Next Article in Journal
Storytelling in Interactive 3D Geographic Visualization Systems
Previous Article in Journal
Efficient Method for POI/ROI Discovery Using Flickr Geotagged Photos
Article Menu
Issue 3 (March) cover image

Export Article

Open AccessArticle
ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 2018, 7(3), 122; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi7030122

Single-Frequency Kinematic Performance Comparison between Galileo, GPS, and GLONASS Satellite Positioning Systems Using an MMS-Generated Trajectory as a Reference: Preliminary Results

1
DICATECh—Politecnico di Bari, Via Orabona 4, 70125 Bari, Italy
2
GeoSNav Lab, Università degli Studi di Trieste, via Valerio 6/2, 34127 Trieste, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 24 January 2018 / Revised: 27 February 2018 / Accepted: 14 March 2018 / Published: 18 March 2018
View Full-Text   |   Download PDF [3373 KB, uploaded 3 May 2018]   |  

Abstract

The initial Galileo satellite positioning services, started on December 15, 2016, became available with a formal announcement by the European Commission. This first step toward the Galileo system Full Operational Capability (FOC) has allowed many researchers to test the new system. The aim of this paper is to illustrate the results and the conclusions of a kinematic test involving a GNSS (Global Navigation Satellite System) multi-constellation receiver able to acquire the Galileo Open Service (OS) signal. The produced outputs were compared to a reference trajectory obtained from a Mobile Mapping System (MMS) implementing integrated high-performance GPS/INS measurements. By exploiting the CUI (command user interface) of the open source library RTKLIB, a reduced operative status was simulated for GPS and GLONASS. Specifically, all the possible operative combinations were tested and, when possible, statistically assessed. This was necessary to offer a fair comparison among the tested constellations. The results, referred to the reference trajectory, show that the new European system is characterized by a better planimetric performance with respect to the other systems, whereas, from an altimetric point of view, the GPS and GLONASS systems perform better. View Full-Text
Keywords: kinematic; Galileo; GPS; GLONASS; mobile mapping system; RTKLIB kinematic; Galileo; GPS; GLONASS; mobile mapping system; RTKLIB
Figures

Figure 1

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. (CC BY 4.0).

Supplementary material

SciFeed

Share & Cite This Article

MDPI and ACS Style

Tarantino, E.; Novelli, A.; Cefalo, R.; Sluga, T.; Tommasi, A. Single-Frequency Kinematic Performance Comparison between Galileo, GPS, and GLONASS Satellite Positioning Systems Using an MMS-Generated Trajectory as a Reference: Preliminary Results. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 2018, 7, 122.

Show more citation formats Show less citations formats

Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Related Articles

Article Metrics

Article Access Statistics

1

Comments

[Return to top]
ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. EISSN 2220-9964 Published by MDPI AG, Basel, Switzerland RSS E-Mail Table of Contents Alert
Back to Top