Age-Related Effects on MSC Immunomodulation, Macrophage Polarization, Apoptosis, and Bone Regeneration Correlate with IL-38 Expression

Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are known to promote tissue regeneration and suppress excessive inflammation caused by infection or trauma. Reported evidence indicates that various factors influence the expression of MSCs’ endogenous immunomodulatory properties. However, the detailed interactions of MSCs with macrophages, which are key cells involved in tissue repair, and their regulatory mechanisms are not completely understood. We herein investigated how age-related immunomodulatory impairment of MSCs alters the interaction of MSCs with macrophages during bone healing using young (5-week old) and aged (50-week old) mice. To clarify the relationship between inflammatory macrophages (M1) and MSCs, their spatiotemporal localization at the bone healing site was investigated by immunostaining, and possible regulatory mechanisms were analyzed in vitro co-cultures. Histomorphometric analysis revealed an accumulation of M1 and a decrease in MSC number at the healing site in aged mice, which showed a delayed bone healing. In in vitro co-cultures, MSCs induced M1 apoptosis through cell-to-cell contact but suppressed the gene expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines by soluble factors secreted in the culture supernatant. Interestingly, interleukin 38 (Il-38) expression was up-regulated in M1 after co-culture with MSCs. IL-38 suppressed the gene expression of inflammatory cytokines in M1 and promoted the expression of genes associated with M1 polarization to anti-inflammatory macrophages (M2). IL-38 also had an inhibitory effect on M1 apoptosis. These results suggest that MSCs may induce M1 apoptosis, suppress inflammatory cytokine production by M1, and induce their polarization toward M2. Nevertheless, in aged conditions, the decreased number and immunomodulatory function of MSCs could be associated with a delayed M1 clearance (i.e., apoptosis and/or polarization) and consequent delayed resolution of the inflammatory phase. Furthermore, M1-derived IL-38 may be associated with immunoregulation in the tissue regeneration site.


Introduction
The skeletal system plays a crucial role in the human body and is one of the few tissues capable of self-repair [1].However, in complex clinical situations, such as aging and degenerative diseases, like osteoporosis, or large bone defects due to trauma, tumor resection, or skeletal abnormalities, the self-repair ability of the skeletal system is significantly impaired [2].Although skeletal-related diseases and conditions are rarely life threatening, they can dramatically impair function and reduce the quality of life [3].
Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are multipotent stromal cells that exist in some adult tissues [4].They are characterized by their ability to self-renew and differentiate into various cell types [5].MSCs are potential candidates for tissue engineering and promote tissue regeneration by suppressing the excessive inflammation caused by infection or trauma [6] owing to their immunomodulatory functions.Previous reports have shown that systemic injection of MSCs can induce polarization of inflammatory macrophages (M1 polarized macrophages: M1) towards anti-inflammatory macrophages (M2 polarized macrophages: M2), improving the symptoms of immune dysregulation [7,8].A number of studies have reported that the protective and regenerative capacities of MSCs decrease with age, leading to a reduction in the number and overall function of these cells.This results in increased inflammation and a slower healing process following injury [9].
In clinical practice, delayed wound healing associated with aging is a frequently encountered problem.Although it is well known that the balance between inflammation and regeneration is important in regulating tissue regeneration, the detailed mechanisms remain unclear.In particular, the mechanisms of immunomodulation at the site of tissue regeneration remain largely unknown.
To date, two main pathways have been elucidated for the immunomodulatory mechanisms of MSCs.One pathway involves the secretion of anti-inflammatory cytokines, which can suppress immune responses, such as the culture supernatant from MSCs can downregulate the expression pathways of tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) and interleukin 6 (IL-6) in macrophages by inhibiting the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) and nuclear factor kappa-B (NF-κB) [10,11].The other pathway is based on direct cell-to-cell contact, such as the induction of T-cell apoptosis via the FAS and FAS Ligand (FASL) pathway, which may be a triggering factor for macrophage activation and regulatory T-cell differentiation [12].Macrophages' mass aggregation and proliferation can promote tissue regeneration at the initial stage of wound healing.But it may also lead to tissue necrosis if macrophage apoptosis is not properly coupled with phagocytic clearance [9].However, some reports showed that the inflammation and oxidative stress-induced cellular senescence alter the immunomodulatory capacity of MSCs and impede their pro-regenerative function, leading to increased disease severity, maladaptive tissue injury, and development of complications [13][14][15].Whether this age-related dysfunction of MSCs can affect tissue regeneration by altering MSCs' interaction with macrophages, or more specifically altering the macrophage apoptosis, has not been clearly reported.
This study aimed to explore how age-related functional impairment affects the immunomodulatory properties of MSCs, more specifically, the interaction between MSCs and M1 macrophages, and their polarization to M2 phenotype.In more detail, we investigated the differences in the spatiotemporal localization of macrophages and MSCs and the distribution of apoptotic cells in a femoral bone defect model using young and aged mice.Additionally, detailed interactions were investigated by co-culturing MSCs with bone marrow-derived macrophages in vitro to study the induction of apoptosis in M1 and their polarity change to M2.

Delayed Femoral Bone Healing in Aged Mice
A femur bone defect model was developed in young (5-week-old) and aged (50-week-old) mice (Figure 1a,b).Micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) analysis revealed significantly more regenerated bone within the bone defect over time in the young groups than in the aged groups (p values for main effects of post-surgery time and mouse age and their interaction: 0.0002, 0.0003, and 0.0013, respectively; two-way factorial ANOVA), resulting in significant difference between the young and aged groups on day 7 (p value: 0.0002; Tukey's post-hoc test) (Figure 1c and Supplementary Table S1).The regenerated bone area was also quantified based on hematoxylin and eosin (HE) stained areas that were widely expanded over time in the newly formed trabecular bone in the young mice, but not in the aged counterparts (p values for main effects of post-surgery time and mouse age and their interaction: 0.0006, 0.0007, and 0.0046, respectively; two-way factorial ANOVA) (Figure 1d and Supplementary Table S1).Similarly, Masson's trichrome staining showed that the amount of aniline blue-stained mature bone tissue was significantly smaller in the aged group than in the young group (p values for main effects of post-surgery time and mouse age and their interaction: <0.0001, <0.0001, and <0.0001, respectively; two-way factorial ANOVA) (Figure 1e and Supplementary Table S1).Although the number of Runt-related transcription factor 2 positive (Runx2 + ) osteoblasts increased over time in the bone defect areas in both the young and aged groups (p values for main effects of post-surgery time and mouse age and their interaction: 0.0004, 0.0001, and 0.2689, respectively; two-way factorial ANOVA), it was significantly lower on day 3 in the aged group (p value: 0.0088; Tukey's post-hoc test) (Figure 1f and Supplementary Table S1).

Delayed Macrophage Accumulation at the Wound Healing Site in Aged Mice
In the young group, the number of CD80 + M1 increased on day 3 and decreased on day 7 after surgery.In contrast, in the aged group, M1 number showed an increasing trend during the observation period (p values for main effects of post-surgery time and mouse age and their interaction: 0.0046, 0.0299, and 0.0020, respectively; two-way factorial ANOVA), resulting in significantly higher M1 number on day 7 (p value: 0.0047; Tukey's post-hoc test) (Figure 2a and Supplementary Table S1).The number of CD206 + M2, which is known to be associated with the resolution of inflammation and tissue repair, also showed a time-dependent increase in both groups (p values for main effects of post-surgery time and mouse age and their interaction: 0.0003, 0.0032, and 0.5794, respectively; two-way factorial ANOVA).However, the aged group had a lower mean number than the young group at all time points (Figure 2b and Supplementary Table S1).

Increased Number of Accumulated MSCs and Induce M1 Apoptosis in Young Mice
The percentage of platelet-derived growth factor receptor alpha positive (PDGFRα + ) MSCs increased over time in both groups.Similar to M2, the number of MSCs was lower in aged mice than the young counterparts (p values for main effects of post-surgery time and mouse age and their interaction: 0.0002, 0.0052, and 0.8933, respectively; two-way factorial ANOVA) (Figure 3a and Supplementary Table S1).To detect apoptotic M1 macrophages, we performed double immunohistochemical staining for TdT-mediated UTP nick-end labeling (TUNEL) and CD80.The percentage of double-positive cells increased on day 3 after surgery (p values for main effects of post-surgery time and mouse age and their interaction: <0.0001, 0.0269, and 0.0009, respectively; two-way factorial ANOVA), and the number of apoptotic M1 cells in young mice was significantly higher than that in aged mice (p value: 0.0012; Tukey's post-hoc test) (Figure 3b and Supplementary Table S1).S1).Then, Tukey's post-hoc tests were proceeded to confirm the mean difference between the bars (**** p < 0.0001, *** p < 0.001, ** p < 0.01, * p < 0.05, n = 3).

Young MSCs Induced M1 Apoptosis through Cell-to-Cell Contact
Flow cytometric analysis showed that the mean percentage of apoptotic M1 was significantly increased after direct co-culture with MSCs but not with M0 and M2, while this result was partially abolished when M1 was co-cultured indirectly with MSCs using a cell culture insert (Transwell ® ) (Corning, NY, USA) (p values for main effects of macrophage types [M0/M1/M2] and experimental conditions [no MSCs/MSCs without Transwell/ MSCs with Transwell] and their interaction: <0.0001, <0.0001, and <0.0001, respectively; two-way factorial ANOVA) (p value for MSCs without Transwell vs. MSCs with Transwell: <0.0001; Tukey's post-hoc test) (Figure 4a and Supplementary Table S1).Importantly, M1 co-cultured with aged MSCs showed a significantly lower mean percentage of apoptosis than those co-cultured with young MSCs (p values for main effects of macrophage types [M0/M1/M2] and MSC types [young/aged] and their interaction: <0.0001, 0.0153, and 0.0003, respectively; two-way factorial ANOVA) (Figure 4b and Supplementary Table S1).In support of these findings, the direct co-culture of young MSCs with M1 enhanced Fas expression in M1, while the direct co-culture of young MSCs with M2 did not enhance Fas expression in M2 (p values for main effects of macrophage types [M0/M1/M2] and experimental conditions [no MSCs/young MSCs/aged MSCs] and their interaction: <0.0001, <0.0001, and <0.0001, respectively; two-way factorial ANOVA) (Figure 4c and Supplementary Table S1).Regarding Fasl expression in MSCs, the direct co-culture of young MSCs with M1 enhanced the most apparent Fasl expression in MSCs (p values for main effects of experimental conditions [no macrophage/M0/M1/M2] and MSC types [young/aged] and their interaction: <0.0001, <0.0001, and 0.0003, respectively; two-way factorial ANOVA) (Figure 4c,d and Supplementary Table S1), resulting in significantly higher Fasl expression in MSCs co-cultured with M1 (p value for M1/young MSCs vs. M1/aged MSCs: <0.0001; Tukey's post-hoc test) and with M2 (p value for M2/young MSCs vs. M2/aged MSCs: <0.0001; Tukey's post-hoc test).S1).Then, Tukey's post-hoc tests were proceeded to confirm the mean difference between the bars (**** p < 0.0001, *** p < 0.001, ** p < 0.01, * p < 0.05, n = 3).

Discussion
Macrophages have been suggested to play essential roles in maintaining and repairing the tissue microenvironment, including pathogen elimination, immunosuppression, and anti-inflammatory responses.They may also be involved in inflammation-induced tissue regeneration [18][19][20][21][22]. On the other hand, MSCs are considered crucial cells for tissue regeneration due to their multipotent differentiation ability and immunomodulatory properties [6,22].Recent studies have suggested that the crosstalk between these cells may be significant for tissue regeneration [23][24][25].Pajarinen et al. showed that MSCs regulate the chemotaxis and function of macrophages, and that in some cases, the signaling derived from MSCs can promote bone regeneration by regulating macrophage function [24].Ko et al. demonstrated that human MSCs can promote polarization of lung macrophages to M2 [26].Our previous studies have shown that age-related dysfunction of MSCs is a key factor affecting the severity of periodontal tissue destruction severity in ligature-induced defects in mice [27].The proliferation and differentiation ability of aged MSCs declines with changes in gene expression and cytokine production involved in tissue regeneration [28,29].Duscher et al. have reported that aged MSCs fail to support the formation of vascular networks, thereby impeding their ability in age-related damage in cutaneous wound healing [30].Studying the effects of age-related MSC dysfunction on the interaction between MSCs and macrophages during tissue regeneration and wound healing is very important to elucidate some of the mechanisms of age-related delayed healing that have been observed in clinical practice.
Our in vivo data, similar to previous reports [31,32], showed that M1 accumulated within 3 days postoperatively in young mice (Figure 2a).Subsequently, the number of MSCs and M2, which play an essential role in tissue regeneration, increased (Figures 2b and 3a).This may indicate that accumulation of M1 in the early stages of inflammation may trigger a subsequent tissue regeneration cascade.Hence, we hypothesize that the delayed tissue regeneration in aged mice is accompanied by the delayed accumulation of M1.
Numerous studies have reported that MSCs produce anti-inflammatory cytokines such as IL-4, IL-10, and IL-13 [33][34][35].It is known that the production of these anti-inflammatory cytokines is regulated by various factors [15,25,36].In the present study, the expression of anti-inflammatory cytokine genes such as Tgf-β, Hgf, and Il-2 was increased with co-culture with inflammatory M1 (Figure S1a), and significant changes in cytokine production were also observed in the comprehensive analysis (Figure S1b).In addition, as IL-4 and IL-13 are well known as M2 inducers [37], gene expression levels of Il-4 and Il-13 in 50-week MSCs were significantly lower than that of 5-week MSCs after co-culture with M1 (Figure S2).
In terms of direct cell-to-cell contact, a prior study reported that systemically injected MSCs could induce T-cell apoptosis via the FAS/FASL pathway in both peripheral blood and bone marrow, leading to immunotolerance in systemic lupus erythematosus animals and humans [12].However, it remains unclear whether accumulated endogenous MSCs induce immune cell apoptosis during local tissue regeneration.Our in vivo data revealed that with increasing numbers of accumulated MSCs, the number of apoptotic cells was increased on day 3 and then decreased on day 7 in young mice compared to that in aged mice (Figure 3b).In vitro confirmation demonstrated that MSCs from young mice promoted apoptosis at M1, whereas the induction effect was unclear at M0 and M2.M1 apoptosis induction was also observed in MSCs from aged mice but was significantly lower than that in young MSCs (Figure 4b).Moreover, this apoptosis-inducing effect was abolished by eliminating cell-to-cell contact from using the culture inserts (Figure 4a).Additionally, Fas expression in macrophages increased upon differentiation into M1, and Fasl expression was upregulated in young MSCs co-cultured with M1.In contrast, this effect was not observed in aged MSCs (Figure 4b,c).Macrophages in aged mice exhibited lower apoptosis when co-cultured with MSCs, despite Fas expression being upregulated in macrophages differentiated to M1 compared to macrophages from young mice (Figure S3).This suggests that age-related MSC dysfunction may be one of the factors affecting the induction of M1 apoptosis.Interestingly, this induction of apoptosis peaked at 3 days after bone defect creation and then decreased.There are several possible explanations for this phenomenon.One possible reason may be that M1 changed the polarity to M2 and no longer induced apoptosis, as shown by our in vitro co-culture results.Another possible reason could be a change in the induction of apoptosis in the accumulated cells.Among them, the apoptosisinducing effect of accumulated MSCs, i.e., Fasl expression, may have been altered.In our previous study, Fasl expression of MSCs was increased by stimulation with inflammatory cytokines, and this effect was not significantly changed from 24 to 72 h after stimulation.In terms of this, it may be that the apoptosis-induced side, i.e., the apoptosis-induced M1, suppressed apoptosis induction as a negative feedback mechanism.
IL-38 is a new cytokine of the IL-1 family that shows 37-41% amino acid sequence homology with IL-1Ra and possesses anti-inflammatory properties [38][39][40].Studies have reported that macrophages that release IL-38 regulate the cellular apoptotic balance and suppress inflammatory cytokine expression in macrophages [41] or Th17 [16].Wei et al. reported that inflammatory cardiomyocytes release IL-38, suppressing excessive apoptosis and inflammation, and as a result, ventricular remodeling was alleviated [42].However, the regulatory mechanism of IL-38 expression with its anti-inflammatory effect is not fully understood.Our results indicate that MSCs could promote its expression in M1, and this promoting function diminishes with age.Regarding the more specific anti-inflammatory effects of IL-38, we observed its suppression of gene expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines and Nf-κb in M1 (Figure 6b,c), consistent with previous reports [41].Furthermore, in vitro results showed that IL-38 suppressed the onset of M1 inflammatory cytokines (Figure 6b,c) and enhanced the expression of M2-related genes (Figure 6d).Interestingly, IL-38 attenuated the apoptosis-inducing effect of cell-to-cell contact (Figure 6e).Although the expression of IL-38 at tissue regeneration sites and its relationship to the inhibition of M1 apoptosis is not clear, it will be considered as a possible negative feedback mechanism.
This study reveals that MSCs play an immunomodulatory function at the site of tissue regeneration by promoting the apoptosis of inflammatory macrophages, suppressing proinflammatory cytokines, and inducing polarity changes.The age-related decline in MSC function delays tissue regeneration and may play a part in the mechanism of delayed healing in elderly patients in clinic.However, the exact mechanism underlying IL-38 inhibition remains to be elucidated.Questions, such as how the delicate balance between MSC-induced M1 apoptosis and the anti-apoptotic effects of IL-38 is achieved, how MSC lose these functions with aging, and what can be done to activate the lost functions, need further investigation.

Animals
C57BL/6J mice (female, 5 and 50 weeks old) were purchased from Japan CLEA Co., Ltd.(Tokyo, Japan).The mouse femoral bone defect model was created under general anesthesia (ketamine, 90 mg/kg; hydroxyzine, 5 mg/kg).A central incision was made in the thigh skin to reveal the muscle.The muscle was then separated, and the periosteum was excised to expose the cortical bone surface of the femur.A bone defect was created in the femoral cortex, 3 mm above the knee joint in the 5-week-old group and 4 mm above in the 50-week-old group using a 1 mm diameter drill bit.All animals were maintained on a standard laboratory diet and were housed under the Okayama University Animal Research Committee (OKU-2021377) throughout the experimental period.

Histological Analysis
After fixation with 4% PFA, the femurs were decalcified with 10% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) for 2-3 weeks and embedded in paraffin according to a standard protocol.For histological analysis, 7 µm thick sections were prepared and stained with HE and Masson's trichrome.We utilized HE staining to color the samples and observed the tissue structure of the samples under a microscope for image analysis.For the measurement of bone reconstruction in Masson's trichrome staining results, we followed the standard Masson's trichrome staining procedure to highlight collagen fibers and bone tissue in blue.After HE and Masson's trichrome staining, the samples were observed under a microscope, and ImageJ was used to quantify the area of newly formed bone tissue, thereby evaluating the extent of bone reconstruction.

TUNEL Assay
To obtain 5 µm frozen sections, the same methods that were used for immunohistochemical analysis were used for the TUNEL assay.According to the manufacturer's instructions, Click-iT Plus TUNEL detection and Alexa Fluor 594 dye (Thermo Fisher Scientific, C10618, Waltham, MA, USA) vwere used to detect apoptotic cells in the bone defect area.Simultaneously, anti-CD80 monoclonal antibody and secondary antibody Alexa Fluor 488, Goat anti-Hamster IgG (H+L) Cross-Absorbed Secondary Antibody were used for CD80 (M1).All images were captured using an all-in-one fluorescence microscope (BZ-710 Keyence, Osaka, Japan), and quantitative analyses of the number of positive cells per area in the regenerative healing site (ROI: 100 µm square) were performed using ImageJ software (ImageJ bundled with 64-bit Java 8, Bethesda, Rockville, MD, USA).

In Vitro Co-Culture Experiments
The culture inserts (Transwell, Corning, Glendale, AZ, USA) for the 6-well plates were used for indirect co-culture.The naïve macrophages (M0) were seeded at a concentration of 1.0 × 10 6 cells/well onto a 6-well plate (lower chamber) and induced to differentiate into M1 or M2 by adding100 ng/mL lipopolysaccharide (LPS, Sigma-Aldrich, Germany), 50 ng/mL IFN-γ (BioLegend, San Diego, CA, USA), or 20 ng/mL IL-4 (BioLegend, San Diego, CA, USA) for 24 h.After 24 h, culture dishes were washed with PBS and replaced with basal culture medium with 10%FBS.Then, MSCs (5-or 50-week MSCs were added into the culture insert (upper chamber) at a 1:1 ratio with the macrophages.In the control group, macrophages or MSCs were incubated separately in the same induction medium.

Real-Time RT-PCR
Total cellular RNA was extracted from MSCs and macrophages separately after 24 h of indirect co-culture using a Purelink RNA Mini Kit (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA), according to the manufacturer's instructions.Total RNA was reverse transcribed using the iScript cDNA Synthesis Kit (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA).Real-time RT-PCR was performed to quantify the expression of target genes using KAPA SYBR FAST qPCR Master Mix (KAPA BIOSYSTEMS, Wilmington, MA, USA) and a CFX96 real-time system (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA), as described previously [44].The expression levels of each mRNA were normalized to those of the reference gene s29.The primer sequences are shown in Table 1.

Flow Cytometry Analysis
To separate MSCs and macrophages after direct co-culture, MSCs were pre-stained with PKH-26 (Invitrogen, Waltham, MA, USA), according to the manufacturer's instructions.Apoptotic macrophages that were negative for PKH26 were detected using Annexin-V Apoptosis Detection Kit I (BD Pharmingen, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA).All samples were analyzed using a BD Accuri C6 (BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA).

Statistical Analyses
The ROI was set as a square with a 0.7 mm side length for micro-CT and histological analysis and 0.1 mm side length for immunohistochemical analysis in the defected area with a 1 mm diameter and 0.8 mm depth from the cortical bone's inner side.
Statistical analyses were performed by two-way factorial ANOVA with Tukey's posthoc correction test (Figures 1-4 and 6a), or one-way factorial ANOVA with Tukey's posthoc correction test (Figures 5 and 6), using GraphPad Prism version 9.5.1 for Windows (GraphPad Software, Boston, MA, USA) with a significance level set at p < 0.05.All data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation.

Figure 1 .
Figure 1.Aged mice showed delayed femoral bone healing.(a,b) Experimental design and establishment of the femoral bone defects in this study.Mice aged 5 and 50 weeks were used in the experiments.A bone defect was created using a 1 mm diameter round bar on the femoral cortex 3 or 4 mm above the knee joint.Mice were sacrificed at day 0, 3, or 7 after surgery.(c) Representative sagittal micro-CT images of the femoral defect after the surgery.Scale bar: 0.5 mm.Yellow square box: Region of Interest (ROI) used for quantification analysis.The bar graph shows the results of the quantitative analysis of bone volume (BV) of the defect area after surgery.(d) Histological examination by HE staining and (e) Masson's trichrome staining after surgery.Scale bar: 0.5 mm.Yellow square box: ROI used for quantification.(f) Representative immunofluorescence images of Runx2 + osteoblasts (red) in the defect area after surgery.Cell nuclei were stained with DAPI (blue).Scale bar: 0.1 mm.Red square box: ROI used for quantification.Bone regeneration was measured

Figure 2 .
Figure 2. Aged mice showed decreased cell accumulation in the wound healing area.(a) Representative images of CD80 + inflammatory macrophages (M1) (green) and (b) CD206 + anti-inflammatory macrophages (M2) (red) in the defect area 0, 3, and 7 days after surgery.Cell nuclei were stained with DAPI (blue).Scale bar: 0.1 mm.Red square box: ROI used for quantification.Yellow square box: magnified images were shown on the right panel.The bar graph shows the results of the quantitative analysis of (a) CD80 + M1 or (b) CD206 + M2 in the ROI.Data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation of three independent experiments or three mice.Two-way factorial ANOVA was performed to confirm statistical significance for main effects of both factors (post-surgery time and

Figure 2 .
Figure 2. Aged mice showed decreased cell accumulation in the wound healing area.(a) Representative images of CD80 + inflammatory macrophages (M1) (green) and (b) CD206 + anti-inflammatory macrophages (M2) (red) in the defect area 0, 3, and 7 days after surgery.Cell nuclei were stained with DAPI (blue).Scale bar: 0.1 mm.Red square box: ROI used for quantification.Yellow square box: magnified images were shown on the right panel.The bar graph shows the results of the quantitative analysis of (a) CD80 + M1 or (b) CD206 + M2 in the ROI.Data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation of three independent experiments or three mice.Two-way factorial ANOVA was performed to confirm statistical significance for main effects of both factors (post-surgery time and mouse age) and those interactions (Supplementary TableS1).Then, Tukey's post-hoc tests were proceeded to confirm the mean difference between the bars (** p < 0.01, * p < 0.05, n = 3).

Figure 3 .
Figure 3. Increased accumulation of MSCs and induction of M1 apoptosis in young mice.(a) Representative images of PDGFRα + MSCs (red) and (b) CD80 + M1 (green) and TUNEL + (red) apoptotic M1 macrophages in the defect area 0, 3, and 7 days after surgery.Cell nuclei were stained with DAPI (blue).Scale bar: 0.1 mm.Red square box: ROI used for the quantification.Yellow square box:

Figure 4 .
Figure 4. MSCs from aged mice showed low ability to induce M1 apoptosis via cell-to-cell contact.(a) Bone marrow-derived monocytes were stimulated with 100 ng/mL M-CSF for 6 h and then induced with 100 ng/mL lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and 50 ng/mL IFN-γ for M1, or 20 ng/mL IL-4 for M2 for 24 h.The 5-week MSCs were added to the Transwell (upper-chamber) at a 1:1 ratio with macrophages or without Transwell for 24 h, and the apoptotic cell percentage was measured by flow cytometry.(b) The same macrophages were cultured with 5-or 50-week MSCs directly at a 1:1 ratio, and the percentage of apoptotic cells was measured.(c) The bar graphs represent Fas' relative gene expression levels in macrophages and (d) Fasl in 5-or 50-week MSCs after co-culture.Apoptotic cells were measured by flow cytometry (a,b), and gene expression levels were measured by realtime RT-PCR (c,d).Data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation of three independent experiments.Two-way factorial ANOVA was performed to confirm statistical significance for the main effects of both factors: (a) macrophage types and experimental conditions, (b) macrophage types and MSC types, (c) macrophage types and experimental conditions, (d) and MSC types and

Figure 4 .
Figure 4. MSCs from aged mice showed low ability to induce M1 apoptosis via cell-to-cell contact.(a) Bone marrow-derived monocytes were stimulated with 100 ng/mL M-CSF for 6 h and then induced with 100 ng/mL lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and 50 ng/mL IFN-γ for M1, or 20 ng/mL IL-4 for M2 for 24 h.The 5-week MSCs were added to the Transwell (upper-chamber) at a 1:1 ratio with macrophages or without Transwell for 24 h, and the apoptotic cell percentage was measured by flow cytometry.(b) The same macrophages were cultured with 5-or 50-week MSCs directly at a 1:1 ratio, and the percentage of apoptotic cells was measured.(c) The bar graphs represent Fas' relative gene expression levels in macrophages and (d) Fasl in 5-or 50-week MSCs after co-culture.Apoptotic cells were measured by flow cytometry (a,b), and gene expression levels were measured by real-time RT-PCR (c,d).Data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation of three independent experiments.Two-way factorial ANOVA was performed to confirm statistical significance for the main effects of both factors: (a) macrophage types and experimental conditions, (b) macrophage types and MSC types, (c) macrophage types and experimental conditions, (d) and MSC types and experimental conditions) and those interactions (Supplementary TableS1).Then, Tukey's post-hoc tests were proceeded to confirm the mean difference between the bars (**** p < 0.0001, *** p < 0.001, ** p < 0.01, * p < 0.05, n = 3).

Figure 5 .
Figure 5. MSCs from aged mice showed low immunomodulatory properties through soluble factors.(a) Bone marrow-derived monocytes were stimulated with 100 ng/mL M-CSF for 6 h and then induced with 100 ng/mL LPS and 50 ng/mL IFN-γ to M1 for 24 h.The 5-or 50-week MSCs were added to the Transwell (upper-chamber) at a 1:1 ratio with macrophages for 24 h, and the relative gene expression levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines (Il-6, iNos, and Tnf-α), (b) Nf-κb, and (c) M2

Figure 5 .
Figure 5. MSCs from aged mice showed low immunomodulatory properties through soluble factors.(a)Bone marrow-derived monocytes were stimulated with 100 ng/mL M-CSF for 6 h and then induced with 100 ng/mL LPS and 50 ng/mL IFN-γ to M1 for 24 h.The 5-or 50-week MSCs were added to the Transwell (upper-chamber) at a 1:1 ratio with macrophages for 24 h, and the relative gene expression levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines (Il-6, iNos, and Tnf-α), (b) Nf-κb, and (c) M2

Table 1 .
Nucleotide sequences of primers used for real-time RT-PCR.