Cultural History: The State of the Field

A special issue of Humanities (ISSN 2076-0787).

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (1 March 2014) | Viewed by 18373

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
School of Historical, Philosophical and Religious Studies, Arizona State University, PO Box 874302, Tempe, AZ 85287-4302, USA
Interests: history of urban space; travel and travel writing; the history of women; gender and sexuality

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

In the 1980s, in response to the crisis of social history, advocates of the “New Cultural History” proposed a new paradigm for studying the past. Drawing on the work of structuralist and poststructuralist thinkers from a variety of disciplines, new cultural historians analyzed texts, images and practices to identify systems of thought and belief. By the turn of the twentieth century, New Cultural History had reached its own crisis point. Both critics and practitioners expressed concern at a lack of standard definitions and methodology as well as a tendency to focus on representations divorced from social practices. Including cultural history within a larger critique of postmodernism, skeptics and adherents alike asked whether cultural history was able to bring to light any objective “truth” about the past. Yet despite this criticism, cultural history has continued to develop as a distinct approach to the past, as historians turn to new topics (emotions, memory) and draw from diverse disciplines (cultural geography, neurobiology). This special issue asks whether it is possible, twenty-five or so years after the “cultural turn,” to speak of cultural history as a coherent field. Are the criticisms of cultural history made in the late 1990s still valid? How has new technology altered cultural historical approaches? What might we gain by thinking of cultural history as a field, and what might we lose? This special issue asks authors to submit articles based on their own original research that speak to these questions concerning the state of the field.

Dr. Victoria Thompson
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All papers will be peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a double-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Humanities is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • culture
  • cultural history
  • New Cultural History
  • interdisciplinary
  • structuralism
  • poststructuralism
  • historical methodology
  • postmodernism
  • thought
  • belief

Published Papers (2 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

100 KiB  
Article
Beyond Cultural History? The Material Turn, Praxiography, and Body History
by Iris Clever and Willemijn Ruberg
Humanities 2014, 3(4), 546-566; https://doi.org/10.3390/h3040546 - 09 Oct 2014
Cited by 13 | Viewed by 12178
Abstract
The body came to be taken seriously as a topic of cultural history during the “corporeal” or “bodily” turn in the 1980s and 1990s. Soon, however, critique was raised against these studies’ conceptualization of the body as discursively shaped and socially disciplined: individual [...] Read more.
The body came to be taken seriously as a topic of cultural history during the “corporeal” or “bodily” turn in the 1980s and 1990s. Soon, however, critique was raised against these studies’ conceptualization of the body as discursively shaped and socially disciplined: individual bodily agency and feeling were felt to be absent in the idea of the material body. This article critically analyzes new approaches in the field of body history, particularly the so-called “material turn”. It argues that the material turn, especially in the guise of praxiography, has a lot to offer historians of the body, such as more attention to material practices, to different kinds of actors and a more open eye to encounters. Potential problems of praxiographical analyses of the body in history include the complicated relationship between discourses and practices and the neglect of the political and feminist potential of deconstructive discourse analyses. However, a focus on the relationship between practices of knowledge production and the representation of the body may also provide new ways of opening up historical power relations. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Cultural History: The State of the Field)
156 KiB  
Article
Cyber-Cultural History: Some Initial Steps toward a Cultural History of Digital Networking
by Federico Mazzini
Humanities 2014, 3(2), 185-209; https://doi.org/10.3390/h3020185 - 20 May 2014
Viewed by 5253
Abstract
Too much in the present to be legitimately regarded as “history”, yet too important to be ignored by scholars, the cultural history of digital networking remains a largely unexplored field of study. The present article seeks to connect the reasons for this lack [...] Read more.
Too much in the present to be legitimately regarded as “history”, yet too important to be ignored by scholars, the cultural history of digital networking remains a largely unexplored field of study. The present article seeks to connect the reasons for this lack of interest in the subject to the difficulties which historians face when approaching it. By piecing together the fragments of a history that for the most part still awaits being written—yet not always by taking historical–cultural works as a starting point—the author suggests some key moments, crucial themes, critical points and possible future developments. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Cultural History: The State of the Field)
Back to TopTop