Next Article in Journal
An evaluation of the effectiveness and safety of midazolam in children undergoing dental surgery
Previous Article in Journal
Impact of etiology on course and outcomes of severe acute pancreatitis
Medicina is published by MDPI from Volume 54 Issue 1 (2018). Articles in this Issue were published by another publisher in Open Access under a CC-BY (or CC-BY-NC-ND) licence. Articles are hosted by MDPI on mdpi.com as a courtesy and upon agreement with Lithuanian Medical Association, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, and Vilnius University.
Open AccessArticle

Comparison of body composition, nutritional status, functional status, and quality of life between osteoporotic and osteopenic postmenopausal women

1
Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Sisli Etfal Education and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
2
Ankara Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Education and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Medicina 2015, 51(3), 173-179; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medici.2015.05.003
Received: 25 April 2014 / Accepted: 8 May 2015 / Published: 5 July 2015
Background and objective: Osteoporosis is a condition that affects body composition, physical activity, and psychological state. We aimed to examine the differences between osteoporotic and osteopenic postmenopausal women with respect to body composition, nutrition, functional status, and quality of life.
Materials and methods: A total of 102 osteopenic (Group 1) and 100 osteoporotic (Group 2) patients were enrolled in the study. Bone mineral density (BMD), fat tissue mass (FTM), lean tissue mass (LTM), and bone mineral content (BMC) were evaluated using dual-energy X-ray absorbtiometry. Nutritional status of the patients was assessed with the Mini Nutritional Assessment (MNA), functional status with the Nottingham Extended Activities of Daily Living (NEADL) scale, and quality of life with the assessment of health-related quality of life in osteoporosis (ECOS-16).
Results: Group 2 had significantly lower FTM, LTM, and MNA scores than Group 1 (P < 0.05). NEADL and ECOS-16 scores did not differ between the groups (P > 0.05). A significant correlation was found between MNA and FTM, LTM, BMC, and BMD (P < 0.05). Whereas the assessment of functional status showed a significant positive correlation with BMD and a significant negative correlation with age (P < 0.05), no significant correlation was found between functional status and body composition (P > 0.05).
Conclusions: We found lower FTM and LTM values and a poorer nutritional status in osteoporotic patients than in osteopenic ones. Nutritional status was correlated with body composition and BMD, and functional status was correlated with age and BMD.
Keywords: Body composition; Functional status; Nutrition; Osteoporosis; Quality of life Body composition; Functional status; Nutrition; Osteoporosis; Quality of life
MDPI and ACS Style

Dogu, B.; Sirzai, H.; Usen, A.; Yilmaz, F.; Kuran, B. Comparison of body composition, nutritional status, functional status, and quality of life between osteoporotic and osteopenic postmenopausal women. Medicina 2015, 51, 173-179.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Only visits after 24 November 2015 are recorded.
Back to TopTop