Next Article in Journal
Concepts of Empowerment: The Role of Energy and Environmental Citizenship in the Energy Transition
Previous Article in Journal
Environmental Citizenship or Consumership—A Methodological Approach
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Proceeding Paper

City Digital Twin Concepts: A Vision for Community Participation †

by
Fathima Nishara Abdeen
* and
Samad M. E. Sepasgozar
School of Built Environment, Faculty of Arts, Design and Architecture, University of New South Wales, Sydney 2052, Australia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Presented at the 3rd Built Environment Research Forum, Sydney, Australia, 1 December 2021.
Environ. Sci. Proc. 2021, 12(1), 19; https://doi.org/10.3390/environsciproc2021012019
Published: 3 March 2022
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of The 3rd Built Environment Research Forum)

Abstract

:
Community participation is seen as a means of improving the effectiveness of planning to benefit the people by empowering the people. However, a novel approach to enable community participation during the planning stage of smart city infrastructure projects is lacking. Hence, the study presents an approach through the Smart City Digital Twin (SCDT) to support community participation during the planning stage of smart city infrastructure provision. The proposed system architecture comprises five key layers, namely: (a) an acquisition layer, (b) a transmission layer, (c) a digital modeling and data complementary layer, (d) a data/model integration layer, and (e) an application layer. The components of the architecture allow the SCDT to automatically re-create and predict the appearance of infrastructure after community feedback. Volunteered geographic information supported by an agent-based model empowers the process. Unlike other platforms, the architecture of the SCDT is developed to be open to the public. It can be utilized initially in the planning stage and continue throughout the construction stage of infrastructure development. Further, the SCDT would support urban planners, policymakers, and developers to make decisions by considering public needs, perceptions, attitudes, and interests.

1. Introduction

Smart and sustainable city concepts must be realized to deal with rising urbanization around the world [1]. During the process, special attention needs to be provided in planning the infrastructure by considering the needs and interests of the community [1,2]. Paul [3] argues that in the wider context, community participation may be viewed as an instrument of empowerment. Yet, in the context of smart cities, many recent efforts are frequently linked to different dimensions of the operation stage of the city, such as e-ticketing, smart street lights, and emission reduction [4]. According to Antonova and Slyvia [4], what is necessary is an information-rich city provided with intelligent models enabling the planning and design of city elements. Therefore, to plan and build infrastructure while involving the community, new tools are needed [5].
In the past several tools and methodologies to achieve community participation have been tested, all of which serve the fundamental principle that cities are made for the community and thus, communities should have a say in how they are planned [6]. According to Thoneick [6], specifically, recent studies focus mainly on two strands: either communicative methods as a way to increase the quality of participation or digital participation procedures facilitated by technological development. Digital participation methods have been used in participatory processes for the past 15 years [7]. Some of these technologies include volunteered geographic information (VGI), geographic information systems (GIS), virtual reality technologies (VR), computer vision (CV), and social media (SM) tools [7]. A Smart City Digital Twin (SCDT) could integrate these technologies to create a novel and robust system for community participation during the planning stage of infrastructure projects. A digital twin enables changes and representation (e.g., future designs) and minimizes risks and associated costs in the real-world through collaborative planning and participation [8]. However, the complexity of the city and the interdependencies between its elements (humans, infrastructure, and technologies) have made it a challenge to integrate the elements and develop a platform enabling community engagement [9]. Dembski et al. [8] present urban digital twins for smart cities and citizens. The study integrates a mobile application connected to the urban digital twin so that the citizen can be involved in urban planning. However, the study provides limited opportunity to engage the community during the planning stage of the infrastructure developments, which is a key element in smart cities. White et al. [10] present a digital twin that can be used to engage citizens and get valuable feedback on key urban planning and policy decisions. However, citizen feedback has been collected through online forms. Hence, a gap prevails in terms of developing a SCDT that enables the community to share their expectations and needs at the planning stage of the infrastructure project. Condensing the above arguments, the research aim of the study is to develop a SCDT platform with the capacity to incorporate community feedback during the infrastructure planning stage. After integrating citizen feedback, the platform should be able to automatically display the changes to the planned version.

2. Research Process

Figure 1 presents the research process intended to be followed by this ongoing study to achieve the research aim.
Figure 1 shows three main steps, including developing SCDT architecture, developing the mobile application for collecting community feedback, and developing a SCDT platform to reflect changes to infrastructure based on community feedback. This paper presents the initial concept of the SCDT architecture, but the platform should be further developed in the next phase of this project.

3. Literature Analysis

The SCDT architecture developed by the study comprises five layers. The technologies and processes adopted by these layers are summarized in Table 1.
Table 1 provides a detailed explanation of the key layers of DT architecture. These layers when integrated systematically form the DT architecture, which is depicted in Figure 2.

3.1. Data Acquisition Layer

The data acquisition layer provides the foundation for gathering required data in an SCDT architecture [16]. The layer comprises OpenStreetMap, Sydney 3D city model, DEM and VGI. OpenStreetMap and Sydney 3D city model provide the underlying map data. DEM, provided by regional authorities, acts as a source to simulate planned infrastructures within the SCDT platform. VGI, enabled through a mobile application, is to integrate community participation.

3.2. Data Transmission Layer

The transmission layer’s main goal is to convert acquired data and send it to the higher layers [16]. According to Lu et al. [16], Wi-Fi is the most well-known and commonly utilized wireless local area network (WLAN) technology of all available options.

3.3. Digital Modeling and Data Complementary Layer

The digital modeling and data complementary layer display the digital model and add additional information to support the higher levels and connect the bottom layer [16]. The digital model can be displayed through CIM and BIM. Moreover, an agent-based model is used in the architecture to re-create and predict the appearance of infrastructure after community feedback.

3.4. Data/Model Integration Layer

The 3D city information simulation, change in infrastructure simulation and community feedback simulation are integrated into the model integration layer of SCDT architecture. Further, deep learning algorithms are used in the architecture to analyze and present the data for decision-making. The data visualization is performed in a game engine environment through the Unity3D software.

3.5. Application Layer

The final output of the SCDT is presented in this layer. This includes (a) the degree of community expectations, satisfaction, recommendations, and changes to the planned version; (b) safety concerns/safety warnings, and (c) environmental concerns.

4. Future Directions and Conclusions

The purpose of this study is to present a robust architecture of SCDT to enable community participation during the planning stage of infrastructure projects. Hence, the architecture comprises VGI that would facilitate the community to input their ideas and module the expected infrastructure through agent-based models. The next steps of this ongoing study are as follows:
(a)
Develop a mobile application to enable community participation during the planning stage of urban infrastructure.
(b)
Adopting the SCDT architecture (refer to Figure 2), the study proceeds further to develop DT simulations by integrating OpenStreetMap and the digital elevation model.
The SCDT would support urban planners, policymakers, and developers to make decisions by considering the public needs, perceptions, attitudes, and interests.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, F.N.A.; methodology, F.N.A.; formal analysis, F.N.A.; writing—original draft preparation, F.N.A.; writing—review and editing, S.M.E.S.; visualization, F.N.A.; supervision, S.M.E.S.; project administration, S.M.E.S.; funding acquisition, S.M.E.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Marzouk, M.; Othman, A. Planning utility infrastructure requirements for smart cities using the integration between BIM and GIS. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2020, 57, 102120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Dembski, F.; Woessner, U.; Letzgus, M. The Digital Twin Tackling Urban Challenges with Models, Spatial Analysis and Numerical Simulations in Immersive Virtual Environments. In Architecture in the Age of the 4th Industrial Revolution, Proceedings of the 37th eCAADe and 23rd SIGraDi Conference, Porto, Portugal, 11–13 Septemebr 2019; Faculty of Architecture, University of Porto: Porto, Portugal, 2019; Available online: http://papers.cumincad.org/cgi-bin/works/paper/ecaadesigradi2019_334 (accessed on 6 February 2022).
  3. Paul, S. Community Participation in Development Projects; World Bank: Washington, DC, USA, 1987. [Google Scholar]
  4. Petrova-Antonova, D.; Ilieva, S. Methodological Framework for Digital Transition and Performance Assessment of Smart Cities. In Proceedings of the 2019 4th International Conference on Smart and Sustainable Technologies (SpliTech), Split, Croatia, 18–21 June 2019. [Google Scholar]
  5. Axelsson, K.; Granath, M. Stakeholders’ stake and relation to smartness in smart city development: Insights from a Swedish city planning project. Gov. Inf. Q. 2018, 35, 693–702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Thoneick, R. Integrating Online and Onsite Participation in Urban Planning: Assessment of a Digital Participation System. Int. J. E-Plan. Res. (IJEPR) 2021, 10, 1–20. [Google Scholar]
  7. Slaev, A.D.; Kovachev, A.; Nozharova, B.; Daskalova, D.; Nikolov, P.; Petrov, P. Overcoming the failures of citizen participation: The relevance of the liberal approach in planning. Plan. Theory 2019, 18, 448–469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Dembski, F.; Wössner, U.; Letzgus, M.; Ruddat, M.; Yamu, C. Urban Digital Twins for Smart Cities and Citizens: The Case Study of Herrenberg, Germany. Sustainability 2020, 12, 2307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Shahat, E.; Hyun, C.T.; Yeom, C. City digital twin potentials: A review and research agenda. Sustainability 2021, 13, 3386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. White, G.; Zink, A.; Codecá, L.; Clarke, S. A digital twin smart city for citizen feedback. Cities 2021, 110, 103064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Ham, Y.; Kim, J. Participatory Sensing and Digital Twin City: Updating Virtual City Models for Enhanced Risk-Informed Decision-Making. J. Manag. Eng. 2020, 36, 04020005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Aubry, E.; Silverston, T.; Lahmadi, A.; Festor, O. CrowdOut: A mobile crowdsourcing service for road safety in digital cities. In Proceedings of the 2014 IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communication Workshops (PERCOM WORKSHOPS), Budapest, Hungary, 24–28 March 2014. [Google Scholar]
  13. Digital Earth Australia. Satellite Imagery to Inform Australia. Available online: https://www.dea.ga.gov.au/ (accessed on 9 November 2021).
  14. Kim, S.; Kim, D.; Choi, S. CityCraft: 3D virtual city creation from a single image. Vis. Comput. 2020, 36, 911–924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Fan, C.; Jiang, Y.; Mostafavi, A. Social Sensing in Disaster City Digital Twin: Integrated Textual-Visual-Geo Framework for Situational Awareness during Built Environment Disruptions. J. Manag. Eng. 2020, 36, 04020002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Lu, Q.; Parlikad, A.K.; Woodall, P.; Ranasinghe, G.D.; Xie, X.; Liang, Z.; Konstantinou, E.; Heaton, J.; Schooling, J. Developing a Digital Twin at Building and City Levels: Case Study of West Cambridge Campus. J. Manag. Eng. 2020, 36, 05020004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Park, J.; Yang, B. GIS-Enabled Digital Twin System for Sustainable Evaluation of Carbon Emissions: A Case Study of Jeonju City, South Korea. Sustainability 2020, 12, 9186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Major, P.L. Guoyuan: Hildre, Hans Petter: Zhang, Houxiang, The Use of a Data-Driven Digital Twin of a Smart City: A Case Study of angstrom lesund, Norway. IEEE Instrum. Meas. Mag. 2021, 24, 39–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Research process.
Figure 1. Research process.
Environsciproc 12 00019 g001
Figure 2. Smart City Digital Twin architecture.
Figure 2. Smart City Digital Twin architecture.
Environsciproc 12 00019 g002
Table 1. Composition of SCDT architecture encompassing technologies and functions.
Table 1. Composition of SCDT architecture encompassing technologies and functions.
SCDT LayersTechnologies/ProcessesSourcesFunctions
Data acquisition layerOpenStreetMap of Sydney and Sydney 3D city model [2,8,11]To model terrain, building and planned infrastructure
Digital elevation model (DEM) provided by regional authorities [12,13]
Volunteered Geographic Information (VGI) [14,15]Incorporating feedback from community
Data transmission layerWireless local area network (WLAN) technology (WiFI)[12,16]Transforming collected data
Digital modeling and data complementary layerBuilding Information Model (BIM)/ City Information Modelling (CIM)[8,17]Generate the background of the SCDT and related infrastructure
Agent-based model[14,16]Re-create and predict the appearance of community satisfied infrastructure
Data/model integration layer3 D city information simulation [2,10,14,18]Integrating the key components of the SCDT
Change in infrastructure simulation [10]
Community feedback simulation [10]
Deep learning algorithms[15,16]Analyze data relevant to community needs, safety and environmental concerns to enable decision making
Unity 3D game engine [10,18]Visualization platform
Application layerDegree of community expectations, satisfactions, recommendations, changes to the planned version [8,10]Visualize expectations and whether developments are aligned with it
Safety concerns/safety warnings [10,12]Tag places with an unsafe condition
Environmental concerns [18]Tag places with environmental issues
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Abdeen, F.N.; Sepasgozar, S.M.E. City Digital Twin Concepts: A Vision for Community Participation. Environ. Sci. Proc. 2021, 12, 19. https://doi.org/10.3390/environsciproc2021012019

AMA Style

Abdeen FN, Sepasgozar SME. City Digital Twin Concepts: A Vision for Community Participation. Environmental Sciences Proceedings. 2021; 12(1):19. https://doi.org/10.3390/environsciproc2021012019

Chicago/Turabian Style

Abdeen, Fathima Nishara, and Samad M. E. Sepasgozar. 2021. "City Digital Twin Concepts: A Vision for Community Participation" Environmental Sciences Proceedings 12, no. 1: 19. https://doi.org/10.3390/environsciproc2021012019

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop