Quantitative Analysis of Camellia oleifera Seed Saponins and Aqueous Two-Phase Extraction and Separation

At present, the technology used for the extraction and purification of Camellia oleifera saponins generally has the problems of high cost and low purity, and the quantitative detection of Camellia oleifera saponins also has the problems of low sensitivity and easy interference from impurities. To solve these problems, this paper aimed to use liquid chromatography for the quantitative detection of Camellia oleifera saponins, and to adjust and optimize the related conditions. In our study, the average recovery of Camellia oleifera saponins obtained was 100.42%. The RSD of precision test was 0.41%. The RSD of the repeatability test was 0.22%. The detection limit of the liquid chromatography was 0.06 mg/L, and the quantification limit was 0.2 mg/L. In order to improve the yield and purity, the Camellia oleifera saponins were extracted from Camellia oleifera Abel. seed meal by methanol extraction. Then, the extracted Camellia oleifera saponins were extracted with an ammonium sulfate/propanol aqueous two-phase system. We optimized the purification process of formaldehyde extraction and aqueous two-phase extraction. Under the optimal purification process, the purity of Camellia oleifera saponins extracted by methanol was 36.15%, and the yield was 25.24%. The purity of Camellia oleifera saponins obtained by aqueous two-phase extraction was 83.72%. Thus, this study can provide a reference standard for rapid and efficient detection and analysis of Camellia oleifera saponins for industrial extraction and purification.


Introduction
Camellia oleifera Abel. (C. oleifera), an oil crop, is widely cultivated in China. C. oleifera Abel. seed meal, the residue of C. oleifera Abel. processing, is often used in traditional agriculture as a fertilizer, with a general utilization rate and low added value [1]. C. oleifera Abel. seed meal is naturally rich in C. oleifera saponins, which can be used as a raw material to purify and separate C. oleifera saponins products with high purity and high added value [2]. Therefore, C. oleifera Abel. seed meal is used to extract high-purity C. oleifera saponins, which can greatly increase the economic benefits of the C. oleifera industry. C. oleifera saponins are an oleanane-type pentacyclic triterpene saponin [3]. Their basic structure is composed of triterpene saponins, sugar bodies, and organic acids [4]. They exhibit the general properties of saponins, such as good hemolytic, antibacterial, and surface activity [5,6]. In recent years, C. oleifera saponins, traditionally used as emulsifiers, have been industrially utilized, including use as daily chemicals, pesticides, medicine, and food, which shows the potential for their broad application and economic value [7][8][9].
The quantitative analysis of C. oleifera saponins requires certain selectivity due to their structural complexity and molecular diversity [2]. Generally, the quantitative analysis of C. oleifera saponins are performed mainly via gravimetry, colorimetry, and high-performance liquid chromatography [10][11][12][13][14]. Although the determination results of gravimetry are relatively stable, the experimental procedure is cumbersome and time-consuming, and it requires many reagents and drugs. Therefore, the cost of the gravimetry is high [15]. Colorimetry has high sensitivity but is easily affected by impurities, such as flavonoids and phenolic compounds. Liquid chromatography is simple, rapid, accurate, and reproducible. Moreover, the literature on the detection of saponins by liquid chromatography has verified its advantages. Sun [16] et al. established a method for the simultaneous determination of five triterpenoid saponins in Clematis using high-performance liquid chromatographyevaporative light scattering, and the total recovery of each of the five analytes was between 91.3% and 99.5%. Ganzera et al. [17] separated triterpenoid saponins from purslane using high-performance liquid chromatography and determined that the total saponins content in the sample varied from 1.1 to 13.0%.
The current primary methods for the industrial extraction of C. oleifera saponins include aqueous extraction, organic solvent methods, and auxiliary extraction [18][19][20]. The methods that have been utilized to enhance the purity of C. oleifera saponins mainly include chemical precipitation, recrystallization, membrane purification, etc. [21,22]. However, these methods have their limitations. For example, although chemical precipitation is simple to operate, it leads to residual impurities. Recrystallization is time-consuming, and the membrane of the membrane separation method is easily blocked. Therefore, studies have increasingly used aqueous two-phase extraction and purification technologies on the basis of the selectivity of the extracted substance in the upper and lower phases [23][24][25]. Extraction and separation are accomplished on the basis of the differential solubility and partition coefficient of the substance in the two phases [26][27][28]. Wei [29] et al. constructed a new recyclable two-phase aqueous system for the distribution of C. oleifera saponins using the temperature-responsive polymer PN and the pH-responsive polymer PADB4.78. Motlagh [30] et al. used an aqueous two-phase system composed of polyethylene glycol and K 2 HPO 4 solution to extract beetroot saponins, which greatly improved foam volume and stability.
In this study, the quantitative analyses of C. oleifera saponins via liquid chromatography, colorimetry, and gravimetry methods were studied and compared. High-value and high-purity C. oleifera saponins were prepared from C. oleifera seed meal. First, the C. oleifera saponins were extracted from C. oleifera seed meal via a methanol extraction method. The crude C. oleifera saponins were separated and purified via aqueous two-phase extraction, resulting in a high-value and high-efficiency utilization of C. oleifera processing residues. This has important practical significance for improving the comprehensive output of the C. oleifera industry and promoting the industrial utilization of C. oleifera saponins.

Results and Discussion
2.1. Quantitative Analysis of C. oleifera Saponins 2.1.1. UV Spectrophotometry A standard curve was drawn with the abscissa as the mass concentration of the C. oleifera saponins and the ordinate as the absorbance. The regression equation was y = 6.1374x − 0.0151, where y is the absorbance, and x is the mass concentration of the C. oleifera saponins (R 2 = 0.9972). The standard curve is shown in Figure 1.
The content of saponins in the sample was detected by UV spectrophotometry, and the measured absorbance was 0.677 a.u. The mass concentration of the C. oleifera saponins in the sample was calculated by the standard curve in Figure 1. Finally, the content of the sample of the C. oleifera saponins was determined as 62.00% using Formula (2).
The detection limit of UV spectrophotometry was 0.15 mg/L, and the quantification limit was 0.49 mg/L using Formulas (3) and (4). The matrix effect was determined to be 26.24% by using Formula (7). This value was between 20% and 50%, which was a medium matrix effect. This indicated that spectrophotometry was more easily interfered with by other impurities in the solution when used to measure the content of C. oleifera saponins.

Analysis of Detection Results by Liquid Chromatography Standard Curve Based on Liquid Chromatography
A standard solution of 100 mg C. oleifera saponins was accurately weighed and dissolved in a 10 mL volumetric flask with pure water. After mixing evenly, a standard solution of 10 mg/mL C. oleifera saponins was obtained via ultrasonic vibration for 5 min. A volume of 5 mL of standard solution was transferred into a 10 mL volumetric flask with pure water to obtain a 5 mg/mL C. oleifera saponins standard solution. Standard working solutions of 2.5, 1.25, 0.625, and 0.3125 mg/mL were obtained from repeated operations. An amount of 1 mL of standard liquid was transferred via a syringe to a 0.22 µm microwell filter membrane and loaded into the sample bottle. The test results are shown in Table 1. Because the C. oleifera saponins were composed of a variety of saponins monomers, the chromatogram exhibited multiple monomer peaks. The sum of the sealing areas of multiple monomers represented the peak area of C. oleifera saponins.
Taking the concentration of the C. oleifera saponins standard working solution as the abscissa, and the sum of the peak areas of the six main chromatographic peaks as the ordinate, the standard curve of C. oleifera saponins content was calculated, and it is shown in Figure 2.
The detection limit of the liquid chromatography limit was determined as 0.06 mg/L, and the quantification was determined as 0.2 mg/L using Formulas (5) and (6). The matrix effect was determined as 17.74% using Formula (7), and the value <20% was a weak matrix effect, which could be ignored without compensation measures. dinate, the standard curve of C. oleifera saponins content was calculated, and it is shown in Figure 2.
The detection limit of the liquid chromatography limit was determined as 0.06 mg/L, and the quantification was determined as 0.2 mg/L using Formulas (5) and (6). The matrix effect was determined as 17.74% using Formula (7), and the value <20% was a weak matrix effect, which could be ignored without compensation measures.

Precision Test
An amount of 10.0 mg C. oleifera saponins was dissolved in a 10 mL volumetric flask with pure water and then sonicated for 5 min to obtain a 1 mg/mL C. oleifera saponin standard solution. An appropriate amount of standard solution was filtered through a 0.22 μm microporous filter membrane and then loaded into the sample injection bottle for sample injection and detection.
In accordance with the liquid chromatography method described in this study, C. oleifera saponins were continuously injected, six times a day. The results are shown in Table 2. As shown in Table 2, the average peak area of the C. oleifera saponins was 827.83 mAU and the RSD of C. oleifera saponins peak area was 0.41%, indicating the precision and repeatability of the test.

Repeatability Test
A C. oleifera saponins sample (200 mg) was weighed, and the procedure was repeated according to the conditions for liquid chromatography sample preparation in this

Precision Test
An amount of 10.0 mg C. oleifera saponins was dissolved in a 10 mL volumetric flask with pure water and then sonicated for 5 min to obtain a 1 mg/mL C. oleifera saponin standard solution. An appropriate amount of standard solution was filtered through a 0.22 µm microporous filter membrane and then loaded into the sample injection bottle for sample injection and detection.
In accordance with the liquid chromatography method described in this study, C. oleifera saponins were continuously injected, six times a day. The results are shown in Table 2. As shown in Table 2, the average peak area of the C. oleifera saponins was 827.83 mAU and the RSD of C. oleifera saponins peak area was 0.41%, indicating the precision and repeatability of the test.
Repeatability Test A C. oleifera saponins sample (200 mg) was weighed, and the procedure was repeated according to the conditions for liquid chromatography sample preparation in this experiment. The peak of the C. oleifera saponins was obtained, as shown in Figure 3. Three single peaks were detected at 33, 35, and 36 min, respectively.
The sum of the chromatographic peak areas of six samples was recorded, and the results are shown in Table 3.
The relative standard deviation (RSD) result was 0.22% (n = 6), indicating that the method had good repeatability. The calculated average peak area of the C. oleifera saponins was 1708.74 mAU, and the average peak area of C. oleifera saponins was substituted into the standard equation of the C. oleifera saponins y = 1476.1x − 249.17. The calculated average mass fraction of the C. oleifera saponins samples was 70.08%.
Molecules 2023, 28, x FOR PEER REVIEW 5 of 19 experiment. The peak of the C. oleifera saponins was obtained, as shown in Figure 3. Three single peaks were detected at 33, 35, and 36 min, respectively. The sum of the chromatographic peak areas of six samples was recorded, and the results are shown in Table 3. The relative standard deviation (RSD) result was 0.22% (n = 6), indicating that the method had good repeatability. The calculated average peak area of the C. oleifera saponins was 1708.74 mAU, and the average peak area of C. oleifera saponins was substituted into the standard equation of the C. oleifera saponins y = 1476.1x − 249.17. The calculated average mass fraction of the C. oleifera saponins samples was 70.08%.

Average Spike Recovery Test
An amount of 100.0 mg of C. oleifera saponins was dissolved in a 10 mL volumetric flask with pure water and then sonicated for 5 min to obtain a 10 mg/mL C. oleifera saponins standard solution.
A 1 mL aliquot of the C. oleifera saponins sample solution was treated with 0.5 mL, 1 mL, and 1.5 mL of C. oleifera saponins standard solutions, and the conditions for improved detection in this experiment were tested. The results are shown in Table 4.   An amount of 100.0 mg of C. oleifera saponins was dissolved in a 10 mL volumetric flask with pure water and then sonicated for 5 min to obtain a 10 mg/mL C. oleifera saponins standard solution.
A 1 mL aliquot of the C. oleifera saponins sample solution was treated with 0.5 mL, 1 mL, and 1.5 mL of C. oleifera saponins standard solutions, and the conditions for improved detection in this experiment were tested. The results are shown in Table 4. The RSD peak area was used as an indicator of instrument precision. The RSD of the precision test was 0.41% (n = 6), indicating strong accuracy. The RSD of the repeatability test was 0.22% (n = 6), indicating good repeatability. The recoveries ranged from 97.20% to 104.50%, which met the criteria for recovery. The average recovery of the C. oleifera saponins obtained in this method was 100.42%.

Analysis of Weight Test Results
The weight of the C. oleifera saponins sample (m 1 ) was 1.50 g, and the mass of the receiving bottle after drying (m 2 ) was 125.90 g. The sum of the mass of the receiving bottle Molecules 2023, 28, 2132 6 of 18 and the extract was 126.23 g after the constant weight was determined. Based on the above data, the following formula was used to analyze the weight of the saponins: In the parallel experiment, the C. oleifera saponins sample (m 1 ) was 1.50 g, while the mass of the receiving bottle after drying (m 2 ) was 133.10 g. The sum of the mass of the receiving bottle and the extract after the experimental procedure was constant (m 3 ) was 133.42 g. Based on these data, the average mass fraction was calculated using the following formula: The average mass fraction of the gravimetric method was 52.24%. The experimental results were relatively accurate, but lower than the results obtained via liquid chromatography. The operation was cumbersome and time-consuming, and the detection efficiency was poor.

The Effect of the Extracted Liquid-Solid Ratio on the Yield of C. oleifera Saponins
As shown in Figure 4, the yield of the C. oleifera saponins increased first and then decreased with the increase in the liquid-solid ratio. The maximum yield was 3.5 mL/g, and the yield of C. oleifera saponins was 18.35%. When the quality of raw materials reached a specific level, the addition of a methanol solution reduced the concentration of the C. oleifera saponins. As the difference in concentration between the C. oleifera saponins and solvent increased, it accelerated the speed of mass transfer. The yield of the C. oleifera saponins was increased. However, when the liquid-solid-liquid ratio was too large, it increased the dissolution of impurities, resulting in a decline in the yield of the C. oleifera saponins with the increase in the solid-liquid ratio [31]. Based on the overall analysis, a liquid-solid ratio of 3.5:1 was selected.

The Effect of Extraction Temperature on the Yield of C. oleifera Saponins
As shown in Figure 5, with the increase in temperature, the yield of the C. oleifera saponins increased first and then decreased. When the extraction temperature was 60 °C, the yield of the C. oleifera saponins reached 18.14%. The amount of C. oleifera saponins dissolved was relatively small at low temperatures. The yield was also low. However, when the temperature was too high, the volatility of the solvent increased significantly, resulting in irreversible degeneration and solidification of impurities, such as proteins and pectin, and precipitation after combining with the C. oleifera saponins, which decreased the content in the solution [32]. Therefore, the most suitable temperature was 60 °C.

The Effect of Extraction Temperature on the Yield of C. oleifera Saponins
As shown in Figure 5, with the increase in temperature, the yield of the C. oleifera saponins increased first and then decreased. When the extraction temperature was 60 • C, the yield of the C. oleifera saponins reached 18.14%. The amount of C. oleifera saponins dissolved was relatively small at low temperatures. The yield was also low. However, when the temperature was too high, the volatility of the solvent increased significantly, resulting in irreversible degeneration and solidification of impurities, such as proteins and pectin, and precipitation after combining with the C. oleifera saponins, which decreased the content in the solution [32]. Therefore, the most suitable temperature was 60 • C.
2.2.2. The Effect of Extraction Temperature on the Yield of C. oleifera Saponins As shown in Figure 5, with the increase in temperature, the yield of the C. oleifera saponins increased first and then decreased. When the extraction temperature was 60 °C, the yield of the C. oleifera saponins reached 18.14%. The amount of C. oleifera saponins dissolved was relatively small at low temperatures. The yield was also low. However, when the temperature was too high, the volatility of the solvent increased significantly, resulting in irreversible degeneration and solidification of impurities, such as proteins and pectin, and precipitation after combining with the C. oleifera saponins, which decreased the content in the solution [32]. Therefore, the most suitable temperature was 60 °C.

The Effect of Methanol Concentration on the Yield of C. oleifera Saponins
As shown in Figure 6, with the increase in the methanol concentration, the yield of the C. oleifera saponins first slowly increased and then decreased. When the methanol concentration was 75%, the yield of the C. oleifera saponins reached a peak value of 18.94%. The low-concentration methanol leaching solution carried multiple water-soluble impurities and bubbles which were difficult to eliminate. Within a certain

The Effect of Methanol Concentration on the Yield of C. oleifera Saponins
As shown in Figure 6, with the increase in the methanol concentration, the yield of the C. oleifera saponins first slowly increased and then decreased. When the methanol concentration was 75%, the yield of the C. oleifera saponins reached a peak value of 18.94%. The low-concentration methanol leaching solution carried multiple water-soluble impurities and bubbles which were difficult to eliminate. Within a certain range of methanol concentration, increasing the methanol concentration increased the yield of the C. oleifera saponins. However, if the methanol concentration was too high, the solubility of the C. oleifera saponins decreased and the extraction efficiency was reduced [33]. Therefore, based on the overall analysis, a 75% methanol concentration was selected. range of methanol concentration, increasing the methanol concentration increased the yield of the C. oleifera saponins. However, if the methanol concentration was too high, the solubility of the C. oleifera saponins decreased and the extraction efficiency was reduced [33]. Therefore, based on the overall analysis, a 75% methanol concentration was selected.

The Effect of Extraction Time on the Yield of C. oleifera Saponins
As shown in Figure 7, the content of the C. oleifera saponins first increased and then decreased with the increase in extraction time. When the extraction time was 180 min, the yield of the C. oleifera saponins was 19.73%, reaching a maximum value. When the extraction time was short, the methanol and C. oleifera Abel. seed meal failed to mix completely, and the methanol failed to completely dissolve the C. oleifera saponins. With the increase in extraction time, the dissolution of impurities increased and the yield of the C. oleifera saponins decreased. Therefore, the most suitable extraction time was 180 min.  Figure 7, the content of the C. oleifera saponins first increased and then decreased with the increase in extraction time. When the extraction time was 180 min, the yield of the C. oleifera saponins was 19.73%, reaching a maximum value. When the extraction time was short, the methanol and C. oleifera Abel. seed meal failed to mix completely, and the methanol failed to completely dissolve the C. oleifera saponins. With the increase in extraction time, the dissolution of impurities increased and the yield of the C. oleifera saponins decreased. Therefore, the most suitable extraction time was 180 min.  Figure 7, the content of the C. oleifera saponins first increased and then decreased with the increase in extraction time. When the extraction time was 180 min, the yield of the C. oleifera saponins was 19.73%, reaching a maximum value. When the extraction time was short, the methanol and C. oleifera Abel. seed meal failed to mix completely, and the methanol failed to completely dissolve the C. oleifera saponins. With the increase in extraction time, the dissolution of impurities increased and the yield of the C. oleifera saponins decreased. Therefore, the most suitable extraction time was 180 min.

Orthogonal Test and Analysis of C. oleifera Saponins Extraction
Based on the orthogonal test of L9 (3 4 ), four factors and value intervals were obtained. The experimental results are shown in Table 5. Abbreviations are as follows: A, extraction temperature; B, extraction time; C, methanol concentration; D, liquid to solid ratio; K, horizontal sum; k, mean value, K/3; Rj, range. The extraction mass was averaged three times.
As shown in Table 5, the impact of the four factors on yield was in the order of D > C > A > B, suggesting that the effect of the liquid-solid ratio was greater than that of the methanol concentration, which was greater than that of the extraction temperature, which was greater than the effect of the extraction time. Thus, the liquid-solid ratio and methanol concentration had the greatest impact on the yield of the C. oleifera saponins extraction. The liquid-solid ratio and methanol concentration were significant factors affecting the extraction yield of the C. oleifera saponins. The optimum extraction conditions of the C. oleifera saponins were as follows: the extraction temperature was 55 • C, the extraction time was 210 min, the methanol concentration was 75%, and the liquid-solid ratio was 4:1. Under these conditions, multiple experiments were carried out. The average yield of the obtained C. oleifera saponins was 25.26%, and the average purity of the C. oleifera saponins was 36.15%. Bao [7] et al. found that the yield of the C. oleifera saponins was 14.71% by ultrasonic-assisted ethanol extraction. In contrast, the yield of the C. oleifera saponins obtained by our methanol extraction method was significantly improved. The reason might be that the polarity of the methanol was greater and our experimental conditions were better, and the varieties of C. oleifera were also better, containing more C. oleifera saponins, thus, the extraction effect was better.

Effect of Extraction Temperature on Two-Phase Extraction and Purification of C. oleifera Saponins
As shown in Figure 8, the purity of the C. oleifera saponins increased first and then decreased with the increase in extraction temperature. When the extraction temperature reached 30 • C, the purity reached the highest value of 81.12%. A further increase in the extraction temperature sharply decreased the purity. An increase in temperature led to an increase in the solubility of the C. oleifera saponins in the aqueous two-phase system. However, excessive temperatures led to the denaturation of impurities, such as proteins and polysaccharides, and precipitation via encapsulation of the C. oleifera saponins, resulting in reduced levels of purity [34]. Therefore, the most suitable extraction temperature was 30 • C. However, excessive temperatures led to the denaturation of impurities, such as proteins and polysaccharides, and precipitation via encapsulation of the C. oleifera saponins, resulting in reduced levels of purity [34]. Therefore, the most suitable extraction temperature was 30 °C.

The Effect of Propanol Mass Fraction on C. oleifera Saponins Aqueous Two-Phase Extraction and Purification
As shown in Figure 9, the purity of the C. oleifera saponins increased first and then decreased with the increase in the mass fraction of propanol. When the mass fraction of propanol was 11%, the purity of the C. oleifera saponins reached its peak value of 78.06%. However, when the mass fraction of propanol was too high, the purity of the C. oleifera saponins showed a downward trend. With the increase in the mass fraction of propanol, the ability of the upper phase to absorb the C. oleifera saponins increased, which increased the solubility of the C. oleifera saponins in the upper phase. However, it led to protein denaturation, resulting in the partial encapsulation of the C. oleifera saponins precipitated into the lower phase. Therefore, the mass fraction of propanol was selected as 11%.

The Effect of Propanol Mass Fraction on C. oleifera Saponins Aqueous Two-Phase Extraction and Purification
As shown in Figure 9, the purity of the C. oleifera saponins increased first and then decreased with the increase in the mass fraction of propanol. When the mass fraction of propanol was 11%, the purity of the C. oleifera saponins reached its peak value of 78.06%. However, when the mass fraction of propanol was too high, the purity of the C. oleifera saponins showed a downward trend. With the increase in the mass fraction of propanol, the ability of the upper phase to absorb the C. oleifera saponins increased, which increased the solubility of the C. oleifera saponins in the upper phase. However, it led to protein denaturation, resulting in the partial encapsulation of the C. oleifera saponins precipitated into the lower phase. Therefore, the mass fraction of propanol was selected as 11%.
propanol was 11%, the purity of the C. oleifera saponins reached its peak value of 78.06%. However, when the mass fraction of propanol was too high, the purity of the C. oleifera saponins showed a downward trend. With the increase in the mass fraction of propanol, the ability of the upper phase to absorb the C. oleifera saponins increased, which increased the solubility of the C. oleifera saponins in the upper phase. However, it led to protein denaturation, resulting in the partial encapsulation of the C. oleifera saponins precipitated into the lower phase. Therefore, the mass fraction of propanol was selected as 11%.

Effect of Ammonium Sulfate Mass Fraction on C. oleifera Saponins Aqueous Two-Phase Extraction and Purification
As shown in Figure 10, with the increase in the mass fraction of ammonium sulfate, the purity of the C. oleifera saponins first increased and then decreased. When the mass fraction of ammonium sulfate was 10%, the purity of the C. oleifera saponins reached the maximum value of 80.85%. With the increase in the ammonium sulfate mass fraction, the solubility of the C. oleifera saponins in the upper phase increased. However, an excessive ammonium sulfate mass fraction led to salting out, and the C. oleifera saponins were precipitated to the lower phase. At this time, the C. oleifera saponins content was reduced. Therefore, it was most appropriate to select a 10% mass fraction of ammonium sulfate.

Effect of Ammonium Sulfate Mass Fraction on C. oleifera Saponins Aqueous Two-Phase Extraction and Purification
As shown in Figure 10, with the increase in the mass fraction of ammonium sulfate, the purity of the C. oleifera saponins first increased and then decreased. When the mass fraction of ammonium sulfate was 10%, the purity of the C. oleifera saponins reached the maximum value of 80.85%. With the increase in the ammonium sulfate mass fraction, the solubility of the C. oleifera saponins in the upper phase increased. However, an excessive ammonium sulfate mass fraction led to salting out, and the C. oleifera saponins were precipitated to the lower phase. At this time, the C. oleifera saponins content was reduced. Therefore, it was most appropriate to select a 10% mass fraction of ammonium sulfate.

Orthogonal Test and Analysis of C. oleifera Saponins Aqueous Two-Phase Extraction and Purification
Based on orthogonal test on L9 (3 3 ), three influencing factors and value intervals were obtained. The experimental results are shown in Tables 6.

Orthogonal Test and Analysis of C. oleifera Saponins Aqueous Two-Phase Extraction and Purification
Based on orthogonal test on L9 (3 3 ), three influencing factors and value intervals were obtained. The experimental results are shown in Table 6. Abbreviations are as follows: A, extraction temperature; B, ammonium sulfate mass fraction; C, propanol mass fraction; K, horizontal sum; k, mean value, K/3; Rj, range. The extraction mass was averaged three times.
As shown in Table 6, the effect of the three factors on the purity of the C. oleifera saponins was in the order of C > B > A. That is, the effect of the mass fraction of propanol was greater than the effect of the mass fraction of ammonium sulfate, and the effect of the mass fraction of ammonium sulfate was greater than that of the extraction temperature of the C. oleifera saponins. The mass fractions of propanol and ammonium sulfate were significant factors. According to the analysis and experimental results, the optimum conditions for two-phase extraction and purification of the C. oleifera saponins was an extraction temperature of 20 • C, a 9% mass fraction of ammonium sulfate, and an 11% mass fraction of propanol. Under these experimental conditions, the yield of the C. oleifera saponins obtained was 61.34%, and the average purity was 83.72%. Compared with the purity of 75.79% ginsenoside obtained by enzymatic hydrolysis from Han [20] et al. in the aqueous system of low eutectic solvo salt, higher purity C. oleifera saponins could be obtained by the propanol/ammonium sulfate system. This may be mainly due to the high selectivity of the propyl alcohol/(NH 4 ) 2 SO 4 system to the C. oleifera saponins in the aqueous two-phase system. The ions that could be used to precipitate C. oleifera saponins include Ba 2+ and Ca 2+ ions. These ions could be combined with the carboxyl groups in the C. oleifera saponins to obtain higher purity C. oleifera saponins.

Experimental Method
3.2.1. Quantitative Analysis of C. oleifera Saponins UV Spectrophotometry

1.
Preparation of C. oleifera saponins standard solution and sample solutions We accurately weighed 100.0 mg of 98% C. oleifera saponins standard, dissolved it in 20% ethanol solution, and diluted it in a 100 mL volumetric flask to obtain a standard solution of 1 mg/mL. The sample solution (1 mg/mL) was prepared similarly to the standard solution described above.

2.
Selection of the maximum absorption wavelength Using a pipette gun (100-1000 µL/1-10 mL Shanghai Baoyude Scientific Instrument Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China), a 0.5 mL standard solution and 0.5 mL sample solution were added to a test tube. It was then absorbed with 0.8% vanillin and 0.5 mL of extract-ethanol solution (0.80 g vanillin dissolved in 10 mL anhydrous ethanol). The solution was shaken well and then soaked in an ice-cold water bath for 10 min, followed by the addition of 4 mL of 77% concentrated sulfuric acid [36]. The mixture was heated for 15 min in a constant temperature water bath at 60 • C (DF-101S, Zhengzhou Dufu Instrument Factory, Zhengzhou, China), followed by immersion in an ice water bath for 10 min. The solution was then left at room temperature for recovery and removal [36]. The maximum absorption wavelength was determined by a UV spectrophotometer (TU-1950, Beijing Puxi General Instrument Co., Ltd., Beijing China) in the range of 200-800 nm, with a 20% ethanol solution as a blank control [37]. Finally, the maximum absorption wavelength was determined to be 461 nm.

3.
Drawing of standard curve Aliquots of 0.1 mL, 0.2 mL, 0.3 mL, 0.4 mL, 0.5 mL, 0.6 mL, 0.7 mL, and 0.8 mL of the standard solution were added to the labeled test tubes, followed by mixing with 0.9 mL, 0.8 mL, 0.7 mL, 0.6 mL, 0.5 mL, 0.4 mL, 0.3 mL, and 0.2 mL of 20% ethanol solution, respectively. The reagent blank was treated with 1 mL of 20% ethanol solution, followed by the addition of 0.5 mL of 8% vanillin-ethanol solution. The test tube was then left in an ice water bath for 10 min, followed by the addition of 4 mL of 77% concentrated sulfuric acid. It was then heated in a water bath at a constant temperature of 6 • C for 15 min. It was immersed in an ice water bath for 10 min and transferred to a room temperature environment [38]. Then, the blank reagent was used to measure the absorbance of other groups and the data were recorded, and three parallel experiments were performed. A standard curve was drawn based on the data. The absorbance of the test samples was determined, and the concentration and content of C. oleifera saponins were calculated.

4.
Calculation method (1) Calculation of yield In the formula above, n is the total mass of crude C. oleifera saponins after drying (g), N denotes the total mass of C. oleifera Abel. seed meal (g), and D is the yield (%).
(2) Calculation of purity In the formula, C is the mass concentration of the C. oleifera saponins after dilution based on ultraviolet spectrophotometry. It was obtained by measuring the absorbance, and then converted according to the standard curve shown in Figure 2. The symbol m is the mass of the C. oleifera saponins (mg), while W is the purity of the C. oleifera saponins (%).
(3) Limit of detection and limit of quantitation of UV spectrophotometry In the formula, D L is the limit of detection, Q L is the limit of quantitation, k (k 1 = 3, k 2 = 10) is the confidence factor, S is the blank standard deviation, and b is the slope of the standard curve in the low concentration range.
(4) Limit of detection and limit of quantitation of liquid chromatography In the formula, D L is the limit of detection, Q L is the limit of quantitation, k (k 1 = 3, k 2 = 10) is the confidence factor, N d is the baseline noise, C is sample concentration, and H is the peak height of liquid chromatography.
(5) Matrix effect A total of 1 g of C. oleifera saponins sample powder was accurately weighed, added to 50 mL of 80% methanol solution, soaked overnight, sonicated for 40 min, and centrifuged at 5000 r/min for 15 min. An amount of 2 mL of the supernatant was precisely transferred, dried under a vacuum oven at 60 • C, dissolved in methanol, and diluted to 5 mL. The extract was accurately transferred to a centrifuge tube containing 100 mg and centrifuged at 5000 r/min for 6 min. The supernatant was filtered through a 0.22 µm membrane, which was a matrix solution. The matrix effect was calculated using Formula (7).
In the formula, S m is the slope of the working curve prepared by the matrix matching standard solution, and S s is the slope of the working curve prepared by the standard solution prepared by pure solvent. Additionally, |ME| < 20% is a weak matrix effect, which can be ignored without compensation measures; 20% ≤ |ME| ≤ 50% is a moderate matrix effect; |ME| > 50% is a strong matrix effect, and measures should be taken to compensate the matrix effect in this case.

Liquid Chromatography Detection Method
Based on the reference method, the study was carried out via liquid chromatography (1260 Infinity, Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) under the following conditions [39].

Weight Detection
Alkali and acid hydrolysis of C. oleifera saponins was used to generate saponins. Based on the properties of hydrolysis, the hydrolyzed solution was injected into water to precipitate saponins of good quality [41].

Alcohol Extraction of C. oleifera Saponins
Our research method of extracting C. oleifera saponins by methanol was improved and optimized on the basis of related purification technology [32]. Using an analytical balance, 15 g of degreasing camellia oil was weighed into a 250 mL round-bottomed flask, followed by the addition of 75% anhydrous methanol to obtain a liquid-solid ratio of 3.5:1. The mixture was condensed and refluxed at 60 • C for 180 min before filtering. The filter residue was washed with hot water, repeatedly. The filtrate was combined several times, heated, and stirred briefly in a constant-temperature water bath until about 10 mL of the filtrate remained. The remaining filtrate was left in a 54 • C vacuum drying box (DZ-2BCII, Tianjin Test Instrument Co., Ltd., Tianjin, China) to dry to constant weight. The crude C. oleifera saponins were obtained (crude C. oleifera saponins 1).

Aqueous Two-Phase Extraction of C. oleifera Saponins
Our research method using an aqueous two-phase extraction was improved and optimized on the basis of the study of C. oleifera saponins purification [42]. Following the dissolution of 10 g ammonium sulfate in water, 11 g N-Propanol was added slowly while stirring. A certain amount of distilled water was added until the total weight of the system was 50 g, forming a two-phase system. The crude C. oleifera saponins 1 obtained after drying were added to a beaker and transferred to the aqueous two-phase system. It was stirred in a 30 • C water bath for 20 min, followed by transfer to a 250 mL liquid separation funnel for 20 min. The liquid C. oleifera saponins were removed and heated in a constant-temperature water bath at a certain temperature and stirred briefly until about 10 mL of the filtrate remained. The remaining liquid was dried in a 54 • C vacuum drying box to constant weight. The dried, solid C. oleifera saponins were designated as C. oleifera saponins 2. The extraction, purification, and detection of the C. oleifera saponins are shown in Figure 12. tion funnel for 20 min. The liquid C. oleifera saponins were removed and heated in a constant-temperature water bath at a certain temperature and stirred briefly until about 10 mL of the filtrate remained. The remaining liquid was dried in a 54 °C vacuum drying box to constant weight. The dried, solid C. oleifera saponins were designated as C. oleifera saponins 2. The extraction, purification, and detection of the C. oleifera saponins are shown in Figure 12. Figure 12. Extraction, purification, and detection of C. oleifera saponins. Figure 12. Extraction, purification, and detection of C. oleifera saponins.

Statistics and Analyses Statistical Analysis of C. oleifera Saponins Alcohol Extraction
In the present study, based on the previous single-factor experiment, the orthogonal array experiment was designed using SPSS 25.0., where the following four variables were analyzed in C. oleifera saponins alcohol extraction: extraction temperature (factor A), extraction time (factor B), methanol concentration (factor C), and liquid-solid ratio (factor D). These variables were identified to have larger effects on the yield of C. oleifera saponins from C. oleifera Abel. seed meal. The L9 (3 4 ) matrix, which is an orthogonal array of four factors and three levels, was employed to assign the considered factors and levels, as shown in Table 7. Optimal conditions were obtained after the orthogonal experiments and subsequent data analysis, as shown in Table 5. Finally, the experiment was repeated under the optimal conditions in order to verify the data. Statistical Analysis of C. oleifera Saponins Aqueous Two-Phase Extraction Based on the previous single factor experiment, the orthogonal array experiment was designed using SPSS 25.0., where the following three variables were analyzed in the aqueous two-phase extraction process of C. oleifera saponins: extraction temperature (factor A), ammonium sulfate mass fraction (factor B), and propanol mass fraction (factor C). These variables were identified to have larger effects on the yield of C. oleifera saponins. The L9 (3 3 ) matrix, which is an orthogonal array of three factors and three levels, was employed to assign the considered factors and levels, as shown in Table 8. Optimal conditions were obtained after the orthogonal experiments and subsequent data analysis, as shown in Table 6. Finally, the experiment was repeated under the optimal conditions in order to verify the data.

Conclusions
Compared with vanillin sulfuric acid colorimetry and gravimetric analysis, liquid chromatography was more accurate and sensitive, was simple to operate, and resulted in rapid analysis and strong separation. It eliminated the interference due to impurity and solvent peaks, and it was more suitable for the rapid quantitative detection of C. oleifera saponins.
Orthogonal experiments were carried out on the basis of a single factor. The extraction and separation were optimized. The optimum technical conditions for the extraction of C. oleifera saponins by formaldehyde were obtained, and then the crude C. oleifera saponins were further separated and purified by an ammonium sulfate/propanol two-phase extraction method. The extraction and purification rate of C. oleifera saponins was 83.72%, and the average yield was 61.34%. Compared with the literature on the purification of C. oleifera saponins, the purity of C. oleifera saponins increased to a certain extent, indicating that this study provides an important reference for the rapid and efficient quantitative detection of C. oleifera saponins, and has potential application value in industrial extraction, separation, and purification.