Knowing When to Silence: Roles of Polycomb-Group Proteins in SAM Maintenance, Root Development, and Developmental Phase Transition

Polycomb repressive complex 1 (PRC1) and PRC2 are the major complexes composed of polycomb-group (PcG) proteins in plants. PRC2 catalyzes trimethylation of lysine 27 on histone 3 to silence target genes. Like Heterochromatin Protein 1/Terminal Flower 2 (LHP1/TFL2) recognizes and binds to H3K27me3 generated by PRC2 activities and enrolls PRC1 complex to further silence the chromatin through depositing monoubiquitylation of lysine 119 on H2A. Mutations in PcG genes display diverse developmental defects during shoot apical meristem (SAM) maintenance and differentiation, seed development and germination, floral transition, and so on so forth. PcG proteins play essential roles in regulating plant development through repressing gene expression. In this review, we are focusing on recent discovery about the regulatory roles of PcG proteins in SAM maintenance, root development, embryo development to seedling phase transition, and vegetative to reproductive phase transition.


Introduction
Higher eukaryotes have evolved mechanisms to temporally and specially control gene expression. Polycomb-group (PcG) proteins have been initially identified as transcriptional repressors of Homeobox (Hox) genes in Drosophila (Drosophila melanogaster) to control embryonic development, stem cell differentiation, and tissue homeostasis development [1,2]. PcG proteins usually form multiple complexes, such as polycomb repressive complex 1 (PRC1) and PRC2, to inactivate gene expression and maintain the silencing state of the target chromatin through covalent histone modifications [3]. PRC1 complexes are E3 ubiquitin ligases that modify the chromatin via depositing monoubiquitylation of lysine 119 mark on histone 2A (H2AK119ub). PRC2s are methyltransferases that target lysine 27 on histone 3 for trimethylation (H3K27me3) and generates H3K27me3 epigenetic mark on the target loci [4,5]. Most of the components in PRC1 and PRC2 complexes are conserved from Drosophila to mammals and plants, homologs of which have been characterized recently [6,7].
In the rice (Oryza sativa) genome, two E(z)-like proteins in the rice genome have been identified termed OsCLF and OsSET1/OsiEZ1, respectively, because of their high similarity to Arabidopsis CLF and SET1 [24][25][26]. There are only two Su(z)12-like proteins, designated as OsEMF2a and OsEMF2b, which are the Arabidopsis homologs of EMF2. In contrast to the single copy of an Esc homolog, FIE in Arabidopsis, there are two Esc homologs in rice, OsFIE1 and OsFIE2. The two genes are located close to each other on chromosome 8 separated by one gene. The amino acid sequences of OsFIE1 and OsFIE2 are 72% identical [24]. One homolog of MSI1 in rice termed OsMSI1 has also been reported [27] ( Table 1).
During the life cycle, plants undergo several important phase transitions, from gametophytic to sporophytic stage; from embryogenesis to germination, from juvenile to adult vegetative phase, and from vegetative to reproductive phase [41]. PcG proteins play pivotal roles in controlling these processes. Whole genome data have shown that about 20% of Arabidopsis genes are marked by H3K27me3 [32,42,43]. In this review, we are focusing on recent findings on roles of PcG proteins in SAM maintenance, root development, seed to germination phase transition, and floral transition.

Roles of PcG Proteins in SAM Maintenance and Differentiation
Generation of new organs during life cycle of plants is dependent on the maintenance and differentiation of stem cells [42,44,45]. Root apical meristem (RAM) is involved in generation of underground architecture. Shoot apical meristem (SAM), axillary meristems (AMs), inflorescence meristem (IM), and floral meristem (FM) generate aboveground organs [46].
These regulatory mechanisms are conserved in rice [61]. The WUS ortholog in rice termed OsWUS is expressed mainly in leaf margins but could not be always detected in SAM [62,63]. The functions of Oryza sativa WUSCHEL-Related Homeobox 4 (OsWOX4) is similar to WUS in Arabidopsis. RNAi transgenic lines of OsWOX4 reduce the size of SAM and flatten SAM [64]. Rice Floral Organ Number 1 (FON1) and FON4 (also termed FON2) are homologs of CLV1 and CLV3, which play important roles in maintaining activities of the stem cells within the FM [65-68].

PRC2 Represses the Expression of WUS Directly or Indirectly
The expression of WUS is transcriptionally regulated by PRC2 complex [69]. The chromatin of WUS is marked by H3K27me3 [70]. The Polycomb Response Elements (PREs) from WUS locus, termed CArG boxes, have been characterized and are shown to be essential for establishing and spreading of H3K27me3 through PRC2 activity [70][71][72]. AGAMOUS (AG), a MADS domain-containing protein, binds directly to the CArG boxes located in the WUS coding region, which in turn recruits PRC2 complex to catalyze trimethylation of H3K27 and repress WUS expression [70]. Mutations in the CArG boxes of WUS disrupt the binding of AG to WUS and activate the expression of WUS (Figure 1a). Mutation in AG results in the decreased H3K27me3 level at the WUS locus [70].

PRC2 Inactivates KNOX Genes
The Knotted 1-like homeobox (KNOX) genes, including Shoot Meristemless (STM), BREVIPEDICELLUS (BP), Knotted 1-Like from Arabidopsis thaliana 1 (KNAT1), KNAT2, and KNAT6 are important to maintain the meristem activity of SAM [80][81][82]. They are localized at the shoot apex and function redundantly with STM [83]. The KNOX genes are expressed in the meristems. The Asymmetric leaves 1 (AS1) and AS2 genes, encoding MYB-domain and LOB-domain containing transcription factors, respectively, are expressed in the organ primordial [83]. The KNOX genes restrict the expression of AS1 and AS2 genes to organ primordia, thus preventing ectopic organ initiation. AS1 and AS2 can, in turn, repress KNOX gene expression [84,85]. These genes are crucial for distinguishing stem cells and organ founder cells.
It has been recently reported that H3K27 trimethylation of these cell fate-determination genes depends on FIE [86]. The expression of the genes, including STM, WUS, KNATs, and WOX1, are upregulated by fie mutation, along with the loss of H3K27me3 [86,87]. Mechanisms on In addition to directly repressing WUS, AG inactivates WUS to regulate stem cell activity through activating KNUCKLES (KNU) [72][73][74]. KNU, a C2H2-type zinc finger protein, represses the expression of WUS [72,73]. The expression of KNU is repressed by PRC2 [75,76]. There are three AG binding sites, termed KNU-PREs, in the promoter region of KNU (Figure 1b). KNU activation by AG is associated with the loss of H3K27me3 [71,72]. AG binds to the KNU-PREs by competing with PRC2, leading to the loss of H3K27me3 at the coding region and activation of KNU, further suppressing the expression of WUS (Figure 1c) [72,74,[77][78][79].

PRC2 Inactivates KNOX Genes
The Knotted 1-like homeobox (KNOX) genes, including Shoot Meristemless (STM), BREVIPEDICELLUS (BP), Knotted 1-Like from Arabidopsis thaliana 1 (KNAT1), KNAT2, and KNAT6 are important to maintain the meristem activity of SAM [80][81][82]. They are localized at the shoot apex and function redundantly with STM [83]. The KNOX genes are expressed in the meristems. The Asymmetric leaves 1 (AS1) and AS2 genes, encoding MYB-domain and LOB-domain containing transcription factors, respectively, are expressed in the organ primordial [83]. The KNOX genes restrict the expression of AS1 and AS2 genes to organ primordia, thus preventing ectopic organ initiation. AS1 and AS2 can, in turn, repress KNOX gene expression [84,85]. These genes are crucial for distinguishing stem cells and organ founder cells.
It has been recently reported that H3K27 trimethylation of these cell fate-determination genes depends on FIE [86]. The expression of the genes, including STM, WUS, KNATs, and WOX1, are upregulated by fie mutation, along with the loss of H3K27me3 [86,87]. Mechanisms on PRC2-mediated H3K27me3 modification of KNOX genes have been recently reported [88,89]. AS1 physically associates with AS2, forming AS1-AS2 complex [85,90,91]. AS1-AS2 complex has DNA-binding activity and directly binds to the CWGTTD and KMKTTGAHW PREs localized in the promoters of BP and KNAT2 to recruit PRC2, thus triggering H3K27me3 modification to silence their expression [88,89]. AS1 integrates into PRC2 through physically interacting with CLF and FIE, whereas AS2 is directly associated with EMF2 and recruit PRC2 complex to BP and KNAT2 regions to modify the chromatin with H3K27me3 mark and silence SAM-specific homeobox domain genes in leaf tissue ( Figure 1d) [88].
In addition, AS1-AS2 complex also interacts with LHP1 and recruits PRC2 to cis-acting element in the promoter regions of BP and KNAT2 [92]. Mutations in AS1 or AS2 lead to reduction in H3K27me3 levels at BP and KNAT2 loci. Furthermore, mutations in AS1-AS2 binding sites also result in decrease of H3K27me3 accumulation and the derepression of BP and KNAT2 genes [88,92]. These results indicate that AtRING1s and AtBMI1s are required for H2AK119ub, but that they are not required for the trimethylation of H3K27 by PRC2 [29,37].

PRC2 Represses ABI4 to Control Root Development
Involvement of PRC2 in root development has been characterized recently. Abscisic acid Insensitive 4 (ABI4), an AP2/ERF domain-containing transcription factor, regulates root development [93]. Disruption of ABI4 gene increases the number of lateral roots, whereas overexpression of ABI4 decreases lateral root density. The effect of ABI4 on lateral root development is mediated through repression of PIN-FORMED 1 (PIN1), which encodes an auxin-efflux carrier and regulates auxin distribution [93]. Basic Pentacysteine (BPC) proteins have been identified as plant-specific transcription factors [94,95]. BPCs proteins contain a conserved DNA-binding domain at the C-terminus and can bind to the GAGA-cis elements of their target genes [96,97]. BPCs are able to recruit PRC2 through interacting with SWN to the promoter of ABI4 to repress the expression of ABI4 by catalyzing H3K27me3 and regulate root development [98].

PcG Proteins Control Root Development through NRT2.1 under Lower NO −
3 Conditions Nitrogen (N) is a limiting factor for plant development. Low levels of nitrate stimulate lateral root formation, whereas high levels suppress lateral root formation. In addition, different N forms such as nitrate (NO − 3 ), ammonium (NH + 4 ), or some amino acids are signaling molecules modulating plant development [99,100]. In Arabidopsis, Nitrate Transporter 2.1 (NRT2.1) encodes a key high-affinity root nitrate (NO − 3 ) transporter, crucial for NO − 3 uptake and thus for N nutrition during lateral root development and plant growth [101]. The nrt2.1 mutants show a dramatic reduction of growth under low and limiting NO − 3 availability. It has recently been observed that NRT2.1 is modified by H3K27me3 [33,102]. PRC2 directly targets and downregulates NRT2.1 in the nutritional conditions where this gene is one of the most highly expressed genes [103]. The mutation of CLF leads to the loss of H3K27me3 at NRT2.1 and results in the activation of NRT2.1 expression.

APOLO lncRNA Recruits PRC1 to Control Root Development
APOLO (AUXIN-REGULATED PROMOTER LOOP), a long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs), is involved in lateral root development in Arabidopsis [104]. APOLO recognizes its targets by sequence complementarity to form DNA-RNA duplexes (R-loops). The recognition of APOLO to the target DNA recruits PRC1 through LHP1, which regulates the local chromatin three-dimensional conformation changes. APOLO lncRNA modulates the expression of distal unrelated auxin-responsive genes during lateral root development [104]. The findings are consistent with the report in Drosophila. R-loops are able to be formed at many PREs in Drosophila embryos and are correlated with repressive states of the target genes. PRC1 and PRC2 can recognize R-loops and open DNA bubbles. In addition, PRC2 activity drives formation of RNA-DNA hybrids, the key component of R-loops, from RNA and dsDNA [105].

Roles of PcG Proteins in Embryo to Seedling Phase Transition
The repressive activities of PcG proteins are required for the embryo to seedling phase transition [86,87,106]. Plants produce and store food in the seed, especially in endosperm to support germination and seedling growth. During germination, genes specifying embryogenesis, seed dormancy, and accumulation of seed storage compounds must be repressed to allow embryo to grow and differentiate into plants [107].

PRC2 Is Required for Transition from Embryogenesis to Seed Maturation
In Arabidopsis, as in most of the Angiosperms species, the female gametophyte (embryo sac) contains a haploid egg cell and a diploid central cell. After fertilization, the central cell forms the triploid endosperm and the egg cell generates the diploid zygote [108]. In the absence of fertilization, the autonomous endosperm development is repressed by FIS-PRC2, while seed coat development is suppressed by EMF-PRC2 and VRN-PRC2 [109][110][111]. Mutations in FIS-PRC2 or impairment of auxin synthesis and signaling affect the development of embryo, endosperm, and seed coat causing seed abortion [111][112][113].
SEEDSTICK (STK), a MADS-box gene, is specifically expressed during ovule and seed development and functions in these tissues [114,115]. During carpel development, the expression of STK is confined to placental tissues and ovule primordial. In mature ovules, STK is expressed strongly in the funiculus and integuments, which form the seed coat later [115]. Class I BPCs and the MADS-domain factors, including Short Vegetative Phase (SVP), APELATA 1 (AP1), and AGAMOUS-Like 24 (AGL24), are the key regulators of STK. Class I BPCs, including BPC1, BPC2, and BPC3, form homodimers and heterodimers and bind to the C-boxes in the promoter of STK [95,116]. SVP acts redundantly as AP1 and AGL24 to repress STK expression during early stages of flower development, through binding to its promoter [117,118]. Class I BPCs physically interact with SVP to repress STK expression in the floral meristem [117]. Class I and class II BPCs control the expression of STK, by depositing and/or maintaining H3K27me3 marks through interacting with LHP1 [119,120].
It has been shown that a protein homologous to HEME Activator Protein 3 (HAP3) subunits of the CAAT Box binding Factors, termed Leafy Cotyledon 1 (LEC1), and three B3-domain transcription factors, including ABA Insensitive 3 (ABI3), FUSCA 3 (FUS3), and LEC2, termed LAFL proteins, are the major factors activating the seed maturation program in a complex network [121][122][123]. The fus3-3 mutant exhibits ovule and seed abortion [124]. The repression of LAFL genes during early embryogenesis has been reported [125]. LAFL expression is tightly controlled in specific tissues of seeds. FUS3 is expressed during ovule development. Before fertilization, the expression of FUS3 is restricted to the chalaza and funiculus of mature ovules. After fertilization, FUS3 is confined in the funiculus, seed coat, and chalaza [126]. BPC1 and 2 promote the transition from ovule to seed development by repressing FUS3 in ovule integuments. Class I BPCs interact with FIS2 and MEA in FIS-PRC2 and bind to the GA/CT cis-element located in FUS3 promoter to represses the expression of FUS3 in the integuments of mature ovules and the endosperm of developing seeds. These results suggest that BPCs-mediated repression of FUS3 in the endosperm is necessary to coordinate endosperm and embryo growth.
In plants, hormones are required for regulating seed development and germination. Abscisic acid (ABA) promotes seed development, maturation, and dormancy, whereas gibberellic acid (GA) facilitates germination and seedling growth [107]. PcG proteins regulate seedling development through multiple hormone signaling pathways [86,106]. During germination, FIE and EMF1 bind to genes encoding positive regulators in ABA signaling pathway, such as ABI3 and ABI4, to genes encoding negative regulators of GA signaling, e.g., RGA-Like 3 (RGL3) and to genes encoding major regulatory factors that promote embryo development and maturation, such as LEC2, to repress their expression [86,87,106]. In fie mutant, positive regulator genes of ABA signaling and negative regulator genes of GA signaling, such as ABI4, Delay of Germination 1 (DOG1), CHOTTO 1/AINTEGUMENTA-LIKE 5 (CHO1/AIL5), and SOMNUS (SOM), and SQUAMOSA Promoter Binding Protein-Like 8 (SPL8), are activated because of the loss of H3K27me3 modification [86,106].

PRC1 Represses Seed Development Genes to Allow Germination
PRC1 is involved in seed development and seedling growth. Genes required for seed development are activated by emf1 mutation. EMF1 binds to major seed regulated genes, such as FUS3, ABI3, and the downstream seed maturation genes, including LEC2, LEA, OLEO2, Lipid Transfer Protein 3 (LTP3), and seed storage protein genes, which are modified by H3K27me3 [130,131]. The VAL (VP1/ABI3-LIKE) 1/2/3 proteins suppress the expression of ABI3, FUS3, and LEC2 to initiate germination and vegetative development [121]. VAL proteins interact with AtBMI1 proteins to initiate repression of seed maturation genes. The H2AK119ub levels of the seed development genes are lower in atbmi1a/b than in WT seedlings. In val1/2 mutants, the levels of H2AK119ub are also reduced at seed maturation genes, but are not affected at WUS, indicating that VAL proteins are specifically required for generating H2AK119ub mark at seed maturation genes [36]. The regulation of seed maturation genes by AtBMI1s does not follow the classic hierarchical model proposed for animal PcG-mediated repression [132].
The PRC1 activity is required for the H3K27me3 modification of these genes to maintain the suppression status. Whether VALs is responsible for recruiting PRC1 to the targets remain unclear.

Roles of PcG Proteins in Floral Transition
The timing of floral transition is essential for the life cycle of plants. In Arabidopsis, a facultative long-day plant, the autonomous, vernalization, photoperiod, PAF1 complexes, FRIGIDA (FRI) /FRIGIDA-Like (FRL), GA, and aging pathways form a complicated network to regulate floral transition [133,134]. Till date, key flowering time-related genes in the network have been characterized and their regulatory mechanisms have been intensively investigated. Flowering Locus C (FLC), a MADS box protein, is a central suppressor of flowering through repressing the expression of two flowering time integrators, Flowering locus T (FT) and Suppressor of COSTANS 1 (SOC1) [135][136][137]. The expression of FLC is activated by FRI/FRL and PAF1 complexes, but repressed by vernalization and the autonomous-pathway proteins [138]. Two PRC2 complexes, VRN-PRC2 and EMF-PRC2, are involved in the inactivation of FLC through generating H3K27me3 modification on its chromatin [6,139,140].

EMF-PRC2 in Floral Transition
The EMF-PRC2 plays important roles in repressing reproductive development during vegetative growth [9,12,18,152]. Mutants of EMF2 gene skip vegetative growth and flower upon germination [153]. EMF-PRC2 complex is attributed to the ectopic expression of flower organ identity or flower MADS box genes, such as AG, APETALA1 (AP1), AP3, and PISTILATA (PI), to delay flowering [130,131,154]. In addition, EMF-PRC2 inhibits the expression of FLC in a vernalization independent manner, which may function in concert with Flowering Locus D (FLD) [155]. FLD encodes a plant ortholog of the human protein Lys-Specific Demethylase 1 (LSD1) that is involved in H3K4 demethylation [155,156]. Loss of FLD function causes a reduction in H3K27me3, and, conversely, loss of EMF-PRC2 activity leads to an increase in H3K4me3 [157,158]. This suggests that EMF-PRC2 and the FLD complex function coordinately to demethylate H3K4, deacetylate histones, and deposit H3K27me3 on FLC chromatin, leading to the establishment of a repressive chromatin environment to repress FLC expression. EMF-PRC2-mediated repression is an endogenous mechanism that is independent of environmental signals [159].

PRC1 in Floral Transition
AtBMI1C, a component of PRC1 in Arabidopsis, has been identified as flowering time accelerator. Overexpression of AtBMI1C promotes flowering in Arabidopsis [31]. LHP1 is a component of PRC1 through interacting with AtRING1a and acts as a reader component of PRC1, similar to Drosophila Pc. LHP1 displays the binding specificity to H3K27me3 through its chromodomain [29,160]. A genome-wide analysis of LHP1 showed that LHP1 is highly enriched with H3K27me3-modified loci [32,33]. The lhp1 mutant exhibits early flowering because of the activation of the expression of flowering time-related genes FT and floral organ identity genes, such as AG, AP3, PI, and SEPALLATA 3 (SEP3) [32, 149,161]. In addition, LHP1 is required to maintain the epigenetically repressed state of FLC upon return to warm conditions [162]. To maintain SEP3 chromatin in a silenced state, Short Vegetative Phase (SVP) interacts with LHP1/TFL2 to modulate H3K27me3 [163].
EMF1, another Arabidopsis gene required for vegetative development, encodes a plant-specific protein containing sequence motifs found in transcriptional regulators [164]. The emf1 mutants have similar phenotypes to emf2 mutants, flowering early upon germination [18,106,152,153]. Tissue-specific removal of EMF1 activity from leaf primordia allows vegetative growth, but leads to early flowering plants with curly leaves similar to clf mutants [165]. The expression of floral organ identity such as AG, AP1, AP3, and PI are upregulated by emf1, which confers its early flowering phenotype [130,131,154]. EMF1 binds to the chromatin regions of the floral organ identity genes such as AG, AP1, AP3, and PI and displays characteristics similar to PRC1 component, Psc, in Drosophila [35]. EMF1 is also required for Arabidopsis RING-finger protein-mediated H2AK119 monoubiquitination [37].
It has also been revealed that EMF1, LHP1, and a trimethyl histone H3 lysine-4 (H3K4) demethylase form a PcG complex, termed EMF1 complex (EMF1c) to mediate FT silencing in Arabidopsis. In leaf veins, EMF1c directly represses FT expression before the end of long days (LDs) and at night, and that in response to inductive LDs, CONSTANS (CO) accumulation at dusk antagonizes EMF1c binding to FT chromatin to promote FT transcriptional activation and thus the onset of flowering [159].

PcG Proteins in Flowering Time Control of Rice
Photoperiodic regulation is a major mechanism on flowering time control of rice. Short day (SD) promotes rice flowering. The genes involved in the photoperiod pathway are conserved between Arabidopsis and rice. OsGIGANTEA (OsGI), Heading date 1 (Hd1), Heading date 3a (Hd3a), and Rice Flowering locus T 1 (RFT1) are the ortholog of Arabidopsis GI, CO, and FT in rice. Hd3a and RFT1 proteins are the florigens in rice [166][167][168]. OsGI, Hd1, and Hd3a form OsGI-Hd1-Hd3a module to control rice flowering. OsGI activates the expression of Hd1 to promote synthesis of Hd3a and RFT1 to accelerate flowering [169][170][171][172].
PRC2 is involved in regulation of flowering time. OsVIN3-Like (OsVIL) proteins are PHD domain containing protein, a homolog of Arabidopsis VIN3. There are four VIN3-like proteins, PHD proteins, in rice, termed OsVIL1 to OsVIL4 [183,184]. OsVIL2 and LC2/OsVIL3 have been reported to associate with PRC2 to regulate flowering time in rice [183][184][185]. The osvil2 mutant and OsVIL2-RNAi lines display late flowering phenotype under both LD and SD conditions [184,185]. The expression of OsLFL1 is increased, but the expression of Ehd1, Hd3a, and RFT1 is reduced by osvil2 mutation [185]. OsLFL1 chromatin is modified by H3K27me3 mark. OsVIL2 physically interacts with OsEMF2b, a component of PRC2 in rice. OsVIL2 binds directly to OsLFL1 chromatin to recruit PRC2 through interacting with OsEMF2b and catalyze H3K27 trimethylation on the locus of OsLFL1. H3K27me3 enrichment is diminished in the osvil2 mutants. The osemf2b mutant flowers late by increasing OsLFL1 expression and decreasing Ehd1 expression [185]. These results suggest that OsVIL2, together with PRC2, represses OsLFL1 expression and increases the expression of Ehd1 to induce flowering [185].
LC2/OsVIL3 promote flowering of rice. The lc2 mutation delays heading date by reducing the expression of Hd1 and Hd3a under SD conditions. LC2 physically interacts with OsVIL2, but not with OsMSI1, OsCLF, OsEMF2a, OsEMF2b, OdFIE1, and OsFIE2. LC2 binds to the promoter region of a floral repressor OsLF and represses the OsLF expression via H3K27 trimethylation modification. OsLF directly regulates the Hd1 expression through binding to Hd1 promoter. OsLF, a bHLH transcription factor, interacts with OsPIL13 and OsPIL15 to repress rice flowering [186]. These results suggest that LC2 may bind to the promoter region of target genes to recruit PRC2 and modify its target genes [184].

Concluding Remarks
PRC2 and PRC1 play critical roles in maintaining the stable inactivated states of developmental genes by catalyzing H3K27me3 and H2AK119ub histone modifications, respectively. To ensure proper development, PcG proteins are required to precisely program gene expression in temporal-and spatial-dependent manners. The major components of PRC1 and PRC2 and their functions have extensively been explored in Arabidopsis and rice [6,7]. So far, the evidence suggests that both PRC1 and PRC2 are involved in the maintenance of stem cell activity and root development. After germination, multiple forms of PRC2s repress the expression of seed development genes, and PRC1 represses seed development and flower genes. EMF-PRC2, VRN-PRC2, and PRC1 control flowering time or floral transition by repressing the relative gene expression.
Though recent progresses have advanced our understanding of the PcG mechanisms on regulating major phase transitions in Arabidopsis and rice, more questions remain. It has been known that about 20% of the genes in Arabidopsis are modified by H3K27 tri-methylation [32,42,43]. Only small part of modified gene function is uncovered. Discovering the functions of modified genes is the challenges we are facing. For most of these identified targets, it is still not known precisely how and in which cells, the PcG system regulates gene expression. Because PcG proteins lack DNA-binding activity, the recruitment of PRC1 and PRC2 to their target chromatin is one of the major open questions in PcG-mediated gene silencing. Up to date, PRE cis-elements, transcription factors, DNA-binding proteins, and lncRNAs are proposed to contribute to the recruitment [6,187]. It is expected that various mechanisms exist, and further identifications of PcG-interacting factors would extend our understanding and allow us to extract fundamental principles underlying epigenetic regulation of eukaryote developmental programs.
Addressing these questions will further elucidate the functions of PcG proteins in silencing gene expression and regulating plant development.