Next Article in Journal
On Adaptive Control for Electrical Discharge Machining Using Vibroacoustic Emission
Previous Article in Journal
Physicochemical Properties of Gac (Momordica cochinchinensis (Lour.) Spreng) Seeds and Their Oil Extracted by Supercritical Carbon Dioxide and Soxhlet Methods
Previous Article in Special Issue
Task Engagement as Personalization Feedback for Socially-Assistive Robots and Cognitive Training
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Special Issue on “Assistive Robotics”

by
Ramviyas Parasuraman
1,2 and
Byung-Cheol Min
1,*
1
Department of Computer and Information Technology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA
2
Department of Computer Science, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Technologies 2018, 6(4), 95; https://doi.org/10.3390/technologies6040095
Submission received: 18 October 2018 / Accepted: 18 October 2018 / Published: 20 October 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Assistive Robotics)
The technology behind robotics has rapidly advanced to a level enabling humans and robots to interact in everyday aspects of life. Nevertheless, it remains a challenge to design and develop these interactions to accommodate people of varying abilities [1]. Assistive Robotics is a branch of robotics that addresses the research challenges inherent in providing sensory and perception abilities and performing actions that are beneficial to the elderly and physically-challenged people [2,3]. This Special Issue presents recent research advances in the field of Assistive Robotics that can empower people to perform various tasks they could not otherwise, to be more independent, and to improve their overall quality of life. Robots for the visually impaired, telepresence robots for physical impairments, social robots for cognitive impairments, and wearable robots are some of the areas of research that were welcomed in this special issue.
After the careful and thorough review, this special issue consists of four papers advancing the state of the art in different aspects of assistive robotic technologies, such as personalizing robot assistants, controlling prosthetic devices, and investigating the meaning of “assistance” in a social-technological context. In [4], the authors proposed a data-driven Interactive Reinforcement Learning (IRL) framework that combines task performance and task engagement with the goal of achieving efficient personalization of socially-assistive robots, specifically focusing on coaching and training assistants. Their objective is to monitor how engaged users are with their tasks so that the robots provide personalized training strategies and maximize training outcomes. They integrated human-generated feedback to obtain task engagement, which will be used for adjusting task parameters and difficulty level as demonstrated through their experimental results. The authors of [5] studied the problem of sensorization in dexterous control of prosthetic devices. Specifically, they focused on how regression models can be used to predict movement activation at various levels (wrist, hand, and single finger) from the tactile sensors. They analyzed different Gaussian Process regression kernels on the combination of surface electromyography (sEMG) and tactile myography (TMG) using data from real human experimental subjects, and concluded that the regressed sensor data is effective in proportional control and the detection of prosthetic device activation. In similar research, Castellini et al. [6] presented a solution for myocontrol in prosthetic devices using Tactile Myography (TMG). They proposed a tactile bracelet that accommodates different shapes of forearm or residual limb of amputees to measure TMG signals; these measurements are then used to classify differential activation of the wrist or fingers. The authors applied this solution to experimental data from healthy human subjects and amputee human subjects and found that the results from both group are comparable regarding classification accuracy. This work complements the work in [5]; both push the boundaries of experimental research in prosthetic device control and activation. Krings and Weinberger in [7] discuss the role and function of assistance in assistive robotics technologies for inpatient care solutions and debate the terms in the context of socio-technical systems. With the exemplar of an empirical study using inpatient care for patients with dementia, the authors reveal the functional character of such assistance systems. They conclude that further studies and theoretical analysis are needed to well-establish the social and functional aspects of assistance within the community of scientists and technologists. Although these four papers in the special issue represent only a fraction of the recent advances in assistive robotics, they push the boundaries of what the research community is already working on and will continue to explore further.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank all the authors who submitted their scholarly works for their invaluable scientific contributions to this special issue on assistive robotics. We also thank all the anonymous reviewers for their time and effort in providing constructive comments to the authors and for helping us maintain a high scientific standard.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Lotfi, A.; Langensiepen, C.; Yahaya, S.W. Socially Assistive Robotics: Robot Exercise Trainer for Older Adults. Technologies 2018, 6, 32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Tapus, A.; Mataric, M.J.; Scassellati, B. Socially assistive robotics [grand challenges of robotics]. IEEE Robot. Autom. Mag. 2007, 14, 35–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Forlizzi, J.; DiSalvo, C.; Gemperle, F. Assistive robotics and an ecology of elders living independently in their homes. Hum. Comput. Interact. 2004, 19, 25–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Tsiakas, K.; Abujelala, M.; Makedon, F. Task Engagement as Personalization Feedback for Socially-Assistive Robots and Cognitive Training. Technologies 2018, 6, 49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Jaquier, N.; Connan, M.; Castellini, C.; Calinon, S. Combining Electromyography and Tactile Myography to Improve Hand and Wrist Activity Detection in Prostheses. Technologies 2017, 5, 64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Castellini, C.; Kõiva, R.; Pasluosta, C.; Viegas, C.; Eskofier, B.M. Tactile Myography: An Off-Line Assessment of Able-Bodied Subjects and One Upper-Limb Amputee. Technologies 2018, 6, 38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Krings, B.J.; Weinberger, N. Assistant without Master? Some Conceptual Implications of Assistive Robotics in Health Care. Technologies 2018, 6, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Parasuraman, R.; Min, B.-C. Special Issue on “Assistive Robotics”. Technologies 2018, 6, 95. https://doi.org/10.3390/technologies6040095

AMA Style

Parasuraman R, Min B-C. Special Issue on “Assistive Robotics”. Technologies. 2018; 6(4):95. https://doi.org/10.3390/technologies6040095

Chicago/Turabian Style

Parasuraman, Ramviyas, and Byung-Cheol Min. 2018. "Special Issue on “Assistive Robotics”" Technologies 6, no. 4: 95. https://doi.org/10.3390/technologies6040095

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop