Next Article in Journal
Burgeoning Nanotechnology for Diabetic Wound Healing: A Novel Approach to the Future
Previous Article in Journal
New Resveratrol Derivatives Exhibit Acetylcholinesterase Inhibitory Properties and Decrease Reactive Oxygen Species Production in the SH-SY5Y Human Neuroblastoma Cell Line
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Proceeding Paper

In Silico Study of the Functional Effects of TNRC6B Polymorphic Loci Associated with the Risk of Developing Uterine Leiomyomas According to Genome-Wide Studies †

by
Ola Mohamad Alali
Department of Medical Biological Disciplines, Belgorod State National Research University, 308015 Belgorod, Russia
Presented at the 2nd International Electronic Conference on Biomedicines, 1–31 March 2023; Available online: https://ecb2023.sciforum.net.
Med. Sci. Forum 2023, 21(1), 32; https://doi.org/10.3390/msf2023021032
Published: 16 June 2023
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of The 2nd International Electronic Conference on Biomedicines)

Abstract

:
Uterine leiomyoma (UL) is the most common benign tumor causing considerable morbidity during the reproductive years in women with contributions from environmental and genetic factors. According to the GWAS studies, there are many genes and polymorphisms that are related with and are somehow responsible for the UL pathogenesis, but the biological mechanisms underlying this association remain unclear. This study aimed to investigate the published GWAS studies of UL to recognize the significant functionality of TNRC6B polymorphism linked with UL. Six SNPs were selected based on the seven GWAS published on their association with UL by PubMed database. For their analyses, including their epigenetic effects, expression and splicing patterns, we used in silico approach and bioinformatics tools (HaploReg, GTEx-portal and Gene Ontology Resource). Based on HaploReg, several epigenetic effects regulating these SNPs were found as: rs12484776 (one motif changed, sixteen enhancers and four DNAs histone markers), rs4821939 (three motifs changed, eleven enhancers, four protein bounds and five DNAs histone markers), rs733381 (two motifs changed, eleven enhancers, one protein bound and two DNAs histone markers), rs12484951 (one motif changed histone markers), rs3830738 (five motifs changed histone markers) and rs17332320 (two motifs changed and two DNAs histone markers). Based on on GTEx, it was inferred that rs12484776, rs4821939, rs733381, rs3830738, rs12484951 and rs17332320 are associated with the expression of genes/in tissues as 4/4, 4/4, 4/4, 3/3, 4/4 and 2/2, respectively. These loci do not regulate the expression level of any genes in the UL pathophysiology important tissues, and are not associated with the alternative splicing traits (sQTL) of any gene in any tissue. Gene Ontology Resource indicated that no statistically significant biological pathways for genes associated with the studied polymorphisms have been identified. The in silico analysis of GWAS TNRC6B gene polymorphisms significant for fibroids have pronounced epigenetic effects and affect the expression of six genes (RP51042K10.10, FAM83F, TNRC6B, RP51042K10.13, SLC25A17 and XPNPEP3), which may be the basis of their involvement in the pathophysiology of fibroids.

1. Introduction

The most frequent tumors of the female reproductive system are uterine leiomyomas (ULs) [1,2]. They originate from the myometrium and are benign monoclonal uterine smooth muscle tumors [3,4]. By menopause, more than 70% of women have uterine fibroids. With a lifetime prevalence of 30% to 70% [5], they afflict 20% to 40% of women of reproductive age [4] (they frequently regress after menopause). Around a quarter of women with UL are aware of their symptoms, despite the fact that many of them are oblivious of them [6], and are susceptible to possible reproductive disruption, in addition to other indications of the overall effect of fibroids on health-related quality of life. Miscarriage is twice as prevalent in women with symptomatic UL, and complications affect 10% to 40% of pregnancies with UL [7].
Uterine leiomyoma is a complicated condition caused by a number of demographic, dietary, and hormonal risk factors [8,9,10] as well as biological, epigenetic, and genetic causes [11], with the genetic component accounting for 40–50% [12] of the illness. The genetic foundation for the formation, development and progression of ULs is now being studied by a considerable number of academics and researchers.
Utilizing the whole genome association search (GWAS), researchers may investigate how genetic factors contribute to the emergence and development of various multifactorial diseases, including ULs [13]. On the basis of GWAS, several research teams are actively researching the genetic basis of ULs. In addition, there is a lack of consistency in the findings among various global groups and they are little repeated and sometimes contradictory. It was suggested by many candidate gene association studies that TNRC6B was linked to UL in several ethnic populations. However, the biological mechanisms behind these relationships are still largely unclear. In addition to making it possible to choose genetic markers for a study with greater accuracy and support, the exponential growth of biomolecular data and their mining into databases have also made it possible through providing tools for comprehensive analysis to gain deeper insights into the potential functions of candidate genetic variants and the mechanisms by which they contribute to traits [14,15,16]. A thorough in silico analysis of the TNRC6B polymorphisms, which were found to be linked with UL, was carried out using numerous online genomic databases and recent advancements in bioinformatics. The goal of this bioinformatic investigation was to gain knowledge of the mechanisms behind these linkages. This study aimed to investigate the published GWAS studies of UL to recognize significant functionality of TNRC6B polymorphism linked with UL.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Selection of Polymorphisms

Based on the results of their connection with UL that have been published, polymorphisms were chosen for the study. The phrases “uterine leiomyoma,” “TNRC6B”, and “in silico analysis” were used in different combinations to search PubMed for relevant articles. The search resulted in 7 articles that were pertinent. These papers listed a total of six SNPs connected to UL in 4 ethnic samples: Japanese, European, UK and European and African. Table 1 contains a list of the chosen polymorphisms.

2.2. Bioinformatic Analysis

The following bioinformatics tools were used for the analyses: utilizing the integrated online program HaploReg v4.1 [23], chosen polymorphism loci were examined for their functional importance (chromatin states, motifs changes, protein interactions, regulatory potential, and eQTLs).
In addition to HaploReg (v4.1), the GTExportal data (http://www.gtexportal.org (accessed on 29 January 2023 )) were used to evaluate the influence of the six candidate SNPs for UL on gene expression level (cis- and trans-eQTL) in organs and tissues [24]. Using the Gene Ontology Resource tools available at (http://geneontology.org (accessed on 29 January 2023 )) [25], the functional importance of the candidate genes for UL in the different biological pathways was investigated.

3. Results

3.1. Genomic Location of the SNPs

In the introns of the TNRC6B gene, six reference SNPs were found.

3.2. Regulatory Effects

They suggest that all reference SNPs can produce various regulatory effects, albeit to a different extent, as follows:
SNP rs12484776 displays histone marks associated with enhancers in 16 tissues (hESC-derived CD56+ mesoderm cultured cells and primary B and T cells (regulatory, effector/memory enriched, helper, etc.)) from peripheral blood and brain (hippocampus middle, anterior caudate, dorsolateral and prefrontal cortex, etc., and male fetal brain, fetal adrenal gland, fetal muscle trunk, etc.) located in the DNase-1 hypersensitive region in four tissues (H1-derived mesenchymal stem cells, foreskin fibroblast primary cells skin01, fetal lung and placenta) and altered motif (SRF) for the transcription factor.
SNP rs4821939 displays histone marks associated with enhancers in 11 tissues (hESC-derived CD56+ mesoderm cultured cells and primary B and T cells (regulatory, effector/memory enriched, helper, etc.)) from peripheral blood and brain (hippocampus middle, anterior caudate, dorsolateral and prefrontal cortex, etc., and male fetal brain, fetal adrenal gland, fetal muscle trunk, etc.) located in the DNase-1 hypersensitive region in four tissues (primary T cells from cord blood, primary hematopoietic stem cells G-CSF-mobilized male and female, and HUVEC umbilical vein endothelial primary cells), five bound proteins (iPS-15b cells, primary hematopoietic stem cells G-CSF-mobilized male and female, and monocytes-CD14+ RO01746 primary cells) and three altered motifs (Hmx, Mef2 and Nkx2) for the transcription factor.
SNP rs733381 displays histone marks associated with enhancers in 11 tissues (hESC-derived CD56+ mesoderm cultured cells and primary B and T cells (regulatory, effector/memory enriched, helper, etc.) from peripheral blood and brain (hippocampus middle, anterior caudate, dorsolateral and prefrontal cortex, etc., and male fetal brain, fetal adrenal gland, fetal muscle trunk, etc.)) located in the DNase-1 hypersensitive region in two tissues (fetal kidney and ovary), bound proteins (ZNF263) and two altered motifs (BCL and p300) for the transcription factor.
SNP rs12484951 displays histone marks associated with two altered motifs (BATF and Hmbox1) for the transcription factor. SNP rs3830738 displays histone marks associated with five altered motifs (Foxj1, Foxk1, Irf, TCF12 and p300) for the transcription factor.
SNP rs17332320 displays histone marks located in the DNase-1 hypersensitive region in two tissues (BLD and BLD) and two altered motifs (HDAC2 and Pax-5) for the transcription factor.

3.3. Expression QTLs

In four tissues (organs), four SNPs seemed to have a cis-eQTL influence on the expression of four genes (RP51042K10.10, TNRC6B, RP51042K10.13 and XPNPEP3). However, SNP rs3830738 only affected the expression of three genes (RP51042K10.10, TNRC6B, and RP51042K10.13), while SNP rs17332320 only affected RP51042K10.10 and TNRC6B.

3.4. The Alternative Splicing Traits (sQTL)

The GTEx dataset highlighted the regulatory function of mRNA precursor splicing patterns. According to GTEx, none of the six SNPs are linked to alternative splicing traits (sQTL) of any gene in any tissue.

3.5. Pathway Analysis

This investigation was performed on TNRC6B since it was discovered to be linked with UL and multiple reference polymorphisms were mapped to this gene, as well as because several reference SNPs may impact the expression of this gene according to the eQTL analysis. The following genes were evaluated using the Gene Ontology database: (RP51042K10.10, FAM83F, TNRC6B, RP51042K10.13, SLC25A17, and XPNPEP3) in Table 1, where no statistically significant biological pathways for genes related with the researched polymorphisms were discovered.

4. Discussion

This study shows that, in addition to the previously reported TNRC6B gene as being connected with UL, many reference polymorphisms were mapped to this gene, and that the expression of this gene may be influenced by several reference SNPs based on the eQTL analysis. These associated polymorphism loci were shown to have no major functional role (multiple expression and splicing patterns) that was reported to correlate with UL, which somehow did not affect any gene in any tissue, by documenting pronounced pleiotropic tissue-specific regulatory/expression/splicing effects.
In general, the degree of gene pleiotropy appears to be inversely linked to the gene’s proportionate contribution to the trait. Given that the majority of genes in the human genome are pleiotropic [26], the predicted contribution of each to a specific characteristic is relatively small. As a result, extremely pleiotropic genes have a limited impact size and frequently provide false negative findings in GWAS unless their contribution to a specific trait is greater than the average for other traits. The current analysis also offers insight on often observed discrepancies in relation to polymorphisms and failed attempts to replicate potential loci in other ethnic populations.

5. Conclusions

The in silico analysis of GWAS TNRC6B gene polymorphisms significant for fibroids have pronounced epigenetic effects and affect the expression of six genes (RP51042K10.10, FAM83F, TNRC6B, RP51042K10.13, SLC25A17 and XPNPEP3), which may be the basis of their involvement in the pathophysiology of fibroids.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

This study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Local Ethical Committee of Belgorod State University.

Data Availability Statement

The data generated in the present study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Donnez, J.; Dolmans, M.M. Uterine fibroid management: From the present to the future. Hum. Reprod. Update. 2016, 22, 665–686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Drayer, S.M.; Catherino, W.H. Prevalence, morbidity, and current medical management of uterine leiomyomas. Int. J. Gynecol. Obstet. 2015, 131, 117–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Bulun, S.E. Uterine fibroids. N. Engl. J. Med. 2013, 369, 1344–1355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Ponomarenko, I.; Reshetnikov, E.; Polonikov, A.; Verzilina, I.; Sorokina, I.; Yermachenko, A.; Dvornyk, V.; Churnosov, M. Candidate genes for age at menarche are associated with uterine leiomyoma. Front. Genet. 2021, 11, 512940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Doherty, L.; Mutlu, L.; Sinclair, D.; Taylor, H. Uterine fibroids: Clinical manifestations and contemporary management. Reprod. Sci. 2014, 21, 1067–1092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Gallagher, C.S.; Mäkinen, N.; Harris, H.R.; Rahmioglu, N.; Uimari, O.; Cook, J.P.; Shigesi, N.; Ferreira, T.; Velez-Edwards, D.R.; Edwards, T.L.; et al. Genome-wide association and epidemiological analyses reveal common genetic origins between uterine leiomyomata and endometriosis. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 4857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Van Heertum, K.; Barmat, L. Uterine fibroids associated with infertility. Womens Health 2014, 10, 645–653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Wise, L.A.; Laughlin-Tommaso, S.K. Epidemiology of uterine fibroids–from menarche to menopause. Clin. Obstet. Gynecol. 2016, 59, 2–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Pavone, D.; Clemenza, S.; Sorbi, F.; Fambrini, M.; Petraglia, F. Epidemiology and risk factors of uterine fibroids. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2018, 46, 3–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Ciebiera, M.; Włodarczyk, M.; Słabuszewska-Jóźwiak, A.; Nowicka, G.; Jakiel, G. Influence of vitamin D and transforming growth factor β3 serum concentrations, obesity, and family history on the risk for uterine fibroids. Fertil. Steril. 2016, 106, 1787–1792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Qin, H.; Lin, Z.; Vásquez, E.; Xu, L. The association between chronic psychological stress and uterine fibroids risk: A meta-analysis of observational studies. Stress Health 2019, 35, 585–594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Meadows, K.L.; Andrews, D.M.; Xu, Z.; Carswell, G.K.; Laughlin, S.K.; Baird, D.D.; Taylor, J.A. Genome-wide analysis of loss of heterozygosity and copy number amplification in uterine leiomyomas using the 100K single nucleotide polymorphism array. Exp. Mol. Pathol. 2011, 91, 434–439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Dehghan, A. Genome-Wide Association Studies. Methods Mol. Biol. 2018, 1793, 37–49. [Google Scholar]
  14. Chen, C.Y.; Chang, I.; Hsiung, C.A. Wasserman, W.W. On the identification of potential regulatory variants within genome wide association candidate SNP sets. BMC Medical Genom. 2014, 7, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Herman, M.A.; Rosen, E.D. Making biological sense of GWAS data: Lessons from the FTO locus. Cell Metab. 2015, 22, 538–539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Reshetnikov, E.A. Study of associations of candidate genes differentially expressing in the placenta with the development of placental insufficiency with fetal growth restriction. Res. Result Biomed. 2020, 6, 338–349. [Google Scholar]
  17. Cha, P.C.; Takahashi, A.; Hosono, N.; Low, S.K.; Kamatani, N.; Kubo, M.; Nakamura, Y. A genome-wide association study identifies three loci associated with susceptibility to uterine fibroids. Nat. Genet. 2011, 43, 447–450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Sakai, K.; Tanikawa, C.; Hirasawa, A.; Chiyoda, T.; Yamagami, W.; Kataoka, F.; Susumu, N.; Terao, C.; Kamatani, Y.; Takahashi, A.; et al. Identification of a novel uterine leiomyoma GWAS locus in a Japanese population. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Välimäki, N.; Kuisma, H.; Pasanen, A.; Heikinheimo, O.; Sjöberg, J.; Bützow, R.; Sarvilinna, N.; Heinonen, H.R.; Tolvanen, J.; Bramante, S.; et al. Genetic predisposition to uterine leiomyoma is determined by loci for genitourinary development and genome stability. Elife 2018, 7, e37110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Rafnar, T.; Gunnarsson, B.; Stefansson, O.A.; Sulem, P.; Ingason, A.; Frigge, M.L.; Stefansdottir, L.; Sigurdsson, J.K.; Tragante, V.; Steinthorsdottir, V.; et al. Variants associating with uterine leiomyoma highlight genetic background shared by various cancers and hormone-related traits. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Edwards, T.L.; Giri, A.; Hellwege, J.N.; Hartmann, K.E.; Stewart, E.A.; Jeff, J.M.; Bray, M.J.; Pendergrass, S.A.; Torstenson, E.S.; Keaton, J.M.; et al. A trans-ethnic genome-wide association study of uterine fibroids. Front. Genet. 2019, 10, 511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Masuda, T.; Low, S.K.; Akiyama, M.; Hirata, M.; Ueda, Y.; Matsuda, K.; Kimura, T.; Murakami, Y.; Kubo, M.; Kamatani, Y.; et al. GWAS of five gynecologic diseases and cross-trait analysis in Japanese. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 2020, 28, 95–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Ward, L.D.; Kellis, M. HaploReg: A resource for exploring chromatin states, conservation, and regulatory motif alterations within sets of genetically linked variants. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012, 40, D930–D934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Westra, H.J.; Peters, M.J.; Esko, T.; Yaghootkar, H.; Schurmann, C.; Kettunen, J.; Christiansen, M.; Fairfax, B.P.; Schramm, K.; Powell, J.E.; et al. Systematic identification of trans eQTLs as putative drivers of known disease associations. Nat. Genet. 2013, 45, 1238–1243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Gene Ontology Consortium. The gene ontology resource: 20 years and still GOing strong. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019, 47, D330–D338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Watanabe, K.; Stringer, S.; Frei, O.; Umićević Mirkov, M.; de Leeuw, C.; Polderman, T.J.; van der Sluis, S.; Andreassen, O.A.; Neale, B.M.; Posthuma, D. A global overview of pleiotropy and genetic architecture in complex traits. Nat. Genet. 2019, 51, 1339–1348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Table 1. Overview of functional effects of TNRC6B gene polymorphisms at (22q13.1) associated with UL in GWAS studies.
Table 1. Overview of functional effects of TNRC6B gene polymorphisms at (22q13.1) associated with UL in GWAS studies.
GeneSNPs (Pos.)OR (Effect Allele), p (Ref.)Regulatory EffectseQTL
TNRC6Brs4821939
(40263247)
OR = 1.08 (A),
p = 7.8 × 10−16 [6]
Enhancer 11 tissues, DNAse 4 tissues, 5 protein bounds,
3 altered motifs
RP51042K10.10, FAM83F, TNRC6B, RP51042K10.13, SLC25A17, XPNPEP3
rs12484776
(40256869)
OR = 1.23 (G),
p = 2.8 × 10−12 [17]
Enhancer 16 tissues, DNAse 4 tissues, 1 altered motifRP51042K10.10, TNRC6B, FAM83F RP51042K10.13, XPNPEP3, SLC25A17
OR = 0.89 (A),
p = 4.6× 10−18 [18]
rs733381
(40273644)
OR = 1.10 (G),
p = 5.7 × 10−11 [19]
Enhancer 11 tissues, DNAse 2 tissues, 1 protein bound,
2 altered motifs
RP51042K10.10, FAM83F, XPNPEP3 RP51042K10.13, TNRC6B, SLC25A17
rs12484951
(40307071)
OR = 1.11 (G),
p = 3.2 × 10−13 [20]
2 altered motifsRP5-1042K10.10, FAM83F, SLC25A17, RP5-1042K10.13, TNRC6B, XPNPEP3
rs3830738
(40315223)
OR = 0.91 (A),
p = 2.7 × 10−13 [21]
5 altered motifsRP5-1042K10.10, TNRC6B, FAM83F, RP5-1042K10.13, XPNPEP3
rs17332320
(40315616)
OR = 1.15 (T),
p = 1.6 × 10−12 [22]
DNAse 2 tissues, 2 altered motifsRP51042K10.10, TNRC6B, SLC25A17, RP5-1042K10.13, XPNPEP3, FAM83F
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Alali, O.M. In Silico Study of the Functional Effects of TNRC6B Polymorphic Loci Associated with the Risk of Developing Uterine Leiomyomas According to Genome-Wide Studies. Med. Sci. Forum 2023, 21, 32. https://doi.org/10.3390/msf2023021032

AMA Style

Alali OM. In Silico Study of the Functional Effects of TNRC6B Polymorphic Loci Associated with the Risk of Developing Uterine Leiomyomas According to Genome-Wide Studies. Medical Sciences Forum. 2023; 21(1):32. https://doi.org/10.3390/msf2023021032

Chicago/Turabian Style

Alali, Ola Mohamad. 2023. "In Silico Study of the Functional Effects of TNRC6B Polymorphic Loci Associated with the Risk of Developing Uterine Leiomyomas According to Genome-Wide Studies" Medical Sciences Forum 21, no. 1: 32. https://doi.org/10.3390/msf2023021032

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop