this work is the inverse, potentially counteracting the toxicological effects of iAs in living beings, where diverse metabolic paths are possible. Thus, an innovative approach employing magnetic beads modified with -Bis(carboxymethyl)-L-lysine, a polyhistidine tag, and MB-NTA(Ni)-His6-SA enables the selective capture of iAs binding proteins in HepG2 cells labelled by Bio-PAO(III) probes, facilitating gentle digestion by trypsin. The method is able to successfully identify 41 iAs(III)-binding proteins, including those involved in cytoskeletal structure, heat shock response, transcriptional regulation, DNA damage repair, redox state regulation, mitochondrial dehydrogenase function, and protein synthesis and structure, contributing to a more comprehensive understanding of the toxic mechanisms of arsenic, and providing potential valuable insights for the prevention or treatment of arsenic-related diseases [437]. Flavonoids, some trace elements, and herbal drugs are promising natural detoxifying agents against iAs. Other substances, such as silver nanoparticles (Ag-NPs), inhibit the As(III)-induced mutations, intracellular accumulation of As(III) in human-hamster hybrid AL cells, suppressing the expression of specific As(III)-binding protein (Gal-1), and the up-regulation of antioxidant enzymes, eventually inhibiting the generation of ROS and the downstream stress-activated protein kinases/c-Jun amino-terminal kinases (SAPK/JNK) signalling pathway [438].
As previously mentioned, iAs generates reactive free radicals that can damage DNA, at least in vitro studies using the RWPE-1 cell line, a normal human prostate epithelial cell line [439]. Nevertheless, antioxidants overcome these effects by reducing the excess of free radicals through the restoration of cellular enzymatic and non-enzymatic antioxidant activities, thereby decreasing lipid peroxidation and protein oxidation. Thus, Nigella sativa oil can enhance the intestine’s ability to protect against free radical-mediated iAs toxicity by improving the antioxidant status and energy metabolism [440]. The Gentianella acuta treatment ameliorates the decreased maturation potential and fertilisation deficiency of iAs(III)-exposed oocytes (ovocytes, female gametocytes, or germ cells involved in reproduction), also significantly inhibiting DNA damage and apoptosis and altering the H3K27me3 expression level [441]. Fruit and vegetable antioxidants (Table 3) minimise iAs-induced genotoxicity [442]. Plant antioxidants, including those derived from the green tea extract, which contains high molecular weight polyphenols, (flavonoids such as kaempferol 3 O-α-L (600 ethyl rhamnopyranoside) and epicatechins) (Table 4), are among the most effective, showing great diversity and few side effects, but especially those with low molecular weight [443]. Thus, hydroxytyrosol, taurine, alpha-lipoic acid, ellagic acid, and thymoquinone effectively alleviate iAs-induced neurotoxicity through their antioxidative and anti-inflammatory properties, primarily through their anti-apoptotic function via the Nrf2 and PI3/Akt/SIRT1 signalling pathways [444]. Melatonin (N-Acetyl-5-Metoxitriptamine) is a promising neuroprotective agent because it increases tissue levels of acetylcholinesterase and decreases lactate dehydrogenase and myeloperoxidase, also overcoming iAs-induced OS and suppressing inflammation, DNA damage, and apoptosis in the foetus’s brain [445]. Similarly, free curcumin ((1E,6E)-1,7-bis(4-hydroxy-3-methoxyphenyl)-1,6-heptadiene-3,5-dione) and curcumin-loaded Poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) nanoparticles (CUR-NP) attenuate iAs-mediated genotoxic effects, although the same doses of nanoformulation protect better than free curcumin [446]. Curcumin also exerted inhibitory effects on inflammation and pyroptosis triggered by iAs(III), which modulates NF-κB/NLRP3 signalling pathways in the hypothalamus of ducks [447].
However, lowering iAs toxicity is significantly improved by sequestering arsenic species, thereby overcoming the metal–protein selectivity [448] and facilitating the removal of arsenic from the body. This trend is possible and much more common using chelating agents, where the most used today is illustrated in Table 5 [449,450,451], showing high conditional stability constants with iAs(III) (Table 6) [452,453,454,455,456].
Even though all the compounds mentioned above show potential as chelating agents, some of them, such as BAL, DMSA, DMPS, and PCA, are most usually employed in acute arsenic poisoning, while others, such as ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) and diethylenetriamine pentaacetic acid (DTPA), show a limited practical efficacy for treating chronic arsenic poisoning [457].
Using chelating agents constitutes one effective strategy for reducing iAs’s toxic effects, as the inert chelator–metal complex formed is excreted from the body. Diverse thiol chelators, such as meso-2,3-dimercaptosuccinic acid (DMSA), dimercaptopropane succinate (DMPS), 2,3-dimercapto-1-propane sulfonic acid, 2-ethyl-5,5-bis(sulfanyl)-1,3-dioxepane-4,7-dione), sodium 2,3-dimercapto-1-propane sulfonate, 2,3-dimercaptopropanol, d-penicillamine (D-(−)-2-amino-3-mercapto-3-methyl butanoic acid), and other agents can constitute suitable chelators against chronic arsenic toxicity, also assisting in normalising the GSH level [409,456]. Combining DMSA with long-chain lipophilic and hydrophobic chelators, such as monoisoamyl DMSA or monocyclohexyl DMSA, results in greater efficacy in reducing iAs(III) tissue concentrations than DMSA alone. On the other hand, DMPS chelation increases the excretion of iAs(III) in urine, even in chronic arsenic toxicity [409]. The sulphur atoms of the thiol groups (nucleophilic) join with arsenic (electrophilic). Thus, dithiols, DMSA (succimer), and BAL bind metals through –SH groups. DMSA sequesters heavy metals in the brain because it crosses the blood–brain barrier. BAL and DMSA are helpful chelating agents to sequester arsenic away from blood proteins and treat acute As(III) poisoning, although they can generate hypertension as the most critical side effect. However, BAL is considerably more toxic than DMSA [457,458,459]. DMPS and DMSA have a therapeutic index higher than BAL [452]. DMSA monoesters, such as MiADMSA, are also good antidotes for As(III) poisoning [460,461]. Other chelating agents (Table 5) can also achieve this, but may cause more side effects than BAL, DMSA, and DMPS. Alternative chelating agents, such as nitriloacetic acid (NTA) and DTPA, form stable metal–ligand complexes and are not used to remove iAs. Further, NTA is a Class II carcinogen, while DTPA shows some toxicity, potentially carcinogenic [462]. Gallic acid shows antioxidant and anticancer properties, and after exposure to iAs, gallic acid alone is more effective than when combined with MiADMSA (monoisoamyl meso-2,3-dimercaptosuccinic acid) in reducing oxidative injury. MiADMSA monotherapy provides significant therapeutic efficacy against iAs. However, gallic acid may be a promising candidate for therapy against arsenic due to its antioxidant and anticancer properties [463]. Otherwise, the high efficiency and safety of nano-drug delivery systems are also promising alternatives to conventional chelators. The effectiveness of any chelator depends strongly on the patient’s general health situation, mode and dose of administration, and potential biotransformation. Nutritional factors also play a critical role in combating free radical species, and a balanced daily diet supplemented with essential nutrients (such as vitamins, micronutrients, and proteins) can help mitigate the severity of arsenicosis.
Flavonols, such as quercetin and kaempferol, provide tolerance to wheat plants under iAs stress by activating antioxidant enzymes {SOD, peroxidase (POD), ascorbate peroxidase (APX)}, protecting the photosynthetic reactions from OD. Quercetin triggers the AsA renewal, and kaempferol maintains the GSH pool [464]. Further, chemicals involved in one-carbon metabolism are essential for facilitating the methylation of iAs(III) through SAM. Among them, methionine, betaine, choline, and vitamins B2 (riboflavin), B6 (pyridoxal phosphate), B9 (folate), and B12 (cobalamin) are the most important for alleviating arsenic-related adverse health outcomes by enhancing its metabolism [465]. However, a deficiency of these chemicals may impair the metabolism of As(III), thereby worsening its toxicity [465,466,467,468].

4. Conclusions and Looking Forward

iAs(III) species and their metabolites can exhibit various chronic and genotoxic effects mediated by reactive oxidants or free radical species, including modulation of signalling pathways. There are differences in the activities of iAs and oAs species regarding target organ carcinogenicity and toxic and genotoxic mechanisms. The trivalent and pentavalent methylated metabolites may play some role in bladder cancer, where lower concentrations of DMA(III,V) are present for promotion, leaving the question of whether arsenic needs a carcinogenic partner. Many questions remain unanswered, and future researchers must address the following significant goals.
Clarifying the methylation patterns, the relative toxicity of the methylated arsenic forms (MMA and DMA), their storage forms, and resistance mechanisms would provide insights into the relationships between entry, metabolism, interactions, bioaccumulation, and excretion of all arsenic species.
The development of unified methodologies for sample preparation and analytical procedures to monitor low levels of arsenic species and arsenic biomarkers in complex biological systems, such as hair and nails, would be beneficial compared to urine and other biological matrices.
The antagonistic and synergistic interactions of arsenic species with essential and toxic metals, diverse-sized biological molecules, and the pathways of ROS and RNS generation require straightforward elucidation.
iAs-induced aberrant gene expression, involvement in signal transduction, carcinogenic potential, and the development of pharmacokinetic pathways represent essential areas of future knowledge that require deeper evaluation.
Evaluation of population variability, gender, and age differences in susceptibility, immunotoxicity, and immunosuppression, as well as genetic polymorphisms, requires additional confirmation. Ultimately, a worthwhile goal is to mitigate the adverse effects of arsenic exposure by developing and incorporating new, safe chelating agents.

Author Contributions

Conceptualisation, A.J.A.; methodology, A.J.A.; validation, F.J.P., R.L. and A.J.A.; investigation, F.J.P., R.L. and A.J.A.; writing—original draft, A.J.A.; writing—review and editing, F.J.P., R.L. and A.J.A.; supervision, F.J.P. and A.J.A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analyzed in this study. Data sharing is not applicable to this article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Appendix A

Table A1. Names, abbreviations, and formulas of other arsenic compounds and related biomolecules.
Table A1. Names, abbreviations, and formulas of other arsenic compounds and related biomolecules.
Chemical SpeciesAbbreviationChemical Formula
Monomethyldithioarsonic acidMMDTA(V)CH3AsS(SH)(OH)
ArsineAsH3
Trimethylarsine oxideTMAO(V)(CH3)3AsO
Arsenic triglutathione ATG(III)As(SG)3
Monomethylarsino-diglutathione MMADG(III)CH3As(SG)2
Dimethylarsino-glutathione DMAG(III) (CH3)2As(SG)
Dimethylarsenic radical(CH3)2As
Dimethylarsenic peroxyl radical(CH3)2AsOO
Reduced glutathione GSH Ijms 26 10761 i0a1
Oxidised glutathione GSSG Ijms 26 10761 i0a2
S-adenosylmethionine SAM Ijms 26 10761 i0a3
S-adenosyl-L-homocysteineSAHIjms 26 10761 i0a4
Lipoic acid Ijms 26 10761 i0a5

References

  1. Emsley, J. The Elements, 3rd ed.; Clarendon Press: Oxford, UK, 1998. [Google Scholar]
  2. Feng, Z.; Xia, Y.; Tian, D.; Wu, K.; Schmitt, M.; Kwok, R.K.; Mumford, J.L. DNA Damage in Buccal Epithelial Cells from Individuals Chronically Exposed to Arsenic via Drinking Water in Inner Mongolia, China. Anticancer Res. 2001, 21, 51–58. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  3. Tian, D.; Ma, H.; Feng, Z.; Xia, Y.; Le, X.C.; Ni, Z.; Allen, J.; Collins, B.; Schreinemachers, D.; Mumford, J.L. Analyses If Micronuclei in Exfoliated Epithelial Cells from Individuals Chronically Exposed to Arsenic via Drinking Water in Inner Mongolia, China. J. Toxicol. Environ. Health A 2011, 64, 473–484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Aller, A.J.; Deban, L. Total and Extractable Contents of Trace Metals in Agricultural Soils of the Valderas Area, Spain. Sci. Total Environ. 1989, 79, 253–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Aller, A.J. Behaviour of Trace Elements in Soils. Part 1. Metals. Agric. Equip. Int. 1995, 47, 12–18. [Google Scholar]
  6. Aller, A.J. Behaviour of Trace Elements in Soils. Part 2. Non-Metals. Agric. Equip. Int. 1995, 47, 36–38. [Google Scholar]
  7. Pereira, F.J.; López, R.; Suárez, D.; Aller, A.J. pH-Dependent Structural Changes of Arsenic Oxoacids in Solution and Solid Phase: Raman Spectrometry and Computational Studies. Microchem. J. 2022, 175, 107109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Reimer, K.J.; Koch, I.; Cullen, W.R. Organoarsenicals. Distribution and Transformation in the Environment. Met. Ions Life Sci. 2010, 7, 165–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Cullen, W.R. Chemical Mechanism of Arsenic Biomethylation. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 2014, 27, 457–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Dopp, E.; Kligerman, A.D.; Diaz-Bone, R.A. Organoarsenicals. Uptake, Metabolism, and Toxicity. Met. Ions Life Sci. 2010, 7, 231–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Francesconi, K.; Edmonds, J.; Stick, R. Arsenic Compounds from the Kidney of the Giant Clam Tridacna Maxima: Isolation and Identification of an Arsenic-Containing Nucleoside. J. Chem. Soc. Perkin Trans. 1 1992, 1, 1349–1357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Rumpler, A.; Edmonds, J.S.; Katsu, M.; Jensen, K.B.; Goessler, W.; Raber, G.; Gunnlaugsdottir, H.; Francesconi, K.A.; Rumpler, A.; Edmonds, J.S.; et al. Arsenic-Containing Long-Chain Fatty Acids in Cod-Liver Oil: A Result of Biosynthetic Infidelity? Angew. Chem. 2008, 120, 2705–2707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Mancini, I.; Guella, G.; Frostin, M.; Hnawia, E.; Laurent, D.; Debitus, C.; Pietra, F. On the First Polyarsenic Organic Compound from Nature: Arsenicin A from the New Caledonian Marine Sponge Echinochalina bargibanti. Chem. Eur. J. 2006, 12, 8989–8994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Sciuto, A.M.; Kodavanti, U.P. The Respiratory Toxicity of Chemical Warfare Agents. In Handbook of Toxicology of Chemical Warfare Agents; Gupta, R.C., Ed.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2015; pp. 489–518. [Google Scholar]
  15. Smedley, P.L.; Kinniburgh, D.G. A Review of the Source, Behaviour and Distribution of Arsenic in Natural Waters. Appl. Geochem. 2002, 17, 517–568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Oremland, R.; Saltikov, C.; Wolfe-Simon, F.; Stolz, J. Arsenic in the Evolution of Earth and Extraterrestrial Ecosystems. Geomicrobiol. J. 2009, 26, 522–536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Duker, A.A.; Carranza, E.J.M.; Hale, M. Arsenic Geochemistry and Health. Environ. Int. 2005, 31, 631–641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Rodríguez, R.; Ramos, J.A.; Armienta, A. Groundwater Arsenic Variations: The Role of Local Geology and Rainfall. Appl. Geochem. 2004, 19, 245–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. McGeehan, S.L.; Naylor, D.V. Sorption and Redox Transformation of Arsenite and Arsenate in Two Flooded Soils. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 1994, 58, 337–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Reynolds, J.G.; Naylor, D.V.; Fendorf, S.E. Arsenic Sorption in Phosphate-Amended Soils during Flooding and Subsequent Aeration. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 1999, 63, 1149–1156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Qiao, J.-T.; Li, X.-M.; Li, F.-B. Roles of Different Active Metal-Reducing Bacteria in Arsenic Release from Arsenic-Contaminated Paddy Soil Amended with Biochar. J. Hazard. Mater. 2018, 344, 958–967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Cummings, D.E.; Caccavo, F.; Fendorf, S.; Rosenzweig, R.F. Arsenic Mobilization by the Dissimilatory Fe(III)-Reducing Bacterium Shewanella Alga BrY. Environ. Sci. Technol. 1999, 33, 723–729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Ahmann, D.; Krumholz, L.R.; Hemond, H.F.; Lovley, D.R.; Morel, F.M.M. Microbial Mobilization of Arsenic from Sediments of the Aberjona Watershed. Environ. Sci. Technol. 1997, 31, 2923–2930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Savage, K.S.; Bird, D.K.; Ashley, R.P. Legacy of the California Gold Rush: Environmental Geochemistry of Arsenic in the Southern Mother Lode Gold District. Int. Geol. Rev. 2000, 42, 385–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Michel, P.; Chiffoleau, J.; Averty, B.; Auger, D.; Chatier, E. High Resolution Profiles for Arsenic in the Seine Estuary. Seasonal Variations and Net Fluxes to the English Channel. Cont. Shelf Res. 1999, 19, 2041–2061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Siegel, F.R. Environmental Geochemistry of Potentially Toxic Metals; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  27. McLaren, S.; Kim, N. Evidence for a Seasonal Fluctuation of Arsenic in New Zealand’s Longest River and the Effect of Treatment on Concentrations in Drinking Water. Environ. Pollut. 1995, 90, 67–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Azcue, J.M.; Nriagu, J.O. Impact of Abandoned Mine Tailings on the Arsenic Concentrations in Moira Lake, Ontario. J. Geochem. Explor. 1995, 52, 81–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Gao, S.; Burau, R.G. Environmental Factors Affecting Rates of Arsine Evolution from and Mineralization of Arsenicals in Soil. J. Environ. Qual. 1997, 26, 753–763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Aller, A.J. Uncommon Micronutrients in Plants. Agric. Equip. Int. 1996, 48, 108–115. [Google Scholar]
  31. Akter, K.F.; Owens, G.; Davey, D.E.; Naidu, R. Arsenic Speciation and Toxicity in Biological Systems. Rev. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 2006, 184, 97–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Nevens, F.; Fevery, J.; van Steenbergen, W.; Sciot, R.; Desmet, V.; de Groost, J. Arsenic and Non-Cirrhotic Portal Hypertension: A Report of Eight Cases. J. Hepatol. 1990, 1, 80–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Nordstrom, D.K. Worldwide Occurrences of Arsenic in Ground Water. Science 2002, 296, 2143–2145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. WHO. Guidelines for Drinking-Water Quality, 3rd ed.; WHO: Geneva, Japan, 2004; Volume 1. [Google Scholar]
  35. Aller, A.J.; Bernal, J.L.; del Nozal, M.J.; Deban, L. Effects of Selected Trace Elements on Plant Growth. J. Sci. Food Agric. 1990, 51, 447–479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Green, K.; Broome, L.; Heinze, D.; Johnston, S. Long Distance Transport of Arsenic by Migrating Bogon Moth from Agricultural Lowlands to Mountain Ecosystem. Victorian Nat. 2001, 118, 112–116. [Google Scholar]
  37. Viana, J.L.M.; Steffler, D.A.; Hernández, A.H.; dos Santos Costa, J.; Pellegrinetti, T.A.; de Jesus, E.C.R.; Cancian, M.; Fiore, M.F.; Rezende-Filho, A.T.; Sussulini, A.; et al. Bioaccumulation and Speciation of Arsenic in Plankton from Tropical Soda Lakes along a Salinity Gradient. Sci. Total Environ. 2023, 895, 165189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Mandal, B.K.; Ogra, Y.; Suzuki, K.T. Identification of Dimethylarsinous and Monomethylarsonous Acids in Human Urine of the Arsenic-Affected Areas in West Bengal, India. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 2001, 14, 371–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Alexander, J.; Benford, D.; Boobis, A.; Ceccatelli, S.; Cravedi, J.-P.; di Domenico, A.; Doerge, D.; Dogliotti, E.; Edler, L.; Farmer, P.; et al. Scientific Opinion on Arsenic in Food. Wiley Online Libr. 2009, 7, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Cullen, W.R.; Reimer, K.J. Arsenic Speciation in the Environment. Chem. Rev. 2002, 89, 713–764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Azizur Rahman, M.; Hasegawa, H.; Mahfuzur Rahman, M.; Mazid Miah, M.A.; Tasmin, A. Arsenic Accumulation in Rice (Oryza sativa L.): Human Exposure through Food Chain. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2008, 69, 317–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Ashmore, E.; Molyneux, S.; Watson, S.; Miles, G.; Pearson, A. Inorganic Arsenic in Rice and Rice Products in New Zealand and Australia. Food Addit. Contam. 2019, 12, 275–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Hileman, B. Arsenic in Chicken Production. Chem. Eng. News Arch. 2007, 85, 34–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Zong, X.; Wang, X.; Yu, M.; Wang, J.; Li, C.; Wang, B.; Wang, Y. A Reduction-Secretion System Contributes to Roxarsone (V) Degradation and Efflux in Brevundimonas sp. M20. BMC Microbiol. 2025, 25, 23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Zheng, Y.; Wu, J.; Ng, J.C.; Wang, G.; Lian, W. The Absorption and Excretion of Fluoride and Arsenic in Humans. Toxicol. Lett. 2002, 133, 77–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Rossman, T. Arsenic. In Environmental and Occupational Medicine; Rom, W.N., Markowitz, S.B., Eds.; Wolters Kluwer: Philadelphia, PA, USA, 2007; pp. 1006–1017. [Google Scholar]
  47. Farmer, J.G.; Johnson, L.R. Assessment of Occupational Exposure to Inorganic Arsenic Based on Urinary Concentrations and Speciation of Arsenic. Br. J. Ind. Med. 1990, 47, 342–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Kitchin, K.T. Recent Advances in Arsenic Carcinogenesis: Modes of Action, Animal Model Systems, and Methylated Arsenic Metabolites. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 2001, 172, 249–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Freeman, G.; Johnson, J.D.; Killinger, J.M.; Liao, S.C.; Davis, A.O.; Ruby, M.V.; Chaney, R.L.; Lovre, S.C.; Bergstrom, P.D. Bioavailability of Arsenic in Soil Impacted by Smelter Activities Following Oral Administration in Rabbits. Fundam. Appl. Toxicol. 1993, 21, 83–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Rodríguez, V.M.; Dufour, L.; Carrizales, L.; Díaz-Barriga, F.; Jiménez-Capdevillel, M.E. Effects of Oral Exposure to Mining Waste on in Vivo Dopamine Release from Rat Striatum. Environ. Health Perspect. 1998, 106, 487–491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Karagas, M.R.; Gossai, A.; Pierce, B.; Ahsan, H. Drinking Water Arsenic Contamination, Skin Lesions, and Malignancies: A Systematic Review of the Global Evidence. Curr. Environ. Health Rep. 2015, 2, 52–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Kuivenhoven, M.; Mason, K. Arsenic Toxicity; StatPearls Publishing LLC: St. Petersburg, FL, USA, 2023. [Google Scholar]
  53. Haraguchi, H. Metallomics as Integrated Biometal Science. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. 2004, 19, 5–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Arruda, M.A.Z.; Azevedo, R.A. Metallomics and Chemical Speciation: Towards a Better Understanding of Metal-Induced Stress in Plants. Ann. Appl. Biol. 2009, 155, 301–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. López, R.; Pereira, F.J.; Aller, A.J. An Appraisal at a Glance of Metallome and Disease Biomarkers. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2025, 297, 117931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Liu, Z.; Shen, J.; Carbrey, J.M.; Mukhopadhyay, R.; Agre, P.; Rosen, B.P. Arsenite Transport by Mammalian Aquaglyceroporins AQP7 and AQP9. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2002, 99, 6053–6058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Huang, R.; Lee, T. Cellular Uptake of Trivalent Arsenite and Pentavalent Arsenate in KB Cells Cultured in Phosphate-Free Medium. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 1996, 136, 243–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Stýblo, M.; Drobná, Z.; Jaspers, I.; Lin, S.; Thomas, D.J. The Role of Biomethylation in Toxicity and Carcinogenicity of Arsenic: A Research Update. Environ. Health Perspect. 2002, 110, 767–771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Gilbert-Diamond, D.; Li, Z.; Perry, A.E.; Spencer, S.K.; Jay Gandolfi, A.; Karagas, M.R. A Population-Based Case-Control Study of Urinary Arsenic Species and Squamous Cell Carcinoma in New Hampshire, USA. Environ. Health Perspect. 2013, 121, 1154–1160, Erratum in Environ. Health Perspect. 2013, 121, 1159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Francesconi, K.A.; Tanggaard, R.; McKenzie, C.J.; Goessler, W. Arsenic Metabolites in Human Urine after Ingestion of an Arsenosugar. Clin. Chem. 2002, 48, 92–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Hughes, M.F.; Devesa, V.; Adair, B.M.; Conklin, S.D.; Creed, J.T.; Styblo, M.; Kenyon, E.M.; Thomas, D.J. Tissue Dosimetry, Metabolism and Excretion of Pentavalent and Trivalent Dimethylated Arsenic in Mice after Oral Administration. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 2008, 227, 26–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Vahter, M.; Concha, G. Role of Metabolism in Arsenic Toxicity. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 2001, 89, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Vahter, M. Mechanisms of Arsenic Biotransformation. Toxicology 2002, 181–182, 211–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Aposhian, H.V.; Arroyo, A.; Cebrian, M.E.; del Razo, L.M.; Hurlbut, K.M.; Dart, R.C.; Gonzalez-Ramirez, D.; Kreppel, H.; Speisky, H.; Smith, A.; et al. DMPS-Arsenic Challenge Test. 1: Increased Urinary Excretion of Monomethylarsonic Acid in Humans given Dimercaptopropane Sulfonate. J. Pharm. Exp. Ther. 1997, 282, 192–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Aposhian, H.V.; Zheng, B.; Aposhian, M.M.; Le, X.C.; Cebrian, M.E.; Cullen, W.; Zakharyan, R.A.; Ma, M.; Dart, R.C.; Cheng, Z.; et al. DMPS-Arsenic Challenge Test. II. Modulation of Arsenic Species, Including Monomethylarsonous Acid (MMA(III)), Excreted in Human Urine. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 2000, 165, 74–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Le, X.C.; Lu, X.; Ma, M.; Cullen, W.R.; Aposhian, H.V.; Zheng, B. Speciation of Key Arsenic Metabolic Intermediates in Human. Anal. Chem. 2000, 72, 5172–5177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Le, X.C.; Ma, M.; Lu, X.; Cullen, W.R.; Aposhian, H.V.; Zheng, B. Determination of Monomethylarsonous Acid, a Key Arsenic Methylation Intermediate, in Human Urine. Environ. Health Perspect. 2000, 108, 1015–1018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Sampayo-Reyes, A.; Zakharyan, R.A.; Healy, S.M.; Aposhian, H.V. Monomethylarsonic Acid Reductase and Monomethylarsonous Acid in Hamster Tissue. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 2000, 13, 1181–1186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Hansen, H.R.; Raab, A.; Jaspars, M.; Milne, B.F.; Feldmann, J. Sulfur-Containing Arsenical Mistaken for Dimethylarsinous Acid [DMA(III)] and Identified as a Natural Metabolite in Urine: Major Implications for Studies on Arsenic Metabolism and Toxicity. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 2004, 17, 1086–1091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Hansen, H.R.; Pickford, R.; Thomas-Oates, J.; Jaspars, M.; Feldmann, J. 2-Dimethylarsinothioyl Acetic Acid Identified in a Biological Sample: The First Occurrence of a Mammalian Arsinothioyl Metabolite. Angew. Chem. 2004, 116, 341–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Yoshida, K.; Kuroda, K.; Inoue, Y.; Chen, H.; Date, Y.; Wanibuchi, H.; Fukushima, S.; Endo, G. Metabolism of Dimethylarsinic Acid in Rats: Production of Unidentified Metabolites In Vivo. Appl. Organomet. Chem. 2001, 15, 539–547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Yoshida, K.; Kuroda, K.; Zhou, X.; Inoue, Y.; Date, Y.; Wanibuchi, H.; Fukushima, S.; Endo, G. Urinary Sulfur-Containing Metabolite Produced by Intestinal Bacteria Following Oral Administration of Dimethylarsinic Acid to Rats. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 2003, 16, 1124–1129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Kuroda, K.; Yoshida, K.; Yasukawa, A.; Wanibuchi, H.; Fukushima, S.; Endo, G. Enteric Bacteria May Play a Role in Mammalian Arsenic Metabolism. Appl. Organomet. Chem. 2001, 15, 548–552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Suzuki, K.T.; Mandal, B.K.; Katagiri, A.; Sakuma, Y.; Kawakami, A.; Ogra, Y.; Yamaguchi, K.; Sei, Y.; Yamanaka, K.; Anzai, K.; et al. Dimethylthioarsenicals as Arsenic Metabolites and Their Chemical Preparations. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 2004, 17, 914–921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Naranmandura, H.; Carew, M.W.; Xu, S.; Lee, J.; Leslie, E.M.; Weinfeld, M.; Le, X.C. Comparative Toxicity of Arsenic Metabolites in Human Bladder Cancer EJ-1 Cells. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 2011, 24, 1586–1596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Cohen, S.M.; Arnold, L.L.; Uzvolgyi, E.; Cano, M.; St. John, M.; Yamamoto, S.; Lu, X.; Le, X.C. Possible Role of Dimethylarsinous Acid in Dimethylarsinic Acid-Induced Urothelial Toxicity and Regeneration in the Rat. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 2002, 15, 1150–1157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Adair, B.M.; Moore, T.; Conklin, S.D.; Creed, J.T.; Wolf, D.C.; Thomas, D.J. Tissue Distribution and Urinary Excretion of Dimethylated Arsenic and Its Metabolites in Dimethylarsinic Acid- or Arsenate-Treated Rats. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 2007, 222, 235–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Drobna, Z.; Naranmandura, H.; Kubachka, K.M.; Edwards, B.C.; Herbin-Davis, K.; Styblo, M.; Le, X.C.; Creed, J.T.; Maeda, N.; Hughes, M.F.; et al. Disruption of the Arsenic (+3 Oxidation State) Methyltransferase Gene in the Mouse Alters the Phenotype for Methylation of Arsenic and Affects Distribution and Retention of Orally Administered Arsenate. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 2009, 22, 1713–1720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Naranmandura, H.; Rehman, K.; Le, X.C.; Thomas, D.J. Formation of Methylated Oxyarsenicals and Thioarsenicals in Wild-Type and Arsenic (+3 Oxidation State) Methyltransferase Knockout Mice Exposed to Arsenate. Anal. Bioanal. Chem. 2013, 405, 1885–1891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Schrenk, D.; Bignami, M.; Bodin, L.; Chipman, J.; del Mazo, J.; Grasl-Krupp, B.; Hogstrand, C.; Hoogenboom, L.; Leblanc, J.; Nebbia, C.; et al. Risk Assessment of Small Organoarsenic Species in Food. EFSA J. 2024, 22, e8844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Kumagai, Y.; Sumi, D. Arsenic: Signal Transduction, Transcription Factor, and Biotransformation Involved in Cellular Response and Toxicity. Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 2007, 47, 243–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Janasik, B.; Reszka, E.; Stanislawska, M.; Jablonska, E.; Kuras, R.; Wieczorek, E.; Malachowska, B.; Fendler, W.; Wasowicz, W. Effect of Arsenic Exposure on NRF2-KEAP1 Pathway and Epigenetic Modification. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 2018, 185, 11–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Itoh, K.; Wakabayashi, N.; Katoh, Y.; Ishii, T.; Igarashi, K.; Douglas Engel, J.; Yamamoto, M. Keap1 Represses Nuclear Activation of Antioxidant Responsive Elements by Nrf2 through Binding to the Amino-Terminal Neh2 Domain. Genes. Dev. 1999, 13, 76–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Wang, X.-J.; Sun, Z.; Chen, W.; Li, Y.; Villeneuve, N.F.; Zhang, D.D. Activation of Nrf2 by Arsenite and Monomethylarsonous Acid Is Independent of Keap1-C151: Enhanced Keap1–Cul3 Interaction. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 2008, 230, 383–389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Pi, J.; Qu, W.; Reece, J.M.; Kumagai, Y.; Waalkes, M.P. Transcription Factor Nrf2 Activation by Inorganic Arsenic in Cultured Keratinocytes: Involvement of Hydrogen Peroxide. Exp. Cell Res. 2003, 290, 234–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Ueki, K.; Kondo, T.; Tseng, Y.H.; Kahn, C.R. Central Role of Suppressors of Cytokine Signaling Proteins in Hepatic Steatosis, Insulin Resistance, and the Metabolic Syndrome in the Mouse. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2004, 101, 10422–10427, Correction in Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2005, 102, 13710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Vigo, J.B.; Ellzey, J.T. Effects of Arsenic Toxicity at the Cellular Level: A Review. Tex. J. Micros. 2006, 37, 45–49. [Google Scholar]
  88. Shiobara, Y.; Ogra, Y.; Suzuki, K.T. Animal Species Difference in the Uptake of Dimethylarsinous Acid (DMAIII) by Red Blood Cells. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 2001, 14, 1446–1452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Rodríguez, V.M.; del Razo, L.M.; Limón-Pacheco, J.H.; Giordano, M.; Sánchez-Peña, L.C.; Uribe-Querol, E.; Gutiérrez-Ospina, G.; Gonsebatt, M.E. Glutathione Reductase Inhibition and Methylated Arsenic Distribution in Cd1 Mice Brain and Liver. Toxicol. Sci. 2005, 84, 157–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Muller, D.; Lièvremont, D.; Simeonova, D.D.; Hubert, J.C.; Lett, M.C. Arsenite Oxidase Aox Genes from a Metal-Resistant β-Proteobacterium. J. Bacteriol. 2003, 185, 135–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. Winski, S.L.; Carter, D.E. Interactions of Rat Red Blood Cell Sulfhydryls with Arsenate and Arsenite. J. Toxicol. Environ. Health 1995, 46, 379–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Gregus, Z.; Németi, B. Purine Nucleoside Phosphorylase as a Cytosolic Arsenate Reductase. Toxicol. Sci. 2002, 70, 13–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  93. Radabaugh, T.R.; Sampayo-Reyes, A.; Zakharyan, R.A.; Aposhian, H.V. Arsenate Reductase II. Purine Nucleoside Phosphorylase in the Presence of Dihydrolipoic Acid Is a Route for Reduction of Arsenate to Arsenite in Mammalian Systems. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 2002, 15, 692–698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Németi, B.; Csanaky, I.; Gregus, Z. Arsenate Reduction in Human Erythrocytes and Rats—Testing the Role of Purine Nucleoside Phosphorylase. Toxicol. Sci. 2003, 74, 22–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Sakurai, T. Biomethylation of Arsenic Is Essentially Detoxicating Event. J. Health Sci. 2003, 49, 171–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  96. Hughes, M.F. Biomarkers of Exposure: A Case Study with Inorganic Arsenic. Environ. Health Perspect. 2006, 114, 1790–1796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Torbøl Pedersen, J.; de Loma, J.; Levi, M.; Palmgren, M.; Broberg, K. Predicted AS3MT Proteins Methylate Arsenic and Support Two Major Phylogenetic AS3MT Groups. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 2020, 33, 3041–3047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Zhao, C.Q.; Young, M.R.; Diwan, B.A.; Coogan, T.P.; Waalkes, M.P. Association of Arsenic-Induced Malignant Transformation with DNA Hypomethylation and Aberrant Gene Expression. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1997, 94, 10907–10912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Thompson, D.J. A Chemical Hypothesis for Arsenic Methylation in Mammals. Chem. Biol. Interact. 1993, 88, 89–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Friesen, S.A.; Elder, J.B.; Bushnell, E.A.C. Density Functional Theory Investigation of As(III) S-Adenosylmethionine Methyltransferase. ACS Omega 2020, 5, 21000–21006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Gebel, T.W. Arsenic Methylation Is a Process of Detoxification through Accelerated Excretion. Int. J. Hyg. Environ. Health 2002, 205, 505–508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Styblo, M.; Thomas, D.J. Selenium Modifies the Metabolism and Toxicity of Arsenic in Primary Rat Hepatocytes. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 2001, 172, 52–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Kenyon, E.M.; Fea, M.; Styblo, M.; Evans, M.V. Application of Modelling Techniques to the Planning of in Vitro Arsenic Kinetic Studies. ATLA Altern. Lab. Anim. 2001, 29, 15–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Hirano, S. Biotransformation of Arsenic and Toxicological Implication of Arsenic Metabolites. Arch. Toxicol. 2020, 94, 2587–2601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  105. Petrick, J.S.; Ayala-Fierro, F.; Cullen, W.R.; Carter, D.E.; Vasken Aposhian, H. Monomethylarsonous Acid (MMA(III)) Is More Toxic than Arsenite in Chang Human Hepatocytes. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 2000, 163, 203–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Gardner, R.M.; Nermell, B.; Kippler, M.; Grandér, M.; Li, L.; Ekström, E.C.; Rahman, A.; Lönnerdal, B.; Hoque, A.M.W.; Vahter, M. Arsenic Methylation Efficiency Increases during the First Trimester of Pregnancy Independent of Folate Status. Reprod. Toxicol. 2011, 31, 210–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  107. Yamanaka, K.; Mizoi, M.; Kato, K.; Hasegawa, A.; Nakano, M.; Okada, S. Oral Administration of Dimethylarsinic Acid, a Main Metabolite of Inorganic Arsenic, in Mice Promotes Skin Tumorigenesis Initiated by Dimethylbenz (a) Anthracene With. Biol. Pharm. Bull. 2001, 24, 510–514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  108. Hunt, K.M.; Srivastava, R.K.; Elmets, C.A.; Athar, M. The Mechanistic Basis of Arsenicosis: Pathogenesis of Skin Cancer. Cancer Lett. 2014, 354, 211–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  109. Thomas, D.J.; Li, J.; Waters, S.B.; Xing, W.; Adair, B.M.; Drobna, Z.; Devesa, V.; Styblo, M. Arsenic (+3 Oxidation State) Methyltransferase and the Methylation of Arsenicals. Exp. Biol. Med. 2007, 232, 3–13. [Google Scholar]
  110. Rehman, K.; Naranmandura, H. Arsenic Metabolism and Thioarsenicals. Metallomics 2012, 4, 881–892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Naranmandura, H.; Suzuki, N.; Suzuki, K.T. Trivalent Arsenicals Are Bound to Proteins during Reductive Methylation. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 2006, 19, 1010–1018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Ajees, A.A.; Marapakala, K.; Packianathan, C.; Sankaran, B.; Rosen, B.P. Structure of an As(III) S-Adenosylmethionine Methyltransferase: Insights into the Mechanism of Arsenic Biotransformation. Biochemistry 2012, 51, 5476–5485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Rossman, T.G. Mechanism of Arsenic Carcinogenesis: An Integrated Approach. Mutat. Res.-Fundam. Mol. Mech. Mutagen. 2003, 533, 37–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Elschenbroich, C. Organometallics, 3rd ed.; Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co.: Weinheim, Germany, 2006; ISBN 978-3-527-29390-2. [Google Scholar]
  115. Aposhian, H.V. Enzymatic Methylation of Arsenic Species and Other New Approaches to Arsenic Toxicity. Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 1997, 37, 397–419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Healy, S.; Casarez, E.; Ayala-Fierro, F.; Aposhian, H. Enzymatic Methylation of Arsenic Compounds: V. Arsenite Methyltransferase Activity in Tissues of Mice. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 1998, 148, 65–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Hayakawa, T.; Kobayashi, Y.; Cui, X.; Hirano, S. A New Metabolic Pathway of Arsenite: Arsenic-Glutathione Complexes Are Substrates for Human Arsenic Methyltransferase Cyt19. Arch. Toxicol. 2005, 79, 183–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Zakharyan, R.A.; Sampayo-Reyes, A.; Healy, S.M.; Tsaprailis, G.; Board, P.G.; Liebler, D.C.; Aposhian, H.V. Human Monomethylarsonic Acid (MMAv) Reductase Is a Member of the Glutathione-S-Transferase Superfamily. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 2001, 14, 1051–1057. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  119. Thomas, D.J.; Styblo, M.; Lin, S. The Cellular Metabolism and Systemic Toxicity of Arsenic. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 2001, 176, 127–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Lin, S.; Shi, Q.; Brent Nix, F.; Styblo, M.; Beck, M.A.; Herbin-Davis, K.M.; Hall, L.L.; Simeonsson, J.B.; Thomas, D.J. A Novel S-Adenosyl-L-Methionine:Arsenic(III) Methyltransferase from Rat Liver Cytosol. J. Biol. Chem. 2002, 277, 10795–10803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Yamanaka, K.; Hayashi, H.; Kato, K.; Hasegawa, A. Involvement of Preferential Formation of Apurinic/Apyrimidinic Sites in Dimethylarsenic-Induced DNA Strand Breaks and DNA-Protein Crosslinks in Cultured Alveolar. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 1995, 207, 244–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Rossman, T.G.; Uddin, A.N.; Burns, F.J.; Bosland, M.C. Arsenite Cocarcinogenesis: An Animal Model Derived from Genetic Toxicology Studies. Environ. Health Perspect. 2002, 110, 749–752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Trader, D.J.; Carlson, E.E. Chemoselective Hydroxyl Group Transformation: An Elusive Target. Mol. Biosyst. 2012, 8, 2484–2493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Shen, S.; Li, X.F.; Cullen, W.R.; Weinfeld, M.; Le, X.C. Arsenic Binding to Proteins. Chem. Rev. 2013, 113, 7769–7792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Percy, A.J.; Gailer, J. Methylated Trivalent Arsenic-Glutathione Complexes Are More Stable than Their Arsenite Analog. Bioinorg. Chem. Appl. 2008, 2008, 539082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Kala, S.V.; Neely, M.W.; Kala, G.; Prater, C.I.; Atwood, D.W.; Rice, J.S.; Lieberman, M.W. The MRP2/CMOAT Transporter and Arsenic-Glutathione Complex Formation Are Required for Biliary Excretion of Arsenic. J. Biol. Chem. 2000, 275, 33404–33408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  127. Suzuki, K.T.; Tomita, T.; Ogra, Y.; Ohmichi, M. Glutathione-Conjugated Arsenics in the Potential Hepato-Enteric Circulation in Rats. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 2001, 14, 1604–1611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  128. Wang, Q.Q.; Thomas, D.J.; Naranmandura, H. Importance of Being Thiomethylated: Formation, Fate, and Effects of Methylated Thioarsenicals. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 2015, 28, 281–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. de Loma, J.; Tirado, N.; Ascui, F.; Levi, M.; Vahter, M.; Broberg, K.; Gardon, J. Elevated Arsenic Exposure and Efficient Arsenic Metabolism in Indigenous Women around Lake Poopó Bolivia. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 657, 179–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  130. Yoshida, K.; Inoue, Y.; Kuroda, K.; Chen, H.; Wanibuchi, H.; Shoji, F.; Endo, G. Urinary Excretion of Arsenic Metabolites after Long-Term Oral Administration of Various Arsenic Compounds to Rats. J. Toxicol. Environ. Health A 1998, 54, 179–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Zakharyan, R.; Wildfang, E.; Aposhian, H.V. Enzymatic Methylation of Arsenic Compounds: III. The Marmoset and Tamarin, but Not the Rhesus, Monkeys Are Deficient in Methyltransferases That Methylate Inorganic. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 1996, 140, 77–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  132. Vahter, M. Methylation of Inorganic Arsenic in Different Mammalian Species and Population Groups. Sci. Prog. 1999, 82 Pt 1, 69–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  133. Gao, S.; Lin, P.I.; Mostofa, G.; Quamruzzaman, Q.; Rahman, M.; Rahman, M.L.; Su, L.; Hsueh, Y.M.; Weisskopf, M.; Coull, B.; et al. Determinants of Arsenic Methylation Efficiency and Urinary Arsenic Level in Pregnant Women in Bangladesh. Environ. Health 2019, 18, 94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Tseng, C.H. A Review on Environmental Factors Regulating Arsenic Methylation in Humans. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 2009, 235, 338–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Zhang, Q.; Li, Y.; Liu, J.; Wang, D.; Zheng, Q.; Sun, G. Differences of Urinary Arsenic Metabolites and Methylation Capacity between Individuals with and without Skin Lesions in Inner Mongolia, Northern China. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2014, 11, 7319–7332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Luo, L.; Li, Y.; Gao, Y.; Zhao, L.; Feng, H.; Wei, W.; Qiu, C.; He, Q.; Zhang, Y.; Fu, S.; et al. Association between Arsenic Metabolism Gene Polymorphisms and Arsenic-Induced Skin Lesions in Individuals Exposed to High-Dose Inorganic Arsenic in Northwest China. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Meza, M.M.; Yu, L.; Rodriguez, Y.Y.; Guild, M.; Thompson, D.; Gandolfi, A.J.; Klimecki, W.T. Developmentally Restricted Genetic Determinants of Human Arsenic Metabolism: Association between Urinary Methylated Arsenic and CYT19 Polymorphisms in Children. Environ. Health Perspect. 2005, 113, 775–781. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. González-Martínez, F.; Sánchez-Rodas, D.; Varela, N.M.; Sandoval, C.A.; Quiñones, L.A.; Johnson-Restrepo, B. As3MT and GST Polymorphisms Influencing Arsenic Metabolism in Human Exposure to Drinking Groundwater. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 4832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  139. Kuo, C.C.; Howard, B.V.; Umans, J.G.; Gribble, M.O.; Best, L.G.; Francesconi, K.A.; Goessler, W.; Lee, E.; Guallar, E.; Navas-Acien, A. Arsenic Exposure, Arsenic Metabolism, and Incident Diabetes in the Strong Heart Study. Diabetes Care 2015, 38, 620–627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  140. Jeanguenin, L.; Lara-Núñez, A.; Pribat, A.; Hamner Mageroy, M.; Gregory, J.F., III; Rice, K.C.; Crécy-Lagard, V.; Hanson, A.D. Moonlighting Glutamate Formiminotransferases Can Functionally Replace 5-Formyltetrahydrofolate Cycloligase. J. Biol. Chem. 2010, 285, 41557–41566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Pierce, B.L.; Tong, L.; Dean, S.; Argos, M.; Jasmine, F.; Rakibuz-Zaman, M.; Sarwar, G.; Islam, T.; Shahriar, H.; Islam, T.; et al. A Missense Variant in FTCD Is Associated with Arsenic Metabolism and Toxicity Phenotypes in Bangladesh. PLoS Genet. 2019, 15, e1007984, Erratum in PLoS Genet. 2019, 15, e1008172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Steinmaus, C.; Moore, L.E.; Shipp, M.; Kalman, D.; Rey, O.A.; Biggs, M.L.; Hopenhayn, C.; Bates, M.N.; Zheng, S.; Wiencke, J.K.; et al. Genetic Polymorphisms in MTHFR 677 and 1298, GSTM1 and T1, and Metabolism of Arsenic. J. Toxicol. Environ. Health-A Curr. Issues 2007, 70, 159–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Hoffmann, T.; Warmbold, B.; Smits, S.H.J.; Tschapek, B.; Ronzheimer, S.; Bashir, A.; Chen, C.; Rolbetzki, A.; Pittelkow, M.; Jebbar, M.; et al. Arsenobetaine: An Ecophysiologically Important Organoarsenical Confers Cytoprotection against Osmotic Stress and Growth Temperature Extremes. Environ. Microbiol. 2018, 20, 305–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Ritchie, A.W.; Edmonds, J.S.; Goessler, W.; Jenkins, R.O. An Origin for Arsenobetaine Involving Bacterial Formation of an Arsenic-Carbon Bond. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2004, 235, 95–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Jenkins, R.O.; Ritchie, A.W.; Edmonds, J.S.; Goessler, W.; Molenat, N.; Kuehnelt, D.; Harrington, C.F.; Sutton, P.G. Bacterial Degradation of Arsenobetaine via Dimethylarsinoylacetate. Arch. Microbiol. 2003, 180, 142–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. IARC: International Agency for Research on Cancer. A Review of Human Carcinogens. Part C: Arsenic, Metals, Fibres, and Dusts. IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans. v. 100C; IARC: Lyon, France, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  147. Nayak, A.S.; Lage, C.R.; Kim, C.H. Effects of Low Concentrations of Arsenic on the Innate Immune System of the Zebrafish (Danio Rerio). Toxicol. Sci. 2007, 98, 118–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Kozul, C.D.; Ely, K.H.; Enelow, R.I.; Hamilton, J.W. Low-Dose Arsenic Compromises the Immune Response to Influenza A Infection in Vivo. Environ. Health Perspect. 2009, 117, 1441–1447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  149. Wu, H.; Kalia, V.; Niedzwiecki, M.M.; Kioumourtzoglou, M.A.; Pierce, B.; Ilievski, V.; Goldsmith, J.; Jones, D.P.; Navas-Acien, A.; Walker, D.I.; et al. Metabolomic Changes Associated with Chronic Arsenic Exposure in a Bangladeshi Population. Chemosphere 2023, 320, 137998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  150. Hong, Y.S.; Song, K.H.; Chung, J.Y. Health Effects of Chronic Arsenic Exposure. J. Prev. Med. Public Health 2014, 47, 245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  151. Cervantes, C.; Ji, G.; Ramírez, J.; Silver, S. Resistance to Arsenic Compounds in Microorganisms. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 1994, 15, 355–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Leonard, A. Arsenic. In Metals and Their Compounds in the Environment; Merian, E., Clarkson, T., Eds.; VCH: Weinheim, Germany, 1991; pp. 751–772. [Google Scholar]
  153. Moore, M.M.; Harrington-Brock, K.; Doerr, C.L. Relative Genotoxic Potency of Arsenic and Its Methylated Metabolites. Mutat. Res. Rev. Mutat. Res. 1997, 386, 279–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Styblo, M.; del Razo, L.M.; Vega, L.; Germolec, D.R.; Lecluyse, E.L.; Hamilton, G.A.; Reed, W.; Wang, C.; Cullen, W.R.; Thomas, D.J. Comparative Toxicity of Trivalent and Pentavalent Inorganic and Methylated Arsenicals in Rat and Human Cells. Arch. Toxicol. 2000, 74, 289–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Brown, J.L.; Kitchin, K.T.; George, M. Dimethylarsinic Acid Treatment Alters Six Different Rat Biochemical Parameters: Relevance to Arsenic Carcinogenesis. Teratog. Carcinog. Mutagen. 1997, 17, 71–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. No, A.F.; Winski, S.L.; Barber, D.S.; Rael, L.T.; Carter, D.E. Sequence of Toxic Events in Arsine-Induced Hemolysis In Vitro: Implications for the Mechanism of Toxicity in Human Erythrocytes. Toxicol. Sci. 1997, 38, 123–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  157. Rainey, N.E.; Armand, A.-S.; Petit, P.X. Sodium Arsenite and Arsenic Trioxide Differently Affect the Oxidative Stress of Lymphoblastoid Cells: An Intricate Crosstalk between Mitochondria, Autophagy and Cell Death. PLoS ONE 2024, 19, e0302701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Yeh, J.; Cheng, L.; Liang, Y.-C.; Ou, B. Modulation of the Arsenic Effects on Cytotoxicity, Viability, and Cell Cycle in Porcine Endothelial Cells by Selenium. Endothelium 2003, 10, 127–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Jiang, X.; Chen, C.; Zhao, W.; Zhang, Z. Sodium Arsenite and Arsenic Trioxide Differently Affect the Oxidative Stress, Genotoxicity and Apoptosis in A549 Cells: An Implication for the Paradoxical Mechanism. Environ. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2013, 36, 891–902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Mähler, J.; Persson, I.; Herbert, R.B. Hydration of Arsenic Oxyacid Species. Dalton Trans. 2013, 42, 1364–1377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Gailer, J.; Ruprecht, L.; Reitmeir, P.; Benker, B.; Schramel, P. Mobilization of Exogenous and Endogenous Selenium to Bile after the Intravenous Administration of Environmentally Relevant Doses of Arsenite to Rabbits. Appl. Organomet. Chem. 2004, 18, 670–675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. del Razo, L.M.; Styblo, M.; Cullen, W.R.; Thomas, D.J. Determination of Trivalent Methylated Arsenicals in Biological Matrices. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 2001, 174, 282–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  163. Aposhian, H.V.; Zakharyan, R.A.; Avram, M.D.; Sampayo-Reyes, A.; Wollenberg, M.L. A Review of the Enzymology of Arsenic Metabolism and a New Potential Role of Hydrogen Peroxide in the Detoxication of the Trivalent Arsenic Species. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 2004, 198, 327–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  164. Ahmad, S.; Kitchin, K.T.; Cullen, W.R. Arsenic Species That Cause Release of Iron from Ferritin and Generation of Activated Oxygen. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 2000, 382, 195–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  165. Chen, Y.-C.; Lin-Shiau, S.-Y.; Lin, J.-K. Involvement of Reactive Oxygen Species and Caspase 3 Activation in Arsenite-Induced Apoptosis. J. Cell Physiol. 1998, 177, 324–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Nies, D.H. Microbial Heavy-Metal Resistance. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 1999, 51, 730–750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  167. Gebel, T. Confounding Variables in the Environmental Toxicology of Arsenic. Toxicology 2000, 144, 155–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  168. Graeme, K.A.; Pollack, C.V. Heavy Metal Toxicity, Part I: Arsenic and Mercury. J. Emerg. Med. 1998, 16, 45–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. Abernathy, C.O.; Liu, Y.P.; Longfellow, D.; Aposhian, H.V.; Beck, B.; Fowler, B.; Goyer, R.; Menzer, R.; Rossman, T.; Thompson, C.; et al. Meeting on Arsenic: Health Effects, Mechanisms of Actions, and Research Issues. In Proceedings of the Environmental Health Perspectives, Baltimore, MD, USA, 22–24 September 1997; Public Health Services, US Dept of Health and Human Services: Washington, DC, USA, 1999; Volume 107, pp. 593–597. [Google Scholar]
  170. Liao, Y.T.; Chen, C.J.; Li, W.F.; Hsu, L.I.; Tsai, L.Y.; Huang, Y.L.; Sun, C.W.; Chen, W.J.; Wang, S.L. Elevated Lactate Dehydrogenase Activity and Increased Cardiovascular Mortality in the Arsenic-Endemic Areas of Southwestern Taiwan. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 2012, 262, 232–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  171. Brockmöller, J.; Cascorbi, I.; Henning, S.; Meisel, C.; Roots, I. Molecular Genetics of Cancer Susceptibility. Pharmacology 2000, 61, 212–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  172. Wei, Q.; Matanoski, G.M.; Farmer, E.R.; Hedayati, M.A.; Grossman, L. DNA Repair and Susceptibility to Basal Cell Carcinoma: A Case-Control Study. Am. J. Epidemiol. 1994, 140, 598–607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  173. NRC (National Research Council). Arsenic in Drinking Water; National Academies Press: Washington, DC, USA, 1999. [Google Scholar]
