Structural Characterization of an N-Acetyl Sugar Amidotransferase Involved in the Lipopolysaccharide Biosynthesis in Bacteria

N-acetyl sugar amidotransferase (NASAT) is involved in the lipopolysaccharide (LPS) biosynthesis pathway that catalyzes the formation of the acetamido moiety (sugar-NC(=NH)CH3) on the O-chain. So far, little is known about its structural and functional properties. Here, we report the crystal structure of an N-acetyl sugar amidotransferase from Legionella pneumophila (LpNASAT) at 2.33 Å resolution. LpNASAT folds into a compact basin-shaped architecture with an unusually wide and open putative substrate-binding pocket and a conserved zinc ion-binding tetracysteine motif. The pocket contains a Rossmann-like fold with a PP-loop, suggesting that the NASAT-catalyzed amidotransfer reaction probably requires the conversion of ATP to AMP and PPi. Our data provide structural insights into the NASAT family of proteins, and allow us to possibly identify its functionally important regions.


Introduction
Lipopolysaccharide (LPS) is a complex glycolipid which is an essential component of the cell envelope in most Gram-negative bacteria [1].It plays an important role in the stability of the bacterial outer membrane.Due to its physicochemical properties, LPS can inhibit the passage of small, hydrophobic molecules through the phospholipid bilayer, endowing bacteria with an innate resistance to external agents (e.g., antibiotics and detergents) [2].As an endotoxin, LPS also plays a crucial role in bacteria-host interactions by modulating the host immune system's responses [3].
LPS consists of three components that are covalently linked to each other in descending order: lipid A, a core oligosaccharide, and a long polysaccharide (O-chain).Unlike the other components, O-chains are known as the most variable structures in LPS molecules and confer resistance to complement-mediated killing [4].They are composed of a variable number of repeating oligosaccharide units that extend outside the bacteria.
During O-chain biosynthesis, N-acetyl sugar amidotransferase (NASAT) has been implicated in the formation of the acetamido moiety (sugar-NC(=NH)CH3).The reaction involves the ligation of ammonia with a sugar N-acetyl group, displacing water (Figure 1).The NASAT family belongs to the AANH_like (Adenine nucleotide alpha hydrolases-like) superfamily [5], whose domain forms an alpha/beta/alpha fold for Adenosine nucleotide binding [6].Members of the NASAT family carry a conserved PP-loop (SGGXDS, where X represents any residue), indicating that they may have ATP PPase activity.In addition, this family is characterized by a conserved tetracysteine motif (CXXCX n [GN]XCXXC, where X represents any residue).The site was supposed to bind a metal atom, whose nature was, however, unknown.
(SGGXDS, where X represents any residue), indicating that they may have ATP PPase activity.In addition, this family is characterized by a conserved tetracysteine motif (CXXCXn[GN]XCXXC, where X represents any residue).The site was supposed to bind a metal atom, whose nature was, however, unknown.According to previous studies, WbpG, a member of NASAT family in Pseudomonas aeruginosa O5, is responsible for forming the C-3 acetiminido group on the first sugar residue of the O-unit to produce DManNAc3NAmA [7,8].WbuX in E. coli O145 is a homolog of WbpG, which is involved in the amination of L-FucNAc for the synthesis of L-FucNAm [9].However, while NASAT is indispensable for generating bacterial LPS specificity, surprisingly little is known about its structural and functional properties.
We herein report for the first time the crystal structure of NASAT from Legionella pneumophila (LpNASAT, Uniprot ID: A0A3A6V1D8_LEGPN) at 2.33 Å resolution.The elucidated structure provides detailed structural information pertaining to the NASAT family, and allows us to possibly identify its functionally important regions.

Overall Structure
We determined the crystal structure of LpNASAT, and refined it to an R factor (Rfree) of 20.6% (24.9%) (Table 1).Most residues are modelled in two chains.A few regions, including long N-terminal residues, several gaps, and 11 C-terminal residues were not modeled due to the poor electron density map in their respective regions, indicating the high flexibility of these areas.The structures of chains A and B are nearly identical with a RMSD of 0.137 Å for 327 common Cα atoms.The protein contains 18 helices and nine strands (Figure 2A,B).A five-stranded parallel β-sheet (β3β2β1β4β7) in the core (lower part) of the molecule was sandwiched by two arrays of α-helices (α3α4α6α10α11), which is a typical nucleotide-binding Rossmann-like fold [10].The remainder is packed around the Rossmann-like fold to complete a compact architecture, resulting in a basin shape and creating a big pocket.
On the edge of the pocket, there is a conserved tetracysteine motif (Cys44, Cys47, Cys79 and Cys82) possibly indicative of a metal binding site.Not surprisingly, the omit map calculated using protein sequence alone reveals a significant positive density close to the tetracysteine motif.To confirm the identity of the metal, we conducted inductively coupled plasma mass spectroscopy (ICP-MS) experiments on highly purified LpNASAT, and the results showed that zinc appears to be the candidate among the transition metals under investigation (Figures 2A and S1).
We herein report for the first time the crystal structure of NASAT from Legionella pneumophila (LpNASAT, Uniprot ID: A0A3A6V1D8_LEGPN) at 2.33 Å resolution.The elucidated structure provides detailed structural information pertaining to the NASAT family, and allows us to possibly identify its functionally important regions.

Overall Structure
We determined the crystal structure of LpNASAT, and refined it to an R factor (R free ) of 20.6% (24.9%) (Table 1).Most residues are modelled in two chains.A few regions, including long N-terminal residues, several gaps, and 11 C-terminal residues were not modeled due to the poor electron density map in their respective regions, indicating the high flexibility of these areas.The structures of chains A and B are nearly identical with a RMSD of 0.137 Å for 327 common Cα atoms.The protein contains 18 helices and nine strands (Figure 2A,B).A five-stranded parallel β-sheet (β3β2β1β4β7) in the core (lower part) of the molecule was sandwiched by two arrays of α-helices (α3α4α6α10α11), which is a typical nucleotide-binding Rossmann-like fold [10].The remainder is packed around the Rossmann-like fold to complete a compact architecture, resulting in a basin shape and creating a big pocket.
On the edge of the pocket, there is a conserved tetracysteine motif (Cys44, Cys47, Cys79 and Cys82) possibly indicative of a metal binding site.Not surprisingly, the omit map calculated using protein sequence alone reveals a significant positive density close to the tetracysteine motif.To confirm the identity of the metal, we conducted inductively coupled plasma mass spectroscopy (ICP-MS) experiments on highly purified LpNASAT, and the results showed that zinc appears to be the candidate among the transition metals under investigation (Figures 2A and S1).Based on structural comparison with experimentally solved data performed at the Dali server, the closest structural homologs of LpNASAT include a Sulfur transferase from Pyrococcus horikoshii OT3 (PDB code 5mko; Z score: 10.4; rmsd: 3.8; sequence identity: 14%) [11], 2-thiouridine synthetase TtuA from Thermus thermophilus HB27 (PDB code 5b4e; Z score: 10.1; rmsd: 4.1; sequence identity: 13%) [12], Nicotinamide mononucleotide synthetase from Francisella tularensis (FtNadE) (PDB code 3fiu; Z score: 9.6; rmsd: 4.0; sequence identity: 9%) [13] and sulfur transferase LarE from Lactiplantibacillus plantarum (PDB code 6b2m; Z score: 9.3; rmsd: 4.0; sequence identity: 10%) [14].These proteins all contain a Rossmann-like fold.Superposition of the structures showed that despite of the similarity in the Rossmann-like fold region, there are notable differences in overall architecture (Figure S2).vulnificus, WP_002794802 from Campylobacter, WP_011315607 from N. winogradskyi, WP_011127308 from P. marenigrum, WP_011149294 from V. vulnificus, WP_002790577 from Campylobacter, and WP_011015749 from F. nucleatum.The alignment was performed using Clustal Omega [15] and ESPript [16].α-helices, β-strands and 310-helices are denoted by Greek characters α, β and η, respectively.Identical residues are shown in white with a red background and conservative changes in red with a white background.Zn-binding cysteines are indicated by black triangles.Coli, WbpG (WP_003119728) from P. aeruginosa PAO1, WP_011714045 from M. marinus, WP_011149327 from V. vulnificus, WP_011171025 from M. maripaludis, WP_011149293 from V. vulnificus, WP_002794802 from Campylobacter, WP_011315607 from N. winogradskyi, WP_011127308 from P. marenigrum, WP_011149294 from V. vulnificus, WP_002790577 from Campylobacter, and WP_011015749 from F. nucleatum.The alignment was performed using Clustal Omega [15] and ESPript [16].α-helices, β-strands and 3 10 -helices are denoted by Greek characters α, β and η, respectively.Identical residues are shown in white with a red background and conservative changes in red with a white background.Zn-binding cysteines are indicated by black triangles.

LpNASAT Crystallizes as a Dimer
Two LpNASAT molecules in the asymmetric unit seem to form a dimer (Figure 3A,B).PISA (Proteins, Interfaces, Structures and Assemblies) program [17] analysis of protein the interfaces suggests that the dimer is likely to be stable in solution with a favorable interaction energy (∆iG −3.9 kcal/mol), consistent with the results of size exclusion chromatography (Figure S3).The dimer interface covers about 1632 Å 2 , corresponding to 8.7% of the total accessible surface area of one monomer (about 18,941 Å 2 ).

LpNASAT Crystallizes as a Dimer
Two LpNASAT molecules in the asymmetric unit seem to form a dimer (Figure 3A,B).PISA (Proteins, Interfaces, Structures and Assemblies) program [17] analysis of protein the interfaces suggests that the dimer is likely to be stable in solution with a favorable interaction energy (ΔiG −3.9 kcal/mol), consistent with the results of size exclusion chromatography (Figure S3).The dimer interface covers about 1632 Å 2 , corresponding to 8.7% of the total accessible surface area of one monomer (about 18,941 Å 2 ).According to the analysis of LIGPLOT [19], the dimer interfaces reveal an extensive network of interactions that involves hydrogen bonds and hydrophobic contacts (Figure 3B,C).Residues Gly113, Lys135, Ile164, His165, Asp169, Asn170, His171, Leu172, Thr174, Asn176, Gly177, Arg178, Arg181, Tyr205, Gln271, Asp272, Glu311 and Lys399 involve in direct hydrogen bonds.Besides, residues Ser114, Tyr115, Asn141, Tyr152, Trp157, Ala166, Gly167, Phe168, Phe173, Pro175, Met209, Leu212, His213, Asp270, Asp274, Glu311 and His312 contribute to a large number of hydrophobic interactions.There is also a small number of water-molecule-mediated hydrogen bonding interactions at the dimerization interface.These interactions together stabilize the structure of the dimer.However, the vast majority of these residues are not conserved among the NASAT family members (Figures 2B and S4), suggesting that proteins in this family may not necessarily require dimerization to function.

Possible Functional Regions
The binding site of LpNASAT was predicted using the FTSite binding site predicting tool [20].The yellow, blue and green mesh in the big pocket represent the predicted binding sites (Figure 4A) and the residues within 5 Å of the binding sites are shown in Figure 4B-D.According to the conservation pattern analysis (Figures 2B and 4A), the side of the putative substrate-binding pocket near the tetracysteine motif contains conserved negatively charged amino acids that are likely essential for catalyzing the amidotransfer reaction.At the other side of the pocket near α6, there are a number of positively charged residues which are highly variable in homologs from other bacterial species, suggesting possible major differences in substrate structure.

Possible Functional Regions
The binding site of LpNASAT was predicted using the FTSite binding site pred tool [20].The yellow, blue and green mesh in the big pocket represent the pre binding sites (Figure 4A) and the residues within 5 Å of the binding sites are sho Figure 4B-D.According to the conservation pattern analysis (Figures 2B and 4A), th of the putative substrate-binding pocket near the tetracysteine motif contains cons negatively charged amino acids that are likely essential for catalyzing the amidotr reaction.At the other side of the pocket near α6, there are a number of positively ch residues which are highly variable in homologs from other bacterial species, sugg possible major differences in substrate structure.According to the electron density map, a fragment consisting of approxim fifteen residues (residues 55-69) is severely disordered.Based on its orientatio fragment is probably located above the putative substrate-binding pocket.The anal AlphaFold [22] predicted that the structure of LpNASAT supports this hypothesis ( 5).Therefore, we hypothesize that this region maybe be involved in the regulat substrate binding and product release.Interestingly, this fragment is missing in According to the electron density map, a fragment consisting of approximately fifteen residues (residues 55-69) is severely disordered.Based on its orientation, the fragment is probably located above the putative substrate-binding pocket.The analysis of Al-phaFold [22] predicted that the structure of LpNASAT supports this hypothesis (Figure 5).Therefore, we hypothesize that this region maybe be involved in the regulation of substrate binding and product release.Interestingly, this fragment is missing in other NASAT family members.This suggests that there may be a difference in the catalytic mechanism between LpNASAT and other members.
NASAT family members.This suggests that there may be a difference in the catalytic mechanism between LpNASAT and other members.At the bottom of the putative substrate-binding pocket, LpNASAT harbors a highly conserved PP-loop motif (122-SGGKDS-127) on a region between β1 and α3.The PP-loop motif is the signature of the ATP pyrophosphatase domains [23], which catalyzes the cleavage of the bond between α and β phosphates of ATP to form AMP and PPi.Due to the amino groups of the loop and dipole of helix α3, the PP-loop forms a large anionic space, which may contribute to the binding of nucleotide phosphate groups.In the electron density map of the crystal, we observed a distinct density feature close to the PPloop motif (Figure S5).When the LpNASAT and FtNadE (PDB code 3fiu, AMP-PPi-bound structure) [13] structures are superimposed, the PPi moiety in FtNadE is equivalent to the position of the observed density in LpNASAT.The residues, which are involved in specific hydrogen bonds and van der Waals contacts to the AMP and PPi in FtNadE, are conserved or have similar physicochemical properties to the corresponding residues in LpNASAT and its homologs (Figure 6).Based on these observations, we speculated that the amidotransfer reaction catalyzed by NASAT family members is likely to utilize the energy provided by the hydrolysis of ATP to AMP.At the bottom of the putative substrate-binding pocket, LpNASAT harbors a highly conserved PP-loop motif (122-SGGKDS-127) on a region between β1 and α3.The PP-loop motif is the signature of the ATP pyrophosphatase domains [23], which catalyzes the cleavage of the bond between α and β phosphates of ATP to form AMP and PPi.Due to the amino groups of the loop and dipole of helix α3, the PP-loop forms a large anionic space, which may contribute to the binding of nucleotide phosphate groups.In the electron density map of the crystal, we observed a distinct density feature close to the PP-loop motif (Figure S5).When the LpNASAT and FtNadE (PDB code 3fiu, AMP-PPi-bound structure) [13] structures are superimposed, the PPi moiety in FtNadE is equivalent to the position of the observed density in LpNASAT.The residues, which are involved in specific hydrogen bonds and van der Waals contacts to the AMP and PPi in FtNadE, are conserved or have similar physicochemical properties to the corresponding residues in LpNASAT and its homologs (Figure 6).Based on these observations, we speculated that the amidotransfer reaction catalyzed by NASAT family members is likely to utilize the energy provided by the hydrolysis of ATP to AMP.
NASAT family members.This suggests that there may be a difference in the catalytic mechanism between LpNASAT and other members.At the bottom of the putative substrate-binding pocket, LpNASAT harbors a highly conserved PP-loop motif (122-SGGKDS-127) on a region between β1 and α3.The PP-loop motif is the signature of the ATP pyrophosphatase domains [23], which catalyzes the cleavage of the bond between α and β phosphates of ATP to form AMP and PPi.Due to the amino groups of the loop and dipole of helix α3, the PP-loop forms a large anionic space, which may contribute to the binding of nucleotide phosphate groups.In the electron density map of the crystal, we observed a distinct density feature close to the PPloop motif (Figure S5).When the LpNASAT and FtNadE (PDB code 3fiu, AMP-PPi-bound structure) [13] structures are superimposed, the PPi moiety in FtNadE is equivalent to the position of the observed density in LpNASAT.The residues, which are involved in specific hydrogen bonds and van der Waals contacts to the AMP and PPi in FtNadE, are conserved or have similar physicochemical properties to the corresponding residues in LpNASAT and its homologs (Figure 6).Based on these observations, we speculated that the amidotransfer reaction catalyzed by NASAT family members is likely to utilize the energy provided by the hydrolysis of ATP to AMP.

Expression and Purification of Recombinant LpNASAT
The recombinant construct of LpNASAT cloned with an N-terminal 6xHis-tag into the bacterial expression vector p28 derived from pET28a by deleting the sequence AGCAGCG-GCCTGGTGCCGCGCGGCAGC between the NcoI and NdeI restriction sites.This recombinant plasmid was transformed into Escherichia coli strain Rosetta.Cells were grown at 37 • C in Luria-Bertani medium containing 100 µg/mL Kanamycin.Expression of the recombinant LpNASAT was induced at an OD600 of 0.8-1.0 by adding 0.2 mM isopropyl -β-d-1-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG) followed by incubation at 16 • C for 20 h.The cells were harvested by centrifugation at 4 • C, 6000× g for 10 min.Harvested cells were resuspended in 20 mM Tris-HCl buffer pH 8.0 containing 400 mM NaCl and lysed by using French Press.The lysate was clarified by centrifugation at 15,000× g for 30 min at 4 • C. The soluble fraction was loaded onto a Chelating Sepharose Fast Flow (GE Healthcare, Chicago, IL, USA) pre-equilibrated with 20 mM Tris pH 8.0, 400 mM NaCl.The resin was washed with 20 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.0, 50 mM imidazole, 400 mM NaCl, and the target protein was eluted with 20 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.0, 250 mM imidazole, 400 mM NaCl.The eluate was further purified using HiLoad 16/60 Superdex 200 (GE Healthcare).The eluted recombinant LpNASAT was concentrated and stored in 20 mM Tris-HCl buffer (pH 8.0) containing 400 mM NaCl.The protein concentration was determined using the Bradford method (Bio-Rad Protein Assay, Hercules, CA, USA), using bovine serum albumin as standard.

Crystallization, Data Collection and Structure Determination
Crystals of LpNASAT were produced by the hanging-drop vapor-diffusion method.An amount of 2 µL of protein solution (10 mg/mL) was mixed with 2 µL of precipitant solution (20% (w/v) PEG 3350, 0.2 M ammonium acetate) and incubated at 14 • C. The crystals were harvested using cryoloops and immersed briefly in a cryoprotectant solution consisting of 80% (v/v) reservoir solution and 20% (v/v) glycerol.The crystals were subsequently flash-frozen and stored in liquid nitrogen for further data collection.The best data were collected in beamline BL17U1 of the SSRF (Shanghai Synchrotron Radiation Facility) and processed by AutoPX [24].Using a RoseTTAFold [25] predicted model as a search coordinate, the LpNASAT structure was determined by molecular replacement with the Phaser program [26].The model was completed by iterative manual building in Coot [27] and refined with REFMAC5 [28] and PHENIX [29].The quality of the final refined model was evaluated using MolProbity [30].The statistics of data collection and refinement are summarized in Table 1.
The DALI [31] was used for structure similarity search.Amino acid sequences were aligned by Clustal Omega [15], and the figure of structure-based sequence alignment was generated using ESPript [16].All other structural figures were prepared with PyMOL [18].

Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectroscopy (ICP-MS)
The metal contents in the LpNASAT sample were measured using Thermo Scientific iCAP Q ICP-MS.The purified protein and buffer solution were heated at 65 • C in 2 M HNO3 for 20 min, kept at room temperature overnight, and centrifuged at 14,000× g for 20 min.The metal concentrations of the common transition metals (Cu, Ge, Mg, Mn, Ni, Fe, Zn, Co and Ru) in the supernatant were analyzed by ICP-MS.All samples were measured in three replicates.

Size-Exclusion Chromatography
The molecular mass and oligomeric state of LpNASAT were characterized on an AKTA FPLC (GE Healthcare) using a Superdex™ 200 Increase column 10/300 GL (Cytiva, Lot 10323365, Marlborough, MA, USA).The column was equilibrated with 20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 400 mM NaCl and run at 0.7 mL/min at 16 • C. A calibration curve for molecular size estimation was generated by loading thyroglobulin (670 kDa), gamma globulin (158 kDa),

Figure 2 .
Figure 2. Crystal structure of LpNASAT.(A) Stereo view of cartoon representation of LpNASAT structure.The N and C termini and secondary structure elements are labeled.The zinc ion is drawn as orange sphere.Electron density map contoured at 1.5 σ for Zn-binding tetracysteine motif.(B) Structure-based Sequence alignment of LpNASAT and its homologs.The sequence of LpNASAT from L. pneumophila (PDB code 8WEX; present study) was aligned with the sequences of WbuX from E. Coli, WbpG (WP_003119728) from P. aeruginosa PAO1, WP_011714045 from M. marinus, WP_011149327 from V. vulnificus, WP_011171025 from M. maripaludis, WP_011149293 from V.vulnificus, WP_002794802 from Campylobacter, WP_011315607 from N. winogradskyi, WP_011127308 from P. marenigrum, WP_011149294 from V. vulnificus, WP_002790577 from Campylobacter, and WP_011015749 from F. nucleatum.The alignment was performed using Clustal Omega[15] and ESPript[16].α-helices, β-strands and 310-helices are denoted by Greek characters α, β and η, respectively.Identical residues are shown in white with a red background and conservative changes in red with a white background.Zn-binding cysteines are indicated by black triangles.

Figure 2 .
Figure 2. Crystal structure of LpNASAT.(A) Stereo view of cartoon representation of LpNASAT structure.The N and C termini and secondary structure elements are labeled.The zinc ion is drawn as orange sphere.Electron density map contoured at 1.5 σ for Zn-binding tetracysteine motif.(B) Structure-based Sequence alignment of LpNASAT and its homologs.The sequence of LpNASAT from L. pneumophila (PDB code 8WEX; present study) was aligned with the sequences of WbuX from E.Coli, WbpG (WP_003119728) from P. aeruginosa PAO1, WP_011714045 from M. marinus, WP_011149327 from V. vulnificus, WP_011171025 from M. maripaludis, WP_011149293 from V. vulnificus, WP_002794802 from Campylobacter, WP_011315607 from N. winogradskyi, WP_011127308 from P. marenigrum, WP_011149294 from V. vulnificus, WP_002790577 from Campylobacter, and WP_011015749 from F. nucleatum.The alignment was performed using Clustal Omega[15] and ESPript[16].α-helices, β-strands and 3 10 -helices are denoted by Greek characters α, β and η, respectively.Identical residues are shown in white with a red background and conservative changes in red with a white background.Zn-binding cysteines are indicated by black triangles.

