Next Article in Journal
Prognostic Factors for All-Cause Mortality in Thai Patients with Fragility Fracture of Hip: Comorbidities and Laboratory Evaluations
Next Article in Special Issue
Non-Autogenous Innovative Reconstruction Method Following Mandibulectomy
Previous Article in Journal
Oral Administration of Cannabis and Δ-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) Preparations: A Systematic Review
Previous Article in Special Issue
Angiolipoma in the Head and Neck: Imaging, Diagnosis and Management
Open AccessArticle

Evaluation of Surgical Treatment of Oroantral Fistulae in Smokers Versus Non-Smokers

1
Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Unit, Shaare Zedek Medical Center, P.O.B 3235, 9103102 Jerusalem, Israel
2
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Rabin Medical Center, Beilinson Campus, 49100 Petach-Tikva, Israel
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Medicina 2020, 56(6), 310; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina56060310
Received: 14 May 2020 / Revised: 16 June 2020 / Accepted: 19 June 2020 / Published: 23 June 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Oral Surgery – Minimizing Postoperative Morbidity)
Background and Objectives: Smoking has been found to interfere with wound healing processes. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to compare surgical treatment of oroantral fistulae (OAFs) in smokers and non-smokers. Materials and Methods: Medical records of all consecutive patients who underwent surgical closure of OAFs between 2003 and 2016 at the oral and maxillofacial surgery department, Rabin Medical Center, Israel were reviewed. Patients’ demographic data, preoperative signs and symptoms, surgical method of repair, and postoperative complications were recorded. Results: The cohort consisted of 38 smokers and 59 non-smokers. Age and gender distributions were similar in both groups. The main etiology in both groups was tooth extraction, followed by pre-prosthetic surgery in smokers and odontogenic infection in non-smokers (p = 0.02). Preoperative conditions were not significantly different between smokers and non-smokers in terms of size of soft tissue fistula and bony defect, chronic sinusitis and foreign bodies inside the sinus. OAFs were repaired by local soft tissue flaps without consideration of smoking status. Smokers experienced more moderate-severe postoperative pain (p = 0.05) and requested more weak opioids (p = 0.06). Postoperative complications included infection, delayed wound healing, residual OAF, pain, sensory disturbances and sino nasal symptoms. These were mostly minor and tended to be more frequent in smokers (p = 0.35). Successful closure of OAFs was obtained in all patients except one smoker who required revision surgery. Conclusions: Smokers may be more susceptible to OAFs secondary to preprosthetic surgery. In this cohort, there was no statistically significant difference in outcome between smokers and non-smokers in terms of failure. However, smokers tended to have more severe postoperative pain and discomfort and to experience more postoperative complications. Further studies with larger sample sizes should be conducted to validate these results. View Full-Text
Keywords: preprosthetic surgery; oroantral fistula (OAF); wound healing; smoking preprosthetic surgery; oroantral fistula (OAF); wound healing; smoking
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Sella, A.; Ben-Zvi, Y.; Gillman, L.; Avishai, G.; Chaushu, G.; Rosenfeld, E. Evaluation of Surgical Treatment of Oroantral Fistulae in Smokers Versus Non-Smokers. Medicina 2020, 56, 310.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop