Next Article in Journal
Q Fever Endocarditis in Romania: The First Cases Confirmed by Direct Sequencing
Previous Article in Journal
Molecular Diagnosis of 5α-Reductase Type II Deficiency in Brazilian Siblings with 46,XY Disorder of Sex Development
Article Menu

Export Article

2011, 12(12), 9481-9503;

Modeling Natural Anti-Inflammatory Compounds by Molecular Topology
Molecular Connectivity & Drug Design Research Unit, Department of Physical Chemistry, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Valencia, Avenida V.A. Estelles s/n, Burjasot, Valencia 46100, Spain
Department of Pharmacology, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Bologna, Via Irnerio, Bologna 48-40126, Italy
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 8 November 2011; in revised form: 8 December 2011 / Accepted: 9 December 2011 / Published: 20 December 2011


One of the main pharmacological problems today in the treatment of chronic inflammation diseases consists of the fact that anti-inflammatory drugs usually exhibit side effects. The natural products offer a great hope in the identification of bioactive lead compounds and their development into drugs for treating inflammatory diseases. Computer-aided drug design has proved to be a very useful tool for discovering new drugs and, specifically, Molecular Topology has become a good technique for such a goal. A topological-mathematical model, obtained by linear discriminant analysis, has been developed for the search of new anti-inflammatory natural compounds. An external validation obtained with the remaining compounds (those not used in building up the model), has been carried out. Finally, a virtual screening on natural products was performed and 74 compounds showed actual anti-inflammatory activity. From them, 54 had been previously described as anti-inflammatory in the literature. This can be seen as a plus in the model validation and as a reinforcement of the role of Molecular Topology as an efficient tool for the discovery of new anti-inflammatory natural compounds.
Molecular Topology; virtual screening; natural; anti-inflammatory; linear discriminant analysis

1. Introduction

One of the biggest pharmacological problems today is the treatment of chronic inflammations. Diseases like chronic asthma, rheumatoid arthritis, multiple sclerosis, inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), and psoriasis, are strongly debilitating and are becoming increasingly common in our aging society. Rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis are the major inflammatory diseases affecting people worldwide. Increases in life expectancy and aging populations are expected to make osteoarthritis the fourth leading cause of disability by the year 2020. Moreover, epidemiological studies have identified chronic infections and inflammation as major risk factors for various types of cancer [1].
Several classes of drugs, such as corticosteroids, NSAIDs, and biologics, are used to treat the inflammatory disorders. The main problem is that these drugs possess several adverse effects or are too expensive to be used. Corticosteroids have long been used for the management of rheumatoid arthritis and IBD’s diseases, but they suffer from some serious adverse effects, such as Cushing’s habitus, hypertension, hyperglycemia, muscular weakness, increased susceptibility to infection, osteoporosis, glaucoma, psychiatric disturbances, growth arrest, etc.
Likewise, the side effects associated with the use of NSAIDs, such as gastrointestinal ulceration and bleeding, and platelet dysfunction, are several and common, and because of the largest use (and abuse) of this class of drugs, they represent a big problem at the moment to treat chronic inflammations.
The coxibs also exhibited cardiovascular side effects due to inhibition of prostacyclin formation in the infarcted heart, tipping the balance of prostacyclin/thromboxane, coupled with a diminution in prostacyclin in heart muscle. Therefore, it is quite clear that the clinically used anti-inflammatory drugs suffer from the disadvantage of side effects and high cost of treatment (in case of biologics) [1].
There is a valid alternative to these drugs, represented by natural products, which offer a great hope in the identification of bioactive lead compounds and their development into drugs for treating inflammatory diseases [1]. Is known that plants have been the basis of many traditional medicine systems throughout the world for thousands of years and they represent an exhaustive source of “raw materials” in order to find and synthesize new molecules with pharmacological activity [1].
Natural Products (NP) are classified into three groups: NPs, semi-synthetic NPs or NP-derived [2]. The value of natural products can be assessed by the rate of introduction of new chemical entities of wide structural diversity, including serving as templates for semisynthetic and total synthetic modification.
An analysis of the origin of the drugs developed between 1981 and 2002 showed that natural products or natural product-derived drugs comprised 28% of all new chemical entities (NCEs) launched onto the market. In addition, 24% of these NCEs were synthetic or natural mimic compounds, based on the study of pharmacophores related to natural products. This combined percentage (52% of all NCEs) suggests that natural products are important sources for new drugs and are also good lead compounds suitable for further modification during the drug development process. Scrutiny of medical indications by source of compounds has demonstrated that natural products and related drugs are used to treat 87% of all categorized human diseases (48/55) [3].
It is noteworthy that Natural Products have played a pivotal role in immunosuppression drug discovery as shown by the launch of the NPs cyclosporin 72 (1983), tacrolimus (1993), sirolimus 10 (1999) and mycophenolate sodium (2003), and the semi-synthetic NPs mycophenolate mofetil (1995), everolimus 129 (2004) and fingolimod (2010). In addition, the NP-derived aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid) discovered in the late 1890s is still used widely as an analgesic and anti-inflammatory, while corticosteroids and b2 agonists modeled on adrenaline (e.g., salbutamol and salmeterol) are used to help control asthma [2]. A total of 13 NP and NP-derived drugs were approved for marketing worldwide from 2005 to 2007, with 5 being classified as NPs, 6 semi-synthetic NPs and 2 NP-derived drugs [2].
Despite this statistic, pharmaceutical companies have embraced the era of combinatorial chemistry, neglecting the development of natural products as potential drug candidates in favor of high-throughput synthesis of large compound libraries [4]. The main reasons for this include the incompatibility of natural product libraries with high-throughput screening and the marginal improvement in core technologies for natural product screening in the late 1980s and early 1990s [5]. Luckily, during the last years, the development of new technologies has revolutionized the screening of natural products. Applying these technologies compensates for the inherent limitations of natural products and offers a unique opportunity to re-establish natural products as a major source for drug discovery [5].
We have to understand that the natural product landscape offers, not only the direct introduction of natural products into the drug discovery process, but more often, natural products serve themselves as lead agents, providing the chemist with a structural platform which can be elaborated upon, or simplified, to yield a therapeutically valuable pharmaceutical [6]. They offer unmatched chemical diversity with structural complexity and biological potency. Natural product resources, especially from the marine environment, are resourceful and largely unexplored [7].
Another key point relating to natural products is that we can start from the original natural product and develop an analog strategy which permits us to create or modify new molecules with biological or pharmacological activity. As for the anti-inflammatory natural products, they have been discovered based on ethnopharmacological observations, thanks to some new strategies in chemical investigation. In this regard, through the use of topological descriptors, they could provide new potential drug targets.
In the late 1980s, computational chemistry sped up the drug discovery process. Afterwards, combinatorial chemistry (including molecular evolution, multiple parallel synthesis, etc.) arrived combined with High Throughput Screening (HTS), in the mid-1990s.
Virtual Screening, or in silico screening, is an approach attracting increasing interest in the pharmaceutical industry as a productive and cost-effective technology for the search of novel hit or lead compounds [810].
The principles involve the computational analysis of chemical databases, to identify those compounds that are most likely to show a given biological activity. Of course, these ideas are not new, but have been pursued for years by groups working in drug design and discovery. However, the availability of inexpensive high-performance computing platforms has transformed these processes in such a way that, at present, increasingly complex and more accurate analyses can be performed on a very large data set.
The topological virtual screening is based on the analysis of a chemical diversity of molecules [8], which enables the selection of the best potential molecular choices. In principle, the molecules are not classified according to their biological activity, but depicted by their topological indices (TIs) and after a computational study of their structures, only those ones complying with a desired topological model are chosen for further development.
Then a model comes from a linear discriminant analysis (LDA) containing two sets of structures: One of them has a well-defined pharmacological activity, and the other one, is built from structures showing no this biological activity.
The resulting model, associated with the desired pharmacological activity, generates a set of topological descriptors capable of differentiating potentially active compounds from those lacking activity.
The method above represents a rather detailed and relevant framework to search for leads, prioritizing the selection of compounds that are advisable to be tested in a biological assay. It offers a new option, a new method that shows itself to be powerful in facing the hunt for new targets, new lead compounds that finally enable the securing of new drugs.
This report deals with the search of natural anti-inflammatory compounds by using a database of natural products. The research team has gained experience in discovering new drugs applying Molecular Topology, and has developed several models in the field of anti-inflammatory compounds [1113].

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Analyzed Compounds

The model for searching new natural anti-inflammatory compounds was made up of 412 natural compounds, 123 active as anti-inflammatories and 289 inactive. Almost all the active compounds were from a paper reported by Kontogiorgis et al. [14] and the rest of them active and inactive from the collection Pure Natural Products from MicroSource database [15]. Compounds conforming the test set and Virtual screening were also achieved from these sources. Compounds forming the training set are shown in Supplementary material, Annex I. All sets of compounds are characterized by a large structural diversity

2.2. Molecular Descriptors

The 2D structure of each compound was drawn using the ChemDraw Ultra package [16]. Each compound was characterized by a set of 436 topological indices, standing among them the topological charge indices, quotients and differences between nonvalence and valence connectivity indices, topological and 2D autocorrelation descriptors. All indices were calculated with Dragon software [17]. In the supplementary material, Annex I, the TI’s values are given for all compounds of the model.

2.3. Modeling Techniques

Linear discriminant analysis (LDA) is a pattern recognition method which provides a classification model based on the combination of variables that best predict the category or group to which a given compound belongs. We built up a natural compounds database where all compounds were allocated into an active or inactive group according to their anti-inflammatory activity. The LDA was then applied to these two groups to obtain a discriminant function (DF) with the statistical software Statistica 9.0 [18]. The independent variables were the TIs, and the discriminatory property was the anti-inflammatory activity. The discriminant capability was assessed as the percentage of correct classifications in each set of compounds. The classification criterion was the minimal Mahalanobis distance (distance of each case to the mean of all the cases in a category). The quality of the discriminant function was evaluated using the Wilks parameter, λ, which was obtained by multivariate analysis of variance that tests the equality of group means for the variable in the discriminant model.
The method used to select the descriptors was based on the Fisher-Snedecor parameter (F), which determines the relative importance of candidate variables. The variables used to compute the linear classification function are chosen in a stepwise manner: at each step, the variable that makes the largest contribution to the separation of the groups is entered into the discriminant equation (or the variable that makes the smallest contribution is removed).
The validation of the selected function was done using an external test set. Compounds that comprise the test set, were randomly selected from approximately 20% of the data, and were not used in the set up of the DF equation.
Another important parameter that usually provides a balanced evaluation of the model’s prediction is the Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC) [19]. This coefficient is based on the fact that in any prediction process there can be four different possibilities to account for:
  • TP (True positive): Active compounds correctly classified or predicted.
  • FP (False positive): Inactive compounds classified as anti-inflammatory.
  • TN (True negative): Inactive compounds correctly classified.
  • FN (False negative): Anti-inflammatory compounds classified as inactive.
It is clear therefore, that any single number that represents the predictive power of the method must account for all the possibilities listed above. MCC fulfils these requirements. Matthews’ coefficient is defined as shown in Equation (1):
M C C = ( T P × T N ) - ( F P × F N ) ( T N + F N ) × ( T N + F P ) × ( T P + F P ) × ( T P + F N )
The Matthews correlation coefficient ranges from −1 ≤ MCC ≤ 1. A value of MCC = 1 indicates the best possible prediction, in which every compound in the model was correctly classified, whereas if MCC = −1 then we are in the worst possible case (or anti-correlation), where no one single compound has been correctly labeled. Finally, a Matthews correlation coefficient of MCC = 0 is what would be expected for a random prediction.

2.4. Pharmacological-Activity Distribution Diagrams

A pharmacological distribution diagram (PDD) is a graphical representation that provides a straightforward way of visualizing the regions of minimum overlap between active and inactive compounds, as well as the regions in which the probability of finding active compounds is at a maximum [20].
Actually, a PDD is a frequency distribution diagram of dependent variables in which the ordinate represents the expectancy (probability of activity) and the abscissa represents the DF values in the range. For an arbitrary range of values of a given function, an “expectancy of activity” can be defined as Ea = a/(i + 1), where “a” is the number of active compounds in the range divided by the total number of active compounds and “i” is the number of inactive compounds in the interval divided by the total number of inactive compounds. The expectancy of inactivity is defined in a symmetrical way, as Ei = i/(a + 1). Presented with these diagrams, it is easy to visualize the intervals in which there is a maximum probability of finding new active compounds and a minimum probability of finding inactive compounds.

2.5. Topological Virtual Screening

The topological model resulting from DF function was used to find new natural anti-inflammatory compounds. A group of compounds from MicroSource Pure Natural Products Collection database, that has not been employed neither in the training set nor in the test set, were screened for the search of potential new anti-inflammatory natural compounds.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Similarity Study

A study of compounds’ similarity was previously carried out in order to guarantee that no simple or evident structural features are discriminating between the molecules that make up the data set. Thus, molecular weight, MW, partition coefficient, logP, (values estimated for log P with Dragon software, [17]) and Randic index, 1χ, have been calculated for all compounds in the database. These descriptors give us information about the molecular size, lipophilia and molecular branching, respectively.
For these parameters in the training set, we obtained an average value of 300 (MW), 2.66 (logP) and 10.4 (1χ) for the active compounds, whereas average values of 372 (MW), 2.7 (logP) and 10.9 (1χ) were obtained for the inactive ones. Hence, the set is well balanced and no obvious structural differences are expected to distort the study. The results obtained with the test set are similar to those of the training set (see Figure 1).
If we compare these values to those obtained for the selected set of anti-inflammatory natural compounds, i.e., 276.75 (MW), 2.00 (logP) and 8.12 (1χ) value, we can see that the predicted anti-inflammatory natural compounds show lower values of the three parameters, and therefore the structures selected from natural compounds are diverse from those already well-known and used in the training set.

3.2. Mathematical Modeling

The mathematical model was developed from a training set including 412 compounds, with heterogeneous molecular structures. Even if the number of active compounds (123 molecules) and inactive (289) that comprise the training set were not similar in number, this was offset by the construction of a model by which every compound has the same statistical weight. The discriminant Equation (2), is shown below. This equation is comprised of five independent variables:
D F = - 0 , 005 × TI 1 + 5 , 666 × ATS 7 m - 11 , 820 × ATS 4 v - 9 , 178 × ATS 7 v + 28 , 912 × ATS 1 p - 42 , 202
N = 412, F = 46, and λ =0.663.
The molecular descriptors in Equation (2) are described in Table 1 along with their definitions and references.
According to Equation (2), a compound should be classified as active if DF > 0.78, otherwise it is labeled as inactive.
By applying this criterion to the training set (412 compounds), (see supplementary material annex I for details), 61 out of 123 experimentally active compounds were correctly classified as such (50% accuracy), and 284 out of 289 experimentally inactive compounds were also well classified (98% accuracy) as can be seen in Table 2. Altogether, the average of correct classification for the entire set of compounds (active plus inactive) was 74%.
The following formula was used to calculate the percentage of correctly classified compounds within a particular category (active or inactive) as shown in Equation (3):
Classification accuracy ( % ) = ( CCC × 100 / TNC )
where CCC is correctly-classified compounds and TNC is a total number of compounds.
Regarding the Matthews correlation coefficient, which returns a value between −1 and +1, our model shows a value of 0.6, what ensures its reliability.
Furthermore, the Matthews correlation coefficient was calculated in a slightly different way, i.e., by adding +1 to each scale value, in this way the outcome it could be expressed as % accuracy. In other words, 0 would mean no correlation at all, 1 represents 50% and 2 stands for the maximum correlation (100%). By doing so, our model’s yield was 80% (MCC modified = 1.6).
To establish the adequate range of activity, we analyzed the pharmacological distribution diagram obtained with the discriminant function, DF.
Looking at Figure 2, we can appreciate that, all the compounds studied show DF values in the range 8 > DF > −7. Outside these ranges the compound’s classification is uncertain and it is labeled as “not-classified” (outliers), NC.
An easy way to evaluate the quality of the function above is to apply it into an external group. In our case, this group was made up of 84 compounds (41 active and 43 inactive) which had not been included for DF calculation, what is about 20% of the data. Table 3 outlines the results of the prediction obtained for every compound of the test set.
As we can appreciate in Table 2, the success rate is increased in the active group up to 59% (24 of 41 compounds analyzed were correctly classified). In the case of the inactive group belonging to the test set, there are only six compounds misclassified; the rate of correct compounds was 86% (37 of 43 compounds analyzed were correctly classified), indicating that DF has a high specificity in recognizing inactive compounds, because it has the capability to predict if an inactive compound is actually inactive. Hence, we can ensure that the number of “false active” is going to be minimumized. Furthermore, although DF will lead to the loss of some of the active compounds, the important point is that there is a lower risk of including false active compounds when we carry out a database screening searching for anti-inflammatory natural compounds.
As illustrated in Table 3, there is just one outlier or uncertain compound in the inactive group, namely Tropine, whose DF value exceeds the range of application of the model.
In Equation (2), there are topological descriptors which evaluate the molecular bonds, TI1, the atomic masses, ATS7m, Van der Waal volumes, ATS4v and ATS7v, and finally, the atomic polarizabilities of the molecules, ATS1p.
Although it is not easy to unfold the structural features explaining the discriminant equation obtained, some insight can be gained on the basis of the most relevant indices in the regression equation, namely TI1, ATS7m, ATS4v, ATS7v and ATS1p. Each one of these indices refers to a specific physical or chemical property of the molecule.
For example, the Moreau-Broto (ATS) autocorrelation descriptors represent the interactions between atoms at topological distance k, (lag k), for a particular atomic property (weighting factor). In our case, the weighting factors are basically the atomic polarizability, the van der Waals volume and the atomic mass. These descriptors seem to be sensitive to the molecular branching and cyclicity.
From a general overview of the active and inactive compounds, we can find some differences, for example the active compounds typically show hydroxyl groups (low mass and electronic acceptors) which, contrary to the inactive compounds, are placed in the molecule far away from the carbonyls. On the other hand, the inactive set includes compounds showing methoxy groups (higher mass and electronic donors). In general there are less cyclic compounds among the inactive set. See as examples (Figure 3), capsaicin or p-hydroxycinnamaldehyde among the actives or Rhodinyl acetate or theanine among the inactives.
The active compounds often show a higher polarizability (taken into account by the index ATS1p), as compared to the inactive, which is compatible with their larger molecular volume and the presence of hydroxyl groups. Obviously the hydroxyl groups would also play a key role in molecular solubility and the molecule’s capability to form hydrogen bonding, which are also well known factors influencing the activity.
Given the high structural heterogenicity of the molecules used to build up the models, these results can be applied to large databases including natural compounds to search for new active compounds.

3.3. Topological Virtual Screening

Based on the model described above, a virtual screening was carried out on a database of heterogeneous natural compounds. We used some of the compounds of the library MicroSource Pure Natural Products Collection, that were not used for the construction of the model or for the external validation and we performed a virtual screening searching for anti-inflammatory natural compounds. The library composition can be obtained from the MicroSource Discovery Systems website [15].
As shown in Table 4, a set of 74 natural compounds were selected with a DF values between 2 < DF < 6 with predicted activity as anti-inflammatory. Almost all of these were commercially available.
As illustrated in the Table 4, most of the compounds selected had been described previously as anti-inflammatory in the literature (55/74) (see column 9), which is highly encouraging and represents an extra proof of the model’s performance. It is pretty clear that there are many ways of applying the model described herein to the search for new anti-inflammatory natural compounds. Although 19 out of the 74 compounds do not show anti-inflammatory activity, one cannot be sure if this is because of their inactivity or the absence of laboratory tests developed by someone. So it will be an attractive challenge for us to test these compounds and see if some of them would indeed show anti-inflammatory activity.
Virtual screening is increasingly gaining acceptance in the pharmaceutical industry as a cost-effective and timely strategy for analyzing very large chemical data set. This procedure is computationally intensive for analyzing large databases and it provides the most detailed basis for determining which compounds are likely to be potent hits or leads. The results outlined here demonstrate not only that the Topological Virtual Screening could accurately reproduce the well-known pharmacological activity, but also represent a new step forward in the pathway to demonstrate the high efficiency of the in silico methods based in Molecular Topology.

4. Conclusions

The joint use of topological-structural descriptors of compounds and a statistical treatment based on discriminant analysis has been demonstrated as a very efficient methodology for the selection of new natural compounds with anti-inflammatory activity. The mathematical model obtained can readily be applied to the search of new natural compounds in large databases or even for drug design. These results confirm the usefulness of Molecular Topology as a powerful tool in the search for new drugs.

Supplementary Material



We thank the Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación, Spain (project SAF2009-13059-C03-02) for support of this study. The authors want to express their acknowledgements to Jorge Gálvez from the University of Valencia, for his help and useful comments.


  1. Gautam, R.; Jachak, S.M. Recent developments in anti-inflammatory natural products. Med. Res. Rev 2009, 29, 767–820. [Google Scholar]
  2. Butler, M.S. Natural products to drugs: Natural product-derived compounds in clinical trials. Nat. Prod. Rep 2008, 25, 475–516. [Google Scholar]
  3. Chin, Y.W.; Balunas, M.J.; Chai, H.B.; Kinghorn, A.D. Drug discovery from natural sources. AAPS J 2006, 8, 239–253. [Google Scholar]
  4. Paterson, I.; Anderson, E.A. The renaissance of natural products as drug candidates. Science 2005, 310, 451–453. [Google Scholar]
  5. Lam, K.S. New aspects of natural products in drug discovery. Trends Microbiol 2007, 15, 279–289. [Google Scholar]
  6. Wilson, R.M.; Danishefsky, S.J. Small molecule natural products in the discovery of therapeutic agents: The synthesis connection. J. Org. Chem 2006, 71, 8329–8351. [Google Scholar]
  7. Bohlin, L.; Göransson, U.; Alsmark, C.; Wedén, C.; Backlund, A. Natural products in modern life science. Phytochem. Rev 2010, 9, 279–301. [Google Scholar]
  8. Galvez, J.; Villar, M.; Galvez-Llompart, M.; Amigo, M. Chemistry explained by topology: An alternative approach. Comb. Chem. High Throughput Screen 2011, 14, 279–283. [Google Scholar]
  9. García-Domenech, R.; Gálvez, J.; de Julián-Ortiz, J.V.; Pogliani, L. Some new trends in chemical graph theory. Chem. Rev 2008, 108, 1127–1169. [Google Scholar]
  10. Horrobin, D.F. Innovation in the pharmaceutical industry. J. R. Soc. Med 2000, 93, 341–345. [Google Scholar]
  11. Galvez-Llompart, M.; Giner, M.; Recio, C.; Candeletti, S.; Garcia-Domenech, R. Application of molecular topology to the search of novel NSAIDs: Experimental validation of activity. Lett. Drug Des. Discov 2010, 7, 438–445. [Google Scholar]
  12. Pla-Franco, J.; Gálvez-Llompart, M.; Gálvez, J.; García-Domenech, R. Application of molecular topology for the prediction of reaction yields and anti-inflammatory activity of heterocyclic amidine derivatives. Int. J. Mol. Sci 2011, 12, 1281–1292. [Google Scholar]
  13. Marrero-Ponce, Y.; Siverio-Mota, D.; Gálvez-Llompart, M.; Recio, M.C.; Giner, R.M.; García-Domènech, R.; Torrens, F.; Arán, V.J.; Cordero-Maldonado, M.L.; Esguera, C.V.; et al. Discovery of novel anti-inflammatory drug-like compounds by aligning in silico and in vivo screening: The nitroindazolinone chemotype. Eur. J. Med. Chem 2011, 46, 5736–5753. [Google Scholar]
  14. Kontogiorgis, C.; Bompou, E.M.; Ntella, M.; Berghe, W.V. Natural products from mediterranean diet: From anti-inflammatory agents to dietary epigenetic modulators. Anti Inflamm. Anti Allergy Agents Med. Chem 2010, 9, 101–124. [Google Scholar]
  15. MicroSource Discovery Systems. Available online: accessed on 14 December 2011.
  16. ChemDraw, version Ultra 10.0; CambridgeSoft: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2006.
  17. Dragon Software, version 5.4-2006; Talete, SRL: Milan, Italy, 2006.
  18. Statistica (data analysis software system), version 9.0; StatSoft, I: Tulsa, OK, USA, 2009.
  19. Matthews, B.W. Comparison of the predicted and observed secondary structure of T4 phage lysozyme. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1975, 405, 442–451. [Google Scholar]
  20. Gálvez, J.; García-Domenech, R.; de Gregorio Alapont, C.; de Julián-Ortiz, J.; Popa, L. Pharmacological distribution diagrams: A tool for de novo drug design. J. Mol. Graph 1996, 5, 272–276. [Google Scholar]
  21. Mohar, B.; Babic, D.; Trinajstic, N. A novel definition of the Wiener index for trees. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci 1993, 33, 153–154. [Google Scholar]
  22. Broto, P.; Devillers, J. Autocorrelation of Properties Distributed on Molecular Graphs. In Practical Application of Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship (QSAR) in Environmental Chemistry and Toxicology; Karcher, W., Devillers, J., Eds.; Kluwer Academic Publishers: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1990; pp. 105–127. [Google Scholar]
  23. Moreau, G.; Broto, P. Autocorrelation of molecular structures, application to SAR studies. Nouv. J. Chim 1980, 4, 757–764. [Google Scholar]
  24. Won, S.J.; Liu, C.T.; Tsao, L.T.; Weng, J.R.; Ko, H.H.; Wang, J.P.; Lin, C.N. Synthetic chalcones as potential anti-inflammatory and cancer chemopreventive agents. Eur. J. Med. Chem 2005, 40, 103–112. [Google Scholar]
  25. Tewtrakul, S.; Subhadhirasakul, S.; Karalai, C.; Ponglimanont, C.; Cheenpracha, S. Anti-inflammatory effects of compounds from Kaempferia parviflora and Boesenbergia pandurata. Food Chem 2009, 115, 534–538. [Google Scholar]
  26. Witaicenis, A.; Seito, L.N.; di Stasi, L.C. Intestinal anti-inflammatory activity of esculetin and 4-methylesculetin in the trinitrobenzenesulphonic acid model of rat colitis. Chem. Biol. Interact 2010, 186, 211–218. [Google Scholar]
  27. Ruan, Q.; Zhang, W.; Hufnagl, P.; Kaun, C.; Binder, B.R.; Wojta, J. Anisodamine counteracts lipopolysaccharide-induced tissue factor and plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 expression in human endothelial cells: Contribution of the NF-kB pathway. J. Vasc. Res 2001, 38, 13–19. [Google Scholar]
  28. Nunomura, R.C.S.; Oliveira, V.G.; Silvab, S.; Nunomuraa, S.M. Characterization of bergenin in Endopleura uchi bark and its anti-inflammatory activity. J. Braz. Chem. Soc 2009, 20, 1060–1064. [Google Scholar]
  29. Nazir, N.; Koul, S.; Qurishi, M.A.; Taneja, S.C.; Ahmad, S.F.; Bani, S.; Qazi, G.N. Immunomodulatory effect of bergenin and norbergenin against adjuvant-induced arthritis—A flow cytometric study. J. Ethnopharmacol 2007, 112, 401–405. [Google Scholar]
  30. Lourens, A.; Reddy, D.; Baser, K.; Viljoen, A.; van Vuuren, S. In vitro biological activity and essential oil composition of four indigenous South African Helichrysum species. J. Ethnopharmacol 2004, 95, 253–258. [Google Scholar]
  31. Hsu, D.Z.; Liu, M.Y. Bicuculline methiodide attenuates hepatic injury and decreases mortality in septic rats: Role of cytokines. Shock 2004, 22, 347–350. [Google Scholar]
  32. Dai, S.J.; Ren, Y.; Shen, L.; Zhang, D.W. New alkaloids from Forsythia suspensa and their anti-inflammatory activities. Planta Med 2009, 75, 375–377. [Google Scholar]
  33. Konrath, E.L.; Santin, K.; Nassif, M.; Latini, A.; Henriques, A.; Salbego, C. Antioxidant and pro-oxidant properties of boldine on hippocampal slices exposed to oxygen-glucose deprivation in vitro. Neurotoxicology 2008, 29, 1136–1140. [Google Scholar]
  34. O’Brien, P.; Carrasco-Pozo, C.; Speisky, H. Boldine and its antioxidant or health-promoting properties. Chem. Biol. Interact 2006, 159, 1–17. [Google Scholar]
  35. Sasaki, Y.; Hosokawa, T.; Nagai, M.; Nagumo, S. In vitro study for inhibition of NO production about constituents of Sappan Lignum. Biol. Pharm. Bull 2007, 30, 193–196. [Google Scholar]
  36. Shen, J.; Zhang, H.; Lin, H.; Su, H.; Xing, D.; Du, L. Brazilein protects the brain against focal cerebral ischemia reperfusion injury correlating to inflammatory response suppression. Eur. J. Pharmacol 2007, 558, 88–95. [Google Scholar]
  37. Cashman, J.; Burt, H.; Springate, C.; Gleave, J.; Jackson, J. Camptothecin-loaded films for the prevention of postsurgical adhesions. Inflamm. Res 2004, 53, 355–362. [Google Scholar]
  38. Wall, M.E.; Wani, M.; Cook, C.; Palmer, K.; McPhail, A.; Sim, G. The isolation and structure of camptothecin, a novel alkaloidal leukemia and tumor inhibitor from Camptotheca acuminata. J. Am. Chem. Soc 1966, 88, 3888–3890. [Google Scholar]
  39. Gupta, S.C.; Kim, J.H.; Prasad, S.; Aggarwal, B.B. Regulation of survival, proliferation, invasion, angiogenesis, and metastasis of tumor cells through modulation of inflammatory pathways by nutraceuticals. Cancer Metastasis Rev 2010, 29, 405–434. [Google Scholar]
  40. Luo, X.J.; Peng, J.; Li, Y.J. Recent advances in the study on capsaicinoids and capsinoids. Eur. J. Pharmacol 2010, 650, 1–7. [Google Scholar]
  41. Mengoni, E.S.; Vichera, G.; Rigano, L.A.; Rodriguez-Puebla, M.L.; Galliano, S.R.; Cafferata, E.E.; Pivetta, O.H.; Moreno, S.; Vojnov, A.A. Suppression of COX-2, IL-1[beta] and TNF-[alpha] expression and leukocyte infiltration in inflamed skin by bioactive compounds from Rosmarinus officinalis L. Fitoterapia 2011, 82, 414–421. [Google Scholar]
  42. Trinh, H.T.; Chae, S.J.; Joh, E.H.; Son, K.H.; Jeon, S.J.; Kim, D.H. Tanshinones isolated from the rhizome of Salvia miltiorrhiza inhibit passive cutaneous anaphylaxis reaction in mice. J. Ethnopharmacol 2010, 132, 344–348. [Google Scholar]
  43. Wang, M.; Dai, H.; Li, X.; Li, Y.; Wang, L.; Xue, M. Structural elucidation of metabolites of tanshinone I and its analogue dihydrotanshinone I in rats by HPLC-ESI-MSn. J. Chromatogr. B 2010, 878, 915–924. [Google Scholar]
  44. Singh, K.; Jaggi, A.S.; Singh, N. Exploring the ameliorative potential of Punica granatum in dextran sulfate sodium induced ulcerative colitis in mice. Phytother. Res 2009, 23, 1565–1574. [Google Scholar]
  45. Ogawa, Y.; Kanatsu, K.; Iino, T.; Kato, S.; Jeong, Y.; Shibata, N.; Takada, K.; Takeuchi, K. Protection against dextran sulfate sodium-induced colitis by microspheres of ellagic acid in rats. Life Sci 2002, 71, 827–839. [Google Scholar]
  46. Min, K.R.A.K.; Wang, B.Y.; Lim, H.S.; Kang, B.S.; Oh, G.J.; Lee, J.; Kang, S.H.; Lee, K.S.; Ro, J.S.; Kim, Y. (−)-Epiafzelechin: Cyclooxygenase-1 inhibitor and anti-inflammatory agent from aerial parts of Celastrus orbiculatus. Planta Med. 1999, 65, 460–462. [Google Scholar]
  47. Yasukawa, K.; Akihisa, T.; Yoshida, Z.; Takido, M. Inhibitory effect of euphol, a triterpene alcohol from the roots of Euphorbia kansui, on tumour Promotion by 12-Otetradecanoylphorbol- 13-acetate in two-stage carcinogenesis in mouse skin. J. Pharm. Pharmacol 2000, 52, 119–124. [Google Scholar]
  48. Kroes, B.; Van den Berg, A.; Van Ufford, H.C.Q.; van Dijk, H.; Labadie, R. Anti-inflammatory activity of gallic acid. Planta Med 1992, 58, 499–499. [Google Scholar]
  49. Németh, Z.H.; Deitch, E.A.; Szabó, C.; Mabley, J.G.; Pacher, P.; Fekete, Z.; Hauser, C.J.; Haskó, G. Na/H exchanger blockade inhibits enterocyte inflammatory response and protects against colitis. Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol 2002, 283, G122–G132. [Google Scholar]
  50. Choi, J.; Jeong, T.; Kim, D.; Kim, Y.; Na, H.; Nam, K.; Lee, S.; Kim, H.; Oh, S.R.; Choi, Y.; et al. Hematein inhibits atherosclerosis by inhibition of reactive oxygen generation and NF-κB-dependent inflammatory mediators in hyperlipidemic mice. J. Cardiovasc. Pharmacol 2003, 42, 287–295. [Google Scholar]
  51. Chandrasekaran, C.; Deepak, H.; Thiyagarajan, P.; Kathiresan, S.; Sangli, G.K.; Deepak, M.; Agarwal, A. Dual Inhibitory Effect of Glycyrrhiza Glabra (GutGard (TM)) on COX and LOX Products; Urban & Fischer Verlag: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  52. Geraets, L.; Moonen, H.J.J.; Brauers, K.; Wouters, E.F.M.; Bast, A.; Hageman, G.J. Dietary flavones and flavonoles are inhibitors of poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase-1 in pulmonary epithelial cells. J. Nutr 2007, 137, 2190–2195. [Google Scholar]
  53. Ahn, K.S.; Noh, E.J.; Cha, K.H.; Kim, Y.S.; Lim, S.S.; Shin, K.H.; Jung, S.H. Inhibitory effects of Irigenin from the rhizomes of Belamcanda chinensis on nitric oxide and prostaglandin E2 production in murine macrophage RAW 264.7 cells. Life Sci 2006, 78, 2336–2342. [Google Scholar]
  54. Lee, S.; Kim, J.; Seo, G.; Kim, Y.C.; Sohn, D. Isoliquiritigenin, from Dalbergia odorifera, up-regulates anti-inflammatory heme oxygenase-1 expression in RAW264.7 macrophages. Inflamm. Res 2009, 58, 257–262. [Google Scholar]
  55. Chan, S.C.; Chang, Y.S.; Wang, J.P.; Chen, S.C.; Kuo, S.C. Three new flavonoids and antiallergic anti-inflammatory constituents from the heartwood of Dalbergia odorifera. Planta Med 1998, 64, 153–158. [Google Scholar]
  56. Maes, M.; Mihaylova, I.; Ruyter, M.D.; Kubera, M.; Bosmans, E. The immune effects of TRYCATs (tryptophan catabolites along the IDO pathway): Relevance for depression—And other conditions characterized by tryptophan depletion induced by inflammation. Neuroendocrinol. Lett 2007, 28, 826–831. [Google Scholar]
  57. Alia, B.; Bashir, A.; Tanira, M. Anti-inflammatory, antipyretic, and analgesic effects of Lawsonia inermis L. (henna) in rats. Pharmacology 1995, 51, 356–363. [Google Scholar]
  58. Yadav, V.R.; Prasad, S.; Sung, B.; Kannappan, R.; Aggarwal, B.B. Targeting inflammatory pathways by triterpenoids for prevention and treatment of cancer. Toxins 2010, 2, 2428–2466. [Google Scholar]
  59. Du, H.; Matsushima, T.; Spyvee, M.; Goto, M.; Shirota, H.; Gusovsky, F.; Chiba, K.; Kotake, M.; Yoneda, N.; Eguchi, Y. Discovery of a potent, metabolically stabilized resorcylic lactone as an anti-inflammatory lead. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett 2009, 19, 6196–6199. [Google Scholar]
  60. Shen, Y.; Du, H.; Kotake, M.; Matsushima, T.; Goto, M.; Shirota, H.; Gusovsky, F.; Li, X.; Jiang, Y.; Schiller, S. Discovery of an in vitro and in vivo potent resorcylic lactone analog of LL-Z1640-2 as anti-inflammatory lead, II. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett 2010, 20, 3047–3049. [Google Scholar]
  61. Kubo, K. In studies on N-cyclohexylanthranilic acid analogs. I. synthesis and analgesic activity. Chem. Abstr 1978, 88, 570. [Google Scholar]
  62. Shah, V.O.; Ferguson, J.; Hunsaker, L.A.; Deck, L.M.; Vander Jagt, D.L. Cardiac glycosides inhibit LPS-induced activation of pro-inflammatory cytokines in whole blood through an NF-κB-dependent mechanism. Int. J. Appl. Res. Nat. Prod 2011, 4, 11–19. [Google Scholar]
  63. Phitak, T.; Choocheep, K.; Pothacharoen, P.; Pompimon, W.; Premanode, B.; Kongtawelert, P. The effects of p-hydroxycinnamaldehyde from Alpinia galanga extracts on human chondrocytes. Phytochemistry 2009, 70, 237–243. [Google Scholar]
  64. Morikawa, T.; Ando, S.; Matsuda, H.; Kataoka, S.; Muraoka, O.; Yoshikawa, M. Inhibitors of nitric oxide production from the rhizomes of Alpinia galanga: Structures of new 8–9′ linked neolignans and sesquineolignan. Chem. Pharm. Bull 2005, 53, 625–630. [Google Scholar]
  65. Madhukar, M.; Sawraj, S.; Sharma, P.D. Design, synthesis and evaluation of mutual prodrug of 4-biphenylacetic acid and quercetin tetramethyl ether (BPA-QTME) as gastrosparing NSAID. Eur. J. Med. Chem 2010, 45, 2591–2596. [Google Scholar]
  66. Al-Harbi, M.M.; Qureshi, S.; Ahmed, M.M.; Raza, M.; Miana, G.A.; Shah, A.H. Studies on the antiinflammatory, antipyretic and analgesic activities of santonin. Jpn. J. Pharmacol 1994, 64, 135–139. [Google Scholar]
  67. Wagoner, J.; Morishima, C.; Graf, T.N.; Oberlies, N.H.; Teissier, E.; Pécheur, E.I.; Tavis, J.E.; Polyak, S.J. Differential in vitro effects of intravenous versus oral formulations of silibinin on the HCV life cycle and inflammation. PLoS One 2011, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Bannwart, C.F.; Peracoli, J.C.; Nakaira-Takahagi, E.; Peracoli, M.T. Inhibitory effect of silibinin on tumour necrosis factor-alpha and hydrogen peroxide production by human monocytes. Nat. Prod. Res 2010, 24, 1747–1757. [Google Scholar]
  69. Hou, Y.C.; Liou, K.T.; Chern, C.M.; Wang, Y.H.; Liao, J.F.; Chang, S.; Chou, Y.H.; Shen, Y.C. Preventive effect of silymarin in cerebral ischemia-reperfusion-induced brain injury in rats possibly through impairing NF-[kappa] B and STAT-1 activation. Phytomedicine 2010, 17, 963–973. [Google Scholar]
  70. Pan, C.H.; Kim, E.S.; Jung, S.H.; Nho, C.W.; Lee, J.K. Tectorigenin inhibits IFN-γ/LPS-induced inflammatory responses in murine macrophage RAW 264.7 cells. Arch. Pharm. Res 2008, 31, 1447–1456. [Google Scholar]
  71. Kim, Y.P.; Yamada, M.; Lim, S.S.; Lee, S.H.; Ryu, N.; Shin, K.H.; Ohuchi, K. Inhibition by tectorigenin and tectoridin of prostaglandin E2 production and cyclooxygenase-2 induction in rat peritoneal macrophages. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Mol. Cell Biol. Lipids 1999, 1438, 399–407. [Google Scholar]
  72. Marquez-Martin, A.; Puerta, R.D.L.; Fernandez-Arche, A.; Ruiz-Gutierrez, V.; Yaqoob, P. Modulation of cytokine secretion by pentacyclic triterpenes from olive pomace oil in human mononuclear cells. Cytokine 2006, 36, 211–217. [Google Scholar]
  73. Öztürk, A.; Özbek, H. The anti-inflammatory activity of Eugenia caryophyllata essential oil: An animal model of anti-inflammatory activity. Eur. J. Gen. Med 2005, 2, 159–163. [Google Scholar]
  74. Zou, J.; Jin, D.; Chen, W.; Wang, J.; Liu, Q.; Zhu, X.; Zhao, W. Selective cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors from Calophyllum membranaceum. J. Nat. Prod 2005, 68, 1514–1518. [Google Scholar]
  75. PubChem Bioassay. Available online: accessed on 27 October 2011.
  76. Mencherini, T.; Cau, A.; Bianco, G.; Loggia, R.D.; Aquino, R. An extract of Apium graveolens var. dulce leaves: Structure of the major constituent, apiin, and its anti-inflammatory properties. J. Pharm. Pharmacol 2007, 59, 891–897. [Google Scholar]
  77. Ocana, A.; Gomez-Asensio, C.; Arranz-Gutierrez, E.; Torres, C.; Senorans, F.J.; Reglero, G. In vitro study of the effect of diesterified alkoxyglycerols with conjugated linoleic acid on adipocyte inflammatory mediators. Lipids Health. Dis 2010, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Matsui, J.; Ikemoto, T.; Yoshida, M.; Kakishima, H. Anti-inflammatory skin-lightening cosmetics containing (iso)bergaptol. JP Patent 2001114663, 24 April 2001. [Google Scholar]
  79. Reddy, M.K.; Alexander-Lindo, R.L.; Nair, M.G. Relative inhibition of lipid peroxidation, cyclooxygenase enzymes, and human tumor cell proliferation by natural food colors. J. Agric. Food Chem 2005, 53, 9268–9273. [Google Scholar]
  80. Washiyama, M.; Sasaki, Y.; Hosokawa, T.; Nagumo, S. Anti-inflammatory constituents of Sappan lignum. Biol. Pharm. Bull 2009, 32, 941–944. [Google Scholar]
  81. Horie, S.; Okuda, C.; Yamashita, T.; Watanabe, K.; Kuramochi, K.; Hosokawa, M.; Takeuchi, T.; Kakuda, M.; Miyashita, K.; Sugawara, F. Purified canola lutein selectively inhibits specific isoforms of mammalian DNA polymerases and reduces inflammatory response. Lipids 2010, 45, 713–721. [Google Scholar]
  82. Fernandes, E.S.; Passos, G.F.; Medeiros, R.; da Cunha, F.M.; Ferreira, J.; Campos, M.M.; Pianowski, L.F.; Calixto, J. Anti-inflammatory effects of compounds alpha-humulene and (−)-trans-caryophyllene isolated from the essential oil of Cordia verbenacea. Eur. J. Pharmacol 2007, 569, 228–236. [Google Scholar]
  83. Mazura, M.; Susanti, D.; Rasadah, M. Anti-inflammatory action of components from Melastoma malabathricum. Pharm. Biol 2007, 45, 372–375. [Google Scholar]
  84. Lima, J.; Oliveira, A.; Miranda, A.L.P.; Rezende, C.; Pinto, A. Anti-inflammatory and antinociceptive activities of an acid fraction of the seeds of Carpotroche brasiliensis (Raddi)(Flacourtiaceae). Braz. J. Med. Biol. Res 2005, 38, 1095–1103. [Google Scholar]
  85. Li, X.; Yang, Y.B.; Yang, Q.; Sun, L.N.; Chen, W.S. Anti-Inflammatory and analgesic activities of Chaenomeles speciosa fractions in laboratory animals. J. Med. Food 2009, 12, 1016–1022. [Google Scholar]
  86. Bastos, V.P.D.; Gomes, A.S.; Lima, F.J.B.; Brito, T.S.; Soares, P.M.G.; Pinho, J.P.M.; Silva, C.S.; Santos, A.A.; Souza, M.H.L.P.; Magalhães, P.J.C. Inhaled 1,8-cineole reduces inflammatory parameters in airways of ovalbumin-challenged Guinea pigs. Basic Clin. Pharmacol. Toxicol 2010, 108, 34–39. [Google Scholar]
  87. Park, K.Y.; Lee, S.; Min, B.; Lee, K.S.; Choi, J.; Chung, S.R.; Min, K.R.; Kim, Y. Inhibitory effect of luteolin 4′-O-glucoside from Kummerowia striata and other flavonoids on interleukin-5 bioactivity. Planta Med 1999, 65, 457–459. [Google Scholar]
  88. Rehani, K.; Scott, D.A.; Renaud, D.; Hamza, H.; Williams, L.R.; Wang, H.; Martin, M. Cotinine-induced convergence of the cholinergic and PI3 kinase-dependent anti-inflammatory pathways in innate immune cells. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Mol. Cell Res 2008, 1783, 375–382. [Google Scholar]
  89. Kalayarasan, S.; Sriram, N.; Sudhandiran, G. Diallyl sulfide attenuates bleomycin-induced pulmonary fibrosis: Critical role of iNOS, NF-[kappa] B, TNF-[alpha] and IL-1[beta]. Life Sci 2008, 82, 1142–1153. [Google Scholar]
  90. Marinier, B. Unsymmetrical derivatives of djenkolic acid. U.S. Patent 3448142(A), 19 April 1969. [Google Scholar]
  91. Del-Vechio-Vieira, G.; Sousa, O.V.; Miranda, M.A.; Senna-Valle, L.; Kaplan, M.A.C. Analgesic and anti-inflammatory properties of essential oil from Ageratum fastigiatum. Braz. Arch. Biol. Techn 2009, 52, 1115–1121. [Google Scholar]
  92. Rai, S.K.; Sharma, M.; Tiwari, M. Inhibitory effect of novel diallyldisulfide analogs on HMG-CoA reductase expression in hypercholesterolemic rats: CREB as a potential upstream target. Life Sci 2009, 85, 211–219. [Google Scholar]
  93. Koehler, A.N. Methods for modulating NF-κB using gibberellins. U.S. Patent WO 2010062372, 3 June 2010. [Google Scholar]
  94. Nakamichi, K.; Nakano, T.; Yasuura, H.; Izumi, S.; Kawashima, Y. Stabilization of sodium guaiazulene sulfonate in granules for tableting prepared using a twin-screw extruder. Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm 2003, 56, 347–354. [Google Scholar]
  95. Hamsa, T.; Kuttan, G. Harmine inhibits tumour specific neo vessel formation by regulating VEGF, MMP, TIMP and pro inflammatory mediators both in vivo and in vitro. Eur. J. Pharmacol 2010, 15, 64–73. [Google Scholar]
  96. Yamazaki, Y.; Kawano, Y. Inhibitory effects of herbal alkaloids on the tumor necrosis factor-α and nitric oxide production in lipopolysaccharide-stimulated RAW264 macrophages. Chem. Pharm. Bull 2011, 59, 388–391. [Google Scholar]
  97. Lanhers, M.C.; Fleurentin, J.; Mortier, F.; Vinche, A.; Younos, C. Anti-inflammatory and analgesic effects of an aqueous extract of Harpagophytum procumbens. Planta Med 1992, 58, 117–123. [Google Scholar]
  98. Rao, K. Screening of anti-inflammatory and hepatoprotective activities of alantolactone, isolated from the roots of Inula racemosa. Indian Drugs 1997, 34, 571–575. [Google Scholar]
  99. Kang, S.R.; Park, K.I.; Park, H.S.; Lee, D.H.; Kim, J.A.; Nagappan, A.; Kim, E.H.; Lee, W.S.; Shin, S.C.; Park, M.K. Anti-inflammatory effect of flavonoids isolated from Korea Citrus Aurantium L. on lipopolysaccharide-induced mouse macrophage RAW 264.7 cells by blocking of nuclear factor-kappa B (NF-[kappa]B) and mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling pathways. Food Chem 2011, 129, 1721–1728. [Google Scholar]
  100. Byeon, S.E.; Lee, Y.G.; Kim, J.; Han, J.G.; Lee, H.Y.; Cho, J.Y. Hinokitiol, a natural tropolone derivative, inhibits TNF-alpha production in LPS-activated macrophages via suppression of NF-kappa B. Planta Med 2008, 74, 828–833. [Google Scholar]
  101. Kim, E.J.; Park, H.; Kim, J.; Park, J.H.Y. 3,3′-diindolylmethane suppresses 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate-induced inflammation and tumor promotion in mouse skin via the downregulation of inflammatory mediators. Mol. Carcinog 2010, 49, 672–683. [Google Scholar]
  102. Claxson, A.; Morris, C.; Blake, D.; Siren, M.; Halliwell, B.; Gustafsson, T.; Löfkvist, B.; Bergelin, I. The anti-inflammatory effects of D-myo-inositol-1,2,6-trisphosphate (PP56) on animal models of inflammation. Inflamm. Res 1990, 29, 68–70. [Google Scholar]
  103. Maruo, S.; Kuriyama, I.; Kuramochi, K.; Tsubaki, K.; Yoshida, H.; Mizushina, Y. Inhibitory effect of novel 5-O-acyl juglones on mammalian DNA polymerase activity, cancer cell growth and inflammatory response. Bioorg. Med. Chem 2011, 19, 5803–5812. [Google Scholar]
  104. Keiss, H.P.; Dirsch, V.M.; Hartung, T.; Haffner, T.; Trueman, L.; Auger, J.; Kahane, R.; Vollmar, A.M. Garlic (Allium sativum L.) modulates cytokine expression in lipopolysaccharide-activated human blood thereby inhibiting NF-kappaB activity. J. Nutr 2003, 133, 2171–2175. [Google Scholar]
  105. Orhan, I.; Kupeli, E.; Sener, B.; Yesilada, E. Appraisal of anti-inflammatory potential of the clubmoss, Lycopodium clavatum L. J. Ethnopharmacol 2007, 109, 146–150. [Google Scholar]
  106. Kawamura, F.; Nakanishi, M.; Hirashima, N. Effects of menadione, a reactive oxygen generator, on leukotriene secretion from RBL-2H3 cells. Biol. Pharm. Bull 2010, 33, 881–885. [Google Scholar]
  107. Juergens, U.R.; Stober, M.; Vetter, H. The anti-inflammatory activity of L-menthol compared to mint oil in human monocytes in vitro: A novel perspective for its therapeutic use in inflammatory diseases. Eur. J. Med. Res 1998, 3, 539–545. [Google Scholar]
  108. Kawata, J.; Kameda, M.; Miyazawa, M. Cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitory effects of monoterpenoids with a p-methane skeleton. Int. J. Essent. Oil Ther 2008, 2, 145–148. [Google Scholar]
  109. Frydas, S.; Papaioannou, N.; Papazahariadou, M.; Hatzistilianou, M.; Karagouni, E.; Trakatelli, M.; Brellou, G.; Petrarca, C.; Castellani, M.L.; Conti, P.; et al. Inhibition of MCP-1 and MIP-2 chemokines in murine trichinellosis: Effect of the anti-inflammatory compound L-mimosine. Int. J. Immunopathol. Pharmacol 2005, 18, 85–94. [Google Scholar]
  110. Luft, P.; Oostingh, G.J.; Gruijthuijsen, Y.; Horejs-Hoeck, J.; Lehmann, I.; Duschl, A. Patulin influences the expression of Th1/Th2 cytokines by activated peripheral blood mononuclear cells and T cells through depletion of intracellular glutathione. Environ. Toxicol 2008, 23, 84–95. [Google Scholar]
  111. Lim, H.; Son, K.H.; Chang, H.W.; Bae, K.H.; Kang, S.S.; Kim, H.P. Anti-inflammatory activity of Pectolinarigenin and Pectolinarin isolated from Cirsium chanroenicum. Biol. Pharm. Bull 2008, 31, 2063–2067. [Google Scholar]
  112. Gemmell, D.K.; Cottney, J.; Lewis, A.J. Comparative effects of drugs on four paw oedema models in the rat. Inflamm. Res 1979, 9, 107–116. [Google Scholar]
  113. Bae, G.S.; Kim, M.S.; Jung, W.S.; Seo, S.W.; Yun, S.W.; Kim, S.G.; Park, R.K.; Kim, E.C.; Song, H.J.; Park, S.J. Inhibition of lipopolysaccharide-induced inflammatory responses by piperine. Eur. J. Pharmacol 2010, 642, 154–162. [Google Scholar]
  114. Luo, P.; Wong, Y.F.; Ge, L.; Zhang, Z.F.; Liu, Y.; Liu, L.; Zhou, H. Anti-inflammatory and analgesic effect of plumbagin through inhibition of nuclear factor-κB activation. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther 2010, 335, 735–742. [Google Scholar]
  115. Kim, J.-Y.; Lee, W.-K.; Yu, Y.G.; Kim, J.-H. Blockade of LTB4-induced chemotaxis by bioactive molecules interfering with the BLT2-Gαi interaction. Biochem. Pharmacol 2010, 79, 1506–1515. [Google Scholar]
  116. Hong, E.S.; Ahn, G.U.; Cho, B.G. Cosmetics containing rhapontin. KR Patent 2011013813, 10 February 2011. [Google Scholar]
  117. Takahashi, A.; Nakata, K. Anti-inflammatory effects of peppermint. Aromatopia 1995, 13, 42–45. [Google Scholar]
  118. Arjumand, W.; Seth, A.; Sultana, S. Rutin attenuates cisplatin induced renal inflammation and apoptosis by reducing NFkappaB, TNF-alpha and caspase-3 expression in wistar rats. Food Chem. Toxicol 2011, 49, 2013–2021. [Google Scholar]
  119. Yan, W.; Guo, Y.; Xu, Z.; Huang, R. Vacuum distillation preparation and pharmaceutical application of Asarum heterotropoides volatile oil. CN Patent 101530442, 16 September 2009. [Google Scholar]
  120. Jin, M.H.; Bae, K.; Chang, H.W.; Son, J.K. Anti-inflammatory compounds from the leaves of Ailanthus altissima. Biomol. Ther.(Seoul. ) 2009, 32, 86–91. [Google Scholar]
  121. Xing, J.; Sun, J.; Dong, Y.; Qu, Q.; Yuan, Z.; Hu, S.; Shi, R. Application of shikimic acid to prepare medicines for treating ulcerative colitis. CN Patent 101352427, 28 January 2009. [Google Scholar]
  122. Xing, J.-F.; Sun, J.-N.; Hou, J.-Y.; Guo, Y.-J.; Wang, X.-K.; Zheng, X.-H.; Guo, R.-T. Antiinflammatory effects of 3,4-oxo-isopropylidene-shikimic acid. Zhongguo Yaoxue Zazhi 2006, 41, 1861–1863. [Google Scholar]
  123. El Gazzar, M.; El Mezayen, R.; Marecki, J.C.; Nicolls, M.R.; Canastar, A.; Dreskin, S.C. Anti-inflammatory effect of thymoquinone in a mouse model of allergic lung inflammation. Int. Immunopharmacol 2006, 6, 1135–1142. [Google Scholar]
  124. Ganguly, K.; Sharma, A.V.; Reiter, R.J.; Swarnakar, S. Melatonin promotes angiogenesis during protection and healing of indomethacin-induced gastric ulcer: Role of matrix metalloproteinase-2. J. Pineal Res 2010, 49, 130–140. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Average, maximum and minimum values (gray, white and black bars, respectively) obtained with molecular weight, MW, partition coefficient, logP, and Randic index, 1χ for the training and test sets of compounds.
Figure 1. Average, maximum and minimum values (gray, white and black bars, respectively) obtained with molecular weight, MW, partition coefficient, logP, and Randic index, 1χ for the training and test sets of compounds.
Ijms 12 09481f1
Figure 2. Pharmacological distribution diagram for natural anti-inflammatory compounds obtained using the discriminant function DF. (The black color represents the compounds with anti-inflammatory activity and the white color, the compounds without it).
Figure 2. Pharmacological distribution diagram for natural anti-inflammatory compounds obtained using the discriminant function DF. (The black color represents the compounds with anti-inflammatory activity and the white color, the compounds without it).
Ijms 12 09481f2
Figure 3. General overview of the active and inactive compounds by their structural and chemical properties.
Figure 3. General overview of the active and inactive compounds by their structural and chemical properties.
Ijms 12 09481f3
Table 1. Descriptors used in this model.
Table 1. Descriptors used in this model.
TI1first Mohar index[21]
ATS7m2D Broto-Moreau autocorrelation of a topological structure-lag7/weighted by atomic masses[22]
ATS4v2D Broto-Moreau autocorrelation of a topological structure-lag4/weighted by Van der Waal volumes[23]
ATS7v2D Broto-Moreau autocorrelation of a topological structure-lag7/weighted by Van der Waal volumes[23]
ATS1p2D Broto-Moreau autocorrelation of a topological structure-lag4/weighted by Atomic polarizabilities[23]
Table 2. Classification matrix obtained through the selected discriminant function (DF) for the training and test set.
Table 2. Classification matrix obtained through the selected discriminant function (DF) for the training and test set.
Percent-CorrectCompounds Classified as ActiveCompounds Classified as Inactive
Training Set

Active Group506162
Inactive Group985284

Test Set

Active Group592417
Inactive Group86637
Table 3. Results of prediction of anti-inflammatory activity obtained applying the linear discriminant analysis to the test set.
Table 3. Results of prediction of anti-inflammatory activity obtained applying the linear discriminant analysis to the test set.

Active Group

β-CARYOPHYLLENE ALCOHOL23.7503.1202.925.13A[30]
BICUCULLINE (+)158.893.693.663.243.25−0.95I[31,32]
CARNOSIC ACID54.112.933.812.683.21−2.66I[41]
DIHYDROTANSHINONE I57.022.663.512.43.13−0.49I[42,43]
ELLAGIC ACID56.292.613.431.723.023.35A[44,45]
EPIAFZELECHIN (2R,3R)(−)44.793.023.062.532.981.45A[46]
GALLIC ACID001.9302.332.36A[48]
IRIGENIN TRIMETHYL ETHER90.883.733.753.273.17−4.15I[53]
KOPARIN 2′-METHYL ETHER59.213.23.372.813.05−1.78I[55]
LUTEOLIN GLUCOSIDE171.974.013.573.453.352.44A[14]
MADECASSIC ACID189.694.044.433.753.63−2.1I[58]
METHYL ORSELLINATE00.852.390.412.420.59I[59,60]
OLEANOLIC ACID163.483.854.283.683.59−1.63I[14]
QUERCETIN TETRAMETHYL (5,7,3′,4′) ETHER74.793.593.543.093.11−2.49I[14]

Inactive Group

2-METHYL GRAMINE13.231.12.731.12.65−1.78I-
3-PINANONE OXIME9.0202.1902.565.84A-
BAEOMYCESIC ACID47.583.653.523.253.16−1.82I-
CRASSIN ACETATE37.493.913.713.523.23−3.06I-
DUARTIN. DIMETHYL ETHER76.83.393.63.043.11−3.9I-
EUDESMIC ACID01.32.70.712.45−2.3I-
METHYL EVERNINATE01.612.560.932.46−0.68I-
METHYL ROBUSTONE146.493.653.683.343.3−1.03I-
PLECTOCOMINE METHYL ETHER23.691.522.761.212.741.61A-
RHODINYL ACETATE−25.562.042.361.82.52−2.14I-
ROBUSTIC ACID114.563.693.713.363.28−1.77I-
SARMENTOSIDE B484.874.664.424.153.75−0.04I-
SENECRASSIDIOL 6-ACETATE41.442.63.422.063.040.77I-
Table 4. Group of natural compounds selected as anti-inflammatories. The indexes value for each compounds, the DF value and the known anti-inflammatory activity are outlined.
Table 4. Group of natural compounds selected as anti-inflammatories. The indexes value for each compounds, the DF value and the known anti-inflammatory activity are outlined.
CompoundTI1ATS7mATS4vATS7vATS1pDF ValueRef.
BATYL ALCOHOL−83.552.942.962.813.083.3[77]
CARYOPHYLLENE [t(−)]11.3702.8902.773.75[82]
CHAULMOOGRIC ACID02.692.772.572.993.14[84]
CHLOROGENIC ACID48.223.363.092.783.073.29[85]
DIALLYL SULFIDE−7.501.3902.122.63[89]
DJENKOLIC ACID−28.532.372.281.862.694.92[90]
EPOXY (1,11)HUMULENE15.1603.0502.833.48[91]
GIBBERELLIC ACID92.612.833.[93]
HARMALOL HYDROCHLORIDE22.471.652.810.872.775.94nr
HARMOL HYDROCHLORIDE22.471.652.810.872.775.94[96]
HUMULENE (alpha)00302.772.56[82]
LYCOPODINE PERCHLORATE36.7903.4803.013.55[105]
OCTOPAMINE HYDROCHLORIDE00.941.940.32.365.54nr
PUNCTAPORONIN B17.91.413.30.572.915.6nr
RUTOSIDE (rutin)392.194.683.884.073.63.12[118]
SHIKIMIC ACID001.9302.332.36[121,122]
XANTHURENIC ACID13.511.32.650.712.643.73[56]
nr (is not referenced as an anti-inflammatory in literature).
Int. J. Mol. Sci. EISSN 1422-0067 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top