Molybdenum Trioxide: Efficient Nanosorbent for Removal of Methylene Blue Dye from Aqueous Solutions

Nano Molybdenum trioxide (α-MoO3) was synthesized in an easy and efficient approach. The removal of methylene blue (MB) in aqueous solutions was studied using this material. The effects of various experimental parameters, for example contact time, pH, temperature and initial MB concentration on removal capacity were explored. The removal of MB was significantly affected by pH and temperature and higher values resulted in increase of removal capacity of MB. The removal efficiency of Methylene blue was 100% at pH = 11 for initial dye concentrations lower than 150 ppm, with a maximum removal capacity of 152 mg/g of MB as gathered from Langmuir model. By comparing the kinetic models (pseudo first-order, pseudo second-order and intraparticle diffusion model) at various conditions, it has been found that the pseudo second-order kinetic model correlates with the experimental data well. The thermodynamic study indicated that the removal was endothermic, spontaneous and favorable. The thermal regeneration studies indicated that the removal efficiency (99%) was maintained after four cycles of use. Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) and Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) confirmed the presence of the MB dye on the α-MoO3 nanoparticles after adsorption and regeneration. The α-MoO3 nanosorbent showed excellent removal efficiency before and after regeneration, suggesting that it can be used as a promising adsorbent for removing Methylene blue dye from wastewater.


Introduction
Dyes are organic pollutants that have a complex chemical structure, are highly stable; resist washing, light and microbial invasions and poorly biodegradable [1][2][3][4]. They are harmful to aquatic life and humans and their removal is of significant importance [5][6][7][8].
Molybdenum trioxide nanosorbent (α-MoO 3 ) was synthesized using the thermal decomposition of an oxalic precursor of Molybdenum gained from the reaction of oxalic acid and ammonium molybdate (NH 4 ) 6 Mo 7 O 24 ·4H 2 O in the solid state, as described in our earlier work [61]. Oxalic acid and ammonium molybdate (NH 4 ) 6 Mo 7 O 24 ·4H 2 O were mixed together in a ratio of Mo:acid of 1:3. The mixture was ground then heated on a hot plate at 160 • C. Then, the oxalic precursor was decomposed at 350 • C in a tubular furnace open on both ends.

Adsorption Experiments
The removal of MB was carried out by batch adsorption experiments [68]. The removal of MB by α-MoO 3 was carried out by stirring specific amount of adsorbent into 100 mL of MB solution of known concentrations at specific temperature (T = 25, 50 and 70 • C) and at different contact times (10,30,60,90 and 120 min). At the end of predetermined time intervals, the solution was filtrated with a 0.45 µm syringe filter (Whatman, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) and examined using a UV-Visible spectrometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Madison, WI, USA) at λ max = 665 nm. The pH of the MB solution was adjusted by adding either 0.01 N NaOH or 0.01 N HCl solutions. The percentage of removal (%) and the removed amount of MB at equilibrium q e (mg/g) were calculated using the following relationships.
where C i and C f represent the initial and equilibrium concentration of MB (ppm), respectively. V is the used volume of solution (L) and M is the added mass of α-MoO 3 (g). The results were repeated three times and the uncertainty was about 3%.

Adsorbent Regeneration Method
For the regeneration experiments, a solution of 150 ppm was used and the removal equilibrium time was extended for 2 h. The fresh spent α-MoO 3 was filtered, dried at 100 • C and calcined at 400 • C for 1 h, under air atmosphere. The calcined α-MoO 3 was tested again at the same conditions. The regeneration process was repeated for three cycles.

Characterization
The powder characterization in terms of the phase composition of the synthetized α-MoO 3 nanosorbent, was analyzed by XRD (X-ray diffractometer 6000, Shimadzu, Tokyo, Japan, installed with λ Cu-Kα = 1.5406 and Ni filter). The specific surface area was deduced from the nitrogen isotherm adsorption and using the BET equation (D BET = 6000/d.S, where S is the specific surface area and d is the density), as reported in our previous work [61]. The specific surface area value was 41.02 m 2 /g.
The presence of MB dye on the α-MoO 3 nanoparticles after the adsorption and regeneration studies was confirmed by FTIR spectroscopy using IR Affinity-1S Shimadzu apparatus (Shimadzu, Tokyo, Japan) in the range of 400 and 4000 cm −1 using KBr pellets. Scanning electron microscope (SEM) analysis was performed using Quanta Feg 250 (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Hillsboro, OR, USA). The concentration at equilibrium was determined using UV-Visible spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific Genesys 10S, Madison, WI, USA).

Effect of Initial Dye Concentration and Contact Time
The effect of contact time and initial dye concentration on the removal of MB dye was studied and presented in Figure 1. The removal of MB increases with the increase of contact time and reaches a maximum value of 99% at about 30 min for initial MB concentrations of 10, 20 and 30 ppm and 120 min of contact time for initial dye concentration of 40 ppm. The removal capacity was improved from 19 mg/g to 42 mg/g when the initial dye concentrations increased from 20 ppm to 50 ppm, respectively. These results can be clarified by the primarily great availability of vacant sites on the α-MoO 3 surface, which steadily decreases as the sites are filled up over time as a result of the sorption process [69]. min of contact time for initial dye concentration of 40 ppm. The removal capacity was improved from 19 mg/g to 42 mg/g when the initial dye concentrations increased from 20 ppm to 50 ppm, respectively. These results can be clarified by the primarily great availability of vacant sites on the α-MoO3 surface, which steadily decreases as the sites are filled up over time as a result of the sorption process [69].

Effect of Adsorbent Dose and Initial Dye Concentration
The adsorbent dose is a very important parameter in the adsorption process [70]. The removal of MB using α-MoO3 was investigated by varying the adsorbent dose from 1.0 to 4.0 g/L and the initial dye concentrations from 30 to 60 ppm ( Figure 2).
For lower initial concentrations less than 50 ppm, 2 g/L of adsorbent dose was needed to achieve 99% of MB removal percentage. However, for 60 ppm, 3 g/L was the minimum adsorbent needed to obtain 99% of removal efficiency.
The amount of MB removed decreased with respect to an increase of adsorbent dose and this is shown in Figure 2. This is due to the increase of the available active sites on the adsorbents' surface area. These results can be explained by the availability of more active sites as the adsorbent dose increased [70].

Effect of Adsorbent Dose and Initial Dye Concentration
The adsorbent dose is a very important parameter in the adsorption process [70]. The removal of MB using α-MoO 3 was investigated by varying the adsorbent dose from 1.0 to 4.0 g/L and the initial dye concentrations from 30 to 60 ppm ( Figure 2). min of contact time for initial dye concentration of 40 ppm. The removal capacity was improved from 19 mg/g to 42 mg/g when the initial dye concentrations increased from 20 ppm to 50 ppm, respectively. These results can be clarified by the primarily great availability of vacant sites on the α-MoO3 surface, which steadily decreases as the sites are filled up over time as a result of the sorption process [69].

Effect of Adsorbent Dose and Initial Dye Concentration
The adsorbent dose is a very important parameter in the adsorption process [70]. The removal of MB using α-MoO3 was investigated by varying the adsorbent dose from 1.0 to 4.0 g/L and the initial dye concentrations from 30 to 60 ppm ( Figure 2).
For lower initial concentrations less than 50 ppm, 2 g/L of adsorbent dose was needed to achieve 99% of MB removal percentage. However, for 60 ppm, 3 g/L was the minimum adsorbent needed to obtain 99% of removal efficiency.
The amount of MB removed decreased with respect to an increase of adsorbent dose and this is shown in Figure 2. This is due to the increase of the available active sites on the adsorbents' surface area. These results can be explained by the availability of more active sites as the adsorbent dose increased [70].

Temperature Effect
As the temperature has a great effect on removing dyes [71], an investigation was carried out on temperature as a parameter on its own from 25 to 70 °C during the process of removing the MB dye, this can be seen in Figure 3. The percentage removal of MB (at Ci = 40 ppm) has gone up from 82% to 99% and the removal capacity has increased from 33 mg/g to 39 mg/g. In actual fact, the removal  For lower initial concentrations less than 50 ppm, 2 g/L of adsorbent dose was needed to achieve 99% of MB removal percentage. However, for 60 ppm, 3 g/L was the minimum adsorbent needed to obtain 99% of removal efficiency.
The amount of MB removed decreased with respect to an increase of adsorbent dose and this is shown in Figure 2. This is due to the increase of the available active sites on the adsorbents' surface area. These results can be explained by the availability of more active sites as the adsorbent dose increased [70]. As the temperature has a great effect on removing dyes [71], an investigation was carried out on temperature as a parameter on its own from 25 to 70 • C during the process of removing the MB dye, this can be seen in Figure 3. The percentage removal of MB (at C i = 40 ppm) has gone up from 82% to 99% and the removal capacity has increased from 33 mg/g to 39 mg/g. In actual fact, the removal activity of the adsorbent sites enhanced as the temperature increased giving rise to the dye molecule motion [71,72]. activity of the adsorbent sites enhanced as the temperature increased giving rise to the dye molecule motion [71,72]. Thermodynamic factors are important in the adsorption process [73,74]. The likelihood and the mechanism of adsorption can be projected in reference to the thermodynamic factors [73]. Thermodynamic parameters can be deduced using the following equations: Where R is the gas constant (J·mol −1 ·K −1 ), ΔG° is the free energy (KJ·mol −1 ), Kd is the distribution constant, T is absolute temperature (K), Ce is the equilibrium concentration (mol/L), Ca is the amount of dye adsorbed on the adsorbent at equilibrium (mol/L), ΔH° is the standard enthalpy (KJ·mol −1 ) and ΔS° is the standard entropy (KJ·mol −1 ·K). ∆S° and ∆H° values were achieved from the intercept and slope of plot lnKd versus 1/T and presented in Figure 4 (The value of the regression correlation coefficients (R 2 ) is 0.83). ∆G° values were obtained from Equation (3) and presented in Table 1. The adsorption is favorable and spontaneous, indicated by the negative value of ∆G°. ∆H° value indicates that MB removal occurred in a physisorption process as indicated by the positive value of ∆H° (90 KJ mol −1 ) [75]. The increased disorder and randomness at the solid solution interface of MB and α-MoO3 is indicated by the positive values of ∆S°. The adsorbed water molecules are displaced by the adsorbate molecules and therefore more translational energy is gained than is lost, this leads the system occurring randomly [76]. Thermodynamic factors are important in the adsorption process [73,74]. The likelihood and the mechanism of adsorption can be projected in reference to the thermodynamic factors [73]. Thermodynamic parameters can be deduced using the following equations: where R is the gas constant (J·mol −1 ·K −1 ), ∆G • is the free energy (KJ·mol −1 ), K d is the distribution constant, T is absolute temperature (K), C e is the equilibrium concentration (mol/L), C a is the amount of dye adsorbed on the adsorbent at equilibrium (mol/L), ∆H • is the standard enthalpy (KJ·mol −1 ) and ∆S • is the standard entropy (KJ·mol −1 ·K). ∆S • and ∆H • values were achieved from the intercept and slope of plot lnK d versus 1/T and presented in Figure 4 (The value of the regression correlation coefficients (R 2 ) is 0.83). ∆G • values were obtained from Equation (3) and presented in Table 1. The adsorption is favorable and spontaneous, indicated by the negative value of ∆G • . ∆H • value indicates that MB removal occurred in a physisorption process as indicated by the positive value of ∆H • (90 KJ mol −1 ) [75]. The increased disorder and randomness at the solid solution interface of MB and α-MoO 3 is indicated by the positive values of ∆S • . The adsorbed water molecules are displaced by the adsorbate molecules and therefore more translational energy is gained than is lost, this leads the system occurring randomly [76].   pH is an essential element that controls the removal of dyes [71]. Consequently, the effect of pH for the removal of MB using α-MoO3 nanosorbent was studied by variable pH values from 2.5 to 11 at temperature of 25 °C and initial concentration of 40 ppm. As presented in Figure 5, the MB removal is evidently pH dependent. The percentage removal increases from 47% to 99% as pH increases from 2.5 to 11. The amount of dye removed per unit mass of adsorbent at equilibrium (qe) increased from 19 to 40 mg/g by variation of pH from 2.5 to 11. At pH = 11 the hydroxyl group (OH − ) in solution favors the positive charge of the MB since its pKa equals 3.8 [77]. Therefore, pH = 11 was considered as the optimum value for MB removal using α-MoO3 nanosorbent.

Effect of pH
pH is an essential element that controls the removal of dyes [71]. Consequently, the effect of pH for the removal of MB using α-MoO 3 nanosorbent was studied by variable pH values from 2.5 to 11 at temperature of 25 • C and initial concentration of 40 ppm. As presented in Figure 5, the MB removal is evidently pH dependent. The percentage removal increases from 47% to 99% as pH increases from 2.5 to 11. The amount of dye removed per unit mass of adsorbent at equilibrium (q e ) increased from 19 to 40 mg/g by variation of pH from 2.5 to 11. At pH = 11 the hydroxyl group (OH − ) in solution favors the positive charge of the MB since its pKa equals 3.8 [77]. Therefore, pH = 11 was considered as the optimum value for MB removal using α-MoO 3 nanosorbent.   pH is an essential element that controls the removal of dyes [71]. Consequently, the effect of pH for the removal of MB using α-MoO3 nanosorbent was studied by variable pH values from 2.5 to 11 at temperature of 25 °C and initial concentration of 40 ppm. As presented in Figure 5, the MB removal is evidently pH dependent. The percentage removal increases from 47% to 99% as pH increases from 2.5 to 11. The amount of dye removed per unit mass of adsorbent at equilibrium (qe) increased from 19 to 40 mg/g by variation of pH from 2.5 to 11. At pH = 11 the hydroxyl group (OH − ) in solution favors the positive charge of the MB since its pKa equals 3.8 [77]. Therefore, pH = 11 was considered as the optimum value for MB removal using α-MoO3 nanosorbent.

Effect of MB Initial Dye Concentration and Contact Time after pH Adjustment
The removal efficiency of α-MoO 3 was examined for higher concentrations of methylene blue dye at pH = 11 as presented in Figure 6. Interestingly, the percent of removal of MB was 100% after 60 min and 120 min for initial dye concentrations of 100 and 150 ppm, respectively. The removed amount of MB was 100 mg/g for initial dye concentrations of 100 ppm and 150 mg/g for initial dye concentrations of 150 and 250 ppm.

Effect of MB Initial Dye Concentration and Contact Time after pH Adjustment
The removal efficiency of α-MoO3 was examined for higher concentrations of methylene blue dye at pH = 11 as presented in Figure 6. Interestingly, the percent of removal of MB was 100% after 60 min and 120 min for initial dye concentrations of 100 and 150 ppm, respectively. The removed amount of MB was 100 mg/g for initial dye concentrations of 100 ppm and 150 mg/g for initial dye concentrations of 150 and 250 ppm.

Kinetic Study
The kinetic models based on the removal capacity were fitted to experimental data to determine the rates of adsorption for MB dye molecules and to investigate the mechanism of the removal process [78].
The data obtained from the kinetics of removing MB using 0.1 g of α-MoO3 nanosorbent at room temperature and pH = 11 was analyzed by pseudo first-order (PFO), pseudo second-order (PSO) and intraparticle diffusion (IPD) kinetic models. The equations of the studied models are given in Table  2.
The three model parameters, pseudo first, pseudo second and intra-particle diffusion are tabulated in Table 3 and presented in Figures 7-9 respectively. The three models differ in their regression correlation coefficients (R 2 ). Pseudo first ranges from 0.995 to 0.997, whereas Pseudo second is 0.998 to 1.000 and intra-particle is 0.832 to 0.910, with their different concentrations used. The R 2 for pseudo second-order is close to 1 and hence this model fitted well the experimental data.

Kinetic Study
The kinetic models based on the removal capacity were fitted to experimental data to determine the rates of adsorption for MB dye molecules and to investigate the mechanism of the removal process [78].
The data obtained from the kinetics of removing MB using 0.1 g of α-MoO 3 nanosorbent at room temperature and pH = 11 was analyzed by pseudo first-order (PFO), pseudo second-order (PSO) and intraparticle diffusion (IPD) kinetic models. The equations of the studied models are given in Table 2. Table 2. Kinetic models' equations.

Model Equation Parameters
Pseudo first-order (PFD) [79] Ln q e − q t = Lnq e + K 1 t q t : the removal capacity at time t (mg/g); q e : the removal capacity at equilibrium (mg/g); K 1 : the rate constant of pseudo first-order adsorption (1/min) Pseudo second-order (PSD) [79] t q t = 1 K2q 2 e + t q e q t : the removal capacity at time t (mg/g); q e : the removal capacity at equilibrium (mg/g); K 2 : the pseudo second-order rate constant (g·mg −1 ·min −1 ) Intraparticle diffusion (IPD) [80]. q t = K I t 0.5 + l I (mg/g) and K I (mg/(g·min 0.5 )) are the intraparticle diffusion constants, q t : the removal capacity (mg/g) at time t; t: the contact time (min) The three model parameters, pseudo first, pseudo second and intra-particle diffusion are tabulated in Table 3 and presented in Figures 7-9 respectively. The three models differ in their regression correlation coefficients (R 2 ). Pseudo first ranges from 0.995 to 0.997, whereas Pseudo second is 0.998 to 1.000 and intra-particle is 0.832 to 0.910, with their different concentrations used. The R 2 for pseudo second-order is close to 1 and hence this model fitted well the experimental data.  Where qexp is the removal capacity (mg/g) at 120 min.   Where qexp is the removal capacity (mg/g) at 120 min.

Adsorption Isotherms
To optimize the design of a removal system for the MB molecules, various isotherm equations have been used to describe the equilibrium characteristics of the removal process [81]. Four adsorption models were investigated, namely Freundlich, Langmuir, Temkin isotherm and Dubinin-Radushkevich models. The equations for the four tested models are summarized in Table 4.

Adsorption Isotherms
To optimize the design of a removal system for the MB molecules, various isotherm equations have been used to describe the equilibrium characteristics of the removal process [81]. Four adsorption models were investigated, namely Freundlich, Langmuir, Temkin isotherm and Dubinin-Radushkevich models. The equations for the four tested models are summarized in Table 4.

Model Equation Parameters
Freundlich [81] Lnq e = Lnq F + 1 n LnC e n: the heterogeneity factor (g/L); q F : the Freundlich constant (mg (1−1/n) ·L 1/n ·g −1 ); C e : concentration of MB at equilibrium (ppm); q e : the MB dye amount adsorbed by α-MoO 3 at equilibrium (mg/g) Langmuir [82] Ce q e Langmuir, Freundlich, D-R isotherm and Temkin models were applied to fit the experimental data. The values of the regression correlation coefficients (R 2 ) and the model parameters are included within Table 5 and shown in Figure 10. Langmuir equation showed the highest value of R 2 (1.000) and D-R model showed the lowest value of R 2 (0.939), whereas intermediate values were achieved for Temkin and Freundlich (0.989 and 0.997 respectively). Langmuir model fits wells with the experimental data and the MB removal took place on homogenous surface forming a monolayer on the α-MoO 3 adsorbent, with high adsorption capacity of 152 mg/g. MB dye removal by α-MoO 3 is favorable which is indicated by the separation factor R L ranging from 0.0007 to 0.0090. Langmuir, Freundlich, D-R isotherm and Temkin models were applied to fit the experimental data. The values of the regression correlation coefficients (R 2 ) and the model parameters are included within Table 5 and shown in Figure 10. Langmuir equation showed the highest value of R 2 (1.000) and D-R model showed the lowest value of R 2 (0.939), whereas intermediate values were achieved for Temkin and Freundlich (0.989 and 0.997 respectively). Langmuir model fits wells with the experimental data and the MB removal took place on homogenous surface forming a monolayer on the α-MoO3 adsorbent, with high adsorption capacity of 152 mg/g. MB dye removal by α-MoO3 is favorable which is indicated by the separation factor RL ranging from 0.0007 to 0.0090.
The comparative links between α-MoO3 and other sorbents presented in this work are shown in Table 6. The Molybdenum trioxide (α-MoO3) nanorods and stacked nanoplates synthesized easily and efficiently at rather low temperature with the use of simple and economical approach [61,66] showed high removal capacity. In addition, the molybdenum trioxide is presenting the advantage to be successfully regenerated as it will be presented in this paper. Moreover, no modification is needed for the molybdenum trioxide because it is used as prepared which is not the case when using supported gold nanoparticles or when using nanotubes. Another important point to raise is that the mass production of the MoO3 is possible as the production can be done easily at higher scale.   The comparative links between α-MoO 3 and other sorbents presented in this work are shown in Table 6. The Molybdenum trioxide (α-MoO 3 ) nanorods and stacked nanoplates synthesized easily and efficiently at rather low temperature with the use of simple and economical approach [61,66] showed high removal capacity. In addition, the molybdenum trioxide is presenting the advantage to be successfully regenerated as it will be presented in this paper. Moreover, no modification is needed for the molybdenum trioxide because it is used as prepared which is not the case when using supported gold nanoparticles or when using nanotubes. Another important point to raise is that the mass production of the MoO 3 is possible as the production can be done easily at higher scale.

Regeneration Efficiency
The regeneration and repeatability of the adsorbent are very critical for the practical application. Many regeneration procedures were proposed in the literature survey, including thermal treatment, chemical extraction, bio-regeneration, supercritical regeneration, microwave irradiation and so forth. Thermal regeneration is often applied for regeneration of exhausted activated carbon [91]. In our case, the structure of α-MoO 3 removal agent was stable and the thermal treatment method was selected in this part.
It is found that α-MoO 3 could be regenerated through thermal treatment. The MB removal efficiency of α-MoO 3 was maintained after three cycles of regeneration with an average of 99% as presented in Figure 11. The high removal efficiency indicated that the regeneration of the adsorbent by calcination under air atmosphere at 400 • C was highly efficient and suggesting an excellent reusability.
The regeneration and repeatability of the adsorbent are very critical for the practical application. Many regeneration procedures were proposed in the literature survey, including thermal treatment, chemical extraction, bio-regeneration, supercritical regeneration, microwave irradiation and so forth. Thermal regeneration is often applied for regeneration of exhausted activated carbon [91]. In our case, the structure of α-MoO3 removal agent was stable and the thermal treatment method was selected in this part.
It is found that α-MoO3 could be regenerated through thermal treatment. The MB removal efficiency of α-MoO3 was maintained after three cycles of regeneration with an average of 99% as presented in Figure 11. The high removal efficiency indicated that the regeneration of the adsorbent by calcination under air atmosphere at 400 °C was highly efficient and suggesting an excellent reusability.

Fourier-Transform Infrared Spectroscopy
In order to fully recognize the MB removal process by α-MoO 3 nanosorbent, the materials exposed to MB were studied by IR spectroscopy. Figure 12 shows the FTIR spectra of the α-MoO 3 sample before and after removal of MB dye. As seen, the characteristic stretching and flexing vibrations of the metal-oxygen bonds at 991, 880, 820, 513, 486 and a broad centered at 623 cm −1 , corresponded to Molybdenum trioxide [92]. The FTIR spectrum of pure MB exhibited bands between 1700 and 1000 cm −1 [93]. While, the FTIR spectrum of α-MoO 3 after adsorption of MB (MoO 3 -MB1) exhibited additional bands located at 1600 cm −1 , related to C=C stretching of MB, due to the presence of MB attached to the active sites of α-MoO 3 [94]. The FTIR spectrum of the regenerated α-MoO 3 (MoO 3 -R) after thermal treatment was similar to the fresh α-MoO 3 . The reused sample (MoO 3 -MB2) exhibited again all bands characteristic of the MB [93]. The obtained spectrum confirmed the efficiency of the reused adsorbent. In order to fully recognize the MB removal process by α-MoO3 nanosorbent, the materials exposed to MB were studied by IR spectroscopy. Figure 12 shows the FTIR spectra of the α-MoO3 sample before and after removal of MB dye. As seen, the characteristic stretching and flexing vibrations of the metal-oxygen bonds at 991, 880, 820, 513, 486 and a broad centered at 623 cm −1 , corresponded to Molybdenum trioxide [92]. The FTIR spectrum of pure MB exhibited bands between 1700 and 1000 cm −1 [93]. While, the FTIR spectrum of α-MoO3 after adsorption of MB (MoO3-MB1) exhibited additional bands located at 1600 cm −1 , related to C=C stretching of MB, due to the presence of MB attached to the active sites of α-MoO3 [94]. The FTIR spectrum of the regenerated α-MoO3 (MoO3-R) after thermal treatment was similar to the fresh α-MoO3. The reused sample (MoO3-MB2) exhibited again all bands characteristic of the MB [93]. The obtained spectrum confirmed the efficiency of the reused adsorbent.

Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) Analysis
It is interesting to follow up the evolution of the α-MoO3 morphology at different steps of the adsorption test. The SEM micrograph in Figure 13A indicated that the α-MoO3 particles exhibited sponge like structure, of dimensions varying from 5 to 10 microns. After removal of MB molecules, the sponge-like structure vanished and the pores were stuffed by the removed molecules ( Figure  13B). Figure 13C,D indicated that the morphology of the sample was not altered after regeneration

Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) Analysis
It is interesting to follow up the evolution of the α-MoO 3 morphology at different steps of the adsorption test. The SEM micrograph in Figure 13A indicated that the α-MoO 3 particles exhibited sponge like structure, of dimensions varying from 5 to 10 microns. After removal of MB molecules, the sponge-like structure vanished and the pores were stuffed by the removed molecules ( Figure 13B). Figure 13C,D indicated that the morphology of the sample was not altered after regeneration and the first reuse. In both cases the particles are less agglomerated with aggregates less than 1 micron in size. In overall, the morphology of α-MoO 3 was not significantly modified even after the second reuse in Figure 13E.

Removal Mechanism of MB
It was found that the removal of MB by α-MoO 3 nanoparticles was by adsorption mechanism. In fact, the FTIR spectroscopy indicated that the removed MB cations caused by adsorption process, without chemical decomposition of MB and no intermediate compounds were detected. In addition, the increase on the effectiveness of the removal of MB using α-MoO 3 nanoparticles by increasing the pH until 11 could be attributed to the basic media. From this establishment, a mechanism could be suggested ( Figure 14). In fact, in the first step at pH = 11, the positive charge of the MB is maintained since its pKa is equal to 3.8 [77]. In addition, the hydroxyl groups (OH − ) in the solution react with α-MoO 3 to produce the ion molybdate (MoO 4 2− ) without intermediate compounds [95]. Thus, the adsorption is governed by strong electrostatic interactions between the negatively surface charge of molybdate (MoO 4 2− ) and the positively charged MB cations. The specific surface area of α-MoO3 deduced from the monolayer capacity (qm) at natural pH and has been calculated from the following equation: Specific Surface Area (SSA) = qm × N × A (6) where qm is the monolayers capacity in moles per gram; N is Avogadro number (6.019 × 10 23 ) and A is area per molecule on the surface. The value of (57 m 2 /g) was slightly higher than the value deduced from the BET equation (42 m 2 /g), using the N2 adsorption isotherm. The difference between these values was related to the mechanism of adsorption related to nitrogen and MB molecules [96]. In the N2 absorption method, the molecules are attracted to the surface by van der Waals forces (physisorption) and multiple layers may form. However, in the case of MB used as probe molecule, there is a high bonding energy (ionic Coulombian attraction-chemisorption) and it is generally limited to a monolayer [97].

Conclusions
Nanocrystalline α-MoO3, synthesized through a simple method, was tested as a Nanosorbent for the removal of cationic Methylene blue dye from aqueous solution. The material exhibited higher removal efficiency (99%) at pH = 11 and a maximum removal capacity of 152 mg/g. The adsorbent was easily regenerated by calcination and the removal efficiency was 99% after three The specific surface area of α-MoO 3 deduced from the monolayer capacity (q m ) at natural pH and has been calculated from the following equation: Specific Surface Area (SSA) = q m × N × A (6) where q m is the monolayers capacity in moles per gram; N is Avogadro number (6.019 × 10 23 ) and A is area per molecule on the surface. The value of (57 m 2 /g) was slightly higher than the value deduced from the BET equation (42 m 2 /g), using the N 2 adsorption isotherm. The difference between these values was related to the mechanism of adsorption related to nitrogen and MB molecules [96]. In the N 2 absorption method, the molecules are attracted to the surface by van der Waals forces (physisorption) and multiple layers may form. However, in the case of MB used as probe molecule, there is a high bonding energy (ionic Coulombian attraction-chemisorption) and it is generally limited to a monolayer [97].

Conclusions
Nanocrystalline α-MoO 3 , synthesized through a simple method, was tested as a Nanosorbent for the removal of cationic Methylene blue dye from aqueous solution. The material exhibited higher removal efficiency (99%) at pH = 11 and a maximum removal capacity of 152 mg/g. The adsorbent was easily regenerated by calcination and the removal efficiency was 99% after three regeneration/removal cycles. Considering the easy and low-cost of α-MoO 3 synthesis process, the high removal efficiency and its regeneration after several cycles, the synthesized α-MoO 3 adsorbent will be proposed as promising candidate for the removal of MB from aqueous solutions.

Conflicts of Interest:
The authors declare no conflict of interest.