Next Article in Journal / Special Issue
On the Causality and K-Causality between Measures
Previous Article in Journal / Special Issue
The Geometry of Noncommutative Spacetimes
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Cosmology with Varying Constants from a Thermodynamic Viewpoint

Institute of Physics, University of Szczecin, Wielkopolska 15, 70-451 Szczecin, Poland
Universe 2017, 3(1), 26; https://doi.org/10.3390/universe3010026
Submission received: 31 January 2017 / Revised: 6 March 2017 / Accepted: 13 March 2017 / Published: 17 March 2017
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Varying Constants and Fundamental Cosmology)

Abstract

:
We study the variation of fundamental constants in cosmology while dealing with thermodynamic aspects of gravity. We focus on the variation of the speed of light, c, and Newton’s gravitational constant, G, with respect to cosmic time. We find the constraints on the possible variation of these constants by comparing varying constants of cosmological models with the latest observational data.

1. Introduction

One of the most important breakthroughs in the field of black hole physics is the correspondence between the parameters of black holes and the quantities in thermodynamics. According to Hawking’s area theorem, the area, A, of the surface of a black hole always increases so that we can relate it with the entropy, S, of the black hole by the relation S = ( k B c 3 / 4 G ) A [1,2], where k B and ℏ are Boltzmann’s constant and reduced Planck constant, respectively. Classically, black holes do not emit radiation. By including the quantum effects, black holes do emit all kinds of radiation. This is why there is a temperature associated with the black hole, by the relation T = κ / 2 π k B [3], where κ is the surface gravity of the black hole.
There are many approaches to studying the gravity–thermodynamic correspondence [4,5,6,7,8]. We focus on the approach given in [9,10], in which the curvature of the space-time is proportional to the stress energy plus the entropic force terms (surface terms). The entropic terms are due to the force acting on the boundary of the universe due to the increasing entropy of the universe. However, this has been criticized on the basis of a galaxy formation problem and some other issues [11,12,13,14]. For extended versions of the entropic cosmology, see [15,16,17], where the authors consider the general framework of entropic cosmology, and these general entropic models solve the issues raised in [11,12,13,14].
The variation of fundamental constants has been a hot topic for the last twenty years. For a detailed review, see [18,19,20]. There are different approaches to studying the variation of fundamental constants in cosmology [21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29]. In this report, we briefly summarize the approach given by us in [29] to study the variation of fundamental constants. We extend the entropic cosmology to the variation of fundamental constants, the varying c and varying G. We assume that the universe is a sphere with a boundary as Hubble horizon. We define the Hawking temperature and Bekenstein entropy on the boundary. We further assume that the Hawking temperature and Bekenstein entropy additionally depend on varying c and varying G. We use the first law of thermodynamics to find the continuity equation, and use it to find the entropic force terms in the field equations by following the papers [15,16,17]. We compare our model with the data from supernovae, Baryon Acoustic Oscillations (BAO), and Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB). Our model is also related to dynamical vacuum energy models, which have been discussed and confronted with data [11,12,13,14,30,31,32]. Similarly, dynamical dark energy models with varying fundamental constants have been discussed in [33,34]. The remainder of the report is as follows. In Section 2, we give the modified field equations for varying constants theories from a thermodynamic point of view. In Section 3, we compare our model with the latest observational data and find the bounds on varying c and G, and in Section 4, we give the conclusion.

2. Modified Field Equations

We consider the universe as a sphere of volume V with a boundary or screen as Hubble horizon. We associate the temperature and entropy with the boundary of the universe. We apply the Hawking temperature T and the Bekenstein entropy S on the boundary, which additionally depend on varying c and G with respect to cosmic time
T = γ c ( t ) 2 π k B r h ( t ) , S = k B 4 c 3 ( t ) A ( t ) G t .
Here A ( t ) = 4 π r h 2 ( t ) , where r h ( t ) c ( t ) / H ( t ) is the Hubble horizon, H ( t ) is the Hubble parameter, and γ is a non-negative parameter on the order of unity O ( 1 ) associated with the boundary of the universe. By using the first law of thermodynamics for non adiabatic expansion of the universe
d E d t + p d V d t = T d S d t ,
we have the first modified continuity equation
ρ ˙ + 3 H ρ + p c 2 ( t ) = 2 c ˙ ( t ) c ( t ) ρ + 3 γ H 2 8 π G ( t ) 5 c ˙ ( t ) c ( t ) G ˙ ( t ) G ( t ) 2 H ˙ H .
d V / d t = 3 V ( t ) H ( t ) and the internal energy E ( t ) = ε ( t ) V ( t ) , where energy density ε ( t ) = ρ ( t ) c 2 ( t ) , are being used to get the above modified continuity Equation (3), and a is the scale factor. We follow the formulation of entropic cosmology ([15,16,17] and references therein) to find the entropic force terms. For detailed calculations, see [29]. Let us assume that the general functions f ( t ) and g ( t ) are the additional terms in Friedmann and acceleration equations
a ˙ a 2 = 8 π G ( t ) 3 ρ k c 2 ( t ) a 2 + f t ,
a ¨ a = 4 π G ( t ) 3 ρ + 3 p c 2 ( t ) + g ( t ) .
The functions f ( t ) and g ( t ) play a role analogous to bulk viscosity. In our framework, these functions play the role of entropic force terms and the terms due to the variation of c and G. From Friedmann Equation (4) and acceleration Equation (5), we obtain the second modified continuity equation
ρ ˙ + 3 H ρ + p c 2 ( t ) + ρ G ( t ) ˙ G ( t ) 3 k c ( t ) c ˙ ( t ) 4 π G ( t ) a 2 ( t ) = 3 H 4 π G ( t ) g ( t ) f ( t ) f ˙ ( t ) 2 H .
We can see that generalized continuity Equation (6) has dissipative terms similar to bulk viscosity models. We define the functions
f ( t ) = γ H 2 and g ( t ) = γ H 2 + γ 2 5 c ˙ ( t ) c ( t ) G ˙ ( t ) G ( t ) H + 4 π G ( t ) 3 H G ˙ ( t ) G ( t ) 2 c ˙ ( t ) c ( t ) ρ
by comparing the Equations (3) and (6), so we have the modified Friedmann Equation (4) and acceleration Equation (5),
a ˙ a 2 = 8 π G ( t ) 3 ρ + γ H 2 ,
a ¨ a = 4 π G ( t ) 3 ρ + 3 p c 2 ( t ) + γ H 2 + 7 γ 2 2 c ˙ ( t ) c ( t ) H + 1 2 γ 2 G ˙ ( t ) G ( t ) H ,
together with modified continuity equation
ρ ˙ + 3 H ρ + p c 2 ( t ) = 2 c ˙ ( t ) c ( t ) ρ + 3 γ H 2 8 π G ( t ) 5 c ˙ ( t ) c ( t ) G ˙ ( t ) G ( t ) 2 H ˙ H .
If we use the ansätze c = c 0 a n and G = G 0 a q in the above-modified equations of motion, then these equations are analogous to the entropic force expressions [15,16,17] and running vacuum models [11,12,13,14,30,31,32]. We consider the multiple fluid scenario, and using the barotropic equation of state p i = w i ρ i , we solve the modified continuity equation
ρ i = ρ 0 H H 0 2 γ 1 γ a f i X ( γ , n , q ) ,
where f i c ( γ , n ) = 3 1 + w i + n ( 2 7 γ ) 3 ( 1 γ ) is for varying c, and f i G ( γ , q ) = 3 1 + w i + q γ 3 ( 1 γ ) is for varying G. Here n, q, and γ are free parameters which can be constrained from the observations. For each fluid with the barotropic parameter w i and barotropic equation of state ρ i = w i ρ i , we have w i = 0 for matter, w i = 1 / 3 for radiation, and w i = 1 for vacuum. Now, the normalized Friedmann equations can be written as
E 2 = H H 0 2 = i Ω i , 0 1 γ a f i c ( γ , n ) γ 1 2 γ 1
for varying c model and
E 2 = H H 0 2 = a q i Ω i , 0 1 γ a f i G ( γ , q ) γ 1 2 γ 1
for varying G model, where Ω i , 0 = ( 8 π ρ i , 0 / 3 H 0 2 ) .

3. Observational Data Analysis

The analysis has involved the largest updated set of cosmological data available, and includes: Type Ia Supernovae (SNeIa); Baryon Acoustic Oscillations (BAO); Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB); and a prior on the Hubble constant parameter, H 0 . For detailed calculations and analysis, see [29]. The main results of observational analysis are given in Table 1. We have found the observational bound on the free parameter γ, which is taken to the order of unity on the theoretical background. Our analysis shows that it should be on the order of 10 2 10 4 , and this is consistent with the results obtained in [31]. Similarly, we have found the bound on the variability of c and G. Our analysis shows that both c and G are increasing with the evolution of the universe in the entropic description.
Recently, it has been claimed that the fine structure constant α = e 2 / c (do not confuse this α with the α in Table 1α and β in Table 1 characterize the stretch luminosity and color luminosity relationship) is changing [35,36,37,38,39] (where e is the electron charge), so relating the speed of light with the fine structure constant, we have
Δ c c = Δ α α = n Δ a a n 10 .
From Table 1, we evaluate n = 4.9 × 10 4 > 0 , and this implies that a change in c (or α) from our fit is Δ α / α 0 10 5 in the redshift range [1; 2], while other observational bounds in the same range (see Table II of [40] and [36,37,38,39]) give Δ α / α 0 10 6 . However, our estimation is compatible with constraints from CMB Planck first release [41]. Similarly, for G, we have q = 0.048 from Table 1, and this can be written as ( G ˙ / G ) 0 = q H 0 3.42 × 10 12 y e a r 1 by using the current value of the Hubble constant H 0 . This is compatible with the Solar System bound coming from Viking landers on Mars [42] ( G ˙ / G ) 0 = ( 2 ± 4 ) × 10 12 y e a r 1 and weaker than the bound from the Lunar laser ranging [43] ( G ˙ / G ) 0 = ( 4 ± 9 ) × 10 13 y e a r 1 .
Recently, new methods [44,45,46] have been introduced to detect the possible variation of speed of light by using future galaxy surveys, such as The Square Kilometer Array (SKA), Euclid, and the Wide-Field Infrared Survey Telescope (WFIRST-2.4). For example, in [45] it is shown that SKA will be able to detect a 1% variation in the speed of light at 3σ level.

4. Conclusions

In this report, we discussed entropic cosmology with varying gravitational constant G and varying speed of light c. We discussed the consequences of these variations on the entropic force terms. We started with a general set of field equations which described varying constants’ entropic cosmology. We derived the continuity equation from the first law of thermodynamics by using the Bekenstein entropy, as well as Hawking temperature to fit the general entropic terms to this continuity equation. We have examined many-fluid entropic models against observational data (supernovae, BAO, and CMB). We have used data from JLA compilation of SDSS-II and SNLS collaboration (supernovae), WiggleZ Dark Energy Survey, and SDSS-III Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey (BOSS), as well as Planck data (CMB). We found that the observational bound on the Hawking temperature coefficient γ was much smaller ( 10 2 10 4 ) than it is usually assumed to be on the theoretical basis to be on the order of unity O ( 1 ) . We have also found that in our entropic models, G and c should be increasing with the evolution of the universe. Our bound on the variation of c being Δ c / c 10 5 is at least one order of magnitude weaker than observational bound obtained from analysis of the quasar spectra.

Acknowledgments

This project was financed by the Polish National Science Center (NCN) Grant DEC-2012/06/A/ST2/00395 and NCN doctoral scholarship (Agreement number: UMO-2016/20/T/ST2/00490) granted within the framework of ETIUDA 4.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Bekenstein, J.D. Black holes and entropy. Phys. Rev. D 1973, 7, 2333–2346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Bekenstein, J.D. Generalized second law of thermodynamics in black hole physics. Phys. Rev. D 1974, 9, 3292–3300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Hawking, S.W. Black hole explosions. Nature 1974, 248, 30–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Jacobson, T. Thermodynamics of space-time: The Einstein equation of state. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1995, 75, 1260–1263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Padmanabhan, T. Gravitational entropy of static space-times and microscopic density of states. Class. Quantum Gravity 2004, 21, 4485–4494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Padmanabhan, T. Thermodynamical Aspects of Gravity: New Insights. Rep. Prog. Phys. 2010, 73, 046901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Verlinde, E.J. On the Origin of Gravity and the Laws of Newton. J. High Energy Phys. 2011, 2011, 1–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Verlinde, E.J. Emergent Gravity and the Dark Universe. arXiv, 2016; arXiv:1611.02269. [Google Scholar]
  9. Easson, D.A.; Frampton, P.H.; Smoot, G.F. Entropic Accelerating Universe. Phys. Lett. B 2011, 696, 273–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Easson, D.A.; Frampton, P.H.; Smoot, G.F. Entropic Inflation. Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 2012, 27, 125066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Basilakos, S.; Polarski, D.; Solá, J. Generalizing the running vacuum energy model and comparing with the entropic-force models. Phys. Rev. D 2012, 86, 043010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Basilakos, S.; Solá, J. Entropic-force dark energy reconsidered. Phys. Rev. D 2014, 90, 023008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Gómez-Valent, A.; Solá, J. Vacuum models with a linear and a quadratic term in H: Structure formation and number counts analysis. Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 2015, 448, 2810–2821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Basilakos, S.; Plionis, M.; Solá, J. Hubble expansion and Structure Formation in Time Varying Vacuum Models. Phys. Rev. D 2009, 80, 083511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Komatsu, N.; Kimura, S. Non-adiabatic-like accelerated expansion of the late universe in entropic cosmology. Phys. Rev. D 2013, 87, 043531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Komatsu, N.; Kimura, S. Entropic cosmology for a generalized black-hole entropy. Phys. Rev. D 2014, 88, 083534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Komatsu, N.; Kimura, S. Evolution of the universe in entropic cosmologies via different formulations. Phys. Rev. D 2014, 89, 123501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Uzan, J.-P. Varying constants, gravitation, and cosmology. Liv. Rev. Rel. 2011, 14, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Ellis, G.F.R.; Uzan, J.-P. c is the speed of light, isn’t it? Am. J. Phys. 2005, 73, 240–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Duff, M.J. How fundamental are fundamental constants? J. Contemp. Phys. 2015, 56, 35–47. [Google Scholar]
  21. Albrecht, A.; Magueijo, J. A Time varying speed of light as a solution to cosmological puzzles. Phys. Rev. D 1999, 59, 043516. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Barrow, J.D.; Magueijo, J. Solutions to the quasi-flatness and quasilambda problems. Phys. Lett. B 1999, 447, 246–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Barrow, J.D. Cosmologies with varying light speed. Phys. Rev. D 1999, 59, 043515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Moffat, J. Superluminary universe: A possible solution to the initial value problem in cosmology. Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 1993, 2, 351–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Clayton, M.A.; Moffat, J.W. Fluctuation Spectrum from a Scalar-Tensor Bimetric Gravity Theory. Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 2003, 12, 697–712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Moffat, J.W. Bimetric Gravity Theory, Varying Speed of Light and the Dimming of Supernovae. Int. J. Mod. Phys. D 2003, 12, 281–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Hossenfelder, S. Bounds on an energy-dependent and observer-independent speed of light from violations of locality. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2010, 104, 140402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Magueijo, J.; Smolin, L. Gravity’s rainbow. Class. Quantum Gravity 2004, 21, 1725–1736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Da̧browski, M.P.; Gohar, H.; Salzano, V. Varying Constants Entropic-ΛCDM Cosmology. Entropy 2016, 18, 60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Grande, J.; Solá, J.; Basilakos, S.; Plionis, M. Hubble expansion and structure formation in the ”running FLRW model” of the cosmic evolution. J. Cosmol. Astrop. Phys. 2011, 2001, 007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Gómez-Valent, A.; Solá, J.; Basilakos, S. Dynamical vacuum energy in the expanding Universe confronted with observations: A dedicated study. J. Cosmol. Astrop. Phys. 2015, 2015, 004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Solá, J.; Gómez-Valent, A.; de Cruz Pérez, J. Hints of dynamical vacuum energy in the expanding Universe. Astrophys. J. Lett. 2015, 811, L14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Fritzsch, H.; Solá, J.; Nunes, R.C. Running vacuum in the Universe and the time variation of the fundamental constants of Nature. arXiv, 2016; arXiv:1605.06104. [Google Scholar]
  34. Grande, J.; Solá, J.; Fabris, J.C.; Shapiro, I.L. Cosmic perturbations with running G and Λ. Class. Quantum Gravity 2010, 27, 105004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Webb, J.K.; King, J.A.; Murphy, M.T.; Flambaum, V.V.; Carswell, R.F.; Bainbridge, M.B. Indications of a spatial variation of the fine structure constant. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2011, 107, 191101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Molaro, P.; Centurion, M.; Whitmore, J.B.; Evans, T.M.; Murphy, M.T.; Agafonova, I.I.; Bonifacio, P.; D’Odorico, S.; Levshakov, S.A.; Lopez, S.; et al. The UVES Large Program for Testing Fundamental Physics: I Bounds on a change in α towards quasar HE 2217–2818. Astron. Astrophys. 2013, 555, A68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Molaro, P.; Reimers, D.; Agafonova, I.I.; Levshakov, S.A. Bounds on the fine structure constant variability from Fe II absorption lines in QSO spectra. Eur. Phys. J. Spec. Top. 2008, 163, 173–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Chand, H.; Srianad, R.; Petitjean, P.; Aracil, B.; Quast, R.; Reimers, D. On the variation of the fine-structure constant: Very high resolution spectrum of QSO HE 0515-4414. Astron. Astrophys. 2006, 451, 45–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Agafonova, I.I.; Molaro, P.; Levshakov, S.A. First measurement of Mg isotope abundances at high redshifts and accurate estimate of Δα/α. Astron. Astrophys. 2011, 529, A28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Da̧browski, M.P.; Denkiewicz, T.; Martins, C.J.A.P.; Vielzeuf, P. Variations of the fine-structure constant α in exotic singularity models. Phys. Rev. D 2014, 89, 123512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. O’Brian, J.; Smidt, J.; de Bernardis, F.; Cooray, A. Constraints on Spatial Variations in the Fine-Structure constant from Planck. Astrophys. J. 2015, 798, 18. [Google Scholar]
  42. Hellings, R.W.; Adams, P.J.; Anderson, J.D.; Keesey, M.S.; Lau, E.L.; Standish, E.M.; Canuto, V.M.; Goldman, I. Experimental Test of the Variability of G Using Viking Lander Ranging Data. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1983, 51, 1609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Williams, J.G.; Turyshev, S.G.; Boggs, D.H. Progress in lunar laser ranging tests of relativistic gravity. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2004, 93, 26101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Salzano, V.; Da̧browski, M.P.; Lazkoz, R. Measuring the speed of light with Baryon Acoustic Oscillations. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2015, 114, 101304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Salzano, V.; Da̧browski, M.P.; Lazkoz, R. Probing the constancy of the speed of light with future galaxy survey: The case of SKA and Euclid. Phys. Rev. D 2016, 93, 063521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Da̧browski, M.P.; Salzano, V.; Balcerzak, A.; Lazkoz, R. New tests of variability of the speed of light. EPJ Web Conf. 2016, 126, 04012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Table 1. Observational parameters of the models under study.
Table 1. Observational parameters of the models under study.
id. Ω m Ω b h q / n γαβ M B 1 Δ m
G = G 0 a q 0.314 0.008 + 0.009 0.0453 0.0009 + 0.0009 0.698 0.007 + 0.007 0.048 0.033 + 0.042 <0.022 0.141 0.006 + 0.007 3.106 0.087 + 0.077 19.044 0.019 + 0.018 0.071 0.023 + 0.023
c = c 0 a n 0.311 0.007 + 0.007 0.046 0.001 + 0.001 0.696 0.007 + 0.007 0.00049 0.00053 + 0.00049 <0.0007 0.141 0.007 + 0.007 3.100 0.080 + 0.080 19.043 0.018 + 0.018 0.070 0.022 + 0.023

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Gohar, H. Cosmology with Varying Constants from a Thermodynamic Viewpoint. Universe 2017, 3, 26. https://doi.org/10.3390/universe3010026

AMA Style

Gohar H. Cosmology with Varying Constants from a Thermodynamic Viewpoint. Universe. 2017; 3(1):26. https://doi.org/10.3390/universe3010026

Chicago/Turabian Style

Gohar, Hussain. 2017. "Cosmology with Varying Constants from a Thermodynamic Viewpoint" Universe 3, no. 1: 26. https://doi.org/10.3390/universe3010026

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop