Lipid Mediators and Cytokines/Chemokines Display Differential Profiles in Severe versus Mild/Moderate COVID-19 Patients

Host immune responses play a key role in COVID-19 pathogenesis. The underlying phenomena are orchestrated by signaling molecules such as cytokines/chemokines and lipid mediators. These immune molecules, including anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies, interact with immune cells and regulate host responses, contributing to inflammation that drives the disease. We investigated 48 plasma cytokines/chemokines, 21 lipid mediators, and anti-S protein (RBD) antibodies in COVID-19 patients (n = 56) and non-COVID-19 respiratory disease controls (n = 49), to identify immune-biomarker profiles. Cytokines/chemokines (IL-6, CXCL-10 (IP-10), HGF, MIG, MCP-1, and G-CSF) and lipid mediators (TxB2, 11-HETE, 9-HODE, 13-HODE, 5-HETE, 12-HETE, 15-HETE, 14S-HDHA, 17S-HDHA, and 5-oxo ETE) were significantly elevated in COVID-19 patients compared to controls. In patients exhibiting severe disease, pro-inflammatory cytokines/chemokines (IL-6, CXCL-10, and HGF) and anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies were significantly elevated. In contrast, lipid mediators involved in the reduction/resolution of inflammation, in particular, 5-HETE, 11-HETE, and 5-oxoETE, were significantly elevated in mild/moderate disease. Taken together, these immune-biomarker profiles provide insight into immune responses related to COVID-19 pathogenesis. Importantly, our findings suggest that elevation in plasma concentrations of IL-6, CXCL-10, HGF, and anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies can predict severe disease, whereas elevation in lipid mediators peaks early (compared to cytokines) and includes induction of mechanisms leading to reduction of inflammation, associated complications, and maintenance of homeostasis.


Introduction
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) caused hundreds of millions of confirmed cases of COVID-19, leading to approximately seven million deaths worldwide [1].Infection with SARS-CoV-2 leads to varied clinical outcomes ranging from asymptomatic infection to mild/moderate and severe disease including acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), vascular and neurological complications, and death [2,3].
As in the case of infection by pathogens in general, the outcome of virus infection is influenced by cytokines and other immunomodulating agents involved in autocrine, nificantly higher in COVID-19 patients compared to disease controls.Additional analyses showed an inverse relationship in severe and mild/moderate COVID-19 between cytokines/chemokines, anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies, and lipidomic changes.These findings may have important implications for the identification and treatment of hyperinflammation in these patients and the development of new therapeutic targets.

Cytokine/Chemokine Profiles Associated with COVID-19 Severity
Three cytokines/chemokines, IL-6, CXCL-10, and HGF, were found to be highly elevated in plasma samples of severe COVID-19 patients compared to mild/moderate patients (Figure 2; see right panels).The mean value for IL-6 was more than nine-fold higher in severe compared to mild/moderate patients (38 pg/mL and 4 pg/mL, respectively) (p-

Cytokine/Chemokine Profiles Associated with COVID-19 Severity
Three cytokines/chemokines, IL-6, CXCL-10, and HGF, were found to be highly elevated in plasma samples of severe COVID-19 patients compared to mild/moderate patients (Figure 2; see right panels).The mean value for IL-6 was more than nine-fold higher in severe compared to mild/moderate patients (38 pg/mL and 4 pg/mL, respectively) (p-value < 0.01).The other two cytokines/chemokines were both more than two-fold higher in severe compared to mild/moderate disease, as follows: CXCL-10: 7528 pg/mL and 3267 pg/mL, respectively (p-value < 0.05); HGF: 2000 pg/mL and 895 pg/mL, respectively (p-value 0.01).The results suggest that plasma elevation of these three cytokines/chemokines may lead to severe disease by enhancing inflammatory responses.

Lipid Mediator Profiles Related to COVID-19 Severity
In general, all lipid mediators profiled in this study showed higher plasma concentrations in mild/moderate versus severe COVID-19 patients (p-value range: <0.001 and <0.05) (Figure 3; see right panels).TXB2, though not significant between mild/moderate and severe COVID-19 patients, was found in higher plasma concentrations in the former group.However, compared to non-COVID-19 respiratory disease controls, TXB2 was significantly elevated in COVID-19 patients (p-value < 0.05) (Figure 3).Our results demonstrate that pro-inflammatory lipid mediators of the cyclooxygenase pathway (TxB2 and 11-HETE) and the lipoxygenase pathway (9-HODE, 13-HODE, 5-HETE, 12-HETE, 15-HETE, 14-SDHA, 17-SDHA, and 5-oxo ETE,) were significantly elevated in COVID-19 patients (Figure 3; left panels of each lipid).Our observations were in agreement with previous reports [20].However, when we analyzed our data based on the severity of the disease, we observed that all of the lipid mediators noted above were significantly elevated in the mild/moderate patient samples when compared to control (disease controls) samples or patients with severe disease (Figure 3; right panels of each lipid).Moreover, none of the resolving lipids were detected in our lipid mediator analysis.

Multiplex Antibody Profiles in COVID-19 Patients and Disease Controls
The multiplex antibody assay was employed to analyze humoral immune responses (the multiplex panel included seven human coronaviruses) in the plasma of COVID-19 patients and non-COVID-19 respiratory disease controls (Figure 4).Antibodies detected by the multiplex panel that included SARS-CoV-2 S-RBD-and N, SARS-CoV S and N, MERS S-RBD, and S proteins of four common coronaviruses (229E, NL63, OC43, and HKU1), and they are shown in a heatmap (Figure 4).
Plasma samples from the majority of the COVID-19 patients were positive for antibodies against S-RBD and N of SARS-CoV-2 with some cross-reactivity to S and N proteins of SARS-CoV.This is likely due to the fact RBD in the S proteins of SARS-CoV-2 and SARS-CoV share 74% amino acid identity [24] and the N proteins of the two viruses contains share 90% amino acid identity [25].The majority of the non-COVID-19 respiratory disease controls did not exhibit a significant background reactivity to SARS-CoV-2 S-RBD, SARS-CoV S, SARS-CoV N, and MER S-RBD.Antibodies against the four common coronaviruses were present in the majority of the COVID-19 patients and disease controls.

Antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 S-RBD Related to COVID-19 Severity
Antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 S-RBD were significantly elevated in COVID-19 patients (mean MFI = 2483; n = 56) compared to non-COVID-19 respiratory disease controls (mean MFI = 432; n = 49) (p-value < 0.0001) (Figure 5A).These COVID-19 patients were stratified by disease severity (severe, n = 29; mild/moderate, n = 27) to assess antibody responses (Figure 5B).The levels of antibodies in plasma samples in severe COVID-19 patients were significantly higher (mean MFI = 3138) than in mild/moderate COVID-19 patients (mean MFI = 1877) (p-value < 0.05).Antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 S-RBD were not detected in 4 individuals in the severe group and 14 individuals in the mild/moderate group, while 12 individuals in the disease control group had anti-SARS-CoV-2 S-RBD antibodies probably because these individuals were at some point infected with SARS-CoV-2 with unnoticeable symptoms (see Section 3).High levels of humoral responses in severe COVID-19 indicate that such responses may be involved in driving inflammation.The lower level of humoral responses in mild/moderate COVID-19 patients might be associated with a milder inflammatory response.These results highlight the potential of humoral immune responses in driving COVID-19.As previously reported, anti-S-RBD antibody-virion complexes trigger inflammatory responses leading to severe COVID-19 [26].

Discussion
In this report, we demonstrate that mild/moderate and severe COVID-19 patients display differential profiles of cytokine/chemokine and eicosanoid storms in COVID-19 patients' plasma.Profiles of these immune system modulators showed an inverse correlation with respect to disease severity, i.e., cytokines/chemokines were significantly elevated in severe COVID-19.In contrast, lipid mediators were significantly elevated in mild/moderate COVID-19, but their levels were almost down to control levels in severe patient samples.
SARS-CoV-2-infection-driven immune responses are a complex phenomenon involving innate immune responses, adaptive immunity, and immunomodulatory molecules secreted by multiple cell types of the immune system.A delicate balance attained by the immune responses appears to be necessary for the successful control of viral replication

Discussion
In this report, we demonstrate that mild/moderate and severe COVID-19 patients display differential profiles of cytokine/chemokine and eicosanoid storms in COVID-19 patients' plasma.Profiles of these immune system modulators showed an inverse correlation with respect to disease severity, i.e., cytokines/chemokines were significantly elevated in severe COVID-19.In contrast, lipid mediators were significantly elevated in mild/moderate COVID-19, but their levels were almost down to control levels in severe patient samples.
SARS-CoV-2-infection-driven immune responses are a complex phenomenon involving innate immune responses, adaptive immunity, and immunomodulatory molecules secreted by multiple cell types of the immune system.A delicate balance attained by the immune responses appears to be necessary for the successful control of viral replication and host survival by the early and sufficient release of cytokines.Therefore, it is important to study not only the inflammatory and anti-inflammatory molecules driving the disease process but also the role of antiviral humoral immune responses [27,28].
Tuberculosis (TB) and COVID-19 are both lung diseases driven by inflammatory host responses.We have shown in active pulmonary TB that patients with weak humoral responses to Mycobaterium tuberculosis contain significantly higher levels of cytokines/chemokines, and patients with strong humoral responses contain significantly lower levels of cytokines/chemokines, suggesting TB patients who mount a strong Th1 response (cellular) do not have a concomitantly strong Th2-driven B-cell (humoral antibody) response [29,30].Thus, differential cellular and humoral responses underly active TB, a chronic lung disease.We hypothesized a similar correlation would exist in COVID-19, another lung disease, but acute.Notably, data for COVID-19 patients in this study show that both cellular and humoral immune responses drive severe disease in unison.
Our results strongly suggest that in COVID-19, anti-S-RBD antibodies bound to the spike protein of the virus trigger stronger inflammatory responses, leading to severe disease.This conclusion is supported by a previous report that antibody-virion complexes stimulate the accumulation of pro-inflammatory macrophages and monocytes in the lungs as mediated by chemotaxis toward the cytokines [26] In this study, in severe (when compared to mild/moderate) disease, several lipid mediators (TxB2, 11-HETE, 9-HODE, 13-HODE, 5-HETE, 12-HETE, 15-HETE, 14S-HDHA, 17S-HDHA, and 5-oxo ETE) were significantly reduced, whereas inflammatory cytokine/chemokines (IL-6, HGF, and CXCL-10) and humoral immune responses (anti-S-RBD antibodies) were elevated.Such a significant reduction in the levels of the above lipid mediators in severe versus mild/moderate disease might suggest that the lipid mediator release is significantly higher in moderate disease compared to severe disease.However, this observation could also imply that the lipid storm in response to viral infection is not physiologically sustained throughout the development of severe disease.We were particularly interested in seeing elevations in resolving lipids (resolvins, lipoxins, and moresins) during the course of the disease, but we have not seen that in this set of samples.
Taken together, the results in our study suggest that inflammatory processes leading to severe disease are driven by cytokine/chemokines and humoral immune responses together.
Although we set out to determine the changes in a number of lipid mediators (pro-and anti-inflammatory), we also had an untested minor hypothesis which states that changes in anti-inflammatory or pro-resolving lipid mediators together with the cytokine/chemokine levels might be better biomarkers of the severity of the disease.In this regard, it is noteworthy that, we did not see a clear indication of any of the pro-resolving lipid mediators in our analyses.Instead, we observed primarily pro-inflammatory lipid mediators that peaked in moderate patient samples.These findings are novel and have not been reported previously.
In future studies, we plan to incorporate these findings into individual lipid/cytokine ratios and examine their utility in predicting the development of severe disease.
We previously reported a multiple reaction monitoring LC-MS/MS method to measure a panel of pro-inflammatory, anti-inflammatory, and pro-resolving lipid mediators [16].This method quantitatively evaluates 39 of the bioactive signaling metabolites of LA, AA, DHA, and EPA in the COX and LOX pathways, together with pathway markers and stable end products, as described in the present study [16].Of the lipid mediators that were quantified by this method, those with elevated concentrations in COVID-19 patient plasma have well-documented roles in immune response as well as diseases affecting the lung and heart (Figure 3) [2,17,20,21,23].These lipid mediators include pro-inflammatory and anti-inflammatory/pro-resolving molecules.HETEs and HODEs can lead to vascular remodeling, cell proliferation, inflammation, vasoconstriction, angiogenesis, and fibrosis associated with pulmonary hypertension [17].Leukotrienes, including LTB 4 , contribute to cell proliferation, resistance to apoptosis, and inflammation in the context of pulmonary arterial hypertension, and additionally, it contributes to neutrophil recruitment and vascular leakage [14,17].TXB 2 , the inactive product of the biologically unstable TXA 2 , was increased in COVID-19 patients compared to disease controls (Figure 3).TXA 2 chemical effects include increasing platelet aggregation and vasoconstriction while decreasing T cell activation [14].14S-HDHA and 17S-HDHA possess pro-resolving, pain-reducing, and tissue regenerative properties [19].17-HDHA in particular can limit neutrophil infiltration and regulate macrophages [19].Our findings are also similar to other studies that have shown increased levels of eicosanoids in the lung and plasma of COVID-19 patients [20,21].It is also interesting to note that blockage of eicosanoids utilizing tools such as apoA-I mimetic peptides modulates inflammatory bowel disease, pulmonary hypertension, and lung cancer in mice [16,18,31,32].With regards to COVID-19 pathophysiology, blockage of eicosanoid signaling protects mice from severe disease, and apoA-I mimetics attenuate replication of the virus, apoptosis, inflammation, and oxidative stress in vitro [33,34].In combination with these reports, targeting eicosanoids and their signaling pathways may be key to potential treatments and therapeutics for COVID-19.
In the present study, all COVID-19 patients exhibited significantly higher levels of IL-6, CXCL-10, HGF, MIG, MCP-1, and G-CSF than the non-COVID-19 respiratory disease controls.Severe COVID-19 patients had elevated levels of cytokines, IL-6, CXCL-10, and HGF compared to mild/moderate.IL-6 has been reported to be the leading cause of inflammatory response in severe COVID-19 and emerged as an important regulator of Th1/Th2 differentiation, promoting the IL-4-dependent induction of Th2 differentiation and inhibiting Th1 differentiation [42,43].The role of IL-6 in inflammation in insulin target tissues, the pathogenesis of systemic insulin resistance, and increasing vascular permeability contributing to tissue damage have been reported [44][45][46].The role of HGF in inducing monocyte-macrophage activation, B-cell homing, and modulation of dendritic cell functions has been reported [47][48][49].We and others have reported that CXCL-10, the most prominently elevated cytokine in COVID-19 patients in this study, is a useful inflammatory marker related to COVID-19 [13,50,51].A study from Mexico reported elevated levels of MIG, MCP-1, and CXCL-10 in severe COVID-19 patients, consistent with our findings [52].Previously, we described elevated levels of cytokines/chemokines such as IL-18, IFNγ, CXCL-10, CXCL-9, G-CSF, IL-6, CXCL-1, VEGF, and PDGF-BB in plasma samples of tuberculosis (TB) patients with active pulmonary disease [29,30].Even though the cytokine storm is observed in both Mycobacterium tuberculosis (M.tb) and SARS-CoV-2 infection, the outcomes associated with the cytokine storm are different in both diseases [53].The cytokine storm in COVID-19 leads to acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), whereas in TB it leads to chronic and slow lung destruction [53].
Interestingly, we observed higher levels of lipid mediators and lower levels of cytokines/chemokines in mild/moderate compared to severe COVID-19, and vice versa.This seems counterintuitive as it has been reported that the eicosanoid storm leads to the cytokine storm in COVID-19 infection [23].However, some studies reported that lipid mediator profiles are dysregulated in critically ill COVID-19 patients, including decreased levels of pro-inflammatory eicosanoids [21].It is also noteworthy that eicosanoids are short-lived autocrine and paracrine molecules [54].Given that it takes days to go from infected to a severe state of illness, it may be possible that once the eicosanoids have initiated the inflammasome and stimulated cytokine release, both of which would lead to severe outcomes, the eicosanoid levels decrease.Unfortunately, no patients in this study were monitored over time.Such a longitudinal study would be important to determine how lipid levels change as the illness progresses from mild to severe stages.
Anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies were significantly elevated in severe COVID-19 patients compared to mild/moderate disease; this finding is in agreement with previous studies [55 -57].The underlying mechanism which establishes the relationship between anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody levels and COVID-19 disease severity is not yet elucidated.
Higher viral load in severe COVID-19 than in mild/moderate disease may lead to increased antibody levels.In our study, 52% of individuals in the mild/moderate COVID-19 group lacked antibodies, whereas 14% in the severe group lacked antibodies.Our data are consistent with previous studies showing that IgG antibodies are less likely to develop in persons with mild/moderate disease [58][59][60].PCR tests can detect SARS-CoV-2 during the period of viral shedding but the duration of viral shedding is not well understood [61].Importantly, RT-PCR may yield up to 29 percent false-negative results globally; 10 percent in the USA [62].Among the non-COVID-19 respiratory disease controls, 24% of patients were antibody positive.The presence of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in some of the disease controls indicates that these patients might have previously been infected with the virus but may have remained asymptomatic.These samples were collected in 2021 when the pandemic was at its peak.These disease controls may not have been infected with the virus when the samples were collected but might have been previously infected.These samples were negative by SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR, which suggests that these patients may not have had a viral infection at the time of sample collection.
To summarize, our findings indicate that SARS-CoV-2 infection can lead to robust activation pathways that regulate the resolution of the disease by generating pro-inflammatory cytokines and lipid mediators.Further investigation of these pathways is needed to support the development of novel anti-inflammatory treatments targeted to these pathways.A thorough understanding of the interplay of cytokines and lipid mediators is crucial for developing strategies for the management of SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Ethics Statement
Plasma from COVID-19 patients and disease controls were obtained under the protocols approved through the relevant Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) at the University of California, Davis Medical Center, and National Institute of Health (NIH), Pakistan (IRB 758309-1).Written informed consent was received from all participants before inclusion in the study and all the samples were de-identified before access.

COVID-19 Patient Plasma Samples
All COVID-19 patients were confirmed by RT-PCR testing for SARS-CoV-2.The date of illness onset, clinical classification, RT-PCR testing results during the hospitalization period, and personal demographic information were obtained from the clinical records.EDTA-treated blood samples were drawn, processed, and stored under a standardized protocol: blood was kept on ice immediately after collection, and plasma was separated by centrifugation at 1000× g, 10 min, (room temperature) within 2 h of collection and immediately frozen in aliquots at −80 • C until use.This blood plasma collection method is suitable for cytokines/chemokines but may not be ideal for lipid mediators [13,63,64].
Plasma samples (n = 56) were collected between May 2020 and November 2021 from the National Institutes of Health (NIH), Pakistan.COVID-19 patients were stratified by disease severity.Patients with mild or moderate symptoms who did not require admittance to intensive care were classified as mild to moderate COVID-19 (n =27), whereas patients who developed severe symptoms and required admittance to intensive care were classified as severe COVID-19 (n = 29).Basic demographic and clinical information of the SARS-CoV-2 patient from Pakistan included in the study can be found in Table S1.The median age of the severe patients was 60 years (IQR: 50-68 years); the median age of the mild/moderate group was 49 years (IQR: 34-63 years).None of the study subjects received COVID-19 vaccine at the time of sample collection.

Respiratory Disease Control Patient Samples (Other Than COVID-19)
Patients with other respiratory illnesses who were negative for SARS-CoV-2 PCR served as disease controls (n = 49) (median age: 43 years; IQR: 30-53 years) in this study.Ba-sic demographic and clinical information of the disease controls is shown in Supplementary Table S1.

Healthy Control Group
These samples served as negative controls in this study; they were collected before the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic and cryopreserved at −80 • C.This group comprised pre-pandemic EDTA blood samples of healthy individuals (n = 54) of mixed sex (median age: 21 years; IQR: 20, 23) taken from Pakistan; these individuals had no history of pulmonary symptoms, and no known medical conditions (infection, cancer, or metabolic disease) [64].This group consisted of random, young individuals to represent the general healthy population for comparison to COVID-19 patients.

Multiplex Antibody Assay
Multiplex assays were performed based on the xMAP platform (Luminex Corp, Austin, TX, USA) and median fluorescence intensity (MFI) data were collected as previously described [13].Briefly, plasma samples were diluted 1:200 in 2% Prionex and incubated with HCoV antigen-coated beads for 1 h at room temperature in a 96-well plate.After incubation, the beads were washed twice by adding 100 µL of wash buffer (PBS-tween) per well and drained under vacuum using a vacuum manifold (Millipore Corporation, Bedford, MA, USA).To detect human IgG, phycoerythrin-conjugated anti-human IgG was used (Jackson Immuno Research, PA, USA) at a 1:500 dilution in PBS-tween and incubated at room temperature for 15 min.Following incubation, beads were washed twice with wash buffer, resuspended in 100 µL of wash buffer per well, and analyzed in the Magpix instrument.
We have previously published the relative quantitation of antibody responses to SARS-CoV-2 S-RBD based on a standard curve (MFI values plotted against serial dilutions of a standard plasma sample) and shown that the MFI values strongly correlated with antibody titers in longitudinal samples collected from COVID-19 patients [13].We have also shown that pre-existing immunity to common coronaviruses does not confer crossreactivity against SARS-CoV-2 infection [13].Variations in the protein sequence between common HCoVs and SARS-CoV-2 RBDs may account for this lack of cross-reactivity [13,65].
To deactivate the virus, samples were treated by adding 450 uL of 100% methanol to a 50 uL sample to achieve a final concentration of 90% methanol.Samples were then incubated for 30 min at room temperature before freezing.A total of 100 µL of the sample was used from 500 uL of stock and combined with 150 µL of methanol, 1 µL of 20 mM butylated hydroxytoluene (BHT), and 50 µL of the internal standard mixture in methanol [16].The samples were vortexed and left at −80 • C for 30 min before centrifuging them at 13,000 rpm for 10 min.The supernatant was then combined with 1.8 mL of acidified water (pH 3-4).The resulting sample was loaded onto a preconditioned 3cc Oasis hydrophilic-lipophilicbalanced (HLB) solid phase extraction (SPE) cartridge on a vacuum manifold (Waters).The SPE cartridge was equilibrated with 2 mL of methanol followed by 2 mL of water before the sample load.The sample was slowly loaded on the cartridge, and the cartridge was washed with 2 mL of 5% methanol in water.The lipids were subsequently eluted with 2 mL of methanol.The eluate was then evaporated to dryness under a stream of argon.A total of 100 µL of methanol was added to the dried extract, vortexed for 30 s, and the reconstituted extract was centrifuged at 13,000 rpm for 10 min to remove any precipitate that could clog the LC/MS/MS instrument [16].The resulting supernatants were transferred to autosampler vials and processed for LC/MS/MS analysis.Quantification was performed using Analyst 1.6.3 and MultiQuant software 3.0.

Data Analysis
For the analysis of antibody data, cut-off values were calculated for each antigencoated microbead set using data from healthy individuals (Cut-off = Mean MFI + (3 standard deviations)).The cut-off values were used to determine antibody-positive samples in the data sets [13].
For measurements of antibodies, cytokines/chemokines, and lipid mediators, graphs were generated and p-values were determined by a Mann-Whitney test when comparing disease controls versus all COVID-19 patients using GraphPad Prism.To compare differences between disease control, mild/moderate COVID-19, and severe COVID-19 groups, the data were tested with a one-way Kruskal-Wallis test using GraphPad Prism, and adjusted p-values were reported.The heatmap was generated using Prism after normalizing the data by log2(n + 1) for lipids and cytokines/chemokines, and log2 for all the antibody data.

1 .
Figure 1.Heatmap depicting cytokines and inflammatory lipids in COVID-19 patients (n = 56; severe, n = 29; mild/moderate, n = 27) and disease controls (n = 49).Plasma concentrations of lipid mediators and cytokine/chemokines are shown as ng/mL and pg/mL, respectively.Values are log2(n + 1) transformed.Each row corresponds to one sample and columns correspond to cytokines or lipid mediators.The color intensity scale represents the log-transformed concentrations ranging from the highest (15; red) to the lowest (0; green).

Figure 1 .
Figure 1.Heatmap depicting cytokines and inflammatory lipids in COVID-19 patients (n = 56; severe, n = 29; mild/moderate, n = 27) and disease controls (n = 49).Plasma concentrations of lipid mediators and cytokine/chemokines are shown as ng/mL and pg/mL, respectively.Values are log2(n + 1) transformed.Each row corresponds to one sample and columns correspond to cytokines or lipid mediators.The color intensity scale represents the log-transformed concentrations ranging from the highest (15; red) to the lowest (0; green).

Figure 4 .
Figure 4. Heatmap depicting the overall antibody responses detected by multiplex microbead panel against members of the coronavirus family (SARS-CoV-2, SARS-CoV, MERS-CoV, and 4 common coronaviruses (229E, NL63, OC43, and HKU1)) in COVID-19 patients and non-COVID-19 respiratory disease controls.Each row corresponds to one sample and columns correspond to CoV antigens in the multiplex assay.The color intensity scale represents the log2 transformed MFI values ranging from the highest (14; red) to no antibody response (4; green).

Figure 4 .
Figure 4. Heatmap depicting the overall antibody responses detected by multiplex microbead panel against members of the coronavirus family (SARS-CoV-2, SARS-CoV, MERS-CoV, and 4 common coronaviruses (229E, NL63, OC43, and HKU1)) in COVID-19 patients and non-COVID-19 respiratory disease controls.Each row corresponds to one sample and columns correspond to CoV antigens in the multiplex assay.The color intensity scale represents the log2 transformed MFI values ranging from the highest (14; red) to no antibody response (4; green).
9 E