The YABBY Transcription Factor, SlYABBY2a, Positively Regulates Fruit Septum Development and Ripening in Tomatoes

The tomato fruit is a complex organ and is composed of various structures from the inside out, such as columella, septum, and placenta. However, our understanding of the development and function of these internal structures remains limited. In this study, we identified a plant-specific YABBY protein, SlYABBY2a, in the tomato (Solanum lycopersicum). SlYABBY2a exhibits relatively high expression levels among the nine YABBY genes in tomatoes and shows specific expression in the septum of the fruit. Through the use of a gene-editing technique performed by CRISPR/Cas9, we noticed defects in septum development in the Slyabby2a mutant fruits, leading to the inward concavity of the fruit pericarp and delayed septum ripening. Notably, the expression levels of key genes involved in auxin (SlFZY4, SlFZY5, and SlFZY6) and ethylene (SlACS2) biosynthesis were significantly downregulated in the septum of the Slalkbh10b mutants. Furthermore, the promoter activity of SlYABBY2a was regulated by the ripening regulator, SlTAGL1, in vivo. In summary, these discoveries provide insights into the positive regulation of SlYABBY2a on septum development and ripening and furnish evidence of the coordinated regulation of the auxin and ethylene signaling pathways in the ripening process, which expands our comprehension of septum development in the internal structure of the fruit.


Introduction
The tomato is considered the most valuable horticultural commodity worldwide and is a significant source of micronutrients in the human diet [1].From their wild progenitors to modern cultivated varieties, artificial selection has amplified tomato fruit weight by approximately 50-fold, concomitant with profound alterations in fruit metabolism [2,3].In the context of commercially cultivated tomatoes, fruit morphology and ripening characteristics stand as pivotal traits.For instance, the fs8.1 locus, associated with tomato fruit shape variation from round to elongated (oblong or square), represents a critical differentiating factor between fresh consumption and processing tomatoes [4].However, our comprehension the internal structure development of tomatoes and its influences on fruit morphology and quality remains insufficient.
Fruit development initiates from the fruit set, and the resumption of cell division within the ovary signifies a successful fruit set [5,6].After the fruit set, early tomato fruit development is often described as two consecutive stages.The first stage involves cell division, followed by cell expansion [7,8].The levels of gene expression related to the cell cycle regulate the process of cell division.The continuous process of mitotic cell division is regulated by a heterodimeric protein complex composed of cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) catalytic subunits and regulatory subunits (CYC) [9].Auxin is also involved in regulating cell division.For instance, in pre-anthesis ovaries of Arabidopsis, Aux/IAA interferes with auxin signaling by binding to the auxin response factor ARF, thereby inhibiting cell division and maintaining the ovary in a dormant state [10].The increase in auxin levels due to the completion of pollination in flowers leads to the degradation of Aux/IAA and the release of ARF, which then activates the expression of target genes to promote cell division.[11].Additionally, auxin has the ability to control the expression of auxin-responsive genes and influence cell expansion through the action of inhibitory proteins, like IAA17.In tomatoes, IAA17 exhibits high expression levels at the onset of fruit cell expansion (10 DPA-days post anthesis), gradually decreasing until fruit ripening [12].Reducing the expression of the IAA17 through RNAi resulted in enlarged fruit pericarp cells, ultimately leading to the development of larger fruits [8].Fruit development directly impacts its size and shape.Mutants such as sun, ovate, lc, and fs8.1 exhibit significant changes in tomato fruit shape, making them essential genetic materials for studying fruit morphology [13].Among them, the mutated sun variant exhibits heightened cell numbers along the proximal-distal axis, resulting in elongation.Alterations in the expression of genes associated with auxin production, signaling, and transport indicate that SUN may influence fruit shape during ovary development by modulating auxin-related gene expression [13].
Fruit ripening constitutes the last phase of fruit development, with auxin playing a role in controlling the shift from unripe to ripe fruit.In tomatoes, auxin signaling sharply decreases during wild-type (WT) fruit ripening, but this decrease is absent in the ripening inhibitor (rin) mutant [14].Additionally, the upregulation of SlSAUR69 expression led to early ripening, while the downregulation of SlSAUR69 prolonged the ripening process [14].The use of chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP)-ChIP, ChIP-seq, and RNA sequencing in combinatorial analysis indicated that SlSAUR69 is a direct target of RIN [15,16], a SEPALLATA (SEP) clade protein.This implies that RIN could play a role in regulating auxin during fruit ripening.Notably, RIN is particularly known for forming DNA-binding complexes with the MADS transcription factors TAGL1, FUL1, and FUL2, which play a role in regulating ripening [17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24].One example is that RIN, FULs, and TAGL1 have the ability to directly attach to the SlACS2 gene promoter [15,17,20], which controls the production of ethylene, a key regulator in tomato fruit ripening.However, whether TAGL1 and FULs affect the auxin signaling pathway and fruit ripening has seldom been reported.Early studies have shown that the TAGL1 gene regulates fruit development and ripening.A reduction in TAGL1 mRNA in tomato plants results in yellow-orange fruits with lower carotenoid levels and thinner pericarps [18].Moreover, the methylated form of TAGL1, known as the GREEN STRIPE (GS) locus, affects various aspects of chloroplast development and carotenoid buildup [25].Furthermore, silencing SlTAGL1 through RNAi technology in Ailsa Craig (AC) or knocking out SlTAGL1 using CRISPR/Cas9 in the gs both resulted in the formation of sunken fruit phenotypes [18,25].However, the mechanism by which SlTAGL1 influences this fruit shape formation remains unknown.
The naming of the YABBY transcription factor (TF) family originated from studies in Arabidopsis thaliana.The crc-1 mutant of Arabidopsis exhibited incomplete fusion of the carpel margins at the apex, resembling the shape of a crab's claw.As a result, this gene was named CRC (CRABS CLAW) [26].The CRC gene encodes a specific TF with a zinc finger domain and a helix-loop-helix domain.By utilizing this structural characteristic, five additional genes were discovered in the Arabidopsis genome, all showing high similarity in their zinc finger and helix-loop-helix domains.This led to the definition of a new gene family.To establish a connection with the founding member CRC, Bowman and Smyth named this gene family after the Australian freshwater crayfish "yabby", giving rise to the unique YABBY TF family in plants [26].Currently, YABBY proteins have been identified in numerous species, with six in Arabidopsis thaliana [27], nine in Oryza sativa (rice) [28], nine in Solanum lycopersicum (tomato) [29], and seven in Vitis vinifera (grape) [30].Based on the evolutionary relationships and functional studies in Arabidopsis, YABBY proteins in dicotyledonous plants such as Arabidopsis and tomato can be categorized into five subfamilies: FIL/YAB3, CRC, INO, YAB2, and YAB5 [29,31].The main characteristic of YABBY proteins is their role in the abaxial cells of lateral organs in plants [32].Furthermore, recent research has demonstrated that YABBY family genes play a crucial role in various aspects of plant reproductive growth [33,34], vegetative growth [35], and response to abiotic stresses [36].
The natural mutations of fasciated (fas) and locule number (lc) during the domestication of tomato fruits had a combined impact on the size of the meristematic tissue and the number of locules in tomato fruits [37,38].Initially, the putative gene for fas was identified as SlYABBY2b [39].Subsequent studies revealed that an inversion of 296 kb at the fas locus affected the promoter of SlCLV3, thereby altering the expression level of SlCLV3 [40][41][42].Although to a lesser extent than SlCLV3, SlYABBY2b also participates in regulating locule number.The overexpression of SlYABBY2b decreased the number of locules in fruits [43], while the knockout of SlYABBY2b led to dwarfed plants with smaller flowers and fruits [44].Among other members of the tomato YABBY family, SlCRCa acts as an inhibitor of flower organ size and negatively impacts fruit size by influencing cell division and expansion [33].Furthermore, in single-knockout mutants of SlCRCa or SlCRCb, uncertain flower development was observed, while in double-mutant lines of SlCRCa and SlCRCb, all flowers exhibited severe phenotypic uncertainty, indicating that tomato CRC homologous genes ensure the normal initiation of floral meristem and carpel development through partial redundancy [34].Altogether, these studies suggest that the tomato YABBY family plays a role in controlling the development of floral organs and fruits.However, the tomato YABBY family consists of nine shared members, most of which have unknown functions.
The tomato fruit consists of various structures, such as the placenta, seeds, locular tissue, septum, and total pericarp, from the inside out [45].Our understanding of how these structures influence fruit development and ripening still needs to be improved.A thorough examination of the tomato fruit transcriptome, covering various tissues and development stages, has provided insights into gene expression patterns in different periods and structures of tomato fruit [45].Furthermore, the AGAMOUS (AG) MADSbox TF SlMBP3 has been identified as a key regulator of locular tissue in tomato fruit, impacting fruit softening [46,47].These studies have begun to focus on the developmental regulation of internal structures within tomato fruit.The septum in tomato fruit serves as a specialized tissue that separates different locules and may have a structural function.However, the developmental regulation of the septum remains largely unexplored.This research uncovered that SlYABBY2a serves as a specific regulator of septum development and ripening.Knocking out SlYABBY2a resulted in altered expression of genes related to auxin and ethylene signaling pathways in the septum, ultimately leading to inward collapse at the septum and delayed septum ripening.In addition, the MADS-box TF SlTAGL1 can activate the promoter of SlYABBY2 in vivo, indicating that SlYABBY2 is a direct target of SlTAGL1.These findings offer fresh insights into the function of YABBY TF in septum development and ripening.

Characterization of the Transcription Factor SlYABBY2a
In order to study the evolutionary connection of SlYABBY2a in tomatoes (Solanum lyco-persicum), a phylogenetic tree was created using the complete amino acid sequences of YABBY proteins from model plants, like tomatoes, Arabidopsis, and rice.According to the YABBY family protein classification and naming system in Arabidopsis, the tomato YABBY family proteins were categorized into five distinct subfamilies: YAB2, YAB5, FIL/YAB3, INO, and CRC (Figure 1A).Notably, there is no homologous protein of YAB5 in the rice genome, which is a monocotyledonous plant.In addition, tomato and Arabidopsis are dicotyledonous plants.Still, the tomato has two proteins in the YAB2, YAB5, and CRC subfamilies, while Arabidopsis has only one protein, suggesting potential functional differentiation of tomato proteins, respectively, within the YAB2, YAB5, and CRC subfamily.Further amino acid sequence analysis demonstrated that SlYABBY2a shares a C2C2 zinc finger domain (Figure 1B) and a YABBY domain (Figure 1C) with other YABBY proteins.In addition, we carried out transient expression assays through agroinfiltration to observe the subcellular distribution of YFP and recombinant proteins.The control consisted of an empty vector, and we detected green fluorescent signals in the nucleus and cytoplasm (Figure 2A).Conversely, the green fluorescent signals emitted by the SlYABBY2a-YFP fusion protein overlapped with the nucleus localization red fluorescence signal emitted by the HY5-YFP fusion protein (Figure 2B).These findings corroborated that SlYABBY2a is a conserved YABBY family transcription factor and localizes to the nucleus. in the rice genome, which is a monocotyledonous plant.In addition, tomato and Arabidopsis are dicotyledonous plants.Still, the tomato has two proteins in the YAB2, YAB5, and CRC subfamilies, while Arabidopsis has only one protein, suggesting potential functional differentiation of tomato proteins, respectively, within the YAB2, YAB5, and CRC subfamily.Further amino acid sequence analysis demonstrated that SlYABBY2a shares a C2C2 zinc finger domain (Figure 1B) and a YABBY domain (Figure 1C) with other YABBY proteins.In addition, we carried out transient expression assays through agroinfiltration to observe the subcellular distribution of YFP and recombinant proteins.The control consisted of an empty vector, and we detected green fluorescent signals in the nucleus and cytoplasm (Figure 2A).Conversely, the green fluorescent signals emitted by the SlYABBY2a-YFP fusion protein overlapped with the nucleus localization red fluorescence signal emitted by the HY5-YFP fusion protein (Figure 2B).These findings corroborated that SlYABBY2a is a conserved YABBY family transcription factor and localizes to the nucleus.  in the rice genome, which is a monocotyledonous plant.In addition, tomato and Arabidopsis are dicotyledonous plants.Still, the tomato has two proteins in the YAB2, YAB5, and CRC subfamilies, while Arabidopsis has only one protein, suggesting potential functional differentiation of tomato proteins, respectively, within the YAB2, YAB5, and CRC subfamily.Further amino acid sequence analysis demonstrated that SlYABBY2a shares a C2C2 zinc finger domain (Figure 1B) and a YABBY domain (Figure 1C) with other YABBY proteins.In addition, we carried out transient expression assays through agroinfiltration to observe the subcellular distribution of YFP and recombinant proteins.The control consisted of an empty vector, and we detected green fluorescent signals in the nucleus and cytoplasm (Figure 2A).Conversely, the green fluorescent signals emitted by the SlYABBY2a-YFP fusion protein overlapped with the nucleus localization red fluorescence signal emitted by the HY5-YFP fusion protein (Figure 2B).These findings corroborated that SlYABBY2a is a conserved YABBY family transcription factor and localizes to the nucleus.

SlYABBY2a Is Specifically Expressed in the Septum of Tomato Fruit
To investigate the gene expression levels of nine YABBY TF family genes in tomato plants, we conducted a comprehensive analysis using transcriptome data (Tomato Genome Consortium, 2012 [48]).The YABBY family genes in tomatoes exhibited minimal expression in the roots, with some genes displaying tissue-specific expression patterns (Figure 3A).For instance, higher expression levels of SlYABBY5b were observed in the leaf and bud compared to other tissues, while SlYABBY1a and SlCRCb showed elevated expression levels in the bud and flower.Additionally, four genes within the YABBY family, SlYABBY2a, SlYABBY5a, SlYABBY1b, and SlYABBY2b, exhibited more widespread expression patterns.Notably, SlYABBY2a displayed relatively high expression levels in all tissues, except the roots (Figure 3A).Furthermore, the expression pattern of SlYABBY2a in tomato tissues or organs was investigated through qRT-PCR, revealing that SlYABBY2a has relatively high expression levels in flowers and fruits (up to the breaker stage) (Figure 3B).Interestingly, in another dataset of spatial and temporal transcriptome data during tomato fruit development, we found that SlYABBY2a exhibited abundant expression in the pericarp and septum, while its expression levels were significantly lower in structures, such as the placenta and columella (Figure S1).To validate this tissue-specific expression pattern of SlYABBY2a, we performed qRT-PCR to assess its expression levels in different fruit tissues at the Breaker stage.The findings demonstrated that the relative expression levels of SlYABBY2a were significantly elevated in the pericarp and septum compared to the placenta and columella (Figure 3C).The expression levels of SlYABBY2a were further compared in the pericarp and septum of fruits at different developmental stages.The results showed that during fruit development stages, including immature green (IMG), mature green (MG), and breaker (B), there were no significant differences observed in the expression levels of SlYABBY2a between the pericarp and septum.However, during ripening, specifically at the B + 4 stage, the expression level of SlYABBY2a significantly decreased in the pericarp, while it remained similar to the IMG stage in the septum (Figure 3D).These results suggested that SlYABBY2a is expressed explicitly in the septum of fruits, indicating its potential role in controlling the development and ripening process of fruit septum.

Knocking out of SlYABBY2a Affects the Development of Fruit Septum
To further investigate the biological functions of SlYABBY2a, we successfully obtained two homozygous mutant lines of SlYABBY2a with distinct genotypes, CR-1 and CR-2, through gene editing techniques, genetic transformation, and genome sequencing (Figure S2).Specifically, CR-1 exhibited an 8 bp deletion near the initiation codon (Figure 4A), while CR-2 exhibited a 169 bp base deletion, including the initiation codon of SlYABBY2a (Figure 4B).These deletions induced a frameshift mutation in the coding sequence, resulting in premature translation termination.Gene expression analysis of SlYABBY2a revealed its specific expression in the fruit pericarp and septum.In addition, the septum was formed by the fusion of carpels.Therefore, we conducted paraffin sectioning and observation of the carpel tissue from WT and Slyabby2a mutants one day after flowering.Compared to the WT, the cell layers at the junction of carpels in the Slyabby2a mutants were noticeably separated, and the degree of carpel fusion was reduced (Figure 4C,D), confirming the involvement of SlYABBY2a in carpel fusion and septum development.Moreover, during the further fruit development stages, the fruit of Slyabby2a mutants exhibited an uneven fruit appearance, and significant invagination at the junction of the fruit septum and pericarp was observed (Figure 4E).Hence, these findings confirmed the biological function of SlYABBY2a in controlling septum development and influencing fruit shape.Auxin plays a crucial role in regulating tomato fruit development, with its main signaling pathway consisting of three stages: synthesis, signal transduction, and response [49].YABBY family transcription factors, such as AtCRC, have been reported to directly participate in regulating auxin homeostasis in the carpel primordia [50,51].To further investigate the pericarp invagination phenotype observed in Slyabbay2a mutants, the expression levels of known auxin-related genes were compared between the fruit septum of WT and Slyabbay2a.Three auxin synthesis genes (SlFZY4, SlFZY5, and SlFZY6) [52], five auxin response inhibitor genes (SlIAA2, SlIAA9, SlIAA13, SlGH3.8, and SlTRN2) [44,53], and two auxin transport genes (SlPIN1 and SlPIN4) [54] were selected (Figure 5).Quantitative RT-PCR analysis showed a significant decrease in the transcripts of auxin synthesis genes (SlFZY4, SlFZY5, and SlFZY6; Figure 5A-C), as well as the auxin transport genes (SlPIN1 and SlPIN4; Figure 5I,J), in the fruit septum of Slyabbay2a mutants compared to the WT.However, the expression levels of the five tested auxin response inhibitor genes were significantly higher in the fruit septum of Slyabbay2a mutants compared to the WT (Figure 5E-H).Furthermore, since auxin can regulate the synthesis of cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) complexes through the regulation of auxin response genes (ARGs), thereby affecting the G1/S transition in plants [55], we further examined the transcript levels of two cell cycle-related genes.The results showed that the transcript levels of cell cycle-related genes, SlCycA3 [56] and SlCycD2 [57], were also significantly downregulated in the fruit septum of Slyabbay2a mutants (Figure 5K,L).These findings suggested that the auxin signaling pathway is altered in the fruit septum due to the knockout of SlYABBY2a, leading to changes in fruit development.affecting the G1/S transition in plants [55], we further examined the transcript levels of two cell cycle-related genes.The results showed that the transcript levels of cell cyclerelated genes, SlCycA3 [56] and SlCycD2 [57], were also significantly downregulated in the fruit septum of Slyabbay2a mutants (Figure 5K,L).These findings suggested that the auxin signaling pathway is altered in the fruit septum due to the knockout of SlYABBY2a, leading to changes in fruit development.

Knocking out SlYABBY2a Affects the Ripening of Fruit Septum
During our observation of the fruit shape and cross-section of Slyabbay2a mutants, we noticed that the maturity of the Slyabbay2a fruit septum in the breaker (B) stage was significantly lower compared to the WT.For instance, the septum of WT fruit had turned red, indicating the accumulation of lycopene, while the septum of Slyabbay2a mutants remained green, resembling an unripened state (Figure 4E).This finding prompted us to investigate whether SlYABBY2a plays a role in controlling the ripening of the fruit septum.

Knocking out SlYABBY2a Affects the Ripening of Fruit Septum
During our observation of the fruit shape and cross-section of Slyabbay2a mutants, we noticed that the maturity of the Slyabbay2a fruit septum in the breaker (B) stage was significantly lower compared to the WT.For instance, the septum of WT fruit had turned red, indicating the accumulation of lycopene, while the septum of Slyabbay2a mutants remained green, resembling an unripened state (Figure 4E).This finding prompted us to investigate whether SlYABBY2a plays a role in controlling the ripening of the fruit septum.To test this hypothesis, we further observed fruits at different stages of ripening.Throughout the ripening process of the fruit, no significant variations were observed in the external fruit color or pigment accumulation between Slyabbay2a mutants and the WT (Figure 6A).However, the cross-sectional analysis demonstrated a rapid increase in pigment accumulation in the septum of WT fruits as they matured, while Slyabbay2a mutant fruits experienced a significant delay in pigment accumulation (Figure 6A).The ripeness of tomatoes is typically determined by the levels of total carotenoids and lycopene.Therefore, we sampled the fruit pericarp, septum, and placenta tissues from WT and Slyabbay2a mutant fruits and measured the levels of total carotenoids and lycopene.The findings revealed a significant decrease in the levels of total carotenoids and lycopene in the fruit septum of Slyabbay2a mutants compared to WT fruits (Figure 6B,C).At the same time, there were no differences in the levels of total carotenoids and lycopene in the fruit pericarp and placenta tissues (Figure 6C,D and Figure 6F,G).These findings indicated that the knockout of SlYABBY2a specifically impacts the ripening process of the fruit septum.2.6.Knocking out SlYABBY2a Alters Ripening-Related Genes in the Fruit Septum The primary regulation of tomato fruit ripening involves ethylene and transcription factors, along with carotenoid accumulation and cell wall degradation [58].To obtain further insights into the delayed ripening seen in Slyabby2a mutants, we compared the transcripts of previously reported ripening-related genes in both the WT and Slyabby2a fruit septum at the B stage.Quantitative RT-PCR analysis revealed a significant decrease in the transcripts of key genes involved in tomato fruit ripening, such as the ethylene biosynthesis rate-limiting gene SlACS2 [59], ethylene receptor genes SlETR3/NR and SlETR4 [60], and the "master ripening regulator" SlRIN [61], in the fruit septum of Slyabby2a mutants compared to the levels observed in the WT (Figure 7A-D).Additionally, the transcription levels of genes involved in carotenoid biosynthesis [62], including SlPSY1, SlPDS, SlZDS, and SlLYCB (Figure 7E-H), as well as cell wall metabolism genes [63], such as SlPG, SlPE, and SlPL (Figure 7I-K), were significantly downregulated in the fruit septum of Slyabby2a mutants.Furthermore, auxin plays a role in the unripe-to-ripe transition, and the small auxin-up RNA gene SlSAUR69 positively regulates tomato fruit ripening [14].To investigate whether the auxin signaling pathway is altered during fruit septum ripening in the Slyabby2a mutant, we examined the transcription levels of SlSAUR69.Quantitative RT-PCR analysis showed a significant downregulation of SlSAUR69 expression in the fruit septum of the Slyabby2a mutants (Figure 7L).and the "master ripening regulator" SlRIN [61], in the fruit septum of Slyabby2a mutants compared to the levels observed in the WT (Figure 7A-D).Additionally, the transcription levels of genes involved in carotenoid biosynthesis [62], including SlPSY1, SlPDS, SlZDS, and SlLYCB (Figure 7E-H), as well as cell wall metabolism genes [63], such as SlPG, SlPE, and SlPL (Figure 7I-K), were significantly downregulated in the fruit septum of Slyabby2a mutants.Furthermore, auxin plays a role in the unripe-to-ripe transition, and the small auxin-up RNA gene SlSAUR69 positively regulates tomato fruit ripening [14].To investigate whether the auxin signaling pathway is altered during fruit septum ripening in the Slyabby2a mutant, we examined the transcription levels of SlSAUR69.Quantitative RT-PCR analysis showed a significant downregulation of SlSAUR69 expression in the fruit septum of the Slyabby2a mutants (Figure 7L).Compared to the changes in septum ripening time, there was no significant difference in the ripening time of the fruit pericarp between the Slyabby2a mutants and the WT (Figure 6A).To explore whether SlYABBY2a affects the ripening process of the fruit pericarp at the molecular level, we selected genes with significant expression level differences in the septum and then quantitatively analyzed their expression levels in the fruit pericarp at stage B. The results showed no significant difference in the expression levels of key ripening-controlling genes, such as SlACS2, SlETR3/NR, and SlRIN, between the fruit pericarp of the Slyabby2a mutants and the WT (Figure S3).In contrast, the expression levels Compared to the changes in septum ripening time, there was no significant difference in the ripening time of the fruit pericarp between the Slyabby2a mutants and the WT (Figure 6A).To explore whether SlYABBY2a affects the ripening process of the fruit pericarp at the molecular level, we selected genes with significant expression level differences in the septum and then quantitatively analyzed their expression levels in the fruit pericarp at stage B. The results showed no significant difference in the expression levels of key ripening-controlling genes, such as SlACS2, SlETR3/NR, and SlRIN, between the fruit pericarp of the Slyabby2a mutants and the WT (Figure S3).In contrast, the expression levels of SlACS2, SlETR3, and SlRIN in the fruit septum of the Slyabby2a mutants at the B + 2 stage remained significantly lower than those in the WT fruit septum (Figure S4).These results indicated that SlYABBY2a has a more significant impact on septum ripening than on pericarp ripening.Knocking out SlYABBY2a significantly reduces the expression levels of ripening-related genes in the fruit septum, ultimately leading to the delayed ripening phenotype observed in the Slyabby2a mutants.

SlYABBY2a Functions Downstream of MADS-Box Protein SlTAGL1
Silencing or knocking out SlTAGL1 leads to a phenotype of inward concavity in the tomato fruit septum [18,25], similar to what is observed in the Slyabby2a mutant (Figure 3).This phenomenon suggests a potential interaction between SlTAGL1 and SlYABBY2a.We first analyzed their interaction at the protein level using yeast two-hybrid (Y2H) technology.However, the results of the Y2H assay indicated that there is no direct interaction between the SlYABBY2a and SlTAGL1 (Figure 8A).Subsequently, we investigated the potential interaction at the transcriptional regulation level using a dual-luciferase reporter system, where SlTAGL1 was used as the effector and a promoter fragment of SlYABBY2a was used as the reporter (Figure 8B).Through transient expression in tobacco leaves and measurement of dual-luciferase activity, the results showed that SlTAGL1 can activate the promoter of SlYABBY2a and enhance the transcription of the downstream LUC gene (Figure 8C).These findings suggested that the transcription of SlYABBY2a is regulated by SlTAGL1, indicating that SlYABBY2a is a potential direct target of SlTAGL1.results indicated that SlYABBY2a has a more significant impact on septum ripening than on pericarp ripening.Knocking out SlYABBY2a significantly reduces the expression levels of ripening-related genes in the fruit septum, ultimately leading to the delayed ripening phenotype observed in the Slyabby2a mutants.

SlYABBY2a Functions Downstream of MADS-Box Protein SlTAGL1
Silencing or knocking out SlTAGL1 leads to a phenotype of inward concavity in the tomato fruit septum [18,25], similar to what is observed in the Slyabby2a mutant (Figure 3).This phenomenon suggests a potential interaction between SlTAGL1 and SlYABBY2a.We first analyzed their interaction at the protein level using yeast two-hybrid (Y2H) technology.However, the results of the Y2H assay indicated that there is no direct interaction between the SlYABBY2a and SlTAGL1 (Figure 8A).Subsequently, we investigated the potential interaction at the transcriptional regulation level using a dual-luciferase reporter system, where SlTAGL1 was used as the effector and a promoter fragment of SlYABBY2a was used as the reporter (Figure 8B).Through transient expression in tobacco leaves and measurement of dual-luciferase activity, the results showed that SlTAGL1 can activate the promoter of SlYABBY2a and enhance the transcription of the downstream LUC gene (Figure 8C).These findings suggested that the transcription of SlYABBY2a is regulated by SlT-AGL1, indicating that SlYABBY2a is a potential direct target of SlTAGL1.

Discussion
The CRABS CLAW (CRC) gene serves as the quintessential member of the plant-specific YABBY family, exerting a pivotal role in carpel development, and it is also indispensable for the formation of nectar-producing structures [64].The precise expression pattern of CRC in carpel tissues [26] reflects the overarching function of YABBY genes in specifying the abaxial orientation of lateral organs in plants [32].In the case of Arabidopsis, crc-1 mutations result in impairments in carpel fusion and alterations in the overall size and shape of pistils [65].Moreover, orthologues of CRABS CLAW (CRC) play a fundamental role in the determination of floral meristem (FM) and the formation of the gynoecium across angiosperms, both of which are pivotal developmental processes that ensure suc-

Discussion
The CRABS CLAW (CRC) gene serves as the quintessential member of the plant-specific YABBY family, exerting a pivotal role in carpel development, and it is also indispensable for the formation of nectar-producing structures [64].The precise expression pattern of CRC in carpel tissues [26] reflects the overarching function of YABBY genes in specifying the abaxial orientation of lateral organs in plants [32].In the case of Arabidopsis, crc-1 mutations result in impairments in carpel fusion and alterations in the overall size and shape of pistils [65].Moreover, orthologues of CRABS CLAW (CRC) play a fundamental role in the determination of floral meristem (FM) and the formation of the gynoecium across angiosperms, both of which are pivotal developmental processes that ensure successful plant reproduction and crop yield [66]. Through a functional complementarity experiment, it was observed that the expression of YAB2 under the control of the CRC promoter in crc-1 mutants facilitated the complete fusion of developmentally compromised carpels, thereby suggesting a degree of functional similarity between YAB2 and CRC [64].Phylogenetic analysis conducted in this study revealed that the YABBY family can be classified into five distinct subfamilies, with two members (SlYABBY2a and SlYABBY2b) found in the tomato YAB2 subfamily and only one member (AtYAB2) present in Arabidopsis (Figure 1A).SlYABBY2b has long been regarded as a functional gene governing fas, a crucial locus implicated in the domestication of tomato fruit size [39].Consequently, the YABBY family in tomatoes is also believed to be involved in regulating fruit shape [39].However, recent investigations have demonstrated that the dominant gene at the fas locus is CLV, and its influence on fruit shape is mediated through the regulation of WUS transcription [41].Although transgenic functional studies on SlYABBY2b suggest its involvement in the regulation of tomato plant height and fruit size [43], the mechanisms by which the tomato YABBY family TF governs fruit shape remain elusive.
The tomato fruit is a complex organ, consisting of various components from the inner to the outer layers.For instance, the internal structure includes the placenta, locular tissue, and septum [45].Traditionally, only the pericarp has been utilized as a sample for assessing tomato fruit development and ripening, resulting in limited knowledge regarding the development and biological functions of the internal structures.Recent studies have indicated that an AGAMOUS MADS-box protein, namely SlMBP3, governs the pace of placenta liquefaction in tomatoes [46].Further investigations have revealed that SlMBP3 acts as a critical regulator of locular tissue in tomato fruit, and deletion at the gene locus is responsible for the all-flesh trait [47].These studies have shed light on the influence of internal structure development on fruit ripening and commercial characteristics.However, our understanding of the regulatory mechanisms governing septum development in tomato fruit still needs to be improved.Through transcriptome data analysis and qRT-PCR validation, we have identified a YABBY family gene, SlYABBY2a, which exhibits specific expression in the septum (Figure 3).Interestingly, the knockout of SlYABBY2a using CRISPR/Cas9 also affects the fusion degree of the carpels, further influencing fruit shape during fruit development and causing inward pericarp at the septum (Figure 4).Considering that the YABBY transcription factor CRC regulates proper auxin maxima, thereby influencing the initiation of carpel primordia and the termination of FM cell proliferation [49,50], we have examined the expression of genes involved in the auxin signaling pathway at the transcriptional level in the Slyabby2a mutant and WT septum.The results demonstrate a significant downregulation in the expression levels of genes related to auxin synthesis and transport, along with a significant upregulation in the expression levels of genes related to auxin inhibition in the Slyabby2a mutant compared to the WT (Figure 5).Moreover, alterations in the auxin signaling pathway have also affected the expression levels of cell cycle-related genes, such as SlCycA3 and SlCycD2 (Figure 5).Consistent with the phenotypes observed in the Slyabby2a mutant fruit, both silencing and knockout of the tomato AGAMOUS-LIKE1 (SlTAGL1) result in an irregular fruit surface phenotype [18,25].To investigate the potential correlation between these two similar phenotypes, we have explored the possible interaction between SlYABBY2a and SlTAGL1 at the protein-protein interaction and transcriptional regulation levels.The research findings suggest that SlYABBY2a and SlTAGL1 do not directly interact in yeast, but in the dual-luciferase reporter system, SlTAGL1, can recognize the promoter of SlYABBY2a and enhance its transcription (Figure 8).In fact, AtCRC has been identified as a direct target of the MADS-box transcription factor AGAMOUS [51].Therefore, these results indicated that SlYABBY2a is a potential direct target of SlTAGL1, further influencing carpel fusion and septum development by regulating the auxin signaling pathway.Subsequent investigations may involve overexpressing the SlYABBY2a gene in the WT or Sltagl1 mutants to further validate the biological function of SlYABBY2a, as well as explore the interaction between SlYABBY2a and SlTAGL1.
Tomato, a typical climacteric fruit, has its ripening process strictly regulated by ethylene.Despite this control, the exact mechanisms behind the transition from immature to ripe stages are not fully understood.In the ripening process of climacteric fruits, there is a complex interaction between auxin and ethylene.For example, auxin plays a role in regulating ethylene biosynthesis and signaling genes in various fleshy fruits, like tomatoes and peaches [67,68].Additionally, SlARF2 and SlARF4, which are auxin response factors, have been implicated in fruit ripening [69,70].The importance of the interplay between ethylene and auxin is further evidenced by the influence of ethylene on the PIN1 auxin transporter and the need for high auxin levels for producing significant amounts of System 2 ethylene in peach [71].Changing the levels of expression of auxin-responsive genes [72] can also influence the process of fruit ripening transition.The expression of SlSAUR69 was increased in tomatoes, causing early ripening, while reducing it led to a delay in fruit ripening [14].These findings strongly suggest that auxin plays a role in the transition to fruit ripening.In this study, we initially identified developmental defects in the septum of Slyabby2a mutant fruit, along with changes in the auxin signaling pathway characterized by a notable decrease in the expression levels of genes related to auxin synthesis (Figures 4 and 5).As the fruit transitioned into the ripening stage, delayed ripening was observed in the septum of Slyabby2a mutant fruit, accompanied by a significant downregulation in the expression levels of ripening-related genes (Figures 6 and 7), such as the ethylene biosynthetic gene SlACS2 and other relevant genes.The expression of the auxin-responsive gene SlSAUR69 in the septum of Slyabby2a fruit decreased by more than 80% compared to the WT counterpart (Figure 7L).Conversely, an analysis of key ripening-related gene expression in the fruit pericarp, including SlACS2, SlETR3/NR, and RIN, showed no notable differences between Slyabby2a and WT fruits (Figure S3).These findings suggest that the absence of SlYABBY2a specifically impacts septum ripening by modulating the auxin signaling pathway, subsequently affecting System 2 ethylene biosynthesis and downstream ethylene responses.

Plant Materials and Growth Conditions
In this study, Solanum lycopersicum cv.Ailsa Craig served as the genetic transformation materials, alongside wild-type (WT) controls.All tomato plants were cultivated in a controlled glass greenhouse, adhering to the following subsequent environmental parameters: 16 h of daylight maintained at 27 • C complemented by 8 h of nocturnal conditions at 19 • C whilst ensuring a relative humidity level of 70-80%.Materials from the roots, stems, leaves, flowers, and fruits of WT were collected for RNA extraction, facilitating the examination of SlYABBY2a expression levels across tissues and organs.Fully opened flowers were duly marked, and the stage of fruit development was recorded in days post anthesis (DPA).Fruits at the stage of 20 DPA were characterized as immature green (IMG), whereas those reaching 35 DPA were designated as mature green (MG).When the fruit surface visibly turned yellow, it was defined as the breaker stage (B), and the period of fruit ripening was distinguished by the number of days after the B stage, such as the B + 2 stage.Furthermore, tomato fruits underwent dissection into pericarp, septum, placenta, and columella for sampling, thereby facilitating RNA extraction and the subsequent analysis of SlYABBY2a expression in the internal structure of fruits.

Expression Analysis of SlYABBY2a
To compare the expression levels of the 9 genes in the tomato YABBY family across different tissues and organs in tomatoes, gene expression heatmaps were generated using RNA-seq data from the Tomato Genome Consortium, 2012 [48].The RPKM data, which represented gene expression levels, were normalized through log2 processing and visualized using the OmicStudio tool (https://www.omicstudio.cn/tool/(accessed on 20 October 2021)).Furthermore, quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) technology was employed to validate the relative expression levels of SlYABBY2a in different tissues and organs.The qRT-PCR experiments were conducted with three biological replicates.

Subcellular Localization
To examine the subcellular localization of SlYABBY2a, a SlYABBY2a-YFP fusion protein and transient expression strategy was employed, with HY5-RFP fusion protein serving as a nuclear localization control signal.Firstly, the coding sequence of SlYABBY2a, without the stop codon, was cloned and digested with enzymes (BamHI and SacI) before being inserted into the pHB-YFP vector, which had also been cleaved with enzymes (BamHI and SacI), to construct the pHB-SlYABBY2a-YFP fusion vector.After transforming the plasmids expressing SlYABBY2a-YFP, YFP, and HY5-RFP into Agrobacterium tumefaciens GV3101competent cells, positive monoclonal cells were cultured until reaching an optical density (OD 600 = 1.0).Equal volumes of the GV3101 strains carrying pHB-SlYABBY2a-YFP and the control vector pHB-YFP were mixed with the GV3101 strain containing HY5-RFP, respectively, and the mixture was then infiltrated into 4-week-old tobacco leaves (N.benthamiana) using a needleless 1 mL syringe, followed by 48 h of cultivation.The infiltrated leaf sections were observed using a laser confocal microscope.Excitation wavelengths for GFP and RFP were set at 488 nm and 563 nm, respectively, and emission wavelengths for GFP and RFP were set at 507 nm and 582 nm, respectively.The cultivation of Agrobacterium and the preparation of the re-suspension solution were performed as previously described [75].

Gene Editing
The CRISPR-P tool (http://cbi.hzau.edu.cn/crispr/(accessed on 1 November 2021)) was utilized to identify the knockout site on the SlYABBY2a gene.Combined with the usage method of the knockout vector pKSE-401 [76], primer pairs (forward: ATTGCAAA-CACGTTCCGAGGAAG; reverse: AAACCTTCCTCGGAACGTGTTTG) were designed and synthesized.Following denaturation and annealing, the primer pairs were inserted into the pKSE-401 vector and digested with BsaI.The recombinant vector was transformed into Agrobacterium tumefaciens LBA4404 and utilized for a successful genetic transformation using cotyledons from the WT.Regenerated shoots were examined on selection medium with kanamycin (50 mg/mL), and regenerated plants were verified through PCR analysis of genomic DNA using primer pairs (NPT-II-F: TGTGCTCGACGTTGTCACTGAA and NPT-II-R: CACCATGATATTCGGCAAGCAG). Subsequently, the genomic target regions were cloned and sequenced to identify the genotype of the transgenic lines and whether potential off-target mutations occurred, as previously described [77].In addition, Tables S2 and S3 list the specific primers used in this section, and Table S4 contains the detection results for potential off-target sites.

qRT-PCR
The samples stored at −80 • C were ground into a powder using liquid nitrogen.Following this, RNA isolation and reverse transcription reactions were carried out using TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen, Shanghai, China) and M-MLV reverse transcriptase (Promega, Beijing, China), respectively, according to standard procedures.The quality and quantity of RNA were evaluated as previously described [77].The reverse-transcribed cDNA was then diluted with RNase/DNase-free water to three times its volume.For qRT-PCR analysis, a CFX96 Touch™ machine (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) was utilized with a reaction system consisting of 5 µL of 2× GoTaq ® qPCR Master Mix enzyme, 3.5 µL of nuclease-free water, 0.5 µL of primers, and 1 µL of diluted cDNA.The amplification conditions were as follows: an initial denaturation step at 95 • C for 2 min, followed by 40 amplification cycles (95 • C for 15 s and 60 • C for 40 s).The tomato SlCAC gene (Solyc08g006960) served as an internal reference gene [78], and the relative expression levels of the genes were determined using the 2 −∆∆CT method [79].Each experiment included three biological replicates and three technical replicates.

Pigment Quantification and Histologic Analysis
The samples of different tomato fruits were ground into a powder using liquid nitrogen.Total carotenoid contents were extracted using a hexane/acetone solution, and the quantification was conducted by calculating the absorbance of samples as described in a previous study [80].Lycopene extraction was achieved by employing a hexane/ethanol/acetone solution with 0.05% butylated hydroxytoluene (BHT), and the quantification was conducted by calculating the absorbance of samples as described in a previous study [81].The paraffin sectioning of carpel tissue (one day after anthesis) using light microscopy was carried out according to previously established methods [82].All measurements mentioned were performed in three independent experiments.

Yeast Two-Hybrid Assay
The yeast two-hybrid assay was conducted following the MATCHMAKER TM GAL4 Two-Hybrid System III protocol (Clontech, Palo Alto, CA, USA).In brief, the full-length open reading frame (ORF) of SlYABBY2a was inserted into the pGBKT7-BD vector and transformed into the Y2HGold yeast strain as bait strain.In contrast, the ORF of SlTAGL1 was inserted into the pGADT7-AD vector as the prey.The recombinant bait strain containing pGBKT7-SlYABBY2a underwent a self-activation test as previously described [83].After the self-activation test, the prey plasmids were transformed into the recombinant bait strain.The transformation and evaluation of protein-protein interaction were evaluated by screening on a DDO (SD medium without Trp and Leu) and QDO medium (SD medium without Trp, Leu, His, and Ade), respectively.

Dual-Luciferase Reporter Assay
The full-length ORF of SlTAGL1 was cloned into the pGreen II 62-SK vector and then transformed into the Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain GV3101 as the effector.The promoter sequence of SlYABBY2a was also cloned and inserted into the pGreen II 0800-LUC vector, which was subsequently transformed into GV3101 as the reporter.Both the reporter and effector were co-transformed into tobacco leaves (N.benthamiana) for transient expression.
The activities of firefly luciferase (LUC) and Renilla luciferase (REN) were measured according to a previously described protocol [84].

Primers and Accession Numbers
The qRT-PCR primers, along with the accession numbers for the target genes, were provided in Table S5.For vector construction, the primers were listed in Table S6, with partial primer sequences containing restriction enzyme sites.

Statistical Analysis
Statistical differences between the WT and each Slyabby2a mutant line, CR-1 and CR-2, were computed using Student's t-test (* p < 0.05), while multiple comparisons were estimated using one-way ANOVA and Duncan's multiple range test (p < 0.05), and the same lowercase letters indicate no significant differences.

Conclusions
We have identified a novel tomato YABBY transcription factor, SlYABBY2a.Based on the results of knocking out SlYABBY2a, we hypothesize that SlYABBY2a positively regulates septum development and ripening by influencing the auxin and ethylene signaling pathways.A model has been proposed to illustrate the potential function of SlYABBY2a (Figure 9).In summary, our study contributes to the comprehension of fruit septum development and ripening and reveals that modifications in auxin signaling in the septum also impact the ethylene signaling pathway and the ripening process.This provides new evidence for the involvement of auxin in regulating the transition from unripe to ripe fruit.

Statistical Analysis
Statistical differences between the WT and each Slyabby2a mutant line, CR-1 and CR-2, were computed using Student's t-test (* p < 0.05), while multiple comparisons were estimated using one-way ANOVA and Duncan's multiple range test (p < 0.05), and the same lowercase letters indicate no significant differences.

Conclusions
We have identified a novel tomato YABBY transcription factor, SlYABBY2a.Based on the results of knocking out SlYABBY2a, we hypothesize that SlYABBY2a positively regulates septum development and ripening by influencing the auxin and ethylene signaling pathways.A model has been proposed to illustrate the potential function of SlYABBY2a (Figure 9).In summary, our study contributes to the comprehension of fruit septum development and ripening and reveals that modifications in auxin signaling in the septum also impact the ethylene signaling pathway and the ripening process.This provides new evidence for the involvement of auxin in regulating the transition from unripe to ripe fruit.

Figure 1 .
Figure 1.Phylogenetic relationship and conservation analysis of YABBY family proteins.(A) Phylogenetic tree.The asterisk is used to highlight the location of SlYABBY2a.(B,C) Multiple sequence alignments of conserved C2C2 zinc finger (B) and YABBY domains (C).Sl: Solanum lycopersicum (tomato); At: Arabidopsis thaliana; Os: Oryza sativa (rice).Red represents highly conserved amino acids in the sequence alignment, yellow represents partially conserved, and dots represent gaps.

Figure 1 .
Figure 1.Phylogenetic relationship and conservation analysis of YABBY family proteins.(A) Phylogenetic tree.The asterisk is used to highlight the location of SlYABBY2a.(B,C) Multiple sequence alignments of conserved C2C2 zinc finger (B) and YABBY domains (C).Sl: Solanum lycopersicum (tomato); At: Arabidopsis thaliana; Os: Oryza sativa (rice).Red represents highly conserved amino acids in the sequence alignment, yellow represents partially conserved, and dots represent gaps.

Figure 1 .
Figure 1.Phylogenetic relationship and conservation analysis of YABBY family proteins.(A) Phylogenetic tree.The asterisk is used to highlight the location of SlYABBY2a.(B,C) Multiple sequence alignments of conserved C2C2 zinc finger (B) and YABBY domains (C).Sl: Solanum lycopersicum (tomato); At: Arabidopsis thaliana; Os: Oryza sativa (rice).Red represents highly conserved amino acids in the sequence alignment, yellow represents partially conserved, and dots represent gaps.

Figure 2 .
Figure 2. Subcellular localization of SlYABBY2a.(A) The green fluorescent signal excited by YFP was observed in both the nucleus and cytoplasm.(B) The SlYABBY2a-YFP fusion protein produced a green fluorescent signal in the nucleus upon excitation.The HY5-RFP protein served as a positive control for nuclear localization.The red fluorescence signal is emitted by RFP (red fluorescent protein), while the green fluorescence signal is emitted by YFP (yellow fluorescent protein).The yellow signal is formed by the convergence of red and green fluorescence signals.The circles under the bright field provide the outline of the cells.Scale bar = 50 µm.

Figure 3 .Figure 3 .
Figure 3. Expression analyses of SlYABBY2a.(A) Gene expression heatmap of the tomato YABBY family genes based on transcriptome expression data (FPKM) taken from the Tomato Genome Consortium, 2012 [48].Each column represents a different tomato tissue or organ, including different fruit developmental stages.(B) Tissue-and organ-specific relative expression pattern of SlYABBY2a detected by qRT-PCR.RT, root; ST, stem; YL, young leaf; ML, mature leaf; SL, senescent leaf; SE, sepal; FL, flower; IMG, immature green; MG, mature green; B, breaker stage; B + 4, four days after breaker stage; B + 7, seven days after breaker stage.(C) Relative expression levels of SlYABBY2a in different fruit tissues at the B stage.Sep, septum; Per, pericarp; Pla, placenta; Col, columella.(D) Figure 3. Expression analyses of SlYABBY2a.(A) Gene expression heatmap of the tomato YABBY family genes based on transcriptome expression data (FPKM) taken from the Tomato Genome Consortium,

Figure 4 .
Figure 4. Phenotypic characterization of the Slyabby2a mutant during fruit development.(A,B) The genotypes of Slyabby2a mutant lines CR-1 (A) and CR-2 (B).The short purple and blue underlines indicate the initiation codon and PAM sequence "CCT", respectively.(C,D) Carpel section of WT (C) and CR-1 (D) one day after flowering.WT, wild type.The red arrows indicate the carpel's fusion and the septum's formation.Scale bar = 300 µm.(E) Fruit phenotype of WT, CR-1, and CR-2 at the different fruit development stages.IMG, immature green; MG, mature green; B, breaker stage.Red arrows indicate the connection position of the septum and pericarp.

2. 4 .
Knocking out of SlYABBY2a Alters the Auxin Signaling Pathway in the Fruit Septum Auxin plays a crucial role in regulating tomato fruit development, with its main sig-

Figure 4 .
Figure 4. Phenotypic characterization of the Slyabby2a mutant during fruit development.(A,B) The genotypes of Slyabby2a mutant lines CR-1 (A) and CR-2 (B).The short purple and blue underlines indicate

2. 4 .
Knocking out of SlYABBY2a Alters the Auxin Signaling Pathway in the Fruit Septum Int. J. Mol.Sci.2024, 25, x FOR PEER REVIEW 8 of 20
Int. J. Mol.Sci.2024,25,  x FOR PEER REVIEW 9 of 20 septum of Slyabbay2a mutants compared to WT fruits (Figure6B,C).At the same time, there were no differences in the levels of total carotenoids and lycopene in the fruit pericarp and placenta tissues (Figure6C,D and 6F,G).These findings indicated that the knockout of SlYABBY2a specifically impacts the ripening process of the fruit septum.

Figure 6 .
Figure 6.Phenotypic characterization of the Slyabby2a mutant during fruit ripening.(A) Fruit phenotype of WT, CR-1, and CR-2 at different fruit ripening stages.B, breaker stage; B + 1, one day after breaker stage; B + 2, two days after breaker stage; B + 3, three days after breaker stage.Red arrows indicate the connection position of the septum and pericarp.Scale bar = 2 cm.(B-D) Lycopene contents in the septum (B), placenta (C), and pericarp (D) from WT and Slyabby2a mutant fruits at the B stage.(E-G) Total carotenoid contents in the septum (E), placenta (F), and pericarp (G) from WT and Slyabby2a mutant fruits at the B stage.Red arrows indicate the connection position of the septum and pericarp.Error bars indicate the SE based on three replicates.Asterisks indicate significant differences between WT and each Slyabby2a mutant line, CR-1 and CR-2 (* p < 0.05; Student's t-test).

Figure 7 .
Figure 7. Transcripts quantification of the fruit septum at the B stage from WT and Slyabby2a lines.(A-C) Relative expression of ethylene biosynthesis and receptor genes SlACS2 (A), SlETR3 (B), and SlETR4 (C).(D) Relative expression of the master regulator gene SlRIN of tomato fruit ripening.(E-H) Relative expression of carotenoid biosynthesis genes SlPSY1 (E), SlZDS (F), SlPDS (G), and SlLYCB (H).(I-K) Relative expression of cell wall-modifying genes SlPG (I), SlPL (J), and SlPE (K).(L) Relative expression of the auxin transport repressor gene SlSAUR69.Error bars indicate the SE based on three replicates.Asterisks indicate significant differences between WT and each Slyabby2a mutant line, CR-1 and CR-2 (* p < 0.05; Student's t-test).

Figure 7 .
Figure 7. Transcripts quantification of the fruit septum at the B stage from WT and Slyabby2a lines.(A-C) Relative expression of ethylene biosynthesis and receptor genes SlACS2 (A), SlETR3 (B), and SlETR4 (C).(D) Relative expression of the master regulator gene SlRIN of tomato fruit ripening.(E-H) Relative expression of carotenoid biosynthesis genes SlPSY1 (E), SlZDS (F), SlPDS (G), and SlLYCB (H).(I-K) Relative expression of cell wall-modifying genes SlPG (I), SlPL (J), and SlPE (K).(L) Relative expression of the auxin transport repressor gene SlSAUR69.Error bars indicate the SE based on three replicates.Asterisks indicate significant differences between WT and each Slyabby2a mutant line, CR-1 and CR-2 (* p < 0.05; Student's t-test).

Figure 8 .
Figure 8. Interaction analyses between SlYABBY2a and SlTAGL1.(A) Transformation and proteinprotein interaction in yeast.The related interaction confirmed by pGBKT7-53 and pGADT7-T served as a positive control, while pGBKT7-Lam and pGADT7-Tm served as negative controls.(B) Schematic diagram of constructs.(C) SlTAGL1 regulates the activity of the SlYABBY2a promoter as determined by dual-luciferase assays.Values are means ± SE (n ≥ 10) of three replicates.The asterisk indicates a significant difference determined by Student's t-test (* p < 0.05).

Figure 8 .
Figure 8. Interaction analyses between SlYABBY2a and SlTAGL1.(A) Transformation and proteinprotein interaction in yeast.The related interaction confirmed by pGBKT7-53 and pGADT7-T served as a positive control, while pGBKT7-Lam and pGADT7-Tm served as negative controls.(B) Schematic diagram of constructs.(C) SlTAGL1 regulates the activity of the SlYABBY2a promoter as determined by dual-luciferase assays.Values are means ± SE (n ≥ 10) of three replicates.The asterisk indicates a significant difference determined by Student's t-test (* p < 0.05).

Figure 9 .
Figure 9. Proposed model depicting the regulation of SlYABBY2a and its role in controlling fruit septum development and ripening in tomatoes.Supplementary Materials: The following supporting information can be downloaded at www.mdpi.com/xxx/s1.Author Contributions: Conceptualization, H.S., Z.H. and T.W.; methodology and data analysis, H.S., B.L., Y.D. and H.X.; resources, G.C. and Z.Y.; writing-original draft preparation, H.S.; writing-review and editing, Z.H. and T.W.; supervision, Z.H. and T.W.All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Figure 9 .
Figure 9. Proposed model depicting the regulation of SlYABBY2a and its role in controlling fruit septum development and ripening in tomatoes.