Imidazoles as Potential Anticancer Agents: An Update on Recent Studies

Nitrogen-containing heterocyclic rings are common structural components of marketed drugs. Among these heterocycles, imidazole/fused imidazole rings are present in a wide range of bioactive compounds. The unique properties of such structures, including high polarity and the ability to participate in hydrogen bonding and coordination chemistry, allow them to interact with a wide range of biomolecules, and imidazole-/fused imidazole-containing compounds are reported to have a broad spectrum of biological activities. This review summarizes recent reports of imidazole/fused imidazole derivatives as anticancer agents appearing in the peer-reviewed literature from 2018 through 2020. Such molecules have been shown to modulate various targets, including microtubules, tyrosine and serine-threonine kinases, histone deacetylases, p53-Murine Double Minute 2 (MDM2) protein, poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP), G-quadraplexes, and other targets. Imidazole-containing compounds that display anticancer activity by unknown/undefined mechanisms are also described, as well as key features of structure-activity relationships. This review is intended to provide an overview of recent advances in imidazole-based anticancer drug discovery and development, as well as inspire the design and synthesis of new anticancer molecules.


Introduction
According to the 2020 World Cancer Report, slightly over 18 million new cases of cancer and nearly 10 million cancer-related deaths occurred across the globe in 2018 [1]. Cancer is also the first or second leading cause of premature death in people of ages 30-69 in most countries worldwide. It is characterized by uncontrolled cell growth which may spread to other parts of the body (known as metastasis) and invade other tissues. Although prevention efforts are critical to limit cancer incidence, the treatment of cancer often involves pharmacologic intervention. Cytotoxic chemotherapeutic agents continue to play an important role in cancer pharmacotherapy, but discovery efforts have increasingly turned to targeted therapies (drugs interfering with processes unique to the proliferation and spread of cancer cells) and immunotherapy (boosting the immune system or changing how the immune system works) as effective and less toxic forms of pharmacotherapy for cancer [2,3]. While numerous anticancer drugs are available, many forms remain difficult to cure, resulting in the mortality rates mentioned above. The toxicity, rapid development of resistance, and limited efficacy associated with currently available anticancer agents highlight the urgency to discover new compounds that can overcome the limitations of existing drugs [4].
An analysis of U.S. FDA approved drugs revealed that 59% of these small-molecule agents include nitrogen-containing heterocycles [5]. Imidazole is among the top ten and fused imidazoles (benzimidazole and imidazopyrimidine (purine)) are among the top 25 most frequently appearing nitrogen heterocycles in such small molecule drugs [5]. These ring systems are key components of structural scaffolds occurring in modern medicinal chemistry, thus forming critical building blocks for new drug design. Compounds containing an imidazole ring display a wide range of pharmacological activities including anticancer [6], antibacterial [7], antiviral [8], antiepileptic [9], antitubercular [10], and antifungal activities [11]. A range of anticancer drugs, such as dacarbazine (1), bendamustine hydrochloride (2), fludarabine phosphate (3), nilotinib (4), and ponatinib (5), contain imidazole and fused imidazole as structural components (see Figure 1). Many biological targets have been investigated and identified for imidazole and fused imidazole derivatives through which they are thought to exhibit their anticancer activities. These proposed targets include tubulin/microtubules, a range of kinases, histone deacetylases and other proteins that regulate gene expression, and additional targets as detailed in this review article. An analysis of U.S. FDA approved drugs revealed that 59% of these small-molecule agents include nitrogen-containing heterocycles [5]. Imidazole is among the top ten and fused imidazoles (benzimidazole and imidazopyrimidine (purine)) are among the top 25 most frequently appearing nitrogen heterocycles in such small molecule drugs [5]. These ring systems are key components of structural scaffolds occurring in modern medicinal chemistry, thus forming critical building blocks for new drug design. Compounds containing an imidazole ring display a wide range of pharmacological activities including anticancer [6], antibacterial [7], antiviral [8], antiepileptic [9], antitubercular [10], and antifungal activities [11]. A range of anticancer drugs, such as dacarbazine (1), bendamustine hydrochloride (2), fludarabine phosphate (3), nilotinib (4), and ponatinib (5), contain imidazole and fused imidazole as structural components (see Figure 1). Many biological targets have been investigated and identified for imidazole and fused imidazole derivatives through which they are thought to exhibit their anticancer activities. These proposed targets include tubulin/microtubules, a range of kinases, histone deacetylases and other proteins that regulate gene expression, and additional targets as detailed in this review article. Imidazole, a five-membered heterocycle, is highly polar (experimental logP close to zero) [12] due to the presence of two nitrogen atoms. This ring system can serve as an acid or a base; imidazole can act as a hydrogen bond donor if it is not substituted at N1 and is also capable of coordinating metals [13,14]. In addition to hydrogen bonding and coordination, imidazole can participate in van der Waals interactions, π-π stacking, cation-π interactions, and other interactions [15]. The versatility of imidazole in terms of its molecular interactive properties is reflected by its presence in the amino acid histidine and in the purine bases, thus making imidazole ubiquitous in biochemistry. The first synthesis of imidazole, in which glyoxal, ammonia, and formaldehyde reacted to prepare the ring in low yield, was reported by Debus in 1858 [16]. The Radiszewski synthesis [17] is an extension of the Debus synthesis in which 1,2-dicarbonyl compounds, aldehydes, and amines react to form substituted imidazoles, a method that is still employed for the synthesis of various substituted imidazoles. The Wallach synthesis [18] and the Marckwald synthesis [19] are other named reactions employed for the synthesis of imidazoles, but numerous approaches have been reported for the preparation of this ring system. Reviews by Sharma et al. [20], Vessaly et al. [21], Hossain and Nanda [22], Soni et al. [23], and Shabalin and Camp [24] have described various methods used for the synthesis of imidazoles. The review by Alaqueel et al. reported that benzimidazole preparation is generally through the reaction of o-phenylenediamine with different benzaldehydes [25], while the Imidazole, a five-membered heterocycle, is highly polar (experimental logP close to zero) [12] due to the presence of two nitrogen atoms. This ring system can serve as an acid or a base; imidazole can act as a hydrogen bond donor if it is not substituted at N1 and is also capable of coordinating metals [13,14]. In addition to hydrogen bonding and coordination, imidazole can participate in van der Waals interactions, π-π stacking, cation-π interactions, and other interactions [15]. The versatility of imidazole in terms of its molecular interactive properties is reflected by its presence in the amino acid histidine and in the purine bases, thus making imidazole ubiquitous in biochemistry. The first synthesis of imidazole, in which glyoxal, ammonia, and formaldehyde reacted to prepare the ring in low yield, was reported by Debus in 1858 [16]. The Radiszewski synthesis [17] is an extension of the Debus synthesis in which 1,2-dicarbonyl compounds, aldehydes, and amines react to form substituted imidazoles, a method that is still employed for the synthesis of various substituted imidazoles. The Wallach synthesis [18] and the Marckwald synthesis [19] are other named reactions employed for the synthesis of imidazoles, but numerous approaches have been reported for the preparation of this ring system. Reviews by Sharma et al. [20], Vessaly et al. [21], Hossain and Nanda [22], Soni et al. [23], and Shabalin and Camp [24] have described various methods used for the synthesis of imidazoles. The review by Alaqueel et al. reported that benzimidazole preparation is generally through the reaction of o-phenylenediamine with different benzaldehydes [25], administration of compound 6 (60 mg/kg every other day for 21 days) suppressed tumor growth by 77% compared to control, without causing obvious weight loss in the animals. Wang et al. designed novel anticancer compounds based on the clinical drug candidate VERU-111 (8) where structural modification of the 3,4,5-trimethoxyphenyl group in this compound led to improved anticancer activity [35]. The authors presented an elegant synthetic approach where 3-methoxybenzo [4,5]-dioxene (a ring system found in the most potent compound) was synthesized using a second-generation Grubbs catalyst via ring closing metathesis. The antiproliferative effects of these compounds were evaluated on A375, M14, and RPMI7951 human melanoma cell lines. Compound 9 (containing a 3methoxybenzo [4,5]-dioxene ring system) was the most active, with IC50 values of 1.1 nM, 1.2 nM and 3.3 nM on A375, M14, and RPMI7951 cell lines, respectively. When the trimethoxyphenyl group present in compound 8 was replaced with 4-methoxybenzo[d][1,3]dioxole, 5-methoxy-2,3-dihydrobenzo[b][1,4]dioxene, or 6-methoxy-3,4-dihydro-2H-benzo[b][1,4]dioxepine, the activity was greatest with the dioxole ring-containing compound and decreased with increasing ring size. Incubation of compound 9 with Wang et al. designed novel anticancer compounds based on the clinical drug candidate VERU-111 (8) where structural modification of the 3,4,5-trimethoxyphenyl group in this compound led to improved anticancer activity [35]. The authors presented an elegant synthetic approach where 3-methoxybenzo [4,5]-dioxene (a ring system found in the most potent compound) was synthesized using a second-generation Grubbs catalyst via ring closing metathesis. The antiproliferative effects of these compounds were evaluated on A375, M14, and RPMI7951 human melanoma cell lines. Compound 9 (containing a 3-methoxybenzo [4,5]-dioxene ring system) was the most active, with IC 50 values of 1.1 nM, 1.2 nM and 3.3 nM on A375, M14, and RPMI7951 cell lines, respectively. When the trimethoxyphenyl group present in compound 8 was replaced with  [1,4]dioxepine, the activity was greatest with the dioxole ringcontaining compound and decreased with increasing ring size. Incubation of compound 9 with bovine brain tubulin at a concentration of 10 µM resulted in nearly complete inhibition of tubulin assembly. The X-ray crystal structure of compound 9 bound to the tubulin/stathmin-like domain of RB-3/tubulin tyrosine ligase complex confirmed that 9 binds to the colchicine site on β-tubulin. When given at a dose of 30 mg/kg every other day for 15 days by i.p. injection, compound 9 inhibited tumor growth by 73.9% in an A375 murine melanoma xenograft model without significant weight loss.
Additional work regarding 8 (also known as ABI-231) conducted by Wang et al. reported structure-activity relationship (SAR) studies around the 3-indole moiety of this molecule [36]. Target compounds were screened against the A375, WM164, and M14 human melanoma cell lines. Among these compounds, 10-12 displayed the greatest potency, with IC 50 values ranging from 1.6-8.0 nM against the cancer cell lines tested. In terms of the SAR for 3-indolyl compounds, derivatives bearing bulky groups at the other positions on the indole ring system displayed reduced activity, while substitution with a methyl group at the 4-position of indole (compound 10) resulted in a marked increase in antiproliferative activity. When the point of attachment to the indole ring system was changed, compounds where trimethoxybenzoyl imidazole was placed at the 4-, 5-, or 6position of indole displayed superior antiproliferative activity compared to the compound harboring this substitution at the C7 position of indole. Compounds 10-12 were tested against the NCI 60 cell line panel and displayed low nanomolar IC 50 values against most of these cell lines. At a concentration of 10 µM, compounds 10 and 11 completely inhibited the polymerization of purified bovine brain tubulin in vitro. Further, X-ray crystallographic studies verified that the lead compound 8, as well as compounds 10 and 11, bind at the colchicine site on tubulin. Intraperitoneal injection of compound 11 (30 mg/kg/day on alternate days for 20 days) resulted in 90.6% tumor growth inhibition in an A375 melanoma xenograft model in nude mice. In a lung metastasis model conducted in C57BL mice, animals treated with 30 mg/kg compound 11 for two weeks (five days per week) by intraperitoneal injection showed an 80.9% decrease in metastasis. Moreover, in a taxaneresistant PC-3 (PC-3/TxR) mouse model, administration of compound 11 (30 mg/kg) resulted in an 83.8% reduction in tumor growth and 62.8% decrease in the average tumor weight compared to controls.
Bai et al. reported on 5-(3,4,5-trimethoxybenzoyl)-4-methyl-2-(p-tolyl) imidazole (BZML, 13), a compound with potent activity against colorectal cancer cell lines that inhibits tubulin polymerization and causes DNA damage [37]. Compound 13 displayed potent IC 50 values of 27.42, 23.12, and 33.14 nM against SW480, HCT116, and Caco-2 cells, respectively, while the Caco-2 cell line was insensitive to both paclitaxel and doxorubicin (IC 50 values > 1800 nM). When tested at a concentration of 60 nM, compound 13 disrupted microtubules in these cell lines as assessed by immunofluorescence microscopy and increased the number of γ-H2AX foci in the cell lines mentioned above, indicating the induction of DNA damage. Moreover, this compound decreased P-glycoprotein (P-gp) expression and enhanced the activity of both doxorubicin and paclitaxel in the Caco-2 cell line at a concentration of 60 nM.
A series of new imidazopyridine-triazole conjugates were reported as potential tubulin polymerization inhibitors and were screened against A549, DU-145, HCT116, and MDA-MB 231 cancer cell lines [38]. Compounds 14 and 15 displayed IC 50 values of 0.51 and 0.63 µM against the A549 cell line, respectively, and exhibited the greatest potency against the four cancer cell lines overall. At a concentration of 3 µM, compounds 14 and 15 inhibited tubulin polymerization in a fluorescence-based assay by 59% and 56%, respectively, while the standard compound nocodazole displayed 55% inhibition. At 1 µM concentrations, compounds 14 and 15 also caused a dramatic increase in the percentage of A549 cells in the G 2 /M phase. Molecules bearing an unsubstituted phenyl ring at the C2 position of the imidazopyridine system generally displayed the greatest potency. Narasimha Rao et al. synthesized a library of imidazothiadiazole-oxindole conjugates and evaluated their antimicrotubule activity, as well as their antiproliferative activity, against HeLa, MCF-7, and MIAPaCa-2 cancer cell lines and HEK-293 human embryonic kidney cells [39]. Compounds 16-19 displayed the greatest activity overall, exhibiting submicromolar or low micromolar GI 50 values against all three cell lines. When compound 18 was screened against the NCI 60 cancer cell line panel, GI 50 values below 5.0 µM were observed against most of these cell lines, with the exception of leukemia and colon cancer cells. Compounds 16, 17, and 18 were inhibitors of bovine brain tubulin polymerization, displaying IC 50 values of 5.6, 2.8, and 4.6 µM, respectively. Accumulation of HeLa cells in the G 2 /M phase was observed upon incubation with 5 µM concentrations of compounds 16-18, while these compounds activated caspase-3 in HeLa cells at 2 µM concentrations. While the SAR was complex, inclusion of a nitro group either on the oxindole system or on the phenyl ring generally decreased the anticancer activity.
Baig et al. synthesized imidazothiazole-benzimidazole derivatives as potential tubulin polymerization inhibitors and tested their cytotoxicity against HeLa, A549, MCF-7, and DU-145 cancer cell lines [40]. Compound 20 (see Figure 3 for structures of compounds 20-32) exhibited an IC 50 value of 1.09 µM against the A549 cancer cell line. Analogs bearing a 4-methoxy substitution on the phenyl ring at C6 of the imidazothiazole ring system generally displayed high activity against the A549 cell line, although the substitutions on the benzimidazole ring system at C5 also influenced activity. Compound 20 inhibited porcine tubulin polymerization in a fluorescence-based assay with an IC 50 value of 1.68 µM, while the IC 50 value for the standard compound nocodazole was 1.99 µM in this assay. At a concentration of 2 µM, compound 20 caused the accumulation of A549 cells in the G 2 /M phase of the cell cycle.
Donthiboina et al. synthesized benzimidazole-cinnamide derivatives as potential tubulin polymerization inhibitors and evaluated their activity against A549, MDA-MB-231, B16F10, BT474, and 4T1 cell lines [41]. Among the synthesized compounds, 21 displayed IC 50 values in the range between 0.29 to 1.48 µM against the cancer cell lines tested, exhibiting the greatest potency against A549 cells. Compound 21 also displayed an IC 50 value of 1.58 µM against a normal rat kidney epithelial cell line (NRK-52E cells). This compound inhibited porcine tubulin polymerization with an IC 50 value of 4.64 µM, while incubation of A549 cells with 0.5 µM concentrations of this compound caused an increase in the percentage of cells in the G 2 /M phase of the cell cycle. In general, compounds possessing electron donating substituents on the phenyl portion of the benzimidazole group were more active than compounds bearing electron withdrawing substituents.
Wang et al. synthesized a series of benzimidazole sulfonamides containing a substituted pyrazole ring at the C2 position [42]. These derivatives displayed IC 50 values in the range between 0.15-7.26 µM against A549, HeLa, HepG2, and MCF-7 cancer cell lines. Compound 22 was the most potent derivative, displaying IC 50 values of 0.15, 0.21, 0.33, and 0.17 µM against A549, HeLa, HepG2, and MCF-7 cells, respectively. This compound also showed low toxicity to murine primary hepatocytes and 293T cells (CC 50 values of 132 and 223 µM, respectively). In terms of the SAR for these derivatives against the cancer cell lines, placement of the benzene sulfonyl group on the benzimidazole nitrogen enhanced activity and the inclusion of 2,5-dimethyl, 4-methyl and 4-methoxy groups on the phenylsulfonyl ring increased potency. Compound 22 displayed an IC 50 value of 1.52 µM against porcine brain tubulin polymerization, while colchicine and combretastatin A4 displayed IC 50 values of 2.26 µM and 1.61 µM in the same assay, respectively. At a concentration of 5 µM, compound 22 inhibited the binding of [ 3 H]colchicine (5 µM) to tubulin by 91%. Incubation with this compound at a concentration of 0.5 µM resulted in an increase in the percentage of A549 cells in the G 2 /M phase. and compound 32 (which exhibited an IC50 value of 3.8 nM against NCI-H460 cells) displayed 13.5% and 47.3% inhibition, respectively. Compounds 31 and 32 also disrupted microtubules in NCI-H460 cells at a concentration of 5 nM as assessed by immunofluorescence.

Imidazoles as Kinase Inhibitors
Protein kinases play an important role in the progression of various cellular processes, such as growth, differentiation, and apoptosis. These enzymes are classified as serine/threonine or tyrosine kinases based on the identity of the phosphorylated amino acid. While expression of these kinases is strictly controlled in normal cells, overexpression of serine/threonine and tyrosine kinases has been reported in a variety of cancers. Thus, the inhibition of these kinases with small molecules can provide a strategy for cancer treatment. Tyrosine kinases discussed below include vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR), Src family kinase (SFK), and activin receptor-like kinase 5 (ALK5). Serine- Zhang et al. synthesized aminomethyl dimethylpyridinones as potential anticancer agents against HepG2, HCT116, and A549 cancer cell lines and also evaluated their tubulin polymerization inhibitory activity [43]. Most of these compounds exhibited antiproliferative activity with IC 50 values of <10 µM against these cell lines. Among these compounds, SKLB0533 (23) was the most potent, displaying IC 50 values of 0.08, 0.06, and 0.10 µM against HepG2, HCT116, and A549 cells compared to the standard compound myoseverin (IC 50 values of 3.06, 7.82, and >10 µM, respectively). In general, substitution with 2-propyl, 3-pentyl, or cyclopentyl groups at N9 resulted in increased antiproliferative activity compared to N9-tetrahydropyranyl derivatives. Compound 23 inhibited the assembly of porcine tubulin in vitro in a dose-dependent manner and caused the dose-dependent accumulation of HCT116 and SW620 cells in the G 2 /M cell cycle phase (the highest concentration tested was 75 nM in cell cycle analysis experiments). Moreover, compound 23 displayed no activity against a panel of 420 kinases when tested at a concentration of 1 µM, suggesting its specific tubulin inhibitory activity. This compound displayed high activity against a panel of other colorectal cancer cell lines (SW620, IC 50 = 60 nM; CT26, IC 50 = 45.5 nM; SW480, IC 50 = 64.5 nM; DLD-1, IC 50 = 135.5 nM; HCT-15, IC 50 = 61.0 nM, and HT29, IC 50 = 71.0 nM). In a murine xenograft model employing HCT116 cells, oral administration of compound 23 at 40 or 80 mg/kg once daily for 28 days resulted in tumor growth inhibition (TGI) of 39.9% and 71.6% compared to the control group, respectively, while the TGI for the group receiving oral capecitabine at 540 mg/kg once daily for 28 days was 61.6%.
In a further extension of the work described above, Hu et al. synthesized a series of derivatives based on compound 23 [44]. These target compounds displayed high potency against CT26, SW620, and HCT116 colorectal cancer cell lines. Compound 24 displayed IC 50 values of 0.022, 0.009, and 0.058 µM against the cell lines mentioned above, respectively, while SKLB0565 (25) exhibited IC 50 values of 0.057, 0.040, and 0.021 µM, respectively, against these cell lines. Compound 25 displayed concentration-dependent inhibition of porcine tubulin assembly and also caused concentration-dependent accumulation of HCT116 and SW620 cells in the G 2 /M cell cycle phase at 25-100 nM concentrations. In addition, this compound displayed activity against other colorectal cancer cell lines (SW480, IC 50  Huang et al. designed new purine and pyrimidine molecules based on the structural modification of apcin (26), a substituted 2-aminopyrimidine compound [45]. Compound 26 is a specific inhibitor of Cdc20, a protein which activates the key E3 ubiquitin ligase APC/C that controls cell cycle progression; Cdc20 is overexpressed in several cancers (see Reference [46] for a review of Cdc20 as an anticancer target). Of the compounds tested, 27 and 28 generally displayed the greatest potency against cancer cell lines, with IC 50 values in the range between 0.2-1.8 µM against MCF-7, A375, A549, OVCAR-3, Caov-3, HepG2, and HeLa cancer cell lines. By comparison, the IC 50 values of 26 were greater than 193 µM against these cell lines. In terms of the SAR for the purine-containing compounds against cancer cell lines, substitution with fluorine rather than chlorine at C2 of the purine ring system resulted in greater potency. Compound 29 displayed a K d = 49 µM for Cdc20 as measured by surface plasmon resonance (SPR), while the binding of 26 and 28 to Cdc20 was weaker (K d values of 123 µM and 119 µM, respectively). Compounds 29 (30 µM) and 28 (0.3 µM) both blocked the exit of HepG2 cells from mitosis as assessed by the increased levels of phosphohistone H3, a marker of mitosis. Given the potency of 28 compared to 29, the authors hypothesized that the former compound could possess an additional mechanism of action. Compound 28 was shown to dose-dependently (3 to 300 µM) inhibit the assembly of porcine tubulin in vitro, consistent with this molecule acting as an antimicrotubule agent.

Imidazoles as Kinase Inhibitors
Protein kinases play an important role in the progression of various cellular processes, such as growth, differentiation, and apoptosis. These enzymes are classified as serine/threonine or tyrosine kinases based on the identity of the phosphorylated amino acid. While expression of these kinases is strictly controlled in normal cells, overexpression of serine/threonine and tyrosine kinases has been reported in a variety of cancers. Thus, the inhibition of these kinases with small molecules can provide a strategy for cancer treatment. Tyrosine kinases discussed below include vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR), Src family kinase (SFK), and activin receptor-like kinase 5 (ALK5). Serine-threonine kinases mentioned in this section include checkpoint kinases 1 and 2 (Chk1 and Chk2), rapidly accelerated fibrosarcoma (RAF) kinase, cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK), Polo like kinase 1 (PLK1), Aurora kinase (AURK), and AKT. Phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase (PI3K) is a lipid kinase that transforms phosphatidylinositol (4,5)-bisphosphate into the second messenger phosphatidylinositol (3,4,5)-trisphosphate. A variety of drugs targeting receptor tyrosine kinases, non-receptor tyrosine kinases and serine-threonine kinases have been developed (reviewed in Reference [49]), and the discovery of selective kinase inhibitors continues to be the focus of many medicinal chemists.

Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor (VEGFR) Inhibitors
The formation of new blood vessels (angiogenesis) is required for cell and tissue growth. Cancer growth and metastasis depend directly on tumor angiogenesis and vascularization. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is a signaling protein that plays an important role in cellular proliferation, survival, and migration during the development of new vasculature, and most human cancers display up-regulated expression of VEGF mRNA. VEGF mediates its biological effects through binding to VEGF receptors (VEGFRs), tyrosine kinases that dimerize and become autophosphorylated upon binding VEGF, triggering a range of downstream effects (for recent reviews of VEGF and VEGF signaling, see references [50,51]). Various therapeutic agents, such as monoclonal antibodies (bevacizumab) and small molecules (sunitinib and sorafenib), have been approved as VEGFR inhibitors, but side effects, such as hypertension, are associated with the small molecule agents [52]. New VEGFR inhibitors with an improved therapeutic window are, thus, being sought.
Yuan et al. reported several compounds possessing a benzoxazole/benzimidazole scaffold displaying potent in vitro antiproliferative activity against HUVEC, HepG2, MDA-MB-231, and A549 cell lines through the inhibition of VEGFR-2 kinase [53]. These compounds showed potent activity against VEGFR-2 expressing cell lines (HepG2 and HUVEC), but they were less active on EGFR expressing cell lines (MDA-MB-231 and A549). Compounds 33 and 34 (see Figure 4 for structures of compounds 33-43) displayed activity against HU-VECs (IC 50 values of 1.47 and 3.21 µM) and HepG2 cells (IC 50 values of 2.57 and 5.56 µM). The compounds possessing a benzimidazole scaffold were generally more active against these cell lines than benzoxazole-containing compounds. Compound 33 displayed an IC 50 value of 51.4 nM against VEGFR-2, while inhibiting EGFR by 58.3%, when tested at a concentration of 1 µM. Compound 33 displayed little or no activity on a panel of five other kinases (PGDFR-α and β, FLT1, FLT4, and MET). Moreover, compound 33 displayed 56.4% inhibition against LO2 (normal human liver) cells at a concentration of 10 µM. Dose-dependent anti-angiogenic activity was observed with compound 33 using a chick chorioallantoic membrane assay (79% at 10 nM/eggs). Western blotting studies showed that compound 33 inhibited VEGFR-2 phosphorylation in HUVECs at concentrations of 2 µM and 4 µM.

Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) Inhibitors
The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is a receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) known to play an important role in the physiology of epithelial cells by regulating several cellular processes including cell survival and differentiation. Activation of EGFR results in signaling through several pathways, including the PI3K/AKT and Ras/MAPK pathways. Mutation or overexpression of EGFR occurs in many cancers, including lung cancer and glioblastoma, and the EGFR is the target of small molecule inhibitor drugs, such as erlotinib and gefitinib, as well as EGFR-binding antibodies (see Reference [55] for a review of the roles of the EGFR in cancer). Thus, the development of new EGFR-directed agents continues to be of interest.
Akhtar et al. synthesized new benzimidazole-pyrazole derivatives as potential anticancer agents targeting EGFR [56]. Among the synthesized compounds, 37 and 38 displayed the greatest inhibition of EGFR phosphorylation in the KB cell line as assessed by ELISA, exhibiting IC50 values of 0.97 µM and 1.7 µM, respectively. The reference standard gefitinib exhibited an IC50 value of 0.011 µM in this assay. Of the four cancer cell lines examined, compounds 37 and 38 displayed the greatest antiproliferative activity against Mostafa et al. synthesized 2-phenyl benzimidazole derivatives as potential anticancer agents that were evaluated against the MCF-7 cell line and also against VEGFR-2 [54]. Of the target compounds, 35 and 36 displayed IC 50 values of 3.37 and 6.30 µM against MCF-7 cells, respectively, while the IC 50 value of the standard drug doxorubicin was 4.17 µM. When these compounds were tested against three normal human cell lines (breast epithelial (MCF-10F), skin fibroblast (BJ), and lung fibroblast (MRC-5) cells), IC 50 values ranged from 17.3-79.3 µM, while the IC 50 value for doxorubicin against these cells ranged from 15.2-22.6 µM. In an ELISA-based VEGFR assay, these compounds displayed IC 50 values of 6.7 and 6.9 nM, respectively, while the reference drug sorafenib displayed an IC 50 value of 7.6 nM.

Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) Inhibitors
The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is a receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) known to play an important role in the physiology of epithelial cells by regulating several cellular processes including cell survival and differentiation. Activation of EGFR results in signaling through several pathways, including the PI3K/AKT and Ras/MAPK pathways. Mutation or overexpression of EGFR occurs in many cancers, including lung cancer and glioblastoma, and the EGFR is the target of small molecule inhibitor drugs, such as erlotinib and gefitinib, as well as EGFR-binding antibodies (see Reference [55] for a review of the roles of the EGFR in cancer). Thus, the development of new EGFR-directed agents continues to be of interest.
Akhtar et al. synthesized new benzimidazole-pyrazole derivatives as potential anticancer agents targeting EGFR [56]. Among the synthesized compounds, 37 and 38 displayed the greatest inhibition of EGFR phosphorylation in the KB cell line as assessed by ELISA, exhibiting IC 50 values of 0.97 µM and 1.7 µM, respectively. The reference standard gefitinib exhibited an IC 50 value of 0.011 µM in this assay. Of the four cancer cell lines examined, compounds 37 and 38 displayed the greatest antiproliferative activity against A549 cells, with IC 50 values of 2.2 and 2.8 µM, respectively. When incubated with A549 cells at 5 and 10 µM for 24 h, compound 37 caused a dose-dependent increase in the percentage of cells in the G 2 /M cell cycle phase. No mortality was observed 24 h post-administration when a single 500 mg dose of compound 37 was given to female albino rats by oral gavage.
Hei et al. synthesized new 2,9-disubstituted purine derivatives also containing 8phenylthio and 8-phenylsulfinyl substitutions as potential antiproliferative agents against A549, H1975, and HCC827 human lung adenocarcinoma cell lines and tested these compounds for their EGFR inhibitory activities [57]. These compounds displayed high activity against the HCC827 cell line, which harbors a deletion mutation that activates EGFR, compared to A549 cells (possessing wild type EGFR) and H1975 cells (harboring EGFR T790M and L858R mutations). Compounds 39 and 40 exhibited IC 50 values of 29.4 nM and 47.8 nM against the HCC827 cell line and were at least two orders of magnitude less potent against A549 and H1975 cells. Among 8-phenylthio and 8-phenylsulfinyl purines with the same substitutions at positions 2 and 9, the former compounds were in general more active against HCC827 cells. In an EGFR enzymatic assay against EGFR WT , EGFR L858R , EGFR L858R/T790M , and EGFR L858R/T790M/C797S , compounds 39 and 40 displayed IC 50 values of 1.6, 1.9, 104, 331 nM and 2.5, 1.2, 189, 114 nM, respectively. In Western blotting studies with compound 39 in the HCC827 cell line, a dose-dependent inhibition of EGFR phosphorylation was observed at concentrations of 39 ranging from 0.1-3.0 µM. When evaluated in an HCC827 xenograft model in nude Balb/c mice, compound 39 (5 mg/kg administered orally once a day for 20 days) significantly reduced tumor volume and tumor weight compared to the vehicle control group.
In a follow-up to the previous study, Lei et al. synthesized a series of 29 new purine derivatives targeting the mutant EGFR tyrosine kinases which have resulted in resistance to first, second, and third generation EGFR inhibitors [58]. The target compounds were highly active against the HCC827 cancer cell line, with IC 50 values ranging from 0.00088-1.81 µM. Compound 41 displayed high potency against HCC827, H1975, A549, and A431 cancer cell lines, with IC 50 values in the range between 0.0016-1.67 µM. The presence of a sulfonamide group on the substituent at the N9 position of the purine core resulted in high potency in this group of analogs, although activity against HCC827 cells was retained upon replacement of a pyrrolidinyl sulfonyl moiety with phenyl acetamide or piperidinyl amide groups. In an in vitro EGFR kinase assay performed with EGFR L858R/T790M/C797S , compound 41 displayed an IC 50 value of 40 nM, while the third generation EGFR inhibitor osimertinib displayed an IC 50 value of 110 nM. Western blotting studies with compound 41 and other analogs in HCC827, H1975, and A549 cells showed that the compounds exhibited dose-dependent inhibition of EGFR phosphorylation and AKT phosphorylation at 0.1-10-µM concentrations.
A series of 20 xanthine/chalcone hybrids were prepared and evaluated as potential EGFR-directed anticancer compounds [59]. While these molecules were not toxic to the MCF-10A human mammary gland epithelial cell line, IC 50 values for these compounds ranged from 1.0 to 11.6 µM against A549, PANC-1, HT29, and MCF-7 cancer cells. By comparison, the standard drug doxorubicin displayed IC 50 values ranging from 0.90 to 1.41 µM against these cell lines. In terms of the antiproliferative structure-activity relationship, the 1,3-dimethylxanthine derivatives were generally more potent than the 1-methylated xanthines. The six most active compounds in the antiproliferative assay were examined for their inhibition of EGFR kinase in a cell-free assay. IC 50 values ranged from 0.3-1.6 µM in this assay, while the standard compound staurosporin exhibited an IC 50 value of 0.4 µM. Compound 42, which displayed IC 50 values ranging from 1.3-1.8 µM against the cancer cell lines and an IC 50 value of 0.3 µM against EGFR in vitro, also caused increased expression of the apoptotic marker caspase-3 in PANC-1 cells.
Hisham et al. synthesized substituted xanthine derivatives as EGFR-targeting anticancer agents and tested their antiproliferative activity against PANC-1, HT29, A549, and MCF-7 cancer cells and MCF-10A normal human breast epithelial cells [60]. These compounds displayed IC 50 values in the range between 0.8-11.9 µM against the cancer cell lines, while the authors reported that all compounds were non-cytotoxic to MCF-10A cells. Compound 43 displayed IC 50 values ≤ 1.7 µM against these cancer cell lines and was most active against MCF-7 cells (IC 50 = 0.8 µM). In terms of the SAR against cancer cell lines, compounds containing an oxime moiety at the benzylic position generally possessed higher antiproliferative activity compared to the corresponding ketone-containing precursors. Of these target molecules, compound 43 displayed the most potent EGFR inhibitory activity (IC 50 = 0.32 µM), while the standard drug erlotinib displayed an IC 50 value of 0.08 µM in this assay. In PANC-1 cells, the most potent antiproliferative compounds increased the expression of caspase-3 by 4-to 8-fold with respect to controls.
Srour et al. synthesized thiazole-benzimidazole derivatives as potential anticancer agents directed against EGFR [61]. These compounds displayed IC 50 values against EGFR kinase in the range between 71.7-1235 nM. Compounds that showed potent activity against EGFR were evaluated for their cytotoxicity to the MCF-7 cell line. Of these, compounds 44 and 45 (see Figure 5 for structures of compounds 44-56) possessed the greatest potency against the MCF-7 cells, exhibiting IC 50 values of 6.30 µM and 5.96 µM, respectively, while the IC 50 of the standard drug erlotinib was 4.15 µM against this cell line. Considering that EGFR inhibitory activity did not directly correlate with activity against MCF-7 cells for these molecules, the authors speculated that other mechanisms of action may also be responsible for their anticancer activity. When tested at its IC 50 concentration in MCF-7 cells, compound 44 caused the accumulation of these cells in the pre-G 1 and G 2 /M cell cycle phases. At this same concentration, compound 44 increased the percentage of early and late apoptotic cells compared to the DMSO treated controls as assessed by annexin V/propidium iodide staining. Moreover, at its IC 50  Rezaei et al. prepared a series of diphenylimidazo-quinoxalinamine derivatives as anticancer candidates [65]. Compounds 52, 53, and 54 showed the greatest potencies against the K562 cell line (IC50 values of 9.77, 12.02, and 15.84 µM, respectively). Evaluation of compounds 52-54 against the tyrosine kinases c-Src, LCK (an SFK), and ABL1 (see below) revealed that only compound 54 possessed activity against ABL1 and c-Src with IC50 values of 5.25 and 3.94 µM, respectively, while this compound was not active against LCK.

Bcr-Abl and Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase (BTK) Inhibitors
Bcr-Abl is a tyrosine kinase that is known to play a major role in chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML), while Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) is implicated in B-cell malignancies (chronic lymphocytic leukemia and non-Hodgkin lymphomas). The expression of the Bcr-

Src Family Kinase (SFK) Inhibitors
The SFKs are nonreceptor tyrosine kinases that play important roles in the regulation of cell cycle progression, apoptosis, transcription, migration, differentiation, development, and survival. Since SFKs are downstream of oncogenic drivers, such as EGFR, and are also part of pathways that regulate survival and proliferation, the inhibition of SFKs provides a good strategy for the discovery of new anticancer candidates (see Reference [63] for a review of SFKs and SFK inhibitors).
Francini et al. described the synthesis of new aminoimidazole anticancer candidates that inhibit SFKs [64]. The target compounds were screened against K562, U87 (glioblastoma multiforme (GBM)), and SH-SY5Y (neuroblastoma) cancer cell lines. Compounds 50 and 51 displayed antiproliferative activities with IC 50 values of 8.6 and 7.8 µM against SH-SY5Y cells, 11.7 and 18.9 µM against K562 cells, and 12.6 and 13.3 µM against U87 cells, respectively. These two compounds displayed IC 50 values against SFKs (Src, Fyn, Lyn, and Yes) in the range between 3-50 nM. In terms of the SAR for these compounds, molecules displaying ortho or meta hydroxy substitutions on the phenyl ring exhibited the highest potency against SFKs in vitro.
Rezaei et al. prepared a series of diphenylimidazo-quinoxalinamine derivatives as anticancer candidates [65]. Compounds 52, 53, and 54 showed the greatest potencies against the K562 cell line (IC 50 values of 9.77, 12.02, and 15.84 µM, respectively). Evaluation of compounds 52-54 against the tyrosine kinases c-Src, LCK (an SFK), and ABL1 (see below) revealed that only compound 54 possessed activity against ABL1 and c-Src with IC 50 values of 5.25 and 3.94 µM, respectively, while this compound was not active against LCK.

Bcr-Abl and Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase (BTK) Inhibitors
Bcr-Abl is a tyrosine kinase that is known to play a major role in chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML), while Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) is implicated in B-cell malignancies (chronic lymphocytic leukemia and non-Hodgkin lymphomas). The expression of the Bcr-Abl fusion protein causes dysregulation of kinase activity, while BTK plays a central role in B cell receptor signaling pathways. Thus, Bcr-Abl and BTK are important targets against leukemia. Drugs, such as imatinib, nilotinib (4), and ponatinib (5), are known to target Bcr-Abl, while ibrutinib targets the BTK pathway (please see Reference [66] for a review of Bcr-Abl inhibitors and Reference [67] for a review of anticancer drugs targeting BTK). Bertrand et al. synthesized 2,6,9-trisubstituted purine derivatives as candidate dual Bcr-Abl/Btk inhibitors [68].  TGF-β modulates various cellular processes including cell proliferation, migration, differentiation and apoptosis. In a process that involves TGF-β binding to the TGF-β receptor-2 (TβRII), TGF-β receptor-1 (ALK5) is activated and phosphorylates Smad2 and Smad3, which then combine with Smad4 to modulate transcription. Although TGF-β acts as a tumor suppressor early in tumor development, it acts as a tumor promotor later in tumorigenesis. Thus, ALK5 inhibitors have been investigated as potential anticancer therapeutics (see Reference [69] for a review of TGF-β signaling and opportunities presented by this process for anticancer therapeutics). A series of novel benzothiadiazole-imidazole and thienopyridine-imidazole derivatives were synthesized by Guo et al. and evaluated for activity against ALK5 [70]. These compounds inhibited ALK5 kinase activity with IC 50 values in the range between 0.008-0.043 µM, with compound 57 (see Figure 6 for structures of compounds 57-69) displaying the highest potency against ALK5. Compound 57 displayed 19-fold selectivity for ALK5 compared to p38α MAP kinase, which possesses a kinase domain similar to that of ALK5. Compound 58 exhibited an IC 50 value of 7.70 µM against p38α MAP kinase and 0.022 µM against ALK5 (selectivity of 350-fold). In terms of the SAR, imidazole-containing compounds possessing a benzothiadiazole ring were in general slightly more active compared to those bearing a thienopyridine ring, while substitutions on the aniline moiety had little effect on activity. Western blotting analysis revealed that treatment of HepG2 and SPC-A1 cells with 0.1 µM and 0.5 µM concentrations of compound 57 resulted in the inhibition of TGF-β1-stimulated phosphorylation of Smad2. In a wound healing assay, treatment with compound 57 at 2 µM and 10 µM inhibited TGF-β1-induced migration of HUVECs.

Inhibitors of Checkpoint Kinases
The checkpoint kinases (Chk1 and Chk2) are intracellular serine/threonine protein kinases which play an important role in the DNA damage response pathway limiting cell cycle progression in the presence of such damage. Chk1 is activated by ATR (ataxia telangiectasia mutated and Rad3-related serine/threonine kinase), while Chk2 is activated by ATM (ataxia telangiectasia mutated serine/threonine kinase; see references [71,72] for reviews focused on these kinases). Activated checkpoint kinases are responsible for downstream phosphorylation processes causing cell-cycle arrest in the presence of DNA damage, leading to DNA repair. Considering the roles played by Chk1 and Chk2 in the response to DNA damage, inhibition of Chk1 and/or Chk2 may improve the efficacy of anticancer agents that damage DNA and are, thus, an attractive target for the development of new anticancer drugs (see Reference [73] for a review of Chk1 and Chk2 inhibition in cancer). The development of Chk inhibitors, such as UCN-01, LY2603618, PF477736, AZD7762, and MK-8776, have provided a path toward the discovery of new molecules targeting checkpoint kinases [71,73].
Analogs bearing a pyrazole-benzimidazole motif were synthesized by Galal et al. and were tested for their cytotoxic activity on MCF-7, HeLa, and HepG2 cell lines and were also tested in vitro for Chk2 inhibition [74]. Chk2 inhibitory activity was in the range 9.95-65.07 nM for these molecules. Compounds 59 and 60 were among the most potent of these

Inhibitors of Checkpoint Kinases
The checkpoint kinases (Chk1 and Chk2) are intracellular serine/threonine protein kinases which play an important role in the DNA damage response pathway limiting cell cycle progression in the presence of such damage. Chk1 is activated by ATR (ataxia telangiectasia mutated and Rad3-related serine/threonine kinase), while Chk2 is activated by ATM (ataxia telangiectasia mutated serine/threonine kinase; see references [71,72] for reviews focused on these kinases). Activated checkpoint kinases are responsible for downstream phosphorylation processes causing cell-cycle arrest in the presence of DNA damage, leading to DNA repair. Considering the roles played by Chk1 and Chk2 in the response to DNA damage, inhibition of Chk1 and/or Chk2 may improve the efficacy of anticancer agents that damage DNA and are, thus, an attractive target for the development of new anticancer drugs (see Reference [73] for a review of Chk1 and Chk2 inhibition in cancer). The development of Chk inhibitors, such as UCN-01, LY2603618, PF477736, AZD7762, and MK-8776, have provided a path toward the discovery of new molecules targeting checkpoint kinases [71,73].
Analogs bearing a pyrazole-benzimidazole motif were synthesized by Galal et al. and were tested for their cytotoxic activity on MCF-7, HeLa, and HepG2 cell lines and were also tested in vitro for Chk2 inhibition [74]. Chk2 inhibitory activity was in the range 9.95-65.07 nM for these molecules. Compounds 59 and 60 were among the most potent of these derivatives against Chk2, exhibiting IC 50 values of 11.49 and 11.13 nM, respectively. Assays on HepG2, HeLa, MCF-7 and baby hamster kidney (BHK) cells showed that compound 60 displayed a GI 50 value of 6.5 µM against MCF-7 cells, while compounds 61 and 59 exhibited GI 50 values of 11.7 µM and 6.6 µM against HeLa cells, respectively. Some of these analogs enhanced the activity of the cytotoxic anticancer agents doxorubicin and cisplatin in MCF-7 cells, while some did not. For example, a potentiation index of 276 was determined for the combination of doxorubicin with compound 61 in MCF-7 cells, while no potentiation was observed for doxorubicin paired with target compounds 59 and 60. Of the compounds evaluated, 61 was the least toxic in vivo and was, thus, further tested alone and in combination with doxorubicin in an MNU-induced breast cancer model in rats. Serum Chk2 activity was lower in MNU-induced animals receiving compound 61 at an oral dose of 50 mg/kg/day for 10 days compared to MNU-treated animals that did not receive this compound, and the serum of MNU-induced animals receiving a combination of doxorubicin and compound 61 at this same dose displayed lower Chk2 activity compared to MNU-induced rats receiving doxorubicin alone.
These authors extended the work described above by synthesizing derivatives in which the pyrazole moiety was changed to pyrimidine [75]. These new derivatives inhibited Chk2 activity with IC 50

Rapidly Accelerated Fibrosarcoma (RAF) Kinase Inhibitors
RAF kinases are serine/threonine protein kinases that are activated by the human oncogene RAS. RAF acts in the RAS-RAF-MEK-ERK pathway, which plays a role in cell differentiation, survival, growth, apoptosis, and other cellular processes. ERK ultimately phosphorylates multiple cytoplasmic and nuclear substrates, resulting in the effects mentioned above. The RAF family of kinases consists of ARAF, BRAF, and CRAF, with BRAF mutations commonly occurring in papillary thyroid cancers, melanomas, and hairy cell leukemias. Sorafenib (BAY 43-9006) is a first-generation RAF inhibitor approved by the U.S. FDA for the treatment for renal cancer and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The approval of sorafenib, together with the approval of second-generation RAF inhibitors vemurafenib and dabrafenib which act on cancers harboring BRAF mutations, has sparked interest in the discovery of new molecules selectively targeting this pathway (see References [76,77] for reviews covering RAF signaling and inhibition in cancer). Abdel-Maksoud et al. synthesized a series of imidazothiazole derivatives and studied their BRAF inhibitory activity and cytotoxicity against the NCI 60 cancer cell line panel [78]. These compounds were most active against the colon cancer and melanoma sub-panels. IC 50  against SKMEL-28 cells. In terms of the SAR for these molecules in the melanoma cell lines, among amide-containing compounds, derivatives containing a two carbon linker, such as 66 and 67, showed greater potency compared with agents bearing three carbon linkers. In the case of sulfonamide derivatives, however, compounds with a three carbon linker were generally more potent than those bearing a two carbon linker. The most potent derivatives were tested in the in vitro kinase assay against WT BRAF, V600E BRAF, and CRAF, with the compounds displaying IC 50 values in the range 9.30-312 nM. These compounds generally showed the highest potency against V600E BRAF, with compound 69 displaying an IC 50 value of 9.30 nM.

Cyclin-Dependent Kinase (CDK) Inhibitors
The CDKs are an important class of serine/threonine kinases divided into two subfamilies: cell-cycle-related subfamilies (CDK1, 4, and 5) and transcriptional subfamilies (CDK7, 8, 9, 11, and 20; please see Reference [79] for a review of CDKs). Cell-cycle-related subfamilies control various transitional phases of the cell cycle, as well as mitotic progression and transcriptional subfamilies generally control the initiation and elongation of mRNA by the phosphorylation of RNA polymerase II, while some CDKs have a wider range of functions that are often tissue specific. Since cancer cells frequently show dysregulation in cell-cycle or transcriptional CDKs, inhibition of these enzymes may result in a selective antitumor effect (see References [80,81] for further information regarding CDKs in cancer and the use of CDK inhibitors as anticancer drugs).
CDK2 is involved in cell cycle regulation and is considered to be a member of the CDK1 subfamily [79]. Al-Warhi et al. synthesized six imidazole/benzimidazole thioarylethanone derivatives as potential cytotoxic agents against T47D and MCF-7 breast cancer cell lines; these compounds were also tested for CDK2 inhibitory activity [82]. Among these molecules, imidazoles 70 and 71 (see CDK4 and CDK6 promote progression through the G 1 cell cycle phase, while CDK1 is critical in mitosis and is the only CDK that is essential for cell cycle progression in mammalian cells [81]. A series of analogs was designed based on the structural features of the approved drug abemaciclib (72), a selective oral CDK4/6 inhibitor indicated for metastatic breast cancer [83]. The synthesized compounds showed high selectivity toward CDK4/6 compared to CDK1/D3. Compounds 73 and 74 displayed high activity against CDK4/6 with IC 50 values of 7.4/0.9 nM and 0.6/12.7 nM, respectively, and low activity against CDK1/D3 (IC 50

Aurora Kinase (AURK) Inhibitors
Aurora kinases (A, B and, C) are cell cycle regulated serine-threonine kinases which play roles in different aspects of mitosis; the overexpression of AURKs is associated with wide variety of tumors. The inhibition of AURKs with small molecules, thus, represents an intriguing strategy towards the discovery of novel anticancer agents (see Reference [85] for a review of AURK inhibitors against cancer). Fan et al. synthesized a novel series of benzimidazole-quinazolinones and evaluated these molecules for cytotoxicity against MDA-MB-231, PC-3, and SH-SY5Y cancer cell lines [86].  Ghanem et al. synthesized imidazopyridine derivatives and studied their inhibitory activity against CDK9, as well as their antiproliferative activities, on HCT116 and MCF-7 cell lines [84]. Compounds 75 and 76 were the most potent against the MCF-7 cell line, exhibiting IC 50 values of 0.71 and 0.63 µM, respectively, while compound 77 displayed the greatest activity against the HCT116 cell line (IC 50 = 1.69 µM). Compounds 75, 76, and 77 also exhibited IC 50 values against CDK9 of 0.95, 0.50, and 1.00 µM, respectively, while sorafenib displayed an IC 50 value of 0.76 µM in this assay. SAR analysis indicated that compounds containing an amine functionality para to the imidazopyridine attachment point generally displayed greater potency against the MCF-7 cell line compared to compounds bearing a diazo group at this position.

Aurora Kinase (AURK) Inhibitors
Aurora kinases (A, B and, C) are cell cycle regulated serine-threonine kinases which play roles in different aspects of mitosis; the overexpression of AURKs is associated with wide variety of tumors. The inhibition of AURKs with small molecules, thus, represents an intriguing strategy towards the discovery of novel anticancer agents (see Reference [85] for a review of AURK inhibitors against cancer). Fan et al. synthesized a novel series of benzimidazole-quinazolinones and evaluated these molecules for cytotoxicity against MDA-MB-231, PC-3, and SH-SY5Y cancer cell lines [86].

Nek2 Kinase Inhibitors
Nek2 is a serine/threonine kinase involved in the regulation of several aspects of mitosis that is overexpressed in several cancers, making it an intriguing antineoplastic drug target (anticancer Nek2 inhibitors are reviewed by Fang and Zhang [87]). Wang et al. synthesized imidazopyridine derivatives based on the Nek2 kinase inhibitor MBM-55 (80) (see Figure 8 for structures of compounds 80-87) and evaluated these compounds for activity against the MGC-803 gastric cancer cell line (high expression of Nek2 frequently occurs in gastric cancer cell lines) [88]. Incubation of compound 86 with Nek2 at 10× its IC 50 concentration followed by rapid dilution of the Nek2 sample resulted in 3% recovery of activity compared to 11% recovery of activity after treatment of Nek2 with control competitive inhibitors, providing evidence for the irreversible inhibition of Nek2 by compound 86. Compound 85 displayed weak competitive inhibition of Nek2-C22A (in which the Cys22 residue of Nek2 was mutated to Ala) with an IC 50 value of 3.5 µM. When compounds 85 and 86 were tested against a panel of Ser-Thr kinases, they typically displayed >10-fold selectivity for Nek2 over other kinases, although this was not the case for the inhibition of Cdk2 by compound 86 (IC 50

Phosphatidylinositol-3-Kinase (PI3K)/AKT/mTOR Inhibitors
Signaling through the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway is initiated by receptor tyrosine kinases and G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) present on the cell surface. Kinase interactions downstream of PI3K are known to involve a complex signaling cascade which influences cell proliferation, cell cycle progression, cell growth, and cell survival. Dysregulation of the PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling pathway has been found in most cancers, such as breast, lung, blood, ovarian, and colorectal malignancies, indicating that this pathway is worthy of exploration in a wide range of cancers (please see Reference [77,90] for reviews of PI3K signaling and inhibition). The PI3K inhibitors idelalisib and copanlisib are

Phosphatidylinositol-3-Kinase (PI3K)/AKT/mTOR Inhibitors
Signaling through the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway is initiated by receptor tyrosine kinases and G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) present on the cell surface. Kinase interactions downstream of PI3K are known to involve a complex signaling cascade which influences cell proliferation, cell cycle progression, cell growth, and cell survival. Dysregulation of the PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling pathway has been found in most cancers, such as breast, lung, blood, ovarian, and colorectal malignancies, indicating that this pathway is worthy of exploration in a wide range of cancers (please see References [77,90] for reviews of PI3K signaling and inhibition). The PI3K inhibitors idelalisib and copanlisib are approved for the treatment of leukemia and lymphoma [91], while the PI3Kα inhibitor alpelisib has been approved in combination with fulvestrant for the treatment of certain types of breast cancer [92]. These successes, together with the desire to improve side effect profiles, have driven continued research on compounds that affect the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway.
Ding et al. synthesized a novel series of disubstituted benzimidazoles based on fragment features taken from GSK2292767 (88) and the previously reported PI3K inhibitor HS-173 (89) (structures for compounds 88-103 are provided in Figure 9) possessing potent anticancer activity towards the T47D, MCF-7, and HCT116 cell lines [93]. Most of the synthesized compounds were active against these cell lines, possessing IC 50    Zuo et al. synthesized piperazinone-purine hybrids as selective PI3Kδ inhibitors targeting non-Hodgkin's lymphomas [97]. WNY1613 (102) displayed an IC 50 value of 1.2 nM against PI3Kδ and selectivity indexes (IC 50 vs. the kinase of interest/IC 50 vs. PI3Kδ) of 219, 120, and 250 relative to PI3Kα, PI3Kβ, and PI3Kγ, respectively. Moreover, this compound only displayed activity >50% against PI3K isoforms when tested at a concentration of 500 nM against a panel of 300 other kinases. Gaonkar et al. synthesized substituted pyrimidine derivatives as antiproliferative agents that were evaluated against HeLa, MCF-7, HepG2, NCI-H460, and IMR-32 cancer cell lines [98]. Target compound 103 contained imidazole at the C2 position of the pyrimidine core and displayed the greatest potency against HeLa cells (IC 50 = 5.88 µM). Treatment of HeLa cells with compound 103 at 5, 10, and 20 µM concentrations resulted in the dose-dependent accumulation of cells in the sub-G 1 phase of cell cycle and the induction of apoptotic cell death. Since morpholinopyrimidines, such as apitolisib (GDC-0980), have shown activity as PI3K/mTOR inhibitors [99], molecular docking studies were performed between compound 103 and mTOR's catalytic domain. The authors reported several interactions between compound 103 and amino acids at the ATP binding pocket of mTOR.

DNA Intercalators
Intercalators are classes of small molecules that insert between adjacent DNA base pairs, causing significant deformation of the double helix. These compounds typically contain planar polyaromatic regions which stack with DNA bases, but intercalators may also make ionic and hydrogen bonding interactions with DNA. Due to these alterations in DNA, intercalators may interfere with replication, transcription, cell growth, and cell division. Interest in DNA intercalators as potential anticancer agents remains robust (see References [100,101] for reviews of DNA intercalating agents), and a better understanding of the interactions between DNA and anticancer candidates may help medicinal chemists to design intercalating molecules with improved anticancer activity.
Zhao et al. synthesized Schiff base derivatives of dehydroabietylamine (104) (see Figure 10 for structures of compounds 104-114) as potential anticancer agents and evaluated these compounds for activity against MCF-7, A549, HeLa, and HepG2 cancer cell lines, with HUVECs used as a normal reference cell line [102]. Most of the derivatives displayed IC 50 values ranging from 2.5-15 µM against MCF-7 cells, while compounds 105 and 106 exhibited the highest potency against HepG2 cells (IC 50 values of 0.24 and 0.14 µM, respectively). By comparison, 104 displayed an IC 50 value of 2.56 µM against HepG2 cells. Interestingly, 106 was 180 times more potent against HepG2 cells compared to HUVECs. Addition of compounds 105 and 106 to salmon sperm DNA complexed with ethidium bromide resulted in a reduction in fluorescence, consistent with binding of compounds 105 and 106 to DNA. A hypochromic shift was observed upon adding more DNA to solutions containing compounds 105 and 106, consistent with the hypothesis that these compounds bind to DNA via intercalation.  Further extension of the work by Zhao et al. conveyed the synthesis of imidazole derivatives of compound 104 (organic salts and amides) [103]. All the compounds derived from 104 were more potent against MCF-7 cancer cells compared to the parent compound. Among these, compounds 107 and 108 displayed IC50 values of 6.47 and 0.75 µM against MCF-7 cells compared to compound 104 (IC50 = 19.45 µM). Compound 107 displayed greater potency against A549 cells (IC50 = 1.85 µM) compared to compound 104 (IC50 = 5.02 µM). As above, spectroscopic experiments were used to provide evidence for the binding of these compounds to DNA via intercalation.
A series of compounds reported by Singh et al. explored the benzimidazole scaffold for the synthesis of DNA-interactive anticancer candidates [104][105][106][107]. In one such effort, naphthalimide-benzimidazole hybrid compounds were prepared as potential antiproliferative agents against the NCI panel of 60 human cancer cell lines [104]. Based on the Further extension of the work by Zhao et al. conveyed the synthesis of imidazole derivatives of compound 104 (organic salts and amides) [103]. All the compounds derived from 104 were more potent against MCF-7 cancer cells compared to the parent compound. Among these, compounds 107 and 108 displayed IC 50 values of 6.47 and 0.75 µM against MCF-7 cells compared to compound 104 (IC 50 = 19.45 µM). Compound 107 displayed greater potency against A549 cells (IC 50 = 1.85 µM) compared to compound 104 (IC 50 = 5.02 µM). As above, spectroscopic experiments were used to provide evidence for the binding of these compounds to DNA via intercalation.
A series of compounds reported by Singh et al. explored the benzimidazole scaffold for the synthesis of DNA-interactive anticancer candidates [104][105][106][107]. In one such effort, naphthalimide-benzimidazole hybrid compounds were prepared as potential antiprolif-erative agents against the NCI panel of 60 human cancer cell lines [104]. Based on the evaluation of 18 target compounds against this panel at a single 10 µM dose, compounds 109 and 110 were chosen for testing against the full panel of cell lines at concentrations ranging from 0.01 to 100 µM. Mean graph midpoint (GI 50  Benzimidazole-imidazopyrazine conjugates were synthesized and were also evaluated for their antiproliferative activity on the NCI 60 panel of cancer cell lines [105].

G-Quadruplex Stabilizers
G-quadruplexes (G4s) are four-stranded guanine-rich sequences present in the telomere and promotor regions of the human genome that play important roles regulating replication, transcription, and translation. The level of G4s is elevated in tumors and G4s frequently occur in proto-oncogenes; stabilization of these sequences by G4 ligands may block replication, transcription, and translation that is vital to cancer cells (see Reference [108] for a review of G-quadruplexes in cancer). For example, the c-MYC protein, which is dysregulated in several cancers, is coded by a gene that contains a G-rich promoter element that forms G4s [109]. Stabilization of c-MYC G4s with a small molecule has been shown to be promising anticancer strategy [110]. The design of ligands that bind to G-quadruplexes and regulate various genetic functions through stabilization of G4s has, thus, become an interesting focus area for anticancer drug discovery.
Phenanthroimidazole derivatives were synthesized by Wu et al. as potential anticancer agents targeting c-MYC G-quadruplexes [111]. Compound 115 (see Figure 11   Pelliccia et al. synthesized imidazopurine derivatives as potential G4-targeting anticancer agents [112]. The authors initially synthesized compound 118, which displayed a significant effect on the melting temperature (∆Tm) of G4 forming DNA sequences from oncogene promotors (∆Tm for BCL2 G4, c-MYC G4, and c-KIT1 G4 of 9.2, 7.2, and 5.2 • C, respectively), while increasing the ∆Tm of telomeric G4 Tel23 by only 2.4 • C. Moreover, compounds 119 and 120 were synthesized as part of a focused library of analogs of 118; these compounds showed selectivity for increasing the melting temperature of BCL2 and c-MYC G4 regions over telomeric G4 Tel23 and duplex DNA. Compound 119 displayed an IC 50 value of 17 µM against the Jurkat cell line but showed little effect on the growth of MCF-7, HCT116, or A375 cancer cell lines or against nonmalignant human dermal fibroblasts (HDF) or human keratinocytes (HaCaT). Compound 120 decreased the survival of Jurkat cells by approximately 60% at a concentration of 50 µM. Reduction of c-MYC expression by 66% and 56% was observed by qPCR when Jurkat cells were exposed to 25 µM concentrations of compounds 119 and 120, respectively. Similarly, treatment with compounds 119 and 120 caused 67% and 43% inhibition of BCL2 expression in Jurkat cells. Western blotting analysis revealed that exposure of Jurkat cells to compound 119 at a concentration of 25 µM reduced c-MYC and BCL-2 protein levels by approximately 50% and 40%, respectively, with compound 120 having less effect on the expression of these proteins.
In a subset of cancers, a telomerase-independent mechanism (alternative lengthening of telomeres or the ALT pathway) maintains telomeres (reviewed in Reference [113]). Hu et al. synthesized dimeric arylimidazole derivatives designed to target telomeric G4s, which are multimeric, and inhibit the ALT pathway [114]. Among these target molecules, compound 121 displayed high selectivity towards a multimeric G4 sequence (tel45) over a monomeric G4 sequence (tel21). Compound 121 displayed ∆T m values of 12.7 • C and 1.7 • C for tel45 and tel21, respectively, in line with the smaller dissociation constant determined for the DIZ-3/tel45 complex (4.

Topoisomerase Inhibitors
DNA topoisomerases play important roles in modifying DNA topology, with type 1 topoisomerases (TopI, which make single strand cuts in DNA) and type II topoisomerases (TopII, which result in DNA double strand cleavage) both serving as targets for clinical anticancer drugs. Anticancer agents, such as doxorubicin, etoposide, and topotecan, promote topoisomerase-mediated DNA cleavage, while inhibitors of catalytic function have not enjoyed significant clinical success (see Reference [115] for a review of topoisomerases in cancer). Despite the clinical efficacy of these topoisomerase-targeted agents, their shortcomings, such as dose-limiting toxicities, drug resistance, and poor solubility, limit their use, leading to the exploration of additional compounds designed to target DNA topoisomerases (see Reference [116] for a recent review of anticancer topoisomerase inhibitors). Kundu et al. tested the activity of novel quinoline-based compounds bearing an imidazole side chain in vitro against recombinant TopI and on TopI activity in MCF-7 cellular lysates [117].

Inhibitors of Minichromosomal Maintenance Proteins (MCMs)
MCMs display helicase activity and play important roles in DNA replication and cell cycle progression (a review of these proteins is given in Yu et al. [118]), and overexpression of MCMs has been linked to poor outcomes in cancer [119]. The search to find novel molecules which target MCMs is, therefore, an emerging area in anticancer drug discovery. High-throughput screening of a library containing two million molecules performed by

Poly(ADP-Ribose)polymerase (PARP) Inhibitors
PARP family enzymes play an important role in DNA repair, especially the repair of single strand breaks or the excision of a DNA base, by the transfer of ADP-ribose to target proteins from the substrate NAD + . If PARP activity is inhibited during DNA repair, single strand breaks result in the formation of double strand breaks (DSBs). Cells exhibiting DSBs require homologous recombination (HR) for DNA repair, making tumor cells that are deficient in HR (those harboring BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations) sensitive to PARP inhibition. PARP is, thus, an inviting target in anticancer drug discovery (see References [121,122] for recent reviews on PARP and PARP inhibitors). Benzimidazole carboxamide derivatives developed by Min et al. were tested for PARP inhibition, as well as for cytotoxicity, against MDA-MB-436 (a BRCA1 mutant breast cancer cell line) and Capan-1 (a BRAC2-deficient pancreatic cancer cell line) [123]. Compounds 128, 129, and 130 were excellent PARP-1 and PARP-2 inhibitors, with IC 50 values of 5.9 and 4.5 nM, 3.9 and 4.2 nM, and 3.6 and 3.2 nM, respectively, whereas the known PARP inhibitor veliparib exhibited IC 50 values of 5.3 and 1.6 nM against PARP-1 and PARP-2. Compounds 129 and 130 displayed the highest potencies against the MDA-MB-436 and Capan-1 cell lines, with IC 50 values ranging from 11.4-19.8 µM, while the IC 50 values for veliparib were >100 µM against these cell lines. In this series, compounds possessing a phenyl ketone moiety exhibited the greatest potency against these cell lines, irrespective of the two to four carbon length of the linker between the pyrrolidine and phenyl rings.

Histone Deacetylase (HDAC) Inhibitors
Histone deacetylases (HDACs) reverse the action of histone acetyltransferases by removing acetyl groups from lysine residues of both histone and nonhistone proteins. There are four classes of HDACs that deacylate lysine substrates via a Zn 2+ or NAD + dependent mechanism, and the abnormal expression of HDACs has been reported in various types of cancers. HDAC inhibitors have emerged as a class of anticancer agents capable of regulating gene expression, inhibiting DNA repair, causing growth arrest, inducing apoptosis, and inhibiting angiogenesis (see References [124][125][126] for reviews of HDACs and anticancer HDAC inhibitors). The utility of FDA-approved drugs, such as vorinostat, romidepsin, belinostat, and panobinostat, along with the challenges remaining concerning the use of these HDAC inhibitors for cancer treatment, have encouraged the design and synthesis of new compounds as selective HDAC inhibitors [127].
Chen et al. prepared thirty-one 6-phenylpurines linked to hydroxamate via an alkoxy chain of variable length [128]. Compound 131 (see Figure 12 for structures of compounds 131-141) exhibited promising activity against MV4-11 and PC-3 cancer cell lines, with IC 50 values of 0.16 and 1.16 µM, respectively. This compound also showed excellent potency as an inhibitor of HDAC activity in HeLa cell nuclear extracts, with an IC 50 value of 35 nM. By comparison, the known HDAC inhibitor vorinostat displayed an IC 50 value of 57 nM against HeLa nuclear extract-derived HDAC activity and IC 50 values of 0.36 and 1.49 µM against MV4-11 and PC-3 cancer cell lines, respectively. For these thirty-one derivatives, a positive correlation was shown between HDAC IC 50 and antiproliferative potency against the MV4-11 cell line, consistent with the hypothesis that the compounds evaluated target HDACs in these cancer cells. Compound 131 was also found to be a strong inhibitor of class I and IIb HDACs but a weak inhibitor of class IIa and IV HDACs. When compound 131 was evaluated against a panel of 97 kinases, ≥50% inhibitory activity was not observed for any of these kinases at a 1 µM concentration of this compound. Histone H3 acetylation was increased in BALB/c nude mice bearing PC-3 tumors when compound 131 was administered orally to these animals at a dose of 150 mg/kg.
Due to the proposed unique roles of HDAC6 in carcinogenesis (reviewed in Reference [129]), HDAC6 inhibitors are of interest as potential selective anticancer agents. Mackwitz et al. reported a multicomponent reaction using aldehydes, 2-aminopyridines, and methyl 4-isocyanobenzoate under microwave irradiation as a key step to access new imidazopyridine derivatives as candidate HDAC6 inhibitors [130]. These derivatives were screened for inhibition of human recombinant HDAC1 and HDAC6, as well as for activity against a human tongue squamous cell carcinoma cell line (CAL27). Compound 132 displayed IC 50 values of 2.20 µM against HDAC1 and 58 nM against HDAC6 (selectivity index = 38). Compound 133 displayed the best activity in a whole-cell HDAC inhibition assay employing CAL27 cells with an IC 50 value of 1.75 µM. In terms of the SAR for these compounds, derivatives bearing an alkyl group at C7 of the imidazopyridine core displayed the highest selectivity for HDAC6 over HDAC1. The substituent present at C2 was less important in dictating cellular activity, however, as a subset of target compounds bearing substituents ranging from H (134) to 4-(dimethylamino)-1-naphthyl (133)  synthesis of new compounds as selective HDAC inhibitors [127].
Chen et al. prepared thirty-one 6-phenylpurines linked to hydroxamate via an alkoxy chain of variable length [128]. Compound 131 (see Figure 12 for structures of compounds 131-141) exhibited promising activity against MV4-11 and PC-3 cancer cell lines, with IC50 values of 0.16 and 1.16 µM, respectively. This compound also showed excellent potency as an inhibitor of HDAC activity in HeLa cell nuclear extracts, with an IC50 value of 35 nM. By comparison, the known HDAC inhibitor vorinostat displayed an IC50 value of 57 nM against HeLa nuclear extract-derived HDAC activity and IC50 values of 0.36 and 1.49 µM against MV4-11 and PC-3 cancer cell lines, respectively. For these thirty-one derivatives, a positive correlation was shown between HDAC IC50 and antiproliferative potency against the MV4-11 cell line, consistent with the hypothesis that the compounds evaluated target HDACs in these cancer cells. Compound 131 was also found to be a strong inhibitor of class I and IIb HDACs but a weak inhibitor of class IIa and IV HDACs. When compound 131 was evaluated against a panel of 97 kinases, ≥50% inhibitory activity was not observed for any of these kinases at a 1 µM concentration of this compound. Histone H3 acetylation was increased in BALB/c nude mice bearing PC-3 tumors when compound 131 was administered orally to these animals at a dose of 150 mg/kg. Novel benzoylimidazole derivatives were synthesized as dual RAF/HDAC inhibitors and were screened for activity against five different human cancer cell lines [132]. Compounds 139 and 140 displayed the greatest potency, with IC 50 values of 0.086/1.710 µM and 1.853/0.635 µM against BRAF V600E /HDAC1, respectively. Compounds 139 and 140 were further tested against RAF and HDAC isoforms, with compound 139 displaying IC 50 values of 0.045, 0.134, and 0.102 µM against ARAF, wt BRAF, and CRAF isotypes, respectively. Compound 140 was less active against the RAF isoforms, while both of these compounds were inactive against HDAC6 and HDAC8 at a concentration of 50 µM. Compound 139 also displayed antiproliferative activity against A549, SK-Mel-2, and MV4-11 cell lines, with IC 50 values of 9.11, 5.40, and 0.38 µM, respectively. By comparison, the IC 50 values determined for SAHA (vorinostat) and sorafenib against these three cell lines were 18.1, 8.20, 0.11 µM and 10.6, 9.30, 0.42 µM, respectively.
Yun et. al. reported a series of purine-based dual inhibitors of HDAC1/2 and CDK2 as potential multi-targeting anticancer agents and tested these compounds for activity against HCT116, HeLa, A375, HepG2, and H460 cancer cell lines [133]. The authors designed compounds by combining the aminobenzamide moiety common to one class of HDAC inhibitors with the purine-based pharmacophore present in CDK2 inhibitors. Of the target compounds, 141 was the most potent against four of the five cancer cell lines tested, displaying IC 50 values ranging from 0.47-1.59 µM against these cell lines. Compound 141 also displayed IC 50 values of 70.7, 23.1, and 800 nM against HDAC1, HDAC2, and CDK2, respectively. By comparison, the HDAC inhibitor CS055 displayed IC 50 values of 260 and 66.5 nM against HDAC1 and HDAC2, respectively, while the CDK2 inhibitor roscovitine exhibited an IC 50 value of 110 nM against this enzyme. Docking simulations with 141 suggested hydrogen bonding interactions and coordination with the zinc ion are important for binding of the aminobenzamide moiety of this compound to HDAC1 and HDAC2, while hydrogen bonds formed by the purine ring and the 1,2-diaminobenzene moiety promote binding of compound 141 to CDK2. Antitumor activity for 141 was evaluated in a HCT116 xenograft colon cancer model in nude mice. When compound 141 was administered to these mice at 25, 50, and 100 mg/kg by i.p. injection once daily for 21 days, tumor growth inhibition of 28%, 40%, and 44% was observed, respectively, compared to the control group.

Lysine-Specific Demethylase 1 (KDM1A) Inhibitors
Lysine-specific demethylase 1 (LSD1 or KDM1A) demethylates lysine residues (K4 and K9) of histone H3 protein and also regulates lysine methylation in other proteins. KDMA1 plays an important role in cancer cell growth and survival through the regulation of transcription, and the overexpression of KDMA1 has been associated with a range of cancers (reviewed in Reference [134]). KDMA1 has, thus, emerged as an anticancer target. New imidazolylthienopyrroles have been reported which act as reversible inhibitors of KDM1A [135]. Compound 142 (see Figure 13 for structures of compounds 142-153) displayed an IC 50 value of 0.10 nM against KDM1A. A dose-dependent increase in the expression of CD86, a biomarker related to KDMA1 inhibition, was also observed in THP-1 cells treated with 142 at concentrations of 5 and 50 nM. In addition, 38.8% and 72.3% inhibition of colony formation was observed when THP-1 cells were treated with compound 142 at concentrations of 50 and 500 nM. When compound 142 was given orally at a dose of 30 mg/kg/day, 5 days a week for 2 weeks in separate murine models of acute promyelocytic and acute myeloid leukemia, survival in these groups of mice was prolonged by 55% and 70%, respectively. 145 = 9.02 µM and 146 = 0.99 µM) cell lines compared to 145. Similar activity was observed for the two isomers against HDAC1, however (IC50 value of 145 = 0.91 µM and 146 = 0.89 µM). In an A549 xenograft model in nude mice, compound 144 exhibited 65.4% tumor growth inhibition when given orally at 100 mg/kg/day for 21 days, while tumor growth inhibition values of 57.3% and 44.0% were observed for the known HDAC and MDM2 inhibitors SAHA and Nutlin-3, respectively, when given by the same route and dosing regimen.

p53-Murine Double Minute 2 (MDM2) Inhibitors
The transcription factor p53 plays a critical 'gate keeper' role in cancer suppression, while the murine double minute 2 (MDM2) protein is the major inhibitor of p53 within the cell. Interaction between MDM2 and wild-type p53 is responsible for inhibition of p53 function via three separate mechanisms: (1) direct binding to p53 resulting in inhibition of p53 binding to target DNA, (2) nuclear export of p53, and (3) ubiquitination of p53 via MDM2 s E3 ligase activity. Several MDM2 inhibitors are in clinical trials, and the search for additional antagonists as anticancer candidates is in progress (see References [136,137] for reviews of MDM2 inhibition in cancer). He at al. designed and synthesized putative dual inhibitors of MDM2 and HDACs based on known substituted dihydroimidazole MDM2 inhibitors and HDAC inhibitors [138]. Compound 143 showed good activity toward both MDM2 (K i = 0.34 µM) and HDAC1 (IC 50 = 0.27 µM). To improve binding affinity and solubility, piperazine and piperidine moieties were incorporated into the aliphatic chain. Compound 144 exhibited balanced activity, displaying a K i of 0.11 µM against MDM2 and an IC 50  In an A549 xenograft model in nude mice, compound 144 exhibited 65.4% tumor growth inhibition when given orally at 100 mg/kg/day for 21 days, while tumor growth inhibition values of 57.3% and 44.0% were observed for the known HDAC and MDM2 inhibitors SAHA and Nutlin-3, respectively, when given by the same route and dosing regimen.

Bromodomain and Extraterminal (BET) Protein Inhibitors
The BET protein family (BRD2, BRD3, BRD4, and BRDT) plays an important role in oncogene expression. These proteins have tandem bromodomains (BD1 and BD2) that regulate gene expression through recognition of acetylated histone lysine residues, and disruption of this association by BET inhibitors is a promising approach in cancer drug discovery and development (see Reference [139] for a review of bromodomains as a drug target). Novel derivatives of 7-methylimidazopyrazinone synthesized by Yang et al. were evaluated for their activity against BET proteins and for their activity against a lymphoblast-like cell line (Raji), a leukemia cell line (HL-60), and a human pancreatic (BxPC-3) cancer cell line [140]. Compound 147 displayed IC 50 values of 33 nM against BRD4/BD1 and 25 nM against BRD4/BD2 in vitro. This compound also exhibited an IC 50 value of 110 nM against the HL-60 cell line along with 43.2% inhibition of BxPC-3 cell proliferation at a concentration of 2 µM. In terms of the SAR for these molecules, replacement of the difluorophenyl substituent with a pyridyl group generally caused a significant decrease in potency. Western blotting analysis revealed that the treatment of BxPC-3 cells with compound 147 at concentrations of 5, 10, and 15 µM caused upregulation of the BRD4 protein, caspase 3, and caspase 9, as well as downregulation of c-Myc and Bcl-xl, suggesting that compound 147 modulates apoptosis in this cell line.

WD Repeat Domain 5 (WDR5) Inhibitors
WDR5 belongs to the family of WD40 repeat (WDR) domain proteins, a group of proteins containing a central pocket for peptide binding that is amenable to the design of small molecule ligands. WDR5 is known to play a role in the transcriptional activation of oncogenes by facilitating histone methylation, resulting in the proliferation of cancer cells, tumor growth, and metastasis (see Reference [141] for a review of WDR domain proteins and Reference [142] for a review of WDR5 in cancer). The transcription factor MYC, a key driver of many tumors, has also been shown to rely on its interaction with WDR5 to bind to chromatin [143]. WDR5 has, thus, emerged as an attractive target for cancer therapeutics.
Tian et al. synthesized new compounds based on dihydroimidazole imine 148 in which the structure-guided optimization of this compound led to improved WDR5 inhibitory activity, as well as anticancer activity [144]. Replacement of the 4-fluoro-2-methylpyridin-3-yl and 3,4-dichlorobenzyl moieties present in compound 148 with 4-fluoro-2-methylphenyl and 3,5-dimethoxy benzyl groups, respectively, resulted in compound 149. This compound exhibited potent WDR5 binding with a K i value of 0.049 nM, potent MLL1 histone methyltransferase inhibition (IC 50  Applying NMR-based fragment screening of 15 N-labeled WDR5 (consisting of amino acids 23-334), an imidazole sulfonamide (compound 151) was designed and synthesized that bound to WDR5 and disrupted the interaction between this protein and a fluorescent probe with a K d of 1.0 µM [145]. To optimize the binding of compound 151 to WDR5, various hydrophobic substitutions were made at the N1 position of imidazole, leading to the synthesis of compound 152, which displayed a K d value of 0.40 µM. Replacement of imidazole with its isosteres and bioisosteres, such as 1,2,4-triazole, pyrazole, thiazole, and benzothiazole, led to either a modest or significant decrease in binding affinity. Further optimization of compound 152 via modification at the C2 position of imidazole resulted in the discovery of compound 153, which displayed a K d value of 0.10 µM. While small substitutions, such as methyl, ethyl, ethyl ester, and methyl sulfone, at the C2 position in compound 152 resulted in molecules possessing K d values in the range between 0.10-0.22 µM, placement of larger groups such as 4-substituted piperazine-amide and piperidine-amide led to a decrease in the K d . Six of the seven active compounds disrupted the interaction between WDR5 and MYC in HEK-293 cell lysates in a co-immunoprecipitation assay at a concentration of 50 µM, while a structurally related compound showing no measurable WDR5 affinity (K d > 40 µM) did not disrupt the WDR5-MYC complex. Active compounds also inhibited the histone methyltransferase activity of MLL-1 when in complex with WDR5, RBBP5, ASH2L, and DPY30.

Signal Transducer and Activator of Transcription 3 (STAT3) Inhibitors
The transcription factor STAT3 is vital for cancer cell survival and proliferation. STAT3 is activated in many forms of cancer, resulting in the proliferation of cancer cells and, through the effect of STAT3 on its target genes, immunosuppression. Inhibition of STAT3 activity by small molecules can impede the growth of cancer cells, making STAT3 an important target in anticancer drug discovery (reviewed in Reference [146]).
A series of 2-imidazopyridines was synthesized and evaluated for activity against the PLC5 hepatoma cell line [147]. Of the synthesized compounds, 154, 155, and 156 (see Figure 14 for structures of compounds 154-172) displayed activity against this cell line with IC 50 values of 9.3 µM, 10.4 µM, and 11.7 µM, respectively. Antiproliferative activity is greater when the compounds contain the imidazopyridine ring system rather than benzimidazole at the C2 position of pyrrole. Mechanistic studies employing 10 µM concentrations of compounds 154, 155, and 156 revealed reduction of STAT3 phosphorylation in PLC5 cells. In addition, treatment of PLC5 cells with 10 µM concentrations of these compounds increased the activity of SHP-1, a phosphatase that dephosphorylates and, thus, deactivates STAT3, by approximately 2-fold compared to control. The expression of survivin, cyclin D1, and MCL-1, which are downstream targets of STAT3, were also decreased upon treatment of PLC5 cells with compound 155 at concentrations of 5 and 10 µM.   Wang et al. synthesized C2,C6-disubstituted purines as potential anticancer agents targeting STAT3 [148]. The target compounds were tested for their antiproliferative activity against HCT116, SW480, and MDA-MB-231 cancer cell lines, as well as for their effects, on a human breast epithelial cell line (MCF-10A). PD26-TL07 (157) displayed potent antiproliferative activity with IC 50 values of 1.77, 1.51, and 1.25 µM against HCT116, SW480, and MDA-MB-231 cancer cells, respectively, while exhibiting low toxicity to MCF-10A cells (IC 50 > 100 µM). IL6-induced phosphorylation of STAT3 was inhibited in MDA-MB-231 cells treated with 1-10 µM concentrations of compound 157 as assessed by Western blotting, but the same concentrations of this compound had no effect on IL6-induced STAT1 phosphorylation. In an MDA-MB-231 murine xenograft model, administration of compound 157 (30 mg/kg by i.p. injection) resulted in a significant decrease in tumor weight compared to animals receiving vehicle (TGI of 47.8%), while no difference in body weight between the two groups was observed.

Indoleamine-2,3-Dioxygenase (IDO)/Tryptophan 2,3-Dioxygenase (TDO) Signaling Inhibitors
IDO and TDO catalyze the oxidation of tryptophan to N-formylkynurenine, the first step of tryptophan breakdown. Accumulation of tryptophan metabolites results in immunosuppression through multiple mechanisms, and the overexpression of the predominant IDO isoform (IDO1) occurs in some cancers. Since the immune system plays an important role in limiting cancer cell growth, invasion, and metastasis, compounds that inhibit IDO and TDO are of interest as anticancer candidates. While there are currently no approved drugs that function as IDO modulators, candidates, such as epacadostat, indoximod, and GDC-0919, are in various phases of clinical trials, and the identification of novel IDO1 and TDO inhibitors remains of interest in anticancer drug discovery (see Reference [149] for a review of IDO in cancer and cancer therapy).  [151], employing the Ugi and Passerini multicomponent reactions, and studied their inhibitory activities against IDO1 [152]. Some of these compounds displayed IC 50 values below 1.0 µM against the recombinant human IDO1 (rhIDO1) enzyme; among those, 163 and 164 displayed enzymatic IC 50 values of 0.81 and 0.20 µM, respectively. However, only compound 163 displayed moderate inhibition (24% at a concentration of 10 µM) in an IDO cellular inhibition assay in the human melanoma A375 cell line, while other compounds were inactive in this assay. The authors speculated that poor solubility, avid serum protein binding, or efflux from the target cells may have led to the disconnect between inhibition of rhIDO1 activity and activity in the cell-based assay. In terms of the SAR for these compounds against rhIDO1, the placement of benzyl groups at the "left" side of the target molecules generally resulted in better inhibitory activity compared to derivatives possessing phenyl substitutions. Serafini et al. further extended the work by Griglio, synthesizing two additional series of imidazothiazole derivatives by replacing the benzylamide/benzyl ester moiety in 163 and 164 with 1,4-disubstituted 1,2,3-triazole and 1,2,3-triazole amides [153]. Of the synthesized imidazothiazole-1,4-disubstituted 1,2,3triazole derivatives, 165 and 166 displayed IC 50 values of 0.5 and 1.1 µM against rhIDO1, respectively, while, among triazole amide derivatives, compound 167 displayed an IC 50 value of 0.2 µM against this enzyme.
As a follow-up to these studies, Serafini et al. identified benzimidazoles as IDO1 inhibitors with the aid of a virtual screen of the IDO1 active site using the ZINC15 database [154]. Fifty of the top 500 molecules identified in this screen were purchased and evaluated in a cell-based assay measuring kynurenine levels in the A375 melanoma cancer cell line (which expresses high kynurenine levels when stimulated with INF-γ). Among these compounds, the hit molecule 168 displayed an IC 50

Aromatase Inhibitors
Aromatase, a member of the CYP450 superfamily of enzymes, aids in the conversion of androgens to estrogen. The production of estrogen due to the action of the aromatase enzyme enhances tumor cell growth in hormone-dependent breast cancer, therefore aromatase inhibitors, such as letrozole, have been used clinically for the treatment of this type of cancer (see Reference [155] for a review of the use of aromatase inhibitors in breast cancer). Kalalinia et al. synthesized new azole derivatives as candidate aromatase inhibitors [156]. Neither the target compounds nor letrozole reached 50% inhibitory activity against either MCF-7 or HepG2 cancer cell lines at a concentration of 100 µM. However, compounds 171 and 172 efficiently inhibited aromatase in cultured cells using a commercial estrone ELISA with IC 50 values of 0.2 nM and 6.8 nM, respectively, while letrozole displayed an IC 50 value of 0.3 nM in this assay (the cell line used was not specified). Compound 171 decreased androstenedione-induced uterine hypertrophy in immature female rats when administered orally at doses of 10, 50, and 100 µg/kg once a day for four days, while letrozole (given orally at 10 µg/kg) produced a similar effect. In adult male rats treated with adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH, which stimulates cortisol and aldosterone production), a single oral dose of letrozole (4 mg/kg) significantly decreased serum concentrations of cortisol and aldosterone in comparison to control, while the same oral dose of compound 171 did not have significant effects on the serum concentration of these steroids, showing the specificity of compound 171.

Inhibition of Aldehyde Dehydrogenase
Aldehyde dehydrogenase subtype 1A3 (ALD1A3) is overexpressed in high mortality glioblastomas and plays an important role in glioma cell invasion [157]. The inhibition of this enzyme may, thus, provide an attractive strategy for the treatment of certain brain tumors. Toward this end, Quattrini et al. synthesized novel derivatives of imidazopyridine targeting ALD1A3 [158]. The authors crystallized preliminary hit GA11 (173) (see Figure 15 for

Galectin-1 Inhibitors
Galectin-1 is a carbohydrate-binding protein that plays an important role in tumor invasion, progression, metastasis, and angiogenesis when overexpressed (reviewed in Reference [161]). Thus, galectin-1 inhibition is a potential anticancer strategy. Goud et al. synthesized 1-benzyl-benzimidazole derivatives as potential galectin-1 targeted anticancer agents and evaluated their activity against MDA-MB-231, A549, MCF-7, DU-145, HT29, and HCT116 cancer cell lines [162]. Compound 179 was as active as any of the target compounds against MCF-7 cells, exhibiting an IC50 value of 7.01 µM against this cell line. Treatment of MCF-7 cells with compound 179 (10-300 µM) caused a dose-dependent reduction of the expression of Gal-1 protein as determined by ELISA; the binding of compound 179 with the galectin-1 protein was confirmed by fluorescence spectroscopy and surface plasmon resonance experiments. In an extension of this work, benzimidazole-1,2,3-triazole hybrid compounds were synthesized as galectin-1 targeted agents based on

Heme Oxygenase-1 (HO-1) Inhibitors
HO-1 participates in the degradation of heme; overexpression of this enzyme is linked to protective effects on cancer cells and may promote cancer progression, cancer cell growth and survival, and metastasis (see Reference [159] for a review of HO-1 as an anticancer target). Ciaffaglione et al. synthesized a series of arylethanolimidazole-based derivatives as candidate HO-1 inhibitors [160]. Compound 178 displayed significant activity against HO-1, exhibiting an IC 50 value of 0.90 µM. In terms of the SAR for these compounds, removal or oxidation of the hydroxyl group led to diminished activity against HO-1.

Galectin-1 Inhibitors
Galectin-1 is a carbohydrate-binding protein that plays an important role in tumor invasion, progression, metastasis, and angiogenesis when overexpressed (reviewed in Reference [161]). Thus, galectin-1 inhibition is a potential anticancer strategy. Goud et al. synthesized 1-benzyl-benzimidazole derivatives as potential galectin-1 targeted anticancer agents and evaluated their activity against MDA-MB-231, A549, MCF-7, DU-145, HT29, and HCT116 cancer cell lines [162]. Compound 179 was as active as any of the target compounds against MCF-7 cells, exhibiting an IC 50 value of 7.01 µM against this cell line. Treatment of MCF-7 cells with compound 179 (10-300 µM) caused a dose-dependent reduction of the expression of Gal-1 protein as determined by ELISA; the binding of compound 179 with the galectin-1 protein was confirmed by fluorescence spectroscopy and surface plasmon resonance experiments. In an extension of this work, benzimidazole-1,2,3-triazole hybrid compounds were synthesized as galectin-1 targeted agents based on compound 179 and were evaluated for their activity against NCI-H460, A549, MDA-MB-231, and MCF-7 cancer cell lines [163]. Target

Glutathione S-Transferase Inhibitors
Glutathione S-transferase (GST) is best known as a phase 2 metabolic enzyme involved in the detoxification of electrophiles. The non-hepatic GSTP1 isotype is abundantly expressed in some cancers and may be responsible for anticancer drug resistance by deactivating electrophilic drugs or by influencing cell signaling pathways (reviewed in Reference [164]). GSTP1 inhibitors may, thus, be useful for treating some forms of cancer, as well as for reversing resistance. Abd El-Karim et al. synthesized new benzimidazoles with the goal of inhibiting GST as an anticancer strategy [165]. Compounds 181 and 182 displayed IC 50 values of 1.7 µg/mL and 0.67 µg/mL, respectively, against the GST enzyme prepared from human placenta, while the standard ethacrynic acid exhibited an IC 50 value of 5.5 µg/mL. In general, placement of isoxazole or a 2-pyridyl group at the C2 position of benzimidazole resulted in greater potency against GST, while placement of pyrazole or N-methyl pyrazole at this position led to a decrease in potency. Compounds 183 and 184 displayed the greatest potency against the MCF-7 cell line (IC 50 values of 3.2 and 2.7 µg/mL, respectively), while these compounds exhibited IC 50 values of 3.7 and 4.9 µg/mL against the HCT cell line, respectively. These results indicate that compounds 183 and 184 may act on a target distinct from GST or that compounds 181 and 182 (IC 50 values of 7.5 and 15.5 µg/mL against MCF-7 cells, respectively) may exhibit poor permeability to these cancer cell lines. Molecular docking studies revealed good binding between compounds 181 and 182 and GSTP1.

Lipoxygenase Inhibitors
Lipoxygenases (LOXs) catalyze the conversion of polyunsaturated fatty acids into fatty acid hydroperoxides. With arachidonic acid as a substrate, different LOX isotypes can perform this oxidation at different sites of unsaturation. Since the 15-LOX isotype has been implicated in several forms of cancer, 15-LOX inhibitors are of interest as new anticancer candidates (see Reference [166] for a review of anticancer 15-LOX inhibitors). Afifi et al. described the synthesis and evaluation of purine-pyrazole hybrids as potential inhibitors of the 15-LOX isoform [167]. The target compounds exhibited IC 50 values against 15-LOX in the range 1.76-6.12 µM. These compounds were also screened for in vitro activity against the MCF-7, PC-3, A549, HepG2, and Caco-2 cancer cell lines. Of the compounds tested, 185 was the most potent against all five cancer cell lines, exhibiting IC 50 values ranging from 18.5-23.4 µM. While compound 185 (see Figure 16 for structures of compounds 185-191) was one of the stronger 15-LOX inhibitors identified (IC 50 = 2.33 µM), it displayed the best antioxidant activity in an assay measuring the reduction of 2,2 -diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl, displaying an IC 50 value of 0.93 µg/mL (1.64 µM) in this assay. In molecular docking studies, compound 185 bound to 15-LOX (PDB ID code: 1-LOX) with a docking score of −3.37 kcal/mol. IC50 values of 15.48 and 4.99 µM, respectively, against T47D cells; these molecules were more potent than the standard compound bazedoxifene (IC50 = 16.43 µM). Upon analysis of the structural features of these molecules, it was observed that bromoimidazole derivatives 186 and 187 were more potent than their unsubstituted imidazole analogs and significantly more potent than analogs containing an imidazopyridine ring system. Compounds 186 and 187 displayed affinity for ER-α, with IC50 values of 73.61 and 80.36 nM, respectively, in a competitive binding assay (the IC50 of bazedoxifene in this assay was 31.71 nM). Expression of ER-α mRNA and ER-α protein were both diminished by treatment of T47D cells with 15 µM and 5 µM concentrations of compounds 186 and 187, respectively.

ABCB1 Inhibitors
Multidrug resistance (MDR) is a major cause of failure in cancer chemotherapy, as efflux of intracellular drugs by P-gp (the drug transporter MDR1 or ABCB1; overexpressed in multidrug resistant cancer cells) causes a decrease in the intracellular drug concentration (reviewed in Reference [170]). Thus, the modulation of ABCB1 activity has been explored as a strategy for cancer treatment. In this regard, Wang et al. designed new molecules based on WS-36 (188), which increases sensitization of the ABCB1-overexpressing SW620/Ad300 cell line to paclitaxel [171]. The combination of compound 188 (20 µM, a nontoxic concentration alone) with paclitaxel was toxic to SW620/Ad300 cells with an IC50 value of 2.34 µM, while paclitaxel alone displayed an IC50 value of 4.23 µM against this cell line. Various structural modifications at C8, C6, and C2 of the triazolopyrimidine core of compound 188 were carried out, resulting in the identification of compound WS-691

Estrogen Receptor-α (ER-α) Inhibitors
As stated in Section 4.13, estrogen plays a vital role in mammary tumorigenesis. The effect of estrogen is mediated by estrogen receptors α and β (ER-α and ER-β); in most breast cancers, initiation and progression of tumors occurs by the activation of ER-α. Compounds, such as tamoxifen, which selectively bind to ER-α, thus, provide an important strategy for the treatment of breast cancer (see Reference [168] for a review of the use of ER-α antagonists in breast cancer). Singla et al. synthesized a series of indole-benzimidazole derivatives and examined their activity using the ER-α responsive T47D breast cancer cell line and an ER-α binding assay [169]. Target compounds 186 and 187 displayed IC 50 values of 15.48 and 4.99 µM, respectively, against T47D cells; these molecules were more potent than the standard compound bazedoxifene (IC 50 = 16.43 µM). Upon analysis of the structural features of these molecules, it was observed that bromoimidazole derivatives 186 and 187 were more potent than their unsubstituted imidazole analogs and significantly more potent than analogs containing an imidazopyridine ring system. Compounds 186 and 187 displayed affinity for ER-α, with IC 50 values of 73.61 and 80.36 nM, respectively, in a competitive binding assay (the IC 50 of bazedoxifene in this assay was 31.71 nM). Expression of ER-α mRNA and ER-α protein were both diminished by treatment of T47D cells with 15 µM and 5 µM concentrations of compounds 186 and 187, respectively.

ABCB1 Inhibitors
Multidrug resistance (MDR) is a major cause of failure in cancer chemotherapy, as efflux of intracellular drugs by P-gp (the drug transporter MDR1 or ABCB1; overexpressed in multidrug resistant cancer cells) causes a decrease in the intracellular drug concentration (reviewed in Reference [170]). Thus, the modulation of ABCB1 activity has been explored as a strategy for cancer treatment. In this regard, Wang et al. designed new molecules based on WS-36 (188), which increases sensitization of the ABCB1-overexpressing SW620/Ad300 cell line to paclitaxel [171]. The combination of compound 188 (20 µM, a nontoxic concentration alone) with paclitaxel was toxic to SW620/Ad300 cells with an IC 50 value of 2.34 µM, while paclitaxel alone displayed an IC 50 value of 4.23 µM against this cell line. Various structural modifications at C8, C6, and C2 of the triazolopyrimidine core of compound 188 were carried out, resulting in the identification of compound WS-691 (189) as the most potent derivative. Paclitaxel displayed an IC 50 value of 0.022 µM in combination with compound 189 (20 µM, a nontoxic concentration when given alone), while paclitaxel in combination with the first-generation ABCB1 modulator verapamil (4 µM) displayed an IC 50 value of 0.30 µM. In terms of the SAR, placement of a thiomethyl group at the C2 position of the triazolopyrimidine core leads to higher potency compared to larger thioalkyl groups, while, among the various substituted anilines at the C7 position, only molecules substituted with 4-fluoroaniline (compound 189) or aniline displayed potent MDR reversal activity. In studies employing the KB-3-1 cell line and its corresponding multidrug resistant cell line KB-C2 (which overexpresses ABCB1), a complete reversal of paclitaxel resistance was observed in KB-C2 cells at a 20 µM concentration of compound 189. At concentrations of 10 and 20 µM, compound 189 increased the intracellular concentration of paclitaxel in ABCB1-overexpressing SW620/Ad300 cells compared to cells that were not exposed to this compound. Compound 189 did not inhibit the critical drug metabolizing enzyme CYP3A4 when tested at a concentration of 30 µM, in contrast with verapamil. In a SW620/Ad300 murine xenograft model, compound 189 (administered at 20 mg/kg/day for 21 days by intragastric injection) in combination with paclitaxel caused a reduction in tumor volume and tumor weight that was greater than the effect of paclitaxel alone.

Heat Shock Protein (HSP) Inhibitors
HSPs are molecular chaperones which play important roles in protein folding and also protect protein structure and function during cellular stress. Cancer cells depend heavily on HSPs for survival, thus making these chaperones important targets for cancer therapeutics. HSP90 has been the subject of most of these drug discovery and development efforts. While a number of HSP90 inhibitors are undergoing clinical trials, there are currently no approved anticancer drugs that act on this pathway, highlighting the need for further investigation of small molecules targeting HSPs (see References [172,173] for reviews focusing on the targeting of HSPs and HSP90, respectively). Uno et al. reported a series of molecules based on preliminary hit 190 as potential HSP90 inhibitors [174]. Compound 190 was a hybrid compound designed from the X-ray crystal structures of two previous inhibitors of HSP90. The authors explored the indole nucleus in compound 190 and also examined the effect of the 3-quinoline group. The former strategy revealed pyrazolopyridine as the optimal core, and the latter strategy showed that the best results were obtained through the replacement of quinoline with substituted imidazole. Further optimization showed that the best overall activity against HSP90α (IC 50 = 69 nM) in conjunction with effectiveness against the SK-BR-3 cell line (IC 50 = 330 nM), and good oral exposure in mice (AUC 0-6h = 90.1 µM·h at a dose of 50 mg/kg) was achieved when the C4 position of imidazole was substituted with N-methyl pyrazole and the C2 position of the phenyl ring attached to imidazopyridine was substituted with an ethyl group (compound 191). After oral administration of compound 191 in an NCI-H1975 murine xenograft model at a dose of 10 mg/kg/day for 14 days, the tumor volume in control animals was approximately four times greater than in animals receiving compound 191. Western blotting studies of tumor proteins from this in vivo study revealed that treatment with compound 191 resulted in decreased levels of the HSP90 client protein EGFR, thus inhibiting downstream phosphorylation of AKT, RPS6, and MAPK 1/3.

Benzimidazolium Salts
Karatas et al. synthesized coumarin substituted benzimidazolium salts and tested their cytotoxicities against PC-3 (prostate) and A2780 (ovarian) cancer cell lines [175]. Some of the synthesized compounds were found to have good cytotoxic activity in the PC-3 cancer cell line. PC-3 cells exposed to a 1 µM concentration of compound 192 (see Figure 17 for structures of compounds 192-199) displayed a viability by 44.53%, while the viability of these cells exposed to 1 µM docetaxel was 31.45%.   In terms of antiproliferative SAR, the activity pattern with respect to the central benzimidazole ring followed the general trend (starting with the most potent) 5,6-dimethyl benzimidazole > benzimidazole > 2-methyl benzimidazole > imidazole. In the compounds possessing 5,6-dimethyl benzimidazole and 2-methyl benzimidazole, compounds containing substitutions with phenacyl, 4-bromophenacyl, 4-trifluoromethylphenacyl, 4-methoxyphenacyl, 4-phenylphenacyl, and naphthylacyl generally displayed the most potent activities (IC 50

Benzimidazole Containing and Related Molecules
The in vitro antitumor potency of a new series of benzimidazole-quinolinone derivatives was evaluated against HepG2, SKOV3, NCI-H460, and BEL-7404 cancer cell lines along with the toxicity of these molecules against the HL-7702 normal human liver cell line [179].  Novel N1, C2-substituted benzimidazoles were synthesized by Mohareb et al. and screened against A549, H460, HT29, MKN-45, U87MG, and SMMC-7721 cancer cell lines [180]. The most potent compounds in this series exhibited IC 50 values in the range between 0.2-4.0 µM against all cancer cell lines tested, while compounds 202-206 were non-toxic when tested against shrimp larvae. In terms of the SAR, compounds containing hydrazine (202) or nitrile (203) at the R group possessed enhanced activity compared to the corresponding chlorine-containing derivative. The presence of -COCH 3 and -COOC 2 H 5 in compound 204 resulted in increased antiproliferative effects, while, among coumarin compounds, placement of 2,4-dichloro and 4-nitro substitutions on the phenyl substituent resulted in high anticancer activity on all the cancer cell lines tested.
Chouiter et al. synthesized chalcones and pyrazoline-type compounds based on an imidazole or benzimidazole core and evaluated the anticancer activity of these compounds against A549 adenocarcinoma and AGS stomach cancer cell lines; counter-screening was also performed against the MRC-5 human lung fibroblast cell line [181]. The target compounds were more potent against AGS cells. were inactive on all the three cancer cell lines tested. Increased caspase-3 activity was observed in A549 and AGS cells exposed to compounds 207-209.
A series of benzimidazole-chalcone hybrids synthesized by Hsieh et al. were screened for anticancer activity against A549, MCF-7, HepG2, and OVCAR-3 cancer cell lines [182]. Rasal et al. synthesized compounds containing a dimethylpyrrole carboxamidebenzimidazole scaffold as potential anticancer agents that were evaluated against the NCI 60 cancer cell line panel [184]. When tested at a concentration of 10 µM, compound 214 displayed the highest growth inhibition of 62.46% against the MDA-MB-435 and 40.24% against the MDA-MB-468 cell lines. In terms of the SAR, compounds bearing acyclic aliphatic amines in an amide linkage at the C3 position of pyrrole lacked potent anticancer activity. Introduction of imidazole or pyrazole at this position did not improve activity, while insertion of tetrahydrothienopyridine (compound 215) has a positive influence on activity against T47D and MDA-MB-468 breast cancer cell lines.
The cytotoxic and apoptosis-inducing activity of benzimidazole derivatives of dehydroabietic acid (100; see Figure 9) were evaluated against MCF-7, HeLa, and HepG2 cancer cell lines and a normal hepatocyte (LO2) cell line by Li et al. [185]. Among these compounds, 216 displayed the highest activity with IC 50 values of 0. 87, 9.39, and 8.31 against MCF-7, HeLa, and HepG2 cell lines, respectively. This compound also displayed an IC 50 value of 42.83 µM on the LO2 cell line, thus showing selectivity towards the cancer cell lines. The SAR indicated that compounds bearing electron-withdrawing groups on the phenylsulfonamide portion displayed stronger activity when compared to electrondonating groups. Moreover, sulfonamide derivatives displayed higher activities compared to amide derivatives. Incubation of MCF-7 cells with 1-4 µM concentrations of compound 216 caused a dose-dependent accumulation of cells in the S-phase of the cell cycle, as well as a dose-dependent increase in apoptotic cells.
Novel amidino substituted benzimidazoles linked to 1,2,3-triazole via a phenoxy methyl or ethyl linker were synthesized using microwave and ultrasound irradiation by Bistrovic et al. [186]. The antiproliferative activities of these compounds were evaluated against A549, CFPAC-1, HeLa, and SW620 cell lines, as well as on normal human lung fibroblasts (WI38). These compounds were highly selective towards the A549 cell line, with compounds 217 and 218 exhibiting high potency (IC 50 values of 0.05 and 0.07 µM, respectively) and comparatively little effect on W138 fibroblasts (IC 50 values of 8.04 and 6.89 µM, respectively). In terms of the SAR, compounds containing isopropyl amidine and imidazoline at the C5-position of benzimidazole were more active and selective towards the A549 cell line, while compounds possessing a phenoxymethyl group at the C2 position of benzimidazole also displayed potent activity against this cell line. A significant reduction in PDE5, CDK9/cyclin T1, TGM2, phospho SK1, phospho p38 MAPK, and phospho-p53 levels were observed in A549 cells treated with a 0.14-µM concentration of compound 218. Compound 217 at a concentration of 0.10 µM did not affect PDE5, CDK9/cyclin T1, TGM2, or phospho-p53 levels but displayed similar (albeit weaker) effects on phospho SK1 and phospho p38 MAPK levels in A549 cells.

Imidazopyridines, Imidazopyrimidines, and Related Compounds
A series of imidazole and imidazopyridine dimers synthesized by Meenakshisundaram et al. was tested for cytotoxicity against HeLa, MDA-MB-231, and ACHN cancer cell lines [188]. Compounds 221 and 222 (see Figure 19 for structures 221-237) displayed GI 50 values of 0.43 µM and 0.30 µM, respectively, against the MDA-MB-231 cell line, showing higher potency than the standard drug adriamycin (GI 50 = 0.51 µM). In addition, administration of 221 and 222 (both given at 50 mg/kg for 14 days by gastric intubation) in a 7,12-dimethylbenz[a]anthracene-induced rat mammary carcinoma model caused a reduction of cancer markers (carcinoembryonic antigen and cancer antigen 15-3) and resulted in lower levels of the liver enzymes aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, and alkaline phosphatase compared to rats in the mammary carcinoma control group. In terms of the SAR for these compounds, imidazopyridine dimers were more active compared to imidazole dimers. Results from a comet assay in LN-405 cells treated with a 10 µM compound 224 showed that this derivative caused DNA damage (affecting 14% of the cells) compared to the control (where DNA damage was observed in 0.7% of the cells). In silico studies using Schrödinger suggested that the target compounds are likely to be orally available and should penetrate the blood-brain barrier. the inclusion of an electron withdrawing group on the C3 phenyl group and on the terminal aniline generally resulted in increased potency. Compound 231 caused a dose-dependent increase in the percentage of HCT116 cells in the G0/G1 phase of the cell cycle at concentrations of 0.5-2.5 µM and increased the formation of reactive oxygen species in these cells at 1.0 and 2.5 µM concentrations. Figure 19. Imidazopyridines, imidazopyrimidines, and related compounds with anticancer activity (compounds 221, 222,  224-233, 236, and 237). Reagents/reagent scaffolds (223, 234) and target compound scaffold 235 from reactions described in the text are also shown. Figure 19. Imidazopyridines, imidazopyrimidines, and related compounds with anticancer activity (compounds 221, 222,  224-233, 236, and 237). Reagents/reagent scaffolds (223, 234) and target compound scaffold 235 from reactions described in the text are also shown.
Khalili et al. synthesized a library of styrylimidazopyridines and evaluated them for activity against three breast cancer cell lines [190]. Compound 226 displayed IC 50 values of 9.59, 12.12, and 10.10 µM against MDA-MB-231, MCF-7, and T47D cell lines, respectively, while compound 227 displayed IC 50 values of 8.13 and 9.61 µM against MCF-7 and T47D cell lines. In general, compounds synthesized from cyclohexyl isocyanides had higher potencies than derivatives synthesized from tert-butyl isocyanides. The placement of a methyl group at positions 5, 6, or 7 of the imidazopyridine core increased the anticancer activity of compounds obtained from cyclohexyl isocyanides, while insertion of chlorine at C6 caused the loss of activity against all three cell lines.
Chitti et al. reported the synthesis of imidazopyridine analogs as potential antiproliferative agents against A549, HeLa, and B16F10 cancer cell lines and also performed counter-screening using the HEK-293 cell line [191]. A subset of the synthesized compounds displayed antiproliferative activity in the range between 2.55-20.0 µM against the tested cancer cell lines, with compounds 228-230 exhibiting IC 50 values in the range between 2.55-8.11 µM against these cancer cell lines. Among these, 229 and 230 were the most potent against the A549 cell line, displaying IC 50 values of 2.55 and 3.69 µM against this cell line, respectively. In terms of the SAR, imidazopyridines possessing amide functionalities were more potent compared to derivatives containing a sulfonamide moiety.
A series of imidazopyridine-arylaminopropenone conjugates synthesized by Mani et al. were tested for activity against A549, HCT116, B16F10, BT474, and MDA-MB-231 cancer cell lines [192]. Among these compounds, 231 displayed the greatest potency against the HCT116 cell line (IC 50 = 1.21 µM). While the structure-activity relationship is complex, the inclusion of an electron withdrawing group on the C3 phenyl group and on the terminal aniline generally resulted in increased potency. Compound 231 caused a dosedependent increase in the percentage of HCT116 cells in the G 0 /G 1 phase of the cell cycle at concentrations of 0.5-2.5 µM and increased the formation of reactive oxygen species in these cells at 1.0 and 2.5 µM concentrations.
Mantipally et al. synthesized a series of novel homopiperazine linked imidazopyrimidine derivatives as candidate cytotoxic and antimicrobial agents [193]. Evaluation of these compounds against a panel of four human cancer cell lines (SKOV3, DU-145, HeLa, and A549) revealed that compound 232 displayed an IC 50 value of 5.98 µM against A549 cells, while compound 233 exhibited IC 50 values of 6.24 µM, 6.54 µM, and 4.14 µM on DU-145, HeLa, and A549 cell lines, respectively. Compounds bearing an amide group on the diazepane nitrogen were generally more active when compared to analogs bearing a sulfonamide moiety at this position.

Naphthoquinone Imidazoles
Liu et al. synthesized morpholino ethyl-substituted naphthoquinone imidazoles that were tested for in vitro activity against MCF-7, HeLa, and A549 cell lines, as well as for their effects on the L929 normal mouse fibroblast cell line [195]. Compound 238 (see Figure 20 for structures of compounds 238-241) displayed IC 50 values of 4.3, 10.6, and 8.3 µM against A549, MCF-7, and HeLa cells, respectively, while exhibiting an IC 50 value of 67.3 µM against the L929 cell line. In terms of the SAR, 2-alkyl-substituted compounds were less potent compared to 2-aryl-substituted compounds. In addition, compounds lacking a quinone moiety were inactive on the cancer cell lines tested. their effects on the L929 normal mouse fibroblast cell line [195]. Compound 238 (see Figur 20 for structures of compounds 238-241) displayed IC50 values of 4.3, 10.6, and 8.3 µM against A549, MCF-7, and HeLa cells, respectively, while exhibiting an IC50 value of 67. µM against the L929 cell line. In terms of the SAR, 2-alkyl-substituted compounds wer less potent compared to 2-aryl-substituted compounds. In addition, compounds lackin a quinone moiety were inactive on the cancer cell lines tested. Wei et al. synthesized a novel series of arylvinyl-naphthoimidazolium iodide and bromide derivatives and screened these compounds for antiproliferative activity agains PC-3, HeLa, and A375 cell lines [196]. Wei et al. synthesized a novel series of arylvinyl-naphthoimidazolium iodide and bromide derivatives and screened these compounds for antiproliferative activity against PC-3, HeLa, and A375 cell lines [196]. Compounds 239 and 240 displayed IC 50 values of 0.022, 1.12, 1.07 µM and 0.022, 1.13, and 0.536 µM against PC-3, HeLa, and A375 cells, respectively, while indole-substituted compound 241 displayed IC 50 values of 0.128, 0.059, and 0.212 µM against these cell lines, respectively. In general, phenyl vinyl substitutions at the C2 position of imidazole resulted in compounds that were more active against PC-3 cells; however, compounds bearing indole vinyl substituents were more active towards A375 and HeLa cell lines. In A375 cells, both compounds 239 and 241 decreased the expression of survivin and Bcl-2 and increased the percentage of annexin V positive cells at 1 µM concentrations. In a subcutaneous solid tumor model using Ehrlich's ascites carcinoma cells, intraperitoneal administration of compound 241 at a dose of 0.6 mg/kg/day for 10 consecutive days resulted in 53.12% reduction in tumor progression compared to the vehicle control group.

Polysubstituted Imidazole Derivatives
Hebishy et al. reported the preparation of bis-and poly(imidazoles) via a threecomponent reaction among 1,2-diketones, aldehydes, and ammonium acetate using 10 mol% of a ZnO nanocatalyst under conventional heating, as well as microwave irradiation [197]. The target compounds were tested against HepG2, MCF-7, and Caco-2 cancer cell lines and were counter-screened using Vero (African green monkey kidney) cells. Among these target compounds, 242, 243, and 244 (see Figure 21 for structures of compounds 242-253) exhibited IC 50 values against HepG2 cells of 8.14, 9.58, and 9.77 µM, respectively, while all other compounds displayed IC 50 values greater than 10 µM. Compounds 242 and 244 displayed selectivity indexes of 27.47 and 13.62 against HepG2 cells compared to Vero cells.
Ghanbarimasir et al. synthesized and evaluated the activity of 2-aminoimidazolequinoxaline hybrids against MCF-7 and HCT116 cancer cell lines, along with their effects on a normal HFF cell line [198]. The most potent activity was exhibited by compounds 245 and 246. Compound 245 displayed 83.3% inhibition against MCF-7 cells and compound 246 exhibited 77.3% growth inhibition against HCT116 cells when tested at a concentration of 50 µg/mL. The standard drug doxorubicin exhibited 93.3% and 97.2% inhibition against these cell lines, respectively, when tested at the same concentration. Unsubstituted quinoxaline compound 245 displayed the best activity; substitution of the phenyl group linked to the imidazole ring in compound 245 with electron-withdrawing or electron-releasing groups led to a decrease in potency. Among the 6-Cl and 7-Cl-quinoxaline series, the 4-methoxyphenyl substitution in the former series showed the highest potency against both cancer cell lines tested.

Natural Product Imidazole Derivatives
Hu et al. synthesized a series of artemisinin-imidazole and artemisinin-indole hybrids which were tested in vitro against A549, MCF-7, HepG2, and MDA-MB-231 cancer cell lines and were counter-screened against a normal LO2 cell line [202]. Most of the artemisinin-imidazole and artemisinin-indole hybrids showed good potency (IC50 values below 20 µM) on MCF-7 and A549 cell lines when compared to artemisinin and dihydroartimisinin (IC50 values ranging from 34-51 µM against these cell lines). Artemisinin-imidazole hybrid compound 254 (see Figure 22 for structures 254-265) exhibited an IC50 value of 9.78 µM against MCF-7 cells, while artemisinin-indole hybrid 255 displayed IC50 values of 5.25 and The anticancer activity of imidazole derivatives prepared from guanylhydrazone and phenylglyoxal was evaluated in vitro against MCF-7 and HepG2 cancer cell lines by Yavuz et al. [199]. The synthesized compounds displayed selectivity towards MCF-7 cells compared to HepG2 cells. The most potent compounds in this series (247 and 248) exhibited IC 50 values against MCF-7 cells of 10.22 and 14.80 µM, respectively. Compounds substituted with electron-withdrawing groups as in 247 and 248 were more potent than compounds bearing electron-releasing groups.
Demjén et al. synthesized a library of imidazopyrazole-7-carboxamides and measured their activity against 4T1, MCF-7, and HL-60 cancer cell lines [200]. Compounds 249 and 250 displayed the greatest potency against the HL-60 cancer cell line, with IC 50 values of 0.183 and 0.297 µM, respectively. Regarding substitution on the imidazopyrazole system, compounds having alkyl substitutions at C2 and alkylamines at C3 displayed the highest potency.
Shaik et al. reported the synthesis of benzoimidazothiazole-propenone conjugates as potential antiproliferative agents against HeLa, HepG2, A549, and MCF-7 cancer cell lines [201]. Compounds 251 and 252 displayed IC 50 values ranging from 1.6-8.4 µM against the four cancer cell lines tested. Compound 251 showed the greatest potency against the HeLa cell line with an IC 50 value of 1.6 µM. In terms of the SAR for these molecules, compounds possessing heteroaryl groups at R 1 in scaffold 253 displayed superior potency compared to compounds possessing aryl rings at this position, while compounds displaying a chlorine at R 2 generally exhibited inferior potency compared to compounds with a hydrogen atom at this position. Treatment of HeLa cells with compound 251 at a concentration of 5 µM caused a 40% decrease in the mitochondrial membrane potential and a 4-fold increase in the level of reactive oxygen species.

Natural Product Imidazole Derivatives
Hu et al. synthesized a series of artemisinin-imidazole and artemisinin-indole hybrids which were tested in vitro against A549, MCF-7, HepG2, and MDA-MB-231 cancer cell lines and were counter-screened against a normal LO2 cell line [202]. Most of the artemisininimidazole and artemisinin-indole hybrids showed good potency (IC 50 values below 20 µM) on MCF-7 and A549 cell lines when compared to artemisinin and dihydroartimisinin (IC 50 values ranging from 34-51 µM against these cell lines). Artemisinin-imidazole hybrid compound 254 (see Figure 22 for structures 254-265) exhibited an IC 50 value of 9.78 µM against MCF-7 cells, while artemisinin-indole hybrid 255 displayed IC 50 values of 5.25 and 6.17 µM on MCF-7 and A549 cell lines, respectively. In general, derivatives bearing an indole substitution instead of imidazole displayed slightly greater potency. Compound 255 showed outstanding reversal activity in MCF-7/ADR cells resistant to adriamycin, displaying a reversal fold of 117.
Based on the strong antitumor activity of the natural product neoplanocin A (256) and the related cyclopentenyl nucleoside 258, a series of fluorocyclopentenyl pyrimidines and purines were synthesized and tested against six cancer cell lines [203]. Among the pyrimidine derivatives, 258 was the most active against these cell lines (A549, HCT-116, SNU-638, MDA-MB-231, SK-Hep-1, and PC-3), with IC 50 values ranging from 0.18-0.76 µM, while the addition of a fluorine atom at the 5-position of the pyrimidine ring resulted in a significant loss of potency. For the purines, fluorocyclopentenyl analog 257 (IC 50 values 1.10-2.17 µM) and its N6-methyl derivative (IC 50 values 2.14-15.3 µM) displayed potency against the six cancer cell lines similar to or slightly lower than neoplanocin A (IC 50 values 0.82-2.36 µM), but the corresponding derivative bearing an oxygen atom bound at C6 lacked activity. Addition of the bulkier cyclopropylmethyl group to the N6 amino group resulted in a loss of activity, as did addition of an amino group to C2 of the purine ring. The phosphoamidate prodrug of compound 257 was 1.6-to 17.7-fold less active than 257 itself against the cancer cell lines, leading the authors to speculate that anticancer action is through inhibition of S-adenosylhomocysteine hydrolase by 257 rather than interference with DNA or RNA polymerase by the triphosphorylated metabolite of 257. 6.17 µM on MCF-7 and A549 cell lines, respectively. In general, derivatives bearing an indole substitution instead of imidazole displayed slightly greater potency. Compound 255 showed outstanding reversal activity in MCF-7/ADR cells resistant to adriamycin, displaying a reversal fold of 117. Based on the strong antitumor activity of the natural product neoplanocin A (256) and the related cyclopentenyl nucleoside 258, a series of fluorocyclopentenyl pyrimidines and purines were synthesized and tested against six cancer cell lines [203]. Among the pyrimidine derivatives, 258 was the most active against these cell lines (A549, HCT-116, SNU-638, MDA-MB-231, SK-Hep-1, and PC-3), with IC50 values ranging from 0.18-0.76 µM, while the addition of a fluorine atom at the 5-position of the pyrimidine ring resulted in a significant loss of potency. For the purines, fluorocyclopentenyl analog 257 (IC50 values 1.10-2.17 µM) and its N6-methyl derivative (IC50 values 2.14-15.3 µM) displayed potency against the six cancer cell lines similar to or slightly lower than neoplanocin A (IC50 values 0.82-2.36 µM), but the corresponding derivative bearing an oxygen atom bound at C6 lacked activity. Addition of the bulkier cyclopropylmethyl group to the N6 amino group resulted in a loss of activity, as did addition of an amino group to C2 of the purine ring. The phosphoamidate prodrug of compound 257 was 1.6-to 17.7-fold less active than 257 itself against the cancer cell lines, leading the authors to speculate that anticancer action is through inhibition of S-adenosylhomocysteine hydrolase by 257 rather than interference with DNA or RNA polymerase by the triphosphorylated metabolite of 257. A novel series of imidazoazepine derivatives inspired by the natural product ceratamine A (259) was synthesized by Pan et al. [204]. The key step in the synthesis was the formation of the imidazoazepine core (scaffold 261) via an intramolecular Heck reaction starting from 260. The target compounds were tested for activity against the BGC-823, A549, HCT116, HepG2, and A2780 cancer cell lines. Derivatives 262, 263, and 264 displayed IC 50 values of 20.0, 6.23, and 3.80 µM against the HCT116 cancer cell line, whereas the IC 50 value of ceratamine A was 12.4 µM. Interestingly, compounds with substitutions possessing bulky groups, electron-withdrawing groups, or electron-donating groups on the benzyl substituent attached to the nitrogen atom of the azepine ring generally displayed decreased potency against the other four cell lines tested. Compound 265, which contains a 3,4,5-trimethoxyphenyl substitution corresponding to the 3,5-dibromo-4-methoxyphenyl group of 259, was active against all five cancer cell lines tested, with IC 50 values ranging from 8.56-12.9 µM. The removal of the benzyloxymethyl group from the imidazole ring resulted in a dramatic loss of potency against the cell lines.

Purine Derivatives
Tuncbilek et al. synthesized β-D-ribofuranosyl-purine derivatives that were evaluated for anticancer activity against Huh7, HCT116, and MCF-7 cell lines [205]. Of these compounds, 266 (see Figure 23 for structures of compounds 266-283) displayed the greatest activity, with IC 50 values of 2, 1, and 4 µM against the three cell lines, respectively. By comparison, the standard drug 5-FU exhibited IC 50 values of 30, 4, and 3 µM against the Huh7, HCT116, and MCF-7 cell lines. Compound 266 also displayed activity against HepG2, MAHLAVU, and FOCUS hepatocellular carcinoma cells (IC 50 values of 3, 3, and 1 µM, respectively), while 5-FU exhibited IC 50 values of 5, 10, and 4 µM against these three hepatocellular carcinoma cell lines, respectively.  Borowiecki et al. synthesized analogs of proxyphylline (267) and tested them for activity against CCRF-CEM and MCF-7 cancer cell lines [206]. Of the target compounds, polybrominated derivatives 268 and 269 displayed the greatest potency against CCRF-CEM cells, with EC 50 values of 6.3 and 6.5 µM, respectively. Against MCF-7 cells, the greatest potency was observed for compounds 270 and 269, which both exhibited EC 50 values of 80 µM against this cancer cell line. By comparison, doxorubicin displayed an EC 50 value of 1.4 µM against both CCRF-CEM and MCF-7 cells. These proxyphylline analogs were also tested for antifungal activity against Candida albicans, with compounds 270 and 269 exhibiting the best antifungal activity.
Kowalska et al. tested the anticancer activity of multisubstituted purine and xanthine derivatives against SNB-19, MDA-MB-231, and C32 cell lines and also counter-screened these compounds against normal HFF-1 cells [207]. The target compounds possessed a range of activities against the four cell lines tested. Compound 271 was highly active against SNB-19 cells, possessing an IC 50  Liu et al. synthesized purinone and imidazotriazinone derivatives as potential antitumor agents and tested these compounds against HepG2 and U-118 MG cancer cell lines [211]. Compound 280 displayed IC 50 values of 2.0 and 3.8 µM, respectively, against these cancer cell lines. Compounds 281 and 282 exhibited IC 50 values of 0.5 and 0.4 µM, respectively, against HepG2 cells. In terms of the general SAR trends, compounds possess-ing a purinone core were typically more active against the HepG2 cells compared to target compounds containing an imidazotriazinone core, and introduction of fluorine atoms on the benzyl substituent at N9 and the presence of a longer alkyl group at the C2 position of the purinone core conveyed increased anticancer activity.

Conclusions
Cancer is one of the leading causes of mortality worldwide, placing a huge burden on the healthcare system and exacting a staggering human toll. Despite the many drugs available for treatment of various types of cancer, the side effects, resistance profiles, and variable efficacy of these drugs provides the motivation to discover new anticancer compounds. As illustrated in this review article, considerable attention has been devoted to the synthesis and anticancer evaluation of imidazole and fused imidazole derivatives in recent years. This review summarizes the in vitro and in vivo efficacy studies performed with these derivatives, mechanistic studies conducted on these candidates, and the SAR of the series presented. The work recapped here demonstrates that these imidazole-containing derivatives display anticancer activity through a wide range of mechanisms. While it is impossible to predict with certainty the candidates and approaches described in this review that will have the greatest impact on the treatment of cancer, the following future outlook identifies molecules and strategies that appear to be particularly promising to the authors. Although extensive work on antimicrotubule agents as anticancer compounds has been performed in the past, antitubulin candidates related to compound 8 show outstanding efficacy in murine cancer models [35,36], suggesting that compounds with this scaffold may have a future in cancer therapy. At the time of the writing of this review, a phase 3 trial is being planned to evaluate compound 8 for treating metastatic, castration-resistant prostate cancer (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04844749). Kinases are popular drug targets, but there have been selectivity issues due to their structural and sequence similarity. Considering the covalent binding of Nek2 inhibitors 85 and 87 to their putative target [89], such compounds may have enhanced duration of activity, may be effective at a lower dose, and could be less likely to engender drug resistance [213]. Given the effects of lead compound 125 on MCM2, a promising new target, 127 is considered an exciting, potent anticancer candidate considering its efficacy in vivo at doses of just 1 mg/kg [120] if off-target effects (including CYP450 inhibition and generation of ROS) can be minimized. Despite its challenges, polypharmacology is recognized as a promising strategy for cancer treatment due to the potential of multi-target agents to address the problem of drug resistance [214]. The dual HDAC1/2 and CDK2 inhibitor 141 displays in vivo anticancer efficacy [133], while the pharmacophore fusion strategy reported by He et al. indicated that compound 144 displays potent p53-MDM2/HDAC inhibitory activity and good activity in a murine xenograft model [138], making these molecules intriguing multi-target lead compounds. Compound 150 shows exceptionally tight binding to WDR5, strong inhibition of MLL1 histone methyltransferase activity, and excellent activity against MYC-driven cancer cell lines [144]. Targeting WDR5 may, thus, provide a strategy to exploit MYC, a critical driver of many cancers that has remained difficult to target directly due to its lack of defined small molecule binding sites [215]. Further investigation of the pharmacokinetic properties of compound 150 and its derivatives is, therefore, needed.
Cutting edge drug discovery approaches, such as NMR-based fragment screening, also represent attractive strategies for the exploitation of WDR5, and, by extension, MYC, for cancer therapy [145]. While no HSP inhibitors have been approved to date, compound 191 is undergoing phase II clinical trials for the treatment of gastrointestinal cancer refractory to current treatments [216], indicating the promise of this agent for cancer treatment.
Our understanding of cancer biology continues to increase, but the development of effective, less toxic therapeutics remains a significant challenge, with drug resistance continuing to represent a major obstacle. Selective attack of key processes/enzymes of vital importance to specific cancers (targeted therapy) has already improved clinical outcomes in cancer [3]; the work summarized in this review shows that the highlighted compounds possessing imidazole/fused imidazole exhibit selectivity towards various targets and display potent activity cancer cell lines compared to normal cell lines. In some cases, minor modifications in a particular scaffold or the inclusion of imidazole via scaffold hopping can result in promising new anticancer activities. Many of the synthesized derivatives reported here display similar or greater potency compared to the reference drugs and promising activity in animal models of cancer, reinforcing both the versatility and utility of the imidazole moiety in modern medicinal chemistry. We hope that this review aids medicinal chemists and other pharmaceutical scientists in the discovery and development of new anticancer compounds with improved efficacy and safety.