Figure 3 .
Figure 3. LpNASAT crystallizes as a dimer.(A) Two LpNASAT molecules in the asymmetric unit form a dimer.The left panel shows the ribbon representation of the dimer organization of LpNASAT with each monomer colored separately.The right panel shows electrostatic potential surface plots of LpNASAT dimer.The structure is represented on the surface at the same orientation as in the left panel.Surface electrostatic potential map was generated by PyMol [18], with positive and negative regions in blue and red, respectively.(B) Closed-up view of the interactions of two neighboring monomers.The view differs by a 90° rotation along the vertical axis.The relevant residues in one monomer are labeled and shown in stick form.(C) Ligplot diagram illustrating the molecular interactions in a LpNASAT dimer.Hydrogen bonding and hydrophobic interactions were illustrated using Ligplot [19].

Figure 3 .
Figure 3. LpNASAT crystallizes as a dimer.(A) Two LpNASAT molecules in the asymmetric unit form a dimer.The left panel shows the ribbon representation of the dimer organization of LpNASAT with each monomer colored separately.The right panel shows electrostatic potential surface plots of LpNASAT dimer.The structure is represented on the surface at the same orientation as in the left panel.Surface electrostatic potential map was generated by PyMol [18], with positive and negative regions in blue and red, respectively.(B) Closed-up view of the interactions of two neighboring monomers.The view differs by a 90 • rotation along the vertical axis.The relevant residues in one monomer are labeled and shown in stick form.(C) Ligplot diagram illustrating the molecular interactions in a LpNASAT dimer.Hydrogen bonding and hydrophobic interactions were illustrated using Ligplot [19].

Figure 4 .
Figure 4. Closed-up view of the putative substrate-binding pocket.(A) Location of the p binding sites of LpNASAT obtained from the FTSite server.The yellow, blue and green represent different binding spaces.The conservation pattern was obtained using the Consurf [21].The correspondence between conservation and color is labeled from the most v (turquoise) through intermediately conserved positions (white) to the most conserved (burg (B-D) Close-up view of the binding sites.The residues within 5 Å of the binding sites are and shown in stick form.

Figure 4 .
Figure 4. Closed-up view of the putative substrate-binding pocket.(A) Location of the possible binding sites of LpNASAT obtained from the FTSite server.The yellow, blue and green mesh represent different binding spaces.The conservation pattern was obtained using the Consurf server [21].The correspondence between conservation and color is labeled from the most variable (turquoise) through intermediately conserved positions (white) to the most conserved (burgundy).(B-D) Close-up view of the binding sites.The residues within 5 Å of the binding sites are labeled and shown in stick form.

Figure 6 .
Figure 6.Superposition of the ligand-binding site of FtNadE and LpNASAT.(A) The PP-loop of FtNadE in complex with the products of ATP hydrolysis (PDB code 3fiu, orange) and LpNASAT (PDB code 8WEX, green).(B) Close-up view of the nucleotide-binding site.The amino acid residues,

Figure 6 .
Figure 6.Superposition of the ligand-binding site of FtNadE and LpNASAT.(A) The PP-loop of FtNadE in complex with the products of ATP hydrolysis (PDB code 3fiu, orange) and LpNASAT (PDB code 8WEX, green).(B) Close-up view of the nucleotide-binding site.The amino acid residues,

Figure 6 .
Figure 6.Superposition of the ligand-binding site of FtNadE and LpNASAT.(A) The PP-loop of FtNadE in complex with the products of ATP hydrolysis (PDB code 3fiu, orange) and LpNASAT (PDB code 8WEX, green).(B) Close-up view of the nucleotide-binding site.The amino acid residues, which are involved in FtNadE-AMP-PPi binding, are shown in orange.Residues of LpNASAT at positions equivalent to those of FtNadE are shown in green.

Table 1 .
Data collection and refinement statistics.