Next Article in Journal
Microwave Thermal Ablation versus Open Partial Nephrectomy for the Treatment of Small Renal Tumors in Patients Over 70 Years Old
Previous Article in Journal
The Discrimination Against, Health Status and Wellness of People Who Use Drugs in Italian Services: A Survey
Open AccessCommunication

Bioelectric Impedance Vector Analysis (BIVA) in Breast Cancer Patients: A Tool for Research and Clinical Practice

1
Department of Nutrition, Centro de Investigacion en Alimentacion y Desarrollo A.C. (CIAD), Carretera Gustavo Enrique Astiazaran Rosas 46, Hermosillo 83304, Mexico
2
Department of Chemical and Biological Sciences, Universidad de Sonora, Hermosillo 83000, Mexico
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Medicina 2019, 55(10), 663; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina55100663
Received: 15 May 2019 / Revised: 11 September 2019 / Accepted: 26 September 2019 / Published: 30 September 2019
Background and objectives: Body composition assessment can provide information associated with breast cancer patients’ (BCP) prognosis, that can lead interventions to improve survival outcomes. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of an individualized nutrition intervention program on breast cancer patients using bioelectrical impedance vector analysis (BIVA). Materials and Methods: This is a pretest-posttest study in recently diagnosed nonmetastatic BCP undergoing antineoplastic treatment, free of co-morbidities and dietary supplementation. Body composition was assessed at baseline and 6 months after an individualized nutrition intervention program, by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and BIVA. According to BIVA, each participant was located in the bivariate tolerance ellipses for Mexican population (50%, 75%, and 95%). In clinical practice, the 50% and 75% ellipses are considered within normality ranges. Results: Nine nonmetastatic BCP completed the intervention and were included in the analysis. After the intervention, they decreased by 5.8 kg of body weight (IQR, 3–6; p < 0.05), 3.8 kg of fat mass (IQR, 0.1–4.2; p < 0.05), and 1.4 kg of fat-free mass (IQR, −0.1 to 4; p < 0.05) while appendicular skeletal muscle mass remained unchanged (−0.2 kg, IQR, −0.8 to 2.3; p = 0.4). Using BIVA at baseline, five participants were among the 50% and 75% ellipses, mainly located in the area corresponding to edema and low lean tissue, two in the cachexia quadrant and two in the athletic quadrant (≥95% ellipse). After 6 months of intervention, six out of nine participants were in the athletic quadrant and eight of nine BCP were above the 5° phase angle cut-off point. One patient initially presented cachexia (≥95% ellipse); at postintervention her vector changed to the 50% ellipse. Conclusions: An individualized nutrition intervention program designed for nonmetastatic BCP was effective to improve the nutritional status of BCP as assessed by BIVA, therefore BIVA can be a useful tool to monitor changes in nonmetastatic BCP body composition in research and clinical practice. View Full-Text
Keywords: oncology; sarcopenic obesity prevention; body composition assessment; food-based individualized nutrition program oncology; sarcopenic obesity prevention; body composition assessment; food-based individualized nutrition program
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Limon-Miro, A.T.; Valencia, M.E.; Lopez-Teros, V.; Guzman-Leon, A.E.; Mendivil-Alvarado, H.; Astiazaran-Garcia, H. Bioelectric Impedance Vector Analysis (BIVA) in Breast Cancer Patients: A Tool for Research and Clinical Practice. Medicina 2019, 55, 663.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop