Effects of 3-(4-Hydroxy-3-methoxyphenyl)propionic Acid on Enhancing Grip Strength and Inhibiting Protein Catabolism Induced by Exhaustive Exercise

3-(4-Hydroxy-3-methoxyphenyl)propionic acid (HMPA), also known as dihydroferulic acid, is a hydroxycinnamic acid derivative that can be derived from the microbial transformation of dietary polyphenols or naturally obtained from fermented foods. Although numerous studies have documented its antioxidant and anti-obesity effects, the effect of HMPA on muscle function remains unknown. This study investigated the effects of HMPA on muscle strength and exercise endurance capacity. Mice were orally administered low and high doses of HMPA for 14 days and subjected to grip force and treadmill exhaustion tests to evaluate muscle function. Our results showed that HMPA-administered groups significantly enhanced absolute grip strength (p = 0.0256) and relative grip strength (p = 0.0209), and low-dose HMPA decreased the plasma level of blood urea nitrogen after exercise (p = 0.0183), but HMPA did not affect endurance performance. Low-dose HMPA administration increased Myf5 expression in sedentary mice (p = 0.0106), suggesting that low-dose HMPA may promote muscle development. Additionally, HMPA improved hepatic glucose and lipid metabolism, and inhibited muscular lipid metabolism and protein catabolism, as indicated by changes in mRNA expression levels of related genes. These findings suggest that HMPA may be a promising dietary supplement for muscle health and performance.


Introduction
Skeletal muscle, the most abundant tissue in the body, plays a crucial role in various biological activities, such as physical movement, thermogenesis, and energy metabolism [1,2].It functions as a major site for glycogenesis and as a protein reservoir to maintain energy and protein balance [2].Aging, sedentary lifestyles, and unhealthy diets have detrimental effects on skeletal muscle functionality, leading to muscle dysfunction [3,4].
The improvement of muscle function is of great interest to varied populations, not only to people with skeletal muscle dysfunction but also to athletes driven by competitive motivations [5].The improvement of muscle function is governed by the combined action of many regulatory factors, such as improving metabolism and oxidative capacity in various tissues [6].Additionally, improving the expression of myogenic regulatory factors (MRFs) and muscle protein synthesis is crucial for muscle regeneration and increased muscle mass [5,7].More importantly, those improvements can offer protection under various pathological conditions, including inflammation, ischemia, and hypoxia [8].Recent studies have increasingly reported that phenolic compounds improve muscle strength, exercise performance, and/or reduce tissue damage resulting from physical challenge [9,10].
3-(4-hydroxy-3-methoxyphenyl)propionic acid (HMPA) (Figure 1A), also known as dihydroferulic acid, is a phenolic compound that can be naturally found in various fermented foods, such as vinegar [11] and fermented rice bran [12].It is also a microbial metabolite from the degradation of dietary polyphenols like 4-hydroxy-3-methoxycinnamic acid (HMCA) (Figure 1B), known as ferulic acid [13][14][15].HMPA and HMCA share some chemical properties due to their similar chemical structures.However, HMPA exhibits unique characteristics as it forms through the hydrogenation of the double bond in the HMCA molecule.HMCA is a well-studied phenolic acid, known for its pharmacological properties, including antioxidant [16], anti-inflammatory [17], and hypolipidemic effects [13].Growing research has demonstrated a variety of positive effects of HMCA on muscle function.Wang et al. [18] demonstrated that a five-week dietary supplementation with 0.45% HMCA could increase the proportion of slow-twitch fibers without affecting growth performance.Similarly, a 30-day dietary supplementation with 0.2% HMCA led to an increase in muscle mass [19].Additionally, You et al. [20,21] showed that both a single dose (125 or 250 µmole/kg) and a 12-day oral administration of 25 mg/kg of HMCA enhanced exercise endurance capacity in mice, attributed to its antioxidant effects.However, the applications of HMCA are limited because of its low water solubility and rapid oxidation [22,23].
Int. J. Mol.Sci.2024, 25, x FOR PEER REVIEW 2 of 17 muscle mass [5,7].More importantly, those improvements can offer protection under various pathological conditions, including inflammation, ischemia, and hypoxia [8].Recent studies have increasingly reported that phenolic compounds improve muscle strength, exercise performance, and/or reduce tissue damage resulting from physical challenge [9,10].
3-(4-hydroxy-3-methoxyphenyl)propionic acid (HMPA) (Figure 1A), also known as dihydroferulic acid, is a phenolic compound that can be naturally found in various fermented foods, such as vinegar [11] and fermented rice bran [12].It is also a microbial metabolite from the degradation of dietary polyphenols like 4-hydroxy-3-methoxycinnamic acid (HMCA) (Figure 1B), known as ferulic acid [13][14][15].HMPA and HMCA share some chemical properties due to their similar chemical structures.However, HMPA exhibits unique characteristics as it forms through the hydrogenation of the double bond in the HMCA molecule.HMCA is a well-studied phenolic acid, known for its pharmacological properties, including antioxidant [16], anti-inflammatory [17], and hypolipidemic effects [13].Growing research has demonstrated a variety of positive effects of HMCA on muscle function.Wang et al. [18] demonstrated that a five-week dietary supplementation with 0.45% HMCA could increase the proportion of slow-twitch fibers without affecting growth performance.Similarly, a 30-day dietary supplementation with 0.2% HMCA led to an increase in muscle mass [19].Additionally, You et al. [20,21] showed that both a single dose (125 or 250 µmole/kg) and a 12-day oral administration of 25 mg/kg of HMCA enhanced exercise endurance capacity in mice, attributed to its antioxidant effects.However, the applications of HMCA are limited because of its low water solubility and rapid oxidation [22,23].The derivatives of HMCA have demonstrated promising features, including superior antioxidant activity, enhanced stability, and reduced toxicity, offering a wide range of applications [15,24,25].Several in vitro studies have shown that HMPA demonstrates superior antioxidant [15] and anti-platelet activities [25] compared to HMCA.Shimoji et al. [15] identified HMPA, present in Kurosu (unpolished rice vinegar), as exhibiting a higher level of antioxidative activity than HMCA, suggesting that HMPA may have advantageous applications in antioxidative food products due to its better water solubility.Ohue-Kitano et al. [26] observed a higher absorption rate of HMPA than HMCA following an oral administration of 500 mg/kg in mice.Moreover, in antibiotic-treated mice where HMPA production was absent, HMCA administration failed to produce anti-obesity effects or enhance hepatic lipid metabolism, indicating a critical role of HMPA in facilitating the positive metabolic effects associated with HMCA [26].Considering the potent bioactivity of HMPA, we hypothesize that HMPA administration would improve muscle function in mice.To test this hypothesis, two doses of HMPA were applied to investigate the chronic effects of HMPA on muscle function, including muscle strength and exercise endurance The derivatives of HMCA have demonstrated promising features, including superior antioxidant activity, enhanced stability, and reduced toxicity, offering a wide range of applications [15,24,25].Several in vitro studies have shown that HMPA demonstrates superior antioxidant [15] and anti-platelet activities [25] compared to HMCA.Shimoji et al. [15] identified HMPA, present in Kurosu (unpolished rice vinegar), as exhibiting a higher level of antioxidative activity than HMCA, suggesting that HMPA may have advantageous applications in antioxidative food products due to its better water solubility.Ohue-Kitano et al. [26] observed a higher absorption rate of HMPA than HMCA following an oral administration of 500 mg/kg in mice.Moreover, in antibiotic-treated mice where HMPA production was absent, HMCA administration failed to produce anti-obesity effects or enhance hepatic lipid metabolism, indicating a critical role of HMPA in facilitating the positive metabolic effects associated with HMCA [26].Considering the potent bioactivity of HMPA, we hypothesize that HMPA administration would improve muscle function in mice.To test this hypothesis, two doses of HMPA were applied to investigate the chronic effects of HMPA on muscle function, including muscle strength and exercise endurance capacity.
To understand the underlying molecular mechanisms, we analyzed plasma biomarkers associated with tissue damage and energy substances, in addition to assessing mRNA expression related to energy metabolism and muscle development pathways.

Effects of HMPA Administration on Skeletal Muscle Function in Mice
Two different doses of HMPA were orally administered to mice for 14 days and did not affect body weight compared to in the vehicle control group (Figure S1).
Low-dose HMPA tended to increase both relative and absolute grip strength after the administration, but the difference did not reach statistical significance (Figure 2A,B, p = 0.10).Compared to in the C group, both absolute and relative grip strength were significantly improved in the HMPA-administered (L + H) groups (Figure 2A,B, p < 0.05).
Int. J. Mol.Sci.2024, 25, x FOR PEER REVIEW 3 of 17 capacity.To understand the underlying molecular mechanisms, we analyzed plasma biomarkers associated with tissue damage and energy substances, in addition to assessing mRNA expression related to energy metabolism and muscle development pathways.

Effects of HMPA Administration on Skeletal Muscle Function in Mice
Two different doses of HMPA were orally administered to mice for 14 days and did not affect body weight compared to in the vehicle control group (Figure S1).
Low-dose HMPA tended to increase both relative and absolute grip strength after the administration, but the difference did not reach statistical significance (Figure 2A,B, p = 0.10).Compared to in the C group, both absolute and relative grip strength were significantly improved in the HMPA-administered (L + H) groups (Figure 2A,B, p < 0.05).Regarding the difference in grip strength before and after administration, there was a statistically significant main effect of time in the analysis of the absolute grip strength (Figure 2D, p < 0.05), and a significant time × HMPA interaction in the analysis of the relative grip strength (Figure 2E, p < 0.05).Post hoc evaluations indicated that absolute grip strength increased in the L group, and had a greater improvement compared to in the H group (Figure 2D, p < 0.05).The L group and the H group showed significantly increased relative grip strength (Figure 2E, p < 0.05), whereas there was no change in grip strength observed in the C group.
Exhaustion time appeared similar across groups (Figure 2F: 189 ± 32.57min vs. 184.8± 50.43 min vs. 182.6 ± 50.83 min, p > 0.05).Furthermore, no significant differences were observed in the loss of grip strength after exercise (Figure 2C).Regarding the difference in grip strength before and after administration, there was a statistically significant main effect of time in the analysis of the absolute grip strength (Figure 2D, p < 0.05), and a significant time × HMPA interaction in the analysis of the relative grip strength (Figure 2E, p < 0.05).Post hoc evaluations indicated that absolute grip strength increased in the L group, and had a greater improvement compared to in the H group (Figure 2D, p < 0.05).The L group and the H group showed significantly increased relative grip strength (Figure 2E, p < 0.05), whereas there was no change in grip strength observed in the C group.

Effects of HMPA Administration on Visceral Function and Energy Metabolism Substances
Numerous biochemical markers in plasma were assessed to investigate the effects of a 14-day oral administration of HMPA on visceral functions and energy metabolism, as well as the effects of HMPA on exhaustive exercise.There were no significant differences among the C group, L group, and H group at post-administration in the blood markers of albumin, aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), blood urea nitrogen (BUN), creatinine (Cr), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), creatine kinase (CK), and amylase, demonstrating that 14 days of HMPA administration did not result in toxic effects (Figure 3).Exhaustive exercise significantly increased the plasma levels of AST (Figure 3A, p < 0.0001), ALT (Figure 3B, p < 0.0001), CK (Figure 3D, p < 0.0001), LDH (Figure 3E, p < 0.0001), Cr (Figure 3F, p < 0.01), BUN (Figure 3G, p < 0.0001), and amylase (Figure 3H, p < 0.001) compared in the sedentary groups.Low-dose HMPA administration significantly decreased plasma BUN levels compared to in the C group following exercise (Figure 3G, p < 0.05).Neither exercise nor HMPA administration affected plasma uric acid levels (Figure 3H).Energy metabolism substances were also investigated in this study.Exhaustive exercise significantly increased plasma triglyceride (TG) (Figure 3M, p < 0.001) and free fatty acids (FFAs) levels (Figure 3N, p < 0.0001), while simultaneously causing a significant decrease in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL) (Figure 3J, p < 0.0001), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL) (Figure 3K, p < 0.01), total cholesterol (Figure 3L, p < 0.0001), and glucose (Figure 3O, p < 0.0001) levels.However, none of these significant differences were observed with HMPA administration.

Effect of HMPA Administration on Glucose Metabolism in Liver
Glucose-6-phosphatase catalytic subunit 1 (G6pc1 or G6Pase) (Figure 5A, p < 0.0001) and Slc2a2 (Glut2) (Figure 5B, p < 0.0001), which are related to glucose metabolism in the liver, were significantly increased following exhaustive exercise.Compared to in the CE group, low-dose HMPA administration significantly enhanced hepatic G6pc1 (G6Pase)

Effect of HMPA Administration on Glucose Metabolism in Liver
Glucose-6-phosphatase catalytic subunit 1 (G6pc1 or G6Pase) (Figure 5A, p < 0.0001) and Slc2a2 (Glut2) (Figure 5B, p < 0.0001), which are related to glucose metabolism in the liver, were significantly increased following exhaustive exercise.Compared to in the CE group, low-dose HMPA administration significantly enhanced hepatic G6pc1 (G6Pase) gene expression after exercise (Figure 5A, p < 0.05).Additionally, a significant interaction was observed between HMPA administration and exercise in Slc2a2 (Glut2) gene expression (Figure 5B, p < 0.05).Compared to in the C group, the H group showed significantly increased Slc2a2 (Glut2) gene expression (Figure 5B, p < 0.05).However, no significant effect of HMPA administration or exercise was observed in the expression levels of Gys2 (Figure 5C) or Mct1 (Figure 5D).

Effect of HMPA Administration on Muscle Satellite Cell Proliferation and Differentiation
To elucidate the underlying mechanisms contributing to the improvement in grip strength following HMPA administration, we analyzed the expression of genes related to myogenesis in the gastrocnemius muscle.Low-dose administration of HMPA significantly increased myogenic factor 5 (Myf5) mRNA expression compared to vehicle control mice (Figure 8A, p < 0.05).However, HMPA administration did not affect the mRNA levels of myoblast determination protein 1 (Myod1) (Figure 8B), myogenin (Myog) (Figure 8C), or myogenic factor 6 (Myf6) (Figure 8D).

Effect of HMPA Administration on Muscle Satellite Cell Proliferation and Differentiation
To elucidate the underlying mechanisms contributing to the improvement in grip strength following HMPA administration, we analyzed the expression of genes related to myogenesis in the gastrocnemius muscle.Low-dose administration of HMPA significantly increased myogenic factor 5 (Myf5) mRNA expression compared to vehicle control mice (Figure 8A, p < 0.05).However, HMPA administration did not affect the mRNA levels of myoblast determination protein 1 (Myod1) (Figure 8B), myogenin (Myog) (Figure 8C), or myogenic factor 6 (Myf6) (Figure 8D).

Discussion
There is limited literature addressing the effect of HMPA on muscle function a potential protective role against tissue damage induced by exhaustive exercise.In th sent study, we evaluated the potential beneficial effects of HMPA administration on cle function and tissue damage after a physical challenge in mice.The primary find our study indicates that 14-day HMPA administration improves grip strength, and dose HMPA reduces plasma BUN levels after exhaustive exercise.However, HMP ministration did not improve exercise endurance capacity in mice.
Facilitating energy production and substrate utilization is believed to be asso with optimizing muscle function.Preserving muscle glycogen and sustaining h blood glucose levels are key factors in maintaining and improving exercise perform [27,28].Swim training has been reported to improve grip strength by optimizing m energy metabolism in a muscle dysfunction model of mice [29].The liver is the majo abolic organ.During exercise, it increases glucose production by activating glucone esis and glycogenolysis, and modulates lipid metabolism in response to the increas

Discussion
There is limited literature addressing the effect of HMPA on muscle function and its potential protective role against tissue damage induced by exhaustive exercise.In the present study, we evaluated the potential beneficial effects of HMPA administration on muscle function and tissue damage after a physical challenge in mice.The primary finding of our study indicates that 14-day HMPA administration improves grip strength, and low-dose HMPA reduces plasma BUN levels after exhaustive exercise.However, HMPA administration did not improve exercise endurance capacity in mice.
Facilitating energy production and substrate utilization is believed to be associated with optimizing muscle function.Preserving muscle glycogen and sustaining higher blood glucose levels are key factors in maintaining and improving exercise performance [27,28].Swim training has been reported to improve grip strength by optimizing muscle energy metabolism in a muscle dysfunction model of mice [29].The liver is the major metabolic organ.During exercise, it increases glucose production by activating gluconeogenesis and glycogenolysis, and modulates lipid metabolism in response to the increased energy demands [30].Thus, we investigated the effects of HMPA on glucose and lipid metabolism, focusing on circulating substrates and mRNA expression levels in the liver and gastrocnemius.Our results showed that HMPA did not affect the plasma levels of energy substances in either sedentary or exercised mice.Regarding mRNA expression, high-dose HMPA increased the gene expression level of Slc2a2 (Glut2) in sedentary mice compared to in the C group.Additionally, low-dose HMPA significantly increased the expression level of G6pc1 (G6Pase) after exercise.G6pc1 (G6Pase) catalyzes the final step in converting glycogen and other substrates to glucose to support the increased energy needs induced by prolonged exercise [31].Our results suggest that could improve glucose metabolism and glucose utilization in the liver, potentially enhancing glucose supply during exercise.Despite this, these beneficial effects were not observed in the plasma glucose levels.During prolonged exercise, FFAs serve as a primary energy source, which can be taken up from the circulation and originate from the lipolysis of triacylglycerol [32].Pnpla2 (Atgl) is a crucial enzyme involved in the hydrolysis of triglycerides in adipocytes and other cells, playing an essential role in supplying FFAs during exercise [33].We observed that high-dose HMPA enhanced Pnpla2 (Atgl) expression level in the liver but suppressed it in the gastrocnemius during exercise, indicating that high-dose HMPA may promote the release and use of FFAs from liver triglycerides while conserving muscle triglycerides.This dual action may tend to delay the depletion of muscular energy, thereby potentially improving exercise performance.However, these findings did not adequately explain the mechanism by which HMPA administration enhances grip strength in sedentary mice.
MRFs, comprising Myod1, Myf5, Myog, and Myf6, are master transcription factors that are upregulated during myogenesis and play an important role in influencing stem cells to differentiate into myogenic lineage cells.Myf5 and Myod1 are essential for the early stage of myogenesis, primarily involved in the determination and specification of myoblasts [34][35][36].Myog and Myf6 mediate the late stages of myogenesis, promoting the formation and maturation of myotubes [35,37].Numerous studies have confirmed that dietary polyphenolic compounds can affect satellite cells and myoblast proliferation and differentiation [19,[38][39][40].HMCA has been reported to promote hypertrophic growth of fast skeletal muscle by upregulating relative mRNA expression levels of MRFs, specifically Myod1 and Myog [19].Another well-known polyphenolic compound, catechins, has been reported to stimulate satellite cell activation by inducing Myf5 expression, which contributes to muscle regeneration after muscle damage [41].Myf5 expression is important for muscle formation and growth.In this study, we investigated the effect of HMPA administration on the regulation of MRFs expression.We found that low-dose HMPA administration significantly increased the expression of Myf5 in sedentary mice, indicating HMPA may enhance muscle development or regeneration processes through the upregulation of myogenic factors.These results suggest that HMPA could be used as a supplement ingredient to improve muscle function in sedentary or muscle-wasting conditions.However, it should be noted that improving muscle strength can result from the interaction of multiple regulatory factors.The increase in Myf5 induced by low-dose HMPA may be just one of the potential contributors.Further studies are needed to investigate additional potential mechanisms, such as assessing muscle mass and the pathways regulating protein synthesis in muscle.
Protein catabolism serves as a subsidiary energy substrate during prolonged endurance exercise when primary energy stores, carbohydrates and fat, are insufficient or depleted.BUN is a waste byproduct from the breakdown of proteins and amino acids, which is excreted by the kidneys [42].Low-dose HMPA administration significantly reduced the increased BUN levels caused by exhaustive exercise.Our findings indicate that HMPA may provide a protective effect against muscle protein degradation caused by exhaustive exer-cise.We speculated that this protective effect of HMPA may be attributed to its modulation of signaling pathways of muscle protein degradation, specifically the ubiquitin-proteasome and autophagic-lysosomal pathways.In the present study, our findings demonstrate that exhaustive exercise leads to an increase in muscle protein degradation, as indicated by elevated mRNA expression levels of the muscle atrophy markers Fbxo32 (ATROGIN1), Trim63 (MuRF1), and the autophagy-related protein Map1lc3b (LC3b).These findings are consistent with the results of Zhang et al. [43].Considerable evidence shows that utilizing nutritional supplements to inhibit muscle protein degradation following intense resistance or endurance exercise can optimize protein synthesis, repair muscle damage, and stimulate training adaptations [44,45].According to a previous study involving a mouse model of diabetes-induced muscle atrophy, HMCA was demonstrated to increase myofiber size and enhance grip strength.These improvements are attributed to its inhibitory effects on the expression of FBXO-32 and MURF-1 in skeletal muscle, thereby reducing muscle degradation and improving muscle function [46].We observed that HMPA inhibited the expression of Trim63 (MuRF1) and Map1lc3b (LC3b).These results suggest that HMPA could prevent muscle protein degradation by ameliorating the ubiquitin-proteasome and the autophagic lysosomal pathways during exhaustive exercise.This mechanism may be beneficial for preserving muscle mass and facilitating subsequent muscle repair.However, these findings are confined to the time point at which muscle tissue was collected immediately after exercise.The time-course changes after exercise have not been determined.Future research needs to elucidate more details about the effects of HMPA on muscle repair, regeneration, and adaptation.
In this study, HMPA administration did not exhibit a dose-dependent effect on improving muscle function.The dosages used in this study were selected based on previous research on HMCA, the parent compound of HMPA, which showed dose-dependent effects on improving muscle function in animal models [18,47].However, our findings revealed that low-dose HMPA demonstrated greater benefits, such as increased grip strength and decreased BUN levels after exercise, underscoring its potent bioactivity.Conversely, high-dose HMPA did not show these beneficial effects, which may be attributed to metabolic saturation or negative feedback mechanisms induced by consecutive high-dose administration, potentially leading to diminished muscle responsiveness.
Despite these interesting findings, our study has several limitations.First, the sample size was relatively small, which may have limited the power to detect more subtle differences between treatment groups.Second, while HMPA is known to possess antioxidant properties [12,15], the relationship between its antioxidant effects and muscle development remains unexplored.Finally, as this is the first study to investigate the effects of HMPA on muscle strength and exercise endurance capacity in mice, further research is warranted to determine the optimal dosage and duration of HMPA treatment for improving muscle health.
In summary, our findings provide initial evidence for the potential of HMPA as a dietary supplement to enhance muscle function and reduce protein catabolism induced by exhaustive exercise.However, more comprehensive studies are needed to understand its mechanisms of action and establish the most effective administration protocols.

Animals
Eight-week-old male C57BL/6 mice (n = 48) were obtained from Takasugi Experimental Animals Supply Co., Ltd.(Kasukabe, Japan).Three or four mice were housed together in plastic cages under a suitable growth environment with automatic temperature and relative humidity controls, along with a 12/12 h light/dark cycle.Mice were given CE-2 standard pelleted chow and allowed free access to water.The care of mice adhered to the Guiding Principles for the Care and Use of Animals laid out by the Waseda University Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (approved number: A23-127).

HMPA Administration
A formulation containing 25.4% HMPA and dextrin, used in this study, was provided by Maruzen Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd.(Hiroshima, Japan).Since the optimal dosage and duration for HMPA treatment have not been well researched, we referenced studies on HMCA and muscle function due to their similar metabolic benefits and characteristics [16][17][18][19][20][21]48].Because of the low toxicity and rapid metabolism of HMPA, we selected two significantly different doses: 50 mg/kg and 500 mg/kg (corresponding to actual HMPA dosages of 12.7 mg/kg and 127 mg/kg, respectively), which were confirmed to be non-toxic to mice in our preliminary study.
Following a one-week acclimatization period, mice were stratified into three experimental cohorts based on their average body weight and baseline grip strength measurements, ensuring equitable distribution.These groups comprised a vehicle control group (distilled water, 10 mL/kg), a low-dose HMPA group (50 mg/kg body weight (BW)/day), and a high-dose HMPA group (500 mg/kg BW/day).Each freshly prepared solution or distilled water was then orally administered to mice through a plastic gastric tube for 14 consecutive days.The administration was performed at approximately the same time of day (between 9:30 and 11:30 a.m.) to limit potential influences.

Functional Assessment of Skeletal Muscle
Grip force test and treadmill exhaustion test were conducted to evaluate the functional capacity of the skeletal muscle.The experimental protocol is depicted in Figure 10.
mouse was pulled backward at a constant speed until the forelimbs released.This m urement was conducted three consecutive times by the same operator blinded to the ments.The maximum force value of the three trials was defined as absolute grip stre recorded in grams.Relative grip strength was calculated as the absolute grip streng vided by body weight.The absolute and relative grip strength were used to analyz grip strength.
The treadmill exhaustion test was performed to assess endurance capacity o mice.All mice were allowed to acclimate to a motorized treadmill (Kyoto, Japan) two prior, by running for 10 min at a speed of 15 m/min with no incline.On the testing each of the vehicle control group, low-dose HMPA group, and high-dose HMPA g was subdivided into exercise (EX) and sedentary (SED) groups: (1) C group (vehicle trol administration + sedentary group, n = 8), (2) CE group (vehicle control administr + exercise group, n = 8), (3) L group (low-dose HMPA administration + sedentary g n = 8), (4) LE group (low-dose HMPA administration + exercise group, n = 8), (5) H g (high-dose HMPA administration + sedentary group, n = 8), ( 6) HE group (high HMPA administration + exercise group, n = 8).After one hour of the final oral admin tion, the exercise subgroups underwent exhaustive exercise beginning at a 7° inclin 10 m/min for 15 min, subsequently increasing by 5 m/min every 15 min for the ne min, and finally increasing to 24 m/min until the mice met the criteria for exhaustion failed to maintain the speed and frequently turned around despite the persistent sti tion by gently brushing the back and tail of the mice.An operator who was blinded group assignment was responsible for the judgment of exhaustion and recorded the of exhaustion.Immediately after exhaustion, the mice were subjected to the final grip test and then anesthetized by isoflurane inhalation (Abbott, Tokyo, Japan).Blood sam were collected from the inferior vena cava into heparin-coated tubes to obtain pl Following euthanasia of the mice by cervical vertebra dislocation, the liver and trocnemius were harvested and immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen.All samples stored at −80 °C until analyses.

Assessment of Plasma Biochemical Markers
Tissue damage and metabolic markers, including liver function (AST, ALT, and min levels), renal function (BUN, Cr, and uric acid levels), pancreatic enzymes (amy muscle damage markers (LDH and CK levels), lipid profiles (TG, FFA, total choles LDL, and HDL levels), and blood glucose level were measured by Kotobiken Medic boratories (Tokyo, Japan).A grip-strength meter (GPM-101BV-C, Melquest, Toyama, Japan) was employed to assess muscle force at three time points: before oral administration, one hour after the final oral administration, and immediately after exercise (for exercise groups only) to evaluate muscle fatigue.The protocol has been described previously [49].In brief, the mouse was allowed to grip a mesh bar with its forelimbs and hind limbs, and then the tail of the mouse was pulled backward at a constant speed until the forelimbs released.This measurement was conducted three consecutive times by the same operator blinded to the treatments.The maximum force value of the three trials was defined as absolute grip strength, recorded in grams.Relative grip strength was calculated as the absolute grip strength divided by body weight.The absolute and relative grip strength were used to analyze the grip strength.
The treadmill exhaustion test was performed to assess endurance capacity of the mice.All mice were allowed to acclimate to a motorized treadmill (Kyoto, Japan) two days prior, by running for 10 min at a speed of 15 m/min with no incline.On the testing day, each of the vehicle control group, low-dose HMPA group, and high-dose HMPA group was subdivided into exercise (EX) and sedentary (SED) groups: (1) C group (vehicle control administration + sedentary group, n = 8), (2) CE group (vehicle control administration + exercise group, n = 8), (3) L group (low-dose HMPA administration + sedentary group, n = 8), (4) LE group (low-dose HMPA administration + exercise group, n = 8), (5) H group (high-dose HMPA administration + sedentary group, n = 8), (6) HE group (high-dose HMPA administration + exercise group, n = 8).After one hour of the final oral administration, the exercise subgroups underwent exhaustive exercise beginning at a 7 • incline and 10 m/min for 15 min, subsequently increasing by 5 m/min every 15 min for the next 30 min, and finally increasing to 24 m/min until the mice met the criteria for exhaustion: mice failed to maintain the speed and frequently turned around despite the persistent stimulation by gently brushing the back and tail of the mice.An operator who was blinded to the group assignment was responsible for the judgment of exhaustion and recorded the time of exhaustion.Immediately after exhaustion, the mice were subjected to the final grip force test and then anesthetized by isoflurane inhalation (Abbott, Tokyo, Japan).Blood samples were collected from the inferior vena cava into heparin-coated tubes to obtain plasma.Following euthanasia of the mice by cervical vertebra dislocation, the liver and gastrocnemius were harvested and immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen.All samples were stored at −80 • C until analyses.

Assessment of Plasma Biochemical Markers
Tissue damage and metabolic markers, including liver function (AST, ALT, and albumin levels), renal function (BUN, Cr, and uric acid levels), pancreatic enzymes (amylase), muscle damage markers (LDH and CK levels), lipid profiles (TG, FFA, total cholesterol, LDL, and HDL levels), and blood glucose level were measured by Kotobiken Medical Laboratories (Tokyo, Japan).

Statistical Analysis
GraphPad Prism 10 (GraphPad Software, La Jolla, CA, USA) was applied for statistical analysis.All data were shown as the mean ± standard deviation (SD).In cases of extreme data, the interquartile range (IQR) method was used to identify and exclude outliers.The grip force of mice after administration and exhaustion time were analyzed by one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's post hoc test.Student's t-test was applied to compare the difference between the C group and the HMPA-administered (L + H) group.Additionally, a two-way ANOVA was applied to investigate the effect of HMPA administration and time, as well as the effect of HMPA administration and/or exercise.If a significant interaction was identified, simple main-effects analysis and Tukey's post hoc test were applied.When main effects were identified as statistically significant, main-effects analysis and Tukey's post hoc test were applied.p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Conclusions
This study demonstrated that HMPA enhances grip strength after 14 days of administration.Low-dose HMPA may promote muscle proliferation and differentiation by upregulating Myf5 expression.Furthermore, our results suggest that low-dose HMPA reduces BUN levels after exhaustive exercise, indicating an important role for HMPA in preserving muscle protein during exhaustive exercise.This protective effect may be attributed to the inhibition of ubiquitin-proteasome and autophagic lysosomal pathways during exhaustive exercise.Although HMPA increased mRNA expression levels related to glucose and lipid metabolism in the liver, these changes did not affect plasma levels of metabolites or endurance performance in mice.These findings suggest potential applications of HMPA as a natural dietary supplement to improve muscle development and preserve muscle mass.

Figure 2 .
Figure 2. (A) The absolute grip strength at post-administration. (B) The relative grip strength at post-administration. (C) The loss of grip strength after exercise.(D) The changes in absolute grip strength before and after administration.(E) The changes in relative grip strength before and after administration.(F) The exhaustion time in exercise groups.C group, vehicle control group; L group, low-dose HMPA administration group; H group, high-dose HMPA administration group.Values are the means ± standard deviation (SD); * p < 0.05, compared with the C group; # p < 0.05, compared with pre-administration; & p < 0.05, compared with the H group at post-administration.

Figure 2 .
Figure 2. (A) The absolute grip strength at post-administration. (B) The relative grip strength at post-administration. (C) The loss of grip strength after exercise.(D) The changes in absolute grip strength before and after administration.(E) The changes in relative grip strength before and after administration.(F) The exhaustion time in exercise groups.C group, vehicle control group; L group, low-dose HMPA administration group; H group, high-dose HMPA administration group.Values are the means ± standard deviation (SD); * p < 0.05, compared with the C group; # p < 0.05, compared with pre-administration; & p < 0.05, compared with the H group at post-administration.

Figure 10 .
Figure 10.Schematic of the experimental protocol.

Figure 10 .
Figure 10.Schematic of the experimental protocol.

Table 1 .
Primer sequence for Real-Time PCR analysis.