Determination of Post-Fermentation Waste from Fermented Vegetables as Potential Substitutes for Preservatives in o/w Emulsion

Post-fermentation wastes are rich sources of various biologically active compounds with antimicrobial activity, whose potential is not being fully exploited. One of the possible applications of post-fermentation waste may be its use as a natural preservative that effectively combats pathogens found in formulations. The study aims included the following: (1) compare the antimicrobial and antioxidant activity of fermented vegetable extracts (FVEs), (2) examine the inhibition of cosmetic-borne pathogens by FVEs, and (3) estimate the preservative effectiveness of FVEs in o/w emulsions. It was found that fermented white cabbage, cucumber, celery, and the mixture of fermented white cabbage, cucumber, and celery (1:1:1) showed antibacterial and antifungal activity against all the tested reference microbial strains. The addition of fermented cucumber, celery, and the mixture of fermented white cabbage, cucumber, and celery (1:1:1) to the o/w emulsion fulfilled criterion A of the preservative effectiveness test for S. aureus, E. coli, and A. brasiliensis, but did not fulfill the criterion for P. aeruginosa and C. albicans. The tested FVEs have comparable activity to inhibit pathogens in o/w emulsion as sodium benzoate. The results of our study prove that FVEs can be valuable raw materials supporting the preservative system, which, in turn, can significantly reduce the concentration of preservatives used in o/w emulsion.


Introduction
Food fermentation is regarded as one of the oldest ways of food processing and preservation.Fermentation enhances the flavor and nutritional quality of food and makes it a rich source of beneficial ingredients for human health (vitamins, probiotics, antioxidants, minerals).Therefore, fermented food, especially the fermented vegetables industry is the fastest-growing segment of the agricultural production market in the world.Unfortunately, while fermented vegetables are a valuable and valued source of food, the post-fermentation wort is a waste product of the food industry, whose potential is not being fully exploited.
Fermented vegetable extracts (FVEs) are raw materials obtained by the fermentation of vegetables with lactic acid bacteria (LAB).LAB is a group of Gram-positive, catalasenegative, microaerophilic, non-sporing cocci, coccobacilli, or rods with lactic acid as the main product of carbohydrate fermentation [1].Most LAB (Lactobacillus, Pediococcus, Enterococcus, Leuconostoc) inhibit pathogenic, non-pathogenic, and spoilage organisms in fermenting foods and beverages [2].The antimicrobial activity of LAB strains is attributed to the production of metabolites such as organic acid (lactic, acetic, formic, propionic acids), diacetyl, hydrogen peroxide, bacteriocins (nisin, reuterin, pediocin, lacticin, enterocin), antifungal compounds (propionate, phenyl-lactate, hydroxyphenyl-lactate, cyclic dipeptides, and 3-hydroxy fatty acids) and antimicrobial peptides causing non-specific inhibition of pathogen development [3,4].Lactic and acetic acids effectively inhibit the growth of bacteria, mold, and yeast [3,5,6].Their mechanism of action involves lowering the pH of the environment to a level unfavorable for pathogens (below pH 4), as well as disturbing the metabolic processes taking place in microbial cells and the active transport through cell membranes.Diacetyl is more effective against Gram-negative bacteria, yeasts, and molds than against Gram-positive bacteria by inactivating the arginine metabolic pathway [7].Hydrogen peroxide has strong antimicrobial activity, consisting of the denaturation of cellular enzymes and peroxidation of membrane lipids, which lead to disruption of cell membrane function and the stopping of many metabolic pathways [3].Bacteriocins are ribosomally produced antimicrobial peptides by LAB, either processed or not by additional posttranslational modification enzymes and exported to the extracellular medium [8].Bacteriocins may have a bacteriostatic or bactericidal activity on closely related microbial species [9].Most of them damage the cell membrane of microorganisms and disturb the internal metabolism of their cells [10].Bacteriocins from LAB are GRAS (Generally Recognised As Safe) compounds that continue to gain interest due to their potential as safe food preservatives [11], alternatives for medically important antibiotics for treating infectious diseases [12], and substitutes for cosmetic preservative systems [13].Therefore, fermented plants with antimicrobial activities could be a valuable raw material for the cosmetics industry.Moreover, fermented plants have many other valuable properties, such as antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, anti-melanogenic, and wound-healing activity useful for the cosmetics industry [14].
Industrial food waste may have the potential to generate income from antimicrobial compounds obtained through fermentation as valuable raw materials for the pharmaceutical and cosmetics industry.One of the possible applications of post-fermentation waste may be its use as a natural preservative that effectively combats pathogens found in formulations.The study aims include the following: (1) compare the antimicrobial and antioxidant activity of FVEs, (2) examine the inhibition of cosmetic-borne pathogen growth by FVEs and their mixtures, and (3) estimate the preservative effectiveness of FVEs and their mixtures in o/w emulsions.

Number of LAB in FVEs
All FVEs contained both Lactobacillus and Leuconostoc strains (Table 1).None of the FVEs contained Bifidobacterium sp.Among the FVEs, the richest source of Lactobacillus sp. and Leuconostoc sp. were the fermented garlic (1 × 10 8 cfu/mL) and fermented carrot (1 × 10 9 cfu/mL), respectively.The smallest amount of Lactobacillus sp. and Leuconostoc sp. were observed in the fermented beetroot with 1 × 10 4 cfu/mL and 5 × 10 3 cfu/mL, respectively.None of the FVEs contained Bifidobacterium sp.Moreover, the presence of LAB and organic acid produced by these microorganisms lowered the pH of the FVEs to acidic values.All the bioferments before and after lyophilization had an acidic pH ranging from 3.42 (fermented carrot) to 4.44 (fermented cauliflower) for non-lyophilized samples, and from 2.9 (fermented cucumber) to 3.91 (fermented white cabbage) for the lyophilized samples (Table 2).

Antioxidant Activity of FVEs
All tested FVEs show antioxidant activity (Figure 1).EC50 estimation of the antioxidant activity of the FVEs showed that fermented red cabbage has the most effective concentration of antioxidant compounds that results in 50% inhibition of radical formation (EC50 = 7.14 mg/mL), while the fermented carrot has the weakest antioxidant activity (EC50 = 265.16mg/mL) (Table 3).The antioxidant activity of fermented red cabbage was weaker compared to the antioxidant activity of ascorbic acid (EC50 = 0.1 mg/mL).

Antimicrobial Activity of FVEs and Their Mixtures
The antimicrobial activity of the FVEs and their mixtures were checked in the diffusion test and are presented in Table 4.The fermented white cabbage, fermented cucumber, and fermented celery showed the strongest antibacterial activity against S. aureus, P. aeruginosa, and E. coli growth.Moreover, fermented white cabbage and fermented cucumber inhibited C. albicans growth, while fermented celery showed antifungal activity against A. brasiliensis.Fermented carrot, fermented red cabbage, and fermented garlic showed antibacterial activity only against P. aeruginosa, and no antifungal activity was observed.Fermented radish and fermented beetroot did not inhibit the growth of bacteria, yeast, and mold.The mixture of fermented white cabbage, fermented cucumber, and fermented celery (1:1:1) showed the strongest antimicrobial activity compared to all other mixtures and inhibited all the bacteria and yeast tested.Therefore, the fermented white cabbage, fermented cucumber, fermented celery, and their mixture (1:1:1) were selected for further study.

The Microbiological Purity of the o/w Emulsions
All prepared o/w emulsions (base, preservative, FVEs, and their mixtures) fulfilled the quantitative and qualitative conditions of microbiological purity for cosmetics according to EN ISO standards (Table 5).The total aerobic mesophilic microorganisms for all tested o/w emulsions were below 100 cfu/g and fulfilled the criterion for cosmetics category 1 (cosmetics for children; in the eye area and mucous membranes).Moreover, yeast and mold were not detected in the o/w emulsions.Among the microbial colonies, no pathogenic bacteria (S. aureus, P. aeruginosa, E. coli) or yeast (C.albicans) were detected.

Antimicrobial Effectiveness Test
The FVEs that were added to the o/w emulsion at a concentration of 6% and the synthetic preservative (0.5% sodium benzoate) protect the o/w emulsion against the growth of Gram-positive bacteria but are less effective against Gram-negative bacteria (Figure 2).
The FVEs that were added to the o/w emulsion at a concentration of 6% and the synthetic preservative (0.5% sodium benzoate) protect the o/w emulsion against the growth of Gram-positive bacteria but are less effective against Gram-negative bacteria (Figure 2).Among all tested bioferments, fermented celery and a mixture of fermented white cabbage, cucumber, and celery (1:1:1) completely inhibited S. aureus growth in o/w emulsion after 28 days of incubation, while the fermented cucumber significantly inhibited the growth of E. coli.The synthetic preservative completely inhibited P. aeruginosa and S. aureus growth in the o/w emulsion after 28 days of incubation.Moreover, antimicrobial activity of fermented cucumber, celery, and the mixture of white cabbage, cucumber, and celery (1:1:1) in o/w emulsion were comparable with the activity of the synthetic preservative against S. aureus, A. brasiliensis, and both were not effective against C. albicans.The fermented cucumber, celery, and mixture of white cabbage, cucumber, and celery (1:1:1) inhibited E. coli growth, while the synthetic preservative was not effective against E. coli.In turn, the synthetic preservatives inhibited P. aeruginosa growth, while all the fermented vegetable extracts were not effective.The fermented vegetable extracts added to the o/w Among all tested bioferments, fermented celery and a mixture of fermented white cabbage, cucumber, and celery (1:1:1) completely inhibited S. aureus growth in o/w emulsion after 28 days of incubation, while the fermented cucumber significantly inhibited the growth of E. coli.The synthetic preservative completely inhibited P. aeruginosa and S. aureus growth in the o/w emulsion after 28 days of incubation.Moreover, antimicrobial activity of fermented cucumber, celery, and the mixture of white cabbage, cucumber, and celery (1:1:1) in o/w emulsion were comparable with the activity of the synthetic preservative against S. aureus, A. brasiliensis, and both were not effective against C. albicans.The fermented cucumber, celery, and mixture of white cabbage, cucumber, and celery (1:1:1) inhibited E. coli growth, while the synthetic preservative was not effective against E. coli.In turn, the synthetic preservatives inhibited P. aeruginosa growth, while all the fermented vegetable extracts were not effective.The fermented vegetable extracts added to the o/w emulsion effectively reduced the growth of A. brasiliensis.None of the tested bioferments inhibited yeast C. albicans growth.These results were comparable with the results obtained for the synthetic preservatives, which also inhibited the growth of mold but not yeast.
According to the PN-EN ISO 11930:2019-03/A1:2023-02 standard [21], a preservative system meets the requirements when the following observations are made in the formulation: (1) a significant decrease in the number of viable microorganisms, (2) no increase in the number of viable microorganisms counted from the previous contact time, and (3) the cosmetic formulations meet criterion A or B of the preservative effectiveness test for all the reference microorganisms (Tables 6 and 7).Among all the tested bioferments, fermented cucumber, celery, and the mixture of white cabbage, cucumber, and celery (1:1:1) fulfilled criterion A of the preservative effectiveness test for S. aureus, E. coli, and A. brasiliensis.Unfortunately, fermented cucumber, celery, and the mixture of white cabbage, cucumber, and celery (1:1:1) are beyond the criterion of the preservative effectiveness test for P. aeruginosa and C. albicans.In turn, the synthetic preservative fulfilled criterion A of the preservative effectiveness test for S. aureus and P. aeruginosa, as well as criterion B for A. brasiliensis.However, the synthetic preservatives do not fulfill the criterion of the preservative effectiveness test for E. coli and C. albicans.Fermented cabbage fulfilled criterion A of the preservative effectiveness test only for A. brasiliensis.Fermented cucumber, celery, and a mixture of white cabbage, cucumber, and celery (1:1:1) at a 6% concentration have comparable activity with 0.5% sodium benzoate in inhibiting the growth of pathogens in the o/w emulsion.Therefore, both fermented cucumber and celery and a mixture of white cabbage, cucumber, and celery (1:1:1) and sodium benzoate should be used in combination with other preservatives/compounds to ensure full protection of the cosmetic formulation and meet the criterion of the preservative effectiveness test for all reference strains of microorganisms.

Discussion
The extensive demands of customers for products containing fewer chemicals and more natural bio-preserving products have resulted in extensive research on new antimicrobial compounds that could effectively inhibit the development of pathogens in cosmetic formulations.The FVEs, a waste product from the food industry, are a rich source of antimicrobial compounds, which may act as substitutes for synthetic preservatives or preservative boosters, reducing the concentration of preservatives added to the formulations.
During fermentation processes, LAB produce a wide range of metabolites that constitute an effective weapon in the fight against pathogenic microflora [2].The FVEs are a rich source of Lactobaccillus sp. and Lactococcus sp.The range of LAB in bioferments varies between 1 × 10 4 and 1 × 10 8 cfu/mL for Lactobaccillus sp. and 5 × 10 3 and 1 × 10 9 cfu/mL for Lactococcus sp., and they tend to have an acidic pH (average pH 3.46 for lyophilizate samples).The amount of LAB in FVEs and their pH are closely related to the fermentation stages.It was found that between 3 and 7 days after the start of white cabbage fermentation, heterofermentative Leuconostoc sp. is usually succeeded by the more acid-tolerant homofermentative Lactobacillus sp., due to the accumulation of lactic acid to 1% (wt/vol) or more and the decrease in pH below 4.5 [22].Furthermore, Lactobacillus plantarum completes the fermentation of white cabbage with a final pH of approximately 3.5.These results correspond to the results obtained by us and show that fermented white cabbage extract contains much less Leuconostoc sp.(6 × 10 3 cfu/mL) than Lactobacillus sp.(2 × 10 7 cfu/mL), with a final pH 4 in complete fermentation.Furthermore, it is well known that the LAB production of weak organic acids (acetic acid, citric acid, lactic acid, formic, propionic acid) results in an acidic environment, which generally restricts the growth of both bacteria and fungi, including many pathogenic and spoilage microbes [23].It was shown that the growth of pathogens depends on the pH of the food products [24].The growth of S. aureus and E. coli is inhibited when the pH of the food product drops below pH 4. In our studies, the acidic pH of lyophilizates from the fermented cucumber (pH 2.90), fermented celery (pH 3.37), fermented cauliflower (pH 3.48), and fermented white cabbage (pH 3.91) showed antibacterial activity against S. aureus and E. coli.Unfortunately, this correlation was not visible in the case of all FVEs.It seems that the acidic pH of FVEs is not always sufficient to inhibit the growth of pathogenic bacteria.However, the weak organic acids produced by LAB are only active in their undissociated form, which is capable of crossing the cell membrane of a microorganism [25].In the cytosol (pH 6-7), the acid transforms into its dissociated form and causes a decrease in the cytosolic pH, resulting in microbial death or the inhibition of growth, causing very extended lag phases.Therefore, the low pH of FVEs may have a beneficial effect on inhibiting the microorganisms' growth in the o/w formulation.
Vegetables generate a large number of various compounds which may be fermented and metabolized by LAB, leading to the creation of an attractive biologically active raw material for the cosmetics and pharmaceutical industries.The results of the diffusion test showed that fermented white cabbage, cucumber, and celery and their mixture (1:1:1) strongly inhibited the growth of S. aureus, P. aeruginosa, E. coli, and had weak antifungal activity against C. albicans and A. brasiliensis.Not many studies on fermented plant antimicrobial activity are available.Fermented carrot (Daucus carota) with Lactobacillus sp.(L.plantarum, L. casei, L. paracasei, L. rhamnosus) showed antibacterial activity against foodborne Listeria monocytogenes, Salmonella spp., S. aureus, Bacillus cereus, and weak activity against E. coli in the disk diffusion assay [26].In our study, no antibacterial and antifungal activities for fermented carrots were observed in the disk diffusion test.It seems that scientists focus their interests on the antimicrobial properties of LAB isolated from fermented vegetables, rather than the antimicrobial activity of fermented vegetable extracts.The Lactobacillus sp.(L.paracasei, L. casei, L. rhamnosus) isolated from fermented beetroot [27], L. plantarum, L. fermentum, L. acidophilus, and Leuconostoc mesenteroides isolated from the spontaneous fermentation of cucumber [28], Lactobacillus sp. and Leuconostoc sp. from fermented white cabbage [29], Pediococcus pentosaceus from fermented garlic [30], and the L. plantarum, L. pentosus, and L. fermentum strains isolated from fermented radish [31] showed antibacterial activity.
The FVEs, due to their antimicrobial activities, may emerge as effective strategies for extending the shelf life of formulations by inhibiting the growth of pathogenic microorganisms.The use of fermented cucumber, celery, and the mixture of white cabbage, cucumber, and celery (1:1:1) in formulation significantly reduced S. aureus, E. coli, and A. brasiliensis growth and fulfilled criterion A of the preservative efficiency test, but they were inactive against P. aeruginosa and C. albicans.Therefore, the tested FVEs can be valuable raw materials in supporting the preservative system but may not be able to replace synthetic preservatives in o/w formulation.Also, sodium benzoate, categorized as a natural preservative, is permitted for use in cosmetics and personal care products at a maximum concentration 0.5% in leave-on products [32] but does not meet the criterion of the preservative efficiency test for all the tested reference microorganism strains.Sodium benzoate inhibited the growth of S. aureus, P. aeruginosa, A. basiliensis, but was not active against E. coli and C. albicans.In the case of dermal formulations with high water content, the efficacy of conventional preservatives (especially used in low concentrations) does not always guarantee complete protection against pathogenic microorganisms.It was shown that phenoxyethanol (0.25%) and a combination of methylparaben and propylparaben (7:3, w/w; 0.1% and 0.4%) in cosmetic emulsions do not fulfill criterion A or B of the preservative efficiency test for P. aeruginosa and C. albicans [33].Therefore, the preservative system efficiency should always be confirmed by a challenge test.
Our research data are the first in the scientific literature to attempt to use fermented vegetable extracts as a preservative system in cosmetic products.A similar result was obtained for Lactobacillus ferment (mixture of antimicrobial peptides not specified by authors) added at concentrations of 1% and 1.5% to cosmetic emulsions [33].The Lactobacillus ferment at a 1% concentration significantly reduced S. aureus and A. brasiliensis growth and fulfilled criterion A of the preservative efficiency test but does not protect the emulsion against P. aeruginosa and C. albicans.The Lactobacillus ferment at a concentration of 1.5% meets criterion A of the preservative efficiency test for S. aureus, P. aeruginosa, A. brasiliensis but does not protect the formulation against C. albicans.Therefore, the Lactobacillus ferment should be used in combination with other preservatives that are efficacious against yeast.Currently available on the cosmetics market are several natural preservatives for cosmetics application based on LAB ferment filtrate, including Leucidal  [34].Leucidal ® Liquid was the first fermented bio-preservative on the market, based on antimicrobial peptides synthesized during the fermentation of Daikon radish root (Raphanus sativus) by Leuconostoc.Leucidal ® Liquid is accepted by ECOCERT as an alternative preservative used in organic cosmetics [35].According to the manufacturer's declaration, Leucidal ® Liquid inhibits the growth of S. aureus, E. coli, P. aeruginosa, C. albicans, A. niger, K. pneumoniae, and B. cepacia bacteria in cosmetic preparations (especially face creams, body lotions, with hydroxy acids, hair conditioners) that do not require production temperatures of higher than 70 • C, has stability in a wide pH range from 3 to 8, and its recommended concentration in cosmetic formulas is 2-4% [36].In addition to its preservative activities, Leucidal ® Liquid increases the level of skin hydration and antioxidant capacity (0.001%) comparable to 200 µM Trolox.Li et al. [37] showed that the antimicrobial activity of commercial fermented radish kimchi is attributed to salicylic acid against Gram-negative bacteria, as well as didecyldimethylammonium salt against Gram-positive activity.Unfortunately, during the analysis, it was unable to detect antimicrobial peptides in the studied samples of the commercial fermented radish kimchi [37].It was also showed that the high concentration of Leucidal ® Liquid exerted antibacterial activity (bacteriostatic, not bactericidal) against S. aureus, Salmonella enterica, P. aeruginosa, E. coli, and Enterococcus faecalis, but this activity poses low selectivity and may be problematic when in contact with the skin microbiome [38].
FVEs are rich sources of antioxidants (ascorbic acid, polyphenols) that may act as preservative boosters in topical formulations by preventing the oxidation of a product [39].All the tested FVEs showed antioxidant activities.The most significant antioxidant properties were shown in fermented red cabbage, radish, and beetroot, while fermented garlic poses weaker radical scavenging activity.The literature data confirm the results obtained by us.Generally, fermented red cabbage [40,41], fermented white cabbage (sauerkraut) [42], fermented red radish [43], fermented beetroot [44], fermented garlic [45], fermented carrot juice [46], fermented cauliflower [47] have weaker antioxidant activity compared to fresh vegetables, and this difference is associated with the decreasing number of polyphenols during the fermentation process.Moreover, compounds with antioxidant activity are always present in cosmetic products as active agents for the prevention of hyperpigmentation and slowing down of the skin-aging process [48,49].The FVEs with significant antioxidant properties may act as biologically active raw materials in anti-aging formulations as well as preservative boosters in cosmetic and pharmaceutical products.
The FVEs were collected from the vegetables and 100 µL of each bioferment was spread onto MRS agar (Lactobacilli growth), M17 agar (Lactococcus growth), and MRS agar supplemented with 0.05% cysteine hydrochloride (Bifidobacterium growth) for the determination of the amount of LAB in the fermented vegetable extracts.The plates for Lactobacilli and Lactococcus growth were incubated at 37 • C for 48 h, while the plates for Bifidobacterium sp. were incubated under anaerobic conditions for 72 h at 37 • C and the colonies that formed on plates were counted.Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG (ATCC 53103), Lactococcus lactis (ATCC 11454), and Bifidobacterium animalis BB-12 as probiotic supplements were positive controls.Also, pH measurements of the bioferments before and after lyophilization were carried out.The yield rates of lyophilization of the FVEs are shown in Table 8.The samples were stored at −80 • C until the analysis.

Determination of the Antioxidant Activity of FVEs-ABTS Assay
The ABTS (2,2 ′ -azinobis-(3-ethylbenzthiazolin-6-sulfonic acid)) assay measures the ability of an antioxidant to stabilize the ABTS radical cation (ABTS + ).The ABTS •+ is a green-blue chromophore produced through a reaction between 7 mM aqueous ABTS and 2.45 mM potassium persulfate (K 2 S 2 O 8 ) mixed in a ratio of 1:1 and incubated overnight (12-16 h) at room temperature in the dark.The ABTS solution was diluted to obtain 0.7 absorbance at 734 nm.In a 96-well microtiter plate, a 10 µL sample of the FVEs or ascorbic acid as a positive control (both at the concentration range of 0.015-250 mg/mL obtained by a two-fold dilution in water) was mixed with 190 µL of ABTS radical solution and incubated for 30 min at room temperature in the dark.The blanc well was obtained by mixing 10 µL of water and 190 µL of the ABTS radical solution.For each test, three replicates were performed.The sample and blanc absorbances were determined at a 734 nm wavelength in a microplate reader (Synergy H4, BioTek, Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA).
The radical scavenging activity (RSA) of the fermented vegetable extract was calculated using the following formula: % RSA = ((Abs blanc − Abs sample )/Abs blanc ) × 100 where: % RSA-percent of radical scavenging activity Abs blanc -absorbance of ABTS Abs sample -absorbance of a sample The antiradical activity of a fermented plant extract was also expressed as EC50 (mg/mL), the concentration of sample required to cause 50% ABTS inhibition.The EC50 value was calculated by a graphical method as the effective concentration that results in 50% inhibition of radical formation.

Determination of the Antimicrobial Activity of FVEs and Their Mixture
The antibacterial and antifungal activity of FVEs as well as inoculum preparation were evaluated using the methods described by EUCAST [50][51][52].Several colonies of overnight cultures for bacteria and 48 h for yeast were suspended in saline to obtain a density equal to the McFarland turbidity standard of 0.5 (approximate cell density of 1.5 × 10 8 CFU/mL for bacteria, and 1.5 × 10 6 CFU/mL for yeast).Sporulated A. brasiliensis colonies were covered with 5 mL of sterile water supplemented with 0.1% Tween 20.Then, the conidia were rubbed with a sterile cotton swab and transferred with a pipette to a sterile tube.The suspension was homogenized for 15 s with a vortex mixer.The suspension was then checked for the presence of hyphae or clumps via a cell-counting hematocytometer chamber.If a significant number of hyphae were detected, 5 mL of the suspension was transferred to a sterile syringe attached to a sterile filter with a pore diameter of 11 µm, filtered and then collected in a sterile tube.This step removes the hyphae and yields a suspension composed of conidia.If many clumps were detected, the inoculum was shaken again in a vortex mixer for a further 15 s.This step was repeated until clumps were no longer encountered.The suspension of A. brasiliensis conidia was adjusted with sterile distilled water to the McFarland turbidity standard of 0.5 (approximate cell density of 1.5 × 10 6 CFU/mL).Suspensions of microorganisms were spread over the TSA and SDA agar plates (BioMerieux, Craponne, France), respectively, using sterile cotton swabs.Then, 10 µL of fermented vegetable lyophilizates (1 g/mL) and their mixtures (1:1) were placed on the agar surface.Gentamycin (120 µg) and nystatin (100 IU) (BTL, Warsaw, Poland) were used as controls.All bacterial plates were incubated at 37 • C for 24 h and fungal plates at 25 • C for 48 h (C.albicans) and 5 days (A.brasiliensis), respectively.The diameter of the zone of inhibition was measured in mm.All tests were conducted in triplicate and data from experiments were calculated as mean ± SD.

Determination of Microbiological Purity of the o/w Emulsions
The enumeration and detection of aerobic mesophilic bacteria, yeast, and mold present in the emulsion were performed according to PN-EN ISO 21149:2017-07/A1:2023-01 [15] and PN-EN ISO 16212:2017-08/A1:2023-01 [20], respectively.Detection of S. aureus, P. aeruginosa, E. coli, and C. albicans in emulsions were performed according to the PN-EN ISO 22718:2016-01/A1:2023-01 [16], PN-EN ISO 22717:2016-01/A1:2023-03 [17], PN-EN ISO 21150:2016-01/A1:2023-03 [18], and PN-EN ISO 18416:2016-01/A1:2023-03 [19].The 1 g o/w emulsion with FVEs/preservative/control (without FVEs or preservative) was mixed with 9 mL of Eugon LT 100 broth medium to neutralize the possible preservative effect.Then, 1 mL of these samples were grown on selective agar such as Cetrimide, Sabouraud Dextrose with Chloramphenicol, Baird-Parker, and MacConkey for P. aeruginosa, C. albicans, S. aureus, and E. coli, respectively.The agar plates were incubated 24 h (bacteria), 48 h (yeast), and 5 days (mold) at 37 • C and 25 • C, respectively.4.7.Determination of the Preservation Efficacy (Challenge Test) of the o/w Emulsions Evaluation of the antimicrobial protection of a cosmetic product was performed according to PN-EN ISO 11930:2019-03/A1:2023-02 [21].Inoculation of the test microorganism suspensions was prepared by the addition of 0.02 mL of calibrated inoculum (each strain separately) to 20 g emulsion o/w sample to obtain a final bacterial concentration of between 1 × 10 5 and 1 × 10 6 CFU/mL and fungi of between 1 × 10 4 and 1 × 10 5 CFU/mL in the formulation.The inoculated containers were mixed thoroughly and incubated in the dark at 20 • C-25 • C. The number of viable microorganisms in the formulations was determined by the plate count method at the proper times, 0, 7, 14, and 28 days after inoculation for bacteria and yeast, and 0, 14, and 28 days for molds.A sample of 1 g of emulsion was then transferred to 9 mL of Eugon LT 100 broth (Graso Biotech, Owidz, Poland) and pre-incubated for 30 min at room temperature; a 10-fold dilution method was carried out.Triplicate plating of each dilution was performed with TSA agar for bacteria, SDA agar for yeast, and PDA agar for mold.The plates were incubated at 37 • C for 24 h (bacteria), 48 h (C.albicans), and 30 • C for 5 days (A.brasiliensis), respectively.The CFU per plate (30-300 colonies for bacteria and C. albicans, 15-150 colonies for A. brasiliensis) were counted to determine the number of surviving microorganisms per gram of tested cosmetic product.The results were expressed as a log reduction value (log CFU/g).R = log 0 − log t where: R-logarithmic reduction in the number of viable microorganisms log 0 -logarithm of the number of microorganisms in 1 g of cosmetic immediately after infection log t -logarithm of the number of microorganisms in 1 g of cosmetic after a specified time (7,14,28

days) after infection
For each time and each strain, the log reduction value is calculated and compared to the minimum values required for evaluation criteria A or B of the preservation efficacy test (Annex B in PN-EN ISO 11930:2019) [21].The formulation meets Criterion A when the cosmetic product is protected against microbial proliferation that may present a potential risk for the users and the cosmetic product is deemed to have met the requirements of the standard without any additional rationale (recommended efficacy of antimicrobial preservation for topical preparations).The formulation meets Criterion B when the microbiological risk analysis demonstrates the existence of control factors not related to the formulation (e.g., a protective package such as pomp provides a higher level of protection than a jar), indicating that the microbiological risk is tolerable.All tests were conducted in triplicate and data from the experiments were calculated as mean ± SD.The standard deviation for the test of microorganism population viability does not exceed 0.5 logarithmic unit.

Statistical Analysis
All tests were conducted in triplicate and data from experiments were calculated as mean ± SD.The standard deviation for the test of microorganism population viability does not exceed 0.5 logarithmic unit.

Conclusions
The food industry generates a large amount of waste whose potential remains underestimated and among them are FVEs.Fermentation products are rich sources of biologically active compounds, emphasizing their use as natural preservatives in cosmetic and pharmaceutical products.Fermented cucumber, fermented celery, and a mixture of fermented white cabbage, cucumber, and celery (1:1:1) can be valuable raw materials supporting the preservative system, which can significantly reduce the concentration of synthetic preservatives used in formulations.Finding a suitable type of preservative or preservative system to incorporate into the specific formula, which satisfies all preservation and toxicological safety criteria, presents a challenge for the cosmetic microbiologists.Further, to ensure the safety of fermented vegetables, the bacterial strains used for transforming the components of plant products into active entities must be isolated and their safety should be verified.Another important issue is determining the chemical composition of fermented vegetable extracts to find out the molecular components responsible for the antimicrobial activity and to highlight their mechanism of action.The final stage should include a preservative effectiveness test for improvements in the effectiveness of the compounds isolated from FVEs as a preservative system to inhibit the growth of microorganisms in the formulation during manufacturing, storage, and safety use by consumers.Therefore, future studies should be directed toward characterizing the bacterial strains responsible for fermentation, determining the composition of bioferments, isolating active compounds with antimicrobial properties from fermentation wort, and confirming their use as substitutes for preservatives in cosmetic products.

Table 1 .
The number of lactic acid bacteria in the fermented vegetable extracts [cfu/mL].

Table 2 .
The pH value of fermented vegetable extracts before (pH 1) and after lyophilization (pH 2).

Table 3 .
Radical scavenging activity of fermented vegetable extracts.

Table 3 .
Radical scavenging activity of fermented vegetable extracts.

Table 4 .
Antibacterial and antifungal activity of fermented vegetable extracts and their mixtures (10 µL) in agar diffusion method, diameter inhibition zone (mm).

Table 4 .
Antibacterial and antifungal activity of fermented vegetable extracts and their mixtures (10 µL) in agar diffusion method, diameter inhibition zone (mm).

Table 5 .
Microbiological purity of o/w emulsion (base), o/w emulsion with preservative, or fermented vegetable extracts, according to PN-EN ISO standards.
Legends: ↑-growth of microorganisms above initial level of contamination; NI-did not increase in the count from the previous contact time; *-the number of microorganisms does not increase in relation to the initial level of contamination of the sample.

Table 8 .
The yield rates of lyophilization of the FVEs [%].