Next Article in Journal
Visible-Light-Driven BiOBr-TiO2-Attapulgite Photocatalyst with Excellent Photocatalytic Activity for Multiple Xanthates
Previous Article in Journal
Visible-Light-Driven α-C(sp3)–H Bond Functionalization of Glycine Derivatives
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Immobilization of β-Galactosidase on Glass Fiber Rolls

Faculty of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, University of Maribor, Smetanova 17, 2000 Maribor, Slovenia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Catalysts 2023, 13(12), 1503; https://doi.org/10.3390/catal13121503
Submission received: 16 November 2023 / Revised: 5 December 2023 / Accepted: 7 December 2023 / Published: 9 December 2023
(This article belongs to the Section Biocatalysis)

Abstract

:
The usability of glass fibers as immobilization support with a porous open structure was investigated. We developed a method to immobilize the enzyme β-galactosidase on special glass fiber rolls. The new method is simple, non-expensive and industrially applicable. Glutaraldehyde was used as a non-specific cross-linking agent for the covalent binding of β-galactosidase on modified glass fibers. The efficiency of immobilization was tested with the known hydrolysis of lactose. All experiments were performed in a continuous laboratory reactor. The influence of the reaction temperature (20, 25 and 30 °C), the substrate flow rate (1, 2 and 3 mL/min) and the pH of the reaction medium (6, 7 and 8) on the conversion was investigated. The reaction efficiency was monitored by measuring the glucose concentration with a spectrophotometer. High immobilization efficiency, enzyme activity and stability were obtained. The optimal reaction temperature, substrate flow rate and pH were found. The activity and stability of the enzyme entrapped on the glass fiber rolls remained almost unchanged during reuse, which is promising for potential industrial applications.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Lactose intolerance is the inability to digest a sugar called lactose, which is found in milk and dairy products. Nowadays, this inability is a serious problem. It is caused by a deficiency of the enzyme lactase or β-galactosidase in the digestive system, which leads to various digestive disorders. This can lead to various symptoms, including flatulence, diarrhea, nausea, intestinal bloating and abdominal cramps, and in some cases, headaches. The severity of symptoms can vary depending on the amount of lactose consumed [1,2,3]. Newborns usually have the ability to digest lactose, but this ability deteriorates with age because the older people are, the fewer lactase enzymes they have for hydrolyzing lactose. If the lactose is not hydrolyzed, it cannot be absorbed in the intestine and then becomes a substrate for the bacterial community, resulting in undesirable digestive disturbances. The prevalence of lactose intolerance varies according to geographical location. More than two thirds of the world’s population are lactose intolerant. In a recent study, the global prevalence of lactose intolerance was estimated at 68%. On average, most people with lactose intolerance live in Asia (64%) and the fewest in Northern, Southern and Western Europe (28%). There are countries where the prevalence of lactose intolerance is very low (4%), such as Denmark and Ireland, and countries where almost every inhabitant is lactose intolerant, such as South Korea, Yemen and Ghana [4].
Lactose is less fermentable than other sugars and crystallizes at lower temperatures. This can lead to problems in the production of refrigerated dairy products. These problems can be solved by hydrolyzing lactose to glucose and galactose. Lactose consists of the monosaccharides glucose and galactose [1]. The hydrolysis of lactose can be catalyzed by acids or enzymes. Enzymatic hydrolysis is preferred to acid hydrolysis as the process temperatures are lower and the catalyst is easier to separate from the reaction medium [2]. For enzymatic catalysis of lactose hydrolysis, β-galactosidases are used. β-galactosidases are enzymes that convert lactose into glucose and galactose. They are often used to produce lactose-free dairy products for people suffering from lactose intolerance, also known as lactose malabsorption. They can be isolated from microbial, animal and plant sources. β-galactosidases from microorganisms such as bacteria, molds, yeasts or fungi are available in relatively large quantities and at a reasonable price compared to β-galactosidases from animals or plants [1,3,5].
The dairy industry is involved in the processing of raw milk into various dairy drinks, fermented milk products, butter, different types of cheese, ice cream, etc., among other things. Production technologies in the dairy industry are adapted to obtain the desired product. Several different technological processes take place during the processing of milk into different types of cheese. During the production of cheese, a quantity of excess liquid is secreted, which is known as whey. The amount of whey secreted depends on the type of cheese and the water retained in the cheese grain, which affects the firmness of the cheese. Whey as a by-product is a waste with a high content of organic substances. A small proportion is used; otherwise, it is thrown away. This poses a serious environmental problem. In order to reduce the amount of waste whey and its impact on and pollution of the environment, new processes are being introduced to use whey for the production of value-added products. For example, an important use of β-galactosidase is to hydrolyze the lactose in whey. The hydrolyzed form of whey is sweeter, creamier and more biodegradable [1].
There are basically two different ways of using β-galactosidases for the hydrolysis of lactose. Soluble, non-immobilized free enzymes are normally used in batch bioprocesses, while immobilized enzymes can be used in both batch and continuous bioreactors. With a suitable immobilization method, the activity and stability of the enzymes can be increased, which can reduce production costs, allow scale-up to industrial applications and enable successive multiple uses of the enzymes [2,3,4,5]. There are numerous immobilization techniques such as covalent bonding [6,7,8], physical adsorption [9], cross-linking [10,11,12], and microencapsulation or entrapment [4,5,13,14]. Which technique is used for the immobilization of enzymes depends on the respective application. However, it is important that the solid support has the desired characteristics, such as a large surface area, high porosity, non-toxicity, easy separation from the reaction medium and no leakage of the enzyme from the support [12,15,16].
Various supports, including polymeric fibrous materials, cotton fabric, chitosan, agarose, zeolite, nylon fibers and κ-carrageenan, have been successfully used for the immobilization of β-galactosidase [3,17,18,19]. In addition, some simple physical adsorption techniques have been used to improve the efficiency of the enzyme in lactose hydrolysis. Immobilization experiments of β-galactosidase on zeolite pellets have been studied in fluidized bed columns [20]. However, several problems associated with these supports have also been reported. A common problem with the use of polymeric materials for enzyme immobilization is the lack of active sites on the polymer. Carrageenan has been used for the immobilization of enzymes and cells using entrapment techniques. It is inexpensive but suffers from poor mechanical and thermal stability [21,22]. On the other hand, β-galactosidase from Aspergillus oryzae was immobilized by diazotization or condensation on nylon membranes grafted with glycidyl methacrylate. It has been found that immobilization by condensation strengthens the enzyme structure in contrast to immobilization by diazotization, and membranes prepared by the first method exhibit higher resistance to temperature and acidic solutions compared to those prepared by the second method [23]. In many cases, these supports are very expensive, mechanically poor in terms of stiffness, hardness and flexibility, and all are susceptible to microbial attack [24,25]. The process conditions for immobilization should be mild enough so that the enzymes are not denatured during immobilization [26].
Various reactors have been used for the utilization of β-galactosidase. Reactors such as fluidized bed, hollow fiber, plug flow, capillary bed and rolling membrane reactors have all been used for lactose hydrolysis [3,27,28]. Membrane reactors have also been tested for this reaction and show lower enzymatic activity compared to the use of enzymes in batch reactors [29].
The aim of this work was to test a new method for immobilization of the enzyme β-galactosidase. As a porous support for enzyme immobilization, special industrial glass fibers were used, which usually occur as a residue in the industrial production of grinding plates. As this material is widely available and cheap, it could be used for specific immobilization procedures and further enzyme catalysis. The characterization of the solid support was carried out. The efficiency of immobilization was tested by the hydrolysis of lactose in a continuous reactor. The reactions were carried out at different temperatures, pH values of the substrate, and flow rates. In addition, the reusability of the immobilized β-galactosidase enzyme was tested.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Characterization of Glass Fibers

To characterize the glass fibers, we performed a scanning electron microscopy (SEM) analysis, which provides a complex image of the surface topography of the sample at high magnification. The SEM image of the glass fibers shown in Figure 1 was recorded with the Philips SEM XL series. We can see that a single fiber has a diameter of about 10 μm. We can see that the diameter of the glass fiber is the same over the entire length of the fiber. The length of the fibers is not important because we used glass fiber sheets for the immobilization of the enzyme and later for the lactose hydrolysis reaction. The thickness of the glass fiber sheet is approximately 20 μm.
The thermogravimetric analysis of the glass fibers was carried out with the TGA 2 from Mettler Toledo. The analysis was performed in a temperature range from 30 to 800 °C with a heating rate of 10 °C/min in an air atmosphere. The results of the thermogravimetric analysis are presented in Figure 2.
According to thermogravimetric analysis, the total loss of mass was less than 2.9%. Although the mass loss was significantly low, it was attributed to the loss of water at lower temperatures and probably some impurities at temperatures above 200 °C. This is because the characterization was performed with the glass fibers as received without purification.
The N2 adsorption/desorption technique was used to measure the surface area and pore size of the glass fibers. BET was performed with TriStar II from Micromeritics. The results are shown in Figure 3.
As we can see from the results of the BET measurement in Figure 3, the hysteresis loop was not fully completed. This is due to the very small surface area of the glass fibers. The BET surface area was determined to be 0.25 m2/g and the pore size 2.29 nm. Since the available surface area is small, we have to use a larger mass of the support for the immobilization of the enzyme compared to supports with a larger available surface area.

2.2. Hydrolysis of Lactose

Each experiment was performed in duplicate and the highest standard deviation in conversion was observed to be 3.1%.
First, we tested the influence of GA and APTES concentration on the yield of immobilization of β-galactosidase and further on the hydrolysis of lactose conversion.
The immobilization procedure was performed with four different GA concentrations (φGA = 0.5, 1, 2, 5%), while the APTES concentration (φAPTES = 10%) and the β-galactosidase enzyme concentrations were kept constant. The dynamic profiles of lactose conversion until a steady state was reached are shown in Figure 4a. The hydrolysis of lactose was carried out over a period of 4 h and samples were taken every hour to analyze the amount of glucose formed. In this step, the experiments were carried out at a temperature of T = 30 °C and with a substrate flow rate of qV = 3 mL/min. The lactose solutions were prepared with phosphate buffer at pH = 7 and a concentration of c = 0.05 mol/L.
Figure 4a shows that a steady state was reached after 1 h and that the highest conversion of lactose (30%) was achieved with GA at a concentration of φGA = 0.5%.
We continued with the experiments by changing the concentrations of APTES using the previously determined optimal concentration of GA (φGA = 0.5%). Figure 4b shows that the highest lactose conversion (30%) was achieved with APTES at a concentration of φAPTES = 10%.
The optimal concentration of APTES for successful β-galactosidase immobilization varies [30,31]. Therefore, we tested the immobilization procedure with APTES at concentrations of φAPTES = 10% and 20%. Since a higher concentration only decreased the immobilization efficiency (Figure 4b), we continued the study with the previously reported value. We assume that we obtained better immobilization efficiency with lower concentrations of GA and APTES because the support has low surface area and, thus, lower amounts of reagents are sufficient. This is important because of possible applications in the food industry. In particular, the toxicity of GA and APTES should be investigated before use [32].
After determining the optimal immobilization conditions (φGA = 0.5% and φAPTES = 10%), we investigated the influence of substrate flow rate, reaction temperature and pH on lactose conversion.
The influence of the lactose flow rate (1, 2, 3 mL/min) on the final conversion is shown in Figure 5. These experiments were performed at temperatures of T = (20, 25 and 30 °C). The reaction of lactose hydrolysis was carried out for 4 h. As expected, at 20 °C, the lowest lactose flow rate, qV = 1 mL/min, resulted in the highest conversion of lactose, namely 38.7%. At the two higher flow rates, the conversion was almost the same, at 26.8%.
In the next step, we repeated the experiments at 25 °C. Again, we investigated the effects of the flow rate of the lactose solution on the reaction conversion (Figure 5).
At a temperature of T = 25 °C and a flow rate of qV = 1 mL/min, a conversion of up to 50% was reached. At higher flow rates, the conversions were again similar at around 29%.
Regardless of the temperature, we observed that at low flow rates (qV = 1 mL/min), the shape of the glass fiber roll apparently allowed good contact between the substrate and immobilized enzyme, while at higher flow rates, some of the substrate flowed through the small hole in the middle of the roll, where there was less contact with the enzyme and, consequently, conversions were noticeably lower. For possible industrial application, it would be more appropriate to cut the sheets of glass fibers to the shape of the reactor and stack them horizontally in a column-like shape.
Figure 5 shows that at 30 °C, the highest conversion of lactose was 56% at the lowest flow rate and more than 30% lower at the two higher flow rates. The difference in conversion of lactose of about 5% was observed between 2 and 3 mL/min only at the highest temperature of 30 °C, while the profiles of lactose conversion at the two highest flow rates were practically the same at the two lower temperatures (20 and 25 °C). The difference is probably more pronounced at higher temperatures, which is due to the higher reaction rate.
A direct comparison with literature data is not possible, but in a study that was performed in a continuous packed bed reactor with β-galactosidase immobilized on double-layered hydrophilic polymer-coated magnetic nanoparticles, 100% conversion was achieved [15]. Comparison of lactose bioconversion has shown that in different reactors using different support materials for β-galactosidase immobilization, lactose conversion rates were between 38% and 88% [33].
If we compare the conversions of lactose at the same flow rate as a function of temperature (Figure 5), we see that within this temperature range, the conversion of lactose increases with increasing temperature. We could probably expect a higher conversion if we further decreased the flow rate of lactose. However, for our study, we only tested the efficiency of immobilization at three selected flow rates. The optimal temperature range for the hydrolysis of lactose is between 25 and 50 °C and depends on whether the enzyme is free or immobilized [1,15,34].
In order to determine the optimal values of the most important process parameters for the lactose hydrolysis reaction, we also investigated the influence of the pH of the phosphate buffer used for the preparation of the lactose solutions. We performed the hydrolysis of lactose at three pH values of the substrate: 6, 7 and 8. Figure 6 shows the conversion profiles during the reaction until a steady state was reached for different pH values of the lactose solution.
From all three conversion profiles in Figure 6, we can see that a steady state was reached after about 3 h. The highest conversion of lactose (50%) was obtained at pH = 7, while the conversion of lactose was slightly lower at pH = 6 (40%) and less than 10% at pH = 8. As can be seen in the literature, the optimal pH of lactose hydrolysis using the β-galactosidase enzyme varies depending on the origin of the β-galactosidase, the type of enzyme (free or immobilized) and the substrate used [34,35,36]. The optimal pH for immobilized β-galactosidase on a Cu-trimesic acid support was found at pH = 7 [35], on polymer-coated magnetic nanoparticles at pH = 6 [15] and for free β-galactosidase entrapped in calcium alginate at pH = 7 [1].
After obtaining the optimal process conditions for the immobilization and hydrolysis reaction, we investigated the possibilities of reusing the immobilized β-galactosidase enzyme. The immobilized enzyme was used repeatedly for three cycles (Figure 7).
The highest conversion of lactose that was reached after 2 h was around 20%. Figure 7 shows that the immobilization of the β-galactosidase enzyme on the glass fiber rolls preserved enzyme activity and stability. The same roll was reused for three consecutive lactose hydrolysis reactions with almost unchanged conversion, which certainly indicates high immobilization efficiency and practically no leakage of the enzyme from the support during the reaction and during cleaning of the glass fiber rolls between reactions.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Substrates and Chemicals

Lactose 1-hydrate from Panreac Quimica S.A.U. (Barcelona, Spain) was used as the substance for the hydrolysis study. A phosphate buffer was prepared with di-potassium hydrogen phosphate and potassium dihydrogen phosphate (from Emsure, Madrid, Spain). A liquid β-galactosidase enzyme from Kluyveromyces lactis was purchased from Sigma Aldrich (≥2600 U/g) (St. Louis, MO, USA). We purified the glass fibers with deionized water, ethanol (w ≥ 99%, Sigma Aldrich) and acetone (w ≥ 99.5%, Carlo Erba, Milano, Italy). Glutaraldehyde (GA, w = 25%, Sigma Aldrich) served as a cross-linking agent for the amino group of the network linker 3-(triethoxysilyl)-propylamine (APTES, Merck, Darmstadt, Germany). This enabled the covalent bonding of the enzyme to the modified glass fiber support. The woven glass fibers (Figure 8) were produced by the company Swatycomet d.o.o. and used as a solid support for the immobilization of the enzyme β-galactosidase. This material is used by the company for the production of grinding wheels for better cutting or grinding. This process produces some glass fiber waste that could be reused to support the immobilized enzymes. This would reduce the amount of waste produced, which is good for the environment and the economics of industrial applications. Glass fibers are silicates made from a melt consisting of 70% SiO2 and 30% Al2O3. They have excellent tensile and compressive strength, temperature resistance, dimensional stability, low thermal conductivity and good fire resistance. Glucose (w ≥ 99.5%, Sigma Aldrich) was used for the preparation of standard solutions, which were used together with the glucose reagent GOD/PAP (Roche (Basel, Switzerland)/Hitachi (Tokyo, Japan)) to determine the concentration of glucose formed during the reaction and in the standard solutions. Albumin from bovine serum (BSA, Sigma Aldrich) and Coomassie Brilliant Blue reagent (Sigma) were used for the determination of proteins.

3.2. Characterization of Glass Fibers

Optical microscopy, scanning electron microscopy, thermogravimetric analysis and N2 adsorption/desorption techniques were used to characterize the as-received glass fibers.

3.3. Immobilization

The immobilization procedure consisted of three main steps: preparation of the glass fibers, their purification and the immobilization of the β-galactosidase enzyme.
The β-galactosidase was immobilized on a 20 × 60 cm2 glass fiber sheet. After the glass fiber sheet was cut to the desired dimensions, it was dried in a dryer at 100 °C for 2 h. The dried glass fiber sheet with a mass of 28 g was then folded three times on the long edge and placed in a flat square container. The glass fibers were cleaned with a mixture of 66 mL of deionized water, 66 mL of ethanol and 66 mL of acetone to ensure that all impurities were removed. The glass fibers were shaken for 10 min at 25 min−1 in this cleaning solution. After the cleaning process, the glass fibers were rinsed with acetone. The cleaned glass fibers were then shaken with 200 mL of a 10% v/v APTES solution in acetone for 10 min at 25 min−1. After rinsing with acetone and additionally with phosphate buffer, they were treated with 200 mL of a 0.5% v/v solution of glutaraldehyde in phosphate buffer by shaking for 10 min at 25 min−1. Then, the glass fibers were rinsed with phosphate buffer. The last step in this procedure was the immobilization of the enzyme β-galactosidase on the prepared support. We prepared the solution of the enzyme by diluting 200 μL of β-galactosidase in 200 mL of phosphate buffer. This solution was then poured over the glass fibers and everything was shaken at 25 min−1 for 60 min. At the end, the glass fibers with the immobilized β-galactosidase were rinsed again with phosphate buffer to remove unbound enzyme. The sheet of glass fibers with immobilized β-galactosidase enzyme was rolled up, placed in the measuring cylinder filled with phosphate buffer, and left in the refrigerator overnight.

3.4. Hydrolysis of Lactose by Immobilized β-Galactosidase

Lactase or β-galactosidase is an enzyme used for the degradation (hydrolysis) of lactose. It catalyzes chemical reactions by converting lactose into two monosaccharides, glucose and galactose. The enzyme was covalently bound to a modified support (glass fiber rolls) as previously described. All experiments were carried out in a continuous catalytic laboratory reactor CEU from Armfield. The glass fiber roll containing the immobilized β-galactosidase enzyme was placed in a double-walled continuous flow reactor and then the reactor was filled with phosphate buffer at the desired pH such that all air bubbles were removed. The reactor contents were then preheated to the desired temperature. The experiment was begun by pumping the lactose solution through the reactor. The lactose solution was prepared by diluting an appropriate amount of lactose 1-hydrate in the phosphate buffer with the desired pH and a concentration of c = 0.05 mol/L to obtain a lactose solution with a concentration of γ = 6 g/L. During the reaction, samples were taken at different time intervals for up to 4 h. Each sample was treated at 100 °C for a few minutes to denature any enzymes that might leak from the glass fiber support into the sample. We performed the experiments at different temperatures of 20, 25 and 30 °C, substrate flow rates of 1, 2 and 3 mL/min, and pH values of 6, 7 and 8. The conversion of lactose was determined by measuring the glucose concentration formed with a spectrophotometer at 510 nm.

3.5. Analysis Procedure

By analyzing standard solutions of glucose with the concentrations γ = (0, 1, 2, 3 and 4 g/L), the standard curve was obtained. The standard curve was used to determine the glucose concentrations in the samples. To the 990 μL of the glucose GOD/PAP reagent in the Eppendorf tube, 10 μL of the glucose standard solution or the sample solution was added, mixed thoroughly and thermostated at 35 °C for 10 min. The colored solution was transferred to the cuvette and then the absorbance was measured at 510 nm.

3.6. Bradford Analysis Procedure

The Bradford test was utilized for the determination of proteins. The standard solutions were prepared from albumin from bovine serum diluted in deionized water. The Bradford test was used to determine the amount of immobilized β-galactosidase enzyme from the difference in the concentration of proteins before and after the immobilization procedure. The concentrations of the proteins were determined by mixing the protein-containing solutions with Coomassie Brilliant Blue reagent and measuring the absorbance of the resulting solutions at 595 nm using a spectrophotometer. The Bradford test was performed for each immobilization procedure. The immobilization procedure was the same for all experiments and the quantity of immobilized enzyme was almost the same; thus, the average value of the immobilized β-galactosidase enzyme was calculated. On a single glass fiber sheet, approximately 0.49 mg of β-galactosidase enzyme was immobilized.

4. Conclusions

The main objective of this study was to investigate the possibility of using industrial glass fibers as a matrix for the immobilization of the enzyme β-galactosidase. Typically, this material is used in the production of cutting disks and coated abrasives. This residue is cheap and widely available. On the other hand, the enzymatic hydrolysis of sugars by the enzyme β-galactosidase, which produces glucose and galactose monosaccharides, is becoming an important biotechnological process with application in the dairy industry.
The enzyme β-galactosidase was immobilized on sheets of glass fibers rolled into a cylindrical shape. We determined the optimal conditions for immobilization: the pH of the phosphate buffer (pH = 7), the concentration of APTES (φAPTES = 10%) and the concentration of glutaraldehyde (φGA = 0.5%). The efficiency of immobilization was tested using the known hydrolysis of lactose. Conversions of up to 55% were obtained, which confirms the strong activity of the immobilized biocatalyst. The shape of the glass fiber rolls allows good contact between the substrate and the immobilized enzyme at a low flow rate (qV = 1 mL/min) and a temperature of T = 30 °C. At higher flow rates, the substrate flowed through the small hole in the center of the roll, resulting in lower conversion.
We also checked the activity and stability of the enzyme immobilized on the glass fiber rolls during its reuse, which remained almost unchanged after three reactions. Our results show great potential for possible industrial applications.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, D.P.; methodology, D.P.; validation, D.P. and K.Z.; formal analysis, D.P. and K.Z.; investigation, K.Z.; data curation, D.P.; writing—original draft preparation, D.P. and K.Z.; writing—review and editing, D.P. and A.G.; supervision, D.P. and A.G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Slovenian Research Agency (ARIS) within research program “Process systems engineering and sustainable development” with the code P2-0414.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available in the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Argenta, A.B.; Nogueira, A.; Scheer, A.D.P. Hydrolysis of whey lactose: Kluyveromyces lactis β-galactosidase immobilisation and integrated process hydrolysis-ultrafiltration. Int. Dairy J. 2021, 117, 105007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Mohamad, N.R.; Marzuki, N.H.C.; Buang, N.A.; Huyop, F.; Wahab, R.A. An overview of technologies for immobilization of enzymes and surface analysis techniques for immobilized enzymes. Biotechnol. Biotechnol. Equip. 2015, 29, 205–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Panesar, P.S.; Kumari, S.; Panesar, R. Potential Applications of Immobilized β-Galactosidase in Food Processing Industries. Enzym. Res. 2010, 2010, 473137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Souza, C.J.F.; Garcia-Rojas, E.E.; Souza, C.S.F.; Vriesmann, L.C.; Vicente, J.; de Carvalho, M.G.; Petkowicz, C.L.O.; Favaro-Trindade, C.S. Immobilization of β-galactosidase by complexation: Effect of interaction on the properties of the enzyme. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019, 122, 594–602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Wolf, M.; Tambourgi, E.B.; Paulino, A.T. Stability of β-D-galactosidase immobilized in polysaccharide-based hydrogels. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2021, 609, 125679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. González-Delgado, I.; Segura, Y.; Martín, A.; López-Muñoz, M.-J.; Morales, G. β-galactosidase covalent immobilization over large-pore mesoporous silica supports for the production of high galacto-oligosaccharides (GOS). Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2018, 257, 51–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Salvi, H.M.; Yadav, G.D. Surface functionalization of SBA-15 for immobilization of lipase and its application in synthesis of alkyl levulinates: Optimization and kinetics. Biocatal. Agric. Biotechnol. 2019, 18, 101038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Soares, C.M.F.; Barbosa, M.S.; Santos, S.B.; Mattedi, S.; Lima, Á.S.; Pereira, M.M.; Tecelão, C.; Ferreira-Dias, S. Production of Human Milk Fat Substitutes by Lipase-Catalyzed Acidolysis: Immobilization, Synthesis, Molecular Docking and Optimization Studies. Catalysts 2023, 13, 825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Ansari, S.A.; Husain, Q. Lactose hydrolysis from milk/whey in batch and continuous processes by concanavalin A-Celite 545 immobilized Aspergillus oryzae β-galactosidase. Food Bioprod. Process. 2012, 90, 351–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Xu, M.; Ji, D.; Deng, Y.; Agyei, D. Preparation and assessment of cross-linked enzyme aggregates (CLEAs) of β-galactosidase from Lactobacillus leichmannii 313. Food Bioprod. Process. 2020, 124, 82–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Heinks, T.; Montua, N.; Teune, M.; Liedtke, J.; Höhne, M.; Bornscheuer, U.T.; Fischer von Mollard, G. Comparison of Four Immobilization Methods for Different Transaminases. Catalysts 2023, 13, 300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. de Freitas, L.A.; de Sousa, M.; Ribeiro, L.B.; de França, Í.W.L.; Gonçalves, L.R.B. Magnetic CLEAs of β-Galactosidase from Aspergillus oryzae as a Potential Biocatalyst to Produce Tagatose from Lactose. Catalysts 2023, 13, 306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. de Carvalho-Silva, J.; da Silva, M.F.; de Lima, J.S.; Porto, T.S.; de Carvalho, L.B.; Converti, A. Thermodynamic and Kinetic Investigation on Aspergillus ficuum Tannase Immobilized in Calcium Alginate Beads and Magnetic Nanoparticles. Catalysts 2023, 13, 1304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Costa, G.P.; Queiroz, L.B.; Manfroi, V.; Rodrigues, R.C.; Hertz, P.F. Immobilization of Alpha Acetolactate Decarboxylase in Hybrid Gelatin/Alginate Support for Application to Reduce Diacetyl Off-Flavor in Beer. Catalysts 2023, 13, 601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Bayramoglu, G.; Cimen, A.G.; Arica, M.Y. Immobilisation of β-galactosidase onto double layered hydrophilic polymer coated magnetic nanoparticles: Preparation, characterisation and lactose hydrolysis. Int. Dairy J. 2023, 138, 105545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Pottratz, I.; Müller, I.; Hamel, C. Potential and Scale-Up of Pore-Through-Flow Membrane Reactors for the Production of Prebiotic Galacto-Oligosaccharides with Immobilized β-Galactosidase. Catalysts 2022, 12, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Elnashar, M.M.; Awad, G.E.; Hassan, M.E.; Mohy Eldin, M.S.; Haroun, B.M.; El-Diwany, A.I. Optimal Immobilization of β-Galactosidase onto κ-Carrageenan Gel Beads Using Response Surface Methodology and Its Applications. Sci. World J. 2014, 2014, 571682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Urrutia, P.; Bernal, C.; Wilson, L.; Illanes, A. Use of chitosan heterofunctionality for enzyme immobilization: β-galactosidase immobilization for galacto-oligosaccharide synthesis. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2018, 116, 182–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Zhang, S.; Gao, S.; Gao, G. Immobilization of β-Galactosidase onto Magnetic Beads. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2010, 160, 1386–1393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Poletto, M.; Parascandola, P.; Saracino, I.; Cifarelli, G. Hydrolysis of Lactose in a Fluidized Bed of Zeolite Pellets Supporting Adsorbed ß-Galactosidase. Int. J. Chem. React. Eng. 2005, 3, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Silva, R.C.; Trevisan, M.G.; Garcia, J.S. β-galactosidase Encapsulated in Carrageenan, Pectin and Carrageenan/Pectin: Comparative Study, Stability and Controlled Release. An. Acad. Bras. Ciências 2020, 92, e20180609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Yassin, M.A.; Naguib, M.; Abdel Rehim, M.H.; Ali, K.A. Immobilization of β-galactosidase on Carrageenan Gel via bio-inspired Polydopamine Coating. J. Text. Color. Polym. Sci. 2018, 15, 85–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. El-Masry, M.M.; De Maio, A.; Martelli, P.L.; Casadio, R.; Moustafa, A.B.; Rossi, S.; Mita, D.G. Influence of the immobilization process on the activity of β-galactosidase bound to Nylon membranes grafted with glycidyl methacrylate: Part 1. Isothermal behavior. J. Mol. Catal. B Enzym. 2001, 16, 175–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Klein, M.P.; Nunes, M.R.; Rodrigues, R.C.; Benvenutti, E.V.; Costa, T.M.H.; Hertz, P.F.; Ninow, J.L. Effect of the Support Size on the Properties of β-Galactosidase Immobilized on Chitosan: Advantages and Disadvantages of Macro and Nanoparticles. Biomacromolecules 2012, 13, 2456–2464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Ricardi, N.C.; de Menezes, E.W.; Valmir Benvenutti, E.; da Natividade Schöffer, J.; Hackenhaar, C.R.; Hertz, P.F.; Costa, T.M.H. Highly stable novel silica/chitosan support for β-galactosidase immobilization for application in dairy technology. Food Chem. 2018, 246, 343–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Tanriseven, A.; Doğan, Ş. A novel method for the immobilization of β-galactosidase. Process Biochem. 2002, 38, 27–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Mariotti, M.P.; Yamanaka, H.; Araujo, A.R.; Trevisan, H.C. Hydrolysis of whey lactose by immobilized β-Galactosidase. Braz. Arch. Biol. Technol. 2008, 51, 1233–1240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Yeon, J.H.; Jung, K.H. Repeated-batch operation of immobilized β-galactosidase inclusion bodies-containing Escherichia coli cell reactor for lactose hydrolysis. J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2011, 21, 972–978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Jurado, E.; Camacho, F.; Luzón, G.; Vicaria, J.M. Kinetic and enzymatic adsorption model in a recirculation hollow-fibre bioreactor. Bioprocess Biosyst. Eng. 2005, 28, 27–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Ladero, M.; Santos, A.; Garcıa-Ochoa, F. Kinetic modeling of lactose hydrolysis with an immobilized β-galactosidase from Kluyveromyces fragilis. Enzym. Microb. Technol. 2000, 27, 583–592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Song, Y.S.; Shin, H.Y.; Lee, J.Y.; Park, C.; Kim, S.W. β-Galactosidase-immobilised microreactor fabricated using a novel technique for enzyme immobilisation and its application for continuous synthesis of lactulose. Food Chem. 2012, 133, 611–617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Beauchamp, R.O., Jr.; St Clair, M.B.; Fennell, T.R.; Clarke, D.O.; Morgan, K.T.; Kari, F.W. A critical review of the toxicology of glutaraldehyde. Crit. Rev. Toxicol. 1992, 22, 143–174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Misson, M.; Jin, B.; Dai, S.; Zhang, H. Interfacial Biocatalytic Performance of Nanofiber-Supported β-Galactosidase for Production of Galacto-Oligosaccharides. Catalysts 2020, 10, 81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Limnaios, A.; Tsevdou, M.; Tsika, E.; Korialou, N.; Zerva, A.; Topakas, E.; Taoukis, P. Production of Prebiotic Galacto-Oligosaccharides from Acid Whey Catalyzed by a Novel β-Galactosidase from Thermothielavioides terrestris and Commercial Lactases: A Comparative Study. Catalysts 2023, 13, 1360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Al-Harbi, S.A.; Almulaiky, Y.Q. Cu-trimesic acid-based metal organic frameworks for improved ß-galactosidase immobilization: Enhanced stability, reusability and lactose hydrolysis. J. Mol. Liq. 2023, 392, 123456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Shi, X.; Wu, D.; Xu, Y.; Yu, X. Engineering the optimum pH of β-galactosidase from Aspergillus oryzae for efficient hydrolysis of lactose. J. Dairy Sci. 2022, 105, 4772–4782. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Scanning electron microscopy image of glass fibers (100× magnification).
Figure 1. Scanning electron microscopy image of glass fibers (100× magnification).
Catalysts 13 01503 g001
Figure 2. Thermogravimetric analysis results of glass fibers (TGA).
Figure 2. Thermogravimetric analysis results of glass fibers (TGA).
Catalysts 13 01503 g002
Figure 3. N2 adsorption/desorption results of glass fibers (BET).
Figure 3. N2 adsorption/desorption results of glass fibers (BET).
Catalysts 13 01503 g003
Figure 4. Conversion of lactose regarding residence time using (a) different concentrations of GA (T = 30 °C, qV = 3 mL/min, φAPTES = 10%) and (b) different concentrations of APTES (T = 30 °C, qV = 3 mL/min, φGA = 0.5%).
Figure 4. Conversion of lactose regarding residence time using (a) different concentrations of GA (T = 30 °C, qV = 3 mL/min, φAPTES = 10%) and (b) different concentrations of APTES (T = 30 °C, qV = 3 mL/min, φGA = 0.5%).
Catalysts 13 01503 g004
Figure 5. Conversion of lactose regarding residence time at different flow rates and temperatures (φAPTES = 10%, φGA = 0.5%).
Figure 5. Conversion of lactose regarding residence time at different flow rates and temperatures (φAPTES = 10%, φGA = 0.5%).
Catalysts 13 01503 g005
Figure 6. Conversion of lactose regarding residence time at different pH of the substrate (T = 25 °C, qV = 1 mL/min, φAPTES = 10%, φGA = 0.5%).
Figure 6. Conversion of lactose regarding residence time at different pH of the substrate (T = 25 °C, qV = 1 mL/min, φAPTES = 10%, φGA = 0.5%).
Catalysts 13 01503 g006
Figure 7. Conversion of lactose regarding residence time after immobilized β-galactosidase enzyme reuse (T = 30 °C, qV = 3 mL/min, φAPTES = 10%, φGA = 0.5%).
Figure 7. Conversion of lactose regarding residence time after immobilized β-galactosidase enzyme reuse (T = 30 °C, qV = 3 mL/min, φAPTES = 10%, φGA = 0.5%).
Catalysts 13 01503 g007
Figure 8. Part of the sheet of glass fibers at 40× magnification under optical microscope.
Figure 8. Part of the sheet of glass fibers at 40× magnification under optical microscope.
Catalysts 13 01503 g008
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Pečar, D.; Zečević, K.; Goršek, A. The Immobilization of β-Galactosidase on Glass Fiber Rolls. Catalysts 2023, 13, 1503. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal13121503

AMA Style

Pečar D, Zečević K, Goršek A. The Immobilization of β-Galactosidase on Glass Fiber Rolls. Catalysts. 2023; 13(12):1503. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal13121503

Chicago/Turabian Style

Pečar, Darja, Katja Zečević, and Andreja Goršek. 2023. "The Immobilization of β-Galactosidase on Glass Fiber Rolls" Catalysts 13, no. 12: 1503. https://doi.org/10.3390/catal13121503

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop