Assessment of Geometric Distortion in Six Clinical Scanners Using a 3D-Printed Grid Phantom
AbstractA cost-effective regularly structured three-dimensional (3D) printed grid phantom was developed to enable the quantification of machine-related magnetic resonance (MR) distortion. This phantom contains reference features, “point-like” objects, or vertices, which resulted from the intersection of mesh edges in 3D space. 3D distortions maps were computed by comparing the locations of corresponding features in both MR and computer tomography (CT) data sets using normalized cross correlation. Results are reported for six MRI scanners at both 1.5 T and 3.0 T field strengths within our institution. Mean Euclidean distance error for all MR volumes in this study, was less than 2 mm. The maximum detected error for the six scanners ranged from 2.4 mm to 6.9 mm. The conclusions in this study agree well with previous studies that indicated that MRI is quite accurate near the centre of the field but is more spatially inaccurate toward the edges of the magnetic field. View Full-Text
Scifeed alert for new publicationsNever miss any articles matching your research from any publisher
- Get alerts for new papers matching your research
- Find out the new papers from selected authors
- Updated daily for 49'000+ journals and 6000+ publishers
- Define your Scifeed now
Jafar, M.; Jafar, Y.M.; Dean, C.; Miquel, M.E. Assessment of Geometric Distortion in Six Clinical Scanners Using a 3D-Printed Grid Phantom. J. Imaging 2017, 3, 28.
Jafar M, Jafar YM, Dean C, Miquel ME. Assessment of Geometric Distortion in Six Clinical Scanners Using a 3D-Printed Grid Phantom. Journal of Imaging. 2017; 3(3):28.Chicago/Turabian Style
Jafar, Maysam; Jafar, Yassir M.; Dean, Christopher; Miquel, Marc E. 2017. "Assessment of Geometric Distortion in Six Clinical Scanners Using a 3D-Printed Grid Phantom." J. Imaging 3, no. 3: 28.
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.