Locally Synthetized 17-β-Estradiol Reverses Amyloid-β-42-Induced Hippocampal Long-Term Potentiation Deficits

Amyloid beta 1-42 (Aβ42) aggregates acutely impair hippocampal long-term potentiation (LTP) of synaptic transmission, and 17β-estradiol is crucial for hippocampal LTP. We tested whether boosting the synthesis of neural-derived 17β-estradiol (nE2) saves hippocampal LTP by the neurotoxic action of Aβ42. Electrophysiological recordings were performed to measure dentate gyrus (DG) LTP in rat hippocampal slices. Using a pharmacological approach, we tested the ability of nE2 to counteract the LTP impairment caused by acute exposure to soluble Aβ42 aggregates. nE2 was found to be required for LTP in DG under physiological conditions. Blockade of steroid 5α-reductase with finasteride, by increasing nE2 synthesis from testosterone (T), completely recovered LTP in slices treated with soluble Aβ42 aggregates. Modulation of the glutamate N-methyl-D aspartate receptor (NMDAR) by memantine effectively rescued the LTP deficit observed in slices exposed to Aβ42, and memantine prevented LTP reduction observed under the blocking of nE2 synthesis. nE2 is able to counteract Aβ42-induced synaptic dysfunction. This effect depends on a rapid, non-genomic mechanism of action of nE2, which may share a common pathway with glutamate NMDAR signaling.


Introduction
Neurosteroids are a wide range of cholesterol-derived molecules, synthesized de novo within the central nervous system (CNS), able to exert diverse neuronal functions and affect behavior.17β-Estradiol (E2), one of the most studied estrogenic neuro-active steroids, is known to regulate multiple neuronal molecular signaling systems that are at the basis of synaptic transmission and neural network remodeling and that contribute to learning and memory processing, ultimately affecting cognition [1,2].Although neuronal-and systemicderived E2 may contribute simultaneously to synaptic modulation, growing evidence suggests an important contribution of neural E2 (nE2) in the rapid modulation of synaptic transmission and plasticity.Accordingly, nE2 has been demonstrated to exert a pivotal role in the long-term potentiation (LTP) of synaptic transmission in the hippocampus [3][4][5] and in other brain regions [6,7] involved in learning and memory processes [5,[8][9][10][11][12].Dysfunctional E2 signaling has been reported to be dramatically related to several neurological conditions, ranging from psychiatric disorders [13,14] to many neurodegenerative diseases [15][16][17], in which cognitive decline is present to a certain extent.Among others, mild cognitive impairment (MCI), Alzheimer's disease (AD), or other conditions associated with dementia, display changes in E2 signaling within the CNS [18][19][20] paralleled by changes in cognitive functions.Like most chronic diseases, AD develops slowly from a preclinical phase into a fully expressed clinical syndrome.In AD, large amyloid beta (Aβ) aggregates and plaque deposition are major pathogenic factors of the disease.In this regard, it is known that E2 decreases the generation of Aβ [21] and promotes its degradation, reducing the risk for AD [22].However, aggregated Aβ accumulation is only a part of a much larger set of pathogenic processes, comprising tau protein hyperphosphorylation or activation of the local immune response, which together initiate cognitive decline.In this pathological setting, soluble Aβ oligomers exist in a dynamic equilibrium with more aggregated fibrillary structures [23,24], and the former seem to be the main toxic species responsible for neural circuit imbalance in critical brain areas such as the hippocampus.Aβ oligomers indeed deeply affect glutamatergic synaptic transmission, altering membrane distribution of glutamate receptors and interfering with intracellular calcium homeostasis, undermining the ability of hippocampal neurons to express LTP, ultimately leading to network dysfunction [25][26][27] and neurological symptoms.Estrogen depletion in mouse models of AD was shown to increase pathological signs and treatment with E2 was shown to exert a protective role against amyloidogenesis and cognitive impairment [28][29][30].Most of the E2 effects are likely due to the up-or down-regulation of gene transcription, but E2 can also activate rapid intracellular signaling pathways, acting within seconds or minutes through membraneassociated extranuclear receptors [31,32].E2 rapidly increases synaptic transmission in various brain regions by facilitating glutamate NMDARs activity [33][34][35][36] and inhibiting GABA release [37], thus rapidly modulating the function of neurons [4,[38][39][40].
Here, we performed electrophysiological analysis to establish whether nE2 is able to exert rapid modulatory effects on LTP deficits in a rat model of Aβ-induced synaptic dysfunction, resembling synaptic deficits as in an MCI-like condition and AD.

Animals
All procedures involving animals were performed in conformity with the European Directive 2010/63/EU, in accordance with protocols approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee at the University of Perugia, authorization n. 297/2016-PR.All efforts were made to minimize the number of animals used and their suffering.Adult Wistar rats (3-month-old, ~300 g, Charles River, Italy) were used for the experiments; only male animals were used to avoid any possible influence of cyclic estrogenic fluctuation on the induction of synaptic plasticity [41].Animals were housed at room temperature of about 23 • C with food and water ad libitum and a 12 h light-dark cycle.

Slice Preparation and Electrophysiological Procedures
Rats were decapitated under deep sedation and the brain removed and immersed for 2-3 min in ice-cold artificial cerebrospinal fluid (ACSF) containing (in mM): 126 NaCl, 2.5 KCl, 1.2 MgCl 2 , 1.2 NaH 2 PO 4 , 2.4 CaCl 2 , 10 glucose and 25 NaHCO 3 , continuously bubbled with 95% O 2 and 5% CO 2 , pH = 7.4.Transversal 400 µm-thick hippocampal slices were obtained using a vibratome (LEICA, VT 1200S) with iced ACSF as the cutting solution.The slices were then transferred to a recovery chamber with oxygenated ACSF at 30 • C for 30 min and then at room temperature (RT) for 1-2 more hours before experimental recordings.Each slice was then transferred into a recording chamber and submerged in ACSF at a constant rate flow of 2.9-3 mL/min at a temperature of 29 • C. Local field excitatory postsynaptic potentials from the hippocampal dentate gyrus (DG) were recorded as previously described [42].Borosilicate glass microelectrodes filled with 2 mol/L NaCl as recording electrodes (resistance 10-15 MΩ) were placed nearby the granular layer.Electrical responses were evoked by stimulating the perforant pathway at 0.1 Hz (10 µs duration, 20-30 V amplitude) by a pair of bipolar electrodes placed under visual control.An Axoclamp 2B amplifier (Molecular Devices, San Jose, CA, USA) was used for recordings, and traces were filtered at 3 KHz, digitized at 10 KHz and stored in a PC.The postsynaptic responses in the DG included population spikes (PS) that were set at 50% of maximum amplitude.LTP of the PS amplitude was induced by a high-frequency stimulation (HFS) protocol at 100 Hz, consisting of three trains of 1 s, at 5 min intervals.
Drugs were applied by dissolving them to the desired final concentration in oxygenated ACSF and then bath-applied by switching the recording solution to one containing known concentrations of drugs.Total replacement of the medium in the chamber occurred within 1 min.Finasteride (Fin) and E2 were applied at a final concentration of 1 nM, letrozole (Let) at 100 nM and ICI 182,780 (ICI) at 100 nM [7].For experiments involving memantine (Mem), slices were incubated for 2 h in a chamber containing the drug diluted at 1 µM in oxygenated ACSF [12].E2, Fin, ICI, Let and Mem were from Tocris Biosciences (Bristol, UK).

Preparation of Aβ1-42 Oligomers and Treatment of Brain Slices
Amyloid β-peptide 1-42 (Aβ42, Innovagen, Lund, Sweden) was initially solubilized with hexafluoro isopropanol (HFIP, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) and incubated at RT for 30 min, resulting in a final peptide concentration of 1 mM.The Aβ42-containing solution was divided in 10 µL aliquots and HFIP was allowed to evaporate overnight in a fume hood.Tubes were then transferred to a SpeedVac and dried down for approximately 1 h.The dried peptide was stored at −80 • C. Immediately before use, aliquots were carefully and completely re-suspended in anhydrous dimethyl sulfoxide (Sigma-Aldrich) by pipette mixing followed by bath sonication for 10 min (5 mM, Aβ42 DMSO stock).Aβ42 oligomers were prepared by diluting 5 mM Aβ42 stock in PBS 0.01 M at pH 7.4, the solution was immediately vortexed for 30 s, then incubated at 4 • C for 24 h [43].
For Aβ42 treatments, some hippocampal slices were moved to an incubation chamber 30 min after cutting, remaining incubated for 2 h in a solution containing oxygenated ACSF enriched with 200 nM fresh Aβ42 oligomers.The slices were then transferred to the recording chamber for electrophysiological recordings [42,44].

Data Analysis and Statistic
Data analysis was performed using Clampfit (Molecular Devices) and GraphPad Prism 8.0.1 (GraphPad software).The time course of the PS amplitude was measured for 15-20 min to obtain a stable, reproducible response to set a baseline and then was measured for subsequent 50 min.Modifications of the PS amplitude induced by drugs or by HFS were expressed as a percentage of the baseline value.The occurrence of LTP was verified by Student's t-test by comparing PS amplitudes 5 min pre-HFS to 40 min post-HFS.Comparisons among different post-HFS PS amplitude time-courses (LTP curves) were evaluated by two-way ANOVA considering the treatment as the main factor.The LTP amplitude corresponded to the PS amplitude measured at 50 min post-HFS.Statistical significance was established at p < 0.05.Values given in the text and figures are the mean ± SEM, and n represents the number of slices, 3-4 slices per rat were used for electrophysiological recordings.Aβ42-treated and untreated slices were recorded for each animal.

Local E2 Synthesis Is Required for the Induction of Long-Term Potentiation in the Dentate Gyrus
To evaluate whether the local synthesis of E2, obtained by the conversion of testosterone (T), could rapidly influence neuronal learning in the DG, we compared the LTP in the presence or absence of the aromatase inhibitor Let.After acquiring a stable PS response, LTP was induced in the control condition or after the bath application of 100 nM Let.We found that in the presence of Let the mean LTP amplitude was reduced by 64% (control, 223.45 ± 9.6%, Let, 144.4 ± 13.8%, p < 0.01; Figure 1a), suggesting that the synthesis of E2 is required for the induction of physiological LTP in DG.We also tested the effect of the endogenous production of 5α-dihydrotestosterone (DHT), the major androgenic metabolite of T, on LTP expression in the DG by comparing the LTP in the presence or absence of 1 nM of the steroid 5α-reductase inhibitor Fin.We found that DG LTP did not depend on the presence of endogenous DHT, since LTP measured in the presence of Fin was not significantly different from the control LTP (215.7 ± 14.2%, p > 0.05; Figure 1a). of E2 is required for the induction of physiological LTP in DG.We also tes the endogenous production of 5α-dihydrotestosterone (DHT), the major tabolite of T, on LTP expression in the DG by comparing the LTP in the sence of 1 nM of the steroid 5α-reductase inhibitor Fin.We found that D depend on the presence of endogenous DHT, since LTP measured in the was not significantly different from the control LTP (215.7 ± 14.2%, p > 0.0

Locally Synthetized E2 Restores LTP in DG of Aβ42-Treated Slices via Dire with E2 Receptors
The Aβ42-induced synaptopathy model we produced by the treatm slices with Aβ42 is characterized by an impaired hippocampal LTP [42, strate the role of locally synthetized E2 in LTP induction in this model, w LTP after incubation of the slices in ACSF enriched with 200 nM Aβ42 wit presence of Fin.We found reduced LTP in slices treated with Aβ42 by 54 to untreated controls (Aβ42, 156.59 ± 14.58%, p < 0.01; Figure 1b).Interes exposed to Aβ42 plus 1 nM Fin, LTP impairment was completely preven 232.57± 22.30%, vs. Aβ42 p < 0.01; Figure 1b), suggesting that promoting of T into E2 is sufficient to maintain physiological LTP.To confirm that th LTP in Aβ42-treated slices in the presence of Fin was in fact due to an in E2, we induced LTP in Aβ-treated slices in the presence of Fin plus 100 nM

Locally Synthetized E2 Restores LTP in DG of Aβ42-Treated Slices via Direct Interaction with E2 Receptors
The Aβ42-induced synaptopathy model we produced by the treatment of rat brain slices with Aβ42 is characterized by an impaired hippocampal LTP [42,44].To demonstrate the role of locally synthetized E2 in LTP induction in this model, we measured DG LTP after incubation of the slices in ACSF enriched with 200 nM Aβ42 with or without the presence of Fin.We found reduced LTP in slices treated with Aβ42 by 54% with respect to untreated controls (Aβ42, 156.59 ± 14.58%, p < 0.01; Figure 1b).Interestingly, in slices exposed to Aβ42 plus 1 nM Fin, LTP impairment was completely prevented (Aβ42 + Fin, 232.57± 22.30%, vs. Aβ42 p < 0.01; Figure 1b), suggesting that promoting the conversion of T into E2 is sufficient to maintain physiological LTP.To confirm that the restoration of LTP in Aβ42-treated slices in the presence of Fin was in fact due to an increased level of E2, we induced LTP in Aβ-treated slices in the presence of Fin plus 100 nM ICI, a selective antagonist of E2 receptors.In this condition, the mean LTP was reduced by 61%, not significantly different from what was measured in the presence of Aβ42 alone (Aβ42 + Fin + ICI, 148.56 ± 17.81%, vs. Aβ42, p > 0.05; Figure 1b), confirming that E2 production is able to prevent LTP impairment in Aβ42-induced synaptopathy.Consistently, exogenous application of 1 nM E2 was able to fully restore DG LTP in Aβ42-treated slices (229.7 ± 35.7%; Figure 2).

nE2-Dependent DG LTP Involves Glutamate NMDA Receptor Function
We previously found that LTP impairment in DG is fully restored in a genetic model of brain amyloidosis by Mem [12], a noncompetitive NMDAR antagonist that is widely used in clinical practice for AD therapy [45,46].Here, we tested the effect of Mem on the Aβ42 model of synaptopathy, as it might suggest that the NMDAR plays a role in the modulation of LTP by E2.Thus, LTP was induced in Aβ42-treated slices plus 1μM Mem, a dosage that does not affect physiological DG LTP (226.5 ± 16.84%, Figure 3), showing that this drug is also able to completely prevent the effect of Aβ42 on LTP in acute Aβ42induced synaptopathy (Aβ42 + Mem, 231.36 ± 32.33%, vs. Aβ42, p < 0.05; Figure 4a).To shed light on the possibility that E2 promotes LTP through a mechanism mediated by NMDAR, we induced LTP in hippocampal slices in the presence of 100 nM Let plus 1 μM Mem.In this condition, we found that the exposure to Mem prevented the LTP impairment of DG caused by the blockade of E2 synthesis (Let plus Mem, 222.80 ± 19.78%, p > 0.05; Figure 4b) suggesting a convergence of E2 receptor (ER) and NMDAR signaling pathway activation.

nE2-Dependent DG LTP Involves Glutamate NMDA Receptor Function
We previously found that LTP impairment in DG is fully restored in a genetic model of brain amyloidosis by Mem [12], a noncompetitive NMDAR antagonist that is widely used in clinical practice for AD therapy [45,46].Here, we tested the effect of Mem on the Aβ42 model of synaptopathy, as it might suggest that the NMDAR plays a role in the modulation of LTP by E2.Thus, LTP was induced in Aβ42-treated slices plus 1µM Mem, a dosage that does not affect physiological DG LTP (226.5 ± 16.84%, Figure 3), showing that this drug is also able to completely prevent the effect of Aβ42 on LTP in acute Aβ42-induced synaptopathy (Aβ42 + Mem, 231.36 ± 32.33%, vs. Aβ42, p < 0.05; Figure 4a).To shed light on the possibility that E2 promotes LTP through a mechanism mediated by NMDAR, we induced LTP in hippocampal slices in the presence of 100 nM Let plus 1 µM Mem.In this condition, we found that the exposure to Mem prevented the LTP impairment of DG caused by the blockade of E2 synthesis (Let plus Mem, 222.80 ± 19.78%, p > 0.05; Figure 4b) suggesting a convergence of E2 receptor (ER) and NMDAR signaling pathway activation.

nE2-Dependent DG LTP Involves Glutamate NMDA Receptor Function
We previously found that LTP impairment in DG is fully restored in a genetic mo of brain amyloidosis by Mem [12], a noncompetitive NMDAR antagonist that is wid used in clinical practice for AD therapy [45,46].Here, we tested the effect of Mem on Aβ42 model of synaptopathy, as it might suggest that the NMDAR plays a role in modulation of LTP by E2.Thus, LTP was induced in Aβ42-treated slices plus 1μM M a dosage that does not affect physiological DG LTP (226.5 ± 16.84%, Figure 3), show that this drug is also able to completely prevent the effect of Aβ42 on LTP in acute Aβ induced synaptopathy (Aβ42 + Mem, 231.36 ± 32.33%, vs. Aβ42, p < 0.05; Figure 4a) shed light on the possibility that E2 promotes LTP through a mechanism mediated NMDAR, we induced LTP in hippocampal slices in the presence of 100 nM Let plus 1 Mem.In this condition, we found that the exposure to Mem prevented the LTP imp ment of DG caused by the blockade of E2 synthesis (Let plus Mem, 222.80 ± 19.78%, 0.05; Figure 4b) suggesting a convergence of E2 receptor (ER) and NMDAR signaling p way activation.

Discussion
E2 of neural origin (nE2) is known to be strongly implicated in LTP ferent brain regions by exerting rapid, non-genomic effects that are me vation of its membrane receptors [11,34,39].The present study, while co is required for the induction and maintenance of LTP in the hippocampa strates that it is able to influence LTP expression in a pathological con synaptic toxicity induced by soluble Aβ42 oligomers.In fact, here we de first time that a pharmacological approach aimed at boosting nE2 levels induced synaptic dysfunction at the hippocampal DG, rescuing the d term potentiation of synaptic plasticity that characterizes models of cere In the CNS, T can be converted both in E2 by P450 aromatase and in DH reductase, and it is suggested that the selective inhibition of one enzyme sequently shifts the local availability of androgen or estrogen [41,47].Th ited DHT formation with finasteride in order to increase endogenous le pocampal slices (Figure 5).

Discussion
E2 of neural origin (nE2) is known to be strongly implicated in LTP induction in different brain regions by exerting rapid, non-genomic effects that are mediated by the activation of its membrane receptors [11,34,39].The present study, while confirming that nE2 is required for the induction and maintenance of LTP in the hippocampal DG, also demonstrates that it is able to influence LTP expression in a pathological condition such as the synaptic toxicity induced by soluble Aβ42 oligomers.In fact, here we demonstrate for the first time that a pharmacological approach aimed at boosting nE2 levels counteracts Aβ42-induced synaptic dysfunction at the hippocampal DG, rescuing the deficit of the longterm potentiation of synaptic plasticity that characterizes models of cerebral amyloidosis.In the CNS, T can be converted both in E2 by P450 aromatase and in DHT by steroid 5-α-reductase, and it is suggested that the selective inhibition of one enzyme or the other subsequently shifts the local availability of androgen or estrogen [41,47].Therefore, we inhibited DHT formation with finasteride in order to increase endogenous levels of nE2 in hippocampal slices (Figure 5).
There is evidence that P450 aromatase is expressed at the hippocampal level and that its activation depends on neuronal activity [48][49][50][51].Performing electrophysiological recordings in rat hippocampal slices, we confirmed that nE2 is required for physiological LTP at the DG, since this form of synaptic plasticity is reduced in the presence of the P450 aromatase inhibitor letrozole, similar to what was observed previously in the CA1 regions by our group [3].Furthermore, the time window of our recordings (<1 h) strongly suggests that nE2 is able to sustain LTP induction by a rapid non-genomic action [11,52]; indeed, 15-20 min letrozole application appeared sufficient to rapidly reduce the LTP amplitude.There is evidence that P450 aromatase is expressed at the hippocamp its activation depends on neuronal activity [48][49][50][51].Performing electro cordings in rat hippocampal slices, we confirmed that nE2 is required f LTP at the DG, since this form of synaptic plasticity is reduced in the pre aromatase inhibitor letrozole, similar to what was observed previously in by our group [3].Furthermore, the time window of our recordings (<1 h) s that nE2 is able to sustain LTP induction by a rapid non-genomic action [1 20 min letrozole application appeared sufficient to rapidly reduce the LT Our experiments demonstrate that the role of nE2 in hippocampal far more relevant when considering pathological conditions.Accordingly of hippocampal LTP observed in the presence of Aβ42 oligomers was com by endogenous nE2 synthesis, obtained by the exposition to finasteride.ide was applied at a nanomolar concentration, a dose that did not alter p Our experiments demonstrate that the role of nE2 in hippocampal LTP induction is far more relevant when considering pathological conditions.Accordingly, the impairment of hippocampal LTP observed in the presence of Aβ42 oligomers was completely rescued by endogenous nE2 synthesis, obtained by the exposition to finasteride.Of note, finasteride was applied at a nanomolar concentration, a dose that did not alter physiological LTP [41,47].Interestingly, this low concentration effectively restored DG LTP in Aβ-treated slices without altering the LTP of untreated slices, suggesting increased sensitivity to rapidly synthetized nE2 in the pathological setting of in vitro cerebral amyloidosis induced by Aβ42 aggregates.Accordingly, in this experimental condition, the concurrent E2 receptor blockade abolished the effect obtained with finasteride, while 1 nM E2, a dose comparable with physiological levels of nE2 in the hippocampus of male rats [32,49], was sufficient to restore DG LTP.These findings allow us to hypothesize a possible bidirectional cause-effect relationship between amyloidopathy and altered steroidogenesis in the CNS, also opening the hypothesis that the pharmacological modulation of nE2 levels might have a neuroprotective potential.
Although our study shows that locally synthesized E2 is crucial for the induction and recovery of LTP in the DG, the exact mechanism underlying this phenomenon is not fully understood.The activation of ER by E2 has been reported to induce a rapid increase in spines on granule neurons, significantly enhancing the excitatory input to the DG [52]; accordingly, the loss of hippocampal neuron-derived E2 was shown to significantly decrease the number of dendritic spines and synapses [53].Our in vitro studies, however, demonstrated that nE2 is able to rescue Aβ42-impaired LTP within minutes, an effect that is far too rapid to be based on granule cells' spinogenesis.Similar conclusions are in line with findings reporting that LTP impairment preceded hippocampal spine and synapse loss [53,54].Rapid mechanisms of action in which nE2 can play a role in LTP include its influence on glutamatergic and GABAergic transmission [37,52,[55][56][57].Since hippocampal LTP is mediated by the activation of NMDARs [58], nE2 likely facilitates LTP by interacting with these receptors, as reported for exogenous E2 [59-61].Moreover, nE2-dependent LTP induction has been shown to rely on the interaction between ERs and NMDARs signaling cascades in different hippocampal regions [35,59,60,62].Thus, we hypothesized in hippocampal DG a similar convergent interaction between nE2 signaling and activation of the NMDAR intracellular pathway (Figure 5).Indeed, our experiments demonstrate that in control conditions, the LTP induced in the presence of letrozole and memantine is not altered, suggesting that NMDARs' modulation acts downstream of ERs.
Our results are in line with the observations of Tanaka and colleagues showing that endogenously synthesized E2 constitutively enhances NMDAR function through synaptic ER [63,64].Moreover, numerous studies have demonstrated that Aβ oligomers directly alter the function of NMDARs.In particular, Aβ oligomers specifically activated the extra-synaptic NMDARs subpopulation, responsible for glutamate excitotoxicity and cell death [65,66], and reduced the synaptic sub-population of NMDARs [67][68][69], disrupting the balance between synaptic and extra-synaptic NMDARs [70].The non-competitive NMDAR antagonist memantine, widely used in moderate and severe dementia, antagonized Aβinduced negative effects [71] by acting on extra-synaptic NMDARs [72][73][74].In this scenario, we can hypothesize that locally synthesized E2 can recover hippocampal LTP by acting on the balance between synaptic and extra-synaptic NMDARs' functionality.
Although further investigation, including measurements of single neurons, may help to illustrate the specific interaction between nE2 and NMDAR in DG LTP, we can conclude that the gatekeeping function of the DG to filter incoming activity in the hippocampus can be modulated by nE2 under both physiological and pathological conditions through the modulation of NMDARs.Our results confirm the pivotal role of locally synthesized E2 in mediating long-term changes in synaptic strength, highlighting the importance of its effect on memory and learning mechanisms.Moreover, our data highlight the importance of nE2 as a possible neuroprotective agent in cerebral amyloidosis, able to counteract the early loss of synaptic plasticity associated with Aβ aggregates' accumulation.

Figure 2 .
Figure 2. Effect of exogenous 17-β-estradiol (E2) on DG LTP in Aβ42-treated slices.Time-course plot of the mean PS amplitude before and after the HFS protocol to induce LTP in control slices (Ctrl) and in the presence of 1 nM E2 (n = 6).

Figure 3 .
Figure 3.Effect of memantine (Mem) on DG LTP in untreated slices.Time-course plot of the mean PS amplitude before and after the HFS protocol to induce LTP in control slices (Ctrl) and in the presence of 1 μM Mem (n = 6).

Figure 2 .
Figure 2. Effect of exogenous 17-β-estradiol (E2) on DG LTP in Aβ42-treated slices.Time-course plot of the mean PS amplitude before and after the HFS protocol to induce LTP in control slices (Ctrl) and in the presence of 1 nM E2 (n = 6).

Figure 2 .
Figure 2. Effect of exogenous 17-β-estradiol (E2) on DG LTP in Aβ42-treated slices.Time-course of the mean PS amplitude before and after the HFS protocol to induce LTP in control slices ( and in the presence of 1 nM E2 (n = 6).

Figure 3 .
Figure 3.Effect of memantine (Mem) on DG LTP in untreated slices.Time-course plot of the m PS amplitude before and after the HFS protocol to induce LTP in control slices (Ctrl) and in presence of 1 μM Mem (n = 6).

Figure 3 .
Figure 3.Effect of memantine (Mem) on DG LTP in untreated slices.Time-course plot of the mean PS amplitude before and after the HFS protocol to induce LTP in control slices (Ctrl) and in the presence of 1 µM Mem (n = 6).

Figure 4 .
Figure 4. Effect of memantine (Mem) on DG LTP.(a) Time-course plot of the before and after the HFS protocol in Aβ42 plus 1μM Mem-treated slices (Aβ 42.54%, n = 7, vs. Aβ42, dashed time-course (Ctrl), F(1,13) = 4.78, * p < 0.05).Repr post-HFS traces from an Aβ42-treated slice in the presence of Mem.(b) Time-cou PS amplitude before and after the HFS protocol after the co-exposure of the slice 1 μM Mem (Mem + Let, 222.80 ± 19.78%, n = 6, vs. Ctrl, dashed time-course, p > 0 pre-and post-HFS traces from control slices in the presence of Mem plus Let.ms.

Figure 4 .
Figure 4. Effect of memantine (Mem) on DG LTP.(a) Time-course plot of the mean PS amplitude before and after the HFS protocol in Aβ42 plus 1µM Mem-treated slices (Aβ42 + Mem, 253.56 ± 42.54%, n = 7, vs. Aβ42, dashed time-course (Ctrl), F (1,13) = 4.78, * p < 0.05).Representative pre-and post-HFS traces from an Aβ42-treated slice in the presence of Mem.(b) Time-course plot of the mean PS amplitude before and after the HFS protocol after the co-exposure of the slices to 100 nM Let plus 1 µM Mem (Mem + Let, 222.80 ± 19.78%, n = 6, vs. Ctrl, dashed time-course, p > 0.05).Representative pre-and post-HFS traces from control slices in the presence of Mem plus Let.Scale bars: 1 mV, 10 ms.

Figure 5 .
Figure 5. Neural E2 modulation of DG LTP in the model of cerebral amyloidosis.Ne (nE2) levels are increased by finasteride (Fin), an inhibitor of the steroid 5α-reducta responsible for dihydrotestosterone (DHT) production from testosterone (T).T is P450 aromatase (P450 ARO).In hippocampal slices treated for 2 h with 200 nM of fragment (Aβ42), the high-frequency stimulation protocol is able to induce long (LTP) when the slices of the pathological model are treated with Fin or in the prese NMDAR antagonist memantine (Mem).Designed with CorelDRAW Graphics Sui

Figure 5 .
Figure 5. Neural E2 modulation of DG LTP in the model of cerebral amyloidosis.Neural 17-βestradiol (nE2) levels are increased by finasteride (Fin), an inhibitor of the steroid 5α-reductase (5α-RED) that is responsible for dihydrotestosterone (DHT) production from testosterone (T).T is converted to E2 by P450 aromatase (P450 ARO).In hippocampal slices treated for 2 h with 200 nM of the β-amyloid 1-42 fragment (Aβ42), the high-frequency stimulation protocol is able to induce long-term potentiation (LTP) when the slices of the pathological model are treated with Fin or in the presence of 1 µM of the NMDAR antagonist memantine (Mem).Designed with CorelDRAW Graphics Suite.