Nanomedicine: Insights from a Bibliometrics-Based Analysis of Emerging Publishing and Research Trends
Department of Mathematics and Statistics, York University, Toronto, ON M3J 1P3, Canada
Medicina 2019, 55(12), 785; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina55120785
Received: 20 November 2019 / Revised: 11 December 2019 / Accepted: 13 December 2019 / Published: 15 December 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Nano-Biosciences in the Field of Health-Care)
Background and Objectives: Nanomedicine, a term coined by the American engineer Eric Drexler (1955) and Robert Freitas Jr. (1952) in the nineties, can be defined as a complex, multi-disciplinary branch of medicine, in which nano-technologies, molecular biotechnologies, and other nano-sciences are applied at every step of disease management, from diagnosis (nano-diagnostics) to treatment (nano-therapeutics), prognosis, and monitoring of biological parameters and biomarkers. Nanomedicine is a relatively young discipline, which is increasingly and exponentially growing, characterized by emerging ethical issues and implications. Nanomedicine has branched out in hundreds of different sub-fields. Materials and Methods: A bibliometrics-based analysis was applied mining the entire content of PubMed/MEDLINE, using “nanomedicine” as a Medical Subject Heading (MeSH) search term. Results: A sample of 6696 articles were extracted from PubMed/MEDLINE and analyzed. Articles had been published in the period from 2003 to 2019, showing an increasing trend throughout the time. Six thematic clusters emerged (first cluster: molecular methods; second cluster: molecular biology and nano-characterization; third cluster: nano-diagnostics and nano-theranostics; fourth cluster: clinical applications, in the sub-fields of nano-oncology, nano-immunology and nano-vaccinology; fifth cluster: clinical applications, in the sub-fields of nano-oncology and nano-infectiology; and sixth cluster: nanodrugs). The countries with the highest percentages of articles in the field of nanomedicine were the North America (38.3%) and Europe (35.1%). Conclusions: The present study showed that there is an increasing trend in publishing and performing research in the super-specialty of nanomedicine. Most productive countries were the USA and European countries, with China as an emerging region. Hot topics in the last years were nano-diagnostics and nano-theranostics and clinical applications in the sub-fields of nano-oncology and nano-infectiology.
View Full-Text
Keywords:
nanomedicine; bibliometrics; scientometrics
▼
Show Figures
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited
- Supplementary File 1:
PDF-Document (PDF, 406 KiB)
MDPI and ACS Style
Bragazzi, N.L. Nanomedicine: Insights from a Bibliometrics-Based Analysis of Emerging Publishing and Research Trends. Medicina 2019, 55, 785.
AMA Style
Bragazzi NL. Nanomedicine: Insights from a Bibliometrics-Based Analysis of Emerging Publishing and Research Trends. Medicina. 2019; 55(12):785.
Chicago/Turabian StyleBragazzi, Nicola L. 2019. "Nanomedicine: Insights from a Bibliometrics-Based Analysis of Emerging Publishing and Research Trends" Medicina 55, no. 12: 785.
Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.