Next Article in Journal
Sigfox and LoRaWAN Datasets for Fingerprint Localization in Large Urban and Rural Areas
Previous Article in Journal
SIMADL: Simulated Activities of Daily Living Dataset
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessArticle

Comparison between Simulation and Analytical Methods in Reliability Data Analysis: A Case Study on Face Drilling Rigs

1
Department of Mining Engineering, Isfahan University of Technology, Isfahan 84156-83111, Iran
2
Division of Operation & Maintenance Engineering, Lulea University of Technology, 97187 Lulea, Sweden
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 16 December 2017 / Revised: 17 March 2018 / Accepted: 22 March 2018 / Published: 10 April 2018
Full-Text   |   PDF [6220 KB, uploaded 3 May 2018]   |  

Abstract

Collecting the failure data and reliability analysis in an underground mining operation is challenging due to the harsh environment and high level of production pressure. Therefore, achieving an accurate, fast, and applicable analysis in a fleet of underground equipment is usually difficult and time consuming. This paper aims to discuss the main reliability analysis challenges in mining machinery by comparing three main approaches: two analytical methods (white-box and black-box modeling), and a simulation approach. For this purpose, the maintenance data from a fleet of face drilling rigs in a Swedish underground metal mine were extracted by the MAXIMO system over a period of two years and were applied for analysis. The investigations reveal that the performance of these approaches in ranking and the reliability of the studies of the machines is different. However, all mentioned methods provide similar outputs but, in general, the simulation estimates the reliability of the studied machines at a higher level. The simulation and white-box method sometimes provide exactly the same results, which are caused by their similar structure of analysis. On average, 9% of the data are missed in the white-box analysis due to a lack of sufficient data in some of the subsystems of the studies’ rigs. View Full-Text
Keywords: modeling; simulation; black-box; white-box; Pareto analysis modeling; simulation; black-box; white-box; Pareto analysis
Figures

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. (CC BY 4.0).
SciFeed

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Hoseinie, S.H.; Al-Chalabi, H.; Ghodrati, B. Comparison between Simulation and Analytical Methods in Reliability Data Analysis: A Case Study on Face Drilling Rigs. Data 2018, 3, 12.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Data EISSN 2306-5729 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top