Next Article in Journal
Complement System Inhibitors in Nephrology: An Update—Narrative Review
Previous Article in Journal
Extramedullary Relapse of CBFA2T3::GLIS2-Positive Megakaryoblastic Leukemia Mimicking Secondary Ewing Sarcoma: An Exemplary Case for the Diagnostic Trap
Previous Article in Special Issue
4-Substituted Pyridine-3-Sulfonamides as Carbonic Anhydrase Inhibitors Modified by Click Tailing: Synthesis, Activity, and Docking Studies
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Condensation Reactions of 2-Aminothiophenoles to Afford 2-Substituted Benzothiazoles of Biological Interest: A Review (2020–2024)

by
Itzia I. Padilla-Martínez
1,
Alejandro Cruz
1,*,
Efrén V. García-Báez
1,
Jessica E. Mendieta-Wejebe
2 and
Martha C. Rosales-Hernández
2
1
Laboratorio de Química Supramolecular y Nanociencias, Departamento de Ciencias Básicas, Unidad Profesional Interdisciplinaria de Biotecnología, Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Av. Acueducto s/n, Colonia Barrio La Laguna Ticomán, Ciudad de México 07340, Mexico
2
Laboratorio de Biofísica y Biocatálisis, Sección de Estudios de Posgrado e Investigación, Escuela Superior de Medicina, Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Av. Salvador Diaz Mirón esq. Plan de San Luis s/n, Casco de Santo Tomas, Miguel Hidalgo, Ciudad de México 11340, Mexico
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26(12), 5901; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26125901
Submission received: 21 March 2025 / Revised: 9 June 2025 / Accepted: 13 June 2025 / Published: 19 June 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Organic Synthesis in Drug Discovery)

Abstract

Several benzothiazole (BT) derivatives have recently been explored in medicinal chemistry, and they are frequently reported in the literature. The interest in this kind of heterocyclic compounds and their structural hybrids has been increasing, as shown by several reviews reported over the last decade. In this context, we found that about 70 articles related to the synthesis of BT derivatives that studied their biological activities were published in the last five years. From this, we prepared a review on the synthesis and biological activity studies about this topic. In this bibliographic review it was found that medicinal chemists also explore BT derivatives in search of anticancer and anti-Alzheimer’s candidates. This review comprehends 70 articles, published between 2020 and 2024, related to the synthesis of BT derivatives with the purpose of assessing their biological activities. On the other hand, BT derivatives have been explored as molecular species that perform two or more biological actions, called multifunctional drugs. Some accounts related to the structure–activity relationship which provide a framework for drug discovery and design are also discussed. The synthetic methods of BT synthesis include the use of biocatalysts, solvent-free conditions, photocatalysts, and catalysts supported on nanoparticles. Studies also explore renewable energy sources such as microwave, UV, and visible-light and mechanochemical sources.

1. Introduction

Benzothiazole (BT) is an aromatic heterobicyclic system containing a benzene ring fused to a thiazole ring. This small molecule is frequently present in compounds that possess a wide range of biological activities. BT derivatives are rarely found in natural products; however, some of them have been found in terrestrial and marine natural products as part of simple or more complex structures. For instance, in the 1940s, the simple firefly d-luciferin structure [1,2,3], the more complex rifamycins P and Q, and thiazinotrienomycin F and G were isolated (Figure 1) [4,5]. Aromatic constituents of cranberries and tea leaves and flavor compounds such as the benzothiazole (BT) alkaloids nordercitine, dercitamide, dercitamine, and cyclodercitin, from the Dercitus sp. and Stellata sp. sponges, were also isolated (Figure 1) [6,7]. On the other hand, since riluzole (6-trifluoromethoxy-2-benzothiazolamine) has been clinically used to diminish amyotrophic lateral sclerosis progression and as an anticonvulsant drug [8,9,10], medicinal chemists have been interested in developing synthetic methodologies to afford BT derivative compounds.
From these findings, BT cores have been found in several synthesized drugs. From 1970 to the present, BT derivatives have been found to possess antiviral [11,12,13], antibacterial [13,14,15,16], antimicrobial [17,18,19], fungicidal [20,21], antiallergic [22,23,24], antidiabetic [25,26,27], antitumoral [28,29,30,31], anti-inflammatory [32,33], and anthelmintic [34,35,36] properties and have recently been shown to possess anticonvulsant and antioxidant [37,38,39,40,41,42] biological activities. For instance, zopolrestat has been used since 1991 in treating diabetes (Figure 2a) [43], compound 2-(3,4-dimethoxyphenyl)-5-fluoroBT (PMX 610, NSC 721648) has shown antitumor activity (Figure 2b) [44,45], and the Schiff bases shown in Figure 2c were found to be useful in the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease [46] (Figure 2).
On the other hand, the BT nucleus has been found in molecules used as ligands for catalysis [47,48]. In this context, we found that the investigation of the synthesis and biological activity of BT derivatives in medicinal chemistry has increased. In the last five years we found twenty-one article reviews about this topic, from 2020 to 2024 [49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68,69,70], several of them related to the use of BT derivatives as anticancer agents [51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,62,63,64]. Also, we found in this period about 53 articles related to the condensation reaction of 2-aminothiophenol (ATP) to synthesize BT derivatives. In some of these, the synthesized compounds were studied concerning their biological activity. By conducting this search, we prepared a bibliographic review on the synthesis and biological activity studies about this topic. In this review it was found that medicinal chemistry also explores BT derivatives in search of anticancer [53,54,55,56,57], anti-Parkinson’s [71,72], and anti-Alzheimer’s candidates [73,74,75]. In addition, some accounts of the structure–activity relationship that provide a framework for drug discovery and design were also discussed. On the other hand, BT derivatives were also explored as molecules capable of two or more biological actions, known as multifunctional drugs [76]. Some recent examples of this kind of BT-based compounds that have been clinically approved are halethazole (antibacterial) [77], thioflavin-T (amyloid imaging agent) [78], dimazole (antifungal) [79], ethoxzolamide (treatment of glaucoma) [80], phortress (antitumoral) [81], riluzole (antidepressant) [82], flutemetamol (radiopharmaceutical) [83], and frentizole (immunosuppressive) [84] (Figure 3).

2. Condensation of 2ATPs with Carbonyl Compounds

One of the best-known reactions that affords 2-substituted benzothiazoles (BTs) is the condensation of carbonylic compounds with 2-aminothiophenoles (2ATPs). The followed pathway consists of three stages: (a) imine thiophenol (ITP) formation, (b) cyclization to benzothiazolidine (BTI), and (c) reduction to BTs (Scheme 1). These reactions have been carried out with and without the use of catalysts.

2.1. Condensation with Aldehydes

In one step, the condensation reaction of 2ATP with several benzaldehydes using sodium hydrosulfite (Na2S2O4) as an oxidizing agent in refluxing a mixture of water–ethanol as the dissolvent for 12 h was carried out to afford 2-arylBTs 1ak in 51–82% yields (Table 1) [85]. On the other hand, the condensation of 5-substituted 2ATPs as hydrochlorides or disulfides with benzaldehydes under refluxion for 36 h afforded the BTs 2bk in 53–82% yields and 3ak in 51–84% yields.
Compounds were evaluated as sun-filtering, antioxidant, antifungal, and antiproliferative agents [85]. Compound 1g was the most effective blocker of hERG potassium channels expressed in HEK 293 cells, resulting in 60.32% inhibition, with an IC50 = 4.79 μM. Compounds 1g, 1h, 1k, 2d, 2g, 3d, and 3g were considered broad-spectrum and ultraviolet A filters (UVA filters) because their λc ≥ 370 nm and the ultraviolet A-protector factor (UVA-PF) values were greater than one-third of their sun protection factor (SPF) values. Compounds 1d and 1j were regarded as candidates for UVB protection. All compounds were photostable, especially 2e, which showed a degradation rate of less than 2%.
It was found that the wavelength of maximum absorption (λmax) was related to stereo electronic effects by substituents on the 2-aryl or BT moiety, which alter the electron density of compounds. The -OH group at the para position of the 2-aryl group leads the resonance interaction of the lone pair of oxygen and the π cloud of 2-aryl and the BT group. This shift increases if -OH is at the ortho position, due to the formation of an intramolecular hydrogen bond between the nitrogen of BT and the hydrogen of the -OH group. On the other hand, the order of λmax along the series was -H ≪ -SO2NH2 < -COOH. Additionally, the -COOH or -SO2NH2 groups on the BT ring increased the photostability of the compounds.
Compounds 1i,j, 2g,h, and 3r,s showed a good antioxidant profile. Compound 1h had the highest antifungal activity against the dermatophytes Trichophyton tonsuransEpidermophyton floccosum, and Microsporum gypsum. Significant activities were found for compounds 1f and 1g against Epidermophyton floccosum and Microsporum gypseum. Compounds 1g and 1k exhibited high antiproliferative activity against CEM and SK-Mel 5 tumor cells, 1g (6-fold) and 1k (25-fold) being more selective for CEM and SK-Mel 5 cells, respectively. Because of their various biological activities, some 2-arylBTs could be applied as drugs in the treatment of neoplastic diseases such as melanoma, childhood leukemia, and pancreatic cancer. However, based on the experimental results and SAR studies on positions 2 and 6 of 2-arylBTs, compounds 1g and 1k were proposed as powerful candidates for designing multifunctional drugs.
2ATP was condensed with substituted benzaldehydes by using biodegradable rice husk chemically activated carbon (RHCAC) as the catalyst at room temperature in ethanol–water to afford 2-arylBTs 4af in 93–98% yields (Table 2) [86]. The catalyst was recovered by filtration, washed, dried, and recycled for eight runs, unlike a corrosive and toxic acid catalyst that was difficult to recover and separate.
No significant effects of electron donation were observed, while OMe, CH3, and Cl groups and electron-withdrawing NO2 groups were found, and the reactions were completed in short times (5–10 min), giving high yields of the desired products (93–98%).
A series of 2-arylBTs 5af were synthesized from the condensation reaction of 2ATP with substituted benzaldehydes in 1,4-dioxane under an O2 atmosphere in the presence of [PhI(OH)OTs] (Koser’s reagent) as a catalyst at room temperature (Table 3) [87]. The features of this protocol included short reaction times (15 min), a broad substrate scope, 80–90% yields, low catalyst loading, and scalability.
Six p-substituted 2-arylBTs 6af were obtained in 70–90% yields from the condensation of 2ATP with p-benzaldehydes catalyzed with Cu2O and DMSO as oxidants in string at room temperature for 3–5 h (Table 4) [88]. The reaction tolerated a wide range of functional groups. The compounds 6c and 6e showed equal antifungal activity against A. niger and the highest activity against C. albicans, compared to voriconazole as a reference.
Three green synthetic protocols were used to synthesize 6-substituted 2-arylBTs, 7af and 8af, in 62–89% yields (Table 5) [89]. Method A: A stirred suspension of 4-substituted-2ATP and the 2-hydroxybenzaldehyde was heated in glycerol at 110–170 °C for 1 to 24 h to afford compounds 7ac in 62–71% yields. Method B: A stirred suspension of the 5-substituted 2ATP disulfide and 2-hydroxybenzaldehyde or 2-methoxybenzaldehyde was heated in glycerol at 160–175 °C for 30–60 min to afford compounds 7ac in 74–80% yields and 8ac in 70–79% yields. Method C: The corresponding 2-substituted benzaldehyde was added to a stirred solution of 4-amidino-2ATPate in glacial acetic acid, and the mixture was heated under nitrogen for 4 h, then alkalinized with NaOH (pH 10–11); the resulting free base was mixed with 2-propanol and methanesulfonic acid and stirred at room temperature for 2 h to afford compounds 7d, 7e, 8d, and 8e in 62–83% yields. Method D: A solution of SnCl2 dihydrate in conc. HCl and methanol was added to the corresponding 6-nitro-substituted BTs 7b and 8b, then refluxed for 30 min. The mixture was alkalinized with 20% NaOH (pH 8–9) to afford compounds 7f and 8f in 89.3 and 81.6% yields, respectively. The influence of the hydroxy and methoxy groups and substituents on C6 on the 2-arylBT scaffold against antibacterial, antitumor, and antioxidant activities was studied. The amidino derivatives 7d and 8d showed modest activity against Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacterial strains. At the same time, compounds 7b, 7c, 7e, 7f, and 8f resulted in potent and selective antiproliferative activity towards tumor cells, without activity against human skin fibroblasts. Compounds 7f and 8f were the most selective against the growth of HeLa cell lines. Compound 7f resulted in the most promising radical scavenging activity. HIF-1α hydroxylated protein was upregulated by treatment of HeLa cells with compounds 7f, 8c, and 8f, which were considered potent suppressors of the hypoxia-induced HIF-1 protein. Compounds 7f and 8f were proposed to lead compounds for further rationalized design of the BT skeleton. Compound 7f with the OH group on the 2-arylBT core had the most promising antioxidative activity as evaluated by DPPH, ABTS, and FRAP in vitro assays. The presence of the amino protonated group attached at the BT moiety was essential for the antiproliferative and antioxidant activities observed, exerted through a change in the levels of the reactive oxygen species-modulated HIF-1 protein. The BTs 7af and 8f showed good antioxidant activity (38 to 117 µM), while BTs 8ae had a low ability for stabilization of ABTS•+ radicals (>200 µM).
In a two-step protocol, the corresponding p-bromophenyl-ITP intermediate, accessed from the condensation of 2ATP and p-bromobenzaldehyde, suffered a Pd-catalyzed cyclization to 2-bromophenyl-BT 9 in [BMIM][BF4] or [BMIM][PF6] as a recycled IL solvent. Compound 9 was functionalized by cross-coupling reactions (Suzuki, Heck, or Sonogashira) and catalyzed by Ni or Pd to afford a series of substituted 2-aryl-/heteroaryl-BTs, 10ae, 11ad, and 12ad, in acceptable yields (55–86%) under mild reaction conditions (Scheme 2) [90]. The yields were from moderate to good for 10ae (60–81%, 12–14.5 h), 11ad (63–80%, 16.5–17 h), and 12ad (55–80%, 14.5–16 h).
2-substituted BTs, 14a,b (25, 34%) and 17a,b (52, 60%), were designed and synthesized from BTs 13 (60%) and 15 (34%), which were obtained from the condensation of 2-aminobenzothiazole (2ABT) with 3-bromobenzaldehyde and lactic acid, then oxidation of the derived alcohol with MnO2, to be tested as antiproliferative cancer cell lines (Scheme 3) [91]. Compounds 217ab were obtained from compound 15 by (a) cyclization of 2ABT with 3-bromobenzaldehyde to afford compound 13, and the BTs 14a,b were obtained from compound 13 by (b) Buchwald–Hartwig amination with anilines. Compounds 17ab were obtained from (d) α-bromination with CuBr2, then (e) reaction with the corresponding substituted thiourea. Antiproliferative assays using cancer cells from the breast (MCF7) and prostate (22Rv1 and PC3) were carried out for all synthesized BTs. However, these compounds had worse activity than JG-98 as a reference (IC50 values from ~0.7 to 13 µM).
A photo-assisted radical cyclo-condensation of 2ATP with a series of aromatic and aliphatic aldehydes was designed using wosin Y as a photocatalyst and K2CO3 or Et3N as basic media and tert-butyl hydroperoxide (TBHP) (70% in water) in acetonitrile to afford the 2-aryl(alkyl)BTs 18aj in 70–92% yields (Table 6) [92]. Unfortunately, the designed method required harsh reaction conditions, a long reaction time (24–36 h), and flash column chromatography and allowed no recovery of the catalyst.
A reasonable mechanistic process has been proposed beginning with the in situ formation of the corresponding imine and the excitation of eosin Y under blue LED irradiation, then the reaction of eosin Y* with TBHP to generate an (eosin y).-radical anion and a t-Bu. radical, which undergo hydrogen atom abstraction with the imine to produce the Ar-O. imine-fenoxy radical. Then, there occurs an intramolecular cycloaddition to the corresponding benzothiazoline, which is transformed to a benzothiazoline.+ radical cation that reacts with the eosin Y.-radical anion to afford the corresponding BT. This method tolerates several aldehydes, including aliphatic, aromatic, cyclic, and heteroaromatic aldehydes, but has several limitations, such as the requirement of a transition metal, a high temperature, and a pre-synthesized catalyst/ligand scaffold.
As previously reported, three series of substituted 2-arylBTs, 2123, were synthesized as VEGFR-2/FGFR-1/PDGFR-β multi-angiokinase inhibitors targeting breast cancer (Scheme 4) [93]. The compounds 21 and 22 were obtained from the condensation of 2ATP and vanillin in refluxing DMF to afford the 2-arylBT 19, which was subsequently reacted with methyl bromoacetate, followed by hydrazinolysis with hydrazine hydrate in refluxing ethanol to afford the hydrazide 20, which through acid catalysis with aldehydes or ketones afforded the Schiff bases 21an and 22ac in 40% to 88% yields. On the other hand, the reaction of hydrazide 20 with isocyanates and isothiocyanate in refluxing ethanol afforded the corresponding ureas 23a,b in 84 and 72% yields and thiourea 23c in a 61% yield.
Compounds 21d, 21f, 21i, and 21k showed high inhibitory activity against multiple kinases: VEGFR-2 (IC50s of 0.19, 0.18, 0.17, and 0.13 μM, respectively), FGFR-1 (IC50s of 0.28, 0.37, 0.19, and 0.27 μM, respectively), and PDGFR-β (IC50s of 0.07, 0.04, 0.08, and 0.14 μM, respectively). Additionally, the substituted 2-arylBTs exhibited promising cytotoxic activity against the MCF-7 cell line comparable to that of sorafenib as a reference drug (IC50 = 4.33 μM). The most potent arylBTs were 21d and 21i (IC50s of 7.83 and 6.58 μM). Also, 21d and 21i had VEGFR-2 inhibitory activity in MCF-7 cells of 81% and 83% compared with sorafenib (88%). Molecular docking of compounds in the VEGFR-2 and FGFR-1 active sites showed that the 2-phenylBT moiety was placed in the hinge region of the tyrosine kinase (RTK)-binding receptor site. In contrast, the amide moiety showed hydrogen bonding interactions with the amino acids, directing the aryl group to the hydrophobic allosteric back pocket of the RTKs in a type II-like binding mode. Additionally, the aryl BTs exhibited good ADME properties, facilitating further optimization in drug discovery.
An acetic acid-mediated three-component condensation reaction of 2ATPs and α, β-unsaturated aldehydes in the presence of thiophenols was developed to afford 2-thioalkyl BTs 24at (Figure 4) [94]. Metal-free conditions were used in the reaction, with oxygen as an oxidant. This method was regioselective, tolerant of several functional groups, and provided access to various kinds of BTs with modest to good yields (34–81%).
On comparing the yields of compounds 24a (70%), 24b (42%), and 24d, the position of the methyl/phenyl group (R4) on the α, β-unsaturated aldehydes affected the reaction yield. However, α, β-unsaturated aldehydes bearing an electron-donating group or electron-withdrawing group like Me, Cl, or Br at the para position of the phenyl ring produced the compounds 24eg in moderate yields (54–57%). Also, moderate yields (51–59%) were observed when Me, Cl, and F substituents were located at different positions on the benzene of the BT ring. Thiophenols containing methyl groups at the para, meta, or ortho positions did not show an influence and efficiently reacted in moderate yields. However, electron-donating groups such as tBu and OMe at the para position of thiophenols afforded BTs in 71% (24k) and 80% (24l) yields, respectively. Halogen-containing thiophenols such as F, Cl, and Br successfully afforded the thioalkyl-substituted BTs 24a, 24m, and 24n in 53–70% yields. Various disubstituted thiophenols resulted in good substrates for this reaction to afford the BTs 24oq in 56, 80, and 81% yields, respectively.
The eco-friendly biocatalytic oxidant system Laccase/DDQ (2,3-dichloro-5,6-dicyano-1,4-benzoquinone) was applied to condense 2ATP with aromatic aldehydes to afford 2-arylBTs 25ax in 65–98% yields using O2 pure or from the air as an oxidant in aqueous media at room temperature in 1 h (Table 7) [95]. Two steps were required in the aerobic oxidative cyclization: (1) chemical cyclization and (2) chemoenzymatic oxidation. Benzaldehydes with electron-donating and electron-withdrawing groups, heterocyclic and α,β-unsaturated aldehydes, 1-naphthaldehyde, 2-naphthaldehyde, 9-anthraldehyde, and terephthaldehyde were successfully applied to prepare the corresponding BTs. The advantages of this method are as follows: (1) the use of air or O2 as an environmentally benign, inexpensive, and abundant oxidant agent and the formation of H2O as a non-toxic by-product; (2) the synthesis of BTs in good to high yields in aqueous media at room temperature; (3) its superiority with respect to other available methods and its attractiveness to the pharmaceutical industry owing to its being free from any toxic and expensive transition metals and halide catalysts; (4) its conforming to several of the guiding principles of green chemistry.
In a one-pot reaction, 2ATP was condensed with benzaldehydes and aromatic heterocyclic aldehydes under solvent-free conditions using ZnCl2 nano-flakes supported on nano-hydroxyapatite (HAp) as a catalyst to afford the 2-arylBTs 26al in 65–95% yields in 15–90 min (Table 8) [96]. The reaction was fast, eco-friendly, and efficient. The molecular docking validation with transpeptidase and 14 α-demethylase enzyme inhibitors showed that five 2-substituted-BTs gave good energy values. Also, antioxidant studies showed that four BTs were promising in relation to ABTS (inhibition %) compared with ascorbic acid. Substituted and disubstituted benzaldehydes with electron-donating groups on R2, such as 4MeO and OH groups, and electron-withdrawing groups, such as F, Cl, and NO2 groups, gave BTs 26a,b,dh with excellent yields (75–80%); however, 1,2,3-OMe-substituted and 3-pyridil-substituted benzaldehydes gave BTs 26c and 26j in 67 and 65% yields, respectively.
The condensation reaction of substituted 2ATPs with several aromatic and aliphatic aldehydes was catalyzed with sulfated tungstate (ST) under solvent-free, room temperature, and ultrasound irradiation conditions to afford 2-substituted BTs, 27az and 28ad, in excellent yields (90–98%) (Table 9) [97]. ST is considered a mildly acidic, easy-to-prepare, non-toxic, recyclable, efficient, and heterogeneous green catalyst. This method is very good for the synthesis of 2-substituted-BTs from several functionalized aromatic, aliphatic, and heteroaromatic aldehydes. The advantages of this method are as follows: easy handling, functional group compatibility, short reaction times (5 min), high catalytic activity and recyclability, chemoselectivity, very good yields, no column purification, low corrosiveness, and environmental compatibility.
2ATP and substituted aryl aldehydes were condensed using ruthenium silicate (RS-1) zeolite as a catalyst in a hydrothermal process to afford the 2-arylBTs 29ai in 85–93% yields (Table 10) [98]. The benefits of this protocol include mild reaction conditions, short reaction times (30 min), and high thermal catalyst and catalysis recyclability.
Substituted BTs 30at were synthesized in 82–94% yields in 3 h by the visible-light-induced condensation–cyclization reaction of substituted 2ATP with substituted aromatic aldehydes (Table 11) [99]. Fluorescein was used as a photocatalyst, a blue LED lamp was used as the light source, and atmospheric molecular oxygen was required for the reaction to proceed.
Substituted aromatic aldehydes, such as 4-Br, 4-Cl, and 4-F (electron-withdrawing) and 2-Me, 4-Me and 4-OMe (electron-donating) substituents, afforded BTs in high to excellent yields: 30df (88–94%) and 30gi (87–92%). Notably, the position of the substituents on the aromatic aldehydes had little effect on the yield of the BTs 30bd (88–91%) and 30g,h (91, 92%). In addition, two electron-donating groups on the aromatic aldehydes gave a lower yield (82%) of the BT 3j. The reactions were smooth, with good functional group tolerance. Additionally, the catalytic system eliminates the need for an oxidant or metal catalyst, aligning with the principles of green chemistry.
The 2-aryl-BTs 31at were synthesized in 64–99% yields in 10 min by combining enzymatic (trypsin) and visible-light (450 nm) catalysis under an air atmosphere (Table 12) [100]. The method consisted of biocatalytic condensation of 2ATP with aromatic or aliphatic aldehydes to afford the corresponding benzothiazoline BTI as an intermediate. Subsequent visible-light-induced oxidization produced the 2-arylBTs in approximately 10 min. Additional oxidants or metals were not required in this protocol, which was environmentally benign.
It was found that the electronic effect on the substituents on the benzene ring influences the reaction. Aldehydes containing electron-deficient groups afforded the BTs 31a, 31g, and 31j, which were obtained in 98–99% yields, while an electron-rich pair group afforded the BT 31m in 75% yields. If the electron-richness group of the aldehyde is increased, the yield of BTs decreases, as in the series of BTs 31gi, whose yields were 98%, 95%, and 89%, and the yield in BT 31p was reduced to 64%. In the case of steric hindrance of methyl-substituted benzaldehydes, the yield is negligible, as in the BTs 31ce (96–98%). With a larger volume of 1-naphthaldehyde, the yield of the BT 31s decreases to 78%.
An ionic liquid immobilized on silica-coated cobalt–ferrite magnetic nanoparticles (CoFe2O4@SiO2@PAF-IL) was formed. This hybrid nanostructure was used as a catalyst in the condensation reaction of 2ATP with aromatic aldehydes to synthesize the 2-aryl-BTs 32ai in 83–91% yields (Table 13) [101]. The reaction was carried out under heating in solvent-free conditions at 70 °C for 10 min. The advantages of this procedure included the use of solvent-free conditions, the simple work-up, the short reaction times, and the environmentally benign conditions. The nano-catalyst could be reused several times without loss of catalytic activity and was easily separated.
Substituted 2ATP disulfides or dihydrochlorides were condensed with the corresponding aldehydes in refluxing glycerol without a catalyst for 45 min to afford the previously designed 6-cyano- (33a, 83%; 33d, 64%) and 6-amidino- (33b,c,e,f, 22–56%) 2,5-disubstituted furane-BTs 33af to be screened for antimicrobial and antitumor activities (Figure 5) [102]. The antitumor activity was tested on the human lung cancer cell lines A549, HCC827, and NCI-H358, with MTS cytotoxicity and in vitro BrdU proliferation assays performed using 2D and 3D cell culture methods. Compounds 33b,c,e resulted in possible antitumor activity to stop the proliferation of cells. Broth microdilution testing was used to evaluate the antimicrobial activity on Gram-negative E. coli and Gram-positive S. aureus and S. cerevisiae as eukaryotic model organisms, according to Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) guidelines. The BTs 33b,c,e and 233f showed promising antibacterial activity. All compounds were more activated in the 2D than in the 3D assays on the three cancer cell lines and in the antimicrobial assays. Compounds with the amidine group at the 6-position of the benzothiazole ring, 33b and 33e, gave low yields (22 and 28%, respectively).
Compound 4-(BT-2-yl)-2-methoxyphenol 34, obtained from the condensation of 2ATP with the corresponding benzaldehyde, was transformed to compound 2-[4-BT-2-yl)-2-methoxyphenoxy]acetohydrazide 36 through ethyl 2-(4-BT-2-yl)-2-methoxyphenoxy) acetate 35, then reacted with chlorine acetyl chloride to afford the 2-(4-BT-2-yl)-2-methoxy-phenoxy)-N′-(2-chloroacetyl)acetohydrazide 38 (Scheme 5) [103]. The acetohydrazides 36 and 38 were reacted with anhydrides and amino acids to afford the BT derivatives 37a–f in 65–90% yields and 39a–k in 65–90% yields, respectively. The in vitro anticancer activity of all the compounds exhibited promising potency against hepatocellular carcinoma HepG-2 (IC50s from 0.7 ± 0.4 to 1.0 ± 0.7 μM) and very good potency against breast cancer cells MCF-7 (IC50s from 2.5 ± 2.5 to 3.5 ± 3.4 μM) compared with the standard drug doxorubicin (IC50s = 1.0 ± 0.8 μM and 2.9 ± 1.9 μM, respectively). The highest cytotoxic activity was observed for compounds 37ac, 39c, and 39f. Also, these compounds were further evaluated for their EGFR inhibitory activity compared with the reference drug erlotinib. Molecular docking studies of the promising compounds 39ac were carried out to interpret their enzymatic activities. Moreover, compounds 39a and 39b exhibited considerable pre-G1 and G2/M cell cycle arrest compared with the untreated MCF-7 cells. Additionally, 39a and 39b increased the levels of Bax, p53, and caspase-3 levels while decreasing the levels of Bcl-2, which are oncogenic parameters. The results of these BT-based derivatives proposed an excellent framework for detecting new potent antitumor leads.
The condensation reaction of (un)substituted 2ATP, 2ATP-disulfide, or 2ATP-hydrochloride with furfural, pyrrole-2-carboxaldehyde, or 2-thiophenecarboxaldehyde occurred under stirring in ethanol at room temperature, then unsubstituted 2ATP was reacted under refluxion for 12 h and substituted under refluxion for 36 h in the presence of an aqueous solution of sodium hydrosulfite as a catalyst to afford the 2-substituted-BTs 40ai in 69, 48, 87, 34, 30, 48, 31, 29, and 54% yields (Figure 6) [76]. The synthesized BTs were investigated for their photoprotective, antioxidant, antiproliferative, and antifungal activities. Compounds 40d and 40g exhibited a multifunctional profile with an excellent filtering UVB capacity, which was higher than that of PBSA, which served as a reference and is currently used as a UV sunscreen filter. These compounds were the best at inhibiting the growth of dermatophytes and C. albicans, and 40g showed good antioxidant activity. Furthermore, 40d was effective on melanoma tumor cells (SK-Mel 5). These compounds are proposed as new skin preventive and protective agents.
2ATP was cyclo-condensed with a series of aromatic/aliphatic aldehydes in the presence of bovine serum albumin (BSA) as a biocatalyst in water under stirring at room temperature for 8 h to afford a series of 2-substituted BTs, 41av, in 79–93% yields (Table 14) [104]. The advantages of this protocol were its excellent yields, high atom economy, gram scalability, operational simplicity, and recyclability.
The condensation–cyclization reaction of 2ATP with aromatic benzaldehydes was carried out in a self-neutralizing acidic CO2–alcohol system to afford the BTs 42an in 55–87% yields. Practicality, economic viability, and environmental friendliness were the advantages of this protocol (Table 15) [105]. The alkyl carbonic acid formed CO2, and methanol was proposed as an intermediate in the reaction mechanism, generating hydrogen cations to catalyze the reaction. 2-PhenylBT 42a gave the highest yield (87%), while in the case of the 2-substituted BTs 42bm the yields decreased to 55–62%. However, in 5-chloro-2-phenylbenzothiazole 42n the yield increased to 72%.
2ATP was condensed with aromatic aldehydes in the presence of 0.05 mol% of bacterium-derived hemoglobin Vitreoscilla (VHb) as a biocatalyst, tert-buthyl hydroperoxide (TBHP) as an oxidant, and dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) as a solvent at room temperature to afford 2-arylBTs 43an in only 5 min with excellent yields (85–97%) (Table 16) [106]. The advantages of this protocol were its mild reaction conditions and high efficiency, with a wide substrate scope.
It was found that electron-rich groups on R2 resulted in decreased yields (43b,c,g,i; 92, 88, 89, and 87% yields, respectively) compared with 2PhBT (43a), whereas electron-poor moieties within the aromatic aldehydes (43df,h,j; 91–97%) were the best substrates. Aldehydes with heteroaromatic groups produced the BTs 43km in high yields (93–95%) with a longer reaction time (20 min). The yield decreased significantly when the benzaldehyde contained the naphthalyl group, affording the BT 43n in an 85% yield, due to the steric effect.
Substituted 2ATPs were condensed with a series of aldehydes at 80 °C using an environmentally friendly, inexpensive, and easily accessible Zn(OAc)2·2H2O (5 mol%) in a solvent-free reaction to afford a series of substituted 2-arylBTs, 44ap, in 67–96% yields in 30–60 min (Table 17) [107]. The reaction involving heterocyclic aldehydes interestingly afforded the corresponding BTs 44mo in good yields (79–84%), and with alkyl aldehydes, such as isobutyraldehyde, the corresponding BT 44p was produced in a moderate yield (67%). The BTs 44ao were obtained in 79–96% yields.
The nanocomposite MNPs-phenanthroline-Pd (Fe3O4@SiO2-diPy-Pd) was synthesized to be used as a catalyst for the cyanation of aryl halides at 80 °C for 6 h in the synthesis of BTs 45ah in 89–98% yields (Table 18) [108]. The optimal conditions for the reaction were 20 mg of the MNPs-phenanthroline-Pd nano-catalyst and K2CO3 in DMF under reflux conditions. The catalyst was highly efficient and easily recovered and reused, without losing the morphology and dispersion of the particles. Aryl halide compounds with electron-donating groups at the p-position of the aryl group afforded the BTs 45c,d,f in higher yields (96%, 98%, and 94%) than that of aryl with electron-withdrawing groups (BT 45e, 92% yield), whereas aryl bromide in the m-position decreased the yield (BT 45h, 89% yield).
The eco-friendly DABCO-based dicationic acidic ionic liquid [C4H10-DABCO][HSO4]2 (DABCO = 1,4-diazabicyclooctane) was synthesized, characterized, and successfully used as a catalyst in the condensation of aryl aldehydes under H2O reflux for 30–50 min to afford 2-phenylBTs 46ah in 85–91% yields (Table 19) [109]. The advantages of this protocol were its short reaction time; easy work-up; moderate to excellent yields; the use of green solvents; the use of non-metal, inexpensive catalysts; and catalyst recyclability. Aldehydes with electron-withdrawing groups at the m- or p-position of the aryl group afforded BTs 46b,e,f in higher yields (87%, 90%, and 91%) than that of aldehyde with an electron-donating group (BT 45c, 82%).
Six 1-aryl-4-BTyl-1,2,3-triazoles 47af were prepared from condensation of 2ATP with aldehydes (Figure 7) [110]. The synthesized donor–acceptor molecules exhibited optical properties based on charge transfer emission depending on the substituent in the 1,2,3-triazole moiety. Compounds 47a and 47e with moderately electron-donating groups (CH3 and OCH3) or 47b and 47c with electron-withdrawing substituent groups (F and CF3) in the triazole fragment were blue-shifted, in contrast to compounds 47d and 47f with strong electron-withdrawing (-NO2) and electron-donating (-N(CH3)2) substituents, respectively, which showed red-shifted maxima. Compounds 5ad had low fluorescence quantum yields, 5d being almost non-emissive with a ΦF less than 0.01 due to the –NO2 group. However, compound 5f had the highest quantum yield, which increased with the decreasing polarity of the solvent.
Some of these compounds were active in human A2780, HeLa, and A549 cancer cell lines, exhibiting IC50 values in the low micromolar range and low cytotoxicity in healthy CHO cells. Interestingly, compound 47f showed cytoplasmic staining determined by confocal fluorescent microscopy.
The fluorescent probe 51 based on BT was synthesized in a 53% yield by condensing 2ATP with 5-methyl salicylaldehyde in DMF and Na2S2O5 as an oxidant to afford BT 48 in an 80.5% yield, followed by three steps through BT 49 in a 62.5% yield and 50 in a 72% yield (Scheme 6) [111]. The excellent selectivity enabled the detection of Cu2+. The probe exhibited a cyan blue fluorescence emission peak at 487 nm under 360 nm UV excitation with fluorescence quenching after adding Cu2+. The detection limit of Cu2+ of the probe was determined as 3.08 × 10−7 M. According to a Job plot and high-resolution mass spectrometry, the complexation ratio of the probe to Cu2+ was 2:1. An excited intramolecular proton transfer (ESIPT) was confirmed as the sensor mechanism. Under alkaline conditions, the probe showed cyan blue and green fluorescence under acidic conditions. On the other hand, due to the excellent membrane permeability and low cytotoxicity, the probe could detect Cu2+ in water samples and recognize Cu2+ in human breast cancer cells (MCF-7).
2ATPolate, 2ATP-disulfide, or 2ATP-hydrochloride were condensed with the corresponding aldehyde using two methods to afford the series of benzo[b]thienyl and 2,2′-bithienyl-BTs 52ad and 53ad to study the in vitro antitrypanosomal and antiproliferative activities (Figure 8) [112]. Specifically, the amidine group substitutions and the type of thiophene backbone impacted the biological activity. All synthesized BTs were active as both antiproliferative and antitrypanosomal agents.
The 2,2′-bithienyl-BTs with unsubstituted and 2-imidazolinyl amidine showed the most selective antitrypanosomal activity. The 2,2′-bithiophene BTs showed the most selective antiproliferative activity, whereas all 2,2′-bithienyl BTs were selectively active against lung carcinoma. The BT with an unsubstituted amidine group also produced strong antiproliferative effects. The pronounced antiproliferative activity of the BTs was attributed to different cytotoxicity mechanisms. Cell cycle analysis and DNA binding experiments provided evidence that BTs are localized in the cytoplasm and do not interact with DNA.
All amidino-substituted BTs, 52ad and 53ad, were tested in vitro for their antiproliferative activity against human cancer cell lines, including HCT116 and SW620 (colon carcinomas), H460 (lung carcinoma), MCF-7 (breast carcinoma), PC3 (prostate carcinoma) and HeLa (cervical carcinoma), and HEK 293 (human embryonic kidney) cells. The 2,2′-bithiophene-BT 53a displayed very potent and selective activity against H460 cells, with an IC50 value of 0.02 μM, which was twice the magnitude of the IC50 values for the other cancer cells tested. All other 2,2′-bithienyl-BTs, 53b, 53c, and 53d, also showed selective activity against H460 cells, with IC50 values of 0.2 μM, compared with doxorubicin (IC50 = 0.04 ± 0.01).
4NO2-2ATP was condensed with 4-N-substituted benzaldehydes to afford the targeting fluorescent 2-(N,N-dimethyl/diphenyl-aminophenyl)-5-substituted-BTs 54a,b in 73.5% and 69.1% yields, respectively. Then, the nitro group of compounds 54a,b was reduced to the amine derivatives 55a,b (81.3 and 78.8%, respectively) with Pd(OAc)2 in ethanol and reacted with the corresponding aldehyde under stirring in methanol to afford the imines 56a,b in 73.8 and 70.2% yields, respectively (Scheme 7) [113]. The compounds were analyzed for their photophysical properties, absorbance, and fluorescence in different organic solvents. The photophysical properties of BTs 54a,b and 56a,b were strongly impacted by the solvent used. In DMSO, all BTs had higher fluorescence intensities, showing that solvent polarity has a great impact on their excited-state properties. For BT 54a, the λmax values ranged from 337 nm to 389 nm, and BT 54b showed λmax values ranging from 373 nm to 394 nm, with the highest absorption observed in DMSO, whereas BTs 56a and 56b presented λmax values ranging from 387 to 417 nm and 393 nm to 423 nm, respectively. For BT 54a,b, the fluorescence emission maxima ranged from 495 to 522 nm and 512 to 531 nm, respectively, with their highest values observed in ethanol. Conversely, BTs 56a,b displayed emission maxima ranging from 518 to 537 nm and 518 to 571 nm, respectively, with the highest fluorescence observed in DMSO and ethanol, respectively.
All BTs were evaluated for cytotoxicity across anticancer cell lines and inhibition against VEGFR-2 kinase using an anti-phosphotyrosine antibody test. BT 54a showed moderate inhibitory activity with little variability (IC50 = 0.38 ± 0.13 μM). Conjugate 54b had a higher potency, with an IC50 of 0.29 ± 0.16 μM, with lower variability. The BT 56a showed considerable inhibitory activity, with an IC50 of 0.31 ± 0.08 μM, with the lowest variability, whereas BT 56b showed an IC50 value of 0.23 ± 0.20 μM. Compounds 54b and 56b resulted in potent cytotoxic activity against MCF-7 cells (IC50 values of 7.06 ± 0.29 and 8.82 ± 0.37 μM, respectively), whereas compound 56b exhibited the greatest potency in VEGFR-2 inhibition (IC50 of 0.23 ± 0.20 μM). Molecular docking studies indicated BT 54b to have a stronger interaction. An ADME study showed BTs 54b and 56b to have enhanced lipophilicity and decreased solubility, which could influence their pharmacokinetic behavior.
2ATP was condensed with aromatic aldehydes in the presence of the prepared Co/Niacin-MOF as an economic, efficient, sustainable, and green stable catalyst under stirring at 60–70 °C for the appropriate length of time (30–60 min) to afford 2-heteroaryl-BTs 57af in 75–95% yields (Table 20) [73]. All compounds were screened as acetylcholine esterase (AChE) inhibitors. Validation in molecular docking studies showed that BTs 57e and 57f gave good results in binding with acetylcholine esterase. The data from in vitro studies showed that compound 57e had a promising value (59.8% inhibition, IC50 = 5.25 μg/mL) compared with the Alzheimer’s reference drug donepezil (74.89% inhibition, IC50 = 4.19 mg/μL).

2.2. Condensation with Carboxylic Acids and Their Derivatives

In a simple trituration method, 2ATP was condensed with N-protected amino acids using molecular iodine as a mild Lewis acid catalyst to synthesize the 2-substituted BTs 58af in 66–97% yields and 59af in 54–98% yields (Figure 9) [114]. The reaction was carried out in solvent-free conditions for 20–25 min to provide the products with moderate to excellent yields (54–98%).
Graphene oxide (GO) was used as a catalyst in the condensation of 2ATF with α-phenyl glyoxylic acids, and water was used as a solvent; the reaction was conducted at room temperature under heating conditions for 1 h to synthesize the 2-aryl-BTs 60ad (Table 21) [115]. Their neuroprotective effects were assayed in the U87 MG cell line under a H2O2-induced stressed condition and compared with the breast cancer (MCF-7) and macrophage (RAW264.7) cell lines using a cell viability assay. These 2-aryl-BTs enhanced the neuronal cell viability and protected neuronal cells from the ROS-mediated neuronal damage induced by H2O2. Furthermore, these compounds modulated catalase and enhanced the catalase activity by up to 90% during the H2O2 exposure in the U87MG cell line. Molecular modeling studies in the AutoDockTool-1.5.6. Lig Plot + program showed these compounds to have strong binding energies of −7.39, −7.52, −6.5, and −7.1 Kcal/mol, as observed by using the potent analogs 60b and 60c and the catalase enzyme, which indicated the presence of hydrophobic interactions in the catalytic site. Furthermore, a simulation of the ligand and catalase protein performed using DESMOND software showed further strengthened ligand and enzyme interactions. An in silico ADMET study revealed the drug-likeliness of these analogs. The BTs 60b,d had potential catalase-modulating activity comparable with valproic acid as a standard drug. These results indicated the use of an in vivo animal model for possible therapy.
Substituted 2ATPs and substituted α-keto acids were reacted by a decarboxylative cross-coupling reaction under blue LED (λ = 435–445 nm) irradiation without using any photocatalyst or metal at room temperature for 8 h to afford unsubstituted and substituted BTs, 61ap, in moderate to good yields (40–88%) (Table 22) [116]. The reaction was carried out without any photocatalyst or metal. An electron donor–acceptor complex (EDA) formed with α-keto acid, and 2ATP drove the formation of the corresponding BT. The BT 61n had the lowest yield (40%), the 5ClBT 61o had a yield of 61%, and the 2MeBT 61p had a yield of 53%; the 2-phBT 61a had the highest yield (88%) yield. The 2-(oOHPh)BT 61e had a yield of 73%), the 2-(pOMePh)BT 61j a yield of 74%, the 2-(pMePhBT) 61h a yield of 58%, the 2-(pClPh)BT 61m a yield of 77%, the 2-(pFPh)BT 61c a yield of 73%, and the 5Cl,2PhBT 61b a yield of 83%).
The 2PhBT 61a had the higher yield (88%), whereas BT 61n had the lowest yield (40%). Substituents in the para position of the phenyl ring just as the compounds 61c,m with strong deactivating effect (F and Cl) with yields of 73 and 77%, and compounds 61h,j with strong activating effect (OH and OMe) with yields of 73 and 77%, respectively), reflected a decrease compared to unsubstituted 2PhBT 61a. Also, the yields of the BTs with activating groups had lower yields than those of BTs with deactivating groups. The 2-alkyl BTs 61np had the lowest yields (40, 61, and 53%, respectively). The 4-amino substituted α-keto acid (R3 = p-aminoPh) could not be transformed to the BT 61q in the present reaction condition, whereas from α-ketoglutaric acid, the BT 61s was obtained in traces.
A decarboxylative coupling of α-keto acids with 2ATP was carried out in a one-pot reaction using an aqueous suspension of K2CO3 as a base under grinding at room temperature for the appropriate time for the synthesis of the 2-aryl-BTs 62ah (Table 23) [117]. The protocol was carried out with excellent tolerance of functional groups in yields of 95, 97, 93, 95, 92, 98, 95, and 91%. The advantages of this method were short reaction times, a straightforward work-up, and catalyst-free and chromatography-free purification. On comparing BTs 62e (92%) and 62f (98%), it was clear that an electron-withdrawing group at the meta position of the phenyl ring disfavored the yield, whereas electron-donating groups at the para position favored the yield compared with the 2PhBT 62a (95%).
On comparing 3NO2PhBT 62e (92%) with 2PhBT 62a (95%), it was clear that an electron-withdrawing group at the meta position of the phenyl ring disfavored the yield, whereas an electron-donating in 3MePhBT 62g (95%) favored the yield. However, the best electron-donating groups at the para position were in 4MeOPhBT 62f (98%), the yield of which was more highly favored, surprisingly, and with electron-withdrawing groups at this position in 4FPhBT 62b (97%) the yield also increased, maybe due to the resonance effect of the fluor atom in this case.
The Schiff base BTs 63ag were synthesized in two steps: (a) 4-minosalicylic acid and 5-aminosalicylic acid were reacted with 2ATP in polyphosphoric acid to produce the intermediates 2-(2-hydroxyaniline)BT and 2-(3-hydroxyaniline)BT. Finally, (b) these intermediates were treated with a series of trisubstituted aldehydes by stirring a few drops of acetic acid in ethanol at room temperature for 8 h to produce the 63ag BTs in good yields (85–91%) (Figure 10) [118]. These compounds were evaluated for in vitro antibacterial activities on Bacillus sps, S. aureus, K. pneumoniae, and E. Coli strains and antifungal activity on the C. Albicans strain using the ‘micro-broth dilution method’ (MICs in μg/μL). All the compounds displayed very good antibacterial activity for the S. aureus, E. coli, and K. pneumonia strains (MIC = 0.8 μg/mL), compared with ciprofloxacin (2.0 μg/mL), and antifungal activity for C. albicans, compared with fluconazole (16 μg/mL), as standard drugs. Molecular docking studies were performed to understand the binding mechanism. Molecular electrostatic potential (MEP) was used to evaluate the reactivity of the molecules. Antimicrobial activity was correlated with the calculated HOMO–LUMO gap, chemical hardness, and global softness. BT 63e exhibited very good antimicrobial activity, less toxicity, and more chemical reactivity, as confirmed by a smaller HOMO–LUMO gap, a lesser electrophilicity index, a higher global softness, and a lesser chemical hardness. The evaluation of DNA cleavage of 63e against MCF-7 breast cancer cells revealed 85.82% inhibition of cancer cells at 200 μg/μL. In addition, 63e showed less toxicity to normal cells at the concentration required to produce an anticancer effect (IC50 = 973 μg/μL).
2ATP was condensed with the corresponding 2-aryl-1H-benzimidazole-5-carboxylic acid in the presence of polyphosphoric acid (PPA) via heating to 250 °C and 20 bar for 3 min to produce BTs 64ah in moderate yields (40–72%) (Figure 11) [119]. NIH3T3 (ATCC CRL-1658), Caco-2 (ATCC HTB-37), and A549 (ATCC CCL-185) cell lines were used to test the cytotoxic effects of the BTs. All the BTs exhibited low to moderate activity against the tested cancer cell lines. Compound 64e had the most potent activities against A549 and Caco-2 cells, with IC50 values of 73.76 ± 2.54 μM and 73.15 ± 2.84 μM, respectively. This result suggested that the methyl group of the phenyl ring group may affect the antiproliferative activity to a certain extent. Also, BT 64e displayed antiproliferative activity similar to cisplatin against NIH3T3. On the other hand, BT 64c displayed significant potency against A549 and Caco-2 cells, with IC50 values of 98.83 ± 3.71 μM and 77.80 ± 3.19 μM, respectively. In addition, BT 64e showed a similar selectivity to that of cisplatin.
Aliphatic dicarboxylic acids were condensed with 5-amidino-2ATPs in polyphosphoric acid (PPA) at 180 °C to afford a series of symmetric bis-6-amidino-BTs 6471 with aliphatic central units, as previously designed, with 24–71% yields (Figure 12) [120]. The BTs were isolated as methanesulfonates by an additional acid–base reaction because these salts are more stable and soluble in water. All BTs were evaluated for their efficacy against bloodstream forms of the African trypanosome Trypanosoma brucei. Most of the tested compounds were more potent than fexinidazole (2.40 μM), with EC50 values against T. brucei ranging from 0.51 to 5.39 μM. With the exception of BTs 68ac, trypanocidal activity decreased in the following order: unsubstituted amidine > pyrimidine > imidazoline. The aliphatic spacer between the two BTs also influenced the activity. The bis-BTs 70ac with a cyclohexyl unit had the most pronounced impact, and bis-BT 70a, which has an unsubstituted amidino moiety, displayed a remarkable potency (EC50 = 0.51 nM). BTs 71ac, which have conformationally constrained ethenyl spacers, showed better activity than the corresponding conformationally unrestricted ethyl spacers 64ac. All BTs with conformationally unrestricted alkyl chains, with the exception of the most active BT, 68c (n = 6; EC50 = 0.028 ± 0.001 μM), and BTs 6469, with three to eight different lengths (n = 4 (66ac; 0.063, 1.14, 0.19 μM)), were generally optimal. On the other hand, BT 70a showed sub-nanomolar in vitro potency with good selectivity over mammalian cells (>26,000-fold). In all the experiments, mice treated with a dose of 20 mg kg−1 were cured of stage 1 trypanosomiasis. Compound 70a displayed a favorable in vitro ADME profile, except for its low membrane permeability, while 70a was also active at low nanomolar concentrations against cultured asexual forms of the malaria parasite Plasmodium falciparum. On these bases, compound 70a was considered a lead with therapeutic potential.
2ATP was condensed with ethyl oxalate to afford the ethyl 2-carboxylateBT 72, which suffered hydrazinolysis to be transformed to the acid hydrazide 73, the precursor used for the preparation of the hydrazone derivatives 7276 (Scheme 8) [121]. BTs 74a,b were obtained in 87 and 92% yields, respectively, through the interaction of 73 with either 4-chloro or 4-f luorobenzoyl chloride, respectively, in glacial acetic acid. Also, compound 73 was reacted with p-substituted isothiocyanates to afford the respective thiosemicarbazides 75ad in 84–90% yields. The thiosemicarbazides 75ad were refluxed in 2N NaOH to suffer cyclization into their 1,2,4-triazole-3-thiols 76ad in 31–63% yields. Also, compound 73 was reacted with 4-bromo benzenesulfonyl chloride or tosyl chloride in glacial acetic acid to afford the sulfonamides 77a,b in 84 and 78% yields, respectively. Finally, acid hydrazide 73 was used as a precursor for the synthesis of the hydrazones 78ag in 88–93% yields through a reaction with aromatic and heteroaromatic aldehydes. The antitumor activities of the synthesized hydrazone BTs 7376 were evaluated. Also, they were tested in vitro against colorectal carcinoma (HCT-116), hepatocellular carcinoma (HepG2), prostate cancer (PC-3), mammary gland cancer (MCF-7), and epithelioid carcinoma (HeLa). The most active compounds were 78e, 78f, 75b, 76c, and 77b, exhibiting IC50 values comparable to that of lapatinib, the reference drug. The most potent compounds for EGFR inhibitory activity were 78e and 78f, with IC50 values of 24.58 and 30.42 nM, respectively, compared to the standard drug lapatinib (17.38 nM). Molecular modeling studies were conducted, including docking into the EGFR active site and surface mapping for all compounds. The hydrazones 78e and 78f showed superior binding with EGFR, showing them to be excellent candidates for targeted antitumor therapy through EGFR kinase inhibition.
The condensation reaction of 2ATP with acyl chlorides or acid anhydrides was performed in the presence of KF-Al2O3 as a heterogeneous base catalyst under stirring with acetonitrile at room temperature for 30 min to afford 2-substituted BTs 79ak in 87–97% yields (Table 24). The catalyst showed good recyclability [122]. It was observed that electron-withdrawing functionalities gave higher isolated yields (79a,b; 97 and 95%). On the other hand, electron-donating groups (79df; 94, 91, 90%) gave lower isolated yields.
2ATP was condensed with nine pyrrolidinone ester derivatives under microwave irradiation in the presence of a heterogeneous eutectic mixture of (CuCl2 or NiCl2/urea) and Cu- or Ni-doped TiO2 nanoparticles to produce N-aryl pyrrolidinone-BTs 80ai in 83–96 and 78–91% yields, respectively (Figure 13) [123]. Eco-friendliness and short reaction times (5 min) were the advantages of this protocol. All synthesized BTs were screened for their antibacterial activity against Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacterial strains: compounds 80a and 80b were active against E. coli and P. aeruginosa, with an MIC of 12.5 µg/mL. Compounds 80c, 80e, and 80f showed important activity against MRSA and BS, with MIC values ranging from 12.5 µg/mL to 25 µg/mL. Also, compounds 80c and 80f were active against the four tested bacteria strains, with MIC values of 12.5 for EC, 12.5 for PA, 12.5 for BS, and 18.75 μg/mL for MRSA, compared with the antibiotic ciprofloxacin as a standard control.
The p-nitro benzoyl chloride was condensed with 5-methoxy-2ATP in toluene as a dissolvent upon heating for 1 h to afford the BT derivative 81, which was reacted in ethanol with stannous chloride upon heating to 80 °C for 3 h; then, paraformaldehyde dissolved in fresh NaOMe in MeOH solution was mixed and stirred at room temperature for 4 h. After that, sodium boron hydride was added, and the solution was refluxed for 1.5 h to afford BT 82 in a 33% yield. A solution of 82 and ICl in acetic acid was refluxed upon stirring overnight for 10 h to afford BT 83a in a 35% yield, which was cooled to −78 °C and reacted with BBr3 upon stirring at room temperature for 16 h to afford 83b in a 37% yield. The neopentylboronic ester 84a could be quantitatively formed from 83a, but the isolation of 84a without hydrolysis was challenging. Partial and full hydrolysis of 84a during isolation efforts led to unsatisfactory mixtures of 84a alongside boronic acid 85a and protodeborylated compound 82. The synthesis of BT derivatives with [211At]3′-At-PIB-OMe 86a,b was carried out using a Cu-catalyzed astatination protocol via boronic acid precursors 85a,b (Scheme 9) [74]. Compound 86a had a radiochemical yield of 55% and was stable for at least 3 h in phosphate-buffered saline. Studies were carried out to evaluate the binding affinities of 86a and 86b against Aβ(1–40) AD plaques and their in vivo stability, biodistribution, and AD-associated plaque clearance abilities.
A series of substituted 2ATPs were condensed with a variety of aryl/alkyl nitriles under mild reaction conditions (oil bath, 70 °C) using ZnO nanoparticles as a catalyst in solvent-free conditions to produce two series of 2-substituted BTs, 87az and 88ad, in 88–96% yields (Table 25) [124]. This method was compatible with several functional groups and exhibited excellent catalyst recyclability, easy recovery of materials, and high economy; there is no need to purify the products by recrystallization or column chromatography, and it is an environmentally benign process.
Five 2-[3-(aryl)prop-2-enenitrile]BTs 90ae were synthesized in 84–96% (4–8 min) yields by a microwave irradiation method from 2-cyano-methylBT 89 in EtOH/AcOH, obtained in a 92% yield from the condensation of 2ATP and malononitrile under microwave irradiation at 40 °C for 10 min and used as an intermediate in the synthesis of 7-amino-6-(BT-2-yl)-5-(aryl)-2-thioxo-2,3dihydropyrido[2,3-d]pyrimidin-4(1H)-ones 91ae obtained in 84–92% yields (25 min) and 1-amino-2-(aryl)pyrrolo[2,1-b][1,3]BT-3-carbonitrile derivatives 92ae obtained in 78–90% yields (20–25 min) (Scheme 10) [125]. These compounds were tested as antioxidant, antimicrobial, and anticancer agents.
It was found that pyrimidine-BTs 91a,d were more potent against bacteria, with MICs from 4 to 12 μmol L–1, than cefotaxime (MIC = 6–12 μmolL–1); pyrimidine-BTs 91bc,e showed good activity against all the bacterial strains. This high efficacy was attributed to the presence of a BT and thiophene moieties, as in pyrimidine-BT 91a, and to the presence of an electron-withdrawing (fluoro) group in the para position of the phenyl ring attached to the pyridopyrimidine, as in pyrimidine-BT 91d. Pyrimidine-BT 91a had equipotent activity with MICs of 6 and 12 μmol L−1 similar to those of cefotoxime against Bacillus subtilis and Chlamydia pneumonia, respectively, whereas 91e was equipotent (MIC = 8 μmol L−1) with respect to cefatoxime against Salmonella typhi. Pyrrolo-BTs 92ae effectively inhibited the growth of the tested bacteria strains. PyrroloBT 92a was more potent against Staphylococcus aureus and had equipotent efficacy against Bacillus subtilis and Chlamydia pneumonia compared with cefotaxime; this was attributed to the presence of a thiophene moiety. In addition, pyrrolo-BT 92d (MICs from 4 to 10 μmol L–1) had extraordinary activity toward all bacteria due to the presence of a p-fluorophenyl substituent which increased the antibacterial potency compared to the reference drug. Also, pyrrolo-BTs 92b,c,e exhibited good inhibition activity against all bacterial strains. The cytotoxic activity of pyrimidine-BTs 91ad and pyrrolo-BTs 92ad against the colon cancer HCT-116, lung cancer NCI-H460, and liver cancer HepG2 human cell lines was observed and compared with that of doxorubicin as a reference drug. The series of pyrimidine-BTs 91ae exhibited higher cytotoxic activity than the pyrrolo-BTs 92ae. Pyrrolo-BT 91a containing thiophene (IC50s = 0.66, 0.45, and 0.70 μmol L−1), pyrrolo-BT 91d containing p-fluorophenyl (IC50s = 0.28, 0.39, and 0.14 μmol L−1), pyrrolo-BT 92a with thiophenyl (IC50s = 1.10, 0.49 and, 0.89 μmol L−1), and pyrrolo-BT 92d containing p-fluorophenyl (IC50s = 0.45, 0.47, and 0.59 μmol L−1) were found to be more potent and efficacious than doxorubicin as the reference drug (IC50s = 1.98, 0.52, and 1.12 μmol L−1). It was found that the presence of the p-fluorophenyl group improved the antitumor activity more than thiophene. In addition, pyrrolo-BT 91b (IC50s = 2.56, 2.89, and 2.68), and pyrrolo-BT 91e (2.60, 3.00, and 3.08 μmol L−1) exhibited good cytotoxic effects towards the three tumor cell lines. On the other hand, 5-methylfurany 92b (IC50s = 3.90, 4.08, and 4.50 μmol L−1) showed good antitumor activity against all tumor cell lines. Compounds with 5-naphthalenyl side chains in both pyrimidine-BT 91c and pyrrolo-BT 92c showed moderate antitumor activity. From the above structure–activity relationships (SARs), the most selective pyrimidine BT and pyrrolo-BT on the studied cancer cell lines bore p-fluorophenyl and thiophene moieties. Thus, pyrimidine-BTs 91a,d and pyrrolo-BTs 92a,d were considered promising candidates as pharmacophores against cancer cell lines. A series of pyrimidine-BTs 91ae and pyrrolo-BTs 91ae were tested for antioxidant activity, as reflected in the ability to inhibit lipid peroxidation in rat brain and kidney homogenates using (3 ethylbenzthiazoline-6-sulfonicacid) an ABTS free radical scavenging assay. Pyrimidine-BTs 91a,d (91.2 and 92.8% yields, respectively) and pyrrolo-BT 92d (90.4%) showed inhibition levels higher than that of Trolox (89.5%), while pyrrolo-BT 92a (88.7%) showed nearly equipotent inhibition activity.
Scheme 10. Condensation of 2ATP with malononitrile to afford 2-[3-(aryl)prop-2-enenitrile]BTs 90ae as intermediates in synthesizing BT derivatives 91,92ae by the MWI method in % yields.
Scheme 10. Condensation of 2ATP with malononitrile to afford 2-[3-(aryl)prop-2-enenitrile]BTs 90ae as intermediates in synthesizing BT derivatives 91,92ae by the MWI method in % yields.
Ijms 26 05901 sch010
The nano-catalyst aminopropyl-1,3,5-triazine-2,4-diphosphonium tetrachloroferrate immobilized on halloysite nanotubes [(APTDP)(FeCl4)2@HNTs] was prepared to be used as a highly effective agent in the condensation reaction of 2ATP with benzonitriles containing various electron-withdrawing and -donating substituents for the synthesis of several BTs, 93ao, in excellent yields (90–96%). The reaction was performed in the absence of a catalyst under solvent-free conditions at 80 °C within 4–5 h (Table 26) [126]. Additionally, the use of dinitriles such as 1,3-dicyanobenzene and 1,3-phenylenediacetonitrile, using a 1:1 molar ratio, gave the corresponding mono-benzonitrile-BT 93t and mono-methylphenylacetonitrile-BT 93u in 90 and 85% yields, respectively, using a 1:1 molar ratio. Also, bis- and tris-BTs 93vx were smoothly synthesized from dinitrile and trinitrile in those conditions in 78 and 75% yields. The advantages of this protocol were its easy work-up, high purity, high catalytic activity, reusability, and the easy recovery of the catalyst. On the other hand, the competitive condensation of 2ATP with an equimolar mixture of an aromatic nitrile (4-methylbenzonitrile) and an aliphatic nitrile (heptanenitrile) was examined under the same conditions. The results showed that 4-methylbenzonitrile was transformed to the corresponding BT 93j (90%) in the presence of heptanenitrile. This outcome indicated the selectivity performance of the catalyst.

2.3. Condensation with Ketones

2ATP was condensed with several 7-benzylidenebicyclo[3.2.0]hept-2-en-6-ones to afford a series of thirteen 2-[2-(2-phenylethenyl)cyclopent-3-en-1-yl]-BTs, 94am, in 93–98% yields (Figure 14) [127]. The antiproliferative activities of all compounds were tested against C6 (rat brain tumor) and HeLa (human cervical carcinoma) cell lines using BrdU cell proliferation ELISA assays, with the use of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and cisplatin as standard drugs. Compound 94e was the most active against C6 cell lines, with an IC50 = 5.89 μm (5-FU, IC50 = 76.74 μm, and cisplatin, IC50 = 14.46 μm). But compound 94c was the most active against HeLa cell lines, with an IC50 = 3.98 μm (5-FU, IC50 = 46.32 μm, and cisplatin, IC50 = 37.95 μm). On the other hand, computational studies of all compounds using the B3LYP/6-31G+(d,p) level in the gas phase were performed. The calculated results were compatible with the experimental IR and NMR data. Molecular electrostatic potential (MEP) maps allowed the identification of the region in 94c that is biologically active against HeLa and that in compound 94e which is active against C6. Molecular docking analysis was used to determine the biological activities of these molecules. The appropriate target proteins (PDB codes: 1JQH for the C6 cells and 1M17 for the HeLa cells) were used for 94c and 94e, demonstrating high antiproliferative activity against both cell lines. These compounds were proposed as promising candidates for anticancer drugs.

2.4. Miscellaneous Condensations

2ATP and both electron-rich and electron-poor substituted styrenes were condensed in a one-pot methodology for the synthesis of the pharmacologically active 2-arylBTs 95af in 30–66% yields (Table 27). The reaction was carried out with Pd(OAc)2 in AcOH as a solvent and heating at 90 °C for 12 h in the presence of O2. The process involved sequential C-C/C-N bond cleavage followed by C-N/C-S bond formation [128]. To further the scope of the reaction, 2ATP was reacted with styrene under standard conditions. However, no desired product was obtained, and the starting materials were isolated.
2ATP disulfide was reacted with terminal alkynes under aerobic oxidative C(sp)–S coupling in a visible-light-driven copper-catalyzed reaction (Table 28) [129]. The photochemical reaction was achieved using a wide range of thiol dimers and alkynes with good chemoselectivity and excellent conversion. The utility of alkynyl sulfide formations as isolated intermediates (35–92%) was demonstrated in the construction of the 2-phenylBTs 96an in 55–79% yields via “thia-Wolff rearrangement” in the presence of AgNO3, using visible light with 9-mesityl-10-methylacridinium ions (Acr+–Mes) as a photoredox catalyst system. BTs with electron-donating groups on the benzene ring increased the yield, while BTs 96bd and BTs with electron-withdrawing groups at the ortho (96f), meta (96k), or para (96e,g,h) positions decreased the yields compared with the 2PhBT 96a. The BT with a pyridinyl ring instead of a benzene ring in 96l (59%) decreased the yield. Curiously, napthalenyl and phenanthrenyl groups, instead of the phenyl ring, resulted in high yields of 96m,n. This reaction failed with aliphatic terminal alkynes.
In a metal-free and environmentally friendly approach, 2ATP was condensed with methyl arenes under visible-light irradiation using eosin Y as a photocatalyst, ethanol–water (1:2) as a green solvent at room temperature, and atmospheric air as an oxidant to synthesize the biologically important BTs 97aq (Table 29) [130]. This methodology demonstrated a broad substrate scope, yielding the desired products in good to excellent yields (83–92%). The advantages of this procedure included its environmental friendliness, low cost, non-toxicity, green solvent, ease of handling, and use of visible light as a renewable energy source. All the BTs were obtained in good yields when the substituent was in the meta and ortho positions (97bh,j; 85–92%). When the methyl arene had F, Cl, and Br (97bd; 91, 90, and 90%, respectively) and OMe (97j, 86%) in the p-position, the yield obtained with electron-withdrawing groups was higher than that obtained with electron-donating groups. Additionally, methyl arene with multiple substituents yielded 85% (97i). The use of heteroaromatic methyl arenes (97nq,v,w) afforded BTs with good yields (83–84%).
2ATP was condensed by an oxidative coupling with substituted aryl methyl amines in the presence of a Ba-doped CoMoO4 system as a catalyst to synthesize several 2-aryl BTs 98ak under visible-light irradiation (Table 30) [131]. The reaction was carried out under atmospheric air and had good to excellent yields (78–98%). The advantages of this protocol were its atom economy, functional group tolerance, a wide range of substrate scopes, and suitability for scale-up reusability. Aryl methyl amines with an OMe as an electron-donating group at the para position of the benzene ring favored the yield, as in 98b, but an iPr group (98d) decreased the yield due to steric effects. On the other hand, electron-withdrawing groups, such as Cl or F (98h and 981), decreased the yield, compared with 2PhBT 98a. The aryl methyl amines with electron-donating or electron-withdrawing substituents at the para position, BTs 98b,d,h,i, were obtained with good to excellent yields. Electron-donating or electron-withdrawing substituents at the ortho position of the benzene ring decreased the yields (98e,j), but electron-withdrawing substituents decreased the yields more. The OPh group at the meta opposition of the phenyl ring produced only a little decrease (98f).
The condensation of 2ATP with aromatic primary alcohols via the acceptorless dehydrogenative coupling (ADC) method was carried out in the presence of Pd(II)N^N^S as a pincer-type catalyst for the synthesis of the pharmaceutically important BT derivatives 98au (Table 31) [132]. Several primary aromatic alcohols, such as electron-releasing and -withdrawing alcohols, sterically hindered alcohols, heterocyclic alcohols, polycyclic alcohols, and aliphatic alcohols, were coupled with 2ATP. p-substituted benzyl alcohols, including electron-donating 4-methyl and 4-isopropyl benzyl alcohol, were coupled with 2ATP to afford the corresponding BTs 99a,b in 90 and 86% yields, respectively. Interestingly, alcohols containing electron-poor groups, such as 3-fluro, 4-choloro, and 4-nitro benzyl alcohols, were well-tolerated to obtain BTs 99gi in 69, 72, and 53% yields, respectively. Benzylic alcohols with sterically hindered 2-substituted alcohols, such as 2-Br, 2,5-Cl2, 2-amino, and 2-NO2-benzyl alcohols, gave BTs 99jm with 58, 63, 71, and 47% yields, respectively. Next, benzyl alcohols containing electron-rich groups like 2,3-dimethoxy and 2,5-substituted groups were reacted to afford BTs 99n,o in 74 and 71% yields, respectively. Reactions with heteroaromatic benzyl alcohols such as 2-pyridine methanol, piperonyl alcohol, and thiophene-2-methanol proceeded smoothly to furnish BTs 99pr in 69, 73, and 72% yields, respectively. Interestingly, the reaction of cinnamyl alcohol and polycyclic alcohols, such as 4-biphenyl benzyl acohol, 1-naphthalene methanol, and pyrene 2-methanol, afforded the corresponding BTs 99sv in 66, 79, 75, and 56% yields, respectively. The use of aliphatic alcohols such as propan-1-ol, 2-methylpropan-1-ol, and hexan-1-ol gave the BTs 99wy in 52, 53, and 48% yields, respectively. To understand the electronic effect, an intermolecular competitive experiment involving 4-methyl benzyl alcohol and 4-chloro benzyl alcohol was carried out under the same reaction conditions. It was found that the electron-rich benzyl alcohol is more reactive to give BT 99b with a 53% yield than the electron-deficient benzyl alcohol to give BT 99h with a 32% yield.
The BTs were synthesized via C−S and C−N bond formations, yielding up to 93%. This method was sustainable, with excellent yields, 1 mol% catalyst loading, inexpensive primary alcohol, and only water and hydrogen gas as by-products. A mechanism was proposed via in situ aldehyde formation and dehydrogenation of primary alcohols. The utility of this catalytic procedure was illustrated by the large-scale synthesis of the 2-(4-methoxyphenyl)benzo[d]thiazole 99a.
The treatment of the respective substituted (2-isocyano-phenyl)(alkyl)sulfanes, derived from 2ATP, with a series of diarylphosphine oxides under irradiation with 23W white LED light for 13 h at room temperature in an air atmosphere, using the photocatalyst Rose Bengal and DMF as a solvent, gave the 2-phosphorylBTs 100al in 65–89% yields (Figure 15) [133]. On the other hand, electron-poor and electron-rich substituents on the benzene ring in the 2-isocyanoaryl thioethers produced the substituted 2-phosphorylBTs 100mt in 64–88% yields.
Several H-phosphorus oxides were well-tolerated, regardless of whether the ring of diarylphosphine oxides was substituted with either electron-deficient, electron-rich, or steric-hindered groups; the reactions proceeded to afford BTs 100ai in medium to good yields (65–87%). Additionally, dimethyl-substituted H-phosphorus oxide was used to give BT 100j in a moderate yield (58%). The same procedure was used with piperonyl and naphthyl phosphine oxide derivatives, affording the BTs 100k,l (79 and 81% yields, respectively). On the other hand, functional groups with electron-rich (OMe and Me) and electron-poor (F, Cl, Br, and –SO2Me) substituents on the BT ring were also tolerated to afford BTs 100mt in good yields (64–88%).
A metal-free radical cascade cyclization of substituted 2-isocyanophenyl-methyl-sulfanes with 5.0 mL of the corresponding primary or secondary alcohol in the presence of the radical initiator di-tert-butyl-peroxide (DTBP) was refluxed for 6 h at 120 °C (Figure 16) [134]. The desired 2-hydroxyalkylBTs 101ai and 102av were obtained in yields ranging from 34 to 92%. The advantages of this reaction were its mild reaction conditions, its being a metal-free reaction, the good functional group tolerance, and the broad substrate scope.
This cascade cyclization reaction of 2-isocyanoaryl thioethers proceeded smoothly with alcohols such as isopropanol, ethanol, and 2-butyl alcohol to give the desired BTs 101a,c,f in good yields (68.92%). Other alcohols such as methanol, n-propanol, n-butyl alcohol, cyclopentanol, and cyclohexanol afforded BTs 101b,d,e,g,h with moderate yields (51–68%). Additionally, the benzyl alcohol gave BT 101i in a 34% yield. On the other hand, several 5-substituted 2-isocyanoaryl thioethers reacted well with isopropanol to yield BTs 102ag in 57–91% yields. It was found that substituents at the C5 position of 2-isocyanoaryl thioethers had little effect on the reaction. Other substituents such as phenyl, 4-chlorophenyl, 4-methylphenyl, naphthalen-2-yl, and phenanthren-9-yl also proceeded smoothly to synthesize BTs 102hj and 102r,s in good yields (53–86% yields). Substituents at the C5 position were also well-tolerated to afford BTs 102km in 76–82% yields. C4 substituents were also tolerated to afford BT 102o in a 73% yield. Moreover, it was found that heteroaryl substituents also gave BTs 102tv in 64–84% yields. 3-chloro, 4,6-dichloro, and 5,6-dimethyl substituents also reacted with isopropanol to give BTs 102p,q in 68 and 84% yields, respectively.
2-Isocyanoaryl thioethers derived from 2ATPs were cyclized with ethers in an oxidant-free and metal-free visible-light-induced reaction to access the ether-functionalized BTs 103av (Figure 17) [135]. The cyclization reaction was carried out with 1,2,3,5-tetrakis-(carbazol-9-yl)-4,6-dicyanobenzene (4CzIPN) as a photocatalyst and the irradiation of blue LED light in a nitrogen atmosphere in mild reaction conditions, and the procedure was characterized by operational simplicity. This strategy provides an efficient approach to access various ether-containing BTs in acceptable to good yields.
Both electron-rich groups (−Me and −OMe) and electron-poor groups (−F, −Cl, and −Br) were well-tolerated in the reactions and smoothly afforded BTs 103ak in moderate to good yields (42–70 %). Notably, the Br substituent at both the 4- and 5-positions of the phenyl rings gave BTs 103e,g,l in relatively low yields (64, 43, and 47% yields, respectively). Moreover, this methodology was extended to 1,3-dioxolane and several substituted isocyanides to afford BTs 103m/m′-p/p′ in 65 (2:1), 61 (2:1), 57 (3:1), and 60% (2:1) yields, respectively. It was observed that the BTs showed a preference for C2 selectivity over the C4 position. The synthesized compounds combine BT with an ether functional group representing key structural motifs of various biologically active molecules of interest in medicinal chemistry.
A photo-induced cascade sulfone alkylation/cyclization of 2-isocyanoaryl thioethers and α-iodosulfones was carried out to afford alkyl/benzyl-sulphonyl BTs in up to 97% yields 104azf (Figure 18) [136]. This visible-light-triggered reaction not only occurs under extremely mild reaction conditions but also does not require the presence of a photosensitizer. The photocatalytic process is triggered by the photochemical activity of in situ-generated electron donor–acceptor complexes arising from the association of 2-isocyanoaryl thioethers and α-iodosulfones. The radical pathway was confirmed by UV–vis spectroscopy, radical trapping, a Job plot, and on/off irradiation experiments.
A visible-light-induced radical addition/cyclization cascade reaction of 2-isocyanoaryl thioethers was achieved under metal-free and mild conditions (Table 32) [137]. This method utilizes hydrazines as radical precursors and efficiently accesses a series of 2-aryl and 2-alkyl BTs, 105ar and 106ak, in good yields (71–83% and 70–81%).
In the reaction of 2-isocyanoaryl thioethers, the groups on the benzene ring, electron-donating (Me and MeO) and electron-withdrawing groups (halogens, CF3, CN, and NO2), were compatible with the process to afford BTs 105bk in good yields (71–83% yields). No influence of the position of the substituents was observed on the yields. In addition, the disubstituted substrate reacted well to afford BT 105l in a 79% yield. Instead of aryl rings, β-naphthyl-, 4-pyridyl-, and 2-furanyl-substituted hydrazines were used in this method to afford BTs 105mo in 74–80% yields. It is worth mentioning that benzylhydrazine, isopropylhydrazine, and cyclopropylhydrazine could furnish BTs 105pr in good yields (70–75%) when a series of substituted (2-isocyanophenyl)(methyl)sulfanes were used. In general, substrates bearing electron-rich (Me, Et, and MeO) or electron-deficient groups (halogens, CF3, and CN) were tolerable and afforded BTs 106aj in good yields (71–82% yields). When a disubstituted substrate was used, BT 106k was formed in a 73% yield.
The 2-guanidinoBT 107, obtained from condensation of 2ATP with cyanoguanidine, was used for the development of a range of synthetic methods with various reagents, such as α,β-unsaturated carbonyl, 2-cyano-three-(dimethylamino)-N-acrylamide, β-diketones, β-keto esters, and (S,S)-ketene dithioacetals, to afford pyrimidine-based BTs 108115 in 66–72% yields as novel anticancer agents (Scheme 11) [138].
The docking analysis revealed that the most active BTs, 7b, 7c, 13b, 13c, 15c, 17d, 18, and 24, fit inside the active site within the protein tyrosine kinase (PTK). It was observed that these compounds formed a hydrogen donor bond with Met318, except for 15c. Among these compounds, BTs 15c, 17d, 18, and 24 resulted in binding energies closer to that of the cocrystallized ligand 1N1, with values of −7.729, −7.321, −7.681, and −7.5790 kcal mol−1, respectively. Compound 13c had a binding energy of −6.963 kcal mol−1, but it had four more interactions with the active site, including one arene–H interaction with Leu248 and three H-bond donors with Met318 and Thr319. Furthermore, the in silico studies and ADMET properties of the most potent BTs suggested them as promising candidates for further development, with favorable bioavailability and pharmacokinetic profiles. In vitro cytotoxicity studies were carried out against HepG2, HCT116, and MCF7 human tumor cell lines at a concentration 100 μmol mL−1 using the standard 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) bioassay. BTs 108c, 109b, 111d, and 112 showed strong efficacy against the HepG2 cell line, exhibiting cell viability percentages of 61.29, 68.18, 61.04, and 66.85, respectively, compared with the standard drug (64.41%). BTs 108b, 109a, 110c, and 111b exhibited moderate activities against the same cell line, with cell viabilities of 72.70, 72.35, 72.69, and 76.02%. In addition, BTs 108b, 109c, and 110c showed slightly strong efficacy against the HCT116 cell line, with viabilities of 70.62, 67.11, and 65.68%, respectively, in contrast to the standard drug with a cell viability percentage of 55.96. Furthermore, the singular BT 24 exhibited efficacy against the MCF7 cell line, with a cell viability of 69.98%, compared with the standard drug (62.76%). From the IC50 results, it was found that the pyrimidine-based BT 111d (IC50 = 0.41 ± 0.01 μmol mL−1) was the most potent of the tested BTs against HepG2. Also, BT 112 (IC50 = 0.53 ± 0.05 μmol mL−1) was the second most potent compound against HepG2, followed by compound 109b (IC50 of 0.56 ± 0.03 μmol mL−1). Notably, BTs 111d, 112, and 109b showed higher potency, based on their IC50 data, compared with 5-fluorouracil (IC50 of 1.03 μmol mL−1) as the reference drug. Surprisingly, BT 110c (IC50 of 0.02 ± 0.001 μmol mL−1) showed higher efficacy against HCT116 compared with 5-fluorouracil (IC50 of 9 ± 1.7 μmol mL−1). BT 110c not only showed heightened potency related to 5-fluorouracil but also showed notable efficacy together with BTs 108b and 109c (IC50 values of 2.95 ± 0.26 and 1.033 ± 0.06, respectively). In addition, BT 115 showed an IC50 value of 1.485 ± 0.15 μmol mL−1, lower than that of the 5-fluorouracil (IC50 of 7.12 μmol mL−1), against MCF7. These results suggest that the investigated BTs exhibit potential as anticancer agents. The findings revealed that the inclusion of halogen groups, such as F and Cl, on the aryl group bonded with pyrimidine-based BTs 108a–d resulted in an increase in their activity. In addition, the incorporation of CO2Et, as in 110c, enhanced the potency in comparison to its analogs, 110a,b, containing COCH3 and COPh, respectively. In the context of pyrimidine-based BTs 111a–d, the presence of a OMe group amplifies the compound’s potency more significantly than those possessing halogen substituents. Notably, BTs containing SCH3 exhibited the lowest activity levels across the three tested cell lines.

3. Conclusions

In this investigation, we found that BT derivatives are compounds that have currently boomed in the last five years. In this period, at least 21 review articles appeared in the literature, and about 53 articles were found to be related to the condensation reaction of 2ATPs for the synthesis of this kind of compounds, studied for their biological activity, most of them as anticancer agents. In addition, we found that medicinal chemists also explore BT derivatives in searching for anti-Parkinson’s and anti-Alzheimer’s candidates. In some articles, the structure–activity relationships providing a framework for drug discovery and design were discussed. On the other hand, BT derivatives were explored as molecular entities endowed with two or more biological actions, called multifunctional drugs.
The most popular method to synthesize 2-substituted BTs was found to be the condensation of 2ATPs with carbonyl compounds such as aldehydes and carboxylic acids and their derivatives. The majority of these approaches have several drawbacks, such as harsh reaction conditions, high reaction temperatures, multistep processes, the need for an excessive amount of reagents, prolonged reaction times, and the employment of expensive, air-sensitive catalysts, among others. One of the main protocols for preparing BTs documented in the literature is the use of polyphosphoric acid (PPA). This popular method requires heating to high temperatures (110–220 °C) and long reaction times (1–24 h). These harsh conditions depend on the starting material’s stability, which limits the generalization of this condensation. Therefore, as an alternative to PPA, other catalyst-dehydrating agents have been designed to be used in this condensation, such as P2O5/MeSO3H, trimethylsilyl polyphosphate ester (PPSE), triphenylphosphine (PPh3), tetrabutylammonium bromide (TBAB), Samarium (III) triflate, molecular iodine, N-methyl-2-pyrrolidone (NMP), AlMe3, KF/Al2O3, CuCl2/K2CO3, o-benzene disulfonimide, acetic acid, pyridine, glycerol, DMSO, DMF, etc. These acids were effective for a wide range of aliphatic and aromatic carboxylic acids and derivatives to afford BTs in less exacting conditions and shorter reaction times. However, there is still a need to create a straightforward, mild, highly efficient, and environmentally benign method for the synthesis of BTs without the use of hazardous chemicals or reagents. Sometimes such condensation reactions have been carried out via direct heating or refluxing in solvents from high to low boiling points, improving yields. Due to their low production costs and simplicity of usage, applications of solvent-free synthetic methods to synthesize pharmacologically relevant BT derivatives have grown in favor. In this sense, the use of ionic liquids (ILs) as green solvents in these condensation reactions has gained considerably in importance due to their solvating ability, negligible vapor pressure, and easy recyclability. In addition, they have been shown to promote and catalyze these transformations due to their high polarity. ILs can also be recovered and recycled many times with marginal loss. The use of ILs such as 1-Butil-3-metil imidazolium [BMIM][BF4] or [BMIM][PF6] in this type of condensation reaction has been found to increase yields. Another method involving condensation uses microwave irradiation (MI). This method is carried out in short reaction times (5 to 60 min) with good to excellent yields (70–90%). As can be seen in the Table 33, recently, novel catalyst systems have been developed, such as homogeneous and heterogeneous catalysts, nano-catalysts, biocatalysts, photocatalysts, and combinations of these. Several examples of these systems have been proved to be excellent catalysts that reduce reaction times and increase yields with very good to excellent results (80–99%). Additionally, these methods are mild procedures, environmentally benign with good recyclability of the catalysts, and effective for a wide range of aliphatic and aromatic carbonyl compounds.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.C., M.C.R.-H. and I.I.P.-M.; methodology, I.I.P.-M.; formal analysis, A.C. and M.C.R.-H.; investigation, E.V.G.-B. and J.E.M.-W.; resources, A.C., I.I.P.-M. and E.V.G.-B.; writing—original draft preparation, A.C. and J.E.M.-W.; writing—review: A.C. and I.I.P.-M.; editing, E.V.G.-B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The authors acknowledge the economic support given by the Secretaría de Investigación y Posgrado del Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Grant Numbers: I.I.P.-M. (20250238), A.C. (20250182), and E.V.G.-B. (20250681).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
BTsBenzothiazoles
2ATPs2-aminothiophenoles

References

  1. Le Bozec, L.; Moody, C.J. Naturally Occurring Nitrogen–Sulfur Compounds The Benzothiazole Alkaloids. J. Aust. J. Chem. 2009, 62, 639–647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. McElroy, W.D. The Energy Source for Bioluminescence in an Isolated System. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1947, 33, 342–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. White, E.H.; McCapra, F.; Field, G.F. The Structure and Synthesis of Firefly Luciferin. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1963, 85, 337–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Cricchio, R.; Antonini, P.; Sartori, G. Thiazorifamycins III. Biosynthesis of Rifamycins P, Q and Verde, Novel Metabolites from a mutant of Nocardia Mediterranea. J. Antibiot. 1980, 33, 842–846. [Google Scholar]
  5. Hosokawa, N.; Naganawa, H.; Hamada, M.; Iinuma, H.; Takeuchi, T.; Tsuchiya, K.S.; Hori, M. New Triene-ansamycins, Thiazinotrienomycins F and G and a Diene-ansamycin, Benzoxazomycin. J. Antibiot. 2000, 53, 886–894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Gunawardana, G.P.; Kohmoto, S.; Gunasekera, S.P.; McConnell, O.J.; Koehn, F.E. Dercitine, a new biologically active acridine alkaloid from a deep water marine sponge, Dercitus sp. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1988, 110, 4856–4858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Gunawardana, G.P.; Kohmoto, S.; Burres, N.S. New cytotoxic acridine alkaloids from two deep water marine sponges of the family Pachastrellidae. Tetrahedron Lett. 1989, 30, 4359–4362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Harriet, M.B.; Bret, F.; Paul, B. Riluzole. A review of its pharmacodynamics and Pharmacokinetic Properties and Therapeutic Potential in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis. Drugs 1996, 52, 549–563. [Google Scholar]
  9. Pittenger, C.; Coric, V.; Banasr, M.; Bloch, M.; Krystal, J.H.; Sanacora, G. Rluzole in the Treatment of Mood and Anxiety Disorders. CNS Drugs 2008, 22, 761–786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Dunlop, J.; McIlvain, H.B.; She, Y.; Howland, D.S. Impaired Spinal Cord Glutamate Transport Capacity and Reduced Sensitivity to Riluzole in a Transgenic Superoxide Dismutase Mutant Rat Model of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis. J. Neurosci. 2003, 23, 1688–1696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Borthwick, A.D.; Davies, D.E.; Ertl, P.F.; Exall, A.M.; Haley, T.M.; Hart, G.J.; Jackson, D.L.; Parry, N.R.; Patikis, A.; Trivedi, N.; et al. Design and synthesis of pyrrolidine-5,5’-trans-lactams (5-oxo-hexahydropyrrolo[3,2-b] pyrroles) as novel mechanism-based inhibitors of human cytomegalovirus protease. 4. Antiviral activity and plasma stability. J. Med. Chem. 2003, 46, 4428–4449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Akhtar, T.; Hameed, S.; Al-Masoudi, N.A.; Loddo, R.; La Colla, P. In vitro antitumor and antiviral activities of new benzothiazoles and 1,3,4-oxadiazole-2-tione derivatives. Acta Pharm. 2008, 58, 135–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Ke, S.; Wei, Y.; Ziwen, Y.; Wang, K.; Liang, Y.; Shi, L. Novel cycloalkylthiophene–imine derivatives bearing benzothiazole scaffold: Synthesis, characterization and antiviral activity evaluation. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2013, 23, 5131–5134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Haydon, D.J.; Stokes, N.R.; Ure, R.; Galbraith, G.; Bennett, J.M.; Brown, D.R.; Baker, P.J.; Barynin, V.V.; Rice, D.W.; Sedelnikova, S.E.; et al. An inhibitor of FtsZ with potent and selective anti-staphylococcal activity. Science 2008, 321, 1673–1675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Saeed, A.; Rafique, H.; Hameed, A.; Rasheed, S. Synthesis and antibacterial activity of some new 1-aroyl-3-(substituted-2-benzothiazolyl)thio-ureas. Pharm. Chem. J. 2008, 42, 191–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Haydon, D.J.; Bennett, J.M.; Brown, D.; Collins, I.; Galbraith, G.; Lancett, P.; Macdonald, R.; Stokes, N.R.; Chauhan, P.K.; Sutariya, J.K.; et al. Creating an antibacterial with in vivo efficacy: Synthesis and characterization of potent inhibitors of the bacterial cell division protein FtsZ with improved pharmaceutical properties. J. Med. Chem. 2010, 53, 3927–3936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Scheich, C.; Puetter, V.; Schade, M. Novel small molecule inhibitors of MDR mycobacterium tuberculosis by NMR fragment screening of antigen 85C. J. Med. Chem. 2010, 53, 8362–8367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Singh, M.K.; Tilak, R.; Nath, G.; Awasthi, S.K.; Agarwal, A. Design, synthesis and antimicrobial activity of novel benzothiazole analogs. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2013, 63, 635–644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Singh, M.; Gangwar, M.; Nath, G.; Singh, S.K. Synthesis, DNA cleavage and antimicrobial activity of 4-thiazolidinones-benzothiazole conjugates. Indian J. Exp. Biol. 2014, 52, 1062–1070. [Google Scholar]
  20. Mittal, S.; Samota, M.K.; Kaur, J.; Seth, G. Synthesis, spectral, and antifungal evaluation of phosphorylated and thiophosphorylated benzothiazole derivatives. Phosphorus Sulfur Silicon Relat. Elem. 2007, 182, 2105–2113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Huang, W.; Yang, G.-F. Microwave-assisted, one-pot syntheses and fungicidal activity of polyfluorinated 2-benzylthiobenzothiazoles. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2006, 14, 8280–8285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Yevich, J.P.; Temple, D.L.; Covington, R.R.; Owens, D.A.; Seidehamel, R.J.; Dungan, K.W. Antiallergics: 3-(1H-Tetrazol-5-yl)-4H-pyrimido[2,1-b]benzo-thiazol-4-ones. J. Med. Chem. 1982, 25, 864–868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Musser, J.H.; Brown, R.E.; Love, B.; Baily, K.; Jones, H.; Kahen, R. Synthesis of 2-(2,3-dihydro-2-oxo-1,3,4-oxadiazol-5-yl) benzo heterocycles. A novel series of orally active antiallergic agents. J. Med. Chem. 1984, 27, 121–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Ager, I.R.; Barnes, A.C.; Danswan, G.W.; Hairsine, P.W.; Kay, D.P.; Kennewell, P.D.; Matharu, S.S.; Miller, P.; Robson, P. Synthesis and oral antiallergic activity of carboxylic acids derived from imidazo[2,1-c]-[1,4]benzoxazines, imidazo[1,2-a]quinolines, imidazo[1,2-a]quinoxalines, imidazo[1,2-a]quinoxalinones, pyrrolo[1,2-a]quinoxalinones, pyrrolo[2,3-a]quinoxalinones, and imidazo[2,1-b]benzothiazoles. J. Med. Chem. 1988, 31, 1098–1115. [Google Scholar]
  25. Pattan, S.R.; Suresh, C.; Pujar, V.D.; Reddy, V.V.K.; Rasal, V.P.; Kotti, B.C. Synthesis and antidiabetic activity of 2-amino [5’(4-sulphonylbenzylidine)-2,4-thiazolidinedione]-7-chloro-6-fluorobenzothiazole. Indian J. Chem. 2005, 44, 2404–2408. [Google Scholar]
  26. Moreno-Díaz, H.; Villalobos-Molina, R.; Ortiz-Andrade, R.; Díaz-Coutiño, D.; Medina-Franco, J.L.; Webster, S.P.; Binnie, M.; Estrada-Soto, S.; Ibarra-Barajas, M.; León-Rivera, I.; et al. Antidiabetic activity of N-(6-substituted-1,3-benzothiazol-2-yl)benzenesulfonamides. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2008, 18, 2871–2877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Mariappan, G.; Prabhat, P.; Sutharson, L.; Banerjee, J.; Patangia, U.; Nath, S. Synthesis and antidiabetic evaluation of benzothiazole derivatives. J. Korean Chem. Soc. 2012, 56, 251–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Yan, Y.; Xie, X.; Zhu, N.; Liu, G. Benzothiazoles exhibit broad-spectrum antitumor activity: Their potency structure-activity and structure-metabolism relationships. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2014, 76, 67–78. [Google Scholar]
  29. Gabr, M.T.; El-Gohary, N.S.; El-Bendary, E.R.; El-Kerdawy, M.M. Synthesis and in vitro antitumor activity of new series of benzothiazole and pyrimido[2,1-b]benzothiazole derivatives. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2014, 85, 576–592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Gabr, M.T.; El-Gohary, N.S.; El-Bendary, E.R.; El-Kerdawy, M.M. New series of benzothiazole and pyrimido[2,1-b]benzothiazole derivatives: Synthesis, antitumor activity, EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitory activity and molecular modeling studies. Med. Chem. Res. 2015, 24, 860–878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Yurttas, L.; Tay, F.; Demirayak, S. Synthesis and antitumor activity evaluation of new 2-(4-aminophenyl)benzothiazole derivatives bearing different heterocyclic ring. J. Enzym. Inhib. Med. Chem. 2015, 30, 458–465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Paramashivappa, R.; Kumar, P.P.; Rao, S.P.V.; Rao, S. Design, synthesis and biological evaluation of benzimidazole/benzothiazole and benzoxazole derivatives as cyclooxygenase inhibitors. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2003, 13, 657–660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Deshmukh, V.K.; Raviprasad, P.; Kulkarni, P.A.; Kuberkar, S.V. Design, synthesis and biological activities of novel 4H-pyrimido [2, 1-b] [1,3] benzothiazole derivatives. Int. J. Chem. Tech. Res. 2011, 3, 136–142. [Google Scholar]
  34. Munirajasekhar, D.; Himaja, M.; Sunil, V.M. Synthesis and anthelmintic activity of 2-amino-6-substituted benzothiazoles. Int. Res. J. Pharm. 2011, 2, 114–117. [Google Scholar]
  35. Suresh, C.H.; Rao, J.V.; Jayaveera, K.N.; Subudhi, S.K. Synthesis and anthelmintic activity of 3-(2-hydrazinobenzothiazoles)-substituted indole-2-one. Int. Res. J. Pharm. 2011, 2, 257–261. [Google Scholar]
  36. Balaji, P.N.; Ranganayakulu, D.; Yadav, K.R.; Jayamma, J.; Kumar, S.; Sivaramaiah, C. Anthelmintic and anti-microbial activities of synthesized heterocyclic pyrazole and its derivatives from fluoro substituted hydrazino benzothiazole. Int. J. Pharm. Tech. Res. 2014, 6, 1970–1975. [Google Scholar]
  37. Reddy, D.R.S.; Raparla, L.P.; Pradeep, K.; Ahmed, S.M.; Sindhura, J. Synthesis, analytical characterization, antimicrobial, anti-oxidant and anti-convulsant evaluation of some novel 6-fluorobenzothiazole substituted pyrazole analogues. Int. J. Pharm. Chem. 2013, 3, 72–81. [Google Scholar]
  38. Joseph, J.; Janaki, G.B. Synthesis, structural characterization and biological studies of copper complexes with 2-aminobenzothiazole derivatives. J. Mater. Environ. Sci. 2014, 5, 693–704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Fen, R.; Christian, S. Antioxidant potential of novel 2-(4-amino-2-arylaminothiazol-5-oyl) benzothiazoles. Int. J. Pharm. Bio. Sci. 2014, 5, 74–79. [Google Scholar]
  40. Yadav, A.G.; Patil, V.N.; Asrondkar, A.L.; Naik, A.A.; Ansulkar, P.V.; Bobade, A.S.; Chowdhary, A.S. Anti-oxidant and anti-microbial activities of pyrazolyl-benzothiazole derivatives using Vilsmeier-Haack reaction. Rayazan J. Chem. 2012, 5, 117–120. [Google Scholar]
  41. Nessim, M.I.; Ahmed, M.H.M.; Ali, A.M.B.; Salem, A.A.; Attia, S.K. The effect of some benzothiazole derivatives as antioxidants for base stock. Int. J. Curr. Res. 2013, 5, 111–1113. [Google Scholar]
  42. Choudhary, S.; Kini, S.G.; Mubeen, M. Antioxidant activity of novel coumarin substituted benzothiazole derivatives. Der. Pharm. Chem. 2013, 5, 213–222. [Google Scholar]
  43. Aldinger, C.E.; Dee, M.F.; Siegel, T.W.; Singleton, D.H. Novel, potent aldose reductase inhibitors: 3,4-Dihydro-4-oxo-3-[[5-(trifluoromethyl)-2-benzothiazolyl]methyl]-1-phthalazineacetic acid (zopolrestat) and congeners. J. Med. Chem. 1991, 34, 108–122. [Google Scholar]
  44. Mortimer, C.G.; Wells, G.; Crochard, J.P.; Stone, E.L.; Bradshaw, T.D.; Stevens, M.F.G.; Westwell, A.D. Antitumor Benzothiazoles. 26. 2-(3,4-Dimethoxyphenyl)-5-fluorobenzothiazole (GW 610, NSC 721648), a Simple Fluorinated 2-Arylbenzothiazole, Shows Potent and Selective Inhibitory Activity against Lung, Colon, and Breast Cancer Cell Lines. J. Med. Chem. 2006, 49, 179–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Aiello, S.; Wells, G.; Stone, E.L.; Kadri, H.; Bazzi, R.; Bell, D.R.; Stevens, M.F.G.; Matthews, C.S.; Bradshaw, T.D.; Westwell, A.D. Synthesis and Biological Properties of Benzothiazole, Benzoxazole, and Chromen-4-one Analogues of the Potent Antitumor Agent 2-(3,4-Dimethoxyphenyl)-5-fluorobenzothiazole (PMX 610, NSC 721648). J. Med. Chem. 2008, 51, 5135–5139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Geng, J.; Li, M.; Wu, L.; Ren, J.; Qu, X. Liberation of Copper from Amyloid Plaques: Making a Risk Factor Useful for Alzheimer’s Disease Treatment. J. Med. Chem. 2012, 55, 9146–9155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Yao, S.; Schafer-Hales, K.J.; Belfield, K.D. A New Water-Soluble Near-Neutral Ratiometric Fluorescent pH Indicator. Org. Lett. 2007, 9, 5645–5648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Rodionov, V.O.; Presolski, S.I.; Gardinier, S.; Lim, Y.H.; Finn, M.G. Benzimidazole and Related Ligands for Cu-Catalyzed Azide−Alkyne Cycloaddition. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2007, 129, 12696–12704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Asiri, Y.I.; Alsayari, A.; Muhsinah, A.B.; Mabkhot, Y.N.; Hassan, M.Z. Benzothiazoles as potential antiviral agents. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 2020, 72, 1459–1480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Liu, X.; Dong, Z.-B. A Review on Domino Condensation/Cyclization Reactions for the Synthesis of 2-Substituted 1,3-Benzothiazole Derivatives. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2020, 2020, 408–419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Elgemeire, G.H.; Azzam, R.A.; Osman, R.R. Recent advances in synthesis, metal complexes and biological evaluation of 2-aryl, 2-pyridyl and 2-pyrimidylbenzothiazoles as potential chemotherapeutics. Inorg. Chm. Acta. 2020, 502, 119302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Ammazzalorso, A.; Carradori, S.; Amoroso, R.; Fernández, I.F. 2-Substituted benzothiazoles as antiproliferative agents: Novel insights on structure-activity relationships. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2020, 207, 112762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Mokesch, S.; Cseh, K.; Geisler, G.; Hejl, M.; Klose, M.H.M.; Roller, A.; Meier-Menches, S.M.; Jakupec, M.A.; Kandioller, W.; Keppler, B.K. Investigations on the Anticancer Potential of Benzothiazole-Based Metallacycles. Front. Chem. 2020, 8, 209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Sharma, P.C.; Sharma, D.; Sharma, A.; Bansal, K.K.; Rajak, H.; Sharma, S.; Thakur, V.K. New horizons in benzothiazole scaffold for cancer therapy: Advances in bioactivity, functionality, and chemistry. Appl. Mater. Today 2020, 20, 100783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Irfan, A.; Batool, F.; Zahra Naqvi, S.A.; Islam, A.; Osman, S.M.; Nocentini, A.; Alissa, S.A.; Supuran, C.T. Benzothiazole derivatives as anticancer agents. J. Enzym. Inhib. Med. Chem. 2020, 35, 265–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Pathak, N.; Rathi, E.; Kumar, N.; Kini, S.G.; Rao, C.M. A review on anticancer potentials of benzothiazole derivatives. Mini Rev. Med. Chem. 2020, 20, 12–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Dhadda, S.; Raigar, A.K.; Saini, K.; Guleria, A. Benzothiazoles: From recent advances in green synthesis to anti-cancer potential. Sustain. Chem. Pharm. 2021, 24, 100521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Haider, K.; Rehman, S.; Pathak, A.; Najmi, A.K.; Yar, M.S. Advances in 2-substituted benzothiazole scaffold-based chemotherapeutic agents. Arch. Pharm. 2021, 354, 2100246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Zhilitskaya, L.V.; Shainyan, B.A.; Yarosh, N.O. Modern Approaches to the Synthesis and Transformations of Practically Valuable Benzothiazole Derivatives. Molecules 2021, 26, 2190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. García-Báez, E.V.; Padilla-Martínez, I.I.; Tamay-Cach, F.; Cruz, A. Benzothiazoles from Condensation of o-Aminothiophenoles with Carboxylic Acids and Their Derivatives: A Review. Molecules 2021, 26, 6518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Sethiya, A.; Sahiba, N.; Teli, P.; Soni, J.; Agarwal, S. Current advances in the synthetic strategies of 2-arylbenzothiazole. Mol. Divers. 2022, 26, 513–553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Haider, K.; Shrivastava, N.; Pathak, A.; Dewangan, R.P.; Yahya, S.; Yar, M.S. Recent advances and SAR study of 2-substituted benzothiazole scaffold based potent chemotherapeutic agents. Results Chem. 2022, 4, 100258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. El-Meguid, E.A.A.; Naglah, A.M.; Moustafa, G.O.; Awad, H.M.; El Kerdawy, A.M. Novel benzothiazole-based dual VEGFR-2/EGFR inhibitors targeting breast and liver cancers: Synthesis, cytotoxic activity, QSAR and molecular docking studies. Biorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2022, 58, 128529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Huang, G.; Cierpicki, T.; Grembecka, J. 2-Aminobenzothiazoles in anticancer drug design and discovery. Bioorg. Chem. 2023, 135, 106477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Yadav, K.P.; Rahman, M.A.; Nishad, S.; Mujahid, M. Synthesis and biological activities of benzothiazole derivatives: A review. Intell. Pharm. 2023, 1, 122–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Kashyap, P.; Verma, S.; Gupta, P.; Narang, R.; Lal, S.; Devgun, M. Recent insights into antibacterial potential of benzothiazole derivatives. Med. Chem. Res. 2023, 32, 1543–1573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Yadav, R.; Meena, D.; Singh, K.; Tyagi, R.; Yadav, Y.; Sagar, R. Recent advances in the synthesis of new benzothiazole based anti-tubercular compounds. RSC Adv. 2023, 13, 21890–21925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Awadh, A.A. Biomedical applications of selective metal complexes of indole, benzimidazole, benzothiazole and benzoxazole: A review (from 2015 to 2022). Saudi Pharm. J. 2023, 31, 101698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Tran, L.; Tu, V.L.; Dadam, M.N.; Aziz, J.M.; Duy, T.L.; Ahmed, H.H.; Kwaah, P.A.; Quoc, H.N.; Van Dat, T.; Mizuta, S.; et al. Antimalarial activities of benzothiazole analogs: A systematic review. Fund. Clin. Pharm. 2024, 38, 410–464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. El Alami, A.; El Maraghi, A.; Sdassi, H. Review of synthesis process of benzoxazole and benzothiazole derivatives. Synth. Commun. 2024, 54, 769–801. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Benazzouz, A.; Boraud, T.; Dubedat, P.; Boireau, A.; Stutzmann, J.-M.; Gross, C. Riluzole prevents MPTP-induced parkinsonism in the rhesus monkey: A pilot study. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 1995, 284, 299–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Jimonet, P.; Audiau, F.; Barreau, M.; Blanchard, J.-C.; Boireau, A.; Bour, Y.; Coleno, M.-A.; Doble, A.; Doerflinger, G.; Do Huu, C. Riluzole Series. Synthesis and In Vivo “Antiglutamate” Activity of 6-Substituted-2-benzothiazolamines and 3-Substituted-2-imino-benzothiazolines. J. Med. Chem. 1999, 42, 2828–2843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Said, G.E.; Tarek, M.; Al-Wasidi, A.S.; Naglah, A.M.; Almehizia, A.A.; Khatab, T.K. Niacin based MOF as efficient nano-catalyst in the synthesis of some new benzothiazoles and benzimidazoles as anti-Alzheimer (AChE inhibitors). J. Mol. Struct. 2024, 1311, 138462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Kirkeby, E.K.; Chyan, M.-K.; Diehl, G.; Wilbur, D.S.; Li, Y.; Roberts, A.G.; Mastren, T. Design and synthesis of astatinated benzothiazole compounds for their potential use in Targeted Alpha Therapy (TAT) strategies to treat Alzheimer’s disease-associated amyloid plaques. Appl. Radiat. Isot. 2023, 191, 110555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Hafez, D.E.; Dubiel, M.; La Spada, G.; Catto, M.; Reiner-Link, D.; Syu, Y.-T.; Abdel-Halim, M.; Hwang, T.-L.; Holger Stark, H.; Abadi, A.H. Novel benzothiazole derivatives as multitargeted-directed ligands for the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease. J. Enzym. Inhib. Med. Chem. 2023, 38, 2175821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Djuidje, E.N.; Barbari, R.; Baldisserotto, A.; Durini, E.; Sciabica, S.; Balzarini, J.; Liekens, S.; Vertuani, S.; Manfredini, S. Benzothiazole Derivatives as Multifunctional Antioxidant Agents for Skin Damage: Structure–Activity Relationship of a Scaffold Bearing a Five-Membered Ring System. Antioxidants 2022, 11, 407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Cossey, H.D.; Judd, J.; Stephens, F.F. Some anti-microbial compounds in the heterocyclic series. Part 1V. Non-photosensitizing basic esters in the benzothiazole series. J. Chem. Soc. 1965, 954–973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Xue, C.; Lin, T.Y.; Chang, D.; Guo, Z. Thioflavin T as an amyloid dye: Fibril quantification, optimal concentration and effect on aggregation. R. Soc. Open sci. 2017, 4, 160696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. William Snyder, M.D. Asterol® Dihydrochloride Therapy of Microsporum Audouini Scalp Infections. AMA Arch. Dermatol. Syphilol. 1952, 65, 464–465. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Rahman, M.M.; Tikhomirova, A.; Modak, J.K.; Hutton, M.L.; Supuran, C.T.; Roujeinikova, A. Antibacterial activity of ethoxzolamide against Helicobacter pylori strains SS1 and 26695. Gut Pathog. 2020, 12, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Bradshaw, T.D.; Westwell, A.D. The Development of the Antitumor Benzothiazole Prodrug, Phortress, as Clinical candidate. Curr. Med. Chem. 2004, 11, 11009–11021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Kan, H.J.M.; Groeneveld, G.J.; Kalmijn, S.; Spieksma, M.; Van Den Berg, L.H.; Guchelaar, H.J. Association between CYP1A2 activity and riluzole clearance in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 2005, 59, 310–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Son, H.J.; Jeong, Y.J.; Yoon, H.J.; Lee, S.Y.; Choi, G.-E.; Park, J.-A.; Kim, M.H.; Lee, K.C.; Lee, Y.J.; Kim, M.K.; et al. Assessment of brain beta-amyloid deposition in transgenic mouse models of Alzheimer’s disease with PET imaging agents 18F-flutemetamol and 18F-florbetaben. BMC Neurosci. 2018, 19, 45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Ramos, S.; Vicente-Blázquez, A.; López-Rubio, M.; Gallego-Yerga, L.; Álvarez, R.; Peláez, R. Frentizole, a Nontoxic Immunosuppressive Drug, and Its Analogs Display Antitumor Activity via Tubulin Inhibition. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24, 17474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Djuidje, E.N.; Sciabica, S.; Buzzi, R.; Dissette, V.; Balzarini, J.; Liekens, S.; Serra, E.; Andreotti, E.; Manfredini, E.; Vertuani, S.; et al. Design, synthesis and evaluation of benzothiazole derivatives as multifunctional agents. Bioorg. Chem. 2020, 101, 103960. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Asatkar, A.; Lambat, T.L.; Mahmood, S.; Mondal, A.; Singh, M.; Banerjee, S. Facile protocol for the synthesis of benzothiazole, benzoxazole and N-benzimidazole derivatives using rice husk derived chemically activated carbon. Mater. Today Proc. 2020, 29, 738–742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Ramya, P.V.S.; Angapelly, S.; Rani, R.S.; Digwal, C.S.; Kumar, C.G.; Babu, B.N.; Guntuku, L.; Kamal, A. Hypervalent iodine(III) catalyzed rapid and efficient access to benzimidazoles, benzothiazoles and quinoxalines: Biological evaluation of some new benzimidazole-imidazo[1,2-a]pyridine conjugates. Arab. J. Chem. 2020, 13, 120–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Sirgamalla, R.; Kommakula, A.; Konduru, S.; Ponakanti, R.; Devaram, J.; Boda, S. Cupper-catalyzed an efficient synthesis, characterization of 2-substituted benzoxazoles, 2-substituted benzothiazoles derivatives and their anti-fungal activity. Chem. Data Coll. 2020, 27, 100362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Racané, L.; Ptiček, L.; Fajdetić, G.; Tralić-Kulenović, V.; Klobučar, M.; Pavelić, S.K.; Perić, M.; Paljetak, H.Č.; Verbanac, D.; Starčević, K. Green synthesis and biological evaluation of 6-substituted-2-(2-hydroxy/methoxy phenyl)benzothiazole derivatives as potential antioxidant, antibacterial and antitumor agents. Bioorg. Chem. 2020, 95, 103537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Malunavar, S.S.; Suta, S.M.; Savanur, H.M.; Kalkhambkar, R.G.; Laali, K.K. Facile access to libraries of diversely substituted 2-aryl-benzoxazoles/benzothiazoles from readily accesible aldimines via cyclization/cross coupling in imidazolium-ils with Pd(OAc)2 or NiCl2 (dppp) as catalyst. Tetrahedron Lett. 2020, 61, 151509. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Shao, H.; Gestwicki, J.E. Neutral analogs of the heat shock protein 70 (Hsp70) inhibitor, JG-98. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2020, 30, 126954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  92. Nguyen Le, H.A.; Nguyen, L.H.; Nguyen Ba, Q.N.; Nguyen, H.T.; Nguyen, K.Q.; Tran, P.H. Straightforward synthesis of benzoxazoles and benzothiazoles via photocatalytic radical cyclization of 2-substituted anilines with aldehydes. Catal. Commun. 2020, 145, 106120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Abdel-Mohsen, H.T.; El-Meguid, E.A.A.; El Kerdawy, A.M.; Mahmoud, A.E.E.; Ali, M.M. Design, synthesis, and molecular docking of novel 2-arylbenzothiazole multiangiokinase inhibitors targeting breast cancer. Arch. Pharm. Chem. Life Sci. 2020, 353, 1900340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Li, X.; Li, Y.; Liu, R.; Wang, Z.; Li, X.; Shi, D. AcOH-mediated aerobic oxidative synthesis of 2-thioalkylbenzothiazoles via a three-component reaction. Tetrahedron Lett. 2020, 61, 152054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Ghorashi, N.; Shokri, Z.; Moradi, R.; Abdelrasoul, A.; Rostam, A. Aerobic oxidative synthesis of quinazolinones and benzothiazoles in the presence of laccase/DDQ as a bioinspired cooperative catalytic system under mild conditions. RSC Adv. 2020, 10, 14254–14261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  96. Khatab, T.K.; Abdelghany, A.M.; Kandil, E.M.; Elsefy, D.E.; El-Mekabaty, A. Hydroxyapatite/ZnCl2 nano-flakes: An efficient catalyst for the synthesis of 2-arylbenzothiazoles with molecular docking and anti-oxidant evaluation. Biointerface Res. Appl. Chem. 2020, 10, 5182–5187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Pise, A.S.; Ingale, A.P.; Dalvi, N.R. Ultrasound-assisted efficient and green synthesis of 2-substituted benzothiazoles under solvent-free condition using recyclable sulfated tungstate. Synth. Commun. 2021, 51, 3629–3641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Gadekar, S.P.; Lande, M.K. Ruthenium silicate (RS-1) zeolite: Novel heterogeneous efcient catalyst for synthesis of 2-arylbenzothiazole derivatives. Res. Chem. Intermed. 2021, 47, 1253–1267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Sun, W.; Chen, H.; Wang, K.; Wang, X.; Lei, M.; Liu, C.; Zhong, Q. Synthesis of benzothiazoles using fluorescein as an efficient photocatalyst under visible light. Mol. Cathalysis 2021, 510, 111693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Yang, Z.-J.; Gong, Q.-T.; Yu, Y.; Lu, W.-F.; Wu, Z.-N.; Wang, N.; Yu, X.-Q. Fast and high-efficiency synthesis of 2-substituted benzothiazoles via combining enzyme catalysis and photoredox catalysis in one-pot. Bioorg. Chem. 2021, 107, 104607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Bodaghifard, M.A.; Shafi, S. Ionic liquid-immobilized hybrid nanomaterial: An efficient catalyst in the synthesis of benzimidazoles and benzothiazoles via anomeric-based oxidation. J. Iran. Chem. Soc. 2021, 18, 677–687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Racané, L.; Zlatar, I.; Perin, N.; Cindrić, M.; Radovanović, V.; Banjanac, M.; Shanmugam, S.; Stojković, M.R.; Karmen Brajša, K.; Marijana Hranjec, M. Biological activity of newly synthesized benzimidazole and benzothizole 2,5-disubstituted furane derivatives. Molecules 2021, 26, 4935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. El-Meguid, E.A.A.; Moustafa, G.O.; Awad, H.M.; Zaki, E.R.; Eman, S.; Nossier, E.S. Novel benzothiazole hybrids targeting EGFR: Design, synthesis, biological evaluation and molecular docking studies. J. Mol. Struct. 2021, 1240, 130595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Saima; Lavekara, A.G.; Equbala, D.; Sinha, A.K. Aspects of green chemistry toward synthesis of benzazoles and quinoxalines: Bovine serum albumin-water system for C–N/C–S bond formation. Synth. Commun. 2022, 52, 834–848. [Google Scholar]
  105. Li, X.; Ma, Q.; Wang, P.; Xue, L.; Hong, H.; Han, L. Synthesis of benzothiazole from 2-aminothiophenol and benzaldehyde catalyzed by alkyl carbonc acid. Phosphrus Sulfur Silicon Relat. Elem. 2022, 197, 689–696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Xu, Y.; Zhao, N.; Li, F.; Xie, H.; Wu, J.; Wang, C.; Li, Z.; Wang, L. Efficient synthesis of 2-aryl benzothiazoles mediated by Vitreoscilla hemoglobin. Mol. Catal. 2022, 533, 112784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Digambar, K.B.; Ravi Varala, R.; Pati, S.G. Zn(OAc)2•2H2O: An efficient catalyst for the one-pot synthesis of 2-substituted benzothiazoles. Org. Commun. 2022, 15, 378–385. [Google Scholar]
  108. Cai, Y.; Yuan, H.; Gao, Q.; Wu, L.; Xue, L.; Feng, N.; Sun, Y. Palladium (II) Complex Supported on Magnetic Nanoparticles Modified with Phenanthroline: A Highly Active Reusable Nanocatalyst for the Synthesis of Benzoxazoles, Benzothiazoles and Cyanation of Aryl Halides. Catal. Lett. 2023, 153, 460–476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Pinate, P.; Makone, S. Synthesis and Study of Catalytic Perspectives of DABCO Based Ionic Liquid for the Synthesis of 2,3-Dihydro-1,5-Benzothiazepines and 2-Phenylbenzothiazoles. Catal. Lett. 2023, 153, 995–1012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Ballester, F.J.; Ortega-Forte, E.; Bautista, D.; Santana, M.D.; Barone, G.; Ruiz, J. Newly synthesized benzothiazolyl-1,2,3-triazole derivatives: Intramolecular charge transfer tuning, solvatofluorochromism and antiproliferative properties. Dye. Pigment. 2023, 209, 110905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Zhao, L.; Chen, K.; Xie, K.; Hu, J.; Deng, M.; Zou, Y.; Gao, S.; Fu, Y.; Ye, F. A benzothiazole-based “on-off” fluorescence probe for the specific detection of Cu2+ and its application in solution and living cells. Dye. Pigment. 2023, 210, 110943. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Racané, L.; Zlatić, K.; Cindrić, M.; Mehić, E.; Karminski-Zamola, G.; Taylor, M.C.; Kelly, J.M.; Malić, S.R.; Stojković, M.R.; Kralj, M.; et al. Synthesis and Biological Activity of 2-Benzo[b]thienyl and 2-Bithienyl Amidino-Substituted Benzothiazole and Benzimidazole Derivatives. ChemMedChem 2023, 18, e202300261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Zghab, I.; Alanazi, A.N. Synthesis, antiproliferative, and molecular docking of novel donor-π-acceptor benzothiazole conjugates based fluorescent chromophores. J. Photochem. Photobiol. A Chem. 2024, 454, 115688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Arfana, M.; Tahiraa, A.; Mannanb, A.; Fatima, T. A Facile Approach to the Synthesis of Benzothiazoles from N-Protected Amino Acids. Russ. J. Org. Chem. 2020, 56, 292–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Ramaiah, M.J.; Karthikeyan, D.; Mathavan, S.; Rajesh, B.R.D.; Yamajala, R.B.R.D.; Ramachandran, S.; Vasavi, P.J.; Chandana, N.V. Synthesis, in vitro and structural aspects of benzothiazole analogs as anti-oxidants and potential neuroprotective agents. Environ. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2020, 79, 103415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Monga, A.; Bagchi, S.; Soni, R.K.; Sharma, A. Synthesis of Benzothiazoles via Photooxidative Decarboxylation of α-Keto Acids. Adv. Synth. Catal. 2020, 362, 2232–2237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Mathavan, S.; Ramesh, S.; Yamajala, R.B.R.D. Base promoted coupling of α-ketoacids and 2-substituted aromatic amines: Green synthesis of diverse benzoxazoles, benzothiazoles, quinoxalinones and benzoxazinones and its practical application. Synt. Commun. 2024, 54, 50–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Mishra, V.R.; Ghanavatkar, C.W.; Mali, S.N.; Chaudhari, H.K.; Sekar, N. Schiff base clubbed benzothiazole: Synthesis, potent antimicrobial and MCF-7 anticancer activity, DNA cleavage and computational study. J. Biomol. Struct. Dyn. 2020, 38, 1772–1785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Polat, B.U.; Çevik, U.A.; Dikmen, M.; Özkay, Y. Synthesis of Some 2-Substituted-5-(benzothiazol-2-yl)-1H-benzimidazole Derivatives and Investigation of Their Antiproliferative Effects. Pharm. Chem. J. 2022, 56, 451–455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Racané, L.; Ptiček, L.; Kostrun, S.; Raić-Malić, S.; Taylor, M.C.; Michael Delves, M.; Alsford, S.; Olmo, F.; Francisco, A.F.; Kelly, M.J. Bis-6-amidino-benzothiazole Derivative that Cures Experimental Stage1 African Trypanosomiasis with a Single Dose. J. Med. Chem. 2023, 66, 13043–13053. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Mokhtar, A.M.; El-Messery, S.M.; Ghaly, M.A.; Hassan, G.S. Targeting EGFR tyrosine kinase: Synthesis, in vitro antitumor evaluation, and molecular modeling studies of benzothiazole-based derivatives. Bioorg. Chem. 2020, 104, 104259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  122. Bahadorikhalili, S.; Sardarian, A.R. KF-Al2O3 as a Base Heterogeneous Catalyst for the Synthesis of 2-Substituted Benzoxazoles and Benzothiazoles under Mild Reaction Conditions at Room Temperature. Polycycl. Aromat. Compd. 2020, 40, 990–997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Geesi, M.H.; Ouerghi, O.; Dehbi, O.; Riadi, Y. Metal-doped TiO2-nanocatalysts in an MX2/urea mixture for the synthesis of benzothiazoles bearing substituted pyrrolidin-2-ones: Enhanced catalytic performance and antibacterial activity. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2021, 9, 105344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Dhawale, K.D.; Ingale, A.P.; Shinde, S.V.; Thorat, N.M.; Patil, L.R. ZnO-NPs catalyzed condensation of 2-aminothiophenol and aryl/alkyl nitriles: Efficient green synthesis of 2-substituted benzothiazoles. Synth. Commun. 2021, 51, 1588–1601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Al-Mutairi, A.; Hafez, H.N.; El-Gazzar, A.R.B.A.; Mohamed, M.Y.A. Synthesis and antimicrobial, anticancer and anti-oxidant activities of novel 2,3-dihydropyrido[2,3-d]pyrimidine-4-one and pyrrolo[2,1-b][1,3]benzothiazole derivatives via microwave-assisted synthesis. Molecules 2022, 27, 1246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Zadeh, F.G.; Asadi, B.; Poor-Baltork, I.M.; Tangestaninejad, S.; Mirkhani, V.; Moghadam, M.; Omidvar, A. Triazine diphosphonium tetrachloroferrate ionic liquid immobilized on functionalized halloysite nanotubes as an efficient and reusable catalyst for the synthesis of mono-, bis- and tris-benzothiazoles. RSC Adv. 2023, 13, 31213–31223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Ceylan, M.; Erkan, S.; Yaglioglu, A.S.; Uremis, N.K.; Koc, E. Antiproliferative evaluation of some 2-[2-(2-Phenylethenyl)-cyclopent-3-en-1-yl]-1,3-benzothiazoles: DFT and molecular docking study. Chem. Biodivers. 2020, 17, e1900675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Shaikh, A.; Ravi, O.; Ragini, S.P.; Sadhana, N.; Bathula, S.R. Benzimidazoles and benzothiazoles from styrenes and N-vinylimidazole via palladium catalysed oxidative C@C and CAN bond cleavage. Tetrahedron Lett. 2020, 61, 151356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Reddy, M.B.; Anandhan, R. Visible light initiated amino group ortho-directed copper(i)-catalysed aerobic oxidative C(sp)–S coupling reaction: Synthesis of substituted 2-phenylbenzothiazoles via thia-Wolff rearrangement. Chem. Commun. 2020, 56, 3781–3784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Rajput, K.; Singh, V.; Kamal, A.; Singh, H.K.; Singh, S.; Srivastava, V. A novel approach towards synthesis of benzothiazoles and benzimidazoles: Eosin Y-catalyzed photo-triggered C–S and C–N bond formation. New J. Chem. 2023, 47, 22276–22280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Abinaya, R.; Elavarazan, S.; Binish, B.; Raulan, K.M.; Balasubramanian, K.K.; Manokaran, K.; Varatham, E.; Baskar, B. Visible-Light-Driven One-Pot Synthesis of Benzimidazoles, Benzothiazoles, and Quinazolinones Catalyzed by Scalable and Reusable Ba-Doped CoMoO4 Nanoparticles Under Air Atmosphere. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2023, 26, e202201098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Anandaraj, P.; Saranya, S.; Ramesh, R. Synthesis and structural characterization of palladium pincer complexes: Sustainable synthesis of benzothiazoles. Appl. Organomet. Chem. 2023, 37, e7062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Yang, W.; Li, B.; Zhang, M.; Wang, S.; Ji, Y.; Dong, S.; Feng, J.; Yuan, S. Metal-free photo-induced radical C-P and C-S bond formation for the synthesis of 2-phosphoryl benzothiazoles. Chin. Chem. Lett. 2020, 31, 1313–1316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Xue, D.; Ge, Q.; Zhi, X.; Song, S.; Shao, L. Metal-free radical cascade cyclization of 2-isocyanoaryl thioethers with alcohols: Synthesis of 2-hydroxyalkyl benzothiazoles. Tetrahedron 2022, 121, 132927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Xie, X.-Y.; Li, Y.; Xia, Y.-T.; Luo, D.K.; Wu, L. Visible Light-Induced Metal-Free and Oxidant-Free Radical Cyclization of (2-Isocyanoaryl)(methyl)sulfanes with Ethers. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2021, 2021, 4273–4277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Shen, J.; Li, H.; Li, Y.; Zhu, Z.; Luo, K.; Wu, L. Visible-Light-Promoted Radical Cascade Sulfone Alkylation/Cyclization of 2-Isocyanoaryl Thioethers Enabled by Electron Donor–Acceptor Complex Formation. J. Org. Chem. 2024, 89, 10223–10233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Zhang, J.; Zhu, L.; Zhao, Z.; Wang, J. Visible-light-induced construction of 2-aryl or 2-alkyl benzothiazoles via radical addition cascade cyclization of 2-isocyanoaryl thioethers. Tetrahedron Lett. 2023, 129, 154757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Ismail, T.I.; El-Khasragy, N.; Azzam, R.A. In the pursuit of novel therapeutic agents: Synthesis, anticancer evaluation, and physicochemical insights of novel pyrimidine-based 2-aminobenzothiazole derivatives. RSC Adv. 2024, 14, 16332–16348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Natural compounds containing a BT ring used in pharmaceutical applications.
Figure 1. Natural compounds containing a BT ring used in pharmaceutical applications.
Ijms 26 05901 g001
Figure 2. (ac) BT as core nucleus in some drugs.
Figure 2. (ac) BT as core nucleus in some drugs.
Ijms 26 05901 g002
Figure 3. Recent examples of clinically approved BT derivatives.
Figure 3. Recent examples of clinically approved BT derivatives.
Ijms 26 05901 g003
Scheme 1. Stages for the condensation reaction of 2-aminothiophenoles with aldehydes.
Scheme 1. Stages for the condensation reaction of 2-aminothiophenoles with aldehydes.
Ijms 26 05901 sch001
Scheme 2. 2-Aryl-/heteroarylBTs 1012 from p-bromophenylaldimine and the recycling/reuse of the IL solvent.
Scheme 2. 2-Aryl-/heteroarylBTs 1012 from p-bromophenylaldimine and the recycling/reuse of the IL solvent.
Ijms 26 05901 sch002
Scheme 3. Synthesis of 2-arylBTs 14a,b and 2-(thiazolin-4-yl)BTs 17a,b starting from condensation of aldehydes.
Scheme 3. Synthesis of 2-arylBTs 14a,b and 2-(thiazolin-4-yl)BTs 17a,b starting from condensation of aldehydes.
Ijms 26 05901 sch003
Scheme 4. Condensation of 2ATP with vanillin afforded compound 20 as an intermediate, producing three series of functionalized BTs: 21an, 22ac, and 23ac.
Scheme 4. Condensation of 2ATP with vanillin afforded compound 20 as an intermediate, producing three series of functionalized BTs: 21an, 22ac, and 23ac.
Ijms 26 05901 sch004
Figure 4. Compounds 24at.
Figure 4. Compounds 24at.
Ijms 26 05901 g004
Figure 5. Compounds 33af.
Figure 5. Compounds 33af.
Ijms 26 05901 g005
Scheme 5. The sequence of synthesis of BT derivatives 37a–f and 39a–k.
Scheme 5. The sequence of synthesis of BT derivatives 37a–f and 39a–k.
Ijms 26 05901 sch005
Figure 6. Compounds 40ai.
Figure 6. Compounds 40ai.
Ijms 26 05901 g006
Figure 7. Compounds 47ad.
Figure 7. Compounds 47ad.
Ijms 26 05901 g007
Scheme 6. Condensation of 2ATP with 5-methyl salicylaldehyde followed by four steps to afford the fluorescent probe 51.
Scheme 6. Condensation of 2ATP with 5-methyl salicylaldehyde followed by four steps to afford the fluorescent probe 51.
Ijms 26 05901 sch006
Figure 8. Compounds 52ad and 53ad.
Figure 8. Compounds 52ad and 53ad.
Ijms 26 05901 g008
Scheme 7. Synthesis of fluorescent 2-(N,N-dimethyl/diphenyl-aminophenyl)-5-substituted-BTs 54a,b and 56,b.
Scheme 7. Synthesis of fluorescent 2-(N,N-dimethyl/diphenyl-aminophenyl)-5-substituted-BTs 54a,b and 56,b.
Ijms 26 05901 sch007
Figure 9. Compounds 58af and 59af.
Figure 9. Compounds 58af and 59af.
Ijms 26 05901 g009
Figure 10. Compounds 63ag.
Figure 10. Compounds 63ag.
Ijms 26 05901 g010
Figure 11. Compounds 64ah.
Figure 11. Compounds 64ah.
Ijms 26 05901 g011
Figure 12. Compounds (6471)ac.
Figure 12. Compounds (6471)ac.
Ijms 26 05901 g012
Scheme 8. 2-CarboxylateBT 272, from condensation of 2ATP with ethyloxalate, was used as the starting material to afford the hydrazone derivatives 273278.
Scheme 8. 2-CarboxylateBT 272, from condensation of 2ATP with ethyloxalate, was used as the starting material to afford the hydrazone derivatives 273278.
Ijms 26 05901 sch008
Figure 13. Compounds 80ai obtained from A: CuTiO2 in CuCl2/urea or B: Ni-TiO2 in NiCl2/urea.
Figure 13. Compounds 80ai obtained from A: CuTiO2 in CuCl2/urea or B: Ni-TiO2 in NiCl2/urea.
Ijms 26 05901 g013
Scheme 9. Condensation of 2ATP with pNO2benzoyl chloride to synthesize the radiolabeling of BT derivatives with 211At 86a,b.
Scheme 9. Condensation of 2ATP with pNO2benzoyl chloride to synthesize the radiolabeling of BT derivatives with 211At 86a,b.
Ijms 26 05901 sch009
Figure 14. Compounds 94am.
Figure 14. Compounds 94am.
Ijms 26 05901 g014
Figure 15. Compounds 100as.
Figure 15. Compounds 100as.
Ijms 26 05901 g015
Figure 16. Compounds 101ai and 102av.
Figure 16. Compounds 101ai and 102av.
Ijms 26 05901 g016
Figure 17. Compounds 103av.
Figure 17. Compounds 103av.
Ijms 26 05901 g017
Figure 18. Compounds 104azf.
Figure 18. Compounds 104azf.
Ijms 26 05901 g018
Scheme 11. 2-guanidinobenzothiazole 107 used as an intermediate to produce pyrimidine-based 2ABTs 108115.
Scheme 11. 2-guanidinobenzothiazole 107 used as an intermediate to produce pyrimidine-based 2ABTs 108115.
Ijms 26 05901 sch011
Table 1. Compounds 1ak, 2bk and 3bk.
Table 1. Compounds 1ak, 2bk and 3bk.
1a–k2b–k3b–k1–3abcdef
R1 =H6CO2H6SO2NH2R2 =Ph2OHPh3OHPh4OHPh4MeOPh2,4OHPh
% Yields6080,71,7871,55,7878,67,8482,82,8068,53,74
ghijk
2,5OHPh2,3OHPh2OH,3MePh3,5OHPh2,4,5OHPh
% Yields58,75,5570,69,6965,69,7858,59,6351,63,51
Table 2. Compounds 4af.
Table 2. Compounds 4af.
4abcdef
R1 = H, R2 =Ph4MeOPh4ClPh4NO2Ph4OH-5MeOPh4BrPh
% Yield989493969790
Table 3. Compounds 5af.
Table 3. Compounds 5af.
5abcdef
R1 = H, R2 =pMeOPh3,4MeOPh3,4,4MeOPhPh4CNPh4FPh3NO2Ph
% Yield8488908958780
Table 4. Compounds 6af.
Table 4. Compounds 6af.
6abcdef
R1 = H, R2 =PhpClPhPhpFPhpMePhpNO2Ph4BrPh
% Yield858085908870
Table 5. Compounds 7af and 8af.
Table 5. Compounds 7af and 8af.
7a–f8a–f7,8abcdef
R2 = oOHPhR2 = oMeOPhR1 =HNO2CNIjms 26 05901 i001Ijms 26 05901 i002Ijms 26 05901 i003
% Yield=62,7059,7871,7966,7463,8389,82
Table 6. Compounds 18aj.
Table 6. Compounds 18aj.
18abcdefghij
R1 = H, R2 =pMePhpClPhpBrPhpFPhPhptBuPhpMeOPhFuran-2-ylPy-4-ylnHexyl
% Yield92889288887091828590
Table 7. Compounds 25ax.
Table 7. Compounds 25ax.
25abcdefghij
R1 = H, R2 =Ph4MePh4MeOPh4,5MeOPh4NMe2Ph4FPh2ClPh4ClPh5,6ClPh4,6ClPh
% Yield95909896809787989294
25klmnopqrs
R1 = H, R2 =4BrPh3BrPh3Br,4OHPh4OHPh2MeOPh3MeOPh3FPh3NO2Ph5Mefuran-2-yl
% Yield989695909093957595
25tuvwx
R1 = H, R2 =naphtalen-1-ylantracen-10-ylnaphtalen-2-ylCH=CHPh4BT-2-ylPh
% Yield8665857072
Table 8. Compounds 26al.
Table 8. Compounds 26al.
26abcdefg
R1 = HR2 =Ph4MeOPh1,2,3MeOPh3MeO,4OHPh4FPH4ClPh3ClPh
% Yield95806780908590
26hijkl
4NO2PhBenzo[1,3]dioxolePy-3-ylIndol-3-yl5Mefuran-2-yl
% Yield7580658085
Table 9. Compounds 27az and 28ad.
Table 9. Compounds 27az and 28ad.
27abcdefghij
R1 = H, R2 =PhpMePhpMeOPhpNMe2PhpFPhpClPhpBrPhoBrPhoClPhoNO2Ph
% Yield98959490969796909390
27klmnopqr
R1 = H, R2 =pCF3PhpCNPhpNO2PhNapht-1-ylNapht-2-ylPy-4-ylPy-3-ylFuran-2-yl
% Yield9695969594949594
27stuvwxyz
R1 = H, R2 =Thiophen-2-ylMeiPrcPrcHexBn(CH2)2PhCH2naphthalen-1-yl
% Yield93939292959492
28abcd
R1 = 5Cl, R2 =PhpFPhpClPhpCF3Ph
95959696
Table 10. Compounds 29ai.
Table 10. Compounds 29ai.
29abcdefghi
R1 = H, R2 =pClPhPhoClPhpMeOPhpMePhoOHPhpOHPhpNO2Ph2OH,4MePh
% Yield939391919290919385
Table 11. Compounds 30at.
Table 11. Compounds 30at.
30a–j, R1 = H; 30a–t, R1 = Cl
30a–ta(k)b(l)c(m)d(n)e(o)f(p)g(q)h(r)i(s)j(t)
R2 =PhoBrPhmBrPhpBrPhpFPhpClPhpMePhoMePhpMeOPh3,4MeOPh
%Yield92(89)90(90)91(92)88(93)94(91)86(84)91(89)92(87)87(90)82(83)
Table 12. Compounds 31at.
Table 12. Compounds 31at.
31abcdefghijk
R1 = H, R2 =oNO2PhPhpMePhmMePhoMePhpCF3PhpFPhpClPhpBrPhpCNPhmClPh
% Yield9996969896969895899995
31lmnopqrst
R1 = H, R2 =mBrPhpNMe2PhoClPhoBrPhpNEt2PhpMeOPhThiophen-2-ylNapht-1-ylBn
% Yield837589806492757880
Table 13. Compounds 32ai.
Table 13. Compounds 32ai.
32abcdefghi
R1 = H, R2 =PhoMePhpMeOPhPy-2-ylpFPhpNO2PhpClPhpOHPhpNMe2Ph
% Yield879085839090918383
Table 14. Compounds 41av.
Table 14. Compounds 41av.
41abcdefghij
R1 = H, R2 =pMeOPhPh3,4MeOPhpNMe2Phnapht-1-ylpOHPhpNO2PhpCF3PhpCNPhpBrPh
% Yield93928680868890828883
41klmnopq
R1 = H, R2 =Thiophen-2-ylPy-2-ylIndol-3-ylQuinolin-2-ylchexyl3MeO,4(propene-2-ylO)Ph3MeO, 4(propine-2-ylO)Ph
% Yield83857985858183
41rst41uv
R1 = H, R2 =3MeO,4AcOPhCinnamoylPhpMeOcinnamoylPhR1 = 6CF3, R2 =CinnamoylPhpNMe2Ph
% Yield888889% Yield8184
Table 15. Compounds 41an.
Table 15. Compounds 41an.
42abcdefg
R1 = H, R2 =PhpMePhoMeOPh3,4MeOPhpOHPhpNMe2PhpFPh
% Yield87606255605862
42hijklmn
R1 = H, R2 =pClPhpBrPhpCNPhoOHPhFuran-2-ylBnR1 = Cl, R2 = Ph
% Yield58555657606272
Table 16. Compounds 43an.
Table 16. Compounds 43an.
43abcdefghi
R1 = H, R2 =PhpMePhpMeOPhpFPhpClPhpBrPhmMePhmClPhoMePh
% Yield929288979690899387
43jklmn
R1 = H, R2 =oClPhPy-3-ylThiophen-2-ylFuran-2-ylNaphthalen-2-yl
% Yield9193949585
Table 17. Compounds 44ap.
Table 17. Compounds 44ap.
44abcdefghi
R1 = H6Me6MeO6Br6CF3HHHH
R2 =PhPhPhPhPhpMePhpMeOPhpClPhpOHPh
% Yield949294899189969085
44jklmnop
R1 = HHHHHHH
R2 =pNMe2PhpCNPhmNO2PhiBuPhPy-4-ylFuran-2-ylThiophen-2-yl
% Yield85909467798184
Table 18. Compounds 45ah.
Table 18. Compounds 45ah.
45abcdefgh
R1 = H, R2 =PhpMePhpMeOPhpClPhpNO2PhpBrPhpEtPhmBrPh
% Yield9493969892959289
Table 19. Compounds 46ah.
Table 19. Compounds 46ah.
46abcdefgh
R1 = H, R2 =pBnOPhpClPhpMePhPhpNO2PhmNO2PhoOHPhpMeOPh
% Yield9087828590918685
Table 20. Compounds 57af.
Table 20. Compounds 57af.
57abcdef
R1 = H, R2 =Furan-2-ylThiophen-2-ylThiazo-2-ylPy-4-yl4benzoatePh4MebenzoatePh
% Yield758088859590
Table 21. Compounds 60ad.
Table 21. Compounds 60ad.
60abcd
R1 = H, R2 =PhpClPhpMePhpMeOPh
Table 22. Compounds 61ap.
Table 22. Compounds 61ap.
61abcdefgh
R1 =H5ClH5ClH5CF3HH
R2 =PhPh4FPh4FPh2OHPh2OHPhThiophen-2-yl4MePh
% Yield8883738773488258
61ijklmnop
R1 =5ClH5Cl6MeHH5ClH
R2 =4MePh4MeOPh4MeOPhPh4ClPhHHMe
% Yield6274678077406153
Table 23. Compounds 62ah.
Table 23. Compounds 62ah.
62abcdefgh
R1 = H, R2 =PhpFPhpClPhpBrPhmNO2PhpMeOPhmMePhR1 = Cl, R2 = Ph
% Yield9597939592989591
Table 24. Compounds 79ak.
Table 24. Compounds 79ak.
79abcdefghijk
R1 = H, R2 =pCNPhpMeCOPhpClPhPhNapht-1-ylpMePhpOHPhpMeOPhMeBnnBu
% Yield9795959491908787919290
Table 25. Compounds 88az and 89ad.
Table 25. Compounds 88az and 89ad.
87abcdefghijk
R1 = H, R2 =PhpMePhpMeOPhpNMe2PhpFPhpClPhpBrPhoBrPhoClPhoNO2PhpCF3Ph
% Yield9491908893959690928994
87lmnopqrs
R1 = H, R2 =pCNPhpNO2PhNapht-1-ylNapht-2-ylPy-4-ylPy-3-ylFuran-2-ylThiophen-2-yl
% Yield9496929193929089
87tuvwxyz88abcd
R1 = H, R2 =MeiPrcPrcHexBn(CH2)2PhCH2napht-1-ylR1 = Cl, R2 =PhpFPhpClPhpCF3Ph
% Yield91909294939389 94939596
Table 26. Compounds 93ax.
Table 26. Compounds 93ax.
93abcdefghi
R1 = H, R2 =Ph2ClPh3ClPh4ClPh3BrPh4BrPh4FPh4CNPh2MePh
% Yield959092969295929590
93jklmnopqr
R1 = H, R2 =4MePh3NH2Ph4MeOPhPy-2-ylPy-3-ylBn4ClBn4MeOPhBn4MeBn
% Yield909091959590929090
93stuvwx
R1 = H, R2 =CHPh23CNPh3(CH2CN)Ph3(BT-2-yl)Ph3(BTCH2)Bn3,5(BTCH2)2Bn
% Yield929085807875
Table 27. Compounds 95af.
Table 27. Compounds 95af.
95abcdef
R1 = H, R2 =PhpMePhpMeOPhpBrPhoClPh3,5MeOPh
% Yield606566353063
Table 28. Compounds 96an.
Table 28. Compounds 96an.
96abcdefgh
R1 = H, R2 =Ph4MePh4MeOPh4tBuPh4ClPh2ClPh4BrPh4CNPh
% Yield6668706864556558
96ijklmn
R1 = H, R2 =4CO2MePh4PhCOPh3NO2PhPy-2-ylNapht-1-ylFenantren-1-yl
% Yield615664597679
Table 29. Compounds 97aq.
Table 29. Compounds 97aq.
97abcdefghij
R1 = H, R2 =Ph4FPh4ClPh4BrPh4NO2Ph3ClPh3NO2Ph3BrPh2,3ClPh4MeOPh
% Yield90919090918592858580
96klmnopq
R1 = H, R2 =4NMe2Ph2NO2PhNaphth-2-ylPy-2-ylThiophen-2-ylIndol-2-ylFuran-2-yl
% Yield85928784848384
Table 30. Compounds 98a–k.
Table 30. Compounds 98a–k.
98abcdefghijk
R1 = H, R2 =Ph4MeOPhNapht-1-ylPh4iPrPh2MePh3PhOPh2OH,4MePh4ClPh4FPh2FPh3,4ClPh
% Yield9898808583947886897979
Table 31. Compounds 99ay.
Table 31. Compounds 99ay.
99abcdefghijk
R1 = H, R2 =pMeOPhpMePhpiPrPhmMeOPhmMePhPhmFPhpClPhpNO2PhoBrPh2,6ClPh
% Yield9390868785846972535863
99lmnopqr
R1 = H, R2 =oNH2PhoMePh2,3MeOPh2,5MeOPhPy-2-ylBenzo[1,3]dioxolan-5-ylThiophen-2-yl
% Yield71477471697372
99stuvwxy
R1 = H, R2 =CH=CHPhpPhPhNaphth-1-ylPiren-2-ylEtiPrnPentyl
% Yield66797556525348
Table 32. Compounds 105ar and 106ak.
Table 32. Compounds 105ar and 106ak.
105abcdefghi
R1 = H, R2 =Ph4MePh4MeOPh4FPh4ClPh4BrPh4CF3Ph4CNPh4NO2Ph
% Yield848381788082757772
105jklmnopqr
R1 = H, R2 =3ClPh2ClPh3,5MeOPhNaphtha-2-ylPy-4-ylFuran-2-ylBncPriPr
% Yield767179807476757370
106abcdefghijk
R2 = Ph, R1 =6Me6Et6MeO6F6Cl6Br6CF36CN5Cl4Me5,7Me
% Yield8280817679777375807173
Table 33. Novel catalyst systems recently developed.
Table 33. Novel catalyst systems recently developed.
EntryCatalyst SystemTimeYields (%)Ref.
1Na2S2O4 catalyst as oxidant12–36 h51–84[85]
2Rice husk chemically activated carbon (RHCAC)5–10 min93–98[86]
3PhI(OH)OTs (Koser’s reagent)15 min80–90[87]
4Eosin Y (photocatalyst)/K2CO3 or Et3N/tert-butylhydroperoxide (TBHP)24–36 h [92]
5Biocatalytic oxidant system (Laccase)/DDQ (2,3-dichloro-5,6-dicyano-1,4-benzoquinone)1 h65–98[95]
6ZnCl2 nano-flake catalyst supported on nano-hydroxyapatite (HAp)15–90 min65–95[96]
7Sulfated tungstate (ST) catalyst under solvent-free and ultrasound irradiation conditions5 min90–98[97]
8Ruthenium silicate (RS-1)-zeolite catalyst30 min85–93[98]
9Fluorescein (photocatalyst), blue LED lamp3 h82–94[99]
10Biocatalytic enzymatic (Trypsin) catalysis and visible light (450 nm)10 min64–99[100]
11Nano-catalyst IL on silica-coated/cobalt–ferrite magnetic nanoparticles (CoFe2O4@SiO2@PAF-IL)10 min83–91[101]
12Biocatalytic bovine serum albumin (BSA) in water8 h79–93[104]
13Biocatalytic bacterium-derived hemoglobin, Vitreoscilla (VHb)20 min85–97[106]
14Zn(OAc)2.2H2O heterogeneous catalyst30–60 min79–84[107]
15Nano-catalytic MNPs-phenanthroline-Pd/K2CO3 in DMF6 h89–98[108]
161,4-diazabicyclooctane (DABCO)-based dicationic acidic ionic liquid [C4H10-DABCO][HSO4]2 catalyst30–50 min82–91[109]
17Co/Niacin-MOF catalyst30–60 min75–95[73]
18Blue LED (λ = 435–445 nm) irradiation without photocatalyst or metal8 h40–88[116]
19KF-Al2O3 as a base heterogeneous catalyst30 min87–97[122]
20Nano-catalytic eutectic mixture of CuCl2 or NiCl2/urea and Cu- or Ni-doped TiO2 heterogeneous nanoparticles and MWI5 min78–96[123]
21ZnO nanoparticle, solvent-free catalyst20–25 min88–96[124]
22Nano-catalytic aminopropyl-1,3,5-triazine-2,4-diphosphonium tetrachloroferrate immobilized on halloysite nanotubes [(APTDP)(FeCl4)2@HNTs]4–5 h90–96%[126]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Padilla-Martínez, I.I.; Cruz, A.; García-Báez, E.V.; Mendieta-Wejebe, J.E.; Rosales-Hernández, M.C. Condensation Reactions of 2-Aminothiophenoles to Afford 2-Substituted Benzothiazoles of Biological Interest: A Review (2020–2024). Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26, 5901. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26125901

AMA Style

Padilla-Martínez II, Cruz A, García-Báez EV, Mendieta-Wejebe JE, Rosales-Hernández MC. Condensation Reactions of 2-Aminothiophenoles to Afford 2-Substituted Benzothiazoles of Biological Interest: A Review (2020–2024). International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2025; 26(12):5901. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26125901

Chicago/Turabian Style

Padilla-Martínez, Itzia I., Alejandro Cruz, Efrén V. García-Báez, Jessica E. Mendieta-Wejebe, and Martha C. Rosales-Hernández. 2025. "Condensation Reactions of 2-Aminothiophenoles to Afford 2-Substituted Benzothiazoles of Biological Interest: A Review (2020–2024)" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 26, no. 12: 5901. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26125901

APA Style

Padilla-Martínez, I. I., Cruz, A., García-Báez, E. V., Mendieta-Wejebe, J. E., & Rosales-Hernández, M. C. (2025). Condensation Reactions of 2-Aminothiophenoles to Afford 2-Substituted Benzothiazoles of Biological Interest: A Review (2020–2024). International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 26(12), 5901. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26125901

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop