Molecular Aspects of the Functioning of Pathogenic Bacteria Biofilm Based on Quorum Sensing (QS) Signal-Response System and Innovative Non-Antibiotic Strategies for Their Elimination

One of the key mechanisms enabling bacterial cells to create biofilms and regulate crucial life functions in a global and highly synchronized way is a bacterial communication system called quorum sensing (QS). QS is a bacterial cell-to-cell communication process that depends on the bacterial population density and is mediated by small signalling molecules called autoinducers (AIs). In bacteria, QS controls the biofilm formation through the global regulation of gene expression involved in the extracellular polymeric matrix (EPS) synthesis, virulence factor production, stress tolerance and metabolic adaptation. Forming biofilm is one of the crucial mechanisms of bacterial antimicrobial resistance (AMR). A common feature of human pathogens is the ability to form biofilm, which poses a serious medical issue due to their high susceptibility to traditional antibiotics. Because QS is associated with virulence and biofilm formation, there is a belief that inhibition of QS activity called quorum quenching (QQ) may provide alternative therapeutic methods for treating microbial infections. This review summarises recent progress in biofilm research, focusing on the mechanisms by which biofilms, especially those formed by pathogenic bacteria, become resistant to antibiotic treatment. Subsequently, a potential alternative approach to QS inhibition highlighting innovative non-antibiotic strategies to control AMR and biofilm formation of pathogenic bacteria has been discussed.


Introduction
Bacterial processes, such as biofilm formation, secretion of the virulence factor, bioluminescence, production of antibiotics, secondary metabolites, sporulation, apoptosis, and horizontal gene transfer (HGT) ability, are necessary for the functioning of these microorganisms in the external environment [1,2].However, these metabolic processes are ineffective if they occur during the planktonic growth phase of individual bacterial cells [3,4].We know, however, that bacteria have successfully developed an "intelligent" system of cell cooperation, communication, and control mechanisms to survive in the unfavourable conditions of the surrounding environment [5,6].
How are bacteria doing?Through quorum sensing (QS), bacteria synchronously control the global gene expression in response to changes in cell density and species complexity [7,8].Detecting the quorum allows bacteria to switch between two different gene expression programs.The first (1), preferred at low cell density (LCD), promotes individual antisocial behaviour.The second (2), favoured at high cell density (HCD), promotes community behaviour, also known as group behaviour [9][10][11][12].Adapting to environmental changes requires the bacterial community to integrate external signals and coordinate intracellular responses based on global regulatory networks.The basic processes related to detecting and reacting to changes in the number of bacterial cells are analogous in all known bacterial quorum detection systems [10,11,13,14].First, signal molecules called autoinducers (AIs) are synthesized intracellularly.Second, these molecules are either passively released or secreted outside the cellular environment.As the number of cells in the population increases, so does the extracellular autoinducer concentration.Third, when signalling molecules accumulate above the minimum threshold required for detection, their cognate receptors bind to the autoinducer and trigger a signalling cascade that changes gene expression within the bacterial population [11,15,16].Thus, quorum detection enables the coordinated functioning of the bacterial cell population, thereby increasing the chance of survival in adverse environmental conditions [11].
It is well known that bacteria form a biofilm under the control of the QS system [13,15,[17][18][19]].Several excellent reviews discuss how microorganisms develop pathogenic biofilms and their protective mechanisms against antibiotics, antimicrobial agents, and host innate immunity [4,[20][21][22].In 2017, the World Health Organization (WHO) prepared a list of bacterial strains (ESKAPE) like Enterococcus faecium, Staphylococcus aureus, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Acinetobacter baumanii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Enterobacter spp., which are developed through several molecular mechanisms of antimicrobial resistance (AMR), making them ineffective in traditional antibiotic therapy [23,24].These pathogens are responsible for nearly 80% of hospital-acquired infections, particularly in critically ill patients, due to their capacity for biofilm formation [25,26].For instance, previous studies have shown that the pathogenicity of P. aeruginosa is closely related to the biofilm [27].E. faecium and S. aureus resisted various antibiotics, such as vancomycin and fluoroquinolones [28].
Currently, antibiotics are still a significant treatment for pathogens infections.However, biofilms, being a barrier around bacterial cells, reduce the receptivity of bacteria to conventional antibiotics, leading to persistent infections.For instance, Hoiby et al. [29] observed that biofilm bacteria increase antibiotic resistance by about 1000 fold.The intensive development of bacterial resistance to antimicrobial agents is currently a new, major threat to public health care [24,30].Therefore, discovering alternative non-antibiotic strategies for inhibiting bacterial biofilms is urgent due to biofilm resistance to already-used antimicrobial agents [31].Because QS controls a broad spectrum of phenotypes, including virulence and biofilm formation, inhibition of QS may provide alternative therapeutic methods for treating microbial infections [32].The strategy of blocking the QS system and inhibiting virulence factor production is called quorum quenching (QQ) [13,33,34].QQ is a promising non-antibiotic alternative for the treatment of a broad range of pathogenic bacterial infections, including QQ enzymes, which inactivate QS signals, and QS inhibitors (QSIs), which chemically disrupt QS pathways via inhibition of signal receptors [33,35].Moreover, several other innovative therapeutic strategies, like antimicrobial peptides [36], antibodies [37], nanoparticles [38], probiotics [39], and phage therapy [40], as well as precision genome targeting [41], aimed at effectively eradicating biofilm-related infections, are currently under investigation.Despite tremendous progress in antibiotic-resistant mechanisms and corresponding strategies to override resistance, biofilm-associated infections remain a considerable challenge.
Given the important role of quorum sensing (QS) in biofilm formation, this review summarised recent progress in biofilm research, focusing on the mechanisms by which biofilms, especially those formed by pathogenic bacteria, become resistant to antibiotic treatment.In the first part of the review, the role of main QS systems in the global expression regulation of multiple genes involved in the pathogenicity of the biofilm-forming bacteria has been systematized.The second part of the review focused on recent developments in antibiofilm strategies by disrupting the quorum sensing system, which is critical for biofilm formation, and summarised different classes of antimicrobial compounds to control biofilm formation.

Genetic Modules and Their Homologues as Regulatory Networks Detecting QS
The QS system presented in Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria is involved in biofilm formation, bacterial adhesion, host colonization, and expression of many viru-lence factors [17].Moreover, several studies have QS's crucial role in gut microbiota-host cell interaction [31].QS regulates gene expression dependent on cell population density, facilitated by small signalling molecules known as autoinducers (AIs) [11,42].Therefore, AIs are called "hormone-like molecules", whereas the biofilm is considered a multicellular organism [11,16,43].The AIs are products of the specific genes, and then after modification, they diffuse freely across the cell membranes or are actively transported out of the cell [13,14,44].Once the concentration of secreted Al molecules has reached a threshold level, they are detected by cognate sensor proteins.These proteins either transduce the signal to downstream transcriptional regulators or function as transcriptional regulators to mediate changes in global gene expression [15,18,45].

QS in Gram-Negative Bacteria 2.1.1. AHL Signalling
The primary signalling molecules in Gram-negative bacteria are homoserine lactones (AHLs), called acyl-homoserine lactones, known as AI-1 autoinducers [16].AI-1 is used in intraspecific communication of biofilm-forming bacteria [10], although some bacteria can detect competing bacterial species in the surrounding environment [14].In Gram-negative bacteria, the QS based on AHLs plays a vital role in regulating global gene expression in response to the density of bacterial cells [16].This type of QS signal is found in more than 70 species of bacteria, most of which are pathogens [12,46,47].
The best-known AHL-mediated QS mechanism in Gram-negative bacteria is the LuxI/LuxR system, which was described for the first time in V. fischeri (Figure 1).LuxItype proteins are responsible for the synthesis of AI-1, predominantly 3-oxo-hexanoyll-homoserine lactone (3OC 6 -HSL), which passively penetrates the cell membrane and transmits a signal transmission between cells [6,7].The N-terminal domain of LuxR protein recognises and binds AI-1.In contrast, the C-terminal domain, via conserved helix-turnhelix motif, interacts with the promoter of multiple target genes in the region of their palindromic sequence (lux-box), located about 40 bp upstream of the ATG codon [11,16,42].After reaching the threshold, AHLs and LuxR form the LuxR-AHLs complex, which recognises the "lux box" of luxI to promote the luxI transcription, creating a positive feedback loop [48][49][50].

PQS Signalling
In P. aeruginosa, the third QS system is an AHL-independent system that consists of a LysR-type regulator PqsR (also known as MyfR) and the pseudomonas quinolone signal (PQS, 2-heptyl-3-hydroxy-4-quinolone) called PQS system [75].Cell signalling of the PQS system occurs via the synthesis and modification of 4-hydroxy-2-alkyquinolines (HAQ) under the control of the transcriptional regulator PqsR.PqsR regulates the expression of the genes involved in the production of anthranilic acid and its conversion to 4-hydroxy-2heptylquinoline (HHQ) [76].The pqsABCDE, phnAB, and pqsH locus control the synthesis of HAQ and HHQ molecules; the pqsA and pqsBCD genes encode the ligase and synthases involved in the precursor HHQ synthesis.HHQ, following subsequent modifications via the action of the FAD-dependent mono-oxygenase encoded by pqsH, is converted to PQS [77,78].Recent studies suggest the role of pqsE in thioesterase TesB synthesis, which is involved in the HHQ synthesis pathway [79].The resulting PQS and HHQ autoinducers, after exceeding the critical threshold required for QS induction, bind and activate pqsR and pqsH mRNA transcription under the control of LasR.PQS and HHQ play dual roles as PqsR ligands and as extracellular signalling molecules for the pqsR regulon, although there are differences in their biological properties [77,78,80,81].Diffusion of hydrophobic PQS into the biofilm matrix occurs via the secretion of small membrane vesicles (MVs) [77,78].In the P. aeruginosa genome, the PQS-PqsR complex controls the expression of over 12% of genes involved, among others, in the biosynthesis of rhamnolipids, pyocyanin, elastase, iron acquisition, resistance to oxidative stress, and biofilm formation [80].PQS signalling creates a network of connections with the PqsR, Las, and Rhl systems to regulate the production of several common factors involved in biofilm formation, such as LecA and siderophores [82].The factor controlled by the PQS/PqsR system is extracellular DNA (eDNA), which is essential for forming stable and mature biofilms [83].Accumulation of 2-n-heptyl-4-hydroxyquinoline N-oxide (HQNO), whose production is controlled by PQS signalling, leads to autolysis, eDNA release, and increased biofilm biomass [83].In addition, Cookie et al. [84] reported that PQS induces outer membrane vesicle (OMVs) formation in P. aeruginosa.A significantly elevated PQS and OMV synthesis level was observed during biofilm dispersion compared to the attachment and maturation stages.Authors showed that OMVs participate in extracellular protein, lipid, and nucleotide degradation, promoting biofilm dissemination in P. aeruginosa infections [84,85].

IQS Signalling
IQS has been identified as the fourth QS system in P. aeruginosa capable of integrating environmental stress cues with the QS network [86,87].Several previous studies reported that synthesis of the IQS (2-(2-hydroxyphenyl) thiazole-4-carbaldehyde) is controlled by the gene cluster ambABCDE, while the cognate receptor is unknown [88].For example, Lee et al. [86] reported that the disruption of LasI/LasR leads to the inhibition of the ambBCDE expression and reduction of the IQS synthesis.Recently, Cornelis [89] presented commentary that ambABCDE genes are not responsible for IQS synthesis.Results strongly suggested that IQS is aeruginaldehyde derived from the siderophore pyochelin biosynthetic pathway [88] and is produced by other Pseudomonas, including P. protegens and Burkholderia thailandensis, which do not have the amb genes cluster [88,90].Furthermore, Rojas Murcia et al. [91] reported that the ambBCDE genes cluster is responsible for the biosynthesis of L-2-amino-4-methoxy-trans3-butenoic acid (AMB) but did not specify IQS in P. aeruginosa.Therefore, the accurate role of IQS in the QS system requires further investigation.

QS in Gram-Positive Bacteria
Gram-positive bacteria have developed different mechanisms of autoinducer synthesis and signal transmission from the sensor proteins of a cell to the effectors [92][93][94].Mechanisms and proteins involved in QS in Gram-positive bacteria are best known in Streptococcus pneumoniae, Bacillus subtilis, and Staphylococcus aureus [95].QS system in Gram-positive bacteria is mediated by autoinducing peptides (AIPs), which are products of the digestion of larger protein precursors [96,97].One of the major differences between LuxI/LuxR and AIPs is the location of their cognate receptors.In the Gram-positive bacteria, LuxR-type receptors are cytoplasmic, whereas, in the Gram-positive bacteria, API receptors are membrane-bound and, as binary signalling proteins, transmit information by a series of phosphorylation events [98].Next, APIs are transported outside the cell via specialized ATP-binding cassette transporters, interacting with transcription factors that control the expression of target genes [99].A typical Gram-positive QS system consists of a membrane-bound histidine kinase receptor and a related cytoplasmic response regulator acting as a transcription regulator (Figure 2).ceptors are membrane-bound and, as binary signalling proteins, transmit information by a series of phosphorylation events [98].Next, APIs are transported outside the cell via specialized ATP-binding cassette transporters, interacting with transcription factors that control the expression of target genes [99].A typical Gram-positive QS system consists of a membrane-bound histidine kinase receptor and a related cytoplasmic response regulator acting as a transcription regulator (Figure 2).As in AHL quorum detection systems, the concentration of secreted AIP autoinducers increases with increasing cell density.Phosphorylated regulatory proteins act as DNA-binding transcription factors to modulate the expression of target genes.In many cases, the genes encoding the autoinducer precursor, the histidine kinase receptor, and the regulatory protein form an operon, and its expression is automatically induced by QS detection.This configuration produces positive feedback and accelerates the transition from LCD to HCD, a quorum-dependent mode of gene expression.The figure was created with BioRender (https://biorender.com/, 4 February 2023).
The most typical example of AIP-mediated QS is the agr system in S. aureus [92,95,99].The agr system is evolutionarily conserved in Gram-positive bacteria, including Lactobacillus plantarum, Clostridium botulinum, C. perfringens, C. difficile, L. monocytogenes and Enterococcus faecalis [100].In S. aureus, the synthesis of AIPs and their sensors are under the control of the P2 and P3 promoters, controlling the agrBDCA operon, which is transcribed to produce the polycistronic RNAII and RNA III transcripts [101,102].The AIP precursor is encoded by the agrD, which, after subsequent modifications and the attachment of the thiolactone ring under the control of the argB, acquires the properties of a specific autoinducer API.The agrC is responsible for histidine kinase synthesis, while the AgrA, as a terminal regulatory protein, is synthesized under the control of the agrA gene [103].agrA/agrC induces RNAII transcription, terminating the autoinduction and RNAIII circuits.Interestingly, instead of encoding a regulatory protein, the RNAIII transcript acts as a regulatory effector molecule for the agr system, mainly via translational inhibition of the virulence gene repressor Rot [103,104].In S. aureus, a specific peptide sequence defines four groups of specific AIPs (I, II, III, IV) [105].The agrC/agrA S. aureus system activates the expression of several virulence genes involved in α-hemolysin, coagulase, and enterotoxin synthesis [101,106].A well-studied AIP system is ComQXPA B. subtilis, which comprises four proteins: the ComQ isoprenyl transferase, the ComX pre-peptide signal, the ComP histidine kinase, and the ComA response regulator [96,102].ComQ is required to process, modify, export ComX, and produce the mature QS signal.Extracytoplasmic binding of ComX with ComP leads to phosphorylation and activation of ComA, which positively regulates surfactin production [107,108].Another group of QS receptors is the RRNPP system, which was discovered in Bacillus, Streptococcus, and Enterococcus [96].The RRNPP consists of Rap, NprR, PlcR, PrgX, and Rgg proteins [109]; the Rap is a phosphatase and transcriptional antiactivator, whereas NprR, PlcR, and PrgX are DNA-binding transcription factors.In B. cereus, NprR and PlcR regulate sporulation, virulence, biofilm formation, and genetic competence [96].In Streptococcus pyogenes, Rgg regulates the expression of genes required for biofilm formation and virulence [110].In turn, PrgX in Enterococcus faecalis regulates the conjugation of the antibiotic resistance plasmid pCF10 [111].Autoinducer-2 (AI-2) is a conserved universal QS system coexisting in Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacteria [99,112,113].The AI-2 system is believed to be used for crossspecies signalling by organisms living in mixed-species communities, such as biofilms [99,114].AI-2 produced by one species can influence gene expression in another, enabling bacteria to modify behaviours such as virulence, luminescence, and biofilm formation across different species [99,112,114].For example, an EHEC strain that lacks the luxI gene can communicate within the species via Al-2 and sense Al-1 secreted by P. aeruginosa [113].However, AI-2 produced by E. coli can be detected by V. harveyi to induce bioluminescence.Conversely, AI-2 produced by V. harveyi can be detected by E. coli to regulate the expression of the lsr system [114,115].Moreover, AI-2 may coordinate microcolony formation and other processes in multispecies biofilms such as HGT [112,116].
The enzyme responsible for the synthesis of the AI-2 is the LuxS protein, a synthase encoded by the luxS gene [116].LuxS is a metalloenzyme containing a zinc ion in the active site, which is involved in the cleavage of the ribose ring during the synthesis of AI-2 [117].AI-2 is synthesized starting from S-adenosylmethionine, which through a series of enzymatic reactions, including the reaction catalysed by LuxS, is converted to 4,5-dihydroxy-2,3-pentanedione (DPD), a compound that cyclizes into several furanones in the presence of water [115].DPD is a very reactive molecule that, in solution, spontaneously rearranges into a collection of chemically distinct molecular forms that contain AI-2 activity, which is recognised by receptor proteins of bacteria belonging to different species [118][119][120].LuxS, the AI-2 has been identified in many bacterial species, including pathogens such as E. coli, S. enterica Typhimurium, V. cholerae, Haemophilus influenzae, S. aureus, Streptococcus pyogenes, B. subtilis, C. jejuni, Helicobacter pylori, Klebsiella pneumoniae, as well as Shigella flexnerii [118,121,122].The LuxS/AI-2 QS system modulates various cellular processes involved mainly in the regulation of virulence factors, bacterial luminescence, sporulation, motility, toxin production, biofilm formation, and drug resistance [112,115,116,120].
In Vibrio species, AI-2 controls bioluminescence involving two proteins, LuxP and LuxQ [120,123].AI-2/LuxP complex interacts with a sensor kinase, LuxQ, triggering a phosphotransfer cascade that leads to luciferase production and subsequent luminescence [99,120,121].In S. enterica Typhimurium, the homologue of the LuxP is the LsrB (LuxS-regulated protein B) receptor, which is part of the ABC transporter system [124].In this system, AI-2, by binding to the LsrB receptor, is phosphorylated by the LsrK kinase and, then, by binding to the transcription-regulating protein LsrR, activates the transcription of the lsrACDBFGE operon, resulting in active internalization of AI-2 from the extracellular space into the cytoplasm [119].In pathogenic H. pylori, the function of the AI-2 is performed by the chemoreceptor TlpB, but the signal transduction mechanism has not yet been fully understood [117].It is known, however, that AI-2 induces pathogenicity island genes in E. coli O157: H7 [125] and is involved in the regulation of hemolysin and protease synthesis in V. vulnificus [126], secretion of cysteine protease in S. pyogenes [127], and expression of the virulence gene virB in Shigella flexnerii [128].In EHEC and enteropathogenic E. coli, LuxS is a crucial regulator of the QS and controls the expression of the T3SS system encoded by the locus of enterocyte effacement (LEE) pathogenicity island [46].Transcriptomic studies have revealed that LuxS is a global regulator in EHEC, controlling the expression of over 400 genes [129].Most of these genes have functions related to bacterial virulence, such as flagellar motility, surface adhesion, and Shiga toxin production [130].

Autoinducer System Type 3 (AI-3)
The regulatory mechanism of the AI-3 autoinducer in biofilm formation and correlation with QS remains incomplete.In a previous study, the production of AI-3 was reported to depend on a luxS gene [46], but this was later shown to be due to an indirect effect [131].It has been suggested that Al-3 may play an essential function as a QS signal in interspecies bacterial-host communication [132,133].The AI-3 is a hormone-like signal transduced by the binary QseBC system in which QseC is a histidine kinase, whereas QseB is a response regulator [134].The periplasmic QseC domain is preserved among several species of Gram-negative bacteria such as enteropathogenic E. coli (serotype O26: H11 and O111ac: H9), Shigella spp., Salmonella spp., S. enterica Typhimurium, S. typhi, E. cloacae, Yersinia pestis, Y. enterocolitica, Pasteurella multocida and H. influenzae [135].AI-3 acts similarly to eukaryotic hormones since QseC is a bacterial adrenergic receptor for the eukaryotic host hormones epinephrine and noradrenaline [46,136].Another consequence of this structural similarity is that AI-3 is inhibited by adrenergic receptor antagonists [135,137].In addition, epinephrine/norepinephrine can provide a QS signal to the quorum of gut microbiota and activate the QseC/QseB system [137,138].Enterohemorrhagic E. coli O157:H7 (EHEC) use human hormones such as epinephrine and noradrenaline to activate virulence genes [136,139], which can be associated with irritable bowel syndrome induced by chronic stress and the stress hormone cascade [132].In E. coli, mobility and virulence are regulated by QS using an Al-3 signalling molecule [46,134,136].In the presence of AI-3, the QseC domain undergoes autophosphorylation and then, by phosphorylating QseB, induces the transcription of the main flhDC regulon located in the locus of enterocyte effacement (LEE), which is responsible for cilia biosynthesis, cell mobility, and synthesis Shiga toxin [140].However, the regulatory mechanisms of AI-3 for biofilm formation remain unclear.

Bacterial-Host Communication
It is suggested that QS may control the species composition of the gut microbiota [114,141,142].Thompson et al. [114] showed that antibiotic therapy's disruption of the composition of gut bacteria species synthesizing AI-2 leads to dysbiosis.Interestingly, a much greater percentage of Firmicutes than Bacteroidetes encode functional AI-2 signalling systems [51,114].It has been reported that AI-2 synthesized by gut microflora such as Blautia obeum was associated with reduced V. cholerae virulence and protection against this pathogen [143].The human commensal bacterium Ruminococcus obeum was shown to inhibit colonization of the mouse gut by V. cholerae, partially through AI-2 signalling [143].Moreover, AI-2 exposure to host epithelial cells has been associated with increased inflammatory cytokines, such as IL-8 [144] and IL-17A secretion, during acute P. aeruginosa infection [145].In addition, Al-2 produced by P. aeruginosa caused apoptosis in some mammalian cells [141,146].Recent studies suggest that QS is involved in bacterial-host interactions [141,142].Ismail et al. [141] showed that mammalian epithelial cells produce an Al-2 mimic activity in response to bacteria or tight junction disruption that acts analogously to AI-2.This AI-2 mimic can be recognised by the bacterial AI-2 receptor, such as LuxP/LsrB, leading to the activation of QS-controlled gene expression [51,94,141].AI-2 mimic could be involved in host-gut microbiota interaction and play a role in host-microbial symbiosis as epithelial cells directly interact with colonizing bacteria [141].Although this remains debatable, AI-2 mimic may trigger widespread global gut microbiota gene expression changes.
The main bacterial QS systems used by selected bacteria are summarised in Table 1.

Molecular Mechanisms of the Formation and Functioning of Bacterial Biofilm
The Role of QS in the Global Control of Gene Expression Profiles Biofilm formation includes several stages, which depend on the colonized surface and the type of microorganisms [5,6].The characteristic feature of bacterial cells that are an integral part of the biofilm is their increased resistance to external factors such as temperature, antibiotics, and nutrient changes [148].These properties arise from the diversity of phenotypic subpopulations of bacterial cells forming the biofilm structure.Biofilm is characterised by complex ecological and structural heterogeneity, genetic diversity, the complexity of interactions, and the presence of extracellular substances [18,19,149,150].The number of genes controlled by QS is large and may even exceed 10% of the bacterial genome [151,152].Research on the molecular mechanisms of biofilm formation and the role of the QS in this process gained momentum with the development of high-throughput sequencing cDNA technology (RNA-seq) applying next-generation sequencing (NGS) platforms.Compared to the traditional methods of studying individual genes, transcriptomics provides a global study of gene expression and has been used successfully to study biofilm formation [129,153].Numerous data revealed that pathogenic bacteria growing in biofilm exhibit differential gene expression (DEGs) compared with the planktonic state, including Salmonella [154], S. pneumoniae [155], S. aureus [156,157], V. parahaemolyticus [158], and C. difficile [159].
Generally, based on numerous transcriptional studies, the genes controlled by QS can be classified into four categories based on their biological functions [152,160,161].The first group includes genes involved in cell life and growth; the second group includes genes controlling the behaviour of cells in the environment; the third group includes genes associated with HGT; and the fourth group includes genes whose expression is correlated with the synthesis of virulence factors [152,160].Several groups of genes expressed by induction of the QS system, such as Las operon (lasB, aprA, toxA, rhlR), Rhl operon (lecA, Lecb, rhlAB), Pqs operon (pqsE), and Igs operon (lasA, lasB, hcnA, rhlAB), encode proteins belonging to proteases, elastases, coagulases, exotoxins, lectins, and other virulence factors [154,155,161].Among the mRNA transcripts under the control of the QS system, different expression levels were noticed for genes involved in the stress response pathway (hslS, hslT, soxS) [156], as well as in the cellular metabolic pathway (metK, artI, hyaA, fruK, gadB) [154,156,157].Recently, Jiang et al. [160] showed that the differential expression of artM, artQ, ssrS, pflA, and hutX genes (DEGs) was significantly correlated with the in vitro colonization and adhesion ability of Haemophilus parasuis; these are the most likely genes to affect biofilm formation.These data indicate that biofilm formation is a multifactorial process involving stress response, structural development, and regulatory processes.Nonetheless, it should be noted that some important signalling pathways can be regulated by phosphorylation cascades that are not detected at the level of the global expression analyses [152].

QS Pathways Inhibition
Quorum-sensing inhibitory compounds might be applicable in many fields, including medicine, agriculture, and environmental engineering.This is extremely important in the context of resistance to preventing and treating infections associated with the pathogenic biofilm resistant to traditional antibiotics.Many bacterial pathogens responsible for infectious diseases are known to have the ability to form biofilms.Due to the increased antibiotic resistance of human and animal pathogens, QQ is a promising antimicrobial approach.Prevention of biofilm formation by blocking the QS signal has the advantage that no direct bactericidal effect is associated with a lower probability of bacterial resistance development.In combination with antibiotic therapy, it increases its effectiveness by blocking the synthesis of a wide range of virulence factors [32].
Therefore, next-generation antibiofilm agents are being discovered and developed to block particular virulence factors and specific matrix-targeting enzymes responsible for biofilm formation (Figure 3).There are different ways for QS inhibition in each pathway, such as (1) inhibition of AHL synthesis, (2) AHL receptor antagonism, (3) inhibition of targets downstream of receptor binding, (4) sequestration of AHL, (5) the degradation of AHL, and (6) inhibition of AHL secretion and/or transport [162].by phosphorylation cascades that are not detected at the level of the global expression analyses [152].

QS Pathways Inhibition
Quorum-sensing inhibitory compounds might be applicable in many fields, including medicine, agriculture, and environmental engineering.This is extremely important in the context of resistance to preventing and treating infections associated with the pathogenic biofilm resistant to traditional antibiotics.Many bacterial pathogens responsible for infectious diseases are known to have the ability to form biofilms.Due to the increased antibiotic resistance of human and animal pathogens, QQ is a promising antimicrobial approach.Prevention of biofilm formation by blocking the QS signal has the advantage that no direct bactericidal effect is associated with a lower probability of bacterial resistance development.In combination with antibiotic therapy, it increases its effectiveness by blocking the synthesis of a wide range of virulence factors [32].
Therefore, next-generation antibiofilm agents are being discovered and developed to block particular virulence factors and specific matrix-targeting enzymes responsible for biofilm formation (Figure 3).There are different ways for QS inhibition in each pathway, such as (1) inhibition of AHL synthesis, (2) AHL receptor antagonism, (3) inhibition of targets downstream of receptor binding, (4) sequestration of AHL, (5) the degradation of AHL, and (6) inhibition of AHL secretion and/or transport [162].So far, many natural QS inhibitors have been isolated from bacteria, plants, fungi, and some animals from aqueous ecosystems [148].These compounds are typically non-toxic to eukaryotes and offer many applications in medicine, food, and other industries.Natural compounds acting as QS inhibitors have been demonstrated in numerous species of herbs, vegetables, and fruits [163][164][165][166]. Furocoumarins, naturally occurring substances in grapefruit, showed more than 90% inhibition of the AI-1 and AI-2 activity in V. harveyi and biofilm formation by E. coli O157: H7, P. aeruginosa, and S. Typhimurium [164].In P. aeruginosa, limonene extracted from mandarine (Citrus reticulate) inhibited biofilm formation by 41% at 0.1 mg/mL and AHL signalling production by 33%.Orange extract rich in flavons such as hesperidin, neohesperidin, and naringenin inhibited AHL production in Yersinia enterocolitica [165].Antibiofilm activity was also observed for Ananas comosus extract (pineapple) or Musa paradiciaca (banana) water extracts, which prevented the synthesis of P. aeruginosa virulence factors such as proteases, elastases, and pyocyanin, which resulted in decreased biofilm production [167].Murugan et al. [168] showed that the methanol extract from the herb Andrographis paniculata, containing diterpenoid lactone and andrographolide, effectively inhibited the production of bacterial efflux pumps and virulence factors in clinical strains of P. aeruginosa KMS P03 and KMS P05, resulting in increased sensitivity of bacteria to antibiotics and inhibition of biofilm formation [168].Similarly, ethanol extract from Amomum tsaoko inhibited the biofilm formation of food-borne pathogens such as S. typhimurium, S. aureus, and P. aeruginosa [163].In contrast, the biofilm formation of E. coli and P. aeruginosa was inhibited by the methanolic extract of Buchanania lanzana Spreng [169].Pyocyanin production, biofilm formation, swarming motility, elastolytic, and proteolytic activities in P. aeruginosa PAO1 were inhibited by a flavonoid extract from Centella Asiatica [170].P. aeruginosa PAO1 virulence was studied by Vandeputte et al. [166], who proved that specific flavonoids could decrease signal perception, which results in lower virulence and inhibition of biofilm formation.The ability of eugenol from clove, garlic, and phenolic extract of Rubus rosifolius to attenuate biofilm formation of P. aeruginosa and Serratia marcescens has also been reported [170,171].Ruttrapa and Bais [172] showed that curcumin from Curcuma longa attenuated the virulence of P. aeruginosa PAO1 and prevented biofilm at the early stages of its formation.Recent studies have found that quercetin can inhibit the QS systems and target the lasIR and rhlR in P. aeruginosa and lux and agr in Listeria monocytogenes, respectively [173].Kalia [164] showed antibiofilm QQ-dependent activity of secondary plant metabolites such as apigenin, naringenin, and kaempferol against E. coli O157:H7.Other plant extracts, such as hordenine and limonoids, have shown efficiency against biofilm formation by preventing the transcription of specific AHLs and were investigated as control strategies for inhibiting QS and biofilm formation [174].
Synthetic QQ molecules such as cinnamyl alcohol, allyl cinnamate, and methyl transcinnamate, which are derivatives of cinnamic acid, inhibited the production of the important virulence factor, violacein, by Caenorhabditis violaceum [175].It has been reported that polyamine norspermidine effectively reduced the attachment of P. aeruginosa to the surface by inhibiting the expression of lasI, lasR, rhlI, rhlR, and mvfR genes [176].Hobley et al. [177] showed that exogenous norspermidine prevented B. subtilis biofilm formation by condensing biofilm exopolysaccharide.Moreover, the class of chemically synthesized halogenated furanones has successfully inhibited biofilm formation [178,179].Zhao et al. [178] reported that furanone C-30 may inhibit biofilm formation and antibiotic resistance in P. aeruginosa through regulating QS genes; significantly decreased lasB, rhlA, phzA2, pqsR, lasI, rhlI, pqsE, and pqsH expression levels in the mature biofilm have been observed.It was also shown that biofilms treated with C-30 are susceptible to tobramycin and readily dispersed by detergents [180].In addition, the effect of C-5 aromatic substituted furanones on inhibiting biofilm formation and reducing virulence factor production in P. aeruginosa has also been reported [179].Unfortunately, despite numerous advantages, recent reports indicate the development of bacterial resistance to QS inhibitors [152,164,181].For example, studies of mexR and nalC P. aeruginosa mutants showed increased resistance to C-30 [181].Defoirdt et al. [182] proposed that bacteria might evolve resistance to QQ compounds under conditions in which growth is directly coupled to QS.In addition, QS inhibitors can select more virulent strains, disrupting natural selection for reduced virulence [181].Therefore, it is important to consider the risks associated with using the QQ strategies described above.

Enzymatic QS Inhibitors
Enzymatic degradation of the QS signal is a second group of the QQ strategy.QQ enzymes were discovered in a wide range of bacteria and were classified into three major types according to their enzymatic mechanisms: (1) lactonase that hydrolyses lactone moiety of AHL; (2) acylase that cleaves amide bonds between lactone ring and the fatty acid side chain; and (3) oxidoreductase that modify AHL chemical structure by oxidation or reduction of a third carbon of the fatty acid side chain [183].In Gram-negative bacteria, lactonase and acylase degrade all signals and have the broadest spectrum of AHL specificity regardless of acyl side chain length or substitutions [184].AHL lactonases, such as SsoPox, Aii810, AiiK, AiiA, and AHL-1, isolated from different microorganisms, have been reported to sequester AHL and reduce biofilm formation [185][186][187].Rajesh and Rai [188] showed that AiiA lactonase produced by the Bacillus cereus VT96 effectively inhibited biofilm formation and production of pyocyanin, rhamnolipid, and exopolysaccharides in P. aeruginosa PAO1.A reduction in lung injury and mortality in a rat P. aeruginosa model was also observed upon nasal administration of the SsoPox-1-lactonase, which inhibited QS signalling, virulence factor production, and biofilm formation [189].Lactonase isolated from Geobacillus kaustophilus HTA426 was reported to degrade the lactone ring in the AHL's structure, affecting Acinetobacter baumannii by impeding biofilm production [190].Enzymes with lactonase activity, such as paraoxonases (PONs), have also been identified in host cells [191].The ability of human PON1, PON2, and PON3 to AHL hydrolysis has been reported by Chun et al. [191].Devarajan et al. [192] showed that in PON2 deficient mice, a marked impairment in their ability to hydrolyse 3-OC 12 -HSL and fight P. aeruginosa infection was observed.Similarly, in cystic fibrosis patients, lower PON-2 expression was associated with susceptibility to P. aeruginosa infection [193].Gupta et al. [194] showed that lactonase obtained from Bacillus sp.ZA12 stopped the systemic spread of bacteria, reduced mortality, and offered synergistic activity with ciprofloxacin in a mice model of burn infection using the P. aeruginosa reference strain PAO1.
Acylase enzymes similar to lactonases can hydrolyse AHLs and disrupt the QS of pathogens bacteria.Acylases were derived from Streptomyces sp.M664 (AhlM) [195] Ralstonia sp.XJ12B (AiiD) [196], Ralstonia solanacearum GMI1000 (Aac) [197], P. aeruginosa (PydQ) [198], and Ochrabactrum sp.A44 (AiiO) [199].In vitro experiments showed that AiiD and AhlM could greatly reduce the swimming of P. aeruginosa, extracellular elastase activity, secretion of pyocyanin, and the pathogenicity of nematodes [200].Similar results have been reported by Utari et al. [198], who studied the activity of PvdQ on the AHL signalling molecule of P. aeruginosa in a mouse model.Results showed that PvdQ hydrolysed AHL, leading to a decrease in P. aeruginosa infection.Paul et al. [201] showed the potential of acylase I to reduce biofilm formation by Aeromonas hydrophila and Pseudomonas putida on borosilicate (36% and 23%), polystyrene (60% and 73%), and a reverse osmosis membrane.In the rabbit model of infection, the acylase, in combination with α-amylase derived from the Bacillus amyloliquefaciens, was found to degrade the biofilm formation of E. coli and P. aeruginosa [202].In turn, Aspergillus melleus acylase incorporated within silicon catheters and polyurethane coatings disrupted the biofilm formation of P. aeruginosa ATCC10145 and PAO1 strain [202].
Regarding oxidoreductases, the novel oxidoreductase BpiB09 derived from the metagenomic library was found to be able to inhibit 3OC 12 -HSL production, leading to a significant reduction of motility, biofilm formation, and pyocyanin synthesis in P. aeruginosa [200].The P-450/NADPH-P450 isolated from B. megaterium CYP102A1 was capable of the efficient oxidation of AHLs at the ω-1, ω-2, and ω-3 carbons of the acyl chain to eliminate their QS activity [203].Uroz et al. [204] reported the presence of two oxidoreductases in Rhodococcus erythropolis W2, which converts 3-oxo-AHLs to their corresponding 3-hydroxy derivatives, and an amidolytic activity, which cleaves the amide bond linking the acyl chain to the HSL residue.Similarly, the capability of QQ-2 oxidoreductase, immobilized to the glass surface, to inhibit Klebsiella oxytoca and clinical K. pneumoniae biofilm formation, has also been reported [205].

Antimicrobial Peptides as QS Inhibitors
Antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) are a class of natural (NAMPs) and synthetic peptides (SAMPs) with a broad spectrum of antimicrobial properties [36,206].Natural AMPs are important components of the innate immunity of almost all living organisms, protecting the host against infections [206,207].NAMPs have been extracted from bacteria, fungi, plants, insects, fish, amphibians, mammals, and the human body [206].The largest number of AMPs derived from animals, totalling 2519 AMPs, followed by 824 AMPs from plants, 431 AMPs from bacteria, 7 AMPs from protozoans, 6 AMPs from fungi, and, finally, 4 AMPs from archaea [208,209].In various studies, AMPs have exhibited antibacterial and antibiofilm activity against various MDR strains and, therefore, are promising alternatives to current antimicrobials [36,206,207].Antimicrobial properties of NAMPs, including gramicidin S from B. brevis [210], polymyxin B and A from B. polymyxa or vancomycin produced by S. orientalis [211], have been reported in several studies [207,212].Similarly, magainin-2 extracted from amphibians, such as frog skin, showed antibacterial activity against MDR strains, protozoa, yeasts, and fungi [213].Crotalicidin extracted from rattlesnakes killed 90% of E. coli and P. aeruginosa cells within 90-120 min and 5-30 min, respectively [214].Moreover, the strong in vitro antibacterial potential of NAMPs against various pathogenic microorganisms isolated from marine sources has also been reported [209].Polyphemusin-I obtained from hemocyte debris of Lumulus polyphemus showed antibacterial activity against E. coli and Candida albicans [215].Raghavan et al. [216] reported that MFAP9 derived from marine Aspergillus fumigatus BTMF9 exhibited inhibitory activity against B. circulans biofilm formation.Cathelicidins (CATH BRALE and codCath1) derived from fish showed antibacterial activity in a broad spectrum of Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria [175].The best-studied NAMP produced in the human body is cathelicidin LL-37, termed host defence enzymes, which possesses antimicrobial and antibiofilm activities against a broad spectrum of MDR strains [171,217].A large number of studies regarding antimicrobial/antibiofilm properties of the LL-37 are focused on strains in which antibiotic resistance is a serious problem, including P. aeruginosa [218], S. aureus [219], S. epidermidis [220], Streptococcus pneumoniae [221], Streptococcus pyogenes [222], Acinetobacter baumannii [223], E. coli [224], K. pneumonia [225], Helicobacter pylori [226], and Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans [227].In P. aeruginosa PAO1 grown under biofilm conditions in a flow cell, global gene expression analysis revealed that 4-day exposure to LL-37 (4 µg/mL) led to the downregulation of 475 genes, including QS-controlled genes such as lasl and rhlR [228].This caused the downregulation of over 50 genes that are part of the respective regulons and affected the transcription of genes involved in producing virulence factors, motility, adhesion, the development of biofilm, and the modulation of host immune responses [189].Xiao et al. [218] showed that sub-growth inhibitory doses of LL-37 affect biofilm formation in P. aeruginosa PAO1 by reducing the elastase and pyocyanin levels, promoting eDNA release and biofilm formation.In addition, LL-37 at a concentration of >20 µM suppressed S. aureus biofilm formation, isolated from lesion skin of patients with atopic dermatitis [229].In addition, LL-37 reduced biofilm formed by MRSA at 41% [230].Tachyplesin III from Southeast Asian horseshoe crabs is also known for its antimicrobial properties [231].Minardi et al. [231] showed that Tachyplesin III, in combination with piperacillin-tazobactam, significantly reduced P. aeruginosa biofilms in a rat ureteral stent model.Moreover, antibiofilm properties of Protegrin 1 against Acinetobacter baumannii [232], indolicidin against multi-drug-resistant enteroaggregative E. coli (MDR-EAEC) [233], as well as SMAP-29 against Burkholderia thailandensis isolated from pig [232], cattle [234], and sheep [235], have also been demonstrated.
AMPs affect biofilm formation or degradation with different mechanisms of action, including acting on the cell wall, cell membrane, and different intracellular targets, as well as host immune system modulation activities [236].Some AMPs destroy bacterial cell wall structure by interfering with the biosynthesis of cell wall components such as peptidoglycan [237,238].Vancomycin and oritavancin can bind to the cell wall synthesis precursor lipid II, which in turn interferes with further enzymatic processes, thereby inhibiting peptidoglycan synthesis [237].Similarly, nisin secreted by Lactococcus and Streptococcus exerts an antibacterial effect by inhibition of peptidoglycan synthesis and forms pores at sensitive membranes upon interaction with lipid II synthesis [238][239][240].Moreover, peptides can inhibit cell wall and protein synthesis, bacterial cell division or DNA replication by interacting with specific proteins involved in this biological process.Di Somma et al. [241] showed that temporin-L interaction with E. coli FtsZ protein impaired cell division by inhibiting Z-ring formation, causing bacterial death without damaging the cell membrane.Mardirossian et al. [242] showed the antimicrobial activity of Bac5 against E. coli, A. baumannii, K. pneumoniae, S. aureus, S. enterica, and P. aeruginosa by inhibiting bacterial protein synthesis.A similar antibiofilm mechanism for proline-rich AMPs [243] and several SAMPs, e.g., PS1-2, 35409 or SET-M33 [209,234,236], has also been demonstrated.Moreover, studies reported that SAMPs are more efficient NAMPs by exerting antibacterial activity at low concentrations than their natural analogues [243,244].For example, compared to natural AamAP1, synthetic AamAP1-Lysine had stronger antibacterial activity and bactericidal efficacy against S. aureus and E. coli in the low concentration range of 5-7.5 µM [244].
Although large numbers of AMPs have been characterised, a small number have been applied in clinical trials, and a limited number have been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) [245].Most clinically used AMPs are limited to topical applications due to their systemic toxicity, the susceptibility of the peptides to degradation by proteases, and rapid kidney clearance when administrated orally [246].Furthermore, oral administration of AMPs can lead to proteolytic digestion by digestive enzymes, such as trypsin and pepsin, while systemic administration leads to a short half-life, protease degradation, and cytotoxic profiles in blood [246].

Antibodies for Quenching QS Signalling
In vitro and in vivo studies have reported the effectiveness of monoclonal antibodies (mAb) against QS signal molecules and biofilm formation, especially bacterial pathogens [247][248][249].Antibodies acting against AI molecules could disrupt cell-to-cell and cell-surface interactions, thereby interfering with biofilm formation [248,250].Although many antibacterial mAbs are still under experimental investigations, the QQ antibodies represent a promising treatment strategy that may complement antibiotic therapy to improve treatment for biofilm-associated infections [250].In the pioneering study from Kaufmann et al. [251], murine anti-AHL antibody RS2-1G9 inhibited QS signalling and QS-regulated pyocyanin in vitro production in P. aeruginosa via binding 3OC 12 -HSL.The MAb RS2-1G9 was also tested for its ability to protect murine macrophages from the cytotoxicity effects of the P. aeruginosa quorum sensing molecule 3-OC 12 -HSL, and it was demonstrated that RS2-1G9 protected macrophages from v-induced apoptosis.The antibody also prevents the activation of cellular stress kinase pathways, indicating that the sequestration of 3-OC 12 -HSL is complete [252].In the study from Sun, Accavitti, and Bryers [253], three isolated mAbs, namely 12C6, 12A1, and 3C1, against S. epidermidis cell wall accumulation-associated protein (AAP) inhibited biofilm formation on abiotic surfaces.Moreover, significantly higher biofilm inhibition was noticed for mAb mixtures compared with individual mAb.The ability of biofilm inhibition by 12C6, 12A1, and 3C1 was 42%, 39%, and 66%, respectively.However, 12A1 and 3C1 mixtures and 12C6 and 12A1 increased S. epidermidis RP62A biofilm formation inhibition to 87% and 79%, respectively.In turn, a human mAb, TRL068, was shown to disrupt S. aureus and S. aeruginosa biofilm formation via binding to the DNABII proteins, resulting in the rapid collapse and subsequent detachment of bacteria from their protective biofilm matrix.This leads to the subsequent pathogen clearance by host immune effectors or antibiotics [254].In addition, TRL068 showed the effectiveness of in vitro biofilm inhibition of E. faecium, S. aureus, K. pneumoniae, A. baumannii, P. aeruginosa, and Enterobacter spp.(ESKAPE) pathogens.Moreover, antibiofilm activity of TRL068 has also been reported in experimental biofilm models of chronic human diseases, including otitis media (OM), caused by nontypeable Haemophilus influenzae (NTHi) in chinchillas, lung infection by P. aeruginosa in mice, and periodontal peri-implantitis by Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans in rats [255,256].Park et al. [195] reported that mAb AP4-24H11 against the agr locus efficiently inhibited QS in vitro via sequestration of the autoinducing peptide AIP IV produced by S. aureus RN4850 and reduced the α-hemolysin expression.Moreover, an in vivo study has demonstrated that mAb AP4-24H11 significantly attenuated the pathogenicity of S. aureus in the infected mouse model [195,257].In addition, antibodybased QQ also involved other strategies, such as generating catalytic antibodies to degrade and thus inactivate the AHLs.De Lamo Marin et al. [258] used this approach to screen and evaluate catalytic antibodies for lactonase activity.A mAb XYD-11G2 was shown to suppress pyocyanin production by hydrolysing 3OC 12 -HSL in P. aeruginosa cultures.Several human mAbs capable of binding biofilm and planktonic forms of S. aureus, including 4497-IgG1, CR5132, and rF1-IgG1, have recently been identified [259].De Vor et al. [259] demonstrated that these antibodies had a great ability to block S. aureus biofilm formation via direct binding to wall teichoic acid (WTA) or surface proteins of the serine-aspartate dipeptide repeats (SDR) family.
Although monoclonal antibodies effectively block QS signalling among pathogenic bacterial species, their applications for treating bacterial infections are still in the initial stage [260].Several antibodies, including ClfA, CP5 and 8, PNAG, Hla, and HlgAB targeting S. aureus biofilm, have been tested as passive vaccines in clinical phase II and/or III trials [261][262][263].However, none of them improved the clinical outcome in treating bacteremia and cystic fibrosis patients [261][262][263][264]. Nevertheless, several interesting S. aureus vaccine candidates have shown promising results in pre-clinical studies [265,266].For instance, MEDI3902 against P. aeruginosa biofilm formation received a fast-track designation from the FDA in 2014 [265].Currently, several other mAbs targeting S. aureus toxins and immune evasion proteins, e.g., ASN-100 (Arsanis) and 514G3 (X-Biotech), are being tested in different phases of clinical trials [266].

Nanoparticles Strategy of QS Inhibition
Blocking the activity of the QS system with metal or metal-oxide nanoparticles (NPs) is a new strategy in the fight against pathogenic microbes [267][268][269][270]. Due to the strong antimicrobial properties of NPs, their pleiotropic effect on the cell, non-toxic, relatively safe, and specificity towards QS systems, they are gaining increasing importance in treating bacterial infections [268].Most research on their therapeutic function concerns mainly P. aeruginosa [271], S. aureus [272], and E. coli [273,274].NPs based on silver (Ag NPs), gold (Au NPs) or zinc oxide (ZnO NPs) are effective QQ due to their ability to inhibit bacterial microcolony formation, reduce biofilm production, and change its structure [275].The antibiofilm activity of Ag NPs has been demonstrated in numerous studies [276,277] and summarised in comprehensive reviews [278,279].Ag NPs are highly effective against P. aeruginosa and inhibit the transcription of the phzA-G operon and piochelin, pyoveridin, and rhamnolipids synthesis [271,280].In biofilm-forming P. aeruginosa, Ag NPs disrupt proteins due to the binding of ionic constituents to cysteine residues, causing more deterioration and impairing the formation of exo-polysaccharides [280].The antimicrobial activity of Ag NPs against planktonic forms of E. coli and the inhibition of biofilm formation has been reported by Du et al. [281]; the Ag NPs reduced E. coli biofilm formation in vitro by inhibiting bacterial adhesion and icaAD expression.On the other hand, Yang et al. [282] reported that the antibacterial activity of Ag NPs is more effective against Gram-negative (E.coli) than against Gram-positive bacteria (S. aureus and S. epidermidis) and yeast (Candida albicans).Starch-stabilised Ag NPs have been found to inhibit biofilm formation by food-borne pathogens like Shigella flexneri, Salmonella typhi, and Mycobacterium smegmatis and are non-toxic to macrophages.In addition, these Ag NPs were more potent as antibiofilm agents than antimicrobial peptides, such as LL-37 [283].In addition, Au NPs have been shown to exhibit strong antibiofilm activity against P. aeruginosa PAO1 by reducing exo-polysaccharides synthesis [284].
Recently, there has been increased interest in zinc oxide nanoparticles (ZnO NPs).This is mainly because ZnO is one of the metal oxides listed as Generally Recognized As Safe (GRAS) by the FDA due to its non-toxic properties.[269,283,285].Numerous studies have been reported on ZnO NPs' efficiency in inhibiting broad-spectrum pathogens' growth [273,280,285,286], which could potentially replace conventional antibiotics.Kemung et al. [273] reported that the anti-adherence and antibiofilm properties of ZnO NPs against MRSA S. aureus were higher than the antibiotic vancomycin, even at low concentrations.Moreover, evidence has indicated that ZnO NPs exhibit potential applications in the poultry and livestock industries, particularly as a feed supplement in the animal's diet [285].Antibacterial and antibiofilm properties of ZnO NPs against P. aeruginosa PAO1, E. coli O157:H7 (EHEC), methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA), and a methicillin-sensitive S. aureus (MSSA) have been reported by Lee et al. [280].However, Khan et al. [285] showed that ZnO NPs effectively inhibited the biofilm formation of oral opportunistic pathogens, Rothia dentocariosa, and Rothia mucilaginosa.Another study demonstrated the antibiofilm activity of ZnO NPs against food-borne pathogens such as S. aureus, S. enterica, and E. coli [274].Furthermore, Vinotha et al. [286] reported that synthesized ZnO NPs using an insulin-rich leaf from Costus igneus showed antibiofilm activity against Streptococcus mutans, Lysinibacillus fusiformis, Proteus Vulgaris, and Vibrio parahaemolyticus.
An antibiofilm effect has also been observed for CuO NPs, effectively destroying biofilm produced by MRSA S. aureus strains and E. coli.In Methylobacterium spp., CuO NPs coupled with carbon nanomaterials inhibited QS and prevented biofilm formation [287,288].Moreover, the antimicrobial and antibiofilm capabilities of MgO and aluminum oxide (Al 2 O 3 ) NPs on planktonic and biofilm forms of antibiotic-resistant E. coli, K. pneumoniae, and S. aureus have also been demonstrated [289,290].
Recent studies suggest that bacteria can develop resistance to NPs after long-term exposure [291][292][293].Kaweeteerawat et al. [291] showed that Ag NPs can enhance bacterial resistance to antibiotics by promoting stress tolerance via the induction of intracellular ROS.Panáček et al. [292] showed that E. coli 013, P. aeruginosa CCM 3955, and E.coli CCM 3954 can develop resistance to Ag NPs after repeated exposure to increased production of the adhesive flagellum protein flagellin, which stimulates the aggregation of Ag NPs and destruction their antibacterial effect.Additionally, in several studies, toxic effects of the same NPs have been reported [245,293].For example, Hemeg [294] showed that Ag NPs can accumulate in human organs like the colon, liver, spleen or bone, causing damage and/or decreased organ efficacy and dysfunction.In turn, exposure to Al 2 O 3 -NPs may produce reactive oxygen species (ROS) within the cells and impair the level of antioxidant activities [295].Ji et al. [296] demonstrated that intranasal instillation of Al 2 O 3 NPs led to oxidative damage in the brains of ICR mice, impaired neurobehavioural functions, and induced cell necrosis and apoptosis ROS production and oxidative damage induced by CuO NPs and ZnO NPs has also been reported [294].Therefore, further studies are needed to verify the potential development of bacterial resistance to NP exposure.

Probiotic Therapies Based on QS Inhibition
Due to the abundance of commonly used antibiotics in recent decades, antibiotic resistance of pathogen strains is ubiquitous and difficult to control.Gut microflora dysbiosis is associated with various human diseases, including type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular disease, Clostridium difficile infection (CDI), colorectal cancer, and obesity [297,298].By adopting S. typhimurium, Enterohaemorrhagic E. coli (EHEC), and Clostridium difficile as representative pathogens, Bäumler [299] conducted comprehensive studies based on the interactions between the gut microbiota, the host, and the above-mentioned pathogens and antibiotic therapy.The study has shown that antibiotic treatment increased the level of free sialic acid (from the host) and succinate (from the gut microbiota), which in turn promoted the expansion of Salmonella typhimurium and Clostridium difficile and damaged the intestinal epithelial cells.In addition, EHEC has been found to use a QS system with fucose sensors to avoid nutrient competition with commensal E. coli [300].To reduce the defect of antibiotic treatments that cause resistance to pathogenic bacteria, many attempts have been made to develop probiotic therapies based on lactic acid bacteria (LAB) as vectors for drugs and signalling molecules [301].Moreover, probiotic delivery techniques not only inhibited the biofilm formation of pathogenic bacteria but also stimulated the host immune system [302].Studies have shown that certain probiotic strains may interfere with the QS system of ESKAPE bacteria, inhibiting pathogenic biofilm from its initial stage of attachment and development to its dispersion [42,187].Valdez et al. [303] demonstrated that Lactobacillus plantarum PA100 can prevent the induction of P. aeruginosa virulence factors by targeting AHL.According to this study, the development of biofilm, elastase, and AHL could be inhibited by the acid filtrate and the neutralized filtrate of L. plantarum PA100.In addition, the effect of L. crustorum ZHG 2-1 (Companilactobacillus crustorum) on the suppression of C4-HSL and 3-oxo-C12-HSL synthesis leading to the inhibition of P. aeruginosa biofilm formation and reduction of virulence factors (chitinases and proteases) was also noticed [130].Chapman et al. [304] showed that multi-strain probiotic preparation of L. acidophilus NCIMB 30184, L. fermentus NCIMB 30226, L. plantarum NCIMB 30187, and L. rhamnosus NCIMB 30,188 inhibited biofilm formation of pathogenic bacteria such as Clostridium difficile, E. coli, and S. Typhimurium.The ability of L. brevis to inhibit pyocyanin production and biofilm formation in P. aeruginosa strain PA002 has been demonstrated by Liang et al. [305].Moreover, the metabolites of LAB (L.lactis NCDC 309, L. rhamnosus MTCC 5897, L. rhamnosus MTCC 5857, L. fermentum MTCC 5898, L. acidophilus NCDC 15, L. delbrueckii subsp.lactis, and L. plantarum NCDC 372) were found to effectively inhibited elastase and biofilm formation, as well as lasI and rhlI expression in P. aeruginosa [306].QS in Listeria monocytogenes was inhibited by the metabolites of L. plantarum M.2 and L. curvatus B.67 due to inhibition of agr genes [307].A similar mechanism has been noted for C. difficile, which has been shown to inhibit AI-2 and the luxS system upon adding heat-treated supernatant L. fermentum Lim2 [308].Furthermore, lipopeptides known as phengycins produced by Bacillus subtilis have been shown to interfere with the QS system of S. aureus by suppressing agr signal transduction, leading to inhibition of the production of key Agr-regulated virulence factors such as phenol-soluble modulins, α-toxin, and Panton-Valentine leucocidin [309].Similar to the previous example, the biosurfactants generated by L. plantarum and Pediococcus acidilactici decreased the expression of AI-2 in a dose-dependent manner, as well as the cidA, icaA, dltB, agrA, sortaseA, and sarA genes, which are related to biofilm formation in S. aureus [187].In addition, the effectiveness of other probiotic strains such as L. reuteri RC-14 [310], Bifidobacterium BB12 [311], and Bifidobacterium adolescentis SPM1005 [312] in QS system suppression and inhibition of the pathogenic biofilm formation has also been reported.

Bacteriophage Application
In recent years, bacteriophages (phages) have re-gained interest mainly due to their host specificity and bacteriolytic activity against antibiotic-resistant strains and their biofilms [313][314][315].Applying phages in bacterial biofilm eradication involves using naturally occurring strictly virulent or lytic phages that do not encode genes for virulence, toxins or AMR [313,315].Phage should not be able to mediate horizontal gene transfer or transduce infected bacterial cells [316].Single phages usually have a narrow host range as they are generally specific for a limited set of strains of the same bacterial species [316].A phage mixture or cocktail is commonly used to target either mono or several bacterial strains due to its greater efficacy in biofilm destruction than a single phage application [317][318][319].The use of phage cocktails arises from the fact that simultaneous treatment targeting a variety of bacterial receptors with diverse antibacterial pathways will more efficiently decrease the bacterial burden, expand host range coverage and lysis potential, and mitigate resistance or development of lysogenic strains [316,320].
In numerous in vitro biofilm studies, phages have shown their efficacy in penetrating established biofilms and eradicating bacteria [321], and the effectiveness of single phages and phage cocktails to infect and lyse bacterial cells in single and multispecies biofilms has been confirmed [314][315][316]322].Recent reports found that phages are highly effective at in vitro reducing and controlling bacterial biofilms, particularly those formed by S. aureus, K. pneumoniae, Acinetobacter baumannii, P. aeruginosa, Listeria monocytogenes, Salmonella sp., and E. coli [40,[323][324][325][326].For example, Peng et al. [327]  MR003 displayed a broad host range against methicillin-resistant S. aureus of human origin.Kazimierczak et al. [328] demonstrated that phages vB_SauM-A, vB_SauM-C, and vB_SauM-D were effective against most multi-drug-resistant S aureus strains and, additionally, showed more efficiency in biofilm reduction compared to the antibiotics used.Moreover, antibiofilm properties of other isolated phages, such as vB KleM-RaK2 (RaK2) against Klebsiella sp.[329], phiPA3 against Pseudomonas aeruginosa [330], phiRSL1 against Ralstonia sp.[331], vB_EcoM_10C2 and vB_EcoM_11B2 against E. coli O177 [332], and BPECO 19 against Escherichia coli O157:H7 [333], as well as R1-37 against Yersinia enterocolitica [334], have been determined.Several studies report the success of lytic phages against enterococci biofilms.Melo et al. [322], for instance, showed that newly isolated phages, the siphovirus y BEfaS-Zip (Zip) and the podovirus vB EfaP-Max (Max), demonstrated lytic activity against E. faecalis and E. faecium, which are the most frequent antibiotic-resistant strains present in chronic wounds.Rakov et al. [335] showed that phages PSTCR4 and PSTCR6 exhibited an efficient reduction of well-established MDR Providencia stuartii biofilm formed in the catheter model.D'Andrea et al. [336] reported that vB_EfaH_EF1TV phage belonging to the Herelleviridae family inhibited biofilm produced in vitro by E. faecalis clinical strains.In a study by Khalifa et al. [337], phage EFDG showed effective lytic activity against various antibiotic-resistant E. faecalis and E. faecium isolates and disrupted their biofilms.However, Bhardwaj et al. [338] found a phage targeting multi-drug-resistant Enterococcus strains isolated from chronic periodontitis patients, and its ability to reduce biofilm formation by E. faecalis after 24 h of infection was observed.
Recent studies showed that applying phage cocktails in biofilm models is highly efficient at destroying bacterial biofilms [313][314][315].For example, in vitro lytic efficacies of phage cocktails AB-SA01 and AB-PA01, which target S. aureus and P. aeruginosa, respectively, significantly reduced biofilm biomass in mixed-species biofilms, compared to the respective phage cocktail treatment [339].Gutierrez et al. [340] demonstrated that the mixture of phiIPLA-RODI and phiIPLA-C1C phages was more efficient in the planktonic phase than in the biofilms phase during S. aureus IPLA16 and S. epidermidis LO5081 mixed-species cultures.Similarly, phages ΦKpnM-vB1, ΦKpnP-vB2, and ΦKpnM-vB3 were highly efficient in reducing K. pneumoniae biofilms when applied as a cocktail [341].Similarly, the phage cocktail composed of four lytic ΦEcp1, ΦEcp2, ΦEcp3, and ΦEcp4 phages completely inhibited the growth of MDR E. coli and significantly prevented the development of biofilms.The phage mixture caused strong biomass reduction of biofilm and showed the highest biofilm inhibition, up to nearly 87% [318].Several experiments had more extensive bactericidal results when phage therapy was combined with antibiotics as a single treatment [328,342].Jiang et al. [342] showed that virulent phage WV in high-concentration S. aureus culture demonstrated a greater antibiofilm effect than streptomycin.In addition, using phage WV and streptomycin in combination yielded significantly better antibiofilm and bactericidal effects against S. aureus than those achieved using streptomycin or phage WV alone [342].
Recent advances in biotechnology and synthetic biology fields have enabled the development of various methods of phage genetic engineering to modify their host range and improve safety and antimicrobial activity [343][344][345].Several engineering phages to express degradation enzymes targeted at the EPS matrix for biofilm destruction have been reported [346][347][348].For example, the modified T7 phage with expressed dispersin B enzyme effectively reduced more than 99% of E. coli biofilm [349].Additionally, T7 phage expressing AiiA lactonase was reported to effectively reduce the QS of P. aeruginosa in a mixed E. coli biofilm, resulting in a 75% and 66% reduction in biomass after 4 and 8 h, respectively [347].
Møller-Olsen et al. [350] used CRISPR-Cas-based selection to obtain a T7-like phage, K1F, which was able to kill inside human cells a hybrid between E. coli strains K12 and K1, responsible for urinary tract infections, meningitis, and sepsis.More recently, the first clinical application of an engineered phages cocktail (Muddy, ZoeJ, and BPs) was applied to treat a cystic fibrosis patient with a disseminated Mycobacterium abscessus infection [351].
It is important to note that a fundamental principle of phage therapeutic development for clinical purposes is to ensure the potential phage product is safe and effective.Despite all the successful cases of patients treated with phages documented to date [352][353][354][355][356], the introduction of phage therapy in Western countries still faces major barriers, especially regulatory issues [357].The main limitation of phage therapy is high host specificity and the possibility of developing resistance by targeted bacteria against phage attachment and adsorption by altering the receptor sites [245].Additionally, it is difficult to control the stability and purity of phages that are prepared for clinical trials, which may result in lowquality control data [358].Moreover, a significant decrease in phage concentrations by the reticuloendothelial system or neutralization by antibodies during therapeutic application has also been reported [359].Now, attempts to make phage therapy widely available are underway, and several clinical trials are being carried out in Europe and the United States (US) [360,361].For example, a clinical trial including a phase 1b/2 trial assessing the microbiological activity of a single dose of phage therapy in cystic fibrosis patients chronically colonized with P. aeruginosa is conducted by the APT, Inc., with Antibacterial Resistance Leadership Group (ARLG) cooperation (https://aphage.com/adaptive-phage-therapeuticsannounces-first-patient-dosed-in-the-phage-clinical-trial/,23 January 2023).Additionally, in 2022, Locus Biosciences, Inc., kicked off a randomized phase 2/3 trial evaluating the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics and efficacy of a CRISPR-enhanced phage (crPhage ® ) for the treatment of urinary tract infections (UTIs) caused by MDR E. coli bacteria (https://www.locus-bio.com/locus-biosciences-announces-first-patient-treated-in-theeliminate-registrational-phase-2-3-trial-of-lbp-ec01-for-urinary-tract-infections/, 13 September 2022).On the other hand, the application phage preparations in the agro-food sector have already been approved and supported by authorities in certain countries, such as the US, where biopreparations against Listeria monocytogenes (Listshield TM ), S. enterica (SalmoFresh TM ), and E. coli (Ecoshield TM ) for direct application to food are commercially available [362].QQ mechanisms of antimicrobial/antibiofilm activity are summarized in Table 2.  [394,395] and found in approximately 50% of bacterial genomes and 87% of archaeal genomes [396,397].The genetic loci of CRISPR/Cas systems contain the CRISPR array, comprising short repeated sequences (repeats) and similarly sized flanking sequences (spacers).The Cas proteins encoded by cas genes, located in the proximity of a CRISPR array, are key functional elements of CRISPR systems that offer adaptive immune protection against bacteriophages or other foreign mobile genetic elements [398].In bacteria, CRISPR/Cas systems, according to the diversity of cas genes, are categorized into 2 classes, 6 types (I-VI), and 33 subtypes [395,399].Each CRISPR/Cas system has a specific protein composition for expression, interference, and adaptation [394,395,400].Class 1 comprises three types (I, III, and IV) and sixteen subtypes, whereas Class 2 includes three types (II, V, and VI) and seventeen subtypes [401,402].The Class 1 CRISPR/Cas system takes on interference through the use of a multi-Cas effector protein complex, whereas Class 2 utilises a single effector protein responsible for the identification and cleavage of the target sequence [403].Among the type II CRISPR/Cas systems, the most commonly studied effector protein is the DNA endonuclease Cas9 using a specificity-programming guide RNA (gRNA).The gRNA is a specific RNA sequence that recognises the target DNA region of interest and directs the Cas9 for editing [398,399,403].Currently, Cas9 isolated from Streptococcus pyogenes (SpCas9) is extensively carried out for gene edition due to its simplicity, versatility, efficiency, and specificity [396,400,403].
In recent years, the CRISPR/Cas9 system has emerged as a promising tool for developing next-generation antimicrobial agents to combat infectious diseases, especially those caused by AMR pathogens [395,403].CRISPR/Cas9 has been widely applied in targeting genes that encode antibiotic resistance and virulence in bacteria [404].Depending on the localisation of the target gene, CRISPR/Cas9 can be used in two different ways, a pathogen-focused approach and a gene-focused approach [405,406].A pathogen-focused way is targeting specific chromosome regions to induce bacterial cell death.On the other hand, targeting the plasmids that carry the AMR genes is part of the gene-focused approach.This way removes the plasmid and causes bacteria to be susceptible to antibiotics [407,408].
In several studies, CRISPR/Cas9 has been successfully used to selectively remove target genes involved in antibiotic resistance of clinical pathogens [408,409].For example, Bikard et al. [410] used the CRISPR/Cas9 system to target the mecA gene conferring methicillin resistance to clinical isolate S. aureus USA300, which significantly reduced the S. aureus counts (50%) from a mixed population of bacteria as compared to the control.Furthermore, studies using a mouse skin colonization model demonstrated that CRISPR/Cas9 selectively reduced staphylococci colonization compared to other treatment conditions [410,411].In another study, Ates et al. [412] showed that engineered CRISPR plasmids containing sgRNAs suppressed the mecA, gentamicin (aacA), and ciprofloxacin (grlA, grlB) resistance genes in MRSA strains, leading to altering the resistance profile and enhancing sensitivity to antibiotics.The CRISPR-Cas9 mediated plasmid-curing system (pCasCure) was employed to resensitize Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) to carbapenems.The results showed that pCasCure precisely cleaved bla NDM , bla KPC , and bla OXA-48 genes and targeted repA, repB, and parA on the pKpQIL plasmid to effectively clear the prevalent plasmid carrying the carbapenem-resistance gene and resensitize CRE, including K. pneumoniae, E. coli, E. hormaechei, E. xiangfangensis, and S. marcescens to carbapenem antibiotics [413].Subsequently, Yosef et al. [414] applied CRISPR/Cas9 system to destroy plasmids carrying beta-lactamase genes bla NDM-1 and bla CTX-M-15 to kill extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producing E. coli.In E. coli strain O157:H7 (EHEC), a conjugative CRISPR/Cas9 system targeting the mobile colistin resistance gene (mcr-1) eliminated not only drug-resistant plasmids and re-sensitized to antibiotics but also prohibited horizontal gene transfer after transformation with CRISPR/Cas9 plasmid [415].Subsequently, Citorik et al. [416] demonstrated that the CRISPR/Cas system targeting eae, encoding virulence factor in E. coli O157:H7 (EHEC), caused a 20-fold reduction in viable cell counts.However, Rodrigues et al. [417] deployed the CRISPR/Cas9 system to selectively remove the erythromycin (ermB) and tetracycline (tetM) resistance genes in E. faecalis in vitro and in vivo.In vivo results showed a significant reducing the prevalence of antibiotic-resistant E. faecalis in the mouse gut after antibiotic treatment and intestinal infections caused by this bacterium [417].
More recently, Askoura et al. [418] reported that the CRISPR/Cas9 system targeting sdiA affected S. enterica biofilm formation, cell adhesion, and invasion.Additionally, the CRISPR/Cas-HDR approach was used to inhibit E. coli ATCC 25,922 biofilm formation by knockout genes involved in QS (luxS) and adhesion (fimH/bolA) [419].Results showed that all mutant strains lacked extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) production compared to the wild-type the noticed reduction of biofilm formation in ∆fimH, ∆luxS, and ∆bolA strains ranged between 75.39% and 84.17%.In addition, significantly higher adherence and cell aggregation, as well as biofilm formation on urinary catheters, were observed for wild-type strains [419].
Apart from CRISPR/Cas9, Kiga et al. [420] utilised CRISPR/Cas13a-based antibacterial nucleocapsids, CapsidCas13a, to effectively kill carbapenem-resistant E. coli and methicillinresistant S. aureus by targeting antimicrobial resistance genes.On the other hand, the CRISPRi/dCas9 system was used to control the expression of the wcaF involved in the colanic acid synthesis, a key EPS component in E. coli biofilm formation.Depending on the level of the guide RNA (gRNA) controlled by a chemical inducer, wcaF expression was regulated by gRNA-dCas9 binding to the chromosomal wcaF locus; temporal induction showed different levels of biofilm thickness [421].

sRNA Technologies
Growing evidence indicated that, like other bacterial processes, the integration of information by QS systems is regulated by noncoding small RNAs (sRNAs) called Qrr (quorum regulatory RNA), which are global regulators that act directly and indirectly to control gene expression via post-transcriptional mechanisms [152,422].The role of Qrr-sRNA in modulating QS signalling has been described for the first time in V. harveyi and V. cholerae [423,424].In the Vibrionaceae, the number of Qrr-sRNA is different between species, such as, for example, four Qrr-sRNAs in V. cholerae [425] and five Qrr-sRNAs in V. harveyi [426] and V. vulnificus [427], respectively.In V. cholerae, Qrr1-4 sRNAs inhibit the expression of the hapR gene, which encodes a significant regulator of high-cell density behaviour that represses biofilm formation and virulence genes [426].Therefore, targeting regulatory sRNAs may be another potential tool for blocking QS signalling by inhibiting the expression of genes involved in biofilm formation [152,428,429].Mandin et al. [430] showed that the modulation of expression of several sRNAs, OmrR, OmrB, and McaS, leading to the change in cell motility, the production of curli, and the export of exopolysaccharides, results in the inhibition of E. coli biofilm formation.Also, the knockout of other sRNAs, Arc2, SdsR, GadY, and MicA affects biofilm formation and motility, although their mode of action remains elusive [430].Metabolic engineering and the possibility to synthesize artificial RNAs of choice [431] create the opportunity for silencing any specific gene and, therefore, inhibit various steps of biofilm formation or enhance biofilm dispersal.

Prospects and Future Directions
Since the initial discovery of quorum sensing more than 40 years ago, the mechanistic understanding of various QS systems and appreciation for the importance of QS in the pathogenesis of many bacterial species have been expanded.Numerous studies confirmed that the QS system regulates biofilm formation in Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacterial strains.Bacterial biofilms, especially those formed by human pathogens, are relevant to chronic bacterial infections.Therefore, using QS-inhibiting agents is a promising therapeutic strategy targeting QS systems that is attracting attention in drug development.In recent years, many natural or synthetic QS-inhibiting strategies that effectively reduce biofilm formation have been developed, mainly thanks to the development of sophisticated micro-biological techniques.Unfortunately, the potential risk of using all QQ strategies described above should also be mentioned [432].Future studies in the therapeutic development of anti-virulence/antibiofilm strategies should proceed with care and caution to avoid the undesired fate currently with antibiotic development.

41 Figure 1 .
Figure 1.General mechanism of QS in Gram-negative bacteria scheme of activation of the lux operon by luxI and luxR in Vibrio fischeri.The autoinducers (3OC6-HSL: red dots), produced by LuxI, diffuse through the cell membrane into the growth medium at low cell density.As the cell growth continues, the autoinducers in the medium accumulate in a confined environment.A very low intensity of light can be detected.When enough autoinducers have accumulated in the medium, they can reenter the cell, directly binding the LuxR protein to activate luxICDABEG expression.High levels of autoinducers activate the luminescent system of A. fischeri.High-intensity light can be detected.The figure was created with BioRender (https://biorender.com/, 4 February 2023).

Figure 1 .
Figure 1.General mechanism of QS in Gram-negative bacteria scheme of activation of the lux operon by luxI and luxR in Vibrio fischeri.The autoinducers (3OC6-HSL: red dots), produced by LuxI, diffuse through the cell membrane into the growth medium at low cell density.As the cell growth continues, the autoinducers in the medium accumulate in a confined environment.A very low intensity of light can be detected.When enough autoinducers have accumulated in the medium, they can reenter the cell, directly binding the LuxR protein to activate luxICDABEG expression.High levels of autoinducers activate the luminescent system of A. fischeri.High-intensity light can be detected.The figure was created with BioRender (https://biorender.com/, 4 February 2023).

Figure 2 .
Figure 2. General mechanism of QS in Gram-positive bacteria.As in AHL quorum detection systems, the concentration of secreted AIP autoinducers increases with increasing cell density.Phosphorylated regulatory proteins act as DNA-binding transcription factors to modulate the expression

Figure 2 .
Figure 2. General mechanism of QS in Gram-positive bacteria.As in AHL quorum detection systems, the concentration of secreted AIP autoinducers increases with increasing cell density.Phosphorylated regulatory proteins act as DNA-binding transcription factors to modulate the expression of target genes.In many cases, the genes encoding the autoinducer precursor, the histidine kinase receptor, and the regulatory protein form an operon, and its expression is automatically induced by QS detection.This configuration produces positive feedback and accelerates the transition from LCD to HCD, a quorum-dependent mode of gene expression.The figure was created with BioRender (https://biorender.com/, 4 February 2023).

Table 1 .
Quorum systems of selected Gram-negative and Gram-positive bacterial strains.

Table 2 .
QQ mechanisms of alternatives to antibiotics with antimicrobial and antibiofilm activities.