Abstract
Chemical investigation of the ethanol extract of the aerial parts of Scyphiphora hydrophyllacea Gaertn. collected in Hainan Province of China resulted in the isolation of a new iridoid, scyphiphin C (1) and a known iridoid glycoside, shanzhiside methyl ester (2). Their structures were elucidated by a study of their physical and spectral data.
1. Introduction
Mangrove plants are groups of trees and shrubs growing along seashores in tropical and subtropical areas, which contain plenty of new and bioactive secondary metabolites due to their special eco-environment [1,2,3]. Scyphiphora hydrophyllacea Gaertn. F. (Rubiaceae), one of the mangrove plants, is distributed from south to southeast Asia, Caroline Islands, Australia, and New Caledonia [4]. Our previously phytochemical studies showed that flavonoids and terpenoids, especially iridoids, were major constituents of S. hydrophyllacea [5,6,7,8]. In our continuous search for structurally unique iridoids from this plant, a new iridoid, scyphiphin C (1) and a known iridoid glycoside, shanzhiside methyl ester (2) (Figure 1), were isolated from the 95% ethanol extract of the aerial parts of this plant. In this paper, we present the isolation and structural characterization of this new iridoid on the basis of the interpretation of spectral data, including 1D and 2D NMR data.
2. Results and Discussion
Compound 1, 
- 13.4 (c 0.01, MeOH), was obtained as white amorphous powder. The molecular formula of 1 was established as C11H18O6 with three degrees of unsaturation according to the high-resolution ESI-MS data at m/z 269.0998 (calcd. 269.1001 for C11H18O6Na, [M+Na]+), which was also supported by 13C-NMR and DEPT spectral data. The 13C-NMR spectrum (DEPT) showed two quaternary carbons (δC 174.4, 78.6), five methines (δC 94.5, 72.2, 50.7, 48.9, 48.6), two methylenes (δC 65.2, 49.0), and two methyls (δC 52.1, 24.2). The 1H-NMR showed a signal characteristic of an iridoid with a proton at δH 4.99 (1H, d, J = 9.0 Hz). Interpretation of 2D NMR data especially HMQC correlations and 1H-1H COSY correlations of H-4 with H-3 and H-5, H-6 with H-5 and H-7, H-9 with H-1 and H-5, allowed us to construct the partial structure a (Table 1 and Figure 2). The 1H- and 13C- NMR spectroscopic data of 1 were similar to those of aglycone moiety of shanzhigenin methyl ester [9,10,11], the major differences in the 13C-NMR spectral data were the presence of a methylene attributed to the 3-position and a methine attributed to the 4-position in 1 instead of the two olefinic carbons seen in shanzhigenin methyl ester. Their chemical shifts were shifted upfield to δC 65.2 (C-3) and 50.7 (C-4), respectively. C-1 was connected with C-3 through an oxygen atom on the basis of the chemical shifts of C-1 (δC94.5) and C-3 (δC 65.2), which was also confirmed by the HMBC correlations from H-3 to C-1 and H-1 to C-3. The remaining fragment was confirmed to be identical to that of shanzhigenin methyl ester by analysis of HMQC, HMBC and 1H-1H COSY spectra. Since the stereochemistry of the three asymmetric centers (C-1, C-5, and C-9) was the same in practically all iridoids identified hitherto [12], 1-OH, H-5, and H-9 were assigned a β-orientation in the iridoid skeleton. In the ROESY spectrum (Figure 2), the cross peaks from H-1 to H-4 and H-6 revealed that the relative configuration of H-4 and H-6 were in α-orientation. The stereo configuration of Me-10 was determined as α-orientation on the basis of the ROESY correlation of Me-10 with H-4. Thus, the structure of compound 1 was identified to have the structure shown in Figure 1, and was named scyphiphin C.
- 13.4 (c 0.01, MeOH), was obtained as white amorphous powder. The molecular formula of 1 was established as C11H18O6 with three degrees of unsaturation according to the high-resolution ESI-MS data at m/z 269.0998 (calcd. 269.1001 for C11H18O6Na, [M+Na]+), which was also supported by 13C-NMR and DEPT spectral data. The 13C-NMR spectrum (DEPT) showed two quaternary carbons (δC 174.4, 78.6), five methines (δC 94.5, 72.2, 50.7, 48.9, 48.6), two methylenes (δC 65.2, 49.0), and two methyls (δC 52.1, 24.2). The 1H-NMR showed a signal characteristic of an iridoid with a proton at δH 4.99 (1H, d, J = 9.0 Hz). Interpretation of 2D NMR data especially HMQC correlations and 1H-1H COSY correlations of H-4 with H-3 and H-5, H-6 with H-5 and H-7, H-9 with H-1 and H-5, allowed us to construct the partial structure a (Table 1 and Figure 2). The 1H- and 13C- NMR spectroscopic data of 1 were similar to those of aglycone moiety of shanzhigenin methyl ester [9,10,11], the major differences in the 13C-NMR spectral data were the presence of a methylene attributed to the 3-position and a methine attributed to the 4-position in 1 instead of the two olefinic carbons seen in shanzhigenin methyl ester. Their chemical shifts were shifted upfield to δC 65.2 (C-3) and 50.7 (C-4), respectively. C-1 was connected with C-3 through an oxygen atom on the basis of the chemical shifts of C-1 (δC94.5) and C-3 (δC 65.2), which was also confirmed by the HMBC correlations from H-3 to C-1 and H-1 to C-3. The remaining fragment was confirmed to be identical to that of shanzhigenin methyl ester by analysis of HMQC, HMBC and 1H-1H COSY spectra. Since the stereochemistry of the three asymmetric centers (C-1, C-5, and C-9) was the same in practically all iridoids identified hitherto [12], 1-OH, H-5, and H-9 were assigned a β-orientation in the iridoid skeleton. In the ROESY spectrum (Figure 2), the cross peaks from H-1 to H-4 and H-6 revealed that the relative configuration of H-4 and H-6 were in α-orientation. The stereo configuration of Me-10 was determined as α-orientation on the basis of the ROESY correlation of Me-10 with H-4. Thus, the structure of compound 1 was identified to have the structure shown in Figure 1, and was named scyphiphin C.
Figure 1.
Structures of compounds 1 and 2.
Figure 2.
Key HMBC, ROESY and 1H-1H COSY correlations of compound 1.
Compound 2 was determined as shanzhigenin methyl ester by comparison of the 1H- and 13C-NMR spectral data of 2 with those reported in the literature [9,10,11].
3. Experimental
3.1. General
Optical rotation was recorded using a Rudolph Autopol III polarimeter (Rudolph Research Analytical, Hackettstown, NJ, USA). The UV spectra were measured on a Shimadzu UV-2550 spectrometer. The IR spectra were obtained as KBr pellets on a Nicolet 380 FT-IR instrument. The NMR spectra were recorded on a Bruker AV-400 spectrometer, using TMS as an internal standard. The HRESIMS spectra were measured with an API QSTAR Pulsar mass spectrometer. Column chromatography was performed with silica gel (Marine Chemical Industry Factory, Qingdao, China) and Sephadex LH-20 (Merck). TLC was preformed with silica gel GF254 (Marine Chemical Industry Factory, Qingdao, China).
Table 1.
1H- and 13C-NMR data of 1 in CD3OD. (1H- at 400 and 13C- at 100 MHz; J in Hz).
| No. | δC | δH |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 94.5 ( d) | 4.99 (1H, d, 9.0 Hz) |
| 3 | 65.2 ( t) | 3.22 (1H, t, 11.8 Hz, H-3a) |
| 3.79 (1H, ddd, 0.8, 6.1, 12.2 Hz, H-3b) | ||
| 4 | 50.7 ( d) | 2.06 (1H, m) |
| 5 | 48.9 ( d) | 2.89 (1H, m) |
| 6 | 72.2 ( d) | 4.42 (1H, dt, 3.5, 9.0 Hz) |
| 7 | 49.0 ( t) | 2.23 (1H, dd, 9.4, 15.1 Hz, H-7a) |
| 1.68 (1H, dq, 1.7, 15.0 Hz, H-7b) | ||
| 8 | 78.6 ( s) | |
| 9 | 48.6 ( d) | 2.59 (1H, dd, 5.6, 9.0 Hz) |
| 10 | 24.2 ( q) | 1.15 (3H, s) |
| 11 | 174.4 (s) | |
| 12 | 52.1 ( q) | 3.68 (3H, s) |
3.2. Plant Material
The aerial parts of Scyphiphora hydrophyllaceaGaertn. F. were collected in Wenchang county (Nov. 2004) in Hainan Province (P.R. China). It was identified by Associate Prof. Zheng-fu Dai of the Institute of Tropical Bioscience and Biotechnology, Chinese Academy of Tropical Agricultural Sciences, where a voucher specimen (SH20051112) is deposited.
3.3. Extraction and isolation
The dried, milled aerial parts of Scyphiphora hydrophyllacea Gaertn. F. (17.6 kg) were exhaustively extracted with 95 % EtOH (3 × 30 L) at room temperature. After evaporation, the residue was suspended in H2O and partitioned with light petroleum to give a light petroleum fraction (687.0 g). The H2O part was applied to a D101 reticular resin column eluted with H2O and MeOH. The H2O eluent was not further fractionated because the major components were sugars. The MeOH eluent was concentrated in vacuo to give a residue (421.0 g), which was chromatographed on a silica gel column (200-300 mesh) with CHCl3-MeOH [50:1 (2.6 L), 20:1 (21.5 L), 10:1 (17.5 L), 5:1 (21.5 L), 2:1 (21.0 L)] to give 26 fractions. Fraction 16 (5.02 g) was subjected to column chromatography over silica gel eluted with light petroleum-EtOAc (4:6) to afford nine further fractions. Sub-fraction 4 (624.2 mg) was fractionated by column chromatography (Sephadex LH-20) eluted with 95 % EtOH and then rechromatographed on a silica-gel column with light petroleum-EtOAc (3:7) to afford compound 1 (18.7 mg). Fraction 18 (10.06 g) was subjected to vacuum liquid column chromatography over RP-18 eluted with MeOH-H2O [1:9 (0.5 L), 2:8 (0.5 L), 3:7 (0.5 L), 4:6 (0.5 L), 1:1 (0.5 L), 6:4 (0.5 L), 8:2 (0.5 L), 0:1 (0.5 L)] gradually to afford eight further fractions. Sub-fraction 1 (2.18 g) was purified by silica gel CC eluted with CHCl3-MeOH (9:1) to afford compound 2 (290.2 mg).
Scyphiphin C (1): White amorphous powder, = - 13.4 (c 0.01, MeOH). IR (KBr): n = 3875, 3858, 3605, 3308, 2941, 2247, 1482, 865 cm-1. HR-ESI-MS (positive): m/z = 269.0998 (calcd. 269.1001 for C11H18O6Na, [M+Na]+). 1H and 13C-NMR: see Table 1.
= - 13.4 (c 0.01, MeOH). IR (KBr): n = 3875, 3858, 3605, 3308, 2941, 2247, 1482, 865 cm-1. HR-ESI-MS (positive): m/z = 269.0998 (calcd. 269.1001 for C11H18O6Na, [M+Na]+). 1H and 13C-NMR: see Table 1.Shanzhigenin methyl ester (2): White amorphous powder, = - 380.0 (c = 0.50, MeOH). IR (KBr): n = 3922, 3886, 3779, 3654, 3700, 3543, 3112, 3081, 2326, 1583, 891 cm-1. HR-ESI-MS (positive): m/z = 429.1380 (calcd. 429.1372 for C17H26O11Na, [M + Na]+).
= - 380.0 (c = 0.50, MeOH). IR (KBr): n = 3922, 3886, 3779, 3654, 3700, 3543, 3112, 3081, 2326, 1583, 891 cm-1. HR-ESI-MS (positive): m/z = 429.1380 (calcd. 429.1372 for C17H26O11Na, [M + Na]+).4. Conclusions
As a part of our chemical investigation on Scyphiphora hydrophyllaceaGaertn., a new iridoid scyphiphin C (1) and a known iridoid glucoside shanzhigenin methyl ester (2) were isolated. Their structures were established on the basis of spectroscopic evidence.
Acknowledgements
This research was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (20862020).
- Sample Availability: Samples of compounds 1 and 2 are available from the authors.
References
- Wang, B.S.; Liang, S.C.; Zhang, W.Y.; Zan, Q.J. Mangrove flora of the world. Acta Botanica Sinica 2003, 46, 644–653. [Google Scholar]
- Zhao, Y.; Guo, Y.W. The proceeding of chemical constituents and pharmacological activities of mangrove. Chin. J. Nat. Med. 2004, 2, 135–140. [Google Scholar]
- Wang, Y.S.; He, L.; Wang, Q.J.; Zhang, S. Study on the chemical composition and its pharmacology of the medicinal mangrove plant. J. Mar. Drugs 2004, 23, 26–31. [Google Scholar]
- The Chinese Academy of Science Flora of China Editorial Board, Flora Reipublicae Popularis Sinicae Tomus 71; Science Press: Beijing, China, 1999; p. 368.
- Zeng, Y.B.; Mei, W.L.; Zhuang, L.; Hong, K.; Dai, H.F. Cytotoxic components from mangrove plant Scyphiphora hydrophyllacea. J. Trop. Subtrop. Bot. 2007, 15, 249–252. [Google Scholar]
- Zeng, Y.B.; Mei, W.L.; Zhao, Y.X.; Zhuang, L.; Hong, K.; Dai, H.F. Two new epimeric pairs of iridoid from mangrove plant Scyphiphora hydrophyllacea. Chin. Chem. Lett. 2007, 18, 1509–1511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zeng, Y.B.; Mei, W.L.; Zhao, Y.X.; Dai, H.F. Two new noriridoids from Scyphiphora hydrophyllacea. Z. Naturforsch 2008, 63b, 108–110. [Google Scholar]
- Tao, S.H.; Wu, J.; Qi, S.H.; Zhang, S.; Li, M.Y.; Li, Q.X. Scyphiphorins A and B, two new iridoid glycosides from the stem bark of a Chinese mangrove Scyphiphora hydrophyllacea. Helv. Chim. Acta 2007, 90, 1718–1722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kasai, R.; Katagiri, M.; Ohtani, K.; Yamasaki, K.; Yang, C.R.; Tanaka, O. Iridoid glycosides from Phlomis younghusbandii roots. Phytochemistry 1994, 4, 967–970. [Google Scholar]
- Achenbach, H.; Waibel, R.; Raffelsberger, B.; Addae-Mensah, I. Iridoid and other constituents of Canthium subcordatum. Phytochemistry 1981, 7, 1591–1595. [Google Scholar]
- Guo, S.J.; Gao, L.M.; Cheng, D.L. Iridoids from Phlomis umbrosa. Pharmazie 2001, 2, 178–180. [Google Scholar]
- Zapesochnaya, G.G.; Kurkin, V.A.; Pervykh, L.N.; Karasartov, B.S. Velpetin – a new iridoid glycoside from Nepeta velutina. Khim. Prir. Soedin. 1991, 6, 777–781. [Google Scholar]
© 2010 by the authors; licensee Molecular Diversity Preservation International, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open-access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/).