The Pupa Stage Is the Most Sensitive to Hypoxia in Drosophila melanogaster

Hypoxia not only plays a critical role in multiple disease conditions; it also influences the growth and development of cells, tissues and organs. To identify novel hypoxia-related mechanisms involved in cell and tissue growth, studying a precise hypoxia-sensitive time window can be an effective approach. Drosophila melanogaster has been a useful model organism for studying a variety of conditions, and we focused in this study on the life cycle stages of Drosophila to investigate their hypoxia sensitivity. When normoxia-grown flies were treated with 4% O2 at the pupa stage for 3, 2 and 1 day/s, the eclosion rates were 6.1%, 66.7% and 96.4%, respectively, and, when 4% O2 was kept for the whole pupa stage, this regimen was lethal. Surprisingly, when our hypoxia-adapted flies who normally live in 4% O2 were treated with 4% O2 at the pupa stage, no fly eclosed. Within the pupa stage, the pupae at 2 and 3 days after pupae formation (APF), when treated for 2 days, demonstrated 12.5 ± 8.5% and 23.6 ± 1.6% eclosion, respectively, but this was completely lethal when treated for 3 days. We conclude that pupae, at 2 days APF and for a duration of a minimum of 2 days, were the most sensitive to hypoxia. Our data from our hypoxia-adapted flies clearly indicate that epigenetic factors play a critical role in pupa-stage hypoxia sensitivity.


Introduction
Hypoxia plays a detrimental role in multiple disease conditions.A failure in adequately maintaining oxygen (O 2 ) homeostasis leads to various pathological conditions, and some of them, e.g., cardiac ischemia, stroke, etc., are a leading cause of death in humans [1,2].Although cells and tissues frequently encounter hypoxia, a series of molecular responses can maintain O 2 homeostasis, for example, through the stabilization of hypoxia-inducible factors (HIFs), well-known master regulators of O 2 homeostasis [3,4].
Drosophila melanogaster has been an important model organism in studying a number of conditions, including to identify hypoxia-related markers.Indeed, newer technologies have further helped us identify numerous hypoxia targets in embryos, larvae and adult flies [5][6][7].However, a systematic study to identify the critical O 2 level and critical sensitive stage that limit its normal development has never been attempted.Previous reports in embryos, larvae and adults have indicated significant variability in O 2 sensitivity.For example, at 2% O 2 , there are reports of cell cycle arrest in embryos [8][9][10] and behavioral changes in larvae [11].Similarly, we and others have previously reported that adult flies are extremely resistant to anoxia [12,13].At the same time, none of the flies survived when kept in a 4% O 2 environment for their entire life cycle, i.e., 0% pupa eclosion [6].Given that the survival of the fittest is dictated by the most vulnerable stage of the life cycle, we believe identifying the critical hypoxia-sensitive phase will facilitate the identification of key genes and pathways involved in O 2 sensing.This will also help us to enrich our understanding of the role that hypoxia plays during normal development and identify novel hypoxia-responding gene/s with therapeutic potential.In this study, we systematically examined different stages in the life cycle of Drosophila melanogaster to identify critical hypoxia-sensitive stages.

Determination of the Critical O 2 Level for Hypoxia Sensitivity
In order to determine an optimal O 2 level that has a substantial but not lethal effect on flies, we exposed embryos from control flies, i.e., w1118 and y 1 v 1 , and hypoxia-adapted (HA) flies to 3.5%, 3.7%, 4%, 5% and room-air O 2 for 21 days.The 3.5% and 3.7% O 2 environment were lethal for the pupae of control flies (>100 uneclosed pupae).As anticipated, the eclosion rate in HA flies was significantly higher, i.e., 53.9 ± 7.9% and 80.2 ± 3.9% at 3.5% and 3.7% O 2 , respectively (Figure 1 and Table S1).At 4% O 2 , the eclosion rates were between 0.8% and 2% in the control flies and 76.9 ± 13% in HA flies, and at 5% O 2 , the eclosion rates were 11.1 ± 6% and 18.7 ± 1.9% in w1118 and y 1 v 1 and 78.2 ± 8.2% in HA flies (Figure 1 and Tables S1 and S2).We used the 4% O 2 level for subsequent screening.involved in O2 sensing.This will also help us to enrich our understanding of the role that hypoxia plays during normal development and identify novel hypoxia-responding gene/s with therapeutic potential.In this study, we systematically examined different stages in the life cycle of Drosophila melanogaster to identify critical hypoxia-sensitive stages.

Identification of the Critical Hypoxia-Sensitive Stage
To determine the critical hypoxia-sensitive stage, we treated flies with 4% O2 at different stages of their life cycle, i.e., embryo; first-, second-and third-instar larvae; and early, mid and late pupae.Figure 2 (pie chart in the top section) depicts the specific stage at which the flies were transferred to a 4% O2 chamber from normoxia (21% O2) or vice versa.Our results indicate that the pupa stage was the most critical hypoxia sensitivity stage.For example, there was no eclosion in the normoxia-grown flies when treated with 4% O2 at the pupa stage compared to >97% in hypoxia-grown (4% O2) control flies; i.e., control flies grown in 4% O2 from embryo to late third-instar larvae returned back to normoxia before the pupa stage (Figure 2 and Table S3).Our results also confirm that 4% O2 does not have a significant impact on the embryos, as the number of pupae in the experimental groups where the embryos were pretreated with 4% O2 for up to 48 h and the normoxia groups, i.e., no hypoxia treatment (0 h), were similar (Figure S1).Similarly, the eclosion rates of these pupae were >90% (Figure S2).Interestingly, the rate of eclosion decreased as the starting point of 4% O2 treatment moved from 1 day after pupa formation (APF) to 3 days APF; i.e., the eclosion rate decreased from >99% when exposed to 4% O2 at 1 day APF to 66.1 ± 22.09% and 89 ± 7.04% at 2 days APF and 54.3 ± 11.33% and 66.2 ± 8.72% at 3 days AFP in w1118 and y 1 v 1 , respectively (Figure 2 and Table S3), indicating early pupae are less hypoxia-sensitive.In the control flies (w1118 and y 1 v 1 lines), no eclosion was detected in 3.5% and 3.7% O 2 level environments, 0-5% in the 4% O 2 environment and between 11% and 19% in the 5% O 2 environment.In the HA flies, the eclosion rates were 53.9% at 3.5% O 2 and >75% in 3.7%, 4% and 5% O 2 environments.

Identification of the Critical Hypoxia-Sensitive Stage
To determine the critical hypoxia-sensitive stage, we treated flies with 4% O 2 at different stages of their life cycle, i.e., embryo; first-, second-and third-instar larvae; and early, mid and late pupae.Figure 2 (pie chart in the top section) depicts the specific stage at which the flies were transferred to a 4% O 2 chamber from normoxia (21% O 2 ) or vice versa.Our results indicate that the pupa stage was the most critical hypoxia sensitivity stage.For example, there was no eclosion in the normoxia-grown flies when treated with 4% O 2 at the pupa stage compared to >97% in hypoxia-grown (4% O 2 ) control flies; i.e., control flies grown in 4% O 2 from embryo to late third-instar larvae returned back to normoxia before the pupa stage (Figure 2 and Table S3).Our results also confirm that 4% O 2 does not have a significant impact on the embryos, as the number of pupae in the experimental groups where the embryos were pretreated with 4% O 2 for up to 48 h and the normoxia groups, i.e., no hypoxia treatment (0 h), were similar (Figure S1).Similarly, the eclosion rates of these pupae were >90% (Figure S2).Interestingly, the rate of eclosion decreased as the starting point of 4% O 2 treatment moved from 1 day after pupa formation (APF) to 3 days APF; i.e., the eclosion rate decreased from >99% when exposed to 4% O 2 at 1 day APF to 66.1 ± 22.09% and 89 ± 7.04% at 2 days APF and 54.3 ± 11.33% and 66.2 ± 8.72% at 3 days AFP in w1118 and y 1 v 1 , respectively (Figure 2 and Table S3), indicating early pupae are less hypoxia-sensitive.
To see if the HA flies, which complete their entire life cycle in 4% O2, are protected from extreme hypoxia sensitivity of the pupae, we treated normoxia-grown hypoxiaadapted pupae at 4% O2.Surprisingly, similar to the w1118 and y 1 v 1 controls, none of the HA pupae eclosed (Figure 3).This is in contrast to the 76.9 ± 13% eclosion observed when HA flies were kept in 4% O2 for their entire life cycle (Figure 1 and Table S1).Presumably, epigenetic mechanisms govern hypoxia sensitivity during pupa development.Hypoxia treated during 1st-, 2nd-or 3rd-instar larvae resulted in >97% eclosion.The eclosion rate dropped significantly from >99% at 1 day after pupa formation (APF) to 66.1% in w1118 and 54.4% in y 1 v 1 at 3 days APF to no eclosion (0%) when normoxia-grown larvae or pupae were treated at 4% O2. (Top) Schematic of the experimental method, i.e., the life cycle stage (insert) at which the flies were treated with hypoxia.The shaded part indicates the time period during which flies were kept in 4% O2 and the unshaded part is the time spent in room air.Data presented in Table S3.

Critical Time Period for Pupa Hypoxia Exposure
To assess the duration of hypoxia exposure critical to detect a noticeable phenotype, we treated normoxia-grown pupae with 4% O2 for different time periods and at different Hypoxia treated during 1st-, 2nd-or 3rd-instar larvae resulted in >97% eclosion.The eclosion rate dropped significantly from >99% at 1 day after pupa formation (APF) to 66.1% in w1118 and 54.4% in y 1 v 1 at 3 days APF to no eclosion (0%) when normoxia-grown larvae or pupae were treated at 4% O 2 .(Top) Schematic of the experimental method, i.e., the life cycle stage (insert) at which the flies were treated with hypoxia.The shaded part indicates the time period during which flies were kept in 4% O 2 and the unshaded part is the time spent in room air.Data presented in Table S3.
To see if the HA flies, which complete their entire life cycle in 4% O 2 , are protected from extreme hypoxia sensitivity of the pupae, we treated normoxia-grown hypoxia-adapted pupae at 4% O 2 .Surprisingly, similar to the w1118 and y 1 v 1 controls, none of the HA pupae eclosed (Figure 3).This is in contrast to the 76.9 ± 13% eclosion observed when HA flies were kept in 4% O 2 for their entire life cycle (Figure 1 and Table S1).Presumably, epigenetic mechanisms govern hypoxia sensitivity during pupa development.To see if the HA flies, which complete their entire life cycle in 4% O2, are protected from extreme hypoxia sensitivity of the pupae, we treated normoxia-grown hypoxiaadapted pupae at 4% O2.Surprisingly, similar to the w1118 and y 1 v 1 controls, none of the HA pupae eclosed (Figure 3).This is in contrast to the 76.9 ± 13% eclosion observed when HA flies were kept in 4% O2 for their entire life cycle (Figure 1 and Table S1).Presumably, epigenetic mechanisms govern hypoxia sensitivity during pupa development.The eclosion rate dropped significantly from >99% at 1 day after pupa formation (APF) to 66.1% in w1118 and 54.4% in y 1 v 1 at 3 days APF to no eclosion (0%) when normoxia-grown larvae or pupae were treated at 4% O2. (Top) Schematic of the experimental method, i.e., the life cycle stage (insert) at which the flies were treated with hypoxia.The shaded part indicates the time period during which flies were kept in 4% O2 and the unshaded part is the time spent in room air.Data presented in Table S3.

Critical Time Period for Pupa Hypoxia Exposure
To assess the duration of hypoxia exposure critical to detect a noticeable phenotype, we treated normoxia-grown pupae with 4% O2 for different time periods and at different

