Next Article in Journal / Special Issue
Real-Time and Embedded Detection of Hand Gestures with an IMU-Based Glove
Previous Article in Journal / Special Issue
Convolutional Neural Networks for Human Activity Recognition Using Body-Worn Sensors
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Informatics 2018, 5(2), 27; https://doi.org/10.3390/informatics5020027

A Comprehensive Study of Activity Recognition Using Accelerometers

1
School of Computer Science, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, and Engineering Mathematics, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1UB, UK
2
Amazon Research, Cambridge CB3 0RD, UK
Work done prior to joining Amazon.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 16 March 2018 / Revised: 22 May 2018 / Accepted: 25 May 2018 / Published: 30 May 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sensor-Based Activity Recognition and Interaction)
Full-Text   |   PDF [839 KB, uploaded 30 May 2018]   |  

Abstract

This paper serves as a survey and empirical evaluation of the state-of-the-art in activity recognition methods using accelerometers. The paper is particularly focused on long-term activity recognition in real-world settings. In these environments, data collection is not a trivial matter; thus, there are performance trade-offs between prediction accuracy, which is not the sole system objective, and keeping the maintenance overhead at minimum levels. We examine research that has focused on the selection of activities, the features that are extracted from the accelerometer data, the segmentation of the time-series data, the locations of accelerometers, the selection and configuration trade-offs, the test/retest reliability, and the generalisation performance. Furthermore, we study these questions from an experimental platform and show, somewhat surprisingly, that many disparate experimental configurations yield comparable predictive performance on testing data. Our understanding of these results is that the experimental setup directly and indirectly defines a pathway for context to be delivered to the classifier, and that, in some settings, certain configurations are more optimal than alternatives. We conclude by identifying how the main results of this work can be used in practice, specifically in experimental configurations in challenging experimental conditions. View Full-Text
Keywords: activities of daily living; activity recognition; accelerometers; machine learning; sensors activities of daily living; activity recognition; accelerometers; machine learning; sensors
Figures

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. (CC BY 4.0).
SciFeed

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Twomey, N.; Diethe, T.; Fafoutis, X.; Elsts, A.; McConville, R.; Flach, P.; Craddock, I. A Comprehensive Study of Activity Recognition Using Accelerometers. Informatics 2018, 5, 27.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Informatics EISSN 2227-9709 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top