Synthesis and Bioactivity Evaluation of N-Arylsulfonylindole Analogs Bearing a Rhodanine Moiety as Antibacterial Agents

Due to the rapidly growing bacterial resistance to antibiotics and the scarcity of novel agents under development, bacterial infections are still a pressing global problem, making new types of antibacterial agents, which are effective both alone and in combination with traditional antibiotics, urgently needed. In this paper, seven series of N-arylsulfonylindole analogs 5–11 bearing rhodanine moieties were synthesized, characterized, and evaluated for antibacterial activity. According to the in vitro antimicrobial results, half of the synthesized compounds showed potent inhibition against four Gram-positive bacteria, with MIC values in the range of 0.5–8 µg/mL. For multidrug-resistant strains, compounds 6a and 6c were the most potent, with MIC values of 0.5 µg/mL, having comparable activity to gatifloxacin, moxiflocaxin and norfloxacin and being 128-fold more potent than oxacillin (MIC = 64 µg/mL) and 64-fold more active than penicillin (MIC = 32 µg/mL) against Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 43300.


Introduction
Bacterial drug resistance has emerged and become increasingly serious on a global scale, both in developed and developing countries [1]. Drug-resistant bacteria, such as methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), multi-drug resistant Escherichia coli, and multi-drug resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa, cause lethal diseases and cause great difficulties in the treatment of nosocomial infections [2][3][4][5], which severely threaten global public health while resulting in very large economic costs [6]. Currently the development of new antimicrobial drugs cannot keep pace with the development of bacterial drug resistance, and the number of new antibiotics approved for marketing per year is declining continuously. Taking advantage of pathogens virulence is an alternative strategy to inhibit antibiotic resistance development, and some studies have focused on anti-virulence agents against Gram-positive pathogens and Gram-negative pathogens [7,8]. However, this strategy has some weaknesses that limiting its development, such as the lack of a good way to assessing the efficacy and the inapplicability in immunocompromised patients. Over the last decade, a few new antibiotics (e.g., linezolid, ceftolozane, telavancin, ceftaroline fosamil, Xifaxan®, and daptomycin) were approved and dozens of antibiotics are currently in Phase 2 or Phase 3 clinical trials [9]. However, these drugs cannot address the entire spectrum of bacteria resistance [10], therefore, there is an urgent need to develop new antimicrobial agents, especially those with a new drug target or with the ability to overcome drug resistance.
The amino acid tryptophan is an indole derivative and the precursor of the neurotransmitter serotonin. Up to now, indoles have displayed important physiological functions and potent pharmacological activities, including anti-inflammatory and antioxidant [11], antineoplastic [12][13][14], antimicrobial [15,16], antiviral [14,17,18], and anti-HIV activity [19,20]. N-Arylsulfonylindoles, as a kind of indole derivative, have received a great deal of attention in the field of chemical drug research, behaving as 5-HT₆ receptor antagonists [21], anti-AIDS drugs [22], and antifungal agents [23]. However, the antibacterial activity of N-arylsulfonylindoles has not yet been reported to our knowledge.
Previously, we reported a series of rhodanine derivatives (compounds I, Scheme 1) which showed good inhibitory activity against Gram-positive bacteria (including multidrug-resistant clinical isolates) [24][25][26][27][28][29], which suggested that the rhodanine moiety was an important fragment for antimicrobial activity. Fragment-based drug discovery and skeleton migration strategy is a rational technique for molecular modification and drug design when some active fragments are obtained. Based upon these observations, and as part of our ongoing program aiming at the discovery and development of bioactive molecules, in this work, seven series of N-arylsulfonyl-3-substituted indoles 5-11 (Scheme I) were designed using compound I as the lead compound. The target compounds were prepared by combining the rhodanine groups with N-arylsulfonylindoles, and their anti-bacterial activities were screened. Chen et al. [30] have reported the synthesis and antibacterial activity evaluation of chalcone derivatives containing a rhodanine-3-acetic acid moiety, and found that the antibacterial activity of compounds with halogen and methyl substituents on the phenyl group was obviously higher than that of compounds with other substituents. In view of these findings, in this paper, only halogen and methyl substituents were chosen on the indole and phenyl sulfonyl moieties.

Chemistry
The target compounds were synthesized as outlined in Scheme 2. A series of 3-substituted-5-((1-(phenylsulfonyl)-1H-indol-3-yl)methylene)-2-thioxothiazolidin-4-ones were synthesized using 1Hindole-3-carbaldehydes as the starting material. Firstly, benzenesulfonyl chlorides 1a, 1b were reacted with 1H-indole-3-carbaldehydes 2a-2c in the presence of anhydrous potassium carbonate (K2CO3) at 40 °C to give 1-(phenylsulfonyl)-1H-indole-3-carbaldehydes 3a-f, which were directly used in the next step without purification. Next compounds 3a-f were subjected to a Knoevenagel condensation reaction with appropriate N-substituted rhodanines to provide seven new series of target compounds 5-11. The structures of the products were well characterized by 1 H-NMR, 13 C-NMR, and high-resolution mass spectrometry. Chen et al. [30] have reported the synthesis and antibacterial activity evaluation of chalcone derivatives containing a rhodanine-3-acetic acid moiety, and found that the antibacterial activity of compounds with halogen and methyl substituents on the phenyl group was obviously higher than that of compounds with other substituents. In view of these findings, in this paper, only halogen and methyl substituents were chosen on the indole and phenyl sulfonyl moieties.

Antimicrobial Activity
All of the target compounds 5-11 were evaluated for their in vitro anti-bacterial activity using a serial dilution method to obtain the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) against five Grampositive strains (S. aureus (CMCC(B) 26003 and CMCC 25923, Streptococcus pyogenes CMCC 32067, Enterococcus faecalis CMCC 29212, and Bacillus subtilis CMCC 63501), four Gram-negative strains (E. coli (CMCC 25922 and CMCC 44568) and P. aeruginosa (CMCC 27853 and CMCC 10104))m as well as two methicillin-resistant clinical isolates (S. aureus ATCC 43300 and ATCC 33591). Gatifloxacin, moxifloxacin, norfloxacin, oxacillin, and penicillin were used as positive control drugs.
Preliminarily, compounds 5-11 were screened for their activity against five Gram-positive strains and four Gram-negative strains. Initial screening results described as MIC values are presented in Table 1. The results illustrate that the inhibition of the seven series of derivatives against Gram-positive strains (effective against four bacteria) is in general superior to that of Gram-negative strains (effective against one bacterium). For Gram-positive strains, more than half of the tested compounds showed potent inhibition activity against S. aureus (CMCC(B) 26003 and CMCC 25923), with MIC values in the range of 0.5-4 µg/mL. Half of the target compounds exhibited moderate activity against E. faecalis CMCC 29212 (MIC = 4-32 µg/mL) and S. pyogenes CMCC 32067 (MIC = 2-128 µg/mL). Conversely, five positive control agents did not exhibit inhibition activity for the two strains (MICs > 128 µg/mL). All compounds, however, had no effect on B. subtilis CMCC 63501 at 128 µg/mL. For Gram-negative strains, only a few of compounds showed moderate activity against P. aeruginosa CMCC 10104 with MICs of 4-64 µg/mL, while showing no inhibitory activity against three other strains at 128 µg/mL. The study found that, among the compounds synthesized, compound 8b was the most active compound against two S. aureus with MIC values of 1 or 0.5 µg/mL, along with MIC = 2 or 4 µg/mL against S. pyogenes CMCC 32067 and E. faecalis CMCC 29212, respectively.
In the following trials, five compounds (6a, 6c, 8a-c) were chosen to evaluate their inhibitory activity against two clinical isolates of multidrug-resistant Gram-positive bacterial strains (S. aureus ATCC 43300 and S. aureus ATCC 33591), whose MICs against S. aureus (CMCC(B) 26003 or CMCC 25923 are less than 1 µg/mL. The results are listed in Table 2. The data illustrated that five compounds had excellent inhibitory activities against the two multidrug-resistant strains, with MICs of 0.5, 1, or 2 µg/mL. Among them, compounds 6a and 6c were the most potent, with MIC values of 0.5 µg/mL, having comparable activity to gatifloxacin, moxiflocaxin and norfloxacin, while being 128-fold more potent than oxacillin (MIC = 64 µg/mL) and 64-fold more active than penicillin (MIC = 32 µg/mL) against S. aureus ATCC 43300. Scheme 2. The synthesis route of compounds 5-11.

Antimicrobial Activity
All of the target compounds 5-11 were evaluated for their in vitro anti-bacterial activity using a serial dilution method to obtain the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) against five Gram-positive strains (S. aureus (CMCC(B) 26003 and CMCC 25923, Streptococcus pyogenes CMCC 32067, Enterococcus faecalis CMCC 29212, and Bacillus subtilis CMCC 63501), four Gram-negative strains (E. coli (CMCC 25922 and CMCC 44568) and P. aeruginosa (CMCC 27853 and CMCC 10104))m as well as two methicillin-resistant clinical isolates (S. aureus ATCC 43300 and ATCC 33591). Gatifloxacin, moxifloxacin, norfloxacin, oxacillin, and penicillin were used as positive control drugs.
Preliminarily, compounds 5-11 were screened for their activity against five Gram-positive strains and four Gram-negative strains. Initial screening results described as MIC values are presented in Table 1. The results illustrate that the inhibition of the seven series of derivatives against Gram-positive strains (effective against four bacteria) is in general superior to that of Gram-negative strains (effective against one bacterium). For Gram-positive strains, more than half of the tested compounds showed potent inhibition activity against S. aureus (CMCC(B) 26003 and CMCC 25923), with MIC values in the range of 0.5-4 µg/mL. Half of the target compounds exhibited moderate activity against E. faecalis CMCC 29212 (MIC = 4-32 µg/mL) and S. pyogenes CMCC 32067 (MIC = 2-128 µg/mL). Conversely, five positive control agents did not exhibit inhibition activity for the two strains (MICs > 128 µg/mL). All compounds, however, had no effect on B. subtilis CMCC 63501 at 128 µg/mL. For Gram-negative strains, only a few of compounds showed moderate activity against P. aeruginosa CMCC 10104 with MICs of 4-64 µg/mL, while showing no inhibitory activity against three other strains at 128 µg/mL. The study found that, among the compounds synthesized, compound 8b was the most active compound against two S. aureus with MIC values of 1 or 0.5 µg/mL, along with MIC = 2 or 4 µg/mL against S. pyogenes CMCC 32067 and E. faecalis CMCC 29212, respectively.
In the following trials, five compounds (6a, 6c, 8a-c) were chosen to evaluate their inhibitory activity against two clinical isolates of multidrug-resistant Gram-positive bacterial strains (S. aureus ATCC 43300 and S. aureus ATCC 33591), whose MICs against S. aureus (CMCC(B) 26003 or CMCC 25923 are less than 1 µg/mL. The results are listed in Table 2. The data illustrated that five compounds had excellent inhibitory activities against the two multidrug-resistant strains, with MICs of 0.5, 1, or 2 µg/mL. Among them, compounds 6a and 6c were the most potent, with MIC values of 0.5 µg/mL, having comparable activity to gatifloxacin, moxiflocaxin and norfloxacin, while being 128-fold more potent than oxacillin (MIC = 64 µg/mL) and 64-fold more active than penicillin (MIC = 32 µg/mL) against S. aureus ATCC 43300.

Cytotoxicity
The cytotoxic properties of compounds 6a, 8b, and 8c were also investigated on HEK 293T cells using the CCK-8 method and the results are shown in Table 3. Compounds 6a, 8b, and 8c, with IC50 values of 36.90, 54.09, and 32.28 µg/mL, respectively, were not cytotoxic at concentrations in the range of 0.5-16 µg/mL. The comparison between the MIC and IC50 values of the tested compounds suggests that compounds 6a, 8b, and 8c exhibit in vitro antibacterial activity at non-cytotoxic concentrations.

The Structure-Activity Relationships (SARs) Analysis
Based on the present data of the synthesized compounds, simple SARs could be proposed. For the derivatives bearing weak electron-donating substituents (R1 = -CH3), it seems that there is no obvious impact on the antibacterial activity in comparison with non-substituted compounds (R1 = H). In series 6, for example, the MIC values against CMCC 26003 of compound 6c (R1 = -CH3) and compound 6a (R1 = H) were both 2 µg/mL, and the same result was discovered in the series 7. As evidenced from Table 1, this could lead to the conclusion that a general inhibitory activity order of seven series of target compounds was series 6, 8 > series 7, 10 > series 9 > series 5, 11, but the differences are not remarkable. Upon comparison of series 7 and 8, it can be found that the activity of the R-configuration compounds appears to be slightly better than that of S-configuration compounds.

Cytotoxicity
The cytotoxic properties of compounds 6a, 8b, and 8c were also investigated on HEK 293T cells using the CCK-8 method and the results are shown in Table 3. Compounds 6a, 8b, and 8c, with IC50 values of 36.90, 54.09, and 32.28 µg/mL, respectively, were not cytotoxic at concentrations in the range of 0.5-16 µg/mL. The comparison between the MIC and IC50 values of the tested compounds suggests that compounds 6a, 8b, and 8c exhibit in vitro antibacterial activity at non-cytotoxic concentrations.

The Structure-Activity Relationships (SARs) Analysis
Based on the present data of the synthesized compounds, simple SARs could be proposed. For the derivatives bearing weak electron-donating substituents (R1 = -CH3), it seems that there is no obvious impact on the antibacterial activity in comparison with non-substituted compounds (R1 = H). In series 6, for example, the MIC values against CMCC 26003 of compound 6c (R1 = -CH3) and compound 6a (R1 = H) were both 2 µg/mL, and the same result was discovered in the series 7. As evidenced from Table 1, this could lead to the conclusion that a general inhibitory activity order of seven series of target compounds was series 6, 8 > series 7, 10 > series 9 > series 5, 11, but the differences are not remarkable. Upon comparison of series 7 and 8, it can be found that the activity of the R-configuration compounds appears to be slightly better than that of S-configuration compounds.

Cytotoxicity
The cytotoxic properties of compounds 6a, 8b, and 8c were also investigated on HEK 293T cells using the CCK-8 method and the results are shown in Table 3. Compounds 6a, 8b, and 8c, with IC50 values of 36.90, 54.09, and 32.28 µg/mL, respectively, were not cytotoxic at concentrations in the range of 0.5-16 µg/mL. The comparison between the MIC and IC50 values of the tested compounds suggests that compounds 6a, 8b, and 8c exhibit in vitro antibacterial activity at non-cytotoxic concentrations.

The Structure-Activity Relationships (SARs) Analysis
Based on the present data of the synthesized compounds, simple SARs could be proposed. For the derivatives bearing weak electron-donating substituents (R1 = -CH3), it seems that there is no obvious impact on the antibacterial activity in comparison with non-substituted compounds (R1 = H). In series 6, for example, the MIC values against CMCC 26003 of compound 6c (R1 = -CH3) and compound 6a (R1 = H) were both 2 µg/mL, and the same result was discovered in the series 7. As evidenced from Table 1, this could lead to the conclusion that a general inhibitory activity order of seven series of target compounds was series 6, 8 > series 7, 10 > series 9 > series 5, 11, but the differences are not remarkable. Upon comparison of series 7 and 8, it can be found that the activity of the R-configuration compounds appears to be slightly better than that of S-configuration compounds.

Cytotoxicity
The cytotoxic properties of compounds 6a, 8b, and 8c were also investigated on HEK 293T cells using the CCK-8 method and the results are shown in Table 3. Compounds 6a, 8b, and 8c, with IC50 values of 36.90, 54.09, and 32.28 µg/mL, respectively, were not cytotoxic at concentrations in the range of 0.5-16 µg/mL. The comparison between the MIC and IC50 values of the tested compounds suggests that compounds 6a, 8b, and 8c exhibit in vitro antibacterial activity at non-cytotoxic concentrations.

The Structure-Activity Relationships (SARs) Analysis
Based on the present data of the synthesized compounds, simple SARs could be proposed. For the derivatives bearing weak electron-donating substituents (R1 = -CH3), it seems that there is no obvious impact on the antibacterial activity in comparison with non-substituted compounds (R1 = H). In series 6, for example, the MIC values against CMCC 26003 of compound 6c (R1 = -CH3) and compound 6a (R1 = H) were both 2 µg/mL, and the same result was discovered in the series 7. As evidenced from Table 1, this could lead to the conclusion that a general inhibitory activity order of seven series of target compounds was series 6, 8 > series 7, 10 > series 9 > series 5, 11, but the differences are not remarkable. Upon comparison of series 7 and 8, it can be found that the activity of the R-configuration compounds appears to be slightly better than that of S-configuration compounds.

Cytotoxicity
The cytotoxic properties of compounds 6a, 8b, and 8c were also investigated on HEK 293T cells using the CCK-8 method and the results are shown in Table 3. Compounds 6a, 8b, and 8c, with IC50 values of 36.90, 54.09, and 32.28 µg/mL, respectively, were not cytotoxic at concentrations in the range of 0.5-16 µg/mL. The comparison between the MIC and IC50 values of the tested compounds suggests that compounds 6a, 8b, and 8c exhibit in vitro antibacterial activity at non-cytotoxic concentrations.

The Structure-Activity Relationships (SARs) Analysis
Based on the present data of the synthesized compounds, simple SARs could be proposed. For the derivatives bearing weak electron-donating substituents (R1 = -CH3), it seems that there is no obvious impact on the antibacterial activity in comparison with non-substituted compounds (R1 = H). In series 6, for example, the MIC values against CMCC 26003 of compound 6c (R1 = -CH3) and compound 6a (R1 = H) were both 2 µg/mL, and the same result was discovered in the series 7. As evidenced from Table 1, this could lead to the conclusion that a general inhibitory activity order of seven series of target compounds was series 6, 8 > series 7, 10 > series 9 > series 5, 11, but the differences are not remarkable. Upon comparison of series 7 and 8, it can be found that the activity of the R-configuration compounds appears to be slightly better than that of S-configuration compounds. 1 2 a S. aureus ATCC 43300; b S. aureus ATCC 33591.

Cytotoxicity
The cytotoxic properties of compounds 6a, 8b, and 8c were also investigated on HEK 293T cells using the CCK-8 method and the results are shown in Table 3. Compounds 6a, 8b, and 8c, with IC 50 values of 36.90, 54.09, and 32.28 µg/mL, respectively, were not cytotoxic at concentrations in the range of 0.5-16 µg/mL. The comparison between the MIC and IC 50 values of the tested compounds suggests that compounds 6a, 8b, and 8c exhibit in vitro antibacterial activity at non-cytotoxic concentrations. Table 3. Cytotoxic activity of compounds 6a, 8b and 8c on the HEK 293T cells.

The Structure-Activity Relationships (SARs) Analysis
Based on the present data of the synthesized compounds, simple SARs could be proposed. For the derivatives bearing weak electron-donating substituents (R 1 = -CH 3 ), it seems that there is no obvious impact on the antibacterial activity in comparison with non-substituted compounds (R 1 = H). In series 6, for example, the MIC values against CMCC 26003 of compound 6c (R 1 = -CH 3 ) and compound 6a (R 1 = H) were both 2 µg/mL, and the same result was discovered in the series 7. As evidenced from Table 1, this could lead to the conclusion that a general inhibitory activity order of seven series of target compounds was series 6, 8 > series 7, 10 > series 9 > series 5, 11, but the differences are not remarkable. Upon comparison of series 7 and 8, it can be found that the activity of the R-configuration compounds appears to be slightly better than that of S-configuration compounds.

Instruments and Reagents
All of the reagents and solvents were purchased from Aladdin (Shanghai, China) or Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co. Ltd. (Shanghai, China), and were used as received. Melting points were determined in open capillary tubes and are uncorrected. Reaction courses were monitored by thin-layer chromatography on silica gel-precoated F254 plates (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany). Developed plates were examined with UV lamps (254 nm). Nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy was performed on an AV-300 spectrometer (Bruker, Zurich, Switzerland) operating at 300 MHz for 1 H and 75 MHz for 13 C and using DMSO-d 6 as solvent and tetramethylsilane as the internal standard. Electrospray Ionization Mass Spectrometry (ESI-MS) experiments were performed on an IT-TOF mass spectrometer (Shimadzu, Tokyo, Japan) in negative ion mode. Specific optical rotation was measured on a Digital automatic polariscope JASCO P-1020 (JASCO, Tokyo, Japan).

General Procedure for the Preparation of Compounds 3a-3b
To a dry dichloromethane solution (10 mL) of the appropriate 1H-indole-3-carbaldehydes (2 mmol), anhydrous potassium carbonate (6 mmol) and benzenesulfonyl chlorides (4 mmol) in dry dichloromethane (20 mL) were added, and the mixture was stirred for 12 h at 40 • C. After the completion of the reaction, excess solvent was removed under reduced pressure to obtain a yellow crude solid of 3a-3b which was directly used in the next step without purification.

General Procedure for the Preparation of Compounds 3c-3f
To a solution of the appropriate 1H-indole-3-carbaldehydes (1 mmol) in dry dichloromethane (30 mL), sodium hydroxide (1.75 mmol), benzyltriethylammonium chloride (TEBA, 0.1 mmol), and benzenesulfonyl chlorides (1.2 mmol) were added and stirred for 12 h at room temperature. After the completion of the reaction, 15 mL water was added into the mixture. Then the mixture was extracted with dichloromethane (30 mL × 3). The combined organic layers were dried over anhydrous MgSO 4 before being concentrated in vacuo. The crude products 3c-3f obtained were directly used in the next step without purification.

General Procedure for the Preparation of Compounds 5-11
A mixture of 3 (1 mmol), corresponding rhodanine (1 mmol), 10 drops glacial acetic acid and 10 drops piperidine in ethanol (20 mL) was refluxed for 16 h. After cooling, the solvent was evaporated in vacuo, followed by the purification of the resulting residue by silica gel column chromatography (dichloromethane/methanol = 100/1 or 150/1) to obtain a yellow solid 5-11.

Evaluation of Anti-Bacterial Activity In Vitro
The anti-bacterial activity in vitro against S. aureus (CMCC(B) 26003 and CMCC 25923, S. pyogenes CMCC 32067, E. faecalis CMCC 29212, B. subtilis CMCC 63501; E. coli CMCC 25922 and CMCC 44568, P. aeruginosa CMCC 27853 and CMCC 10104, as well as two methicillin-resistant clinical isolates (S. aureus ATCC 43300 and ATCC 33591) was evaluated using a two-fold serial dilution technique [31], and the final concentrations of compounds obtained were in the range of 0.5-128 µg/mL. Test bacteria were grown to mid-log phase in Mueller-Hinton broth (MHB) or Tryptone Soya Broth (TSB) and diluted 1000-fold in the same medium. The bacteria of 10 5 CFU/mL were inoculated into MHB or TSB and dispensed at 0.2 mL/well in a 96-well microtiter plate. As positive controls, gatifloxacin, moxifloxacin, norfloxacin, oxacillin, and penicillin were used. Test compounds were prepared in DMSO, the final concentration of which did not exceed 0.05%. The MIC was defined as the concentration of a test compound that completely inhibited bacteria growth during 24 h incubation at 37 • C. Bacteria growth was determined by measuring the absorption at 630 nm using a microtiter enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) reader. All experiments were carried out three times.

Evaluation of Cytotoxicity In Vitro
HEK 293T cells were used to test the cytotoxicity of the new compounds. HEK 293T cells were grown in Dulbecco modified Eagle medium supplemented with fetal bovine serum (10%), and antibiotics (penicillin-streptomycin mixture (100 U/mL)). Cells at 80% to 90% confluence were split by trypsin (0.25% in PBS; pH 7.4), and the medium was changed at 24 h intervals. The cells were cultured at 37 • C in a 5% CO 2 incubator. The cells were grown to three passages, and approximately 1 × 10 4 cells were seeded into each well of a 96-well plate and allowed to incubate to allow attachment of the cells to the substrate. After 24 h, the medium was replaced with DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS containing various concentrations (4,8,16,32,64, 128 µg/mL) of test compounds and incubated for 48 h. Each concentration set three wells in parallel. Then 20 µL of CCK-8 solution was added to each well. After incubation for 3 h, the optical density was measured at 450 nm using a microtiter ELISA reader. The IC 50 values were defined as the concentrations inhibiting 50% of cell growth.

Conclusions
In summary, seven new series of N-arylsulfonylindoles 5-11 bearing rhodanine moieties were designed, synthesized, and evaluated for their antibacterial activities. In accordance to the results of antibacterial tests in vitro, some of the compounds showed good antibacterial activities against Staphylococcus aureus, including multidrug-resistant strains. Among them compounds 6a and 6c showed the most potent levels of activity (MIC = 0.5 µg/mL) against selected MRSA strains. These results illustrate that N-arylsulfonylindole analogs bearing rhodanine moieties are promising leads to develop novel antimicrobial agents against many infections caused by Gram-positive strains, especially Staphylococcus aureus, incluing MRSA. Future studies will focus on the mechanism of action of these compounds.