Critical Time Period for Pupa Hypoxia Exposure
To assess the duration of hypoxia exposure critical to detect a noticeable phenotype, we treated normoxia-grown pupae with 4% O 2 for different time periods and at different stages, i.e., 1, 2 and 3 days APF.Although 24 h of exposure at 1, 2 and 3 days APF did not affect the eclosion rates (Figure S3a), we observed a significant drop in the eclosion rate when the exposure duration was ≥2 days of hypoxia exposure (42.32 ± 9.2% at 2 days and 6.07 ± 1.8% at 3 days, Figure S3b).
In order to determine the critical phase during the pupal period when flies are most sensitive to hypoxia, we treated HA pupae with 4% O 2 for 2 and 3 days.For this, we used pupae aged 1 to 5 days APF (Section 4).There was no significant change in the eclosion rate of 1-day-APF pupae exposed to hypoxia for 3 days (Figure 4a and Table S4).However, the eclosion rate dropped from 89.3 ± 5.4% to 0% (p-value < 0.001) when 2-day or 3-day-APF pupae were exposed to 4% O 2 for 3 days.Similarly, the eclosion rate also dropped from 81.3 ± 12.7% to 12.5 ± 8.5% (p-value < 0.001) when 2-day-APF pupae were treated for 2 days in 4% O 2 and to 23.6 ± 1.6% (p-value < 0.001) in 3-day-APF pupae treated with a similar hypoxia level (Figure 4b and Table S5).Overall, this experiment clearly indicates that pupae at 2 to 3 days APF are in the phase most vulnerable to hypoxia stress in the entire life cycle of flies, and the minimum time duration is 2 days.
Int. J. Mol.Sci.2024, 25, x FOR PEER REVIEW 4 of 8 stages, i.e., 1, 2 and 3 days APF.Although 24 h of exposure at 1, 2 and 3 days APF did not affect the eclosion rates (Figure S3a), we observed a significant drop in the eclosion rate when the exposure duration was ≥2 days of hypoxia exposure (42.32 ± 9.2% at 2 days and 6.07 ± 1.8% at 3 days, Figure S3b).In order to determine the critical phase during the pupal period when flies are most sensitive to hypoxia, we treated HA pupae with 4% O2 for 2 and 3 days.For this, we used pupae aged 1 to 5 days APF (Methods Section).There was no significant in the eclosion rate of 1-day-APF pupae exposed to hypoxia for 3 days (Figure 4a and Table S4).However, the eclosion rate dropped from 89.3 ± 5.4% to 0% (p-value < 0.001) when 2-day or 3-day-APF pupae were exposed to 4% O2 for 3 days.Similarly, the eclosion rate also dropped from 81.3 ± 12.7% to 12.5 ± 8.5% (p-value < 0.001) when 2-day-APF pupae were treated for 2 days in 4% O2 and to 23.6 ± 1.6% (p-value < 0.001) in 3-day-APF pupae treated with a similar hypoxia level (Figure 4b and Table S5).Overall, this experiment clearly indicates that pupae at 2 to 3 days APF are in the phase most vulnerable to hypoxia stress in the entire life cycle of flies, and the minimum time duration is 2 days.S4.(b) Eclosion rates of normoxia-grown HA flies kept in hypoxia for 2 days.The age of pupae when treated with hypoxia were 1, 2 and 3 days APF.Data presented in Table S5.The eclosion rates were <25% in 2-and 3-day-APF pupae.Top: the shaded part indicates the life cycle stage and the time period during which the flies were kept in 4% O2, and the unshaded part is the time spent in room air.

Discussion
A practical and effective method of identifying novel hypoxia-related markers is to first identify the critical hypoxia-sensitive phase, e.g., during development, and then to conduct focused experiments using the latest techniques to identify the molecular mechanisms.We and others used the embryo, larva or adult stages of Drosophila melanogaster to study various aspects of the hypoxia response, but systematic studies to identify the critical hypoxia-sensitive time window have rarely been conducted.The few studies with a somewhat similar objective have not pinpointed a specific time window,  S4.(b) Eclosion rates of normoxia-grown HA flies kept in hypoxia for 2 days.The age of pupae when treated with hypoxia were 1, 2 and 3 days APF.Data presented in Table S5.The eclosion rates were <25% in 2-and 3-day-APF pupae.Top: the shaded part indicates the life cycle stage and the time period during which the flies were kept in 4% O 2 , and the unshaded part is the time spent in room air.

Discussion
A practical and effective method of identifying novel hypoxia-related markers is to first identify the critical hypoxia-sensitive phase, e.g., during development, and then to conduct focused experiments using the latest techniques to identify the molecular mechanisms.We and others used the embryo, larva or adult stages of Drosophila melanogaster to study various aspects of the hypoxia response, but systematic studies to identify the critical hypoxiasensitive time window have rarely been conducted.The few studies with a somewhat similar objective have not pinpointed a specific time window, likely because of using a milder hypoxia (10% O 2 ) treatment or due to considering a modest endpoint phenotype, i.e., body size, or the combination of both [14].Here, we attempted to address this issue, and our hypoxia tolerance screening results have revealed early pupae as the most hypoxia-sensitive stage in the life cycle of D. melanogaster.Exposing flies to 4% O 2 for 2 days during the early pupa stage, i.e., 2 days APF, led to ~69% drop in the eclosion rate, and a 3-day exposure period was lethal.Interestingly, even the HA flies, which normally live in 4% O 2 , were equally affected (Figure 3), which is interesting and unexpected.Surprisingly, we found that the effects of environmental stress during the pupal stage in insects have rarely been investigated as previous studies are largely focused on its impact on the embryo, larva or adult stages.This is despite the fact that metamorphosis involves a radical transition from a larval to an adult body form and function, making the pupa stage a highly stress-sensitive stage [15].
Previous studies have shown that hypoxia stress during the larval period negatively affects adult fitness, which includes a reduced lifespan [16,17], decreased body size [14,18] and reduced stress resistance [17] in adults.Although these studies primarily focused on the larval stage, some of the results support and strengthen our data, independently demonstrating a similar hypoxia-sensitive window [14,18].For example, Heinrich et al. noted that brief hypoxia exposure during the late larval and mid-pupal periods (around 2 days APF) have the greatest effects on adult size [14], which is consistent with our current study on lethality, due to short hypoxia exposure during the same pupa period.Likewise, the pupal stage was found to be a critical stage beyond which the detrimental effects of hypoxia could not be reversed [18].Besides hypoxia, among the limited studies that have discovered pupa sensitivity to other types of stress is the oriental fruit fly's (Bactrocera dorsalis) response to heat exposure during the pupal stage, which negatively influences longevity and heat tolerance in adults [19].Similarly, Plutella xylostella adults (a global insect pest), when heat-treated as pupae, always lay lower numbers of eggs [20].As anticipated, the differences were only significant when the heat exposure was >16 h [20].Similarly, a 24 h period of exposure to 10% O 2 during the early pupal period significantly reduces adult size [14], which correlates with our observation of a sudden drop in the eclosion rate when the hypoxia exposure was ≥2 days.
While previous studies have shown that even brief 10% O 2 exposure can have a significant impact on body size, we used the eclosion rate as the endpoint phenotype and we observed that a 5% O 2 level has a significant impact on the eclosion rate; hence, we used O 2 levels < 5% in our experiments.For example, when the naive flies were treated with 5% O 2 for their entire developmental period, the eclosion rate was between 0% and 28%, but at 4% O 2 , none survived [6].Additionally, the HA flies that we generated in our laboratory through a laboratory selection experiment were adapted to 4% O 2 , i.e., completed their entire life cycle in a 4% O 2 environment [6].Additionally, based on these considerations, we believe that 4% O 2 constituted a clear distinction between naive (non-adapted) flies and HA flies.Additionally, because our objective was to identify the critical hypoxia-sensitive stage, which involved hypoxia treatment for a relatively shorter period of time (compared to the entire life cycle), we also investigated eclosion rates at 3.5% and 3.7% O 2 levels to have further resolution of that particular critical level.Surprisingly, even at 4% O 2 , a shorter treatment during the pupa stage was detrimental.
It is surprising that the treatment of pupae of HA flies with 4% O 2 was lethal (similar to the control flies), which is unexpected as they had been living and reproducing in a 4% O 2 environment.This clearly indicates that a short period of exposure to hypoxia during the early pupa stage could effectively eliminate the genetic adaptation to the same environment that took these flies > 290 generations to achieve during a period of >15 years of laboratory selection [6,21].This is an important finding, and it would have been impossible to infer or to propose this idea using naive flies.It primarily reveals a pre-developed trajectory whereby the tolerance of subsequent stages is dependent on the conditions during the preceding stages, remarkably overriding the impact of its genetic background.Importantly, it also illustrates the "rigidity" in adaptation, whereby the resistance to a stressful condition may not be applicable in parts to a specific developmental stage, i.e., genetic adaptation per se does not guarantee survival when the treatment is applied in different developmental stages.A potential explanation for this is that the beneficial effect of early life stress exposure can epigenetically influence gene expression for later life stages.In other words, the genome of HA flies remains the same; however, when exposed to a hypoxic environment early in life, the differences in gene expression arising during development render them hypoxia-tolerant.Recent studies have shown that environmental factors can epigenetically influence gene expressions across developmental stages and generations [22].For example, previous studies have shown that in Drosophila, early life exposure to environmental factors like low-dose oxidants can increase longevity [23].In addition, there are intrinsic factors, like transient sulfotransferase overexpression during larval development, that significantly increase lifespan in adult flies [24].Interestingly, in contrast to these results, there are reports that also suggest that early hypoxia treatment can lead to reduced stress resistance or lifespan in the adult [16,17].Such contradictory results are difficult to explain since such responses are dependent on the level of hypoxia, its duration and the stage at which the stress was applied.Importantly, since this experiment suggests epigenetic factors play a crucial role in the cellular response to hypoxia [25][26][27], the study of the critical window that we discovered here is especially important because of the likely involvement of nongenetic factors in otherwise hypoxia-tolerant HA flies.In addition, our results suggest that the hypoxia sensitivity experienced during the critical time window predisposes them to conditions later in life.Therefore, to identify molecular predispositions, we will need to study the transcriptome and epigenome of stages prior to pupa formation, both with and without hypoxia treatment.
Finally, our current study has therapeutic value in identifying mechanisms underlying hypoxia-driven epigenetic regulation [28].For example, hypoxic conditions in tumors contribute to cancer development and progression [29,30], and recent studies have shown that epigenetic changes due to a tumor's microenvironment have profound impacts on its progression [29,31].Exploring the precise molecular mechanisms will surely enrich our understanding of the hypoxia response and further disease therapy.

Fly Rearing and Collection
The Drosophila stocks w1118 (Stock# 3605) and y 1 v 1 (Stock# 1509) were obtained from the Bloomington Stock Center.The HA flies were generated using long-term experimental selection over many generations, and the details of the methods used have previously been reported [6,21].Briefly, we first generated a heterogeneous parental population by pooling 27 wild-type isogenic lines.When these flies were treated at 4%, 6% and 8% O 2 , we noticed that the percentages of embryos reaching the adult stage were 0%, <10% and >80%, respectively.Therefore, the hypoxia selection was initiated at 8% O 2 .Subsequently, the O 2 concentration was gradually decreased by ∼1% every 3 to 5 generations, and by the 32nd generation, the flies were able to complete their entire life cycle in 4% O 2 .Since then, the flies have completed >290 generations in this environment.Under all conditions, the flies were maintained on standard cornmeal diet and were kept in ambient conditions of 25 • C with a 12-12 light-dark cycle.For the hypoxia and normoxia experiments, the ambient temperature and humidity were maintained at 22-24 • C and 30-50%, respectively.

Critical O 2 Level Determination
For all the hypoxia treatments, we used O 2 control glove boxes (Coy Lab Products, Grass Lake, MI, USA) with an oxygen controller at 0-100% +/− 0.1% resolution.We kept 2-3-day-old adult flies in room air for 24 h for egg laying.Subsequently, the adult flies were transferred to a new vial, and the original vials with eggs/embryos were transferred to a hypoxia chamber for 21 days.Another batch of vials with the eggs/embryos was kept in room air.The number of eclosed pupae was counted after 21 days.

Figure 2 .
Figure2.Screening for hypoxia-sensitive stage in the life cycle of Drosophila melanogaster.Hypoxia treated during 1st-, 2nd-or 3rd-instar larvae resulted in >97% eclosion.The eclosion rate dropped significantly from >99% at 1 day after pupa formation (APF) to 66.1% in w1118 and 54.4% in y 1 v 1 at 3 days APF to no eclosion (0%) when normoxia-grown larvae or pupae were treated at 4% O2. (Top) Schematic of the experimental method, i.e., the life cycle stage (insert) at which the flies were treated with hypoxia.The shaded part indicates the time period during which flies were kept in 4% O2 and the unshaded part is the time spent in room air.Data presented in TableS3.

Figure 3 .
Figure 3. Eclosion rates of control and hypoxia-adapted flies when chronically exposed to 4% O2 APF.No eclosion (marked as 'X') was observed in the control fly lines (w1118 and y 1 v 1 ) or in the HA flies at 4% O2 (p-value < 0.001).Pictures show vials kept in 4% O2 throughout development (left) and only at the pupa stage (right) in w1118 (top) and HA flies (bottom).

Figure 2 .
Figure 2. Screening for hypoxia-sensitive stage in the life cycle of Drosophila melanogaster.Hypoxia treated during 1st-, 2nd-or 3rd-instar larvae resulted in >97% eclosion.The eclosion rate dropped significantly from >99% at 1 day after pupa formation (APF) to 66.1% in w1118 and 54.4% in y 1 v 1 at 3 days APF to no eclosion (0%) when normoxia-grown larvae or pupae were treated at 4% O 2 .(Top) Schematic of the experimental method, i.e., the life cycle stage (insert) at which the flies were treated with hypoxia.The shaded part indicates the time period during which flies were kept in 4% O 2 and the unshaded part is the time spent in room air.Data presented in TableS3.

Figure 2 .
Figure 2. Screening for hypoxia-sensitive stage in the life cycle of Drosophila melanogaster.Hypoxia treated during 1st-, 2nd-or 3rd-instar larvae resulted in >97% eclosion.The eclosion rate dropped significantly from >99% at 1 day after pupa formation (APF) to 66.1% in w1118 and 54.4% in y 1 v 1 at 3 days APF to no eclosion (0%) when normoxia-grown larvae or pupae were treated at 4% O2. (Top) Schematic of the experimental method, i.e., the life cycle stage (insert) at which the flies were treated with hypoxia.The shaded part indicates the time period during which flies were kept in 4% O2 and the unshaded part is the time spent in room air.Data presented in TableS3.

Figure 3 .
Figure 3. Eclosion rates of control and hypoxia-adapted flies when chronically exposed to 4% O2 APF.No eclosion (marked as 'X') was observed in the control fly lines (w1118 and y 1 v 1 ) or in the HA flies at 4% O2 (p-value < 0.001).Pictures show vials kept in 4% O2 throughout development (left) and only at the pupa stage (right) in w1118 (top) and HA flies (bottom).

Figure 3 .
Figure 3. Eclosion rates of control and hypoxia-adapted flies when chronically exposed to 4% O 2 APF.No eclosion (marked as 'X') was observed in the control fly lines (w1118 and y 1 v 1 ) or in the HA flies at 4% O 2 (p-value < 0.001).Pictures show vials kept in 4% O 2 throughout development (left) and only at the pupa stage (right) in w1118 (top) and HA flies (bottom).

Figure 4 .
Figure 4. Hypoxia exposure of pupae for 2 days when they are 2 to 3 days APF is the critical hypoxiasensitive phase.(a) The eclosion rates of normoxia-grown HA flies at 1 to 5 days APF kept for 3 days in 4% O2.No eclosion was seen in 2-and 3-day-APF pupae when treated with hypoxia for 3 days.Data presented in TableS4.(b) Eclosion rates of normoxia-grown HA flies kept in hypoxia for 2 days.The age of pupae when treated with hypoxia were 1, 2 and 3 days APF.Data presented in TableS5.The eclosion rates were <25% in 2-and 3-day-APF pupae.Top: the shaded part indicates the life cycle stage and the time period during which the flies were kept in 4% O2, and the unshaded part is the time spent in room air.

Figure 4 .
Figure 4. Hypoxia exposure of pupae for 2 days when they are 2 to 3 days APF is the critical hypoxiasensitive phase.(a) The eclosion rates of normoxia-grown HA flies at 1 to 5 days APF kept for 3 days in 4% O 2 .No eclosion was seen in 2-and 3-day-APF pupae when treated with hypoxia for 3 days.Data presented in TableS4.(b) Eclosion rates of normoxia-grown HA flies kept in hypoxia for 2 days.The age of pupae when treated with hypoxia were 1, 2 and 3 days APF.Data presented in TableS5.The eclosion rates were <25% in 2-and 3-day-APF pupae.Top: the shaded part indicates the life cycle stage and the time period during which the flies were kept in 4% O 2 , and the unshaded part is the time spent in room air.