Using Multiplexed CRISPR/Cas9 for Suppression of Cotton Leaf Curl Virus

In recent decades, Pakistan has suffered a decline in cotton production due to several factors, including insect pests, cotton leaf curl disease (CLCuD), and multiple abiotic stresses. CLCuD is a highly damaging plant disease that seriously limits cotton production in Pakistan. Recently, genome editing through CRISPR/Cas9 has revolutionized plant biology, especially to develop immunity in plants against viral diseases. Here we demonstrate multiplex CRISPR/Cas-mediated genome editing against CLCuD using transient transformation in N. benthamiana plants and cotton seedlings. The genomic sequences of cotton leaf curl viruses (CLCuVs) were obtained from NCBI and the guide RNA (gRNA) were designed to target three regions in the viral genome using CRISPR MultiTargeter. The gRNAs were cloned in pHSE401/pKSE401 containing Cas9 and confirmed through colony PCR, restriction analysis, and sequencing. Confirmed constructs were moved into Agrobacterium and subsequently used for transformation. Agroinfilteration in N. benthamiana revealed delayed symptoms (3–5 days) with improved resistance against CLCuD. In addition, viral titer was also low (20–40%) in infected plants co-infiltrated with Cas9-gRNA, compared to control plants (infected with virus only). Similar results were obtained in cotton seedlings. The results of transient expression in N. benthamiana and cotton seedlings demonstrate the potential of multiplex CRISPR/Cas to develop resistance against CLCuD. Five transgenic plants developed from three experiments showed resistance (60−70%) to CLCuV, out of which two were selected best during evaluation and screening. The technology will help breeding CLCuD-resistant cotton varieties for sustainable cotton production.


Introduction
Cotton (G. hirsutum L.) has a tremendous range of applications, from livestock feed to edible oil, textile industry and medical bandages. It is a natural fiber crop and the foundation of one of the world's biggest textile industries, with an economic impact of

Confirmation of sgRNAs through Restriction Analysis
CRISPR constructs confirmed through digestion with HindIII showed around 2 bp length having multiple gRNAs ( Figure 2).

qPCR-Based Determination of Virus Accumulation
qPCR analysis, to determine viral accumulation in control and Cas9-sgRNA infiltrated leaves (Figure 4), revealed that the plants co-infiltrated with Cas9-gRNA and virus infectious clones showed mild symptoms of CLCuV ( Figures 5 and 6). A significant decrease in viral symptoms in the range of 60-80% was observed in leaves infiltrated with Cas9-gRNA ( Figure 4). In addition, compared to control plants, virus titer was found to be low in systemic leaves infiltrated with Cas9-gRNA, as shown in Figure 6. These results highlight the potential of multiplex genome editing with CRISPR/Cas to control CLCuV in cotton.

qPCR-Based Determination of Virus Accumulation
qPCR analysis, to determine viral accumulation in control and Cas9-sgRNA infiltrated leaves (Figure 4), revealed that the plants co-infiltrated with Cas9-gRNA and virus infectious clones showed mild symptoms of CLCuV ( Figures 5 and 6). A significant decrease in viral symptoms in the range of 60-80% was observed in leaves infiltrated with Cas9-gRNA ( Figure 4). In addition, compared to control plants, virus titer was found to be low in systemic leaves infiltrated with Cas9-gRNA, as shown in Figure 6. These results highlight the potential of multiplex genome editing with CRISPR/Cas to control CLCuV in cotton.

