Hydrology 2014, 1(1), 20-39; doi:10.3390/hydrology1010020

Evaluating Three Hydrological Distributed Watershed Models: MIKE-SHE, APEX, SWAT

1,†,* email, 1,†email, 1,†email and 2,†email
Received: 8 December 2013; in revised form: 29 March 2014 / Accepted: 4 April 2014 / Published: 28 May 2014
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Abstract: Selecting the right model to simulate a specific watershed has always been a challenge, and field testing of watersheds could help researchers to use the proper model for their purposes. The performance of three popular Geographic Information System (GIS)-based watershed simulation models (European Hydrological System Model (MIKE SHE), Agricultural Policy/Environmental Extender (APEX) and Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT)) were evaluated for their ability to simulate the hydrology of the 52.6 km2 Canagagigue Watershed located in the Grand River Basin in southern Ontario, Canada. All three models were calibrated for a four-year period and then validated using an independent four-year period by comparing simulated and observed daily, monthly and annual streamflow. The simulated flows generated by the three models are quite similar and closely match the observed flow, particularly for the calibration results. The mean daily/monthly flow at the outlet of the Canagagigue Watershed simulated by MIKE SHE was more accurate than that simulated by either the SWAT or the APEX model, during both the calibration and validation periods. Moreover, for the validation period, MIKE SHE predicted the overall variation of streamflow slightly better than either SWAT or APEX.
Keywords: hydrology; MIKE SHE; APEX; SWAT; Canagagigue
PDF Full-text Download PDF Full-Text [2214 KB, uploaded 28 May 2014 10:42 CEST]

Export to BibTeX |

MDPI and ACS Style

Golmohammadi, G.; Prasher, S.; Madani, A.; Rudra, R. Evaluating Three Hydrological Distributed Watershed Models: MIKE-SHE, APEX, SWAT. Hydrology 2014, 1, 20-39.

AMA Style

Golmohammadi G, Prasher S, Madani A, Rudra R. Evaluating Three Hydrological Distributed Watershed Models: MIKE-SHE, APEX, SWAT. Hydrology. 2014; 1(1):20-39.

Chicago/Turabian Style

Golmohammadi, Golmar; Prasher, Shiv; Madani, Ali; Rudra, Ramesh. 2014. "Evaluating Three Hydrological Distributed Watershed Models: MIKE-SHE, APEX, SWAT." Hydrology 1, no. 1: 20-39.

Hydrology EISSN 2306-5338 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert