Next Article in Journal
Immigrant Children and Youth in the USA: Facilitating Equity of Opportunity at School
Next Article in Special Issue
Does Higher Education Level the Playing Field? Socio-Economic Differences in Graduate Earnings
Previous Article in Journal / Special Issue
Teenagers’ Expectations of Applying to University: How do they Change?
Article Menu

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
Educ. Sci. 2015, 5(4), 306-322; doi:10.3390/educsci5040306

Will the Use of Contextual Indicators Make UK Higher Education Admissions Fairer?

School of Education, Durham University, Leazes Road, Durham DH1 1TA, UK
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editors: Anna Vignoles and Neil Murray
Received: 14 September 2015 / Accepted: 16 November 2015 / Published: 20 November 2015
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Widening Participation in Higher Education)
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [491 KB, uploaded 20 November 2015]


In the UK, as elsewhere, the use of ‘contextual’ data has been strongly advocated in order to inform undergraduate admissions decision-making. More than a third of UK universities currently take the socioeconomic or other background context of undergraduate applicants’ attainment into account when deciding whom to shortlist, interview, make standard or reduced offers to, or accept at confirmation or clearing. Even more universities plan to do so in the future. Contextualised admissions policies are considered by many commentators to be intrinsically fairer, and to represent a potentially powerful means of addressing the persistent under-representation of HE students from less advantaged backgrounds, but their impact has not yet been rigorously evaluated. In order to be effective, the indicators must be accurate, appropriate, and complete, and policies for their use must demonstrably widen participation, presumably without compromising student achievement. This paper reviews the indicators available for judging context, and the existing evidence base on how contextually-identified students perform in higher education. It illustrates the considerable difficulties of using any available indicators, alone or in combination, in terms of trustworthiness. And it explains how their use could introduce new injustices while tackling merely the symptoms of stratified participation in HE. This is far from a counsel of despair. We need to widen participation and the use of context stills shows considerable promise. The paper therefore presents the case for a new study by the authors, looking at which of the available contextual indicators are best in practice, and what difference their use would really make to widening participation at HE. View Full-Text
Keywords: Higher education; admissions; contextual admissions; overcoming disadvantage; social justice; indicators Higher education; admissions; contextual admissions; overcoming disadvantage; social justice; indicators
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. (CC BY 4.0).

Scifeed alert for new publications

Never miss any articles matching your research from any publisher
  • Get alerts for new papers matching your research
  • Find out the new papers from selected authors
  • Updated daily for 49'000+ journals and 6000+ publishers
  • Define your Scifeed now

SciFeed Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Boliver, V.; Gorard, S.; Siddiqui, N. Will the Use of Contextual Indicators Make UK Higher Education Admissions Fairer? Educ. Sci. 2015, 5, 306-322.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics



[Return to top]
Educ. Sci. EISSN 2227-7102 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top