qPCR-Based Determination of Virus Accumulation
qPCR analysis, to determine viral accumulation in control and Cas9-sgRNA infiltrated leaves (Figure 4), revealed that the plants co-infiltrated with Cas9-gRNA and virus infectious clones showed mild symptoms of CLCuV ( Figures 5 and 6). A significant decrease in viral symptoms in the range of 60-80% was observed in leaves infiltrated with Cas9-gRNA ( Figure 4). In addition, compared to control plants, virus titer was found to be low in systemic leaves infiltrated with Cas9-gRNA, as shown in Figure 6. These results highlight the potential of multiplex genome editing with CRISPR/Cas to control CLCuV in cotton.     For CLCuV infection in cotton, the plants were infiltrated with CLCuV, as shown in Figure 7. The seedlings were also kept in net cages for infection by viruliferous whitefly ( Figure S4). Details of the experiment and results of an evaluation of multiplex CRISPR for suppression of CLCuV in N. benthamiana and cotton are given in Tables S1 and S2. Interference in the viral genome was also confirmed through DNA sequence. All three targets in the viral genome showed disruption at the target site ( Figure S5).   For CLCuV infection in cotton, the plants were infiltrated with CLCuV, as shown in Figure 7. The seedlings were also kept in net cages for infection by viruliferous whitefly ( Figure S4). Details of the experiment and results of an evaluation of multiplex CRISPR for suppression of CLCuV in N. benthamiana and cotton are given in Tables S1 and S2. Interference in the viral genome was also confirmed through DNA sequence. All three targets in the viral genome showed disruption at the target site ( Figure S5). For CLCuV infection in cotton, the plants were infiltrated with CLCuV, as shown in Figure 7. The seedlings were also kept in net cages for infection by viruliferous whitefly ( Figure S4). Details of the experiment and results of an evaluation of multiplex CRISPR for suppression of CLCuV in N. benthamiana and cotton are given in Tables S1 and S2. Interference in the viral genome was also confirmed through DNA sequence. All three targets in the viral genome showed disruption at the target site ( Figure S5).

Transformed Callus of Cotton
Once a multiplex construct was evaluated in N. benthamiana, the same construct was used to transform cotton. In addition, DsRed was transformed in cotton to optimize the transformation protocol. About one-week-old cotton hypocotyls were transformed with Agrobacterium containing multiplex CRISPR/Cas constructs. Transgenic calli were selected on hygromycin/kanamycin; after 4-6 weeks of transformation, cotton callus had started to appear, as shown in Figure 8. The callus was sub-cultured after every four weeks onto freshly prepared plates to avoid contamination. DsRed was transformed as control along with CRISPR/Cas-mediated transformation in cotton.

PCR-Based Confirmation of Transgene
Transformation in cotton callus, embryos, and plantlets was confirmed with PCR using specific primers. The callus was cultured throughout on selection plates using appropriate antibiotics. A specific amplicon of 280 bp was amplified using PCR to indicate a successful transformation of cotton hypocotyls ( Figure 9). In addition, DsRed callus was pink to red and visible to the naked eye and under a microscope ( Figure 10).

Transformed Callus of Cotton
Once a multiplex construct was evaluated in N. benthamiana, the same construct was used to transform cotton. In addition, DsRed was transformed in cotton to optimize the transformation protocol. About one-week-old cotton hypocotyls were transformed with Agrobacterium containing multiplex CRISPR/Cas constructs. Transgenic calli were selected on hygromycin/kanamycin; after 4-6 weeks of transformation, cotton callus had started to appear, as shown in Figure 8. The callus was sub-cultured after every four weeks onto freshly prepared plates to avoid contamination. DsRed was transformed as control along with CRISPR/Cas-mediated transformation in cotton.

Transformed Callus of Cotton
Once a multiplex construct was evaluated in N. benthamiana, the same construct wa used to transform cotton. In addition, DsRed was transformed in cotton to optimize the transformation protocol. About one-week-old cotton hypocotyls were transformed with Agrobacterium containing multiplex CRISPR/Cas constructs. Transgenic calli were selected on hygromycin/kanamycin; after 4-6 weeks of transformation, cotton callus had started to appear, as shown in Figure 8. The callus was sub-cultured after every four week onto freshly prepared plates to avoid contamination. DsRed was transformed as contro along with CRISPR/Cas-mediated transformation in cotton.

PCR-Based Confirmation of Transgene
Transformation in cotton callus, embryos, and plantlets was confirmed with PCR using specific primers. The callus was cultured throughout on selection plates using appropriate antibiotics. A specific amplicon of 280 bp was amplified using PCR to indicate a successful transformation of cotton hypocotyls (Figure 9). In addition, DsRed callus wa pink to red and visible to the naked eye and under a microscope ( Figure 10).

PCR-Based Confirmation of Transgene
Transformation in cotton callus, embryos, and plantlets was confirmed with PCR using specific primers. The callus was cultured throughout on selection plates using appropriate antibiotics. A specific amplicon of 280 bp was amplified using PCR to indicate a successful transformation of cotton hypocotyls (Figure 9). In addition, DsRed callus was pink to red and visible to the naked eye and under a microscope ( Figure 10).

Regeneration of Cotton Callus
Regenerating calli with DsRed expression is shown in Figure 10. Cotton calli with a CRISPR construct were subjected to embryogenesis and transgenic plant development. Based on the number of hypocotyl cuttings used in one Petri plate, 40-50% efficiency in callus induction following 10-20% efficiency for embryogenesis was observed. Expression of gRNAs and Cas9 in the plantlets was confirmed and found successful for virus interference in the screening experiments in N. benthamiana and cotton ( Figure 11). Embryos were observed after five to six sub-cultures; five transgenic seedlings were obtained and were subjected to hardening ( Figure 12). The details of number of explants

Regeneration of Cotton Callus
Regenerating calli with DsRed expression is shown in Figure 10. Cotton calli with a CRISPR construct were subjected to embryogenesis and transgenic plant development. Based on the number of hypocotyl cuttings used in one Petri plate, 40-50% efficiency in callus induction following 10-20% efficiency for embryogenesis was observed. Expression of gRNAs and Cas9 in the plantlets was confirmed and found successful for virus interference in the screening experiments in N. benthamiana and cotton ( Figure 11). Embryos were observed after five to six sub-cultures; five transgenic seedlings were obtained and were subjected to hardening (Figure 12). The details of number of explants

Regeneration of Cotton Callus
Regenerating calli with DsRed expression is shown in Figure 10. Cotton calli with a CRISPR construct were subjected to embryogenesis and transgenic plant development. Based on the number of hypocotyl cuttings used in one Petri plate, 40-50% efficiency in callus induction following 10-20% efficiency for embryogenesis was observed. Expression of gRNAs and Cas9 in the plantlets was confirmed and found successful for virus interference in the screening experiments in N. benthamiana and cotton ( Figure 11).

Regeneration of Cotton Callus
Regenerating calli with DsRed expression is shown in Figure 10. Cotton calli with a CRISPR construct were subjected to embryogenesis and transgenic plant development. Based on the number of hypocotyl cuttings used in one Petri plate, 40-50% efficiency in callus induction following 10-20% efficiency for embryogenesis was observed. Expression of gRNAs and Cas9 in the plantlets was confirmed and found successful for virus interference in the screening experiments in N. benthamiana and cotton ( Figure 11). Embryos were observed after five to six sub-cultures; five transgenic seedlings were obtained and were subjected to hardening (Figure 12). The details of number of explants (a) (b) Figure 11. Relative expression of Cas9 and gRNAs in (a) N. benthamiana and (b) cotton. RNA was extracted at 2 dpi and was subjected to prepare cDNA for analyzing relative expression through RT-PCR. Adequate gene expression was observed compared to control plants.
Embryos were observed after five to six sub-cultures; five transgenic seedlings were obtained and were subjected to hardening ( Figure 12). The details of number of explants developed into plants are given in Table S3. The transgene was confirmed through PCR as given in Section 2.6, showing similar bands on agarose gel. Expression of gRNAs and Cas9 was observed through RT-PCR ( Figure 13). developed into plants are given in Table S3. The transgene was confirmed through PCR as given in Section 2.6, showing similar bands on agarose gel. Expression of gRNAs and Cas9 was observed through RT-PCR ( Figure 13).   developed into plants are given in Table S3. The transgene was confirmed through PC as given in Section 2.6, showing similar bands on agarose gel. Expression of gRNAs an Cas9 was observed through RT-PCR ( Figure 13).

Evaluation and Screening
All T1 plants were screened for resistance under controlled conditions using viruliferous whitefly ( Figure S4). Non-transgenic plants showed complete leaf curling. Compared to control plants, all T1 plants showed 60-70% resistance to CLCuV. Based on resistance evaluation, two transgenic plants were finally selected for developing transgenic lines. The comparison of transformed and control plants for CLCuD resistance has been given in Figure 14. Non-transformed plants showed various symptoms ranging from vein thickening and leaf curling to enations. In comparison, CRISPR plants showed resistance to CLCuD infection when challenged with viruliferous whitefly as seen in Figure 14.

Evaluation and Screening
All T1 plants were screened for resistance under controlled conditions using viruliferous whitefly ( Figure S4). Non-transgenic plants showed complete leaf curling. Compared to control plants, all T1 plants showed 60-70% resistance to CLCuV. Based on resistance evaluation, two transgenic plants were finally selected for developing transgenic lines. The comparison of transformed and control plants for CLCuD resistance has been given in Figure 14. Non-transformed plants showed various symptoms ranging from vein thickening and leaf curling to enations. In comparison, CRISPR plants showed resistance to CLCuD infection when challenged with viruliferous whitefly as seen in Figure 14.

Discussion
Begomoviruses damage crops each year and undermine food security worldwide [23,24]. Plants exhibiting resistance are the most feasible way to cope with viral diseases transmitted by insects. The conventional techniques of plant breeding have been comprehensively utilized against begomoviruses for developing resistance. However, these techniques are not viable because of the ability of begomoviruses to evolve quickly through recombination and mutation. These challenges require new methodologies able to produce cost-effective resistance as needed. There are two major strategies to use the CRISPR/Cas system against plant viruses. Firstly, targeting viral genomes for degradation and interference to inhibit viral replication and infection. Secondly, targeting host

Discussion
Begomoviruses damage crops each year and undermine food security worldwide [23,24]. Plants exhibiting resistance are the most feasible way to cope with viral diseases transmitted by insects. The conventional techniques of plant breeding have been comprehensively utilized against begomoviruses for developing resistance. However, these techniques are not viable because of the ability of begomoviruses to evolve quickly through recombination and mutation. These challenges require new methodologies able to produce cost-effective resistance as needed. There are two major strategies to use the CRISPR/Cas system against plant viruses. Firstly, targeting viral genomes for degradation and interference to inhibit viral replication and infection. Secondly, targeting host susceptibility factors to enhance plant immunity against viral infection [25]. DNA viruses have been targeted with CRISPR/Cas9 by several researchers [17][18][19][20]22,[26][27][28].
CRISPR/Cas9 is a more specific, efficient, and faster GE tool [29]. Applied fruitfully in a variety of organisms, including humans, the technology of CRISPR/Cas9 is constantly under development in genome editing, both in eukaryotes and prokaryotes. Improvements in this technique have made it possible to accomplish high-throughput screening for gene identification at the genomic level [30]. Additional studies show Cas9 modification to prompt transcriptional activation and gene knockdown [31,32]. Applications of CRISPR have also been extended to identify and characterize transcriptional enhancers in cells [31]. Upgrades of this technology have encouraged its use in plants, particularly for modification of major crops such as maize, soybean, wheat, and rice [32,33]. Successful use of the technology in cotton will expand its use in plants, especially polyploidy species. In our research, CRISPR/Cas9 technology was utilized for viral suppression in N. benthamiana and cotton. For this purpose, multiple targets in the viral genome were selected, including the nona-nucleotide region, due to its critical importance ( Figure S1). Targeting nonanucleotide, which is important for viral replication, for viral interference and inhibition of replication may produce a broad-spectrum resistance against geminiviruses [20,22]. In infiltration studies, infectious clones were used for virus infection and Cas9 and gRNA expression, which was quantified through RT-PCR from plant leaves. A similar method has been demonstrated by Ji et al. [17], indicating that suitable expression of Cas9, as well as sgRNA, is very important for editing using a CRISPR/Cas-gRNA system. Genome editing with CRISPR/Cas9 is based on RNA-guided DNA-binding of Cas protein to target any sequence in the genome, which may be achieved with higher editing efficiency than with ZFNs and TALENs [29,34,35]. Previous studies showed that partial resistance to begomoviruses may be achieved in N. benthamiana by utilizing a TALE protein that targets the conserved motifs in the virus genome [36]. The technology of CRISPR/Cas has been strongly advocated for use against viral diseases [27]. In plant biology, multiplexed editing of a genome has previously revealed wide applications and is known to significantly assist precision breeding and genome engineering in crops. It presents an outstanding opportunity for plant breeding and is being applied to a rising number of plant species owing to its rapidness, precision, and low cost. In particular, it has been effective for the inhibition of DNA viruses in plants [17,20]. However, plant viruses are sometimes immune to small insertions and deletions produced by CRISPR/Cas and consequently can escape after repair of the DSB [17,26].
Practical demonstrations show that the technology of CRISPR/Cas9 could be harnessed for targeting the CLCuV intervention to produce CLCuD resistance. The sgRNA complementary to non-coding and coding CLCuV sequences cloned into Cas9 transgenic cotton plants significantly inhibit the spread of CLCuD, consequently improving disease tolerance. This approach has been demonstrated for suppression of plant DNA viruses [17,18]. Moreover, multiplex genome editing using Cas9 [20] or other CRISPR/Cas variants have been developed for genetic improvement in monocots and dicots [16]. Multiplex genome editing is predicted to be an efficient and effective approach for the development of virusresistant crops. Simultaneous targeting of multiple sites in viral DNA through CRISPR/Cas can significantly improve virus resistance in plants. This strategy may open novel avenues for engineering the resistance against DNA viruses in other plants. The approach may be exploited further for genome editing of viruses belonging to Geminivirdae, hence raising the prospect for achieving sustainable agriculture by controlling diseases caused by DNA viruses.
In the future, improvements on these fronts will bring genome biology into a new era-an era where scientists can edit genomes extensively through a multiplex genome editing strategy. Off-target events are the most important concern for the application of gene editing, particularly with CRISPR/Cas9 [30]. The field of CRISPR technology is also rapidly developing. For example, a base editing tool, which is based on dCas9 combined with a cytidine deaminase, has been reported [37]. In time, we are likely to see more utilization of genome editing platforms to create varieties with broad resistance, which will ultimately assist efforts to satisfy worldwide food demands. Sustainable crops will profit from the coming advancements in genome editing. Researchers who have recently developed resistant lines by genome modification may broaden their work by knockout of negative regulators of beneficial traits to produce the best performing crop. Furthermore, the advancement of multi-trait-enhanced cultivars through numerous knockouts by CRISPR/Cas9 can transform the foundation of plant science. Indeed, we believe that CRISPR, a multiplexed editing tool, may lead in time to the next green revolution.

Sequence Analysis, Selection of Target Site, and gRNA Designing
Sequences of DNA-A of CLCuV were retrieved from the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ accessed on 13 April 2018) and analyzed for target site selection using ClustalW2 (https://www.ebi.ac.uk/Tools/ msa/clustalw2/ accessed on 18 April 2018) and T-Coffee (http://tcoffee.crg.cat/apps/ tcoffee/all.html, accessed on 29 September 2021) to find potential sites in consensus sequences for broad-spectrum resistance against a complex of viruses responsible for CLCuD ( Figure S1). The single-guide RNAs (sgRNAs) were designed with CRISPRdirect (https://crispr.dbcls.jp/ accessed on 20 April 2018), while CRISPR MultiTargeter (http://multicrispr.net/index.html accessed on 11 May 2018) was used to design the multiple-guide RNAs (multiple gRNAs). The sgRNAs and multiple gRNAs were selected based on high on-target and minimum off-target predictions. Primers were designed according to the target site and synthesized including BsaI restriction sites for cloning.

Cloning of sgRNA and Multiple gRNAs into a Plant Expression Vector (pHSE401/pKSE401) Containing Cas9
For cloning and transient expression of sgRNA along with Cas9, two vectors were used (pHSE401/pKSE401). In final transformation into the plant, pKSE401 Cas9-gRNAs expression vector was used. The details of cloning of sgRNA and multiple gRNAs are given below.

Hybridization of Primers
For hybridization of oligonucleotides, 25 µL (100 µM) of each primer (forward and reverse) were collected in a 200 µL polymerase chain reaction (PCR) tube. Oligo annealing was carried out in a thermocycler using the following program: For cloning multiple gRNAs into Cas9 expression vector (pKSE401), the protocol provided by Xing et al. [38] was followed. Golden Gate cloning was used to clone three gRNAs in the Cas9 plant expression vector.

Construction of Plant Expression Vector Containing Cas9 and sgRNA
The Cas9 plant expression vector (pHSE401) was digested with BSaI and the DNA fragment containing Cas9 was eluted using a GeneJET (Thermo Fisher Scientific) kit. Ligation of sgRNA in digested pHSE401 was carried out at 22 • C for 4 h using T4 DNA ligase (New England BioLabs), according to Khan et al. [22]. After four hours of ligation, the ligation product was transformed into chemically competent cells of E. coli DH5α and colony PCR was performed with specific primers (U6-26-F and dT4-R) to confirm sgRNA ligation: U6-26-F: 5 TGTCCCAGGATTAGAATGATTAGGC3 dT4-R: 5 AAACGTAATATTAAACGGATGGCC3 From the PCR-confirmed clones, plasmid DNA was isolated with a GeneJET Plasmid Miniprep (Thermo Fisher Scientific) kit and, before transformation into Agrobacterium (GV3101), the clones were confirmed through sequencing.

Confirmation of Clone by Colony PCR and Restriction Digestion
After transformation, cloning of sgRNA into plant expression vector pHSE401 was confirmed with colony PCR using the same primers (U6-26-F and dT4-R). sgRNAs were hybridized in a thermal cycler and cloned at BsaI restriction site in pHSE401 (https: //www.addgene.org/search/catalog/plasmids/?q=pHSE401 accessed on 20 May 2018). sgRNA cloning in pHSE401 was first confirmed through colony PCR (Figure 1) with specific primers. Colony PCR products were resolved on agarose gel electrophoresis to observe required band of 280-bp. All sgRNAs were cloned in the same vector under individual promoters.

Extraction and Restriction Digestion of Plasmid
For plasmid extraction, a GeneJET Plasmid Miniprep (Thermo Fisher Scientific) kit was used following the kit protocol. The E. coli culture was grown in 10 mL of Luria-Bertani (LB) media by inoculating a colony of E. coli into the media. Double-distilled water (ddH2O), buffer, plasmid, and enzyme were added in an Eppendorf tube and then placed for 20 min in a water bath at 37 • C. Digestion was performed and then run on a gel of 1.2% agarose. Briefly, after colony PCR, cloned sgRNAs were also confirmed through restriction analysis. For restriction analysis of pHSE401 plasmid containing sgRNAs, a vector was digested with HindIII, thus producing a fragment of~2 kb ( Figure 2). HindIII-digested plasmid products were resolved on agarose gel electrophoresis and a fragment of~2 kb was confirmed in vector, indicating the presence of gRNAs in the vector. Plasmid vectors which were confirmed through restriction analysis were sequenced before proceeding to transformation. Sequence analysis was obtained from Eurofins Genomics. After confirmation with sequencing, vector was transformed into Agrobacterium (strain EHA105). The map of the vector is given in Figure S3.

Growth Condition of Cotton Plants
In cotton growing season, cotton seeds were planted in peat moss in pots kept in dark at 28 • C. A total of 30-35 pots were maintained and watered daily. After eight to ten days, the plants were ready for transformation, as shown in Figure S2.

Virus Infectivity Assay in N. benthamiana
Infectious clones containing cotton leaf curl Kokhran virus and cotton leaf curl Multan betasatellite (CLCuKV/CLCuMuB) were kindly provided by Dr. Imran Amin, NIBGE, Faisalabad, Pakistan. By using an agroinfiltration technique, the infectivity of the infectious clones was checked in N. benthamiana plants. For infiltration of CLCuV, 14-day-old plants of N. benthamiana were used. An inoculation culture of Agrobacterium was grown at 28 • C containing antibiotics. The Agrobacterium cells were spun and resuspended in MgCl 2 (20 mM) with acetosyringone. The infiltration medium was left on the bench for three hours. Syringe infiltration was done on the fully expanded and young leaves. For symptom development, nine-day-old, infiltrated plants were taken for observation. At 14 days post-inoculation (dpi), the plant leaf samples were taken for DNA extraction and either PCR or quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) determination of virus accumulation. For PCR and qPCR, the primers and protocol provided by Khan et al. [19] were used in the present assay.

Transformation of Cotton
Cotton transformation was performed using hypocotyls. For transformation, Agrobacterium (strain EHA105) harboring pHSE401/pKSE401 with sgRNAs/multiple gRNAs was grown in 40 mL of LB media at 28 • C with a specific antibiotic. For the collection of hypocotyls, one-week-old cotton plants were used and sterilized with HgCl 2 and ddH 2 O. Hypocotyls were trimmed to~8-10 cm with a sharp sterile blade, forming blunt ends. Pellet was collected from Agrobacterium culture and reconstituted in MGL medium (5 g/L tryptone, 5 g/L NaCl, 0.1 g/L MgSO 4 , 0.25 g/L KH 2 PO 4 and 1 g/L glycine with pH = 5.8)

PCR-Based Confirmation of Transgene
The transgene was confirmed by PCR amplification of the gRNA. Specific primers according to the construct were used to confirm transgenic callus of cotton. The primers used for PCR confirmation are mentioned in Section 4.2.2.
In addition to cotton transformation with CRISPR/Cas constructs for CLCuV, we used DsRed as a visible marker for cotton transformation. Use of a visible marker helps to confirm and optimize transformation in the growing calli.

Conclusions
The multiplex CRISPR/Cas9 technology can be used to suppress begomoviruses in cotton. The DNA-A has a common region sequence around 200 bp which was found to be useful for viral interference while using sgRNA. Effectively designed sgRNA expression targeting non-coding and coding regions of the CLCuV genome simultaneously will improve CLCuV resistance in cotton plants. The technology may be exploited for editing other Geminivirdae genomes and offer an opportunity for more sustainable agricultural production systems.