Synthesis, Reactivity and Antimicrobial Activity of a Series of 2-Arylamino-1,3-selenazoles

A series of 2-arylamino-1,3-selenazoles was synthesized and their reactivity was studied. The 2-arylamino-1,3-selenazoles and their reaction products were characterized by various spectroscopic methods and X-ray diffraction. In addition, the antimicrobial activity of the 2-arylamino-1,3-selenazoles in a panel of seven bacteria and fungi was examined.


Introduction
2-amino-1,3-selenazoles are five-membered, selenium-containing heterocycles, which were known for a long time. It was Hofmann (a student of Hantzsch) who first showed in 1889 that the condensation of selenourea or phenylselenourea with chloroacetone or 2-bromoacetophenone afforded the corresponding 2-amino-1,3-selenazoles [1]. The compounds were isolated as their hydrochloride or hydrobromide salts and were also converted to the corresponding N-acetyl derivatives and their tetrachloroplatinate salts for characterization. More than 50 years later, Backer prepared a series of alkyl-substituted 2-amino-1,3-selenazoles, which were characterized as the hydrohalide salts, N-acetyl-derivates or picrate salts [2]. In the 1950s, several groups began to study this class of heterocycles in a little more detail. Haginiwa published two short papers (in Japanese) on the preparation and reactions of 2-amino-1,3-selenazoles, demonstrating the high reactivity at the C5-position of the heterocycle [3,4]. Bromination of the hydrobromide salt at position 5 was accomplished using bromine in CCl 4 , nitration or diazo-coupling of the 2-diethylamino-derivative was carried out with H 2 SO 4 /HNO 3 and phenyl diazonium chloride, respectively (Scheme 1). The 2-diethylamino-derivative also condenses with benzaldehyde in the presence of ZnCl 2 to furnish the corresponding carbinol (Scheme 1). These papers, however, contain very few details on the reactions themselves and how the structures of the products were assigned. Around the same time, Zingaro reported various 2-amino-4-methyl-1,3-selenazoles, including the 2-phenylamino-derivative, which was reported to be an oil [5]. Metzger and Bailly showed that the reaction of 2-chloroaldehydes (2-chlorethanal and 2-chlorobutanal) with selenourea leads to 5-alkyl-substituted 2-amino-1,3-selenazoles [6]. As an alternative preparative method, King developed a one-pot reaction involving ketones, iodine and selenourea, which afforded the corresponding 2-amino-1,3-selenezoles in moderate to high yields [7]. Here, α-iodoketones are formed in situ and subsequently undergo cyclisation with selenourea. In the late 1960s the group of Bulka published two papers (in German) on the preparation of 2-arylamino-1,3-selenazoles and their reactivity [8,9]. The free amines could be acetylated in acetic anhydride and the reaction with NaNO 2 in acetic acid (in situ formed nitrous acid) gave yellow products, which were (erroneously) proposed to be the We previously reported some aspects of the chemistry of aryl-selenazoles derived from acylselenoureas, as well as the biological activity of various selenium-containing metal complexes [13][14][15]. Selenium-containing compounds in general experienced a recent renaissance, especially due to their promising medical applications [16,17]. As an example, the benzoselenazolone known as Ebselen, apart from being anti-inflammatory and an antioxidant, was also shown to be an active small molecule inhibitor against SARS-CoV-2 [18,19]. Given that much of the chemistry of 2-arylamino-1,3-selenazoles is quite old and results are at times contradictory, we wished to revisit this chemistry and study the reactivity and the structures of the products with modern spectroscopic methods and X-ray diffraction. We also report the biological activity of selected compounds in various human tumor cell lines and a variety of bacteria and fungi.

Results and Discussion
A library of functionalized 2-arylamino-1,3-selenazoles was prepared in three steps, starting from arylisoselenocyanates (Scheme 2). The required arylisoselenocyanates ArNCSe (Ar = Ph, 4-MeOC 6 H 4 , 4-MeC 6 H 4 ) were synthesized in a one-pot, two-step procedure from the corresponding anilines using a modified literature procedure (Scheme 2A) [20]. The compounds are rather malodorous substances, which do not keep well and deposit red selenium. Despite of this, we managed to obtain single crystals suitable for X-ray diffraction of 1c (Figure 1).
The subsequent reaction of the arylisoselenocyanates with methanolic ammonia solution furnished the corresponding known arylselenoureas ArNHC(Se)NH 2 (Ar = Ph, 4-MeOC 6 H 4 , 4-MeC 6 H 4 ) (Scheme 2) [21]. The subsequent reaction of the arylisoselenocyanates with methanolic ammonia solution furnished the corresponding known arylselenoureas ArNHC(Se)NH2 (Ar = Ph, 4-MeOC6H4, 4-MeC6H4) (Scheme 2) [21]. During one preparation of PhNCSe (1a) we isolated a small amount of material, which was not the expected product as evident from its proton NMR spectrum. By fractional crystallization we could separate a colorless and yellow product (in 2% and 1% yield based on PhNH2). An X-ray diffraction study revealed the two compounds to be the 1,3-selenazetidine 1x (colorless) and the 1,2,4-diselenazolidine 1y (yellow) shown in Figure 2 a and b, respectively. 1,3-Selenazetidines were previously prepared from the reaction of isoselenocyanates with carbodiimides [22,23]. We may explain the formation of this unusual side product by the fact that during the course of the one-pot reaction some PhNCSe reacts with PhN=C=NPh, which in turn was produced (albeit in very small quantities) from PhNC reacting with aniline. However, Koketsu failed to isolate any 1,3selenazetidines using this reaction [23]. The formation of the 1,2,4-diselenazolidine may be explained by two sequential nucleophilic additions of aniline to PhNCSe, followed by oxidation of the intermediate. This mechanism is consistent with that proposed by Yavari for the formation of functionalized 1,2,4-diselenazolidenes from acyl isoselenocyanates [24]. A structurally similar diselenazole was isolated by Woollins as an unexpected  During one preparation of PhNCSe (1a) we isolated a small amount of material, which was not the expected product as evident from its proton NMR spectrum. By fractional crystallization we could separate a colorless and yellow product (in 2% and 1% yield based on PhNH 2 ). An X-ray diffraction study revealed the two compounds to be the 1,3-selenazetidine 1x (colorless) and the 1,2,4-diselenazolidine 1y (yellow) shown in Figure 2a,b, respectively. 1,3-Selenazetidines were previously prepared from the reaction of isoselenocyanates with carbodiimides [22,23]. We may explain the formation of this unusual side product by the fact that during the course of the one-pot reaction some PhNCSe reacts with PhN=C=NPh, which in turn was produced (albeit in very small quantities) from PhNC reacting with aniline. However, Koketsu failed to isolate any 1,3selenazetidines using this reaction [23]. The formation of the 1,2,4-diselenazolidine may be explained by two sequential nucleophilic additions of aniline to PhNCSe, followed by oxidation of the intermediate. This mechanism is consistent with that proposed by Yavari for the formation of functionalized 1,2,4-diselenazolidenes from acyl isoselenocyanates [24]. A structurally similar diselenazole was isolated by Woollins as an unexpected product in the reaction of an acyl isoselenocyanate with an aromatic amine [25]. The Se-Se distance in this compound is with 2.  Ellipsoids are drawn at 50% probability level.
To reduce the amount of side products, an alternative synthesis for the arylselenoureas was developed. Based on the solvent-free synthesis of Kodomari et al., the N-aryl-N'-benzoylselenoureas were treated with an excess of hydrazine hydrate (Scheme 2 B). Upon addition of cold water, the products precipitated together with some red elemental selenium. Purification was easily achieved by recrystallization from EtOH. Overall, this method is faster and less odorous than the isoselenocyanate route [26]. Given that no X-ray crystal structures of such arylselenoureas were so far reported, we determined the molecular structures of 2a-2c by X-ray diffraction (Figure 3a). In the solidstate the molecules from an infinite zig-zag chain through N-H-Se hydrogen bonds between selenium and NH2 groups from neighboring molecules (Figure 3b). The 2-arylamino-1,3-selenazoles were subsequently obtained from the cyclocondensation reaction of these arylselenoureas with various 2-haloketones in the presence of Et3N (Scheme 2) [8,9,27]. The products and their yields are collected in Table  1. Yields are generally quite high, however, the alkyl-or proton-substituted derivatives are sometimes formed in significantly lower yields. This may be due to the generally lower stability of these compounds in solution. In the solid-state however, the compounds are stable for months. Some of the compounds were previously reported, however, characterization was restricted to melting points and elemental analysis. Thus, all of the To reduce the amount of side products, an alternative synthesis for the arylselenoureas was developed. Based on the solvent-free synthesis of Kodomari et al., the N-aryl-Nbenzoylselenoureas were treated with an excess of hydrazine hydrate (Scheme 2 B). Upon addition of cold water, the products precipitated together with some red elemental selenium. Purification was easily achieved by recrystallization from EtOH. Overall, this method is faster and less odorous than the isoselenocyanate route [26]. Given that no X-ray crystal structures of such arylselenoureas were so far reported, we determined the molecular structures of 2a-2c by X-ray diffraction (Figure 3a). In the solid-state the molecules from an infinite zig-zag chain through N-H-Se hydrogen bonds between selenium and NH 2 groups from neighboring molecules (Figure 3b). product in the reaction of an acyl isoselenocyanate with an aromatic amine [25]. The Se-Se distance in this compound is with 2.397(3) Å longer than what is observed in our compound [Se-Se = 2.3396(3) Å]. No mechanistic details explaining how the compound possibly formed are given in the publication. Ellipsoids are drawn at 50% probability level.
To reduce the amount of side products, an alternative synthesis for the arylselenoureas was developed. Based on the solvent-free synthesis of Kodomari et al., the N-aryl-N'-benzoylselenoureas were treated with an excess of hydrazine hydrate (Scheme 2 B). Upon addition of cold water, the products precipitated together with some red elemental selenium. Purification was easily achieved by recrystallization from EtOH. Overall, this method is faster and less odorous than the isoselenocyanate route [26]. Given that no X-ray crystal structures of such arylselenoureas were so far reported, we determined the molecular structures of 2a-2c by X-ray diffraction (Figure 3a). In the solidstate the molecules from an infinite zig-zag chain through N-H-Se hydrogen bonds between selenium and NH2 groups from neighboring molecules (Figure 3b). The 2-arylamino-1,3-selenazoles were subsequently obtained from the cyclocondensation reaction of these arylselenoureas with various 2-haloketones in the presence of Et3N (Scheme 2) [8,9,27]. The products and their yields are collected in Table  1. Yields are generally quite high, however, the alkyl-or proton-substituted derivatives are sometimes formed in significantly lower yields. This may be due to the generally lower stability of these compounds in solution. In the solid-state however, the compounds are stable for months. Some of the compounds were previously reported, however, characterization was restricted to melting points and elemental analysis. Thus, all of the The 2-arylamino-1,3-selenazoles were subsequently obtained from the cyclocondensation reaction of these arylselenoureas with various 2-haloketones in the presence of Et 3 N (Scheme 2) [8,9,27]. The products and their yields are collected in Table 1. Yields are generally quite high, however, the alkyl-or proton-substituted derivatives are sometimes formed in significantly lower yields. This may be due to the generally lower stability of these compounds in solution. In the solid-state however, the compounds are stable for months. Some of the compounds were previously reported, however, characterization was restricted to melting points and elemental analysis. Thus, all of the selenium heterocycles reported here were fully characterized by NMR spectroscopy, mass spectrometry and elemental analysis. In the case of heterocycles 3, 5, 9, 10, 15, 16, 20-24, we determined the molecular structures by single-crystal X-ray diffraction ( Figure 4). In the 1 H NMR spectra of the 1,3-selenazoles, coupling between the proton at position 5 and the selenium nucleus can be observed in form of satellites with H-Se coupling constants of around 48 Hz. This allowed us to record 2D 1 H-77 Se HMBC spectra, which provided 77 Se NMR data much faster (16 min.) and with significantly less material than required for directly recorded spectra. selenium heterocycles reported here were fully characterized by NMR spectroscopy, mass spectrometry and elemental analysis. In the case of heterocycles 3, 5, 9, 10, 15, 16, 20-24, we determined the molecular structures by single-crystal X-ray diffraction ( Figure 4). In the 1 H NMR spectra of the 1,3-selenazoles, coupling between the proton at position 5 and the selenium nucleus can be observed in form of satellites with H-Se coupling constants of around 48 Hz. This allowed us to record 2D 1 H-77 Se HMBC spectra, which provided 77 Se NMR data much faster (16 min.) and with significantly less material than required for directly recorded spectra. In most cases, the X-ray crystal structures show the formation of dimers due to hydrogen bonds between the NH-group and the nitrogen atom N3 of the adjacent heterocycle ( Figure 5). An exception is compound 9, which forms an infinite polymeric chain rather than a dimer ( Figure 5). This is probably due to a packing effect in the crystal. In most cases, the X-ray crystal structures show the formation of dimers due to hydrogen bonds between the NH-group and the nitrogen atom N3 of the adjacent heterocycle ( Figure 5). An exception is compound 9, which forms an infinite polymeric chain rather than a dimer ( Figure 5). This is probably due to a packing effect in the crystal. In most cases, the X-ray crystal structures show the formation of dimers due to hydrogen bonds between the NH-group and the nitrogen atom N3 of the adjacent heterocycle ( Figure 5). An exception is compound 9, which forms an infinite polymeric chain rather than a dimer ( Figure 5). This is probably due to a packing effect in the crystal.  We subsequently examined possible methods to further functionalize the 2-arylamino-1,3-selenazoles at various positions (Scheme 3). The 2-amino group was easily acetylated by heating the parent compounds in acetic anhydride for a few minutes. The presence of the acetamide is clearly confirmed by NMR spectroscopy and X-ray diffraction ( Figure 6a). Between independent molecules, hydrogen bonds are formed between the CH group of the heterocycle and the acetate oxygen atom (Figure 6b). The stability of the acetylated compounds in solution seems to be higher than that of the parent compounds: the amines turn yellow and red in solution over time, whereas solutions of the acetylated derivatives remain unchanged for several days.  Bulka reported that 2-arylamino-1,3-selenazoles react with NaNO 2 in acetic acid at room temperature to give the corresponding N-nitrosamines [8]. When we reproduced this reaction, we isolated a red-orange product, in which the resonances of both the amine proton and the proton at position 5 of the heterocycle were missing in the 1 H NMR spectrum. Furthermore, a new signal at about 14 ppm was observed, suggesting the presence of an OH group. Through a single-crystal X-ray diffraction experiment we could confirm that the   Bulka reported that 2-arylamino-1,3-selenazoles react with NaNO2 in acetic acid at room temperature to give the corresponding N-nitrosamines [8]. When we reproduced this reaction, we isolated a red-orange product, in which the resonances of both the amine proton and the proton at position 5 of the heterocycle were missing in the 1 H NMR spectrum. Furthermore, a new signal at about 14 ppm was observed, suggesting the presence of an OH group. Through a single-crystal X-ray diffraction experiment we could confirm that the product is in fact not the N-nitrosamine, instead a hydroxylamine moiety is introduced at position 5 of the selenazole and, in addition, the amine is deprotonated. Hydrogen bonds are formed between N3 and the OH group of the neighboring molecule ( Figure 7). The inductive effect of the 2-arylamino group directs negative charge towards the 5position. Thus, C5 can react with the nitrogen atom of nitrous acid to form the C-N bond. Finally, elimination of water gives the azomethine. As evident from the molecular structure, the system is extensively conjugated.
Attempted halogenation of the 2-arylamino-1,3-selenazoles with bromine or iodine only afforded the corresponding hydrohalide salts (Figure 8b). However, when reacting the N-acetyl compounds with iodine or bromine, poor yields of the 5-halo-selenazoles could be isolated. Gratifyingly, when we used N-bromo-or N-iodosuccinimide as halide source, the corresponding 5-halo-selenazoles were formed in high yields (Figure 8a). The 5-chloro-compound was prepared similarly using PhICl2. The characteristic signal for the CH proton with the 77 Se-satelites is missing in the proton NMR spectra of the 5-haloselenazoles, consistent with its substitution. In the carbon NMR spectra, the chemical shifts of the resonance of the carbon atom bound to the halogen atom are shifted, depending on the halide. The inductive effect of the 2-arylamino group directs negative charge towards the 5-position. Thus, C5 can react with the nitrogen atom of nitrous acid to form the C-N bond. Finally, elimination of water gives the azomethine. As evident from the molecular structure, the system is extensively conjugated.
Attempted halogenation of the 2-arylamino-1,3-selenazoles with bromine or iodine only afforded the corresponding hydrohalide salts (Figure 8b). However, when reacting the N-acetyl compounds with iodine or bromine, poor yields of the 5-halo-selenazoles could be isolated. Gratifyingly, when we used N-bromoor N-iodosuccinimide as halide source, the corresponding 5-halo-selenazoles were formed in high yields (Figure 8a). The 5-chloro-compound was prepared similarly using PhICl 2 . The characteristic signal for the CH proton with the 77 Se-satelites is missing in the proton NMR spectra of the 5-haloselenazoles, consistent with its substitution. In the carbon NMR spectra, the chemical shifts of the resonance of the carbon atom bound to the halogen atom are shifted, depending on the halide. Furthermore, we examined the ability of the iodo-and bromo-compounds to react in a Sonogashira coupling reaction with phenylacetylene or TMS-acetylene. In the 77 Se NMR spectra of the products, signals are observed at 753 ppm (compound 36) and 755 ppm (compound 37), both are shifted with respect to those of their parent halo-selenazoles. In addition, X-ray crystal structures were obtained for both alkynes (Figure 9) confirming formation of the alkynes. could be isolated. Gratifyingly, when we used N-bromo-or N-iodosuccinimide as halide source, the corresponding 5-halo-selenazoles were formed in high yields (Figure 8a). The 5-chloro-compound was prepared similarly using PhICl2. The characteristic signal for the CH proton with the 77 Se-satelites is missing in the proton NMR spectra of the 5-haloselenazoles, consistent with its substitution. In the carbon NMR spectra, the chemical shifts of the resonance of the carbon atom bound to the halogen atom are shifted, depending on the halide. Furthermore, we examined the ability of the iodo-and bromo-compounds to react in a Sonogashira coupling reaction with phenylacetylene or TMS-acetylene. In the 77 Se NMR spectra of the products, signals are observed at 753 ppm (compound 36) and 755 ppm (compound 37), both are shifted with respect to those of their parent halo-selenazoles. In addition, X-ray crystal structures were obtained for both alkynes ( Figure 9) confirming formation of the alkynes. The mercuration of the sulfur-counterparts (2-amino-4-aryl-1,3-thiazoles) is described in literature several times. However, the position of the mercury atom in the products was not established with certainty. Both mercuration at position 5 of the heterocycle, as well as mercuration of the N-aryl rings were proposed [26,28,29]. We were therefore interested in the mercuration of selenazole derivatives, which to our knowledge have not been described at all and to numinously establish the position of mercuration. Initially, we re-examined the mercuration of 2-amino-4-(p-tolyl)-1,3-thiazole with Hg(OAc)2 and isolated a material, which based on NMR spectroscopy and X-ray diffraction was mercurated at position 5 of the heterocycle ( Figure 10).  The mercuration of the sulfur-counterparts (2-amino-4-aryl-1,3-thiazoles) is described in literature several times. However, the position of the mercury atom in the products was not established with certainty. Both mercuration at position 5 of the heterocycle, as well as mercuration of the N-aryl rings were proposed [26,28,29]. We were therefore interested in the mercuration of selenazole derivatives, which to our knowledge have not been described at all and to numinously establish the position of mercuration. Initially, we re-examined the mercuration of 2-amino-4-(p-tolyl)-1,3-thiazole with Hg(OAc) 2 and isolated a material, which based on NMR spectroscopy and X-ray diffraction was mercurated at position 5 of the heterocycle (Figure 10).
It was also possible to synthesize the selenium counterpart (38) by mercuration of 2-acetamidophenyl-4-phenyl-1,3-selenazole using mercury(II) acetate in a 1:1 mixture of EtOH and acetic acid. Similar to the halogenation reactions, it is important to protect the amino group in position 2, otherwise insoluble solids formed, which could not be characterised. In this case too, mercuration at position 5 of the heterocycle was unambiguously confirmed by NMR spectroscopy and X-ray diffraction (Figure 10b). The next goal was to attempt a transmetallation to gold using the reaction conditions reported by Vicente [30]. The crystals were identified as the organogold(III) salt 39Au, in which the selenazole is bound to the metal through C5 (Figure 11a). The species seems to be rather unstable in solution; any attempts to isolate larger quantities for spectroscopic characterisation failed. If the reaction is left to stir for 3 days, a colorless solid was isolated in low (7%) yield after work-up (Scheme 4).
heterocycle, as well as mercuration of the N-aryl rings were proposed [26,28,29]. We were therefore interested in the mercuration of selenazole derivatives, which to our knowledge have not been described at all and to numinously establish the position of mercuration. Initially, we re-examined the mercuration of 2-amino-4-(p-tolyl)-1,3-thiazole with Hg(OAc)2 and isolated a material, which based on NMR spectroscopy and X-ray diffraction was mercurated at position 5 of the heterocycle (Figure 10). It was also possible to synthesize the selenium counterpart (38) by mercuration of 2acetamidophenyl-4-phenyl-1,3-selenazole using mercury(II) acetate in a 1:1 mixture of EtOH and acetic acid. Similar to the halogenation reactions, it is important to protect the amino group in position 2, otherwise insoluble solids formed, which could not be characterised. In this case too, mercuration at position 5 of the heterocycle was unambiguously confirmed by NMR spectroscopy and X-ray diffraction (Figure 10b). The next goal was to attempt a transmetallation to gold using the reaction conditions reported by Vicente [30]. Indeed, stirring a solution of 38 with [Me4N][AuCl4] in the presence of [Me4N]Cl afforded a yellow-orange solution, which deposited a few single crystals after some time (Scheme 4). The crystals were identified as the organogold(III) salt 39Au, in which the selenazole is bound to the metal through C5 (Figure 11a). The species seems to be rather unstable in solution; any attempts to isolate larger quantities for spectroscopic characterisation failed. If the reaction is left to stir for 3 days, a colorless solid was isolated in low (7%) yield after work-up (Scheme 4).  Based on spectroscopic data and X-ray diffraction, the material was identified as the [Me4N]Cl afforded a yellow-orange solution, which deposited a few single crystals after some time (Scheme 4). The crystals were identified as the organogold(III) salt 39Au, in which the selenazole is bound to the metal through C5 (Figure 11a). The species seems to be rather unstable in solution; any attempts to isolate larger quantities for spectroscopic characterisation failed. If the reaction is left to stir for 3 days, a colorless solid was isolated in low (7%) yield after work-up (Scheme 4).  Based on spectroscopic data and X-ray diffraction, the material was identified as the bis(selenazole) 40, formed by coupling of two selenazoles at position 5 (Figure 11b). The Based on spectroscopic data and X-ray diffraction, the material was identified as the bis(selenazole) 40, formed by coupling of two selenazoles at position 5 ( Figure 11b). The only other known examples of bis(selenazoles) are intensely colored compounds formed by FeCl 3 mediated oxidative coupling of 2-selenazolylhydrazones [31]. In our case, conjugation is not possible, hence the C-C bond length between the two heterocycles is clearly a single bond [C-C = 1.457(4) Å]. Of interest is of course how the formation of this unexpected product can be explained. Carbon-carbon coupling by reductive elimination from organogold(III) species is a key-step in gold(III)-catalysis and was known for some time [32][33][34][35][36]. It is likely that in the reaction reported here, the initially formed monosubstituted gold(III) salt (39Au) reacts with a further equivalent of the mercury compound 39, resulting in transmetallation of a second selenazolyl-moiety to gold. This species can subsequently undergo reductive elimination affording the C-C coupled product 40 and [AuCl 2 ] − . Mass spectrometric studies (negative-ion electrospray mass spectra) of samples taken directly from the reaction mixture gave us a glimpse of some of the species involved. Initially, signals at m/z 642 and 306 due to 39Au and [Hg 2 Cl 6 ] 2− , respectively were detected. The latter dianion results from the reaction of HgCl 2 (by-product of transmetallation) with [Me 4 N]Cl and dimerization. At later stages of the reaction, an intense signal at m/z 266 corresponding to the gold(I) anion [AuCl 2 ] − , which is the species remaining after reductive elimination, is seen. Unfortunately, the di-selenazolyl-substituted gold(III) anion was not detected, probably due to its tendency to rapidly undergo reductive elimination. Overall, these mass spectroscopic data, combined with X-ray diffraction data from isolated compounds, support the aforementioned reaction pathway. Key feature here is the successful sequential transfer of two selenazolyl-groups from mercury to gold.
While a detailed discussion of all the molecular structures reported herein would be too much, some general trends are worth mentioning. The geometry of the five-membered ring remains very similar, no matter what chemical modifications (acylation, halogenation, metallation, etc.) are made in the molecule. Both the angle subtended at the selenium atom (∠C-Se-C) as well as the two C-Se bond distances remain virtually constant, with values of 83.5 ± 0.5 • , 1.86 ± 0.02 and 1.89 ± 0.01 Å, respectively. An exception are the structures of the three halohalide salts, in which the angle at selenium is ca. two degrees larger (∠C-Se-C = 85.5 • ). The C-Se and C-N bond lengths in the halohalide salts however fall in the same range as those of the neutral compounds.

Cytotoxicity
Cytotoxicity screening of compounds 3-5, 7, 11, 15, 19, 21, 23 and 27 was performed at a concentration of 10 µM on the NCI-60 panel of cancer cells. Neither a proliferative nor a significant antiproliferative activity could be observed. Thus, no further concentration dependent tests were performed.

Antimicrobial and Antifungal Activity
The antimicrobial activity of the complexes 3-29 was studied in seven pathogens, including the bacteria Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and fungi Candida albicans and Cryptococcus neoformans var. grubii. Initially, the compounds were screened at a concentration of 32 µg/mL . Compounds 4, 5, 8, 9, 10, 12, 16, 17, 20, 25 and 26 showed significant activity in at least one of the three microorganisms S. aureus, C. albicans and C. neoformans var. grubii. No activity was observed in Gram-negative bacteria. Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) for S. aureus, C. albicans and C. neoformans var. grubii are shown in Table 2. In addition, the cytotoxicity to human embryonic kidney cells (HEK-293) and the hemolytic activity on human red blood cells (RBS) was studied. CC 50 for HEK-293 and HC 10 for RBC are also shown in Table 2. The MIC, CC 50 , and HC 50 values were converted to nmol/mL to allow better comparison. In general, the activity against fungi is higher than against S. aureus. Compounds 8, 17, 25, and 26 are classified as at least partially toxic to human cells, whilst the other compounds show no significant toxicity. Especially compounds 5 and 9 show no significant toxicity but high activity against the two tested fungi. The MIC value of 5 in C. albicans and C. neoformans var. grubii is 12 nmol/mL. The MIC value of 9 is slightly lower with 8 nmol/mL. It is noticeable that even a small change of the structure leads to a very different activity. For example, compounds 4, 12, and 20 bear a 4-tolyl group in position 4 and show some activity, whilst compounds 2, 10, and 19 with a phenyl group in position 4 are basically inactive. It is difficult to compare these data exactly to those from other groups since different strains of microorganisms are used. Laczkowski synthesized hydrazinyl thiazole and selenazole derivatives and studied their activity in different Candida strains, including several strains of C. albicans. Laczkowski determined MIC values of 31-250 µg/mL for the selenazoles and values ranging from 0.49 to 7.81 µg/mL for the thiazoles, similar to our MIC values for the 2-amino-1,3-selenazoles. The activity against S. aureus was also tested by Laczkowski with MIC values for the selenazoles from 31 to 125 µg/mL, comparable to our results [37].

Materials and Methods
Reactions were carried out under aerobic conditions without protection from air or moisture unless stated otherwise. Solvents were HPLC quality stored over 3 Å molecular sieves. NMR spectroscopic data for the arylselenoureas is provided below since it was not given in the original publication. All other chemicals were obtained from commercial suppliers and were used as received. NMR spectra were recorded on Bruker Avance 400 or Bruker Avance III 600 instruments (Coventry, UK). Spectra were referenced externally to Me 4 Si ( 1 H, 13

Preparation of the Arylisoselenocyanates
The arylisoselenocyanates were prepared by a method reported in the literature [20]. Spectroscopic data was identical to that in the literature. Crystals suitable for X-ray diffraction of 1c were obtained by recrystallisation from EtOH. During one preparation of 1a, a yellow fraction was collected by column chromatography. Recrystallisation form an acetone/hexanes mixture afforded a small quantity of colorless (1x) and yellow crystals (1y) suitable for X-ray diffraction.

Preparation of the Arylselenoureas (via Method B)
Hydrazine hydrate (6 equiv.) was added to the solid N-aryl-N -benzoylselenourea (1 equiv.) while cooling in ice-water. The ice-bath was then removed, and the mixture was stirred at room temperature for 5 min. After this time, the mixture was poured into icewater, which precipitated the product. Recrystallization from a suitable solvent afforded the pure compounds.

Preparation of the 2-Arylamino-1,3-selenazoles
A mixture of aryl selenourea and the α-haloketone derivative (1 equiv.) in EtOH (10 mL) was heated to 80 • C for ca. 5 min. Et 3 N (1.3 equiv.) was added to the hot solution. After a further 5 min. of heating, the mixture was filtered hot to remove some elemental selenium. Addition of water to the filtrate precipitated the product, which was isolated by filtration. The products were purified by recrystallization from EtOH.