Next Article in Journal
Mind–Body Therapy for Children with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder
Next Article in Special Issue
An Evaluation of a Continuing Education Program for Family Caregivers of Ventilator-Dependent Children with Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)
Previous Article in Journal
Parent, partner, co-parent or partnership? The need for clarity as family systems thinking takes hold in the quest to motivate behavioural change
Previous Article in Special Issue
Pressure Injuries in Medically Complex Children: A Review
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessReview
Children 2017, 4(4), 30; doi:10.3390/children4040030

Overview of Four Functional Classification Systems Commonly Used in Cerebral Palsy

Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH 45229, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editor: David Hall
Received: 5 March 2017 / Revised: 18 April 2017 / Accepted: 19 April 2017 / Published: 24 April 2017
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Children with Complex Health Care Needs)
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [10224 KB, uploaded 24 April 2017]   |  

Abstract

Cerebral palsy (CP) is the most common physical disability in childhood. CP comprises a heterogeneous group of disorders that can result in spasticity, dystonia, muscle contractures, weakness and coordination difficulty that ultimately affects the ability to control movements. Traditionally, CP has been classified using a combination of the motor type and the topographical distribution, as well as subjective severity level. Imprecise terms such as these tell very little about what a person is able to do functionally and can impair clear communication between providers. More recently, classification systems have been created employing a simple ordinal grading system of functional performance. These systems allow a more precise discussion between providers, as well as better subject stratification for research. The goal of this review is to describe four common functional classification systems for cerebral palsy: the Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS), the Manual Ability Classification System (MACS), the Communication Function Classification System (CFCS), and the Eating and Drinking Ability Classification System (EDACS). These measures are all standardized, reliable, and complementary to one another. View Full-Text
Keywords: cerebral palsy; classification; severity; function; GMFCS; MACS; CFCS; EDACS cerebral palsy; classification; severity; function; GMFCS; MACS; CFCS; EDACS
Figures

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. (CC BY 4.0).

Scifeed alert for new publications

Never miss any articles matching your research from any publisher
  • Get alerts for new papers matching your research
  • Find out the new papers from selected authors
  • Updated daily for 49'000+ journals and 6000+ publishers
  • Define your Scifeed now

SciFeed Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Paulson, A.; Vargus-Adams, J. Overview of Four Functional Classification Systems Commonly Used in Cerebral Palsy. Children 2017, 4, 30.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
Children EISSN 2227-9067 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top