Next Article in Journal
Typical Lateral Interactions, but Increased Contrast Sensitivity, in Migraine-With-Aura
Next Article in Special Issue
Covert Exogenous Cross-Modality Orienting between Audition and Vision
Previous Article in Journal
A Retrospective Analysis of the Effect of Subretinal Hyper-Reflective Material and Other Morphological Features of Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration on Visual Acuity Outcomes in Eyes Treated with Intravitreal Aflibercept over One Year
Previous Article in Special Issue
Implicit Mentalising during Level-1 Visual Perspective-Taking Indicated by Dissociation with Attention Orienting
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Vision 2018, 2(1), 6; doi:10.3390/vision2010006

I Don’t See It Your Way: The Dot Perspective Task Does Not Gauge Spontaneous Perspective Taking

Faculty of Natural Sciences, University of Stirling, Stirling FK9 4LA, UK
Received: 16 November 2017 / Revised: 29 January 2018 / Accepted: 30 January 2018 / Published: 8 February 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Reflexive Shifts in Visual Attention)
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [1293 KB, uploaded 8 February 2018]   |  

Abstract

Data from studies employing the dot-perspective task have been used to support the theory that humans are capable of automatically computing the visual perspective of other individuals. Recent work has challenged this interpretation, claiming instead that the results may arise through the automatic reorienting of attention triggered by observed head and gaze cues. The two experiments reported here offer a stronger test of the perspective taking account by replacing the computer-generated avatars used in previous research with, respectively, photo-realistic stimuli and socially co-present individuals in a “live”, face-to-face version of the task. In each study observers were faster to judge the number of dots in a display when either a digitized image depicting a human “gazer” (Experiment 1), or a socially co-present gazer (Experiment 2) could see the same number of dots as the observer, than when the number of dots visible to each was different. However, in both experiments this effect was also obtained in conditions where barriers clearly occluded the gazers’ view of the target dots so that the perspectives of participants and gazers were always different. These results offer no support for the idea that participants are engaged in spontaneous perspective taking in the dot perspective task. It is argued that, instead, the results are likely caused by a spontaneous redirection of a viewer’s attention by the observed gazes, which is unlikely to involve representations of the gazer’s mental state. View Full-Text
Keywords: perspective taking; social attention; vision; theory of mind; gaze-cued attention perspective taking; social attention; vision; theory of mind; gaze-cued attention
Figures

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. (CC BY 4.0).

Scifeed alert for new publications

Never miss any articles matching your research from any publisher
  • Get alerts for new papers matching your research
  • Find out the new papers from selected authors
  • Updated daily for 49'000+ journals and 6000+ publishers
  • Define your Scifeed now

SciFeed Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Langton, S.R.H. I Don’t See It Your Way: The Dot Perspective Task Does Not Gauge Spontaneous Perspective Taking. Vision 2018, 2, 6.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Vision EISSN 2411-5150 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top