The Effect of Uncoated SPIONs on hiPSC-Differentiated Endothelial Cells

Background: Endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) were indicated in vascular repair, angiogenesis of ischemic organs, and inhibition of formation of initial hyperplasia. Differentiation of endothelial cells (ECs) from human induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSC)-derived endothelial cells (hiPSC-ECs) provides an unlimited supply for clinical application. Furthermore, magnetic cell labelling offers an effective way of targeting and visualization of hiPSC-ECs and is the next step towards in vivo studies. Methods: ECs were differentiated from hiPSCs and labelled with uncoated superparamagnetic iron-oxide nanoparticles (uSPIONs). uSPION uptake was compared between hiPSC-ECs and mature ECs isolated from patients by software analysis of microscopy pictures after Prussian blue cell staining. The acute and long-term cytotoxic effects of uSPIONs were evaluated by MTT (3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide assay) and Annexin assay. Results: We showed, for the first time, uptake of uncoated SPIONs (uSPIONs) by hiPSC-ECs. In comparison with mature ECs of identical genetic background hiPSC-ECs showed lower uSPION uptake. However, all the studied endothelial cells were effectively labelled and showed magnetic properties even with low labelling concentration of uSPIONs. uSPIONs prepared by microwave plasma synthesis did not show any cytotoxicity nor impair endothelial properties. Conclusion: We show that hiPSC-ECs labelling with low concentration of uSPIONs is feasible and does not show any toxic effects in vitro, which is an important step towards animal studies.


Introduction
Endothelial cell therapies show great potential in treatment of multiple diseases. Endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) were indicated in vascular repair, angiogenesis of ischemic organs, and inhibiting the formation of intimal hyperplasia [1,2]. First preclinical studies on animal subjects report positive effects on ischemic myocardium, limb neovascularization or peripheral vascular regeneration [3][4][5].
Clinical application of EPCs is however limited by the small number of cells present in circulating blood. This number is further decreased in some diseases [6,7]. To overcome this issue, pluripotent stem cells have been investigated as an alternative cell source for therapies [8][9][10]. Reprogramming and differentiation provides an unlimited supply of patient specific endothelial cells [9,[11][12][13]. Protocols for differentiation of functional endothelial cells have already been established and human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived endothelial cells (hiPSC-ECs) were shown to line a tissue graft suitable for implantation [10,11,14,15]. The next step in the therapy-oriented research is optimization of cell labelling with magnetic nanoparticles for cell guiding and tracking in vivo. Cell labelling is a convenient tool for detailed study of endothelial cell function in vivo, and cell tracking and guiding mechanisms for regeneration therapy. Moreover, it can provide valuable information about membrane properties of hiPSC-ECs, which were not studied until now.
For cell tracking and guiding mechanisms cells are magnetically labelled in vitro, where superparamagnetic iron-oxide nanoparticles (SPIONs) are uptaken through endocytosis resulting in a cell population susceptible to magnetic field. This cell population can be visualized and manipulated in vivo based on magnetic properties [16]. SPIONs for biomedical applications are usually formed by an iron oxide core and an organic coating. Several products were approved by FDA (Food and Drug Administration) for clinical studies to this day including Endorem (Ferumoxides), Resovist (Ferucarbotran) and Feraheme (Ferumoxytol) [17][18][19][20]. All three products were previously studied and used for magnetic labelling of circulating EPC. Resovist and Endorem showed 100% labelling and magnetic properties detectable by MRI after 24 h of incubation at concentrations of 100 µg/mL and 300 µg/mL respectively [19]. No toxicity was detected even under much higher concentrations of the labelling agents. However, labelling concentrations for nanoparticles remain high and new mechanisms are considered for more effective labelling with better biocompatibility.
The cellular uptake of SPIONs depends on several physicochemical parameters including size, shape, polydispersity, charge and coating. Coating of SPIONs is considered highly advantageous as it offers the possibility to affect nanoparticle properties, however it substantially changes the size and magnetic properties of the nanoparticles [21,22]. In some cases an iron-oxide core of size around 10 nm can result in a nanoparticles ranging from 80 nm to 150 nm dependent on organic coating, which significantly affects the efficiency of uptake and magnetic properties of the labelled cell [22][23][24]. Therefore, uncoated nanoparticles could offer better efficiency of uptake as their size is not affected by coating. Moreover, while it was previously believed that uncoated SPIONs (uSPIONs) have higher toxicity compared to coated nanoparticles, later it was reported that incubation of nanoparticles in serum prevents surface reactivity and results in decreased cytotoxicity [25].
The aim of this study was to prove the feasibility of hiPSC-EC magnetic labeling. Furthermore, as a control, we labeled mature ECs isolated from patients, which represent a cell model most closely resembling endothelial cells in vivo. We assessed the differences in uSPIONs uptake between human dermal fibroblasts (hDFs), mature EC (human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs), human saphena vein endothelial cells (HSVECs)) and hiPSC-ECs. We further theorized that uSPION could have superior magnetic properties over coated SPIONs and lower concentrations of uSPIONs would be required for cell labelling. Therefore, we evaluated the effectivity of uSPION endocytosis under low uSPION concentrations and magnetic properties of the labelled cells. We extensively studied uSPION cytotoxicity including toxic effects during the incubation and long-term effects after the incubation. Finally, we studied the effects of uSPIONs on cell characteristics desired for clinical application; specifically, their endothelial profile and angiogenic properties.

Uptake of uSPIONs Is Different between Cell Types
We reprogrammed HUVECs, HSVECs and hDFs into hiPSCs and differentiated them into hiPSC-ECs. We incubated six cell types (HUVECs, HSVECs, hDFs, ECs-HU, ECs-HS, ECs-HF) with 10 µg/mL and 50 µg/mL of uSPIONs. The experimental design is summarized in Figure 1. We repeated the process with biological replicates HUVECs 1, HSVECs 1, hDFs 1 to ensure reproducibility. We observed the intracellular uptake of uSPIONs after Prussian blue staining (Figure 2a). We showed different uptakes of uSPIONs in the studied cell types. In general, the quantity of uSPIONs uptaken by the cell increased with time and concentration of uSPIONs in medium. The first uptake was detected after 6 h of incubation. We did not observe any point of saturation that would render cells unable to take up more uSPIONs.  2a). We showed different uptakes of uSPIONs in the studied cell types. In general, the quantity of uSPIONs uptaken by the cell increased with time and concentration of uSPIONs in medium. The first uptake was detected after 6 h of incubation. We did not observe any point of saturation that would render cells unable to take up more uSPIONs. We quantified the number of uSPIONs by custom software developed by our group (for details see methods and Figure S4). The differences in uSPION uptake were most apparent at higher concentrations of uSPIONs (50 μg/mL) (Figure 2b). The six cell lines and their replicates were divided into three groups according to uSPION uptake: hDFs/hDFs 1 did not show any uSPION uptake, mature ECs (HSVECs/HSVECs 1 and HUVECs/HUVECs 1) showed high uSPION uptake and hiPSC-ECs (differentiated from all three cell types) showed significantly lower uSPION uptake, relative to mature ECs. We did not observe any significant differences in uSPION uptake among the three hiPSC-EC lines. This suggests that the membrane properties of the original source cell type used for cell reprogramming do not have any effects on the properties of the differentiated ECs. We observed the difference in uptake of uSPIONs between ECs and hiPSCs-EC with identical genetic background. Reprogramming and differentiation changed the properties of cell membranes.

Biodistribution of the uSPIONs Observed by Transmission Electron Microscopy
Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) represents a definite confirmation of nanoparticle uptake and allows to assess uSPIONs size after uptake and their intracellular biodistribution. We incubated cells with 10 g/mL uSPIONs for 24 h and 48 h, fixed the cells and visualized them by TEM. All the observed cell types were able to uptake uSPIONs (Figure 3a-f).
The size of the uSPION was approximately 20 nm, and the variability in size was the result of aggregation (Figure 3i,j). uSPIONs were localized to cytoplasmic intracellular vesicles identified as autophagic vacuoles by their myelin-like content (Figure 3g,h). They entered the cell separately or in small aggregates and formed endocytic vesicles, which later fused together. The size of uSPIONs We quantified the number of uSPIONs by custom software developed by our group (for details see methods and Figure S4). The differences in uSPION uptake were most apparent at higher concentrations of uSPIONs (50 µg/mL) (Figure 2b). The six cell lines and their replicates were divided into three groups according to uSPION uptake: hDFs/hDFs 1 did not show any uSPION uptake, mature ECs (HSVECs/HSVECs 1 and HUVECs/HUVECs 1) showed high uSPION uptake and hiPSC-ECs (differentiated from all three cell types) showed significantly lower uSPION uptake, relative to mature ECs. We did not observe any significant differences in uSPION uptake among the three hiPSC-EC lines. This suggests that the membrane properties of the original source cell type used for cell reprogramming do not have any effects on the properties of the differentiated ECs. We observed the difference in uptake of uSPIONs between ECs and hiPSCs-EC with identical genetic background. Reprogramming and differentiation changed the properties of cell membranes.

Biodistribution of the uSPIONs Observed by Transmission Electron Microscopy
Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) represents a definite confirmation of nanoparticle uptake and allows to assess uSPIONs size after uptake and their intracellular biodistribution. We incubated cells with 10 µg/mL uSPIONs for 24 h and 48 h, fixed the cells and visualized them by TEM. All the observed cell types were able to uptake uSPIONs (Figure 3a-f).
The size of the uSPION was approximately 20 nm, and the variability in size was the result of aggregation (Figure 3i,j). uSPIONs were localized to cytoplasmic intracellular vesicles identified as autophagic vacuoles by their myelin-like content (Figure 3g,h). They entered the cell separately or in small aggregates and formed endocytic vesicles, which later fused together. The size of uSPIONs measured by Raman spectrometry was between 20-50 nm which corresponds with the size observed by TEM after cellular uptake ( Figure S1). measured by Raman spectrometry was between 20-50 nm which corresponds with the size observed by TEM after cellular uptake ( Figure S1).   (1) and HSVECs (1)-or between three differentiated endothelial cells-ECs-HU (1), ECs-HS (1) and ECs-HF (1). A significant difference in uSPION uptake was shown between hDFs (1) and HSVECs (1)/HUVECs (1) and between HUVECs (1)/HSVECs (1) and ECs-HF (1)/ECs-HS (1)/ECs-HU (1)

ECs Show and Maintain Magnetic Properties after Labeling
We studied magnetic properties of the mature ECs (HUVECs/HSVECs) and hiPSC-ECs (EC-HU) immediately following the labeling and 3, 6, 9 and 12 days after labelling. We incubated HUVECs, HSVECs and ECs-HU 24 h or 48 h with 10 µg/mL of uSPIONs and separated them according to their magnetic properties by MACS separation. The data are shown as the percentage of magnetically separated cells from the cell culture. All HUVECs, HSVECs and ECs-HU were separated after 24 h and 48 h of incubation with uSPIONs ( Figure 4). We measured the magnetic properties of the cell culture 3, 6, 9 and 12 days after incubation with uSPIONs. Cells retained their magnetic properties. The number of magnetic cells was proportional to the growth of the cell population. We were not able to observe decrease in number of magnetic cells.

ECs Show and Maintain Magnetic Properties after Labeling
We studied magnetic properties of the mature ECs (HUVECs/HSVECs) and hiPSC-ECs (EC-HU) immediately following the labeling and 3, 6, 9 and 12 days after labelling. We incubated HUVECs, HSVECs and ECs-HU 24 h or 48 h with 10 μg/mL of uSPIONs and separated them according to their magnetic properties by MACS separation. The data are shown as the percentage of magnetically separated cells from the cell culture. All HUVECs, HSVECs and ECs-HU were separated after 24 h and 48 h of incubation with uSPIONs ( Figure 4). We measured the magnetic properties of the cell culture 3, 6, 9 and 12 days after incubation with uSPIONs. Cells retained their magnetic properties. The number of magnetic cells was proportional to the growth of the cell population. We were not able to observe decrease in number of magnetic cells.

Exposure to uSPIONs does not Affect Cell Survival of ECs and hiPSC-ECs
We assessed acute cytotoxicity and long-term cell survival during incubation with uSPIONs in ECs and hiPSC-ECs. MTT (3-(4,5-demethyltiazol-2-yl-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide)) and Annexin assays were used to measure cell viability and metabolism. The MTT assay reflects the overall condition of the cell population through evaluation of cell metabolism. The Annexin assay specifically measures markers of early apoptosis and cell death. The cell cultures showed 90-100% viability in relation to the control sample in both assays ( Figure 5). Cell viability was not significantly affected by magnetic labeling. Cells were also examined by light microscopy and did not show any morphological changes indicative of cell death. We studied the long-term effects of 24 and 48 h incubation with uSPIONs on the viability of the cell population. We did not observe any change in cell viability up to 12 days after incubation with uSPIONs ( Figure S2).
We also assessed cell survival during long-term continual exposure to uSPIONs (12 days) in cells that showed the highest uSPIONs uptake: HUVECs and HSVECs. Prolonged exposure to uSPIONs had no effect on cell survival ( Figure S3).

Exposure to uSPIONs does not Affect Cell Survival of ECs and hiPSC-ECs
We assessed acute cytotoxicity and long-term cell survival during incubation with uSPIONs in ECs and hiPSC-ECs. MTT (3-(4,5-demethyltiazol-2-yl-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide)) and Annexin assays were used to measure cell viability and metabolism. The MTT assay reflects the overall condition of the cell population through evaluation of cell metabolism. The Annexin assay specifically measures markers of early apoptosis and cell death. The cell cultures showed 90-100% viability in relation to the control sample in both assays ( Figure 5). Cell viability was not significantly affected by magnetic labeling. Cells were also examined by light microscopy and did not show any morphological changes indicative of cell death. We studied the long-term effects of 24 and 48 h incubation with uSPIONs on the viability of the cell population. We did not observe any change in cell viability up to 12 days after incubation with uSPIONs ( Figure S2).
We also assessed cell survival during long-term continual exposure to uSPIONs (12 days) in cells that showed the highest uSPIONs uptake: HUVECs and HSVECs. Prolonged exposure to uSPIONs had no effect on cell survival ( Figure S3).

Labelled ECs and EPCs Retain Endothelial Markers and Angiogenic Properties
We studied the effect of uSPIONs on the phenotype and functionality of the cells. We analyzed the expression of endothelial characteristics markers in HUVECs, HSVECs and ECs-HU after 24 and 48 h of incubation with uSPIONs by FACS analysis. We did not observe any effect of uSPIONs on either the expression of CD31 and CD144 (markers confirming endothelial identity) or CD34 and KDR (markers indicative of unmature endothelial phenotype) (Figure 6a). We also evaluated angiogenic properties of the labelled cells by tube formation assay. We did not detect any effect of the uSPIONs on the angiogenic properties of either mature ECs or ECs-HU (Figure 6b).

Labelled ECs and EPCs Retain Endothelial Markers and Angiogenic Properties
We studied the effect of uSPIONs on the phenotype and functionality of the cells. We analyzed the expression of endothelial characteristics markers in HUVECs, HSVECs and ECs-HU after 24 and 48 h of incubation with uSPIONs by FACS analysis. We did not observe any effect of uSPIONs on either the expression of CD31 and CD144 (markers confirming endothelial identity) or CD34 and KDR (markers indicative of unmature endothelial phenotype) (Figure 6a). We also evaluated angiogenic properties of the labelled cells by tube formation assay. We did not detect any effect of the uSPIONs on the angiogenic properties of either mature ECs or ECs-HU (Figure 6b).

Discussion
SPIONs have become a useful tool for biomedical research and some are already in clinical use. They could provide an efficient system for cell tracking and guiding in therapy. However, labelling efficiency and the resulting magnetic properties of the labelled cells are of major concern. Currently used SPIONs show low uptake efficiency, which requires high concentration for labelling and the use of a transfection agent [19,26].
Coating significantly affects size of SPIONs as well as their magnetic properties [2,8,10]. We hypothesized that uSPIONs due to the absence of coating could possess superior magnetic properties and therefore lower concentration of nanoparticles would be needed for effective labelling. It was reported that uncoated SPIONs have low labelling efficiency in comparison with coated SPIONs [27]. However, we showed that a concentration as low as 10 μg/mL is sufficient to label and magnetically

Discussion
SPIONs have become a useful tool for biomedical research and some are already in clinical use. They could provide an efficient system for cell tracking and guiding in therapy. However, labelling efficiency and the resulting magnetic properties of the labelled cells are of major concern. Currently used SPIONs show low uptake efficiency, which requires high concentration for labelling and the use of a transfection agent [19,26].
Coating significantly affects size of SPIONs as well as their magnetic properties [2,8,10]. We hypothesized that uSPIONs due to the absence of coating could possess superior magnetic properties and therefore lower concentration of nanoparticles would be needed for effective labelling. It was reported that uncoated SPIONs have low labelling efficiency in comparison with coated SPIONs [27]. However, we showed that a concentration as low as 10 µg/mL is sufficient to label and magnetically separate 100% of mature endothelial cells as well as hiPSC-ECs. In contrast, the reported labelling concentrations of coated SPION range from 20 µg/mL to 300 µg/mL [19,28].
We additionally pre-treated the uSPIONs with FBS (Fetal Bovine Serum). It was reported that coating reduces toxic effect of uSPIONs [25]. Pre-treatment with FBS causes formation of protein corona, that can affect the endocytosis of the nanoparticles, but protects the cell from toxic interactions with nanoparticle core [25,[29][30][31].
In endothelial cells clathrin and caveolae-mediated endocytosis is the preferred way of cell entry [32]. It was repeatedly described that SPIONs in general use the same receptors for uptake [22,33,34]. Clathrin endocytosis occurs via a clathrin-assembly unit; nanoparticle binding initiates the formation of 'coated pits' on the cytoplasmic side of cell membrane. The pits later self-assemble to polygonal cages. Clathrin complex is also responsible for necking and pinch-off process [35,36]. Clathrin-mediated endocytosis produces vesicles of 100-150 [33]. In contrast caveolae-dependent endocytosis occurs in flask-shaped membrane invaginations lined with caveolin 50-80 nm in size [33]. The two major differences between caveolae and clathrin-mediated endocytosis are the size of the vesicles they form and the fact that clathrin-dependent endocytosis pathway often ends in lysosomal fusion and exocytosis.
We studied the rate of uSPION uptake under high and low concentration in hDFs, mature ECs and hiPSC-ECs. Mature ECs (HUVECs and HSVECs) showed the highest effectiveness in uSPION uptake, hiPSC-ECs showed significantly lower uSPION uptake than mature ECs and no uptake could be observed in hDFs. SPIONs uptake is dependent mainly on adsorption to cell membrane and clathrin or caveolae-mediated endocytosis [22,32,34]. This proposed mechanism can explain our observations while hDFs and ECs have significantly different membrane composition and ECs show an increased number of clathrin and caveolae receptors in comparison to hDFs.
hiPSC-ECs were never studied in the past with respect to their membrane properties. We were interested in whether the original tissue used for reprogramming can affect the properties of the resulting hiPSC-ECs and whether hiPSC-ECs show different uptake than mature ECs. We discovered that all three hiPSC-EC lines showed similar nanoparticle uptake. On the other hand, we showed significantly lower uSPION uptake in hiPSC-ECs than in mature ECs. Data concerning differences between membrane properties of hiPSC-ECs and mature ECs have not been published. The most obvious interpretation suggests that one of the mechanisms responsible for mediation of endocytosis is not yet fully operational due to the immature state of the hiPSC-ECs. As we have previously confirmed by low density lipoprotein (LDL) assay, clathrin receptors are fully functional in hiPSC-ECs [13]. However, the state of caveolae receptors was not examined. We suspect that the immature state of the hiPSC-ECs could have significant effect on the expression of caveolae receptors. Whether the uptake will increase during maturation of the hiPSC-EC remains to be examined. uSPIONs were previously shown to be toxic [37,38]. Some studies showed dose dependent toxicity observed in concentration over 100 µg/mL, however others disagreed with these findings [39][40][41]. Because of this major toxicity concern we extensively studied the cytotoxicity of uSPIONs prepared in microwave plasma. We did not detect any acute effects of uSPIONs on the cell cultures. We did not show any cytotoxicity during the 6-48 h of exposure or any long-term toxic effects up to 12 days after incubation. We also tested long-term exposure to uSPIONs and did not detect any cytotoxicity. The lack of toxic effects can be explained by pre-treatment of uSPIONs in serum as serum pre-treatment was previously shown to significantly decrease uSPION reactivity, aggregation and cytotoxicity. Mahmoudi evaluated toxic effects of poly-vinylalcohol coated and uncoated nanoparticles in his work. He concluded that not coating, but rather protein corona is responsible for the observed toxic or lack of toxic effects [25,42]. It was shown repeatedly that protein corona plays a significant role in adsorption and endocytosis of SPIONs, while cell membrane does not come into contact directly with the nanoparticle surface but rather with the acquired protein corona. Therefore the presented results can be significantly influenced by incubation conditions during nanoparticle endocytosis or nanoparticle pre-treatment [29][30][31].
It was previously shown that SPIONs can affect cell properties. Chondrogenic and osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells was reported to be affected, however different reports disagreed with these conclusions [43][44][45][46]. On the other hand, cardiogenic differentiation of hiPSCs was reported unaffected by SPIONs [47]. The exact mechanism that can interfere with the differentiation is unknown. Incubation with uSPIONs could influence hiPSC-ECs due to their immature state. Maintenance of phenotype and angiogenic properties are imperative for the use of endothelial cells. Therefore, we closely examined phenotype and function of hiPSC-ECs after the incubation with uSPIONs. We observed neither changes in cell phenotype nor angiogenic properties of the cells after the incubation with uSPIONs.
In conclusion, we studied labelling efficiency and cytotoxicity of uSPIONs prepared by microwave plasma. We showed efficient uSPION uptake and confirmed magnetic properties of endothelial cells even with low uSPION concentration. We did not observe any effect of uSPIONs on cell viability, phenotype or angiogenic properties of mature or hiPSC derived ECs. We observed lower uSPION uptake in hiPSC-ECs compared to mature ECs of the same genetic background. The difference can be explained by different membrane properties of hiPSC-ECs that can be attributed to their immature state. However, it remains to be examined whether maturation will resolve the issue. This work emphasizes the need of further studies to provide detailed characterization of hiPSCs-ECs. Despite the differences in uSPION uptake we conclude, that labelling hiPSC-ECs with low concentration of uSPIONs is feasible and does not show any toxic effects in vitro, which is an important step towards animal studies.

Cell Culture
All cell cultures were maintained in a 5% CO 2 atmosphere at 37 • C. Cell cultures with 70-80% confluency were used for all listed experiments.

Preparation and Analysis of uSPIONs
Maghemite nanoparticles were prepared from iron pentacarbonyle (Fe(CO) 5 ), (99.99% purity, Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) in a microwave plasma torch reactor [51,52]. Synthesis was performed in an argon gas flow; iron pentacarbonyl vapors were carried into the plasma reactor chamber and mixed with oxygen. In the reactor chamber, the mixture was introduced into microwave plasma, which reached high temperatures (up to 4000 K) and emitted strong UV radiation. As a result, the iron pentacarbonyl was fully decomposed to its atomic elements. Consequent reactions led to production of dry iron or iron oxide nanoparticles (depending on the stoichiometry of the oxygen and iron pentacarbonyl) and CO 2 . Particles were carefully collected from reactor walls after deposition a dry powder that contained nanoparticles of high crystallinity and chemical purity [52]. The production was tuned to specifically produce maghemite nanoparticles [52], and the operating parameters were 700 sccm for the argon gas flow, 1 sccm of iron pentacarbonyl and 50 sccm of oxygen with the reactor supplied by a 310 W microwave power.
Phase composition of prepared iron oxide samples was determined by X-ray powder diffraction (XRD) using a Rigaku X-ray diffractometer SmartLab Type F with a Cu cathode range of 20 to 120 2 11 of 16 (CO)5), (99.99% purity, [51,52]. Synthesis was into the plasma reactor oduced into microwave V radiation. As a result, equent reactions led to hiometry of the oxygen m reactor walls after d chemical purity [52]. [52], and the operating l and 50 sccm of oxygen -ray powder diffraction de range of 20 to 120 2Ѳ orting analysis to XRD, tion system a with 532-800 cm −1 . The prepared 3 with a Schottky field cattered electron (BSE) with a small admixture rocedure (ending with mentioned phases: the O3 (a = 0.5035 nm, b = of the sample showed longing to maghemite buted to hematite in the kV accelerating voltage aggregates, as shown in ommended by IUPAC, degrees. XRD pattern was evaluated by PDXL2 software (Rigaku). As a supporting analysis to XRD, Raman spectroscopy was carried out using the HORIBA LabRAM HR Evolution system a with 532-m laser, using a 50× objective and 1% ND filter in the range from 120 to 1800 cm −1 . The prepared nanopowder was imaged with Tescan scanning electron microscope MIRA3 with a Schottky field emission electron gun equipped with secondary electron (SE) and back-scattered electron (BSE) detectors as well as an Oxford Instruments EDX analyzer.
The nanopowder consisted of cubic maghemite-C γ-  Figure S1). Peaks at 223 and 293 cm −1 could be attributed to hematite in the sample. SEM analysis was carried out using a MIRA 3 microscope using a 15-kV accelerating voltage and SE detector. The nanopowder consisted of 20-50 nm uSPIONs and their aggregates, as shown in Figure S1. Polydispersity index (PDI) or dispersity was calculated as recommended by IUPAC, defined by ISO 22412:2017 for DLS and similar methods as where D is average particle diameter and s its standard deviation. PDI was 0.18 which suggested moderate size distribution of maghemite nanoparticles. The working stock of uSPIONs was prepared by resuspension of uSPIONs in FBS at a concentration of 1 mg/mL. The stock was incubated in an ultrasonic bath for 3 h to solubilize the nanoparticles properly. From the work stock, the uSPIONs were diluted to the desired concentration in cultivation medium.

MTT Assay
MTT assay is colorimetric assay based on the metabolism of the MTT substrate to a formazan crystal, an insoluble intracellular product that is measured after solubilization by spectrophotometry. Each cell type was seeded at a density of 10,000 cells per well in a 96-well plate and cultured for 24 h before exposure to the uSPIONs. Five different cell lines (HUVECs, HSVECs, ECs-HU, ECs-HS, and ECs-HF) were incubated with different concentrations of uSPIONs (10 and 50 µg/mL). Cell survival was assessed after 6, 24 and 48 h. For each cell line a sample cultured without uSPIONs was used as a control. At the end of the incubation period, new medium with MTT substrate was added into each well, and the MTT assays were performed according to the manufacturer's specifications (Roche, Basel, Switzerland).

Transmission Electron Microscopy
HUVECs, HSVECs and hDFs were incubated with uSPIONs (10 µg/mL) or without uSPIONs (control) for 24 h, harvested using trypsin-EDTA and washed gently with PBS. To prepare samples for TEM, the cells were washed in 0.1 M cacodylate buffer, and fixed with 3% glutaraldehyde with 0.2% tantin in 0.1 M cacodylate buffer for 1 h. They were post-fixed with 1% OsO 4 , washed 3 times in 0.1 M cacodylate and embedded in 1% agar blocks. The blocks were dehydrated by a graded ethanol series (50%, 70%, 96% and 100%), treated with 100% acetone and embedded in Durcupan resin. Ultrathin sections were prepared on an LKB 8802A ultramicrotome, stained with OsO 4 and examined with an FEI Morgagni 286(D) TEM.

Study of Magnetic Properties
The magnetic properties of HUVECs, HSVECs and ECs-HU were assessed by MACS separation (Miltenyi, Bergisch Gladbach, Germany). The separation was performed according to the manufacturer's instructions. Cells were incubated with 10 µg/mL of uSPIONs for 24 h or 48 h, counted on a Beckman cell counter. They were separated according to their magnetic properties by MACS separation and counted on a Beckman counter again. Data are shown as ratio of the separated cells out of the population in percentage.

Image and Statistical Data Analysis
We evaluated the images in Matlab (MathWorks), and the automated routine analyzed the color images. Briefly, the pixels belonging to the cells were identified from the hue channel of the image converted to an HSV color model. First, we smoothed the hue channel with a Gaussian filter (sigma = 1). Then, we segmented the image using the multilevel Otsu thresholding method (considering three levels and taking the highest threshold). Finally, the components, which were bigger than 10 pixels of the binary mask, were morphologically closed with a structuring element with a radius of 11 pixels. The components larger than 1000 pixels were considered as the cell area.
The nuclear pixels were segmented in the a* channel (green-red) of the Lab color representation of the image. We applied the multilevel Otsu thresholding (3 levels, highest threshold) followed by morphological opening and closing with a structuring element with a radius of 11 pixels. Finally, we took the components that were larger than 1000 pixels. Particle pixels were identified as pixels having a red value for the RGB model that was lower than the blue value (decreased by 25, which was an empirically chosen parameter that worked well for all images).
We computed the number of uSPION pixels in the cytoplasmic regions (formed by cell pixels that were not also nuclear pixels) and normalized the cytoplasmic pixels to the number of cell nuclei to compute the number of pixels occupied by uSPIONs per cell. For statistical analysis, we used one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's test. We evaluated three independent biological replicates (one picture each) for each value; each picture contained at least 50 cells.
The Annexin and MTT assays were statistically analyzed by t-test, where each value representing three independent biological replicates was compared with the untreated control. Author Contributions: B.S. was responsible for conception and design of the experiments, most of the experimental work, collection and assembly of data, data analysis and interpretation, and manuscript writing. P.S. (Pavel Simara) was responsible for reprogramming all cell cultures to hiPSCs, conception and design of the experiments and data interpretation. P.M. was responsible for analysis of images of the histological staining, image data assembly and analysis. L.Z., P.S. (Petr Synek) and O.J. contributed with the technology for uSPION production and with uSPION analysis. L.V. was responsible for obtaining biological material and consent from patients. M.S. and Z.N. were responsible for preparation of the electron microscopy samples, gathering of electron microscopy images and their analysis. I.K. was responsible for conception and design of the experiments and data interpretation. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Ethics Statement
Funding: This study was generously supported by the Czech Health Research Council (16-31501A).

Conflicts of Interest:
The authors declare no conflict of interest.