  174. Lee, M.Y.; Bae, O.N.; Chung, S.M.; Kang, K.T.; Lee, J.Y.; Chung, J.H. Enhancement of Platelet Aggregation and Thrombus Formation by Arsenic in Drinking Water: A Contributing Factor to Cardiovascular Disease. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 2002, 179, 83–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  175. Wāng, Y.; Ma, L.; Wang, C.; Gao, T.; Han, Y.; Xu, D.X. Cardiovascular Adverse Effects and Mechanistic Insights of Arsenic Exposure: A Review. Environ. Chem. Lett. 2024, 22, 1437–1472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  176. Balakumar, P.; Kaur, J. Arsenic Exposure and Cardiovascular Disorders: An Overview. Cardiovasc. Toxicol. 2009, 9, 169–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  177. Petrick, J.S.; Jagadish, B.; Mash, E.A.; Aposhian, H.V. Monomethylarsonous Acid (MMAIII) and Arsenite: LD50 in Hamsters and in Vitro Inhibition of Pyruvate Dehydrogenase. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 2001, 14, 651–656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  178. Mass, M.J.; Tennant, A.; Roop, B.C.; Cullen, W.R.; Styblo, M.; Thomas, D.J.; Kligerman, A.D. Methylated Trivalent Arsenic Species Are Genotoxic. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 2001, 14, 355–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  179. Styblo, M.; Serves, S.V.; Cullen, W.R.; Thomas, D.J. Comparative Inhibition of Yeast Glutathione Reductase by Arsenicals and Arsenothiols. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 1997, 10, 27–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  180. Chouchane, S.; Snow, E.T. In Vitro Effect of Arsenical Compounds on Glutathione-Related Enzymes. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 2001, 14, 517–522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  181. Lin, S.; Cullen, W.R.; Thomas, D.J. Methylarsenicals and Arsinothiols Are Potent Inhibitors of Mouse Liver Thioredoxin Reductase. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 1999, 12, 924–930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  182. Lin, S.; Maria, L.; Razo, D.; Styblo, M.; Wang, C.; Cullen, W.R.; Thomas, D.J. Arsenicals Inhibit Thioredoxin Reductase in Cultured Rat Hepatocytes. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 2001, 14, 30–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  183. Hughes, M.F. Arsenic Toxicity and Potential Mechanisms of Action. Toxicol. Lett. 2002, 133, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  184. Chung, J.S.; Kalman, D.A.; Moore, L.E.; Kosnett, M.J.; Arroyo, A.P.; Beeris, M.; Guha Mazumder, D.N.; Hernandez, A.L.; Smith, A.H. Family Correlations of Arsenic Methylation Patterns in Children and Parents Exposed to High Concentrations of Arsenic in Drinking Water. Environ. Health Perspect. 2002, 110, 729–733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  185. Naranmandura, H.; Ibata, K.; Suzuki, K.T. Toxicity of Dimethylmonothioarsinic Acid toward Human Epidermoid Carcinoma A431 Cells. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 2007, 20, 1120–1125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  186. Ochi, T.; Kita, K.; Suzuki, T.; Rumpler, A.; Goessler, W.; Francesconi, K.A. Cytotoxic, Genotoxic and Cell-Cycle Disruptive Effects of Thio-Dimethylarsinate in Cultured Human Cells and the Role of Glutathione. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 2008, 228, 59–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  187. Naranmandura, H.; Ogra, Y.; Iwata, K.; Lee, J.; Suzuki, K.T.; Weinfeld, M.; Le, X.C. Evidence for Toxicity Differences between Inorganic Arsenite and Thioarsenicals in Human Bladder Cancer Cells. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 2009, 238, 133–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  188. Leffers, L.; Unterberg, M.; Bartel, M.; Hoppe, C.; Pieper, I.; Stertmann, J.; Ebert, F.; Humpf, H.U.; Schwerdtle, T. In Vitro Toxicological Characterisation of the S-Containing Arsenic Metabolites Thio-Dimethylarsinic Acid and Dimethylarsinic Glutathione. Toxicology 2013, 305, 109–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  189. Gailer, J.; George, G.N.; Pickering, I.J.; Buttigieg, G.A.; Bonner Denton, M.; Glass, R.S. Synthesis, X-Ray Absorption Spectroscopy and Purification of the Seleno-Bis (S-Glutathionyl) Arsinium Anion from Selenide, Arsenite and Glutathione. J. Organometal Chem. 2002, 650, 108–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  190. Gailer, J.; George, G.N.; Pickering, I.J.; Prince, R.C.; Younis, H.S.; Winzerling, J.J. Biliary Excretion of [(GS)2AsSe] after Intravenous Injection of Rabbits with Arsenite and Selenate. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 2002, 15, 1466–1471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  191. Ganther, H.E.; Baumann, C.A. Selenium Metabolism: I. Effects of Diet, Arsenic and Cadmium. J. Nutr. 1962, 77, 210–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  192. Miyazaki, K.; Ushijima, K.; Kadono, T.; Inaoka, T.; Watanabe, C.; Ohtsuka, R. Negative Correlation between Urinary Selenium and Arsenic Levels of the Residents Living in an Arsenic-Contaminated Area in Bangladesh. J. Health Sci. 2003, 49, 239–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  193. Ponomarenko, O.; La Porte, P.F.; Singh, S.P.; Langan, G.; Fleming, D.E.B.; Spallholz, J.E.; Alauddin, M.; Ahsan, H.; Ahmed, S.; Gailer, J.; et al. Selenium-Mediated Arsenic Excretion in Mammals: A Synchrotron-Based Study of Whole-Body Distribution and Tissue-Specific Chemistry. Metallomics 2017, 9, 1585–1595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  194. Chowdhury, U. Selenium (Se) as Well as Mercury (Hg) May Influence the Methylation and Toxicity of Inorganic Arsenic, but Further Research Is Needed with Combination of Inorg-Arsenic, Se, and Hg. J. Toxicol. Environ. Sci. 2021, 1, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  195. Gailer, J.; George, G.N.; Pickering, I.J.; Prince, R.C.; Ringwald, S.C.; Pemberton, J.E.; Glass, R.S.; Younis, H.S.; DeYoung, D.W.; Aposhian, H.V. A Metabolic Link between Arsenite and Selenite: The Seleno-Bis(S-Glutathionyl) Arsinium Ion. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2000, 122, 4637–4639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  196. Selvaraj, V.; Yeager-Armstead, M.; Murray, E. Protective and Antioxidant Role of Selenium on Arsenic Trioxide–Induced Oxidative Stress and Genotoxicity in the Fish Hepatoma Cell Line PLHC-1. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2012, 31, 2861–2869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  197. Argos, M.; Rathouz, P.J.; Pierce, B.L.; Kalra, T.; Parvez, F.; Slavkovich, V.; Ahmed, A.; Chen, Y.; Ahsan, H. Dietary B Vitamin Intakes and Urinary Total Arsenic Concentration in the Health Effects of Arsenic Longitudinal Study (HEALS) Cohort, Bangladesh. Eur. J. Nutr. 2010, 49, 473–481. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  198. Silver, S.; Ji, G.; Bröer, S.; Dey, S.; Dou, D.; Rosen, B.P. Orphan Enzyme or Patriarch of a New Tribe: The Arsenic Resistance ATPase of Bacterial Plasmids. Mol. Microbiol. 1993, 8, 637–642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  199. Laverman, A.M.; Blum, J.S.; Schaefer, J.K.; Phillips, E.J.P.; Lovley, D.R.; Oremland, R.S. Growth of Strain SES-3 with Arsenate and Other Diverse Electron Acceptors. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1995, 61, 3556–3561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  200. Ahmann, D.; Roberts, A.L.; Krumholz, L.R.; Morel, F.M.M. Microbe Grows by Reducing Arsenic. Nature 1994, 371, 750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  201. Silver, S.; Phung, L.T. Bacterial Heavy Metal Resistance: New Surprises. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 1996, 50, 753–789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  202. Feo, J.C.; Ordoñez, E.; Letek, M.; Castro, M.A.; Muñoz, M.I.; Gil, J.A.; Mateos, L.M.; Aller, A.J. Retention of Inorganic Arsenic by Coryneform Mutant Strains. Water Res. 2007, 41, 531–542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  203. Nies, D.H.; Silver, S. Ion Efflux Systems Involved in Bacterial Metal Resistances. J. Ind. Microbiol. 1995, 14, 186–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  204. Rensing, C.; Ghosh, M.; Rosen, B.P. Families of Soft-Metal-Ion-Transporting ATPases. J. Bacteriol. 1999, 181, 5891–5897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  205. Tokar, E.J.; Kojima, C.; Waalkes, M.P. Methylarsonous Acid Causes Oxidative DNA Damage in Cells Independent of the Ability to Biomethylate Inorganic Arsenic. Arch. Toxicol. 2014, 88, 249–261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  206. Salazar, A.M.; Ostrosky-Wegman, P.; Menéndez, D.; Miranda, E.; García-Carrancá, A.; Rojas, E. Induction of P53 Protein Expression by Sodium Arsenite. Mutat. Res.-Fundam. Mol. Mech. Mutagen. 1997, 381, 259–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  207. Brambila, E.M.; Achanzar, W.E.; Qu, W.; Webber, M.M.; Waalkes, M.P. Chronic Arsenic-Exposed Human Prostate Epithelial Cells Exhibit Stable Arsenic Tolerance: Mechanistic Implications of Altered Cellular Glutathione and Glutathione S-Transferase. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 2002, 183, 99–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  208. Schuliga, M.; Chouchane, S.; Snow, E.T. Upregulation of Glutathione-Related Genes and Enzyme Activities in Cultured Human Cells by Sublethal Concentrations of Inorganic Arsenic. Toxicol. Sci. 2002, 70, 183–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  209. Schoolmeester, W.L.; White, D.R. Arsenic Poisoning. South. Med. J. 1980, 73, 198–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  210. Ratnaike, R.N. Acute and Chronic Arsenic Toxicity. Postgrad. Med. J. 2003, 79, 391–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  211. del Razo, L.M.; Quintanilla-Vega, B.; Brambila-Colombres, E.; Calderón-Aranda, E.S.; Manno, M.; Albores, A. Stress Proteins Induced by Arsenic. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 2001, 177, 132–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  212. Vahidnia, A.; van der Voet, G.B.; de Wolff, F.A. Arsenic Neurotoxicity—A Review. Hum. Exp. Toxicol. 2007, 26, 823–832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  213. Mochizuki, H. Arsenic Neurotoxicity in Humans. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 3418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  214. Simeonova, P.; Luster, M. Mechanisms of Arsenic Carcinogenicity: Genetic or Epigenetic Mechanisms? J. Environ. Pathol. Toxicol. Oncol. 2000, 19, 281–286. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  215. Hu, Y.; Jin, X.; Snow, E. Effect of Arsenic on Transcription Factor AP-1 and NF-ΚB DNA Binding Activity and Related Gene Expression. Toxicol. Lett. 2002, 133, 33–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  216. Zhou, Q.; Xi, S. A Review on Arsenic Carcinogenesis: Epidemiology, Metabolism, Genotoxicity and Epigenetic Changes. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2018, 99, 78–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  217. Colwell, M.L.; Flack, N.; Rezabek, A.; Faulk, C. Intergenerational Arsenic Exposure on the Mouse Epigenome and Metabolic Physiology. Environ. Mol. Mutagen. 2023, 64, 72–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  218. Nava-Rivera, L.E.; Betancourt-Martínez, N.D.; Lozoya-Martínez, R.; Carranza-Rosales, P.; Guzmán-Delgado, N.E.; Carranza-Torres, I.E.; Delgado-Aguirre, H.; Zambrano-Ortíz, J.O.; Morán-Martínez, J. Transgenerational Effects in DNA Methylation, Genotoxicity and Reproductive Phenotype by Chronic Arsenic Exposure. Sci. Rep. 2021, 11, 8276, Correction in Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 4804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  219. Navasumrit, P.; Chaisatra, K.; Promvijit, J.; Parnlob, V.; Waraprasit, S.; Chompoobut, C.; Binh, T.T.; Hai, D.N.; Bao, N.D.; Hai, N.K.; et al. Exposure to Arsenic in Utero Is Associated with Various Types of DNA Damage and Micronuclei in Newborns: A Birth Cohort Study. Environ. Health 2019, 18, 51, Correction in Environ. Health 2019, 18, 68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  220. Chou, W.C.; Chung, Y.T.; Chen, H.Y.; Wang, C.J.; Ying, T.H.; Chuang, C.Y.; Tseng, Y.C.; Wang, S.L. Maternal Arsenic Exposure and DNA Damage Biomarkers, and the Associations with Birth Outcomes in a General Population from Taiwan. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e86398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  221. Medda, N.; De, S.K.; Maiti, S. Different Mechanisms of Arsenic Related Signaling in Cellular Proliferation, Apoptosis and Neo-Plastic Transformation. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2021, 208, 111752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  222. Bernstam, L.; Nriagu, J. Molecular Aspects of Arsenic Stress. J. Toxicol. Environ. Health B Crit. Rev. 2000, 3, 293–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  223. Flora, S.J.S. Arsenic-Induced Oxidative Stress and Its Reversibility. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2011, 51, 257–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  224. Kota, B.P.; Huang, T.H.W.; Roufogalis, B.D. An Overview on Biological Mechanisms of PPARs. Pharmacol. Res. 2005, 51, 85–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  225. Luquet, S.; Gaudel, C.; Holst, D.; Lopez-Soriano, J.; Jehl-Pietri, C.; Fredenrich, A.; Grimaldi, P.A. Roles of PPAR Delta in Lipid Absorption and Metabolism: A New Target for the Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes. Biochim. Biophys. Acta-Mol. Basis Dis. 2005, 1740, 313–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  226. Moraes, L.A.; Piqueras, L.; Bishop-Bailey, D. Peroxisome Proliferator-Activated Receptors and Inflammation. Pharmacol. Ther. 2006, 110, 371–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  227. Sumi, D.; Shinkai, Y.; Kumagai, Y. Signal Transduction Pathways and Transcription Factors Triggered by Arsenic Trioxide in Leukemia Cells. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 2010, 244, 385–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  228. Walton, F.S.; Harmon, A.W.; Paul, D.S.; Drobná, Z.; Patel, Y.M.; Styblo, M. Inhibition of Insulin-Dependent Glucose Uptake by Trivalent Arsenicals: Possible Mechanism of Arsenic-Induced Diabetes. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 2004, 198, 424–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  229. Black, P.H. The Inflammatory Response Is an Integral Part of the Stress Response: Implications for Atherosclerosis, Insulin Resistance, Type II Diabetes and Metabolic Syndrome X. Brain Behav. Immun. 2003, 17, 350–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  230. Carey, A.L.; Lamont, B.; Andrikopoulos, S.; Koukoulas, I.; Proietto, J.; Febbraio, M.A. Interleukin-6 Gene Expression Is Increased in Insulin-Resistant Rat Skeletal Muscle Following Insulin Stimulation. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2003, 302, 837–840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  231. Dandona, P.; Aljada, A.; Bandyopadhyay, A. Inflammation: The Link between Insulin Resistance, Obesity and Diabetes. Trends Immunol. 2004, 25, 4–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  232. Fischer, C.P.; Perstrup, L.B.; Berntsen, A.; Eskildsen, P.; Pedersen, B.K. Elevated Plasma Interleukin-18 Is a Marker of Insulin-Resistance in Type 2 Diabetic and Non-Diabetic Humans. Clin. Immunol. 2005, 117, 152–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  233. Robinan Gentry, P.; Covington, T.R.; Mann, S.; Shipp, A.M.; Yager, J.W.; Clewell, H.J. Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic Modeling of Arsenic in the Mouse. J. Toxicol. Environ. Health A 2004, 67, 43–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  234. Hara, K.; Okada, T.; Tobe, K.; Yasuda, K.; Mori, Y.; Kadowaki, H.; Hagura, R.; Akanuma, Y.; Kimura, S.; Ito, C.; et al. The Pro12Ala Polymorphism in PPAR Γ2 May Confer Resistance to Type 2 Diabetes. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2000, 271, 212–216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  235. Birben, E.; Sahiner, U.M.; Sackesen, C.; Erzurum, S.; Kalayci, O. Oxidative Stress and Antioxidant Defense. World Allergy Organ. J. 2012, 5, 9–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  236. Waalkes, M.P.; Liu, J.; Ward, J.M.; Diwan, B.A. Mechanisms Underlying Arsenic Carcinogenesis: Hypersensitivity of Mice Exposed to Inorganic Arsenic during Gestation. Toxicology 2004, 198, 31–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  237. Mustacich, D.; Powis, G. Thioredoxin Reductase. Biochem. J. 2000, 346, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  238. Matthews, J.R.; Wakasugil, N.; Virelizierl, J.-L.; Yodoi2, J.; Hay, R.T. Thiordoxin Regulates the DNA Binding Activity of NF-ΧB by Reduction of a Disulphid Bond Involving Cysteine 62. Nucleic Acids Res. 1992, 20, 3821–3830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  239. Arrigo, A.P. Gene Expression and the Thiol Redox State. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 1999, 27, 936–944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  240. Powis, G.; Mustacich, D.; Coon, A. The Role of the Redox Protein Thioredoxin in Cell Growth and Cancer. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2000, 29, 312–322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  241. Shimizu, M.; Hochadel, J.F.; Fulmer, B.A.; Waalkes, M.P. Effect of Glutathione Depletion and Metallothionein Gene Expression on Arsenic-Induced Cytotoxicity and c-Myc Expression In Vitro. Toxicol. Sci. 1998, 45, 204–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  242. Rao, G.; Zhong, G.; Hu, T.; Wu, S.; Tan, J.; Zhang, X.; Huang, R.; Tang, Z.; Hu, L. Arsenic Trioxide Triggers Mitochondrial Dysfunction, Oxidative Stress, and Apoptosis via Nrf 2/Caspase 3 Signaling Pathway in Heart of Ducks. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 2023, 201, 1407–1417, Correction in Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 2023, 201, 2097–2099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  243. Lee, C.; Yu, H. Role of Mitochondria, ROS, and DNA Damage in Arsenic Induced Carcinogenesis. Front. Biosci. (Schol. Ed.) 2016, 8, 312–320. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  244. Wang, Q.; Zhu, K.; Zhang, A. SIRT1-Mediated Tunnelling Nanotubes May Be a Potential Intervention Target for Arsenic-Induced Hepatocyte Senescence and Liver Damage. Sci. Total Environ. 2024, 947, 174502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  245. Zhang, H.; Chen, Q.; Han, H.; Guo, C.; Jiang, X.; Xia, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Zhou, L.; Zhang, J.; Tian, X.; et al. SUMOylation Modification of FTO Facilitates Oxidative Damage Response of Arsenic by IGF2BP3 in an M6A-Dependent Manner. J. Hazard. Mater. 2024, 472, 134440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  246. Gupta, M.K.; Gulick, J.; Liu, R.; Wang, X.; Molkentin, J.D.; Robbins, J. Sumo E2 Enzyme UBC9 Is Required for Efficient Protein Quality Control in Cardiomyocytes. Circ. Res. 2014, 115, 721–729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  247. Lynn, S.; Gurr, J.R.; Lai, H.T.; Jan, K.Y. NADH Oxidase Activation Is Involved in Arsenite-Induced Oxidative DNA Damage in Human Vascular Smooth Muscle Cells. Circ. Res. 2000, 86, 514–519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  248. Pagano, P.J. Vascular Gp91(Phox): Beyond the Endothelium. Circ. Res. 2000, 87, 1–3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  249. Smith, K.R.; Klei, L.R.; Barchowsky, A. Arsenite Stimulates Plasma Membrane NADPH Oxidase in Vascular Endothelial Cells. Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell Mol. Physiol. 2001, 280, L442–L449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  250. Leonard, S.S.; Harris, G.K.; Shi, X. Metal-Induced Oxidative Stress and Signal Transduction. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2004, 37, 1921–1942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  251. Fagerberg, L.; Hallstrom, B.M.; Oksvold, P.; Kampf, C.; Djureinovic, D.; Odeberg, J.; Habuka, M.; Tahmasebpoor, S.; Danielsson, A.; Edlund, K.; et al. Analysis of the Human Tissue-Specific Expression by Genome-Wide Integration of Transcriptomics and Antibody-Based Proteomics. Mol. Cell Proteom. 2014, 13, 397–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  252. Uhlén, M.; Fagerberg, L.; Hallström, B.M.; Lindskog, C.; Oksvold, P.; Mardinoglu, A.; Sivertsson, Å.; Kampf, C.; Sjöstedt, E.; Asplund, A.; et al. Tissue-Based Map of the Human Proteome. Science 2015, 347, 1260419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  253. Cooper, K.L.; Volk, L.B.; Dominguez, D.R.; Duran, A.D.; Ke Jian Liu, K.J.; Hudson, L.G. Contribution of NADPH Oxidase to the Retention of UVR-Induced DNA Damage by Arsenic. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 2022, 434, 115799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  254. Cooper, K.L.; King, B.S.; Sandoval, M.M.; Liu, K.J.; Hudson, L.G. Reduction of Arsenite-Enhanced Ultraviolet Radiation-Induced DNA Damage by Supplemental Zinc. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 2013, 269, 81–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  255. Yamanaka, K.; Kato, K.; Mizoi, M.; An, Y.; Takabayashi, F.; Nakano, M.; Hoshino, M.; Okada, S. The Role of Active Arsenic Species Produced by Metabolic Reduction of Dimethylarsinic Acid in Genotoxicity and Tumorigenesis. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 2004, 198, 385–393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  256. Murphy, M.P.; Holmgren, A.; Larsson, N.G.; Halliwell, B.; Chang, C.J.; Kalyanaraman, B.; Rhee, S.G.; Thornalley, P.J.; Partridge, L.; Gems, D.; et al. Unraveling the Biological Roles of Reactive Oxygen Species. Cell Metab. 2011, 13, 361–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  257. Murphy, M.P.; Bayir, H.; Belousov, V.; Chang, C.J.; Davies, K.J.A.; Davies, M.J.; Dick, T.P.; Finkel, T.; Forman, H.J.; Janssen-Heininger, Y.; et al. Guidelines for Measuring Reactive Oxygen Species and Oxidative Damage in Cells and In Vivo. Nat. Metab. 2022, 4, 651–662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  258. Zhou, J.; Wang, W.; Wei, Q.; Feng, T.; Tan, L.; Yang, V. Effects of Arsenic Trioxide on Voltage-Dependent Potassium Channels and on Cell Proliferation of Human Multiple Myeloma Cells. Chin. Med. J. 2007, 120, 1266–1269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  259. Konduri, G.G.; Bakhutashvili, I.; Eis, A.; Gauthier, K.M. Impaired Voltage Gated Potassium Channel Responses in a Fetal Lamb Model of Persistent Pulmonary Hypertension of the Newborn. Pediatr. Res. 2009, 66, 289–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  260. Drolet, B.; Simard, C.; Roden, D.M. Unusual Effects of a QT-Prolonging Drug, Arsenic Trioxide, on Cardiac Potassium Currents. Circulation 2004, 109, 26–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  261. Lu, T.H.; Tseng, T.J.; Su, C.C.; Tang, F.C.; Yen, C.C.; Liu, Y.Y.; Yang, C.Y.; Wu, C.C.; Chen, K.L.; Hung, D.Z.; et al. Arsenic Induces Reactive Oxygen Species-Caused Neuronal Cell Apoptosis through JNK/ERK-Mediated Mitochondria-Dependent and GRP 78/CHOP-Regulated Pathways. Toxicol. Lett. 2014, 224, 130–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  262. Sun, M.; Cheng, H.; Yu, T.; Tan, J.; Li, M.; Chen, Q.; Gu, Y.; Jiang, C.; Li, S.; He, Y.; et al. Involvement of a AS3MT/c-Fos/P53 Signaling Axis in Arsenic-Induced Tumor in Human Lung Cells. Environ. Toxicol. 2023, 38, 615–627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  263. Islam, R.; Zhao, L.; Zhang, X.; Liu, L.Z. MiR-218-5p/EGFR Signaling in Arsenic-Induced Carcinogenesis. Cancers 2023, 15, 1204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  264. Yang, F.; Zhang, A. Involvement of METTL3 in Arsenite-Induced Skin Lesions by Targeting the SOCS3/STAT3/Krt Signaling Pathway. Environ. Poll. 2023, 316, 120634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  265. Gresser, M. ADP-Arsenate. Formation by Submitochondrial Particles under Phosphorylating Conditions. J. Biol. Chem. 1981, 256, 5981–5983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  266. Liu, J.; Liu, Y.; Goyer, R.A.; Achanzar, W.; Waalkes, M.P. Metallothionein-I/II Null Mice Are More Sensitive than Wild-Type Mice to the Hepatotoxic and Nephrotoxic Effects of Chronic Oral or Injected Inorganic Arsenicals. Toxicol. Sci. 2000, 55, 460–467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  267. Romach, E.H.; Zhao, C.Q.; del Razo, L.M.; Cebrián, M.E.; Waalkes, M.P. Studies on the Mechanisms of Arsenic-Induced Self Tolerance Developed in Liver Epithelial Cells through Continuous Low-Level Arsenite Exposure. Toxicol. Sci. 2000, 54, 500–508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  268. Lee, T.; Ho, I. Modulation of Cellular Antioxidant Defense Activities by Sodium Arsenite in Human Fibroblasts. Arch. Toxicol. 1995, 6, 498–504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  269. Yih, L.H.; Peck, K.; Lee, T.C. Changes in Gene Expression Profiles of Human Fibroblasts in Response to Sodium Arsenite Treatment. Carcinogenesis 2002, 23, 867–876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  270. Parrish, A.R.; Zheng, X.H.; Turney, K.D.; Younis, H.S.; Gandolfi, A.J. Enhanced Transcription Factor DNA Binding and Gene Expression Induced by Arsenite or Arsenate in Renal Slices. Toxicol. Sci. 1999, 50, 98–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  271. Aoki, Y.; Lipsky, M.M.; Fowler, B.A. Alteration in Protein Synthesis in Primary Cultures of Rat Kidney Proximal Tubule Epithelial Cells by Exposure to Gallium, Indium, and Arsenite. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 1990, 106, 462–468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  272. Naujokas, M.F.; Anderson, B.; Ahsan, H.; Vasken Aposhian, H.; Graziano, J.H.; Thompson, C.; Suk, W.A. The Broad Scope of Health Effects from Chronic Arsenic Exposure: Update on a Worldwide Public Health Problem. Environ. Health Perspect. 2013, 121, 295–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  273. Lewis, D.R.; Southwick, J.W.; Ouellet-Hellstrom, R.; Rench, J.; Calderon, R.L. Drinking Water Arsenic in Utah: A Cohort Mortality Study. Environ. Health Perspect. 1999, 107, 359–365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  274. Ferreccio, C.; González, C.; Milosavjlevic, V.; Marshall, G.; Sancha, A.M.; Smith, A.H. Lung Cancer and Arsenic Concentrations in Drinking Water in Chile. Epidemiology 2000, 11, 673–679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  275. Ferreccio, C.; Sancha, A.M. Arsenic Exposure and Its Impact on Health in Chile. J. Health Popul. Nutr. 2006, 24, 164–175. [Google Scholar]
  276. Dutta, K.; Prasad, P.; Sinha, D. Chronic Low Level Arsenic Exposure Evokes Inflammatory Responses and DNA Damage. Int. J. Hyg. Environ. Health 2015, 218, 564–574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  277. Tseng, C.H.; Chong, C.K.; Tseng, C.P.; Hsueh, Y.M.; Chiou, H.Y.; Tseng, C.C.; Chen, C.J. Long-Term Arsenic Exposure and Ischemic Heart Disease in Arseniasis-Hyperendemic Villages in Taiwan. Toxicol. Lett. 2003, 137, 15–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  278. Chiou, H.Y.; Huang, W.I.; Su, C.L.; Chang, S.F.; Hsu, Y.H.; Chen, C.J. Dose-Response Relationship between Prevalence of Cerebrovascular Disease and Ingested Inorganic Arsenic. Stroke 1997, 28, 1717–1723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  279. Hendryx, M. Mortality from Heart, Respiratory, and Kidney Disease in Coal Mining Areas of Appalachia. Int. Arch. Occup. Environ. Health 2009, 82, 243–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  280. Navas-Acien, A.; Silbergeld, E.K.; Pastor-Barriuso, R.; Guallar, E. Arsenic Exposure and Prevalence of Type 2 Diabetes in US Adults. JAMA 2008, 300, 814–822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  281. Kile, M.; Christiani, D. Environmental Arsenic Exposure and Diabetes. JAMA 2008, 300, 845–846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  282. Hsueh, Y.M.; Wu, W.L.; Huang, Y.L.; Chiou, H.Y.; Tseng, C.H.; Chen, C.J. Low Serum Carotene Level and Increased Risk of Ischemic Heart Disease Related to Long-Term Arsenic Exposure. Atherosclerosis 1998, 141, 249–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  283. Gebel, T.W. Genotoxicity of Arsenical Compounds. Int. J. Hyg. Environ. Health 2001, 203, 249–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  284. Hood, K.M.; Sweeney, E.; Ilie, G.; Keltie, E.; Kim, J.S. Toenail Arsenic Species and Metallome Profiles Associated with Breast, Cervical, Prostate, and Skin Cancer Prevalence in the Atlantic Partnership for Tomorrow’s Health Cohort. Front. Public Health 2023, 11, 1148283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  285. ATSDR (Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry). ATSDR Case Studies in Environmental Medicine: Arsenic Toxicity; ATSDR: Atlanta, GA, USA, 2009.
  286. ATSDR (Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry). Toxicological Profile for Arsenic: Health Effects; ATSDR: Atlanta, GA, USA, 2007.
  287. Chou, C.; Harper, C. Toxicological Profile for Arsenic; U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry: Atlanta, GA, USA, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  288. Germolec, D.R.; Yoshida, T.; Gaido, K.; Wilmer, J.L.; Simeonova, P.P.; Kayama, F.; Burleson, F.; Dong, W.; Lange, R.W.; Luster, M.I. Arsenic Induces Overexpression of Growth Factors in Human Keratinocytes. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 1996, 141, 308–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  289. Pi, J.; Yamauchi, H.; Kumagai, Y.; Sun, G.; Yoshida, T.; Aikawa, H.; Hopenhayn-Rich, C.; Shimojo, N. Evidence for Induction of Oxidative Stress Caused by Chronic Exposure of Chinese Residents to Arsenic Contained in Drinking Water. Environ. Health Perspect. 2002, 110, 331–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  290. Robles-Osorio, M.L.; Sabath-Silva, E.; Sabath, E. Arsenic-Mediated Nephrotoxicity. Ren. Fail. 2015, 37, 542–547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  291. Hsueh, Y.M.; Chiou, H.Y.; Huang, Y.L.; Wu, W.L.; Huang, C.C.; Yang, M.H.; Lue, L.C.; Chen, G.S.; Chen, C.J. Serum Beta-Carotene Level, Arsenic Methylation Capability, and Incidence of Skin Cancer. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev. 1997, 6, 589–596. [Google Scholar]
  292. Chowdhury, T.R.; Mandal, B.K.; Samanta, G.; Basu, G.K.; Chowdhury, P.P.; Chanda, C.R.; Karan, N.K.; Lodh, D.; Dhar, R.K.; Das, D.; et al. Arsenic in Groundwater in Six Districts of West Bengal, India: The Biggest Arsenic Calamity in the World: The Status Report up to August, 1995. Arsenic 1997, 93–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  293. Mazumder, D.N.G.; Haque, R.; Ghosh, N.; De, B.K.; Santra, A.; Chakrabortic, D.; Smith, A.H. Arsenic in Drinking Water and the Prevalence of Respiratory Effects in West Bengal, India. Int. J. Epidemiol. 2000, 29, 1047–1052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  294. Engel, R.; Hopenhayn-Rich, C.; Receveur, O.; Smith, A. Vascular Effects of Chronic Arsenic Exposure: A Review. Epidemiol. Rev. 1994, 16, 184–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  295. Rajiv, S.V.; George, M.; Nandakumar, G.; Rajiv, S.V.; George, M.; Nandakumar, G. Dermatological Manifestations of Arsenic Exposure. J. Sex. Transm. Dis. 2022, 5, 14–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  296. Rahman, M.; Vahter, M.; Sohel, N.; Yunus, M.; Wahed, M.A.; Streatfield, P.K.; Ekström, E.C.; Persson, L.Å. Arsenic Exposure and Age- and Sex-Specific Risk for Skin Lesions: A Population-Based Case-Referent Study in Bangladesh. Environ. Health Perspect. 2006, 114, 1847–1852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  297. Jones, H.; Visoottiviseth, P.; Bux, M.K.; Földényi, R.; Kováts, N.; Borbély, G.; Galbács, Z. Case Reports: Arsenic Pollution in Thailand, Bangladesh, and Hungary. Rev. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 2009, 197, 163–187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  298. Zeisel, S.H. Choline, Other Methyl-Donors and Epigenetics. Nutrients 2017, 9, 445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  299. Sanyal, T.; Das, A.; Bhattacharjee, S.; Gump, B.B.; Bendinskas, K.; Bhattacharjee, P. Targeting the ‘DNA Methylation Mark’: Analysis of Early Epigenetic-Alterations in Children Chronically Exposed to Arsenic. Sci. Total Environ. 2024, 912, 169049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  300. Goering, P.L.; Vasken Aposhian, H.; Mass, M.J.; Cebrián, M.; Beck, B.D.; Waalkes, M.P. The Enigma of Arsenic Carcinogenesis: Role of Metabolism. Toxicol. Sci. 1999, 49, 5–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  301. Zhong, C.X.; Mass, M.J. Both Hypomethylation and Hypermethylation of DNA Associated with Arsenite Exposure in Cultures of Human Cells Identified by Methylation-Sensitive Arbitrarily-Primed PCR. Toxicol. Lett. 2001, 122, 223–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  302. Tice, R.R.; Yager, J.W.; Andrews, P.; Crecelius, E. Effect of Hepatic Methyl Donor Status on Urinary Excretion and DNA Damage in B6C3F1 Mice Treated with Sodium Arsenite. Mutat. Res.-Rev. Mutat. Res. 1997, 386, 315–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  303. Sciandrello, G.; Caradonna, F.; Mauro, M.; Barbata, G. Arsenic-Induced DNA Hypomethylation Affects Chromosomal Instability in Mammalian Cells. Carcinogenesis 2004, 25, 413–417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  304. Stößer, S.; Lumpp, T.; Fischer, F.; Gunesch, S.; Schumacher, P.; Hartwig, A. Effect of Long-Term Low-Dose Arsenic Exposure on DNA Methylation and Gene Expression in Human Liver Cells. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 15238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  305. Liao, K.H.; Gustafson, D.L.; Fox, M.H.; Chubb, L.S.; Reardon, K.F.; Yang, R.S.H. A Biologically Based Model of Growth and Senescence of Syrian Hamster Embryo (SHE) Cells after Exposure to Arsenic. Environ. Health Perspect. 2001, 109, 1207–1213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  306. Majumdar, S.; Chanda, S.; Ganguli, B.; Mazumder, D.N.G.; Lahiri, S.; Dasgupta, U.B. Arsenic Exposure Induces Genomic Hypermethylation. Environ. Toxicol. 2010, 25, 315–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  307. Chanda, S.; Dasgupta, U.B.; GuhaMazumder, D.; Gupta, M.; Chaudhuri, U.; Lahiri, S.; Das, S.; Ghosh, N.; Chatterjee, D. DNA Hypermethylation of Promoter of Gene P53 and P16 in Arsenic-Exposed People with and without Malignancy. Toxicol. Sci. 2006, 89, 431–437. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  308. Smeester, L.; Rager, J.E.; Bailey, K.A.; Guan, X.; Smith, N.; García-Vargas, G.; del Razo, L.M.; Drobná, Z.; Kelkar, H.; Stýblo, M.; et al. Epigenetic Changes in Individuals with Arsenicosis. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 2011, 24, 165–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  309. Mass, M.; Wang, L. Arsenic Alters Cytosine Methylation Patterns of the Promoter of the Tumor Suppressor Gene P53 in Human Lung Cells: A Model for a Mechanism of Carcinogenesis. Mutat. Res.-Rev. Mutat. Res. 1997, 386, 263–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  310. Reichard, J.F.; Puga, A. Effects of Arsenic Exposure on DNA Methylation and Epigenetic Gene Regulation. Epigenomics 2010, 2, 87–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  311. Budanov, A.V. The Role of Tumor Suppressor P53 in the Antioxidant Defense and Metabolism. Subcell. Biochem. 2014, 85, 337–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  312. Li, T.; Liu, X.; Jiang, L.; Manfredi, J.; Zha, S.; Gu, W. Loss of P53-Mediated Cell-Cycle Arrest, Senescence and Apoptosis Promotes Genomic Instability and Premature Aging. Oncotarget 2016, 7, 11838–11849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  313. Salazar, A.M.; Miller, H.L.; McNeely, S.C.; Sordo, M.; Ostrosky-Wegman, P.; States, J.C. Suppression of P53 and P21CIP1/WAF1 Reduces Arsenite-Induced Aneuploidy. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 2010, 23, 357–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  314. Stein, R.A.; Lee Dav, D. Epigenetics: A Fascinating Field with Profound Research, Clinical, & Public Health Implications. Am. Biol. Teach. 2012, 74, 213–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  315. Margolis, S. Epigenetics as a Cure for Cancer. Sci. J. Lander Coll. Arts Sci. 2015, 9, 115–118. [Google Scholar]
  316. Cohen, S.; Ellwein, L. Genetic Errors, Cell Proliferation, and Carcinogenesis. Cancer Res. 1991, 51, 6493–6505. [Google Scholar]
  317. Vernhet, L.; Allain, N.; Bardiau, C.; Anger, J.P.; Fardel, O. Differential Sensitivities of MRP1-Overexpressing Lung Tumor Cells to Cytotoxic Metals. Toxicology 1999, 142, 127–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  318. Leslie, E.M.; Haimeur, A.; Waalkes, M.P. Arsenic Transport by the Human Multidrug Resistance Protein 1 (MRP1/ABCC1). J. Biol. Chem. 2004, 279, 32700–32708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  319. Leslie, E.M. Arsenic–Glutathione Conjugate Transport by the Human Multidrug Resistance Proteins (MRPs/ABCCs). J. Inorg. Biochem. 2012, 108, 141–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  320. Salerno, M.; Petroutsa, M.; Garnier-Suillerot, A. The MRP1-Mediated Effluxes of Arsenic and Antimony Do Not Require Arsenic-Glutathione and Antimony-Glutathione Complex Formation. J. Bioenerg. Biomembr. 2002, 34, 135–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  321. Burns, F.J.; Uddin, A.N.; Wu, F.; Nádas, A.; Rossman, T.G. Arsenic-Induced Enhancement of Ultraviolet Radiation Carcinogenesis in Mouse Skin: A Dose-Response Study. Environ. Health Perspect. 2004, 112, 599–603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  322. Rossman, T.G.; Uddin, A.N.; Burns, F.J. Evidence That Arsenite Acts as a Cocarcinogen in Skin Cancer. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 2004, 198, 394–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  323. Schwartz, M.A.; Assoian, R.K. Integrins and Cell Proliferation. J. Cell Sci. 2001, 114, 2553–2560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  324. Dangleben, N.L.; Skibola, C.F.; Smith, M.T. Arsenic Immunotoxicity: A Review. Environ. Health 2013, 12, 73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  325. Rosales-Castillo, J.A.; Acosta-Saavedra, L.C.; Torres, R.; Ochoa-Fierro, J.; Borja-Aburto, V.H.; López-Carrillo, L.; García-Vargas, G.G.; Gurrola, G.B.; Cebrián, M.E.; Calderón-Aranda, E.S. Arsenic Exposure and Human Papillomavirus Response in Non-Melanoma Skin Cancer Mexican Patients: A Pilot Study. Int. Arch. Occup. Environ. Health 2004, 77, 418–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  326. Gerdsen, R.; Stockfleth, E.; Uerlich, M.; Fartasch, M.; Steen, K.H.; Bieber, T. Papular Palmoplantar Hyperkeratosis Following Chronic Medical Exposure to Arsenic: Human Papillomavirus as a Co-Factor in the Pathogenesis of Arsenical Keratosis? Acta Derm. Venereol. 2000, 80, 292–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  327. Harrison, M.T.; McCoy, K.L. Immunosuppression by Arsenic: A Comparison of Cathepsin L Inhibition and Apoptosis. Int. Immunopharmacol. 2001, 1, 647–656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  328. Miller, L.J.; Marx, J. Apoptosis. Science 1998, 281, 1301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  329. Martínez-Castillo, M.; García-Montalvo, E.A.; Arellano-Mendoza, M.G.; Sánchez-Peña, L.d.C.; Soria Jasso, L.E.; Izquierdo-Vega, J.A.; Valenzuela, O.L.; Hernández-Zavala, A. Arsenic Exposure and Non-Carcinogenic Health Effects. Hum. Exp. Toxicol. 