<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
    xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/"
    xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
    xmlns:prism="http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/1.2/basic/"
    xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#">
	<channel rdf:about="http://www.mdpi.com/rss/journal/sustainability">
		<title>Sustainability</title>
		<link>http://www.mdpi.com/journal/sustainability</link>
		<description>Latest open access articles published in Sustainability at http://www.mdpi.com/journal/sustainability/</description>
								<items>
			<rdf:Seq>
							<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/4/2/244/" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/4/2/227/" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/4/2/210/" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/4/2/193/" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/4/2/175/" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/4/2/154/" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/4/1/141/" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/4/1/123/" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/4/1/106/" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/4/1/92/" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/4/1/72/" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/4/1/42/" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/4/1/17/" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/4/1/1/" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/12/2500/" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/12/2496/" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/12/2470/" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/12/2456/" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/12/2443/" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/12/2433/" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/12/2413/" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/12/2392/" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/12/2358/" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/12/2339/" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/12/2323/" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/11/2307/" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/11/2289/" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/11/2268/" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/11/2229/" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/11/2217/" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/11/2200/" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/11/2182/" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/11/2157/" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/11/2129/" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/11/2115/" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/11/2105/" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/11/2080/" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/11/2071/" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/11/2050/" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/10/2027/" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/10/2009/" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/10/1986/" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/10/1972/" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/10/1944/" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/10/1908/" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/10/1888/" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/10/1866/" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/10/1855/" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/10/1833/" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/10/1810/" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/10/1796/" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/10/1792/" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/10/1778/" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/10/1773/" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/10/1742/" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/10/1723/" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/10/1688/" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/10/1662/" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/10/1637/" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/9/1616/" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/9/1593/" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/9/1573/" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/9/1555/" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/9/1531/" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/9/1517/" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/9/1510/" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/9/1486/" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/9/1452/" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/9/1416/" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/9/1399/" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/9/1381/" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/9/1357/" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/9/1341/" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/9/1323/" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/9/1302/" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/8/1282/" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/8/1265/" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/8/1250/" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/8/1234/" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/8/1224/" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/8/1206/" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/8/1190/" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/8/1170/" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/8/1136/" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/8/1114/" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/8/1090/" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/7/1074/" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/7/1064/" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/7/1035/" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/7/1022/" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/7/1003/" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/7/984/" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/7/965/" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/7/957/" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/7/955/" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/7/937/" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/6/914/" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/6/897/" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/6/875/" />
            				<rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/6/847/" />
                    	</rdf:Seq>
		</items>
				<cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/" />
	</channel>
	<item rdf:about="http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/4/2/244/">
	<title>Sustainability, Vol. 4, Pages 244-256: Bioenergy Villages and Regions in Germany: An Interview Study with Initiators of Communal Bioenergy Projects on the Success Factors for Restructuring the Energy Supply of the Community</title>
	<link>http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/4/2/244/</link>
	<description>Because of the serious problems related to an energy supply based mainly on fossil and nuclear fuels, the development of renewable energy sources is urgently needed. In Germany, many villages and communities take energy production into their own hands, following the principle of a community-related energy supply. Today, approximately 50 villages or communities in Germany have restructured their energy consumption patterns to rely primarily on locally available renewable energy sources for their electricity and heat. This article describes a qualitative interview study concerning the success factors for the implementation of bioenergy villages. The interviews were conducted with 25 individuals who initiated the restructuring of energy production in their villages toward bioenergy and other renewable energy sources, such as solar or wind energy.</description>
	
	<guid>http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/4/2/244/</guid>
	<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 00:00:00 CET</pubDate>
	
	<prism:publicationName>Sustainability</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2012-02-09</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>4</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>2</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>244</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:endingPage>256</prism:endingPage>
		<prism:issn>2071-1050</prism:issn>
	
	<dc:title>Bioenergy Villages and Regions in Germany: An Interview Study with Initiators of Communal Bioenergy Projects on the Success Factors for Restructuring the Energy Supply of the Community</dc:title>
	<dc:date>2012-02-09</dc:date>
	<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/su4020244</dc:identifier>
		<dc:creator>André Wüste</dc:creator>
		<dc:creator>Peter Schmuck</dc:creator>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/" />
</item>
	<item rdf:about="http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/4/2/227/">
	<title>Sustainability, Vol. 4, Pages 227-243: Employment Effects of Renewable Energy Expansion on a Regional Level—First Results of a Model-Based Approach for Germany</title>
	<link>http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/4/2/227/</link>
	<description>National studies have shown that both gross and net effects of the expansion of energy from renewable sources on employment are positive for Germany. These modeling approaches also revealed that this holds true for both present and future perspectives under certain assumptions on the development of exports, fossil fuel prices and national politics. Yet how are employment effects distributed within Germany? What components contribute to growth impacts on a regional level? To answer these questions (new) methods of regionalization were explored and developed for the example “wind energy onshore” for Germany’s federal states. The main goal was to develop a methodology which is applicable to all renewable energy technologies in future research. For the quantification and projection, it was necessary to distinguish between jobs generated by domestic investments and exports on the one hand, and jobs for operation and maintenance of existing plants on the other hand. Further, direct and indirect employment is analyzed. The results show, that gross employment is particularly high in the northwestern regions of Germany. However, especially the indirect effects are spread out over the whole country. Regions in the south not only profit from the delivery of specific components, but also from other industry and service inputs.</description>
	
	<guid>http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/4/2/227/</guid>
	<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 00:00:00 CET</pubDate>
	
	<prism:publicationName>Sustainability</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2012-02-07</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>4</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>2</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>227</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:endingPage>243</prism:endingPage>
		<prism:issn>2071-1050</prism:issn>
	
	<dc:title>Employment Effects of Renewable Energy Expansion on a Regional Level—First Results of a Model-Based Approach for Germany</dc:title>
	<dc:date>2012-02-07</dc:date>
	<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/su4020227</dc:identifier>
		<dc:creator>Philip Ulrich</dc:creator>
		<dc:creator>Martin Distelkamp</dc:creator>
		<dc:creator>Ulrike Lehr</dc:creator>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/" />
</item>
	<item rdf:about="http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/4/2/210/">
	<title>Sustainability, Vol. 4, Pages 210-226: Safe vs. Fair: A Formidable Trade-off in Tackling Climate Change</title>
	<link>http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/4/2/210/</link>
	<description>Global warming requires a response characterized by forward-looking management of atmospheric carbon and respect for ethical principles. Both safety and fairness must be pursued, and there are severe trade-offs as these are intertwined by the limited headroom for additional atmospheric CO2 emissions. This paper provides a simple numerical mapping at the aggregated level of developed vs. developing countries in which safety and fairness are formulated in terms of cumulative emissions and cumulative per capita emissions respectively. It becomes evident that safety and fairness cannot be achieved simultaneously for strict definitions of both. The paper further posits potential global trading in future cumulative emissions budgets in a world where financial transactions compensate for physical emissions: the safe vs. fair tradeoff is less severe but remains formidable. Finally, we explore very large deployment of engineered carbon sinks and show that roughly 1,000 Gt CO2 of cumulative negative emissions over the century are required to have a significant effect, a remarkable scale of deployment. We also identify the unexplored issue of how such sinks might be treated in sub-global carbon accounting.</description>
	
	<guid>http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/4/2/210/</guid>
	<pubDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 00:00:00 CET</pubDate>
	
	<prism:publicationName>Sustainability</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2012-02-06</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>4</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>2</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>210</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:endingPage>226</prism:endingPage>
		<prism:issn>2071-1050</prism:issn>
	
	<dc:title>Safe vs. Fair: A Formidable Trade-off in Tackling Climate Change</dc:title>
	<dc:date>2012-02-06</dc:date>
	<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/su4020210</dc:identifier>
		<dc:creator>Massimo Tavoni</dc:creator>
		<dc:creator>Shoibal Chakravarty</dc:creator>
		<dc:creator>Robert Socolow</dc:creator>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/" />
</item>
	<item rdf:about="http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/4/2/193/">
	<title>Sustainability, Vol. 4, Pages 193-209: Towards a Sustainable Spatial Organization of the Energy System: Backcasting Experiences from Austria</title>
	<link>http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/4/2/193/</link>
	<description>The transition to a sustainable energy system faces more challenges than a simple replacement of fossil energy sources by renewable ones. Since current structures do not favor sustainable energy generation and use, it is indispensable to change the existing infrastructure. A fundamental change of the energy system also requires re-organizing spatial structures and their respective institutions and governance structures. Especially in Austria, urban sprawl and unsustainable settlement structures are regarded as one of the main developments leading to increased energy demand. One of the aims within the project E-Trans 2050 was to identify socio-economic constellations that are central to the further transformation of the energy system and to focus on actors and their socio-technical framework conditions. Based on a sustainable future vision for the year 2050 a backcasting workshop was conducted to identify necessary steps for the envisaged transition to a more sustainable energy system. The results shed light on the necessary changes for a transformation towards sustainability in the specific Austrian situation. Critical issues are region-specific production of energy and its use, settlement and regional structures and values and role models, which all have a determining influence on energy demand. Combining the knowledge of extensive energy use with available energy resources in spatial planning decisions is a main challenge towards a long term sustainable energy system.</description>
	
	<guid>http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/4/2/193/</guid>
	<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 00:00:00 CET</pubDate>
	
	<prism:publicationName>Sustainability</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2012-02-02</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>4</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>2</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>193</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:endingPage>209</prism:endingPage>
		<prism:issn>2071-1050</prism:issn>
	
	<dc:title>Towards a Sustainable Spatial Organization of the Energy System: Backcasting Experiences from Austria</dc:title>
	<dc:date>2012-02-02</dc:date>
	<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/su4020193</dc:identifier>
		<dc:creator>Petra Wächter</dc:creator>
		<dc:creator>Michael Ornetzeder</dc:creator>
		<dc:creator>Harald Rohracher</dc:creator>
		<dc:creator>Anna Schreuer</dc:creator>
		<dc:creator>Markus Knoflacher</dc:creator>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/" />
</item>
	<item rdf:about="http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/4/2/175/">
	<title>Sustainability, Vol. 4, Pages 175-192: Sustainable Product Service Systems in Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs): Opportunities in the Leather Manufacturing Industry</title>
	<link>http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/4/2/175/</link>
	<description>This paper presents an approach to identify opportunities to develop sustainable Product Service Systems (PSS) involving Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs). The purpose of the research is to build understanding of how the integration of product and service design and the use of Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) can contribute to identify opportunities to develop sustainable PSS involving SMEs. In order to develop the approach, research with 16 Colombian Manufacturing SMEs was carried out. A reference model and four generic types of PSS according to the relationships between product and service design and ICT are used to analyse the data. Finally, the possibility of extending the approach into a general framework to work with other industries is discussed.</description>
	
	<guid>http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/4/2/175/</guid>
	<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jan 2012 00:00:00 CET</pubDate>
	
	<prism:publicationName>Sustainability</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2012-01-30</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>4</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>2</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>175</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:endingPage>192</prism:endingPage>
		<prism:issn>2071-1050</prism:issn>
	
	<dc:title>Sustainable Product Service Systems in Small and Medium Enterprises (SMEs): Opportunities in the Leather Manufacturing Industry</dc:title>
	<dc:date>2012-01-30</dc:date>
	<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/su4020175</dc:identifier>
		<dc:creator>Ricardo J. Hernández Pardo</dc:creator>
		<dc:creator>Tracy Bhamra</dc:creator>
		<dc:creator>Ran Bhamra</dc:creator>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/" />
</item>
	<item rdf:about="http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/4/2/154/">
	<title>Sustainability, Vol. 4, Pages 154-174: Sustainable Manufacturing and Design: Concepts, Practices and Needs</title>
	<link>http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/4/2/154/</link>
	<description>An investigation is reported on the importance of integrating sustainability with manufacturing and design, along with other objectives such as function, competitiveness, profitability and productivity. The need of utilizing appropriate tools like design for environment, life cycle assessment and other environmentally sound practices that are cognizant of the entire life cycle of a process or product is highlighted. It is likely that sustainability and environmental stewardship will be increasingly important considerations in manufacturing and design in the future and are likely to influence the main priorities for advancing manufacturing operations and technologies. Designers and manufacturing decision makers who adopt a sustainability focus and establish a sustainability culture within companies are more likely to be successful in enhancing design and manufacturing. It is concluded that more extensive research and collaboration is needed to improve understanding of sustainability in manufacturing and design, and to enhance technology transfer and applications of sustainability.</description>
	
	<guid>http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/4/2/154/</guid>
	<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 00:00:00 CET</pubDate>
	
	<prism:publicationName>Sustainability</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2012-01-24</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>4</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>2</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Review</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>154</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:endingPage>174</prism:endingPage>
		<prism:issn>2071-1050</prism:issn>
	
	<dc:title>Sustainable Manufacturing and Design: Concepts, Practices and Needs</dc:title>
	<dc:date>2012-01-24</dc:date>
	<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/su4020154</dc:identifier>
		<dc:creator>Marc A. Rosen</dc:creator>
		<dc:creator>Hossam A. Kishawy</dc:creator>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/" />
</item>
	<item rdf:about="http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/4/1/141/">
	<title>Sustainability, Vol. 4, Pages 141-153: Sustainable and Integrated Development—A Critical Analysis</title>
	<link>http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/4/1/141/</link>
	<description>The words “Sustainable Development” are frequently used by very lightly, to the extent that they have lost their meaning. There is a presumption that for any perspective analysis or any development proposal, these two words are the most appropriate. Sustainability has been incorporated in the objectives of many studies. The historical model of industrialized societies in the 19th and 20th centuries served as the central notion of what constitutes development in both the cost-effectiveness and equity perspectives. According to some analysts, this path represents the model for global prosperity. However, a number of growing parallel literatures recognize the importance of diverse development pathways in achieving an environmentally and socio-economically better world. The term sustainable development does not bring forward all aspects of development. A new term that incorporates the wellbeing of all citizens through economic development and the preservation of the environment is needed. A “Worth-living Integrated Development” could be a term that combines economic development, social development and environmental protection. A Worth-living Integrated Development may be achieved only when human societies decide to create necessary presuppositions—at the educational, research, economic, social, political, technical/technological and environmental levels—for a better world, based on the human values of peace, justice, solidarity, political, economic and social democracy and ethics, respect for nature and for the variety of cultures of all human beings.</description>
	
	<guid>http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/4/1/141/</guid>
	<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 00:00:00 CET</pubDate>
	
	<prism:publicationName>Sustainability</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2012-01-12</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>4</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>1</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>141</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:endingPage>153</prism:endingPage>
		<prism:issn>2071-1050</prism:issn>
	
	<dc:title>Sustainable and Integrated Development—A Critical Analysis</dc:title>
	<dc:date>2012-01-12</dc:date>
	<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/su4010141</dc:identifier>
		<dc:creator>Christopher J. Koroneos</dc:creator>
		<dc:creator>Dimitri Rokos</dc:creator>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/" />
</item>
	<item rdf:about="http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/4/1/123/">
	<title>Sustainability, Vol. 4, Pages 123-140: Ecotourism versus Mass Tourism. A Comparison of Environmental Impacts Based on Ecological Footprint Analysis</title>
	<link>http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/4/1/123/</link>
	<description>Academic and policy interest in ecological footprint analysis has grown rapidly in recent years. To date, however, the application of ecological footprint analysis to tourism has been limited. This article aims to discuss the potential of ecological footprint analysis to assess sustainability in tourism. It is about a comparison of the global environmental impacts of different forms of tourism in southern countries where tourism is a major source of foreign exchange earnings. It illustrates how an ecotourism destination has a larger ecological footprint than a “mass” tourism destination.</description>
	
	<guid>http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/4/1/123/</guid>
	<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2012 00:00:00 CET</pubDate>
	
	<prism:publicationName>Sustainability</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2012-01-10</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>4</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>1</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>123</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:endingPage>140</prism:endingPage>
		<prism:issn>2071-1050</prism:issn>
	
	<dc:title>Ecotourism versus Mass Tourism. A Comparison of Environmental Impacts Based on Ecological Footprint Analysis</dc:title>
	<dc:date>2012-01-10</dc:date>
	<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/su4010123</dc:identifier>
		<dc:creator>Mehdi Marzouki</dc:creator>
		<dc:creator>Géraldine Froger</dc:creator>
		<dc:creator>Jérôme Ballet</dc:creator>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/" />
</item>
	<item rdf:about="http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/4/1/106/">
	<title>Sustainability, Vol. 4, Pages 106-122: Intergenerational Justice: How Reasonable Man Discounts Climate Damage</title>
	<link>http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/4/1/106/</link>
	<description>Moral philosophers and economists have evaluated the intergenerational problem of climate change by applying the whole gamut of theories on distributive justice. In this article, however, it is argued that intergenerational justice cannot imply the application of moral ideal theories to future generations. The formal principle of equality simply requires us to treat like cases as like. If intergenerational justice is to have any meaning, it would require future generations to receive the same treatment under the law and the same treatment from the authorities, as far as cases are like. In the context of climate change, the reasonable man standard from tort law is of particular relevance. There is no justification to handle pollution across generational boundaries according to norms which differ from the (international) laws for handling pollution across national borders.  It is argued that this implies, for example, that a zero social rate of time preference should be used in cost-benefit analysis of climate policy: climate damage experienced by future generations should be discounted neither for their higher expected wealth, nor purely for their being remote.</description>
	
	<guid>http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/4/1/106/</guid>
	<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2012 00:00:00 CET</pubDate>
	
	<prism:publicationName>Sustainability</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2012-01-05</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>4</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>1</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>106</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:endingPage>122</prism:endingPage>
		<prism:issn>2071-1050</prism:issn>
	
	<dc:title>Intergenerational Justice: How Reasonable Man Discounts Climate Damage</dc:title>
	<dc:date>2012-01-05</dc:date>
	<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/su4010106</dc:identifier>
		<dc:creator>Marc D. Davidson</dc:creator>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/" />
</item>
	<item rdf:about="http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/4/1/92/">
	<title>Sustainability, Vol. 4, Pages 92-105: A Sustainable Ethanol Distillation System</title>
	<link>http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/4/1/92/</link>
	<description>The discarded fruit and vegetable waste from the consumer and retailer sectors provide a reliable source for ethanol production. In this paper, an ethanol distillation system has been developed to remove the water contents from the original wash that contains only around 15% of the ethanol. The system has an ethanol production capacity of over 100,000 liters per day. It includes an ethanol condenser, a wash pre-heater, a main exhaust heat exchanger as well as a fractionating column. One unique characteristic of this system is that it utilizes the waste heat rejected from a power plant to vaporize the ethanol, thus it saves a significant amount of energy and at the same time reduces the pollution to the environment.</description>
	
	<guid>http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/4/1/92/</guid>
	<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 00:00:00 CET</pubDate>
	
	<prism:publicationName>Sustainability</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2012-01-04</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>4</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>1</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>92</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:endingPage>105</prism:endingPage>
		<prism:issn>2071-1050</prism:issn>
	
	<dc:title>A Sustainable Ethanol Distillation System</dc:title>
	<dc:date>2012-01-04</dc:date>
	<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/su4010092</dc:identifier>
		<dc:creator>Yuelei Yang</dc:creator>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Boots</dc:creator>
		<dc:creator>Dan Zhang</dc:creator>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/" />
</item>
	<item rdf:about="http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/4/1/72/">
	<title>Sustainability, Vol. 4, Pages 72-91: On a Vision to Educating Students in Sustainability and Design—The James Madison University School of Engineering Approach</title>
	<link>http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/4/1/72/</link>
	<description>In order for our future engineers to be able to work toward a sustainable future, they must be versed not only in sustainable engineering but also in engineering design. An engineering education must train our future engineers to think flexibly and to be adaptive, as it is unlikely that their future will have them working in one domain. They must, instead, be versatilists. The School of Engineering at James Madison University has been developed from the ground up to provide this engineering training with an emphasis on engineering design, systems thinking, and sustainability. Neither design nor sustainability are mutually exclusive, and consequently, an education focusing on design and sustainability must integrate these topics, teaching students to follow a sustainable design process. This is the goal of the James Madison University School of Engineering. In this paper, we present our approach to curricular integration of design and sustainability as well as the pedagogical approaches used throughout the curriculum. We do not mean to present the School’s model as an all or nothing approach consisting of dependent elements, but instead as a collection of independent approaches, of which one or more may be appropriate at another university.</description>
	
	<guid>http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/4/1/72/</guid>
	<pubDate>Thu, 29 Dec 2011 00:00:00 CET</pubDate>
	
	<prism:publicationName>Sustainability</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2011-12-29</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>4</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>1</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>72</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:endingPage>91</prism:endingPage>
		<prism:issn>2071-1050</prism:issn>
	
	<dc:title>On a Vision to Educating Students in Sustainability and Design—The James Madison University School of Engineering Approach</dc:title>
	<dc:date>2011-12-29</dc:date>
	<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/su4010072</dc:identifier>
		<dc:creator>Robert L. Nagel</dc:creator>
		<dc:creator>Eric C. Pappas</dc:creator>
		<dc:creator>Olga Pierrakos</dc:creator>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/" />
</item>
	<item rdf:about="http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/4/1/42/">
	<title>Sustainability, Vol. 4, Pages 42-71: The Emerging Global Tourism Geography—An Environmental Sustainability Perspective</title>
	<link>http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/4/1/42/</link>
	<description>The current development of tourism is environmentally unsustainable. Specifically, tourism’s contribution to climate change is increasing while other sectors are reducing their greenhouse gas emissions. This paper has two goals: reveal the main structural cause for tourism’s emission growth and show the consequences thereof for (mitigation) policies. It is reasoned that the main cause for tourism’s strong emission growth is the time-space expansion of global tourism behavior. Contemporary tourism theory and geography fail to clearly describe this geographical development, making it difficult to understand this expansion and develop effective policies to mitigate environmental impacts. Therefore, this paper explores some elements of a ‘new tourism geography’ and shows how this may help to better understand the causes of the environmentally unsustainable development of tourism with respect to climate change and devise mitigation policies.</description>
	
	<guid>http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/4/1/42/</guid>
	<pubDate>Wed, 28 Dec 2011 00:00:00 CET</pubDate>
	
	<prism:publicationName>Sustainability</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2011-12-28</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>4</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>1</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>42</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:endingPage>71</prism:endingPage>
		<prism:issn>2071-1050</prism:issn>
	
	<dc:title>The Emerging Global Tourism Geography—An Environmental Sustainability Perspective</dc:title>
	<dc:date>2011-12-28</dc:date>
	<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/su4010042</dc:identifier>
		<dc:creator>Paul Peeters</dc:creator>
		<dc:creator>Martin Landré</dc:creator>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/" />
</item>
	<item rdf:about="http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/4/1/17/">
	<title>Sustainability, Vol. 4, Pages 17-41: National Sustainability Outreach Assessment Based on Human and Social Capital: The Case of Environmental Sciences in Switzerland</title>
	<link>http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/4/1/17/</link>
	<description>This paper reports on a sustainability outreach study based on an assessment of human and social capital. The aim was to capture the national sustainability outreach of twenty years of Environmental Sciences education, centered at the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH) in Zurich. The study contained two lines of research, one being a human capital assessment with a survey among graduates from the years 1992 to 2005 (n = 542) and the other being a social capital analysis based on interviews with institutions that represent the Swiss social systems of economy, politics/public administration and civil society (20 institutions). Our analyses reveal several functional forms of both human capital (specialists, pioneers, leaders) and social capital (qualification profile, internalization, networks, standardization, professionalization) that trigger and channel sustainability outreach.</description>
	
	<guid>http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/4/1/17/</guid>
	<pubDate>Wed, 28 Dec 2011 00:00:00 CET</pubDate>
	
	<prism:publicationName>Sustainability</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2011-12-28</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>4</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>1</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>17</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:endingPage>41</prism:endingPage>
		<prism:issn>2071-1050</prism:issn>
	
	<dc:title>National Sustainability Outreach Assessment Based on Human and Social Capital: The Case of Environmental Sciences in Switzerland</dc:title>
	<dc:date>2011-12-28</dc:date>
	<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/su4010017</dc:identifier>
		<dc:creator>Harald A. Mieg</dc:creator>
		<dc:creator>Ralph Hansmann</dc:creator>
		<dc:creator>Peter M. Frischknecht</dc:creator>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/" />
</item>
	<item rdf:about="http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/4/1/1/">
	<title>Sustainability, Vol. 4, Pages 1-16: The What, Who, and How of Ecological Action Space</title>
	<link>http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/4/1/1/</link>
	<description>This text presents an analytical concept which is aimed at analysis of the construction of environmental responsibility—ecological action space. The concept makes it possible to analyze what environmental activities householders perform, who takes on the environmental responsibility, and how they motivate and justify everyday practices in relation to other actors. The concept builds on structuration theory, and is useful in studies of sustainable development in everyday life, and in investigations about how actors perceive their role in creating and solving environmental problems, and what actions they take in light of this. The concept should be used for empirical rather than normative studies. Relevant questions for a study about ecological action space are: What activities are considered environmentally friendly? How do the actors conceive of their opportunities to act in environmentally friendly ways and what constraints do they express? These questions are relevant not just for outspoken activists. When promoting increased participation, it is valuable to discuss when, where and how people are expected to get involved.</description>
	
	<guid>http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/4/1/1/</guid>
	<pubDate>Wed, 28 Dec 2011 00:00:00 CET</pubDate>
	
	<prism:publicationName>Sustainability</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2011-12-28</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>4</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>1</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>1</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:endingPage>16</prism:endingPage>
		<prism:issn>2071-1050</prism:issn>
	
	<dc:title>The What, Who, and How of Ecological Action Space</dc:title>
	<dc:date>2011-12-28</dc:date>
	<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/su4010001</dc:identifier>
		<dc:creator>Karin Skill</dc:creator>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/" />
</item>
	<item rdf:about="http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/12/2500/">
	<title>Sustainability, Vol. 3, Pages 2500-2527: ‘Sufferings Start from the Mothers’ Womb’: Vulnerabilities and Livelihood War of the Small-Scale Fishers of Bangladesh</title>
	<link>http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/12/2500/</link>
	<description>Due to its deltaic geographical position and precarious socioeconomic and demographic conditions, Bangladesh is recognized worldwide for its exposure to recurring environmental hazards. Based on a 21-month long field study in two fishing villages that are characterized by distinct ecological settings and ethnic groups, this article examines the arrays of cross-scale environmental, social and institutional stressors that singly or cumulatively impact fishers’ livelihood well-being and generational poverty. Analysis of the vulnerabilities makes it clear that the degree to which poor fishers suffer from environmental stressors and calamities is determined not only by the frequency of abnormal events, but also by their internal capabilities of self-protection, resilience against those stressors, position in the social network and asset and resource ownership. Coastal and floodplain fishers identified cyclone and long-standing floods as strong drivers of poverty as their bundles of ‘safety net’ capital are usually disrupted or lost. For a majority of the fishers, income/day/family declines to as low as US$ 0.7–0.9. Fishers lack appropriate sets of endowments and entitlements that would allow them immediate buffer against livelihood stressors. Vulnerability here is intricately related to one’s socio-economic status; poor and ‘socially vulnerable’ ethnic fishers are concurrently ‘biologically vulnerable’ too. The corollary of multi-faceted stressors is that, poverty persists as an ever-increasing haunting presence that thousands of floodplain and coastal fishers of Bangladesh are forced to cope with. It is evident that nature-induced stressors exert ‘ratchet effects’ on fishers with low endowments who critically risk nutritional deprivation and social standing. Lucidly, most of the fishers are trapped in a form of ‘livelihood war’.</description>
	
	<guid>http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/12/2500/</guid>
	<pubDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2011 00:00:00 CET</pubDate>
	
	<prism:publicationName>Sustainability</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2011-12-20</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>3</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>12</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>2500</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:endingPage>2527</prism:endingPage>
		<prism:issn>2071-1050</prism:issn>
	
	<dc:title>‘Sufferings Start from the Mothers’ Womb’: Vulnerabilities and Livelihood War of the Small-Scale Fishers of Bangladesh</dc:title>
	<dc:date>2011-12-20</dc:date>
	<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/su3122500</dc:identifier>
		<dc:creator>Apurba Krishna Deb</dc:creator>
		<dc:creator>C. Emdad Haque</dc:creator>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/" />
</item>
	<item rdf:about="http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/12/2496/">
	<title>Sustainability, Vol. 3, Pages 2496-2499: Synthesis to Special Issue on New Studies in EROI (Energy Return on Investment)</title>
	<link>http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/12/2496/</link>
	<description>This paper is a synthesis of a series of twenty papers on the topic of EROI, or energy return on investment. EROI is simply the energy gained from an energy-obtaining effort divided by the energy used to get that energy. For example, one barrel of oil invested into getting oil out of the ground might return fifty, thirty, ten or one barrel, depending when and where the process is taking place. It is meant to be read in conjunction with the first paper in this special issue and also a number of the papers themselves. As such I try to summarize what general trends we might conclude from these varied and often highly technical papers. About half of the papers are reports on empirical analyses of various energy sources such as Norwegian or Gulf of Mexico oil, Pennsylvania gas and so on. About a quarter of the papers are methodological: how do we go about undertaking these analyses, what problems are there, what are the proper boundaries and so on. The final quarter are in a sense philosophical: since it appears that we will be living indefinitely in a world of decreasing EROIs, what are the economic, social and psychological implications? The rest of this paper summarizes the results of these studies.</description>
	
	<guid>http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/12/2496/</guid>
	<pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2011 00:00:00 CET</pubDate>
	
	<prism:publicationName>Sustainability</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2011-12-14</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>3</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>12</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Editorial</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>2496</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:endingPage>2499</prism:endingPage>
		<prism:issn>2071-1050</prism:issn>
	
	<dc:title>Synthesis to Special Issue on New Studies in EROI (Energy Return on Investment)</dc:title>
	<dc:date>2011-12-14</dc:date>
	<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/su3122496</dc:identifier>
		<dc:creator>Charles A.S. Hall</dc:creator>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/" />
</item>
	<item rdf:about="http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/12/2470/">
	<title>Sustainability, Vol. 3, Pages 2470-2495: Undergraduate Writing Promotes Student’s Understanding of International Sustainable Development in Horticulture</title>
	<link>http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/12/2470/</link>
	<description>Promotion of undergraduate student thinking and learning in the realm of sustainable production is a new focus for horticulture curricula. In a writing intensive course, Greenhouse Management (Hort 3002W; University of Minnesota), students focus their learning of sustainability by writing peer-reviewed, 3-phase ‘Worldwide Sustainable Horticultural Crop Production Papers’ on past, present, and future prospects for sustainability. The USA is used as an in-class example throughout the semester while each student focuses their writing on a specific country of their choosing. Their papers focus on eight goals for each country across the three Phases: I—their choice of a country, definition of sustainability, identification of historical production practices, current production statistics; II—current production practices and integration of historical/current practices (ranked strategies); III—finalized sustainable development strategy, design of a future sustainable, controlled-environment production facility. The last two goals (Phase III) provide plant breeders with potential breeding objectives for country-specific cultivar development within a sustainable production framework. Completed papers are web-published for global availability to enable each country’s researchers and policy makers to access sustainable ideas for future development. In 2009–2010, ‘Worldwide Sustainable Horticultural Crop Production Papers’ were published for 41 countries which were downloaded 3900 times in 19 months through April 2011. This large readership indicates such an assignment can generate interest in either undergraduate writing about developing sustainable horticulture and/or the topic area itself, although the exact purpose of the downloads or the location of the users could not be determined.</description>
	
	<guid>http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/12/2470/</guid>
	<pubDate>Wed, 14 Dec 2011 00:00:00 CET</pubDate>
	
	<prism:publicationName>Sustainability</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2011-12-14</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>3</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>12</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>2470</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:endingPage>2495</prism:endingPage>
		<prism:issn>2071-1050</prism:issn>
	
	<dc:title>Undergraduate Writing Promotes Student’s Understanding of International Sustainable Development in Horticulture</dc:title>
	<dc:date>2011-12-14</dc:date>
	<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/su3122470</dc:identifier>
		<dc:creator>Neil O. Anderson</dc:creator>
		<dc:creator>Julia A. Kelly</dc:creator>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/" />
</item>
	<item rdf:about="http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/12/2456/">
	<title>Sustainability, Vol. 3, Pages 2456-2469: Sustainable Micro-Manufacturing of Micro-Components via Micro Electrical Discharge Machining</title>
	<link>http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/12/2456/</link>
	<description>Micro-manufacturing emerged in the last years as a new engineering area with the potential of increasing peoples’ quality of life through the production of innovative micro-devices to be used, for example, in the biomedical, micro-electronics or telecommunication sectors. The possibility to decrease the energy consumption makes the micro-manufacturing extremely appealing in terms of environmental protection. However, despite this common belief that the micro-scale implies a higher sustainability compared to traditional manufacturing processes, recent research shows that some factors can make micro-manufacturing processes not as sustainable as expected. In particular, the use of rare raw materials and the need of higher purity of processes, to preserve product quality and manufacturing equipment, can be a source for additional environmental burden and process costs. Consequently, research is needed to optimize micro-manufacturing processes in order to guarantee the minimum consumption of raw materials, consumables and energy. In this paper, the experimental results obtained by the micro-electrical discharge machining (micro-EDM) of micro-channels made on Ni–Cr–Mo steel is reported. The aim of such investigation is to shed a light on the relation and dependence between the material removal process, identified in the evaluation of material removal rate (MRR) and tool wear ratio (TWR), and some of the most important technological parameters (i.e., open voltage, discharge current, pulse width and frequency), in order to experimentally quantify the material waste produced and optimize the technological process in order to decrease it.</description>
	
	<guid>http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/12/2456/</guid>
	<pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2011 00:00:00 CET</pubDate>
	
	<prism:publicationName>Sustainability</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2011-12-13</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>3</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>12</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>2456</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:endingPage>2469</prism:endingPage>
		<prism:issn>2071-1050</prism:issn>
	
	<dc:title>Sustainable Micro-Manufacturing of Micro-Components via Micro Electrical Discharge Machining</dc:title>
	<dc:date>2011-12-13</dc:date>
	<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/su3122456</dc:identifier>
		<dc:creator>Francesco Modica</dc:creator>
		<dc:creator>Valeria Marrocco</dc:creator>
		<dc:creator>Giacomo Copani</dc:creator>
		<dc:creator>Irene Fassi</dc:creator>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/" />
</item>
	<item rdf:about="http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/12/2443/">
	<title>Sustainability, Vol. 3, Pages 2443-2455: Comparing Carbon and Water Footprints for Beef Cattle Production in Southern Australia</title>
	<link>http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/12/2443/</link>
	<description>Stand-alone environmental indicators based on life cycle assessment (LCA), such as the carbon footprint and water footprint, are becoming increasingly popular as a means of directing sustainable production and consumption. However, individually, these metrics violate the principle of LCA known as comprehensiveness and do not necessarily provide an indication of overall environmental impact. In this study, the carbon footprints for six diverse beef cattle production systems in southern Australia were calculated and found to range from 10.1 to 12.7 kg CO2e kg−1 live weight (cradle to farm gate). This compared to water footprints, which ranged from 3.3 to 221 L H2Oe kg−1 live weight. For these systems, the life cycle impacts of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and water use were subsequently modelled using endpoint indicators and aggregated to enable comparison. In all cases, impacts from GHG emissions were most important, representing 93 to 99% of the combined scores. As such, the industry’s existing priority of GHG emissions reduction is affirmed. In an attempt to balance the demands of comprehensiveness and simplicity, to achieve reliable public reporting of the environmental impacts of a large number of products across the economy, a multi-indicator approach based on combined midpoint and endpoint life cycle impact assessment modelling is proposed. For agri-food products, impacts from land use should also be included as tradeoffs between GHG emissions, water use and land use are common.</description>
	
	<guid>http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/12/2443/</guid>
	<pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2011 00:00:00 CET</pubDate>
	
	<prism:publicationName>Sustainability</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2011-12-13</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>3</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>12</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>2443</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:endingPage>2455</prism:endingPage>
		<prism:issn>2071-1050</prism:issn>
	
	<dc:title>Comparing Carbon and Water Footprints for Beef Cattle Production in Southern Australia</dc:title>
	<dc:date>2011-12-13</dc:date>
	<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/su3122443</dc:identifier>
		<dc:creator>Bradley G. Ridoutt</dc:creator>
		<dc:creator>Peerasak Sanguansri</dc:creator>
		<dc:creator>Gregory S. Harper</dc:creator>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/" />
</item>
	<item rdf:about="http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/12/2433/">
	<title>Sustainability, Vol. 3, Pages 2433-2442: Implications of Energy Return on Energy Invested on Future Total Energy Demand</title>
	<link>http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/12/2433/</link>
	<description>Human society is now at the beginning of a transition from fossil-fuel based primary energy sources to a mixture of renewable and nuclear based energy sources which have a lower Energy Return On Energy Invested (EROEI) than the older fossil based sources. This paper examines the evolution of total energy demand during this transition for a highly idealized energy economy. A simple model is introduced in which the net useful energy output required to operate an economy is assumed to remain fixed while the lower EROEI source gradually replaces the older higher EROEI primary energy source following a logistics substitution model. The results show that, for fixed net useful energy output, total energy demand increases as the ratio EROEInew/EROEIold decreases; total energy demand diverges as EROEInew approaches unity, indicating that the system must collapse in  this limit.</description>
	
	<guid>http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/12/2433/</guid>
	<pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2011 00:00:00 CET</pubDate>
	
	<prism:publicationName>Sustainability</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2011-12-13</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>3</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>12</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>2433</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:endingPage>2442</prism:endingPage>
		<prism:issn>2071-1050</prism:issn>
	
	<dc:title>Implications of Energy Return on Energy Invested on Future Total Energy Demand</dc:title>
	<dc:date>2011-12-13</dc:date>
	<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/su3122433</dc:identifier>
		<dc:creator>Shinuo Deng</dc:creator>
		<dc:creator>George R. Tynan</dc:creator>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/" />
</item>
	<item rdf:about="http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/12/2413/">
	<title>Sustainability, Vol. 3, Pages 2413-2432: Seeking to Understand the Reasons for Different Energy Return on Investment (EROI) Estimates for Biofuels</title>
	<link>http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/12/2413/</link>
	<description>The authors of this paper have been involved in contentious discussion of the EROI of biomass-based ethanol. This contention has undermined, in the minds of some, the utility of EROI for assessing fuels. This paper seeks to understand the reasons for the divergent results.</description>
	
	<guid>http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/12/2413/</guid>
	<pubDate>Tue, 13 Dec 2011 00:00:00 CET</pubDate>
	
	<prism:publicationName>Sustainability</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2011-12-13</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>3</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>12</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Review</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>2413</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:endingPage>2432</prism:endingPage>
		<prism:issn>2071-1050</prism:issn>
	
	<dc:title>Seeking to Understand the Reasons for Different Energy Return on Investment (EROI) Estimates for Biofuels</dc:title>
	<dc:date>2011-12-13</dc:date>
	<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/su3122413</dc:identifier>
		<dc:creator>Charles A.S. Hall</dc:creator>
		<dc:creator>Bruce E. Dale</dc:creator>
		<dc:creator>David Pimentel</dc:creator>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/" />
</item>
	<item rdf:about="http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/12/2392/">
	<title>Sustainability, Vol. 3, Pages 2392-2412: Environmental Assessment Methodologies for Commercial Buildings: An Elicitation Study of U.S. Building Professionals’ Beliefs on Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED)</title>
	<link>http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/12/2392/</link>
	<description>Voluntary environmental programs (VEPs) have become increasingly popular around the world to address energy efficiency issues that mandatory building codes have not been able to tackle. Even though the utility of voluntary schemes is widely debated, they have become a de facto reality for many professionals in the building and construction sector. One topic that is neglected, however, in both academic and policy discussions, relates to how professionals (architects, engineers, real estate developers, etc.) perceive the rise of voluntary rating schemes. In order to fill this gap in the literature, the present study investigates beliefs underlying adoption behavior regarding one of the most prominent voluntary assessment and certification programs in the U.S. building industry, the Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) scheme. In this paper, an elicitation study, based on 14 semi-structured interviews with building professionals in the North East of the United States, was conducted to analyze this question. Building on the Reasoned Action Approach, this paper shows that, in addition to more conventional factors such as financial calculations and marketing aspects, the understanding of beliefs held by building professionals offers important insights into their decisions to work with Voluntary Environmental Assessment and Rating Programs.</description>
	
	<guid>http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/12/2392/</guid>
	<pubDate>Mon, 12 Dec 2011 00:00:00 CET</pubDate>
	
	<prism:publicationName>Sustainability</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2011-12-12</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>3</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>12</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>2392</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:endingPage>2412</prism:endingPage>
		<prism:issn>2071-1050</prism:issn>
	
	<dc:title>Environmental Assessment Methodologies for Commercial Buildings: An Elicitation Study of U.S. Building Professionals’ Beliefs on Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED)</dc:title>
	<dc:date>2011-12-12</dc:date>
	<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/su3122392</dc:identifier>
		<dc:creator>Jasmin Kientzel</dc:creator>
		<dc:creator>Gerjo Kok</dc:creator>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/" />
</item>
	<item rdf:about="http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/12/2358/">
	<title>Sustainability, Vol. 3, Pages 2358-2391: An Edible Energy Return on Investment (EEROI) Analysis of Wheat and Rice in Pakistan</title>
	<link>http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/12/2358/</link>
	<description>Agriculture is the largest sector of Pakistan’s economy, contributing almost 22% to the GDP and employing almost 45% of the total labor force. The two largest food crops, wheat and rice, contribute 3.1% and 1.4% to the GDP, respectively. The objective of this research was to calculate the energy return on investment (EROI) of these crops on a national scale from 1999 to 2009 to understand the size of various energy inputs and to discuss their contributions to the energy output. Energy inputs accounted for within the cropping systems included seed, fertilizer, pesticide, human labor, tractor diesel, irrigation pump electricity and diesel, the transport of fertilizer and pesticide, and the embodied energy of tractors and irrigation pumps. The largest per-hectare energy inputs to wheat were nitrogen fertilizer (52.6%), seed (17.9%), and tractor diesel (9.1%). For rice, the largest per-hectare energy inputs were nitrogen fertilizer (32%), tube well diesel (19.8%), and pesticide (17.6%). The EROI of wheat showed a gradual downward trend between 2000 and 2006 of 21.3%. The trend was erratic thereafter. Overall, it ranged from 2.7 to 3.4 with an average of 2.9 over the 11-year study period. The overall trend was fairly consistent compared to that of rice which ranged between 3.1 and 4.9, and averaged 3.9. Rice’s EROI dipped sharply in 2002, was erratic, and remained below four until 2007. It rose sharply after that. As energy inputs increased, wheat outputs increased, but rice outputs decreased slightly. Rice responded to inputs with greater output and an increase in EROI. The same was not true for wheat, which showed little change in EROI in the face of increasing inputs. This suggests that additional investments of energy in rice production are not improving yields but for wheat, these investments are still generating benefits. The analysis shows quantitatively how fossil energy is a key driver of the Pakistani agricultural system as it traces direct and indirect energy inputs to two major food crops.</description>
	
	<guid>http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/12/2358/</guid>
	<pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2011 00:00:00 CET</pubDate>
	
	<prism:publicationName>Sustainability</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2011-12-08</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>3</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>12</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>2358</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:endingPage>2391</prism:endingPage>
		<prism:issn>2071-1050</prism:issn>
	
	<dc:title>An Edible Energy Return on Investment (EEROI) Analysis of Wheat and Rice in Pakistan</dc:title>
	<dc:date>2011-12-08</dc:date>
	<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/su3122358</dc:identifier>
		<dc:creator>Ali S. Pracha</dc:creator>
		<dc:creator>Timothy A. Volk</dc:creator>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/" />
</item>
	<item rdf:about="http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/12/2339/">
	<title>Sustainability, Vol. 3, Pages 2339-2357: Deriving an Improved Dynamic EROI to Provide Better Information for Energy Planners</title>
	<link>http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/12/2339/</link>
	<description>The two most frequently quantified metrics of net energy analysis–the energy return on (energy) investment and the energy payback period–do not capture the growth rate potential of an energy supply infrastructure. This is because the analysis underlying these metrics is essentially static–all energy inputs and outputs are treated the same, regardless of where they occur in the life cycle of the infrastructure. We develop a dynamic energy analysis framework to model the growth potential of alternative electricity supply infrastructures. An additional figure of merit, the infrastructure doubling time, is introduced. This metric highlights the critical importance of the time phasing of the initial energy investment for emplacing a given infrastructure, as opposed to the ongoing O&amp;M energy expenditures, for the infrastructure’s growth potential. The doubling time metric also captures the influence of capacity factor, licensing and construction time lags.</description>
	
	<guid>http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/12/2339/</guid>
	<pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2011 00:00:00 CET</pubDate>
	
	<prism:publicationName>Sustainability</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2011-12-08</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>3</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>12</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>2339</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:endingPage>2357</prism:endingPage>
		<prism:issn>2071-1050</prism:issn>
	
	<dc:title>Deriving an Improved Dynamic EROI to Provide Better Information for Energy Planners</dc:title>
	<dc:date>2011-12-08</dc:date>
	<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/su3122339</dc:identifier>
		<dc:creator>Ioannis N. Kessides</dc:creator>
		<dc:creator>David C. Wade</dc:creator>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/" />
</item>
	<item rdf:about="http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/12/2323/">
	<title>Sustainability, Vol. 3, Pages 2323-2338: Analysis of the Energy Return on Investment (EROI) of the Huge Daqing Oil Field in China</title>
	<link>http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/12/2323/</link>
	<description>In China there has been considerable discussion of how one should express the efficiency of energy conversion and production. Energy return on investment (EROI) can be useful for this because its methodology is based on outputs and inputs. Unfortunately, similar to the rest of the world, most of the data available for assessing energy gains and costs for oil and gas in China has to be derived from economic costs and revenues for oil fields. In this paper we derive a first EROI for China based on using this approach and the existing data for production of crude oil and natural gas for the Daqing oil field, the largest oil field in China. We estimate that its EROIstnd expressed as heat equivalent was 10:1 in 2001 but has declined to 6.5:1 in 2009. Based on this trend we project that the EROIstnd will decline to 4.7:1 in 2015, and the net energy from the field will be decreasing substantially. The calculations have some errors because of incomplete data, and if various externalities are taken into account, the EROI of this oil field would be lower than our present estimates. The trends of EROI and net energy suggest that the Daqing oil field will face more difficulty in the future which can not be overcome by government fiat.</description>
	
	<guid>http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/12/2323/</guid>
	<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2011 00:00:00 CET</pubDate>
	
	<prism:publicationName>Sustainability</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2011-11-30</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>3</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>12</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>2323</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:endingPage>2338</prism:endingPage>
		<prism:issn>2071-1050</prism:issn>
	
	<dc:title>Analysis of the Energy Return on Investment (EROI) of the Huge Daqing Oil Field in China</dc:title>
	<dc:date>2011-11-30</dc:date>
	<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/su3122323</dc:identifier>
		<dc:creator>Yan Hu</dc:creator>
		<dc:creator>Lianyong Feng</dc:creator>
		<dc:creator>Charles C.S. Hall</dc:creator>
		<dc:creator>Dong Tian</dc:creator>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/" />
</item>
	<item rdf:about="http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/11/2307/">
	<title>Sustainability, Vol. 3, Pages 2307-2322: Energy Return on Investment (EROI) of Oil Shale</title>
	<link>http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/11/2307/</link>
	<description>The two methods of processing synthetic crude from organic marlstone in demonstration or small-scale commercial status in the U.S. are in situ extraction and surface retorting. The considerable uncertainty surrounding the technological characterization, resource characterization, and choice of the system boundary for oil shale operations indicate that oil shale is only a minor net energy producer if one includes internal energy (energy in the shale that is used during the process) as an energy cost. The energy return on investment (EROI) for either of these methods is roughly 1.5:1 for the final fuel product. The inclusions or omission of internal energy is a critical question. If only external energy (energy diverted from the economy to produce the fuel) is considered, EROI appears to be much higher. In comparison, fuels produced from conventional petroleum show overall EROI of approximately 4.5:1. “At the wellhead” EROI is approximately 2:1 for shale oil (again, considering internal energy) and 20:1 for petroleum. The low EROI for oil shale leads to a significant release of greenhouse gases. The large quantities of energy needed to process oil shale, combined with the thermochemistry of the retorting process, produce carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gas emissions. Oil shale unambiguously emits more greenhouse gases than conventional liquid fuels from crude oil feedstocks by a factor of 1.2 to 1.75. Much of the discussion regarding the EROI for oil shale should be regarded as preliminary or speculative due to the very small number of operating facilities that can be assessed.</description>
	
	<guid>http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/11/2307/</guid>
	<pubDate>Tue, 22 Nov 2011 00:00:00 CET</pubDate>
	
	<prism:publicationName>Sustainability</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2011-11-22</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>3</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>11</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>2307</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:endingPage>2322</prism:endingPage>
		<prism:issn>2071-1050</prism:issn>
	
	<dc:title>Energy Return on Investment (EROI) of Oil Shale</dc:title>
	<dc:date>2011-11-22</dc:date>
	<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/su3112307</dc:identifier>
		<dc:creator>Cutler J. Cleveland</dc:creator>
		<dc:creator>Peter A. O’Connor</dc:creator>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/" />
</item>
	<item rdf:about="http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/11/2289/">
	<title>Sustainability, Vol. 3, Pages 2289-2306: Climate Responsive Design and the Milam Residence</title>
	<link>http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/11/2289/</link>
	<description>Energy conservation and efficiency is an essential area of focus in contemporary building design. The perception that the designers of buildings during the Modernist period of architecture ignored these principles is a false one. The present study, an examination of Paul Rudolph’s Milam Residence, a masterpiece of American residential architecture, is part of a larger project endeavoring to create a knowledge base of the environmental performance of iconic modernist homes. A critical examination of the Milam House allows insight into specific design characteristics that impact energy efficiency and conservation. Located in Ponte Vedra Beach, Florida, the Milam Residence was constructed in 1962. It was the last of a series of Florida residences designed by Rudolph, Chairman of the Department of Architecture at Yale University (1958–1965). The structure’s form is strongly related to its location on a subtropical beachfront. This paper presents a detailed analysis of the building’s solar responsiveness. Specifically, we examine design strategies such as orientation and sunscreening and their effect on daylighting, shading, and heat gain. The analysis is based on parametric energy modeling studies using Autodesk’s Ecotect, an environmental analysis tool that allows simulation of building performance. While the initial target of the program was early design, the program allows the input of complex geometries and detailed programming of zones, materials, schedules, etc. The program's excellent analyses of desired parameters are augmented by visualizations that make it especially valuable in communicating results. Our findings suggest that the building, as built and situated on the site, does take advantage of daylighting and solar shading and does so in both expected and unexpected ways.</description>
	
	<guid>http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/11/2289/</guid>
	<pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2011 00:00:00 CET</pubDate>
	
	<prism:publicationName>Sustainability</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2011-11-21</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>3</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>11</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>2289</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:endingPage>2306</prism:endingPage>
		<prism:issn>2071-1050</prism:issn>
	
	<dc:title>Climate Responsive Design and the Milam Residence</dc:title>
	<dc:date>2011-11-21</dc:date>
	<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/su3112289</dc:identifier>
		<dc:creator>Carl Fiocchi</dc:creator>
		<dc:creator>Simi Hoque</dc:creator>
		<dc:creator>Mohammad Shahadat</dc:creator>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/" />
</item>
	<item rdf:about="http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/11/2268/">
	<title>Sustainability, Vol. 3, Pages 2268-2288: Life Cycle Costing in Sustainability Assessment—A Case Study of Remanufactured Alternators</title>
	<link>http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/11/2268/</link>
	<description>Sustainability is on the international agenda, and is a driver for industry in international competition. Sustainability encompasses the three pillars: environment, society and economy. To prevent shifting of burden, the whole life cycle needs to be taken into account. For the environmental dimension of sustainability, life cycle assessment (LCA) has been practiced for a while and is a standardized method. A life cycle approach for the social and economic pillars of sustainability needs to be further developed. This paper investigates the application of life cycle costing (LCC) as part of a wider sustainability assessment where also social life cycle assessment (SLCA) and LCA are combined. LCA-type LCC is applied on a case study of remanufactured alternators. Remanufacturing of automobile parts is a fast growing important business with large potential for cost and resource savings. Three design alternatives for the alternator and three locations for the remanufacturing plant are evaluated. The remanufacturer perspective and the user perspective are investigated. The results for the LCA-type LCC show that the largest cost for the remanufacturer is the new parts replacing old warn parts. However, the user cost, and therein especially, cost for fuel used for the alternator’s power production dominates and should be the focus for further improvement. In conducting the case study, it was revealed that the connection between the LCA-type LCC results and the economic dimension of sustainability needs to be further investigated and defined. For this purpose, areas of protection for life cycle sustainability assessment and LCA-type LCC in particular need further development.</description>
	
	<guid>http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/11/2268/</guid>
	<pubDate>Fri, 18 Nov 2011 00:00:00 CET</pubDate>
	
	<prism:publicationName>Sustainability</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2011-11-18</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>3</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>11</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>2268</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:endingPage>2288</prism:endingPage>
		<prism:issn>2071-1050</prism:issn>
	
	<dc:title>Life Cycle Costing in Sustainability Assessment—A Case Study of Remanufactured Alternators</dc:title>
	<dc:date>2011-11-18</dc:date>
	<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/su3112268</dc:identifier>
		<dc:creator>Erwin M. Schau</dc:creator>
		<dc:creator>Marzia Traverso</dc:creator>
		<dc:creator>Annekatrin Lehmann</dc:creator>
		<dc:creator>Matthias Finkbeiner</dc:creator>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/" />
</item>
	<item rdf:about="http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/11/2229/">
	<title>Sustainability, Vol. 3, Pages 2229-2267: Valuing Ecosystem Services with Fishery Rents: A Lumped-Parameter Approach to Hypoxia in the Neuse River Estuary</title>
	<link>http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/11/2229/</link>
	<description>Valuing ecosystem services with microeconomic underpinnings presents challenges because these services typically constitute nonmarket values and contribute to human welfare indirectly through a series of ecological pathways that are dynamic, nonlinear, and difficult to quantify and link to appropriate economic spatial and temporal scales. This paper develops and demonstrates a method to value a portion of ecosystem services when a commercial fishery is dependent on the quality of estuarine habitat. Using a lumped-parameter, dynamic open access bioeconomic model that is spatially explicit and includes predator-prey interactions, this paper quantifies part of the value of improved ecosystem function in the Neuse River Estuary when nutrient pollution is reduced. Specifically, it traces the effects of nitrogen loading on the North Carolina commercial blue crab fishery by modeling the response of primary production and the subsequent impact on hypoxia (low dissolved oxygen). Hypoxia, in turn, affects blue crabs and their preferred prey. The discounted present value fishery rent increase from a 30% reduction in nitrogen loadings in the Neuse is $2.56 million, though this welfare estimate is fairly sensitive to some parameter values. Surprisingly, this number is not sensitive to initial conditions.</description>
	
	<guid>http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/11/2229/</guid>
	<pubDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2011 00:00:00 CET</pubDate>
	
	<prism:publicationName>Sustainability</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2011-11-17</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>3</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>11</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>2229</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:endingPage>2267</prism:endingPage>
		<prism:issn>2071-1050</prism:issn>
	
	<dc:title>Valuing Ecosystem Services with Fishery Rents: A Lumped-Parameter Approach to Hypoxia in the Neuse River Estuary</dc:title>
	<dc:date>2011-11-17</dc:date>
	<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/su3112229</dc:identifier>
		<dc:creator>Martin D. Smith</dc:creator>
		<dc:creator>Larry B. Crowder</dc:creator>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/" />
</item>
	<item rdf:about="http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/11/2217/">
	<title>Sustainability, Vol. 3, Pages 2217-2228: Workspace Representation and Optimization of a Novel Parallel Mechanism with Three-Degrees-of-Freedom</title>
	<link>http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/11/2217/</link>
	<description>The development of a new parallel mechanism based on simulation driven design is a rapid approach to discover the unique features or advantages of a conceptual model. In this research, one novel parallel mechanism which can generate three degrees-of-freedom translations is proposed. The kinematic model and Jacobian matrix is derived. The workspace generation and mapping is investigated based on simplified boundary searching method. The particle swarm algorithm is applied to search for the optimal volume of workspace.</description>
	
	<guid>http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/11/2217/</guid>
	<pubDate>Thu, 17 Nov 2011 00:00:00 CET</pubDate>
	
	<prism:publicationName>Sustainability</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2011-11-17</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>3</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>11</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>2217</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:endingPage>2228</prism:endingPage>
		<prism:issn>2071-1050</prism:issn>
	
	<dc:title>Workspace Representation and Optimization of a Novel Parallel Mechanism with Three-Degrees-of-Freedom</dc:title>
	<dc:date>2011-11-17</dc:date>
	<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/su3112217</dc:identifier>
		<dc:creator>Zhen Gao</dc:creator>
		<dc:creator>Dan Zhang</dc:creator>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/" />
</item>
	<item rdf:about="http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/11/2200/">
	<title>Sustainability, Vol. 3, Pages 2200-2216: Novel Method to Assess the Risk of Dam Failure</title>
	<link>http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/11/2200/</link>
	<description>A new flexible, rapid and affordable risk assessment procedure was developed and verified for dams based on case studies in Scotland (UK) and the region of Baden (Germany). A database of six different sustainable flood retention basin (SFRB) types with varying flood control potential has been developed. In Scotland, there are a relatively high number of current and former large drinking water reservoirs which could contribute to flood management control. In comparison, purpose-built and relatively small SFRB, which are predominantly used for flood control, dominate the landscape in Baden. Moreover, 13 out of 149 SFRB have recently been upgraded, and 11 new SFRB have been built since 2006. Both the estimated hazard and risk are small in comparison to those found in the flood infrastructure in Scotland. The study assesses a rapid screening tool developed to estimate the Dam Condition and the corresponding Dam Failure Hazard and Dam Failure Risk. Most SFRB in Baden have a relatively poor Dam Condition, high Dam Failure Hazard but low Dam Failure Risk compared to those in Scotland. Findings show that Baden is more advanced in flood defence management as well as adaptation to climate change.Deutscher Titel: Neue Methode zur Beurteilung des Risikos eines DammbruchesZusammenfassung: Eine neue, flexible, schnelle und preisgünstige Methode zur Risokobeurteilung von Dämmen wurde entwickelt und getestet, die auf Fallbeispielen in Schottland (Vereinigtes Königreich) und der Region Baden (Deutschland) basiert. Eine Datenbank von sechs verschiedenen Typen nachhaltiger Hochwasserrückhaltebecken (NHRB) mit unterschiedlichem Hochwasserrückhaltevermögen wurde entwickelt. Eine relativ hohe Anzahl von gegenwärtigen und ehemaligen großen Trinkwassertalsperren, die zur Hochwasserschutzkontolle verwandt werden könnten, befinden sich in Schottland. Zweckmäßig gebaute und relativ kleine NHRB, die hauptsächlich für den Hochwasserschutz verwendet werden, dominieren hingegen die Landschaft in Baden. Darüber hinaus wurden 13 von 149 NHRB kürzlich renoviert und seit 2006 wurden 11 neue NHRB gebaut. Sowohl die geschätzte Gefahr als auch das Risiko sind im Vergleich zu den Parametern, die für die Hochwasserschutzinfrastruktur in Schottland gefunden worden sind, klein. Die Studie untersucht ein zeitsparendes Instrument zur Beurteilung des Dammzustandes, der Dammbruchgefahr und des Dammbruchrisikos. Die meisten NHRB in Baden haben relativ geringe Werte bezüglich des Dammzustandes, hohe Werte für Dammbruchgefahr und niedrige Werte bezüglich des Dammbruchrisikos im Vergleich zu NHRB in Schottland. Die Ergebnisse zeigen, dass Baden im Hochwasserschutz vorne liegt und daher dem Klimawechsel besser angepasst ist.</description>
	
	<guid>http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/11/2200/</guid>
	<pubDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2011 00:00:00 CET</pubDate>
	
	<prism:publicationName>Sustainability</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2011-11-16</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>3</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>11</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>2200</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:endingPage>2216</prism:endingPage>
		<prism:issn>2071-1050</prism:issn>
	
	<dc:title>Novel Method to Assess the Risk of Dam Failure</dc:title>
	<dc:date>2011-11-16</dc:date>
	<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/su3112200</dc:identifier>
		<dc:creator>Miklas Scholz</dc:creator>
		<dc:creator>Qinli Yang</dc:creator>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/" />
</item>
	<item rdf:about="http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/11/2182/">
	<title>Sustainability, Vol. 3, Pages 2182-2199: Testing the Environmental Kuznets Curve Hypothesis for Biodiversity Risk in the US: A Spatial Econometric Approach</title>
	<link>http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/11/2182/</link>
	<description>This study investigates whether the environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) relationship is supported for a measure of biodiversity risk and economic development across the United States (US). Using state-level data for all 48 contiguous states, biodiversity risk is measured using a Modified Index (MODEX). This index is an adaptation of a comprehensive National Biodiversity Risk Assessment Index. The MODEX differs from other measures in that it is takes into account the impact of human activities and conservation measures. The econometric approach includes corrections for spatial autocorrelation effects, which are present in the data. Modeling estimation results do not support the EKC hypothesis for biodiversity risk in the US. This finding is robust over ordinary least squares, spatial error, and spatial lag models, where the latter is shown to be the preferred model. Results from the spatial lag regression show that a 1% increase in human population density is associated with about a 0.19% increase in biodiversity risk. Spatial dependence in this case study explains 30% of the variation, as risk in one state spills over into adjoining states. From a policy perspective, this latter result supports the need for coordinated efforts at state and federal levels to address the problem of biodiversity loss.</description>
	
	<guid>http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/11/2182/</guid>
	<pubDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2011 00:00:00 CET</pubDate>
	
	<prism:publicationName>Sustainability</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2011-11-16</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>3</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>11</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>2182</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:endingPage>2199</prism:endingPage>
		<prism:issn>2071-1050</prism:issn>
	
	<dc:title>Testing the Environmental Kuznets Curve Hypothesis for Biodiversity Risk in the US: A Spatial Econometric Approach</dc:title>
	<dc:date>2011-11-16</dc:date>
	<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/su3112182</dc:identifier>
		<dc:creator>Justin Tevie</dc:creator>
		<dc:creator>Kristine M. Grimsrud</dc:creator>
		<dc:creator>Robert P. Berrens</dc:creator>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/" />
</item>
	<item rdf:about="http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/11/2157/">
	<title>Sustainability, Vol. 3, Pages 2157-2181: The Unsustainable Trend of Natural Hazard Losses in the United States</title>
	<link>http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/11/2157/</link>
	<description>In the United States, direct losses from natural hazards are on the rise with hurricanes, flooding, and severe storms contributing about three quarters of the total damages. While losses from severe storms have been stable over the past fifty years, hurricane and flood losses have tripled. Per capita losses are also increasing showing that impacts outpace population growth with high per capita losses occurring largely in the Southeast and Midwest. If the loss escalation of the past two decades continues into the future, then direct losses of $300 to $400 billion within a single decade are possible. In order to reverse this trend, sustainable development, vulnerability reduction, and hazard mitigation must become priorities and current loss reduction efforts need to be evaluated and re-assessed in terms of their effectiveness. These conclusions are drawn from the analysis of spatial and temporal trends in direct losses from natural hazards using SHELDUSTM data from 1960 through 2009. Loss data are adjusted for inflation, population, and wealth to capture both trends in total losses and per capita losses. The loss data are then compared to disaster-related federal government and private insurance expenditures.</description>
	
	<guid>http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/11/2157/</guid>
	<pubDate>Mon, 14 Nov 2011 00:00:00 CET</pubDate>
	
	<prism:publicationName>Sustainability</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2011-11-14</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>3</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>11</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>2157</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:endingPage>2181</prism:endingPage>
		<prism:issn>2071-1050</prism:issn>
	
	<dc:title>The Unsustainable Trend of Natural Hazard Losses in the United States</dc:title>
	<dc:date>2011-11-14</dc:date>
	<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/su3112157</dc:identifier>
		<dc:creator>Melanie Gall</dc:creator>
		<dc:creator>Kevin A. Borden</dc:creator>
		<dc:creator>Christopher T. Emrich</dc:creator>
		<dc:creator>Susan L. Cutter</dc:creator>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/" />
</item>
	<item rdf:about="http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/11/2129/">
	<title>Sustainability, Vol. 3, Pages 2129-2156: Predicting the Psychological Response of the American People to Oil Depletion and Declining Energy Return on Investment (EROI)</title>
	<link>http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/11/2129/</link>
	<description>Oil has played a crucial role in the United States’ continued but increasingly tenuous economic prosperity. The continued availability of cheap, high energy return on investment (EROI) oil, however, is increasingly in doubt. If cheap oil is increasingly constrained, how might that impact the American psychological sense of personal and national well-being? We employ general systems theory and certain key paradigms from psychology and sociology to predict the possible societal response to global peak oil and the declining EROI of whatever oil is produced. Based on these frameworks, the following three defense mechanisms seem likely to be employed by individuals and groups within society if and when confronted with stresses associated with declining oil availability. These are: denial of one’s passive helpless state, desire to establish a scapegoat, and arousal of affiliative needs and increased subgrouping. A group’s “survival” is a function of its unified sense of direction and the stability of necessary interdependencies and linkages. We suggest that the ability of the U.S. society, taken as a whole, to adapt to the stresses derived from the declining EROI of oil will increase during periods of moderate stress, and then decline after reaching its maximum ability to cope with stress. The integrity of interdependencies and linkages—power, communication, affect, and goals—must be preserved for continued social unity. Americans will need to acknowledge the reality of biophysical constraints if they are to adapt to the coming energy crisis.</description>
	
	<guid>http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/11/2129/</guid>
	<pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2011 00:00:00 CET</pubDate>
	
	<prism:publicationName>Sustainability</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2011-11-07</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>3</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>11</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>2129</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:endingPage>2156</prism:endingPage>
		<prism:issn>2071-1050</prism:issn>
	
	<dc:title>Predicting the Psychological Response of the American People to Oil Depletion and Declining Energy Return on Investment (EROI)</dc:title>
	<dc:date>2011-11-07</dc:date>
	<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/su3112129</dc:identifier>
		<dc:creator>Jessica G. Lambert</dc:creator>
		<dc:creator>Gail P. Lambert</dc:creator>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/" />
</item>
	<item rdf:about="http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/11/2115/">
	<title>Sustainability, Vol. 3, Pages 2115-2128: Toward a Heat Recovery Chimney</title>
	<link>http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/11/2115/</link>
	<description>The worldwide population increase and subsequent surge in energy demand leads electricity producers to increase supply in an attempt to generate larger profit margins. However, with Global Climate Change becoming a greater focus in engineering, it is critical for energy to be converted in as environmentally benign a way as possible. There are different sustainable methods to meet the energy demand. However, the focus of this research is in the area of Waste Heat Recovery. The waste heat stored in the exiting condenser cooling water is delivered to the air flow through a water-air cross flow heat exchanger. A converging thermal chimney structure is then applied to increase the velocity of the airflow. The accelerated air can be used to turn on the turbine-generator installed on the top the thermal chimney so that electricity can be generated. This system is effective in generating electricity from otherwise wasted heat.</description>
	
	<guid>http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/11/2115/</guid>
	<pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2011 00:00:00 CET</pubDate>
	
	<prism:publicationName>Sustainability</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2011-11-07</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>3</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>11</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>2115</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:endingPage>2128</prism:endingPage>
		<prism:issn>2071-1050</prism:issn>
	
	<dc:title>Toward a Heat Recovery Chimney</dc:title>
	<dc:date>2011-11-07</dc:date>
	<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/su3112115</dc:identifier>
		<dc:creator>Dan Zhang</dc:creator>
		<dc:creator>Yuelei Yang</dc:creator>
		<dc:creator>Min Pan</dc:creator>
		<dc:creator>Zhen Gao</dc:creator>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/" />
</item>
	<item rdf:about="http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/11/2105/">
	<title>Sustainability, Vol. 3, Pages 2105-2114: Energy Return on Energy Invested (EROI) for the Electrical Heating of Methane Hydrate Reservoirs</title>
	<link>http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/11/2105/</link>
	<description>We model the low frequency electrical heating of submarine methane hydrate deposits located at depths between 1000 and 1500 m, and determine the energy return on energy invested (EROI) for this process. By means of the enthalpy method, we calculate the time-dependent heating of these deposits under applied electrical power supplied to a cylindrical heater located at the center of the reservoir and at variable depths. The conversion of the produced water to steam is avoided by limiting the heater temperature. We calculate the volume of methane hydrate that will melt and the energy equivalent of the gas thus generated. The partial energy efficiency of this heating process is obtained as the ratio of the gas equivalent energy to the applied electrical energy. We obtain EROI values in the range of 4 to 5, depending on the location of the heater. If the methane gas is used to generate the electrical energy required in the heating (in processes with a 33% efficiency), the effective EROI of the process falls in the range of 4/3 to 5/3.</description>
	
	<guid>http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/11/2105/</guid>
	<pubDate>Mon, 07 Nov 2011 00:00:00 CET</pubDate>
	
	<prism:publicationName>Sustainability</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2011-11-07</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>3</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>11</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>2105</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:endingPage>2114</prism:endingPage>
		<prism:issn>2071-1050</prism:issn>
	
	<dc:title>Energy Return on Energy Invested (EROI) for the Electrical Heating of Methane Hydrate Reservoirs</dc:title>
	<dc:date>2011-11-07</dc:date>
	<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/su3112105</dc:identifier>
		<dc:creator>Roberto Cesare Callarotti</dc:creator>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/" />
</item>
	<item rdf:about="http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/11/2080/">
	<title>Sustainability, Vol. 3, Pages 2080-2104: The EROI of Conventional Canadian Natural Gas Production</title>
	<link>http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/11/2080/</link>
	<description>Canada was the world’s third largest natural gas producer in 2008, with 98% of its gas being produced by conventional, tight gas, and coal bed methane wells in Western Canada. Natural gas production in Western Canada peaked in 2001 and remained nearly flat until 2006 despite more than quadrupling the drilling rate. Canada seems to be one of many counter examples to the idea that oil and gas production can rise with sufficient investment. This study calculated the Energy Return on Energy Invested and Net Energy of conventional natural gas and oil production in Western Canada by a variety of methods to explore the energy dynamics of the peaking process. All these methods show a downward trend in EROI during the last decade. Natural gas EROI fell from 38:1 in 1993 to 15:1 at the peak of drilling in 2005. The drilling intensity for natural gas was so high that net energy delivered to society peaked in 2000–2002, while production did not peak until 2006. The industry consumed all the extra energy it delivered to maintain the high drilling effort. The inability of a region to increase net energy may be the best definition of peak production. This increase in energy consumption reduces the total energy provided to society and acts as a contracting pressure on the overall economy as the industry consumes greater quantities of labor, steel, concrete and fuel. It appears that energy production from conventional oil and gas in Western Canada has peaked and entered permanent decline.</description>
	
	<guid>http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/11/2080/</guid>
	<pubDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2011 00:00:00 CET</pubDate>
	
	<prism:publicationName>Sustainability</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2011-11-03</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>3</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>11</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>2080</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:endingPage>2104</prism:endingPage>
		<prism:issn>2071-1050</prism:issn>
	
	<dc:title>The EROI of Conventional Canadian Natural Gas Production</dc:title>
	<dc:date>2011-11-03</dc:date>
	<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/su3112080</dc:identifier>
		<dc:creator>Jon Freise</dc:creator>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/" />
</item>
	<item rdf:about="http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/11/2071/">
	<title>Sustainability, Vol. 3, Pages 2071-2079: Looking for a Silver Lining: The Possible Positives of Declining Energy Return on Investment (EROI)</title>
	<link>http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/11/2071/</link>
	<description>Declining energy return on investment (EROI) of a society’s available energy sources can lead to both crisis and opportunity for positive social change. The implications of declining EROI for human wellbeing are complex and open to interpretation. There are many reasons why frugal living and an energy diet could be beneficial. A measure of wellbeing or welfare gained per unit of energy expended (WROEI) is proposed. A threshold is hypothesized for the relation between energy consumption and wellbeing. The paper offers a biophysical-based social science explanation for both the negative and positive possible implications of declining EROI. Two sets of future scenarios based on environmental and economic trends are described. Six types of social change activism are considered essential if the positives of declining EROI are to balance or exceed the negatives.</description>
	
	<guid>http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/11/2071/</guid>
	<pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2011 00:00:00 CEST</pubDate>
	
	<prism:publicationName>Sustainability</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2011-10-26</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>3</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>11</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>2071</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:endingPage>2079</prism:endingPage>
		<prism:issn>2071-1050</prism:issn>
	
	<dc:title>Looking for a Silver Lining: The Possible Positives of Declining Energy Return on Investment (EROI)</dc:title>
	<dc:date>2011-10-26</dc:date>
	<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/su3112071</dc:identifier>
		<dc:creator>Jack P. Manno</dc:creator>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/" />
</item>
	<item rdf:about="http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/11/2050/">
	<title>Sustainability, Vol. 3, Pages 2050-2070: Energy Return on Investment for Norwegian Oil and Gas from 1991 to 2008</title>
	<link>http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/11/2050/</link>
	<description>Norwegian oil and gas fields are relatively new and of high quality, which has led, during recent decades, to very high profitability both financially and in terms of energy production. One useful measure for profitability is Energy Return on Investment, EROI. Our analysis shows that EROI for Norwegian petroleum production ranged from 44:1 in the early 1990s to a maximum of 59:1 in 1996, to about 40:1 in the latter half of the last decade. To compare globally, only very few, if any, resources show such favorable EROI values as those found in the Norwegian oil and gas sector. However, the declining trend in recent years is most likely due to ageing of the fields whereas varying drilling intensity might have a smaller impact on the net energy gain of the fields. We expect the EROI of Norwegian oil and gas production to deteriorate further as the fields become older. More energy-intensive production techniques will gain in importance.</description>
	
	<guid>http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/11/2050/</guid>
	<pubDate>Wed, 26 Oct 2011 00:00:00 CEST</pubDate>
	
	<prism:publicationName>Sustainability</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2011-10-26</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>3</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>11</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>2050</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:endingPage>2070</prism:endingPage>
		<prism:issn>2071-1050</prism:issn>
	
	<dc:title>Energy Return on Investment for Norwegian Oil and Gas from 1991 to 2008</dc:title>
	<dc:date>2011-10-26</dc:date>
	<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/su3112050</dc:identifier>
		<dc:creator>Leena Grandell</dc:creator>
		<dc:creator>Charles A.S. Hall</dc:creator>
		<dc:creator>Mikael Höök</dc:creator>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/" />
</item>
	<item rdf:about="http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/10/2027/">
	<title>Sustainability, Vol. 3, Pages 2027-2049: Peak Phosphorus: Clarifying the Key Issues of a Vigorous Debate about Long-Term Phosphorus Security</title>
	<link>http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/10/2027/</link>
	<description>This paper reviews the latest information and perspectives on global phosphorus scarcity. Phosphorus is essential for food production and modern agriculture currently sources phosphorus fertilizers from finite phosphate rock. The 2008 food and phosphate fertilizer price spikes triggered increased concerns regarding the depletion timeline of phosphate rock reserves. While estimates range from 30 to 300 years and are shrouded by lack of publicly available data and substantial uncertainty, there is a general consensus that the quality and accessibility of remaining reserves are decreasing and costs will increase. This paper clarifies common sources of misunderstandings about phosphorus scarcity and identifies areas of consensus. It then asks, despite some persistent uncertainty, what would it take to achieve global phosphorus security? What would a ‘hard-landing’ response look like and how could preferred ‘soft-landing’ responses be achieved?</description>
	
	<guid>http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/10/2027/</guid>
	<pubDate>Mon, 24 Oct 2011 00:00:00 CEST</pubDate>
	
	<prism:publicationName>Sustainability</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2011-10-24</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>3</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>10</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Review</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>2027</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:endingPage>2049</prism:endingPage>
		<prism:issn>2071-1050</prism:issn>
	
	<dc:title>Peak Phosphorus: Clarifying the Key Issues of a Vigorous Debate about Long-Term Phosphorus Security</dc:title>
	<dc:date>2011-10-24</dc:date>
	<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/su3102027</dc:identifier>
		<dc:creator>Dana Cordell</dc:creator>
		<dc:creator>Stuart White</dc:creator>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/" />
</item>
	<item rdf:about="http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/10/2009/">
	<title>Sustainability, Vol. 3, Pages 2009-2026: Ultra-Deepwater Gulf of Mexico Oil and Gas: Energy Return on Financial Investment and a Preliminary Assessment of Energy Return on Energy Investment</title>
	<link>http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/10/2009/</link>
	<description>The purpose of this paper is to calculate the energy return on financial investment (EROFI) of oil and gas production in the ultra-deepwater Gulf of Mexico (GoM) in 2009 and for the estimated oil reserves of the Macondo Prospect (Mississippi Canyon Block 252). We also calculated a preliminary Energy Return on Investment (EROI) based on published energy intensity ratios including a sensitivity analysis using a range of energy intensity ratios (7 MJ/$, 12 MJ/$, and 18 MJ/$). The EROFI for ultra-deepwater oil and gas at the well-head, ranged from 0.019 to 0.022 barrels (BOE), or roughly 0.85 gallons, per dollar. Our estimates of EROI for 2009 ultra-deepwater oil and natural gas at the well-head ranged from 7–22:1. The independently-derived EROFI of the Macondo Prospect oil reserves ranged from 0.012 to 0.0071 barrels per dollar (i.e., $84 to $140 to produce a barrel) and EROI ranged from 4–16:1, related to the energy intensity ratio used to quantify costs. We believe that the lower end of these EROI ranges (i.e., 4 to 7:1) is more accurate since these values were derived using energy intensities averaged across the entire domestic oil and gas industry. Time series of the financial and preliminary EROI estimates found in this study suggest that the extraction costs of ultra-deepwater energy reserves in the GoM come at increasing energetic and economic cost to society.</description>
	
	<guid>http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/10/2009/</guid>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2011 00:00:00 CEST</pubDate>
	
	<prism:publicationName>Sustainability</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2011-10-21</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>3</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>10</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>2009</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:endingPage>2026</prism:endingPage>
		<prism:issn>2071-1050</prism:issn>
	
	<dc:title>Ultra-Deepwater Gulf of Mexico Oil and Gas: Energy Return on Financial Investment and a Preliminary Assessment of Energy Return on Energy Investment</dc:title>
	<dc:date>2011-10-21</dc:date>
	<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/su3102009</dc:identifier>
		<dc:creator>Matthew Moerschbaecher</dc:creator>
		<dc:creator>John W. Day Jr.</dc:creator>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/" />
</item>
	<item rdf:about="http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/10/1986/">
	<title>Sustainability, Vol. 3, Pages 1986-2008: Energy Return on Energy Invested for Tight Gas Wells in the Appalachian Basin, United States of America</title>
	<link>http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/10/1986/</link>
	<description>The energy cost of drilling a natural gas well has never been publicly addressed in terms of the actual fuels and energy required to generate the physical materials consumed in construction. Part of the reason for this is that drilling practices are typically regarded as proprietary; hence the required information is difficult to obtain. We propose that conventional tight gas wells that have marginal production characteristics provide a baseline for energy return on energy invested (EROI) analyses. To develop an understanding of baseline energy requirements for natural gas extraction, we examined production from a mature shallow gas field composed of vertical wells in Pennsylvania and materials used in the drilling and completion of individual wells. The data were derived from state maintained databases and reports, personal experience as a production geologist, personal interviews with industry representatives, and literature sources. We examined only the “upstream” energy cost of providing gas and provide a minimal estimate of energy cost because of uncertainty about some inputs. Of the materials examined, steel and diesel fuel accounted for more than two-thirds of the energy cost for well construction. Average energy cost per foot for a tight gas well in Indiana County is 0.59 GJ per foot. Available production data for this natural gas play was used to calculate energy return on energy invested ratios (EROI) between 67:1 and 120:1, which depends mostly on the amount of materials consumed, drilling time, and highly variable production. Accounting for such inputs as chemicals used in well treatment, materials used to construct drill bits and drill pipe, post-gathering pipeline construction, and well completion maintenance would decrease EROI by an unknown amount. This study provides energy constraints at the single-well scale for the energy requirements for drilling in geologically simple systems. The energy and monetary costs of wells from Indiana County, Pennsylvania are useful for constructing an EROI model of United States natural gas production, which suggests a peak in the EROI of gas production, has already occurred twice in the past century.</description>
	
	<guid>http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/10/1986/</guid>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Oct 2011 00:00:00 CEST</pubDate>
	
	<prism:publicationName>Sustainability</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2011-10-20</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>3</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>10</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>1986</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:endingPage>2008</prism:endingPage>
		<prism:issn>2071-1050</prism:issn>
	
	<dc:title>Energy Return on Energy Invested for Tight Gas Wells in the Appalachian Basin, United States of America</dc:title>
	<dc:date>2011-10-20</dc:date>
	<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/su3101986</dc:identifier>
		<dc:creator>Bryan Sell</dc:creator>
		<dc:creator>David Murphy</dc:creator>
		<dc:creator>Charles A.S. Hall</dc:creator>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/" />
</item>
	<item rdf:about="http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/10/1972/">
	<title>Sustainability, Vol. 3, Pages 1972-1985: A Dynamic Function for Energy Return on Investment</title>
	<link>http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/10/1972/</link>
	<description>Most estimates of energy-return-on-investment (EROI) are “static”. They determine the amount of energy produced by a particular energy technology at a particular location at a particular time. Some “dynamic” estimates are also made that track the changes in EROI of a particular resource over time. Such approaches are “bottom-up”. This paper presents a conceptual framework for a “top-down” dynamic function for the EROI of an energy resource. This function is constructed from fundamental theoretical considerations of energy technology development and resource depletion. Some empirical evidence is given as corroboration of the shape of the function components.</description>
	
	<guid>http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/10/1972/</guid>
	<pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2011 00:00:00 CEST</pubDate>
	
	<prism:publicationName>Sustainability</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2011-10-17</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>3</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>10</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>1972</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:endingPage>1985</prism:endingPage>
		<prism:issn>2071-1050</prism:issn>
	
	<dc:title>A Dynamic Function for Energy Return on Investment</dc:title>
	<dc:date>2011-10-17</dc:date>
	<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/su3101972</dc:identifier>
		<dc:creator>Michael Dale</dc:creator>
		<dc:creator>Susan Krumdieck</dc:creator>
		<dc:creator>Pat Bodger</dc:creator>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/" />
</item>
	<item rdf:about="http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/10/1944/">
	<title>Sustainability, Vol. 3, Pages 1944-1971: Evolutionary Plant Breeding in Cereals—Into a New Era</title>
	<link>http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/10/1944/</link>
	<description>In evolutionary plant breeding, crop populations with a high level of genetic diversity are subjected to the forces of natural selection. In a cycle of sowing and re-sowing seed from the plant population year after year, those plants favored under prevailing growing conditions are expected to contribute more seed to the next generation than plants with lower fitness. Thus, evolving crop populations have the capability of adapting to the conditions under which they are grown. Here we review the current state of research in evolutionary plant breeding and concentrate on the ability of evolving plant populations to deal with stressful, variable, and unpredictable environments. This resilience of evolving plant populations is seen as a major advantage under the predicted threats faced by agriculture such as global climate change. We have conducted an analysis of the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats of this breeding approach and suggest how its concept can be broadened and expanded. Given the current legal restrictions for realizing the potential of evolutionary plant breeding, we call for a change in legislation to allow evolving crop populations to enter agricultural practice on a larger scale.</description>
	
	<guid>http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/10/1944/</guid>
	<pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2011 00:00:00 CEST</pubDate>
	
	<prism:publicationName>Sustainability</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2011-10-17</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>3</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>10</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Review</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>1944</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:endingPage>1971</prism:endingPage>
		<prism:issn>2071-1050</prism:issn>
	
	<dc:title>Evolutionary Plant Breeding in Cereals—Into a New Era</dc:title>
	<dc:date>2011-10-17</dc:date>
	<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/su3101944</dc:identifier>
		<dc:creator>Thomas F. Döring</dc:creator>
		<dc:creator>Samuel Knapp</dc:creator>
		<dc:creator>Geza Kovacs</dc:creator>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Murphy</dc:creator>
		<dc:creator>Martin S. Wolfe</dc:creator>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/" />
</item>
	<item rdf:about="http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/10/1908/">
	<title>Sustainability, Vol. 3, Pages 1908-1943: System Energy Assessment (SEA), Defining a Standard Measure of EROI for Energy Businesses as Whole Systems</title>
	<link>http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/10/1908/</link>
	<description>A more objective method for measuring the energy needs of businesses, System Energy Assessment (SEA), measures the combined impacts of material supply chains and service supply chains, to assess businesses as whole self-managing net-energy systems. The method is demonstrated using a model Wind Farm, and defines a physical measure of their energy productivity for society (EROI-S), a ratio of total energy delivered to total energy expended. Energy use records for technology and proxy measures for clearly understood but not individually recorded energy uses for services are combined for a whole system estimate of consumption required for production. Current methods count only energy needs for technology. Business services outsource their own energy needs to operate, leaving no traceable record. That uncounted business energy demand is often 80% of the total, an amount of “dark energy” hidden from view, discovered by finding the average energy estimated needs for businesses far below the world average energy consumed per dollar of GDP. Presently for lack of information the energy needs of business services are counted to be “0”. Our default assumption is to treat them as “average”. The result is a hard measure of total business demand for energy services, a “Scope 4” energy use or GHG impact assessment. Counting recorded energy uses and discounting unrecorded ones misrepresents labor intensive work as highly energy efficient. The result confirms a similar finding by Hall et al. in 1981 [1]. We use exhaustive search for what a business needs to operate as a whole, tracing internal business relationships rather than energy data, to locate its natural physical boundary as a working unit, and so define a business as a physical rather than statistical subject of scientific study. See also online resource materials and notes [2].</description>
	
	<guid>http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/10/1908/</guid>
	<pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2011 00:00:00 CEST</pubDate>
	
	<prism:publicationName>Sustainability</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2011-10-17</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>3</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>10</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>1908</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:endingPage>1943</prism:endingPage>
		<prism:issn>2071-1050</prism:issn>
	
	<dc:title>System Energy Assessment (SEA), Defining a Standard Measure of EROI for Energy Businesses as Whole Systems</dc:title>
	<dc:date>2011-10-17</dc:date>
	<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/su3101908</dc:identifier>
		<dc:creator>Philip F. Henshaw</dc:creator>
		<dc:creator>Carey King</dc:creator>
		<dc:creator>Jay Zarnikau</dc:creator>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/" />
</item>
	<item rdf:about="http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/10/1888/">
	<title>Sustainability, Vol. 3, Pages 1888-1907: Order from Chaos: A Preliminary Protocol for Determining the EROI of Fuels</title>
	<link>http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/10/1888/</link>
	<description>The main objective of this manuscript is to provide a formal methodology, structure, and nomenclature for EROI analysis that is both consistent, so that all EROI numbers across various processes can be compared, and also flexible, so that changes or additions to the universal formula can focus analyses on specific areas of concern. To accomplish this objective we address four areas that are of particular interest within EROI analysis: (1) boundaries of the system under analysis, (2) energy quality corrections, (3) energy-economic conversions, and (4) alternative EROI statistics. Lastly, we present step-by-step instructions outlining how to perform an EROI analysis.</description>
	
	<guid>http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/10/1888/</guid>
	<pubDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2011 00:00:00 CEST</pubDate>
	
	<prism:publicationName>Sustainability</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2011-10-17</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>3</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>10</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>1888</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:endingPage>1907</prism:endingPage>
		<prism:issn>2071-1050</prism:issn>
	
	<dc:title>Order from Chaos: A Preliminary Protocol for Determining the EROI of Fuels</dc:title>
	<dc:date>2011-10-17</dc:date>
	<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/su3101888</dc:identifier>
		<dc:creator>David J. Murphy</dc:creator>
		<dc:creator>Charles A.S. Hall</dc:creator>
		<dc:creator>Michael Dale</dc:creator>
		<dc:creator>Cutler Cleveland</dc:creator>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/" />
</item>
	<item rdf:about="http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/10/1866/">
	<title>Sustainability, Vol. 3, Pages 1866-1887: A New Long Term Assessment of Energy Return on Investment (EROI) for U.S. Oil and Gas Discovery and Production</title>
	<link>http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/10/1866/</link>
	<description>Oil and gas are the main sources of energy in the United States. Part of their appeal is the high Energy Return on Energy Investment (EROI) when procuring them. We assessed data from the United States Bureau of the Census of Mineral Industries, the Energy Information Administration (EIA), the Oil and Gas Journal for the years 1919–2007 and from oil analyst Jean Laherrere to derive EROI for both finding and producing oil and gas. We found two general patterns in the relation of energy gains compared to energy costs: a gradual secular decrease in EROI and an inverse relation to drilling effort. EROI for finding oil and gas decreased exponentially from 1200:1 in 1919 to 5:1 in 2007. The EROI for production of the oil and gas industry was about 20:1 from 1919 to 1972, declined to about 8:1 in 1982 when peak drilling occurred, recovered to about 17:1 from 1986–2002 and declined sharply to about 11:1 in the mid to late 2000s. The slowly declining secular trend has been partly masked by changing effort: the lower the intensity of drilling, the higher the EROI compared to the secular trend. Fuel consumption within the oil and gas industry grew continuously from 1919 through the early 1980s, declined in the mid-1990s, and has increased recently, not surprisingly linked to the increased cost of finding and extracting oil.</description>
	
	<guid>http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/10/1866/</guid>
	<pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2011 00:00:00 CEST</pubDate>
	
	<prism:publicationName>Sustainability</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2011-10-14</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>3</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>10</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>1866</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:endingPage>1887</prism:endingPage>
		<prism:issn>2071-1050</prism:issn>
	
	<dc:title>A New Long Term Assessment of Energy Return on Investment (EROI) for U.S. Oil and Gas Discovery and Production</dc:title>
	<dc:date>2011-10-14</dc:date>
	<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/su3101866</dc:identifier>
		<dc:creator>Megan C. Guilford</dc:creator>
		<dc:creator>Charles A.S. Hall</dc:creator>
		<dc:creator>Peter O’Connor</dc:creator>
		<dc:creator>Cutler J. Cleveland</dc:creator>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/" />
</item>
	<item rdf:about="http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/10/1855/">
	<title>Sustainability, Vol. 3, Pages 1855-1865: Sustainability Science: Sustainable Energy for Mobility and Its Use in Policy Making</title>
	<link>http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/10/1855/</link>
	<description>Since the 1980s sustainability has clearly become the challenge of the 21st century. In a process toward a sustainable society it is crucial that different stakeholders start collaboration and exchange ideas with technicians and academics. To finalize the policy decisions on important issues such as energy sustainability, collaboration between policy makers, academia and the private sector is important. This work intends to give Italian policy makers concrete advice and solutions to develop energy systems for mobility. The analysis proceeds from the context of Sustainability Science, a new science, which has emerged as one of the most important disciplines of international scientific research. Using a new approach, trans-disciplinary and integrated, this research is oriented to study and understand the complexity of the interactions between economy, society and nature. This broad approach permits proposing concrete solutions to complex problems locally and globally. We propose a scheme of definition of Sustainability Energy, defining five pillars of reference, and we redefine the energy systems for mobility in the context of Sustainability Science. In this paper, we start from the idea that we are living in a crucial passage, we are moving from the era of petroleum to the era of energy vectors. Energy systems, including mobility, should be redefined within this new approach.</description>
	
	<guid>http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/10/1855/</guid>
	<pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2011 00:00:00 CEST</pubDate>
	
	<prism:publicationName>Sustainability</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2011-10-12</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>3</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>10</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>1855</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:endingPage>1865</prism:endingPage>
		<prism:issn>2071-1050</prism:issn>
	
	<dc:title>Sustainability Science: Sustainable Energy for Mobility and Its Use in Policy Making</dc:title>
	<dc:date>2011-10-12</dc:date>
	<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/su3101855</dc:identifier>
		<dc:creator>Fabio Orecchini</dc:creator>
		<dc:creator>Adriano Santiangeli</dc:creator>
		<dc:creator>Valeria Valitutti</dc:creator>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/" />
</item>
	<item rdf:about="http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/10/1833/">
	<title>Sustainability, Vol. 3, Pages 1833-1854: Oil Depletion and the Energy Efficiency of Oil Production: The Case of California</title>
	<link>http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/10/1833/</link>
	<description>This study explores the impact of oil depletion on the energetic efficiency of oil extraction and refining in California. These changes are measured using energy return ratios (such as the energy return on investment, or EROI). I construct a time-varying first-order process model of energy inputs and outputs of oil extraction. The model includes factors such as oil quality, reservoir depth, enhanced recovery techniques, and water cut. This model is populated with historical data for 306 California oil fields over a 50 year period. The model focuses on the effects of resource quality decline, while technical efficiencies are modeled simply. Results indicate that the energy intensity of oil extraction in California increased significantly from 1955 to 2005. This resulted in a decline in the life-cycle EROI from 6.5 to 3.5 (measured as megajoules (MJ) delivered to final consumers per MJ primary energy invested in energy extraction, transport, and refining). Most of this decline in energy returns is due to increasing need for steam-based thermal enhanced oil recovery, with secondary effects due to conventional resource depletion (e.g., increased water cut).</description>
	
	<guid>http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/10/1833/</guid>
	<pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2011 00:00:00 CEST</pubDate>
	
	<prism:publicationName>Sustainability</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2011-10-12</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>3</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>10</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>1833</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:endingPage>1854</prism:endingPage>
		<prism:issn>2071-1050</prism:issn>
	
	<dc:title>Oil Depletion and the Energy Efficiency of Oil Production: The Case of California</dc:title>
	<dc:date>2011-10-12</dc:date>
	<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/su3101833</dc:identifier>
		<dc:creator>Adam R. Brandt</dc:creator>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/" />
</item>
	<item rdf:about="http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/10/1810/">
	<title>Sustainability, Vol. 3, Pages 1810-1832: Relating Financial and Energy Return on Investment</title>
	<link>http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/10/1810/</link>
	<description>For many reasons, including environmental impacts and the peaking and depletion of the highest grades of fossil energy, it is very important to have sound methods for the evaluation of energy technologies and the profitability of the businesses that utilize them. In this paper we derive relations among the biophysical characteristic of an energy resource in relation to the businesses and technologies that exploit them. These relations include the energy return on energy investment (EROI), the price of energy, and the profit of an energy business. Our analyses show that EROI and the price of energy are inherently inversely related such that as EROI decreases for depleting fossil fuel production, the corresponding energy prices increase dramatically. Using energy and financial data for the oil and gas production sector, we demonstrate that the equations sufficiently describe the fundamental trends between profit, price, and EROI. For example, in 2002 an EROI of 11:1 for US oil and gas translates to an oil price of 24 $2005/barrel at a typical profit of 10%. This work sets the stage for proper EROI and price comparisons of individual fossil and renewable energy businesses as well as the electricity sector as a whole. Additionally, it presents a framework for incorporating EROI into larger economic systems models.</description>
	
	<guid>http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/10/1810/</guid>
	<pubDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2011 00:00:00 CEST</pubDate>
	
	<prism:publicationName>Sustainability</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2011-10-11</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>3</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>10</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>1810</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:endingPage>1832</prism:endingPage>
		<prism:issn>2071-1050</prism:issn>
	
	<dc:title>Relating Financial and Energy Return on Investment</dc:title>
	<dc:date>2011-10-11</dc:date>
	<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/su3101810</dc:identifier>
		<dc:creator>Carey W. King</dc:creator>
		<dc:creator>Charles A.S. Hall</dc:creator>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/" />
</item>
	<item rdf:about="http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/10/1796/">
	<title>Sustainability, Vol. 3, Pages 1796-1809: A Review of the Past and Current State of EROI Data</title>
	<link>http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/10/1796/</link>
	<description>This is a review of the literature available on data for the EROI (prior to this special issue) of the following 12 sources of fuel/energy: oil and natural gas, coal, tar sands, shale oil, nuclear, wind, solar, hydropower, geothermal, wave/tidal and corn ethanol. Unfortunately, we found that few studies have been undertaken since the 1980s, and such as have been done are often marked more by advocacy than objectivity. The most recent summary of work and data on the EROI of fuels was conducted in the summer of 2007 at SUNY ESF and appeared on The Oil Drum website and in a readable summary by Richard Heinberg. This paper summarizes the findings of that study, and also those preceding and subsequent to it where available. It also summarizes issues raised by some concerning the findings of these studies and with the calculations within. While there are many who believe that such EROI studies are critical to understanding our financial and social future there seems to be very little interest by governments and industries in supporting this research or in using or promulgating such research as has been done. We view this as critical as our main fuels are progressively depleted and as we are faced with making extremely important decisions on a very meager analytical and data base, and with few scientists trained to cut through the reams of insufficiently analyzed energy advocacy saturating our media and the blogosphere.</description>
	
	<guid>http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/10/1796/</guid>
	<pubDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2011 00:00:00 CEST</pubDate>
	
	<prism:publicationName>Sustainability</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2011-10-10</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>3</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>10</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Review</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>1796</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:endingPage>1809</prism:endingPage>
		<prism:issn>2071-1050</prism:issn>
	
	<dc:title>A Review of the Past and Current State of EROI Data</dc:title>
	<dc:date>2011-10-10</dc:date>
	<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/su3101796</dc:identifier>
		<dc:creator>Ajay K. Gupta</dc:creator>
		<dc:creator>Charles A.S. Hall</dc:creator>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/" />
</item>
	<item rdf:about="http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/10/1792/">
	<title>Sustainability, Vol. 3, Pages 1792-1795: A Summary on the Special Issue “Sustainability of Groundwater”</title>
	<link>http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/10/1792/</link>
	<description>One of the most common denominators for almost any form of life is the existential need for water. This need has recently received much attention in the frame of sustainability discussions [1,2]. In addition, environmental sustainability and safe access to fresh water is one of the eight United Nation’s millennium development goals, and ultimately most conditions of life rely on water. Expected higher water demands for irrigation, industrial and household purposes outline the need for more investment in freshwater characterization and quantification. In addition, factors including climate change, large-scale reservoirs, re-channelling of streams, expansion of urban centres as well as chemical and microbial loading need to be taken into account. [...]</description>
	
	<guid>http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/10/1792/</guid>
	<pubDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2011 00:00:00 CEST</pubDate>
	
	<prism:publicationName>Sustainability</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2011-10-10</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>3</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>10</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Editorial</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>1792</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:endingPage>1795</prism:endingPage>
		<prism:issn>2071-1050</prism:issn>
	
	<dc:title>A Summary on the Special Issue “Sustainability of Groundwater”</dc:title>
	<dc:date>2011-10-10</dc:date>
	<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/su3101792</dc:identifier>
		<dc:creator>Veith Becker</dc:creator>
		<dc:creator>Anssi Myrttinen</dc:creator>
		<dc:creator>Johannes A.C. Barth</dc:creator>
		<dc:creator>Peter Bayer</dc:creator>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/" />
</item>
	<item rdf:about="http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/10/1778/">
	<title>Sustainability, Vol. 3, Pages 1778-1791: Representation of Ecodesign Practice: International Comparison of Industrial Design Consultancies</title>
	<link>http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/10/1778/</link>
	<description>Ecodesign offers significant potential to reduce the environmental impacts of products. Whilst some integration of environmental considerations into design occurs in progressive companies when engineering the product, this only represents a small share of the possible design interventions to improve the environmental performance of products. For example, developing new product concepts to fulfill needs in a less environmentally harmful way and considering user related aspects offers a large, currently under-realized potential. This paper identifies industrial design (ID) consultancies as potential agents to tackle this issue on a strategic and operational basis. The extent to which this potential is currently applied was assessed by conducting a content analysis of websites of ID consultancies in Australia, China, and Germany. How ID consultancies represent their ecodesign practice is country-specific. Despite the differences, some ID consultancies in all countries announce and/or show the capability to develop completely new concepts and to influence user related factors to improve environmental performance. This shows their potential to address current shortcomings in ecodesign practice. As ID consultancies embracing that potential still are a minority, further research should be directed to a deeper examination of barriers and stimuli for ID consultancies to take up ecodesign.</description>
	
	<guid>http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/10/1778/</guid>
	<pubDate>Mon, 10 Oct 2011 00:00:00 CEST</pubDate>
	
	<prism:publicationName>Sustainability</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2011-10-10</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>3</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>10</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>1778</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:endingPage>1791</prism:endingPage>
		<prism:issn>2071-1050</prism:issn>
	
	<dc:title>Representation of Ecodesign Practice: International Comparison of Industrial Design Consultancies</dc:title>
	<dc:date>2011-10-10</dc:date>
	<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/su3101778</dc:identifier>
		<dc:creator>Johannes Behrisch</dc:creator>
		<dc:creator>Mariano Ramirez</dc:creator>
		<dc:creator>Damien Giurco</dc:creator>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/" />
</item>
	<item rdf:about="http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/10/1773/">
	<title>Sustainability, Vol. 3, Pages 1773-1777: Introduction to Special Issue on New Studies in EROI (Energy Return on Investment)</title>
	<link>http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/10/1773/</link>
	<description>Energy Return on Investment (EROI) refers to how much energy is returned from one unit of energy invested in an energy-producing activity. It is a critical parameter for understanding and ranking different fuels. There were a number of studies on EROI three decades ago but relatively little work since. Now there is a whole new interest in EROI as fuels get increasingly expensive and as we attempt to weigh alternative energies against traditional ones. This special volume brings together a whole series of high quality new studies on EROI, as well as many papers that struggle with the meaning of changing EROI and its impact on our economy. One overall conclusion is that the quality of fuels is at least as important in our assessment as is the quantity. I argue that many of the contemporary changes in our economy are related directly to changing EROI as our premium fuels are increasingly depleted.</description>
	
	<guid>http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/10/1773/</guid>
	<pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2011 00:00:00 CEST</pubDate>
	
	<prism:publicationName>Sustainability</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2011-10-07</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>3</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>10</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Editorial</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>1773</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:endingPage>1777</prism:endingPage>
		<prism:issn>2071-1050</prism:issn>
	
	<dc:title>Introduction to Special Issue on New Studies in EROI (Energy Return on Investment)</dc:title>
	<dc:date>2011-10-07</dc:date>
	<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/su3101773</dc:identifier>
		<dc:creator>Charles A.S. Hall</dc:creator>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/" />
</item>
	<item rdf:about="http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/10/1742/">
	<title>Sustainability, Vol. 3, Pages 1742-1772: Crop Breeding for Low Input Agriculture: A Sustainable Response to Feed a Growing World Population</title>
	<link>http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/10/1742/</link>
	<description>World population is projected to reach its maximum (~10 billion people) by the year 2050. This 45% increase of the current world population (approaching seven billion people) will boost the demand for food and raw materials. However, we live in a historical moment when supply of phosphate, water, and oil are at their peaks. Modern agriculture is fundamentally based on varieties bred for high performance under high input systems (fertilizers, water, oil, pesticides), which generally do not perform well under low-input situations. We propose a shift of research goals and plant breeding objectives from high-performance agriculture at high-energy input to those with an improved rationalization between yield and energy input. Crop breeding programs that are more focused on nutrient economy and local environmental fitness will help reduce energy demands for crop production while still providing adequate amounts of high quality food as global resources decline and population is projected to increase.</description>
	
	<guid>http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/10/1742/</guid>
	<pubDate>Thu, 06 Oct 2011 00:00:00 CEST</pubDate>
	
	<prism:publicationName>Sustainability</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2011-10-06</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>3</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>10</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Review</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>1742</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:endingPage>1772</prism:endingPage>
		<prism:issn>2071-1050</prism:issn>
	
	<dc:title>Crop Breeding for Low Input Agriculture: A Sustainable Response to Feed a Growing World Population</dc:title>
	<dc:date>2011-10-06</dc:date>
	<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/su3101742</dc:identifier>
		<dc:creator>Tiffany L. Fess</dc:creator>
		<dc:creator>James B. Kotcon</dc:creator>
		<dc:creator>Vagner A. Benedito</dc:creator>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/" />
</item>
	<item rdf:about="http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/10/1723/">
	<title>Sustainability, Vol. 3, Pages 1723-1741: Potential Impact of Biotechnology on Adaption of Agriculture to Climate Change: The Case of Drought Tolerant Rice Breeding in Asia</title>
	<link>http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/10/1723/</link>
	<description>In Asia and Africa the poor tend to live in marginal environments where droughts and floods are frequent. Global warming is expected to increase the frequency of these weather-induced perturbations of crop production. Drought tolerance (DT) has been one of the most difficult traits to improve in genetic crop improvement programs worldwide. Biotechnology provides breeders with a number of new tools that may help to develop more drought tolerant varieties such as marker assisted selection (MAS), molecular breeding (MB), and transgenic plants. This paper assesses some preliminary evidence on the potential impact of biotechnology using data from surveys of the initial DT cultivars developed through one of the main programs in Asia that has been funding DT rice breeding since 1998—The Rockefeller Foundation’s Resilient Crops for Water-Limited Environments program in China, India, and Thailand. Yield increases of DT rice varieties are 5 to 10 percent better than conventional varieties or currently grown commercial varieties than it has been in years. So far we only have experiment station evidence that DT varieties yielded better than conventional or improved varieties during moderate drought years (the one drought year during our study period in South India gave inconclusive results) and in severe drought both the DT and the conventional varieties were either not planted or, if planted, did not yield. We find that the governments could help overcome some of the constraints to the spread of DT cultivars by increasing government funding of DT research programs that take advantage of new biotech techniques and new knowledge from genomics. Secondly, public scientists can make breeding lines with DT traits and molecular markers more easily available to the private seed firms so that they can incorporate DT traits into their commercial hybrids particularly for poor areas. Third, governments can subsidize private sector production of DT seed or provide more government money for state extension services to produce DT varieties.</description>
	
	<guid>http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/10/1723/</guid>
	<pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2011 00:00:00 CEST</pubDate>
	
	<prism:publicationName>Sustainability</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-30</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>3</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>10</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>1723</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:endingPage>1741</prism:endingPage>
		<prism:issn>2071-1050</prism:issn>
	
	<dc:title>Potential Impact of Biotechnology on Adaption of Agriculture to Climate Change: The Case of Drought Tolerant Rice Breeding in Asia</dc:title>
	<dc:date>2011-09-30</dc:date>
	<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/su3101723</dc:identifier>
		<dc:creator>Carl Pray</dc:creator>
		<dc:creator>Latha Nagarajan</dc:creator>
		<dc:creator>Luping Li</dc:creator>
		<dc:creator>Jikun Huang</dc:creator>
		<dc:creator>Ruifa Hu</dc:creator>
		<dc:creator>K.N. Selvaraj</dc:creator>
		<dc:creator>Ora Napasintuwong</dc:creator>
		<dc:creator>R. Chandra Babu</dc:creator>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/" />
</item>
	<item rdf:about="http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/10/1688/">
	<title>Sustainability, Vol. 3, Pages 1688-1722: Inserting Ecological Detail into Economic Analysis: Agricultural Nutrient Loading of an Estuary Fishery</title>
	<link>http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/10/1688/</link>
	<description>Linked general equilibrium economic and ecological models are connected through agricultural runoff and the fisheries. They are applied to a North Carolina estuary in which agricultural runoff alters phytoplankton densities and the resulting hypoxia leads to diminished fisheries. The effects of hypoxia on multiple species across space are analyzed and the joint economic and ecosystem wide response to a policy of reduced runoff is quantified. The approach provides an assessment of changes in ecological welfare (in terms of species populations) and economic welfare (in terms of equivalent variations) following reductions in runoff.</description>
	
	<guid>http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/10/1688/</guid>
	<pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2011 00:00:00 CEST</pubDate>
	
	<prism:publicationName>Sustainability</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-30</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>3</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>10</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>1688</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:endingPage>1722</prism:endingPage>
		<prism:issn>2071-1050</prism:issn>
	
	<dc:title>Inserting Ecological Detail into Economic Analysis: Agricultural Nutrient Loading of an Estuary Fishery</dc:title>
	<dc:date>2011-09-30</dc:date>
	<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/su3101688</dc:identifier>
		<dc:creator>David Finnoff</dc:creator>
		<dc:creator>John Tschirhart</dc:creator>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/" />
</item>
	<item rdf:about="http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/10/1662/">
	<title>Sustainability, Vol. 3, Pages 1662-1687: Modeling Evacuate versus Shelter-in-Place Decisions in Wildfires</title>
	<link>http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/10/1662/</link>
	<description>Improving community resiliency to wildfire is a challenging problem in the face of ongoing development in fire-prone regions. Evacuation and shelter-in-place are the primary options for reducing wildfire casualties, but it can be difficult to determine which option offers the most protection in urgent scenarios. Although guidelines and policies have been proposed to inform this decision, a formal approach to evaluating protective options would help advance protective-action theory. We present an optimization model based on the premise that protecting a community can be viewed as assigning threatened households to one of three actions: evacuation, shelter-in-refuge, or shelter-in-home. While evacuation generally offers the highest level of life protection, it can place residents at greater risk when little time is available. This leads to complex trade-offs involving expected fire intensity, available time, and the quality and accessibility of in-place shelter. An application of the model is presented to illustrate a range of issues that can arise across scenarios.</description>
	
	<guid>http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/10/1662/</guid>
	<pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2011 00:00:00 CEST</pubDate>
	
	<prism:publicationName>Sustainability</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-29</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>3</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>10</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>1662</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:endingPage>1687</prism:endingPage>
		<prism:issn>2071-1050</prism:issn>
	
	<dc:title>Modeling Evacuate versus Shelter-in-Place Decisions in Wildfires</dc:title>
	<dc:date>2011-09-29</dc:date>
	<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/su3101662</dc:identifier>
		<dc:creator>Thomas J. Cova</dc:creator>
		<dc:creator>Philip E. Dennison</dc:creator>
		<dc:creator>Frank A. Drews</dc:creator>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/" />
</item>
	<item rdf:about="http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/10/1637/">
	<title>Sustainability, Vol. 3, Pages 1637-1661: Sustainable Development: A Bird’s Eye View</title>
	<link>http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/10/1637/</link>
	<description>At the turn of the millennium, the world’s political leadership adopted sustainable development as a leading model for societal development. However, the terms “sustainable development”, “sustainability” and “sustainable” are sometimes over- and misused despite wide consensus about the concept’s meaning among sustainability scholars and practitioners. While the concept allows various sustainability views to co-exist, random conceptualizations which do not respect the fundamental sustainability principles undermine the concept’s objective to steer action. This lack of understanding of sustainability arguably inhibits its practical realization and a proper understanding of sustainability is urgently needed. In this paper we aim to contribute to a better understanding of sustainability by adopting a bird’s eye perspective. We review the rich contemporary literature, with a specific focus on the terminology, genesis, fundamental principles, mainstream views of sustainability, and several governing aspects. Further, using the evolving body of sustainability literature, the paper provides arguments to combat common misconceptions of sustainability.</description>
	
	<guid>http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/10/1637/</guid>
	<pubDate>Tue, 27 Sep 2011 00:00:00 CEST</pubDate>
	
	<prism:publicationName>Sustainability</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-27</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>3</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>10</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Review</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>1637</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:endingPage>1661</prism:endingPage>
		<prism:issn>2071-1050</prism:issn>
	
	<dc:title>Sustainable Development: A Bird’s Eye View</dc:title>
	<dc:date>2011-09-27</dc:date>
	<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/su3101637</dc:identifier>
		<dc:creator>Tom Waas</dc:creator>
		<dc:creator>Jean Hugé</dc:creator>
		<dc:creator>Aviel Verbruggen</dc:creator>
		<dc:creator>Tarah Wright</dc:creator>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/" />
</item>
	<item rdf:about="http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/9/1616/">
	<title>Sustainability, Vol. 3, Pages 1616-1636: Phenotypic Changes in Different Spinach Varieties Grown and Selected under Organic Conditions</title>
	<link>http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/9/1616/</link>
	<description>Organic and low-input agriculture needs flexible varieties that can buffer environmental stress and adapt to the needs of farmers. We implemented an experiment to investigate the evolutionary capacities of a sample of spinach (Spinacia oleracea L.) population varieties for a number of phenotypic traits. Three farmers cultivated, selected and multiplied one or several populations over two years on their farms. The third year, the versions of the varieties cultivated and selected by the different farmers were compared to the original seed lots they had been given. After two cycles of cultivation and on-farm mass selection, all the observed varieties showed significant phenotypic changes (differences between the original version and the version cultivated by farmers) for morphological and phenological traits. When the divergence among versions within varieties was studied, the results show that the varieties conserved their identity, except for one variety, which evolved in such a way that it may now be considered two different varieties. The heterogeneity of the population varieties was assessed in comparison with a commercial F1 hybrid used as control, and we found no specific differences in phenotypic diversity between the hybrid and population varieties. The phenotypic changes shown by the population varieties in response to on-farm cultivation and selection could be useful for the development of specific adaptation. These results call into question the current European seed legislation and the requirements of phenotypic stability for conservation varieties.</description>
	
	<guid>http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/9/1616/</guid>
	<pubDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2011 00:00:00 CEST</pubDate>
	
	<prism:publicationName>Sustainability</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-23</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>3</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>9</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>1616</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:endingPage>1636</prism:endingPage>
		<prism:issn>2071-1050</prism:issn>
	
	<dc:title>Phenotypic Changes in Different Spinach Varieties Grown and Selected under Organic Conditions</dc:title>
	<dc:date>2011-09-23</dc:date>
	<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/su3091616</dc:identifier>
		<dc:creator>Estelle Serpolay</dc:creator>
		<dc:creator>Nicolas Schermann</dc:creator>
		<dc:creator>Julie Dawson</dc:creator>
		<dc:creator>Edith T. Lammerts van Bueren</dc:creator>
		<dc:creator>Isabelle Goldringer</dc:creator>
		<dc:creator>Véronique Chable</dc:creator>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/" />
</item>
	<item rdf:about="http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/9/1593/">
	<title>Sustainability, Vol. 3, Pages 1593-1615: Do Respondents’ Perceptions of the Status Quo Matter in Non-Market Valuation with Choice Experiments? An Application to New Zealand Freshwater Streams</title>
	<link>http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/9/1593/</link>
	<description>Many issues relating to the sustainability of environmental resource use are informed by environmental valuation studies with stated preference surveys. Within these, researchers often provide descriptions of status quo conditions which may differ from those perceived by respondents. Ignoring this difference in utility baselines may affect the magnitude of estimated utility changes and hence bias benefit estimates of proposed environmental policies. We investigate this issue using data from a choice experiment on a community’s willingness to pay for water quality improvements in streams. More than 60% of respondents perceived streams’ water quality at the status quo to be better than the description we provided in our scenario. Results show that respondents who could provide details of their perception of the status quo displayed stronger preferences for water quality improvements—and hence higher marginal willingness to pay—than their counterparts. However, respondents who referred to their own status quo description displayed a higher inclination to prefer the status quo, while other respondents tended to prefer the proposed improvements. We argue this might be linked to the amount of knowledge each group displayed about the status quo: a kind of reluctance to leave what one believes he/she knows well.</description>
	
	<guid>http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/9/1593/</guid>
	<pubDate>Fri, 23 Sep 2011 00:00:00 CEST</pubDate>
	
	<prism:publicationName>Sustainability</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-23</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>3</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>9</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>1593</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:endingPage>1615</prism:endingPage>
		<prism:issn>2071-1050</prism:issn>
	
	<dc:title>Do Respondents’ Perceptions of the Status Quo Matter in Non-Market Valuation with Choice Experiments? An Application to New Zealand Freshwater Streams</dc:title>
	<dc:date>2011-09-23</dc:date>
	<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/su3091593</dc:identifier>
		<dc:creator>Dan Marsh</dc:creator>
		<dc:creator>Lena Mkwara</dc:creator>
		<dc:creator>Riccardo Scarpa</dc:creator>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/" />
</item>
	<item rdf:about="http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/9/1573/">
	<title>Sustainability, Vol. 3, Pages 1573-1592: Rogun Dam—Path to Energy Independence or Security Threat?</title>
	<link>http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/9/1573/</link>
	<description>The revitalization of the Rogun hydropower station project and launch of an Initial Public Offering has led the water-energy disputes between Tajikistan and Uzbekistan to a new stage. While two riparian states advocate their positions from their own perspective, it gives the impression of being a “prisoners’ dilemma” case from a regional cooperation point. This paper aims to review the decision of project revitalization from the unconventional security perspective, focusing mainly on its impact on Tajikistan. The scope will be limited to economic, energy, social and political security. The paper attempts to reveal the existing unconventional security threats and suggest possible solutions for the arising problems.</description>
	
	<guid>http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/9/1573/</guid>
	<pubDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2011 00:00:00 CEST</pubDate>
	
	<prism:publicationName>Sustainability</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-22</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>3</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>9</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>1573</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:endingPage>1592</prism:endingPage>
		<prism:issn>2071-1050</prism:issn>
	
	<dc:title>Rogun Dam—Path to Energy Independence or Security Threat?</dc:title>
	<dc:date>2011-09-22</dc:date>
	<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/su3091573</dc:identifier>
		<dc:creator>Bahtiyor R. Eshchanov</dc:creator>
		<dc:creator>Mona Grinwis Plaat Stultjes</dc:creator>
		<dc:creator>Sanaatbek K. Salaev</dc:creator>
		<dc:creator>Ruzumboy A. Eshchanov</dc:creator>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/" />
</item>
	<item rdf:about="http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/9/1555/">
	<title>Sustainability, Vol. 3, Pages 1555-1572: Do Political Attitudes Affect Consumer Choice? Evidence from a Large-Scale Field Study with Genetically Modified Bread in Switzerland</title>
	<link>http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/9/1555/</link>
	<description>Independent of the left-right model of ideological structure, genetically modified organisms (GMOs) in food and agriculture are resented across the political spectrum in Switzerland. In the absence of any real experience with genetically modified (GM) food but faced with continuous exposure to warning messages in the media, conditioned feelings related to such a politically sensitive product may have a significant influence on revealed consumer choice. In our large-scale field study, we examined this assumption by selling three types of bread labeled as ‘made with organic corn’, ‘made with genetically modified corn’ and ‘made with conventional corn’ respectively in five locations across Switzerland using different price scenarios and selling groups. Customers who decided to buy bread also received an envelope containing a questionnaire about their prior political attitude expressed through their voting decision in a national referendum on a five-year ban on GMOs in 2005. The results demonstrate that consumer purchase decisions are determined by contextual factors not captured by general political attitudes. Surprisingly, the mere presence of GM food did have a positive impact on overall sales. The assumption that consumers would feel turned off by the mere presence of GM food for political reasons can therefore be safely discarded.</description>
	
	<guid>http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/9/1555/</guid>
	<pubDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2011 00:00:00 CEST</pubDate>
	
	<prism:publicationName>Sustainability</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-22</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>3</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>9</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>1555</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:endingPage>1572</prism:endingPage>
		<prism:issn>2071-1050</prism:issn>
	
	<dc:title>Do Political Attitudes Affect Consumer Choice? Evidence from a Large-Scale Field Study with Genetically Modified Bread in Switzerland</dc:title>
	<dc:date>2011-09-22</dc:date>
	<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/su3091555</dc:identifier>
		<dc:creator>Philipp Aerni</dc:creator>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/" />
</item>
	<item rdf:about="http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/9/1531/">
	<title>Sustainability, Vol. 3, Pages 1531-1554: Open-Pollinated vs. Hybrid Maize Cultivars</title>
	<link>http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/9/1531/</link>
	<description>The history of maize breeding methods in the USA is reviewed to examine the question of types of maize cultivars in sustainable agriculture. The yield potential of OP cultivars was much higher than national average yields prior to 1930, but hybrid cultivars today often out-yield OP cultivars by 50–100% or more. However, rates of gain for yield using recurrent selection on populations appear equal to that recorded for commercial hybrid breeding. The inbred-hybrid method, while successful, was not “the only sound basis” for maize improvement, as evidenced by later experiences in the United States and worldwide. It appears that maize breeders have practiced objective science and achieved concrete goals, although personal interests and goals clearly direct the work at times. As society looks for tools for sustainability based on achieving multiple goals, a special dedication to scientific validation and broad objectivity may be required. The potential for OP cultivars today is evaluated and research questions are identified.</description>
	
	<guid>http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/9/1531/</guid>
	<pubDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2011 00:00:00 CEST</pubDate>
	
	<prism:publicationName>Sustainability</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-22</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>3</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>9</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Review</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>1531</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:endingPage>1554</prism:endingPage>
		<prism:issn>2071-1050</prism:issn>
	
	<dc:title>Open-Pollinated vs. Hybrid Maize Cultivars</dc:title>
	<dc:date>2011-09-22</dc:date>
	<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/su3091531</dc:identifier>
		<dc:creator>Frank Kutka</dc:creator>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/" />
</item>
	<item rdf:about="http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/9/1517/">
	<title>Sustainability, Vol. 3, Pages 1517-1530: Change of Land Use Patterns in the Areas Close to the Airport Development Area and Some Implicating Factors</title>
	<link>http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/9/1517/</link>
	<description>This paper presents the description of land use change in the suburbs near Suvarnabhumi International Airport, with a focus on land use patterns before and during airport development. According to geographic information system (GIS), land use patterns are categorized into three main groups, namely intensive urban development land, areas developed under environmental conditions, and natural land. Steps of land use changes, land use planning and related factors concerning number of population, dwelling units and factories were analyzed. In the short term, urban development dramatically increases by 39.97% whereas the areas developed under environmental conditions decreased by 37.52%, with significant correlation (P &lt; 0.05). The natural land which is typically grassland and watercourses changed insignificantly (P &gt; 0.05). Urbanization of the areas where the airport is located increased between 10.07% and 15.57%. The changes of land use comply with the Integrated Town and Country Planning. The areas where urbanization is small are under the area designated as the green area. Urban expansion is mainly a result of increase in residential areas which is closely related to number of population. Such changes indicate a need for more effective urban development planning and management to conserve environmental quality.</description>
	
	<guid>http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/9/1517/</guid>
	<pubDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2011 00:00:00 CEST</pubDate>
	
	<prism:publicationName>Sustainability</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-20</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>3</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>9</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>1517</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:endingPage>1530</prism:endingPage>
		<prism:issn>2071-1050</prism:issn>
	
	<dc:title>Change of Land Use Patterns in the Areas Close to the Airport Development Area and Some Implicating Factors</dc:title>
	<dc:date>2011-09-20</dc:date>
	<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/su3091517</dc:identifier>
		<dc:creator>Kanokporn Swangjang</dc:creator>
		<dc:creator>Visut Iamaram</dc:creator>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/" />
</item>
	<item rdf:about="http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/9/1510/">
	<title>Sustainability, Vol. 3, Pages 1510-1516: Using Small-Scale Adaptation Actions to Address the Food Crisis in the Horn of Africa: Going beyond Food Aid and Cash Transfers</title>
	<link>http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/9/1510/</link>
	<description>The countries Kenya, Uganda, Somalia, Ethiopia and Djibouti are facing the worst food crisis of the 21st century as a result of devastating droughts. The crisis is causing starvation and leading to a lack of access to clean water and sanitation for over 12 million people. Not only are the direct drought effects endured now by the population, but they have weakened response capacity and created diminished prospects of ever achieving future water and food security. Over the coming decades, temperatures in this region will continue to rise and rainfall patterns will change. This will create major problems for food production and availability. Thus, building resilience in communities is indispensable as we adapt our farming systems to the challenges of climate change. This will require practical solutions that can build on processes involving adaptation to climate change. The lessons learned from the UN-led project in Uganda, demonstrate the value of small scale innovative interventions, carried out using democratic approaches to help support adaptation to climate change whilst progressing to achieve food security and chart a new Path to eliminate hunger. These lessons should be our guiding vision as we address the current droughts plaguing the Horn of East Africa and elsewhere.</description>
	
	<guid>http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/9/1510/</guid>
	<pubDate>Thu, 15 Sep 2011 00:00:00 CEST</pubDate>
	
	<prism:publicationName>Sustainability</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-15</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>3</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>9</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>1510</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:endingPage>1516</prism:endingPage>
		<prism:issn>2071-1050</prism:issn>
	
	<dc:title>Using Small-Scale Adaptation Actions to Address the Food Crisis in the Horn of Africa: Going beyond Food Aid and Cash Transfers</dc:title>
	<dc:date>2011-09-15</dc:date>
	<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/su3091510</dc:identifier>
		<dc:creator>Richard Munang</dc:creator>
		<dc:creator>Johnson N. Nkem</dc:creator>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/" />
</item>
	<item rdf:about="http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/9/1486/">
	<title>Sustainability, Vol. 3, Pages 1486-1509: Design of an Optimal Waste Utilization System: A Case Study in St. Petersburg, Russia</title>
	<link>http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/9/1486/</link>
	<description>Storing municipal solid waste (MSW) in landfills is the oldest and still the primary waste management strategy in many countries. Russia is the third largest methane (CH4) emitter country after USA and China, representing 5% of total global CH4 emissions from waste landfilling. Due to high economical growth, the amount of waste generated in Russia has risen sharply over the last ten years. However, waste management in Russia is mainly based on landfilling. In order to design an optimal MSW utilization system considering various aspects related to sustainable MSW management, a linear programming model was introduced for this research. The performance of the proposed MSW utilization system in the target area has been evaluated in light of energy, economic, and environmental (3Es) aspects, such as system net cost, annual energy generated from the waste, and the carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions of the system. St. Petersburg city was considered as the target area for the present analysis. The results show that the introduction of the proposed MSW system with energy recovery from waste along with a high level of material recovery has energy, environmental and economic benefits compared to the conventional treatment system. This paper emphasizes the importance of introducing waste treatment methods as an alternative to landfilling, and to improve recycling activities in Russia.</description>
	
	<guid>http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/9/1486/</guid>
	<pubDate>Thu, 08 Sep 2011 00:00:00 CEST</pubDate>
	
	<prism:publicationName>Sustainability</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-08</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>3</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>9</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>1486</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:endingPage>1509</prism:endingPage>
		<prism:issn>2071-1050</prism:issn>
	
	<dc:title>Design of an Optimal Waste Utilization System: A Case Study in St. Petersburg, Russia</dc:title>
	<dc:date>2011-09-08</dc:date>
	<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/su3091486</dc:identifier>
		<dc:creator>Mikhail Rodionov</dc:creator>
		<dc:creator>Toshihiko Nakata</dc:creator>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/" />
</item>
	<item rdf:about="http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/9/1452/">
	<title>Sustainability, Vol. 3, Pages 1452-1485: Improving Nitrogen Use Efficiency in Crops for Sustainable Agriculture</title>
	<link>http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/9/1452/</link>
	<description>In this review, we present the recent developments and future prospects of improving nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) in crops using various complementary approaches. These include conventional breeding and molecular genetics, in addition to alternative farming techniques based on no-till continuous cover cropping cultures and/or organic nitrogen (N) nutrition. Whatever the mode of N fertilization, an increased knowledge of the mechanisms controlling plant N economy is essential for improving NUE and for reducing excessive input of fertilizers, while maintaining an acceptable yield and sufficient profit margin for the farmers. Using plants grown under agronomic conditions, with different tillage conditions, in pure or associated cultures, at low and high N mineral fertilizer input, or using organic fertilization, it is now possible to develop further whole plant agronomic and physiological studies. These can be combined with gene, protein and metabolite profiling to build up a comprehensive picture depicting the different steps of N uptake, assimilation and recycling to produce either biomass in vegetative organs or proteins in storage organs. We provide a critical overview as to how our understanding of the agro-ecophysiological, physiological and molecular controls of N assimilation in crops, under varying environmental conditions, has been improved. We have used combined approaches, based on agronomic studies, whole plant physiology, quantitative genetics, forward and reverse genetics and the emerging systems biology. Long-term sustainability may require a gradual transition from synthetic N inputs to legume-based crop rotation, including continuous cover cropping systems, where these may be possible in certain areas of the world, depending on climatic conditions. Current knowledge and prospects for future agronomic development and application for breeding crops adapted to lower mineral fertilizer input and to alternative farming techniques are explored, whilst taking into account the constraints of both the current world economic situation and the environment. </description>
	
	<guid>http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/9/1452/</guid>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Sep 2011 00:00:00 CEST</pubDate>
	
	<prism:publicationName>Sustainability</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2011-09-07</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>3</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>9</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>1452</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:endingPage>1485</prism:endingPage>
		<prism:issn>2071-1050</prism:issn>
	
	<dc:title>Improving Nitrogen Use Efficiency in Crops for Sustainable Agriculture</dc:title>
	<dc:date>2011-09-07</dc:date>
	<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/su3091452</dc:identifier>
		<dc:creator>Bertrand Hirel</dc:creator>
		<dc:creator>Thierry Tétu</dc:creator>
		<dc:creator>Peter J. Lea</dc:creator>
		<dc:creator>Frédéric Dubois</dc:creator>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/" />
</item>
	<item rdf:about="http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/9/1416/">
	<title>Sustainability, Vol. 3, Pages 1416-1451: Strengthening Sovereignty: Security and Sustainability in an Era of Climate Change</title>
	<link>http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/9/1416/</link>
	<description>Using Pakistan and the Arctic as examples, this article examines security challenges arising from climate change. Pakistan is in crisis, and climate change, a transnational phenomenon perhaps better characterized as radical enviro-transformation, is an important reason. Its survival as a state may depend to great extent on how it responds to 2010’s devastating floods. In the Arctic, the ice cap is melting faster than predicted, as temperatures there rise faster than in almost any other region. Unmanaged, a complex interplay of climate-related conditions, including large-scale “ecomigration”, may turn resource competition into resource conflict. Radical enviro-transformation has repeatedly overborne the resilience of societies. War is not an inevitable by-product of such transformation, but in the 21st Century climate-related instability, from resource scarcity and “ecomigration”, will likely create increasingly undesirable conditions of insecurity. Weak and failing states are one of today’s greatest security challenges. The pace of radical enviro-transformation, unprecedented in human history, is accelerating, especially in the Arctic, where a new, open, rich, and accessible maritime environment is coming into being. The international community must work together to enhance security and stability, promote sustainability, and strengthen sovereignty. Radical enviro-transformation provides ample reason and plentiful opportunity for preventative, collaborative solutions focused broadly on adaptation to climate change, most particularly the effects of “ecomigration”. Nations must work together across the whole of government and with all instruments of national power to create conditions for human transformation—social, political, and economic—to occur stably and sustainably, so as to avoid or lessen the prospects for and consequences of conflict. Collaborative international solutions to environmental issues, i.e., solutions that mobilize and share technology and resources, will build nations and build peace. The military, through “preventative engagement” will play a more and more important role. Further research and analysis is needed to determine what changes in law and policy should be made to facilitate stable and secure “ecomigration” on an international scale, over a long timeline.</description>
	
	<guid>http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/9/1416/</guid>
	<pubDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2011 00:00:00 CEST</pubDate>
	
	<prism:publicationName>Sustainability</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2011-08-31</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>3</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>9</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>1416</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:endingPage>1451</prism:endingPage>
		<prism:issn>2071-1050</prism:issn>
	
	<dc:title>Strengthening Sovereignty: Security and Sustainability in an Era of Climate Change</dc:title>
	<dc:date>2011-08-31</dc:date>
	<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/su3091416</dc:identifier>
		<dc:creator>Rymn J. Parsons</dc:creator>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/" />
</item>
	<item rdf:about="http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/9/1399/">
	<title>Sustainability, Vol. 3, Pages 1399-1415: Breeding Food Legumes for Resistance to Storage Insect Pests: Potential and Limitations</title>
	<link>http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/9/1399/</link>
	<description>Storage insect pests cause significant losses of food legumes particularly in the Tropics and the Sub-tropics. The most important species of storage insect pests of food legumes include Callosobruchus chinensis, C. maculatus, C. analis, Acanthoscelides obtectus, Bruchus incarnatus, B. rufimanus, B. dentipes, B. quinqueguttatus, B. emarginatus, B. ervi, B. lentis and B. pisorum. Effective post-harvest insect pest control measures should constitute part of the overall crop husbandry practices for preserving the quality of produce. Storage insect pests are commonly controlled using chemical insecticides which, however, bear many drawbacks related to high cost, environmental pollution and food safety risks. Breeding legume crops to improve their resistance against storage insect pests, although having technical limitations, is the best way of overcoming these disadvantages in an environment-friendly manner. In this paper, we present the findings of our extensive reviews on the potential of breeding resistant varieties of food legumes against storage insect pests along with the major technical limitations one would likely encounter and the prospective ways of tackling them.</description>
	
	<guid>http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/9/1399/</guid>
	<pubDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2011 00:00:00 CEST</pubDate>
	
	<prism:publicationName>Sustainability</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2011-08-31</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>3</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>9</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Review</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>1399</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:endingPage>1415</prism:endingPage>
		<prism:issn>2071-1050</prism:issn>
	
	<dc:title>Breeding Food Legumes for Resistance to Storage Insect Pests: Potential and Limitations</dc:title>
	<dc:date>2011-08-31</dc:date>
	<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/su3091399</dc:identifier>
		<dc:creator>Gemechu Keneni</dc:creator>
		<dc:creator>Endashaw Bekele</dc:creator>
		<dc:creator>Emana Getu</dc:creator>
		<dc:creator>Muhammad Imtiaz</dc:creator>
		<dc:creator>Tebkew Damte</dc:creator>
		<dc:creator>Bayeh Mulatu</dc:creator>
		<dc:creator>Kifle Dagne</dc:creator>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/" />
</item>
	<item rdf:about="http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/9/1381/">
	<title>Sustainability, Vol. 3, Pages 1381-1398: Undergraduate Sustainable Learning: Effects of Sustainable Soilless Media on Production and Sensory Evaluation of Cucumbers, Basil, Parsley, and Lettuce</title>
	<link>http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/9/1381/</link>
	<description>Modern greenhouse production has been ~100% reliant on fossil fuels for all inputs (glazing, heating, fertilization, lighting, post-harvest). Recent innovations may reduce fossil fuel dependence but their effectiveness may not be thoroughly tested. To promote education in sustainable production, undergraduate students in Greenhouse Management class (Hort 3002W; University of Minnesota) tested the effectiveness of two organic or ‘sustainable’ soilless media (Sunshine Natural and Organic Growing Mix, Sungro Metro-Mix Special Blend) with a control (Sunshine LC8 Professional) for crop production (height, leaf/flower number, yield) and sensory evaluations (appearance, texture, taste, purchase) of cucumbers (‘Big Burpless Hybrid’, ‘Sweet Burpless Hybrid’), basil (‘Opal Purple’, ‘Redleaf’), parsley (‘Green River’, ‘Extra Curled Dwarf’, ‘Hamburg’), and lettuce (Flying Saucer ‘Green’, ‘Red’). Significant differences between sustainable vs. control soils occurred for plant growth, depending on vegetative or reproductive traits, crops, and cultivars. These differences occasionally disappeared for sensory evaluation of edible components. In most crops, however, cultivars were highly significant factors. Undergraduate research can be used to provide directionality for future vegetable and herb plant breeding to focus on creating cultivars with increased yield and high consumer acceptance when grown in sustainable greenhouse soilless mixes.</description>
	
	<guid>http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/9/1381/</guid>
	<pubDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2011 00:00:00 CEST</pubDate>
	
	<prism:publicationName>Sustainability</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2011-08-29</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>3</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>9</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>1381</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:endingPage>1398</prism:endingPage>
		<prism:issn>2071-1050</prism:issn>
	
	<dc:title>Undergraduate Sustainable Learning: Effects of Sustainable Soilless Media on Production and Sensory Evaluation of Cucumbers, Basil, Parsley, and Lettuce</dc:title>
	<dc:date>2011-08-29</dc:date>
	<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/su3091381</dc:identifier>
		<dc:creator>Neil O. Anderson</dc:creator>
		<dc:creator>Joey Annis</dc:creator>
		<dc:creator>Mark Buchholz</dc:creator>
		<dc:creator>Jared Cutting</dc:creator>
		<dc:creator>Eric Heuring</dc:creator>
		<dc:creator>Emily Jankila</dc:creator>
		<dc:creator>Megan McCrumb</dc:creator>
		<dc:creator>Nicole Nelson</dc:creator>
		<dc:creator>Myra Pehoski</dc:creator>
		<dc:creator>Karl Piepho</dc:creator>
		<dc:creator>Valerie Price</dc:creator>
		<dc:creator>Victoria Russell</dc:creator>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/" />
</item>
	<item rdf:about="http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/9/1357/">
	<title>Sustainability, Vol. 3, Pages 1357-1380: Coping with Complex Environmental and Societal Flood Risk Management Decisions: An Integrated Multi-criteria Framework</title>
	<link>http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/9/1357/</link>
	<description>During recent years, a great deal of attention has been focused on the financial risk management of natural disasters. One reason behind is that the economic losses from floods, windstorms, earthquakes and other disasters in both the developing and developed countries are escalating dramatically. It has become apparent that an integrated water resource management approach would be beneficial in order to take both the best interests of society and of the environment into consideration. One improvement consists of models capable of handling multiple criteria (conflicting objectives) as well as multiple stakeholders (conflicting interests). A systems approach is applied for coping with complex environmental and societal risk management decisions with respect to flood catastrophe policy formation, wherein the emphasis is on computer-based modeling and simulation techniques combined with methods for evaluating strategies where numerous stakeholders are incorporated in the process. The resulting framework consists of a simulation model, a decision analytical tool, and a set of suggested policy strategies for policy formulation. The framework will aid decision makers with high risk complex environmental decisions subject to significant uncertainties.</description>
	
	<guid>http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/9/1357/</guid>
	<pubDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2011 00:00:00 CEST</pubDate>
	
	<prism:publicationName>Sustainability</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2011-08-29</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>3</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>9</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>1357</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:endingPage>1380</prism:endingPage>
		<prism:issn>2071-1050</prism:issn>
	
	<dc:title>Coping with Complex Environmental and Societal Flood Risk Management Decisions: An Integrated Multi-criteria Framework</dc:title>
	<dc:date>2011-08-29</dc:date>
	<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/su3091357</dc:identifier>
		<dc:creator>Karin Hansson</dc:creator>
		<dc:creator>Aron Larsson</dc:creator>
		<dc:creator>Mats Danielson</dc:creator>
		<dc:creator>Love Ekenberg</dc:creator>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/" />
</item>
	<item rdf:about="http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/9/1341/">
	<title>Sustainability, Vol. 3, Pages 1341-1356: Accounting for Sustainability: A Dissenting Opinion</title>
	<link>http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/9/1341/</link>
	<description>Discounted-utilitarian welfare, the commonest social objective studied by economists, is the basis for the theory of green accounting in terms of social utility. Sustainability is a different type of social objective. Consequently, green accounting as derived in many empirical models is not appropriate for studying sustainability. Maximin is a consistent foundation for the analysis of sustainability, both weak and strong, that provides conceptually correct accounting prices. These prices are not yet practicable for real economies, however, and must await further advances. Sustainable development is a generalization of the notion of sustainability and can be analyzed using a generalization of maximin.</description>
	
	<guid>http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/9/1341/</guid>
	<pubDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2011 00:00:00 CEST</pubDate>
	
	<prism:publicationName>Sustainability</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2011-08-29</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>3</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>9</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>1341</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:endingPage>1356</prism:endingPage>
		<prism:issn>2071-1050</prism:issn>
	
	<dc:title>Accounting for Sustainability: A Dissenting Opinion</dc:title>
	<dc:date>2011-08-29</dc:date>
	<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/su3091341</dc:identifier>
		<dc:creator>Robert D. Cairns</dc:creator>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/" />
</item>
	<item rdf:about="http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/9/1323/">
	<title>Sustainability, Vol. 3, Pages 1323-1340: Revisiting System Paradigms from the Viewpoint of Manufacturing Sustainability</title>
	<link>http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/9/1323/</link>
	<description>A system paradigm is an abstract representation of system; it includes system architecture used to determine the types and numbers of components and their relations in the system. The design of system paradigm relies on customers’ requirements and the characteristics of the manufacturing environment. Many system paradigms and design guidelines have been proposed for a variety of customers’ needs including functions, cost, quality, personalization, and lead time of products. However, the consideration of sustainability becomes essential to today’s manufacturing systems; a new challenge is how to evolve existing paradigms to accommodate the requirements of sustainability. In contrast to ample research activities on system paradigms in past decades, recent studies on system paradigms have been restricted, partially due to unclear research directions. Limited works can be found on conceiving new manufacturing system paradigms from the perspective of sustainability; most of the related literature concerns the new requirements of sustainability. The objectives of this work are (i) to examine the requirements of manufacturing systems in a wider scope; (ii) to revisit existing paradigms to clarify their limitations and bottlenecks; and eventually (iii) to identify some research directions, which will lead to a solution of sustainable manufacturing. To achieve these objectives, firstly, a brief description of today’s manufacturing environment is provided. Secondly, the requirements of sustainability are discussed, and the relevant researches on system sustainability are surveyed. Thirdly, the reconfigurable system paradigm is focused, and the gaps between a reconfigurable manufacturing system and a sustainable manufacturing system are discussed. Finally, the future endeavors towards to the next-generation manufacturing system paradigms are discussed.</description>
	
	<guid>http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/9/1323/</guid>
	<pubDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2011 00:00:00 CEST</pubDate>
	
	<prism:publicationName>Sustainability</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2011-08-29</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>3</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>9</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>1323</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:endingPage>1340</prism:endingPage>
		<prism:issn>2071-1050</prism:issn>
	
	<dc:title>Revisiting System Paradigms from the Viewpoint of Manufacturing Sustainability</dc:title>
	<dc:date>2011-08-29</dc:date>
	<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/su3091323</dc:identifier>
		<dc:creator>Zhuming Bi</dc:creator>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/" />
</item>
	<item rdf:about="http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/9/1302/">
	<title>Sustainability, Vol. 3, Pages 1302-1322: Herbicide-tolerant Transgenic Soybean over 15 Years of Cultivation: Pesticide Use, Weed Resistance, and Some Economic Issues. The Case of the USA</title>
	<link>http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/9/1302/</link>
	<description>Genetically modified (GM) herbicide-tolerant (HT) crops have been largely adopted where they have been authorized. Nevertheless, they are fiercely criticized by some, notably because of the herbicide use associated with them. However, how much herbicide is applied to GMHT crops compared to conventional crops, and what impacts does the use of herbicide have? The paper first presents some factors explaining the predominance of GMHT crops. Then, trends in the use of herbicide for GM crops are studied in the case of the most widespread HT crop: HT soybean in the USA. The trends in the toxicity of herbicides applied to HT soybean are also addressed, as well as the appearance of glyphosate-resistant (GR) weeds. Lastly, the paper examines the spread of GR weeds and its impact. How are farmers, weed scientists, and the industry coping with this development, and what are the prospects of glyphosate-tolerant crops given weed resistance? In conclusion, some issues of sustainability and innovation governance raised by genetically modified herbicide-tolerant crops are discussed.</description>
	
	<guid>http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/9/1302/</guid>
	<pubDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2011 00:00:00 CEST</pubDate>
	
	<prism:publicationName>Sustainability</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2011-08-29</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>3</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>9</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>1302</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:endingPage>1322</prism:endingPage>
		<prism:issn>2071-1050</prism:issn>
	
	<dc:title>Herbicide-tolerant Transgenic Soybean over 15 Years of Cultivation: Pesticide Use, Weed Resistance, and Some Economic Issues. The Case of the USA</dc:title>
	<dc:date>2011-08-29</dc:date>
	<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/su3091302</dc:identifier>
		<dc:creator>Sylvie Bonny</dc:creator>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/" />
</item>
	<item rdf:about="http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/8/1282/">
	<title>Sustainability, Vol. 3, Pages 1282-1301: An R&amp;D Management Framework for Eco-Technology</title>
	<link>http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/8/1282/</link>
	<description>Although research and development (R&amp;D) affects new value-added creation, including that related to environmental aspects, there is little literature dealing with the integration of R&amp;D management and eco-value. Here, eco-value of technology is defined as the advantage of environmental competitiveness in the market. This paper proposes a framework of R&amp;D management of eco-technology (RDMOET), consisting of: (1) future research for sustainability; (2) making an original eco-theme portfolio and roadmap; (3) gap analysis and implementation of new eco-themes; and (4) eco-value evaluation. (1) and (4) are new processes compared with conventional R&amp;D management. Through practice at the Corporate R&amp;D Center of Toshiba Corporation, the usefulness of the proposed framework is verified from the viewpoint of not only technological eco-innovation, but also that of organizational learning for environmental sustainability.</description>
	
	<guid>http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/8/1282/</guid>
	<pubDate>Wed, 24 Aug 2011 00:00:00 CEST</pubDate>
	
	<prism:publicationName>Sustainability</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2011-08-24</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>3</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>8</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>1282</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:endingPage>1301</prism:endingPage>
		<prism:issn>2071-1050</prism:issn>
	
	<dc:title>An R&amp;D Management Framework for Eco-Technology</dc:title>
	<dc:date>2011-08-24</dc:date>
	<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/su3081282</dc:identifier>
		<dc:creator>Hideki Kobayashi</dc:creator>
		<dc:creator>Masahiro Kato</dc:creator>
		<dc:creator>Yukishige Maezawa</dc:creator>
		<dc:creator>Kenji Sano</dc:creator>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/" />
</item>
	<item rdf:about="http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/8/1265/">
	<title>Sustainability, Vol. 3, Pages 1265-1281: Benefits and Costs of Biologically Contained Genetically Modified Tomatoes and Eggplants in Italy and Spain</title>
	<link>http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/8/1265/</link>
	<description>In this paper we assess the benefits and costs of introducing biologically contained genetically modified (GM) crops, with an application to the potential introduction of GM tomatoes and eggplants in Italy and Spain. Such crops possess both the standard beneficial GM traits, and they prevent introgression of transgenes from GM crops to their conventional or wild relatives, thereby adding to the safety of their cultivation. As a result, coexistence regulations for these crops are less stringent than for crops without biological containment. The potential adoption of biologically contained GM tomatoes and eggplants is assessed in a cost-benefit framework for Italy and Spain. We conclude that biological containment has considerable potential benefits if policy makers are willing to loosen the restrictions on the introduction of these varieties.</description>
	
	<guid>http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/8/1265/</guid>
	<pubDate>Mon, 22 Aug 2011 00:00:00 CEST</pubDate>
	
	<prism:publicationName>Sustainability</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2011-08-22</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>3</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>8</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Review</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>1265</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:endingPage>1281</prism:endingPage>
		<prism:issn>2071-1050</prism:issn>
	
	<dc:title>Benefits and Costs of Biologically Contained Genetically Modified Tomatoes and Eggplants in Italy and Spain</dc:title>
	<dc:date>2011-08-22</dc:date>
	<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/su3081265</dc:identifier>
		<dc:creator>Rolf A. Groeneveld</dc:creator>
		<dc:creator>Erik Ansink</dc:creator>
		<dc:creator>Clemens C.M. Van de Wiel</dc:creator>
		<dc:creator>Justus Wesseler</dc:creator>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/" />
</item>
	<item rdf:about="http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/8/1250/">
	<title>Sustainability, Vol. 3, Pages 1250-1264: Emergency Managers Confront Climate Change</title>
	<link>http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/8/1250/</link>
	<description>Emergency managers will have to deal with the impending, uncertain, and possibly extreme effects of climate change. Yet, many emergency managers are not aware of the full range of possible effects, and they are unsure of their place in the effort to plan for, adapt to, and cope with those effects. This may partly reflect emergency mangers’ reluctance to get caught up in the rancorous—and politically-charged—debate about climate change, but it mostly is due to the worldview shared by most emergency managers. We focus on: extreme events; acute vs. chronic hazards (floods vs. droughts); a shorter event horizon (5 years vs. 75–100 years); and a shorter planning and operational cycle. This paper explores the important intersection of emergency management, environmental management, and climate change mitigation and adaptation. It examines the different definitions of terms common to all three fields, the overlapping strategies used in all three fields, and the best means of collaboration and mutual re-enforcement among the three to confront and solve the many possible futures that we may face in the climate change world.</description>
	
	<guid>http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/8/1250/</guid>
	<pubDate>Fri, 19 Aug 2011 00:00:00 CEST</pubDate>
	
	<prism:publicationName>Sustainability</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2011-08-19</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>3</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>8</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>1250</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:endingPage>1264</prism:endingPage>
		<prism:issn>2071-1050</prism:issn>
	
	<dc:title>Emergency Managers Confront Climate Change</dc:title>
	<dc:date>2011-08-19</dc:date>
	<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/su3081250</dc:identifier>
		<dc:creator>John R. Labadie</dc:creator>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/" />
</item>
	<item rdf:about="http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/8/1234/">
	<title>Sustainability, Vol. 3, Pages 1234-1249: A Carbon Consumption Comparison of Rural and Urban Lifestyles</title>
	<link>http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/8/1234/</link>
	<description>Sustainable consumption has been addressed from different perspectives in numerous studies. Recently, urban structure-related lifestyle issues have gained more emphasis in the research as cities search for effective strategies to reduce their 80% share of the global carbon emissions. However, the prevailing belief often seen is that cities would be more sustainable in nature compared to surrounding suburban and rural areas. This paper will illustrate, by studying four different urban structure related lifestyles in Finland, that the situation might be reversed. Actually, substantially more carbon emissions seem to be caused on a per capita level in cities than in suburban and rural areas. This is mainly due to the higher income level in larger urban centers, but even housing-related emissions seem to favor less urbanized areas. The method of the study is a consumption-based life cycle assessment of carbon emissions. In more detail, a hybrid life cycle assessment (LCA) model, that is comprehensive in providing a full inventory and can accommodate process data, is utilized.</description>
	
	<guid>http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/8/1234/</guid>
	<pubDate>Tue, 16 Aug 2011 00:00:00 CEST</pubDate>
	
	<prism:publicationName>Sustainability</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2011-08-16</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>3</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>8</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>1234</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:endingPage>1249</prism:endingPage>
		<prism:issn>2071-1050</prism:issn>
	
	<dc:title>A Carbon Consumption Comparison of Rural and Urban Lifestyles</dc:title>
	<dc:date>2011-08-16</dc:date>
	<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/su3081234</dc:identifier>
		<dc:creator>Jukka Heinonen</dc:creator>
		<dc:creator>Seppo Junnila</dc:creator>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/" />
</item>
	<item rdf:about="http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/8/1224/">
	<title>Sustainability, Vol. 3, Pages 1224-1233: Adaptability of Wheat Cultivars to a Late-Planted No-Till Fallow Production System</title>
	<link>http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/8/1224/</link>
	<description>In Washington, over fifty percent of the wheat produced under rainfed conditions receives less than 300 mm of annual precipitation. Hence, a winter wheat-summer fallow cropping system has been adopted to obtain adequate moisture for winter wheat production. Current tilled fallow systems are exposed to significant soil degradation from wind and water erosion. As a result, late-planted no-till fallow systems are being evaluated to mitigate erosion concerns. The objective of this study was to evaluate current cultivars under late-planted no-till fallow systems to identify whether current breeding schemes in tilled fallow systems could select productive cultivars in late-planted no-till fallow systems. Thirty cultivars were planted in a split-plot design with fallow type as the main plot and genotype as the sub-plot. Fallow types evaluated were a tilled fallow system and a late planted no-till fallow system. Data were collected on heading date, plant height, grain volume weight, grain yield, and grain protein content. Analysis of variance was conducted on data across locations. Results were significant for all traits except for grain protein content. The late-planted no-till fallow system headed 16 days later was 5 cm shorter, yielded 36% less, and had a grain volume weight 3% less than the tilled fallow system. The lower yield and grain volume weight potential is hypothesized to be due to the 16 day delay in heading date leading to warmer temperatures during grain fill and a shorter duration. In order to breed wheat to be highly productive under a late-planted no-till fallow system, directly selecting in this system for early spring growth and earlier heading dates will be essential.</description>
	
	<guid>http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/8/1224/</guid>
	<pubDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2011 00:00:00 CEST</pubDate>
	
	<prism:publicationName>Sustainability</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2011-08-10</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>3</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>8</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>1224</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:endingPage>1233</prism:endingPage>
		<prism:issn>2071-1050</prism:issn>
	
	<dc:title>Adaptability of Wheat Cultivars to a Late-Planted No-Till Fallow Production System</dc:title>
	<dc:date>2011-08-10</dc:date>
	<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/su3081224</dc:identifier>
		<dc:creator>Ryan W. Higginbotham</dc:creator>
		<dc:creator>Stephen S. Jones</dc:creator>
		<dc:creator>Arron H. Carter</dc:creator>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/" />
</item>
	<item rdf:about="http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/8/1206/">
	<title>Sustainability, Vol. 3, Pages 1206-1223: Collaborative Plant Breeding for Organic Agricultural Systems in Developed Countries</title>
	<link>http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/8/1206/</link>
	<description>Because organic systems present complex environmental stress, plant breeders may either target very focused regions for different varieties, or create heterogeneous populations which can then evolve specific adaptation through on-farm cultivation and selection. This often leads to participatory plant breeding (PPB) strategies which take advantage of the specific knowledge of farmers. Participatory selection requires increased commitment and engagement on the part of the farmers and researchers. Projects may begin as researcher initiatives with farmer participation or farmer initiatives with researcher participation and over time evolve into true collaborations. These projects are difficult to plan in advance because by nature they change to respond to the priorities and interests of the collaborators. Projects need to provide relevant information and analysis in a time-frame that is meaningful for farmers, while remaining scientifically rigorous and innovative. This paper presents two specific studies: the first was a researcher-designed experiment that assessed the potential adaptation of landraces to organic systems through on-farm cultivation and farmer selection. The second is a farmer-led plant breeding project to select bread wheat for organic systems in France. Over the course of these two projects, many discussions among farmers, researchers and farmers associations led to the development of methods that fit the objectives of those involved. This type of project is no longer researcher-led or farmer-led but instead an equal collaboration. Results from the two research projects and the strategy developed for an ongoing collaborative plant breeding project are discussed.</description>
	
	<guid>http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/8/1206/</guid>
	<pubDate>Wed, 10 Aug 2011 00:00:00 CEST</pubDate>
	
	<prism:publicationName>Sustainability</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2011-08-10</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>3</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>8</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>1206</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:endingPage>1223</prism:endingPage>
		<prism:issn>2071-1050</prism:issn>
	
	<dc:title>Collaborative Plant Breeding for Organic Agricultural Systems in Developed Countries</dc:title>
	<dc:date>2011-08-10</dc:date>
	<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/su3081206</dc:identifier>
		<dc:creator>Julie C. Dawson</dc:creator>
		<dc:creator>Pierre Rivière</dc:creator>
		<dc:creator>Jean-François Berthellot</dc:creator>
		<dc:creator>Florent Mercier</dc:creator>
		<dc:creator>Patrick de Kochko</dc:creator>
		<dc:creator>Nathalie Galic</dc:creator>
		<dc:creator>Sophie Pin</dc:creator>
		<dc:creator>Estelle Serpolay</dc:creator>
		<dc:creator>Mathieu Thomas</dc:creator>
		<dc:creator>Simon Giuliano</dc:creator>
		<dc:creator>Isabelle Goldringer</dc:creator>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/" />
</item>
	<item rdf:about="http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/8/1190/">
	<title>Sustainability, Vol. 3, Pages 1190-1205: Structuring an Efficient Organic Wheat Breeding Program</title>
	<link>http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/8/1190/</link>
	<description>Our long-term goal is to develop wheat cultivars that will improve the profitability and competitiveness of organic producers in Nebraska and the Northern Great Plains. Our approach is to select in early generations for highly heritable traits that are needed for both organic and conventional production (another breeding goal), followed by a targeted organic breeding effort with testing at two organic locations (each in a different ecological region) beginning with the F6 generation. Yield analyses from replicated trials at two organic breeding sites and 7 conventional breeding sites from F6 through F12 nurseries revealed, using analyses of variance, biplots, and comparisons of selected lines that it is inappropriate to use data from conventional testing for making germplasm selections for organic production. Selecting and testing lines under organic production practices in different ecological regions was also needed and cultivar selections for organic production were different than those for conventional production. Modifications to this breeding protocol may include growing early generation bulks in an organic cropping system. In the future, our selection efforts should also focus on using state-of-the-art, non-transgenic breeding technologies (genomic selection, marker-assisted breeding, and high throughput phenotyping) to synergistically improve organic and conventional wheat breeding.</description>
	
	<guid>http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/8/1190/</guid>
	<pubDate>Fri, 05 Aug 2011 00:00:00 CEST</pubDate>
	
	<prism:publicationName>Sustainability</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2011-08-05</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>3</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>8</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>1190</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:endingPage>1205</prism:endingPage>
		<prism:issn>2071-1050</prism:issn>
	
	<dc:title>Structuring an Efficient Organic Wheat Breeding Program</dc:title>
	<dc:date>2011-08-05</dc:date>
	<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/su3081190</dc:identifier>
		<dc:creator>P. Stephen Baenziger</dc:creator>
		<dc:creator>Ibrahim Salah</dc:creator>
		<dc:creator>Richard S. Little</dc:creator>
		<dc:creator>Dipak K. Santra</dc:creator>
		<dc:creator>Teshome Regassa</dc:creator>
		<dc:creator>Meng Yuan Wang</dc:creator>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/" />
</item>
	<item rdf:about="http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/8/1170/">
	<title>Sustainability, Vol. 3, Pages 1170-1189: A Longitudinal Study on the Carbon Emissions of a New Residential Development</title>
	<link>http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/8/1170/</link>
	<description>Buildings account for nearly 50% of all greenhouse gases globally. While this has been widely recognized, the GHG mitigation strategies have traditionally concentrated on reducing the use phase emissions, as over 90% of the emissions are generated during the use phase according to several studies. However, two current developments increase the importance of the construction phase emissions and the embodied emissions of the building materials. Firstly, the improvements in the energy efficiency of buildings directly increase the relative share of the construction phase emissions. Secondly, the notification of the temporal allocation of the emissions increases the importance of the carbon spike from construction. While these perspectives have been noted, few studies exist that combine the two perspectives of the construction and the use phase. In this paper, we analyze the implications of low-carbon residential construction on the life cycle emissions of a residential area with a case study. Furthermore, we demonstrate that when the temporal allocation of the emissions is taken into account, the construction phase emissions can hinder or even reverse the carbon mitigation effect of low-carbon buildings for decades.</description>
	
	<guid>http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/8/1170/</guid>
	<pubDate>Thu, 04 Aug 2011 00:00:00 CEST</pubDate>
	
	<prism:publicationName>Sustainability</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2011-08-04</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>3</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>8</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>1170</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:endingPage>1189</prism:endingPage>
		<prism:issn>2071-1050</prism:issn>
	
	<dc:title>A Longitudinal Study on the Carbon Emissions of a New Residential Development</dc:title>
	<dc:date>2011-08-04</dc:date>
	<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/su3081170</dc:identifier>
		<dc:creator>Jukka Heinonen</dc:creator>
		<dc:creator>Antti Säynäjoki</dc:creator>
		<dc:creator>Seppo Junnila</dc:creator>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/" />
</item>
	<item rdf:about="http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/8/1136/">
	<title>Sustainability, Vol. 3, Pages 1136-1169: Enhancing Sustainability of Cotton Production Systems in West Africa: A Summary of Empirical Evidence from Burkina Faso</title>
	<link>http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/8/1136/</link>
	<description>Africa has been hesitant to adopt agricultural biotechnology, lagging behind global trends over the past decade. One exception is Burkina Faso, a West African country that commercially released 125,000 ha of Bt cotton in 2009. Bt cotton may serve as a working example of how African countries can enhance sustainability using modern, science-driven technology to increase production levels while reducing input use and energy consumption. This paper reports the potential impact that Bt cotton can have on sustainability in Burkina Faso’s cotton sector based by summarizing empirical evidence from previously published studies. Based on the summary of published data collected from six years of field trials and producer surveys, Bt cotton increased cotton yields by an average of 21.3% and raised income by $106.14 per ha. Using an energy balance model, the introduction of Bt cotton would also result in a 6.6% saving in energy use. The significant increase in productivity and economic returns could be the catalyst for Burkina Faso, and other African countries, to emerge from the decade or so of stagnation and regain their competitive stance in world cotton markets while providing environmental and social benefits.</description>
	
	<guid>http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/8/1136/</guid>
	<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jul 2011 00:00:00 CEST</pubDate>
	
	<prism:publicationName>Sustainability</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2011-07-28</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>3</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>8</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Review</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>1136</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:endingPage>1169</prism:endingPage>
		<prism:issn>2071-1050</prism:issn>
	
	<dc:title>Enhancing Sustainability of Cotton Production Systems in West Africa: A Summary of Empirical Evidence from Burkina Faso</dc:title>
	<dc:date>2011-07-28</dc:date>
	<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/su3081136</dc:identifier>
		<dc:creator>Jeffrey Vitale</dc:creator>
		<dc:creator>Marc Ouattarra</dc:creator>
		<dc:creator>Gaspard Vognan</dc:creator>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/" />
</item>
	<item rdf:about="http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/8/1114/">
	<title>Sustainability, Vol. 3, Pages 1114-1135: Risk Assessment and Examination of Economic Aspects of Precision Weed Management</title>
	<link>http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/8/1114/</link>
	<description>The aim of this research is to investigate plant production sustainability, the economical requirements, risks, and identify threshold levels to switching on, or off precision weed management techniques in Hungarian growing and sales conditions; taking into consideration that the implementation of precision technology can be justified also by its role in the reduction of environmental load, which would create a harmony between individual usefulness and social utility. A simulation model has been developed to investigate the return of extra investments, along with the risk of this return in relation to the soil type, weed coverage, and the sales price.</description>
	
	<guid>http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/8/1114/</guid>
	<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jul 2011 00:00:00 CEST</pubDate>
	
	<prism:publicationName>Sustainability</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2011-07-27</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>3</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>8</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>1114</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:endingPage>1135</prism:endingPage>
		<prism:issn>2071-1050</prism:issn>
	
	<dc:title>Risk Assessment and Examination of Economic Aspects of Precision Weed Management</dc:title>
	<dc:date>2011-07-27</dc:date>
	<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/su3081114</dc:identifier>
		<dc:creator>Katalin Takács-György</dc:creator>
		<dc:creator>István Takács</dc:creator>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/" />
</item>
	<item rdf:about="http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/8/1090/">
	<title>Sustainability, Vol. 3, Pages 1090-1113: Defining Terms for Integrated (Multi-Inter-Trans-Disciplinary) Sustainability Research</title>
	<link>http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/8/1090/</link>
	<description>Our contemporary social and ecological problems, including climate change, peak oil and food security, necessitate solutions informed by multiple backgrounds that singular disciplines seem unable to provide, and possibly, are even incapable of providing. The increasing occurrence of multi-, inter- and transdisciplinary (MIT) research projects speak to the recognition of that necessity. But as the literature and our own experiences bear out, just calling a project “beyond disciplinary” or integrated does not necessarily yield the intended outcomes or make progress toward alleviating the hurdles of bridging disciplines. Here we examine the distinctions between three categories (multidisciplinary, interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary) of integrated research and offer reflections on how sustainability researchers can categorize their research to improve common understandings.</description>
	
	<guid>http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/8/1090/</guid>
	<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2011 00:00:00 CEST</pubDate>
	
	<prism:publicationName>Sustainability</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2011-07-26</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>3</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>8</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Review</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>1090</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:endingPage>1113</prism:endingPage>
		<prism:issn>2071-1050</prism:issn>
	
	<dc:title>Defining Terms for Integrated (Multi-Inter-Trans-Disciplinary) Sustainability Research</dc:title>
	<dc:date>2011-07-26</dc:date>
	<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/su3081090</dc:identifier>
		<dc:creator>Paul Stock</dc:creator>
		<dc:creator>Rob J.F. Burton</dc:creator>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/" />
</item>
	<item rdf:about="http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/7/1074/">
	<title>Sustainability, Vol. 3, Pages 1074-1089: Sustainable Urban Development and Land Use Change—A Case Study of the Yangtze River Delta in China</title>
	<link>http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/7/1074/</link>
	<description>This paper introduces a sustainability assessment method for the rapidly urbanizing Yangtze River Delta in China addressing the role of land use pattern. We first calculated the sustainability component scores of 16 cities in the area in 2000 and 2005. The results showed that socioeconomic and environmental conditions improved while the performance of resource-use degraded from 2000 to 2005. We then made a spatial analysis of land use change (LUC) using geographic information systems during 1990–2000. We found that diverse spatiotemporal transformation occurred among the cities and identified urban development cluster patterns and profiles based on development density. Finally, we examined the impact of LUC on sustainable urban development (SUD). Using regression techniques, we demonstrated that urbanization, infrastructure development, industrial structure and income significantly affected environmental performance and resource-use. These results suggest a moderate pace of LUC with steady economic growth being key to SUD.</description>
	
	<guid>http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/7/1074/</guid>
	<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jul 2011 00:00:00 CEST</pubDate>
	
	<prism:publicationName>Sustainability</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2011-07-21</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>3</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>7</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>1074</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:endingPage>1089</prism:endingPage>
		<prism:issn>2071-1050</prism:issn>
	
	<dc:title>Sustainable Urban Development and Land Use Change—A Case Study of the Yangtze River Delta in China</dc:title>
	<dc:date>2011-07-21</dc:date>
	<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/su2071074</dc:identifier>
		<dc:creator>Haiyan Zhang</dc:creator>
		<dc:creator>Michinori Uwasu</dc:creator>
		<dc:creator>Keishiro Hara</dc:creator>
		<dc:creator>Helmut Yabar</dc:creator>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/" />
</item>
	<item rdf:about="http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/7/1064/">
	<title>Sustainability, Vol. 3, Pages 1064-1073: Public-Private Partnerships and Sustainable Agricultural Development</title>
	<link>http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/7/1064/</link>
	<description>Agriculture in Africa is not sustainable because average yields have been stagnating for decades due to underinvestment, especially in the development of agricultural markets, crop improvement and the sustainable management of agricultural systems. Low public sector funding for agricultural research and lack of incentives for the private sector to operate in areas where there is no market largely explain the yield gap in many food-importing developing countries. Yet, there are effective ways in which the public and the private sector could work together and jointly improve agricultural sustainability in poor countries. The public sector provides a favorable institutional environment for the development of agricultural markets and investment in rural infrastructure, facilitates local business development and funds research with local relevance. The private sector, in return, brings its considerable expertise in product development and deployment. This article illustrates how new forms of public-private partnerships (PPPs) for agricultural development can work in challenging environments. It discusses three promising examples of PPPs in which the Syngenta Foundation for Sustainable Agriculture (SFSA) is actively involved, and shows that an experimental approach can sometimes be more effective than social planning in efforts to achieve sustainable agriculture.</description>
	
	<guid>http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/7/1064/</guid>
	<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2011 00:00:00 CEST</pubDate>
	
	<prism:publicationName>Sustainability</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2011-07-20</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>3</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>7</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>1064</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:endingPage>1073</prism:endingPage>
		<prism:issn>2071-1050</prism:issn>
	
	<dc:title>Public-Private Partnerships and Sustainable Agricultural Development</dc:title>
	<dc:date>2011-07-20</dc:date>
	<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/su3071064</dc:identifier>
		<dc:creator>Marco Ferroni</dc:creator>
		<dc:creator>Paul Castle</dc:creator>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/" />
</item>
	<item rdf:about="http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/7/1035/">
	<title>Sustainability, Vol. 3, Pages 1035-1063: Continuum of Risk Analysis Methods to Assess Tillage System Sustainability at the Experimental Plot Level</title>
	<link>http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/7/1035/</link>
	<description>This study applied a broad continuum of risk analysis methods including mean-variance and coefficient of variation (CV) statistical criteria, second-degree stochastic dominance (SSD), stochastic dominance with respect to a function (SDRF), and stochastic efficiency with respect to a function (SERF) for comparing income-risk efficiency sustainability of conventional and reduced tillage systems. Fourteen years (1990–2003) of economic budget data derived from 35 treatments on 36 experimental plots under corn (Zea mays L.) and soybean (Glycine max L.) at the Iowa State University Northeast Research Station near Nashua, IA, USA were used. In addition to the other analyses, a visually-based Stoplight or “probability of target value” procedure was employed for displaying gross margin and net return probability distribution information. Mean-variance and CV analysis of the economic measures alone provided somewhat contradictive and inconclusive sustainability rankings, i.e., corn/soybean gross margin and net return showed that different tillage system alternatives were the highest ranked depending on the criterion and type of crop. Stochastic dominance analysis results were similar for SSD and SDRF in that both the conventional and reduced tillage system alternatives were highly ranked depending on the type of crop and tillage system. For the SERF analysis, results were dependent on the type of crop and level of risk aversion. The conventional tillage system was preferred for both corn and soybean for the Stoplight analysis. The results of this study are unique in that they highlight the potential of both traditional stochastic dominance and SERF methods for distinguishing economically sustainable choices between different tillage systems across a range of risk aversion. This study also indicates that the SERF risk analysis method appears to be a useful and easily understood tool to assist farm managers, experimental researchers, and potentially policy makers and advisers on problems involving agricultural risk and sustainability.</description>
	
	<guid>http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/7/1035/</guid>
	<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2011 00:00:00 CEST</pubDate>
	
	<prism:publicationName>Sustainability</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2011-07-20</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>3</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>7</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>1035</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:endingPage>1063</prism:endingPage>
		<prism:issn>2071-1050</prism:issn>
	
	<dc:title>Continuum of Risk Analysis Methods to Assess Tillage System Sustainability at the Experimental Plot Level</dc:title>
	<dc:date>2011-07-20</dc:date>
	<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/su3071035</dc:identifier>
		<dc:creator>Eihab M. Fathelrahman</dc:creator>
		<dc:creator>James C. Ascough II</dc:creator>
		<dc:creator>Dana L. Hoag</dc:creator>
		<dc:creator>Robert W. Malone</dc:creator>
		<dc:creator>Philip Heilman</dc:creator>
		<dc:creator>Lori J. Wiles</dc:creator>
		<dc:creator>Ramesh S. Kanwar</dc:creator>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/" />
</item>
	<item rdf:about="http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/7/1022/">
	<title>Sustainability, Vol. 3, Pages 1022-1034: Planting Trees for Publicity—How Much Are They Worth?</title>
	<link>http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/7/1022/</link>
	<description>Corporate marketing departments use trees and forests for advertising and public relations (PR). Trees and forests constitute a tangible symbol of the environment, reinforced by the growing awareness of the role that trees play in preventing climate change. Although the carbon sequestration function of trees is valued in monetary terms, its derivative services to marketing, CSR or HR departments are not (‘greening the image’). We focus on voluntary carbon offsets and other tree-planting activities undertaken by companies, aiming to demonstrate that the value of these derivative services of trees should be considered in monetary terms. Based on a small survey and an analysis of financial data for 10 tree-planting projects in Poland, we estimate this value at USD 7.42 per tree. This value depends on external circumstances, such as the current interest in climate change and ways to prevent it.</description>
	
	<guid>http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/7/1022/</guid>
	<pubDate>Mon, 18 Jul 2011 00:00:00 CEST</pubDate>
	
	<prism:publicationName>Sustainability</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2011-07-18</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>3</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>7</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>1022</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:endingPage>1034</prism:endingPage>
		<prism:issn>2071-1050</prism:issn>
	
	<dc:title>Planting Trees for Publicity—How Much Are They Worth?</dc:title>
	<dc:date>2011-07-18</dc:date>
	<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/su3071022</dc:identifier>
		<dc:creator>Jakub Kronenberg</dc:creator>
		<dc:creator>Joanna Mieszkowicz</dc:creator>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/" />
</item>
	<item rdf:about="http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/7/1003/">
	<title>Sustainability, Vol. 3, Pages 1003-1021: Climate Change and Industrial Policy</title>
	<link>http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/7/1003/</link>
	<description>Industrial policy (IP) can make an important contribution to both environmental and social sustainability. The purpose of this paper is to explore the new rationale for IP due to climate change and to determine its implications for the how of industrial policy. Five implications are discussed, namely the need for international coordination of IPs; for putting human-development, and not emission targets, as the overriding objective of low-carbon IP; of stimulating innovation for energy efficiency, energy diversification, and carbon capture and storage; and for aligning IP with trade policies. Finally the funding needs of low-carbon IPs are discussed, and the importance of private sector funding emphasized.</description>
	
	<guid>http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/7/1003/</guid>
	<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2011 00:00:00 CEST</pubDate>
	
	<prism:publicationName>Sustainability</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2011-07-14</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>3</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>7</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>1003</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:endingPage>1021</prism:endingPage>
		<prism:issn>2071-1050</prism:issn>
	
	<dc:title>Climate Change and Industrial Policy</dc:title>
	<dc:date>2011-07-14</dc:date>
	<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/su3071003</dc:identifier>
		<dc:creator>Wim Naudé</dc:creator>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/" />
</item>
	<item rdf:about="http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/7/984/">
	<title>Sustainability, Vol. 3, Pages 984-1002: Environmental Innovation and Sustainability in Small Handicraft Businesses in Mexico</title>
	<link>http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/7/984/</link>
	<description>In this study, the relationship between environmental innovation and sustainability is analyzed in 168 handicraft businesses in the Mexican states of Oaxaca, Puebla, and Tlaxcala. The results show a direct, positive relationship between environmental innovation and sustainability in three dimensions: economic, social, and environmental. In terms of determination, the variables that best explain sustainability are: organization type, product innovation, and process innovation. The age of the handicraft businesses was not a significant factor in explaining sustainability. This study concludes that handicraft businesses make sustainable choices more as a result of a desire for profit maximization than as a result of environmental consciousness, as can be explained by neoclassical view of economics.</description>
	
	<guid>http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/7/984/</guid>
	<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2011 00:00:00 CEST</pubDate>
	
	<prism:publicationName>Sustainability</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2011-07-14</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>3</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>7</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>984</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:endingPage>1002</prism:endingPage>
		<prism:issn>2071-1050</prism:issn>
	
	<dc:title>Environmental Innovation and Sustainability in Small Handicraft Businesses in Mexico</dc:title>
	<dc:date>2011-07-14</dc:date>
	<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/su3070984</dc:identifier>
		<dc:creator>Patricia S. Sánchez-Medina</dc:creator>
		<dc:creator>Jack Corbett</dc:creator>
		<dc:creator>Arcelia Toledo-López</dc:creator>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/" />
</item>
	<item rdf:about="http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/7/965/">
	<title>Sustainability, Vol. 3, Pages 965-983: Proportioning of Steel Fibre Reinforced Concrete Mixes for Pavement Construction and Their Impact on Environment and Cost</title>
	<link>http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/7/965/</link>
	<description>Steel fibre reinforced concrete (SFRC) is a construction material investigated for more than 40 years including for pavement applications. A number of studies have demonstrated the technical merits of SFRC pavements over conventional concrete pavements; however little work has been carried out on the environmental and economical impact of SFRC during the pavement’s life cycle. Therefore, extended research was undertaken within the framework of the EU funded project “EcoLanes” to estimate the environmental and economical loadings of SFRC pavements. The innovative concept of the project is the use of recycled steel tyre-cord wire as concrete fibre reinforcement, which provides additional environmental benefits for tyre recycling over landfilling. Within the project framework a demonstration of a steel-fibre-reinforced roller-compacted concrete (SFR-RCC) pavement was constructed in a rural area in Cyprus. In order to assess the economical and environmental picture of the demonstration pavement, life cycle cost analysis (LCCA) and life cycle assessment (LCA) studies were undertaken, which also compared the under study pavement design with four conventional alternatives. The main output of the studies is that SFR-RCC is more environmentally and economically sustainable than others. In addition, various concrete mix designs were investigated by considering parameters such as fibre type and dosage, cement type, and transportation distances to the construction site. Fibre dosage has been highlighted as a crucial factor compared with economical and environmental loadings in SFR-RCC pavement construction.</description>
	
	<guid>http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/7/965/</guid>
	<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2011 00:00:00 CEST</pubDate>
	
	<prism:publicationName>Sustainability</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2011-07-08</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>3</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>7</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>965</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:endingPage>983</prism:endingPage>
		<prism:issn>2071-1050</prism:issn>
	
	<dc:title>Proportioning of Steel Fibre Reinforced Concrete Mixes for Pavement Construction and Their Impact on Environment and Cost</dc:title>
	<dc:date>2011-07-08</dc:date>
	<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/su3070965</dc:identifier>
		<dc:creator>Constantia Achilleos</dc:creator>
		<dc:creator>Diofantos Hadjimitsis</dc:creator>
		<dc:creator>Kyriacos Neocleous</dc:creator>
		<dc:creator>Kypros Pilakoutas</dc:creator>
		<dc:creator>Pavlos O. Neophytou</dc:creator>
		<dc:creator>Stelios Kallis</dc:creator>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/" />
</item>
	<item rdf:about="http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/7/957/">
	<title>Sustainability, Vol. 3, Pages 957-964: Limiting Size of Fish Fillets at the Center of the Plate Improves the Sustainability of Aquaculture Production</title>
	<link>http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/7/957/</link>
	<description>North American dining customers like to have a singular large piece of protein in the center of the plate. When fish is the protein of choice, the portion size from many species is limited by the overall size of the fish. Therefore, for these species, the means to achieve a singular larger portion of “center of the plate” protein is to grow a larger animal. However, fish become less efficient in converting feed to protein as they age. A second option would be to provide two smaller fillets originating from younger, more efficient fish. Here, the sustainability ramifications of these two protein provisioning strategies (single large or two small fillets) are considered for three species of fish produced in aquaculture. Growth data for channel catfish (Ictalurus punctatus) produced in ponds, rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) in raceways, and sablefish (Anoplopoma fimbria) in marine net pens, were modeled to assess the total biomass and overall food conversion ratio for the production of small, medium or large fish. The production of small fish added an additional 50% or more biomass per year for trout, catfish, and sablefish compared to the production of large fish. Feed conversion ratios were also improved by nearly 10% for the smaller compared to larger fish of each species. Thus, even though all of these species tend to be considered aquaculture species of low environmental impact (and hence “green” or sustainable options), the product form requested by retailers and served by chefs can further increase the sustainability of these species.</description>
	
	<guid>http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/7/957/</guid>
	<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2011 00:00:00 CEST</pubDate>
	
	<prism:publicationName>Sustainability</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2011-07-06</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>3</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>7</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Discussion</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>957</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:endingPage>964</prism:endingPage>
		<prism:issn>2071-1050</prism:issn>
	
	<dc:title>Limiting Size of Fish Fillets at the Center of the Plate Improves the Sustainability of Aquaculture Production</dc:title>
	<dc:date>2011-07-06</dc:date>
	<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/su3070957</dc:identifier>
		<dc:creator>Michael F. Tlusty</dc:creator>
		<dc:creator>Ronald Hardy</dc:creator>
		<dc:creator>Stephen F. Cross</dc:creator>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/" />
</item>
	<item rdf:about="http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/7/955/">
	<title>Sustainability, Vol. 3, Pages 955-956: Correction: The Theory and Practice of Genetically Engineered Crops and Agricultural Sustainability Sustainability 2011, 3, 847-874</title>
	<link>http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/7/955/</link>
	<description>Replace the second sentence in the Introduction on p. 848.</description>
	
	<guid>http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/7/955/</guid>
	<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2011 00:00:00 CEST</pubDate>
	
	<prism:publicationName>Sustainability</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2011-06-30</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>3</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>7</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Correction</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>955</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:endingPage>956</prism:endingPage>
		<prism:issn>2071-1050</prism:issn>
	
	<dc:title>Correction: The Theory and Practice of Genetically Engineered Crops and Agricultural Sustainability Sustainability 2011, 3, 847-874</dc:title>
	<dc:date>2011-06-30</dc:date>
	<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/su3070955</dc:identifier>
		<dc:creator>David E. Ervin</dc:creator>
		<dc:creator>Leland L. Glenna</dc:creator>
		<dc:creator>Raymond A. Jussaume, Jr.</dc:creator>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/" />
</item>
	<item rdf:about="http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/7/937/">
	<title>Sustainability, Vol. 3, Pages 937-954: Ecosystem Management: Tomorrow’s Approach to Enhancing Food Security under a Changing Climate</title>
	<link>http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/7/937/</link>
	<description>This paper argues that a sustainable ecosystem management approach is vital to ensure the delivery of essential ‘life support’ ecosystem services and must be mainstreamed into societal conscience, political thinking and economic processes. Feeding the world at a time of climate change, environmental degradation, increasing human population and demand for finite resources requires sustainable ecosystem management and equitable governance. Ecosystem degradation undermines food production and the availability of clean water, hence threatening human health, livelihoods and ultimately societal stability. Degradation also increases the vulnerability of populations to the consequences of natural disasters and climate change impacts. With 10 million people dying from hunger each year, the linkages between ecosystems and food security are important to recognize. Though we all depend on ecosystems for our food and water, about seventy per cent of the estimated 1.1 billion people in poverty around the world live in rural areas and depend directly on the productivity of ecosystems for their livelihoods. Healthy ecosystems provide a diverse range of food sources and support entire agricultural systems, but their value to food security and sustainable livelihoods are often undervalued or ignored. There is an urgent need for increased financial investment for integrating ecosystem management with food security and poverty alleviation priorities. As the world’s leaders worked towards a new international climate change agenda in Cancun, Mexico, 29 November–10 December 2010 (UNFCCC COP16), it was clear that without a deep and decisive post-2012 agreement and major concerted effort to reduce the food crisis, the Millennium Development Goals will not be attained. Political commitment at the highest level will be needed to raise the profile of ecosystems on the global food agenda. It is recommended that full recognition and promotion be given of the linkages between healthy, protected ecosystems and global food security; that sufficient resources be allocated for improved ecosystem valuation, protection, management and restoration; and that ecosystem management be integrated in climate change and food security portfolios. We will not be able to feed the world and eradicate extreme poverty, if we do not protect our valuable ecosystems and biodiversity.</description>
	
	<guid>http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/7/937/</guid>
	<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jun 2011 00:00:00 CEST</pubDate>
	
	<prism:publicationName>Sustainability</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2011-06-28</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>3</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>7</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>937</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:endingPage>954</prism:endingPage>
		<prism:issn>2071-1050</prism:issn>
	
	<dc:title>Ecosystem Management: Tomorrow’s Approach to Enhancing Food Security under a Changing Climate</dc:title>
	<dc:date>2011-06-28</dc:date>
	<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/su3070937</dc:identifier>
		<dc:creator>Richard Tingem Munang</dc:creator>
		<dc:creator>Ibrahim Thiaw</dc:creator>
		<dc:creator>Mike Rivington</dc:creator>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/" />
</item>
	<item rdf:about="http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/6/914/">
	<title>Sustainability, Vol. 3, Pages 914-936: The Dynamics of Brownfield Redevelopment</title>
	<link>http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/6/914/</link>
	<description>Negligence of former industrial sites (“brownfields”) has adversely impacted urban landscapes throughout the industrialized world. Brownfield redevelopment has recently emerged as a sustainable land use strategy and impetus for urban revitalization. This study presents a system dynamics model of the redevelopment process that illustrates how delays compound before realizing financial benefits from investment in these core urban areas. We construct a dynamic hypothesis, in which brownfield redevelopment activities are dependent upon funding and in turn bolster tax base through job creation. Drawing on previous studies, barriers to brownfield redevelopment are explored, including fear of liability, regulatory concerns, and uncertain cleanup standards and funding mechanisms. We model a case study of redevelopment in the State of Michigan (USA), which is informed by data from the Department of Environmental Quality (MDEQ) and U.S. Conference of Mayors brownfield surveys. Stock-flow structures represent phases of redevelopment, with diverted streams for sites in which no contamination was found (false alarms) and those with excess contamination level. The model is used to examine the point at which cumulative tax revenues from redeveloped areas exceed cumulative expenditures on brownfield redevelopment under different levels of funding availability.




</description>
	
	<guid>http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/6/914/</guid>
	<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jun 2011 00:00:00 CEST</pubDate>
	
	<prism:publicationName>Sustainability</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2011-06-23</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>3</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>6</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>914</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:endingPage>936</prism:endingPage>
		<prism:issn>2071-1050</prism:issn>
	
	<dc:title>The Dynamics of Brownfield Redevelopment</dc:title>
	<dc:date>2011-06-23</dc:date>
	<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/su3060914</dc:identifier>
		<dc:creator>Todd  K. BenDor</dc:creator>
		<dc:creator>Sara  S. Metcalf</dc:creator>
		<dc:creator>Mark Paich</dc:creator>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/" />
</item>
	<item rdf:about="http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/6/897/">
	<title>Sustainability, Vol. 3, Pages 897-913: Low Discounting Behavior among Small-Scale Fishers in Fiji and Sabah, Malaysia</title>
	<link>http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/6/897/</link>
	<description>Understanding the socio-economic factors that are associated with fishers’ willingness to delay gratification may be useful for designing appropriate fisheries management and conservation policies. We aim to identify the predictors of low discounting behaviour among fishers, which is analogous to having a longer-term outlook. We base our empirical study on two small-scale tropical reef fisheries in Sabah, Malaysia, and Fiji. We use an experimental approach to identify fishers with low discount rates, and then use a logistic regression model to identify predictors of low discount rates. We find that 42% of the respondents have low discount rates, and that site and village level variables are significant predictors of low discount rates. Within Sabah and Fiji, boat ownership and relative catch differentiate low discounting from non-low discounting fishers, but these variables have contradictory effects in Sabah and Fiji. Overall, our results imply that a substantial proportion of reef fishers may be willing to engage in conservation initiatives; however, local socio-cultural, economic, and ecological conditions have to be considered first during the process of designing management interventions.</description>
	
	<guid>http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/6/897/</guid>
	<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jun 2011 00:00:00 CEST</pubDate>
	
	<prism:publicationName>Sustainability</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2011-06-20</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>3</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>6</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>897</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:endingPage>913</prism:endingPage>
		<prism:issn>2071-1050</prism:issn>
	
	<dc:title>Low Discounting Behavior among Small-Scale Fishers in Fiji and Sabah, Malaysia</dc:title>
	<dc:date>2011-06-20</dc:date>
	<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/su3060897</dc:identifier>
		<dc:creator>Louise S. L. Teh</dc:creator>
		<dc:creator>Lydia C. L. Teh</dc:creator>
		<dc:creator>U. Rashid Sumaila</dc:creator>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/" />
</item>
	<item rdf:about="http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/6/875/">
	<title>Sustainability, Vol. 3, Pages 875-896: Moving Universities: A Case Study on the Use of Unconferencing for Facilitating Sustainability Learning in a Swiss University</title>
	<link>http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/6/875/</link>
	<description>Unconferencing is a method for organizing social learning which could be suitable to trigger sustainability learning processes. An unconference is defined as participant-driven meeting that tries to avoid one or more aspects of a conventional conference, such as top-down organization, one-way communication and power-relationships based on titles, formal hierarchies and status. This paper presents a case study on the application of unconferencing in a large Swiss university (ETH Zurich) where an unconference was conducted to engage students, academics, staff and external experts in a mutual learning process aimed at the development of project ideas for reducing its CO2 emissions. The study analyzes how the unconferencing format initiated and promoted sustainability oriented group processes during the unconference, and in how far the projects which were developed contributed to a reduction of the university’s CO2 emissions.</description>
	
	<guid>http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/6/875/</guid>
	<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2011 00:00:00 CEST</pubDate>
	
	<prism:publicationName>Sustainability</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2011-06-17</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>3</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>6</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>875</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:endingPage>896</prism:endingPage>
		<prism:issn>2071-1050</prism:issn>
	
	<dc:title>Moving Universities: A Case Study on the Use of Unconferencing for Facilitating Sustainability Learning in a Swiss University</dc:title>
	<dc:date>2011-06-17</dc:date>
	<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/su3060875</dc:identifier>
		<dc:creator>Patricia Wolf</dc:creator>
		<dc:creator>Peter Troxler</dc:creator>
		<dc:creator>Ralf Hansmann</dc:creator>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/" />
</item>
	<item rdf:about="http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/6/847/">
	<title>Sustainability, Vol. 3, Pages 847-874: The Theory and Practice of Genetically Engineered Crops and Agricultural Sustainability</title>
	<link>http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/6/847/</link>
	<description>The development of genetically engineered (GE) crops has focused predominantly on enhancing conventional pest control approaches. Scientific assessments show that these GE crops generally deliver significant economic and some environmental benefits over their conventional crop alternatives. However, emerging evidence indicates that current GE crops will not foster sustainable cropping systems unless the negative environmental and social feedback effects are properly addressed. Moreover, GE crop innovations that promote more sustainable agricultural systems will receive underinvestment by seed and chemical companies that must understandably focus on private returns for major crops. Opportunities to promote crops that convey multi-faceted benefits for the environment and the poor are foundational to a sustainable food system and should not be neglected because they also represent global public goods. In this paper, we develop a set of criteria that can guide the development of GE crops consistent with contemporary sustainable agriculture theory and practice. Based on those principles, we offer policy options and recommendations for reforming public and private R&amp;D and commercialization processes to further the potential contributions of GE crops to sustainable agriculture. Two strategies that would help achieve this goal would be to restore the centrality of the public sector in agricultural R&amp;D and to open the technology development process to more democratic participation by farmers and other stakeholders.</description>
	
	<guid>http://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/3/6/847/</guid>
	<pubDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2011 00:00:00 CEST</pubDate>
	
	<prism:publicationName>Sustainability</prism:publicationName>
	<prism:publicationDate>2011-06-17</prism:publicationDate>
	<prism:volume>3</prism:volume>
	<prism:number>6</prism:number>
	<prism:section>Article</prism:section>
	<prism:startingPage>847</prism:startingPage>
		<prism:endingPage>874</prism:endingPage>
		<prism:issn>2071-1050</prism:issn>
	
	<dc:title>The Theory and Practice of Genetically Engineered Crops and Agricultural Sustainability</dc:title>
	<dc:date>2011-06-17</dc:date>
	<dc:identifier>doi: 10.3390/su3060847</dc:identifier>
		<dc:creator>David E. Ervin</dc:creator>
		<dc:creator>Leland L. Glenna</dc:creator>
		<dc:creator>Raymond A. Jussaume, Jr.</dc:creator>
	
	<cc:license rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/" />
</item>


<cc:License rdf:about="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/">
	<cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Reproduction" />
	<cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#Distribution" />
	<cc:permits rdf:resource="http://creativecommons.org/ns#DerivativeWorks" />
</cc:License>

</rdf:RDF>
