Next Article in Journal
Evaluating Interactive Visualization of Multidimensional Data Projection with Feature Transformation
Previous Article in Journal
On the Design of Virtual Reality Learning Environments in Engineering
Previous Article in Special Issue
On the Use of ROMOT—A RObotized 3D-MOvie Theatre—To Enhance Romantic Movie Scenes
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Multimodal Technologies Interact. 2017, 1(2), 12; doi:10.3390/mti1020012

Form, Function and Etiquette–Potential Users’ Perspectives on Social Domestic Robots

Department of Computer and Information Sciences, University of Northumbria at Newcastle, Newcastleupon-Tyne NE1 8ST, UK
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editors: Adrian David Cheok, Cristina Portalés Ricart and Chamari Edirisinghe
Received: 23 January 2017 / Revised: 5 June 2017 / Accepted: 7 June 2017 / Published: 9 June 2017
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Love and Sex with Robots)
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [3270 KB, uploaded 15 June 2017]   |  

Abstract

Social Domestic Robots (SDRs) will soon be launched en masse among commercial markets. Previously, social robots only inhabited scientific labs; now there is an opportunity to conduct experiments to investigate human-robot relationships (including user expectations of social interaction) within more naturalistic, domestic spaces, as well as to test models of technology acceptance. To this end we exposed 20 participants to advertisements prepared by three robotics companies, explaining and “pitching” their SDRs’ functionality (namely, Pepper by SoftBank; Jibo by Jibo, Inc.; and Buddy by Blue Frog Robotics). Participants were interviewed and the data was thematically analyzed to critically examine their initial reactions, concerns and impressions of the three SDRs. Using this approach, we aim to complement existing survey results pertaining to SDRs, and to try to understand the reasoning people use when evaluating SDRs based on what is publicly available to them, namely, advertising. Herein, we unpack issues raised concerning form/function, security/privacy, and the perceived emotional impact of owning an SDR. We discuss implications for the adequate design of socially engaged robotics for domestic applications, and provide four practical steps that could improve the relationships between people and SDRs. An additional contribution is made by expanding existing models of technology acceptance in domestic settings with a new factor of privacy. View Full-Text
Keywords: human-robot interaction; user studies; security; privacy; social domestic robot (SDR); home; human-robot interaction; user studies; security; privacy; social domestic robot (SDR); home;
Figures

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. (CC BY 4.0).

Scifeed alert for new publications

Never miss any articles matching your research from any publisher
  • Get alerts for new papers matching your research
  • Find out the new papers from selected authors
  • Updated daily for 49'000+ journals and 6000+ publishers
  • Define your Scifeed now

SciFeed Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Dereshev, D.; Kirk, D. Form, Function and Etiquette–Potential Users’ Perspectives on Social Domestic Robots. Multimodal Technologies Interact. 2017, 1, 12.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Multimodal Technologies Interact. EISSN 2414-4088 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top