Seed Biofortification and Phytic Acid Reduction: A Conflict of Interest for the Plant?
AbstractMost of the phosphorus in seeds is accumulated in the form of phytic acid (myo-inositol-1,2,3,4,5,6-hexakisphosphate, InsP6). This molecule is a strong chelator of cations important for nutrition, such as iron, zinc, magnesium, and calcium. For this reason, InsP6 is considered an antinutritional factor. In recent years, efforts to biofortify seeds through the generation of low phytic acid (lpa) mutants have been noteworthy. Moreover, genes involved in the biosynthesis and accumulation of this molecule have been isolated and characterized in different species. Beyond its role in phosphorus storage, phytic acid is a very important signaling molecule involved in different regulatory processes during plant development and responses to different stimuli. Consequently, many lpa mutants show different negative pleitotropic effects. The strength of these pleiotropic effects depends on the specific mutated gene, possible functional redundancy, the nature of the mutation, and the spatio-temporal expression of the gene. Breeding programs or transgenic approaches aimed at development of new lpa mutants must take into consideration these different aspects in order to maximize the utility of these mutants. View Full-Text
- Supplementary File 1:
Supplementary Materials (PDF, 214 KB)
Scifeed alert for new publicationsNever miss any articles matching your research from any publisher
- Get alerts for new papers matching your research
- Find out the new papers from selected authors
- Updated daily for 49'000+ journals and 6000+ publishers
- Define your Scifeed now
Sparvoli, F.; Cominelli, E. Seed Biofortification and Phytic Acid Reduction: A Conflict of Interest for the Plant? Plants 2015, 4, 728-755.
Sparvoli F, Cominelli E. Seed Biofortification and Phytic Acid Reduction: A Conflict of Interest for the Plant? Plants. 2015; 4(4):728-755.Chicago/Turabian Style
Sparvoli, Francesca; Cominelli, Eleonora. 2015. "Seed Biofortification and Phytic Acid Reduction: A Conflict of Interest for the Plant?" Plants 4, no. 4: 728-755.