An Efficient Computational Technique for Fractal Vehicular Traffic Flow

In this work, we examine a fractal vehicular traffic flow problem. The partial differential equations describing a fractal vehicular traffic flow are solved with the aid of the local fractional homotopy perturbation Sumudu transform scheme and the local fractional reduced differential transform method. Some illustrative examples are taken to describe the success of the suggested techniques. The results derived with the aid of the suggested schemes reveal that the present schemes are very efficient for obtaining the non-differentiable solution to fractal vehicular traffic flow problem.


Introduction
Firstly, the continuum model was used to elucidate a traffic flow with continuous functions, which was similar to one of fluid dynamics and material models established based on conservation laws. Connected to this, pioneering work was conducted by Lighthill and Whitham [1] and Richards [2] who formulated a model named the Lighthill-Whitham-Richards's (LWR) model. This mathematical model was examined by many research workers [3][4][5][6].
Similar to integer order models, fractional order models are very useful, with extra advantages because they consider full memory effect. Consequently, many researchers have applied this innovative approach of fractional calculus in the mathematical modeling of natural phenomena. Among these are Machado and Mata [7], Carvalho and Pinto [8], Zhou et al. [9], Kumar et al. [10,11], Singh et al. [12], Hristov [13], Yang et al. [14], Area et al. [15], Zaky and Machado [16], Drapaca and Sivaloganathan [17], Sumelka et al. [18], Lazopoulos and Lazopoulos [19], Rahimi et al. [20], and others. In recent years an innovative and very interesting theory of fractional calculus, namely local fractional calculus, has earned importance and popularity among scientists working in this special branch [21,22]. Today, local fractional derivatives and integrals has been utilized to describe various scientific and technological problems, such as local fractional 2-D Burgers-type equations [23], nonlinear Riccati differential equations containing local fractional derivatives [24], diffusion and heat equations pertaining to local fractional operators [25], local fractional Burgers equations [26] and many other problems. In view of the great usefulness of local fractional calculus, we examine the local fractional LWR model on a finite-length highway arising in vehicular traffic flow written as surrounding the initial and boundary conditions w(r, 0) = g 1 (r), (2) w(0, s) = g 2 (s).
The local fractional LWR model with finite-length highway has been examined by the local fractional Laplace variational iteration scheme [27], the local fractional Laplace decomposition approach and the local fractional series expansion scheme [28]. In the present work, we examine the local fractional LWR model by the local fractional homotopy perturbation Sumudu transform method (LFHPSTM) [29][30][31]. Furthermore, we analyze the local fractional LWR model with the aid of local fractional reduced differential transform method (LFRDTM) [32,33]. The LFHPSTM is a hybrid scheme and is developed by the mixing of LFHPM [34][35][36] and a local fractional Sumudu transform technique [37].
The rest of this article is presented as follows: Section 2 involves the primary properties of local fractional calculus. Section 3 is devoted to the solution procedure of LFHPSTM. In Section 4, the solution procedure of LFRDTM is discussed. Section 5 is dedicated to the solution of the local fractional LWR model with a finite-length highway. At the end, Section 6 is devoted to concluding remarks.

Basic Idea LFHPSTM
Here we discuss the main outline of the LFHPSTM. Let us take a linear differential equation associated with the local fractional derivative of the form L β w(r, s) + R β w(r, s) = q(r, s).
In Equation (11) L β represents the linear local fractional differential operator, R β indicates the rest part of the linear operator and q(r, s) represents a function known as source function.
By using the LFST on Equation (11), it yields Applying the inverse of LFST on Equation (12), we get In Equation (13) the term S(r, s) occurs due to initial conditions and source function. Now the LFHPM [36] is employed as By making use of Equation (14) in Equation (13) The result (15) is derived by a combination the LFST and LFHPM.
The comparison of the coefficients of the equal powers of p in both sides gives p 0β : w 0 (r, s) = S(r, s) Thus, the LFHPSTM solution is expressed as follows

Basic Idea of LFRDTM
Here, we present the basic definitions and properties of LFRDTM [32,33].

Definition 7.
The LFRDT of W k (r) is expressed in the following manner [32,33] w(r, s) = The fundamental mathematical operations of the LFRDTM [32,33] are presented in Table 1. Table 1. Reduced differential transformations.

Non-Differential Solutions for Local Fractional LWR Model on a Finite Length Highway
Here, we derive the non-differential solutions of the local fractional LWR model by using LFHPSTM and LFRDTM. Example 1. Firstly, we examine the following local fractional LWR model having finite-length highway surrounding the initial and boundary conditions On applying the LFST on Equation (20) and simplifying, we have On employing the inverse of LFST on Equation (23), we get Now by employing LFHPM [36], we have On comparing the like powers of p, it yields p 0β : w 0 (r, s) = E β (r β ), By making use of the same operations, we evaluate the rest of terms of the LFHPSTM solution. On that account, the solution of local fractional LWR model (20) is expressed in the subsequent manner It can be indicated in closed form in the subsequent manner Now, we apply the LFRDTM on local fractional LWR model.
On applying the LFRDT on Equation (20), it gives In Equation (29) W k (r) represents the transformed function. From the initial condition (21), we can express as W 0 (r) = E β (r β ).
On using Equation (30) in Equation (29) and iterative steps, we get Therefore, LFRDTM solution is given by It can be expressed in closed form in the subsequent manner From the results (28) and (33), we can see the results obtained by using LFHPSTM and LFRDTM are in good agreement and give the exact solution in term of Mittag-Leffler function, which is suitable for numerical computation.
Example 2. Next, we examine the following local fractional LWR model having finite length highway ∂ β w(r, s) ∂s β surrounding the initial and boundary conditions On employing the LFST on Equation (34) and simplifying, we arrive at the subsequent result On employing the inverse of LFST on Equation (37), we get Next, we employ the LFHPM [36], it gives Comparing the same powers of p, we have p 0β : w 0 (r, s) = sinh β (r β ), By making use of the same operations, we compute the rest of terms of the LFHPSTM solution. Consequently, the solution of local fractional LWR model (34) is expressed as It can be represented in closed form in the subsequent manner Next, we use the LFRDTM to study the local fractional LWR model (34). On applying the LFRDT on Equation (34), it yields In Equation (43) W k (r) represents the transformed function. From the initial condition (35), we can express as W 0 (r) = sinh β (r β ).
From the results (42) and (47), we can see the results obtained by using LFHPSTM and LFRDTM are in good agreement and give the exact solution in closed form which is suitable for numerical computation.

Concluding Remarks
In this research article, we have analyzed the local fractional LWR model on a finite-length highway. The LFHMSTM and LFRDTM are used to obtain the non-differentiable solution of local fractional LWR model and the corresponding solutions are presented in closed form, which are very suitable for numerical computation. The result indicates that the suggested computational schemes are very simple and computationally sound for handling similar kinds of differential equations occurring in natural sciences.