2021, 40, S826–S850. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  330. Sathe, S.S.; Gascone, P.; Lo, W.; Pinto, R.; Reichman, L.B. Severe Anemia Is an Important Negative Predictor for Survival with Disseminated Mycobacterium Avium-Intracellulare in Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome. Am. Rev. Respir. Dis. 1990, 142, 1306–1312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  331. Bogner, J.R.; Gathof, B.; Heinrich, B.; Matuschke, A.; Bäcker, U.; Goebel, F.-D. Erythrocyte Antibodies in AIDS Are Associated with Mycobacteriosis and Hypergammaglobulinemia. Klin. Wochenschr. 1990, 68, 1050–1053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  332. Gascón, P.; Sathe, S.; Rameshwar, P. Impaired Erythropoiesis in the Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome with Disseminated Mycobacterium Avium Complex. Am. J. Med. 1993, 94, 41–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  333. Erb, T.J.; Kiefer, P.; Hattendorf, B.; Günther, D.; Vorholt, J.A. GFAJ-1 Is an Arsenate-Resistant, Phosphate-Dependent Organism. Science 2012, 337, 467–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  334. Reaves, M.; Sinha, S.; Rabinowitz, J.; Kruglyak, L.; Redfield, R.J. Absence of Detectable Arsenate in DNA from Arsenate-Grown GFAJ-1 Cells. Science 2012, 337, 470–473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  335. Banerjee, M.; Banerjee, N.; Bhattacharjee, P.; Mondal, D.; Lythgoe, P.R.; Martínez, M.; Pan, J.; Polya, D.A.; Giri, A.K. High Arsenic in Rice Is Associated with Elevated Genotoxic Effects in Humans. Sci. Rep. 2013, 3, 2195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  336. Cohen, S.M.; Chowdhury, A.; Arnold, L.L. Inorganic Arsenic: A Non-Genotoxic Carcinogen. J. Environ. Sci. 2016, 49, 28–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  337. Pierce, B.L.; Kibriya, M.G.; Tong, L.; Jasmine, F.; Argos, M.; Roy, S.; Paul-Brutus, R.; Rahaman, R.; Rakibuz-Zaman, M.; Parvez, F.; et al. Genome-Wide Association Study Identifies Chromosome 10q24.32 Variants Associated with Arsenic Metabolism and Toxicity Phenotypes in Bangladesh. PLoS Genet. 2012, 8, e1002522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  338. Li, J.H.; Rossman, T.G. Comutagenesis of Sodium Arsenite with Ultraviolet Radiation in Chinese Hamster V79 Cells. Biol. Met. 1991, 4, 197–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  339. Yager, J.W.; Erdei, E.; Myers, O.; Siegel, M.; Berwick, M. Arsenic and Ultraviolet Radiation Exposure: Melanoma in a New Mexico Non-Hispanic White Population. Environ. Geochem. Health 2016, 38, 897–910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  340. Hartwig, A.; Schwerdtle, T. Interactions by Carcinogenic Metal Compounds with DNA Repair Processes: Toxicological Implications. Toxicol. Lett. 2002, 127, 47–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  341. Mure, K.; Rossman, T.G. Reduction of Spontaneous Mutagenesis in Mismatch Repair-Deficient and Proficient Cells by Dietary Antioxidants. Mutat. Res.-Fund. Mol. Mech. Mutagen. 2001, 480–481, 85–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  342. Meng, Z.; Hsie, A.W. Polymerase Chain Reaction-Based Deletion Analysis of Spontaneous and Arsenite-Enhanced Gpt Mutants in CHO-AS52 Cells. Mutat. Res.-Fund. Mol. Mech. Mutagen. 1996, 356, 255–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  343. Wang, T.S.; Huang, H. Active Oxygen Species Are Involved in the Induction of Micronuclei by Arsenite in XRS-5 Cells. Mutagenesis 1994, 9, 253–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  344. Wu, M.M.; Chiou, H.Y.; Wang, T.W.; Hsueh, Y.M.; Wang, I.H.; Chen, C.J.; Lee, T.C. Association of Blood Arsenic Levels with Increased Reactive Oxidants and Decreased Antioxidant Capacity in a Human Population of Northeastern Taiwan. Environ. Health Perspect. 2001, 109, 1011–1017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  345. Jomova, K.; Jenisova, Z.; Feszterova, M.; Baros, S.; Liska, J.; Hudecova, D.; Rhodes, C.J.; Valko, M. Arsenic: Toxicity, Oxidative Stress and Human Disease. J. Appl. Toxicol. 2011, 31, 95–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  346. Nesnow, S.; Roop, B.; Lambert, G.; Kadiiska, M.; Mason, R.; Cullen, W.; Mass, M. DNA Damage Induced by Methylated Trivalent Arsenicals Is Mediated by Reactive Oxygen Species. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 2002, 15, 1627–1634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  347. Kessel, M.; Liu, S.; Xu, A.; Santella, R.; Radicals, T.H. Arsenic Induces Oxidative DNA Damage in Mammalian Cells. Mol. Cell Biochem. 2002, 234–235, 301–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  348. Martínez, V.D.; Vucic, E.A.; Adonis, M.; Gil, L.; Lam, W.L. Arsenic Biotransformation as a Cancer Promoting Factor by Inducing DNA Damage and Disruption of Repair Mechanisms. Res. Mol. Biol. Intern. 2011, 2011, 718974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  349. Kitchin, K.; Wallace, K. Evidence against the Nuclear in Situ Binding of Arsenicals–Oxidative Stress Theory of Arsenic Carcinogenesis. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 2008, 232, 252–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  350. Liu, S.X.; Athar, M.; Lippai, I.; Waldren, C.; Hei, T.K. Induction of Oxyradicals by Arsenic: Implication for Mechanism of Genotoxicity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2001, 98, 1643–1648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  351. Bau, D.T.; Wang, T.S.; Chung, C.H.; Wang, A.S.S.; Jan, K.Y. Oxidative DNA Adducts and DNA-Protein Cross-Links Are the Major DNA Lesions Induced by Arsenite. Environ. Health Perspect. 2002, 110, 753–756. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  352. Lai, Y.; Zhao, W.; Chen, C.; Wu, M.; Zhang, Z. Role of DNA Polymerase Beta in the Genotoxicity of Arsenic. Environ. Mol. Mutagen. 2011, 52, 460–468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  353. Ebert, F.; Weiss, A.; Bültemeyer, M.; Hamann, I.; Hartwig, A.; Schwerdtle, T. Arsenicals Affect Base Excision Repair by Several Mechanisms. Mutat. Res. 2011, 715, 32–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  354. Sykora, P.; Snow, E.T. Modulation of DNA Polymerase Beta-Dependent Base Excision Repair in Cultured Human Cells after Low Dose Exposure to Arsenite. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 2008, 228, 385–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  355. Schwerdtle, T.; Walter, I.; Mackiw, I.; Hartwig, A. Induction of Oxidative DNA Damage by Arsenite and Its Trivalent and Pentavalent Methylated Metabolites in Cultured Human Cells and Isolated DNA. Carcinogenesis 2003, 24, 967–974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  356. Curnow, A.; Salter, L.; Morley, N.; Gould, D. A Preliminary Investigation of the Effects of Arsenate on Irradiation-Induced DNA Damage in Cultured Human Lung Fibroblasts. J. Toxicol. Environ. Health A 2001, 63, 605–616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  357. Hartwig, A.; Gröblinghoff, U.D.; Beyersmann, D.; Natarajan, A.T.; Filon, R.; Mullenders, L.H.F. Interaction of Arsenic(III) with Nucleotide Excision Repair in UV-Irradiated Human Fibroblasts. Carcinogenesis 1997, 18, 399–405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  358. Grollman, A.; Moriya, M. Mutagenesis by 8-Oxoguanine: An Enemy Within. Trends Genet. 1993, 9, 246–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  359. Bach, J.; Peremartí, J.; Annangi, B.; Marcos, R.; Hernández, A. Oxidative DNA Damage Enhances the Carcinogenic Potential of in Vitro Chronic Arsenic Exposures. Arch. Toxicol. 2016, 90, 1893–1905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  360. Qu, W.; Waalkes, M.P. Metallothionein Blocks Oxidative DNA Damage Induced by Acute Inorganic Arsenic Exposure. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 2015, 282, 267–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  361. Arslan-Acaroz, D.; Zemheri, F.; Demirel, H.H.; Kucukkurt, I.; Ince, S.; Eryavuz, A. In Vivo Assessment of Polydatin, a Natural Polyphenol Compound, on Arsenic-Induced Free Radical Overproduction, Gene Expression, and Genotoxicity. Environ. Sci. Poll. Res. 2018, 25, 2614–2622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  362. Mäki-Paakkanen, J.; Kurttio, P.; Paldy, A.; Pekkanen, J. Association Between the Clastogenic Effect in Peripheral Lymphocytes and Human Exposure to Arsenic Through Drinking Water. Environ. Mol. Mutagen. 1998, 32, 301–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  363. Warner, M.L.; Moore, L.E.; Smith, M.T.; Kalman, D.A.; Fanning, E.; Smith, A.H. Increased Micronuclei in Exfoliated Bladder Cells of Individuals Who Chronically Ingest Arsenic-Contaminated Water in Nevada. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomark. Prev. 1994, 3, 583–590. [Google Scholar]
  364. Gonsebatt, M.E.; Vega, L.; Salazar, A.M.; Montero, R.; Guzmán, P.; Blas, J.; del Razo, L.M.; García-Vargas, G.; Albores, A.; Cebrian, M.E.; et al. Cytogenetic Effects in Human Exposure to Arsenic. Mutat. Res.-Rev. Mutat. Res. 1997, 386, 219–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  365. Vega, L.; Gonsebatt, M.; Ostrosky-Wegman, P. Aneugenic Effect of Sodium Arsenite on Human Lymphocytes In Vitro: An Individual Susceptibility Effect Detected. Mutat. Res. 1995, 334, 365–373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  366. Gurr, J.; Lin, Y.; Ho, I.; Jan, K.; Lee, T. Induction of Chromatid Breaks and Tetraploidy in Chinese Hamster Ovary Cells by Treatment with Sodium Arsenite during the G2 Phase. Mutat. Res. 1993, 319, 135–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  367. Liou, S.H.; Chen, Y.H.; Loh, C.H.; Yang, T.; Wu, T.N.; Chen, C.J.; Hsieh, L.L. The Association between Frequencies of Mitomycin C-Induced Sister Chromatid Exchange and Cancer Risk in Arseniasis. Toxicol. Lett. 2002, 129, 237–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  368. Xie, H.; Huang, S.P.; Martin, S.; Wise, J.P. Arsenic Is Cytotoxic and Genotoxic to Primary Human Lung Cells. Mutat. Res.-Genet. Toxicol. Environ. Mutagen. 2014, 760, 33–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  369. Hei, T.K.; Liu, S.U.X.; Waldren, C. Mutagenicity of Arsenic in Mammalian Cells: Role of Reactive Oxygen Species. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1998, 95, 8103–8107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  370. Fan, S.R.; Ho, I.C.; Lai-Fun Yeoh, F.; Lin, C.J.; Lee, T.C. Squalene Inhibits Sodium Arsenite-Induced Sister Chromatid Exchanges and Micronuclei in Chinese Hamster Ovary-K1 Cells. Mutat. Res.-Genet. Toxicol. 1996, 368, 165–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  371. Yih, L.-H.; Ho, I.-C.; Lee, T.-C. Sodium Arsenite Disturbs Mitosis and Induces Chromosome Loss in Human Fibroblasts. Cancer Res. 1997, 57, 5051–5059. [Google Scholar]
  372. Wang, X.; Liu, Y.; Wang, J.; Nie, Y.; Chen, S.; Hei, T.; Deng, Z.; Wu, L.; Zhao, G.; Xu, A. Amplification of Arsenic Genotoxicity by TiO2 Nanoparticles in Mammalian Cells: New Insights from Physicochemical Interactions and Mitochondria. Nanotoxicology 2017, 11, 978–995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  373. Bustaffa, E.; Stoccoro, A.; Bianchi, F.; Migliore, L. Genotoxic and Epigenetic Mechanisms in Arsenic Carcinogenicity. Arch. Toxicol. 2014, 88, 1043–1067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  374. Yamanaka, K.; Hayashi, H.; Tachikawa, M.; Kato, K.; Hasegawa, A.; Oku, N.; Okada, S. Metabolic Methylation Is a Possible Genotoxicity-Enhancing Process of Inorganic Arsenics. Mutat. Res.-Genet. Toxicol. Environ. Mutagen. 1997, 394, 95–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  375. Soto-Reyes, E.; del Razo, M.L.; Valverde, M.; Rojas, E. Role of the Alkali Labile Sites, Reactive Oxygen Species and Antioxidants in DNA Damage Induced by Methylated Trivalent Metabolites of Inorganic Arsenic. Biometals 2005, 18, 493–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  376. Kato, K.; Hayashi, H.; Hasegawa, A.; Yamanaka, K.; Okada, S. DNA Damage Induced in Cultured Human Alveolar (L-132) Cells by Exposure to Dimethylarsinic Acid. Environ. Health Perspect. 1994, 102, 285–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  377. Paul, N.P.; Galván, A.E.; Yoshinaga-Sakurai, K.; Rosen, B.P.; Yoshinaga, M. Arsenic in Medicine: Past, Present and Future. BioMetals 2022, 36, 283–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  378. Bentley, R.; Chasteen, T.G. Microbial Methylation of Metalloids: Arsenic, Antimony, and Bismuth. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2002, 66, 250–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  379. Gibaud, S.; Jaouen, G. Arsenic-Based Drugs: From Fowler’s Solution to Modern Anticancer Chemotherapy. Top. Organomet. Chem. 2010, 32, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  380. Rust, D.M.; Soignet, S.L. Risk/Benefit Profile of Arsenic Trioxide; Risk/Benefit Profile of Arsenic Trioxide. Oncologist 2000, 6, 29–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  381. Shen, Z.X.; Chen, G.Q.; Ni, J.H.; Li, X.S.; Xiong, S.M.; Qiu, Q.Y.; Zhu, J.; Tang, W.; Sun, G.L.; Yang, K.Q.; et al. Use of Arsenic Trioxide (As2O3) in the Treatment of Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia (AFL): II. Clinical Efficacy and Pharmacokinetics in Relapsed Patients. Blood 1997, 89, 3354–3360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  382. Kaufmann, S.H.E. Paul Ehrlich: Founder of Chemotherapy. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2008, 7, 373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  383. Novick, S.C.; Warrell, J. Arsenicals in Hematologic Cancers. Semin. Oncol. 2000, 27, 495–501. [Google Scholar]
  384. Wang, Z.G.; Rivi, R.; Delva, L.; König, A.; Scheinberg, D.A.; Gambacorti-Passerini, C.; Gabrilove, J.L.; Warrell, R.P.; Pandolfi, P.P. Arsenic Trioxide and Melarsoprol Induce Programmed Cell Death in Myeloid Leukemia Cell Lines and Function in a PML and PML-RARα Independent Manner. Blood 1998, 92, 1497–1504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  385. Park, W.H.; Seol, J.G.; Kim, E.S.; Hyun, J.M.; Jung, C.W.; Lee, C.C.; Kim, B.K.; Lee, Y.Y. Arsenic Trioxide-Mediated Growth Inhibition in MC/CAR Myeloma Cells via Cell Cycle Arrest in Association with Induction of Cyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor, P21, and Apoptosis. Cancer Res. 2000, 60, 3065–3071. [Google Scholar]
  386. Lunghi, P.; Costanzo, A.; Levrero, M.; Bonati, A. Treatment with Arsenic Trioxide (ATO) and MEK1 Inhibitor Activates the P73-P53AIP1 Apoptotic Pathway in Leukemia Cells. Blood 2004, 104, 519–525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  387. Kumar, S.; Yedjou, C.G.; Tchounwou, P.B. Arsenic Trioxide Induces Oxidative Stress, DNA Damage, and Mitochondrial Pathway of Apoptosis in Human Leukemia (HL-60) Cells. J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res. 2014, 33, 42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  388. Soignet, S.; Fleischauer, A.; Polyak, T.; Heller, G.; Warrell, R.P. All-Trans Retinoic Acid Significantly Increases 5-Year Survival in Patients with Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia: Long-Term Follow-up of the New York Study. Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol. 1997, 40, S25–S29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  389. Soignet, S.L.; Maslak, P.; Wang, Z.-G.; Jhanwar, S.; Calleja, E.; Dardashti, L.J.; Corso, D.; DeBlasio, A.; Gabrilove, J.; Scheinberg, D.A.; et al. Complete Remission after Treatment of Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia with Arsenic Trioxide. N. Engl. J. Med. 1998, 339, 1341–1348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  390. Zhang, P. Arsenic Trioxide Treated 72 Cases of Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia. Chin. J. Hematol. 1996, 17, 58–61. [Google Scholar]
  391. Kinjo, K.; Kizaki, M.; Muto, A.; Fukuchi, Y.; Umezawa, A.; Yamato, K.; Nishihara, T.; Hata, J.; Ito, M.; Ueyama, Y.; et al. Arsenic trioxide (As2O3)-induced apoptosis and differentiation in retinoic acid-resistant acute promyelocytic leukemia model in hGM-CSF-producing transgenic SCID mice. Leukemia 2000, 14, 431–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  392. Zhu, J.; Koken, M.H.M.; Quignon, F.; Chelbi-Alix, M.K.; Degos, L.; Wang, Z.Y.; Chen, Z.; de Thé, H. Arsenic-Induced PML Targeting onto Nuclear Bodies: Implications for the Treatment of Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1997, 94, 3978–3983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  393. Zhang, X.H.; Feng, R.; Lv, M.; Jiang, Q.; Zhu, H.H.; Qing, Y.Z.; Bao, J.L.; Huang, X.J.; Zheng, X.L. Arsenic Trioxide Induces Apoptosis in B-Cell Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemic Cells through down-Regulation of Survivin via the P53-Dependent Signaling Pathway. Leuk. Res. 2013, 37, 1719–1725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef][Green Version]
  394. Holman, J.; Kirkhart, B.; Maxon, M.S.; Oliva, C.; Earhart, R. Safety Experience with Trisenox® (Arsenic Trioxide) Injection. Blood 2004, 104, 4521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  395. Zhang, T.D.; Chen, G.Q.; Wang, Z.G.; Wang, Z.Y.; Chen, S.J.; Chen, Z. Arsenic Trioxide, a Therapeutic Agent for APL. Oncogene 2001, 20, 7146–7153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  396. Calviño, E.; Estañ, M.C.; Simón, G.P.; Sancho, P.; Boyano-Adánez, M.D.C.; de Blas, E.; Bréard, J.; Aller, P. Increased Apoptotic Efficacy of Lonidamine plus Arsenic Trioxide Combination in Human Leukemia Cells. Reactive Oxygen Species Generation and Defensive Protein Kinase (MEK/ERK, Akt/MTOR) Modulation. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2011, 82, 1619–1629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  397. Alimoghaddam, K. A Review of Arsenic Trioxide and Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia. Int. J. Hematol. Oncol. Stem Cell Res. 2014, 8, 44–54. [Google Scholar]
  398. Lengfelder, E.; Hofmann, W.K.; Nowak, D. Impact of Arsenic Trioxide in the Treatment of Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia. Leukemia 2012, 26, 433–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  399. Ohno, R.; Asou, N.; Ohnishi, K. Treatment of Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia: Strategy toward Further Increase of Cure Rate. Leukemia 2003, 17, 1454–1463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  400. Wang, Q.Q.; Hua, H.Y.; Naranmandura, H.; Zhu, H.H. Balance between the Toxicity and Anticancer Activity of Arsenic Trioxide in Treatment of Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 2020, 409, 115299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  401. Chen, H.; Ahn, R.; van den Bossche, J.; Thompson, D.H.; O’Halloran, T.V. Folate-Mediated Intracellular Drug Delivery Increases the Anticancer Efficacy of Nanoparticulate Formulation of Arsenic Trioxide. Mol. Cancer Ther. 2009, 8, 1955–1963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  402. Yang, S.; Raza, F.; Li, K.; Qiu, Y.; Su, J.; Qiu, M. Maximizing Arsenic Trioxide’s Anticancer Potential: Targeted Nanocarriers for Solid Tumor Therapy. Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces 2024, 241, 114014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  403. Tian, W.; Wang, Z.; Tang, N.N.; Li, J.T.; Liu, Y.; Chu, W.F.; Yang, B.F. Ascorbic Acid Sensitizes Colorectal Carcinoma to the Cytotoxicity of Arsenic Trioxide via Promoting Reactive Oxygen Species-Dependent Apoptosis and Pyroptosis. Front. Pharmacol. 2020, 11, 123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  404. Acharyya, N.; Deb, B.; Chattopadhyay, S.; Maiti, S. Arsenic-Induced Antioxidant Depletion, Oxidative DNA Breakage, and Tissue Damages Are Prevented by the Combined Action of Folate and Vitamin B 12. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 2015, 168, 122–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  405. Chen, G.Q.; Shi, X.G.; Tang, W.; Xiong, S.M.; Zhu, J.; Cai, X.; Man, Z.G.; Ni, J.H.; Shi, G.Y.; Jia, P.M.; et al. Use of Arsenic Trioxide (As2O3) in the Treatment of Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia (APL): I. As2O3 Exerts Dose-Dependent Dual Effects on APL Cells. Blood 1997, 89, 3345–3353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  406. Hu, J.; Dong, Y.; Ding, L.; Dong, Y.; Wu, Z.; Wang, W.; Shen, M.; Duan, Y. Local Delivery of Arsenic Trioxide Nanoparticles for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment. Signal Transduct. Target. Ther. 2019, 4, 28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  407. Uthus, E.O. Evidence for Arsenic Essentiality. Environ. Geochem. Health 1992, 14, 55–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  408. Serrazina, D.C.; Lopes De Andrade, V.; Cota, M.; Mateus, M.L.; Aschner, M.; dos Santos, A.P.M. Biomarkers of Exposure and Effect in a Working Population Exposed to Lead, Manganese and Arsenic. J. Toxicol. Environ. Health A 2018, 81, 983–997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  409. Das, N.K.; Sengupta, S.R. Arsenicosis: Diagnosis and Treatment. Indian J. Dermatol. Venereol. Leprol. 2008, 74, 571–581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  410. Chin, W.S.; Hung, W.L.; Say, Y.H.; Chien, L.C.; Chen, Y.C.; Lo, Y.P.; Liao, K.W. The Influence of Exposure to Inorganic Arsenic and Other Arsenic Species on Early Renal Impairment among Young Adults in Taiwan. Environ. Poll. 2024, 363, 125090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  411. Zhang, Y.; Zhou, M.; Wang, D.; Liang, R.; Liu, W.; Wang, B.; Chen, W. Arsenic Exposure and Oxidative Damage to Lipid, DNA, and Protein among General Chinese Adults: A Repeated-Measures Cross-Sectional and Longitudinal Study. J. Environ. Sci. 2025, 147, 382–391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  412. Hall, M.; Chen, Y.; Ahsan, H.; Slavkovich, V.; van Geen, A.; Parvez, F.; Graziano, J. Blood Arsenic as a Biomarker of Arsenic Exposure: Results from a Prospective Study. Toxicology 2006, 225, 225–233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  413. Chen, C.J.; Hsu, L.I.; Wang, C.H.; Shih, W.L.; Hsu, Y.H.; Tseng, M.P.; Lin, Y.C.; Chou, W.L.; Chen, C.Y.; Lee, C.Y.; et al. Biomarkers of Exposure, Effect, and Susceptibility of Arsenic-Induced Health Hazards in Taiwan. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 2005, 206, 198–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  414. Moreno-Ocio, I.; Aquilino, M.; Llorente, L.; Martínez-Madrid, M.; Rodríguez, P.; Méndez-Fernández, L.; Planelló, R. Toxicogenomics of the Freshwater Oligochaete, Tubifex tubifex (Annelida, Clitellata), in Acute Water-Only Exposure to Arsenic. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 3382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  415. Navas-Acien, A.; Guallar, E. Measuring Arsenic Exposure, Metabolism, and Biological Effects: The Role of Urine Proteomics. Toxicol. Sci. 2008, 106, 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  416. Tan, L.B.; Chen, K.T.; Tyan, Y.C.; Liao, P.C.; Guo, H.R. Proteomic Analysis for Human Urinary Proteins Associated with Arsenic Intoxication. Proteom. Clin. Appl. 2008, 2, 1087–1098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  417. Hegedus, C.M.; Skibola, C.F.; Warner, M.; Skibola, D.R.; Alexander, D.; Lim, S.; Dangleben, N.I.; Zhang, L.; Clark, M.; Pfeiffer, R.M.; et al. Decreased Urinary Beta-Defensin-1 Expression as a Biomarker of Response to Arsenic. Toxicol. Sci. 2008, 106, 74–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  418. Marchiset-Ferlay, N.; Savanovitch, C.; Sauvant-Rochat, M.P. What Is the Best Biomarker to Assess Arsenic Exposure via Drinking Water? Environ. Int. 2012, 39, 150–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  419. Pei, Q.; Ma, N.; Zhang, J.; Xu, W.; Li, Y.; Ma, Z.; Li, Y.; Tian, F.; Zhang, W.; Mu, J.; et al. Oxidative DNA Damage of Peripheral Blood Polymorphonuclear Leukocytes, Selectively Induced by Chronic Arsenic Exposure, Is Associated with Extent of Arsenic-Related Skin Lesions. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 2013, 266, 143–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  420. Xiao, L.; Zhou, Y.; Ma, J.; Sun, W.; Cao, L.; Wang, B.; Zhu, C.; Yang, S.; Wang, D.; Yuan, J.; et al. Oxidative DNA Damage Mediates the Association between Urinary Metals and Prevalence of Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Chinese Adults. Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 627, 1327–1333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  421. Shokoohi, R.; Khazaei, M.; Karami, M.; Seid-mohammadi, A.; Khazaei, S.; Torkshavand, Z. Application of Fingernail Samples as a Biomarker for Human Exposure to Arsenic-Contaminated Drinking Waters. Sci. Rep. 2022, 12, 4733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  422. Nicolis, I.; Curis, E.; Deschamps, P.; Benazeth, S. Arsenite Medicinal Use, Metabolism, Pharmacokinetics and Monitoring in Human Hair. Biochimie 2009, 91, 1260–1267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  423. Aller, A.J. Analytical Improvements in the Vibrational Spectroscopy for the Study of Biological Systems. In Advances in Plant Physiology; Hemantaranjan, A., Ed.; Scientific Publishers: Jodhpur, India, 1998; Volume 1, pp. 441–477. [Google Scholar]
  424. López, R.; Pereira, F.J.; Suárez, D.; Aller, A.J. Speciation of Organoarsenicals in Aqueous Solutions by Raman Spectrometry and Quantum Chemical Calculations. Microchem. J. 2022, 175, 107186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  425. Tian, X.; Chen, L.; Li, Y.; Yang, C.; Nie, Y.; Zhou, C.; Wang, Y. Design and Synthesis of a Molecule with Aggregation-Induced Emission Effects and Its Application in the Detection of Arsenite in Groundwater. J. Mater. Chem. C Mater. 2017, 5, 3669–3672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  426. Chauhan, K.; Singh, P.; Kumari, B.; Singhal, R.K. Synthesis of New Benzothiazole Schiff Base as Selective and Sensitive Colorimetric Sensor for Arsenic On-Site Detection at Ppb Level. Anal. Methods 2017, 9, 1779–1785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  427. Pereira, F.J.; Vázquez, M.D.; Debán, L.; Aller, A.J. Inorganic Arsenic Speciation by Differential Pulse Anodic Stripping Voltammetry Using Thoria Nanoparticles-Carbon Paste Electrodes. Talanta 2016, 152, 211–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  428. Pereira, F.J.; Vázquez, M.D.; Debán, L.; Aller, A.J. Determination of Arsenic by ICP-MS after Retention on Thoria Nanoparticles. Anal. Methods 2015, 7, 598–606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  429. Lohar, S.; Pal, S.; Sen, B.; Mukherjee, M.; Banerjee, S.; Chattopadhyay, P. Selective and Sensitive Turn-on Chemosensor for Arsenite Ion at the Ppb Level in Aqueous Media Applicable in Cell Staining. Anal. Chem. 2014, 86, 11357–11361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  430. Ezeh, V.C.; Harrop, T.C. Synthesis and Properties of Arsenic(III)-Reactive Coumarin-Appended Benzothiazolines: A New Approach for Inorganic Arsenic Detection. Inorg. Chem. 2013, 52, 2323–2334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  431. Baglan, M.; Atılgan, S. Selective and Sensitive Turn-on Fluorescent Sensing of Arsenite Based on Cysteine Fused Tetraphenylethene with AIE Characteristics in Aqueous Media. Chem. Comm. 2013, 49, 5325–5327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  432. Ordóñez, E.; Villadangos, A.F.; Fiuza, M.; Pereira, F.J.; Gil, J.A.; Mateos, L.M.; Aller, A.J. Modelling of Arsenate Retention from Aqueous Solutions by Living Coryneform Double-Mutant Bacteria. Environ. Chem. 2012, 9, 121–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  433. Villadangos, A.F.; Ordóñez, E.; Muñoz, M.I.; Pastrana, I.M.; Fiuza, M.; Gil, J.A.; Mateos, L.M.; Aller, A.J. Retention of Arsenate Using Genetically Modified Coryneform Bacteria and Determination of Arsenic in Solid Samples by ICP-MS. Talanta 2010, 80, 1421–1427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  434. Aller, A.J.; Castro, M.A. Live Bacterial Cells as Analytical Tools for Speciation Analysis: Hypothetical or Practical? Trends Anal. Chem. 2006, 25, 887–898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  435. Maher, W.A.; Ellwood, M.J.; Krikowa, F.; Raber, G.; Foster, S. Measurement of Arsenic Species in Environmental, Biological Fluids and Food Samples by HPLC-ICPMS and HPLC-HG-AFS. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. 2015, 30, 2129–2183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  436. Sinha, D.; Prasad, P. Health Effects Inflicted by Chronic Low-Level Arsenic Contamination in Groundwater: A Global Public Health Challenge. J. Appl. Toxicol. 2020, 40, 87–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  437. Nan, K.; He, M.; Chen, B.; Hu, B. Histidine Tag Modified Magnetic Beads for Analysis of Arsenic Binding Proteins. Anal. Chim. Acta 2024, 1304, 342554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  438. Wang, X.; Nie, Y.; Si, B.; Wang, T.; Hei, T.K.; Du, H.; Zhao, G.; Chen, S.; Xu, A.; Liu, Y. Silver Nanoparticles Protect against Arsenic Induced Genotoxicity via Attenuating Arsenic Bioaccumulation and Elevating Antioxidation in Mammalian Cells. J. Hazard. Mater. 2021, 413, 125287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  439. Orihuela, R.; Kojima, C.; Tokar, E.J.; Person, R.J.; Xu, Y.; Qu, W.; Waalkes, M.P. Oxidative DNA Damage after Acute Exposure to Arsenite and Monomethylarsonous Acid in Biomethylation-Deficient Human Cells. Toxicol. Mech. Methods 2013, 23, 389–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  440. Alam, T.; Naseem, S.; Shahabuddin, F.; Abidi, S.; Parwez, I.; Khan, F. Oral Administration of Nigella Sativa Oil Attenuates Arsenic-Induced Redox Imbalance, DNA Damage, Metabolic Distress, and Histopathological Alterations in Rat Intestine. J. Trace Elem. Med. Biol. 2023, 79, 127238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  441. Wang, C.; Wang, B.; Wei, Y.; Li, S.; Ren, J.; Dai, Y.; Liu, G. Effect of Gentianella acuta (Michx.) Hulten against the Arsenic-Induced Development Hindrance of Mouse Oocytes. BioMetals 2024, 37, 1411–1430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  442. Kumar, M.; Lalit, M.; Thakur, R. Natural Antioxidants Against Arsenic-Induced Genotoxicity. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 2015, 170, 84–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  443. Hu, Y.; Li, J.; Lou, B.; Wu, R.; Wang, G.; Lu, C.; Wang, H.; Pi, J.; Xu, Y. The Role of Reactive Oxygen Species in Arsenic Toxicity. Biomolecules 2020, 10, 240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  444. Najafi, N.; Rezaee, R.; Hayes, A.W.; Karimi, G. A Review of Mechanisms Underlying the Protective Effects of Natural Compounds against Arsenic-Induced Neurotoxicity. BioMetals 2023, 36, 799–813, Erratum in BioMetals 2023, 36, 815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  445. Abdollahzade, N.; Babri, S.; Majidinia, M. Attenuation of Chronic Arsenic Neurotoxicity via Melatonin in Male Offspring of Maternal Rats Exposed to Arsenic during Conception: Involvement of Oxidative DNA Damage and Inflammatory Signaling Cascades. Life Sci. 2021, 266, 118876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  446. Sankar, P.; Telang, A.G.; Ramya, K.; Vijayakaran, K.; Kesavan, M.; Sarkar, S.N. Protective Action of Curcumin and Nano-Curcumin against Arsenic-Induced Genotoxicity in Rats in Vivo. Mol. Biol. Rep. 2014, 41, 7413–7422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  447. Gan, R.; Liu, H.; Wu, S.; Huang, R.; Tang, Z.; Zhang, N.; Hu, L. Curcumin Alleviates Arsenic Trioxide–Induced Inflammation and Pyroptosis via the NF-ΚB/NLRP3 Signaling Pathway in the Hypothalamus of Ducks. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 2022, 201, 2503–2511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  448. Choi, T.S.; Tezcan, F.A. Overcoming Universal Restrictions on Metal Selectivity by Protein Design. Nature 2022, 603, 522–527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  449. Kosnett, M.J. The Role of Chelation in the Treatment of Arsenic and Mercury Poisoning. J. Med. Toxicol. 2013, 4, 347–357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  450. Chillè, D.; Cassone, G.; Giacobello, F.; Giuffrè, O.; Nardo, V.M.; Ponterio, R.C.; Saija, F.; Sponer, J.; Trusso, S.; Foti, C. Removal of As(III) from Biological Fluids: Mono- versus Dithiolic Ligands. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 2020, 33, 967–974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  451. Crisponi, G.; Nurchi, V. Chelation Therapy in the Treatment of Metal Intoxication. In Chelation Therapy in the Treatment of Metal Intoxication; Aaseth, J., Crisponi, G., Andersen, O., Eds.; Academic Press: London, UK, 2016; pp. 35–61. ISBN 9780128030721. [Google Scholar]
  452. Szekeres, L.I.; Gyurcsik, B.; Kiss, T.; Kele, Z.; Jancsó, A. Interaction of Arsenous Acid with the Dithiol-Type Chelator British Anti-Lewisite (BAL): Structure and Stability of Species Formed in an Unexpectedly Complex System. Inorg. Chem. 2018, 57, 7191–7200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  453. Andersen, O.; Aaseth, J. A Review of Pitfalls and Progress in Chelation Treatment of Metal Poisonings. J. Trace Elem. Med. Biol. 2016, 38, 74–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  454. Cavanillas, S.; Chekmeneva, E.; Ariño, C.; Díaz-Cruz, J.M.; Esteban, M. Electroanalytical and Isothermal Calorimetric Study of As(III) Complexation by the Metal Poisoning Remediators, 2,3-Dimercapto-1-Propanesulfonate and Meso-2,3-Dimercaptosuccinic Acid. Anal. Chim. Acta 2012, 746, 47–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  455. Chillè, D.; Aiello, D.; Grasso, G.I.; Giuffrè, O.; Napoli, A.; Sgarlata, C.; Foti, C. Complexation of As(III) by Phosphonate Ligands in Aqueous Fluids: Thermodynamic Behavior, Chemical Binding Forms and Sequestering Abilities. J. Environ. Sci. 2020, 94, 100–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  456. Elenkova, N.G.; Tsoneva, R.A. Polarographic Investigation Of The Systems Arsenic(III)-Tartaric Acid And Arsenic(III)-1,2-Diamino-Cyclohexane-N,N,N’’,N’-Tetraacetic Acid (DCTA). J. Coord. Chem. 1980, 10, 19–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  457. Bjørklund, G.; Oliinyk, P.; Lysiuk, R.; Rahaman, M.S.; Antonyak, H.; Lozynska, I.; Lenchyk, L.; Peana, M. Arsenic Intoxication: General Aspects and Chelating Agents. Arch. Toxicol. 2020, 94, 1879–1897. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  458. Domingo, J.; Bosque, M.A.; Llobet, J.M.; Corbella, J. Amelioration by BAL (2,3-Dimercapto-1-Propanol) and DMPS (Sodium 2,3-Dimercapto-1-Propanesulfonic Acid) of Arsenite Developmental Toxicity in Mice. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 1992, 23, 274–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  459. de la Torre, A.; Belles, M.; Llobet, J.M.; Mayayo, E.; Domingo, J.L. Comparison of the Effectiveness of 2,3-Dimercaptopropanol (BAL) Andmeso-2,3-Dimercaptosuccinic Acid (DMSA) as Protective Agents against Mercuric Chloride-Induced Nephrotoxicity in Rats. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 1998, 63, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  460. Flora, S.J.S.; Bhadauria, S.; Pachauri, V.; Yadav, A. Monoisoamyl 2, 3-Dimercaptosuccinic Acid (MiADMSA) Demonstrates Higher Efficacy by Oral Route in Reversing Arsenic Toxicity: A Pharmacokinetic Approach. Basic Clin. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 2012, 110, 449–459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  461. Kreppel, H.; Reichl, F.; Kleine, A.; Szinicz, L.; Singh, P.; Jones, M. Antidotal Efficacy of Newly Synthesized Dimercaptosuccinic Acid (DMSA) Monoesters in Experimental Arsenic Poisoning in Mice. Fund. Appl. Toxicol. 1995, 26, 239–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  462. Neilson, J.W.; Artiola, J.F.; Maier, R.M. Characterization of Lead Removal from Contaminated Soils by Nontoxic Soil-Washing Agents. J. Environ. Qual. 2003, 32, 899–908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  463. Pachauri, V.; Flora, S. Combined Efficacy of Gallic Acid and MiADMSA with Limited Beneficial Effects Over MiADMSA Against Arsenic-Induced Oxidative Stress in Mouse. Biochem. Insights 2015, 8, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed][Green Version]
  464. Arikan, B.; Yildiztugay, E.; Ozfidan-Konakci, C. Protective Role of Quercetin and Kaempferol against Oxidative Damage and Photosynthesis Inhibition in Wheat Chloroplasts under Arsenic Stress. Physiol. Plant. 2023, 175, e13964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  465. El-Ghiaty, M.A.; El-Kadi, A.O.S. The Duality of Arsenic Metabolism: Impact on Human Health. Annu. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 2023, 63, 341–358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  466. Bozack, A.K.; Saxena, R.; Gamble, M.V. Nutritional Influences on One-Carbon Metabolism: Effects on Arsenic Methylation and Toxicity. Annu. Rev. Nutr. 2018, 38, 401–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  467. Abuawad, A.; Bozack, A.K.; Saxena, R.; Gamble, M.V. Nutrition, One-Carbon Metabolism and Arsenic Methylation. Toxicol. 2021, 457, 152803. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  468. Sijko, M.; Kozłowska, L. Influence of Dietary Compounds on Arsenic Metabolism and Toxicity. Part II—Human Studies. Toxics 2021, 9, 259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Distribution of the predominant (A) iAs species, iAs(III) (dashed line) and iAs(V) (continuous line), and (B,C) some organoarsenicals. (B) p-arsanilic acid (dashed line), o-arsanilic acid (continuous line), and (C) roxarsone (dashed line), cacodylic acid (continuous line), inside the usual environmental and biological pH range.
Figure 1. Distribution of the predominant (A) iAs species, iAs(III) (dashed line) and iAs(V) (continuous line), and (B,C) some organoarsenicals. (B) p-arsanilic acid (dashed line), o-arsanilic acid (continuous line), and (C) roxarsone (dashed line), cacodylic acid (continuous line), inside the usual environmental and biological pH range.
Ijms 26 10761 g001
Figure 2. A schematic picture resuming the interrelationships and dynamic biotransformation pathways of various As(III) and As(V) species within the cell and in the extracellular environment. Green boxes and dashed arrows refer to As(III), and purple boxes and solid arrows refer to As(V). As(SG)3 is an important As(III) species involved in the mobility and excretion of As(III) into the cell. Meanwhile, As(V) competes with P(V) for uptake sites and ATP formation. As(V) converts into As(III) to facilitate elimination. As(III), with the participation of AS3MT, undergoes different redox methylation.
Figure 2. A schematic picture resuming the interrelationships and dynamic biotransformation pathways of various As(III) and As(V) species within the cell and in the extracellular environment. Green boxes and dashed arrows refer to As(III), and purple boxes and solid arrows refer to As(V). As(SG)3 is an important As(III) species involved in the mobility and excretion of As(III) into the cell. Meanwhile, As(V) competes with P(V) for uptake sites and ATP formation. As(V) converts into As(III) to facilitate elimination. As(III), with the participation of AS3MT, undergoes different redox methylation.
Ijms 26 10761 g002
Figure 3. Schematic representation of the routes used by inorganic (iAs(III), iAs(V)) and organic arsenic species (oAs) to enter mammalian cells.
Figure 3. Schematic representation of the routes used by inorganic (iAs(III), iAs(V)) and organic arsenic species (oAs) to enter mammalian cells.
Ijms 26 10761 g003
Figure 4. Mechanism triggering the biological transformation of As(III) (iAs(III) and oAs(III), exemplified by MMA(III)), for its excretion from the cell into the bile. Route 1 refers to the basal situation, where Nrf2 suffers ubiquitination via Keap1-Cul3 ubiquitin ligase complex and it is degraded into the proteosome. Route 2 refers to oxidative stress situation: MMA(III) and iAs(III) can interact with the Keap1 protein releasing Nrf2, which triggers ARE and EpRE response, increasing antioxidant proteins as consequence which results in As(III) excretion as As(SG)3 into the bile. The interaction mechanism between arsenic and Keap1 is still unclear.
Figure 4. Mechanism triggering the biological transformation of As(III) (iAs(III) and oAs(III), exemplified by MMA(III)), for its excretion from the cell into the bile. Route 1 refers to the basal situation, where Nrf2 suffers ubiquitination via Keap1-Cul3 ubiquitin ligase complex and it is degraded into the proteosome. Route 2 refers to oxidative stress situation: MMA(III) and iAs(III) can interact with the Keap1 protein releasing Nrf2, which triggers ARE and EpRE response, increasing antioxidant proteins as consequence which results in As(III) excretion as As(SG)3 into the bile. The interaction mechanism between arsenic and Keap1 is still unclear.
Ijms 26 10761 g004
Figure 5. A pictorial schematic representation of the (A) conventional oxidative arsenic methylation pathway and (B,C) reductive arsenic methylation pathways forming As(GS)x complexes (B) and As-protein complexes (C) in humans. The arrows indicate the direction of the chemical transformation. GSTO1 (Glutathione S-Transferase superfamily, Omega-1), GSH (Glutathione), GSSG (Oxidised glutathione), AS3MT (Arsenite methyltransferase is an enzyme encoded in humans by the AS3MT gene), SAM (S-adenosylmethionine), SAH (S-adenosyl-L-homocysteine). Other symbols appear throughout the text. Corel® Photo-Paint software, version 24.3.0.571.
Figure 5. A pictorial schematic representation of the (A) conventional oxidative arsenic methylation pathway and (B,C) reductive arsenic methylation pathways forming As(GS)x complexes (B) and As-protein complexes (C) in humans. The arrows indicate the direction of the chemical transformation. GSTO1 (Glutathione S-Transferase superfamily, Omega-1), GSH (Glutathione), GSSG (Oxidised glutathione), AS3MT (Arsenite methyltransferase is an enzyme encoded in humans by the AS3MT gene), SAM (S-adenosylmethionine), SAH (S-adenosyl-L-homocysteine). Other symbols appear throughout the text. Corel® Photo-Paint software, version 24.3.0.571.
Ijms 26 10761 g005
Figure 6. Diagram showing the arsenic biotransformation processes catalysed by As(III) methyltransferases (AS3MT), which facilitate the stepwise methylation of trivalent arsenic species, contributing to their detoxification and subsequent excretion.
Figure 6. Diagram showing the arsenic biotransformation processes catalysed by As(III) methyltransferases (AS3MT), which facilitate the stepwise methylation of trivalent arsenic species, contributing to their detoxification and subsequent excretion.
Ijms 26 10761 g006
Figure 7. Replacing an arsenic–oxygen (As–OH) group with an arsenic–sulphur (As–SH) group is indeed an oxidation reaction, specifically a nucleophilic substitution where the reaction involves the sulphur atom acting as a nucleophile, attacking the arsenic centre and displacing the oxygen.
Figure 7. Replacing an arsenic–oxygen (As–OH) group with an arsenic–sulphur (As–SH) group is indeed an oxidation reaction, specifically a nucleophilic substitution where the reaction involves the sulphur atom acting as a nucleophile, attacking the arsenic centre and displacing the oxygen.
Ijms 26 10761 g007
Table 1. Chemical structure of some representative compounds of arsenic.
Table 1. Chemical structure of some representative compounds of arsenic.
Arsenite (iAs(III))
Ijms 26 10761 i001
Arsenate (iAs(V))
Ijms 26 10761 i002
Monomethylarsonous acid (MMA(III))
Ijms 26 10761 i003
Monomethylarsonic acid (MMA(V))
Ijms 26 10761 i004
Dimethylarsinous acid (DMA(III))
Ijms 26 10761 i005
Dimethylarsinic acid (DMA(V))
Ijms 26 10761 i006
Dimethylarsine
Ijms 26 10761 i007
Trimethylarsine sulphide
Ijms 26 10761 i008
Trimethylarsine
Ijms 26 10761 i009
Dimethylthioarsenic acid (DMMTA(V))
Ijms 26 10761 i010
Methylarsine
Ijms 26 10761 i011
Monomethylmonothioarsinic acid (MMMTA(V))
Ijms 26 10761 i012
Dimethylthioarsinous acid (DMMTA(III)) Dimethylmonothioarsinic acid
Ijms 26 10761 i013
Dimethyldithioarsinic acid (DMDTA(V))
Ijms 26 10761 i014
Dimethylarsine chloride
Ijms 26 10761 i015
Trimethylarsonium acetate (AsBe) (Arsenobetaine)
Ijms 26 10761 i016
Methylarsine dichloride
Ijms 26 10761 i017
2-Hydroxyethyl (trimethyl) arsonim (Arsenocholine) (AsCho)
Ijms 26 10761 i018
2,4,6-Triosa-1,3,5,7-tetraarsaadamantane (Arsenicin A)
Ijms 26 10761 i019
Paris green (Copper acetoarsenite)
Ijms 26 10761 i020
Table 2. Chemical structure of some representative cyclic organoarsenicals.
Table 2. Chemical structure of some representative cyclic organoarsenicals.
Salvarsan
Ijms 26 10761 i021
p-arsanilic acid
Ijms 26 10761 i022
Neosalvarsan
Ijms 26 10761 i023
o-arsanilic acid
Ijms 26 10761 i024
Melarsoprol
Ijms 26 10761 i025
Roxarsone
Ijms 26 10761 i026
Melarsen oxide
Ijms 26 10761 i027
4-ureidophenyl arsenic acid
Ijms 26 10761 i028
Triphenylarsine
Ijms 26 10761 i029
Nitarsone
Ijms 26 10761 i030
Phenyldichloroarsine
Ijms 26 10761 i031
Penaphenyl arsorane
Ijms 26 10761 i032
Arsabenzene
Ijms 26 10761 i033
Arsole
Ijms 26 10761 i034
10,10′-oxybis-10H-phenoxarsine
Ijms 26 10761 i035
Arsenic-containing ribose derivatives
Ijms 26 10761 i036
Table 3. Chemical structure of some representative fruit and vegetable antioxidants.
Table 3. Chemical structure of some representative fruit and vegetable antioxidants.
Melatonin
Ijms 26 10761 i037
Vitamin C (ascorbic acid)
Ijms 26 10761 i038
Lonidamine
Ijms 26 10761 i039
Arjunolic acid
Ijms 26 10761 i040
Polydatin
Ijms 26 10761 i041
Tannins (galic acid)
Ijms 26 10761 i042
Vitamin A (retinoids, such as retinol and derivatives (retinol, retinoic acid, and carotenoids provitamin A (carotene))
Ijms 26 10761 i043
Quercetin
Ijms 26 10761 i044
Curcumin (ceto form) (Tetrahydrocurcumin)
Ijms 26 10761 i045
Kaempferol
Ijms 26 10761 i046
Curcumin (enol form)
Ijms 26 10761 i047
Kaempferol 3 O-a-L (600 methyl rhamnopyranoside)
Ijms 26 10761 i048
Diallyl trisulphide (DATS): (di(prop-2-en-1-yl)trisulfane)
Ijms 26 10761 i049
Resveratrol
Ijms 26 10761 i050
Lutein
Ijms 26 10761 i051
Zeaxanthin
Ijms 26 10761 i052
β-carotene
Ijms 26 10761 i053
Cryptoxantins
Ijms 26 10761 i054
Table 4. Other antioxidants.
Table 4. Other antioxidants.
(−)-epicatechin (EC)) (2R,3R)
((2R,3S)-2-(3,4-Dihydroxyphenyl)-3,4-dihydro-2H-chromene-3,5,7-triol)
Ijms 26 10761 i055
(−)-epigallocatechin (EGC)
((2R,3R)-3′,4′,5,5′,7-Pentahydroxy flavan-3-yl 3,4,5-trihydroxybenzoate)
Ijms 26 10761 i056
(−)-epicatechin-3-gallate (ECG)
((2R,3R)-3′,4′,5,7-Tetrahydroxyflavan-3-yl 3,4,5-trihydroxybenzoate)
Ijms 26 10761 i057
(−)-epigallocatechin-3-gallate (EGCG)
((2R,3R)-3′,4′,5,5′,7-Pentahydroxy flavan-3-yl 3,4,5-trihydroxybenzoate)
Ijms 26 10761 i058
Saponins (a subclass of terpenoids) are phenolic antioxidant compounds
Ijms 26 10761 i059
Tannins (others)
Ijms 26 10761 i060
Table 5. Chemical structure of some representative chelating agents.
Table 5. Chemical structure of some representative chelating agents.
BAL
Ijms 26 10761 i061
Taurine
Ijms 26 10761 i062
DMSA
Ijms 26 10761 i063
ALA
Ijms 26 10761 i064
MiADMSA
Ijms 26 10761 i065
NAC
Ijms 26 10761 i066
TA
Ijms 26 10761 i067
DMPS
Ijms 26 10761 i068
NTAP
Ijms 26 10761 i069
NTA2P
Ijms 26 10761 i070
NTA3P
Ijms 26 10761 i071
EDDS
Ijms 26 10761 i072
ALA: Alpha-lipoic acid (6,8-Dithiooctanoic acid); BAL: Dimercaprol (2,3-Bis(sulfanyl)propan-1-ol)); DMPS: 2,3-Dimercapto-1-propanesulfonic acid; DMSA: Dimercaptosuccinic acid ((2R,3S)-2,3-Bis(sulfanyl)butanedioic acid); EDDS: Ethylenediamine-N,N′-disuccinic acid; MiADMSA: Monoisoamyl 2,3-dimercaptosuccinic acid; NAC: N-acetyl-cysteine; NTAP: N-phosphonomethyl iminodiacetic acid; NTA2P: N,N-Bis-phosphonomethyl glycine; NTA3P: Nitrilotrimethylphosphonic acid; TA: Tartaric acid (2,3-Dihydroxybutanedioic acid); Taurine: 2-Aminoethane-1-sulfonic acid.
Table 6. Representative conditional stability constants between As(III) and some organic ligands.
Table 6. Representative conditional stability constants between As(III) and some organic ligands.
LigandComplexK’ (Log β)References
BALAsBAL6.95[452]
AsBAL211.56
As2BAL322.73
DMSAAsL9.8[450]
AsLH225.87[454]
DMPSAsL10.68[454]
TA[As(OH)2T]6.62[456]
DCTA[As(OH)2HL]2−20.67[456]
NTAP(L4−)20.91[455]
NTA2P(L5−)24.78[455]
NTA3P(L6−)32.52[455]
The abbreviations mean the same as in Table 5.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Pereira, F.J.; López, R.; Aller, A.J. Arsenome, Arsenobolome, and Arsenobiolome. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26, 10761. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms262110761

AMA Style

Pereira FJ, López R, Aller AJ. Arsenome, Arsenobolome, and Arsenobiolome. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2025; 26(21):10761. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms262110761

Chicago/Turabian Style

Pereira, Fernando J., Roberto López, and A. Javier Aller. 2025. "Arsenome, Arsenobolome, and Arsenobiolome" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 26, no. 21: 10761. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms262110761

APA Style

Pereira, F. J., López, R., & Aller, A. J. (2025). Arsenome, Arsenobolome, and Arsenobiolome. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 26(21), 10761. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms262110761

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop