Next Article in Journal
Health Benefits of Indoor Cycling: A Systematic Review
Previous Article in Journal
Temporary Fixation of Reduction with Fabric Adhesive Bandage in the Surgical Treatment of Pediatric Supracondylar Humerus Fractures
Open AccessArticle

Assessment of Drugs Toxicity and Associated Biomarker Genes Using Hierarchical Clustering

1
Department of Statistics, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman Agricultural University, Gazipur 1706, Bangladesh
2
Department of Statistics, Bangladesh Bank, Dhaka 1000, Bangladesh
3
Bioinformatics Lab., Department of Statistics, University of Rajshahi, Rajshahi 6205, Bangladesh
4
Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Science, University of Rajshahi, Rajshahi 6205, Bangladesh
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Medicina 2019, 55(8), 451; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina55080451
Received: 30 June 2019 / Revised: 4 August 2019 / Accepted: 6 August 2019 / Published: 8 August 2019
Background and objectives: Assessment of drugs toxicity and associated biomarker genes is one of the most important tasks in the pre-clinical phase of drug development pipeline as well as in toxicogenomic studies. There are few statistical methods for the assessment of doses of drugs (DDs) toxicity and their associated biomarker genes. However, these methods consume more time for computation of the model parameters using the EM (expectation-maximization) based iterative approaches. To overcome this problem, in this paper, an attempt is made to propose an alternative approach based on hierarchical clustering (HC) for the same purpose. Methods and materials: There are several types of HC approaches whose performance depends on different similarity/distance measures. Therefore, we explored suitable combinations of distance measures and HC methods based on Japanese Toxicogenomics Project (TGP) datasets for better clustering/co-clustering between DDs and genes as well as to detect toxic DDs and their associated biomarker genes. Results: We observed that Word’s HC method with each of Euclidean, Manhattan, and Minkowski distance measures produces better clustering/co-clustering results. For an example, in the case of the glutathione metabolism pathway (GMP) dataset LOC100359539/Rrm2, Gpx6, RGD1562107, Gstm4, Gstm3, G6pd, Gsta5, Gclc, Mgst2, Gsr, Gpx2, Gclm, Gstp1, LOC100912604/Srm, Gstm4, Odc1, Gsr, Gss are the biomarker genes and Acetaminophen_Middle, Acetaminophen_High, Methapyrilene_High, Nitrofurazone_High, Nitrofurazone_Middle, Isoniazid_Middle, Isoniazid_High are their regulatory (associated) DDs explored by our proposed co-clustering algorithm based on the distance and HC method combination Euclidean: Word. Similarly, for the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor signaling pathway (PPAR-SP) dataset Cpt1a, Cyp8b1, Cyp4a3, Ehhadh, Plin5, Plin2, Fabp3, Me1, Fabp5, LOC100910385, Cpt2, Acaa1a, Cyp4a1, LOC100365047, Cpt1a, LOC100365047, Angptl4, Aqp7, Cpt1c, Cpt1b, Me1 are the biomarker genes and Aspirin_Low, Aspirin_Middle, Aspirin_High, Benzbromarone_Middle, Benzbromarone_High, Clofibrate_Middle, Clofibrate_High, WY14643_Low, WY14643_High, WY14643_Middle, Gemfibrozil_Middle, Gemfibrozil_High are their regulatory DDs. Conclusions: Overall, the methods proposed in this article, co-cluster the genes and DDs as well as detect biomarker genes and their regulatory DDs simultaneously consuming less time compared to other mentioned methods. The results produced by the proposed methods have been validated by the available literature and functional annotation. View Full-Text
Keywords: biomarker gene; doses of drugs; fold change gene expression; error rate; toxicity; hierarchical clustering biomarker gene; doses of drugs; fold change gene expression; error rate; toxicity; hierarchical clustering
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Hasan, M.N.; Malek, M.B.; Begum, A.A.; Rahman, M.; Mollah, M.N.H. Assessment of Drugs Toxicity and Associated Biomarker Genes Using Hierarchical Clustering. Medicina 2019, 55, 451.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map

1
Back to TopTop