Multi-Omics Integration to Reveal the Mechanism of Sericin Inhibiting LPS-Induced Inflammation

Sericin is a natural protein with high application potential, but the research on its efficacy is very limited. In this study, the anti-inflammatory mechanism of sericin protein was investigated. Firstly, the protein composition of sericin extracts was determined by Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). This was then combined with Enzyme-linked Immunosorbent Assay (ELISA) and Quantitative Real-time PCR (qRT-PCR), and it was confirmed that the anti-inflammation ability of sericin was positively correlated with the purity of sericin 1 protein. Finally, RNA-seq was performed to quantify the inhibitory capacity of sericin sample SS2 in LPS-stimulated macrophages. The gene functional annotation showed that SS2 suppressed almost all PRRs signaling pathways activated by lipopolysaccharides (LPS), such as the Toll-like receptors (TLRs) and NOD-like receptors (NLRs) signaling pathways. The expression level of adaptor gene MyD88 and receptor gene NOD1 was significantly down-regulated after SS2 treatment. SS2 also reduced the phosphorylation levels of NF-κB P65, P38, and JNK, thereby reducing the expressions of IL-1β, IL-6, INOS, and other inflammatory cytokines. It was confirmed that sericin inhibited LPS-induced inflammation through MyD88/NF-κB pathway. This finding provides necessary theoretical support for sericin development and application.


Introduction
Sericin is a natural macromolecular protein, accounting for about 25% of silk weight [1,2]. Sericin contains abundant serine and charged amino acid residues, which may contribute to silk's stickiness and aid in silk cocoon construction [3]. With the completion of the silkworm genome project and the development of proteomic methods, the molecular mechanism of silk protein synthesis has been revealed [4][5][6]. There are three sericin genes named sericin 1-3 located on chromosome 11, but their expression shows spatiotemporal specificity [7]. Sericin 3 protein is secreted primarily in the outer cocoon coat and tends to be lost before extraction. Therefore, industrially extracted sericin solutions contain more sericin 1 and sericin 2. Besides fibroin and sericin, the sericin layer also contains some relatively small size proteins which are encapsulated in sericin, such as protease inhibitors, serum proteins, and enzymes [8]. Small molecular proteins are extracted along with sericin through the industrial process, and sericin extract is a mixture of these proteins in a broad sense.
Sericin was discharged as waste during the silk degumming process for a long time. During the past several years, various biological activities of sericin have been reported, including use in cell culture [9] and as a health food for patients with diabetes [10,11],

The Physicochemical Properties of Sericin
Five sericin samples from different sources were selected for parallel experiments, including two sericin samples, SS1 and SS2, extracted in our laboratory and three commercially available sericin samples, S1, S2, and S3 (Table S1). SS1 and SS2 were treated with high temperature and high pressure for 1 h and 1.5 h, respectively. The molecular weight of SS1 (80-300 kDa) and SS2  was detected by SDS-PAGE. The main band of the sericin decreased with the increase in heating time and reached the critical value after 1.5 h ( Figure 1A).

The Physicochemical Properties of Sericin
Five sericin samples from different sources were selected for parallel experiments, including two sericin samples, SS1 and SS2, extracted in our laboratory and three commercially available sericin samples, S1, S2, and S3 (Table S1). SS1 and SS2 were treated with high temperature and high pressure for 1 h and 1.5 h, respectively. The molecular weight of SS1 (80-300 kDa) and SS2  was detected by SDS-PAGE. The main band of the sericin decreased with the increase in heating time and reached the critical value after 1.5 h ( Figure 1A).
The molecule weight ( Figure S1), appearance, odor, and pH value of the five sericin samples were counted (Table 1, Figure 1B). All sericin samples appeared to be acidic solutions (pH values from 4.53 to 5.60). All sericin samples had almost no aerobic bacteria ( Table 1). All samples had a relative nitrogen content between 14% and 18%, which meant the protein content of the sample was close to 100% (F = 6.25) ( Figure 1C).   The molecule weight ( Figure S1), appearance, odor, and pH value of the five sericin samples were counted (Table 1, Figure 1B). All sericin samples appeared to be acidic solutions (pH values from 4.53 to 5.60). All sericin samples had almost no aerobic bacteria ( Table 1). All samples had a relative nitrogen content between 14% and 18%, which meant the protein content of the sample was close to 100% (F = 6.25) ( Figure 1C).

Protein Composition Analysis of Sericin Samples
The protein components of the five sericin samples were detected by Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) [42]. The protein composition of S1, S3, SS1, and SS2 was relatively similar (Figure 2A, Table S2). In total, 315 proteins were identified in the five sericin samples. The molecule weight of sericin 1 was the highest among the 315 proteins ( Figure 2B). Sericin 1 (NP_001037506.1, NCBI) and sericin 2 (NP_001166287.1, NCBI) were detected in all five samples. The purity of the sericin protein in SS1 (93.97%) and SS2 (94.71%) was the highest and was much higher than that in S1 (66.73%), S2 (5.37%), S3 (30.78%). Furthermore, there were also non-sericin proteins detected, such as enzymes (XP_021208623.  Table 2). These components were consistent with those shown in literature reports [2,8].    Even if the composition of each protein sample was not precisely the same, they were mainly composed of sericin, enzyme, protease inhibitor, and unannotated protein parts. Interestingly, the composition of several parts varied. S2 contained more unannotated proteins, and S3 contained more enzymes ( Table 2). It was speculated that the difference was related to the silkworm cocoon type and the sericin production process. The protein abundance of S1, S3, SS1, and SS2 was highly correlated. SS1 and SS2 showed the highest correlation (r pearson = 0.9936, p < 0.001) ( Figure 2C), which was consistent with the fact that the cocoon varieties and sources of SS1 and SS2 were precisely the same. PCA analysis showed that S2 was different from the other four samples ( Figure 2D). The reason was the more unannotated protein and fewer sericin components in S2 (Tables 2 and S2). Based on this, we wanted to know the differences in biological function among sericin samples with different compositions.

Sericin Is a Multifunctional Biomacromolecule
To explore the biological function of sericin, we first detected the cytotoxicity of SS1 and SS2, which showed the highest sericin content. The IC 50 of SS1 and SS2 was 46.29 mg/mL and 48.23 mg/mL, respectively, and both showed no cytotoxicity ( Figure 3A,B). The IC 25 (13.5 mg/mL) was determined as the highest concentration in subsequent experiments on the cellular level. The ocular irritation and corrosion of sericin were detected by a hen's egg test on the chorioallantoic membrane (HET-CAM) experiment [43]. Different concentrations of SS1 and SS2 solution (5%, 7.5%, 10%) were prepared for detection, 10% of which was almost the limited concentration of sericin before it became gel form. The results showed SS1 and SS2 did not cause hemorrhage, coagulation, or blood vessel lysis of the CAM ( Figure 3C,D). The HET-CAM endpoint score (ES) was significantly lower than the positive control ( Table 3). The above results proved sericin was a safe and non-toxic substance.

NO.
Score of 6 Replicates Total Score Results Sericin also showed a strong ability to decrease the cytokines induced by LPS in RAW 264.7 cells. The decrease in inflammatory cytokines was synchronously detected by real-time quantitative PCR and ELISA. SS1 and SS2 showed a suppressive effect on the inflammatory cytokine TNF-α in both mRNA and protein levels ( Figure 3G). S1, S3, SS1, and SS2 showed the ability to inhibit the production of interleukin-6 (IL-6) ( Figure 3H), and S1, SS1, and SS2 showed the inhibition of interleukin-1β (IL-1β) ( Figure 3I) in both mRNA and protein level. S3 was labile in suppressing the inflammatory cytokines. S2 showed almost no ability to suppress the cytokines. In summary, the anti-inflammatory effects of five sericin samples were ranked as SS2 > SS1 > S1 > S3 > S2.
It was worth noting that the anti-inflammatory capacity of S2 was the worst among the five samples. Meanwhile, the LC-MS/MS analysis reported that the component of S2 was the most unusual ( Figure 2A), including more than 93% of unannotated protein and lower than 5% of sericin 1 protein (Table 2). Correspondingly, the SS2 and SS1 samples with the highest sericin 1 protein content had the best anti-inflammatory effect. This suggested that sericin, especially sericin 1, might be the key to the anti-inflammatory effect of the samples.

Sericin Suppressed LPS-Induced Immune Responses through the Pathogen Recognition Receptors (PRRs) Signaling Pathways
Since the sericin protein content of SS2 was more than 94.7%, SS2 might be the best sample to verify the anti-inflammatory function of sericin. To define the anti-inflammatory mechanism of sericin protein, four kinds of treatments were designed for RAW 264.7 cells, including the wild-type cells (WT), the SS2-treated group (S), the LPS-infected group (L), and the SS2-added group after LPS infection (LS) for 4 h. RNA-seq was performed on the four groups with three subsequent repeats ( Figure 4A).
The RNA-seq data showed a high correlation among each replicate. Gene expression level between L and WT showed a low correlation ( Figure 4B), which indicated that LPS stimulated the RAW 264.7 cells. The S and LS groups appeared to correlate highly ( Figure 4B). The correlation between LS and S was more significant than that with L, which indicated that after adding SS2 to the L group, the stimulation activated by LPS was inhibited. The gene expression level also appeared in the same pattern. There were many more (1133) Different Expressed Genes (DEGs) between WT and L, and fewer DEGs (9) between S and LS ( Figure 4C and Figure S2 and Tables S4-S9). All the above results proved that sericin inhibited the LPS-aroused stimulation. Therefore, follow-up analysis on the specific gene function needed to begin.

Receptors (PRRs) Signaling Pathways
Since the sericin protein content of SS2 was more than 94.7%, SS2 might be the best sample to verify the anti-inflammatory function of sericin. To define the anti-inflammatory mechanism of sericin protein, four kinds of treatments were designed for RAW 264.7 cells, including the wild-type cells (WT), the SS2-treated group (S), the LPS-infected group (L), and the SS2-added group after LPS infection (LS) for 4 h. RNA-seq was performed on the four groups with three subsequent repeats ( Figure 4A).  Since there were few DEGs between L and LS, Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA) was suitable for annotating Gene Ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) enrichment [44], of which GSEA was based on the complete gene expression profile but not the DEGs. GO enrichment results reported that LPS aroused many inflammation-related biological responses. Here we visualized the top 10 biological processes. Many inflammation responses were up-regulated after LPS was added to cells, such as cytokines production, defense response, response to biotic stimulus, and response to the bacterium ( Figure 4D, Tables S10 and S11), consistent with previous reports [35,45,46]. Amazingly, most of the biological processes mentioned above were down-regulated after sericin protein was added to the LPS-infected RAW 264.7 cells; typical examples include the response to interferon, virus, and bacterium ( Figure 4E).
Since there were few DEGs between L and LS, Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA) was suitable for annotating Gene Ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) enrichment [44], of which GSEA was based on the complete gene expression profile but not the DEGs. GO enrichment results reported that LPS aroused many inflammation-related biological responses. Here we visualized the top 10 biological processes. Many inflammation responses were up-regulated after LPS was added to cells, such as cytokines production, defense response, response to biotic stimulus, and response to the bacterium ( Figure 4D, Tables S10 and S11), consistent with previous reports [35,45,46]. Amazingly, most of the biological processes mentioned above were down-regulated after sericin protein was added to the LPS-infected RAW 264.7 cells; typical examples include the response to interferon, virus, and bacterium ( Figure 4E).

Molecular Mechanism of Sericin Inhibiting LPS-Induced Inflammation
Signaling pathways were visualized to detect the changes in gene expression level immediately by ClusterProfiler and Pathview [47,48] (Figure 6A). The 20 most reliable pathways and the enriched genes are visualized. PRRs-related signaling pathways were increased in L vs. WT and decreased in LS vs. L, including TLRs signaling pathway, NLRs signaling pathway, and RLRs signaling pathway ( Figure 6A,B).

Molecular Mechanism of Sericin Inhibiting LPS-Induced Inflammation
Signaling pathways were visualized to detect the changes in gene expression level immediately by ClusterProfiler and Pathview [47,48] (Figure 6A). The 20 most reliable pathways and the enriched genes are visualized. PRRs-related signaling pathways were increased in L vs. WT and decreased in LS vs. L, including TLRs signaling pathway, NLRs signaling pathway, and RLRs signaling pathway ( Figure 6A,B).  After LPS stimulation, MyD88 and TIRAP were up-regulated and activated the subsequent inflammatory response. The expression level of NF-κB downstream genes was distinctly changed after LPS treatment ( Figures 6B and 7A,B). Subsequently, NF-κB entered the nucleus and initiated the transcription and expression of pro-inflammatory genes, including the critical tumor necrosis factor receptor-related factors TRAF3, TRAF6, mitogenactivated protein kinase kinase kinase (MAP3K) family member TAK1 and its binding protein TAB1, and interferon regulatory factor IRF7. These genes were involved in the development of inflammation after LPS stimulated and ultimately triggered the expression of cytokine genes IL-1β, IL-6, IL-18, inflammatory mediator genes iNOS, interferon genes IFNGR2, and chemokine genes CCL5 (Figures 6B and 7B). In addition to the TLRs signaling pathway, NOD1, NOD2 gene, and NLRs signaling pathways were captured. Based on previous reports, we hypothesized that NF-κB promoted the activation of the NOD1 and NOD2 genes, which activated the NLRs signaling pathway, further forming the inflammatory cascade amplification [49] (Figure 6B). in the development of inflammation after LPS stimulated and ultimately triggered the expression of cytokine genes IL-1β, IL-6, IL-18, inflammatory mediator genes iNOS, interferon genes IFNGR2, and chemokine genes CCL5 (Figures 6B and 7B). In addition to the TLRs signaling pathway, NOD1, NOD2 gene, and NLRs signaling pathways were captured. Based on previous reports, we hypothesized that NF-κB promoted the activation of the NOD1 and NOD2 genes, which activated the NLRs signaling pathway, further forming the inflammatory cascade amplification [49] (Figure 6B).  After SS2 treatment, the expression of most genes was significantly down-regulated, such as MyD88, TIRAP, TAB2, TBK1, IKKβ, NOD1, RIKP2, IL-1β, IL-6, IL-18, CCL2, and CCL5. As a result, the enriched signaling pathways showed a downward trend ( Figure 6A). The signaling pathways with the most significant differences in gene expression were enriched. This suggested that LPS activated inflammation pathways and made inflammation cytokines, and sericin inhibited inflammation products through MyD88 and TIRAP ( Figure 6B). Most of the PRRs-related genes captured by RNA-seq showed a trend of L > WT, L > LS, and LS > S. STEM clustering was used to cluster genes stimulated by LPS but inhibited by sericin [50]. There were about 750 genes showing the same expression tendency ( Figure 7A, Table S14), and the profiles of representative genes expression were established (Figures 7B and S4A). In summary, after LPS stimulated macrophages, the PRRs signaling pathways were activated, while after adding SS2, the inflammatory pathways were suppressed.
To ensure and complete the reliability of the RNA-seq, several vital proteins were verified by WB. Activating the critical adaptor MyD88 was an essential step of signal transduction after LPS stimulation [46]. We analyzed the abundance of MyD88 in RAW 264.7 cells. The results showed that the abundance of MyD88 increased after LPS stimulation but decreased significantly after adding different concentrations of SS2. The inhibitory effect of sericin was concentration-dependent ( Figure 7C and Figure S4B). To determine whether the NF-κB and MAPKs had been activated, we detected the protein abundance and phosphorylation of NF-κB P65, kinases JNK and P38 of the MAPK signaling pathway. The results showed that their phosphorylation was suppressed after SS2 addition ( Figures 7C and S4B). Finally, cytokines IL-1β and IL-6 were detected at mRNA and protein levels ( Figure 7D). The expression levels of IL-1β and IL-6 were significantly increased after LPS stimulation, but after adding SS2, their expressions decreased with the increase in SS2 concentration (* p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001). The protein abundance trend was very similar to that captured by RNA-seq.

Discussion
Silkworms have been domesticated for over 5000 years as silk-production insects. Sericin is one of the main components of natural silk, and is synthesized and generated in the silkworm's silk gland. The traditional silk industry discharges sericin as industrial waste, polluting water and resources. In recent years, sericin has made great strides in regenerative medicine, tumor diagnostics, and materials science as a natural polymer material. To advocate for the green industry and turn waste into treasure, we used an industrial scale-up plan to prepare sericins with different molecular weights. Furthermore, we found three samples on the market for parallel research. Taking advantage of the insolubility of silk fibroin, boiling silk in water is a standard method for sericin extraction. Acids, alkalis, enzymes, and high pressure can increase efficiency. The extracted sericin is in the form of a suspension and can also be made into powder.
Nevertheless, other water-soluble proteins are usually extracted during the extraction. There are hundreds of proteins in silkworm cocoons, of which fibroin and sericin are the most abundant. In the sericin layer, there are also protease inhibitors, serotonin, enzymes, and unannotated proteins. According to the LC-MS/MS analysis, the protein composition of the five sericin samples conformed to the general rules. We identified multiple proteins in all five sericin samples, including sericin 1, sericin 2, fibroin, enzymes, and unannotated proteins. By comparing several samples, we found that the protein form could affect the physicochemical properties and biological activity of sericin, especially after a period of storage. It could be seen that liquid sericin was more prone to discoloration and degradation. There might be two reasons for the brown or black color of sericin. First, phenol oxidase in silk could catalyze the production of DOPA from tyrosine, which produces melanin [8]. Second, the Maillard reaction might occur between sericins and carbohydrates in the silk [51]. The exceptionally dark color of some samples might be related to the incomplete sequestration of carbohydrates during the extraction process. In addition, liquid sericin samples were more prone to unpleasant odors. It suggested sericin was best stored and transported in dehydrated form. Some sericin samples showed better anti-inflammation effects. Since five sericin samples had no aerobic bacteria contamination (Table 1), the different ability of inflammation inhibition was not microbe-driven. Combined with proteomic analysis, we believed that sericin purity was the key to anti-inflammation. SS2 was the most purified sericin sample and exhibited the best anti-inflammatory effect. Therefore, SS2 was used to investigate the anti-inflammatory mechanism of sericin.
LPS is the cell wall component of Gram-negative bacteria. LPS can stimulate cell membrane receptor TLR4, activate the innate immune pathway, and trigger a series of inflammatory responses, seriously endangering the health of organisms [52,53]. The main treatment methods for the inflammation caused by LPS are antibiotics, hormones, and other conventional methods, which can cause some adverse effects on patients, such as drug resistance, allergy, and metabolism disorders. Therefore, it is of great significance to develop new LPS control strategies. In this study, natural sericin was added to macrophages after LPS infection for 4 h, and cells were cultured for 12 h. The changes in gene expression levels were detected on a genome-wide scale. The cytokines and interferon genes such as IL-1β, IL6, IL18, CCL2, CCL5, and IFN were significantly down-regulated, which preliminarily indicated that sericin could induce the reduction of inflammation. In the upstream, the phosphorylation level of NF-κB P65 was significantly down-regulated, and the phosphorylation levels of the kinases JNK and P38 from the MAPK family decreased accordingly. This indicated that sericin inhibited the NF-κB signaling pathway activated by LPS. Through the KEGG annotation, we found that multiple up-regulated pathways induced by LPS were significantly inhibited, which were all involved in the NF-κB signal transduction. Consistent with previous findings, the classical TLR4 signaling pathway was significantly inhibited. LPS stimulates the TLR4/MD2 complex to recruit MyD88 in large quantities, which presents signals to NF-κB, resulting in its phosphorylation into the nucleus to regulate downstream inflammation. In this study, MyD88 in macrophages was significantly up-regulated after stimulation with LPS, while it was significantly down-regulated after sericin was added. The phosphorylation level of NF-κB P65 also showed a similar trend. So far, we can preliminarily determine that sericin can inhibit cellular inflammation caused by LPS, which functions through the MyD88/NF-κB signaling pathway.
In addition to the TLRs signaling pathway, RNA-seq captured many PRR signaling pathways. Sericin suppressed the various PRR gene expression, such as NOD1, NOD2, and RIG-I. The functional annotation results showed that the PRRs-related signaling pathways were up-regulated after LPS stimulation and down-regulated after sericin addition, especially the inflammatory cytokines and mediators. On the one hand, this showed that LPS stimulated macrophages and activated the innate immune response. On the other hand, one of the characteristics of LPS is causing the inflammatory cascade. Several PRR signaling pathways correlated with each other, eliciting an inflammatory cascade. For example, the NLRs signaling pathway was captured as highly reliable. NOD1 expression showed a consistent trend with genes in the TLRs signaling pathway. It was reported that LPS could activate the NOD1 gene by activating NF-κB and inflammatory factors. NOD1 stimulates NF-κB again and cascading amplifies the inflammatory responses [54]. In this paper, the expression level of NOD1 was down-regulated after the addition of sericin. We speculated that this was due to the inhibition of MyD88/NF-κB P65, which reduced the production of inflammatory factors and mediators, thereby decreasing the expression of NOD1.
Last but not least, we had the following hypotheses regarding the specific mechanism of sericin as an LPS inhibitor. As is known, before LPS induces inflammatory responses, the organisms take a series of countermeasures. First, lipopolysaccharide-binding proteins (LBP) bind to LPS micelles, convert them into monomers, and concentrate them near cell membrane receptors. The LPS monomer is transferred through CD14 to the TLR4/MD-2 complex [52]. CD14 is a glycosyl phosphatidylinositol (GPI)-the anchored protein that transfers LPS to the TLR4/MD2 complex. In the plasma membrane, TLR4 interacts with the adaptor protein MyD88 to further trigger an intracellular inflammatory response [37]. An existing Eritoran inhibitor inhibits LPS through competitive binding with MD2 [53]. Sericin had a similar inhibitory effect. Here, sericin significantly down-regulated the expression of MyD88 and downstream inflammation genes. Therefore, we believed the target of sericin was upstream of MyD88. However, no adequate information was captured on LBP, CD14, TLR4, and MD2. Although sericin had a dose-dependent inhibitory effect on LPS, we could not confirm the specific target. We will focus on this in our future research.
Sericin inhibited LPS-induced MyD88 recruitment and NF-κB activation, regulated downstream inflammatory cytokines, and inhibited activation of PRR signaling pathways. Sericin has potential application prospects in the medicine, food, and cosmetic fields. At the same time, the research team is conducting in-depth research on the specific anti-inflammatory mechanism of sericin, including receptor recognition patterns and core function structures, and the relevant work is steadily advancing.

Materials
Silkworm cocoons used were practical varieties purchased from Chongqing Sericulture Science and Technology Research Institute. LPS were from Sigma. Human immortalized keratinocytes (HaCaT) cells, mouse embryo fibroblast (NIH 3T3) cells, leukemia cells in mouse macrophage (RAW 264.7) cells, and human embryonic kidney (HEK 293) cell lines were from China Center for Type Culture Collection. Dulbecco modified eagle medium (DMEM) and fetal bovine serum (FBS) were from Gibco (Gaithersburg, MD, USA). Milli-Q water was used in all experiments. All other chemicals were of analytical grade or better.

Sericin Extract
Silk cocoons were washed and added to distilled water at a ratio of 1:20. Sericin was extracted at 120 • C for 1 h, 1.5 h, and 2.25 h, and separated by a sifter. The extracted sericins were spray-dried into powder (YAMATO, ALPS-City Yamanashi, Japan) and stored at −20 • C.

Cell Counting Kit-8 (CCK-8) Assay
NIH 3T3 and HACAT cells in the logarithmic phase were inoculated in 24 well plates at a density of 1 × 10 6 cells/mL and cultured at 37 • C in a 5% CO 2 incubator until the cells were 80% confluence. Subsequently, the cells were treated with samples for 24 h. CCK-8 (Yeasen, Shanghai, China) was added to each well, and the cells were incubated for an additional 1-4 h. The optical density (OD) was measured at 450 nm using a microplate reader (Synergy™ H4. Minneapolis, MN, USA), and cell viability was calculated.

Ocular Irritant and Corrosive HET-CAM Test
SPF chicken embryos of Bai Laihang were selected, each weighing 50-60 g. Room temperature 20~25 • C, relative humidity 45~70%. Incubation temperature 37.5 • C ± 0.5 • C, relative humidity 55~70%, turntable frequency 3 times/h~6 times/h. When hatching to 9 days of age, the embryos were inspected with an egg lamp, and unfertilized, defective, broken, or thin-shelled chicken embryos were discarded. Marked the air chamber position on the surface of the eggshell and peeled off the marked part of the eggshell with dental serrated forceps, exposing the white egg film. Added 0.9% NaCl solution to moisten the egg film and poured out the saline. Carefully removed the inner membrane with forceps to ensure that the chorioallantoic membrane (CAM) was not damaged. A quantity of 0.3mL of sericin solution was dripped on the surface of CAM, and after 5 min, whether there was any adverse reaction in CAM was recorded and scored. It was rated as 0 points (none), 1 point (mild), 2 points (moderate), and 3 points (severe), according to the severity of bleeding, coagulation, and vascular melting.

Luciferase Assay
The transfected cells were seeded in 6-well plates and treated with different proteins for 4 h, and then LPS was added for 12 h. Performed the luciferase text according to the instructions (Promega. Madison, WI, USA) and tested the luminous intensity on the microplate reader (Synergy™ H4. Minneapolis, MN, USA).

ELISA Assay
RAW 264.7 cells at a density of 1 × 10 6 cells per ml were seeded into 24-well plates, incubated with sericins for 4 h, and then stimulated with 200 ng/mL LPS for 24 h. Cell supernatant was collected by centrifugation at 3000 rpm. It was assayed for quantitation of pro-inflammatory cytokines tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), interleukin-1β (IL-1β), and interleukin-6 (IL-6), using a mouse ELISA kit according to the manufacturer's instruc-tions (R&D System. Minneapolis, MN, USA). Dexamethasone (DXMS) was used as a positive control.

Quantitative Real-Time PCR
The total mRNA of RAW264.7 cells was isolated by Trizol (Invitrogen. San Diego, CA USA) and reversely transcribed to complementary DNA (cDNA) at 42 • C (E047-01B), and NovoStart ® SYBR qPCR SuperMix plus (E096) was used as the fluorescent dye (Novoprotein. Shanghai, China). The relative mRNA level was normalized with GAPDH. DNA sequence synthesis was completed in Tsingke Co, Ltd., Beijing, China. DXMS was used as a positive control. Primers were detected by AGE, staining with gelRed dye. See Table S3 for details of primers.

Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry (LC-MS/MS)
Protein was digested according to the protocol described as the filter-aided sample preparation method. Briefly, the protein was placed in an ultrafiltration tube (MWCO 3000, Millipore, Burlington, MA, USA) and reduced with 10 mm dithiothreitol (DTT) for 120 min at 37 • C, and then alkylated with 50 mm iodoacetamide (IAA) for 60 min in the dark. After washing three times with 8 M urea and then four times with 50 mm NH 4 HCO 3 , proteins were incubated with trypsin (1 µg/50 µg protein) for 36 h at 37 • C in 150 µL 50 mm NH 4 HCO 3 . Tryptic peptides were concentrated and resuspended in 0.1% formic acid and separated by using the Thermo Fisher Scientific (Springs, CO, USA) EASY-nlc 1000 system and EASY-Spray column (C18, 2 µm, 100 Å, 75 µm × 15 cm) with a 2∼95% acetonitrile gradient in 0.1% formic acid over 140 min at a flow rate of 300 nL/min. The separated peptides were analyzed using a Thermo Scientific Q Exactive mass spectrometer operating in data-dependent mode. Up to 10 of the most abundant isotope patterns with charge ≥2 from an initial survey scan were automatically selected for fragmentation by higher energy collisional dissociation with normalized collision energies of 27%. The maximum ion injection times for the survey and MS/MS scans were 20 and 60 ms, respectively. The ion target value for both scan modes was set to 1E6. A dynamic exclusion of ions sequenced previously within the 20 s was applied.

RNA-Seq
Total RNA was isolated using the SV Total RNA Isolate System (Z3100; Promega, Madison, WI, USA) according to the manufacturer's instructions. All RNAs were screened using an Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer (Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) to ensure the sample quality was sufficiently good for RNA-seq library preparation. The rRNA was cleaned using RNAClean XP beads (Illumina. San Diego, CA, USA) and subjected to reverse transcription to obtain cDNAs. After adenylating the three' ends and ligating the adapters, the library was enriched by a polymerase chain reaction. The average read size of the library was 260 bp, and more than 1 × 10 6 aligned reads were obtained. RNA-seq data were analyzed using standard methods. The quality of the raw and processed reads was evaluated using FastQC (Version 0.11.1). PolyA tails were filtered by fqtrim (Version 0.93). Low-quality reads were removed with Trimmomatic. Clean reads were aligned to the mouse reference genome (mm10, NCBI) with bowtie2 (Version 2.4.5). Differentially expressed genes were detected by RSEM (Version 1.2.29).

Protein Identification
The resulting raw MS data were analyzed with maxQuant software (version 1.6.0.1). Peptide searches were performed with the Andromeda search algorithms [42]. The search parameters for protein identification specified the initial precursor and fragment mass tolerances of 6 and 20 ppm, respectively. Carbamidomethylation of cysteine was set as a fixed modification, and N-terminal protein acetylation and methionine oxidation were set as variable modifications. The minimal peptide length was set to six amino acids, and up to two miscleavages were allowed. The false discovery rate was set to 0.01 for both peptides and proteins. All common contaminants and reverse hits were removed.

SDS-PAGE
Sericins with the same solid content were prepared and loading buffers were added, followed by boiling for 5 min. Electrophoresis was performed in 12% gel (Thermo Fisher Scientific. Springs, CO, USA). The gel was dyed with Coomassie Blue Dye and canned with a Patch clamp system (Canon. Tokyo, Japan).

Western Blot
After SDS-PAGE, the gel was electro-transferred onto PVDF membranes. The membranes were blocked with 5% BSA and incubated with the primary antibody overnight, followed by washing with TBST and incubation with the secondary antibody for 2 h. The signals were detected by ECL Reagent (Thermo Scientific. Springs, CO, USA).

Aerobic Bacterial Count Assay
The 1 g (1 mL) sericins were diluted 100 times and added to lecithin and tween 80 agar medium (Solarbio Life Science. Beijing, China). Cultured in a 36 • C ± 1 • C incubator for 48 h ± 2 h and counted.

Solid Content/Protein Content Assay
The sericin materials were dried to a constant weight, and the solid content ratio was calculated by the difference in mass before and after drying. The sericin materials were carbonized (Haineng SH40F. Jinan, China) when the initial temperature of the controlledtemperature furnace reached 200 • C. A gradient temperature was used to heat 100 • C every half hour until it reached 450 • C. Protein content was determined with a Kjeldahl device (Haineng K9860. Jinan, China).

Statistical Analysis
Data were presented as mean ± SD. Two-tailed Student's t-tests were performed for statistical analysis. p < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.