MDPI Contact

MDPI AG
St. Alban-Anlage 66,
4052 Basel, Switzerland
Support contact
Tel. +41 61 683 77 34
Fax: +41 61 302 89 18

For more contact information, see here.

Advanced Search

You can use * to search for partial matches.

Search Results

4 articles matched your search query. Search Parameters:
Authors = Marko Munih

Matches by word:

MARKO (88) , MUNIH (4)

View options
order results:
result details:
results per page:
Articles per page View Sort by
Displaying article 1-50 on page 1 of 1.
Export citation of selected articles as:
Open AccessArticle Estimation of Joint Forces and Moments for the In-Run and Take-Off in Ski Jumping Based on Measurements with Wearable Inertial Sensors
Sensors 2015, 15(5), 11258-11276; doi:10.3390/s150511258
Received: 24 March 2015 / Revised: 1 May 2015 / Accepted: 8 May 2015 / Published: 13 May 2015
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1592 | PDF Full-text (1130 KB) | HTML Full-text | XML Full-text
Abstract
This study uses inertial sensors to measure ski jumper kinematics and joint dynamics, which was until now only a part of simulation studies. For subsequent calculation of dynamics in the joints, a link-segment model was developed. The model relies on the recursive Newton–Euler
[...] Read more.
This study uses inertial sensors to measure ski jumper kinematics and joint dynamics, which was until now only a part of simulation studies. For subsequent calculation of dynamics in the joints, a link-segment model was developed. The model relies on the recursive Newton–Euler inverse dynamics. This approach allowed the calculation of the ground reaction force at take-off. For the model validation, four ski jumpers from the National Nordic center performed a simulated jump in a laboratory environment on a force platform; in total, 20 jumps were recorded. The results fit well to the reference system, presenting small errors in the mean and standard deviation and small root-mean-square errors. The error is under 12% of the reference value. For field tests, six jumpers participated in the study; in total, 28 jumps were recorded. All of the measured forces and moments were within the range of prior simulated studies. The proposed system was able to indirectly provide the values of forces and moments in the joints of the ski-jumpers’ body segments, as well as the ground reaction force during the in-run and take-off phases in comparison to the force platform installed on the table. Kinematics assessment and estimation of dynamics parameters can be applied to jumps from any ski jumping hill. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sensor Systems for Motion Capture and Interpretation)
Figures

Open AccessArticle Toward Real-Time Automated Detection of Turns during Gait Using Wearable Inertial Measurement Units
Sensors 2014, 14(10), 18800-18822; doi:10.3390/s141018800
Received: 14 April 2014 / Revised: 28 July 2014 / Accepted: 28 September 2014 / Published: 10 October 2014
Cited by 11 | Viewed by 2201 | PDF Full-text (3153 KB) | HTML Full-text | XML Full-text
Abstract
Previous studies have presented algorithms for detection of turns during gait using wearable sensors, but those algorithms were not built for real-time use. This paper therefore investigates the optimal approach for real-time detection of planned turns during gait using wearable inertial measurement units.
[...] Read more.
Previous studies have presented algorithms for detection of turns during gait using wearable sensors, but those algorithms were not built for real-time use. This paper therefore investigates the optimal approach for real-time detection of planned turns during gait using wearable inertial measurement units. Several different sensor positions (head, back and legs) and three different detection criteria (orientation, angular velocity and both) are compared with regard to their ability to correctly detect turn onset. Furthermore, the different sensor positions are compared with regard to their ability to predict the turn direction and amplitude. The evaluation was performed on ten healthy subjects who performed left/right turns at three amplitudes (22, 45 and 90 degrees). Results showed that turn onset can be most accurately detected with sensors on the back and using a combination of orientation and angular velocity. The same setup also gives the best prediction of turn direction and amplitude. Preliminary measurements with a single amputee were also performed and highlighted important differences such as slower turning that need to be taken into account. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Biomedical Sensors and Systems)
Figures

Open AccessArticle Online Phase Detection Using Wearable Sensors for Walking with a Robotic Prosthesis
Sensors 2014, 14(2), 2776-2794; doi:10.3390/s140202776
Received: 19 November 2013 / Revised: 19 January 2014 / Accepted: 23 January 2014 / Published: 11 February 2014
Cited by 24 | Viewed by 2663 | PDF Full-text (1590 KB) | HTML Full-text | XML Full-text
Abstract
This paper presents a gait phase detection algorithm for providing feedback in walking with a robotic prosthesis. The algorithm utilizes the output signals of a wearable wireless sensory system incorporating sensorized shoe insoles and inertial measurement units attached to body segments. The principle
[...] Read more.
This paper presents a gait phase detection algorithm for providing feedback in walking with a robotic prosthesis. The algorithm utilizes the output signals of a wearable wireless sensory system incorporating sensorized shoe insoles and inertial measurement units attached to body segments. The principle of detecting transitions between gait phases is based on heuristic threshold rules, dividing a steady-state walking stride into four phases. For the evaluation of the algorithm, experiments with three amputees, walking with the robotic prosthesis and wearable sensors, were performed. Results show a high rate of successful detection for all four phases (the average success rate across all subjects >90%). A comparison of the proposed method to an off-line trained algorithm using hidden Markov models reveals a similar performance achieved without the need for learning dataset acquisition and previous model training. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Wearable Gait Sensors)
Figures

Open AccessReview A Flexible Sensor Technology for the Distributed Measurement of Interaction Pressure
Sensors 2013, 13(1), 1021-1045; doi:10.3390/s130101021
Received: 1 November 2012 / Revised: 8 January 2013 / Accepted: 8 January 2013 / Published: 15 January 2013
Cited by 32 | Viewed by 3489 | PDF Full-text (2061 KB) | HTML Full-text | XML Full-text
Abstract
We present a sensor technology for the measure of the physical human-robot interaction pressure developed in the last years at Scuola Superiore Sant’Anna. The system is composed of flexible matrices of opto-electronic sensors covered by a soft silicone cover. This sensory system is
[...] Read more.
We present a sensor technology for the measure of the physical human-robot interaction pressure developed in the last years at Scuola Superiore Sant’Anna. The system is composed of flexible matrices of opto-electronic sensors covered by a soft silicone cover. This sensory system is completely modular and scalable, allowing one to cover areas of any sizes and shapes, and to measure different pressure ranges. In this work we present the main application areas for this technology. A first generation of the system was used to monitor human-robot interaction in upper- (NEUROExos; Scuola Superiore Sant’Anna) and lower-limb (LOPES; University of Twente) exoskeletons for rehabilitation. A second generation, with increased resolution and wireless connection, was used to develop a pressure-sensitive foot insole and an improved human-robot interaction measurement systems. The experimental characterization of the latter system along with its validation on three healthy subjects is presented here for the first time. A perspective on future uses and development of the technology is finally drafted. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue State-of-the-Art Sensors Technology in Italy 2012)
Figures

Years

Subjects

Refine Subjects

Journals

Refine Journals

Article Types

Refine Types

Countries

Refine Countries
Back to Top